key: cord-0061194-x5glw4l6 authors: Mayor, David; Panday, Deepak; Kandel, Hari Kala; Steffert, Tony; Banks, Duncan title: CEPS: An Open Access MATLAB Graphical User Interface (GUI) for the Analysis of Complexity and Entropy in Physiological Signals date: 2021-03-08 journal: Entropy (Basel) DOI: 10.3390/e23030321 sha: 69dca3989ec8d66424f6d51137ae78ea79b30d99 doc_id: 61194 cord_uid: x5glw4l6 Background: We developed CEPS as an open access MATLAB(®) GUI (graphical user interface) for the analysis of Complexity and Entropy in Physiological Signals (CEPS), and demonstrate its use with an example data set that shows the effects of paced breathing (PB) on variability of heart, pulse and respiration rates. CEPS is also sufficiently adaptable to be used for other time series physiological data such as EEG (electroencephalography), postural sway or temperature measurements. Methods: Data were collected from a convenience sample of nine healthy adults in a pilot for a larger study investigating the effects on vagal tone of breathing paced at various different rates, part of a development programme for a home training stress reduction system. Results: The current version of CEPS focuses on those complexity and entropy measures that appear most frequently in the literature, together with some recently introduced entropy measures which may have advantages over those that are more established. Ten methods of estimating data complexity are currently included, and some 28 entropy measures. The GUI also includes a section for data pre-processing and standard ancillary methods to enable parameter estimation of embedding dimension m and time delay τ (‘tau’) where required. The software is freely available under version 3 of the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPLv3) for non-commercial users. CEPS can be downloaded from Bitbucket. In our illustration on PB, most complexity and entropy measures decreased significantly in response to breathing at 7 breaths per minute, differentiating more clearly than conventional linear, time- and frequency-domain measures between breathing states. In contrast, Higuchi fractal dimension increased during paced breathing. Conclusions: We have developed CEPS software as a physiological data visualiser able to integrate state of the art techniques. The interface is designed for clinical research and has a structure designed for integrating new tools. The aim is to strengthen collaboration between clinicians and the biomedical community, as demonstrated here by using CEPS to analyse various physiological responses to paced breathing. Every researcher has a dream. Ours has been to find or create an easy-to-use, versatile and reasonably comprehensive toolbox specifically for the analysis of complexity and entropy in physiological signals (CEPS). Since 2011, in our own research on physiological signals and measures, including electroencephalography (EEG), heart rate variability (HRV), temperature, postural sway and respiration, we (D.M. and T.S.) have felt hampered as clinicians by the lack of such a non-specialist software package that would enable us to 1. To explore the literature on complexity and entropy measures for those suited to a MATLAB ® GUI for users who may not be familiar with them and also not expert in computer programming methods. To investigate the 'family trees' of different complexity and entropy measures in order to better select existing codes for inclusion in CEPS. To create a GUI that would allow univariate analysis of single and multichannel (time) series data, specifically for-but not limited to-the data types resulting from our own research. CEPS should thus include some simple analytical methods and basic normality tests, as well as methods to calculate complexity and entropy measures, multiscale measures in particular. 4 . For CEPS to include some basic pre-processing steps and some ancillary methods for estimating embedding dimension and time delay parameters. Batch processing (import and export) should be possible, and different import and export formats catered for. 5 . As a central feature, for CEPS to include a 'Test and Plot' facility for experimentation with measure parameters prior to processing and exporting results. As a priority, to test CEPS with reference to results obtained using other packages, although this is not always a simple process, given the variety of parameter settings possible [7] . Where this is not feasible, to verify results in consultation with the originators of the different complexity and entropy measures implemented. 6. Eventually, for CEPS to include a final 'Classification' section where results using different measures and methods can be compared, and a 'plug-in' facility to allow other researchers to add measures not already included in the list available. 7. To include a 'Primer' with CEPS containing enough background information and references to enable those unfamiliar with the concepts of complexity and entropy to use the GUI and process their own data without too much of a 'garbage in-garbage out' result. 8 . To illustrate how CEPS may be applied in practice by using the GUI for analysing the effects of paced breathing (PB) on variability of ECG, PPG and RSP data in a small pilot study. In particular, to compare the relative performance of conventional linear (time-and frequency-domain) indices and the nonlinear measures provided in CEPS, as well as between the different complexity and entropy measures. A literature search was conducted in PubMed for relevant software packages. Search terms were drawn from keywords found in the titles and abstracts of some of the packages mentioned in the Introduction, which had already been located through prior knowledge, searching references or personal recommendations. These terms were concatenated into a preliminary search string: Adding AND (ECG OR HRV OR EEG OR temperature OR respiration) reduced this number to 74, of which 17 were not known to the searcher (D.M.) but were judged to be of interest from their Abstracts. Most of these turned out to be for very specific applications, beyond the aspirations of CEPS (see Introduction for a brief summary of results). A further search of PubMed was made, on the basis of prior knowledge and measures used in existing software packages, in order to locate studies on complexity and entropy measures likely to be useful in CEPS. The generally accepted names of the complexity and entropy measures were used as search terms, as shown in Tables 1 and 2. Abbreviated Name Search Term Higuchi fractal dimension HFD Higuchi AND "fractal dimension" Katz fractal dimension KFD Katz AND "fractal dimension" Allan Factor AF "Allan Factor" Correlation dimension D 2 "Correlation dimension" Hurst exponent H "Hurst exponent" Detrended fluctuation analysis DFA "Detrended fluctuation analysis" Largest Lyapunov exponent LLE Various 1 Recurrent quantification analysis RQA "Recurrent quantification analysis" Poincaré plot PP "Poincaré plot" NOT "return plot" Lempel-Ziv complexity LZC "Lempel-Ziv complexity" Abbreviated Name SEARCH TERM Slope entropy SlopeEn "Slope entropy" Bubble entropy BE "Bubble entropy" Distribution entropy DistEn "Distribution entropy" Phase entropy PhEn "Phase entropy" Spectral entropy SpEn "Spectral entropy" Differential entropy DiffEn "Differential entropy" Diffusion entropy DnEn "Diffusion entropy" Symbolic Dynamics 1 SymDyn "Symbolic Dynamics" 1 This method is not strictly speaking an Entropy measure but is included here for completeness. Many of the studies located used multiple measures, some not mentioned in their titles or abstracts, enabling further searches for measures not previously encountered. When it became clear that further searching was unlikely to turn up any newer measures, the numbers of studies on each measure were counted, and those measures used infrequently were not considered further. Results are included below in Section 3.1. A review was also undertaken from published studies of the data requirements for all these measures (discrete and/or continuous, short and/or long samples), the measures' robustness to noise, whether they may be (or have been) used with bandpass (or other) filtered data, if they are affected by sampling rate or down-sampling, and whether data needs to be stationary or linear if the measures are to be used appropriately. The results of this review are summarised in Section 3.1.2 below. Information on parameter settings was also gathered, and, for some but not all measures, their expected values where possible. These are presented in the reference document Primer on Complexity and Entropy that is accessible via the HELP section in the CEPS GUI. After preparing a shortlist of measures to be considered for inclusion in CEPS, further PubMed searches were undertaken, using as search terms the names of the researchers who had contributed most papers on each complexity and entropy measure. Results were then collated, and researchers ranked both by the number of their published studies and by how many different measures they had investigated. MATLAB codes used by the highest-ranking researchers or others from their university departments were then sought, for use in CEPS. In recent years, some researchers have generously published the code used in their work, or at least a pseudocode that can then be translated and used by others. When neither was available, code was requested from its originators. The codes used in CEPS and their sources are listed in a Table in Section 3.1.2, with further information provided in an Appendix to the CEPS Manual. In addition, a brief literature review was undertaken using PubMed to locate studies on PB and its