key: cord-0325707-q6yvh9zc authors: Metwaly, Galal Yahya; Wu, Yehui; Peplowska, Karolina; Röhrl, Jennifer; Soh, Young-Min; Bürmann, Frank; Gruber, Stephan; Storchova, Zuzana title: Phospho-regulation of the Shugoshin - Condensin interaction at the centromere in budding yeast date: 2019-12-16 journal: bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2019.12.16.877894 sha: a95791e5ed150c96d4e5be45a8b55642ff87bd99 doc_id: 325707 cord_uid: q6yvh9zc Correct bioriented attachment of sister chromatids to mitotic spindle is essential for chromosome segregation. The conserved protein shugoshin (Sgo1) contributes in budding yeast to biorientation by recruiting the protein phosphatase PP2A-Rts1 and the condensin complex to centromeres. Using peptide prints, we identified a Serine-Rich Motif (SRM) of Sgo1 that mediates the interaction with condensin and is essential for centromeric condensin recruitment and the establishment of biorientation. We show that the interaction is regulated via phosphorylation within the SRM and we determined the phospho-sites using mass spectrometry. Analysis of the phosphomimicking and phosphoresistant mutants revealed that SRM phosphorylation disrupts the shugoshin – condensin interaction. We present an evidence that Mps1, a central kinase in the spindle assembly checkpoint, directly phosphorylates Sgo1 within the SRM to regulate the interaction with condensin and thereby condensin localization to centromeres. Our findings identify novel mechanisms that control shugoshin activity at the centromere in budding yeast. Author summary Proper chromosome segregation in eukaryotes is ensured through correct attachment of the spindle microtubules to the centromeric chromosomal regions. The attachment is mediated via the multimolecular proteinaceous complex called kinetochore and precisely regulated. This enables the establishment of so called bioirentation, when each sister chromatid is attached to microtubules emanating from opposite spindle poles. Shugoshin (Sgo1) is a conserved centromeric protein that facilitates biorientation through its interactions with the protein phosphatase PP2A/Rts1, chromosome passanger complex and centromeric condensin. Here, we identified a serin-rich motif that is required for the interaction of shugoshin with the condensin complex. We show that loss of this region impairs condensin enrichment at the centromere, chromosome biorientation, segregation as well as the function of the chromosome passanger complex in the error correction. Moreover, the interaction is phosphoregulated, as phosphorylation of the serin-rich motif on Sgo1 disrupts its interaction with condensin. Finally, we show that the conserved spindle assembly checkpoint kinase Mps1 is responsible for this phosphorylation. Our findings uncover novel regulatory mechanisms that facilitate proper chromosome segregation. Biorientation of sister chromatids relies on two major processes. First, spindle and kinetochore geometry facilitates the capture of sister kinetochores (KT) by microtubules (MTs) emanating from the opposite spindle poles (1, 2) . Second, destabilization of incorrect, tension-less interactions between KTs and MTs allows error correction (3), while the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) holds the progress through mitosis until bioriented sister kinetochore attachments are achieved (4) . Several proteins, whose activity must be tightly regulated and coordinated, are required for these processes. Among these proteins are so-called shugoshins, a poorly conserved family of proteins with an important function in establishment of biorientation in mitosis and meiosis (5) . A body of evidence determined shugoshins as protectors of centromeric cohesion from separase cleavage during meiosis (e.g. (6) ). Shugoshins also prevent cohesion loss at the centromere during mammalian mitosis, although via a distinct mechanism that affects the prophase pathway (7) . These activities are carried out through the recruitment of a protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A-Rts1 in budding yeast, PP2A-B56 in mammalian cells) that reduces cohesin removal via its dephosphorylation (8) . Shugoshin proteins also recruit additional proteins to the centromeres, such as the chromosome passenger complex (CPC), MCAK (mitotic centromere-associated kinesin)/Kif2A kinesin motor, and condensin (5) . The activity of shugoshins thereby facilitates centromeric conformation, 