key: cord-0008266-gidqke0t authors: Castillo-Chavez, Carlos; Curtiss, Roy; Daszak, Peter; Levin, Simon A; Patterson-Lomba, Oscar; Perrings, Charles; Poste, George; Towers, Sherry title: Beyond Ebola: lessons to mitigate future pandemics date: 2015-06-15 journal: Lancet Glob Health DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(15)00068-6 sha: 719dbc09e69263c621d7a546225d07279156046d doc_id: 8266 cord_uid: gidqke0t nan Beyond Ebola: lessons to mitigate future pandemics It is now just more than a year since the offi cial confi rmation of an outbreak of Ebola haemorrhagic fever in west Africa. 1 With new cases occurring at their lowest rate for 2015, 2 and the end of the outbreak in sight for all three countries predominantly aff ected, now is the time to consider strategies to prevent future outbreaks of this, and other, zoonotic pathogens. The Ebola outbreak, like many other emerging diseases, illustrates the crucial role of the ecological, social, political, and economic context within which diseases emerge. Increasing anthropogenic environmental changes, coupled with a globalised network of travel and trade, allow zoonotic pathogens to spill over into human beings with increasing frequency, and leave us supremely vulnerable to their international spread. 3 Pandemics are no longer simply the domain of public health and clinical medicine, but are a social issue, a development issue, and a global security issue. The cost of management of infectious disease outbreaks is almost always greater than the cost of avoiding them. For severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), the global cost of a single outbreak was estimated to be between US$13 billion and US$50 billion at the currency values of the 2003 outbreak. 4, 5 For Ebola, the cost might be higherboth in the direct, short-term cost of control, patient care, and hospital admission, and in the indirect, longer-term dislocation of the regional economies in west Africa. 6 The economic costs of disease emergence are projected to continue to rise in line with increasing frequency of outbreaks driven by expanding socioeconomic and environmental changes that cause diseases to emerge. 7 Mitigation of future pandemic threats such as Ebola is therefore more cost-eff ective than the current approach of responding to outbreaks after they have begun to spread rapidly in the human population. 7 What would mitigation strategies to deal with future pandemic risks of zoonotic disease look like? Analyses of emerging disease trends during the past six decades have shown that Ebola fi ts the dominant pattern. 8 This pattern involves zoonotic spillover from wildlife or livestock driven by changes in land use, crop choices, migration patterns, animal husbandry, trade, transport, and travel. 9 The west African Ebola outbreak, similar to previous outbreaks of Ebola, HIV, SARS, infl uenza, and most other emerging diseases, probably began with a zoonotic spillover from a wildlife reservoir, in this case thought to be bats. 10 Targeted programmes for behaviour change, focusing on incentives for bushmeat hunting, should be part of the mitigation strategy. This approach was trialled in central Africa, with education programmes designed to reduce the consumption of primates found dead in forests, and has been shown to off er a cost-eff ective way to mitigate the risk of an Ebola outbreak. 11 Additionally, projects aimed to reduce dependency on bushmeat need to be supported, either through creative approaches to farming of some wildlife species, or by expansion of livestock production, with appropriate biosecurity and surveillance to prevent emergence of other zoonoses. The acceleration of vaccine development for Ebola as part of an outbreak control strategy could also have a crucial role to mitigate future outbreaks. Ebola's propensity for nosocomial spread (noted in west Africa and in many previous Ebola outbreaks) could be curtailed by preoutbreak vaccination of critical care workers in Ebola virus hotspots. Likewise, targeted training in infection control, and eff orts to maintain surge capacity between outbreaks, will be crucial for rapid response to the fi rst cases in a future emergence event. Can these approaches be scaled up to mitigate future pandemics on a global scale? Global mitigation of future pandemic risk must focus on the largescale behaviours that lead to zoonotic spillovers. This approach means engaging with the sectors that drive disease emergence, including industries involved in land-use change, resource extraction, livestock production, travel, and trade, among others. Large economic development programmes will need healthimpact assessments that deal explicitly with the risk of emergence of novel diseases, and plans to set up new clinics and surveillance programmes listed as project deliverables. An improved understanding of the liability for disease emergence will drive this change; when all are at risk, collective action is needed to strengthen the weakest links in the chain. 12, 13 Although existing multilateral agreements (eg, the International Health Regulations) allow for some coordination of national responses to outbreaks and bilateral interventions to build public health capacity in poor countries, more is needed. Collective investment needs to occur through a mechanism similar to the Global Environment Facility, www.thelancet.com/lancetgh Vol 3 July 2015 not just in local public health infrastructure, but also in so-called one health measures to reduce the likelihood of zoonotic spillovers. Management of future risk will need anticipation of the origin and spread of diseases through improved predictive models of emergence that include animal populations, the powerful new drivers of global trade and travel, and the eff ect of disparities in income and wealth on health infrastructure, risk mitigation, presymptomatic diagnosis, and vaccination. 14, 15 Perhaps the biggest challenge is that the identity of future emerging diseases will often be unknown before emergence (eg, as in SARS and HIV). Is it possible to design a strategy for an as-yet unknown pathogen? This task seems daunting, but it has already begun, partly though reduction of the size of the problem and allocation of resources in an objective way to the locations most at risk. Analysis of trends in disease emergence provides a strategy to identify the places most likely to propagate the next pandemic. 3 These hotspots for disease emergence tend to be tropical regions with high wildlife diversity that harbour known or unknown zoonoses, and high levels of socioeconomic and environmental change. 3 USAID's Emerging Pandemic Threats (PREDICT) programme targets these hotspots to identify known and previously unknown viruses in wildlife species known to be zoonotic reservoirs, analyses patterns of high-risk human behaviour, tests people for evidence of these viruses moving across the species barrier, and enables the design of strategies to reduce the risk of even the fi rst spillover event. 8 Identifi cation of the next Ebola virus, or the next HIV, will not be a simple task, but estimates of the diversity of viruses existing on the planet show that it is not impossible. 16 Surely this threat is worth concerted eff ort, given the human tragedy and economic devastation when pandemics strike. Open access article published under the terms of CC BY WHO Regional Offi ce for Africa. Ebola virus disease in Guinea Ebola situation reports Global trends in emerging infectious diseases World Bank East Asia and Pacifi c Region, Chief Economist's Offi ce The economic impact of SARS in Beijing The economic impact of the 2014 Ebola epidemic: short and medium term estimates for West Africa Economic optimization of a global stategy to reduce the pandemic threat Prediction and prevention of the next pandemic zoonosis Emerging infectious diseases: the role of social sciences Investigating the zoonotic origin of the West African Ebola epidemic Implementing urgent measures for the surveillance and protection of Great Apes in northern Congo in response to recent Ebola outbreaks: fi nal report to U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service on grant number 98210-5-G195 Biological invasion risks and the public good: an economic perspective Global collective action Merging economics and epidemiology to improve the prediction and management of infectious disease Adaptive human behavior in epidemiological models A strategy to estimate unknown viral diversity in mammals