key: cord-0047593-rhmg8s85
authors: Jeevan, Amrit; Balasubramanian, Haribalakrishna; Kabra, Nandkishor
title: Effect of T-Piece Resuscitator versus Self Inflating Bag on Arterial CO(2) Levels in Preterm Neonates
date: 2020-07-14
journal: Indian J Pediatr
DOI: 10.1007/s12098-020-03393-x
sha: 44ac1c3aa84d635bd17543449b7bb4c81a322250
doc_id: 47593
cord_uid: rhmg8s85

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of self-inflating bag (SIB) vs. T-piece resuscitator (TPR) on PaCO(2) levels, when used for brief manual ventilation during administration of first dose of surfactant. METHODS: Preterm neonates were randomized to receive positive pressure ventilation with either self-inflating bag or T-piece resuscitator during administration of first dose of surfactant. Arterial blood gases were obtained at baseline and 1 h after the intervention. Primary outcome was the mean change in PaCO(2) levels 1 h after the intervention. RESULTS: Eighty neonates were enrolled (40 in each group). The drop in PaCO(2) at 1 h was significantly greater in the self inflating bag group as compared to the T-piece resuscitator group [8.96 ± 9.06 mmHg vs. 1.37 ± 9.06 mmHg, Mean difference = 7.58 mmHg, (95% CI: 3.78 to 11.4); P < 0.01]. The PaCO(2) change was also statistically significant in the subgroup of infants that required only non-invasive ventilation. The need for second dose of surfactant was higher in the self-inflating bag group [77% vs. 55%, RR - 1.41 (95% CI: 1.02 to 1.94); P = 0.03]. CONCLUSIONS: T-piece resuscitator results in smaller reduction in PaCO(2) levels compared to the self inflating bag, when used for brief manual ventilation during surfactant administration.

Self-inflating bag (SIB) and T-piece resuscitator (TPR) are the two most common manual ventilation devices (MVDs) used in neonates in the delivery room and intensive care unit.

Various studies on mechanical models have shown that TPR, as compared to SIB, generates inflation pressures closer to the targeted values and minimizes breath-to-breath variability in the inspiratory pressures [1] [2] [3] [4] . Sustained lung inflations could be more easily achieved with TPR than SIB [5, 6] . TPR also delivers lower and less variable tidal volumes than SIB [7] . Currently, there is limited data on the pressures and volumes achieved in neonatal patients. Dawson et al. observed a lower tidal volume provided by TPR in preterm neonates less than 29 wk of gestation [8] . Whether this effect translates into reduced risk of hypocarbia in the early neonatal period has not yet been evaluated. Studies have also raised concerns regarding generation of inadvertent positive end expiratory pressures (PEEP) with TPR [9] [10] [11] . The effect of these two MVDs on PaCO 2 levels still remains unclear.

Hypocarbia is defined by a PaCO 2 level below 35 mmHg [12] . Two or more PaCO 2 values less than 25 mmHg in first 48 h of life constitutes severe early hypocarbia [13] . Major fluctuations in PaCO 2 can significantly affect systemic blood pressure and cerebral blood flow. A retrospective analysis of 314 preterm neonates <29 wk of gestation revealed that a single PaCO 2 value <30 mmHg in first 48 h of life was associated with increased incidence of severe intraventricular hemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia. Prolonged hypocarbia during this period also increased the odds of bronchopulmonary dysplasia [14] . Given the long term implications of hypocarbia, it is essential to assess the impact of these two MVDs on carbon dioxide elimination in preterm neonates. There is also a paucity of comparative studies on MVDs outside the context of delivery room resuscitation. In centres where minimally invasive surfactant therapy is not practiced, MVDs are regularly being used during surfactant administration while on non-invasive respiratory support.

Hence, the authors planned to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effect of SIB vs. TPR on PaCO 2 levels, when used for brief manual ventilation during administration of first dose of surfactant. They hypothesized that manual ventilation with TPR, as compared to SIB, results in smaller reduction in PaCO 2 levels.

This single centre, parallel group RCT was conducted in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Surya Children's Hospital, Mumbai, Western India from August 2015 through February 2018. Preterm neonates having respiratory distress and/or FiO 2 requirements of >35%, despite being on positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 6 cm H 2 O within first 24 h of life, qualified for the first dose of surfactant and were considered eligible for enrolment into the study. Neonates with major congenital anomalies, complex congenital heart disease, pneumothoraces and those who had received first dose of surfactant prior to transfer to the hospital were excluded.

