key: cord-0036729-ehxpdavo authors: Lee, Joyce S.; Collard, Harold R. title: Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis date: 2013-09-13 journal: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-682-5_17 sha: e48f1bb88fe00033633fdd8e29ffdf078e160333 doc_id: 36729 cord_uid: ehxpdavo Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a clinically important complication of IPF that carries a high morbidity and mortality. In the last decade, we have learned much about this event, but there are many remaining questions: What is it? Why does it happen? How can we prevent it? How can we treat it? This chapter attempts to summarize our current understanding of the epidemiology, etiology, and management of acute exacerbation of IPF and point out areas where additional data are sorely needed. predicted and a diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide of 67 % predicted. His highresolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan demonstrated peripheral, subpleural predominant reticulation and traction bronchiectasis without honeycombing. He was referred for surgical lung biopsy and had a video-assisted thoracic surgery procedure with biopsies obtained from the right lung. His perioperative course was uncomplicated. His pathology was reviewed and was consistent with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern, confi rming the diagnosis of IPF. His initial postoperative course was uncomplicated, but approximately 5 days postoperatively, he developed increased dyspnea and cough with occasional production of clear sputum. He had new-onset hypoxemia (88 % on room air) with diffuse crackles to auscultation that were more prominent in the left chest. A repeat HRCT demonstrated new ground-glass opacities in the left lung ( Fig. 17.1 ). All microbiologic data were negative, and there was no evidence of cardiac dysfunction or ischemia. This case was thought to be due to an acute exacerbation (AEx) of IPF triggered by surgical lung biopsy possibly due to single lung ventilation of the left lung. Unfortunately, the patient progressively worsened despite supportive care and subsequently died from his AEx of IPF. Our view of the natural history of IPF has changed over the last decade with the recognition that there are several distinct clinical courses that patients may follow [ 1 ] . Although most patients with IPF experience a steady decline in lung function over time, some will decline quickly, while others seem stable for many years. Increasingly, we recognize that some patients may also have a more unpredictable course [ 2 ] . These patients experience periods of relative stability followed by acute episodes of worsening in their respiratory status [ 3 ] . Episodes of acute respiratory decline in IPF can be secondary to complications such as infection, pulmonary [ 3 , 4 ] . Such episodes of acute respiratory deterioration have been termed AEx of IPF when the cause for the acute worsening cannot be identifi ed. Acute exacerbations likely comprise almost 50 % of these acute respiratory events, and the clinical characteristics and prognosis are indistinguishable from acute exacerbations of known cause. This chapter will discuss only AEx of IPF. The phenomenon of AEx has been recognized since the late 1980s, when it was initially reported in the Japanese literature [ 5 -8 ] . A survey of providers in the USA suggests that most clinicians believe AEx to be somewhat or very common [ 9 ] . The true incidence of AEx remains unknown, and the incidence may vary by country due to different genetic and environmental factors. Largely due to differences in case defi nition, patient population, sample size, and duration of follow-up, the range of AEx incidence in clinical studies ranges anywhere from 1 % to 24 % [ 3 , 4 ] . The largest and probably most robust study of 461 patients with IPF that were followed longitudinally over 3 years found a 1-and 3-year incidence of 14.2 % and 20.7 %, respectively [ 4 ] . The clinical presentation of AEx is generally quite dramatic and characterized by acute to subacute worsening of dyspnea over days to weeks [ 3 ] . Some patients experience symptoms of worsening cough, sputum production, and fever mimicking a respiratory tract infection [ 10 , 11 ] . Most reported cases of AEx have required unscheduled medical attention (emergency room or hospital care), but there may well be less severe cases that do not get noted by patients and providers and, therefore, are not documented. The occurrence of AEx is unpredictable and can sometimes be the presenting manifestation of IPF [ 11 -13 ] . A few risk factors have been identifi ed, including lower baseline forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted and having been a nonsmoker [ 4 ] . It seems likely that patients with more severe IPF are more likely to develop clinically signifi cant AEx of disease, and this perception is supported by the increased incidence of AEx that was observed in the only study of advanced disease reported in the literature to date, namely, STEP-IPF [ 14 ] . Precipitating factors such as surgical lung biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) have also been reported [ 11 , 15 -20 ] . The occurrence of AEx after videoscopic-assisted surgical lung biopsy is particularly intriguing, as the exacerbation appears to be more pronounced in the lung that was ventilated (i.e., the nonsurgical side receiving single lung ventilation) [ 19 ] . However, the precise relationship between these