key: cord-0027226-ud73pp9u
authors: Greenberg, Jonathan; Bakhshaie, Jafar; Lovette, Brenda C; Vranceanu, Ana-Maria
title: Association Between Coping Strategies and Pain-Related Outcomes Among Individuals with Chronic Orofacial Pain
date: 2022-02-11
journal: J Pain Res
DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s350024
sha: dff394daee1cea62d5653317c8012c68e206fb69
doc_id: 27226
cord_uid: ud73pp9u

BACKGROUND: Chronic orofacial pain is associated with substantial pain-related disability and emotional distress. Understanding the relationship between individuals’ coping strategies and pain-related outcomes is important yet understudied in this population. PURPOSE: To test the cross-sectional association of three coping strategies (pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and mindfulness) to four pain-related outcomes (depression, anxiety, pain intensity, and pain-related disability) among individuals with chronic orofacial pain, after accounting for relevant demographic and clinical variables. METHODS: Individuals (N=303) with heterogeneous chronic orofacial pain (eg, trigeminal neuralgia, other trigeminal neuropathic pain, persistent idiopathic facial pain and other types) completed self-report measures of coping (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, and the 15-item Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire), pain intensity and pain-related disability (Graded Chronic Pain Scale), and PROMIS measure of anxiety and depression. We conducted 4 two-step hierarchical regressions for each of the four pain-related and emotional outcomes, with the first step including demographic and clinical covariates, and the second step including the three coping variables together. RESULTS: Pain catastrophizing was the only coping variable significantly associated with pain intensity (B=0.362, SE=0.115, p=0.002, 3% variance explained) and pain-related disability (B =0.813, SE=0.162, p<0.001, 7% variance explained). Pain catastrophizing (B=0.231-0.267, SE=0.046-0.051-0.050, p<0.001), kinesiophobia (B=0.201-0.316, SE=0.081-0.084, p<0.001-0.018), and mindfulness (B=0.231–0.306, SE=0.046-0.067, p<0.001) were each independently associated with symptoms of anxiety and depression, with the largest incremental variance added by catastrophizing (5–8%) and mindfulness (5%). CONCLUSION: Pain catastrophizing appears to be an important intervention target to improve pain intensity, pain-related disability, anxiety and depression among individuals with chronic orofacial pain. Kinesiophobia and mindfulness may be additional treatment targets for interventions to improve anxiety and depression.

Introduction tendency to magnify pain, actively ruminate on it, and feel helpless about the pain experience 21 ), kinesiophobia (excessive and debilitating fear of movement and activity due to pain or concerns about reinjury 22 ) , and mindfulness (paying attention on purpose, in the present moment, and non-judgmentally 23 ). have shown strong associations with pain intensity, disability and emotional distress in patients with chronic pain. [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] Although prior research has shown that pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia are important among people with pain associated with temporomandibular disorders, [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] these factors remain underexplored within other chronic orofacial pain conditions. 43 Further, no research has explored the association between mindfulness and pain-related outcomes in chronic orofacial pain. Given that orofacial pain conditions tend to be comorbid 44, 45 and may share psychosocial processes, 43 assessing these coping variables in individuals with heterogeneous chronic orofacial pain may help develop interventions for this population that are scalable and implementable.

Building on prior research, we conduct the first examination of the relationship between individuals' strategies for coping with their chronic orofacial pain (pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and mindfulness), and pain-related outcomes (depression, anxiety, pain intensity, and pain-related disability) across a sample of people with heterogeneous chronic orofacial pain. We hypothesized that all three coping strategies would be significantly associated with depression, anxiety, pain intensity, and pain-related disability.

We recruited individuals with chronic orofacial pain between March and June of 2021, through an electronic newsletter sent to members of the Facial Pain Association (FPA), a non-profit organization serving individuals with orofacial pain. Inclusion criteria were ages 18+, self-reported ability to read and write in English at a sixth grade level, having nonmalignant facial pain of any kind for more than 3 months, and living in the United States. Three-hundred fifty-five individuals indicated consent for participation on an electronic consent form presented prior to the questionnaires (see Table 1 for demographic and clinical characteristics). Of these, 303 subsequently completed the questionnaires on REDCap. All study procedures were approved by the Massachusetts General Hospital Institutional Review Board and were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. We classified reported diagnoses in line with the International Classification of Orofacial Pain, first edition (ICOP). 46 

The PROMIS anxiety scale version 108a 47 is an 8-item questionnaire assessing the frequency and intensity of anxiety symptoms on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores are reported as T scores with a mean of 50 (SD=10). 

The PROMIS depression scale version 108b 48 is an 8-item questionnaire assessing the frequency and intensity of depression symptoms on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores are reported as T scores with a mean of 50 (SD=10).

The pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) 21 is a 13-item questionnaire assessing participants' tendency to ruminate, magnify, and feel helpless in the face of pain on a 0-4 Likert scale.

The Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale for Temporomandibular Disorders (TSK-TMD 35 ) is a 12-item questionnaire assessing fear of pain due to movement of the jaw on a 4-point Likert scale. References to "jaw" were modified to "jaw/face/neck" in order to be inclusive of broader orofacial pain conditions.

The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-15 49 ) is a 15-item questionnaire assessing different facets of mindfulness (observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-reactivity, and nonjudging) on a 5-point Likert scale.

The Graded Chronic Pain Scale 50 is a 7-item scale which assesses pain intensity and pain-related disability on separate subscales.

We used SPSS version 24 for all analyses. We used multiple imputations for missing data. First, we conducted descriptive statistics and zero-order correlations. Second, to evaluate the incremental variance explained by pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and mindfulness, we conducted four separate two-step hierarchical regressions for each of the criterion variables (pain intensity, pain-related disability, anxiety, and depression). For all analyses, step 1 included several theoretically relevant covariates that been previously deemed relevant to pain outcomes in orofacial pain population (ie, gender, education, employment, diagnostic category and pain duration 11, 51, 52 ).

Step 2 included the pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and mindfulness scores. Unstandardized coefficient estimates and associated standard errors are reported. Model fit for each of the steps was evaluated with the F statistic and an increase in variance accounted for as evidenced by a change in R 2 . Squared semipartial correlations (sr 2 ) were used as measures of effect size, interpreted as the incremental variance added by each predictor to the regression model. Power analysis was estimated assuming a small sized effect. Thus, with power set at 0.08 (alpha = 0.05) and 8 independent variables, a sample size of 301 would be required to detect a small effect size. 53 

Means and standard deviations for all measures are detailed in Table 2 and zero-order correlations are detailed in Table 3 . Pain catastrophizing was positively correlated with all four outcome variables (pain intensity, pain-related disability, anxiety and depression; rs = 0.237-0.515, ps<0.001). Kinesophobia was positively correlated with pain-related disability, anxiety and 

depression (rs = 0.217-0.418, p<0.001), but not with pain intensity. Mindfulness was negatively correlated with anxiety and depression (rs=−0.380 to −0.389, p<0.001) but not with pain intensity or pain-related disability. The four outcome variables (pain intensity, pain-related disability, anxiety and depression) were also positively correlated with each other (rs=0.281-0.686, ps<0.001). Overall, participants exhibited high rates of depression and anxiety, with 67% reporting clinically meaningful symptoms of depression and 56% reporting clinically meaningful symptoms of anxiety, defined as ≥0.5 SD above the general population mean. 47, 48 Multiple Regressions Table 4 ). Table 4 ).

For anxiety, the overall model was significant (F(14, 289) = 3.04, p < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.13). Significant effects emerged for "homemaker" and " Table 4 ).

For depression, step 1 of the model was statistically significant (F(14, 289) = 3.73, p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.16). Examining the individual independent variables indicated that the "home maker", "student", and "other" employment categories (B = 7.454, SE = 3.109, p = 0.017, sr 2 = 0.02; B = 23.318, SE = 8.369, p = 0.008, sr 2 = 0.03 and B = 5.507, SE = 2.047, p = 0.007, sr 2 = 0.02 respectively), having multiple orofacial pain diagnoses (B = 4.200, SE = 1.572, p = 0.008, sr 2 = 0.02) and pain duration (B = −1.457, SE = 0.655, p = 0.026, sr 2 = 0.02) were significantly associated with depression. In step 2, the model was significant (F(17, 286) = 41.82, p < 0.001, ΔR 2 = 0.25). Pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and mindfulness were significantly associated with depression (B = 0.231, SE = 0.046, p < 0.001, sr 2 = 0.05; B = 0.316, SE = 0.081, p < 0.001, sr 2 = 0.03 and B = −0.298, SE = 0.05, p < 0.001, sr 2 = 0.05, respectively, adding 5-8% incremental variance to the model; see Table 4 ).

Chronic orofacial pain is characterized by substantial pain-related disability and emotional distress. This study tested the association between three coping strategies (pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and mindfulness) and four pain-related outcomes (depression, anxiety, pain intensity, and pain-related disability), while accounting for relevant demographic and clinical variables.