The trial was approved by the institutional ethics committee. The trial was prospectively registered with Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2015/08/006067) following which the first subject was enrolled.

Preterm neonates requiring respiratory support were transported to authors' unit on Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation or nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure through a transport ventilator (T1500 Globe Trotter, Drager, Lubeck, Germany). Neonates with severe respiratory distress and/or FiO 2 requirement of >50% were transported on Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation. Those infants requiring ≤40% FiO 2 on admission were directly extubated to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure following administration of the first dose of surfactant. Neonates retrieved on Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and requiring >35% FiO 2 were considered for surfactant treatment. They were continued on noninvasive ventilation unless they met previously specified ventilation criteria. Second dose of surfactant was given if the FiO 2 requirement was ≥35% at 6 h after the first dose.

Random number sequence was generated in variable block sizes of two or four each, using Stata software. The random sequence was generated by a statistician who was not a part of the study. The random number codes were placed in sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelopes. Neonates were enrolled by a senior resident after obtaining written informed consent from the parents/guardians. The resident then opened the sealed envelope to determine the infant's MVD assignment.

Masking the nurse and senior resident to allocated MVD was not possible due to the nature of the intervention. However, the study investigators and the laboratory technicians processing the blood gas were unaware of the allocation. Treating clinicians had to be informed the blood gas report since it was crucial for further management.

The intervention was brief manual ventilation with either SIB or TPR during administration of first dose of surfactant. Baseline preductal arterial blood gas was obtained prior to the intervention. The staff nurse involved in the care of the neonate, endotracheally administered the first dose of surfactant while the resident provided positive pressure ventilation using the appropriate MVD. All senior residents had formal training on the use of MVDs.

Bovine surfactant (25 mg phospholipids/ml) at the dose of 4 ml/kg was instilled in four aliquots through a 5 or 6 French infant feeding tube. After each aliquot, neonates were ventilated with SIB/TPR for either 30 s or the time to achieve target saturations of 92-95%, whichever was later. Infant's vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate) and saturations were continuously monitored during the procedure. Preductal arterial blood gas was obtained at 1 h and 6 h post intervention. Second dose of surfactant, if indicated, was administered after the 6 h ABG.

Infant silicone manual resuscitator (Zeal Medical, Mumbai, India) without a positive end expiratory valve was used in SIB group and Neopuff (Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) was used in the TPR group. The SIB had a capacity of 250 ml with the pop off valve set at 35 cm H 2 O. In the TPR group, initial peak inspiratory pressure and PEEP was set at 20 cm H 2 O and 5 cm H 2 O respectively. Subsequently, peak pressure was adjusted to achieve optimal chest rise. Maximal pressure release valve was set at 40 cm H 2 O. Manual ventilation was provided at the rate of 40 breaths per min in both the groups. Initial FiO 2 of 30% was titrated to a target saturation of 92-95%.

Neonates requiring ventilation were commenced on volume guarantee mode with a tidal volume of 4-6 ml/kg, inspiratory time of 0.3 s, PEEP of 5 cm H 2 O and FiO 2 to target SpO 2 of 92-95%. Extubation was considered if peak inspiratory pressure required to generate the set tidal volume was ≤18 cm H 2 O, FiO 2 requirement ≤30% and blood gas was suggestive of a pH ≥ 7.25 with PaCO 2 ≤ 55 mmHg.

The primary outcome was the difference between baseline and 1 h PaCO 2 . This was quantified as mean change 1.

Secondary outcomes were: (a) The difference between baseline PaCO 2 and 6 h PaCO 2 -mean change 2; (b) Blood gas variables (pH, PaCO 2 and PaO 2 ) at 1 and 6 h post intervention; (c) Clinical outcomes such as mortality prior to discharge, requirement of mechanical ventilation, need for second dose of surfactant, duration of invasive and non-invasive ventilation, duration of oxygen therapy and length of hospital stay; (d) Neonatal morbidities -severe intraventricular hemorrhage, patent ductus arteriosus requiring medical treatment, necrotizing enterocolitis, late onset sepsis, retinopathy of prematurity requiring treatment, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Observations from authors' neonatal unit indicated that the average reduction in PaCO 2 following a brief period of manual ventilation with SIB during surfactant administration was 12 mmHg (standard deviation of 8.5 mmHg). In order to detect a 6 mmHg difference in the change in PaCO 2 between the two groups with an assumed standard deviation of 8 mmHg, a sample size of 39 neonates in each group was estimated for a study power of 90% and two tailed alpha of 0.05.

