key: cord-0071148-ppzbn892
authors: Wei, Penglu; Yang, Kuo; Long, Dehuai; Tan, Yupei; Xing, Wenlong; Li, Xiang; Wu, Hongli; Liu, Hongxu
title: Efficacy and Safety of TCMI in Patients With Combined Coronary Heart Disease and Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
date: 2021-11-23
journal: Front Pharmacol
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.741261
sha: 20bffe560ccf44596253976553ee73a50d52c1fc
doc_id: 71148
cord_uid: ppzbn892

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of conventional treatments (CTs) to those that included traditional Chinese medicine injections (TCMIs) in patients with combined coronary heart disease and heart failure (CHD-HF). Methods: Eight electronic literature databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Database) were searched from their inceptions to May 18, 2021, to identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcomes analyzed included the total effectiveness rate and adverse events (ADRs). The secondary outcomes analyzed included the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and 6-min walk test (6MWT). Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess quality of the analyzed RCTs. Stata and OpenBUGS software were used to prior to the systematic review and network meta-analysis. Results: Sixty-one eligible trials involved 5,567 patients and one of the following 15 TCMIs: Shuxuetong, Shenmai, Shenfu, Shengmai, Danshenduofenyansuan, Danhong, Dazhuhongjingtian, Xinmailong, Dengzhanxixin, Gualoupi, Shuxuening, Xuesaitong, Yiqi Fumai, Shenqi Fuzheng, Huangqi. Network meta-analysis revealed that Shuxuetong injection + CT group was superior to CT only in improving the total effectiveness rate [odds ratio (OR): 7.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17–27.41]. Shenmai injection + CT was superior to CT only for LVEF (OR: 8.97, CI: 4.67–13.18), Xinmailong injection + CT was superior to CT only for NT-proBNP (OR: −317.70, CI: −331.10–303.10), Shenqi Fuzheng injection + CT was superior to CT only for BNP (OR: −257.30, CI: −308.40–242.80); and Danhong injection + CT was superior to CT only for 6MWT (OR: 84.40, CI: 62.62−106.20). Different TCMIs had different toxicity spectrums. Conclusion: TCMIs combined with CT are better than CT alone in treating CHD-HF. Different TCMIs improve different outcomes. Additional properly designed RCTs are needed to conduce a more refined comparison of various TCMIs. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], identifier [CRD42021258263].

Heart failure (HF) is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome and represents the final path of various heart diseases (Pagliaro et al., 2019) , with an estimated 64.3 million people suffering from HF worldwide (GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators, 2018) . The latest epidemiological survey of HF in China shows that its prevalence rate among residents over 35 years old is 1.3%; accordingly, it is estimated that there are about 8.9 million HF patients (Hao et al., 2019; Metra and Lucioli, 2020) . Ischemic heart disease is one of the most frequent causes of HF. It is usually attributed to coronary heart disease (CHD), which is defined by the presence of one or more obstructive plaques that lead to reduced coronary blood flow, myocardial ischemia, and subsequent HF (Lala and Desai, 2014; Cleland and Pellicori, 2019; Severino et al., 2020) .

HF and CHD share many risk factors. Cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes promote atherosclerosis development, leading to CHD. HF can result from CHD or other specific cardiovascular risk factors (Taylor and Hobbs, 2013) . Conventional treatments of CHD-HF include diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), β-receptor blockers, anti-platelet and anti-thrombotic drugs, statins, aldosteronereceptor blockers, digoxin, and vasodilator agents (Committee of Exports on Rational Drug Use National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People' Republic of China, Chinese Pharmacists Association, 2019; Elgendy et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2019) . However, these treatments have many adverse effects, such as hypotension, arrhythmias, neuropsychosis, hyperkalemia, and worsening kidney function, which limit their clinical applications (Moser, 1997; Saedder et al., 2014) . Although non-pharmacological treatments such as coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTCA), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and heart transplantation have been used in the treatment of CHD-HF, a significant number of CHD-HF patients still have no access to effective treatments (Sardu et al., 2017) . Hence, it is important to explore other potentially effective interventions for treating CHD-HF.

