My mind as a Catholic (Newman) 2d MY MIND AS A CATHOLIC BY CARDINAL NEWMAN (from the “‘Apologia pro Vita sua”) FIFTEENTH THOUSAND LONDON CATHOLIC TRUTH SOCIETY 72 VICTORIA STREET S.W. i <2 227 ANGLICAN CONTROVERSY SELECTED PUBLICATIONS Price Sixpence (Net) each« The Essentials of Spiritual Unity. By Ronald Knox, M.A. Development : Thoughts on Bishop Gore's 44 Roman Catholic Claims." By the Rev. Joseph Rickaby, S.J. The First Eight Councils and Papal Infallibility. By Dom John Chapman, O.S.B. The Line of Cleavage under Elizabeth. By Dom Norbert Birt, O.S.B. Authority and Religious Belief. By the Rev. J oseph Rickaby, S.J. The Anglican Claim to be Catholic. By C. G. Mortimer, B.A. Some Prerogatives of Peter. By the Rev. W. R. Carson. A City Set on a Hill. By Monsignor Benson. This essay is based on a paper which Mgr. Benson drew up a few months before his submission to the Holy See, in order to test the solidity of the reasons that were moving him in that direction. The author examines various theories of Catholicism in the light of the requirements of the Church’s life and efficiency, and then considers the true Catholic theory. Appendixes are added on the Petrine texts, the testimony of the Fathers, etc., the whole forming a powerful argu- ment in support of the Church’s claim. CATHOLIC TRUTH SOCIETY 72 VICTORIA STREET S.W. 1 tteaefdlffed MY MIND AS A CATHOLIC By CARDINAL NEWMAN (From his “Apologia pro Vita sua.”) [introductory NOTE The following essay forms a complete treatise in itself and may rank with the Development of Christian Doctrine and the Grammar of Assent as one of Newman's most important works. It stands in the Apologia under the title, “ The Position of my Mind since 1845,"—a final chapter summarising Newman's reply to Kingsley’s charge of intellectual dishonesty : the last pages, which are relevant only to that particular controversy, are here omitted. The pamphlet as it stands is a treatise on one of the most difficult of all questions in connection with the Catholic claim : how to reconcile submission to a revelation of supernatural truth with that activity of mind which is necessary for the apprehension of truths in the natural order. It describes the attitude of one who acknowledges the absolute claims of the Divine Reason as revealed in Christ and embodied in the Church, His mystical body, who yet is acutely conscious of the claims of all truth perceived by human reason in the more limited order of nature. Newman refuses to shirk any of the difficulties involved in the Church's claim ; indeed, he forces them upon our attention : yet he is convinced, with the certitude which makes martyrs, that here, in the Catholic Roman Church, is the key to an order of truth and life which com- pletes and transcends all that is most vital in human life and thought.] From the time that I became a Catholic, of course I have no further history of my religious opinions to narrate. In saying this, I do not mean to say that my mind has been idle, or that I have given up thinking on theological sub- jects ; but that I have had no variations to record, and 2 My Mind as a Catholic have had no anxiety of heart whatever. I have been in perfect peace and contentment ; I never have had one doubt. I was not conscious to myself, on my conversion, of any change, intellectual or moral, wrought in my mind. I was not conscious of firmer faith in the fundamental truths of Revelation, or of more self-command ; I had not more fervour ; but it was like coming into port after a rough sea ; and my happiness on that score remains to this day without interruption. Nor had I any trouble about receiving those additional articles which are not found in the Anglican Creel. vSome of them I believed already, but not any one of them was a trial to me. I made a profession of them upon my reception with the greatest ease, and I have the same ease in believing them now. I am far of course from denying that every article of the Christian Creed, whether as held by Catholics or by Protestants, is beset with intellectual difficulties ; and it is simple fact, that, for myself, I cannot answer those difficulties. Many persons are very sensitive of the difficulties of Religion ; I am as sensitive of them as any one ; but I have never been able to see a connexion between apprehending those difficulties, however keenly, and multiplying them to any extent, and on the other hand doubting the doctrines to which they are attached. Ten thousand difficulties do not make one doubt, as I under- stand the subject ; difficulty and doubt are incommen- surate. There of course may be difficulties in the evidence ; but I am speaking of difficulties intrinsic to the doctrines themselves, or to their relations with each other. A man may be annoyed that he cannot work out a mathematical problem, of which the answer is or is not given to him, without doubting that it admits of an answer, or that a certain particular answer is the true one. Of all points of faith, the being of a God is, to my own apprehension, encompassed with most difficulty, and yet borne in upon our minds with most power. People say that the doctrine of Transubstantiation is difficult to believe ; I did not believe the doctrine till I was a Catholic. I had no difficulty in believing it as soon as I believed that the Catholic Roman Church was the Qfacle of God, and that she had declared this doctrine to be 3My Mind as a Catholic part of the original revelation. It is difficult, impossible, to imagine, I grant ;—but how is it difficult to believe ? Yet Macaulay thought it so difficult to believe, that he had need of a believer in it of talents as eminent as Sir Thomas More, before he could bring himself to conceive that the Catholics of an enlightened age could resist “ the overwhelming force of the argument against it.” “ Sir Thomas More,” he says, “ is one of the choice specimens of wisdom and virtue ; and the doctrine of transub- stantiation is a kind of proof charge. A faith which stands that test, will stand any test.” But for myself, I cannot indeed prove it, I cannot tell how it is ; but I say, “ Why should it not be ? What's to hinder it ? What do I know of substance or matter ? just as much as the greatest philosophers, and that is nothing at all ; ”—so much is this the case, that there is a rising school of philosophy now, which considers phenomena to constitute the whole of our knowledge in physics. The Catholic doctrine leaves phenomena alone. It does not say that the phenomena go ; on the contrary, it says that they remain ; nor does it say that the same phenomena are in several places at once. It deals with what no one on earth knows anything about, the material substances themselves. And, in like manner, of that majestic Article of the Anglican as well as of the Catholic Creed,—the doctrine of the Trinity in Unity. What do I know of the Essence of the Divine Being ? I know that my abstract idea of three is simply incompatible with my idea of one ; but when I come to the question of concrete fact, I have no means of proving that there is not a sense in which one and three can equally be predicated of the Incommunicable God. But I am going to take upon myself the responsibility of more than the mere Creed of the Church ; as the parties accusing me are determined I shall do. They say, that now, in that I am a Catholic, though I may not have offences of my own against honesty to answer for, ye-t, at least, I am answerable for the offences of others, of my co-religionists, of my brother priests, of the Church her- self. I am quite willing to accept the responsibility ; and, as I have been able, as I trust, by means of a few words, to dissipate, in the minds of all those who do not begin 4 My Mind as a Catholic with disbelieving me, the suspicion with which so many Protestants start, in forming their judgment of Catholics, viz. that our Creed is actually set up in inevitable super- stition and hypocrisy, as the original sin of Catholicism ; so now I will proceed, as before, identifying myself with the Church and vindicating it,—not of course denying the enormous mass of sin and error which exists of necessity in that world-wide multiform Communion,—but going to the proof of this one point, that its system is in no sense dishonest, and that therefore the upholders and teachers of that system, as such, have a claim to be acquitted in their own persons of that odious imputation. Starting then with the being of a God (which, as I have said, is as certain to me as the certainty of my own