key: cord-0252434-xwlwik70
authors: Tomo, Sojit; Karli, Sreenivasulu; Dharmalingam, Karthick; Yadav, Dharmveer; Sharma, Praveen
title: The Clinical Laboratory: A Key Player in Diagnosis and Management of COVID-19
date: 2020-11-20
journal: EJIFCC
DOI: nan
sha: fe17f585202bf7b097621c1789d5b25f8b2a8fc2
doc_id: 252434
cord_uid: xwlwik70

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), had emerged as a pandemic affecting almost all countries in the world in a short span after it was first reported in December. Clinical laboratory have a crucial role in mitigating this new pandemic. Timely and accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 is of paramount importance for detecting cases early and to prevent transmission. Clinical Laboratories have adopted different test modalities and processes to tackle this unprecedented situation with directives from regulatory bodies such as the WHO. The varying presentations, as well as complications attributed to comorbidities in COVID-19, have created hurdles in the management of these patients. Various clinical laboratory parameters have been investigated for their potential for diagnosis and prognosis of the disease, prediction of complications and monitoring of treatment response. Different routine and uncommon parameters have been shown to have the diagnostic and prognostic capacity. This update discusses the role of the laboratory in diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of treatment response. Different methodologies for diagnostic testing as well as various clinical laboratory parameters having diagnostic and predictive powers have been discussed. This compilation organises relevant available information on various clinical laboratory parameters and their role in COVID-19 mitigating pandemic.

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), had emerged as a pandemic affecting almost all countries in the world in a short span after it was first reported in December. Clinical laboratory have a crucial role in mitigating this new pandemic. Timely and accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 is of paramount importance for detecting cases early and to prevent transmission. Clinical Laboratories have adopted different test modalities and processes to tackle this unprecedented situation with directives from regulatory bodies such as the WHO. The varying presentations, as well as complications attributed to comorbidities in COVID-19, have created hurdles in the management of these patients. Various clinical laboratory parameters have been investigated for their potential for diagnosis and prognosis of the disease, prediction of complications and monitoring of treatment response. Different routine and uncommon parameters have been shown to have the diagnostic and prognostic capacity. This update discusses the role of the laboratory in diagnosis, prognosis and Sojit Tomo, Sreenivasulu Karli, Karthick Dharmalingam, Dharmveer Yadav, Praveen Sharma The clinical laboratory: a key player in diagnosis and management of monitoring of treatment response. Different methodologies for diagnostic testing as well as various clinical laboratory parameters having diagnostic and predictive powers have been discussed. This compilation organises relevant available information on various clinical laboratory parameters and their role in COVID-19 mitigating pandemic.

Novel Coronavirus induced pneumonia, which was given the name of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by the WHO on the 11th of February 2020, has rapidly amplified to the full scale of a pandemic since it was first reported in Wuhan, China, back in December 2019 (1, 2) . COVID-19 is the clinical syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The disease signifies a respiratory syndrome starting from mild upper respiratory illness to severe pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). SARS-CoV-2 belongs to the beta coronavirus genus of the coronaviruses. Although Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) also belongs to the same genus, SARS-CoV-2 leads to milder infections.

However, SARS-CoV-2 have a broader community transmission when compared with SARS and MERS. Hence, laboratory testing is of paramount importance to distinguish between COVID-19 and other respiratory diseases. Moreover, extensive testing will help in COVID diagnosis and a better understanding of disease prevalence in asymptomatic infections. As of November 10, 2020, there have been over 50 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 and over 1.2 million deaths across the world. Contribution of Laboratory medicine in diagnosis, prognosis, risk prediction and management is indispensable in most of the human pathologies, and COVID-19 is not an exception. The current COVID-19 pandemic has reconfirmed that laboratory diagnostics will remain the core of every clinical decision made. This review covers recent laboratory modalities available for diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of treatment response in COVID-19.

Clinical Laboratories are of paramount importance in mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic. From early diagnosis, Clinical Laboratories play a crucial role in monitoring comorbidities, diagnosing complications, assessment of treatment responses and in assessing the prevalence of diseases in the community. Timely and accurate diagnosis of the disease is essential for early initiation of treatment as well as to prevent the transmission to contacts.

