key: cord-0689334-nj158bhj
authors: Curryer, Cassie; Cook, Peta S.
title: Counting the costs of ageism: Discrimination and COVID‐19
date: 2021-08-17
journal: Australas J Ageing
DOI: 10.1111/ajag.12993
sha: 9b16658635503f73ac77868234ca50adb24bc658
doc_id: 689334
cord_uid: nj158bhj

nan

staggering US$63 billion annually. 15 By addressing ageism, it is therefore possible that the health of older people could be improved while also reducing health-care costs. 14 It is therefore unsurprising that the WHO (along with the United Nations) has declared 2020-2030 as the 'Decade of Healthy Ageing', with a goal of reducing ageism and to 'change how we think, feel and act towards age and ageing'. 16;p.6 During COVID-19, the dangerousness and insidiousness of ageism have been strongly evident across care provision, policy responses, and media and political debates. In care provision, this has been witnessed in the questioning of the abandonment and resultant deaths of older people in long term or aged care facilities, and ongoing debates about the ethicality of refusing care and life-saving support to older individuals diagnosed with COVID-19. [17] [18] [19] Extra burdens that have been placed on older people arising from the social measures to address COVID-19 include restricting or limiting access to health-care services, 20 physical distancing and lockdown measures that have led to increased mental and physical health problems 21, 22 and a disproportionate impact on mature-aged low-income earners. 23 Such inequalities are also witnessed in policy decisions such as the Australian Federal Government's JobMaker Hiring Credit, which provides incentives to businesses to hire additional employees but only if they are aged 18-35 years. 24 This discrepancy between how older and younger populations are viewed and treated is further observed in media discourses that, playing off ageist stereotypes and myths, cast older people as 'vulnerable' and 'at risk' from COVID-19, while younger people are irresponsible 'risk' takers whose actions threaten the social order. 25, 26 These media discourses demonstrate ageism towards older and younger populations and are based on divisionism: creating distinctions between 'us' (those considered to be safe and responsible) and 'them' (those who are threatening society and the community through their behaviours or, in contrast, at threat from coronavirus infection and irresponsible for wanting to live). 25 During COVID-19, ageism has thus fuelled discrimination, justified the unequal treatment of population groups and heightened intergenerational divides in Australia. 25 Not all ageism during COVID-19, however, has been consciously negative or intended. Vervaecke and Meisner 27 explored the rise of compassionate acts directed towards older people that, although well-meaning (and potentially create intergenerational solidarity), may be experienced as paternalistic and ageist. These COVID-19-related 'caremongering' actions include homogenising older people as being vulnerable and in need of protection, thus generalising older population as well as COVID-19 risks; older adults are highly heterogeneous in terms of physical, social and psychological functioning. 25, 27 As 'an ageism-related focusing event' 28;p.502 , COVID-19 therefore provides a 'breakthrough moment' 11;p.329 from which efforts to educate about and reduce ageism might be strengthened. Given this, we build on calls by McGrath 11 and authors before her, for a renewed focus on ageism. Recognising the differential human rights treatment afforded to older people is a large part of this, but only a start. For example, an online survey undertaken as part of the EveryAge Counts advocacy campaign against ageism found that while 72% of respondents agreed that ageism was an 'important issue', 71% did not 'think a lot' about ageism and only 16% were involved in 'doing something' about it. 29 These findings highlight the high level of inertia amongst the population generally towards addressing ageism. However, ageism is never just about ageing; ageism also often intersects with other attributes that are associated with social marginalisation and discrimination such as class, sex, race, disability and sexuality. 1, 30 Here, it is relevant to remember that age-like sex and class-is socially constructed, 25, 26 and such constructs are amendable to change. In addition, by confronting ageism, other forms of marginalisation and discrimination that impact people across a continuum of ages and functional abilities can also be tackled.

From ageist discourses to policies that existed prior to and have arisen during COVID-19, it is evident that older people as individuals have paid a heavy price. It also costs organisations and businesses. For example, as the population ages, there are fewer younger workers and more older workers available to employ. 31 Brooke noted 'mature age workers [45+ years] are 3.7 times more likely to remain employed with the same employer over a 12 month period than younger workers' 32;p.4 , which reduces recruitment, induction and training costs. Resultingly, the human resource management benefits from employing mature age workers per annum in Australia are $6111 per individual or approximately $27.4 billion in total. 32 In addition, the Australian Human Rights Commission reports that by increasing the employment rate of people aged 55 and over by five per cent, the annual benefit to the Australian economy would be $48 billion. 33 As such, by discriminating against hiring older workers-or failing to support and retain them in the paid workforce where this is an individual's choice-undermines the experience and knowledge older workers bring, as well as their role in the economic prosperity of their communities and the nation-state. As many countries seek to rebuild their economies following (and during) COVID-19, older workers can play a vital role. 34 Ageism and government disincentives to hire older workers undermine this future economic prosperity.