effects on entropy or other nonlinear measures in ECG or RSP data. CEPS was developed in MATLAB, initially with GUIDE ('Graphical User Interface Development Environment'), which was further enhanced by migrating the GUIDE application to App Designer. On the basis of our previous experience in analysing HRV and EEG data, an initial list of descriptive and simple linear measures was created first (17 items), together with some standard normality tests and time-and frequency-domain measures (15 items) . Stationarity tests and a nonlinearity measure [40] were then implemented (six items). The main list of complexity and entropy measures was built using our literature reviews, with 10 and 28 items, respectively, together with three methods of symbolic dynamics. Standard ancillary methods for estimating embedding dimension and time delay were included (three items). The interface was designed in stages, and new measures were tested against results from other published software tools or, where this was not possible, by seeking verification from the methods' originators. Methods of verification used are shown in a process, incorporating user feedback from a usability survey, following the example of gHRV [7] and RR-APET [10] . The survey form is accessible via the GUI. Electrocardiogram (ECG), photoplethysmography (PPG) and respiration (RSP) data were collected from a sample of nine healthy adults in a pilot for a larger study investigating the effects on vagal tone of breathing paced at various different rates, part of a development programme for a home training stress reduction system managed by MindSpire and funded by Innovate UK (reference 63382). Participants were informed about the study and signed a consent form with the explicit agreement that their anonymised data would be stored in perpetuity on a publicly available repository for other researchers to use. Ethics approval procedure was followed, according to the principles of the Helsinki declaration. In this pilot, two 300-s trials were recorded for each person. The first was a baseline, in which people were instructed to sit comfortably and breathe normally. In the second trial, a few minutes later, they were instructed to breathe in and out, guided by a laptop pacer display, with a coloured bar growing and shrinking onscreen at seven cycles per minute. Single-lead ECG signals were obtained from one electrode applied on the volar surface of each forearm, with the ground electrode on the volar surface of the left forearm, PPG signals from the middle finger of the left hand, and respiration from a SleepSense abdominal respiration belt with a piezoelectric crystal effort sensor. Data were collected using a NeXus-10 amplifier with BioTrace+ software v 2015B (Mind Media, Herten, The Netherlands), exported at 256 Hz. The ECG signal was sampled at the same frequency, PPG at 128 Hz and RSP at 32 Hz. Data were exported from BioTrace+. The ECG and PPG signals were then processed separately using industry-standard HRV software, Kubios HRV Premium software (v3.1; Kuopio, Finland), with an automatic RR correction algorithm to deal with artefacts and a 'smoothness priors' method of trend removal [41] . For spectrum estimation, a piecewise cubic spline interpolation was used and the default resampling rate of 4 Hz. The graphed output from the Kubios HRV software for each of the resulting recordings was then examined carefully for any remaining unusual findings or artefacts. In addition to using Kubios HRV Premium for heart and pulse rate analysis, as part of our suite of tools for physiological data analysis, one of the present authors (D.P.) had earlier developed a versatile MATLAB-based GUI for peak detection in raw ECG, Photoplethysmograph (PPG) and Respiration time series data. This was used here for peak detection in the RSP signal, again followed by examination of each data file and manual correction if appropriate. The resulting R-to-R beat interval (RRi) data from the ECG, PPG pulse-to-pulse intervals (PPi) and RSP inter-breath intervals (BBi) were then used as input for CEPS. All measures in CEPS that were suitable for short datasets were selected for further analysis, using default parameters. The usual time-and frequency-domain HRV measures, as well as three derived from Poincaré plot analysis (SD1, SD2 and their ratio) were also computed for the three data streams using Kubios HRV Premium. Standard frequency ranges were set: 'Very low frequency' (VLF), 0-0.04 Hz, 'Low frequency' (LF), 0.04-0.15 Hz, and 'High frequency' (HF), 0.15-0.4 Hz. Analysis was conducted in MATLAB R2019a, Excel Version 2011, SPSS Version 26 and RStudio Version 1.3.1093. Bootstrapped paired t-tests were used to check for significant differences in measures between the 'baseline' (unpaced) and paced breathing conditions. Case-resampling bootstrap was used, with 1000 samples, resulting in percentile-based p-values. Complexity and entropy measures are essential for quantifying nonlinear physiological processes, and in particular the changes in their dynamics that occur over time. To properly encompass the multifarious complexity of physiological signals also necessitates, we believe, considering a large number of those variables that are appropriate for analysis (see Table 3 ). In this analysis, we have used the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to decrease the false discovery rate and so reduce the Type I errors (false positive results) that inevitably occur when conducting the resulting multiple comparisons. A false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.12 was selected, to provide usable p-values for around 50 (just over a quarter) of our 198 measures (50, 45 and 48 measures, for ECG, PPG and RSP, respectively), with uncorrected p-values of 0.033 or less. When an FDR of 0.05 was selected, none of the 198 measures appeared to give positive results, which was patently not the case, whereas for FDR = 0.10 (often used in screening studies), between 21 (for RSP) and 38 (for ECG) of the measures did (35 for PPG). For FDR = 0.2, on the other hand, around 100 measures resulted in p-values less than a Benjamini-Hochberg critical value of 0.05 for each data stream (109, 94 and 108, for ECG, PPG and RSP, respectively). The choice of FDR = 0.12 seemed a suitable compromise. Cohen's d was used as a measure of Effect size [42] . Effect size (Cohen's d) and rank or corrected p-values are closely related. Here, we have chosen to report effect size, followed in square brackets by the range of p-values that remain significant after applying the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Tables 4 and 5 , together with references for software packages known to include them and various other bibliometric details. [7, 15, 20, 33, 34, 43] 118 (458) 1994 [44] 28 (17) 2019 KFD [15] 27 (135) 1994 [45] 43 (0) 2019 AF [22, 33] 18 (98) 1996 [46] 152 (113) 2004-5 D 2 [5, 20, 22, 23, [29] [30] [31] 33, 43, 47] 732 (3869) 1986 [48] 113 (70) 2019 H [5, 15, 20, 33, 43] 427 (3464) 1992 [49] 0 (2) 2008 DFA [10, 15, [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] 26, 27, 33, 34, 43, 47, [50] [51] [52] 907 (3288) 1995 [53] 3850 (2619) 2017 LLE [5, 8, 15, 22, 23, 29, 30, 33, 43] 545 (2470) 1986 [54] 1081 (550) 2019 RQA [10, 13, 20, 22, 23, 30, 33, 43, 50] 386 (1201) 1997 [55] 154 (79) 2019 PP [7, 10, 13, 15, 20, 21, 23, 27, 30, 33, 43, 47, 50, [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] 339 ( PubMed SE [8, 15, 34, 64] 903 ( [9, 15, 20, 33] 166 d (1635) 1998 [71] 286 (209) 2019 ApEn [9, 13, 15, 20, [22] [23] [24] 28, 31, 33, 43, 62] 1199 b (2605) 1991 [72] 5394 (3801) 2013 SampEn [9, 13, 15, 20, 21, 23, 33, 34, 43] 1033 ( For further review results, see Section 3.1.2 below, and the Primer on Complexity and Entropy that is accessible via the HELP section in the CEPS GUI. The most prolific researchers on complexity or entropy-those with more than 25 papers on these topics indexed in PubMed-are listed in Table 6 , showing the numbers of their papers indexed, the number of different complexity or entropy measures mentioned in the abstracts to those papers and listed in Tables 4 and 5 above, the date their first relevant paper appeared in PubMed and the University or other institutions with which Entropy 2021, 23, 321 9 of 34 they were affiliated then and-if different-with which they were affiliated when their most recent papers were published. Note that the numbers of measures and papers shown will have increased now that the journal Entropy is indexed in PubMed. More detailed information can be found in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Material SM2). Table 6 . Those researchers who have published more than 25 papers on complexity or entropy topics, listed by the number of different measures on which they have written and their Institutional affiliation when they first published (unchanged to date, unless noted otherwise in parentheses). The earliest publication dates for each researcher fall into four groups: 1991-1995 Table 7 ). Table 7 Pedro Bernaola-Galván, the main originator of the volatility method of assessing nonlinearity, has co-authored work on nonlinearity with Alberto Porta [95] . 8. Paolo Castiglioni, whose code for mFmDFA is used in CEPS, has co-authored at least six papers with Alberto Porta. 