key: cord-0043447-f6hfr1zf
authors: Ishiga, Takako; Sakata, Nanami; Nguyen, Viet Tru; Ishiga, Yasuhiro
title: Flood inoculation of seedlings on culture medium to study interactions between Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae and kiwifruit
date: 2020-03-27
journal: J
DOI: 10.1007/s10327-020-00916-4
sha: 657feae2f532353040c258632c691c9bcd2fff8d
doc_id: 43447
cord_uid: f6hfr1zf

Bacterial canker of kiwifruit caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) is a serious threat to kiwifruit production. Highly virulent strains of Psa biovar3 (Psa3) have spread rapidly to kiwifruit production areas worldwide. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop critical management strategies for bacterial canker based on dissecting the interactions between Psa and kiwifruit. Here, we developed a rapid and reliable flood-inoculation method using kiwifruit seedlings grown on Murashige and Skoog medium. This method has several advantages over inoculation of conventional soil-grown plants. We demonstrated the utility of a kiwifruit seedling assay to study the virulence of Psa biovars and Psa3 virulence factors, including the type III secretion system (T3SS). Kiwifruit seedlings inoculated with Psa3 developed severe necrosis within 1 week, whereas those inoculated with a T3SS-deficient hrcN mutant of Psa3 did not. This method was also useful for analyzing expression profiles of genes involved in Psa3 virulence during infection, and revealed that the expression of genes encoding the T3SS and type III secreted effectors were strongly induced in planta. Our results indicate that the T3SS has an important role in Psa3 virulence, and the flood-inoculation assay using kiwifruit seedling is suitable for analyzing Psa and kiwifruit interactions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10327-020-00916-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Pseudomonas syringae induces a variety of symptoms such as leaf spots, cankers, galls, wilt, and blights on different plants, and can be classified into more than 50 pathovars (pv.) based on their host plant specificities and disease symptoms (Mansfield et al. 2012; Xin and He 2013) . P. syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa), causal agent of bacterial canker of kiwifruit, is an economically important pathogen worldwide. First reported in Japan, Psa causes severe damage to kiwifruit plants and decreases yields under optimal conditions (Scortichini et al. 2012; Takikawa et al. 1989) . Psa is organized into five biovars including biovar 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 based on biochemical, pathogenicity, and molecular characteristics of the Psa strains Sawada 2016, 2019) . The emergence of Psa3 strains with enhanced virulence was reported in 2008 in Italy, and a pandemic spread rapidly to kiwifruit production areas worldwide (Scortichini et al. 2012) . Major control strategies include chemical treatments such as copper fungicides and antibiotics (Cameron and Sarojini 2013) , but they are associated with potential risks such as induction of Psa resistance strains, phytotoxicity, and chemical residues in fruits (Nakajima et al. 2002; Serizawa et al. 1989; Vanneste and Voyle 2003) . Breeding for resistance is another control strategy, but cultivar development is slow (Kisaki et al. 2019) . Therefore, alternative management strategies based on the dissection of the dynamic interactions between Psa and kiwifruit are urgently needed.

Plants have been inoculated with P. syringae using syringe pressure infiltration, vacuum infiltration, and sprays and dips to investigate the molecular basis of plant-pathogen interactions (Katagiri et al. 2002) . Syringe pressure infiltration is the most commonly used method (Kisaki et al. 2019) . Conventional soil-grown plant inoculation assays have included stem puncture inoculation, syringe pressure infiltration, and spray inoculation were used to study the interactions between Psa and kiwifruit (Bartoli et al. 2015; Gao et al. 2016; Kisaki et al. 2019) . However, to functionally investigate the molecular interactions between plants and P. syringae, the inoculation assay should mimic natural infection and be suitable for high-throughput assays. P. syringae has two lifestyles, an epiphytic phase on the plant leaf surface and an endophytic phase in the apoplastic space (Melotto et al. 2008; Xin and He 2013) . The bacterium generally enters host tissues through natural openings such as stomata and multiplies in the apoplast to cause disease in nature (Lindow and Brandl 2003) .

In previous studies, we developed a flood-inoculation method to investigate the interactions of plants with P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Ishiga et al. 2011; Uppalapati et al. 2008) . To establish a robust assay to study Psa and kiwifruit interactions, in the present study, we developed a rapid and reliable flood-inoculation method using kiwifruit seedlings that had been grown in Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium for 4 weeks. We also demonstrated that this method is suitable to study Psa virulence mechanisms.