Different counties had followed and implemented different testing strategies targeting different genes based on the availability of diagnostic methods and consumables (Table 1) . Further, the WHO has meanwhile taken strict steps and created the diagnostics available with the mission to "detect, protect and treat" to break the chain of transmission of SARS-CoV-2(3). Early diagnosis and immediate treatment will significantly decrease future COVID-19 cases. Therefore, early laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 plays a vital role in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic.

Compared to symptomatic testing and CT scan method, the molecular techniques are more appropriate in accurate diagnosis since they target the identification of pathogens ( Figure 1 ). Despite this, the Real-time reverse transcriptasepolymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) serves as a gold standard method for nucleic acid screening of SARS-CoV-2. Since this a time consuming and sophisticated method, rRT-PCR serves better as a diagnostic tool than a screening tool (10) .

Considering the current stage of the pandemic, a large number of patient screening is needed using novel screening methods which require lesser equipment and materials.

The advancement of molecular techniques is mainly reliant on understanding the genomic and proteomic composition of the pathogen. Similarly, the changes in the host gene or protein expressions induced by the pathogen after infection (11) . World Health Organization (WHO) and China jointly described genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2 and its genetic characterisation (12, 13) . This genome sequencing has given a road map to researchers for designing primers and probe sequences for rRT-PCR and some other nucleic acid amplification tests. 

Since the outbreak of COVID-19, nucleic acid amplification testing is the primary method of diagnosis. Multiple real-time reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) kits have been invented to detect SARS-CoV-2. Corman et al. aligned and scrutinised SARS-CoV-2 related viral genome sequences to construct a set of oligo primers and probe sequences (6) . Among these mainly three conserved sequences have been revealed. 1) In open reading frame ORF1ab region the RdRP gene (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene), 2) Envelope protein gene (E gene), 3) Nucleocapsid protein gene (N gene) (6) . Different countries submitted their primary probe designs to the WHO. As an example, the rRT-PCR can be designed as two genes target system or three genes target systems, where one primer set detects family of coronaviruses, the second set detects specifically SARS-CoV-2 and third is human RNase P as the internal control (Table 1) . Similarly, ICMR also released some recommendations for COVID-19 diagnosis. The ICMR has recommended the use of US-based RT-PCR probes distributed to national laboratories (16).

The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) set up a panel of genes through RT-PCR for the specific finding of SARS-CoV-2 and overall detection of SARS-like beta coronaviruses (9) . Primarily designed by targeting three different sets of primers to the N gene among these two primers sets are specific to SARS-CoV-2 and one primer set is specific to all beta coronaviruses. If all three genes are positive, then it specifies the COVID-19 confirmation. Similarly, in Germany Charite (6) developed two sets of nucleic acid tests for detection of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV and bat-like beta-CoVs by targeting the RdRp and E genes, if both tests were positive then COVID-19 confirmation through SARS-CoV-2 specific RdRp gene. The results of the Chu et al. study suggested targeting the N gene as primary screening and ORF1ab as a confirmative target. Studies targeted at two or more genes, thus had a stronger outcome performance compared to single genes alone (20) . Now, molecular testing was developed as the gold standard for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, hence the E and RdRb genes suggesting better analytical sensitivity compared to the N and ORF1ab genes combination.

While different institutions have developed various SARS-CoV-2 research protocols, it remains uncertain if the findings of nucleic acid tests based on multiple targets are comparable. In a recent study compared the analytical sensitivities of the United States, Germany, Hong Kong and China qRT-PCR assays by using RNA transcripts isolated from a COVID-19 patient (21) .

They found that all primer-probe sets used in the qRT-PCR tests could detect SARS-CoV-2, but the significant difference was observed in the limit of detection (LOD) and the ability to distinguish the positives and negatives while the viral load is at lower levels. The highest sensitivity of primer-probe sets was found E-gene (Germany), N1 gene (US CDC), ORF1 (Hongkong) but RdRp gene (Germany) showed the lowest sensitivity. In another study from Germany Konrad et al.

found that by using a single-step qRT-PCR method, the E gene target was more sensitive than the RdRp target (22).

