key: cord-0683636-6m4dn52g
authors: Donzel, E.; Reyes‐Gomez, E.; Chahory, S.
title: Endogenous endophthalmitis caused by Enterococcus faecalis in a cat
date: 2013-09-13
journal: J Small Anim Pract
DOI: 10.1111/jsap.12136
sha: c1fb1d61edff032d26477e50060e613aab409228
doc_id: 683636
cord_uid: 6m4dn52g

A three‐year‐old male neutered domestic shorthair cat was presented for loss of vision associated with hyperthermia, lethargy and anorexia. Ophthalmic examination revealed a bilateral panuveitis. Cytological examination of aqueous and vitreous humours was performed and revealed a suppurative inflammation associated with numerous cocci. Enterococcus faecalis was identified by bacterial culture from aqueous and vitreous humour. No primary infection site was identified. Active uveitis resolved after systemic antibiotic therapy, but the vision loss was permanent. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first reported case of endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis secondary to E. faecalis infection in a cat.

Endophthalmitis is a severe intra-ocular inflammation of bacterial or fungal origin that may lead to blindness and frequently to enucleation (Khan et al. 2002 , Jackson et al. 2003 , Ramakrishnan et al. 2009 ). In veterinary medicine, most cases are of exogenous origin such as intra-ocular surgery, penetrating injury, corneal ulcer or spread of infectious organisms from ocular adnexa. Endogenous endophthalmitis is rarely described. It results from haematogenous spread of infectious organisms, with an initial site of infection distal to the eye (Khan et al. 2002 , Jackson et al. 2003 , Ramakrishnan et al. 2009 ). This report describes a case of acute vision loss secondary to bilateral bacterial endogenous endophthalmitis in a cat.

A three-year-old male neutered indoor/outdoor domestic shorthair cat was referred to the National Veterinary School of Alfort, Maisons-Alfort, France, for acute vision loss, lethargy and anorexia. Five days before initial presentation, the cat was found to be weak and the owners noticed that the right cornea had turned white.

The initial general examination revealed hyperthermia (39·4°C) and moderate dehydration. On the initial ophthalmic examination, no menace response could be elicited in either eye. Direct and consensual pupillary light reflexes (PLR) were present in the left eye (OS) and absent in the right eye (OD). On examination of the anterior segment, a mild aqueous flare was observed (1+) OS and diffuse corneal oedema, circumlimbal corneal vascularisation, aqueous flare (4+), a fibrin clot within the anterior chamber and iridal hyperaemia were found OD (Fig 1) . Indirect ophthalmoscopy revealed diffuse vitreous haemorrhages, active chorioretinitis and hyperreflective areas on the tapetal fundus OS and a cloudy posterior segment precluding fundus examination OD. The intra-ocular pressure (IOP) measured by rebound tonometry (Tonovet; Tiolat) was within reference limits OS (12 mmHg) but abnormally high OD (33 mmHg).

The conclusion of the ophthalmic examination was blindness secondary to bilateral panuveitis associated with ocular hypertension in the right eye. Several potential causes were considered: trauma, infectious diseases, neoplasia and idiopathic uveitis. Routine haematology, serum biochemistry (ALT, ALP, urea, creatinine, albumin, total protein and glucose) were all within their respective reference intervals. Tests for common infectious agents (feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV), feline leukaemia virus and feline enteric coronavirus) were all negative. The right posterior segment examined by ocular ultrasound was filled with diffuse heterogeneous hyperechoic material (Fig 2) . A sample of aqueous and vitreous humour was collected by fine needle paracentesis from the right eye, under general anaesthesia, for cytological examination and bacterial culture. Cytological examination of ttp://www.bsava.com/ Endogenous endophthalmitis in a cat the vitreous revealed a suppurative inflammation associated with numerous intra-and extracellular cocci (Fig 3) . The results with the aqueous humour were similar, but cocci were less abundant. As there were no signs of trauma and no history of previous ocular surgery, endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis was suspected. Urinalysis, thoracic radiography, abdominal ultrasound examination, echocardiography and blood culture did not detect a primary infection site.