existence, though when I try to put the grounds of that certainty into logical shape I find a difficulty in doing so in mood and figure to my satisfaction), I look out of myself into the world of men, and there I see a sight which fills me with unspeakable distress. The world seems simply to give the lie to that great truth, of which my whole being is so full ; and the effect upon me is, in consequence, as a matter of necessity, as confusing as if it denied that I am in existence myself. If I looked into a mirror, and did not see my face, I should have the sort of feeling which actually comes upon me, when I look into this living busy world, and see no.reflexion of its Creator. This is, to me, one of those great difficulties of this absolute primary truth, to which I referred just now. Were it not lor this voice, speaking so dearly in my conscience and my heart, I should be an atheist, or a pantheist, or a poly- theist when I looked into the world. I am speaking for myself only ; and I am far from denying the real force of the arguments in proof of a God, drawn from the general facts of human society and the course of history, but these do not warm me or enlighten me ; they do not take away the winter of my desolation, or make the buds unfold and the leaves grow within me, and my moral being rejoice. The sight of the world is nothing else than the prophet's scroll, full of “ lamentations, and mourning, and woe." To consider the world in its length and breadth, its My Mind as a Catholic 5 various history, the many races of man, their starts, their fortunes, their mutual alienation, their conflicts ; and then their ways, habits, governments, forms of worship ; their enterprises, their aimless courses, their random achieve- ments and acquirements, the impotent conclusion of long-standing facts, the tokens so faint and broken of a superintending design, the blind evolution of what turn out to be great powers or truths, the progress of things, as if from unreasoning elements, not towards final causes, the greatness and littleness of man, his far-reaching aims, his short duration, the curtain hung over his futurity, the disappointments of life, the defeat of good, the success of evil, physical pain, mental anguish, the prevalence and intensity of sin, the pervading idolatries, the corruptions, the dreary hopeless irreligion, that condition of the whole race, so fearfully yet exactly described in the Apostle's words, “ having no hope and without God in the world," —all this is a vision to dizzy and appal ; and inflicts upon the mind the sense of a profound mystery, which is absolutely beyond human solution. What shall be said to this heart-piercing, reason-bewilder- ing fact ? I can only answer, that either there is no Creator, or this living society of men is in a true sense discarded from His presence. Did I see a boy of good make and mind, with the tokens on him of a refined nature, cast upon the world without provision, unable to say whence he came, his birthplace or his family connexions, I should conclude that there was some mystery connected with his history, and that he was one, of whom, from one cause or other, his parents were ashamed. Thus only should I be able to account for the contrast between the promise and the condition of his being. And so I argue about the world ;—if there be a God, since there is a God, the human race is implicated in some terrible aboriginal calamity. It is out of joint with the purposes of its Creator. This is a fact, a fact as true as the fact of its existence and thus the doctrine of what is theologically called original sin becomes to me almost as certain a,s that the world exists, and as the existence of God. And now, supposing it were the blessed and loving will of the Creator to interfere in this anarchical condition of 6 My Mind as a Catholic things, what are we to suppose would be the methods which might be necessarily or naturally involved in His purpose of mercy ? Since the world is in so abnormal a state, surely it would be no surprise to me, if the inter- position were of necessity equally extraordinary—or what is called miraculous. But that subject does not directly come into the scope of my present remarks. Miracles as evidence, involve a process of reason, or an argument ; and of course I am thinking of some mode of interference which does not immediately run into argument. I am rather asking what must be the face-to-face antagonist, by which to withstand and baffle the fierce energy of passion and the all-corroding, all-dissolving scepticism of the intellect in religious inquiries ? I have no intention at all of denying, that truth is the real object of our reason, and that, if it does not attain to truth, either the premiss or the process is in fault ; but I am not speaking here of right reason, but of reason as it acts in fact and concretely in fallen man. I know that even the unaided reason, when correctly exer- cised, leads to a belief in God, in the immoitality of the soul, and in a future retribution; but I am considering the faculty of reason actually and historically ; and in this point of view, I do not think I am wrong in saying that its tendency is towards a simple unbelief in matters of religion. No truth, however sacred, can stand against it, in the long run ; and hence it is that in the pagan world, when our Lord came, the last traces of the religious knowledge of former times were all but disappearing from those portions of the world in which the intellect had been active and had had a career. And in these latter days, in like manner, outside the Catholic Church things are tending,—with far greater rapidity than in that old time from the circumstance of the age,—to atheism in one shape or other. What a scene, what a prospect, does the whole of Europe present at this day ! and not only Europe, but every government and every civilization through the world, which is under the influence of the European mind ! Especially, for it most concerns us, how sorrowful, in the view of religion, even taken in its most elementary, most attenuated form, is the spectacle presented to us by the educated intellect of My Mind as a Catholic 7 England, France, and Germany ! Lovers of their country and of their race, religious men, external to the Catholic Church, have attempted various expedients to arrest fierce wilful human nature in its onward course, and to bring it into subjection. The necessity of some form of religion for the interests of humanity, has been generally acknow- ledged : but where was the concrete representative of things invisible, which would have the force and the toughness necessary to be a breakwater against the deluge ? Three centuries ago the establishment of religion, material, legal, and social, was generally adopted as the best ex- pedient for the purpose, in those countries which separated from the Catholic Church ; and for a long time it was successful ; but now the crevices of those establishments are admitting the enemy. Thirty years ago, education was relied upon : ten years ago there was a hope that wars would cease for ever, under the influence of commercial enterprise and the reign of the useful and fine arts ; but will any one venture to say that there is any thing any where on this earth, which will afford a fulcrum for us, whereby to keep the earth from moving onwards ? The judgment which experience passes, whether on establishments or on education, as a means of maintaining religious truth in this anarchical world, must be extended even to Scripture, though Scripture be divine. Experience proves surely that the Bible does not answer a purpose for which it was never intended. It may be accidentally the means of the conversion of individuals ; but a book, after all, cannot make a stand against the wild living intellect of man, and in this day it begins to testify, as regards its own structure and contents, to the power of that universal solvent, which is so successfully acting upon religious establishments. Supposing then it to be the will of the Creator to inter- fere in human affairs, and to make provisions for retaining in the world a knowledge of Himself, so definite and dis- tinct as to be proof against the energy of human scepticism, in such a case,—I am far from saying that there was no other way,—but there is nothing to surprise the mind, if He should think fit to introduce a power into the world, invested with the prerogative of infallibility in religious 8 My Mind as a Catholic matters. Such a provision would be a