key: cord-0685914-63ash9pr
authors: Cacciamani, Andrea; Scarinci, Fabio; Bruno, Luca; Balzamino, Bijorn Omar; Cafiero, Concetta; Re, Agnese; Cosimi, Pamela; Ripandelli, Guido; Micera, Alessandra
title: Phacoemulsification and nucleic acid-enriched aerosol: considerations from an eye model of cataract simulation
date: 2021-08-26
journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05350-6
sha: 34b624f5116aea1bee87d477854d9d43e3c45e3d
doc_id: 685914
cord_uid: 63ash9pr

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether phacoemulsification can generate aerosolized single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) and retain sequence integrity using an artificial eye model for experimental cataract surgery. METHODS: A simulation of cataract surgery was performed using an anterior chamber eye model filled with an ssRNA probe at different scalar dilutions (kanamycin positive control ssRNA). A plastic conical cage was built over the artificial eye surface of the mock-up. A total of 24 tests (twice reproduced) were performed, and five nitrocellulose strips were placed 15 cm from the artificial surface of the mock-up and used to collect aerosol particles, from each experiment. Phaco-activity was mimicked using a phacoemulsification equipped with a 2.75-mm tip, and strips were removed at the end of the procedure. RNA extraction, reverse transcription, and agarose gel electrophoresis were performed and compared. RESULTS: Strips collected aerosol droplets enriched with ssRNA, mainly at the higher concentrations tested, compared to related untouched standard solutions. Complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis confirmed the presence of intact ssRNA fragments. As observed from densitometric analysis of resolved RNA in extracted samples and cDNA bands after retro-transcription, lower concentrations of ssRNA were also detected. CONCLUSIONS: As the main output of the study, the phaco-generated aerosol can deliver an intact ssRNA sequence. Since the aerosol can potentially reach the operator’s face, any biological agent (virus/bacteria) potentially inside the anterior chamber of a patient undergoing cataract surgery, eventually escaping from biomolecular checks, can be potentially infective for operators. The data reported herein suggest that collective versus individual protective countermeasures should always be encouraged in ocular surgery and should not be restricted to coronavirus disease emergencies.

A publication storm has been observed regarding studies on the coronavirus disease (COVID-19 pandemic) (March 11, 2020, WHO declaration), particularly focusing on acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) features, diagnosis, and therapies [1] [2] [3] . Of these studies, some reports highlight the aerosol-associated generating of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, mainly through respiratory droplets from infected subjects, including those, who are asymptomatic [4] [5] [6] . Corroborating data indicate that ocular fluids (mainly tears) might represent a "reservoir" for viral replication [7] [8] [9] . Some molecular (mainly viral sequences) and antigenic (protein)-based tests have been included in the standard screening procedures (venous blood, dedicated pre/post-surgery swabs, and oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal swabs) that precede surgery [10] [11] [12] . The possibility of a spread of infected 5-µm-droplet aerosols (0.1-> 100 μm in diameter) generated during cataract surgery cannot be excluded [13] [14] [15] . Aerosol generation can also occur during vitreoretinal surgery [16] . Due to previous observations

The presence of biological molecules inside the anterior chamber could occur even in the absence inflammation or in patients with negative tests.

The coronavirus disease pandemic has significantly influenced both inpatient and outpatient management worldwide Aerosol generation can occur in surgical practice representing an important aspect not only for severe acute respiratory syndrome 2 infection but also for other infectious diseases.

implying that aerosols can reach long distances depending on the size of phaco-tips used and that the ophthalmic surgical microscope forces surgeon to come to close distances to the operating field, in the absence of a face shield, an "infected" patient would present a serious risk for operators.

Since corroborating data encompass the "aerosol-generating medical procedure" and the delivery of potentially infected particles, the aim of present study was to verify if phacoemulsification can generate aerosolized single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) retaining its initial sequence in eye models for experimental cataract teaching, which may represent a real source of infection. The outcome of this study was not limited to COVID-19 pandemic.

A synthetic eye model was used to test the aerosol produced by phacoemulsification cataract surgery, and conventional reverse transcription PCR analysis was carried out to verify nucleic acid integrity. Five different experimental settings were used for the study, and a total of 42 tests were performed.