Traditional Chinese medicine injections (TCMIs) have been widely used to treat CHD-HF (Hu et al., 2009; Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019) . Dozens of RCTs and pairwise meta-analyses using direct comparison models have been carried out to compare the efficacy and safety of TCMIs in patients with CHD-HF (Jiang and Shang, 2018; . Since no head-to-head RCTs comparisons involving TCMIs are available, indirect comparisons involving networks of studies linked by one or more common comparators can be used to assess the efficacy and safety of different TCMIs in patients with CHD-HF (Bucher et al., 1997; Cooper et al., 2019) . Network meta-analysis can synthesize evidence from direct and indirect comparisons to identify the best available treatment (Cipriani et al., 2013) . Here, we described our network meta-analysis of relevant RCTs conducted with the goal to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of different TCMIs in patients with CHD-HF.

This study was conducted following the protocol registered with PROSPERO (Protocol number: CRD42021258263). Our network meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (Radua, 2021; Hutton et al., 2015) ; see Supplementary Table S1 . Bayesian network meta-analysis was applied to make probabilistic statements and predictions regarding treatment effects and advantages in complex clinical situations (Salanti et al., 2011) .

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, Wanfang Database, and Chinese Biomedical Database to get relevant articles with no language restrictions published before May 18, 2021, using as the main search term ("Coronary Diseases") or ("Heart failure") and ("Injection") within the restriction limit of ("randomized controlled trial"). A subset of Chinese and English journals that might publish studies relevant for our subject were also searched manually. The detailed search strategy is described in Supplementary Table S2 .

Two review authors (PW and KY) independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of trials retrieved by the search for potential eligibility. Then, we acquired the full texts of trials considered potentially eligible for inclusion in the review. We sought further information from the authors of the trial, which was not sufficient to determine eligibility. Any differences were resolved through consensus and arbitration by a panel of adjudicators (PW, DL, YT, WX, and XL).

We included published RCTs that met the following criteria:

• Participants: all the enrolled participants were required to accord with the current or past definitions of CHD and HF (Hu et al., 2009; Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019; Pan et al., 2005; Yuan and Du, 2012; Feng, 2013; Wang et al., 2019; Li et al., 2016a; Shi et al., 2016; Shen et al., 2017; Ji, 2019; Zhou et al., 2005; Wu and Duan, 2009; Yang, 2009; Zhao et al., 2011a; Cao, 2012; Dong, 2012; Shen, 2012; Wu and Huang, 2012; Yang and Li, 2012; Zhou et al., 2013; Luo et al., 2015; Xiu and Chen, 2015; Li et al., 2016b; He, 2016; Mao, 2016; Wang et al., 2016; Wu, 2016; Li et al., 2018; Wang and Jang, 2018; Li, 2019a; Zhou and Luo, 2020; Lu, 2005; Zhu et al., 2008; Xing et al., 2009; Wang, 2012; Zhao et al., 2012; Wu, 2014; Yang et al., 2014; Zhang, 2015a; Teng, 2016; Xu, 2016; Tian et al., 2017; Zhan et al., 2017; Han, 2018; Ni et al., 2020; Zhang, 2020; Huang et al., 1999; Zhao et al., 2011b; Wang et al., 2011; Zhang, 2015b; Wei and Lu, 2020; Ren, 2021; Guo et al., 2012) . Trials without a description of the detailed diagnostic criteria but which reported patients with definite CHD-HF were also included (Zhou et al., 2002; Kuang, 2004; Xin and Shan, 2012; Wu et al., 2017; Gong et al., 2018; Li, 2019b • Outcomes: the primary outcomes were total effectiveness rate and adverse reactions (ADRs). The secondary outcomes included the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and 6-min walk test (6MWT). The included trials were required to report at least one of these clinical outcome measures.

Studies not meeting all these inclusion criteria were excluded. In addition, the following exclusion criteria were applied:

• Interventions in the control group included other traditional treatments, such as other TCMI, acupuncture, or Chinese herbal medicine. • The criteria of efficiency evaluation did not meet the following definitions (Hu et al., 2009; Xian et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2009; Xian et al., 2016; Yuan and Du, 2012; Feng, 2013; Shi et al., 2016; Shen et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2017; Wu and Huang, 2012; He, 2016; Gong et al., 2018; Wu and Huang, 2012; He, 2016; Gong et al., 2018; Dong, 2012; Li et al., 2018; Li, 2019a; Wu and Duan, 2009; Luo et al., 2015; Xiu and Chen, 2015; Wu and Duan, 2009; Luo et al., 2015; Xiu and Chen, 2015; Zhao et al., 2012; Li, 2019b; Yang et al., 2014; Zhang, 2015a; Xu, 2016; Tian et al., 2017; Zhang, 2020; Xing et al., 2009; Teng, 2016; Zhao et al., 2011b; Wang et al., 2011; Zhang, 2015b; Zhao et al., 2011b; Wang et al., 2011; Zhang, 2015b) : (1) Excellent: HF was prominently ameliorated and/or the New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA) classification improved to I level or increased by at least two levels;

(2) Valid: HF was partially ameliorated, or NYHA classification increased by at least one level; (3) Invalid: HF was not ameliorated or NYHA classification was unchanged between before and after treatment, or an exacerbation or death occurred. The total effectiveness rate was calculated as the sum of the marked effectiveness rate and the effectiveness rate.

Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by two investigators (PW and HW). Data on trial details are as follows: (1) Basic information of the eligibility, including the content of study ID, first author, nationality, publication year, and study design;

(2) Basic characteristics of included patients: sample size, sex composition, average age, course of treatment, and population distribution with the NYHA class;

(3) Details of interventions; (4) Details of outcomes; (5) Information of quality assessment of RCTs. Two investigators (PW and KY) independently assessed risk of bias of individual studies. Discrepancies were resolved through consensus and arbitration by a panel of adjudicators (PW, DL, YT, WX, and XL). We also made attempts to contact the study authors by means of email, phone, or fax to obtain missing demographic information, such as the sample size, sex distribution, age, etc. When studies had multiple publications, we sorted all reports of the same study, so that each study, not each report, was the unit of interest in the review, and these studies were given a single study ID.

We assessed risk of bias of included RCTs using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (Zhao et al., 2011b; Wang et al., 2011; Zhang, 2015b ) based on the following items: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other bias. Each item was scored as low, unclear, or high risk of bias. Any disagreements were resolved by a third researcher.

We synthesized all direct and indirect evidence to compare different treatments in terms of efficacy and safety, reported as odds ratios for binary outcomes (total effectiveness rate and adverse events) along with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Using Stata (version 16.0), we generated network diagrams for different outcomes to illustrate geometries, to clarify which treatments were directly or indirectly compared in the included studies (Chaimani et al., 2013) . We analyzed frequency and random effects and conducted pairwise meta-analysis for head-to-head comparisons based on two or more trials. We assessed heterogeneity between the studies using Q test and the I 2 statistic within a visual forest plot. A p value less than 0.05 was regarded statistically significant. Heterogeneity was considered low, moderate, or high for estimated I 2 values under 25%, between 25% and 50%, and over 50%, respectively (Higgins et al., 2003) .

Network meta-analyses were performed in a Bayesian framework using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation technique using OpenBUGS (version 3.2.3). For all outcomes (total effectiveness rate, LVEF, NT-proBNP, BNP, and 6MWT), 150,000 sample iterations were generated with 100,000 burn-ins and a thinning interval of 1. We evaluated convergence of iterations by visual inspection of the three chains to establish homogenous parameter estimates in accordance with the Brooks-Gelman-Rubin diagnostic (Supplementary Figure S1 ) (Zhao et al., 2011b; Wang et al., 2011; Zhang, 2015b) . Within the Bayesian framework, the network meta-analysis estimates the overall ranking of treatments by calculating the surface under the cumulative ranking curve for each; it is equal to 1 when the treatment is definitely best and 0 when the treatment is definitely the worst (Salanti et al., 2011) . To assess the robustness and reliability of the results, we performed sensitivity analysis. We restricted the case number ≥100 to observe the effect of various treatments in patients with HF.