direct, immediate, active, and prompt means of withstanding the difficulty ; it would be an instrument suited to the need ; and, when I find that this is the very claim of the Catholic Church, not only do I feel no difficulty in admitting the idea, but there is a fitness in it, which recommends it to my mind. And thus I am brought to speak of the Church’s infalli- bility, as a provision, adapted by the mercy of the Creator, to preserve religion in the world, and to restrain that freedom of thought, which of course in itself is one of the greatest of our natural gifts, and to rescue it from its own suicidal excesses. And let it be observed that, neither here nor in what follows, shall I have occasion to speak directly of Revelation in its subject-matter, but in reference to the sanction which it gives to truths which may be known independently of it,—as it bears upon the defence of natural religion. I say, that a power, possessed of in- fallibility in religious teaching, is happily adapted to be a working instrument, in the course of human affairs, for smiting hard and throwing back the immense energy of the aggressive, capricious, untrustworthy intellect :—and in saying this, as in the other things that I have to say, it must still be recollected that I am all along bearing in mind my main purpose, which is a defence of myself. I am defending myself here from a plausible charge brought against Catholics, as will be seen better as I pro- ceed. The charge is this :—that I, as a Catholic, not only make profession to hold doctrines which I cannot possibly believe in my heart, but that I also believe in the existence of a power on earth, which at its own will imposes upon men any new set of credenda , when it pleases, by a claim to infallibility ; in consequence, that my own thoughts are not my own property ; that I cannot tell that to-morrow I may not have to give up what I hold to-day, and that the necessary effect of such a condition of mind must be a degrading bondage, or a bitter inward rebellion relieving itself in secret infidelity, or the necessity of ignoring the whole subject of religion in a sort of disgust, and of mechani- cally saying every thing that the Church says, and leaving to others the defence of it. As then I have above spoken of the relation of my mind towards the Catholic Creed, so My Mind as a Catholic g now I shall speak of the attitude which it takes up in the view of the Church’s infallibility. And first, the initial doctrine of the infallible teacher must be an emphatic protest against the existing state of mankind. Man had rebelled against his Maker. It was this that caused the divine interposition : and to proclaim it must be the first act of the divinely-accredited messenger. The Church must denounce rebellion as of all possible evils the greatest. She must have no terms with it ; if she would be true to her Master, she must ban and anathe- matize it. This is the meaning of a statement of mine, which has furnished matter for one of those special accusa- tions to which I am at present replying : I have, however, no fault at all to confess in regard to it ; I have nothing to withdraw, and in consequence I here deliberately repeat it. I said, “ The Catholic Church holds it better for the sun and moon to drop from heaven, for the earth to fail, and for all the many millions on it to die of starvation in extremest agony, as far as temporal affliction goes, than that one soul, I will not say, should be lost, but should commit one single venial sin, should tell one wilful untruth, or should steal one poor farthing without excuse.” I think the principle here enunciated to be the mere pre- amble in the formal credentials of the Catholic Church, as an Act of Parliament might begin with a “ Whereas.” It is because of the intensity of the evil which has possession of mankind, that a suitable antagonist has been provided against it ; and the initial act of that divinely-commissioned power is of course to deliver her challenge and to defy the enemy. Such a preamble then gives a meaning to her position in the world, and an interpretation to her whole course of teaching and action. In like manner she has ever put forth, with most ener- getic distinctness, those other great elementary truths, which either are an explanation of her mission or give a character to her work. She does not teach that human nature is irreclaimable, else wherefore should she be sent ? not, that it is to be shattered and reversed, but to be extricated, purified, and restored ; not, that it is a mere mass of hopeless evil, but that it has the promise upon it of great things, and even now, in its present state of disorder io My Mind as a Catholic and excess, has a virtue and a praise proper to itself. But in the next place she knows and she preaches that such a restoration, as she aims at effecting in it, must be brought about, not simply through certain outward provisions of preaching and teaching, even though they be her own, but from an inward spiritual, power or grace imparted directly from above, and of which she is the channel. She has it in charge to rescue human nature from its misery, but not simply by restoring it on its own level, but by lifting it up to a higher level than its own. She recognizes in it real moral excellence though degraded, but she cannot Set it free from earth except by exalting it towards heaven. It was for this end that a renovating grace was put into her hands ; and therefore from the nature of the gift, as well as from the reasonableness of the case, she goes on, as a further point, to insist, that all true conversion must begin with the first springs of thought, and to teach that each individual man must be in his own person one whole and perfect temple of God, while he is also one of the living stones which build up a visible religious community. And thus the distinctions between nature and grace, and between outward and inward religion, become two further articles in what I have called the preamble of her divine commission. Such truths as these she vigorously reiterates, and per- tinaciously inflicts upon mankind ; as to such she observes no half-measures, no economical reserve, no delicacy or prudence. “ Ye must be born again,” is the simple, direct form of words which she uses after her Divine Master : “ your whole nature must be re-born ; your passions, and your affections, and your aims, and your conscience, and your will, must all be bathed in a new element, and recon- secrated to your Maker,—and, the last not the least, your intellect.” It was for repeating these points of her teach- ing in my own way, that certain passages of one of my volumes have been brought into the general accusation which has been made against my religious opinions. The writer has said that I was demented if I believed, and un- principled if I did not believe, in my own statement, that a lazy, ragged, filthy, story-telling beggar-woman, if chaste, sober, cheerful, and religious, had a prospect of heaven, IIMy Mind as a Catholic such as was absolutely closed to an accomplished statesman, or lawyer, or noble, be he ever so just, upright, generous, honourable, and conscientious, unless he had also some portion of the divine Christian graces ;—yet I should have thought myself defended from criticism by the words which our Lord used to the chief priests, “ The publicans and harlots go into the kingdom of God before you.” And I was subjected again to the same alternative of imputations, for having ventured to say that consent to an unchaste wish was indefinitely more heinous than any lie viewed apart from its causes, its motives, and its consequences : though a lie, viewed under the limitation of these con- ditions, is a random utterance, an almost outward act, not directly from the heart, however disgraceful and despicable it may be, however prejudicial to the social contract, how- ever deserving of public reprobation ; whereas we have the express words of our Lord to the doctrine that “ whoso looketh on a woman to lust after her, hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.’ ’ On the strength of these texts, I have surely as much right to believe in these doctrines which have caused so much surprise, as to believe in original sin, or that there is a supernatural revela- tion, or that a Divine Person suffered, or that punishment is eternal. • Passing now from what I have called the preamble of that grant of power which is made to the Church, to that power itself, Infallibility, I premise two brief remarks : — i. on the one hand, I am not here determining any thing about the essential seat of that power, because that is a question doctrinal, not historical and practical ; 2. nor, on the other hand, am I extending the direct subject-matter, over which that power of Infallibility has jurisdiction, beyond religious opinion :—and now as to the power itself. This power, viewed in its fulness, is as tremendous as the giant evil which has called for it. It claims, when brought into exercise but in the legitimate manner, for otherwise of course it is but quiescent, to know for certain the very meaning of every portion of that Divine Message in detail, which was committed by our Lord to His Apostles. It claims to know its own limits, and to decide what it can determine absolutely and what it cannot, It claims, more- 12 My Mind as a Catholic over, to have a hold upon statements not directly religious, so far as this,—to determine whether they indirectly relate to religion, and, according to its own definitive judgment, to pronounce whether or not, in a particular case, they are simply consistent with revealed truth. It claims to decide magisterially, whether as within its own province or not, that such and such statements are or are not prejudicial to the Depositum of faith, in their spirit or in their conse- quences, and to allow them, or condemn and forbid them, accordingly. It claims to impose silence at will on any matters, or controversies, of doctrine, which on its own ipse dixit, it pronounces to be dangerous, or inexpedient, or inopportune. It claims that, whatever may be the judg- ment of Catholics upon such acts, these acts should be received by them with those outward marks of reverence, submission, and loyalty, which Englishmen, for instance, pay to the presence of their sovereign, without expressing any criticism on them on the ground that in their matter they are inexpedient, or in their manner violent or harsh. And lastly, it claims to have the right of inflicting spiritual punishment, of cutting off from the ordinary channels of the divine life, and of simply excommunicating, those who refuse to submit themselves to its formal declarations. Such is the infallibility lodged in the Catholic Church, viewed in the concrete, as clothed and surrounded by the' appendages of its high*sovereignty : it is, to repeat what I said above, a supereminent prodigious power sent upon earth to encounter and master a giant evil. And now, having thus described it, I profess my own absolute submission to its claim. I believe the whole re- vealed dogma as taught by the Apostles, as committed by the Apostles to the Church, and as declared by the Church to me. I receive it, as it is infallibly interpreted by the authority to whom it is thus committed, and (implicitly) as it shall be, in like manner, further interpreted by that same authority till the end of time. I submit, moreover, to the universally received traditions of the Church, in which lies the matter of those new dogmatic definitions which are from time to time made, and which in all times are the clothing and the illustration of the Catholic dogma as already defined. And I submit myself to those other 13My Mind as a Catholic decisions of the Holy See, theological or not, through the organs which it has itself appointed, which, waiving the question of their infallibility, on the lowest ground come to me with a claim to be accepted and obeyed. Also, I consider that, gradually and in the course of ages, Catholic inquiry has taken certain definite shapes, and has thrown itself into the form of a science, with a method and a phraseology of its own, under the intellectual handling of great minds, such as St. Athanasius, St. Augustine, and St. Thomas ; and I feel no temptation at all to break in pieces the great legacy of thought thus committed to us for these latter days. All this being considered as the profession which I make ex animo, as for myself, so also on the part of the Catholic body, as far as I know it, it will at first sight be said that the restless intellect of our common humanity is utterly weighed down, to the repression of all independent effort and action whatever, so that, if this is to be the mode of bringing it into order, it is brought into order only to be destroyed. But this is far from the result, far from what I conceive to be the intention of that high Providence who has provided a great remedy for a great evil,—far from borne out by the history of the conflict between Infalli- bility and Reason in the past, and the prospect of it in the future. The energy of the human intellect “ does from opposition grow ; ” it thrives and is joyous, with a tough elastic strength, under the terrible blows of the divinely- fashioned weapon, and is never so much itself as when it has lately been overthrown. It is the custom with Protes- tant writers to consider that, whereas there are two great principles in action in the history of religion, Authority and Private Judgment, they have all the Private Judgment to themselves, and we have the full inheritance and the superincumbent oppression of Authority. But this is not so ; it is the vast Catholic body itself, and it only, which affords an arena for both combatants in that awful, never- dying duel. It is necessary for the very life of religion, viewed in its large operations and its history, that the warfare should be incessantly carried on. Every exercise of Infallibility is brought out into act by an intense and varied operation of the Reason, both as its ally and as its 14 My Mind as a Catholic opponent, and provokes again, when it has done its work a reaction of Reason against it ; and, as in a civil polity the State exists and endures by means of the rivalry and collision, the encroachments and defeats of its constituent parts, so in like manner Catholic Christendom is no simple exhibition of religious absolutism, but presents a continuous picture of Authority and Private Judgment alternately advancing and retreating as the ebb and flow of the tide it is a vast assemblage of human beings with wilful intel- lects and wild passions, brought together into one by the beauty and the Majesty of a Superhuman Power,—into what may be called a large reformatory or training-school not as if into a hospital or into a prison, not in order to be sent to bed, not to be buried alive, but (if I may changemy metaphor) brought together as if into some moral factory, for the melting, refining, and moulding, by an incessant, noisy process, of the raw material of human nature, so excellent, so dangerous, so capable of divine purposes. St. Paul says in one place that his Apostolical power is given him to edification, and not to destruction. There can be no better account of the Infallibility of the Church, it is a supply for a need, and it does not go beyond that need. Its object is, and its effect also, not to enfeeble the freedom or vigour of human thought in religious specula- tion, but to resist and control its extravagance. What have been its great works ? All of them in the distinct province of theology to put down Arianism, Eutychian- ism Pelagiamsm, Manichaeism, Lutheranism, Jansenism. Su + h ^ t le kroad result of its action in the past ; —and now as to the securities which are given us that so it ever will act in time to come. , ^! rst ’ Infallibility cannot act outside of a definite circle of though.., and it must in all its decisions, or definitions, they are called, profess to be keeping within it. The great truths of the moral law, of natural religion, and of - postolical faith, are both its boundary and its foundation it must not go beyond them, and it must ever appeal to them. Boih its subject-matter, and its articles in that subject-matter, are fixed. And it must ever profess to be guided by Scripture and by tradition. It must refer to 15My Mind as a Catholic the particular Apostolic truth which it is enforcing, or (what is called) defining. Nothing, then, can be presented to me, in time to come, as part of the faith, but what I ought already to have received, and hitherto have been kept from receiving (if so), merely because it has not been brought home to me. Nothing can be imposed upon me different in kind from what I hold already,—much less contrary to it. The new truth which is promulgated, if it is to be called new, must be at least homogeneous, cognate, implicit, viewed relatively to the old truth. It must be what I may even have guessed, or wished, to be included in the Apostolic revelation ; and at least it will be of