key: cord-0016473-a1peak58 authors: Langabeer, James R.; Champagne‐Langabeer, Tiffany; Yatsco, Andrea J.; O'Neal, Meredith M.; Cardenas‐Turanzas, Marylou; Prater, Samuel; Luber, Samuel; Stotts, Angela; Fadial, Tom; Khraish, Gina; Wang, Henry; Bobrow, Bentley J.; Chambers, Kimberly A. title: Feasibility and outcomes from an integrated bridge treatment program for opioid use disorder date: 2021-03-31 journal: J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12417 sha: ea9af7b30260a7641b574a6ff8be0a59e7e0c71a doc_id: 16473 cord_uid: a1peak58 OBJECTIVE: With a significant proportion of individuals with opioid use disorder not currently receiving treatment, it is critical to find novel ways to engage and retain patients in treatment. Our objective is to describe the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a program that used emergency physicians to initiate a bridge treatment, followed by peer support services, behavioral counseling, and ongoing treatment and follow‐up. METHODS: We developed a program called the Houston Emergency Opioid Engagement System (HEROES) that provides rapid access to board‐certified emergency physicians for initiation of buprenorphine, plus at least 1 behavioral counseling session and 4 weekly peer support sessions over the course of 30 days. Follow‐ups were conducted by phone and in person to obtain patient‐reported outcomes. Primary outcomes included percentage of patients who completed the 30‐day program and the percentage for successful linkage to more permanent ongoing treatment after the initial program. RESULTS: There were 324 participants who initiated treatment on buprenorphine from April 2018 to July 2019, with an average age of 36 (±9.6 years) and 52% of participants were males. At 30 days, 293/324 (90.43%) completed the program, and 203 of these (63%) were successfully connected to a subsequent community addiction medicine physician. There was a significant improvement (36%) in health‐related quality of life. CONCLUSION: Lack of insurance is a predictor for treatment failure. Implementation of a multipronged treatment program is feasible and was associated with positive patient‐reported outcomes. This approach holds promise as a strategy for engaging and retaining patients in treatment. patient-reported outcomes. This approach holds promise as a strategy for engaging and retaining patients in treatment. addiction treatment, bridge treatment, buprenorphine, emergency department, opioid use disorder, prehospital emergency care, substance use disorder INTRODUCTION Deaths from opioid-related overdoses across the United States have reached epidemic proportions, claiming >46,000 lives in 2017. 1 ,2 Yet, many people who need treatment are not currently receiving it. 3 Opioid-related visits to hospital emergency departments continue to increase, and an estimated 2 million individuals across the United States have opioid use disorder (OUD). 4 Over 1.23% of all visits to US EDs in 2017 were opioid related, resulting in a total economic burden of $5 billion to the ED alone. 5 Timely access to medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) reduces mortality; however, many communities experience a severe shortage of treatment capacity and access to MOUD. 6, 7 Excessive waitlists for treatment, especially among individuals without health insurance, are barriers to treatment initiation. 8, 9 In the Houston area, patients without insurance typically experience [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] week wait times before treatment initiation; moreover, some research suggests >50% of patients will never achieve admission because of excessive wait times. 10 This may represent a substantial portion of the >80% of individuals with OUD who are currently not in treatment. 4 Lack of treatment could result in increased opioid-related mortality. 11 Hospital EDs and prehospital emergency care are often a first point of contact for patients and represent an opportunity to initiate treatment for an individual with OUD. 12 Results from a randomized clinical trial showed buprenorphine initiated for OUD in the ED was associated with longer treatment retention relative to control groups. 13 This study evaluates a comprehensive bridge program for persons with OUD in Houston, Texas, providing rapid access to buprenorphine with adjuvant behavioral and peer support services. In this study, we report feasibility and initial outcomes so that others may learn from our study design and implementation. We developed a single-arm study based at the University of Texas After identification, screening, and informed consent, patients pro- In some cases, patients were unable to receive their prescription. Lack of insurance and geographic access were a result of several factors, including missed physician appointments or lack of transportation. Although the program covered all medical and behavioral services, prescriptions were not included, and occasionally the patients experienced financial barriers paying for their initial prescription. Although financial assistance was not advertised during recruitment because of limited funds, it was made available to certain patients with no other means so they could continue in the program. The study most frequently prescribed buprenorphine with naloxone at 8 mg/2 mg dosage. Individuals with a history of higher daily use necessitated a 12 mg/3 mg or higher dosage. Physicians prescribed MOUD during the interim bridge period, which varied for each individual because of waitlists for successful placement at an outpatient community clinic. Prescriptions were administered through an affiliated retail pharmacy. In nearly all