The positive controls (2019-nCoV pseudovirus) provide a nucleic acid extraction and a reverse transcription control to validate the entire procedure and reagent integrity. Similarly, the RNAse P internal control provides an RNA extraction of practical control and secondary negative control. However, RNA extraction from clinical samples creates a major bottleneck in the diagnostic process, as it either runs manually and thus is laborious or automated and expensive. To overcome this, recently, some research groups developed direct RT-PCR by omitting RNA extraction procedure (23) (24) (25) . In this method, after the collection of patient material and deposition of potential SARS-CoV-2 viral particles in transport medium followed by the inactivation of the virus through detergent/chaotropic reagents or heating process step. Then, transfer the lysate to single-step RT-PCR format in which cDNA synthesis by RT and detection by qPCR may take place. Wee Sk et al. showed that direct RT-PCR has a high sensitivity of 6 RNA copies per reaction and is quantitative over a dynamic range of 7 orders of magnitude (25). Direct amplification of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA from samples without RNA purification allows the reducing hands-on-time, time-to-results, and costs. As per WHO guidelines, one of the following conditions should be met for considering a case as a NAAT-confirmed laboratory in areas with no circulation of SARS-CoV-2(18).

1) A positive NAAT result for at least two different targets on the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome, of which at least one target is preferably specific for SARS-CoV-2 virus using a validated assay;

2) One positive NAAT result for the presence of beta coronavirus, and SARS-CoV-2 virus further identified by sequencing partial or whole genome of the virus as long as the sequence target is larger or different from the amplicon probed in the NAAT assay used.

At the moment, it's important to identify that a negative result may not eliminate the possibility of COVID-19, it might be due to the poor-quality specimens, early or late collection, inadequate sample, and incorrect test procedures. When a patient with a high level of suspicion obtains a negative result for SARS-CoV-2 virus infection, especially when only upper respiratory tract specimens have been collected, additional specimens should be collected and tested, including, where possible, from the lower respiratory tract (26).

Isothermal amplification depended nucleic acid tests are currently under progression for SARS-CoV-2. Recently a few studies reported the development of reverse transcription LAMP (RT-LAMP) tests (27) (28) (29) and some are clinically tested for SARS-CoV-2 (30, 31) .

Primarily RT-LAMP is based on the DNA polymerase and 4-6 primers to bind at distinct regions on the target genome. RT-LAMP is a highly specific method since it uses a greater number of primers, like two inner primers and two outer primers on different regions on the genome. In LAMP diagnostic tests, SARS-CoV-2 family genes such as ORF1ab, spike (S), envelope (E) or/and N gene can be targeted, and the procedure will be done in a single step at 63 °C isothermal conditions, and within 15-40 minutes the results will be obtained (27, 28, 30, 31) . For the POCT of SARS-CoV-2, many institutes are keen to implement isothermal nucleic acid amplification technology, eliminating the need for a highly costly thermal cycler. The most promising alternative to PCR may be loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) because it provides many advantages in terms of precision, sensitivity, reaction efficiency and product yield. Recently, a reverse transcription (RT)-LAMP assay targeting non-structural protein 3 (Nsp3) for SARS-CoV-2 detection was developed by Park et al., whose LOD was 100 copies per reaction (32) . Similarly, RT-LAMP assay within 60 min targeting an ORF1ab and the S gene, whereby the LOD was 20 copies/reaction and 200 copies/reaction, was prepared by Yan et al. (33) . (37) . In addition to that, Broughton et al. compared the detection strategies of DETECTR, and the RT-qPCR which is recommended by CDC/WHO for SARS-CoV-2 detection, however, they found that the limit of detection these methods is ten copies/µL, 1 or 3.2 copies/µL input sample, respectively. Also, the assays turnaround time is 45 min and four hours, respectively (37). Since less time consumption and equipment requirement, these methods can be set up in emergency departments and local community hospitals. Recently, Hou et al. exploited polymerase mediated amplification by the combination of recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) and CRISPR-Cas13-mediated enzymatic signal amplification for detection of SARS-CoV-2 with high sensitivity and 7.5 copies/reaction within 40 min. The CRISPR-Cas13-based assay has a higher detection potential than the RT-PCR assay, according to a comparative clinical study. (38) . In another study, Ding at al developed the protocol by integrating RT-RPA and CRISPRbased detection in a one-pot reaction and incubating at a single temperature (39) . This "All-In-One Dual CRISPR-Cas12a" (AIOD-CRISPR) assay detected as little as 4.6 SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies per μL input at 40 minutes per μL input.

