The usual reading of Don Giovanni (DG), aside from political critique of aristocracy, sees it as an opera moralizing on the punishment of sin. The resulting interpretation descends from a literary tradition originating in counter-Reformation texts, starting with de Molina's El Burlador and continuing with such acclaimed comedies as the commedia-dell'arte L'ateista fulminato, to Goldoni's and Moliere's Dons. Charles Russell presents Mozart's and Da Ponte's DG as "a culmination of a 150-year-old tradition … of all Don Juans who had come before" (Don Juan Legend, XXX). This linear reading informs the widely shared interpretation that over the whole opera, from overture to finale, looms the sinner's refusal to repent and inevitable condemnation to eternal punishment. I propose a different method that takes into account widely divergent but interlocking contemporary texts. I define this approach as polyphonic and contrapuntal: expanding the network of literary and non-literary texts from Mozart's Kyrie in C minor to Da Ponte's memoirs. My interpretation is that, from the overture onward, Mozart evokes the final call to repentance rather than damnation. Don Giovanni dramatizes the offer of forgiveness, not its refusal.