Kiwifruit (Actinidiae delisiosa) cv. Hayward plants were used for all experiments. Kiwifruit seeds (100-200) were surface-sterilized in 70% (v/v) ethanol for 5 min in a Falcon tube (50 ml), then in 5% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite (FUJI-FILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan) containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 1 h. Seeds were then washed with sterile distilled H 2 O at least four times and incubated in water at 4 °C overnight. Surface sterilization and washing were repeated, and seeds were germinated on one-half strength MS medium (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) containing 1% (w/v) sucrose and Gamborg vitamins (Sigma-Aldrich) solidified with 0.3% (w/v) Phytagel (Sigma-Aldrich) in deep Petri plates (100 mm × 25 mm). Four-week-old kiwifruit seedlings were grown at 24 °C with a light intensity of 150-200 μmol/(m 2 sec) and 12 h light/12 h dark before use. Six-week-old kiwifruit plants were grown in Berger BM2 Germinating Mix soil (Berger, Saint-Modeste, QC, Canada) at 24 °C with a light intensity of 200 μmol/(m 2 sec) and 16 h light/8 h dark to use for spray inoculation.

All bacterial strains and plasmids are shown in Table 1 . Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 1 (Psa1; MAFF 613022), biovar 3 (Psa3; MAFF 212115), biovar 5 (Psa5; MAFF 212056), and biovar 6 (Psa6; MAFF 212133) were a gift from NARO Genebank, Ibaraki, Japan. Psa biovars were used as the pathogenic strains to inoculate kiwifruit plants. The Psa3 hrcN mutant defective in the type III secretion system (T3SS) was generated by conjugation with Escherichia coli S17-1, which possesses pBSLC1 (Sawada et al. 2018; Schäfer et al. 1994) , and was used as a reduced-virulence mutant of Psa3. The pDSK-GFPuv vector was introduced into each Psa biovar by electroporation (Wang et al. 2007 ). All Psa strains were grown at 28 °C on King's B (KB) (King et al. 1954) agar. For inoculation, Luria-Bertani (LB) (Sambrook et al. 1989) broth was used to grow bacterial cultures from plates for 18 h at 28 °C. Before inoculation, bacteria were suspended in sterile distilled H 2 O, and the bacterial cell densities at 600 nm (OD 600 ) were measured using a JASCO V-730 spectrophotometer (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan).

A flood-inoculation method that we developed previously (Ishiga et al. 2017) to infect Arabidopsis seedlings with P. syringae pathogens was modified to develop a kiwifruit seedling inoculation method conducive to observing disease symptoms. Briefly, 40 ml of bacterial suspension (OD 600 of 0.2) in sterile distilled H 2 O containing 0.025% (v/v) Silwet L-77 (OSI Specialties Inc., Danbury, CT, USA) was dispensed onto a plate containing 4-week-old kiwifruit seedlings, and the plates were incubated for 2-3 min at room temperature. After the bacterial suspension was removed by decantation, plates containing inoculated plants were sealed with 3 M Micropore 2.5 cm surgical tape (3 M, St. Paul, MN, USA) and incubated at 22 °C with a light intensity of 150-200 μmol/(m 2 sec) and 12 h light/12 h dark. Symptoms were observed at 1-and 2-weeks post-inoculation (wpi). In each experiment, more than six plants were evaluated, and each experiment was repeated at least three times.

For spray inoculation, 6-week-old kiwifruit plants were sprayed to runoff with a bacterial suspension (OD 600 of 0.2) in sterile distilled water containing 0.025% Silwet L-77. The plants were then incubated in growth chambers at approximately 100% RH for the first 24 h, then at approximately 70% RH for the rest of the experiment. The inoculated plants were observed for 1 wpi for symptom development.

To determine the bacterial growth in kiwifruit seedlings or leaves, we measured the internal bacterial population at 2 wpi. Inoculated seedlings or leaves were collected, and the inoculated plants were weighed. Seedlings or leaves were then surface-sterilized with 10% H 2 O 2 for 3 min, then washed three times with sterile distilled water. Plants were then homogenized in sterile distilled water, and the diluted samples were plated onto solid KB agar. Bacterial colony forming units (CFU) were normalized as CFU/mg using the total mass of the inoculated plants. The bacterial population at 0 day was estimated using leaves harvested 1 h postinoculation (hpi). The bacterial populations were evaluated in three independent experiments.

