key: cord-0684139-9x9wrlft authors: Benita, F.; Gasca-Sanchez, F. title: On the main factors influencing COVID-19 spread and deaths in Mexico: A comparison between Phase I and II date: 2020-12-24 journal: nan DOI: 10.1101/2020.12.22.20248716 sha: 7bbb7d39f69ec8e148c615e472cc5c0f88cb3eb9 doc_id: 684139 cord_uid: 9x9wrlft This article investigates the geographical spread of COVID-19 confirmed cases and deaths across municipalities in Mexico. It focuses on the spread dynamics between Phase I (from March 23th to May 31st, 2020) and II (from June 1st to August 22th, 2020) of the social distancing measures. It also examines municipal-level factors associated with cumulative COVID-19 cases and deaths to understand the spatial determinants of the pandemic. The analysis of the geographic pattern of the pandemic via Space-Time Scan Statistics (SaTScan) revealed fast spread among municipalities. During Phase I, clusters of infections and deaths were mainly located at the center of the country, while in Phase II, these clusters dispersed to the rest of the country. The regression results from the Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Regression analysis suggested that income inequality, prevalence of obesity and diabetes, and concentration of fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) are strongly positively associated to confirmed cases and deaths regardless of lockdown. As of November 24, 2020, Mexico ranks fourth in the world in coronavirus disease 2019 deaths, behind only by the U.S., Brazil and India. The country has a total 1'049,358 positive cases and 101,926 deaths, which at present, represents one of the highest lethality rates (10.29%) in the world. Mexico, like other Latin American countries is framed by growing poverty levels, large income inequality and disparities in access to healthcare services (Dávila-Cervantes and Agudelo-Botero, 2019; Hessel et al., 2019; Mesenburg et al., 2018) . Furthermore, the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and other conditions that might shape obesity in the country have a much larger role on the lethality disease. The strong relationship between being individual with overweight or obesity and severe outcomes of hospitalization has been well documented (Hernández-Garduño, 2020; Popkin et al., 2020) . Hence, individuals with excessive body fat, or major cardiometabolic problems (ranging from hypertension to cardiovascular disease and diabetes) could present severe or even lethal complications. In this vein, Mexico faces a significant risk as, for years now, it has been in the second spot when it comes to the global ranking of adult obesity, just behind the U.S., whereas, overweight and obesity in childhood rates are the highest worldwide (OECD, 2019) . Similarly, an enormous amount of scientific literature has provided strong evidence that climate factors such as high air temperature or exposure to air pollution lead to an increase of lethality rates (Lin et al., 2020a,b; Ahmadi et al., 2020; Bashir et al., 2020; Riccò et al., Mexico City metropolitan area with RR=4.49, meaning that the population within the cluster was 4.49 times more likely to be exposed to the virus than the population outside the cluster. Interestingly, during Phase II, the most-likely cluster was also centered at Mexico City metropolitan area but with a considerably lower RR (RR=1.96). Phase II was also characterized by the spread of new infection and death clusters along the country. The findings suggest that during Phase I, both deaths and infections from COVID-19 were concentrated in the country's capital, however, after the lifting of containment measures, the virus had a rapid spread to the rest of the country due to multiple causes which we further try to investigate. With respect to the ZINB regression results, we found that in both phases, income inequality, the proportion of adults with obesity and diabetes resulted strongly positively correlated with cumulative COVID-19 infections and deaths. Likewise, annual PM 2.5 concentration (log) was found to be strongly positively correlated to total deaths during Phase I and II. This is, regardless the containment measures, municipalities with deep socioeconomic inequalities and poor health outcomes were more likely to suffer from larger infections and deaths during the first wave of the pandemic. After the introduction, Section II presents our methodological framework. Section III shows the main results and discussion of the empirical findings. Finally, Section IV concludes with some policy recommendations and further work. We used Kulldorff's (1997 Kulldorff's ( , 2011 SaTScan analysis to detect space-time clusters of COVID-19 cumulative positive cases and deaths for each of the two phases of lockdown. Under this approach, we tested whether RR of the geographical clustering was caused by a random variation or not. This is, whether the expected number of infections (resp. death) within clusters were larger (e.g., cluster of a high risk of infection (resp. death)) than infections (resp. deaths) outside. To do so, we implemented discrete Poisson probability models using different windows of geographical radius. We refer interested readers to Kihal-Talantikite et al. (2013) , and Rao et al. (2017) for full technical details. Recent SaTScan applications in the context of COVID-19 can be found in the works of Desjardins et al. (2020) or Kim and Castro (2020) for the cases of U.S. and South Korea, respectively. The most-likely geographical cluster is the one with maximum likelihood, and other clusters with significant log-likelihood ratios (LLR) can be seeing secondary potential clusters. Each LLR has a p-value estimated via 999 Monte Carlo Simulations. Finally, if p-value<0.05, then the geographical cluster has significantly higher risk of COVID-19 infections (resp. deaths) than that outside the area. The group of potential predictors is as follows. • Socio-economic. A dummy of metropolitan area, log of population density, proportion of males, Gini of income inequality, and proportion of poverty. • Health. Proportion of obesity in adults aged 20 years or older, proportion of hypertension, proportion of diabetes, and fast food outlets per 1,000 people. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. perpetuity. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in The copyright holder for this this version posted December 24, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101 https://doi.org/10. /2020 • Climate. Log of average monthly maximum temperature, log of average monthly minimum temperature, log of cumulative monthly rainfall, and log of annual PM 2.5 concentration. • Commute. Public buses per 1,000 people, private vehicles automobiles per 1,000 people, and proportion of economic units that are essential activities. Figure 1 . Evolution of Pearson's correlation between monthly new positive COVID-19 cases and new deaths using data from 2,459 Mexican municipalities. Vertical dashed lines in black color represent the start and end of the Phase I. Figure 1 displays the Pearson correlation coefficient resulting from monthly new positive COVID-19 cases and deaths. By visual inspection we notice that population density (log), proportion of adults aged 20 years or older with obesity, annual PM 2.5 (log) and cars per 1,000 people strongly correlate with new monthly COVID-19 cases and monthly deaths. Our econometric strategy is like the one presented in McLaren (2020) in which the dependent variable, , is the cumulative monthly number of reported COVID-19 cases (resp. deaths). More formally, we have: where = 0,1,2, …; stands for municipality and for month. is a dummy variable that takes the value of 1 if = and 0 otherwise. are the coefficients associated to the explanatory variables which can be classified into one of the corresponding socio-economic, health, climate or commuting factors. Our unit of analysis are municipalities, and both the count of positive cases and deaths have more zero observations than predicted by a Poisson process, which assumes that its All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. perpetuity. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in The copyright holder for this this version posted December 24, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10. 1101 variance is equal to its mean. For both of our dependent variables the Vuong test detected significant overdispersion, strongly favoring a ZINB regression. The ZINB regression uses the mixing of a process (logistic regression in this study) that predicts some zero counts and another one (negative binomial) that models counts. The logistic analysis of the ZINB model predicts the probability of falling into the zero group (e.g., no positive cases (resp. no deaths) in municipality ), while the negative binomial part models the expectation of conditional on a non-zero value. This is, the expected count of the number of positive cases (resp. deaths) in municipality . Figure 2(a) depicts the geographical location and size of the pandemic during Phase I. At the beginning of the outbreak, the most-likely cluster of COVID-19 cumulative positive cases was located at Mexico City metropolitan area while secondary clusters were also situated at the center of the country with spatial overlaps. perpetuity. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in The copyright holder for this this version posted December 24, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10. 1101 More precisely, the most-likely cluster was composed of 21 municipalities (see Table 2 ) accounting for 29,784 positive cases in a radius of 23.24km. Recall that Mexico City metropolitan area has a total population of more than 20 million inhabitants. Like New York in the U.S., this high-density area was the first in being hit by the pandemic. During this period, the risk of COVID-19 positive cases of the most-likely cluster was about 4.5 (RR=4.49) times higher than that in other clusters. The effectiveness of social distancing measures imposed by local and federal governments could, perhaps, be appreciated in Figure 2 (b). From the figure, we observe that most-likely and secondary clusters shifted towards southern and eastern regions. As expected, these dynamics indicate the rising spread of the virus in less populated areas of the States of Tlaxcala or Guanajuato. Interestingly, however, are the results of spatio-temporal clusters of COVID-19 deaths which show an opposite pattern. This is, municipalities clustered at highrisk areas during Phase I were located along different latitudes and longitudes (States of Baja California, Nuevo León, Tamaulipas, Oaxaca and Puebla) without a visible spatial pattern. Alternatively, the high-risk areas during Phase II were concentrated around Mexico City metro area (States of Mexico, Mexico City, Tlaxcala, Puebla, Hidalgo). The center of the most-likely cluster of COVID-19 deaths during Phase II was located in Sonora State, with centroid All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. perpetuity. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in The copyright holder for this this version posted December 24, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.22.20248716 doi: medRxiv preprint coordinates 29.9518 latitude and -112.094 longitude (LLR=698.19 p-value<0.001). This circular area covered 69 municipalities with a radius of 353.85km, and included municipalities sharing border with the U.S. The total number of COVID-19 deaths in the cluster was 3,179, and the risk of fatality was about 2 times (RR=2.18) higher than outside this area. The spatial distribution of COVID-19 positive cases and deaths is likely to be shaped by climate and social processes related to the municipalities' growth and social inequalities. This motivates our further analysis, which we discuss in the next section regarding to the examination of the main drivers of COVID-19 disease spread. During the Social Distancing Program, a total of 1,493 (60.71%) municipalities reported at least one confirmed case, and 1,216 (50.5%) reported at least one death. Three months after the Social Distancing Program, 2,096 (85.2%) and 1,551 (63%) municipalities reported at least one confirmed case and deaths, respectively. Table 2 presents the summary statistics of the variables of interest. As we can notice, due to data availability only some climate-related variables present monthly changes in their values. Among other facts, 36 ± 95% (mean ± standard deviation) of the municipalities belong to metropolitan areas, the average Gini income inequality per municipality is 0.39±0.04 while in the average municipality 65±22% of the population lives below the poverty line. In average, Mexican municipalities have 319.83 ± 1,269.56 inhabitants per sq. km of land, but its standard deviation is considerably large indicating that datapoints tend to be far from the mean value. The proportion of obesity is very high, this is, in average 32 ± 9% of the population aged 20 years or older suffer from obesity. As mentioned previously, the relationship between obesity and respiratory disease is largely known (Walton et al., 2009; Jiao et al., 2015; Richardson et al., 2015) and we expect a positive relationship with COVID-19 deaths. However, the magnitude of the coefficient estimates associated to obesity, as well as the coefficients of the other comorbidities, is region dependent. In the category of environmental variables, we have converted temperature into Fahrenheit degrees to avoid negative values of Celsius degrees during cold months so that the log transformation does not disrupts our analysis. Long-term exposure to PM 2.5 adversely affects respiratory and cardiovascular systems and may increases lethality rates of COVID-19 (Wu et al., 2020) . This could be particularly true for municipalities in metro areas. In Méndez-Arriaga (2020) it has been documented that climate conditions in States with low temperatures and poor precipitation (in mm), such as Tlaxcala, Guanajuato or Michoacán, favoured local infections during Phase I. Our proxies for human mobility behaviour are expected to be positively correlated to the spread of the virus (see Figure 1 ), but its association with deaths remains unknown. The variable proportion of essential activities include health-related companies, public security and fundamental sectors of the economy (utilities, food and beverages, agriculture, fisheries and livestock, industrial chemicals, storage, courier services, private security, telecommunications, emergency services, funeral services, transportation of individuals, All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. perpetuity. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in The copyright holder for this this version posted December 24, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10. 1101 logistics and governmental activities). The average percentage of economic units that operate essential activities during Phase I was 68 ± 11%. Notes: Values reported as "-" in column "Phase II" correspond to same values as the ones in column "Phase I"; b: We take the log of this variable for estimation purposes of equation (1) For the easiness of synthesizing our results, Figure 3 shows the effect size of the estimated coefficients related to the count part of the model, e.g., negative binomial, and Tables 3 and 4 summarize full results. Recall that the count model describes associations between explanatory variables and COVID-19 cases (deaths) among municipalities with at least one reported COVID-19 case (death). During both Phases I and II, we observed (Figure 3(a) ) a large and significant positive association between municipal-level cumulative positive cases and proportion of obesity (p-value<0.001), proportion of diabetes (p-value<0.001) and income inequality (p-value<0.001). Although positive and statistical significative, the size of the estimated coefficients of proportion of essential activities, population density (log), average minimum temperature (log) and annual PM 2.5 concentration (log) is considerably smaller. In regard to COVID-19 fatalities, population density (log) and average minimum temperature (log) were found to be positively associated to deaths. The statistical significance of population density is not surprising as we could hypothesized such result from the strong positive correlation shown in Figure 1 . However, positive association between average All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. perpetuity. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in The copyright holder for this this version posted December 24, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.22.20248716 doi: medRxiv preprint minimum temperature and COVID-19 deaths is less obvious. This illustrates the practicality of ZINB models. a) b) Figure 3 . Effect size of predictor coefficients, count model of the Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial. Black lines represent the 95% confidence interval. Variables in grey, red, green and yellow color correspond to socioeconomic, health, climate and commuting factors, respectively Socio-economic and health-related variables had an important role on the evolution of monthly cumulative number of COVID-19 cases and deaths. For the count model results in Figure 3 , the estimated coefficient of population density (log) during Phase I equals 0.53 (resp. 0.31) and it is statistically significant at the 99%. An alternative explanation for the estimated coefficients is the incidence rate ratios (IRR), also known as odds ratios in ZINB models, which are calculated by taking the exponent of the estimated coefficients in Figure 3 . The IRR of population density (log), see Table 3 , indicates that a unit increase in this variable increased it by 1.71 (=exp(0.53)) (resp. 1.37) times among those municipalities who experienced cases of coronavirus disease 2019 infection (resp. deaths) during the Phase I. In Phase II, however, the magnitude of the estimated coefficient became larger in the case of deaths, meaning that more densely populated municipalities suffered from larger counts of fatalities. This result is also partially illustrated in Figure 2 . The finding is in line with recent published work using U.S. county-level data (Sun et al., 2020a) or Iran province-level data (Ahmadi et al. 2020 ) but contrary to the empirical evidence of the provincial regions in China (Sun et al., 2020c) . All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. perpetuity. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in The copyright holder for this this version posted December 24, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.22.20248716 doi: medRxiv preprint Note: Estimates to two decimals, and values of 0 were rounded. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. perpetuity. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in The copyright holder for this this version posted December 24, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101 https://doi.org/10. /2020 Note: Estimates to two decimals, and values of 0 were rounded. Municipalities located at metropolitan areas were more-likely (p-value<0.001) to suffer from infections and deaths in Phase II. Income inequality is revealed as one of main factors associated with the spread of the virus and deaths. During Phase I, holding all other municipal-level variables at their mean values, positive cases increased by a factor of 4,045.05 for each one unit increase in the Gini index, while in Phase II this factor increased to All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. perpetuity. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in The copyright holder for this this version posted December 24, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10. 1101 10,178.66. Moreover, municipalities with disproportionately social inequalities (e.g., municipalities in the States of Oaxaca, Mexico or Mexico City) suffered from larger IRR of COVID-19 deaths. The result is in line with the evidence of the U.S. at the county-level (Millett, 2020) or Singapore at the planning area-level (Yi et a., 2020). The pronounced social disparities across states has shown that vulnerable geographical areas in terms of large social disadvantages were those with the highest numbers of cases and deaths of COVID-19. Our findings also provide support that poor air quality conditions at the municipallevel strongly correlate to the prevalence and deaths due to COVID-19. During Phase I (resp. Phase II) an increase in 1 metric tonne in PM2.5 (log) per year would increase COVID-19 death rate by a factor of 1.25 (resp. 1.97). The finding is in line with relevant studies tackling the atmospheric determinants of population's vulnerability to COVID-19 in the U.S. (Bashir et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020) , Italy (Lubrano et al., 2020) , China (Lin et al., 2020a) or some cities of Latin America (Bolaño et al., 2020), all of them unanimously confirmed the correlation between atmospheric conditions and COVID-19 cases, making poor air quality an additional co-determinant of COVID-19 lethality. With respect to precipitation, we observed that high cumulative rainfall (log) reduced the virus transmission and deaths during Phase II, only. Different from air pollution, the literature focusing on the role of amount of rainfall and virus transmission/deaths have found inconclusive results. In some countries like the U.S. (Bashir et al., 2020) , Indonesia (Tosepu et al., 2020) or Brazil (Rosario et al., 2020) rainfall has been shown to be not associated with the dynamics of the virus. The large magnitude of the coefficients associated to health-related explanatory variables during Phase I indicates that regions