key: cord-0063759-fsuaiuex authors: Pongpiachan, Siwatt; Chetiyanukornkul, Thaneeya; Manassanitwong, Wirat title: Relationship Between COVID-19-Infected Number and PM(2.5) Level in Ambient Air of Bangkok, Thailand date: 2021-05-27 journal: Aerosol Sci Eng DOI: 10.1007/s41810-021-00105-6 sha: d7439a7da026c7e1f97918e609edc139c34572d4 doc_id: 63759 cord_uid: fsuaiuex Several empirical studies of reductions in air pollutants as social distancing and working from home (WFH) policies have sparked recommendations that the COVID-19 pandemic might have been responsible for better air quality particularly in urban area. These findings offer a compelling provocation for the scientific community to detect and investigate variations to air quality as a consequence of government enforced quarantine. In spite of countless research studies focusing on the connection between WFH policy and air pollutant levels, the majority of discussion has unfortunately ignored the central role of other potential sources (e.g. agricultural waste burnings, cooking emissions, and industrial releases) in governing air quality, or has neglected the psychological and social impacts of COVID-19. In this study, a t test was used to compare the average concentrations of PM(2.5) and COVID-19-infected numbers (n) in three different periods which were n < 300 vs. n ≧ 300, n < 500 vs. n ≧ 500, and n < 700 vs. n ≧ 700. Some significant differences were observed in the groups of n < 500 vs. n ≧ 500, and n < 700 vs. n ≧ 700 indicating that the psychological and social impacts play a crucial role in restricting daily activities and thus reducing the atmospheric contents of PM(2.5) in some areas. Further assessments were conducted by separating PM(2.5) contents into three different periods (i.e. Period-I: day-1 ~ day-10; Period-II: day-11 ~ day-20; Period-III: day-21 ~ day-31). Some significant reductions of PM(2.5) during the Period-I were detected in the eastern area of Bangkok. In addition, Pearson correlation analysis showed that hot-spot numbers appear to be a minor of importance in controlling PM(2.5) levels in the ambient air of Bangkok, Thailand. Since the World Health Organization (WHO) formally announced the SARS-CoV-2 as a global pandemic on March 11, 2020, there have been 110,224,709 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 2,441,901 deaths on February 20, 2021. Without any doubts, COVID-19 pandemic has dramatic impact on numerous dimensions such as economic shock, logistics, supply chain, tourism industry, education, mental health, agriculture, food security, and animal sectors (Basilaia and Kvavadze 2020; Gagliano et al. 2020; Grida et al. 2020; McKibbin and Fernando 2020; Proaño 2020; Sahu 2020; Seleiman et al. 2020; Williams 2021) . Apart from the above-mentioned impacts, a work from home policy has been widely adopted as a part of government enforced quarantine measures to reduce the outbreak of pandemic (Purwanto et al. 2020; Setyawan and Lestari 2020) . As a consequence of a transition to remote working amid COVID-19 pandemic, numerous studies have been focused on the improvement of air quality level particularly in urban area around the world (Lian et al. 2020; Mahato et al. 2020; Stratoulias and Nuthammachot 2020) . Although there have been many studies focus on the chemical characterization of air pollutants in the ambient air of Thailand, little is known about the impact of lockdown policy on the improvement of air quality (ChooChuay et al. 2020a, b, c; Pongpiachan and Iijima 2016; Pongpiachan et al. 2013 Pongpiachan et al. , 2017 . Several investigations have been conducted to elucidate the relationship between the "COVID-19 lockdown" and "air pollutant levels" in the ambient air of Thailand (Oo et al. 2021; Wetchayont 2021) . A significant reduction of NO 2 level up to 20.1% was observed in the Bangkok Metropolitan Area (BMA) during the government enforced quarantine in 2020 (Oo et al. 2021) . The monthly average of NO 2 in BMA observed in 2020 was also 9.8% lower than 2019 for the same time duration (Oo et al. 2021) . Another in situ detections found a significant reducing trend of PM 2.5 , PM 10 , O 3 , and CO contents in the ambient air of Bangkok during the COVID-19 outbreak year in comparison with the same periods in 2019 (Wetchayont 2021). In spite of numerous studies focused on the influences of pandemic on reducing air pollutants, there is a rising concern that the psychological and social impact of COVID-19 might have played an important role in various aspects such as societies' mental health, nursing services of elderly patients, anxiety/ depression and suicidal ideation (Meng et al. 2020; Serafini et al. 2020; Sharma et al. 2020; Tee et al. 2020; Yom-Tov et al. 2021 ). On the contrary, there is a limited number of studies shed light on the intimate relationship between "COVID-19 infected number" and "PM 2.5 level" in the ambient air of urban cities. Overall, the main principles of this study are to (i) elucidate the impacts of COVID-19 daily case reports on the variation of PM 2.5 concentration and (ii) investigate the influences of lockdown policy and hot-spot numbers on the fluctuation of PM 2.5 content in the ambient air of