such a character, that my thoughts readily concur in it or coalesce with it, as soon as I hear it. Perhaps I and others actually have always believed it, and the only question which is now decided in my behalf, is, that I have hence- forth the satisfaction of having to believe, that I have only been holding all along what the Apostles held before me. Let me take the doctrine which Protestants consider our greatest difficulty, that of the Immaculate Conception. Here I entreat the reader to recollect my main drift, which is this : I have no difficulty in receiving the doctrine ; and that, because it so intimately harmonizes with that circle of recognized dogmatic truths, into which it has been recently received ;—but if I have no difficulty, why may not another have no difficulty also ? why may not a hundred ? a thousand ? Now I am sure that Catholics in general have not any intellectual difficulty at all on the subject of the Immaculate Conception ; and that there is no reason why they should. Priests have no difficulty. You tell me that they ought to have a difficulty ;—but they have not. Be large-minded enough to believe, that men may reason and feel very differently from yourselves ; how is it that men, when left to themselves, fall into such various forms of religion, except that there are various types of mind among them, very distinct from each other ? From my testimony then about myself, if you believe it, judge of others also who are Catholics : we do not find the difficul- ties which you do in the doctrines which we hold ; we have no intellectual difficulty in that doctrine in particular, which you call a novelty of this day. We priests need not 16 My Mind as a Catholic be hypocrites, though we be called upon to believe in the Immaculate Conception. To that large class of minds, who believe in Christianity after our manner,—in the par- ticular temper, spirit, and light (whatever word is used), in which Catholics believe it,—there is no burden at all in holding that the Blessed Virgin was conceived without original sin ; indeed, it is a simple fact to say, that Catholics have not come to believe it because it is defined, but that it was defined because they believed it. So far from the definition in 1854 being a tyrannical in- fliction on the Catholic world, it was received every where on its promulgation with the greatest enthusiasm. It was in consequence of the unanimous petition, presented from all parts of the Church to the Holy See, in behalf of an ex cathedra declaration that the doctrine was Apostolic, that it was declared so to be. I never heard of one Catholic having difficulties in receiving the doctrine, whose faith on other grounds was not already suspicious. Of course there were grave and good men, who were made anxious by the doubt whether it could be formally proved to be Apostolical either by Scripture or tradition, and who accordingly, though believing it themselves, did not see how it could be defined by authority and imposed upon all Catholics as a matter of faith ; but this is another matter. The point in question is, whether the doctrine is a burden. I believe it to be none. So far from it being so, I sincerely think that St. Bernard and St. Thomas, who scrupled at it in their day, had they lived into this, would have rejoiced to accept it for its own sake. Their difficulty, as I view it, consisted in matters of words, ideas, and arguments. They thought the doctrine inconsistent with other doctrines ; and those who defended it in that age had not that pre- cision in their view of it, which has been attained by means of the long disputes of the centuries which followed. And in this want of precision lay the difference of opinion, and the controversy. Now the instance which I have been taking suggests another remark ; the number of those (so called) new doctrines will not oppress us, if it takes eight centuries to promulgate even one of them. Such is about the length of time through which the preparation has been carried on My Mind as a Catholic 17 for the definition of the Immaculate Conception. This of course is an extraordinary case ; but it is difficult to say what is ordinary, considering how few are the formal occa- sions on which the voice of Infallibility has been solemnly lifted up. It is to the Pope in Ecumenical Council that we look, as to the normal seat of Infallibility : now there have been only eighteen such Councils since Christianity was,—an average of one to a century,—and of these Councils some passed no doctrinal decree at all, others were employed on only one, and many of them were concerned with only elementary points of the Creed. The Council of Trent embraced a large field of doctrine certainly ; but I should apply to its Canons a remark contained in that University Sermon of mine, which has been so ignorantly criticized in the pamphlet which has been the occasion of this volume ;—I there have said that the various verses of the Athanasian Creed are only repetitions in various shapes of one and the same idea ; and in like manner, the Tridentine Decrees are not isolated from each other, but are occupied in bringing out in detail, by a number of separate declarations, as if into bodily form, a few necessary truths. I should make the same remark on the various theological censures, promulgated by Popes, which the Church has received, and on their dogmatic decisions general!}?. I own that at first sight those decisions seem from their number to be a greater burden on the faith of individuals than are the Canons of Councils ; still I do not believe that in matter of fact they are so at all, and I give this reason for it :—it is not that a Catholic, layman or priest, is indifferent to the subject, or, from a sort of reck- lessness, will accept any thing that is placed before him, or is willing, like a lawyer, to speak according to his brief, but that in such condemnations the Holy See is engaged, for the most part, in repudiating one or two great lines of error, such as Lutheranism or Jansenism, principally ethical not doctrinal, which are divergent from the Catholic mind, and that it is but expressing what any good Catholic, of fair abilities, though unlearned, would say himself, from common and sound sense, if the matter could be put before him. Now I will go on in fairness to say what I think is a 18 My Mind as a Catholic great trial to the Reason, when confronted with that august prerogative of the Catholic Church of which I have been speaking. I enlarged just now upon the concrete shape and circumstances, under which pure infallible authority presents itself to the Catholic. That authority has the prerogative of an indirect jurisdiction on subject-matters which lie beyond its own proper limits, and it most reason- ably has such a jurisdiction. It could not act in its own province, unless it had a right to act out of it. It could not properly defend religious truth, without claiming for that truth what may be called its pomceria ; or, to take another illustration, without acting as we act, as a nation, in claiming as our own, not only the land on which we live, but what are called British waters. The Catholic Church claims, not only to judge infallibly on religious questions, but to animadvert on opinions in secular matters which bear upon religion, on matters of philosophy, of science, of literature, of history, and it demands our sub- mission to her claim. It claims to censure books, to silence authors, and to forbid discussions. In this province, taken as a whole, it does not so much speak doctrinally, as enforce measures of discipline. It must of course be obeyed without a word, and perhaps in process of time it will tacitly recede from its own injunctions. In such cases the question of faith does not come in at all ; for what is matter of faith is true for all times, and never can be unsaid. Nor does it at all follow, because there is a gift of infallibility in the Catholic Church, that therefore the parties who are in possession of it are in all their proceedings infallible. “ O, it is excellent," says the poet, “ to have a giant's strength, but tyrannous, to use it like a giant." I think history supplies us with instances in the Church, where legitimate power has been harshly used. To make such admission is no more than saying that the divine treasure, in the words of the Apostle, is “in earthen vessels ; " nor does it follow that the substance of the acts of the ruling power is not right and expedient, because its manner may have been faulty. Such high