key: cord-0252188-kjce1jcb
authors: Lucas, Georgia; Bartolf, Angela; Kroll, Nicholas; De Thabrew, Agampodi-Umanda; Murtaza, Zoya; Kumar, Siddarth; Gani, Abrar; Annoni, Andrea; Parsons, Marie; Pardoe, Helen
title: Procalcitonin (PCT) Level in the Emergency Department Identifies a High-Risk Cohort for All Patients Treated for Possible Sepsis
date: 2021-02-28
journal: EJIFCC
DOI: nan
sha: c70d158d603be35c7a5cabb6e397abf55cd9da9e
doc_id: 252188
cord_uid: kjce1jcb

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN? 1. The benefits of measuring PCT in the Emergency Department (ED) are not yet fully characterised. 2. PCT is widely used in the intensive care setting to guide antimicrobial prescribing. WHAT THIS ADDS? Measurement of PCT as a routine in the emergency department for all patients treated for possible sepsis identifies a high-risk cohort. KEY IMPROVEMENT IN PATIENT CARE: 1. A PCT measurement of >0.2ug/L in the Emergency Department identifies a patient at increased risk of deterioration and of in-hospital death. BACKGROUND: Early recognition and management of sepsis in the Emergency Department (ED) is a clinical challenge. Our aim was to determine if measuring the biomarker PCT in patients with suspected sepsis enables the identification of patients at increased risk of deterioration or in-hospital death in the ED setting of a district general hospital in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted on all patients aged 18 and over presenting to ED fulfilling NICE criteria for moderate to high risk of sepsis admitted to hospital. Patients had a PCT test alongside the sepsis six protocol. PCT was measured using Brahms’s chemiluminescent micro particle assay (CMIA) for the quantitative determination of PCT in human serum and plasma on the Abbott Alinity I analytical platform. The cost per test was approximately 13 GBP. The analysis was performed on patients having a PCT in ED over a 7-month period, with in-depth scrutiny of an appropriate subgroup. A high level quality improvement (QI) approach was used in the study. RESULTS: A total of 1242 patients were included in the study. Mean/median age was 67.9/72, (range 18-102). 88.7% of deaths occurred in patients over 65 years of age. 42.4% (n=532) had a PCT level in ED of >0.2 ug/L. This identified a high risk group with a 2.4 fold increase in mortality rate (7.7%:18.2% p value <0.001). The median length of stay (LOS) was 5 (IQR 9) and 8 days (IQR 11) in patients with a first PCT of ≤0.2 ug/L versus >0.2 ug/L respectively. CONCLUSION: An immediate PCT on patients presenting to ED with signs of sepsis in a non-specialised acute trust identifies those patients at an increased risk of deterioration and in hospital death.

Early recognition and management of sepsis in the Emergency Department (ED) is a clinical challenge. Our aim was to determine if measuring the biomarker PCT in patients with suspected sepsis enables the identification of patients at increased risk of deterioration or in-hospital death in the ED setting of a district general hospital in the United Kingdom.

A prospective observational study was conducted on all patients aged 18 and over presenting to ED fulfilling NICE criteria for moderate to high risk of sepsis admitted to hospital. Patients had a PCT test alongside the sepsis six protocol. PCT was measured using Brahms's chemiluminescent micro particle assay (CMIA) for the quantitative determination of PCT in human serum and plasma on the Abbott Alinity I analytical platform. The cost per test was approximately 13 GBP.

The analysis was performed on patients having a PCT in ED over a 7-month period, with in-depth scrutiny of an appropriate subgroup. A high level quality improvement (QI) approach was used in the study.

A total of 1242 patients were included in the study. 

An immediate PCT on patients presenting to ED with signs of sepsis in a non-specialised acute trust identifies those patients at an increased risk of deterioration and in hospital death.

Sepsis is responsible for approximately 37,000 deaths and 100,000 hospital admissions per year in the UK (1). Early recognition of sepsis in the ED is a clinical challenge due to the variability in presentation (2) . ED staff need a quick, reliable test to diagnose sepsis and identify those patients at high risk of deterioration.

