key: cord-0692073-u1evjj05
authors: Deerain, Joshua; Druce, Julian; Tran, Thomas; Batty, Mitchell; Yoga, Yano; Fennell, Michael; Dwyer, Dominic E.; Kok, Jen; Williamson, Deborah A.
title: Assessment of the Analytical Sensitivity of 10 Lateral Flow Devices against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant
date: 2022-02-16
journal: J Clin Microbiol
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02479-21
sha: 2fb1b6a5b96ae39f7384904159b8b8d98c5142bc
doc_id: 692073
cord_uid: u1evjj05

Timely and accurate diagnostic testing is a critical component of the public health response to COVID-19. Antigen tests are used widely in many countries to provide rapid, economical and accessible point-of-care testing (1). The vast majority of antigen tests detect nucleocapsid (N) protein, a structural protein that displays less variation than the spike (S) protein across different SARS-CoV-2 lineages. Although antigen tests are less sensitive than RT-PCR tests, their ability to quickly detect individuals with high viral loads provides clinical and public health utility in many countries, including Australia, where antigen tests have recently been approved for self-testing (2). As new variants arise, including the recent emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant, it is essential to rapidly assess the performance of diagnostic assays. Here, in order to assess and compare the ability of antigen tests to detect delta and omicron variants, we performed a rapid assessment of ten commercially available antigen tests.

T imely and accurate diagnostic testing is a critical component of the public health response to coronavirus (CoV) disease 2019 . Antigen (Ag) tests are used widely in many countries to provide rapid, economical, and accessible point-of-care testing (1) . The vast majority of antigen tests detect nucleocapsid (N) protein, a structural protein that displays less variation than the spike (S) protein across different severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV-2 lineages. Although antigen tests are less sensitive than reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) tests, their ability to quickly detect individuals with high viral loads provides clinical and public health utility in many countries, including Australia, where antigen tests have recently been approved for self-testing (2) . As new variants arise, including the recent SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, it is essential to rapidly assess the performance of diagnostic assays. Here, in order to assess and compare the abilities of antigen tests to detect the Delta and Omicron variants, we performed a rapid assessment of 10 commercially available antigen tests.

To evaluate analytical sensitivity, we used representative Delta and Omicron isolates cultured from clinical samples (see the supplemental material). Isolates were grown in Calu-3 cells, as described in the supplemental material. For each variant, we constructed a dilution series of quantified virus, ranging from ;10 9 to 10 5 copies/mL, corresponding to cycle threshold (Ct) values of ;18 to ;29 from an inhouse RT-PCR for the N gene (3). Testing was performed according to the manufacturers' provided instructions for use (IFU). Where no specific protocol was provided, a 1:1 dilution of sample to extraction buffer was prepared and added to the test kit. Interpretations of antigen test results were performed as per the manufacturers' instructions, and results of all tests were recorded independently by two scientists. All antigen testing was conducted in quadruplicate and under biosafety level 3 conditions using live virus.

Overall, the analytical sensitivities of the 10 antigen kits were similar for both the Delta and Omicron variants (Fig. 1 ). All 10 kits were able to detect Delta at 6.50 log 10 copies/mL (Ct, 25.4) and Omicron at 6.39 log 10 copies/mL (Ct, 25.8), consistent with the results of previous work on the analytical sensitivities of antigen kits (4) . None of the 10 kits consistently detected either Delta or Omicron at the lowest dilutions (5.23 log 10 copies/mL, with a Ct of 28.8 [Delta]; 5.33 log 10 copies/mL, with a Ct of 28.8 [Omicron]).

Our results provide valuable rapid in vitro data on the abilities of antigen tests to detect the Omicron variant and are consistent with other work demonstrating the effectiveness of antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 variants (5). Given the large investments made in antigen testing in many countries and the increasing reliance on these tests to inform clinical and public health action, ongoing postmarket validation, including assessment of clinical sensitivity against new variants, is essential to ensure optimal test selection and deployment.

Supplemental material is available online only. SUPPLEMENTAL FILE 1, PDF file, 0.1 MB.

Clarifying the evidence on SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid tests in public health responses to COVID-19

COVID-19 rapid antigen self-tests that are approved in Australia

Accessed 15

Ten lateral flow devices were tested against 10-fold dilutions (1:100 to 1:100,000) of SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants in quadruplicate. Green boxes indicate where SARS-CoV-2 antigen was detected for a single replicate, and orange boxes indicate where a negative result was observed. Mean Ct values from three replicates for each dilution were calculated using in-house RT-PCR for the N gene

Republic of Korea); (5) SureScreen Diagnostics COVID-19 antigen rapid test cassette

Isolation and rapid sharing of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) from the first patient diagnosed with COVID-19 in Australia

Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid pointof-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study

SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid tests for the delta variant

This work was supported by the Department of Health, Victoria, Australia. We declare no competing interests.