9. Paolo Grigolini, the originator of Diffusion entropy, co-authored some papers on diffusion with Constantino Tsallis when both were at the University of North Texas [96] . Family trees are always incomplete, and this one is no exception. It is the result of literature review, but not a systematic one, so represents a personal selection by the authors. While in the final stages of preparing this paper for publication, we became aware of a similar-if more technical-analysis of the 'entropy universe' by the indefatigable Teresa Henriques and her colleagues in Porto [107] . Readers will find it instructive to compare our two mappings. CEPS does not include the family (or 'galaxy') of topological or graph entropies, for example [108] , although we do plan to include some applications of maximum entropy. Table 7 . Complexity and entropy measures in Figure 1 and their sources, listed in alphabetical order, showing original references, names of code providers, code type, institutions of originators and (in parentheses) of code providers, how code was verified, and whether verification showed optimal, acceptable or divergent results (O, A or D) according to the criteria used by Gomes [27] , with optimal verification confirmed if Pearson's R > 0.9; pD indicates partial divergence and T that testing is still required. Names asterisked (*) are of those who provided their own codes in response to personal requests (@ indicates no code provided in response). Original Jelinek et al., 2011 [129] n/a n/a n/a n/a ImPE Azami and Escudero 2016 [130] DataShare MATLAB Edinburgh Verification in progress T Grassberger and Procaccia 1983 [131] n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a [40] ván * MATLAB Málaga in progress T 1 Agreement was better for SampEn between CEPS (DataShare) and Kubios HRV than between CEPS (DataShare) and PyBioS or CEPS (DataShare) and HRVAnalysis, but results were partially divergent for all comparisons. However, agreement was better overall for SampEn between CEPS (DataShare) and Kubios HRV than between Kubios HRV and PyBioS or between Kubios HRV and HRVAnalysis. Agreement was good for various short samples of synthetic data (length 50 points) between results provided by Ashish Rohila and those from CEPS; 2 Results for a second implementation of SE ('Entropy_MC') are not identical and should be treated with caution. Paced breathing is used here as an example dataset to display the advantages of the CEPS data analysis tools when focusing on complexity and entropy measures. Our analysis investigates the effects of paced breathing on ECG, PPG and RSP variability. For millennia, slow deep breathing at around 4 to 10 breaths per minute (0.07-0.16 Hz) has been thought to promote both physical and mental health benefits and improve wellbeing. Research over the past few decades has supported this belief and shown a number of beneficial physiological effects, for example improving ventilation efficiency and blood oxygenation (SpO 2 ) in hypoxic patients [142] , lowering blood pressure in the overtly healthy [143] , reducing experimental pain perception [144] , and lessening anxiety scores in school children [145] . By measuring the HRV during a stepwise-paced breathing procedure where participants are asked to breathe at rates ranging from 14 to 4 breaths per minute (bpm), an individual's respiratory 'resonant frequency' where the HRV is greatest can be determined and is generally around 6 bpm (i.e., 0.01 Hz) for adults [144] . Slow breathing is known to affect both time-and frequency-domain measures of heart rate variability [146] . However, less is known about how it impacts entropy and complexity measures. In one study using 3-min recordings, DFA α2, ApEn, SampEn and MSE were reduced during slow paced breathing, while DFA α1 increased [147] . Others too have noted a reduction in MSE with slow paced breathing (at least in flight phobics, but not in healthy controls) [148] . Porta's research group, on the other hand, found that heart period 'multiscale complexity' (but not MSE) decreased with metronome-paced breathing at 10 bpm as a result of regularisation of variability in both LF and HF HRV bands [149] . An associated research group noted that paced breathing at 12 bpm enhanced HRV nonlinearity, and that SampEn decreased significantly when moving from spontaneous breathing to breathing paced at 12 bpm (0.2 Hz), but was substantially unchanged between spontaneous breathing and breathing at 18 bpm (0.3 Hz), when cardiorespiratory synchronisation competes with sinus arrhythmia [150] . Perhaps the most informative of these studies is one in which breathing was paced at between 6 and 27 bpm. SampEn in both the ECG and RSP signals, as well as the ECG RRi itself, increased with respiratory frequency between 6 and around 15 bpm, but results were affected by both age and sex [151] . As mentioned, CEPS is an open access MATLAB™ GUI for analysing Complexity and Entropy in Physiological Signals. It includes data analysis tools that focus on those complexity and entropy measures that appear most frequently in those peer-reviewed publications that are indexed in PubMed, as well as others that are less well known. CEPS, together with a Manual and Primer on complexity and entropy, is publicly available at https://bitbucket.org/deepak_panday/pipeline/src/pipeline_V2/ (accessed on 11 March 2021) for free, non-commercial use, although MATLAB must be installed. The Manual and Primer are also accessible as *.pdf files via a drop-down list in the HELP section of the GUI, as are a feedback form and the present article. When the GUI first opens, the HELP section and a second drop-down list of six Application Modes appears. The six modes, which should be used in order, are: Load Data, Pre-Process Data, Test Parameters, Run Pipeline, Process Results and Classification (the latter is not yet implemented). To proceed, data should be ready for processing and stored in a single location. The 'Load Data' button is used to navigate to that location. Data should be univariate but can be in single or multiple column format, with *.txt, *.csv, *.mat or *.xlsx file extensions. The number of files in the chosen location with the desired extension will appear in the Total Data Files box. Once data are loaded using the 'Load Data File/s' button, the GUI is ready for use. In the Data Type pane (at the top left of the GUI), Time Series or Non Time Series Data can be selected. For the former, a Sample Rate (sampling frequency) in cycles per second (Hz) will need to be selected, and if data is to be subdivided into non-overlapping epochs for analysis, an Epoch Length in seconds will also need to be specified. For Non Time Series Data, the Number of Data Points per Epoch should be entered. CEPS can process raw physiological data like EEG or temperature, but in order to process the periodic RSP BBi we used the Signal Processing MATLAB GUI mentioned above, results being opened directly in CEPS to compute the complexity and entropy Measures. When the Pre-Process Data mode is selected, the list of eighty-two Measures below the Application Mode selection box is inactivated, but the central Panel on the right (II) will show two plots (Figure 3) . Various pre-processing methods are available, including outlier removal, filtering and adding different types of noise. In a forthcoming version of CEPS, it will also be possible to detrend or rescale data (using min-max normalisation) or to use Z-score normalisation (standardisation), as in EZ Entropy [9] and PyBioS [24] . In addition, as many entropy measures are more appropriate for discrete rather than continuous data (see Table 8 ), a selection of coarse-graining methods will be provided, as well as interpolation and resampling as a basis for frequency domain analysis. More details are provided in the Manual, and users need to ensure that data is appropriately pre-processed before moving on to testing parameters or running the pipeline. CEPS can process raw physiological data like EEG or temperature, but in order to process the periodic RSP BBi we used the Signal Processing MATLAB GUI mentioned above, results being opened directly in CEPS to compute the complexity and entropy Measures. When the Pre-Process Data mode is selected, the list of eighty-two Measures below the Application Mode selection box is inactivated, but the central Panel on the right (II) will show two plots (Figure 3) . Various pre-processing methods are available, including outlier removal, filtering and adding different types of noise. In a forthcoming version of CEPS, it will also be possible to detrend or rescale data (using min-max normalisation) or to use Z-score normalisation (standardisation), as in EZ Entropy [9] and PyBioS [24] . In addition, as many entropy measures are more appropriate for discrete rather than continuous data (see Table 8 ), a selection of coarse-graining methods will be provided, as well as interpolation and Table 8 . Results of a non-systematic literature review of the data requirements for measures in CEPS (further information and references available in the Primer accessed via the HELP section in CEPS). (A). Measure suited to discrete (d) data (e.g., RRi) and/or continuous (c) data (e.g., EEG); (B). Measure suited to short (s) (100 data points or even less), medium (m) (300-1000 points) and/or long (l) datasets (10,000 points or more); (C). Measure likely to be affected by noise (y or n); (D). Measure has been or could be used with bandpass (or other) filtered data (y or n), or likely to be affected by filtering (a); (E). Measure likely to be affected by sampling rate or down-sampling (y or n); (F). Whether measure suited to stationary/nonstationary (s/ns) or linear/nonlinear (l/nl) data. 