authorities act by means of instruments ; we know how such instruments claim for themselves the name of their principals, who thus get the credit of faults which really are not theirs, 19My Mind as a Catholic But granting all this to an extent greater than can with any show of reason be imputed to the ruling power in the Church, what difficulty is there in the fact of this want of prudence or moderation more than can be urged, with far greater justice, against Protestant communities and insti- tutions ? What is there in it to make us hypocrites, if it has not that effect upon Protestants ? We are called upon, not to profess any thing, but to submit and be silent, as Protestant Churchmen have before now obeyed the royal command to abstain from certain theological questions. Such injunctions as I have been contemplating are laid merely upon our actions, not upon our thoughts. How, for instance, does it tend to make a man a hypocrite, to be for- bidden to publish a libel ? his thoughts are as free as before : authoritative prohibitions may tease and irritate, but they have no bearing whatever upon the exercise of reason. So much at first sight ; but I will go on to say further, that, in spite of all that the most hostile critic may urge about the encroachments or severities of high ecclesiastics, in times past, in the use of their power, I think that the event has shown after all, that they were mainly in the right, and that those whom they were hard upon were mainly in the wrong. I love, for instance, the name of Origen : I will not listen to the notion that so great a soul was lost ; but I am quite sure that, in the contest between his doctrine and followers and the ecclesiastical power, his opponents were right, and he was wrong. Yet who can speak with patience of his enemy and the enemy of St. John Chrysostom, that Theophilus, bishop of Alexandria ? who can admire or revere Pope Vigilius ? And here another consideration presents itself to my thoughts. In reading ecclesiastical history, when I was an Anglican, it used to be forcibly brought home to me, how the initial error of what afterwards became heresy was the urging forward some truth against the prohibition of authority at an un- seasonable time. There is a time for every thing, and many a man desires a reformation of an abuse, or the fuller development of a doctrine, or the adoption of a particular policy, but forgets to ask himself whether the right time for it is come : and, knowing that there is no one who will be doing any thing towards its accomplish- 20 My Mind as a Catholic ment in his own lifetime unless he does it himself, he will not listen to the voice of authority, and he spoils a good work in his own century, in order that another man, as yet unborn, may not have the opportunity of bringing it happily to perfection in the next. He may seem to the world to be nothing else than a bold champion for the truth and a martyr to free opinion, when he is just one of those persons whom the competent authority ought to silence ; and, though the case may not fall within that subject-matter in which that authority is infallible, or the formal conditions of the exercise of that gift may be want- ing, it is clearly the duty of authority to act vigorously in the case. Yet its act will go down to posterity as an instance of a tyrannical interference with private judg- ment, and of the silencing of a reformer, and of a base love of corruption or error ; and it will show still less to advantage, if the ruling power happens in its proceedings to evince any defect of prudence or consideration. And all those who take the part of that ruling authority will be considered as time-servers, or indifferent to the cause of uprightness and truth ; while, on the other hand, the said authority may be accidentally supported by a violent ultra party, which exalts opinions into dogmas, and has it prin- cipally at heart to destroy every school of thought but its own. Such a state of things may be provoking and discouraging at the time, in the case of two classes of persons ; of moderate men who wish to make differences in religious opinion as little as they fairly can be made ; and of such as keenly perceive, and are honestly eager to remedy, existing evils—evils, of which divines in this or that foreign country know nothing at all, and which even at home, where they exist, it is not every one who has the means of estimating. This is a state of things both of past time and of the present. We live in a wonderful age ; the enlargement of the circle of secular knowledge just now is simply a bewilderment, and the more so, because it has the promise of continuing, and that with greater rapidity, and more signal results. Now these dis- coveries, certain or probable, have in matter of fact an indirect bearing upon religious opinions, and the question 21My Mind as a Catholic arises how are the respective claims of Revelation and of Natural Science to be adjusted. Few minds in earnest can remain at ease without some sort of rational grounds for their religious belief ; to reconcile theory and fact is almost an instinct of the mind. When then a flood of facts, ascertained or suspected, comes pouring in upon us, with a multitude of others in prospect, all believers in Revelation, be they Catholic or not, are roused to consider their bearing upon themselves, both for the honour of God, and from tenderness for those many souls who, in conse- quence of the confident tone of the schools of secular knowledge, are in danger of being led away into a bottom- less liberalism of thought. I am not going to criticize here that vast body of men, in the mass, who at this time would profess to be liberals in religion ; and who look towards the discoveries of the age, certain or in progress, as their informants, direct or indirect, as to what they shall think about the unseen and the future. The Liberalism which gives a colour to society now, is very different from that character of thought which bore the name thirty or forty years ago. Now it is scarcely a party ; it is the educated lay world. When I was young, I knew the word first as giving name to a periodical, set up by Lord Byron and others. Now, as then, I have no sympathy with the philosophy of Byron. Afterwards, Liberalism was the badge of a theological school, of a dry and repulsive character, not very dangerous in itself, though dangerous as opening the door to evils which it did not itself either anticipate or comprehend. At present it is nothing else than that deep, plausible scepticism, ol which I spoke above, as being the development of human reason, as practically exercised by the natural man. The Liberal religionists of this day are a very mixed body, and therefore I am not intending to speak against them. There may be, and doubtless is, in the hearts of some or many of them a real antipathy or anger against revealed truth, which it is distressing to think of. Again ; in many men of science or literature there may be an animosity arising from almost a personal feeling ; it being a matter of party, a point of honour, the excitement of a game, or a satisfaction to the soreness or annoyance occa- 22 My Mind as a Catholic sioned by the acrimony or narrowness of apologists for religion, to prove that Christianity or that Scripture is un- trustworthy. Many scientific and literary men, on the other hand, go on, I am confident, in a straightforward impartial way, in their own province and on their own line of thought, without any disturbance from religious difficulty in them- selves, or any wish at all to give pain to others by the result of their investigations. It would ill become me, as if I were afraid of truth of any kind, to blame those who puisue secular facts, by means of the reason which God has given them, to their logical conclusions : or to be angry with science, because religion is bound in duty to take cognizance of its teaching. But putting these particular classes of men aside, as having no special call on the sympathy of the Catholic, of course he does most deeply enter into the feelings of a fourth and large class of men, in the educated portions of society, of religious and sincere minds, who are simply perplexed,—frightened or rendered desperate, as the case may be,—by the utter confusion into which late discoveries or speculations have thrown their most elementary ideas of religion. Who does not feel for such men ? who can have one unkind thought of them ? I take up in their behalf St. Augustine’s beautiful words, Illi in vos