For expression profiles of Psa3 genes in culture or during infection, we incubated Psa3 in LB broth for 3 h or floodinoculated kiwifruit plants for 24 and 48 h. For expression profiles in culture conditions, Psa3 was grown in LB broth for 24 h, then adjusted to OD 600 of 0.1 with fresh LB broth and grown for 3 h to investigate the expression profiles during the exponential phase, not the stationary phase. Total RNA was extracted from kiwifruit seedlings by an ultrasonication method as described (Yu et al. 2013) . Briefly, 12 plants were collected, immediately submerged in 5 ml of RNAlater Stabilization Solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), sonicated for 7 min, then plants were removed from the solution. The bacterial cells in the suspension were harvested by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 2 min, and cell pellets were used for subsequent purification. Total RNA was extracted using Reliaprep (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and the manufacturer's protocol. Two micrograms of total RNA was treated with gDNA Remover (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan) to eliminate genomic DNA, and the DNase-treated RNA was reverse transcribed using the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix (TOYOBO). The cDNA (1:20) was then used for qRT-PCR that was performed using the primers shown in supplementary 

For standardizing the seedling flood-inoculation assay and testing whether Psa multiplies and causes disease symptoms similar to adult plants grown in soil, 4-week-old kiwifruit seedlings (containing two to four leaves except for the cotyledon) were grown on MS plates. Around 80-100 seeds were planted on each MS plate (Fig. 1a) , which germinated Wang et al. (2007) 2 weeks after planting when exposed to light (Fig. 1b) . Six small seedlings were transferred to a new plate (Fig. 1c) , and after 2 weeks of continuous growth, kiwifruit seedlings were flood-inoculated with a bacterial suspension (OD 600 of 0.2) of Psa ( Fig. 1d-g) . We observed severe disease symptoms within 3 days, and severe necrosis by 1-2 wpi with Psa3 (Fig. 1h) .

To further assess the utility of the seedling flood-inoculation assay, we next inoculated kiwifruit seedlings with Psa biovars including Psa1, Psa3, Psa5, and Psa6. Psa1-and Psa3-inoculated seedlings showed necrosis within 1 wpi, and severe disease symptoms at 2 wpi (Fig. 2a) . Among the Psa biovars, Psa3 caused the most severe symptoms (Fig. 2a) . Symptoms on Psa5-inoculated seedlings developed slower during the first compared to those on Psa1-and Psa3-inoculated seedlings, but developed typical symptoms such as leaf spots at 2 wpi (Fig. 2a) . Typical disease symptoms such as leaf spots can be seen in magnified images of Psa1-, Psa3-, and Psa5-inoculated seedlings at 2 wpi (Fig. 2a, bottom  row) . On the other hand, symptoms on seedlings-inoculated with Psa6 were only observed at 2 wpi (Fig. 2a) . Mild symptoms such as chlorosis without leaf spots can be seen in the magnified image of Psa6-inoculated seedlings. These results suggest that Psa6 shows the least virulence among the Psa biovars (Fig. 2a, bottom row) . Consistent with symptom development caused by the different biovars, Psa3 populations were the highest compared to those of Psa1, Psa5, and Psa6 (Fig. 2b) , and Psa6 populations were the lowest. We also observed bacterial colonies in kiwifruit seedlings by labeling the Psa biovars with the GFPuv protein. Interestingly, the bacterial colonies were clearly observed in Psa1and Psa3-inoculated seedlings at 6 days post inoculation (Fig. 2c) . To evaluate the utility of the kiwifruit seedlingflood inoculation assay for studying nonhost interactions, we inoculated kiwifruit seedlings with P. syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000 (Pst DC3000). Pst DC3000 did not induce HR cell death in the healthy-looking inoculated seedlings by 1 wpi (Supplementary Fig. S1a ). Pst DC3000 bacterial populations were also lower than those of Psa3 (Supplementary Fig. S1b ). Together, these results suggest that the kiwifruit seedling flood-inoculation assay is a reliable method to study Psa disease progression and to evaluate in planta bacterial growth.