The mock-up comprised an artificial anterior segment eye with the possibility of inserting solutions or suspensions inside the anterior chamber. Merely for the study, the chamber was filled with a solution of saline (400 µL), alone or supplemented with standard dilutions of an ssRNA probe (5-µL stock solutions for each scalar dilution), through the use of a sterile PIC Insumed syringe (0.3 mL; 31 G × 8 mm; PIC solution). The 1.2-kb kanamycin positive control RNA was used as an ssRNA probe (10 mM Tris-HCl and 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4; Promega, Milan, Italy). The mock-up was placed over an eyeball stand equipped with an optic light and placed under a direct surgery-teaching microscope connected to real-time video for real-time reproduction. As shown in Fig. 1a , a conical cage was equipped with five nitrocellulose strips (Bio-Schirmer, Bio-Tech Vision Care PVT. LTD. Gujarat, India), to allow the collection of aerosol droplets, which eventually aerosolized from the anterior chamber (of mock-up) during phaco-cataract simulation. An overview of the mock-up, including single components, is shown in Fig. 1b . The plastic cage was placed under the objective 15 cm from the surface of the artificial eye (Fig. 1c ).

The procedure was carried out in a wet lab developed for teaching purposes (Fig. 1b) . A 2.75-mm phacoemulsification tip was used for this study (Alcon, Camberley, Surrey). A wetted artificial surface was obtained using layered BSS, while a dry one was achieved using cellulose eye spears (Weck-Cel, Beaver-Visitec International, Oxford, UK). A dynamic procedure was reproduced by moving the tip inside the artificial anterior chamber to simulate nuclear sculpting, longitudinally along its axis. Before starting each simulation, the conical cage was equipped with a new set of five sterile strips to collect aerosolized droplets for each simulation. Phacoemulsification was reproduced using the Accurus Phaco System (Alcon Inc. Technology, Fort Worth, TX, USA).

Typical phacoemulsification settings were used and the tip was placed in the eye for 1 min (30% continuum phacoemulsification power energy, 90-mmHg pressure inside the eye and 250-mmHg vacuum with continuous irrigation). At the end of phacoemulsification simulation, the strips (nitrocellulose Hybond) were quickly removed and hydrated in extraction buffer (lysis buffer: 50 mM Trizma, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mg/mL RNAsin [pH 7.5]; Promega). Probe-containing aerosol droplets were dissolved in the extraction solution (HIRT supplemented with RNAsin) and placed on an orbital shaker (300 rpm for 45 min). The strips were quickly sent to the laboratory for specific RNA extraction and quantification.

RNA was extracted from all test samples using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Milan, Italy) and resuspended in DEPCautoclaved water (21 µL). Two-microliter RNA samples were spectrophotometrically analyzed and optical density was recorded according to a standard procedure (A1000 Nanodrop, Celbio, Milan, Italy). Reverse transcription (complementary [cDNA] synthesis) was performed according to a standard procedure (GOScript; Promega). cDNA products were electrophoretically separated on a 2% agarose gel (Bio-Rad) prepared in TBE (Serva) and supplemented with SYBR green gel stainer (10 µL; Molecular Probes). Band separation was carried out at 80 V with acquisitions at 15 min and 60 min after loading. Acquisitions (8-tiff images; 500 dpi) were carried out using a digital camera (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) under UV light (Euroclone). Band quantification was carried out using ImageJ software (NIH free-available ImageJ software; https:// imagej. nih. gov/ ij/ downl oad. html).

Illustrations of the eye model station with Schirmer strip and artificial anterior chamber were indicated in Fig. 1a , c, respectively. The simulation of phacoemulsification was performed in a wet lab by reproducing the surgical procedure step-by-step. Five experiments were carried out with five scalar dilutions of each probe. At the end of each simulation, strips were removed and used for RNA extraction and followed by reverse transcription to produce cDNA.

Aerosolized ssRNA was collected using strips at the end of experimental phacoemulsification A280 analysis showed the presence of ssRNA in strips collected at the end of experimental phacoemulsification. The representative spectral absorbances of untouched scalar dilutions of ssRNA (standard curve; Fig. 2a ) and related aerosolized amounts (Fig. 2b) were collected from the strips at the end of the experiment. As expected, the amount of ssRNA was lower in the strips.

