key: cord-0011297-60yypaua
authors: Bashir, Rame; Grigorian, Areg; Lekawa, Michael; Joe, Victor; Schubl, Sebastian D.; Chin, Theresa L.; Kong, Allen; Nahmias, Jeffry
title: Octogenarians with blunt splenic injury: not all geriatrics are the same
date: 2020-04-18
journal: Updates Surg
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00765-y
sha: 06bfae136cbb7724a9335578f10ea0863097e551
doc_id: 11297
cord_uid: 60yypaua

Geriatric trauma patients (GTP) (age ≥ 65 years) with blunt splenic injury (BSI) have up to a 6% failure rate of non-operative management (NOM). GTPs failing NOM have a similar mortality rate compared to GTPs managed successfully with NOM. However, it is unclear if this remains true in octogenarians (aged 80–89 years). We hypothesized that the failure rate for NOM in octogenarians would be similar to their younger geriatric cohort, patients aged 65–79 years; however risk of mortality in octogenarians who fail NOM would be higher than that of octogenarians managed successfully with NOM. The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010–2016) was queried for patients with BSI. Those undergoing splenectomy within 6 h were excluded to select for patients undergoing NOM. Patients aged 65–79 years (young GTPs) were compared to octogenarians. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine the risk for failed NOM and mortality. From 43,041 BSI patients undergoing NOM, 3660 (8.5%) were aged 65–79 years and 1236 (2.9%) were octogenarians. Both groups had a similar median Injury Severity Score (ISS) (p = 0.10) and failure rate of NOM (6.6% young GTPs vs. 6.8% octogenarians p = 0.82). From those failing NOM, octogenarians had similar units of blood products transfused (p > 0.05) and a higher mortality rate (40.5% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.001), compared to young GTPs. Independent risk factors for failing NOM in octogenarians included ≥ 1 unit of packed red blood cells (PRBC) (p = 0.039) within 24 h of admission. Octogenarians who failed NOM had a higher mortality rate compared to octogenarians managed successfully with NOM (40.5% vs 23.6% p = 0.001), which persisted in a multivariable logistic regression analysis (OR 2.25, CI 1.37–3.70, p < 0.001). Late failure of NOM ≥ 24 h (vs. early failure) was not associated with increased risk of mortality (p = 0.88), but ≥ 1 unit of PRBC transfused had higher risk (OR 1.88, CI 1.20–2.95, p = 0.006). Compared to young GTPs with BSI, octogenarians have a similar rate of failed NOM. Octogenarians with BSI who fail NOM have over a twofold higher risk of mortality compared to those managed successfully with NOM. PRBC transfusion increases risk for mortality. Therefore, clinicians should consider failure of NOM earlier in the octogenarian population to mitigate the risk of increased mortality.

The geriatric population, defined as those ≥ 65 years old, compose 15% of the entire US population or roughly 46 million people [1] . By 2040, this number is expected to grow to 22% [1] . Medical advances have led to an increase in life expectancy and enable an active lifestyle into late adulthood, including driving at an older age [2] . As such, injury patterns in this population have shifted with trauma centers noting an increase in geriatric trauma patients (GTPs) suffering blunt trauma [3] . Additionally, octogenarians, defined as those 80-89 years old, are presenting to hospitals at increasing rates. Ukkonen et al. found that patients ≥ 80 years old account for 15% of all emergency room visits nationwide [4] . Management of octogenarians requires special considerations due to suppressed stress responses, impaired central nervous system, altered cardiovascular physiology, as well as overall increased comorbidities [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] . Furthermore, the decreased abdominal musculature in geriatric patients may increase their risk for blunt splenic injury (BSI) [10] .

In blunt trauma, the spleen is the most commonly injured solid organ [11] . Non-operative management (NOM) for BSI was once considered a relative contraindication in geriatric patients with failure rates reported as high as 70% [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] . More recently, however, these rates have been proven to be exaggerated. Trust et al. used the National Trauma Databank to find that GTPs had slightly higher, but comparable failure rates of NOM compared to younger adults (~ 6% versus 4%). Furthermore, this study concluded that failure of NOM for BSI was not an independent risk factor for mortality in GTPs, suggesting NOM to be a safe option. This practice is further supported by the most recent Eastern Association of the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) guidelines regarding BSI where age is no longer considered a contraindication to NOM [17] .

Given the aging population and growing number of octogenarians presenting to trauma centers, we sought to determine whether management of BSI for octogenarian trauma patients would be different from younger GTPs. We hypothesized that the failure rate for NOM in octogenarians with BSI would be similar to younger GTPs, aged 65-79 years. However, we hypothesized the risk of mortality in octogenarians who fail NOM to be higher than octogenarians managed successfully with NOM.

We performed a retrospective analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) over a 7-year period from 2010 to 2016 to identify patients between 65 and 89 years, presenting with splenic injury after blunt trauma, defined by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) version 9 diagnosis codes: 865.0-865. 19 . Patients undergoing splenectomy were identified using the ICD-9 procedure code, 41.5. The American College of Surgeons collects high-quality data from individual trauma centers across the USA in the TQIP database. This provides risk-adjusted benchmarking to compare trauma centers and opportunities to conduct research on a larger population.

