key: cord-0252268-hlofpxlr authors: Cohen, Samuel A.; Ebrahimian, Shayan; Cohen, Landon E.; Tijerina, Jonathan D. title: Online public interest in common malignancies and cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States date: 2021-11-06 journal: J Clin Transl Res DOI: nan sha: 3e5085d6ced4ee1d02d90a08efe510458746b027 doc_id: 252268 cord_uid: hlofpxlr BACKGROUND AND AIM: The COVID-19 pandemic was declared a national emergency in the United States in March 2020. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services subsequently released recommendations that health-care facilities temporarily delay elective surgeries and non-essential medical procedures. Disruptions to medical care significantly impacted cancer patients, with cancer screenings halted and nonurgent cancer surgeries postponed as health-care facilities shifted resources toward the COVID-19 pandemic. Although it has been reported that cancer screening rates decreased dramatically in the United States in 2020, it is unclear whether this trend was driven by factors related to public interest in cancer and/or cancer screening as opposed to other factors such as clinical backlogs, pandemic-related policies, and/or resource limitations. The purpose of this study was to use the Google Trends tool to evaluate public interest in six common malignancies and four common cancer screening methods during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We used the Google Trends tool to quantify public interest in six different malignancies (Breast Cancer, Colon Cancer, Lung Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Thyroid Cancer, and Cervical Cancer) and four cancer screening methods (Pap Smear, Lung Cancer Screening, Mammogram, and Colonoscopy) in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. Welch’s t-tests were used to compare monthly search volumes during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) to the 4 years before the pandemic (2016 – 2019) for all ten search terms included in our study. We used Benjamini-Hochberg to adjust raw p values to account for multiple statistical comparisons. The level of statistical significance was defined by choosing a false discovery rate of 0.05. RESULTS: Our results indicate significantly reduced interest in all malignancies studied at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Public interest in [‘Breast Cancer’], [‘Colon Cancer’], [‘Lung Cancer’], [‘Thyroid Cancer’], and [‘Cervical Cancer’] significantly decreased in the months of March, April, May, and June 2020 when compared with public interest in 2016-2019. Public interest in cancer screening methods such as [‘Pap Smear’], [‘Lung Cancer Screening’], [‘Mammogram’], and [‘Colonoscopy’] significantly deceased in the months of April and May compared to 2016 – 2019 values. However, decreased public interest in cancer screening methods was temporary, with Google search volumes returning to pre-pandemic levels in June 2020 – December 2020. CONCLUSION: There was significantly reduced public interest in both common malignancies and cancer screening methods at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. However, after an initial decline, public interest as indicated by Google search volumes quickly returned to pre-pandemic levels in the second half of the calendar year 2020. In addition, trends in public interest in cancer screening as indicated by Google search volumes aligned with cancer screening uptake rates in the United States during the study period. This finding suggests that Google Trends may serve as an effective tool in gauging the public’s interest in cancer and/or cancer screenings in the United States, which makes it a valuable resource that can be used to inform decisions aimed at improving cancer screening rates in the future. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: The Google Trends tool can be used to measure public interest in various malignancies and their associated screening methods. Google Trends data may be used to inform measures aimed at improving cancer screening uptake. The COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally changed the healthcare landscape for both healthcare professionals and patients. On March 13, 2020 , the President of the United States declared COVID-19 to be a national emergency [1] . The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) subsequently released recommendations that health-care facilities "[delay] all elective surgeries, non-essential medical, surgical, and dental procedures" [2] . The recommendations issued by CMS temporarily brought health-care systems to a halt as resources were shifted to focus on the COVID-19 pandemic [3] . Disruptions in healthcare services significantly impacted cancer patients, as routine cancer screening procedures were advised against and nonurgent cancer surgeries were delayed [4, 5] . More than 1 year after the initial declaration of COVID-19 as a national emergency, concerns have been raised regarding the impact of the pandemic on cancer care, especially with regard to delays in diagnosis and treatment that may have occurred as a result of the pandemic [5] . For example, a recent study examining cancer screening rates in the United States revealed substantial decreases in cancer screenings, visits, and surgeries in 2020 when compared with metrics observed in the previous