In order to understand if the phacoemulsification procedure could alter the ssRNA sequence, cDNA synthesis was performed, according to a standard procedure. Representative 2% agarose gel (Fig. 2c, e, g) and related densitometric analysis (Fig. 2d, f, h) of resolved cDNA products are shown in Fig. 2 . The cDNA from standard solutions (Fig. 2c-d) , the anterior chamber (Fig. 2e, f) , and strip/aerosol (Fig. 2g , h) were used.

As shown, the amount of RT product (cDNA) was lower than that of the related standards and higher than that collected from the artificial chamber (Fig. 2c) .

A typical standard curve is shown in Fig. 2c , d. Note the reduced expression of cDNA in samples from the chamber (Fig. 2e, f) and a consistent amount of cDNA at higher concentrations and a quite absent signal in strip samples at lower concentrations (Fig. 2g, h) . The probe that aerosolized from phacoemulsification surgery was not concentration-dependent.

The laboratory observations reported herein show that intact aerosol-vehicled ssRNA filaments (as probes in the mock-up simulation) can be aerosolized up to 15 cm from the source, as quantified in the strips. The "intact" ssRNA filaments on strips were confirmed by reverse transcription (cDNA synthesis) of total ssRNA extracted from the strip compared to those of chamber and untouched standard dilution curves. A positive-sense RNA sequence was chosen as the probe for simulating the SARS-CoV-2 aerosol delivery. Previous studies suggest that any aerosol droplets can potentially deliver nucleic acids [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] . The release of aerosol from experimental phacoemulsification was previously reported using real-time imaging or luminol techniques [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] . A porcine-eye mock-up showed that phacoemulsification is a low-risk aerosol-generating procedure, which is also supported by the low transmission risk for SARS-CoV-2 by tears [22] [23] [24] . A more recent study highlighted the presence of other techniques for detecting aerosol generated by phacoemulsification (i.e., laser interferometry) and was able to provide clarification of this contrasting literature [13, 25] . This latter observation prompted us to further investigate phaco-aerosol generation in experimental models, as the necessity to develop safety strategies is a major concern in ophthalmological practice during this pandemic [26] .

Herein, RNA extraction, quantification, and retrotranscription analysis confirmed the delivery and integrity of aerosolized nucleic acid. Probe collections were performed at the end of the phacoemulsification cataract simulation (mock-up), as done in previous studies [22] [23] [24] [25] . Comparisons were carried out between the two-factor starting dilutions and the aliquots collected from the chamber-reservoir and Schirmer strips (aerosol captured on a nitrocellulose matrix). The observation of a single undegraded band on agarose gel and the generation of a single band of cDNA products, as synthesized by reverse transcriptase, suggests that phacoemulsification treatment did not modify nucleic acid sequences, which was in line with previous studies [27] . This surgical procedure for eye mock-up requires some considerations. First, the use of an ssRNA probe diluted in saline does not consider both human chamber resistance (artificial structure vs. human anterior chamber) and human fluid composition (saline solution vs. aqueous one). Otherwise, open-globe injuries can be well represented by this model. Second, ssRNA concentrations might not tightly reproduce the minimal virus load that might occur in the human-infected anterior chamber, although five ssRNA dilutions were tested in these studies. Furthermore, the expression of endogenous RNAse (endonuclease, EDN) in human mucosal tissues and biological fluids as natural innate immune defenses might decrease the local and likewise aerosolized "viral load," although the risk of infection cannot be completely abolished [28] . Finally, the strip position (15 cm and not 30 cm) over the artificial ocular surface (mock-up) did not exactly reproduce the distance between the operator and the ocular surface. While previous studies demonstrated aerosol delivery at 30 cm, our focus was to verify the delivery of potentially intact filaments [28] .

The recent COVID-19 pandemic has led to increasing interest in the fact that aerosol produced during cataract surgery can affect the safety of healthcare operators if a minimal viral RNA load can persist inside cells/tissues/ fluids and be released with droplets/aerosol [29] [30] [31] .

