key: cord-0692546-hnjhdlif
authors: Li, Quanman; Miao, Yudong; Zeng, Xin; Tarimo, Clifford Silver; Wu, Cuiping; Wu, Jian
title: Prevalence and Factors for Anxiety during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Epidemic among the Teachers in China
date: 2020-08-13
journal: Journal of Affective Disorders
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.017
sha: 5b102eecc6b53f826eb5626d61cc62c4f9ca05be
doc_id: 692546
cord_uid: hnjhdlif

Abstract Objective To assess the prevalence of anxiety and explore its factors during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic among the teachers in China. Methods We involved 88611 teachers (response rate: 94.75%) from three cities of Henan Province, China, during February 4, 2020 and February 12, 2020. Anxiety was assessed by using Generalized Anxiety Disorder tool (GAD-7). Odds ratios (OR) with 95% Confidence intervals (CI) for potential factors of anxiety were estimated using multiple logistic regression models. Results The overall prevalence of anxiety was 13.67%. The prevalence was higher for women than men (13.89% vs. 12.93%). The highest prevalence of anxiety was 14.06% (SE 2.51%) with age of 60 to 100 years in men, and 14.70% (SE 0.56%) with age of 50 to 60 years in women. Participants located in country-level city school had the lowest prevalence of anxiety across all age categories (12.01% for age of 18-30 years; 12.50% for age of 30-40 years; 12.13% for age of 40-50 years; 9.52% for age of 60-100 years). After adjusting for potential confounders, age, sex, education status, type of teachers, school location, information source, worried level, fear level, and behavior status were found to be associated with anxiety. Conclusions This large-scale study assessed the prevalence of anxiety in teachers, as well as its potential influence of factors, which is useful for international and national decision-makers.

On December 30, 2019, Wuhan became the center of an outbreak of the zoonotic Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) (Zhu et al., 2020) . Subsequently, the number of confirmed cases was a rapid increase in provinces in China which have developed economies and adjacent to Hubei province Lai et al., 2020) . Then, confirmed cases of COVID-19 were consecutively occurred in all provinces, municipalities, and special administrative regions in China (Hoehl et al., 2020) and appeared to be expanding Kamel et al., 2020) . Finally, the outbreak was declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) on January 30, 2020 by the World Health Organization (WHO).

However, the human-to-human transmission of COVID-19 has been evolving since then. The infection even spread across other countries around the world (Holshue et al., 2020; Livingston and Bucher et al., 2020; Young et al., 2020) . On March 11, 2020, WHO had to announce that COVID-19 could be described as a controllable pandemic. Because of the rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2), it therefore incurs substantial losses not only on global economy and trade but also posing the great challenges on medical and health services (Phelan et al., 2020) .

The burden of disease in terms of years lived with disability (YLD) attributable to anxiety disorders relatively increased by 14.8% from 2005 to 2015, ranking ninth in the world (GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators, 2016) . In addition, anxiety disorders may increase the risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and even mortality (Batelaan et al., 2016; Miloyan et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2019) . Previous study has revealed individuals with high health anxiety are prone to misinterpreting harmless bodily sensations and changes as evidence that they are infected in the context of a viral outbreak or pandemic, this will, in turn, increase their anxiety, influence their ability to make rational decisions, and impact their behavior (Asmundson and Taylor, 2020) . Also, with the closure of schools, negative emotions experienced by teachers are compounded. The ongoing COVID-19 epidemic maybe inducing anxiety for teachers. Hence, a timely understanding of anxiety status is urgently needed. Cost-effectiveness studies suggest that treatment alone is not sufficient to eliminate the disease burden attributable to anxiety disorders. Another way to reduce the burden of anxiety disorders is to lower the incidence of new cases, which can be achieved through prevention rather than treatment (Andrews et al., 2004; Neil and Christensen, 2009 ). So, we urgently draw the prevalence and risk factors of COVID-19 in teachers.

Therefore, this present study included registered teachers in China during the COVID-19 outbreak and aimed to assess the prevalence of anxiety and identify the potential risk and protective factors contributing to anxiety. This may assist government agencies and health-care professionals in safeguarding the psychological well-being of the school in the face of COVID-19 outbreak expansion in China and different parts of the world.

We adopted a cross-sectional survey design to assess anxiety in teachers during the epidemic of COVID-19 by using an anonymous online questionnaire through an online survey platform ("SurveyStar", Changsha Ranxing Science and Technology, Shanghai, China). A total of 93518 registered teachers (including Primary school teachers, Junior school teachers, High school teachers, and University teachers) were recruited by using a cluster sampling method from Zhengzhou, Xinyang, Xinxiang city of Henan Province, China, during February 4, 2020 and February 12, 2020. For quality control, we excluded the participants aged<18 years or aged>100 years or those who took ≤100 seconds to fully respond to the questions (n=4907). Ultimately, we included 88611 teachers (response rate: 94.75%) in this analysis.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University. All study participants consented for participation in this study.