It is emphasised that nucleic acid-based testing methods need to extract nucleic acid in advance, the requirement of trained technicians, complex operation, expensive equipment; it is complicated to do in epidemiological and surveillance purposes. With the aid of viral protein antigen and antibodies which are produced in response to a SARS-CoV-2 infection can be used for diagnosis. Since variations in the viral load throughout infection, it may difficult to detect the viral proteins. In contrast to this, the detection of antibodies which are generated to viral proteins may enable the indirect ways to detect SARS-CoV-2.

Serology testing involves the screening test by qualitative assays and measurement of different classes of immunoglobulins (IgA, IgM, IgG) against SARS-CoV-2 by using quantitative assays for establishing whether a person has been infected by SARS-CoV-2. Zhang et al. detected immunoglobulin G and M (IgG and IgM) from the human serum of COVID-19 patients using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (40) .

Although recent reports suggesting that detection of antibody-based methods targeted to IgM and IgG by using recombinant N and S proteins of SARS-CoV-2are consistent with the results obtained by real-time RT-PCR (41) (42) (43) .

In addition to this, the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the viral S protein presented a better antigenicity than viral N protein in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection (44) . Also, IgA levels in patient serum have positively correlated with the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection, signifying that serum IgA can be used as a biological marker (44) . In clinical diagnosis, the IgA and IgM antibodies against viral proteins can be detected seven days after SARS-CoV-2 infection or within 3-4 days after symptoms appear, as well as for IgG antibodies appears in 7-10 days later SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Serology testing has some advantages over other techniques, apart from being inexpensive. The primary application of serology testing is to identify individuals who previously had SARS-CoV-2 infections. This knowledge can be used to guide studies of epidemiology and seroprevalence, and to facilitate contact tracing. Serology tests can also be used to determine possible convalescent donors of plasma and to assess the immune response to candidate vaccines. Finally, serology tests can also aid in diagnosing Covid-19 in patients with clinical suspicion but having repeated RT-PCR-negative results (45, 46) . Serology testing has its limitations too. The serology test cannot be used to diagnose acute or recent COVID-19 cases. Antibody tests for COVID-19 may also interact with other pathogens, including other human coronaviruses and leads to false-positive results. Based on current data, the WHO does not recommend the use of antibody-detecting rapid diagnostic tests for patient care but encourages the continuation of work to establish their usefulness in disease surveillance and epidemiologic research (14) .

Serology testing helps in the assessment of seroprevalence of COVID-19 disease in the community. Nationwide serology testing would help in tailoring the public health measures to control and avoid renewed COVID-19 epidemic wave (47) . Serologic surveillance also can help in anticipate and modify treatment modalities as in perinatal clinical practices pregnant women (48) . Seroprevalence surveys can also help in understand the geographical profile of the COVID-19 disease and help in creating a regional level approach in controlling the pandemic (49) . However, serology testing cannot be used to determine the infectivity status or the susceptibility to reinfection for the patient. The presence of antibodies does not render the patient non-infectious, as the antibodies can be of non-neutralising in nature (50, 51) .

Virus neutralisation tests have to be performed to assess the neutralising capability of antibodies generated by the body against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Hence clinical laboratories are recommended not to promote so-called "immunity passports" due to a lack of evidence for the neutralising capability of antibodies (52).

Sequencing does not play a part in the initial SARS-CoV-2 laboratory diagnosis but can be beneficial in the following circumstances; 1) Provides evidence of virus existence; 2) Monitoring for viral genome mutations that could affect medical countermeasure performance, including diagnostic testing; 3) Virus sequencing of entire genomes can also inform studies on molecular epidemiology. Virus isolation, currently, is not recommended as part of the routine diagnostic methodology.