cases, patients were instructed on home induction of buprenorphine as soon as possible. This study used 12 independent (non-affiliated) outpatient treatment physicians across the community after the interim bridge period. Referrals were based on the patient's health insurance plan (if any), clinic availability, and geographic location. The majority of patients in this program did not have any type of health insurance, and we referred them to clinics that accepted the state's special funding for outpatient-based opioid treatment physicians. Although treatment was initiated on buprenorphine, most clinics offered all 3 approved MOUD treatments, including methadone, buprenorphine, or naltrexone. After initiation, patients were instructed to schedule their first behavioral counseling session with a licensed chemical dependency counselor (LCDC) during the first week in the program. LCDCs worked Engaging and retaining patients with opioid use disorder is challenging. By initiating buprenorphine in the emergency department followed by a session of behavioral counseling and weekly peer support, 90% (293/324) of subjects completed the program with an additional 63% (203/324) subsequently connected with ongoing addiction treatments. with participants using behavioral strategies to achieve long-term sobriety. Counselors also used a comprehensive biopsychosocial form to guide sessions, and this form also served as a valuable data collection instrument. The study required that patients meet with a counselor during the first 2 weeks. We also used peer recovery support specialists (or peer "coaches"). These individuals worked with patients on a daily basis to enhance motivation and engagement. 20 This program had 2 primary dependent variables: treatment adherence during the initial 30-day period and successful linkage rate to ongoing care. We defined treatment adherence as the number of patients who completed the intervention successfully divided by the total number enrolled. Completion was determined based on patients who received the initial buprenorphine induction, maintained ongoing medications for 30 days, received at least 1 behavioral counseling session, and met with peer coaches once weekly for 4 weeks. We defined successful linkage as the number of enrolled patients who initiated MOUD treatment after the initial 30-day program with a community physician, divided by total patients enrolled. Secondary outcomes were rates of reuse and relapse. We chose 30 days as our end point as this study was designed to bridge OUD treatment to permanent ongoing care. To assess quality of life, we used the five-dimension European quality of life (EQ-5D QOL) visual analog scale, which is well represented in research worldwide. 22 This scale represents a number between 0 and 100, where the best imaginable health state is marked 100 and the worst state is marked 0. Additional variables captured included the source of enrollment (home outreach, community referral, or hospital ED) and baseline and demographic information. Study data were collected and managed using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) electronic data capture tools hosted at UTHealth. REDCap is a secure, web-based software platform designed to support data capture for research studies and has been used in thousands of academic studies. 23 We reported descriptive statistics of the demographic and clinical char- We Our findings should be interpreted in light of the limitations of the descriptive study design. Because this is not a randomized controlled trial, we are not suggesting causality. The lack of study comparison groups limits the findings. Our future research plan is to conduct a similar study designed with randomization and control groups to evaluate effect differences. Additionally, our primary focus was on the short-term results after the initial consultation and enrollment. Future studies will report on longer term outcomes of this cohort. In this study of socioeconomically vulnerable patients, we found a program that initiates treatment and provides behavioral counseling and peer support services was feasible and allowed for high linkage rates to more permanent care. These outcomes are important as addiction medicine waitlists can significantly deter patient engagement and retention. These challenges are exacerbated in states where there is a low density of practitioners, such as in Texas, where patients with greater needs may experience more challenges. 24 We can contrast these findings with those of other research. Naeger and colleagues found that of all adult, privately insured patients between 2010 and 2014, only 17% of those treated during an inpatient admission received continuing care after discharge. 25 This is especially significant given the high relapse rates with this condition. One study estimates that 59% of patients will experience a relapse within 1 week after inpatient treatment for OUD. 26 In a large randomized clinical trial, Nunes and colleagues estimated the relapse rates to be around 63% for short-term inpatient stays based on treatment as usual. 27 Another found that just over 60% of heroin users reused heroin after initial detoxification within 30 days whereas Trowbridge and colleagues found that only 39% of patients who initiated buprenorphine were still active in treatment at 30 days. 28, 29 In addition, multiple studies have concluded that the risk of overdose deaths is significantly less for patients in treatment than those who are not in treatment. 