Bangkok in January 2021. It is crucial to underline that all hot-spot numbers were provided by FIRMS (The Fire Information for Resource Management System) which integrates remote sensing and GIS technologies to deliver MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) hot-spot positions to GISTDA (The Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development Agency (Public Organization)). MODIS is a major instrument aboard the Terra (Terra passes from north to south across the equator in the morning) and Aqua (Aqua passes from south to north over the equator in the afternoon) satellites. It is also important to highlight that the MODIS instrument is using both the Terra and Aqua spacecraft. It has a viewing swath width of 2330 km and views the entire surface of the Earth every one to two days. Its detectors measure 36 spectral bands between 0.405 and 14.385 µm, and it acquires data at three spatial resolutions-250 m, 500 m, and 1000 m. In this study, the definition of "hotspot" indicates any fire locations detected by MODIS in the administrative provinces of central Thailand (i.e. Bangkok, Ang Thong, Chai Nat, Kamphaeng Phet, Lopburi, Nakhon Nayok, Nakhon Pathom, Nakhon Sawan, Nonthaburi, Pathum Thani, Phetchabun, Phichit, Phitsanulok, Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya, Samut Prakan, Samut Sakhon, Samut Songkhram, Saraburi, Sing Buri, Sukhothai, Suphan Buri, and Uthai Thani). The Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) has PM 10 and PM 2.5 air quality monitoring networks over Bangkok area use two US-EPA FEM BAM models BAM-1020 Beta Attenuation Mass Monitor and BAM-1022 Portable Continuous Beta Attenuation Mass Monitor. "BAMs" are generally regarded as the standard for continuous ambient PM 2.5 measurement in air quality monitoring. BAMs is using Beta ray attenuation, which is one of the most widely used methods worldwide for regulatory monitoring of automatically measures and records airborne particulate matter concentration levels in micrograms per cubic meter (μg m −3 ). They are generally simple, reliable, comparatively inexpensive, and relatively easy to operate. BAM-1022 received US-EPA Federal Equivalent Method (FEM) designated PM 2.5 in 2013 and latest modifications in 2019. In addition, all PM 2.5 data were collected by using BAMs located at 49 BMA districts. Some more descriptions on locations and characteristics of the site chosen are described as follows. In this study, there are ten BMA districts (i.e. Bang Bon, Bang Kapi, Bang Khae, Bang Khen, Bang Kho Laem, Bang Khun Thian, Bang Na, Bang Phiat, Bang Rak, and Bang Sue) connected with the Thai word "Bang" which means place and/or location usually near a river or canal. Although there are some unconscious biases related to "Bang" districts as suburban areas and/or outer districts, as they grew into a larger town, these "Bang" districts reaches a population of somewhere between 20,000 and 30,000 people then they will begin to be informally regarded as a city. For instance, Bang Kapi, Bang Rak, and Bang Sue have population of 148,964 persons, 46,472 persons, and 128,995 persons, respectively (Bangkok Metropolitan Administration 2014). It is interesting to note that Nong Chok, Lat Krabang, Bang Khun Thian, and Khlong Sam Wa have comparatively large areas with the values of 236,261 km 2 , 123,859 km 2 , 120,687 km 2 , and 110,686 km 2 , respectively (Bangkok Metropolitan Administration 2014). It is also crucial to underline that Khlong San, Ratchathewi, and Bangkok Yai have relatively high population densities with the values of 12,432 person km −2 , 10,355 person km −2 , and 11,327 person km −2 , respectively (Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, 2014). All statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 23. The bivariate Pearson Correlation generates a sample correlation coefficient, R, which detects the strength and direction of linear relationships between hot-spot numbers and PM 2.5 contents. Furthermore, the Pearson Correlation assesses whether there is statistical evidence for a linear relationship among the same pairs of hot-spot numbers and PM 2.5 contents in the population. It is also crucial to note that the data must meet the following requirements which are (i) the values for all parameters (i.e. hot-spot numbers and PM 2.5 contents) across cases are unrelated, (ii) the value for any parameter cannot affect the value of any parameter for other cases, (iii) the cases must have non-missing values on both parameters. In this study, the independent samples t test was used to compare the averages of 2 independent groups, which are PM 2.5 concentrations detected at 49 districts of BMA as categorized by COVID-19-infected number (n) (i.e. n < 300 vs. n ≧ 300, n < 500 vs. n ≧ 500, n < 700 vs. n ≧ 700) to determine whether there is statistical evidence that the related population averages are significantly different. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) is generally employed to evaluate whether there are any statistically significant differences between the averages of PM 2.5 contents measured in three different periods (i.e. 01/01/21-10/01/21, 11/01/21-20/01/21, and 21/01/21-31/01/21). It is also important to highlight that the one-way ANOVA is an omnibus test statistic and cannot explain which specific groups were statistically significantly different from each other; it only describes that at least two groups were different. To obtain a valid result, there are several assumptions that need to be passed prior to the statistical analysis. For instance, the dependent parameter (i.e. PM 2.5 content) should theoretically be detected at the interval or ratio level. The independent parameter should have independence of observations as well as consist of two or more categorical, independent groups. In addition, there should be no significant outliers and the PM 2.5 content should be approximately normally distributed for each monitoring site. As illustrated in Fig. 1A -C, three main peaks of PM 2.5 contents were detected in the first week (i.e. 04/01/21-06/01/21), the second week (i.e. 14/01/21-16/01/21), and the third week (i.e. 21/01/21-23/01/21) of January 2021. The associations of daily peak concentration of PM 2.5 with daily COVID-19-infected number and hot-spot number (see Fig. 2 ) were carefully investigated using t test, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and Pearson Correlation Analysis (PCA). A t test was employed to correlate the arithmetic mean of PM 2.5 and COVID-19-infected numbers (n) in three different categories which were Group-I (i.e. n < 300 vs. n ≧ 300), Group-II (i.e. n < 500 vs. n ≧ 500), and Group-III (i.e. n < 700 vs. n ≧ 700) (see Table 1 ). No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in Group-I indicating that the COVID-19-infected number of 300 can be considered of minor importance for making decisions to work from home (WFH). On the contrary, some significant differences (p < 0.05) were detected in air quality observatory sites located in Taling Chan, Phasi Charoen, Nong Khaem, Phar Nakhon, Bang Bon, Bang Khae, and Bang Khun Thian when using the COVID-19-infected numbers of 500 and 700 as illustrated in Table 1 (173,144) ), the density population is highly deviated with the value in the range of 1435 Person km −2 (Bang Khun Thian) to 10,002 Person km −2 (Phar Nakhon) (Bangkok Metropolitan Administration 2014). It appears rationale to conclude that both the population and the density population cannot be used to explain some significant differences between arithmetic mean of PM 2.5 and COVID-19-infected numbers observed in these seven districts. As clearly illustrated in Fig. 3 , Taling Chan, Phasi Charoen, Nong Khaem, Phar Nakhon, Bang Bon, Bang Khae, and Bang Khun Thian are located in west and southwest of Bangkok. These seven districts are relatively close to Samut Sakhon province, the epidemic hot-spot of the second outbreak of COVID-19 in Thailand. On December 18th 2020, a 67-year-old merchant at a seafood market in Samut Sakhon was tested positive and a few days later up to 1300 persons were also detected with COVID-19. The second wave of outbreak were observed in up to 33 provinces with 28 provinces throughout the nation were declared "red zone" and subjected to lockdown measures (Tan and Lim 2021) . The impact of second wave was more pronounced with the volume of cumulative nationwide cases amounted to 24,751-almost tripled the total cases reported in 2020 (Suphanchaimat et al. 2021) . As a part of COVID-19 prevention measures, the Royal Thai Government has approved the extension of the Emergency Decree nationwide until 28th February, 2021 to contain the local transmission. The Emergency Decree dramatically decrease the number of passengers travelling to the infected areas adjacent to Bangkok due to some active preventive measures such as closure of areas at risk of infection, a ban on gatherings or illegal assembly in crowded areas, and strict screening of the movement of migrant workers. These active preventive measures can significantly reduce PM 2.5 contents particularly during the first week of January, 2021. The fact that all PM 2.5 concentrations detected in the abovementioned BMA districts were significantly lower when the COVID-19-infected numbers were greater than 500 and 700 indicates that the COVID-19-infected situation reports play a major role in governing public decision to WFH. Further assessment connected with the impacts of WFH on air quality improvement were conducted by categorizing monitoring periods of PM 2.5 into three groups namely Group-I (i.e. 01/01/21-10/01/21), Group-II (i.e. 11/01/21-20/01/21), and Group-III (i.e. 21/01/21-31/01/21). It is also interesting to note that some significant reductions of PM 2.5 were observed in the eastern parts of Bangkok as illustrated in Fig. 3 . This can be explained by the fact that the majority of business districts and commercial zone are more likely to be concentrated in the eastern part of Bangkok than the western region. Thus, it appears rationale to assume that the implemented quarantine measures tend to play a major role in reducing PM 2.5 levels particularly in the business areas of eastern Bangkok. In this study, the hotspot numbers in Thailand from 1 to 31st January 2021 were also carefully analyzed using Pearson Correlation Analysis (PCA) to correlate with PM 2.5 contents