precipitating factors and AEx remains unclear. Acute exacerbations have also been described in non-IPF ILD, including nonspecifi c interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) [ 21 ] , connective tissue disease-associated ILD [ 21 -23 ] , and hypersensitivity pneumonitis [ 24 , 25 ] . Compared to IPF AEx, patients with an underlying NSIP pattern appeared to have a better prognosis following their AEx [ 21 ] . A UIP pattern may be a risk factor for AEx in the context of connective tissue disease-associated ILD and hypersensitivity pneumonitis, as the presence of a UIP pattern appeared to be a risk factor in some case series [ 21 , 25 ] . Whether AEx of non-IPF forms of ILD shares a similar pathobiology as AEx of IPF is unknown. The etiology of AEx of IPF remains unknown. Several hypotheses have been proposed, including the following: (1) AEx of IPF represents an abrupt acceleration of the patients underlying disease; (2) AEx is a collection of occult, pathobiologically distinct conditions (e.g., infection, heart failure); or (3) AEx is a combination of both processes that can serve as an occult trigger that leads to acceleration of the underlying fi broproliferative process. Occult aspiration of gastric contents has been suggested as a possible trigger or cause of AEx of IPF. GER is nearly universal in patients with IPF [ 26 , 27 ] and is thought to be a risk factor for aspiration [ 28 , 29 ] . BAL pepsin levels, a biomarker for aspiration of gastric secretions, were shown to be elevated in a subset of patients with AEx of IPF [ 30 ] . In addition, patients with asymmetric IPF on HRCT scan had a higher rate of GER and AEx compared to patients with non-asymmetric disease, suggesting a role for GER and occult aspiration in a subset of patients with IPF [ 31 ] . Infection has also been suggested as a cause of AEx of IPF. Data in support of this hypothesis include animal studies [ 32 ] as well as some human studies [ 33 , 34 ] . In one case series, 75.7 % of 37 AEx cases occurred between December and May [ 10 ] , lending further support to occult infection as a cause of AEx. However, in a prospective study of AEx of IPF ( n = 47), acute viral infection, as determined by the most current genomics-based methodologies, was found in only 9 % of this cohort [ 35 ] . While some cases may well have been missed (i.e., the virus had come and gone by the time testing was obtained), these data suggest that there are many cases of AEx that are not primarily due to occult infection. An alternative explanation is that AEx of IPF is caused by an inherent acceleration of the pathobiology of IPF [ 3 ] . There is indirect evidence for this in several studies that evaluated serum biomarkers and gene expression in AEx. Serum biomarkers of alveolar epithelial cell injury/proliferation have been shown to be increased in AEx, in a pattern that is qualitatively distinct from what is seen in acute lung injury (Table 17.1 ) . Gene expression studies performed in patients with AEx of IPF [ 37 ] have shown that patients have increased expression of genes encoding proteins involved in epithelial injury and proliferation including CCNA2 and alpha-defensins. Interestingly, there was no evidence from the same study for upregulation of genes commonly expressed in viral infection. There are no specifi c laboratory tests that aid in the evaluation and diagnosis of AEx of IPF. Often, patients are found to have impaired gas exchange with a decrease in SP-D Marker of alveolar type II cell injury and/or proliferation Plasma levels higher in AEx compared to stable [ 42 ] Thrombomodulin Membrane protein expressed on the surface of endothelial cells which serves as a receptor for thrombin Plasma levels higher in AEx compared to stable and log change in thrombomodulin was predictive of survival [ 42 ] von Willebrand factor Marker of endothelial cell injury and is involved in hemostasis Higher plasma % in AEx compared to stable [ 42 ] AEx acute exacerbation, IPF idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis, KL-6 Krebs von den Lungen-6, PAI-1 plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, RAGE receptor for advanced glycation end products, NF-kB nuclear factor-kB, ST2 , SP-D surfactant protein D their arterial oxygen tension [ 10 ] . In patients that can tolerate bronchoscopy with lavage, an increase in BAL neutrophils has been reported [ 11 , 45 ] . Nonspecifi c elevations in serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP) have also been observed [ 10 ] . Serial levels of serum KL-6 and baseline thrombomodulin may help identify patients at increased risk for death from AEx [ 42 , 43 ] . Although many experimental biomarkers have been investigated, as shown in Table 17 .1 , none are routinely used in clinical practice. High-resolution CT scans are often obtained during AEx of IPF. The fi ndings include new, generally bilateral, ground-glass opacities and/or consolidation superimposed on the underlying UIP pattern [ 46 ] . The pattern of ground-glass changes during an AEx may have prognostic signifi cance, with more diffuse abnormality correlating with worse outcomes [ 46 ] . Surgical lung biopsy is not frequently obtained during AEx of IPF. A small case series of seven patients who had a surgical lung biopsy during their AEx demonstrated primarily diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) associated with underlying changes typical for UIP ( Fig. 17. 