To evaluate the utility of the seedling flood-inoculation assay for the study of Psa3 virulence factors, we flood-or spray-inoculated kiwifruit seedlings or plants with wild-type Psa3 and a Type III secretion system (T3SS) deficient hrcN mutant. Wild-type Psa3 caused severe symptoms not only on seedlings but also on mature leaves ( Fig. 3a and b) . However, severe necrosis was not observed on hrcN mutant-inoculated week-old kiwifruit seedlings ready for flood inoculation. e Preparation of inoculum. f Flood inoculation by pouring the Psa3 suspension onto plates. g Removal of bacterial suspension by decantation. h Disease phenotypes 1 week post inoculation. Scale bars show 1 cm seedlings and leaves ( Fig. 3a and b) . Consistent with disease development, the bacterial populations of the hrcN mutant were approximately 1000-fold lower compared to wild-type Psa3 after both inoculation methods ( Fig. 3c and d) . These results indicate that the T3SS has important roles in bacterial multiplication, persistence, and disease symptom development of Psa3 in kiwifruit seedlings, and in soil-grown kiwifruit plants. The kiwifruit seedling flood-inoculation assay is suitable for analyzing Psa virulence mutants.

Pseudomonas syringae virulence genes are expressed during infection (McAtee et al. 2018; Nobori et al. 2018) . We thus investigated the expression profiles of these genes in wild-type Psa3 using RT-qPCR and gene-specific primer sets according to a previous study (McAtee et al. 2018; Supplementary Table S1 ). We carried out expression analysis using RNAs from flood-inoculated seedlings (Fig. 4a-h) and spray-inoculated plant leaves similar to the method used for Fig. 3 (Fig. 4i-p) . Our results demonstrated that expression of the alternative sigma factor hrpL, which controls the expression of T3SS effectors (T3SEs) (Fouts et al. 2002) , was clearly induced in planta (in flood-and in sprayinoculated kiwifruit plants) compared to culture in LB broth ( Fig. 4a and i) . In addition, the expression of Psa-conserved T3SS and T3SEs genes, including hrpA1, avrRpm1, hopR1, and hopZ3 were also induced in planta (Fig. 4j-l) , indicating that the T3SS is activated during Psa3 infection. We also investigated other P. syringae virulence genes (Ichinose et al. 2013; Ishiga et al. 2018; Ishiga and Ichinose 2016) . The oxyR and fliC transcripts, encoding transcription factors related to oxidative stress (Ishiga and Ichinose 2016) and flagellin (Shimizu et al. 2003) , respectively, were reduced in planta compared to levels produced in broth culture (Fig. 4f , g, and o). The expression of algD encoding an alginate biosynthesis enzyme (Yu et al. 1999 ) was induced in planta ( Fig. 4h and p) . Overall, we found that expression trends for most genes were the same between the two types of inoculation methods (Fig. 4) . Together, our results suggest that the kiwifruit seedling flood-inoculation assay is suitable for analyzing Psa expression profiles during infection.

Our assessments of the newly developed seedling floodinoculation assay for kiwifruit (Fig. 1) showed that it is suitable for analyzing the virulence mechanism of Psa biovars (Fig. 2) . Our method has several advantages over previous conventional soil-grown plant inoculation assays (Bartoli Fig. 2 Flood-inoculation assay to analyze interactions between Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) biovars 1, 3, 5, and 6 and kiwifruit seedlings. a Disease phenotype of kiwifruit seedlings 1 and 2 weeks post-inoculation (wpi) with suspensions (OD 600 of 0.2) of Psa biovars containing 0.025% Silwet L-77. Close-up of typical symptoms in black square at 2 wpi. Scale bars, 1 cm. b Populations of Psa biovars in kiwifruit seedlings at 0, 1, and 2 wpi. Vertical bars indicate the standard errors for three independent experiments. Significant differences (P < 0.05) are symbolized by different letters. c Visualization of Psa biovars labeled with green fluorescent protein variant GFPuv in the leaves of kiwifruit seedlings at 6 days after flood-inoculation with at 5 × 10 7 CFU/ml Psa biovars. The whole leaf was examined using a Keyence BZ-X 800 fluorescent stereomicroscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan). Scale bars, 5 mm et al. 2015; Gao et al. 2016; Kisaki et al. 2019) , including a shorter growth and incubation period, ease of inoculation and handling, uniformity of infection and disease development, and need for less growth chamber space (Fig. 1) . This new method is suitable not only for dissecting the dynamic interactions between Psa and kiwifruit, but also for highthroughput screening for Psa virulence mutants, to further develop critical management strategies for bacterial canker of kiwifruit.