saeviant,” etc. Let them be fierce with you who have no experience of the difficulty with which error is discriminated from truth, and the way of life is found amid the illusions of the world. How many a Catholic has in his thoughts followed such men, many of them so good, so true, so noble ! how often has the wish risen in his heart that some one from among his own people should come forward as the champion of revealed truth against its opponents ! Various persons. Catholic and Protestant, have asked me to do so myself ; but I had several strong difficulties in the way. One of the greatest is this, that at the moment it is so difficult to say precisely what it is that is to be encountered and overthrown. I am far from denying that scientific knowledge is really growing, but it is by fits and starts ; hypotheses rise and fall ; it is diffi- cult to anticipate which of them will keep their ground, and what the state of knowledge in relation to them wil] be from year to year. In this condition of things, it has 23My Mind as a Catholic seemed to me to be very undignified for a Catholic to com- mit himself to the work of chasing what might turn out to be phantoms, and, in behalf of some special objections, to be ingenious in devising a theory, which, before it was completed, might have to give place to some theory newer still, from the fact that those former objections had already come to nought under the uprising of others. It seemed to be especially a time, in which Christians had a call to be patient, in which they had no other way of helping those who were alarmed, than that of exhorting them to have a little faith and fortitude, and to “ beware/' as the poet says, “ of dangerous steps." This seemed so clear to me, the more I thought of the matter, as to make me surmise, that if I attempted what had so little promise in it, I should find that the highest Catholic Authority was against the attempt, and that I should have spent my time and my thought, in doing what either it would be imprudent to bring before the public at all, or what, did I do so, would only complicate matters further which were already complicated, without my interference, more than enough. And I interpret recent acts of that authority as fulfilling my expectation ; I interpret them as tying the hands of a controversialist, such as I should be, and teach- ing us that true wisdom, which Moses inculcated on his people, when the Egyptians were pursuing them, “ Fear ye not, stand still ; the Lord shall fight for you, and ye shall hold your peace." And so far from finding a diffi- culty in obeying in this case, I have cause to be thankful and to rejoice to have so clear a direction in a matter of difficulty. But if we would ascertain with correctness the real course of a principle, we must look at it at a certain dis- tance, and as history represents it to us. Nothing carried on by human instruments, but has its irregularities, and affords ground for criticism, when minutely scrutinized in matters of detail. I have been speaking of that aspect of the action of an infallible authority, which is most open to invidious criticism from those who view it from without ; I have tried to be fair, in estimating what can be said to its disadvantage, as witnessed at a particular time in the Catholic Church, and now I wish its adversaries to be 24 My Mind as a Catholic equally fair in their judgment upon its historical character. Can, then, the infallible authority, with any show of reason, be said in fact to have destroyed the energy of the Catholic intellect ? Let it be observed, I have not here to speak of any conflict which ecclesiastical authority has had with science, for this simple reason, that conflict there has been none ; and that, because the secular sciences, as they now exist, are a novelty in the world, and there has been no time yet for a history of relations between theology and these new methods of knowledge, and indeed the Church may be said to have kept clear of them, as is proved by the constantly cited case of Galileo. Here “ exceptio pro- bat regulam ” : for it is the one stock argument. Again, I have not to speak of any relations of the Church to the new sciences, because my simple question all along has been whether the assumption of infallibility by the proper authority is adapted to make me a hypocrite, and till that authority passes decrees on pure physical subjects and calls on me to subscribe them (which it will never do, because it has not the power), it has no tendency to interfere by any of its acts with my private judgment on those points. The simple question is, whether authority has so acted upon the reason of individuals, that they can have no opinion of their own, and have but an alternative of slavish super- stition or secret rebellion of heart ; and I think the whole history of theology puts an absolute negative upon such a supposition. It is hardly necessary to argue out so plain a point. It is individuals, and hot the Holy See, that have taken the initiative, and given the lead to the Catholic mind, in theo- logical inquiry. Indeed, it is one of the reproaches urged against the Roman Church, that it has originated nothing and has only served as a sort of remora or break in the development of doctrine. And it is an objection which I really embrace as a truth ; for such I conceive to be the main purpose of its extraordinary gift. It is said, and truly, that the Church of Rome possessed no great mind in the whole period of persecution. Afterwards for a long while, it has not a single doctor to show ; St. Leo, its first, is the teacher of one point of doctrine ; St. Gregory, who, stands at the very extremity of the first age of the Church, My Mind as a Catholic 25 has no place in dogma or philosophy. The great luminary of the western world is, as we know, St. Augustine ; he, no infallible teacher, has formed the intellect of Christian Europe ; indeed to the African Church generally we must look for the best early exposition of Latin ideas. More- over, of the African divines, the first in order of time, and not the least influential, is the strong-minded and heterodox Tertullian. Nor is the Eastern intellect, as such, without its share in the formation of the Latin teaching. The free thought of Origin is visible in the writings of the* Western Doctors, Hilary and Ambrose ; and the indepen- dent mind of Jerome has enriched his own vigorous com- mentaries on Scripture, from the stores of the scarcely orthodox Eusebius. Heretical questionings have been transmuted by the living power of the Church into salutary truths. The case is the same as regards the Ecumenical Councils. Authority in its most imposing exhibition, grave Bishops, laden with the traditions and rivalries of particular nations or places, have been guided in their decisions by the commanding genius of individuals, sometimes young and of inferior rank. Not that uninspired intellect over- ruled the superhuman gift which was committed to the Council, which would be a self-contradictory assertion, but that in that process of inquiry and deliberation, which ended in an infallible enunciation, individual reason was paramount. Thus Malchion, a mere presbyter, was the instrument of the great Council of Antioch in the third century in meeting and refuting, for the assembled Fathers, the heretical Patriarch of that see. Parallel to this instance is the influence, so well known, of a young deacon, St. Athanasius, with the 318 Fathers at Nicaea. In mediaeval times we read of St. Anselm at Bari, as the champion of the Council there held, against the Greeks. At Trent, the writings of St. Bonaventure, and, what is more to the point, the address of a priest and theologian, Salmeron, had a critical effect on some of the definitions of dogma. In some of these cases the influence might be partly moral, but in others it was that of a discursive know- ledge of ecclesiastical writers, a scientific acquaintance with theology, and a force of thought in the treatment of doctrine. 