Our search strategy initially identified 1,284 records. After removal of duplicates, 981 remained for screening based on their titles and abstracts, of which 851 were excluded as irrelevant. We reviewed 130 full-text articles or, if these were not available, abstract publications or trial registry entries. Finally, we identified 61 RCTs (Hu et al., 2009; Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019; Hu et al., 2009; Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019; Hu et al., 2009; Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019) for inclusion, all of which had published. A study flow diagram is presented in Figure 1 .

Among 61 RCTs (Hu et al., 2009; Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019; Hu et al., 2009; Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019; Hu et al., 2009; Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019) for inclusion, a total of 5,567 patients enrolled who received one of the 15 different treatments TCMIs, as listed in the Methods, in combination with conventional treatments (diuretics, ACEIs, ARBs, β-receptor blocker, aldosterone-receptor blocker, digoxin, or vasodilator substance). The main characteristics of all included studies are depicted in Table 1 . The detailed information of TCMIs is described in Supplementary Table S3 . Available data about absolute efficacy of various TCMIs are described in Supplementary Table S4 . 

The detailed risk of bias assessments of the included studies is summarized in Figure 2 , 1999; Hu et al., 2009; Xian et al., 2016) via computer randomization, and two studies (Li et al., 2016a; Tian et al., 2017) via random parallel grouping method, and one study (Shen, 2012 ) via dynamic random grouping; therefore, the risk of selection bias was considered low. The remaining RCTs referred to only random grouping, and the risk of selection bias was considered unclear.

(2) Performance bias (blinding of the participants and personnel): Three studies (Pan et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2011; Xian et al., 2016) were double-blind, and two studies (Dong, 2012; Luo et al., 2015) were single-blind, which were considered low risk. Other studies did not provide information on blinding, so the performance bias was evaluated as unclear risk.

(3) Detection bias: There was not enough information to evaluate its risk level; therefore, the risk is unclear. (4) Attrition bias: None of the included RCTs had incomplete data, so the risk of attrition bias was considered "low." (5) Reporting bias: Taking into account the inability to acquire a complete implementation scheme, the risk of reporting bias was considered "unclear." (6) Other bias: The risk of this bias was considered "low," because no other obvious bias was observed in all studies.

Network meta-analysis included 13 treatments for the total effective rate, 12 treatments for LVEF, three treatments for NT-proBNP, nine treatments for BNP, and five treatments for 6MWT ( Figure 3) . In terms of the total effectiveness rate ( Figure 4A) Figure 4B) , when compared to CT alone, Shenmai injection yielded best results (OR: 8.97, CI: 4.67-13.18); significant improvements were also found for Yiqi Figure 5 shows the Bayesian ranking profiles of the compared treatments with the detail ranking results summarized in Supplementary Tables S5-S9 . Shuxuetong injection was most likely to be ranked first for the total effectiveness rate (cumulative probability 39.24%), Shenmai injection for LVEF (20.37%), Xinmailong injection for NT-proBNP (99.99%), Shenqi Fuzheng injection for BNP (42.55%), and Danhong injection for 6MWT (99.24%).

Forest plots for the four available pairwise comparisons that include heterogeneity estimates are shown in Supplementary Figure S3 . Our assessment suggested minimal heterogeneity (I 2 0.00%) in half of all comparisons regarding different outcomes. However, moderate to high heterogeneity was detected in the following comparisons:

Shenfu injection vs. CT alone for LVEF (93.24%) and BNP (98.29%); Shenmai injection vs. CT alone for LVEF (98.89%), NT-proBNP (99.53%), and BNP (98.51%); Shengmai injection vs. CT alone for LVEF (97.04%) and 6MWT (39.21%); Yiqi Fumai injection vs. CT alone for LVEF (78.35%); Xinmailong injection vs. CT alone for LVEF (99.58%), NT-proBNP (99.24%), and 6MWT (58.09%); and Shenqi Fuzheng injection vs. CT alone for BNP (98.44%). The fit of the consistency model was similar or better than that of the inconsistency model (Supplementary Table S10 ).