We observed Psa colonies in kiwifruit seedlings by labeling with a GFPuv protein. The bacterial colonies were clearly observed in Psa1-and Psa3-inoculated seedlings compared to Psa5-and Psa6-inoculated leaves (Fig. 2c) . However, the population size of Psa5 was almost the same as that of Psa1 (Fig. 2b) . One reason to explain the differences in the GFPuv intensity and the population size between Psa5 and Psa1 could be differences in colonization sites. P. syringae pathovars are known to have different lifestyles (Lindow and Brandl 2003; Xin and He 2013) . The Psa observation system with GFPuv, which we developed in the present study, will help us spatiotemporally analyze colonization by Psa biovars and understand the Psa infection processes.

The T3SS is a key virulence component of P. syringae, because hrp/hrc mutants that block the T3SS completely eliminate virulence against susceptible host plants ( Lindeberg et al. 2012; Xin and He 2013) . We demonstrated that a T3SS deficient Psa hrpN mutant impaired virulence not only in kiwifruit seedlings, but also in soil-grown plants (Fig. 3) , indicating that the T3SS has an important role in Psa3 virulence. In addition, several studies reported that each Psa strain has T3SEs that are conserved among biovars as well as a unique set Sawada 2016, 2019; McCann et al. 2013; Zhao et al. 2019 ). However, the molecular function of the T3SEs in Psa is largely unknown. Therefore, it is important to investigate the molecular basis of the T3SEs in the virulence of Psa biovars, and the flood-inoculation assay will be a robust method.

We also demonstrated that the expression of Psa3 genes encoding the T3SS and T3SEs was induced in planta compared to culture conditions in both flood-and spray-inoculated plants ( Fig. 4i-l) . Several transcriptome studies have been performed using different P. syringae pathovars including P. syringae pv. syringae (Pss) B728a, P. syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000, and Psa3 (McAtee et al. 2018; Nobori et al. 2018; Yu et al. 2013) . Yu et al. (2013) showed that expression of genes encoding the T3SS and T3SEs in Pss B728a was not strongly induced in the apoplast. In contrast, these genes were greatly upregulated in planta in comprehensive analyses of the expression profiles of Pst DC3000 and Psa3 (McAtee et al. 2018; Nobori et al. 2018) . One reason to explain the differences in the T3SS and T3SEs expression profiles in planta among P. syringae pathovars is their different lifestyles. Pss is known as a particularly successful epiphyte, whereas Pst DC3000 is a weak epiphyte (Lindow and Brandl 2003; Xin and He 2013) . A putative epiphytic phase was suggested for Psa3 on asymptomatic flowers and leaves (Gallelli et al. 2011; Stefani and Giovanardi 2011) ; however, how Psa modulates the epiphytic and endophytic phases and which genes arerequired for these phases has not been fully ascertained. Understanding Psa lifestyles will be critical to developing new management strategies for bacterial canker of kiwifruit. We believe that the flood-inoculation method will enable us to identify Psa genes required not only for virulence but also for epiphytic fitness and will provide critical clues to develop effective control strategies. Fig. 3 Seedling flood-inoculation assay to analyze virulence factors in Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 3 (Psa3). a Disease phenotype of kiwifruit seedlings 1 week after flood inoculation with a bacterial suspension (OD 600 of 0.2) of wild-type Psa3 or T3SS hrcN mutant. Scale bars, 1 cm. b Disease phenotype of leaves 1 week after spray inoculation of 6-week-old kiwifruit plants with suspension of wild-type Psa3 or T3SS hrcN mutant at 5 × 10 7 CFU/ml. Scale bars, 1 cm. c Populations of wild-type Psa3 and hrcN mutant at 1 week after flood inoculation of kiwifruit seedlings. Vertical bars indicate standard error for three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from the wild type in a t test (*P < 0.01). d Populations of wild-type Psa3 and hrcN mutant in kiwifruit plants at 0 and 1 week after spray inoculation. Vertical bars indicate the standard error for three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from the wild type in a t test (*P < 0.01) Fig. 4 Expression profiles of genes involved in the virulence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 3 (Psa3) at 24 and 48 h after growth in liquid LB broth (culture) or after flood-or spray-inoculation of kiwifruit plants. Psa3 inoculum suspension had OD 600 of 0.2. Total RNA was extracted for use in real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) with gene-specific primer sets. a hrpL, b hrpA1, c avrRpm1, d hopR1, e hopZ3, f oxyR, g fliC, and h algD in flood-inoculated kiwifruit seedlings. i hrpL, j hrpA1, k avrRpm1, l hopR1, m hopZ3, n oxyR, o fliC, and p algD in spray-inoculated kiwifruit. Expression was normalized using fbp, parA, and tetR (Supplementary Table S1 ). Vertical bars indicate the standard error for three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from culture cells in a t test (*P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01)