2 ) [ 47 ] . One case had organizing pneumonia and UIP and another case had DAD without underlying UIP. Autopsy series and other case series have demonstrated similar fi ndings [ 6 , 11 , 45 , 48 -50 ] . Several defi nitions have been used over the last decade to defi ne AEx of IPF [ 3 , 6 , 50 ] . In order to standardize these criteria, a consensus defi nition was proposed by the National Institutes of Health-funded US IPF Network (IPFNet) in 2007 (Table 17. 2 ) [ 3 ] . Other defi nitions that have been described are generally similar; however, they often include a reduction in PaO 2 as one of their criteria as well as bilateral chest x-ray abnormalities (instead of a HRCT scan) [ 6 , 50 ] . The IPFNet criteria have helped to standardize the defi nition of AEx of IPF, but satisfaction of all criteria is quite diffi cult to achieve in many clinical settings. Specifi cally, it is not infrequent that in patients who appear to have AEx of IPF, microbiologic data and occasionally radiologic data are not collected due to the severity of illness or because the clinician does not feel the tests will change clinical management. By maximizing specifi city at the cost of sensitivity, these criteria (along with the selection of only mild to moderate patients for enrollment) have likely contributed to the low prevalence of AEx observed in recent clinical trials [ 51 -53 ] . The choice of defi nition has signifi cant implications for outcome analyses in clinical trials and should be a focus for further discussion among clinical trialists. There is no known effective treatment for preventing or improving outcomes in AEx of IPF. Previous or concurrent diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Unexplained development or worsening of dyspnea within 30 days High-resolution computed tomography with new bilateral ground-glass abnormality and/or consolidation superimposed on a background reticular or honeycomb pattern consistent with usual interstitial pneumonia No evidence of pulmonary infection by endotracheal aspirate or bronchoalveolar lavage Exclusion of alternative causes, including left heart failure, pulmonary embolism, and other identifi able causes of acute lung injury a Patients who do not meet all fi ve criteria should be termed "suspected acute exacerbation" While there are no data to support effi cacy, vaccination and treatment of comorbidities like heart disease and GER seem prudent as measures that could prevent episodes of acute decline in respiratory function due to known causes such as infection, heart failure, and aspiration. Some novel therapies have suggested a reduction in AEx in clinical trials; these include warfarin [ 54 ] , pirfenidone [ 55 ] , and, most recently, BIBF 1120 [ 56 ] . Unfortunately, both warfarin and pirfenidone have subsequently been shown to have no impact on the rate of AEx, suggesting that the initial observations were inaccurate [ 51 , 57 ] . Although commonly prescribed for the treatment of AEx of IPF, there have been no controlled trials assessing the effi cacy of high-dose corticosteroids. Recent international guidelines on IPF management suggested that the majority of IPF patients with AEx could be treated with corticosteroids [ 58 ] ; however, approaches to dosing, route, and duration of therapy were not provided. Although most clinicians would treat patients who develop an AEx of IPF with high-dose corticosteroids, the effi cacy of this treatment is unclear. Perhaps we should be more critical of the use of corticosteroids to treat AEx of IPF. There are two distinct viewpoints regarding the role of corticosteroids in AEx of IPF. The fi rst viewpoint is that AEx of IPF is histopathologically similar to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) characterized by DAD and acute lung injury [ 59 ] and should, therefore, be treated similarly to ARDS. In the ARDS literature, the mortality benefi t of corticosteroids is unclear [ 60 -65 ] . In one study, increased mortality was observed in ARDS patients treated with delayed corticosteroids (after 14 days) [ 65 ] . If we were to follow the ARDS paradigm, most clinicians would not use corticosteroids in the treatment of AEx of IPF. A second viewpoint for the role of corticosteroids in IPF is that some patients with AEx of IPF have organizing pneumonia on biopsy [ 49 ] . Organizing pneumonia is generally thought to be steroid responsive, and it may be that the pathobiology is different enough between ARDS and AEx of IPF to warrant continued use of corticosteroids. There remains equipoise on the effi cacy of corticosteroids in AEx of IPF, and this treatment intervention should be studied more carefully [ 42 ] . The use of another immunosuppressant, cyclosporine A, to treat AEx of IPF has been reported. These studies suggest some benefi t to the use of cyclosporine A plus corticosteroids [ 66 -68 ] . However, conclusions that can be made from these data are limited by problems with study design and small sample size, and benefi t has not yet been validated in a randomized controlled trial. Other experimental therapies that have reported possible effi cacy to treat AEx of IPF include tacrolimus [ 69 ] , hemoperfusion with polymyxin B-immobilized fi ber column [ 70 -72 ] , and sivelestat [ 73 ] . These investigations were all limited by small numbers and suboptimal study design. Supportive therapy is the standard of care in AEx of IPF. Supportive care for respiratory failure almost always requires higher oxygen supplementation and consideration of additional means of ventilatory support, including mechanical