'T' indicates that testing is required to clarify. Asterisked measures (*) are not implemented in CEPS. A serious problem with many complexity and entropy measures is how to select the parameters used to estimate them. Using fixed parameters may not work well all the time [38] . A 'test and plot' facility is therefore provided to assist in both parameter selection and multiscale analysis, for single or multiple files. In the Test Parameters mode, only the 46 measures in the list on the left of the GUI which require parameter settings can be selected using the check boxes provided, and only one at a time. Selecting a measure in the list will bring up two boxes for each parameter required in the central panel of the GUI (Run Parameter Test II). When the measure is selected, the name of its parent section in the Measures List replaces 'Run Parameter Test II' as the name of the central panel. A range of values for each parameter can then be tested, again for only one parameter at a time. Care should be taken to enter values that will give meaningful results (guidelines are provided in the Manual). When a particular measure is selected for parameter testing, the user can choose whether to test some or all of the loaded datasets, some, or all of the epochs in those files, and which parameters to test. Parameter increments between the minimum and maximum values chosen can also be set. Whether integers or decimals are entered here will depend on the Parameter being tested. Results can be plotted by clicking on 'Plot Result' and, if required, displayed in a Data Table as Both when testing parameters and running the pipeline, in the upper pane ('Pipeline Execution I') the user can select whether to process either a complete data series or some or all of the epochs into which it may be subdivided. When running the pipeline, in contrast to when testing parameters, several measures can be selected in the Measures List at the same time, according to user requirements and research design, the main limitation being computer processing speed. However, now only one value can be assigned to each parameter for a particular measure, and this value will be used for all data files processed (hence the importance of testing parameters in order to make an informed decision about which values to use). As when testing parameters, options can be selected in the 'Pipeline Execution II' pane. A full list of the measures available is given in Table 7 . In the 'Process Results III' pane ( Figure 5) , results can be saved in Excel and/or MATLAB format. Parameters used for the various measures will be saved in the same file in separate sheets, as will Computation time if this option is selected. For batch processing, the option is given to aggregate results by mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range. Both when testing parameters and running the pipeline, in the upper pane ('Pipeline Execution I') the user can select whether to process either a complete data series or some or all of the epochs into which it may be subdivided. When running the pipeline, in contrast to when testing parameters, several measures can be selected in the Measures List at the same time, according to user requirements and research design, the main limitation being computer processing speed. However, now only one value can be assigned to each parameter for a particular measure, and this value will be used for all data files processed (hence the importance of testing parameters in order to make an informed decision about which values to use). As when testing parameters, options can be selected in the 'Pipeline Execution II' pane. A full list of the measures available is given in Table 7 . In the 'Process Results III' pane ( Figure 5) , results can be saved in Excel and/or MATLAB format. Parameters used for the various measures will be saved in the same file in separate sheets, as will Computation time if this option is selected. For batch processing, the option is given to aggregate results by mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range. For most study participants, HFD increases during paced breathing (i.e., at even file numbers), while mPE and RCmDE decrease (see too Figure 6 ). Note that the Measures list is greyed out when processing results. This Mode-planned, but not yet implemented-will be useful when batch processing. For binary groupings of individuals (normal vs. paced breathing, for example), the different measures can be assessed and compared for their sensitivity and selectivity in classifying the individuals in each group (Simple classification). When more than two categories or measures are considered, Compound classification is being explored, perhaps offering options for k-means prediction, AdaBoost and Linear discriminant analysis. Results for the different groupings can also be displayed in exportable plots. CEPS was developed initially using MATLAB ® 2019a. Existing tried and tested MATLAB functions were implemented where possible (sources indicated in Table 8 ). Currently, MATLAB must be installed before CEPS can be used, but a compiled version is foreseen as a future development. A Windows or Linux 64-bit or Mac operating system is required, and for fast plotting and calculation, 8 GB of RAM and a screen resolution of 1400 × 900 pixels are recommended. The complete download will take 800 MB of disk space. As for other MATLAB-based GUIs developed using App Designer [9] , MATLAB ® 2018a or later should be used for best performance. The GUI can be downloaded from Bitbucket. CEPS is open access and free to noncommercial users, under the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 3 or later. Open access MATLAB scripts come with permission to redistribute, with or without modification, and a standard warning that they cannot be assumed to be fit for a particular purpose. Further license details are available in the Manual. Error messages may appear in the MATLAB Command Window or as pop-ups in the GUI itself. If you use CEPS and find a persistent problem, do feel free to report it to one of the authors (D.M. or D.P.), or on the BitBucket site. For most study participants, HFD increases during paced breathing (i.e., at even file numbers), while mPE and RCmDE decrease (see too Figure 6 ). Note that the Measures list is greyed out when processing results. This Mode-planned, but not yet implemented-will be useful when batch processing. For binary groupings of individuals (normal vs. paced breathing, for example), the different measures can be assessed and compared for their sensitivity and selectivity in classifying the individuals in each group (Simple classification). When more than two categories or measures are considered, Compound classification is being explored, perhaps offering options for k-means prediction, AdaBoost and Linear discriminant analysis. Results for the different groupings can also be displayed in exportable plots. CEPS was developed initially using MATLAB ® 2019a. Existing tried and tested MATLAB functions were implemented where possible (sources indicated in Table 8 ). Currently, MATLAB must be installed before CEPS can be used, but a compiled version is foreseen as a future development. A Windows or Linux 64-bit or Mac operating system is required, and for fast plotting and calculation, 8 GB of RAM and a screen resolution of 1400 × 900 pixels are recommended. The complete download will take 800 MB of disk space. As for other MATLAB-based GUIs developed using App Designer [9] , MATLAB ® 2018a or later should be used for best performance. The GUI can be downloaded from Bitbucket. CEPS is open access and free to noncommercial users, under the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 3 or later. Open access MATLAB scripts come with permission to redistribute, with or without modification, and a standard warning that they cannot be assumed to be fit for a particular purpose. Further license details are available in the Manual. Error messages may appear in the MATLAB Command Window or as pop-ups in the GUI itself. If you use CEPS and find a persistent problem, do feel free to report it to one of the authors (D.M. or D.P.), or on the BitBucket site. Fifteen files of RRi and 19 files of unprocessed EEG data (300 s long, both in *.txt format) are packaged with CEPS, as well as a number of synthetic data samples. Users can of course also build their own libraries of sample data. Of our nine participants, five were women. Ages ranged from 16 to 55 (mean 39, SD 16). Their 5-min RRi and PPi recordings were all 320 data points long (mean 319, SD 2.15), and the RSP data was around 50 breaths long (mean 48.4, SD 19.0). Of our 198 measures, most were normally distributed in both normal and paced breathing (more measures were not normally distributed during paced than during non-paced breathing). Paired t-tests with FDR = 0.12 indicated the following numbers of significant increases and decreases in measures for the three different data types: 15 increases and 35 decreases for the ECG data, 16 increases and 29 decreases for the PPG data, with 11 increases and 37 decreases for the RSP data. The highest-ranking ECG and RSP measures (i.e., those with lowest effect sizes) were then removed from further analysis to ensure equal numbers of measures (45) were compared for the three data types. Two complexity, one entropy and two frequency-domain measures were removed for ECG and one complexity, one time-domain and one frequency-domain measure for RSP, leaving 13 increases and 32 decreases for ECG, 16 increases and 29 decreases for PPG, and 11 increases and 34 decreases for RSP. Of the 13 remaining ECG measures that increased during paced breathing, 6 were measures of complexity from CEPS, and 7 were frequency measures from Kubios HRV. Median effect size was 1.894 for the former, reducing to 1.724 if ACN at lag 10 was included [p-values ranging from 0.006 to 0.027]. For the frequency measures, median effect size was less, at 0.946 [p from 0.012 to 0.025]. Corresponding findings for