A standard questionnaire was developed to assess demographic characteristics (sex, age, marital status, and education level and so on), the knowledge about COVID-19, attention, behavior, mental state (worry, fear, anxiety and so on), and other factors among all participants.

Attention of teachers to the epidemic were divided into 3 levels: high, moderate, and low.

Information source were classed as: independent learning (including WeChat/Weibo and TV/radio), structured learning (including documents issued by the government or schools) and mixed learning (including independent and structured learning). Worried condition and fear among teachers on the epidemic were both divided into 3 levels: high, moderate, and low/none. All behavior (including "Wearing a mask", "Increasing the frequency of hand washing", "Going out for dinner", "Canceling the spring festival travel plan") were correctly, the behavioral status as high; part questions were answered correctly, the behavioral status as moderate; all questions were answered incorrectly, the behavioral status as low.

Anxiety was assessed by using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder tool (GAD-7) which has a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 82%. A score of 10 or greater was considered a reasonable cut point for identifying cases. Cut points of 5, 10, and 15 might be interpreted as representing mild, moderate, and severe levels of anxiety on the GAD-7 (Spitzer et al., 2006) .

Categorical data are represented as frequency (%) and were compared using Pearson chi-squared test. Means and standard deviations (SD) were used to present continuous data and were compared by Student's t-test or analysis of variance. Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We developed three models: 1) unadjusted; 2) adjusted for sex, education status, type of teachers, school location, married status, attention level, information source, worried level, fear level, behavior status; and 3) adjusted for age, sex, education status, type of teachers, school location, married status, attention level, information source, worried level, fear level, behavior status.

All analyses were performed by using SAS v9.4 (SAS Inst., Cary, NC) for Windows. All statistical tests were two-sided, with P<0.05 considered statistically significant.

Among 88611 (23.07% men) teachers included 12110 teachers were shown to have anxiety disorder during the outbreak of COVID-19 in China. The age of participants was 36.22 (SD 9.02) years. Table 1 shows the characteristics of participants by anxiety status. As compared to participants without anxiety, participants with anxiety were different from the proportion of sex, education status, type of teachers, school location, married status, attention level, information source, worried level, fear level, and behavior status (all P<0.05).

The overall anxiety prevalence was 13.67% (SE 0.12%) during COVID-19 pandemic in China. The prevalence was higher for women than men (13.89% vs. 12.93%). Figure 1 showed the prevalence of anxiety in participants by age and sex. The highest prevalence of anxiety was 14.06% (SE 2.51%) with age between 60 and 100 years in men, and 14.70% (SE 0.56%) with age between 50 and 60 years in women. The lowest prevalence of anxiety was 12.36% (SE 2.89%) found in participant with the age between 40 and 50 years in men, and 11.76% (SE 4.30%) with age of between 60 and 100 years in women. Participants located in county-level city school have the lowest prevalence of anxiety in almost age groups (12.01% for age of 18-30 years; 12.50% for age of 30-40 years; 12.13% for age of 40-50 years; 9.52% for age of 60-100 years) ( Figure   2 ). Similarly, teachers with low/none fear level showed a protective effect against the anxiety disorders compared to those with those with high level of fear (OR 0.06 [95% CI 0.05-0.06]).

Detail information were showed in Table 2 .

Further, participants at all age categories indicated high proportion of minimal anxiety level (49.89%, 47.27%, 48.33%, 50.83%, and 52.67%). Mild anxiety was most prevalent (38.73%) in 30-40 age group. Prevalence of severe anxiety for participants aged 18-30, 30-40, 40-50, and 50-60 years were 4.07%, 4.50%, 4.18%, and 4.91%, respectively. The proportion with moderate anxiety at the age of 60-100 years was the lowest (7.41%). And for minimal anxiety, the proportion of participants with age of 60 to 100 years was the highest (52.67%) and 30 to 40 years was the lowest (47.27%); for mild anxiety, age of 30 to 40 years was the highest (38.73%) and 60 to 100 years was the lowest (33.74%); for moderate anxiety, age of 30 to 40 years was the highest (9.50%) and 60 to 100 years was the lowest (7.41%); for severe anxiety, age of 60 to 100 years was the highest (6.17%) and 18 to 30 years was the lowest (4.07%) (Supplementary Materials Figure 1) . The detail characteristics of participants by different level of anxiety were showed in Supplementary Materials Table 1 : the proportion of sex, education status, type of teachers, school location, married status, attention level, information source, worried level, fear level, behavior status were all different in different levels of anxiety (all P<0.05).