The primary outcome was failure of NOM defined as: splenectomy after 6 h post-injury. Those undergoing splenectomy within 6 h were excluded to avoid including patients who did not undergo NOM similar to a previous analysis of NOM in BSI [18] . Two groups were compared: patients 65-79 years old (younger GTP) and patients 80-89 years old (octogenarians).

Patient demographic information was collected including pre-hospital comorbidities and the median systolic blood pressure (SBP) on arrival. Pre-hospital comorbidities included congestive heart failure (CHF), end-stagerenal disease (ESRD), smoking, diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), cirrhosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The injury profile included the Injury Severity Score (ISS), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and mechanism of injury. AIS is a scoring system that classifies each injury by body region on a six-point scale. The sum of the squares of the highest AIS scores for the three most severely injured body regions equals the ISS. The ISS ranges from 1 to 75 and correlates most closely with morbidity and mortality [19] . The mechanism of injuries were also evaluated to compare GTPs to octogenarians, including falls, motor vehicle collisions (MVCs), pedestrian accidents, and motorcycle collisions (MCCs).

Other outcomes evaluated included total hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, ventilator days, and units of packed red blood cells (PRBC), platelets and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfused within 24 h. Since blood transfusion was a significant risk factor for failing NOM, we performed a sub-analysis of octogenarians in which we stratified patients by units of blood products transfused. Late failure of NOM, defined as failure 24 h after presentation, was compared to early failure (6-24 h post-injury). In 2013, TQIP began collecting data for splenic angioembolization intervention on patients that failed NOM within the first 48 h of patient arrival to the emergency department. Thus, for this study's 2010-2016 population, evaluation of angioembolization was performed for only the 2013-2016 population.

Descriptive statistics were performed for all variables. Continuous variables were compared using a Mann-Whitney U test, while categorical variables were compared using Chi square. Categorical data were reported as percentages, and continuous data were reported as medians with interquartile range or means with standard deviation. The magnitude of the association between covariates and risk of failing NOM was measured using a univariable logistic regression model. These variables were chosen based on a review of the literature and included hypotension (systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg) within 24 h, ISS ≥ 25, massive blood product transfusion (≥ 5 units of packed red blood cells within 4-h), severe (grade > 3) AIS for the head, spine, thorax, abdomen, history of CHF, ESRD, diabetes, hypertension, COPD, CVA, MI, and smoking [20, 21] . Covariates were then controlled for using a hierarchical multivariable logistic regression model. The adjusted risk of failure of NOM and mortality were reported with an odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We also performed a multivariable regression analysis of octogenarians managed non-operatively for BSI, with the same covariates, to analyze the risk of mortality. All p values were two-sided, with a statistical significance level of < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24. (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp).

From 43,041 patients undergoing NOM after BSI, 3,660 (8.50%) were younger GTPs, and 1,236 (2.9%) were octogenarians. Compared to the younger GTPs, octogenarians were less often male (51.1% vs 60.1%, p < 0.001) and had a lower rate of severe thorax injury (AIS > 3) (16.7% vs 19.4%, p = 0.04), but similar ISS (p = 0.10). The younger GTP group had a higher rate of injury secondary to MCCs (5.8% vs 0.0%, p = 0.02), but a similar rate of falls (40.8% vs 48.8%, p = 0.16), MVCs (42.6% vs 44.0% p = 0.81), and pedestrian accidents (6.6% vs 6.0% p = 0.83) compared to the older octogenarian group. The octogenarian group had higher rates of CHF (10.5% vs 5.5%, p < 0.001), hypertension (59.2% vs 53.8%, p = 0.001), and CVA (4.6% vs 3.0%, p = 0.006), but lower rates of diabetes (18.6% vs 24.1%, p < 0.001) and history of smoking (3.1% vs 10.3%, p < 0.001) compared to the younger GTPs. The octogenarian group failed NOM at a similar rate compared to the younger GTP cohort (6.8% vs 6.6%, p = 0.82) ( Table 1) .

In a multivariable analysis, the strongest risk factors for failing NOM of BSI was an abdominal AIS > 3 (OR 4.58, CI 2.46-8.53, p < 0.001), followed by ≥ 5 units of PRBC transfusions within 4 h of admission (OR 2.01, CI 1.13-3.60, p = 0.02) ( Table 2) .

After adjusting for ISS ≥ 25, octogenarians who received ≥ 1 unit PRBC transfusion within 24 h had a higher risk for failing NOM (OR 2.05, CI 1.01-4.11, p = 0.039). Regarding FFP and platelets, there was a stepwise increased risk of failing NOM with an increased number of units transfused (Table 3) . 