4 establishment of biorientation, tension sensing and correction of aberrant MT-KT attachments. Budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes one Sgo1 variant. Similarly as in other species, Sgo1 localizes to the centromeric chromatin by binding to histone H2A phosphorylated on serine 121 (T120 in human) by the SAC kinase Bub1 (9) . This interaction is mediated by a basic region, one of the two conserved regions of shugoshin proteins (Fig. 1A) . Mps1, a central kinase in the SAC, is also required for the localization of shugoshin to the pericentromere in budding yeast (10) . The interaction between Rts1, the regulatory subunit of PP2A, and Sgo1 is essential for the majority of known Sgo1 functions. Mutational analysis determined a region within the N-terminal coiled-coil domain of Sgo1 that is weakly conserved among species and mediates the interaction with Rts1(8) (11, 12) (13, 14) . Sgo1 also contains an unusual D-box-related sequence motif near its C-terminus that directs its APC/cyclosome dependent degradation at the end of anaphase (Fig. 1A) (13) . Another function of Sgo1 is to maintain centromeric enrichment of Ipl1/Aurora B, the kinase subunit of the CPC (9, 12, 14, 15) , although the specific region of Sgo1 that is required for this function remains enigmatic. Additionally, Sgo1 recruits condensin to the budding yeast centromere (14, 16) . There is only limited understanding of the nature of the interaction between shugoshin and condensin and its regulation. The Sgo1-condensin interaction is not dependent on DNA, suggesting that complex formation between Sgo1 and condensin does not require association with chromatin (16) . Therefore, we hypothesized that there is a direct interaction between Sgo1 and subunits of the multi-subunit complex condensin. Moreover, given the importance of the condensin localization to the kinetochore for correct chromosome segregation, we hypothesized that this interaction might be regulated by spindle assembly checkpoint kinases. To determine how Sgo1 recruits condensin to the centromeric region, we identified a region within Sgo1 that is essential for interaction with condensin in vitro. We demonstrate that a loss of the interaction motif impairs localization of condensin to the centromeres in vivo. The Sgo1 mutations that fail to recruit condensin to the centromeres also negatively affect sister chromatid biorientation and segregation. Finally, we determine that the 5 interaction of Sgo1 with condensin is phosphoregulated. Based on our results we postulate that, in budding yeast, tightly regulated presence of condensin on centromeres is essential for correct chromosome segregation and is mediated via its interaction with Sgo1. To identify the regions responsible for the Sgo1 -condensin interactions, we prepared a peptide array of 15 amino acid peptides with four amino acids phase shifts covering the full length of Sgo1. The membrane with the spotted peptide array was then incubated with the condensin complex that was purified via the Smc2-TEV-HaloTag-TwinStrep tag from budding yeast (Fig. 1B) . Interacting condensin complex bound to Sgo1 peptides was detected by far western via immunoblotting with an anti-V5 antibody that recognizes Smc4-V5-His6. We identified two putative regions of interaction between Sgo1 and condensin complex (Fig. 1C) . To validate the results, we repeated the peptide print specifically for the identified regions at a higher resolution. As a control, we performed identical far western using the same purification procedure, but from an untagged yeast strain (Fig. S1A ). This experiment confirmed the interaction of purified condensin with the Sgo1 peptides that covered an area from 137 to 163 amino acid (L 137 KRTSSRSRSCSLSSPTYSKSYTRLSN 163 ) (Fig. 1D ). To reflect its amino acid composition, we named this area Serine-Rich Motif (SRM). Other regions were not confirmed to interact with condensin in the secondary analysis (Fig. S1B ). To further corroborate the interaction, GST-fused Sgo1 and its mutants purified from E. coli (Fig. S1C) were used in pull down experiments to determine the interaction with condensin as well as with Rts1, the regulatory subunit of the phosphatase PP2A that binds the coiled-coil domain of Sgo1. We found that the full length Sgo1-GST pulls down Ycg1-3FLAG and Smc2-6HA, two subunits of the condensin complex, and Rts1-9Myc, as previously observed (Fig. 1E) . Deletion of the SRM (aa 