with high prevalence of comorbidities, such as municipalities in the states of Mexico, Sinaloa, Veracruz or Yucatan, were hard hit by COVID-19. Note that during Phase I comorbidities where not statistically associated to the cumulative count of deaths. Lastly, commuting-related factors are found to be weakly correlated to confirmed cases and deaths. For instance, during Phase I, municipalities with large proportion of essential activities reported lower death rates (IRR= 0.26, . After the social distancing was gradually lifted in Phase II, an increase in the proportion of essential activities was linked to a decrease (IRR= 0.46, in the spread of the virus. The explanation for these apparently inconsistent effects is tied to the share of the informal employment in Mexico (53.4% in 2016 , according to the International Labour Organization (ILO, 2018 ). Needless to say that the size of the informal employment in the country is comparable to other Latin American nations (Argentina, 47.2%; Brazil 40.5%; Chile 40.1%; Ecuador 59%) or China (54.4%). The spatial distribution of emerging space-time clusters of COVID-19 at the municipal-level showed that after Phase I was lifted, the de-escalation process exhibited rapidly spread of the virus to northern and southern regions, particularly to those municipalities along the Mexico-All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. perpetuity. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in The copyright holder for this this version posted December 24, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101 https://doi.org/10. /2020 U.S. border. We identified a total of 23 clusters of COVID-19 infections during Phase I, and surprisingly, the total number of clusters increased to 40 in Phase II. Notwithstanding, we also found an opposite dynamic with respect to cumulative COVID-19 deaths. This is, the total number of clusters reduced from 24 to 16 between Phase I and II, respectively, and their centroids moved away from Mexico City metropolitan area to Sonora and other bordering states. Although Phase II was characterized by a small number of clusters of COVID-19 deaths, they also reported a considerably larger number of cumulative deaths. For instance, the most-likely cluster during Phase I reported 1,072 deaths whereas in Phase II, it exhibited 3,179. Our spatio-temporal analysis illustrates the usefulness of the spatial scan statistic (SaTScan) as a tool for geographical disease surveillance. Aside from the physical restriction measures imposed by local and federal governments, other potential municipal-level factors associated to dynamic of the disease could be existing socio-economic inequalities. The empirical evidence of Das et al. (2020) showed that COVID-19 spread grow exponentially in those Indian regions with large socioeconomic deprivation. Similarly, the evidence comparing United Kingdom regions revealed important geographical disparities in risk and outcomes of the disease. This is, the risk of dying among those diagnosed with the infection was higher for those belonging to minority ethnic groups and those living in more deprived areas. Sannigrahi et al. (2020) also found strong evidence supporting the idea that spatial determinants of COVID-19 infections and deaths in Europe were mainly associated to poverty rates and income inequality. Additional arguments explaining the geographical spread of the disease are presented in Geng et al. (2020) . Their study found associations between reopening of urban business centers in the U.S. and rapid spread of the virus across counties. Sun et al. (2020a) highlighted the noticeable spatial heterogeneity in the distribution of positive cases in the U.S., in particular, when comparing counties in the center of the country with those located at the East and West coast. The authors illustrated the strong positive correlation between socioeconomic factors (population density, social segregation, and differences by ethnicity) and infection rate. The link between space-time variations of disease and socio-economic factors has also recently been investigated by Snyder and Parks (2020) , Xie et al. (2020) and Karaye and Horney (2020) . In the context of Mexico, our results at the municipal-level indicate that, regardless of lockdown policies, metabolic disorders, such as obesity or diabetes, are able to exacerbate both infections and deaths. Our findings are in line with those presented in Lubrano et al. (2020) , in which the extremely high level of COVID-19 lethality in Northern Italy compared to the rest of the country can be explained by differences in air pollution and obesity. The above-mentioned link, between obesity/air pollution and higher COVID-19 lethality is also supported by Sanchis-Gomar et al. (2020) . The authors detail how adipose tissue may be vulnerable to COVID-19 infection, therefore, obese patients also have worse outcomes with COVID-19 infection, including respiratory failure, need for mechanical ventilation, and higher mortality (Almerie and Kerrigan, 2020; Palaiodimos et al., 2020; Flint and Tahrani, 2020) . Similarly, the presence of diabetes has been associated with an increased mortality risk (Pitocco et al., 2020; Papadokostaki et al., 2020) because people with diabetes could suffer All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. perpetuity. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in The copyright holder for this this version posted December 24, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.22.20248716 doi: medRxiv preprint from a loss of capacity to regulate immunity. Therefore, due to the large prevalence of diabetes (15%) and obesity (60%) in Mexico, we expect COVID-19 lethality being considerably higher than the one experienced by other countries in the region. In this vein, our variable fast food per 1,000 people was intended to discover possible effects of fast food restaurants on infections and deaths. There is an ongoing debate on weather higher density of unhealthy food options is associated with higher obesity and diabetes prevalence. While the evidence is mixed (Frankenfeld et al., 2015 , Mejova et al., 2015 , Mexico has recently implemented a front-ofpack labeling system as an attempt to tackle obesity by reducing the purchase of unhealthy products. All in all, our empirical evidence does not support the idea that an increasing number of local fast food restaurants is associated with higher rates of disease infections or lethality. On the one hand, the detection of space-time clusters of infections and deaths, Figure 2 , can be exploited by policymakers and healthcare authorities to target regions that are on need of priority interventions. For instance, when there is a substantial overlap of secondary clusters, e.g., Figure 2 (a), it is indicative of an urgent need of regional measures for the prevention, containment and coordination to be implemented in combating the COVID-19 health crisis. Successfully examples of localized policy interventions are detailed in Leal-Neto et al. (2020) and Dlamini et al. (2020) for the case of Brazil and Eswatini (Africa), respectively. Likewise, some of the spatial clusters identified in this work grouped together municipalities from different states. This scenario is of key relevance while designing localized public health efforts. In Mexico, the federal government has delegated to Federal States much of the responsibility about the management of the public health system during the pandemic. Federal States also have main duties and responsibilities related to the restriction of non-essential economic activities when the Epidemiological Risk Traffic Light (a bi-weekly monitoring system met to monitor and grade the use of public space according to virus transmission) turns into red color. In context of emerging clusters sharing municipalities from different states, coordinated efforts among various governments levels are critical. Past published research has shown the advantages of these type of coordinated public policy interventions not only to prevent the spread of sexual transmission diseases (Marotta, 2016) or Salmonella (Seixas et al., 2018) but also to provide with better healthcare services to vulnerable population suffering from cleft lip and palate (Gasca et al., 2019), obesity (Gartner et al., 2016) , tuberculosis (Rao et al., 2017) , and so forth. On the other hand, while some experts say that the hardest hit countries had an aging population (Gardner et al., 2020) , underdeveloped healthcare systems (Tanne et al., 2020) or unfavorable natural environment (Di Marco et al., 2020) , it seems that unresolved structural problems of high poverty and income inequality aggravated the spread of the pandemic in Mexico. Thus, government response policies, such as testing procedures, tracking of individuals, social distancing measures or plans for hospital reconversion and immediate expansion will not be sufficient to mitigate the dynamics of the disease spread. Unless major policy changes are implemented to improve environmental sustainability and promote human development, more disadvantaged Mexican municipalities will become hotspots for virus All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. perpetuity. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in The copyright holder for this this version posted December 24, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10. 1101 circulation and re-emergence. More precisely, some of the possible policy actions could include support for workers in the informal sector, assistance for the population in poverty or a decarbonization pathway that focuses on electrification and clean renewable energy. Interestingly, the recent front-of-pack labeling system based on warning labels of unhealthy products seems to be an adequate government's strategy to fight obesity and ultimately COVID-19. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Francisco Benita: Conceptualization, Methodology & Writing. Francisco Gasca-Sanchez: Conceptualization, Data curation, Visualizations. The authors received no specific funding for this work Investigation of effective climatology parameters on COVID-19 outbreak in Iran The association between obesity and poor outcome after COVID-19 indicates a potential therapeutic role for montelukast The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities Correlation between environmental pollution indicators and COVID-19 pandemic: A brief study in Californian context Spread of SARS-CoV-2 through Latin America and the Caribbean region: a look from its economic conditions, climate and air pollution indicators Living environment matters: Unravelling the spatial clustering of COVID-19 hotspots in Kolkata megacity Health inequalities in Latin America: persistent gaps in life expectancy. The Lancet Planetary Health Positive impact of lockdown on COVID-19 outbreak in