Thirty-one reports (Shi et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019; Shi et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019; Shi et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019; Shi et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019; Shi et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019; Shi et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019; Gong et al., 2018; Ji, 2019; He, 2016; Wang et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2013; Wu, 2016; Dong, 2012; Li et al., 2018; Wang and Jang, 2018; Li, 2019a; Zhou and Luo, 2020; Wu and Duan, 2009; Luo et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2008; Zhao et al., 2011a; Zhao et al., 2012; Li, 2019b; Yang et al., 2014; Zhang, 2020; Teng, 2016; Ni et al., 2020; Huang et al., 1999; Zhou et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2011; Zhang, 2015b) considered the occurrence of ADRs; of those, 25 reports listed no ADRs, and 6 records described specific ADRs (Huang et al., 1999; Xin and Shan, 2012; Zhao et al., 2012; Shi et al., 2016; Wang and Jang, 2018; Ni et al., 2020) , such as renal dysfunction, liver dysfunction, urinary system infection or urine protein, etc. ( Table 2 ). The ADR rates of Shenfu injection, Shengmai injection, Xinmailong injection, Dazhuhongjingtian injection, and CT alone were 21. 05, 5.56, 5.26, 6.67, and 7 .28%, respectively.

A total of 2,959 patients in 22 trials with case numbers ≥100 trials (Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019; Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019; Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019; Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019; Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019; Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019; Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019; Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019; Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019; Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019; Zhu and Han, 2014; Xian et al., 2016; Xu and Cao, 2019; Yang et al., 2014;  

Significant results are in bold.

Frontiers in Pharmacology | www.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 12 | Article 741261 Xu, 2016; Zhang, 2020; Yang et al., 2014; Xu, 2016; Zhang, 2020; Yang et al., 2014; Xu, 2016; Zhang, 2020; Yang et al., 2014; Xu, 2016; Zhang, 2020; Yang et al., 2014; Xu, 2016; Zhang, 2020; Yang et al., 2014; Xu, 2016; Zhang, 2020) were included in sensitivity analysis. The results did not show any obvious deviations from the original network meta-analysis (Supplementary Figures  S4-S5) . Among the findings, Yiqi Fumai injection yielded the best therapeutic effects for LVEF and 6MWT, which were only slightly different from the original meta-analysis.

In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we comprehensively summarize the efficacy and safety of different TCMI treatments in patients with CHD-HF. The results suggest that (1) many TCMI combined with CT are superior to CT alone in the total effectiveness rate, LVEF, NT-proBNP, BNP, and 6MWT, although CT alone was superior to some TCMIs combined with CT in improving NT-BNP and BNP indices;

(2) Shuxuetong injection, Shenmai injection, Xinmailong injection, Shenqi Fuzheng injection, and Danhong injection had the best curative effect when measured by the total effectiveness rate, LVEF, NT-proBNP, BNP, and 6MWT, respectively; (3) Shuxuetong injection, Gualoupi injection, and Danshenduofenyansuan injection (which stimulate blood circulation and prevent blood stasis) were consistent in improving the total effectiveness rate, but not LVEF; (4) Shenmai injection, Yiqi Fumai injection, and Shengmai injection (which invigorate qi) were consistent in ameliorating LVEF; (5) Shenfu injection (which revives yang) and Xinmailong injection (qiinvigorating and blood-activating) were consistent in improving NT-proBNP and BNP; (6) Danhong injection (which invigorates blood circulation) and Shenmai injection (which supplements qi and nourishes yin) were beneficial for 6MWT. The safety of TCMIs has always been of concern. A total of 31 studies in our network meta-analysis considered safety issues, and most did not report any serious ADRs. The common side effects were nausea, mouth dryness, and dizziness. Renal dysfunction, liver dysfunction, urinary system infection, urine protein, pulmonary infection, anemia, hypoglycemia, and chills were reported occasionally. These discomforts could be effectively relieved by symptomatic treatments. Nevertheless, clinicians should keep in mind the possibility of ADRs when prescribing TCMI treatments. In our comparisons, Shenfu injection had the least favorable safety profile.