137-163) significantly reduced the interaction with condensin subunits (Fig. 1E) . The Serine-Rich Motif alone as well as a larger fragment of Sgo1 containing SRM (101-200 aa) was not sufficient to pull down 6 condensin subunits, while the N-terminal region of Sgo1, amino acids 1 -163, interacted with both condensin and Rts1 (Fig. 1F ). We found that Sgo1 N51I mutant that cannot bind Rts1 maintains its ability to interact with condensin (Fig. 1F) . Taken together, we have identified a region of Sgo1 137 LKRTSSRSRSCSLSSPTYSKSYTRLSN 163 that is required for condensin binding. The identified serine-rich motif (SRM) is essential, but not sufficient for the interaction. Only the fragments that contain in addition the first 100 amino acids of Sgo1, with an extensive coiled coil domain that is required for Sgo1 dimerization (11) , can interact with condensin in a pull-down assay. This is consistent with the notion that homodimerization of Sgo1 is a prerequisite of binding to condensin. In contrast, mutant Sgo1 that cannot bind PP2A-Rts1 remains positive for condensin binding in vitro. Taken together, the serine-rich motif (SRM) in the N-terminal region of Sgo1 presents a novel functional domain of Sgo1 protein. To determine whether the SRM region functions in chromosome segregation, we created a series of deletions of different sizes around the SRM and used the constructs to replace the endogenous SGO1 allele in haploid yeasts ( Fig. 2A ). All mutants that lacked the SRM became sensitive to the microtubule depolymerizing drug benomyl to a similar degree as a strain lacking Sgo1. Additionally, all strains lacking the SRM were highly sensitive to the Cik1-cc overexpression that triggers formation of syntelic microtubule-kinetochore attachments at a high frequency (17) . In contrast, a deletion of amino acids 201 -310 did not affect the growth of yeast in the presence of benomyl or upon overexpression of Cik1cc (Fig. 2B) . Additionally, loss of SRM increased chromosome missegregation as monitored by segregation of chromosome IV carrying a tetO array and labeled with TetR-GFP (Fig. S2A ). The mutants lacking SRM were also not able to maintain the SAC activation and cell cycle arrest in the absence of tension on KTs that was generated by induced loss of sister chromatid cohesion (Fig. S2B) . This together demonstrates that the SRM region is required for correct chromosome segregation and centromeric functions as well as for a functional SAC in response to the lack of tension. 7 If SRM mediates the interaction of Sgo1 with the condensin complex, then its deletion should reduce the accumulation of condensin on centromeres. First, we used spinning disc confocal microscopy to determine whether the mutant Sgo1-GFP lacking SRM localizes to the centromeres. Indeed, the Sgo1 Δ101-301 lacking the SRM localizes between the two spindle poles similarly as wt Sgo1-GFP. This is in a striking contrast to Sgo1 T379D mutant that carries a mutation in the basic region that is responsible for the interaction with the phosphorylated H2A (Fig. 2C) . The correct localization of the Sgo1 lacking SRM is further confirmed by the fact that Rts1 localizes to the centromeres in strains carrying the sgo1 Δ101-310 mutation as efficiently as in the wild type strains ( The evidence so far suggests that Sgo1 serves as a platform for recruitment of Rts1-PP2A and condensin to the centromere. We asked whether these functions are the essential functions of Sgo1 in mitosis. To this end, we created the "Sgo1-mini" protein that consists of the coiled-coil region required for its dimerization and interaction with Rts1 (aa 44 -84), the SRM important for the recruitment of condensin (aa 137 -163) and the H2A-binding motif within the basic region that ensures localization of Sgo1 to the centromere (aa 364 -391). The functional motifs were joined with linkers of 10 amino acids of random sequence. Additionally, we added the C-terminal SV40 nuclear localization signal (NLS) that was previously used to guide Sgo1 to the nucleus ( Fig. 3A ) (18) . The construct "sgo1-mini" was further fused with eGFP and integrated at the 8 endogenous locus under the control of the Sgo1 promoter. Live cell imaging revealed that Sgo1-mini localizes to the vicinity of the metaphase spindles, although the localization is somewhat impaired in comparison to the wild type (Fig. 3B ). To test whether Sgo1-mini maintains the ability to interact with the PP2A/Rts1 and