Statistical analysis was conducted using the Stata 13.1 software (Statacorp LP, 4905, Lakeway Drive, College Station, Texas, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to define the baseline and outcome variables in both groups. Categorical variables were compared using the Fisher's exact test. Continuous measures were compared using two sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test as appropriate. Analysis was performed by applying intention to treat principle. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Factorial analysis of variance was performed to check the dependence of the mean change in PaCO 2 on the two factors-type of MVD and duration of respiratory support (hours of life) and interaction between them, if any. Line charts and box plots were constructed to provide a visual impression of the difference in the pre and post intervention PaCO 2 .

A total of 176 eligible neonates were admitted to authors' unit from August 2015 through February 2018. Of these, 80 were enrolled in the study (40 in the TPR group and 40 in the SIB group) (Fig. 1) . All the neonates were analyzed for the primary outcome. There were no adverse events associated with surfactant administration or manual ventilation.

Majority of the preterm neonates were outborn (55%) and cesarean delivered (85%). The gestational age of the study patients ranged from 26 to 36 wk and 88% of them were > 28 wk. Most of them were vigorous (83%) at birth and were managed with non-invasive ventilatory support (80%). Neonates who were primarily commenced on non-invasive respiratory support did not require mechanical ventilation subsequently. Sixteen (20%) were on mechanical ventilation at the time of primary outcome assessment. Eleven (14%) continued to require ventilation at 6 h after intervention. Baseline maternal and neonatal characteristics were similar in the study groups (Table 1) .

Blood gas variables of both groups are displayed in Table 2 . A significant drop in PaCO 2 at 1 h was found in the SIB group as compared to the TPR group [SIB: 8.96 ± 9.06 mmHg vs. TPR: 1.37 ± 9.06 mmHg, mean difference 7.58 mmHg, (95% CI: 3.78-11.4), p < 0.01]. However, the differential reduction did not persist at 6 h ( Table 2) .

Neonates on NIV who received surfactant and then returned to NIV were analyzed as a separate subgroup (64 infants; 30 in SIB group and 34 in TPR group). The SIB group still demonstrated a significant drop in PaCO 2 [SIB 8.74 mmHg, TPR 0.71 mmHg, Mean difference 8.02 mmHg, (95% CI: 3.18-12.87), p < 0.01].

The box plot shows that the magnitude of drop in the post intervention PaCO 2 was significantly greater in the SIB group especially at 1 h (Fig. 2) . Analysis of covariance model of linear regression was used to assess the effect of the MVD on the primary outcome after adjusting for the baseline PaCO 2 . That the regression lines for the SIB group/TPR group are nearly parallel and well separated (Fig. 3) , confirms the drop in PaCO 2 to be independent of the baseline values.

Repeated measures of PaCO 2 (baseline, 1 h and 6 h) were subjected to a factorial analysis of variance to determine the device effect (Type of MVD -SIB or TPR) and time effect (1 h and 6 h after manual ventilation). The change in PaCO 2 was found to be significantly associated with time [F (1, 77) = 34.47, p < 0.01time effect] rather than the device F (1, 77) = 3.31, p = 0.07device effect]. However, the interaction effect (device x time) 

This clinical trial evaluates the effect of manual ventilation with a T-piece resuscitator or self-inflating bag during surfactant administration by measuring the mean change in arterial carbon dioxide levels after administration. The authors found that the fall in PaCO 2 level was significantly greater with SIB as compared to TPR, 1 h post intervention. The strength of present study includes a robust randomized controlled trial design adequately powered for the primary outcome. To authors' knowledge, there is no RCT until date comparing the effect of SIB/TPR on carbon dioxide elimination in neonates. Selection of an objective primary outcome and completeness of follow up eliminated detection and attrition bias.