Conditions of patients with CHD-HF are often serious. Despite advances in treatments, the 5-years and 10-years survival rates are still estimated to be 50% and 10%, respectively, and the readmission rates continue to rise (Ren, 2021) . In China, TCMIs are approved by the China Food and Drug Administration and are widely used in patients hospitalized due to CHD-HF. Some studies have shown that TCMIs combined with CT had some advantages. For example, Shenfu injections were reported to improve the NYHA functional classification, TCM syndrome score, 6MWT and SF-36 health survey score, increase the number of CD + 34 stem cells in the peripheral blood, and promote mobilization of bone marrow stem cells (Hu et al., 2009; Xian et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2019) . Wu et al. (2017) indicated that Xinmailong injection can effectively inhibit inflammatory reactions and improve the indices of cardiac function in patients with CHD-HF. Basic studies revealed that Shenfu injection opposes heart failure through anti-apoptosis, antioxidation, and reduction of myocardial fibrosis (Ni et al., 2017; Yan et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2019) . Xinmailong injection could notably reduce the production of reactive oxygen species and enhance the protein expressions of antioxidant enzymes, thereby exerting therapeutic effects on the cardiovascular system . Shengmai injection may attenuate oxidative stressinduced damage in cardiomyocytes potentially through the AKT and ERK1/2 pathways that protect against heart failure (Zhu et al., 2019) .

Our sensitivity analysis showed that the overall results remained relatively robust when the trials were restricted to case numbers ≥100. The SUCRA rankings for LVEF and BNP of Shenfu injection and Shenmai injection had differences, which could be due to the low number of studies that considered these outcomes.

Our study had several limitations. First, our analysis could be complicated by various confounding factors beyond our control, because most treatments were indirectly compared and most direct evidence was derived from one trial in the present network. Second, despite our best efforts, the included RCTs were of relatively poor quality. For example, although all trials reported that patients were randomly assigned into different groups, only some of 61 RCTs described the specific methods of generating random sequences, such as a random number table or a random parallel grouping. Only five studies mentioned the blinding method, and most trials were low sample size tests with positive findings which are particularly prone to various biases. Third, most of the included studies have not been registered.

By synthesizing all evidence from multiple RCTs, this review helps to identify current problems and areas worthy of improvement. Due to the poor quality of the included studies, the evidence obtained from our network meta-analysis is not sufficient for a comprehensive comparison of different TCMI combinations with various CTs for treatment of CHD-HF. Based on our findings, we propose the following two recommendations for further studies on TCMI-CT in the treatment of CHD-HF: (1) clinical trials should be prospectively registered in recognized clinical trials registry platforms; and (2) the quality of study designs should be improved, including randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding.

In this network meta-analysis, the TCMIs known for promoting blood circulation and preventing blood stasis, such as shuxuetong injection, danshenduofenyansuan injection, improved cardiac function, and clinical symptoms when compared in CTs; the Frontiers in Pharmacology | www.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 12 | Article 741261 qi-invigorating, such as Shenqi fuzheng injection, Shenmai injection, and Xinmailong injection improve the indices of LVEF, NT-proBNP, BNP, and 6MWT. Our analysis also revealed that Shenfu injection has obvious side effects, which should be paid more attention to in clinical applications. Whereas the high risk of bias and low quality of the available trials may limit the reliability of our trial comparisons, our analysis clearly reveals the need for more well-designed clinical studies with improved sample sizes and quality of data processing.

More clinical studies with well-designed, reasonable samples and good method quality are needed in the future.

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, and further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

HL and HW contributed to the conception or design of the work. XL and WX revised the manuscript; DL and YT is responsible to data collection; KY made a statistical analysis; and PW drafted the manuscript. The final contribution was read and approved by all the authors.

This work was supported by Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81274315, 81273741, and 81704199) and the National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (No. 2019XZZX-XXG001).