collected at 49 districts of BMA in January 2021. As shown in Fig. 4 , the correlation coefficients of hot spots were comparatively low with the values of R < 0.4. On the contrary, the relatively high correlation coefficients of R > 0.9 were observed with PM 2.5 collected within different BMA air quality observatory sites. These findings underline the importance of traffic emissions as one of the main contributors of PM 2.5 in BMA districts during the observatory period. Numerous empirical investigations underline the importance of lockdown policy as one of key factors which dramatically reduce air pollutants in ambient air around the world particularly in the middle of pandemic. Earlier, there was no clarity whether the COVID-19-infected number can psychologically affect decision making on self-quarantine during the coronavirus crisis. PM 2.5 contents observed in some BMA districts were significantly lower when the COVID-19-infected numbers were larger than 500 and 700 underlines the importance of WFH for improving air quality. The second outbreak can significantly reduce PM 2.5 levels detected in eastern part of Bangkok particularly during the first week of January, 2021. In addition, the relatively low Pearson's correlation coefficients between hot-spot numbers and PM 2.5 concentrations indicates that agricultural waste burnings can be considered as the second contributor after vehicle exhausts. Statistial Profile of Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Bangkok Traffic Statistics 2019. Traffic and Transportation Department Transition to online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia Impacts of PM 2.5 sources on variations in particulate chemical compounds in ambient air of Hashmi Effects of agricultural waste burning on PM25-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, carbonaceous compositions, and water-soluble ionic species in the ambient air of Longrange transboundary atmospheric transport of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, carbonaceous compositions, and watersoluble ionic species in southern Thailand COVID-19 epidemic in the middle province of Northern Italy: impact, logistics, and strategy in the first line hospital Evaluate the impact of COVID-19 prevention policies on supply chain aspects under uncertainty Impact of city lockdown on the air quality of COVID-19-hit of Wuhan city Effect of lockdown amid COVID-19 pandemic on air quality of the megacity Delhi The economic impact of COVID-19 Analyze the psychological impact of COVID-19 among the elderly population in China and make corresponding suggestions Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ) Level Changes during the Control of COVID-19 Pandemic in Thailand Assessment of selected metals in the ambient air PM 10 in urban sites of Bangkok (Thailand) Chemical characterisation of organic functional group compositions in PM 2.5 collected at nine administrative provinces in Northern Thailand during the haze episode in 2013 Effects of day-of-week trends and vehicle types on PM2. 5-bounded carbonaceous compositions Variation in day-of-week and seasonal concentrations of atmospheric PM25-bound metals and associated health risks in On the macroeconomic and social impact of the coronavirus pandemic in Latin America and the developing world Impact of work from home (WFH) on Indonesian Teachers performance during the Covid-19 Pandemic: an exploratory study Closure of universities due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): impact on education and mental health of students and academic staff Will novel coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic impact agriculture, food security and animal sectors? The psychological impact of COVID-19 on the mental health in the general population Challenges of stay-at-home policy implementation during the Coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic in Indonesia Psychological and anxiety/depression level assessment among quarantine people during Covid19 outbreak Air quality development during the COVID-19 pandemic over a medium-sized urban area in Thailand Predicted impact of vaccination and active case finding measures to control epidemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a migrant Populations, Precarity and Pandemics: The Demographics of Inequality and Covid-19 in Southeast Asia. © ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines Wetchayont P (2021) Investigation on the impacts of COVID-19 lockdown and influencing factors on air quality in greater Impacts of the coronavirus pandemic on Europe's tourism industry: addressing tourism enterprises and workers in the undeclared economy Association of COVID19-induced Anosmia and Ageusia with depression and suicidal ideation The authors thank Ms. Roong Thipyanee from the Department of Environment, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) for providing the datasets for this study. The database of hotspot numbers was provided by Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development Agency (GISTDA).Funding This work was supported by the Research Center, National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA). Competing interests None declared.