condensin, a GST-tagged version of Sgo1-mini was over-expressed and purified from Escherichia coli BL-21 cells (Fig. S2E ) for a GST-pulldown assay and incubated with yeast extracts. This showed that Sgo1-mini interacted with Rts1 and with the condensin subunits Ycg1 and Smc2, although weaker than the full length Sgo1 (Fig. 3C) . Remarkably, Sgo1-mini partially rescued the growth defects of sgo1∆ cells on benomyl plates as well as the sensitivity of sgo1∆ cells to high levels of syntelic attachments caused by Cik1-cc overexpression (Fig. 3D ). An equivalent of the N51I mutation that abolishes the interaction with Rts1, and the T379D mutation that impairs centromeric localization of Sgo1, completely abolished the ability of Sgo1-mini to rescue yeast growth under conditions inducing frequent chromosome missegregation (Fig. 3D) . Thus, recruitment of the condensin and PP2A to the pericentric region of yeast chromosomes are among the key functions of Sgo1 in mitosis. The identified SRM that is required for Sgo1 interaction with condensin is rich in residues that can be modified by phosphorylation. Since yeast Sgo1 is readily phosphorylated (Fig. S3A , B), we asked whether phosphorylation within SRM affects the Sgo1-condensin interaction. Indeed, treatment of cell lysates with phosphatase prior to in vivo condensin pulldown increased the amount of recovered Sgo1, suggesting a stronger Sgo-condensin interaction. Strikingly, condensin pulldown from cells harboring sgo1-N51I shows diminished interaction ( Fig. 4A and (14)), supporting the idea that PP2A-Rts1 activity is crucial for the interaction between Sgo1 and condensin. This is in agreement with our previous finding that centromeric localization of condensin was dramatically lost in these cells (14) . To further confirm that the Sgo1 pool that engages condensin at centromeres is in non-phosphorylated form, we isolated the condensin-bound and the condensinunbound fractions of Sgo1. The fractions were resolved by Phostag TM SDS-PAGE to explore their phosphorylation pattern. While the majority of the Sgo1 input and the condensin-unbound Sgo1 appeared to be extensively phosphorylated based on a slow 9 migration in the gel, the condensin-bound Sgo1 exhibited similar migration pattern as a phosphatase treated Sgo1 (Fig. 4B ). Next, we asked whether phosphomimetic or phosphoresistant mutations affect the function of Sgo1. While mutation of all S and T sites to phosphoresistant alanine (sgo1-13A) did not affect the sensitivity of yeast cells to benomyl, the strain carrying phosphomimetic mutations (sgo1-13E) was highly sensitive to benomyl (Fig. 4C) . This was not because of defective Sgo1 localization, as both mutants localized similarly as the wild type protein (Fig. 4D , F) and were expressed to the same level (Fig. S4A) . Strikingly, the sgo1-13E failed to interact with condensin in a pulldown experiment (Fig. 4E ) and the localization of condensin to the centromere was significantly impaired, while the phosphoresistant mutant showed no discernible phenotype ( Fig. 4E -G). Based on these findings, we conclude that the SRM motif of Sgo1 bound to condensin is largely unphosphorylated and that PP2A-Rts1directly or indirectly modulates the phosphorylation state. To determine whether there are individual sites within the SRM responsible for the phosphoregulation, we performed mass spectrometry of Sgo1 purified from yeast cells arrested in mitosis by the spindle poison nocodazole. This analysis revealed multiple potential phosphorylation sites, among them three sites located within the SRM region, namely S148, S151 and T159, an S421/423 site, and three sites, S487, S518 and S522 near the destruction box (Fig. 5A) . To evaluate the function of these sites in chromosome segregation, we constructed a series of yeast strains containing single mutations or their combinations either to phosphoresistant variants with the S/T residues changed to A, or to phosphomimicking variants with the S/T residues changed to E. Phosphomimicking and phosphoresistant mutants of Sgo1 on S421 alone or combined with S423 showed only subtle changes in sensitivity to benomyl or Cik1-cc overexpression and were not further evaluated (data not shown). Mutation of all three sites near the destruction box affected the stability of the Sgo1 protein without altering its localization or localization of condensin nor changed the cellular sensitivity to benomyl (Fig. S4 B-F) . This is in line with the previous findings that chromosome segregation in budding yeast mitosis is not substantially affected by the stability and abundance of Sgo1 (13). 