ventilation (see discussion below) and noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV). Yokoyama et al. described the outcomes of patients with AEx of IPF treated with NIPPV to avoid intubation in acute respiratory failure [ 74 ] . In this retrospective case series of 11 patients, 6 patients failed a NIPPV trial and went subsequently succumbed to respiratory failure. The other fi ve patients survived more than 3 months after the onset of their AEx. However, the use of ventilatory support in AEx (both mechanical ventilation and NIPPV) has never been studied in a randomized controlled trial. A few select centers have experience with emergent transplantation for AEx of IPF [ 75 -78 ] . These critically ill IPF patients have generally been bridged to lung transplant with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and/or mechanical ventilation [ 76 ] . Outcomes of patients who have undergone emergent transplantation have been mixed [ 77 , 78 ] . Emergent lung transplantation requires careful patient selection and is not done at all transplant centers. The prognosis of AEx of IPF is poor, with most case series reporting very high short-term mortality rates [ 11 , 79 -83 ] . This is particularly true for those patients requiring mechanical ventilation. A systematic review of mechanical ventilation in IPF and respiratory failure ( n = 135), including AEx, reported a hospital mortality of 87 % [ 81 ] . Short-term mortality (within 3 months of hospital discharge) was 94 %. The routine use of mechanical ventilation in patients with AEx of IPF is not recommended in the international consensus guidelines because of its low likelihood of benefi t and high risk of complications and further suffering [ 58 ] . Careful consideration regarding intubation and goals of care must be made, given the poor prognosis associated with this condition. Ideally, a discussion concerning end-of-life issues should be held between the patient and their provider in the outpatient setting with the inclusion of the patient's family, if applicable. Acute exacerbation of IPF is responsible for substantial morbidity and mortality in patients with IPF. We suggest that AEx of IPF represents an acute acceleration of the fi broproliferative process (i.e., the underlying pathobiology of IPF) that is triggered by some generally occult stress or insult to the lung (e.g., infection, aspiration, mechanical stretch from ventilation or lavage, high inspired oxygen concentration during surgery). As many patients with AEx of IPF will not meet the current consensus criteria due to missing data, it may be more useful clinically to defi ne AEx by less stringent criteria. It seems likely that the prevention and treatment of AEx of IPF must focus on both disease-specifi c (e.g., anti-fi brotic therapies) and non-disease-specifi c (e.g., vaccination, prevention of stress) areas. The next decade will hopefully answer many of the unresolved questions concerning AEx of IPF. Classifi cation and natural history of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias Clinical course and prediction of survival in idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis: incidence, risk factors and outcome Acute exacerbation in idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis. Analysis of clinical and pathologic fi ndings in three cases Acute exacerbation in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) Current diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis: a survey of academic physicians Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis: outcome and prognostic factors Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis: frequency and clinical features Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis as the initial presentation of the disease Risk factors of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis A controlled trial of sildenafi l in advanced idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Videothoracoscopic lung biopsy in diffuse infi ltrative lung diseases: a 5-year surgical experience Acute exacerbation of interstitial fi brosis after pulmonary resection High short-term mortality following lung biopsy for usual interstitial pneumonia Pulmonary fi brosis and lung cancer: risk and benefi t analysis of pulmonary resection Acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia following surgical lung biopsy Bronchoalveolar lavage as a possible cause of acute exacerbation in idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis patients Acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia other than idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Clinical features and outcome of acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia: collagen vascular diseases-related versus idiopathic Acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia associated with collagen vascular diseases Acute exacerbations of fi brotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a case series Clinical predictors and histologic appearance of acute exacerbations in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis Increased prevalence of gastroesophageal refl ux in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis High prevalence of abnormal acid gastro-oesophageal refl ux in idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Aspiration pneumonitis and aspiration pneumonia Does chronic microaspiration cause idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis? Bronchoalveolar lavage pepsin