Biochemical and haematological parameters have been investigated to assess their role in diagnosis and prognosis. Further, the role of laboratory testing in assessing severity and selecting treatment modalities and monitoring the effectiveness of treatment has been elucidated through multiple studies. Figure 2 depicts the important parameters that can be used for determining diagnosis, prognosis and treatment response.

Several Laboratory Parameters are significantly increased in COVID-19 positive patients when compared with others. RT-PCR diagnosed COVID-19 patients had significantly higher neutrophil (NEU) count, and C-reactive protein (CRP), aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase and Urea levels in serum (53) . Serum albumin levels and White blood cell (WBC) count are decreased Presence of urine occult blood and proteinuria.

Lower urine specific gravity - 

Multiple parameters are useful in assessing the severity of the disease. The parameters that were found to have a significant difference between mild and severe disease include interleukin-6 (IL-6), d-dimer (d-D), glucose, fibrinogen, thrombin time, and C-reactive protein (59). Fibrinogen was found to be higher in COVID-19 patients with SARS compared to those without SARS (55) .

The role of laboratory parameters indicating inflammation have been discussed elsewhere (60) . IL-6, an inflammatory cytokine, was found to have a potential value for monitoring the process of severe cases (61) . The increased concentration of ultra-TnI, MYO, and NT-proBNP was also found to be associated with the severity of COVID-19 (62) . The dysregulated activity of CD3 + CD8 + T lymphocytes, CD16 + CD56 + NK cells and altered C1q and IL-6 have been found to accentuate the severity of disease and death (63) . Further, on correlation analysis between multiple cytokines and coagulation indicators in critically ill COVID-19 patients, a high correlation was observed between IL-6 and the International normalised ratio (INR) (64) .

The severity of lung abnormalities is quantified by chest imaging. Different laboratory parameters are associated with stages of lung diseases in COVID-19 patients as quantified on chest CT. Early-stage as per CT scoring was found to be correlated with the neutrophil count. The progressive stage was correlated with the neutrophil count, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and lactate dehydrogenase. Contrastingly, peak and absorption stages were not correlated with any parameter (65) . The paradoxical increase in D-dimer levels despite decreased fibrinolytic capacity had prompted the researchers to hypothesise that the major source of D-dimer could be the lungs (66) .

Apart from altered coagulation profile, low activities of natural anticoagulants, increased factor VIII level and antiphospholipid antibodies presence have also been found to accentuate the severity of the disease in COVID-19 patients (67) . In severe and critically ill patients, the Interleukin-6 (IL-6),d-dimer (d-D), glucose, thrombin time, fibrinogen, and C-reactive protein IL 6 (AUC=0.795) D-Dimer (AUC=0.75) Glu, TT, CRP and FIB (AUC<0.75) IL 6 + D-Dimer (AUC=0.84)

Zhang et al.

Early stage: neutrophil count . Progressive stage: neutrophil count, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, lactate dehydrogenase. Correlation analysis showed that CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and granulocyte/lymphocyte ratio were positively associated with the CT severity scores.

CRP (AUC=0.87) at 20.42 mg/L cut-off, with sensitivity and specificity 83% and 91%, respectively.

Di Micco et al. specific immunoglobulin G antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 were found to be significantly low when compared with patients with mild disease (68) .

Different parameters have been assessed for their dynamic trend in different stages as well as the severity of the disease. Lymphocytes in the severe COVID-19 were found to be progressively decreasing at the progression and the peak stages. C-reactive protein (CRP) was higher in the severe group at the initial and progression stages than those in the mild group (64) . Table 3 depicts the laboratory parameters associated with severity of the disease in COVID -19 patients.

Laboratory parameters at admission have been investigated for their prognostic power for the severity of the disease. Logistic regression analysis showed that IL-6 and D-Dimer could be important predictors in the severity of COVID-19. Further, it had also been found that combined detection using IL-6 and D-Dimer was more efficient than independent detection (59). Various parameters have also been used to predict admission to ICU. ALC and LDH stood out as parameters that can, with the levels at admission, reliably predict the admission of the patient to ICU (53) . The change of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and D-dimer level has been found to help in discriminating severe COVID-19 cases from mild/moderate ones on consequent days after admission (65) . The early increase in Fibrinogen in COVID-19 patients makes it a good risk stratification marker for the early detection of a subgroup of COVID-19 patient at increased risk to develop SARS (55) .