Pain catastrophizing was the only coping variable that was independently associated with pain intensity and painrelated disability. This finding emphasizes the importance of addressing pain catastrophizing among individuals with orofacial pain, and its potential to aid in reducing pain intensity and pain-related disability among this population. While pain catastrophizing has been linked with negative pain outcomes among individuals with chronic pain 30, 54, 55 as well as temporomandibular disorders, [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] our finding supports the same association for other types of orofacial pain. Pain outcomes may thus benefit from interventions targeting pain catastrophizing. 56, 57 All three coping strategies (pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and mindfulness) were significantly associated with depression and anxiety. While the link between mindfulness and reduced depression and anxiety has been demonstrated in several clinical populations, [58] [59] [60] [61] including those with chronic pain, 19, 62, 63 ours is the first study to show evidence for this association among individuals with chronic orofacial pain. The finding that all three coping strategies were independently associated with levels of depression and anxiety suggests that emotional distress among this population may be most efficiently addressed using a multifaceted intervention, incorporating skills to reduce catastrophizing, minimizing fear of pain due to movement, and cultivating a mindful approach to managing orofacial pain symptoms. Given the high rates of participants with clinically meaningful symptoms of anxiety (56%) and depression (67%) in our sample, addressing emotional distress is an urgent priority for this patient population.

Approximately 20% of our sample reported more than one orofacial pain diagnosis, and those that did tended to exhibit worse outcomes. This suggests that individuals with orofacial pain comorbidity may have an increased need and potential to benefit from interventions. Importantly, all three coping variables were associated with more positive outcomes, above and beyond diagnosis type in the multiple regression models. This provides preliminary support for transdiagnostic clinical interventions that address coping skills, which cut across orofacial pain conditions. Targeting pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and mindfulness may therefore help improve outcomes regardless of specific pain diagnoses. Given challenges with in person treatment for individuals with orofacial pain, 64 interventions delivered via web-based platforms may be a novel solution to promote adherence, engagement and improve treatment accessibility. 65 Such an inclusive approach is supported by previous research indicating heterogeneous orofacial pain conditions share common experiences. 66, 67 Of the other demographic and clinical characteristics controlled for in the current study, employment stood out in its association with four outcome variables (depression, anxiety, pain intensity, and pain-related disability), with less favorable outcomes associated primarily with being unemployed or a homemaker in the multiple regression models. This supports previous work linking socioeconomic factors 51 and specifically employment status 11 with unfavorable orofacial pain outcomes, and suggests that routinely collecting employment-related information may help improve and optimize care for this patient population, 11 particularly for underserved communities or those who with low socioeconomic status. 68 This study has several strengths. First, the concurrent examination of the three tested coping strategies (pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and mindfulness) in individuals with orofacial pain is novel. This enabled us to test the relative and independent association of each strategy to several key pain-related outcomes. Further, while the concept of mindfulness has been studied in the context of chronic pain, [24] [25] [26] [27] 62, 69, 70 to our knowledge, this is the first examination of mindfulness specifically in individuals with orofacial pain. The sample size of >300 participants is an additional strength, which enabled us to have sufficient statistical power to examine the association of the coping strategies above and beyond that of numerous potentially confounding demographic and clinical factors previously associated with painrelated outcomes.

Limitations of the study should also be considered. The main limitation of the study is its cross-sectional design, which precludes us from drawing causal inferences. Indeed, the association between the coping strategies and pain outcomes may be bi-directional, and factors such as anxiety and depression may have developed prior orofacial pain onset. Additionally, over two-thirds of the sample reported trigeminal neuralgia as their primary orofacial pain diagnosis, with only few cases of common diagnoses such as temporomandibular disorders (included under the "multiple diagnoses" or "other" categories). This may have impacted associations with the kinesiophobia scale (TSK-TMD), which is primarily used for musculoskeletal orofacial pain, and may limit generalizability of the findings to other orofacial pain populations to some degree. However, controlling for diagnoses in our statistical analyses may have partially reduced this risk.

Finally, all assessments, including orofacial pain diagnoses, were self-reported, which inherently carries a risk of bias. 71 Longitudinal studies capturing other chronic pain and health issues and testing the effects of interventions targeting these coping strategies are needed to help identify the specific and potentially causal role played by such factors in pain outcomes among individuals with heterogeneous chronic orofacial pain.

Across people with chronic orofacial pain recruited from a national facial pain association, we found alarming rates of depression and anxiety. Higher pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia and lower mindfulness were associated with higher depression and anxiety. Higher pain catastrophizing was associated with higher pain and disability. Results support interventions that address these three coping factors and include heterogeneous samples of people with orofacial pain.