year's [6] . It is unclear to what extent public apprehension regarding cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic was a factor in driving reduced cancer screening rates in 2020 when compared with other factors such as clinical backlogs, pandemic-related policies, and/or pandemic-related resource limitations [7] [8] [9] . As such, we sought to quantify public interest in various malignancies and cancer screening methods during the COVID-19 pandemic. The internet is one way to track public interest in cancer-related topics [10] . When searching for cancer information online, the primary search engine that patients use is Google, which accounts for more than 90% of all internet searches [11] . Google Trends is a free, opensource tool that allows customizable analysis of search term volumes entered into the Google search engine. The Google Trends tool has been utilized previously to measure public interest in a wide range of health topics, from influenza outbreaks to osteoarthritis treatments to plastic surgery procedures [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] . In addition, the Google Trends tool has been used extensively to measure public interest in various oncological topics such as the effectiveness of cancer awareness months [18, 19] . The purpose of this study was to use the Google Trends tool to evaluate public interest in six common malignancies and four common cancer screening methods during the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that there would be a reduction in public interest in common malignancies and cancer screening methods in the months after the onset of the pandemic in the United States. A sustained reduction in public awareness of cancer and cancer screening as a result of the pandemic has important clinical implications. In this cross-sectional retrospective study, we used the Google Trends tool to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on public interest on various malignancies and cancer screening methods in the United States. Google Trends analyses can be customized by search term, time period, and geographic location. After a search term is entered into the Google Trends tool and temporal and geographic constraints are specified, Google Trends generates visuals and outputs that reflect the volume of a given search term relative to peak popularity within the defined time period, which is assigned a value of 100. The data are presented as relative search volume (RSV), which is computed as ratio between searches for a given topic and the total amount of Google queries. An RSV value of 100 indicates the largest ratio between searches for a specific topic and the total amount of Google queries, while an RSV of 0 indicates that at the specified time point, the proportion of queries for the search term was <1% of its peak RSV (RSV 100) [20] . The Google Trends tool uses RSV rather than absolute count of Google searches to allow for ease of comparison of search volumes in states, cities, and countries with varying population densities. In the current study, the following filters were utilized in the Google We investigated trends in public interest for six common malignancies and four common cancer screening methods. ]. The six aforementioned malignancies were chosen due to their high relative frequency and/or available screening methods. The specific search terms for the four cancer screening methods were selected as a result of their demonstrated popularity using the "Related Queries" feature of the Google Trends tool. The Google Trends tool provided RSV on a weekly basis from 2016 to 2020 for all ten search terms (six malignancies and four cancer screening methods) included in this study. To account for monthly fluctuations in RSV during cancer awareness months, we compared monthly search volume data during the COVID-19 pandemic (March -December, 2020) to the same months in the prior 4 years (March -December, 2016 -2019) for each of the ten search terms included in our study. The months of January and February were excluded from analysis due to the onset and declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic as a global health emergency in March 2020 [1] . Welch's t-tests were used to compare monthly search volumes for 10 months (March -December) for all ten search terms included in our study, for a total of 100 t-tests. We used Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) to adjust raw p values to account for multiple statistical comparisons [21] . The adjusted BH p values were obtained using SPSS Version 26.0.0.1. Our significance level was determined by controlling the expected proportion of false discoveries at 0.05. The monthly RSV for the six malignancies studied are displayed in Figure 1 . We compared the mean monthly RSV during the pandemic (March -December, 2020) to RSV prior to the pandemic (mean pooled values including data from 2016 to 2019), and the results are displayed in Tables 1-6. Raw p values and adjusted BH p values due to multiple comparisons are both listed. With regard to public interest in ['Breast Cancer'], a statistically significant reduction in RSV, adjusted for multiple comparisons, at a significance cutoff of p < 0.05 was observed in 2020 in the months of March, April, May, June, and August. The largest drop in public interest (9.4% decrease in mean RSV compared with 2016 -2019) was observed in April ( Table 1) . (Table 2) . For ['Lung Cancer'], a significant reduction in RSV in 2020 was observed in the months of March, April, May, June, September, and November. The largest drop in public interest (6.6% decrease in mean RSV compared with 2016-2019) was observed in April ( Table 3) . For ['Prostate Cancer'], a significant reduction in RSV in 2020 was observed in the months of April and May. The largest drop in public interest (20.4% decrease in mean RSV compared with 2016 -2019) was observed in April. For ['Thyroid Cancer'], a significant reduction in RSV in 2020 was observed in the months of March, April, May, June, and September. The largest drop in public interested (35.6% decrease in mean RSV compared with 2016 -2019) was observed in April ( Table 5 ). The monthly RSV for the four cancer screening methods studied are displayed in Figure 2 . Comparisons of monthly RSV in the 4 years before the pandemic (2016 -2019) to those observed during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) is observed in Tables 7-10. For ['Pap Smear'], a statistically significant reduction in RSV, adjusted for multiple comparisons, at a significance cutoff of p < 0.05 was observed in 2020 in the months of April and May. The largest drop in public interested (28.5% decrease in mean RSV compared with 2016 -2019) was observed in April (Table 7) . For ['Lung Cancer Screening'], a significant reduction in RSV in 2020 was observed in the months of March, April and May. The largest drop in public interested (25.5% decrease in mean RSV compared with 2016 -2019) was observed in April (Table 8) . Table 9) . For ['Colonoscopy'], a significant reduction in RSV in 2020 was observed in the months of April and May. The largest drop in public interested (47.0% decrease in mean RSV compared with 2016 -2019) was observed in April (Table 10 ). There was The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on public interest in various malignancies and cancer screening methods in the United States. Our results indicate significantly reduced interest in all six cancers studied for many of the months included in our study. Public interest in Public interest in various malignancies as indicated by online search activity has previously been correlated with incidence and mortality rates of some cancers [22, 23] . In addition, the Google Trends tool has been shown to be a valuable tool for analyzing public interest in cancer screening in several different countries [24, 25] . As such, the results of our study have clinical implications, with the potential to inform patient counseling. Our findings align with the conclusions of a recently published study examining the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on public interest in various cancers in Canada. In both the United States and Canada, public interest in many of the most common malignancies decreased significantly during the first few of the months of the pandemic before normalizing toward the end of the calendar year 2020 [26] . In addition to analyzing public interest in many common cancers, we also examined trends in public interest in various cancer screening methods. While public interest in all search terms associated with cancer screening decreased significantly in the first few months of the pandemic, search volumes largely normalized to pre-pandemic levels by the end of the calendar year 2020. The results of our study align with a recently published article that examined breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening rates in the United States. Chen et al. [4] reported a sharp decrease in cancer screening uptake in the United States in the months of March through May, which is the same trend that we observed with regards to public interest in various cancer screening methods using the Google Trends tool during the same time period. The result of our study has implications for policy makers and nonprofit organizations tasked with improving cancer screening rates in the United States. Near the beginning of the pandemic, nonemergent medical services such as cancer screenings drastically decreased [4] . In addition to the frequency of nonemergency medical services declining, there was also a sharp reduction in emergency department visits; with many people reporting that they felt uncomfortable visiting the emergency department because of a fear of becoming infected with COVID-19 [27] . This led to many patients waiting to seek treatment for life-threatening conditions, which led to adverse health consequences [28, 29] . As a result, many hospitals launched initiatives aimed at easing patients' fears about the virus and encouraged them to continue their preventative care regimens, such as cancer screenings, that are vital to their overall health [27, 30] . The messaging regarding the importance of attending to cancer screenings was well received, as supported by our findings of increased public interest in common malignancies and cancer screening methods throughout the rest of the 2020 calendar year. However, despite revived public interest in cancer screening, reduced screening totals for the remainder of calendar year 2020 when compared with the previous year's suggest that resources focused on improving cancer rates should be dedicated to other factors such as clinical backlogs, pandemicrelated legislation, and