10 To determine whether there are phosphosites that affect the Sgo1-condensin interaction, we focused on the sites identified within the SRM. Analysis of the phosphoresistant mutants of the sites S148A, S151A and T159A or their combination showed no discernible phenotypes on plates containing benomyl (Fig. 5B ). In contrast, the phosphomimicking S151E and T159E markedly increased the sensitivity of yeasts to benomyl, while mutation of S148 did not affect the phenotype (Fig. 5B) . The increased benomyl sensitivity is not due to altered Sgo1 structure, because a change of the S/T residues to another bulky or charged amino acid residue did not affect the phenotype (Fig. S4G ). Next, we asked whether the mutations of the phosphosites affects the localization of condensin subunits to the centromeric regions. To this end, we analyzed Smc2-GFP localization in Sgo1 phosphomimetic and phosphoresistant mutants. Indeed, Smc2-GFP was mislocalized in a significant fraction of the cells carrying the sgo1 T159E mutation and, to a lesser extent, in sgo1 S151E mutant (Fig. 5C, D) . In contrast, the SMC2-GFP localization was not discernably altered in the phosphoresistant mutants compared to the wild type Sgo1 (Fig. 5C, D) . Finally, we tested the interaction between Sgo1 mutants and condensin subunits in a pull down experiment. This experiment revealed that the T159E mutation decreased the ability of Sgo1 to interact with the Smc2-GFP subunit of condensin (Fig. 5E ). The interaction between Sgo1 T151E and Smc2-GFP was also partially diminished, although to a lesser extent, reflecting the changes observed in condensin localization (compare Fig. 5C , D, E). Importantly, none of these mutations affected the localization of Sgo1 nor the ability of Sgo1 to interact with Rts1 ( Fig. S4H and data not shown). Based on these results we conclude that the interaction of Sgo1 with condensin is regulated by phosphorylation of the SRM region on the S151 and T159 residues. An open question remains what kinase phosphorylates Sgo1 in the SRM region. We monitored the phosphorylation status of Sgo1 in vivo in yeast strains carrying deletions, temperature sensitive or analog sensitive alleles of mitotic kinases Bub1, Ipl1 and Mps1 that are known to affect the Sgo1 function (10, (19) (20) (21) . While we did not observe any striking changes in the phosphorylation pattern of Sgo1 in the absence of Bub1 and Ipl1 11 kinase activity, we noticed a loss of phosphorylation upon Mps1 inhibition (Fig. S3 C-G) . Therefore, we asked whether Mps1 kinase can phosphorylate Sgo1. By in vitro kinase assay we determined that Mps1-GST purified from E. coli phosphorylates purified Sgo1-GST. Interestingly, human Mps1-GST also phosphorylates Sgo1 from yeast, while the kinase dead mutant loses this ability (Fig. 5F) . Additionally, by immunoprecipitation experiments we determined that in budding yeast Sgo1 interacts with the Mps1 kinase. This interaction is independent of the kinase activity, as inhibition of the kinase activity of Mps1-as (22) by adding the ATP analog 1NM-PP1 did not abolish the interaction (Fig. 5G ). Taken together, our data suggest that Sgo1 is directly phosphorylated by Mps1 and this phosphorylation negatively affects the Sgo1-condensin interaction. Shugoshin proteins have an important role in establishing biorientation during mitosis and meiosis that is executed via coordinated interaction with several proteins at the centromere and the pericentric regions of chromosomes. In budding yeast, Sgo1 also facilitates centromeric localization of condensin and this localization is essential for correct biorientation of sister chromatids (14, 16) . This is likely due to the function of condensin, together with cohesin, in establishing the spatial configuration of the pericentric chromatin, which is essential for building functional kinetochore (23) . By identification of the interacting region of Sgo1, we were able to create separation-offunction mutations that allowed us to study the consequences of the lack of Sgo1condensin interaction separately from other Sgo1 functions. Our findings demonstrate that the pericentric enrichment of condensin that is mediated by Sgo1 is required not only for the spatial bias of sister kinetochores that promotes biorientation (16) , but