30, 31 Our results are especially noteworthy given this context. More than half of the participants were considered high risk in our sample because of prior use of heroin or synthetic drugs or because of their socioeconomic status. A lack of financial resources creates a barrier to outpatient services and is an obstacle to remaining in costly MOUD treat- There are opportunities to improve on this model. There were 121 patients (37%) who simply chose not to continue MOUD treatment after the interim period. A small minority discontinued because of reuse, as mentioned earlier, but many were simply lost to follow-up. We attempted to reach many of those through follow-up surveys, yet this vulnerable population included many without phone or email contacts. Of those we reached, barriers including financial, transportation, and access to care were more likely to have prevented successful linkage. For example, patients without health insurance were instructed during the interim period to work on necessary identification and registration for the county health insurance. Many people did not follow through and were not able to be placed into care. Also, our interim program provided free coverage of most behavioral, medical, and peer-based care as well as transportation vouchers during the program. Once patients were outside the research program, transportation and costs became more challenging. Future programs should improve the transition into community care to mitigate these barriers. Our results demonstrate that a more comprehensive program combining rapid access to buprenorphine with behavioral and emotional support is feasible, especially in the presence of long wait times. In Houston, we observed an average wait time of ≈1 month to achieve linkage to MOUD treatment. Regional variations in capacity, and lower prescribing levels for those who are waivered, could be one of many structural factors affecting opioid-related mortality. 11 Whereas some communities particularly in the northeast portion of the United States report average wait time for first appointment of <1 week, many other regions including Houston have significantly longer wait lists, making interim bridge programs more necessary. 6 In our study linkage to ongoing care despite long clinic wait times was associated with significant improvements in QOL. This model holds promise as one strategy to support treatment adherence and Increases in drug and opioid overdose deaths-United States Drug and opioidinvolved overdose deaths -United States Vital signs: trends in emergency department visits for suspected opioid overdoses -United States Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: results from the 2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. PEP19-5068, NSDUH Series H-54). Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Prevalence and charges of opioid-related visits to U.S. emergency departments. Drug Alcohol Depend Access to office-based buprenorphine treatment in areas with high rates of opioid-related mortality: an audit study Champagne-Langabeer AT. Disparities between US opioid overdose deaths and treatment capacity: a geospatial and descriptive analysis In fighting an opioid epidemic, medication-assisted treatment is effective but underused What's in a number? Recommending practicality in the DATA 2000 patient limits Improved patient outcomes and reduced wait times: transforming a VA outpatient substance use disorder program County-level factors underlying opioid mortality in the United States Approach to buprenorphine use for opioid withdrawal treatment in the emergency setting Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone treatment for opioid dependence: a randomized clinical trial A quality framework for emergency department treatment of opioid use disorder Evaluation of an emergency department buprenorphine induction and medication-assisted treatment referral program Retrospective review of a novel approach to buprenorphine induction in the emergency department Opioid prescribing patterns and overdose deaths in Texas The clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS) Telehealth sustains patient engagement in OUD treatment during COVID-19 Utilization of peer-based substance use disorder and recovery interventions in rural emergency departments: patient characteristics and exploratory analysis Lived experience in new models of care for substance use disorder: a systematic review of peer recovery support services and recovery coaching The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status Using EQ-5D: A European Perspective; Evidence from the EuroQol BIOMED Research Programme Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support Geographic proximity to buprenorphine treatment providers in the U Post-Discharge treatment engagement among patients with an opioid-use disorder Lapse and relapse following inpatient treatment of opiate dependence Relapse to opioid use disorder after inpatient treatment: protective effect of injection naltrexone Substance use and mental health in emerging adult vs older adult men and women with opioid use disorder Addiction consultation services -linking hospitalized patients to outpatient addiction treatment Opioid agonist treatment and fatal overdose risk in a state-wide US population receiving opioid use disorder services Opioid agonist treatment and risk of mortality during opioid overdose public health emergency: population based retrospective cohort study MBA, is a tenured full professor with joint appointments at the McGovern Medical School (Emergency Medicine), UT School of Public Health (Health Management and Policy), and the School of Biomedical Informatics How to cite this article: Langabeer JR, Champagne-Langabeer Feasibility and outcomes from an integrated bridge treatment program for opioid use disorder