Several studies performed on manikins have evaluated MVDs for tidal volume and peak inspiratory pressure. Dawson et al. randomized 80 neonates <29 wk of gestation to the two MVDs. A trend towards lower tidal volumes was reported in the TPR group (6.6 ml/kg vs. 9.2 ml/kg, p = 0.34) [8] . A multicenter crossover trial by Szyld et al. reported that TPR generated lower and less variable inflation pressures than SIB (26 vs. 28 cm individual PaCO 2 reading. Significant drop in PaCO 2 (in SIB group) even after restricting the analysis to the NIV subgroup strengthens the findings and captures the impact of MVD on the PaCO 2 values. The lack of effect on the 6 h PaCO 2 values could be explained by the ongoing noninvasive respiratory support in both groups.

Very few studies have evaluated the effects of MVDs on clinical outcomes in neonates. Thakur et al. randomized 90 neonates >26 wk of gestation requiring delivery room resuscitation to TPR or SIB. They demonstrated that neonates in TPR group required positive pressure ventilation for a lesser duration and had lower intubation rates [16] . A Brazilian prospective cohort study of 1962 inborn preterm infants showed that TPR, as compared to SIB, increased the odds of survival to discharge without major morbidities [17] . In the present study, the requirement of second dose of surfactant was significantly lower in the TPR group. Consistent delivery of positive end expiratory pressure and better lung recruitment with the TPR could possibly explain this outcome. A trend towards lower FiO 2 requirement at 6 h in the TPR group is in line with these findings. The arterial oxygen concentration in both groups, especially in the early phase, were high from a comparison with current practice. However, significant hyperoxia has also been reported in preterm neonates transported on nonsynchronized mechanical ventilation [18] .

The present study has certain limitations. Clinicians and nurses could not be blinded to the intervention. Real time monitoring and regulation of pressures generated by the SIB was not done in the study patients. In the absence of a manometer to monitor the peak inspiratory pressure generated, a bias towards administration of higher positive pressure in the SIB group could have existed. Minor group differences due to operator variability, especially with SIB, also could not be ruled out. A blood gas immediately after surfactant administration would have provided information specific to the effect of MVD. Only 12% of neonates in this study were below 28 wk of gestation and a large proportion of infants were outborn (55%). This could limit the generalizabilty of present study results.

The present study highlights the need to regulate pressures generated by MVDs even during brief periods of manual ventilation. RCTs with large sample size addressing clinically important outcomes in high risk neonates (gestation <28 wk) and follow up beyond the neonatal period would be required to assess the implications of the findings from the present study.

T-piece resuscitator results in smaller reduction in PaCO 2 levels compared to self inflating bag, when used for brief manual ventilation during surfactant administration.

Comparison of three manual ventilation devices using an intubated mannequin

A comparison of three neonatal resuscitation devices

Manual ventilation devices in neonatal resuscitation: tidal volume and positive pressure-provision

Comparison of efficacy of three devices of manual positive pressure ventilation: a mannequin-based study

Sustained inflations: comparing three neonatal resuscitation devices

Manual ventilation and sustained lung inflation in an experimental model: influence of equipment type and operator's training

Comparison of the T-piece resuscitator with other neonatal manual ventilation devices: a qualitative review

Oxygenation with T-piece versus self-inflating bag for ventilation of extremely preterm neonates at birth: a randomized controlled trial

Neopuff Tpiece resuscitator: does device design affect delivered ventilation

Unintentional variation in positive end expiratory pressure during resuscitation with a T-piece resuscitator

Variation in inspiratory time and tidal volume with T-piece neonatal resuscitator: association with operator experience and distraction

Hypocapnia and other ventilation-related risk factors for cerebral palsy in low birth weight infants

Early hypocarbia of preterm infants: its relationship to periventricular leukomalacia and cerebral palsy, and its perinatal risk factors

Hypocarbia in the ventilated preterm infant and its effect on intraventricular haemorrhage and bronchopulmonary dysplasia

Comparison of devices for newborn ventilation in the delivery room

T-piece or self inflating bag for positive pressure ventilation during delivery room resuscitation: an RCT

T-piece versus self-inflating bag ventilation in preterm neonates at birth

How safe is intermittent positive pressure ventilation in preterm babies ventilated from delivery to newborn intensive care unit?

Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

Authors' Contributions NK, HB conceptualized and designed the study and carried out the data analysis. AJ performed the literature search, collected the data and drafted the initial manuscript. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final manuscript as submitted. NK will act as Guarantor for this paper.

Conflict of Interest None.