also for tension sensing and error correction. Condensin together with cohesin was previously proposed to build a centromeric spring that balances the forces on the metaphase spindle and might be required for tension sensing. Our observations provide additional support for this model (23) . Chromosome condensation is also essential for spatial organization and successful partitioning of metaphase chromosomes. Our results further emphasize the importance of Sgo1 for this processes highlighted by recent findings that upon deletion of a centromere from yeast chromosomes, Sgo1 cannot facilitate the condensation of chromosomes (24) . Our data show that the newly identified Serine-Rich Motif of Sgo1 is required for the interaction with condensin and for its localization to the centromeres, while condensin localization to rDNA remains unaffected (Fig. 2E, 4G, S4H) . It should be noted that the localization of the condensin at the centromere, while severally impaired, is not completely abolished in the SRM deletion and the 13E mutant. This suggests that there might be another binding site within Sgo1 that was missed in our analysis. For example, the peptide array would not identify interacting domains that are larger than 15 amino acids, or that rely on the tertiary structure of Sgo1. Mutations of Sgo1 that reduce the centromeric localization of condensin lead to defects in chromosome segregation as well as in error correction that leads to SAC activation, and this defect is comparable to a defect observed upon loss of sgo1 (Fig. 2B, S2A,B) . Although we cannot exclude that the loss of SRM does not affect interaction of Sgo1 with other proteins or impairing their activity, our current results suggest that the main defect in SRM is the condensin mislocalization. Therefore, we conclude that the defect in SAC activation is not due to mislocalized CPC with its catalytically active Ipl1 subunit, because lack of SRM does not appear to affect Ipl1 localization. We propose that the correct condensin localization, mediated by its interaction with Sgo1, is required for tension sensing on the MT-KT attachment, most likely via maintaining the spring-like structure of pericentric chromatin that was proposed to contribute to the spindle function (23, 25) . Phosphoregulation of the Sgo1-condensin interaction could explain how Sgo1 can facilitates both recruitment of condensin to the centromere in metaphase (14, 16) as well as the spreading of the condensation signal to the chromosome arms in late metaphase (24) . Here we demonstrate that Sgo1 interacts with condensin only when the SRM motif remains unphosphorylated (Fig. 4) . This unphosphorylated state can be achieved by active dephosphorylation, for example by the interacting phosphatase PP2A (11) . In this scenario, PP2A dephosphorylates the SRM within Sgo1, thereby regulating the Sgo1condensin interaction. Indeed, previous data showed that PP2A-Rts1 is crucial for Sgo1- 13 condensin interaction and as well as condensin localization (14); Verzijlbergen et al., 2014 and this work). However, shugoshins have not been identified as putative substrates in the previous studies of PP2A targets (26, 27) . Another possibility is that binding of Sgo1 to condensin or to PP2A protects the SRM from phosphorylation. An important question arising from our results was the identity of the kinase that phosphorylates the SRM of Sgo1. Using an in vitro kinase assay and in vivo pull down, we show that the conserved SAC kinase Mps1 interacts with Sgo1 and phosphorylates this protein. Moreover, mass spectrometry determined phosphosites within the SRM motif that were sensitive to the Mps1 activity. This is in agreement with previous studies that suggested that Mps1 kinase directly or indirectly affects the function of Sgo1 (10, 21) . We propose that the phosphorylation of Sgo1 by Mps1 might be essential for the release of the condensin load to free the Sgo1 platform to acquire new cargo. In this model, both PP2A-Rts1 and Mps1 fine-tune Sgo1 function and modulate recruitment of proteins required for biorentation. While PP2A phosphatase activity safeguards the efficient Sgo1condensin interaction, Mps1 kinase activity is required to release the condensin load. We further suggest that the interaction between Sgo1 and condensin on yeast centromeres is the default state during mitosis that becomes disrupted by phosphorylation. Our hypothetical model is that the SRM cannot be