This is a large multi-year contemporary national analysis of GTPs that stratifies the GTP population by age to compare the outcomes of octogenarians to their younger geriatric cohort undergoing NOM of BSI. Our data suggest that GTPs were more likely to suffer from MCCs, but had similar rates of falls, MVCs and pedestrian accidents. Octogenarians fail at similar rates to younger GTPs, but when octogenarians fail, they have a fivefold higher risk of mortality, compared to their younger geriatric cohort. Among the octogenarian subgroup, those failing NOM are at a twofold higher risk of mortality compared to those managed successfully with NOM, even after adjusting for ISS. Furthermore, any octogenarian receiving ≥ 1 unit PRBC transfusion is at an increased risk of failing NOM. The failure rate of GTPs undergoing NOM of BSI is relatively low. In recent studies, failure rates range from 4.6% to 6% [12, 18] . These rates are significantly improved from prior studies in the early 2000s with failure rates of 11-33% [14, [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] . Our data parallel the most recent studies demonstrating an overall low failure rate among the general geriatric population, less than 7% for patients between 65-89 years of age. In addition, we found that octogenarians have a similar rate and risk of failure of NOM of BSI compared to the younger geriatric cohort, despite higher rates of [14] . Similarly, Trust et al. concluded that no association exists between failing NOM and mortality among GTPs aged 60-89 years [18] . However, our data augment the findings of Trust et al. by illustrating a fivefold increased risk of mortality among octogenarians failing NOM. In addition, we identified other risk factors for mortality among octogenarians failing NOM: specifically, one unit or more of PRBC transfusion. This data suggests that when performing NOM for BSI in octogenarians, the managing physician should have a lower threshold for operation, as waiting to operate until a single unit of blood is transfused may be associated with increased mortality in this population.

As a retrospective database study, there are inherent limitations including reporting bias and coding errors. Furthermore, there are pertinent missing variables including the severity of splenic injury (e.g., American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade). The use of abdominal AIS is the closest representation to the degree of splenic injury and is tracked by the database; however, concomitant abdominal injuries may account for different AIS scores, thereby this measure may not accurately reflect the degree of injury to the spleen and thus may introduce bias to the study. Other missing pertinent variables include information regarding coagulopathy (i.e., use of antiplatelet or anticoagulants), anemia, and what was the actual clinical trigger for operation. Also, angioembolization intervention was only assessed for half our study population, because TQIP did not begin collecting this data until 2013. This prevented our ability to analyze our entire population for the 2010-2016 period of this study; however, our small sample size of data demonstrated increased use of angioembolization in octogenarians which merits future study. In addition, TQIP does not provide ongoing physiologic data or physical examination data (e.g., development of peritonitis). Despite these limitations, this is the first evaluation of octogenarians using a large trauma database over multiple years. We found that octogenarians with more severe injuries and higher grade BSI are at a higher risk of NOM failure and mortality compared to a generalized GTP cohort. Furthermore, our study is strengthened by its generalizability as TQIP encompasses over 800 centers.

Compared to younger GTPs with BSI, octogenarians have a similar rate and risk for failure of NOM, which reaffirms that age should not be a determinant for performance of NOM for BSI. However, octogenarians with BSI who fail NOM have over a twofold higher risk of mortality compared to those managed successfully with NOM and a greater than fivefold higher risk than younger GTPs that fail NOM. Furthermore, one or more units of PRBC transfused increases the risk for mortality in this octogenarian cohort and therefore octogenarians should be considered for splenectomy at a lower threshold, even prior to the need for transfusion if possible.

Funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest The authors report no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent For this type of article, informed consent is not required.

An aging nation: the older population in the United States

The geriatric driver: factors that influence when to stop driving

A comprehensive investigation of comorbidities, mechanisms, injury patterns, and outcomes in geriatric blunt trauma patients

Emergency department visits in older patients: a population-based survey

Drug policy for an aging population-the European Medicines Agency's geriatric medicines strategy

Impact of advanced age on outcomes following damage control interventions for trauma

Old age as a criterion for trauma team activation

Special considerations in geriatric injury

Evidence-based care of geriatric trauma patients

Does this adult patient have a blunt intra-abdominal injury?

Primary care of the blunt splenic injured adult

Nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma in the elderly: does age play a role?

Age should not be a consideration for nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury

Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries: factors influencing success in age %3e55 years

Blunt splenic injuries: dedicated trauma surgeons can achieve a high rate of nonoperative success in patients of all ages

Nonoperative management of severe blunt splenic injury: are we getting better?

Selective nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline

Is it safe? Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries in geriatric trauma patients

Comparison of injury severity score, new injury severity score, revised trauma score and trauma and injury severity score for mortality prediction in elderly trauma patients

Factors of failure for nonoperative management of blunt liver and splenic injuries

Adult splenic injuries: treatment patterns and predictive indicators

Failure of observation of blunt splenic injury in adults: variability in practice and adverse consequences

Failures of splenic nonoperative management: is the glass half empty or half full?

Contribution of age and gender to outcome of blunt splenic injury in adults: multicenter study of the eastern association for the surgery of trauma

Outcome of the current management of splenic injuries

Age should not be a consideration for nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury