College and Research Libraries B y C . A . M I L L S P A U G H The Significance of the Junior College Library in M y Educational Program C. A. Millspaugh, instructor, Frances Shimer College, Mount Carroll, III., read this paper at the meeting of the Junior College Libraries Section of the A.C.R.L., June 25, 194.2. AN Y DISCUSSION o f " s i g n i f i c a n c e " i n • connection w i t h libraries or w i t h the profession of teaching demands a definition of that much-abused w o r d . I have a strong feeling that the w o r d has become a little parcel of j a r g o n in the w o r l d of education, w h e r e w o r d s usually lose more sense than they gain w i t h the passage of seminars, conferences, and conventions. Strictly, a significant object or institution is one w h i c h betokens an essential mean- i n g ; it is a symbol of a basic ideal, an embodiment of an influential value. T o me, as a teacher or as an everyday citizen, any library means a house of knowledge, a place of experiments among knowledges, an available source of w h a t past minds have thought and present minds remember. Indeed, any fairly precise statement of the significance of the library requires of the teacher an equally precise statement of his philosophy of teaching. F o r surely the teacher must depend on the library as the merchant depends on his storehouse. T h e teacher must perceive, I feel quite sure, that he is a clerk and guide to minds that have come out of the past and that must, to live quite happily, be restored to i t — restored to it in the sense of being made aware of the extent and richness of our cultural heritage, restored by means of such tools as expert reading, precise oral and w r i t t e n expression, restored, as a con- sequence, to a pattern of spirit designed by the great minds of the past. N o teacher, of course, ever achieves this end. B u t he must make his w a y , if ever so slightly, t o w a r d it. H e must think out practical means of exposing student mind to cultural heritage. H e must g r a t e f u l l y adopt, or resolutely reject, past teaching methods. H i s only method can be, at last, in spite of all the fine textbooks on the subject, the result of his ingenuity and his understanding of the separate needs and hungers and dislikes and indifferences of the w i l l i n g , or u n w i l l i n g , minds that challenge positive achievement. T h e success of such enterprise is quali- fied and sometimes definitely determined by the teacher's use of the library. It should be palpably a commonplace in this company to say that the teacher w h o feels that classroom and textbook w o r k is enough can only dismally fail to realize the true objectives of his profession. I cannot pretend to have exhausted the educational possibilities of the library. M y experience has been neither long nor 64 COLLEGE AND RESEARCH LIBRARIES varied, but even such short time has shown me that certain principles must be adopted and the practices they demand unswerv- ingly pursued. T h e s e principles rise out of the nature of the immediate educational situation. In the junior college the students have little cultural or scholarly experience. T h e y do not know their w a y about the store- house and, even after they have found their w a y , they cannot begin to appraise the differing values of the items housed there. Such a condition gives rise to the first principle—required reading. T h i s is a touchy thing. Students shy at the phrase, and even when teachers (given a measure of sensitiveness) operate on its permissible premise they do so w i t h a cer- tain hidden embarrassment. I confess candidly that I am not much deterred by such sentimental barriers. I am aware of the literature that argues free roving but I am not persuaded. I agree that there are many w a y s of getting an educa- tion, and institutionalized methods consti- tute only one w a y ; but formal education is formal education or it is futile play. T o me, formal education means a system of established disciplines—flexible enough to meet the needs of the day, inflexible enough to restore the student mind, which w e as teachers inherit from the past, to the in- tellectual and spiritual designs of solid knowledge. Required Reading in Practice I have been talking in large terms. Permit me now to describe how this dis- cipline of required reading works out in practice. A s a teacher of English compo- sition and literature, on both the high school and the college levels, and as a lec- turer in our survey of humanities on w o r l d literature, philosophy, and religion, I in- sist that my students have recognizable contact w i t h the literary and philosophical masterpieces of the past—selected, of course, according to the age and ability of the student. I require, as do the other in- structors in my institution, that the stu- dent explore a certain minimum of pages each week. In my course in the history of English literature I require