phosphorylated when bound to condensin for steric reasons or due to the PP2A-Rts1 mediated dephosphorylation. This model envisions a biorientation machinery where PP2A-Rts1 protection counteracts Mps1 mediated phosphorylation of Sgo1 SRM to orchestrate dynamic condensin loading on the centromere that is essential to create biorientation microenvironment. Increasing tension on the kinetochore and pericentric chromatin may then lead to chromatin stretching, which allows phosphorylation of the SRM. The phosphorylation would then disable the Sgo1condensin interaction upon successful biorientation and might coincide with the metaphase-to-anaphase transition and Sgo1 removal from centromeres. All yeast strains were derived from the genetic background of W303 or BY4743 and are listed in Supplementary Table S1 . All plasmids used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S2 . Sgo1-mini, Sgo1-13A and Sgo1-13E DNA sequences were synthesized at Integrated DNA Technologies (Belgium). Exponentially growing yeast cells were harvested, resuspended in 100 µl lysis buffer and incubated 10 min on ice. 40 µl 100% TCA was added and incubated for 10 min on ice. Precipitated proteins were spun down for 10 min at 4°C, 13 000. The pellet was washed with 1 ml ice-cold acetone, dried at 50°C for 5-20 min and resuspended in 50 µl 2x Laemmli buffer. Protein lysates were boiled for 5 min at 96°C. Exponentially growing yeast cells were harvested, washed with cold PBS, and 300 μl yeast lysis buffer was added and resuspended completely. The tube was filled with 0.5 mm ZIRCONIA/SILICA beads (Biospec) and processed in a bead-beater 6x for 1 min and 30 Hz, with a 5 min break in between each beating. The tubes were pierced, placed in a 15 falcon tube and spun down for 2 min at 1000 rpm. The lysate was transferred to a fresh tube, 30 μl NP-40 (10% stock) was added, rotated for 30 min at 4°C and centrifuged for 5 min at 4°C and 5000 rpm. The supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube. 100 μl PierceTM Glutathione Magnetic Beads (Thermo Scientific) and 100 μg protein in 500 μl 1x PBS were mixed and rotated for 1 h at 4°C, followed with 3x washing with 600 μl GST washing/binding buffer 10 min and 2x with yeast lysis buffer (5 min) with yeast lysis buffer. Yeast lysate was added to the beads and rotated for 2 h at 4°C. The protein lysate was removed and the beads were washed 2x for 5 min with Washing buffer 1 and 1x for 5 min with Washing buffer 2. The proteins were eluted with 50 μl elution buffer and mixed with 50 μl 4x Laemmli buffer. Samples and the beads were boiled for 5 min at 96°C. These experiments were performed as previously described (14) . Approximately 100 OD 600 of log-phase cells grown exponentially in YPD were harvested and washed twice with water then lysed by beating with 0.5-mm-diameter glass beads (Sigma-Aldrich) and ice cold, freshly prepared native lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 0.5% Triton X-100, 200 mM NaCl, 1X protease inhibitor mix, 1 mM 1,10 phenanthroline, 16 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM iodoacetamide). To pulldown GFP-tagged proteins, lysates were incubated for 2 hours at 4°C with 25 μL GFP-Trap coupled agarose beads (Chromotek). After incubation, the agarose beads were washed three times in lysis buffer before samples were eluted with 2X SDS sample buffer. Nitrocellulose membranes were probed with rat anti-GFP (3H9, Chromotek, 1:2,500), PAP (Sigma-Aldrich, 1: 2,500), and mouse anti-HA (Y-11, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:2,500) primary antibodies. Phospho-affinity gel electrophoresis was performed using Phos-tag ™ acrylamide 7.5% (w/v) running gels polymerized with 50 μM Phos-tag ™ acrylamide (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) and 100 μM MnCl 2. Gel running and transfer conditions were optimized according to the manufacturer's protocol. Exponentially growing yeast cells were imaged by a fully automated Zeiss inverted microscope (AxioObserver Z1) equipped with a MS-2000 stage (Applied Scientific Instrumentation, USA), the CSU-X1 spinning disk confocal head (Yokogawa, Herrsching), LaserStack Launch with selectable laser lines (Intelligent Imaging Innovations, USA) and an X-CITE Fluorescent Illumination System. Images were captured using a CoolSnap HQ camera (Roper Scientific, Canada) under the control of the Slidebook software (Intelligent Imaging Innovations, USA). The fluorescence