The entrenchment of ageism in our global society 12 and the internalisation of ageism by older people themselves make it challenging to create change. In naming and addressing ageism and by working with older people, positive benefits can be achieved: improved experiences of ageing as a lifelong process, older people experiencing better quality (and potentially quantity) of life, renewed intergenerational solidarity, increased social inclusion, fewer experiences of intersecting forms of discrimination and reduced costs of ageism to individuals, social institutions (such as business and health organisations) and our communities.

Systemic change is possible. It requires dedication and effort by social institutions and local, national and international actors, spanning from the United Nations to individuals. 12 As reported by the WHO, 12 this needs to include implementing evidenced-based strategies (eg revoking ageist laws and policies, developing educational activities to address age-related stereotypes and myths and creating intergenerational contact interventions); undertaking and supporting further research on ageism (including applied and evaluative research, and increased collaborations); and widespread awareness and attitudinal change towards age, ageing and older age.

Ageism is too costly not to address, and all can benefit from its elimination.

age discrimination, ageism, coronavirus, COVID-19, human rights

Ageism, as a social determinant of health, intersects with other forms of discrimination and negatively impacts older people as individuals. Of relevance to academics, practitioners and policymakers, this article notes what can be achieved by addressing ageism and how this can be achieved through systemic change.

Recognising the human rights of older people is an important first step in addressing the consequences of ageism for individuals and society. Building on this, and working collaboratively with older people, practitioners and policymakers have a key role to play in challenging ageism and promoting positive change.

COVID-19 and ageism: how positive and negative responses impact older adults and society

Butler's three constructs of ageism in

Age discrimination in the workplace: the more things change…

Everyday discrimination in the Australian workplace: assessing its prevalence and age and gender differences

Perceptions of health-care professionals' treatment of older people

Understanding Australian medical student attitudes towards older people

Talking to healthcare providers about sex in later life: findings from a qualitative study with older Australian men and women

Confronting ageism: the potential of intergenerational contemporary art events to increase understandings of older adults and ageing

Discrimination and disability: types of discrimination and association with trust, self-efficacy and life satisfaction among older Australians

Human rights unbound: an unrepentant call for a more complete application of human rights in relation to older personsand beyond

COVID-19, human rights and older people

A global campaign to combat ageism

Global reach of ageism on older persons' health: a systematic review

Ageism amplifies cost and prevalence of health conditions

Geneva: World Health Organisation

COVID-19: a plea to protect the older population

Nursing homes or besieged castles: COVID-19 in northern Italy

If not now, when? The role of geriatric leadership as Covid-19 brings the world to its knees

Social Protection for Older People During COVID-19 and Beyond. HelpAge International

COVID-19 and the consequences of isolating the elderly

Betrayal of trust? The impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic on older persons

Hidden in Plain Sight: The Impact of the COVID-19 Response on Mature-Age, Low-Income People in Australia. Brotherhood of St Laurence and Nous Group

JobMaker Hiring Credit Scheme. Australian Government and Australian Taxation Office (ATO)

Ageism and risk during the coronavirus pandemic

#StayHomeForGrandma-Towards an analysis of intergenerational solidarity and responsibility in the coronavirus pandemic

Caremongering and assumptions of need: the spread of compassionate ageism during COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic exposes limited understanding of ageism

Challenging Ageism -A Community Segmentation Approach. The Benevolent Society, on behalf of the EveryAGE Counts Campaign

Older adults and Covid 19: social justice, disparities, and social work practice

Ageism and age discrimination in the labour market: a macrostructural perspective

Appreciating Value: Measuring the Economic and Social Contributions of Mature Age Australians. National Seniors Australia

Fact or fiction? Stereotypes of older Australians. Australian Human Rights Commission

Health equals wealth: The global longevity dividend

The authors wish to acknowledge Susan Banks, Barbara Barbosa Neves, Maho Omori, Annetta Mallon and Jack Lam