Procalcitonin (PCT) is a biochemical marker of bacterial sepsis which has excellent diagnostic and prognostic value to identify bacterial sepsis early and alert clinicians regarding disease severity (3) . It can also be used to monitor response to antimicrobial treatment. Whilst PCT results can guide clinical decision making, they cannot replace standard sepsis management. Internationally, PCT is used widely in intensive care (ICU) (4) with serial PCT levels guiding continuation of antimicrobial treatment (Procalcitonin Guided Antimicrobial Therapy -PGAT) using the BRAHMs criteria (5). PGAT as described by Schuetz et al (5) is based on a cut off of 0.25ug/L. However, the cut off used in this study was 0.2ug/L reflecting the fact that the local laboratory LIMS system reports PCT measurements to only one decimal place.

Our aim was to discover if measuring PCT in patients with suspected sepsis would allow us to identify those at increased risk of deterioration or death. 

Patients presenting to the ED at the Princess Alexandra Hospital Trust, a UK district general hospital, fulfilling the NICE 2016 (6) criteria for moderate to severe sepsis had a PCT blood test on triage alongside the sepsis six protocol between August 2019 and February 2020. A second PCT was recommended 24-36 hours later ( Figure 1 ). PCT results were available within 60 minutes of receipt in the laboratory for ED samples and within four hours of receipt in the laboratory for samples received from inpatient wards. PCT was measured using Brahms's chemiluminescent micro particle assay (CMIA) for the quantitative determination of PCT in human serum and plasma on the Abbott Alinity I analytical platform. PCT levels were reported to one decimal place (ug/L). The result reproducibility was acceptable with within run imprecision of 2.9%, 3% and 2.5% determined using internal quality control (IQC) materials with concentrations 0.18, 1.79 and 64ug/L respectively. Between assay imprecision was tested at two levels 0.18 and 64ug/L and was shown to be 4% and 5% respectively. The cost per test (reagents only) was approximately 13GBP. The performance of the PCT assay was monitored using the Welsh External Quality Assurance Scheme (WEQAS) and has performed acceptably when compared to other laboratories performing PCT assays who are subscribed to the scheme. Overall lab SDI? score 0.05, with a median all laboratory SDI score of 0.30.

Outcome data was collected from local digital clinical systems. All patients 18 years old or above with at least one PCT test in ED were included in the sample.

A Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach using the Institute of Healthcare Improvement quality improvement (QI) model was used to optimise staff understanding and engagement with the protocol (Figure 1 ). PCT was introduced as a routine diagnostic test for the investigation of sepsis following local governance approval.

Adherence to the protocol for the second PCT blood test was poor. This can be attributed to a 

A total of 1242 patients were included in the study (male:female 610:632) following the exclusion of 16 patients due to the lack of a valid PCT measurement in ED. The most frequent first line antibiotics prescribed were Co-Amoxiclav and Piptazobactam. Gentamicin was the most frequent second line prescription. Potential antibiotic cost reduction was estimated. Our first step was to assume our prescribers had followed the BRAHMS algorithm in the antimicrobial prescribing for these 23 patients. Theoretical application of the BRAHMs criteria to de-escalate antibiotic prescription after 2 PCT tests of ≤0.2ug/l demonstrated a potential cost saving of approximately 44GBP per patient. The calculation was based on the average cost for 1 day's usage, multiplied by the number of days antibiotics were prescribed. This reflects the cost of the drug only; in reality, the costs will be much higher when factors such as staff time (medical/nursing/pharmacy) and overheads are taken into account.