Non-survivors mainly presented with laboratory abnormalities of serious inflammation response and multiple organ failure, manifesting as high levels of cytokines and deranged coagulation parameters. Neutrophil count, hypersensitivity C-reactive protein, creatine kinase, and blood urea nitrogen were identified to help in early detection of COVID-19 severe patients with poor outcomes on admission (72) . Further, the non-survivors of COVID-19 disease revealed significantly higher D-dimer and FDP levels compared to survivors on admission (71) . Hence, the use of Sepsis-induced coagulopathy scoring system for early assessment and management have been advised in patients with the critical disease (73) . mRNA clearance rates indicate the resolution of the disease. It has been found that the decline of serum creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels significantly correlated with mRNA clearance rates (74) . CSF analyses revealed relatively slightly increased levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 8, tumour necrosis factor-alpha and β2-microglobulin. Ten days after the admission, CSF IL-8 and TNF-α decreased, whereas IL-6

Liu et al. and β2-microglobulin values were stable (76) . Table 4 depicts the important laboratory parameters that can be used to determine the prognosis in COVID-19 patients.

Various laboratory parameters have been assessed for its role in complications in COVID-19 patients. Patients with abnormal liver function had higher levels of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein (78) . Various inflammatory markers are elevated in patients with COVID-19 related cardiac injury. They include C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, ferritin, D-dimer, Interleukin -2 (IL-2) interleukin -7 (IL-7), granulocyte -colony-stimulating factor, IgG-induced protein 10, chemokine ligand three and tumour necrosis alpha (79) . Lymphocyte counts, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and D-dimer was found to be different in patients with venous thromboembolism when compared with the non-VTE group. The significant increase of D-dimer observed in severe patients makes it a good index for identifying high-risk groups of VTE(80). On comparison of COVID-19 patients with and without HBV co-infection, although the level of liver function parameters

Li et al.

279

The higher D-dimer levels on admission progressively improved only in the mild disease group.

Liu et al.

Thrombocytopenia. An increment of per 50 × 109/L in platelets was associated with a 40% decrease in mortality (hazard ratio: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.84). Table 4 Laboratory parameters determining prognosis in COVID-19 patients showed no differences, prealbumin levels were found to be lower in HBsAg+ patients (81) . In solid organ transplant recipients with COVID-19, a biphasic pattern was observed with initial increases in inflammatory markers, followed by an increase in WBC, CRP, ferritin and D-dimer (82) .

To assess the efficacy of treatment, the primary tool for analysis have been the trend shown by Laboratory parameters. Lymphocytopenia improved after Convalescent Plasma transfusion. C-reactive protein (CRP), alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase decreased after treatment (83) . Table 5 depicts the laboratory parameters which are associated with complications and monitoring of response to treatment in COVID-19 patients.

Different fluids have also been assessed in COVID-19 patients for different parameters. The presence of urine occult blood and proteinuria were found to be higher in COVID-19 patients than in healthy controls, whereas urine specific gravity was found to be lower in patients than in healthy controls. The presence of urine glucose and proteinuria were higher in the severe and critical groups when compared with that of Duan et al. the moderate group (58) . CSF analyses have revealed relatively slightly increased levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 8, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, and β2-microglobulin in a single patient (76).

Multiple meta-analyses had been undertaken to find the significance of various laboratory parameters in COVID-19. Soraya et al. had concluded thrombocyte count to have a crucial role in the diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19. Further, lymphocyte count, D-dimer and CRP levels helped to assess the severity of the disease (86). Henry et al. had observed that markers of inflammation, coagulation markers and organ damage to be significantly elevated severe and fatal COVID-19 patients. In patients with severe disease, interleukins 6 (IL-6) and 10 (IL-10) and serum ferritin were found to be predominantly elevated (87) . Interestingly, in a pooled analysis of Laboratory Parameters paediatric COVID-19 patients, contrary to adult patients, leukocyte indices showed inconsistent trends (88) . The elevated levels of the neutrophil count, D-dimer, prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen erythrocyte sedimentation rate, procalcitonin, IL-6, and IL-10 were found to be better predictors for severe COVID-19 disease (89, 90) . Further, high IL-6, CRP, D-dimer and neutrophils were found to be better predictors of mortality in COVID-19 (89) . A similar meta-analysis also observed severe or critical COVID-19 to be associated with innate immune response and tissue damage (91).

In summary, the crucial role that clinical laboratory plays in the management of diseases has never been more evident than today. Validating various assays for diagnosing COVID-19 helps in early diagnosis and initiation of treatment as well as prevent transmission. The assessment of the clinical utility of tests in different scenarios in COVID-19 and ensuring its accuracy adds to the efforts to treatment of the disease as well as predicting complications. This review has emphasised the importance of laboratory in the COVID-19 crisis. The emergence of diagnostic assays with better sensitivity and specificity equips the laboratories with an enhanced ability to identify COVID-19 cases early and prevents transmission (92) . The routine laboratory parameters have been shown to be able to distinguish between positive and negative patients, have the capacity to predict prognosis & complications and have usefulness in monitoring treatment response. Further studies in this arena would lead to validation of better assays for precise diagnosis and newer biomarkers for monitoring treatment and disease progression. Decision-makers should not underestimate the role of the laboratory as it plays a pivotal role in patient-centred and sustainable future of health care.

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.



A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin

Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study. The Lancet

Praveen Sharma The clinical laboratory: a key player in diagnosis and management of COVID-19

Novel Coronavirus; China National Institute For Viral Disease Control and Prevention: Beijing

Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Suspected Human Cases by RT-PCR; School of Public Health

Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Eurosurveillance

Detection of Second Case of 2019-nCoV Infection in Japan; Department of Virology III

Diagnostic Detection of Novel Coronavirus 2019 by Real Time RT-PCR; Department of Medical Sciences

2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel; Division of Viral Diseases

COVID-19)

Point-Counterpoint: Should We Be Performing Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Infectious Disease Diagnosis in the Clinical Laboratory? Ledeboer N, editor

Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease

Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel Coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. The Lancet

2020) Advice on the use of point-of-care immunodiagnostic tests for CO

2020) Interim guidelines for collecting, handling, and testing clinical specimens from persons for coronavirus disease

Evaluation of saline, phosphate-buffered saline, and minimum essential medium as potential alternatives to viral transport media for SARS-CoV-2 testing

Stability of SARS-CoV-2 in Phosphate-Buffered Saline for Molecular Detection

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens

Molecular Diagnosis of a Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Causing an Outbreak of Pneumonia

Rapid establishment of laboratory diagnostics for the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 in Bavaria

Massive and rapid COVID-19 testing is feasible by extraction-free SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR

Rapid Direct Nucleic Acid Amplification Test without RNA Extraction for SARS-CoV-2 Using a Portable PCR Thermocycler

Praveen Sharma The clinical laboratory: a key player in diagnosis and management of COVID-19

Reverse Transcription-Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification

Rapid Detection of COVID-19 Coronavirus Using a Reverse Transcriptional Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (RT-LAMP) Diagnostic Platform

Rapid Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 (CO-VID-19) Virus RNA Using Colorimetric LAMP [Internet]. Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)

Rapid and visual detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) by a reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay

A Novel Reverse Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2

Development of reverse transcription loopmediated isothermal amplification assays targeting SARS-CoV-2

Rapid and visual detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) by a reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay

Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2

SHERLOCK: nucleic acid detection with CRISPR nucleases

Development and Evaluation of A CRISPR-based Diagnostic For 2019-novel Coronavirus [Internet]. Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)

CRISPR-Cas12-based detection of SARS-CoV-2

Xu T Development and evaluation of a rapid CRISPR-based diagnostic for COVID-19

Changchun Liu 4 Ultrasensitive and visual detection of SARS-CoV-2 using all-in-one dual CRISPR-Cas12a assay

Molecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes. Emerg Microbes Infect

Detection of serum IgM and IgG for COVID-19 diagnosis. Sci China Life Sci

Clinical significance of IgM and IgG test for diagnosis of highly suspected COVID-19 infection [Internet]. Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)

Evaluations of serological test in the diagnosis of 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infections during the CO-VID-19 outbreak