health-care center resource limitations that appear to be decreasing screening uptake, [4, [7] [8] [9] 31] . At this time, properly dedicating resources to these areas of focus, rather than focusing on messaging aimed at easing concerns of the public, could help to improve cancer screening rates in the future. The results of our study also provide insight into how public interest patterns in various malignancies and cancer screening methods vary due to media coverage. Previously published reports indicate that public awareness campaign and celebrity diagnoses or deaths significantly impact the public's interest in various malignancies [18, 32] . We observed similar trends in our study. When comparing public interest in cancers or cancer screening methods in 2020 to public interest in 2016-2019, there were limited circumstances (6 months out of 100 months studied) in which the 2020 search volumes were greater than those observed in 2016-2019. However, in each of the six circumstances, greater public interest in 2020 was driven by a media-generating event such as a celebrity diagnosis/death or a cancer awareness month. For example, in late August of 2020, renewed actor Chadwick Boseman died of colon cancer. There was a subsequent increase in public interest in both ['Colon Cancer'] and ['Colonoscopy'] in September and/or October after the news was shared by media outlets around the world (Tables 2 and 10 ). Health-care organizations tasked with improving cancer screening rates and outreach initiatives should utilize the tremendous publicity generated by a celebrity cancer diagnoses or death to raise awareness and to provide important information about cancer screening to the public, which may help to decrease related mortality rates. One long-lasting effect of the COVID-19 pandemic may be a shift in the way in which people expect to undergo their cancer screenings. The convenience of the in-home cancer screening test has become even more valuable to patients who are hesitant to leave their homes during the pandemic, and the race is underway to develop the most accurate in-home screening methods. Stoolbased screening tests that patients perform at home in an effort to detect colon cancer gained popularity over the pandemic and are expected to continue to serve as an efficient alternative to the colonoscopy in the upcoming years [33, 34] . In addition, selfsampling kits for cervical cancer screening are currently under evaluation for approval by the United States Food and Drug Association [35] . It is possible that the convenience of an inhome screening method may improve screening rates, particularly among people who feel uncomfortable with the screening methods that are used in a traditional healthcare setting for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening [36] [37] [38] . In addition, increased uptake of in-home screening methods could help to avoid a steep decline in cancer screening that would likely occur in the event of a future pandemic. As such, it would be beneficial to use the Google Trends tool to monitor the public's interest with regards to in-home cancer screening tests in the future. The findings of our study suggest that Google Trends can serve as an effective tool in gauging the public's interest in cancer screenings in the United States. The patterns observed with regards to public interest in various cancer screenings such as ['Pap Smear'], ['Lung Cancer Screening'], ['Mammogram'], and ['Colonoscopy'] largely mimic those seen in actual healthcare screening uptake in the United States -a sharp decline at the beginning of the pandemic followed by a gradual increase throughout the remainder of the calendar year 2020 [39] . In addition to the long-term benefits of a free, open-source tool that can track public interest in cancer screening, the data provided by the Google Trends tool may prove critical should virus variants that are resistant to modern vaccines emerge and extend the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. The rise of the "delta variant" of the virus has coincided with an increase in breakthrough infections and the potential of a return to more restrictive measures in the United States [40] . In the event of restrictions being implemented in the future similar to those that were implemented at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Google Trends tool can be utilized by healthcare systems to provide real-time, up to date data regarding public interest in cancer screenings, which can contribute to proper resource allocation to meet the screening demands of a given geographical area. There are several limitations to this study. First, casual inferences cannot be drawn due to the observational nature of the study design. In addition, Google Trends does not provide extensive information about the demographics of the users whose data are reflected in this study. As such, it is unclear if the users are a representative sample of the United States population. Next, the Google Trends tool only captures information about searches that are entered into the Google search engine. People may seek information about various malignancies and cancer screening methods using other search engines, and this data would not be reflected in this study. However, more than 90% of search engine inquiries worldwide are executed using Google as