the PPG data were similar: 7 were measures of entropy or complexity from CEPS, and 9 were frequency measures from Kubios HRV. Median effect size for the former was 1.454 [p from 0.004 to 0.025], and 1.013 [p from 0.012 to 0.031] for the frequency measures. For the RSP data, in contrast, median effect size for the seven HFD measures showing significant increases (kmax = 5 and from 9 to 14) was 1.292 [p from 0.007 to 0.029], whereas for the three linear measures from CEPS that increased significantly, median effect size was greater, at 1.643 [p from 0.006 to 0.022]. Effect size for the single Kubios HRV time-domain measure that increased significantly (mean RRi) was 1.297 [p = 0.028], similar to those for HFD. HFD at various lags increased consistently for all three data types (3 for ECG, 4 for PPG and 7 for RSP), with median effect sizes 1.894 [p from 0.006 to 0.013], 2.035 [p from 0.004 to 0.011] and 1.292 [p from 0.007 to 0.029], respectively. Cohen's d was particularly high for RQA ENT (Shannon entropy of the line length distribution in the recurrence plot) in the ECG data, with a value of 2.214 [p = 0.003], but although d was also high in the PPG data (2.239, p = 0.002), this was not significant after applying the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. RQA ENT in the RSP data decreased significantly between baseline and paced breathing, with effect size 0.814 [p = 0.029]. Many more measures decreased than increased with paced breathing for ECG and RSP, but not for PPG. As the measures were not all independent of each other, there is no readily available statistical test to assess the significance of differences between the numbers of those that increased and decreased. However, as an indication, the p-value associated with the Binomial test (a test of independent measures) would yield values of 0.007 for ECG, 0.001 for RSP, but only 0.072 for PPG. The mPE measures show a similar decreasing patten for both RRi and BBi, but the Welch relative (%) HF and LF power measures shows opposite patterns for the two data types, with LF power increasing from normal breathing to breathing paced at 7 bpm for RRi, and HF power decreasing, whereas for BBi HF power increases and LF power decreases. Note that for the RRi data the slope of the line of HF power is less steep than that for the mPE measures, while for the BBi data this is the case for the line of LF power. Steeper slopes correspond to greater effect sizes. The mPE measures show a similar decreasing patten for both RRi and BBi, but the Welch relative (%) HF and LF power measures shows opposite patterns for the two data types, with LF power increasing from normal breathing to breathing paced at 7 bpm for RRi, and HF power decreasing, whereas for BBi HF power increases and LF power decreases. Note that for the RRi data the slope of the line of HF power is less steep than that for the mPE measures, while for the BBi data this is the case for the line of LF power. Steeper slopes correspond to greater effect sizes. The HFD measures are quite different for the RRi and BBi data, with less variation in slope for the latter. Note that for the RRi data the slope of the line of LF power is less steep than that for the HFD measures, while for the BBi data this is the case for the line of HF power. In conclusion, as anticipated, for all three data streams, complexity and entropy measures differentiated more clearly than conventional linear, time-and frequency-domain measures, between spontaneous and 7 bpm paced breathing. More measures decreased than increased, Higuchi fractal dimension at various lags being a notable exception. CEPS is a work in progress, and our dream is inevitably not yet fully materialised. We realise that there will be limitations to the use of CEPS which are dependent on the accuracy of the data used whether it be disease-related or simply based on normal physiological functioning. As a platform for analysis of Complexity and Entropy in Physiological Signals, CEPS meets a number of clinical research requirements for both large and small data samples. In future, other utilities may be added using a plug-in function (see Conclusions for future developments). As CEPS is issued under a creative commons license, it is free to use and can be modified and redistributed as long as the authors and this article are cited. This also applies to results that are generated with the GUI and are published in the future. As with all publications in a rapidly moving field the literature review that has informed the development of CEPS is continuously evolving, as is CEPS itself. It is worth stating that PubMed only provides a limited insight into patterns of publication but that a full literature review would have quite unmanageable in the time available to us and The HFD measures are quite different for the RRi and BBi data, with less variation in slope for the latter. Note that for the RRi data the slope of the line of LF power is less steep than that for the HFD measures, while for the BBi data this is the case for the line of HF power. In conclusion, as anticipated, for all three data streams, complexity and entropy measures differentiated more clearly than conventional linear, time-and frequency-domain measures, between spontaneous and 7 bpm paced breathing. More measures decreased than increased, Higuchi fractal dimension at various lags being a notable exception. CEPS is a work in progress, and our dream is inevitably not yet fully materialised. We realise that there will be limitations to the use of CEPS which are dependent on the accuracy of the data used whether it be disease-related or simply based on normal physiological functioning. As a platform for analysis of Complexity and Entropy in Physiological Signals, CEPS meets a number of clinical research requirements for both large and small data samples. In future, other utilities may be added using a plug-in function (see Conclusions for future developments). As CEPS is issued under a creative commons license, it is free to use and can be modified and redistributed as long as the authors and this article are cited. This also applies to results that are generated with the GUI and are published in the future. As with all publications in a rapidly moving field the literature review that has informed the development of CEPS is continuously evolving, as is CEPS itself. It is worth stating that PubMed only provides a limited insight into patterns of publication but that a full literature review would have quite unmanageable in the time available to us and beyond the scope of this paper. As an illustration, whereas the number of papers in PubMed located using the search term 'entropy' was 34,647 in August 2020, before PubMed indexing of Entropy was rolled out in December 2020, this number had swelled to 39,571 by 23 January 2021. By that date the corresponding number for SCOPUS was 260,974, or more than 6.5 times greater, with around 3.5 million mentions in Google Scholar. A particular technical limitation is that CEPS is not yet able to import data in all the various proprietary output formats by a burgeoning number of wearable technologies. Certain functions are planned but remain to be fully implemented. In the Preprocessing mode, these include various methods of data interpolation, normalisation, coarse-graining, resampling and detrending. In the time-frequency domain, a number of spectral entropy methods have also not yet been implemented. Furthermore, while data segmentation is implemented, sliding window analysis is not yet a feature. Inevitable technical glitches still exist-users are encouraged to report these. Users should also remember that CEPS is not magic, but a tool that must be used with care and discrimination. CEPS has been designed for the analysis of Complexity and Entropy in Physiological Signals intended to suit the requirements of clinical research on both large and small data samples. Although other such software packages exist (PyBioS and EZ Entropy are elegant examples), many are quite technical to use for non-specialist clinicians, and none include so many established or innovative complexity and entropy measures as CEPS. One particularly useful feature is the ability to test the effect of parameter variation on the different measures and to visualise how multiscaling may affect them. Another advantage is the facility for easy comparison of changes in different CEPS measures for the same or parallel physiological data streams, as we have done here in our biomedical engineering investigation of the effects of paced breathing on ECG, PPG and RSP variability. We are aware that CEPS is not unique, and that some clinicians may find other packages more suited to their needs. In general terms, we have proven the utility of CEPS as a cross-platform (Linux, Mac or Windows based machines) MATLAB graphical user interface (GUI) which is more intuitive than command-line or menu-driven interfaces that rely on programming skills or are limited in the analysis options available. GUIs allow direct manipulation of graphical icons such as buttons, scroll bars, windows, tabs, menus, and cursors and allow the exchange of data between different software applications or data sets. They are much easier to use for beginners who do not have to learn command line routines, are easy to explore using the WIMP (windows, icons, menus, pointer) GUI interface provided by CEPS and provide a platform where the user can switch easily between tasks. Even using data with artefacts, we can tentatively conclude that CEPS has shown its usefulness. It has been possible, for instance, to process a welter of results to find a few measures that appear stable to