CO-VID-19 diagnosis and study of serum SARS-CoV-2 specific IgA, IgM and IgG by chemiluminescence immunoanalysis

Profiling early humoral response to diagnose novel coronavirus dis-ease (COVID-19)

Early detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in COVID-19 patients as a serologic marker of infection

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Spain (ENE-COVID): a nationwide, populationbased seroepidemiological study. The Lancet

SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Among Parturient Women

Praveen Sharma The clinical laboratory: a key player in diagnosis and management of COVID-19

Geographical Profiles of COV-ID-19 Outbreak in Tokyo: An Analysis of the Primary Care Clinic-Based Point-of-Care Antibody Testing. J Prim Care Community Health

Virological assessment of hospitalised patients with COVID-2019

SARS-CoV-2 shedding and infectivity

Canadian society of clinical chemists (CSCC) interim consensus guidance for testing and reporting of SARS-CoV-2 serology

Hematologic parameters in patients with COV-ID-19 infection

Differences between COVID-19 and suspected then confirmed SARS-CoV-2-negative pneumonia: a retrospective study from a single center

Clotting Factors in COVID-19: Epidemiological Association and Prognostic Values in Different Clinical Presentations in an Italian Cohort

Eosinopenia and elevated C-reactive protein facilitate triage of COVID-19 patients in fever clinic: a retrospective case-control study

Routine blood tests as a potential diagnostic tool for CO-VID-19

The value of urine biochemical parameters in the prediction of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019

Inflammation, Immunity and Immunogenetics in COVID-19: A Narrative Review

Clinical value of immune-inflammatory parameters to assess the severity of coronavirus disease 2019

Analysis of heart injury laboratory parameters in 273 COVID-19 patients in one hospital in Wuhan

Clinical Characteristics and Immune Injury Mechanisms in 71 Patients with COVID-19

Correlation between cytokines and coagulation-related parameters in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 admitted to ICU

Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): relationship between chest CT scores and laboratory parameters

High D dimers and low global fibrinolysis coexist in COVID19 patients: what is going on in there?

Profile of natural anticoagulant, coagulant factor and antiphospholipid antibody in critically ill COVID-19 patients

Changes of hematological and immunological parameters in COVID-19 patients

Praveen Sharma The clinical laboratory: a key player in diagnosis and management of COVID-19

C-reactive protein correlates with computed tomographic findings and predicts severe COVID-19 early

The clinical implication of dynamic neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and D-dimer in COVID-19: A retrospective study in Suzhou China

Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia

Laboratory abnormalities and risk factors associated with in-hospital death in patients with severe COVID-19

Haematological characteristics and risk factors in the classification and prognosis evaluation of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study

The correlation between viral clearance and biochemical outcomes of 94 COVID-19 infected discharged patients

Dynamic relationship between D-dimer and COVID-19 severity

Steroid-responsive encephalitis in Covid-19 disease

Association between platelet parameters and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019: Retrospective cohort study

Clinical Features of COVID-19-Related Liver Functional Abnormality

Analysis of heart injury laboratory parameters in 273 COVID-19 patients in one hospital in Wuhan

Clinical characteristics in patients with SARS-CoV-2/HBV co-infection

COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: dynamics of disease progression and inflammatory markers in ICU and non-ICU admitted patients

Effectiveness of convalescent plasma therapy in severe COVID-19 patients

Fibrinolysis Shutdown Correlates to Thromboembolic Events in Severe COVID-19 Infection

Early risk factors for the duration of SARS-CoV-2 viral positivity in COVID-19 patients

Crucial laboratory parameters in COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis: An updated metaanalysis

Hematologic, biochemical and immune biomarker abnormalities associated with severe illness and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis

Laboratory abnormalities in children with mild and severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A pooled analysis and review

Praveen Sharma The clinical laboratory: a key player in diagnosis and management of COVID-19

Diagnostic and prognostic value of hematological and immunological markers in COVID-19 infection: A meta-analysis of 6320 patients

Lymphopenia and neutrophilia at admission predicts severity and mortality in patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis

Clinical laboratory parameters associated with severe or critical novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review and metaanalysis. PLoS One

COVID-19 Pandemic in India: What Lies Ahead