The Results of Direct and Indirect Treatment Comparisons in Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Clinical Observation of Shenmai Injection in the Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease with Heart Failure

Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA

Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-Analysis

Myocardial Dysfunction and Coronary Artery Disease as Therapeutic Targets in Heart Failure

Committee of Exports on Rational Drug Use National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People' Republic of China, Chinese Pharmacists Association. Guidelines for Rational Use of Drugs of Heart Failure

Using Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons and Network Meta-Analyses to Compare Efficacy of Brexanolone Injection with Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for Treating Postpartum Depression

Effect of Shenfu Injection Combined with Western Medicine on Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and its Effect on BNP

Medical Therapy for Heart Failure Caused by Ischemic Heart Disease

Clinical Observation on the Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure with Coronary Heart Disease by Injecting Yiqifumai (Freeze-dried)

GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators

Prevalence, and Years Lived with Disability for 354 Diseases and Injuries for 195 Countries and Territories, 1990-2017: a Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study

Effectiveness of Xinmailong in the Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease with Heart Failure and its Influence on Related Indexes

Fifty-eight Cases of Chronic Heart Failure with Coronary Heart Disease Treated by Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine

Effect Analysis of Shenfu Injection in Treatment of Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease

Prevalence of Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Dysfunction in China: the China Hypertension Survey

Effects of Shenfu Injection on Cardiac Function, Related Inflammatory Factors and BNP in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Heart Failure

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

Measuring Inconsistency in Meta-Analyses

Influence of Shenfu Injection on Heart Function and Bone Marrow Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease

Shengmai Injection in the Treatment of 40 Cases of Coronary Heart Failure. Shanxi

The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-Analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations

The Clinical Effect of Xinmailong in the Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease with Heart Failure and its Effect on Plasma Hs-CRP and NT-proBNP Levels

Clinical Evidence and Effect Mechanism of Yiqi Fumai(Freeze-Dried) for Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease with Heart Failure

Clinical Observation of Xuesaitong Injection in the Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease Congestive Heart Failure

The Role of Coronary Artery Disease in Heart Failure

Statins in the Prevention and Treatment of Heart Failure: A Review of the Evidence

Effect of Xinmailong Injection on Serum hsCRP, NT-proBNP and High Sensitivity cTn-I in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Heart Failure

Effect Analysis of Shenmai Injection in Treating Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease

Effect of Shenfu Injection on Left Ventricular Pump Function in 60 Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Heart Failure

Effect of Shenfu Injection on Coronary Heart Disease with Chronic Heart Disease

Mechanisms Underlying Action of Xinmailong Injection, a Traditional Chinese Medicine in Cardiac Function Improvement

Effect of Shenfu Injection Combined with Conventional Western Medicine on Cardiac Function and Related Inflammatory Factors and BNP in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Heart Failure

Effect of Shenqi Fuzheng Injection on Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease

Observation on the Curative Effect of Shenfu Injection on Acute Attack of Chronic Heart Failure

Clinical Effect of Shenfu Injection on Patients with Chronic Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease

Corrigendum to 'Prevalence of Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Dysfunction in China: the China Hypertension Survey

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists and Calcium Channel Blocking Agents: A Review of Potential Benefits and Possible Adverse Reactions

Cardioprotection against Heart Failure by Shenfu Injection via TGF-β/Smads Signaling Pathway

Observation of Therapeutic Effect of Trichosanthis Peel Injection in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

Myocardial Ischemia and Coronary Disease in Heart Failure

Influence of Shenmai Injection on T Lymphcyte Phenotype in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Complicated with Chronic Heart Failure

PRISMA 2020 -an Updated Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

The Therapeutic Effect of Xinmailong in the Treatment of Coronary Heart Failure and its Effect on the Level of NT-proBNP and Hs-CRP

Epidemiology of Heart Failure

Identifying High-Risk Medication: a Systematic Literature Review

Graphical Methods and Numerical Summaries for Presenting Results from Multiple-Treatment Meta-Analysis: an Overview and Tutorial

Multipolar Pacing by Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with a Defibrillators Treatment in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Failing Heart Patients: Impact on Responders Rate, and Clinical Outcomes

Ischemic Heart Disease and Heart Failure: Role of Coronary Ion Channels

Effect of Shenmai Injection Combined with Western Medicine on Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and its Effect on

The Influence of Xinmailong Injection on Cardiac Function and Plasma NT-proBNP Level in Patients with Cornary Heart Disease with Chronic Heart Failure

Effect of Xinmailong Injection on Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease Patients' Serum BNP, hsCRP and VEGF

General Methods for Monitoring Convergence of Iterative Simulations

Heart Failure Therapy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Observation on the Curative Effect of Trichosanthis Peel Injection Combined with Conventional Western Medicine in the Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease

Clinical Observation on Treating Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease with the Dazhu Hongjingtian Injection

Clinical Observation of Danhong Injection in Treating Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease

The Impact of Shenfu Injection on the Immune Function in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Heart-Kidney Yang Deficiency Syndrome

Shenfu Injection Assisted Conventional Western Medicine in Treating Chronic Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease

Effect of Shuxuening on Chronic Heart Failure in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease

Frontiers in Pharmacology | www.frontiersin.org

Randomized, Double-Blinded, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Shenfu Injection for Treatment of Patients with Chronic Heart Failure during the Acute Phase of Symptom Aggravation (Yang and Qi Deficiency Syndrome)

Systematic Review of Effecacy and Safety of Xinmailong Injection in Treatmeng of Coronary Heart Disease Complicated with Heart Failure

Effect of Xin Mai Long Injection in the Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease and its Influnce on Cardiac Funtion index and Vascular Endothelial Function

Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Shenfu Injection in Rats with Ischemic Heart Failure and its Effect on Small Molecules Using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Mass Spectrometry Imaging

Clinical Study of Shenfu Injection for Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease

Effect of Shenfu on Serum Lipoprotein A in Heart Failure Patients with Coronary Heart Disease

Clinical Effect of Integrative Medicine for Treatment of Function on Coronary Heart Disease Patients with Heart Failure

Effect of Shenqi Fuzheng Injection on Left Ventricular Function and Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

Effect of Xinmailong Injection on Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease Patients' Serum BNP, hsCRP and VEGF

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Shenmai Injection in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

Adjuvant Treatment with Shengmai Injection for Chronic Heart Failure Combined with Coronary Heart Disease: a Clinical Observation

Effect of Erigeron Breviscapus on Unstable Angina Pectoris and Chronic Heart Failure

Clinical Observation of Shenfu Injection in Treating Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease

Clinical Effect of Xinmailong Injection Combined with Western Medicine on Patients with Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease

Influnce of Salvianolate on Cardiac Function and Content of H-FABP in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Heart Failure. Elec

Shenfu Formula Reduces Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis in Heart Failure Rats by Regulating microRNAs

Clinical Analysis of Plasma C-Reactive Protein Concentration in 30 Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Heart Failure Treated with Shenfu Injection

Influnce of Salvianolate on Cardiac Function and Content of H-FABP in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Heart Failure

Effect of Shenmai Injection in the Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease with Deficiency of Qi and Yin Two Curative Effect Observation of 30 Cases

Efficacy of Yi Qi Fu Mai Injection on Heart Failure Complicated with Angina Pectoris in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease. Chin

Observation of Therapeutic Effect of Dazhuhongjingtian on Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease

Effect of Shuxuetong Injection on Coronary Heart Disease with normal Ejection Fraction in Patients with Heart Failure

Effect of Danhong Injection on Left Ventricular Function and D-Dimer in Patients with Heart Failure

Effect of Salvianolate Injection on Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease and its Effect on Left Ventricular Function

Clinical Effect of Shengmai Injection on Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease

Thirty-five Cases of Coronary Heart Disease and Heart Failure Treated with Shenmai Injection

Clinical Study of Shenmai Injection in Treating Heart Failure of Coronary Heart Disease

Effect of Shenfu Injection on NT-proBNP in Heart Failure Patients with Coronary Heart Disease

Clinical Study of Shenfu Injection in Adjuvant Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease with Chronic Heart Failure

Clinical Observation on the Adjuvant Treatment of Coronary Heart Failure with astragalus Injection

859 Outcome of Preventive Atrial Stimulation Algorithms in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease

Shengmai Injection Alleviates H2O2-induced O-xidative S-tress through A-ctivation of AKT and I-nhibition of ERK P

Observation on the Curative Effect of Injecting Yiqifumai on Coronary Heart Disease Complicated with Heart Failure

Effect of Shenqi Fuzheng Injection on Plasma Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Chronic Heart Failure

We express gratitude to EditSprings (https://www.editsprings.cn/) for the expert linguistic services provided.

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.741261/ full#supplementary-material Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.