ectopic beats or noise in RRi data. We are also pleased that use of CEPS has enabled us to confirm the general finding that complexity and entropy changes often show more significant changes than conventional linear measures (here, in the analysis of changes that are found during paced compared to spontaneous breathing). The general reduction in complexity in ECG and PPG variability during breathing at 7 bpm echoes that in RSP variability itself, but the latter also requires further investigation. The autonomic implications of the changes found also invite research. Future study, for which recruitment is currently underway, will explore the effects of paced breathing at different rates on a broader selection of CEPS measures and for a larger sample. We also plan to use CEPS in analysing the effects of different frequencies of peripheral electrical stimulation on EEG, HRV, respiration, postural sway and temperature data. Two of our original objectives have not yet been met. Future developments of CEPS will include a 'plug-in' facility to allow other researchers to add measures not already included in the list available, and Classification will be added as a further item in the Application Mode drop-down list, providing alternative methods of classifying results from using CEPS or from other sources. AdaBoost, Sensitivity-Specificity and Linear discriminant analysis are being considered for inclusion in the next iteration of CEPS. No doubt other developments will be made in time and in response to user feedback. Nonetheless, although still in process of development, CEPS is already a versatile tool for the analysis of complexity and entropy in physiological signals, and we feel justified in releasing it at this stage to invite feedback and foster awareness of the hidden mycelium that nourishes the burgeoning worlds of complexity and entropy. Supplementary Materials: The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4 300/23/3/321/s1. SM1. A brief review of studies comparing nonlinear measures of complexity or entropy with traditional linear measures (Tables S1 and S2, Figure S1 ). SM2. Names of researchers who have contributed most papers on each complexity and entropy measure (Tables C1-C3 ). SM3. Software packages for physiological data analysis . Funding: Support has been given for T.S. and D.B. to contribute to this project by Innovate UK, grant number 63382 'Early Detection of Coronavirus Infection using Heart Rate Variability'. To maintain independence, the development of CEPS has been unfunded. Institutional Review Board Statement: The MindSpire ethics review procedure was followed, according to the principles of the Helsinki declaration, with approval reference MS-COVID-WP3-01. Participants were informed about the study and signed a consent form with the explicit agreement that their anonymised data would be stored in perpetuity on a publicly available repository for other researchers to use. The data presented in this study will shortly be freely available in Open Research Data Online (ORDO), The Open University's searchable research data repository at https://ordo.open.ac.uk/ (accessed on 5 February 2021). Mani, George Manis, Pasquale Nardone, Ashish Rohila, Chang Yan and Luciano Zunino. We would also like to thank our two anonymous reviewers, whose friendly but critical comments very much helped to shape the paper in its final form, as well as Neil Spencer (Professor of Applied Statistics at the University of Hertfordshire) for his generous and meticulous advice and support. Last, but not least, we are humbly grateful to those close to us who have made it possible for us to spend time on this project when so much else requires attention in this time of COVID. The authors declare no conflict of interest. 1-dimensional data, H = 2-FD For 1-dimensional data, H ≈ DFA α The LLE can be estimated from RQA Pedro Bernaola-Galván, the main originator of the volatility method of assessing nonlinearity, has co-authored work on nonlinearity with Alberto Porta whose code for mFmDFA is used in CEPS, has co-authored at least six papers with Alberto Porta the originator of Diffusion entropy, co-authored some papers on diffusion with Constantino Tsallis when both were at the University of North Texas /11. SE, CE and DiffEn were all introduced by Shannon in his famous 1948 paper Corrected CE (cCE) and corrected ApEn (cApEn) were both introduced by Alberto Porta and his associates Both AF and DFA are methods of assess the fractal exponent α, the former particularly for point process data While in the final stages of preparing this paper for publication, we became aware of a similar-if more technical-analysis of the 'entropy universe' by the indefatigable Teresa Henriques and her colleagues in Porto [107]. Readers will find it instructive to compare our two mappings. CEPS does not include the family (or 'galaxy') of topological or graph entropies Corrected CE (cCE) and corrected ApEn (cApEn) were both introduced by Alberto Porta and his associates Both AF and DFA are methods of assess the fractal exponent α, the former particularly for point process data KSE can also be estimated from RQA Remote processing server for ECG-based clinical diagnosis support Biosignal Laboratory: A software: Tool for biomedical signal processing and analysis BioLab: An educational tool for signal processing training in biomedical engineering Graphical programming based biomedical signal acquisition and processing The biopsychology-nonlinear analysis toolbox: A free, open-source Matlab-toolbox for the non-linear analysis of time series data Development of an embedded system and MATLAB-based GUI for online acquisition and analysis of ECG signal Heart rate variability analysis made easy Design of a novel biomedical signal processing and analysis tool for functional neuroimaging A software application for the entropy analysis of physiological time-series RR-APET-Heart rate variability analysis software Software for biomedical engineering signal processing laboratory experiments POLYAN: A computer program for polyparametric analysis of cardio-respiratory variability signals Software for advanced HRV analysis Extension and detailed overview of the HRVFrame framework for heart rate variability analysis HRVanalysis: A Free software for analyzing cardiac autonomic activity Version 2.83. Patent RF2001610516 EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis ELAN: A software package for analysis and visualization of MEG, EEG, and LFP signals Brainstorm: A user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis Feature extraction from electroencephalographic records using EEGFrame framework Design, Evaluation, and Application of Heart Rate Variability Analysis Software (HRVAS) Heart Rate Variability Analysis with the R Package RHRV A software toolkit for nonlinear heart rate variability analysis PyBioS: A freeware computer software for analysis of cardiovascular signals KARDIA: A Matlab software for the analysis of cardiac interbeat intervals Development of an Open-Source Python Toolbox for Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Laboratory of Functional MRI Technology (LOFT), Department of Neurology Software review: Chaos data analyzer, professional version Practical implementation of nonlinear time series methods: The TISEAN package Measures of Analysis of Time Series (MATS): A MATLAB toolkit for computation of multiple measures on time series data bases AnyWave: A cross-platform and modular software for visualizing and processing electrophysiological signals A web platform based on specialized frameworks for heterogeneous biomedical time series analysis-an architectural overview Matrix of Lags: A tool for analysis of multiple dependent time series applied for CAP scoring Quantification of sympathetic and parasympathetic tones by nonlinear indexes in normotensive rats Fractal dynamics in physiology: Alterations with disease and aging Short-term model-based multiscale complexity analysis of cardiac control provides complementary information to single-scale approaches Entropy analysis of short-term heartbeat interval time series during regular walking Univariate and multivariate conditional entropy measures for the characterization of short-term cardiovascular complexity under physiological stress Correlations in magnitude series to assess nonlinearities: Application to multifractal models and heartbeat fluctuations An advanced detrending method with application to HRV analysis The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size Physiolyze: A Galaxy-based web service for heart rate variability analysis with online processing Changes in the fractal dimension of alpha envelope from wakefulness to drowsiness in the human electroencephalogram Fractal analysis of pulmonary arteries: The fractal dimen-sion is lower in pulmonary hypertension Fractal character of the electrocardiogram: Distinguishing heart-failure and normal patients HRVTool-An open-source matlab toolbox for analyzing heart rate variability Effects of noise on some dynamical models in ecology Fractal behavior of indoor radon variations A programmatic approach for development of the ViewHRV service platform with accurate and reli-able results An open source benchmarked toolbox for car-diovascular waveform and interval analysis Software for Heart Rate Variability. Macalester College Quantification of scaling exponents and crossover phenomena in nonstationary heartbeat time series Low-dimensional chaos in an instance of epilepsy Lumbar paraspinal muscle fatigability in re-petitive isoinertial loading: EMG spectral indices, Borg scale and endurance time EasieRR: An open-source software for noninvasive heart rate variability as-sessment Development of a Matlab soft-ware for analysis of heart rate variability HRV: A Pythonic package for heart rate variability analysis Computer software tool for heart rate variability (HRV), T-wave alternans (TWA) and heart rate turbulence (HRT) analysis from ECGs Adaptive filtering and analysis of EEG signals in the time-frequency domain based on the local entropy CardioSeries Software. 