Psychosocial interventions for the management of chronic orofacial pain

Risk factors for onset of chronic oro-facial pain -results of the North Cheshire oro-facial pain prospective population study

Oro-facial pain in the community: prevalence and associated impact

Fear-avoidance model of chronic pain: the next generation

The relation between pain-related fear and disability: a meta-analysis

Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain

Tailored treatments in temporomandibular disorders: where are we now? A systematic qualitative literature review

Review of aetiological concepts of temporomandibular pain disorders: towards a biopsychosocial model for integration of physical disorder factors with psychological and psychosocial illness impact factors

Similarity of suffering: equivalence of psychological and psychosocial factors in neuropathic and non-neuropathic orofacial pain patients

The pain-to-well-being relationship in patients experiencing chronic orofacial pain

Emotional aspects of chronic orofacial pain and surgical treatment

Psychosocial impairment in temporomandibular disorders patients. RDC/ TMD axis II findings from a multicentre study

Psychosocial factors and addiction in chronic orofacial neuropathic pain

A systematic review of the psychosocial difficulties relevant to patients with migraine

The association between burning mouth syndrome and psychosocial disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol

Contribution of kinesophobia and catastrophic thinking to upper-extremity-specific disability

Psychosocial correlates of objective, performance-based, and patient-reported physical function among patients with heterogeneous chronic pain

Mechanisms of change in depression and anxiety within a mind-body activity intervention for chronic pain

Pain catastrophizing in older adults with chronic pain: the mediator effect of mood using a path analysis approach

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: development and validation

Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: a shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia

Wherever You Go, There You Are: Mindfulness Meditation in Everyday Life. Hyperion

Randomized trial of the effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction on pain-related disability, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, and A1C in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy

The synergistic effect of vitamin D supplement and mindfulness training on pain severity, pain-related disability and neuropathy-specific quality of life dimensions in painful diabetic neuropathy: a randomized clinical trial with placebo-controlled

Effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction vs cognitive behavioral therapy or usual care on back pain and functional limitations in adults with chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial

Mindfulness-based stress reduction for failed back surgery syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

A mind-body program for older adults with chronic low back pain: results of a pilot study

Acute low back pain: pain-related fear and pain catastrophizing influence physical performance and perceived disability

Pain catastrophizing predicts pain intensity, disability, and psychological distress independent of the level of physical impairment

The key role of pain catastrophizing in the disability of patients with acute back pain

The association of kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing with pain-related disability and pain intensity in obesity and chronic lower-back pain

Role of kinesiophobia on pain, disability and quality of life in people suffering from chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review

Kinesiophobia among patients with musculoskeletal pain in primary healthcare

The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia for Temporomandibular Disorders (TSK-TMD)

Multiple diagnoses, increased kinesiophobia? -Patients with high kinesiophobia levels showed a greater number of temporomandibular disorder diagnoses

Pain catastrophizing mediates the effects of psychological distress on pain interference in patients with orofacial pain: a Cross-Sectional Study

Pain catastrophizing and pain persistence in temporomandibular disorder patients

The roles of beliefs, catastrophizing, and coping in the functioning of patients with temporomandibular disorders

The effect of catastrophizing and depression on chronic pain -a prospective cohort study of temporomandibular muscle and joint pain disorders

Catastrophizing is associated with clinical examination findings, activity interference, and health care use among patients with temporomandibular disorders

Chronic Temporomandibular disorders: disability, pain intensity and fear of movement

Perspectives on next steps in classification of oro-facial pain -part 2: role of psychosocial factors

Outcomes of referrals from endodontic to orofacial pain specialists: a retrospective cohort study

Clinical view of the temporomandibular joint disorder

A brief guide to the PROMIS anxiety instruments. Outcomes measurement information system

A brief guide to the PROMIS depression instruments. Patient reported outcomes measurement information system

Examining the factor structure of the 39-item and 15-item versions of the five Facet mindfulness questionnaire before and after mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for people with recurrent depression

The chronic pain grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research

Facial pain: a comprehensive review and proposal for a pragmatic diagnostic approach

Associations between chronic pain and depressive symptoms in patients with trigeminal neuralgia

Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

Processes of change in treatment for chronic pain: the contributions of pain, acceptance, and catastrophizing

Catastrophizing is associated with pain intensity, psychological distress, and pain-related disability among individuals with chronic pain after spinal cord injury

Cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a feasibility study

Acceptability and feasibility of a mindfulness-based intervention for pain catastrophizing among persons with sickle cell disease

The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: a meta-analytic review

Does mindfulness meditation improve anxiety and mood symptoms? A review of the controlled research

The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on symptoms of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Mindfulness-based interventions for psychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Mindfulness-based interventions for chronic pain: a systematic review of the evidence

Acceptance-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Telehealth increases access to brief behavioral interventions in orofacial pain clinic during COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective study

Adaptation of a live video mind-body program to a web-based platform for English-speaking adults with neurofibromatosis (NF): protocol for the NF-Web study

Towards a new taxonomy of idiopathic orofacial pain

Managing chronic orofacial pain: a qualitative study of patients', doctors', and dentists' experiences

The association among neighborhood socioeconomic status, race and chronic pain in black and white older adults

The clinical use of mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain

Mindfulness meditation for chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis

Social desirability response bias in self-report choice situations

We would like to thank the Facial Pain Association for their contribution to data collection in this study.

This study was funded by grants from the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health to the first (1K23AT010653-01A1) and senior (1K24AT011760-01) authors.

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.