key: cord-0062055-vx3z7edd
authors: Biswas, Mohitosh
title: Predictive association of ABCB1 C3435T genetic polymorphism with the efficacy or safety of lopinavir and ritonavir in coronavirus disease-2019 patients
date: 2021-03-24
journal: nan
DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2020-0096
sha: 32fa3d836650c66e36911d69985cfb2bc489ef87
doc_id: 62055
cord_uid: vx3z7edd

Lopinavir and ritonavir are substrates of permeability glycoprotein encoded by ABCB1. The efficacy and safety of these drugs is unknown in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients affected by ABCB1 genetic variability. Patients carrying one or two copies of the ABCB1 C3435T were predictively considered as risk phenotypes. It was predicted that risk phenotypes due to carrying either one or two copies of ABCB1 C3435T were highly prevalent in Europe (76.8%; 95% CI: 75–78), followed by America (67%; 95% CI: 65–69), Asia (63.5%; 95% CI: 62–65) and Africa (41.4%; 95% CI: 37–46), respectively. It is hypothesized that a considerable proportion of COVID-19 patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir inheriting ABCB1 C3435T genetic polymorphism may be predisposed to either therapeutic failure or toxicity.

There are approximately 50 SNPs of the ABCB1 gene as reported elsewhere [9] ; therefore, it is extremely difficult to predict which SNP would be linked to PK effects of LPV/RTV affecting efficacy or safety in COVID-19 patients. However, from the findings of previous studies, it can be inferred that during this emergency situation researchers need to focus on the ABCB1 C3435T genetic polymorphism and should assess the efficacy or safety end points since it is the most prevalent and mostly studied SNP and has some correlation with LPV/RTV treatment in HIV patients [10] . Although the correlation was with a different virus, it should be noted here that pharmacogenomics of ABCB1 gene was affecting host PK effects of LPV/RTV, not the pathogenic virus, hence the type of virus was involved may not be the most important factor. Instead, there is a need to focus on the efficacy or safety assessment of LPV/RTV associated with ABCB1 C3435T genetic polymorphism for COVID-19 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. How much of the world population that may be affected by carrying this genetic polymorphism can be gauged from ABCB1 C3435T SNP frequency in different ethnic groups as obtained from the literature review.

Prevalence of ABCB1 C3435T genetic polymorphism in different ethnic groups was obtained from the literature review. Phenotypes were predictively assigned based on carrying characteristic alleles. For example, patients carrying two copies of the rs1045642/C3435T SNP of the ABCB1 gene were predicted to be high expressors of P-gp and were potentially considered as risk phenotypes. In a comparative fashion, participants carrying one copy of the rs1045642/C3435T SNP of ABCB1 were predicted to be low expressors of P-gp and were also potentially considered as risk phenotypes. However, participants carrying no mutation of the rs1045642/C3435T SNP of ABCB1 were predicted to be normal expressors of P-gp and were potentially considered as no-risk/normal phenotypes.

From the literature review, it was demonstrated that risk phenotypes carrying either one or two copies of the rs1045642/C3435T SNP of the ABCB1 gene were highly prevalent in Europe (76.8%; 95% CI: 75-78) [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] , followed by America (67%; 95% CI: 65-69) [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] , Asia (63.5%; 95% CI: 62-65) [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] and Africa (41.4%; 95% CI: 37-46) [31, 32] , respectively as shown in Table 1 . This might indicate that COVID-19 patients from Europe, Asia and America may be more vulnerable to either therapeutic failure or toxicity of LPV/RTV if ABCB1 C3435T genetic variability is not considered. Patients from European countries were predictively identified as being as highest risk of either LPV/RTV treatment failure or toxicity associated with ABCB1 C3435T genetic polymorphism, suggesting this should be considered in future clinical studies.

It is worth mentioning here that the association of the ABCB1 C3435T genetic polymorphism with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events of clopidogrel (prodrug) in coronary artery disease patients has already been well established [33] [34] [35] . From collating overall evidence for the association of ABCB1 C3435T genetic polymorphism with therapeutic failure of LPV/RTV in HIV infection of AIDS patients and in cardiovascular disease with another class of medication (e.g., clopidogrel), it is therefore hypothesized that "COVID-19 patients treated with LPV/RTV inheriting ABCB1 pharmacogene in general and in particular ABCB1 C3435T genetic polymorphism might be predisposed to either therapeutic failure or toxicity of this antiviral therapy in considerable proportion of patients" as shown graphically in Figure 1 .

Amid this emergency situation, it is suggested to genotype the ABCB1 C3435T genetic polymorphism in order to make LPV/RTV therapy more precise to overcome adverse clinical events or deaths associated with COVID-19. Every life is important in respect to his/her family, society and even for the respective country. Implementation of this 'hypothesis' may expected to improve clinical outcomes of many COVID-19 patients taking LPV/RTV from all over the world.