2020. Available online: www.danielpenteado.com Patterns of beat-to-beat heart rate variability in ad-vanced heart failure The Lempel-Ziv complexity and local structure analysis of genomes SinusCor: An advanced tool for heart rate variability analysis Estimation of missing cone data in three-dimensional electron microsco-py Measuring the complexity of time series: An application to neurophysiological signals Ultrafast quantum random number generation based on quantum phase fluctuations Nonlinear equation for anomalous diffusion: Unified power-law and stretched exponential exact solution Computing the Kolmogorov entropy from time signals of dissipative and conservative dynamical systems Permutation entropy: A natural complexity measure for time series Measuring regu-larity by means of a corrected conditional entropy in sympathetic outflow A regularity statistic for medical data analysis Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy Improved entropy rate estimation in physiological data A new algorithm for quadratic sample entropy optimization for very short biomedical signals: Application to blood pressure records EMG-derived respiration signal using the fixed sample entropy during an inspiratory load protocol Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series Image thresholding using fuzzy entropies Dispersion entropy: A measure for time-series analysis Slope entropy: A new time series complexity estimator based on both symbolic patterns and amplitude information Bubble entropy: An entropy almost free of parameters Assessing the complexity of short-term heartbeat interval series by distribution entropy Phase entropy: A new complexity measure for heart rate variability Quantification of EEG irregular-ity by use of the entropy of the power spectrum A physico-chemical study of the mechanical properties of low and intermediate moisture foods Memory beyond memory in heart beating, a sign of a healthy physiological condition Spike train analysis toolkit: Enabling wider application of infor-mationtheoretic techniques to neurophysiology Improved analysis of heart rate variability by methods of nonlinear dynamics Four methods to estimate the fractal dimension from self-affine signals Fractal dynamics in chaotic quantum transport Revisiting detrended fluctuation analysis Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors Recurrence plots of dynamical systems Sporadic randomness, Maxwell's Demon and the Poincaré recurrence times Comparison of methods for the assessment of nonlinearity in short-term heart rate variability under different physiopathological states Anomalous diffusion associated with nonlinear fractional derivative Fokker-Planck-like equation: Exact time-dependent solutions A mathematical theory of communication Progressive decrease of heart period variability entropy-based complexity during graded head-up tilt Errors in the estimation of approximate entropy and other recurrence-plot-derived indices due to the finite resolution of RR time series Estimation of dynamical invariants without embedding by recurrence plots Detection of fractal behavior in temporal series of synaptic quantal release events: A feasibility study A new method to estimate the Kolmogorov entropy from recurrence plots: Its application to neuronal signals. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom On relations among the entropic chaos degree, the Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy and the Lyapunov exponent Estimation of entropies and dimensions by nonlinear symbolic time series analysis Order patterns in time series Diffusion entropy and waiting time statistics of hard-x-ray solar flares The entropy universe Twenty years of entropy research: A bibliometric overview Amplitude-aware permutation entropy: Illustration in spike detection and signal segmentation Average entropy: Measurement of disorder for cardiac RR interval signals Statistics of atomic frequency standards Hurst exponents for short time series Complex Correlation Measure: A novel descriptor for Poincaré plot Complex dynamics of human red blood cell flickering: Alterations with in vivo aging Accurate estimation of entropy in very short physiological time series: The problem of atrial fibrillation detection in implanted ventricular devices Efficient algorithm for estimating the correlation dimension from a set of discrete points Correlation dimension and phase space contraction via extreme value theory Mosaic organization of DNA nucleotides Differential entropy feature for EEG-based vigilance estimation Asymmetric anomalous diffusion: An efficient way to detect memory in time series Multi-lag analysis of symbolic entropies on EEG recordings for distress recognition Entropy of entropy: Measurement of dynamical complexity for biological systems The application of the extended Poincaré plot in the analysis of physiological variabilities Approach to an irregular time-series on the basis of the fractal theory Characterization of surface EMG signal based on fuzzy entropy Evidence towards improved estimation of respiratory muscle effort from diaphragm mechanomyographic signals with cardiac vibration interference using sample entropy with fixed tolerance values Long-Term Storage: An Experimental Study Heart rate asymmetry and emotional response to robot-assist task challenges in post-stroke patients Improved multiscale permutation entropy for biomedical signal analysis: Interpretation and application to electroencephalogram recordings Characterization of strange attractors A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom On the complexity of finite sequences A fast DFA algorithm for multifractal multiscale analysis of physiological time series Multiscale Lempel-Ziv complexity for EEG measures Permutation min-entropy: An improved quantifier for unveiling subtle temporal correlations On measures of information and entropy Recurrence quantification analysis as a tool for nonlinear exploration of nonstationary cardiac signals Refined Multiscale Fuzzy Entropy based on Standard Deviation for Biomedical Signal Analysis Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics Tone-entropy analysis on cardiac recovery after dynamic exercise Effects of slow deep breathing at high altitude on oxygen saturation, pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics Effects of slow and regular breathing exercise on cardiopulmonary coupling and blood pressure The effect of deep and slow breathing on pain perception, autonomic activity, and mood processing-An experimental study Effect of slow-deep breathing exercise to reduce anxiety among adolescent school students in a selected higher secondary school in Coimbatore, India The impact of resonance frequency breathing on measures of heart rate variability, blood pressure, and mood. Front Effects of breathing patterns and light exercise on linear and nonlinear heart rate variability Fear induced complexity loss in the electrocardiogram of flight phobics: A multiscale entropy analysis Assessing multiscale complexity of short heart rate variability series through a model-based linear approach Time-varying surrogate data to assess nonlinearity in nonstationary time series: Application to heart rate variability Nonlinear properties of cardiac rhythm and respiratory signal under paced breathing in young and middle-aged healthy subjects Tone-entropy analysis of heart rate variability in cardiac autonomic neuropathy Anwendungen des System Kardivar zur Feststellung des Stressniveaus und des Anpassungsvermögens des Organismus Fractal dimension of 40 MHz intravascular ultrasound radio frequency signals Characterization of early partial seizure onset: Frequency, complexity and entropy Zone specific fractal dimension of retinal images as predictor of stroke incidence Higuchi's fractal dimension, but not frontal or posterior alpha asymmetry, predicts PID-5 anxiousness more than depressivity The Allan factor: A new model of mathematical interpretation of heart rate variability in stable coronary artery disease. Preliminary results A reduction in the correlation dimension of heartbeat intervals precedes imminent ventricular fibrillation in human subjects EEG-based, neural-net predictive classification of Alzheimer's disease versus control subjects is augmented by non-linear EEG measures Evidence of deterministic chaos in the myoelectric signal Diagnostic usefulness of linear and nonlinear quantitative EEG analysis in Alzheimer's disease Discrimination of sleep stages: A comparison between spectral and nonlinear EEG measures Neural net classification of REM sleep based on spectral measures as compared to nonlinear measures Classification of biological signals using linear and nonlinear features Recognition and study of pathological voice based on nonlinear dynamics using gaussian mixture model/support vector machine Do complexity measures of frontal EEG distinguish loss of consciousness in geriatric patients under anesthesia? Fractional Gaussian noise, functional MRI and Alzheimer's disease Increased non-stationarity of heart rate during general anaesthesia with sevoflurane or desflurane in children Investigating fractal property and respiratory modulation of human heartbeat time series using empirical mode decomposition Heart rate