signal was imaged with a 63x oil objective by using a 473 nm or 561 nm laser. A total of 10 z-stacks were collected at 0.5 µm optical sections. A centromeric localization signal was considered "positive" when the signal intensity on line connecting the two SPBs exceeded the intensity of the average nuclear signal. Condensin was purified from yeast strain YSG0168 (Mata, Smc2-TEVs-HaloTag-TwinStrep::HIS3, Smc4-V5-His6::TRP1). An over-night culture in YPAD medium was inoculated from a single colony. Cells were diluted into 2 L of fresh medium to an OD600 Sgo1 peptide arrays were synthesized automatically using SPOT technology with the MultiPep instrument from INTAVIS Bioanalytical Instruments AG as previously (28) . To identify the binding sites of Sgo1 for condensin complex protein, 15-mer peptides with 4mer shift of Sgo1 were synthesized on a membrane. The peptide array membrane was blocked with 5% skim milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature, then SV5-PK antibody. The membrane was then washed extensively with TBST before the anti-mouse antibody was added. The membrane was incubated with the antibody at room temperature for another 1 hour prior to standard chemiluminescent detection. To identify the phosphosites on Sgo1, the TAP-tagged protein was overexpressed from a GAL1 promoter for 180 min followed by treatment with nocodazole for 120 min to arrest the overexpressing cells in mitosis. The protein was purified in presence of phosphatases by calmodulin pulldown, eluted with EGTA and separated by PAGE followed by 18 Coomassie staining. The band corresponding to the expected size of Sgo1-TAP was cut from the gel and subjected to the analysis. Mass spectrometry identification of phosphosites on the isolated protein was performed by Nagarunja Nagaraj at the Mass Spectrometry Core Facility at the MPI Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany, as previously described (29). Gnad Supplementary Table 1 Yeast strains used and created in this study Budding yeast mitotic chromosomes have an intrinsic bias to biorient on the spindle Adaptive changes in the kinetochore architecture facilitate proper spindle assembly Regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments through homeostatic control during mitosis The Molecular Biology of Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Signaling Dynamics Shugoshins: tension-sensitive pericentromeric adaptors safeguarding chromosome segregation The conserved kinetochore protein shugoshin protects centromeric cohesion during meiosis Shugoshin prevents dissociation of cohesin from centromeres during mitosis in vertebrate cells PP2A is required for centromeric localization of Sgo1 and proper chromosome segregation Phosphorylation of H2A by Bub1 prevents chromosomal instability through localizing shugoshin Mps1 mediate a distinct pathway for chromosome biorientation in budding yeast Structure and function of the PP2A-shugoshin interaction Tension-dependent removal of pericentromeric shugoshin is an indicator of sister chromosome biorientation Sgo1 recruits PP2A to chromosomes to ensure sister chromatid bi-orientation during mitosis Sgo1 regulates both condensin and Ipl1/Aurora B to promote chromosome biorientation Tension sensing by Aurora B kinase is independent of survivin-based centromere localization Shugoshin biases chromosomes for biorientation through condensin recruitment to the pericentromere Loss of Function of the Cik1/Kar3 Motor Complex Results in Chromosomes with Syntelic Attachment That Are Sensed by the Tension Checkpoint Control of Shugoshin function during fission-yeast meiosis Phosphorylation of mammalian Sgo2 by Aurora B recruits PP2A and MCAK to centromeres Phosphorylation-enabled binding of SGO1-PP2A to cohesin protects sororin and centromeric cohesion during mitosis Kinase 1 Coordinates Cohesin Cleavage, Gametogenesis, and Exit from M Phase in Meiosis II Cohesin, condensin, and the intramolecular centromere loop together generate the mitotic chromatin spring Centromeres License the Mitotic Condensation of Yeast Chromosome Arms Pericentric chromatin loops function as a nonlinear spring in mitotic force balance PP2ARts1 is a master regulator of pathways that control cell size Expanding the PP2A Interactome by Defining a B56-Specific SLiM PNA microarrays for hybridisation of unlabelled DNA samples We are thankful to Mark Winey and Sabine Elowe for providing plasmids and strains. We