26 My Mind as a Catholic There are of course intellectual habits which theology does not tend to form, as for instance the experimental, and again the philosophical ; but that is because it is theology, not because of the gift of infallibility. But, as far as this goes, I think it could be shown that physical science on the other hand, or again mathe- matical, affords but an imperfect training for the intellect. I do not see then how any objection about the narrowness of theology comes into our question, which simply is, whether the belief in an infallible authority destroys the independence of the mind ; and I consider that the whole history of the Church, and especially the history of the theological schools, gives a negative to the accusation. There never was a time when the intellect of the educated class was more active, or rather more restless, than in the Middle Ages. And then again all through Church history from the first, how slow is authority in interfering ! Perhaps a local teacher, or a doctor in some local school, hazards a proposition, and a controversy ensues. It smoulders or burns in one place, no one inter- posing ; Rome simply lets it alone. Then it comes before a Bishop ; or some priest, or some professor in some other seat of learning takes it up ; and then there is a second stage of it. Then it comes before a University, and it may be condemned by the theological faculty. So the con- troversy proceeds year after year, and Rome is still silent. An appeal perhaps is next made to a seat of authority inferior to Rome ; and then at last after a long while it comes before the supreme power. Meanwhile the question has been ventilated and turned over and over again, and viewed on every side of it, and authority is called upon to pronounce a decision, which has already been arrived at by reason. But even then, perhaps the supreme authority hesitates to do so, and nothing is determined on the point for years : or so generally and vaguely, that the whole controversy has to be gone through again, before it is ultimately determined. It is manifest how a mode of proceeding, such as this, tends not only to the liberty, but to the courage, of the individual theologian or con- troversialist. Many a man has ideas, which he hopes are true, and useful for his day, but he is not confident about My Mind as a Catholic 27 them, and wishes to have them discussed. He is willing, or rather would be thankful, to give them up, if they can be proved to be erroneous or dangerous, and by means of controversy he obtains his end. He is answered, and he yields ; or on the contrary he finds that he is considered safe. He would not dare to do this, if he knew an authority, which was supreme and final, was watching every word he said, and made signs of assent or dissent to each sentence, as he uttered it. Then indeed he would be fighting, as the Persian soldiers, under the lash, and the freedom of his intellect might truly be said to be beaten out of him. But this has not been so :—I do not mean to say that, when controversies run high, in schools or even in small portions of the Church, an interposition may not advisably take place ; and again, questions may be of that urgent nature, that an appeal must, as a matter of duty, be made at once to the highest authority in the Church ; but if we look into the history of controversy, we shall find, I think, the general run of things to be such as I have represented it. Zosimus treated Pelagius and Coelestius with extreme for- bearance ; St. Gregory VII was equally indulgent with Berengaiius :—by reason of the very power of the Popes they have commonly been slow and moderate in their use of it. And here again is a further shelter for the legitimate exercise of the reason :—the multitude of nations which are within the fold of the Church will be found to have acted for its protection, against any narrowness, on the supposition of narrowness, in the various authorities at Rome, with whom lies the practical decision of contro- verted questions. How have the Greek traditions been respected and provided for in the later Ecumenical Councils, in spite of the countries that held them being in a state of schism ! There are important points of doctrine which have been (humanly speaking) exempted from the infallible sentence, by the tenderness with which its instru- ments, in framing it, have treated the opinions of particular places. Then, again, such national influences have a providential effect in moderating the bias which the local influences of Italy may exert upon the See of St. Peter, it stands to reason that, as the Gallican Church has in it 28 My Mind as a Catholic a French element, so Rome must have in it an element of Italy ; and it is no prejudice to the zeal and devotion with which we submit ourselves to the Holy See to admit this plainly. It seems to me, as I have been saying, that Catholicity is not only one of the notes of the Church, but, according to the divine purposes, one of its securities. I think it would be a very serious evil, which Divine Mercy avert ! that the Church should be contracted in Europe within the range of particular nationalities. It is a great idea to introduce Latin civilization into America, and to improve the Catholics there by the energy of French devotedness ; but I trust that all European races will ever have a place in the Church, and assuredly I think that the loss of the English, not to say the German element, in its composition has been a most serious misfortune. And certainly, if there is one consideration more than another which should make us English grateful to Pius the Ninth, it is that, by giving us a Church of our own, he has pre- pared the way for our own habits of mind, our own manner of reasoning, our own tastes, and our own virtues, finding a place and thereby a sanctification, in the Catholic Church. PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE CATHOLIC TRUTH SOCIE1Y, LONDON B, — February, 1922. Crown 8vo, Price is. net ; by post is. 2d. The Compleat Protestant By John Ayscough. A Series of Eight Dialogues between a Catholic and various types of Protestants . “ Shrewd and kindly and very human is the touch of a skilful hand all through these pages. Here is ‘ satire ’ of the genuine sort—healthy and biting as rock salt, and as little poisonous. To give even a few lines of the wisdom of this little book would not be fair either to the ‘ Compleat Protestant ’ or the * Incomplete Catholic 5 or indeed any- one else who says anything therein—we hope our readers will buy for themselves.” — Pax. Cloth, Crown 8vo, pp. xx, 189. Price 2s. net. The See of St. Peter THE ROCK OF THE CHURCH, THE SOURCE OF JURISDICTION, AND THE CENTRE OF UNITY. By Thomas William Allies, K.C.S.G. Fifth Edition. CONTENTS. Preface—The Primacy of St. Peter an Existing Power — The Scriptural Proof of the Primacy—The End and Office of the Primacy—The Power of the Primacy—The Church's Witness to the Primacy—St. Peter’s Primacy and the Royal Supremacy—The Effects of St. Peter’s Primacy and the Royal Supremacy. CATHOLIC TRUTH SOCIETY 72 VICTORIA STREET S W. 1 Books and Pamphlets for Anglicans Cloth, Price FOUR SHILLINGS EACH net. The Church ; or, What do Anglicans Mean by the Church ? By the Very Rev. Canon Bagshawe. The Early History of the Church of God. By Bishop Brownlow. Cloth, Price TWO SHILLINGS net. Authority. By the Rev. Luke Rivington, D.D. This volume, of which several editions have been exhausted since its first publication in 1888, was originally prepared as a reply to the then anonymous author of the book on Roman Catholic Claims , afterwards revealed as the work of Bishop Gore. In the form of an Open Letter to his Anglican antagonist, Dr. Rivington gives some of the reasons which helped to bring about his own conversion. The paper is rich in historical and patristic references and contains many valuable points for the Catholic student and controversialist. ONE SHILLING EACH (net ; wrapper). The Petrine Office : a Reply to the Rev. F. W. Puller. By H. E. Hall, M.A. England’s Breach with Rome. By His Eminence Cardinal Gasquet. A Short History of the Catholic Church in England. By the same. TWOPENCE EACH. Have Anglicans any Right to call themselves Catholics ? By H, E. Hall, M.A, Anglican Orders. By C. G. Mortimer, B.A. The Date of the Anglican Schism. By Adrian Fortescue, D.D. The Failure of Anglicanism. By F. J. Kinsman, late Protestant Bishop of Delaware, U.S.A. Authority or Private Judgement ? By H. E. Hall, M.A. Was Barlow a Bishop ? By Serjeant Bellasis. The Branch Theory. By Adrian Fortescue, D.D. Reasons for being a Catholic. By Dom Ethelbert Horne. Church Defence. (Short Papers on Anglican Controversy.) Continuity Reconsidered. By J. H. Matthews. A Talk on Continuity. By Mgr. Canon Moyes. The Conversion of England. By the Very Rev. Mgr. Benson. “How shall they Preach unless they are sent? r’ By the Rev. H. Lucas, S.J. CATHOLIC TRUTH SOCIETY 72 VICTORIA STREET S.W. 1 C 220. „ 168. „ 188. „ 219. 184. „ 4. „ 5. » 117. „ 10. „ 13. „ 170. 15 „ 222 .