dynamics in patients with stable angina pectoris and utility of fractal and complexity measures Fractal analysis of heart rate variability and mortality in elderly community-dwelling people-Longitudinal Investigation for the Longevity and Aging in Hokkaido County (LILAC) study Discriminating brain activity from task-related artifacts in functional MRI: Fractal scaling analysis simulation and application Multivariate short-term heart rate variability: A pre-diagnostic tool for screening heart disease Multifractal detrending moving-average cross-correlation analysis Nonlinear and conventional biosignal analyses applied to tilt table test for evaluating autonomic nervous system and autoregulation Analysis of the breathing pattern in elderly patients using the Hurst exponent applied to the respiratory flow signal Detrended fluctuation analysis for major depressive disorder Can the detrended fluctuation analysis reveal nonlinear components of heart rate variability? Heart rhythm complexity impairment in patients with pulmonary hypertension Nonlinear measures of respiration: Respiratory irregularity and increased chaos of respiration in patients with panic disorder Predictability analysis for an automated seizure prediction algorithm Functional brain dynamic analysis of ADHD and control children using nonlinear dynamical features of EEG signals Recurrences in heart rate dynamics are changed in patients with diabetes mellitus Prediction of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using recurrence plot-based features of the RR-interval signal Practice of contemporary dance promotes stochastic postural control in aging Application of recurrence quantification analysis to automatically estimate infant sleep states using a single channel of respiratory data A characteristic destabilization profile in parent-child interactions associated with treatment efficacy for aggressive children EMG-based detection of muscle fatigue during low-level isometric contraction by recurrence quantification analysis and monopolar configuration The effects of body posture and temperament on heart rate variability in dairy cows Phase space and power spectral approaches for EEG-based automatic sleep-wake classification in humans: A comparative study using short and standard epoch lengths Recovery of heart rate variability after treadmill exercise analyzed by lagged Poincaré plot and spectral characteristics Cutoffs of short-term heart rate variability parameters in Brazilian adolescents male Detection of major depressive disorder from linear and nonlinear heart rate variability features during mental task protocol EEG complexity as a measure of depth of anesthesia for patients Prediction of response to incision using the mutual information of electroencephalograms during anaesthesia The effect of isoflurane anesthesia on the electroencephalogram assessed by harmonic wavelet bicoherence-based indices Efficient image denoising method based on a new adaptive wavelet packet thresholding function Temperature multiscale entropy analysis: A promising marker for early prediction of mortality in septic patients Differential Shannon entropy and differential coefficient of variation: Alternatives and augmentations to differential expression in the search for disease-related genes An algorithm of spectral minimum shannon entropy on extracting endmember of hyperspectral image A generalized entropy measure of within-host viral diversity for identifying recent HIV-1 infections Enhanced approaches for identifying Amadori products: Application to peanut allergens White matter injuries in mild traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic migraines: Diffusion entropy analysis A comparison study of DRASTIC methods with various objective methods for groundwater vulnerability assessment Using Shannon entropy to model turbulence-induced flocculation of cohesive sediment in water Eddy-current-induced distortion correction using maximum reconciled mutual information in diffusion MR imaging Rényi entropy and Lempel-Ziv complexity of mechanomyographic recordings of diaphragm muscle as indexes of respiratory effort Information-theoretical quantifier of brain rhythm based on data-driven multiscale representation Tsallis entropy-based prior for PET reconstruction Pathological brain detection in MRI scanning by wavelet packet Tsallis entropy and fuzzy support vector machine Improving the performance of empirical mode decomposition via Tsallis entropy: Application to Alzheimer EEG analysis Performance of anesthetic depth indexes in rabbits under propofol anesthesia: Prediction probabilities and concentration-effect relations The complexity of daily life walking in older adult communitydwelling fallers and non-fallers The impact of musical experience on neural sound encoding performance Multiatlas whole heart segmentation of CT data using conditional entropy for atlas ranking and selection Approximate entropy as an electroencephalographic measure of anesthetic drug effect during desflurane anesthesia Correlation of approximate entropy, bispectral index, and spectral edge frequency 95 (SEF95) with clinical signs of "anesthetic depth" during coadministration of propofol and remifentanil Ayres-de-Campos, D. Linear and nonlinear analysis of heart rate patterns associated with fetal behavioral states in the antepartum period Interpretation of the approximate entropy using fixed tolerance values as a measure of amplitude variations in biomedical signals An algorithm for on-line detection of high frequency oscillations related to epilepsy Assembling a multi-feature EEG classifier for left-right motor imagery data using wavelet-based fuzzy approximate entropy for improved accuracy Nonlinear analysis of fetal heart rate dynamics in fetuses compromised by asymptomatic partial placental abruption Athletes who train on unstable compared to stable surfaces exhibit unique postural control strategies in response to balance perturbations Increased parasympathetic cardiac modulation in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD: How should we interpret it? In situ detection of water quality contamination events based on signal complexity analysis using online ultraviolet-visible spectral sensor Video and accelerometer-based motion analysis for automated surgical skills assessment Comparative study on evaluation algorithms for neck muscle fatigue based on surface electromyography signal Entropy-based quantitative electroencephalogram analysis for diagnosing attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in girls Comparison between approximate entropy and regional homogeneity for identification of irritable bowel syndrome based on functional magnetic resonance imaging Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao Diagnosing autism spectrum disorder using brain entropy: A fast entropy method Major depressive disorder assessment via enhanced k-nearest neighbor method and EEG signals Visual attention recognition based on nonlinear dynamical parameters of EEG Base lung sound in diffuse interstitial pneumonia analyzed by linear and nonlinear techniques A novel technique for muscle onset detection using surface EMG signals without removal of ECG artifacts Parametric estimation of sample entropy for physical activity recognition A noise reduction method for dual-mass micro-electromechanical gyroscopes based on sample entropy empirical mode decomposition and time-frequency peak filtering Online analysis of local field potentials for seizure detection in freely moving rats Multiscale entropy analysis of pulse wave velocity for assessing atherosclerosis in the aged and diabetic MEG-based detection and localization of perilesional dysfunction in chronic stroke A novel method of evaluating knee joint stability of patients with knee osteoarthritis: Multiscale entropy analysis with a knee-aiming task Heart rhythm complexity impairment in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis Fuzzy-entropy threshold based on a complex wavelet denoising technique to diagnose Alzheimer disease Bispectral index and spectral entropy in neuroanesthesia Effects of etomidate on bispectral index scale and spectral entropy during induction of anesthesia by means of the raw electroencephalographic and electromyographic characteristics How bispectral index compares to spectral entropy of the EEG and A-line ARX index in the same patient Regional heart motion abnormality detection via information measures and unscented Kalman filtering Regional heart motion abnormality detection: An information theoretic approach Acqknowledge Software. BioPac Systems UK. Available online ARTiiFACT: A tool for heart rate artifact processing and heart rate variability analysis Biopeaks: A graphical user interface for feature extraction from heart-and breathing biosignals BioSig: A free and open source software library for BCI research Biosignal Processing in Python Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data Signal and image processing with FracLab. FRACTAL04, Thinking in Patterns: Complexity and Fractals in Nature A graphical software tool for the acquisition of the heart rate in response to external stimuli Heart Rate Variability Analysis with the HRV Toolkit A toolbox for the fast information analysis of multiple-site LFP, EEG and spike train recordings Neurokit2: A python toolbox for neurophysiological signal processing PhysioScripts: An extensible, open source platform for the processing of physiological data Python for information theoretic analysis of neural data An information theoretic library for analysis of neural codes. Neuromorphic Eng Time-domain heart rate variability analysis with the SPINE-HRV toolkit