that the stu- dents read and report on a minimum of f i f t y pages every week, in texts that w i l l further their biographical and historical information and in texts that w i l l give them a f u l l e r v i e w of poems, essays, and novels not completely treated in the every- day text. Reports of such reading must be carefully made in terms of content and criticism. Mimeographed forms for this purpose are housed in the library. T h e same requirements for the same reasons are made in our survey of the humanities. A s a teacher of high school senior E n g - lish it has been my desire and aim to en- courage as wide and frequent a use of the library as possible. A l m o s t daily the stu- dents have brief library w o r k to do, usually biographical in nature. B u t as climax to the course the students are held responsi- ble for a m a j o r undertaking. T h i s year, in the carrying out of this enterprise, the class w a s divided into research committees, headed by students w h o had demonstrated their ability for leadership. Each commit- tee w a s given a definite task. O n e group was to acquaint itself w i t h modern M i d d l e W e s t e r n poets, another w i t h N e w E n g - land poets, another w i t h the Imagist move- ment, another w i t h postwar poets and their moral and intellectual problems, and so on. T h e s e teams worked, on the whole, quite w e l l . A certain spirit of friendly rivalry and the stimulation that rose out of the need to report findings to the entire DECEMBER, 1942 65 class made for satisfying results. T h e library stock w a s sorely tried by this enter- prise, but not beyond the limits of the material resources of the library and the enduring patience of the librarian. In ad- dition, my high school students are encour- aged to use current periodicals, the Readers' Guide, and other indices, as w e l l as such w o r k s as the Dictionary of Na- tional Biography, not only to f u r t h e r their knowledge of classroom material but also to stimulate thinking and to provide ideas for the w r i t i n g of regular themes. A s a teacher of college freshman compo- sition, I make frequent special assignments, in the f o l l o w i n g literary forms w h i c h the student must eventually be able to analyze w i t h respectable s k i l l : the essay, the short story, the novel, the biography, the lyric poem. Special oral reports are frequently called for in each of these fields. T h e student must make his o w n w a y as much as possible. An Analysis of Literary Masterpieces T h i s year in freshman composition I instituted a new undertaking. M y class was a selected one. O n l y students of superior ability made up its personnel. A f t e r some searching of conscience, I de- termined to depart f r o m the conventional final examination. I assigned to each indi- vidual student a great masterpiece of fic- tion, and told the students that analysis of fictional structure, awareness of meth- ods of characterization, explanation of ideological themes w o u l d condition my j u d g m e n t of the quality of their achieve- ment. T h e library w a s d r a w n on f o r such books as the f o l l o w i n g : War and Peace, The Brothers Karamazov, Budden- brooks, Pride and Prejudice, Wuthering Heights, Crime and Punishment, and many others of like quality. T h e results w e r e good. Required reading and library cooperation gave these students experiences that they w i l l never forget, experiences, in- deed, w h i c h many of them some day w i l l repeat w i t h pleasure. W i t h o u t require- ment these people w o u l d , quite naturally, postpone the reading of such books. T h e first fear is now over. T h e y are ready for mature reading. T h e next principle that rises out of stu- dent interest and need is recreational read- ing. W e use t w o specific devices for en- couraging w i d e general reading among our students. T h e first is the monthly book report w h i c h is w r i t t e n in the classroom w i t h o u t benefit of text. T h e second is an honors reading c r e d i t — g i v e n to students w h o successfully complete a stipulated pro- gram of general reading. T h e standards are h i g h ; no vague perusal of the w o r k of mediocrities is permitted. T h i s , then, is a brief and, I fear, in- adequate sketch of my use of the library, of my single attempt to lead my students to an understanding and appreciation of w h a t the library storehouse can give. I try to make it clear to my students that a single book can change one's w h o l e w a y of life and can assign to the f u t u r e new direction t o w a r d intellectual and spiritual delight. T h e library w i l l be the student's educa- tional institution in days w h e n the class- room and its rigors are forgotten. If the students find the library a treasury of de- light through the years of school, they w i l l find it a source of orderly pleasure in years hereafter. 66 COLLEGE AND RESEARCH LIBRARIES