Our study provided the prevalence of anxiety disorder in teachers during the COVID-19 epidemic. The overall anxiety prevalence was 13.67% (13.89% for women and 12.93% for men).

Age, sex, education status, type of teachers, school location, information source, worried level, fear level, and behavior status were found to be associated with anxiety. However, we found the prevalence of anxiety in teachers reaching up to 13.67% (about 2.74 times) in this survey. The higher prevalence may pose potential risk during the epidemic of COVID-19, such as, excessive consumption of medical resources (Asmundson and Taylor, 2020) .

The data from British survey found that 16% of the population suffered from some form of anxiety (Hale, 1997) . Similarly, anxiety affect more than 40 million adults in the United States alone, about 18% of the population (Torpy et al., 2011) . The evidence of meta-analysis has discovered the global current prevalence of anxiety disorders adjusted for methodological differences was 7.3% (95%CI 4.8-10.9%) (Baxter et al., 2013) . Our study suggested that anxiety may affect more population and the burden of anxiety may have a sharp increase in the world during this pandemic. As is supposed above, the global may also face great challenges work of mental health.

As the previous studies, our study also suggested that the socio-demographic factors such as age, sex, education status were associated with anxiety (Lejtzen et al., 2014) . In addition, we further found that type of teachers, school location, information source, worried level, fear level, and behavior status were associated with anxiety disorder. Sherina et al. suggested that familiar stressful life events, such as loss, unemployment, and work-related, family, and housing problems, were associated with anxiety in primary care patients (Tait and Berrisford, 2011). All teachers in Henan province were facing problems coping with new ways of working when we started the survey. As the epidemic spreads to other countries around the world, similar situation may be expected to happen. So our study may provide clues about the prevalence of anxiety and its factors. However, further studies about other occupations are needed to assess the stability and reliability of our results.

We also found a worrisome result that there was a significant proportion of participants aged between 60 and 100 years who presented severe anxiety level. These teachers may face the risk of insufficient incomes at their retirement stage, due to excessive expenditure on treatment for anxiety. Therefore, we suggest that the decision-makers of health services should pay more attention to the burden of anxiety among elderly individuals, especially during the outbreak of disease.

Our study has several strengths. To our knowledge, this is the large sample size study of teachers exploring the prevalence of anxiety. Secondly, we used the standardized questionnaire (GAD-7) to diagnose anxiety. Thirdly, our results inform which teachers are most likely in need of psychosocial support. Finally, we excluded the participants who not meeting the requirements of this study to make our results more realistic.

Nevertheless, some limitations should be considered. First, although we adjusted two models for many important covariates, there is still a possibility of residual confounding. Further studies are needed to assess those relations and confirm the stability of these results. Second, we did not explore the underlying mechanisms existing among covariates. Future experimental studies are needed. Thirdly, our study was designed as a cross-sectional survey, which does not establish causality. Finally, participants of this study were all teachers, which may limit the generalizability of our findings to other professional population.

The condition of the prevalence of anxiety was not optimal during the COVID-19 epidemic among the teachers in China. Factors including age, sex, education status, type of teachers, school 

A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China

Mapping the changing Internet attention to the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 in China

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and corona virus disease-2019 (COVID-19): the epidemic and the challenges

Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Returning Travelers from Wuhan, China. The New England journal of medicine

Visualising the expansion and spread of coronavirus disease 2019 by cartograms

Geographical tracking and mapping of coronavirus disease COVID-19/severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic and associated events around the world: how 21st century GIS technologies are supporting the global fight against outbreaks and epidemics

First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States. The New England journal of medicine

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Italy

Epidemiologic Features and Clinical Course of Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore

The Novel Coronavirus Originating in Wuhan, China: Challenges for Global Health Governance

Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study

Anxiety and new onset of cardiovascular disease: critical review and meta-analysis. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science

Anxiety disorders and all-cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology

Depression and anxiety in relation to cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Molecular psychiatry

How health anxiety influences responses to viral outbreaks like COVID-19: What all decision-makers, health authorities, and health care professionals need to know

Utilising survey data to inform public policy: comparison of the cost-effectiveness of treatment of ten mental disorders. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science

Efficacy and effectiveness of school-based prevention and early intervention programs for anxiety

A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of internal medicine

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio

Adjusted for sex, education status, type of teachers, school location, married status, attention level, information source, worried level, fear level

Adjusted for age, sex, education status, type of teachers, school location, married status, attention level, information sour ce

This study is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant nos. 2018YFC0114501); Zhengzhou University 2020 Special Project of Discipline Construction (grant nos. XKZDQY202007); Henan Medical Education Research Project (Wjlx2018008).

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

location, information source, worried level, fear level, and behavior status may be considered as part of the overall management of anxiety.