in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Progression of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis: lessons from asymmetrical disease Exacerbation of established pulmonary fi brosis in a murine model by gammaherpesvirus Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis: role of Chlamydophila pneumoniae infection A detailed evaluation of acute respiratory decline in patients with fi brotic lung disease: aetiology and outcomes Viral infection in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Raised plasma concentrations of alpha-defensins in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Gene expression profi les of acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Identifi cation of annexin 1 as a novel autoantigen in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Circulating fi brocytes are an indicator of poor prognosis in idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Gradual increase of high mobility group protein b1 in the lungs after the onset of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Reduction in serum high mobility group box-1 level by polymyxin B-immobilized fi ber column in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis with acute exacerbation Plasma biomarker profi les in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Circulating KL-6 predicts the outcome of rapidly progressive idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis The increase in serum soluble ST2 protein upon acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis: report of a series Computed tomography fi ndings in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Histopathologic features and outcome of patients with acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis undergoing surgical lung biopsy Terminal diffuse alveolar damage in relation to interstitial pneumonias. An autopsy study Acute exacerbation (acute lung injury of unknown cause) in UIP and other forms of fi brotic interstitial pneumonias CT fi ndings during phase of accelerated deterioration in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis (CAPACITY): two randomised trials BUILD-3: a randomized, controlled trial of bosentan in idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Incidence, prevalence, and clinical course of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis: a populationbased study Anticoagulant therapy for idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Double-blind, placebocontrolled trial of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Effi cacy of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor in idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis A Placebocontrolled randomized trial of warfarin in idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis An Offi cial ATS/ERS/ JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management The acute respiratory distress syndrome Snyder 3rd WH. Early steroid therapy for respiratory failure Corticosteroids in the prevention and treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in adults: meta-analysis Methylprednisolone infusion in early severe ARDS: results of a randomized controlled trial Ineffectiveness of highdose methylprednisolone in preventing parenchymal lung injury and improving mortality in patients with septic shock High-dose corticosteroids in patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome Effi cacy and safety of corticosteroids for persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome Cyclosporin A in the treatment of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Cyclosporin A followed by the treatment of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis with corticosteroid Cyclosporin treatment in steroid-resistant and acutely exacerbated interstitial pneumonia Tacrolimus and steroid treatment for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Benefi cial effect of polymyxin B-immobilized fi ber column (PMX) hemoperfusion treatment on acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Effect of direct hemoperfusion with a polymyxin B immobilized fi ber column in acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia and serum indicators Possible therapeutic effect of direct haemoperfusion with a polymyxin B immobilized fi bre column (PMX-DHP) on pulmonary oxygenation in acute exacerbations of interstitial pneumonia Outcome of patients with acute exacerbation of idiopathic interstitial fi brosis (IPF) treated with sivelestat and the prognostic value of serum KL-6 Noninvasive ventilation in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Outcome of critically ill lung transplant candidates on invasive respiratory support Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in awake patients as bridge to lung transplantation One-year experience with high-emergency lung transplantation in france Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplant: midterm outcomes Outcome of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis admitted to the intensive care unit Mechanical ventilation in patients with end-stage idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis Outcome of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis (IPF) ventilated in intensive care unit Outcome of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis admitted to the ICU for respiratory failure Prognosis of patients with advanced idiopathic pulmonary fi brosis requiring mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure