key: cord-0026507-06il2sc3
authors: Cook, Stephanie H; Wood, Erica P; Mirin, Nicholas; Bandel, Michelle; Delorme, Maxline; Gad, Laila; Jayakar, Olive; Mustafa, Zainab; Tatar, Raquel; Javdani, Shabnam; Godfrey, Erin
title: A Mindfulness-Based Intervention to Alleviate Stress From Discrimination Among Young Sexual and Gender Minorities of Color: Protocol for a Pilot Optimization Trial
date: 2022-01-14
journal: JMIR Res Protoc
DOI: 10.2196/35593
sha: 56721d6019c80d4b3e268458df715d8898683020
doc_id: 26507
cord_uid: 06il2sc3

BACKGROUND: Young sexual and gender minorities (SGMs) of color may face unique experiences of discrimination based on their intersectional positions (eg, discrimination based on both racial or ethnic identity and sexual identity). Emerging evidence suggests that mindfulness practices may reduce stress from discrimination and improve overall well-being among young SGM. Moreover, the omnipresence of smartphone access among racial or ethnic and sexual minority communities provides a method through which to administer mindfulness-based interventions among young SGMs of color. OBJECTIVE: This paper outlines the protocol of the Optimizing a Daily Mindfulness Intervention to Reduce Stress from Discrimination among Young Sexual and Gender Minorities of Color (REDUCE) study, a pilot optimization trial of a smartphone-based mindfulness intervention that was developed in conjunction with the Healthy Minds Program (HMP) with the aim of reducing stress from discrimination among young SGMs. METHODS: In total, 80 young (ages 18-29 years) SGMs of color will be enrolled in the study. The HMP is a self-guided meditation practice, and participants will be randomized to either a control condition or an intervention that uses a neuroscience-based approach to mindfulness. We will use the multiphase optimization strategy to assess which combination of mindfulness interventions is the most effective at reducing stress from discrimination among young SGMs of color. A combination of mindfulness-based meditation intervention components will be examined, comprising mindfulness-based practices of awareness, connection, and purpose. Awareness refers to the practice of self-awareness, which reduces the mind’s ability to be distracted and instead be present in the moment. Connection refers to the practice of connection with oneself and others and emphasizes on empathy and compassion with oneself and others. Purpose encourages goal-making in accordance with one’s values and management of behavior in accordance with these goals. In addition, we will assess the feasibility and acceptability of the HMP application among young SGMs of color. RESULTS: The REDUCE study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of New York University, and recruitment and enrollment began in the winter of 2021. We expect to complete enrollment by the summer of 2022. The results will be disseminated via social media, journal articles, abstracts, or presentations, as well as to participants, who will be given the opportunity to provide feedback to the researchers. CONCLUSIONS: This optimization trial is designed to test the efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of implementing an application-based, mindfulness-based intervention to reduce stress from discrimination and improve well-being among young SGMs of color. Evidence from this study will assist in the creation of a sustainable, culturally relevant mobile app–based mindfulness intervention to reduce stress from discrimination among young SGMs of color. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05131360; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05131360 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/35593

Your proposal was reviewed by an interdisciplinary committee of NYU faculty, and reviewers overwhelmingly felt that it was well aligned with the Institute's mission and funding priorities. Committee members also commented on the strength of the interdisciplinary team, the interesting and novel methods proposed, the potential for findings to yield data with significant implications for public health intervention, and the likelihood that study results would be of interest to both academic and practitioner audiences.

• Reviewers expressed some concern about plans to recruit and retain 160 difficult-to-engage participants. While the proposal notes that the PI has successfully recruited this type of sample in previous work, it would be helpful to know if they have done so with this population in such a narrow window of time. Please also elaborate on how the project would deal with attrition. • Please clarify whether there will be any consideration of cultural appropriateness of the mindfulness intervention for this population. • Reviewers expressed concern about the work given the state of the literature on mindfulnessbased approaches for the population. The proposal focuses on optimizing treatment, however the evidence that mindfulness-based intervention is, as a package, effective for similar populations, is unclear. The proposal cites several studies, but these are non-experimental studies. Please provide additional detail regarding the state of the treatment literature for mindfulness based interventions for this population (i.e., details of the preparation phase and its results would be helpful). • Please provide additional information about dosage. It appears that the intervention lasts five days, which may not be appropriate dosage for the effects of mindfulness to be clearly observed or differences between components to be detected. • Due to availability of funding, we will only be able to offer awards totaling $15,000. Please provide a revised budget that reflects a total of $15,000. Please also address the following issue regarding the budget:

o The Participant Incentives section includes a cost of $5,800, but the section total indicates a total of $9,280. According to the budget justification, it appears that $9,280 is the correct amount.

We ask that you provide responses by March 2nd, 2020. Narrative responses can be provided in a brief 1-2 page memo, while revisions to the budget can be submitted as a separate file. Please also feel free to include a separate list of additional references. A final award determination will be made following the receipt of these materials.

Thank you again for submitting a proposal. We look forward to receiving your responses.

Sincerely,

Assistant Director, Program Development 1. Reviewers expressed some concern about plans to recruit and retain 160 difficult-toengage participants. While the proposal notes that the PI has successfully recruited this type of sample in previous work, it would be helpful to know if they have done so with this population in such a narrow window of time. Please also elaborate on how the project would deal with attrition.

To meet budget and feasibility concerns, we have changed our proposed sample size to be 80 instead of 160 (see response to Comment 2). Given the previous work of the study team in recruiting and maintaining SGM of color in research studies, we believe that the recruitment of n=80 SGM of color is entirely possible within the grant timeline. In addition, with the reduction in conditions, we still have significant power to detect a significant finding.