The median LOS was 5(IQR 9) and 8 days (IQR 11) in patients with a first PCT of ≤0.2 ug/L ver-sus>0.2 ug/L respectively. Data samples were too small to identify any significant correlation between ED levels of PCT and ITU admission or hospital readmission. Table 1 The association of PCT in ED and patient mortality 

PCT is not routinely measured on patients with signs of sepsis in ED in the UK. Our study conducted in the emergency department stands out from the published literature on PCT where the target population is in the critical care setting (8) . We have shown that for patients in ED with signs of sepsis, a PCT >0.2 ug/L at presentation is a prognostic indicator for a significantly increased risk of in hospital death. ED is a high volume, high risk area in the treatment of patients with sepsis. A PCT level of 0.2 ug/L was chosen as the cut-off to align with BRAHMS criteria (<0.25ug/L) to ensure clear guidance to clinicians. Raised mortality was observed in PDSA cycle 1 in those patients with an ED PCT level greater than 0.2ug/L and there was clinical concern that a higher cut off would potentially be clinically unsafe in an ED setting. Early identification of a high risk cohort of patients can help alert the clinical teams to an increased need for monitoring and early review by a senior clinician in a patient who may at first appear clinically stable. Early identification of high-risk patients could mean that intensive monitoring and treatment is initiated at an earlier point in the development of sepsis, potentially reducing secondary organ damage and reducing the number of deaths from sepsis.

The study was performed when COVID-19 was present in the population, but the subgroup analysis was completed before the COVID-19 pandemic, indicating that the results are applicable to routine ED practice (9) .

PCT as a routine diagnostic test for investigation of sepsis in ED was successfully introduced using a QI program. Use of PCT in the non-ICU setting to guide antibiotic prescribing was more challenging. Completion of the 2nd PCT test did not exceed 29%. High medical staff turnover, patient ward changes and phlebotomy arrangements and the fact the PCT use was not embedded in current practice were responsible system factors identified for low compliance with performing the 2 nd PCT test. Automation of the 2nd PCT at ordercomms level was considered the single most effective way to improve compliance, but was not achieved.

PGAT supports good antimicrobial stewardship; however, in our study compliance with PGAT was only 20.7% for de-escalation of treatment. Our study suggests that there may be a potential to reduce antimicrobial costs by using the BRAHMS criteria to guide antibiotic deescalation in the non-ICU setting. Larger studies with higher levels of compliance with PGAT for de-escalation of treatment are required to confirm the findings of our study. Resistance of prescribers at all levels to apply evidence based PGAT to prescribing practice was identified as the prime factor causing low compliance with PGAT (10). In our hospital the staff continued to rely on a more familiar, less specific biomarker, namely C-reactive protein (CRP). Education and digital clinical decision support are two key strategies that hospitals could utilise to improve compliance with PGAT. Engaging education programmes delivered by PCT ambassadors such as training meetings, short videos and tea trolley training can encourage adoption of change (11) . Digital clinical decision support could also encourage behaviour change by automated ordering of the second PCT, preventing the daily ordering of CRP analysis and prompts and alerts associated with antibiotic prescribing. If the hospital culture transitioned to the use of PCT evidence based prescribing practice in non-ICU patients, the benefits of PCT measurement in ED would be further enhanced (12).

A Procalcitonin level >0.2 ug/L in patients presenting to the Emergency Department with signs of sepsis identifies a patient cohort at increased 

Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care

Sepsis: definition, epidemiology, and diagnosis

Can procalcitonin measurement help in differentiating between bacterial infection and other kinds of inflammatory processes? Annals of the rheumatic diseases

Use of procalcitonin to reduce patients' exposure to antibiotics in intensive care units (PRORATA trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial Lancet

Procalcitonin algorithms for antibiotic therapy decisions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and recommendations for clinical algorithms. Archives of internal medicine

Sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management

Procalcitonin(PCT) test (immunoassay)

Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy in intensive care unit patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intensive Care

Risk Assessment and Rule-out of Bacterial Coinfection

Sepsis hysteria: excess hype and unrealistic expectations

Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy: an expert consensus

Laboratory medicine and healthcare excellence; Till death do us part

Many thanks to all multidisciplinary team members associated with this project who collectively helped us achieve recognition of achievement in association with the 2020 UNIVANTS of Healthcare Excellence TM awards (13) .We would also like to acknowledge UCLPartners for the funding and support provided through its Innovation Adoption Fund Programme; Dr. Diksha Ramrekha for her contribution in data collection; Debbie Thomas our lead sepsis nurse and the wider ED team for their hard work, clinical insight and dedication.