A framework to gauge the epidemic potential of plant pathogens in environmental reservoirs: the example of kiwifruit canker

The complete genome sequence of the Arabidopsis and tomato pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000

Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae: chemical control, resistance mechanisms and possible alternatives

Genomewide identification of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 promoters controlled by the HrpL alternative sigma factor

Genome analysis of the kiwifruit canker pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 5

Genome analysis of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 6, which produces the phytotoxins, phaseolotoxin and coronatine

Detection of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae, causal agent of bacterial canker of kiwifruit, from symptomless fruits and twigs, and from pollen

Studies on the infection, colonization, and movement of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae in kiwifruit tissues using a GFPuv-labeled strain

Pathogenicity and virulence factors of Pseudomonas syringae

Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato OxyR is required for virulence in tomato and Arabidopsis

Arabidopsis seedling flood-inoculation technique: a rapid and reliable assay for studying plant-bacterial interactions

Pseudomonas syringae flood-inoculation method in Arabidopsis

AlgU contributes to the virulence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 by regulating phytotoxin coronatine production

The Arabidopsis thaliana-Pseudomonas syringae interaction

Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin

Evaluation of various cultivars of Actinidia species and breeding source Actinidia rufa for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 3

Pseudomonas syringae type III effector repertoires: last words in endless arguments

Microbiology of the phyllosphere

Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology

Re-programming of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae gene expression during early stages of infection of kiwifruit

Genomic analysis of the kiwifruit pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae provides insight into the origins of an emergent plant disease

Role of stomata in plant innate immunity and foliar bacterial diseases

Similarity between copper resistance genes from Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae and P. syringae pv. tomato

Transcriptome landscape of a bacterial pathogen under plant immunity

MexEF-OprN multidrug efflux pump transporter negatively controls N-acyl-homoserine lactone accumulation in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci 6605

Small mobilizable multi-purpose cloning vectors derived from the Escherichia coli plasmids pK18 and pK19: selection of defined deletions in the chromosome of Corynebacterium glutamicum

Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae: a re-emerging, multi-faceted, pandemic pathogen

Occurrence of bacterial canker of kiwifruit in Japan: description of symptoms, isolation of the pathogen and screening of bactericides

The ΔfliD mutant of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci, which secretes flagellin monomers, induces a strong hypersensitive reaction (HR) in non-host tomato cells

Dissemination of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae through pollen and its epiphytic life on leaves and fruits

Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae pv. nov.: the causal bacterium of canker of kiwifruit in Japan

Pathogenicity of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato on tomato seedlings: phenotypic and gene expression analyses of the virulence function of coronatine

Genetic basis of copper resistance in New Zealand strains of Pseudomonas syringae

Monitoring in planta bacterial infection at both cellular and whole-plant levels using the green fluorescent protein variant GFPuv

Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000: a model pathogen for probing disease susceptibility and hormone signaling in plants

Involvement of the exopolysaccharide alginate in the virulence and epiphytic fitness of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae

Transcriptional responses of Pseudomonas syringae to growth in epiphytic versus apoplastic leaf sites

Comparative genomics reveal pathogenicityrelated loci in Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 3

Acknowledgements We thank Dr. Christina Baker for editing the manuscript. Psa biovars were the gift of the NARO Genebank, Ibaraki,