Thailand Rapid surveillance of COVID-19 in the United States using a prospective space-time scan statistic: Detecting and evaluating emerging clusters Opinion: Sustainable development must account for pandemic risk Spatial risk assessment of an emerging pandemic under data scarcity: A case of COVID-19 in Eswatini Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand COVID-19 and obesity-lack of clarity, guidance, and implications for care Diabetes, obesity, and recommended fruit and vegetable consumption in relation to food environment subtypes: a cross-sectional analysis of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States Census, and food establishment data The coronavirus and the risks to the elderly in long-term care The spatial distribution of gender differences in obesity prevalence differs from overall obesity prevalence among US adults Spatial Clusters of Children with Cleft Lip and Palate and Their Association with Polluted Zones in the Monterrey Metropolitan Area Population agglomeration is a harbinger of the spatial complexity of COVID-19 Obesity is the comorbidity more strongly associated for Covid-19 in Mexico. A case-control study Educational inequalities in disability linked to social security coverage among older individuals in five Latin American countries Women and Men in the Informal Economy: A Statistical Picture Health implications of adults' eating at and living near fast food or quick service restaurants The impact of social vulnerability on COVID-19 in the U.S.: an analysis of spatially varying relationships An exploratory spatial analysis to assess the relationship between deprivation, noise and infant mortality: an ecological study Spatiotemporal pattern of COVID-19 and government response in South Korea (as of May 31, 2020) A Spatial Scan Statistic SatScan Software for spatial, temporal and space-time scan statistics The epidemiology of COVID-19 cases and the successful containment strategy in Hong Kong The positive impact of lockdown in Wuhan on containing the COVID-19 outbreak in China Prioritizing COVID-19 tests based on participatory surveillance and spatial scanning A mechanism-based parameterisation scheme to investigate the association between transmission rate of COVID-19 and meteorological factors on plains in China Region-specific air pollutants and meteorological parameters influence COVID-19: A study from mainland China Is obesity the missing link between COVID-19 severity and air pollution? Effects of temperature variation and humidity on the death of COVID-19 in Wuhan The party is over: cracking under Sana Distancia in Mexico Assessing spatial relationships between race, inequality, crime, and gonorrhea and chlamydia in the United States Racial disparity in COVID-19 deaths: seeking economic roots with census data # foodporn: Obesity patterns in culinary interactions The temperature and regional climate effects on communitarian COVID-19 contagion in Mexico throughout phase 1 Ethnic group inequalities in coverage with reproductive, maternal and child health interventions: crosssectional analyses of national surveys in 16 Latin American and Caribbean countries Assessing differential impacts of COVID-19 on Black communities The Heavy Burden of Obesity: The Economics of Prevention. OECD Health Policy Studies Severe obesity is associated with higher in-hospital mortality in a cohort of patients with COVID-19 in the COVID-19 and diabetes: What does the clinician need to know? Diabetes and severity of COVID-19: what is the link? Medical Hypotheses Individuals with obesity and COVID-19: A global perspective on the epidemiology and biological relationships Using the Kulldorff's scan statistical analysis to detect spatio-temporal clusters of tuberculosis in Qinghai Province SARS-CoV-2 infection and air pollutants: Correlation or causation? Multiple pathways from the neighborhood food environment to increased body mass index through dietary behaviors: A structural equation-based analysis in the CARDIA study Relationship between COVID-19 and weather: Case study in a tropical country Obesity and outcomes in COVID-19: When an epidemic and pandemic collide Examining the association between socio-demographic composition and COVID-19 fatalities in the European region using spatial regression approach Demographic characterization and spatial cluster analysis of human Salmonella 1, 4 COVID-19 in Italy: impact of containment measures and prevalence estimates of infection in the general population Spatial variation in socio-ecological vulnerability to Covid-19 in the contiguous United States Association between climate variables and global transmission of SARS-CoV-2 A spatial analysis of COVID-19 period prevalence in US counties through Spatial inequalities of COVID-19 mortality rate in relation to socioeconomic and environmental factors across England Impacts of geographic factors and population density on the COVID-19 spreading under the lockdown policies of China Covid-19: how doctors and healthcare systems are tackling coronavirus worldwide Correlation between weather and Covid-19 pandemic in Jakarta Examining the interaction between food outlets and outdoor food advertisements with primary school food environments Air pollution and COVID-19 mortality in the United States: Strengths and limitations of an ecological regression analysis Spatial and temporal differentiation of COVID-19 epidemic spread in mainland China and its influencing factors