Countries like USA, UK, Australia, etc., where precision medicine initiatives are in clinical operation for many therapeutic classes of drugs or the countries having the infrastructure facilities to screen the ABCB1 C3435T genotype testing, it is suggested to start genetic testing of this variant for patients with COVID-19 and provide personalized antiviral therapy accordingly. This can be implemented by testing the ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism with the following groups of patients with COVID-19. Group-1 patients will be severely critically ill patients or patients who have already died. Group-2 patients will be those who are in improving clinical conditions. Group-3 will be those patients who had complete recovery from COVID-19. All of these groups of patients must be taking 10 .2217/pgs-2020-0096

Pharmacogenomics (Epub ahead of print) future science group LPV/RTV. The clinical outcomes of these groups of patients inheriting ABCB1 C3435T genetic polymorphisms may thus correlate the associations between these by adjusting with all other covariates. If it appears that efficacy of LPV/RTV were significantly associated with this SNP of ABCB1 in COVID-19 patients, then this genetic approach may be applied to other SNPs of ABCB1 as well as genetic polymorphisms of CYP450 gene of CYP3A4/5 affecting safety or efficacy of LPV/RTV in patients with COVID-19. For example, a study conducted by Bellusci et al. showed that the ABCB1 C1236T SNP reduces the absorption of LPV/RTV leading to therapeutic failure of this antiviral therapy in HIV-1 infected children [8] , which may also be applicable to patients with COVID-19. It is pertinent to mention here that metabolism of LPV/RTV may also be affected by CYP3A4 and the genetic association of this metabolic enzyme encoded by the CYP3A4 gene has been shown in numerous studies with HIV patients indicating that certain selective SNP of CYP3A4 may significantly lower the clearance of LPV/RTV and may produce drug toxicity [36] [37] [38] . The findings and observations of these studies may also be applicable for COVID-19 patients taking LPV/RTV affecting drug safety and should also be considerable genetic factors in future clinical studies. Since LPV/RTV is also a substrate of OATP1B1 encoded by the SLCO1B1, therefore, this transporter gene should also consider in future clinical studies to optimize efficacy or safety of these antiviral drugs.

Future studies should also consider cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomic testing adoption in routine clinical practice. Although the cost-effectiveness of different pharmacogenomic testing have been investigated in several continents, predominantly Europe and North America where the estimated costs of pharmacogenomic testing in different countries were considerably different; however, most of these studies found pharmacogenomic testing to be cost-effective and recommended that it should be integrated into routine clinical practice [39] [40] [41] [42] .

It is also notable that besides considering genetic effects, future studies should also consider drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of LPV/RTV for optimizing safety and efficacy. This is because a clinical trial of LPV/RTV conducted by Cao et al. in adults hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 reported that gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in LPV/RTV treatment group compared with standard care, whilst other serious adverse effects with LPV/RTV treatment group were respiratory failure, severe anemia, shock, acute kidney injury etc. These adverse clinical effects consequently leading to the early cessation of LPV/RTV treatment in COVID-19 patients [5] . Although this trial did not report whether these adverse drug reactions were due to DDIs of LPV/RTV, however, it is likely that such adverse events might occur in COVID-19 patients due to taking multiple medications leading to DDIs. A meta-analysis conducted by Alhumaid et al. assessing the safety and efficacy of LPV/RTV in COVID-19 patients concluded that a greater number of adverse events were reported for LPV/RTV treatment group compared with other antivirals or no antiviral treatments group [43] .

Furthermore, Baralic et al. revealed that inflammation, cardiotoxicity and dyslipidemias were the main risks of LPV/RTV treatment in COVID-19 patients. Also, it has been suggested that since LPV/RTV may increase the expression of multiple genes involved in immune response and lipid metabolism, this drug combination should be used with caution in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with cardiovascular diseases, autoimmune diseases, or acquired and hereditary lipid disorders [44] . From the perspectives of overall current findings, it may be concluded that a holistic approach is needed that will consider genetic effects, drug-drug interactions as well as comorbidities to optimize safety and efficacy of LPV/RTV in patients with COVID-19.

Considerable proportions of the world population were predictively identified as being at risk of either therapeutic failure or toxicity of LPV/RTV due to them carrying the ABCB1 C3435T genetic polymorphism. Since no selective antiviral treatment for COVID-19 has been developed yet, although a high priority is given from the perspectives of world scientists, it is hypothesized that COVID-19 patients treated with LPV/RTV inheriting ABCB1 pharmacogene in general and in particular the ABCB1 C3435T genetic polymorphism might be predisposed to either therapeutic failure or toxicity of this antiviral therapy in a considerable proportion of patients.

Association of ABCB1 genetic polymorphisms with the efficacy or safety of LPV/RTV in SARS-CoV-2 infection is unknown due to not taking COVID-19 patients into account. The hypothesis presented here may open a new window for the assessment of efficacy or safety of LPV/RTV in COVID-19 patients in future clinical studies by considering genetic variability of the ABCB1 gene as well as other genetic factors affecting PK/PD effects of these antiviral drugs. These genetic considerations may facilitate precision medicine of LPV/RTV in viral infections. 10 .2217/pgs-2020-0096

Pharmacogenomics (Epub ahead of print) future science group PGx considerations of LPV/RTV in COVID-19 patients

Executive summary

• Lopinavir (LPV) and ritonavir (RTV) are substrates of permeability glycoprotein encoded by the gene ABCB1.