2. Due to availability of funding, we will only be able to offer awards totaling $15,000. Please provide a revised budget that reflects a total of $15,000. Please also address the following issue regarding the budget: The Participant Incentives section includes a cost of $5,800, but the section total indicates a total of $9,280. According to the budget justification, it appears that $9,280 is the correct amount.

To bring the budget under 15K and to further support the feasibility of the project in terms of recruiting and retaining SGM of color within the time allotted, we are slightly modifying our design to be a 2 3 (instead of a 2 4 ). The proposed sample size is now 80 instead of 160. Each condition will have 10 participants. This design supports attrition (we can have about 3 non-completers per group and still have valid pilot results). We will remove the "Purpose" component because out of all of the components it has the least amount of supportive evidence. However, we will re-include this in the larger grant proposal. The goal of this pilot is to examine feasibility and acceptability, so even with the proposed modifications, we strongly believe that the pilot is scientifically rigorous and will lead to a successful R01 grant application. Please see the updated budget and justification.

This is a very important question for which we continue to grapple. We have decided not to alter the content of the application at this stage. Indeed, there is much heterogeneity within SGM of color. However, we have pilot tested the application with 10 different SGM of color and received positive feedback, including that the application and the included modules are relevant and acceptable. Small comments concerning the font and background color arose during the preparation phase; however, these are easily addressable. It is vitally important that we optimize an intervention that is sustainable and can be rolled out immediately. Inherent in MOST is the idea that we are not looking for the "best" intervention package. This would, financially speaking, not be obtainable. Instead, we want to create an intervention package that is effective, costeffective, can reach the most SGM of color, and can be immediately distributed to an in-need community. To this end, we continue to be mindful of ways that we may need to tailor the application in the future, and indeed, we ask debrief questions concerning this matter. However, based on our initial piloting of the application and the goal of this pilot study we do not believe there are any other needed modifications to the application with respect to cultural appropriateness. Based on the findings of this pilot study, we will bring together the research team and our community partners to discuss how to modify the application for different cultural realities of SGM of color, if need be.

Reviewers expressed concern about the work given the state of the literature on mindfulness-based approaches for the population. The proposal focuses on optimizing treatment, however the evidence that mindfulness-based intervention is, as a package, effective for similar populations, is unclear. The proposal cites several studies, but these are non-experimental studies. Please provide additional detail regarding the state of the treatment literature for mindfulness-based interventions for this population (i.e., details of the preparation phase and its results would be helpful).

There is an overwhelming amount of research literature showing the effectiveness of mindfulnessbased interventions for vulnerable populations. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] This research includes randomized clinical trials, observational studies, etc. This underlying body of research suggests that that mindfulnessbased interventions should also be effective among SGM of color. However, there is also substantive work showing that mindfulness-based interventions are effective among SGM. 11 For instance, Lyons 12 found in a study of older gay men who experienced psychological distress and low self-esteem from experiences of discrimination that dispositional mindfulness attenuated the mental health impact of sexuality-and age-related discrimination on psychological distress. Further, researchers found in an RCT of gay HIV positive men, that in comparison to the control group, the group that received the mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) had greater positive affect at the 8-week and 6-month follow up visits. 13 Further, in a pilot RCT of rural LGB individuals, researchers found that perceived stress decreased by 23% in women and by 40% in men between baseline and follow up. Women demonstrated a 12% reduction in overall minority from baseline to 12-week follow-up. 14 Taken together, observational studies as well as RCTs suggest that mindfulness-based interventions among LGB work and may be vitally important to reducing the negative effects of stress specific to these populations. In addition to the work described, there has been an overall paradigm shift within the community to think more critically about the role of mindfulness as a meaningful and valuable intervention tool. This is evidenced by the usage of mindfulness in the ESTEEM RCT 7 currently underway and a recent review article outlining the importance of mindfulness for LGB. 11 In this specific proposal, we are building upon this work by attempting to build a feasible and acceptable application-based mindfulness intervention that may can be immediately delivered to SGM communities through our partners Healthy Minds Inc.

Please provide additional information about dosage. It appears that the intervention lasts five days, which may not be appropriate dosage for the effects of mindfulness to be clearly observed or differences between components to be detected.

As part of our pilot we will be assessing feasibility in terms of the timing/dosage of the intervention. However, we are confident that we are starting at the correct dosage. Pogrebtsova et al. 15 found in a similar daily diary RCT that negative affect declined over 5-days compared to the control groups. Thus, in our 5-day daily diary optimization trial we expect to see statistically significant results or results trending towards statistical significance. In addition, in our debrief interview we also assess participant burden by asking questions related to the timing of the intervention (e.g. "was 5-days enough time to fully connect with the intervention?"). If we find that the 5-day daily diary is not enough time, we will utilize this as evidence to extend timing in our R01 submission.

Mindfulness-based interventions for chronic pain: A systematic review of the evidence

Are mindfulness-based interventions effective for substance use disorders? A systematic review of the evidence

A systematic review of mindfulnessbased interventions for youth in school settings

Mindfulness-based interventions for psychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Standardised mindfulness-based interventions in healthcare: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of RCTs

Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future

Mindfulness-based interventions for obesity-related eating behaviours: a literature review

Effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions in improving mental health: A review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Acceptance-and mindfulnessbased interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a meta-analytic review

Mindfulness-based interventions in schools-a systematic review and meta-analysis

An Affirmative Mindfulness Approach for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Youth Mental Health

Mindfulness attenuates the impact of discrimination on the mental health of middle-aged and older gay men

A randomized controlled trial of mindfulnessbased stress reduction to manage affective symptoms and improve quality of life in gay men living with HIV

A Test of Feasibility and Acceptability of Online Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Women and Men at Risk for High Stress: Pilot Study

Exploring daily affective changes in university students with a mindful positive reappraisal intervention: A daily diary randomized controlled trial