While the bacterial culture was pending, a treatment combining systemic broad spectrum antibiotics: 15 mg/kg cefalexin (Rilexine; Virbac) intravenously (iv) every 12 hours and 2 mg/ kg marbofloxacin (Marbocyl; Vetoquinol) iv every 24 hours were initiated. A dose of 0·2 mg/kg meloxicam (Métacam; Boehringer Ingelheim) subcutaneously (sc) every 24 hours was administered in association with iv fluid therapy. Bilateral subconjunctival injection of 1·6 mg/eye triamcinolone acetate (Canitedarol; Merial) was performed, and eyedrops containing 0·1% dexamethasone/polymixin B/neomycin TID (Maxidrol; Alcon) and 1% brinzolamide TID (Azopt; Alcon) were administered. Three days after the initial presentation, the cat had recovered normal appetite and rectal temperature. However there was still no menace response from either eye. In the right eye, an iris bombé was observed with a large fibrin clot. The IOP had increased (59 mmHg). The left eye was unchanged. Enterococcus faecalis was identified by bacterial culture. The strain was multi-drug resistant but susceptible to ampicillin and marginally sensitive to gentamicin (Table 1) . The cat was discharged on 20 mg/kg oral ampicillin (Ampicat; Virbac) every 12 hours, oral meloxicam, topical 1% brinzolamide every 8 hours, 0·5% timolol maleate (Timoptol 0·5%; MSD France) every 12 hours in the right eye and 0·3% gentamicin (Gentalline; MSD France) every 8 hours and 0·1% dexamethasone (Maxidex; Alcon) every 8 hours in both eyes. Anterior uveitis and vitreous inflammation decreased gradually in both eyes during the 2-month follow-up but retinal degeneration was observed OS. Oral ampicillin was discontinued after 3 weeks and topical medication was limited (Jackson et al. 2003) .

In a retrospective study, approximately 75% of blood cultures were positive. In the present case, the blood culture was negative. However, a single blood culture was performed and antibiotic therapy was started thereafter. Because bacteraemia is often intermittent, at least three blood cultures are usually recommended and, conceivably, a positive bacterial culture might have been found if several bacterial cultures had been performed (Greiner et al. 2008 , Nutsi et al. 2010 .

There are only a few case reports of E. faecalis infection in veterinary medicine, and no ocular involvement has been reported in any (Adamo & Cherubini 2001 , Manson et al. 2003 , Tessier-Vetzel et al. 2003 , Pomba et al. 2010 . In the present case, E. faecalis, a Gram-positive streptococcus (Sood et al. 2008) , was identified in intra-ocular fluids. E. faecalis belongs to the normal feline gastrointestinal flora (Jackson et al. 2009 ). In humans, E. faecalis is an uncommon cause of endophthalmitis (Uchio et al. 1992 , Scott et al. 2003 , Chen et al. 2009 , Rishi et al. 2009 ), mainly observed in old or debilitated patients, when the mucosal or epithelial barrier is disrupted or in cases of alteration of the normal bacterial flora secondary to treatment with antibiotics (Chen et al. 2009 ). In the present case, the cat was young and had reportedly not received any prior treatment. The only general signs were transient lethargy and anorexia. Risk factors such as FIV or diabetes were excluded. Nevertheless, the hypothesis of mucosal intestinal disruption cannot be ruled out.

In humans, ocular findings associated with E. faecalis endophthalmitis frequently include a hypopion and a marked vitreous inflammation with exudates (Scott et al. 2003 , Chen et al. 2009 , Rishi et al. 2009 ), which can preclude funduscopic examination (Rishi et al. 2009 ). Increased IOP has also been reported (Chen et al. 2009 ). All these features were observed in this case.

In humans, treatment of bacterial endophthalmitis consists of intravitreal injection of antibiotics (Callegan et al. 2002 , Binder et al. 2003 , Scott et al. 2003 , Schiedler et al. 2004 , Chen et al. 2009 , Rishi et al. 2009 ). Systemic administration of antibiotics has also been reported (Binder et al. 2003 , Schiedler et al. 2004 ) but was not consistently prescribed. Indeed, the intravitreal concentrations obtained are frequently below the minimal inhibitory concentrations for many ocular pathogens (Callegan et al. 2002 , Jackson et al. 2003 . In veterinary ophthalmology, intravitreal injections are rarely performed because of the risk of intra-ocular haemorrhage (Boeve & Stades 2007 , Regnier 2007 . The cat in this report was treated with systemic ampicillin. The penetration of penicillins into normal eyes is generally poor but in case of inflammation, the breakdown of the blood-aqueous barrier facilitates the intra-ocular penetration of ampicillin (Regnier 2007) . A posterior vitrectomy is also often performed to remove bacteria, inflammatory cells, membranes and toxic debris in humans (Binder et al. 2003 , Scott et al. 2003 , Schiedler et al. 2004 , Chen et al. 2009 , Rishi et al. 2009 ), and to promote the distribution of antibiotics (Callegan et al. 2002 , Jackson et al. 2003 . This surgical procedure has not been described for this condition in veterinary medicine and was not available for the present case. to 0·1% dexamethasone solution every 12 hours OU and topical 1% brinzolamide OD. Six months after the initial presentation, the IOP was within reference limits but aqueous flare (+1) was persistent and preiridal fibrovascular membranes and secluded pupil were noted OD. Complete retinal degeneration was confirmed OS (Fig 4) . One year after the initial presentation, a mild aqueous flare (+1) and mature cataract were noticed OD.

Endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis is an uncommon condition seldom reported in veterinary medicine and includes only one case in a cat (Westermeyer et al. 2013) , two cases in dogs (Massa et al. 2002 , Ledbetter et al. 2009 ) and five cases in horses (Blogg et al. 1983 , Reuss et al. 2009 , Priest et al. 2012 . In a recent report, an endogenous endophthalmitis secondary to Actinomyces following multiple dental extractions was described in a cat (Westermeyer et al. 2013) . Other bacteria, such as Brucella canis, Staphylococcus intermedius, Rhodococcus equi and Borrelia burgdorferi, were isolated from aqueous or vitreous humour in dogs and horses (Blogg et al. 1983 , Massa et al. 2002 , Ledbetter et al. 2009 , Reuss et al. 2009 , Priest et al. 2012 . In humans, endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis is a rare, but well-documented, condition (Binder et al. 2003 , Jackson et al. 2003 . It accounts for 2 to 8% of all cases of endophthalmitis (Callegan et al. 2002) . Causes include abscesses, pneumonia, endocarditis, soft tissue infections, urinary tract infections, meningo-encephalitis, septic arthritis, orbital cellulitis and peritonitis (Jackson et al. 2003) . In the present case, all these potential causes were investigated and eventually ruled out. However, in humans, the primary infection site is often not identified. In two case series, the infection site could be identified in only 42 and 79% of patients, respectively (Binder et al. 2003 , Jackson et al. 2003 . It is worth noting that blood culture was considered by some authors as the most

Bacterial endophthalmitis in humans is known to have a poor visual outcome (Binder et al. 2003 , Jackson et al. 2003 , Schiedler et al. 2004 . It depends on several prognostic factors: delay to diagnosis, type of organism involved, time to treatment initiation, visual acuity at initial presentation and presence of retinal detachment or hypopion (Khan et al. 2002 , Binder et al. 2003 . E. faecalis infection is associated with a poor outcome (Scott et al. 2003 , Chen et al. 2009 , Rishi et al. 2009 ).

In conclusion, to the authors' knowledge, this is the first described case of vision loss secondary to endogenous endophthalmitis with isolation of E. faecalis in a cat, with preservation of both globes over a 1-year follow-up.

Discospondylitis associated with three unreported bacteria in the dog

Endogenous endophthalmitis: an 18-year review of culture-positive cases at a tertiary care center

Blindness caused by Rhodococcus equi infection in a foal

Diseases and surgery of the canine vitreous

Bacterial endophthalmitis: epidemiology, therapeutics and bacterium-host interactions

Postcataract endophthalmitis caused by Enterococcus faecalis

A retrospective study of the clinical presentation of 140 dogs and 39 cats with bacteraemia

Endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis: a 17-year prospective series and review of 267 reported cases

Prevalence, species distribution and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from dogs and cats in the United States

The eye in systemic sepsis

Brucella canis endophthalmitis in 3 dogs: clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment

Characterization of a Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis (VREF) isolate from a dog with mastitis: further evidence of a clonage lineage of VREF in New Zealand

Causes of uveitis in dogs: 102 cases

Guideline for the optimal use of blood cultures

Treatment of a lower urinary tract infection in a cat caused by a multi-drug methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Enterococcus faecalis

Diagnosis of Borrelia-associated uveitis in two horses

Microbiological profile of culture proven cases of exogenous and endogenous endophthalmitis: a 10-year retrospective study

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics Part 1: drug deliver

Extrapulmonary disorders associated with Rhodococcus equi infection in foals: 150 cases (1987-2007)

Endophthalmitis causes by Enterococcus faecalis

Culture-proven endogenous endophthalmitis: clinical features and visual acuity outcomes

Endophthalmitis caused by Enterococcus faecalis

Enterococcal infections and antimicrobial resistance

Spontaneous vegetative endocarditis due to Enterococcus faecalis in a rottweiler puppy

A case of endogenous Enterococcus faecalis endophthalmitis

Actinomyces endogenous endophthalmitis in a cat following multiple dental extractions

The authors want to thank Dr Federico Vilaplana, Dr Guillaume Payen, Dr Goedele Storms, Dr Céline Molas, Pr Henri-Jean Boulouis, Dr Christelle Maurey and Dr Ghita Benchekroun for their suggestions and Dr Marc Chodkiewicz for careful editing of this paper.

None of the authors of this article has a financial or personal relationship with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.