• Risk phenotypes associated with carrying the ABCB1 C3435T genetic polymorphism were considerably prevalent in the world population of different ethnic groups and may affect the efficacy or safety of LPV/RTV. • Future clinical studies are warranted to implement genotype testing of the ABCB1 C3435T genetic mutation in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 taking LPV/RTV in order to optimize efficacy or safety of these antiviral drugs.

The author is thankful to Shawonur Rahaman for helping in review literature and extracting ABCB1 C3435T SNP frequency in different ethnic groups.

The author has no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Favipiravir: pharmacokinetics and concerns about clinical trials for 2019-nCoV infection

Safety considerations with chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in the management of SARS-CoV-2 infection

Remdesivir EUA letter of authorization

Antiviral therapy in management of COVID-19: a systematic review on current evidence

A trial of lopinavir-ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe Covid-19

WHO Solidarity Trial Consortium. Repurposed antiviral drugs for Covid-19: interim WHO Solidarity trial results

Impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms on plasma concentrations of efavirenz and lopinavir/ritonavir in Chinese children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus

Influence of MDR1 C1236T polymorphism on lopinavir plasma concentration and virological response in HIV-1-infected children

The MDR1/ABCB1 gene rs 1045642 polymorphism in colorectal cancer

ABCB1 and ABCC1 variants associated with virological failure of firstline protease inhibitors antiretroviral regimens in northeast Brazil patients

Routine assessment of on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity and gene polymorphisms in predicting clinical outcome following drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with stable coronary artery disease

Multidrug-resistant genotype (ABCB1) and seizure recurrence in newly treated epilepsy: data from international pharmacogenetic cohorts

Non-response to antiepileptic pharmacotherapy is associated with the ABCC2-24C >T polymorphism in young and adult patients with epilepsy

The controversial association of ABCB1 polymorphisms in refractory epilepsy: an analysis of multiple SNPs in an Irish population

Lack of association between the C3435T polymorphism in the human multidrug resistance (MDR1) gene and response to antiepileptic drug treatment

Association of multidrug resistance in epilepsy with a polymorphism in the drug-transporter gene ABCB1

C3435T polymorphism of the ABCB1 gene: impact on genetic susceptibility to peptic ulcers

Association between ABCB1 polymorphism and stable warfarin dose requirements in Brazilian patients

C3435T polymorphism of the ABCB1 gene is associated with poor clopidogrel responsiveness in a Mexican population undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

CYP2C19 and ABCB1 gene polymorphisms are differently distributed according to ethnicity in the Brazilian general population

Comparative description of haplotype structure and genetic diversity of MDR1 (ABCB1) in HIV-positive and HIV-negative populations

Associations between ABCB1/MDR1 gene polymorphisms and Crohn's disease: a gene-wide study in a pediatric population

Distribution of ABCB1 polymorphisms among Brazillians: impact of population admixture

Clopidogrel pharmacogenetics in Iranian patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Evaluation of the incremental prognostic value of the combination of CYP2C19 poor metabolizer status and ABCB1 3435 TT polymorphism over conventional risk factors for cardiovascular events after drug-eluting stent implantation in East Asians

Effect of the CYP2C19*2 and*3 genotypes, ABCB1 C3435T and PON1 Q192R alleles on the pharmacodynamics and adverse clinical events of clopidogrel in Chinese people after percutaneous coronary intervention

No association of ABCB1 polymorphisms with drug-refractory epilepsy in a North Indian population

Analysis of genotype and haplotype effects of ABCB1 (MDR1) polymorphisms in the risk of medically refractory epilepsy in an Indian population

Lack of association between C3435T nucleotide MDR1 genetic polymorphism and multidrug-resistant epilepsy

ABCB1 polymorphisms influence the response to antiepileptic drugs in Japanese epilepsy patients

Association between ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a Moroccan case-control study and meta-analysis

MDR1 pharmacogenetics: frequency of the C3435T mutation in exon 26 is significantly influenced by ethnicity

ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism and response to clopidogrel treatment in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients: a meta-analysis

ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism and risk of adverse clinical events in clopidogrel treated patients: a meta-analysis

Effects of the ABCB1 C3435T single nucleotide polymorphism on major adverse cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndrome or coronary artery disease patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with clopidogrel: a systematic review

CYP3A4 polymorphism and lopinavir toxicity in an HIV-infected pregnant woman

Rs35599367) is associated with lopinavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-positive adults

Genetic polymorphisms affecting the pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs

Cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomic and pharmacogenetic test-guided personalized therapies: a systematic review of the approved active substances for personalized medicine in Germany

CYP2C19-guided antiplatelet therapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis of 30-day and 1-year outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention

Rapid evidence review of the comparative effectiveness, harms, and cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics-guided antidepressant treatment versus usual care for major depressive disorder

A systematic review of economic evaluations of pharmacogenetic testing for prevention of adverse drug reactions

Efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir for treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Safety assessment of drug combinations used in COVID-19 treatment: in silico toxicogenomic data-mining approach