Although not related to "viral/bacterial load," high-risk infection can occur during phacoemulsification generating of aerosol/droplets containing pathological sequences [32] . Representative 3D-assisted surgery session. Picture depicting a phacoemulsification session in the surgery room. Note that the surgeon was wearing a face shield over 3D glasses (see red arrows in upper left insert), while performing the surgery with a 3D-visualization system (NGENUITY®; Alcon Inc. Technology, Fort Worth, TX, USA). The 3D-display unit consists of a camera, a processing unit, and a display, allowing the surgeon to be far from the ocular surface (see upper left inset). On the right, a surgical display reproduces the operating field in real time. This viewing system improves both the safety and efficiency of cataract surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic The use of PPIs for outpatients/inpatients and operating microscopes equipped with 3D screen visualization systems (surgery room; Fig. 3 ) has received great interest in dental and ocular surgery, thus allowing for performing the activity at a distance and with a face shield without interfering with the routine procedure [33] [34] [35] .

Since (1) minimal aerosol can potentially reach the operator's face during phacoemulsification, and (2) the absence of virus/bacteria cannot be assured in anterior chamber of any patient undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery, the ability of intact ssRNA to be projected at short distances is possible.

These findings coupled with frontline operators' experiences aim to increase attention regarding creation of best practices in order to avoid potential transmission of RNA viruses, particularly in the field of surgical ophthalmology [36] .

The origin, transmission and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreakan update on the status

SARS-CoV-2: structure, biology, and structure-based therapeutics development

Pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics: in silico prediction of drug effects in treatments for novel coronavirus SARS-CoV2 disease

Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: a systematic review

2020) A study of fluid dynamics and human physiology factors driving droplet dispersion from a human sneeze

Droplets and Aerosols in the Transmission of SARS-CoV-2

Characteristics of ocular findings of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hubei Province, China

Evaluation of coronavirus in tears and conjunctival secretions of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection

Ocular surface expression of SARS-CoV-2 receptors

Effectiveness of tests to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 virus, and antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, to inform COVID-19 diagnosis: a rapid systematic review

One-step quantitative RT-PCR assay with armored RNA controls for detection of SARS-CoV-2

Evaluating ten commercially-available SARS-CoV-2 rapid serological tests using the STARD (standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies) method

Microdroplet and spatter contamination during phacoemulsification cataract surgery in the era of COVID-19

Propensity and quantification of aerosol and droplet creation during phacoemulsification with high-speed shadowgraphy amid COVID-19 pandemic

Aerosol generation through pars plana vitrectomy

Aerosol generating procedures in intraocular surgery

Creating aerosolized droplets in phacoemulsification

Addressing the concerns of aerosolization during phacoemulsification due to COVID-19: human cadaveric eye with trypan blue

A time period study on the efficiency of luminol in the detection of bloodstains concealed by paint on different surfaces

Assessing visible aerosol generation during vitrectomy in the era of Covid-19

Part 2 model eye simulation: aerosol generating procedures in intraocular surgery

Quantification of aerosol generation during cataract surgery

Vitreoretinal surgery tip and tricks in the era of COVID-19

Aerosol generation from high speed ophthalmic instrumentation and the risk of contamination from SARS COVID19

Precautionary measures needed for ophthalmologists during pandemic of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Crosstalk between endoplasmic reticulum stress and anti-viral activities: a novel therapeutic target for COVID-19

Long-distance airborne dispersal of SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 wards

SARS-CoV-2 in environmental perspective: occurrence, persistence, surveillance, inactivation and challenges

Why COVID-19 transmission is more efficient and aggressive than viral transmission in previous coronavirus epidemics?

Aerosol generation during phacoemulsification in live patient cataract surgery environment

Retention of silicone oil droplets from ophthalmic viscosurgical devices in the drainage angle of 2 eyes

Hybrid telehealth medical retina clinic due to provider exposure and quarantine during COVID-19 pandemic

Surgical microscope drape used as a tent over patient to prevent aerosol dissemination during phacoemulsification

Reducing visible aerosol generation during phacoemulsification in the era of Covid-19

Personal protective equipment (PPE) for vitreoretinal surgery during COVID-19

We thank Fondazione Roma (Rome, Italy) for continuous support. Many thanks to Dr. Giuliana Facciolo and Dr. Francesca Petruzzella (IRCCS-Fondazione Bietti) for technical assistance during experimental phacoemulsification cataract.