compared to an alternative search engine, which supports the notion that the data included in our study is representative of all queries in the United States [11] . Finally, due to the de-identified nature of the Google users whose data are reflected in this study, we cannot directly link public interest in various cancer screening methods with actual cancer screening uptake. However, the trends in public interest in cancer screening methods observed in our study mimic the trends of cancer screening uptake observed in recently published studies, which suggests that the Google Trends tool may be an effective gauge for public interest in cancer screening [4, 39] . Google search trends indicate decreased public interest in many common malignancies and cancer screening methods in the United States in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a gradual return to pre-pandemic levels towards the end of the 2020 calendar year. Furthermore, trends in public interest in several cancer screening methods as indicated by Google search volumes aligned with cancer screening uptake in the United States, suggesting that the Google Trends tool may be a valuable information source that can be used to guide decisions aimed at improving cancer screening rates in the future. Finally, we observed the strong impact that the media can have on driving public interest in various malignancies and cancer screening methods. Our findings may be useful to organizations attempting to educate the public regarding various malignancies with the primary goal of improving cancer screening uptake in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic and into the future. COVID-19) Outbreak; 2021 Adapting Hospital Capacity to Meet Changing Demands during the COVID-19 Pandemic Association of Cancer Screening Deficit in the United States with the COVID-19 Pandemic The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Deaths Due to Delays in Diagnosis in England, UK: A National, Population-Based, Modelling Study Impact of COVID-19 on Cancer Care: How the Pandemic Is Delaying Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment for American Seniors Affected Cancer Screening Programs? A Systematic Review Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Oncologic Care Continuum: Urgent Need to Restore Patients Care to Pre-COVID-19 Era The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Care Success of Prostate and Testicular Cancer Awareness Campaigns Compared to Breast Cancer Awareness Month According to Internet Search Volumes: A Google Trends Analysis Search Engine Market Share Worldwide Using Google Trends for Influenza Surveillance in South China Using Google Trends Data to Track Healthcare Use for Hand Osteoarthritis Google Trends as a Tool for Evaluating Public Interest in Total Knee Arthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty Google Trends as a Tool for Evaluating Public Interest in Facial Cosmetic Procedures Public Interest in Elective Orthopedic Surgery Following Recommendations During COVID-19: A Google Trends Analysis Google Trend Analysis Shows Increasing Public Interest in Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis The Impact of Monthly Campaigns and Other High-Profile Media Coverage on Public Interest in 13 Malignancies: A Google Trends Analysis Using Google Trends Data to Study Public Interest in Breast Cancer Screening in Brazil: Why Not a Pink February? FAQ About Google Trends Data-Trends Help Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing Association between Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Web-Based Data in China: Infodemiology Study Relationship Between State-Level Google Online Search Volume and Cancer Incidence in the United States: Retrospective Study Using Google Trends Data to Study Public Interest in Breast Cancer Screening in Malaysia The Impact of Cancer Campaigns in Brazil: A Google Trends Analysis Online Public Interest in Cancer during the COVID-19 Pandemic Where Are All the Patients? Addressing COVID-19 Fear to Encourage Sick Patients to Seek Emergency Care Delay or Avoidance of Medical Care Because of COVID-19-Related Concerns-United States Delayed Care with Harmful Health Consequences-Reported Experiences from National Surveys during Coronavirus Disease The Impact of COVID-19 on Cancer Screening: Challenges and Opportunities Interruption of Cancer Screening Services Due to COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons from Previous Disasters Media Coverage and Public Reaction to a Celebrity Cancer Diagnosis Pandemic Spotlights In-Home Colon Cancer Screening Tests The Future of Cancer Screening after COVID-19 May be at Home Self-Sampling as a Plausible Alternative to Screen Cervical Cancer Precursor Lesions in a Population with Low Adherence to Screening: A Systematic Review Factors Influencing the Decision to Attend Screening for Cancer in the UK: A Meta-Ethnography of Qualitative Research Barriers to Cervical Screening and Interest in Self-Sampling among Women Who Actively Decline Screening Emotional Predictors of Bowel Screening: The Avoidance-Promoting Role of Fear, Embarrassment, and Disgust Decline and Rebound in Routine Cancer Screening Rates during the COVID-19 Pandemic Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines against the B.1.617.2 (Delta) Variant The authors declare no conflicts of interest.