College and Research Libraries CONFERENCE ON LIBRARY SPECIALIZATION ?N[ew Tor\ City, May iyi4, ON M a y 13 and 14, a conference of approximately forty librarians, deans of graduate schools and executive secre- taries of learned societies or councils was held in N e w York on the subject of specialization by American libraries in the acquisition of research collections. T h e conference was called by the American Library Association Board on Resources of American Libraries. T h r o u g h the courtesy of the Director of T h e N e w York Public Library, the conference met in the Trustees Room of that library, the afternoon session of M a y 13, being held at the H a r v a r d Club. T h e purpose of the conference was to consider the great variety of problems created by the enormous increase in the publication of books, government docu- ments, periodicals, and other library ma- terials. T h e r e was general agreement from the outset that the world of printed and other forms of recorded knowledge has become so vast that these problems can no longer be solved by the independent efforts of the various libraries of the country. A totally new point of view must be developed, namely, that each li- brary is to serve not only its own immedi- ate constituency but regional and national interests as well, benefiting in turn from the reciprocal services of the other libraries of the country. T h i s involves specializa- tion by each library in the development of its book collection. Paul Vanderbilt re- ferred, for example, to figures which have been published by Fremont Rider as to the prospective size of such a library as 1 S u m m a r y s t a t e m e n t p r e p a r e d by H a r v i e B r a n s - comb, f a c u l t y m e m b e r , D u k e U n i v e r s i t y . 1 9 4 1 1 that of Yale University, if its growth continues at the rate shown in the past. T h e figures are not excessive, he declared, but the anticipated growth is to be ex- pected on the basis of past experience. T h e same speaker emphasized the necessity for a reworking of the basic conception of the research library. American li- braries have been set up as independent units, and this conception has stamped itself on every one of their operations, particularly their cataloging and acquisi- tion processes. These must be re-examined, if the institution is to function most effec- tively in this new cooperative era. T h e proposal that the various libraries of the country undertake to develop specialized collections called for a defini- tion of specialization. M r . Van Hoesen, who spoke to this point, declared that this could not be supplied in a universally ap- plicable form, but that a definition or description of particular special collections could be formulated. T h i s would be ( a ) in terms of the field of collecting; ( b ) in terms of the policy adopted within the field, whether inclusive, selective, or unde- fined ; ( c ) in terms of its completeness or adequacy for research; ( d ) in terms of its comparative strength with reference to standard bibliographies or to other col- lections; (e) in terms of its rate of growth or of adequate financial support for con- tinued development. For the purposes of the conference, the term specialization was used in the sense of collections on par- ticular subjects that are reasonably ex- haustive, and which are assured continuous financial support. T h a t other obligations would rest on 348 COLLEGE AND RESEARCH ) L I B R A R I E S libraries taking part in such a program besides that of collecting in specified areas, was brought out in the discussion. An obvious one would be to refuse to dupli- cate collections already available in other libraries. A second was the advisability in many instances of transferring collec- tions or portions of collections to other libraries. I t was clearly recognized that such proposals as these involve, for those libraries connected with universities, ques- tions of educational policy and of legality for which librarians are not primarily re- sponsible. T h e conference requested, therefore, that the Board on Resources of American Libraries address to the Associa- tion of American Universities a communi- cation urging that it give consideration to the problem considered by this conference and to the educational issues related to it. T h e questions whether an effort to initiate a program of specialization on the part of American libraries should await the collection of more information as to present holdings, whether experimentation should be carried out first on a regional basis before being considered nationally, and whether initial efforts along this line should be confined to any group of li- braries, occasioned much discussion. It seemed to be agreed that while more in- formation as to special holdings was needed there was available through union catalogs and published bibliographies a body of information sufficient to justify and sup- port many agreements between libraries even while more data was being secured. It was also felt that attention should be kept focused on the national character of the problem. A number of regional pro- grams subsidiary to the national plan are already in existence and others will no doubt develop. Regions with limited re- sources should also be encouraged, it was felt, to develop special interests. O n the issue whether one collection on certain subjects might not be adequate for the entire nation, W . W . Bishop stressed the factor of insurance. One could not forget the Chicago fire, he remarked. T h e ele- ment of insurance would justify, he felt, the duplication of every important collec- tion at least in one other locality. T h e best approach to specific agreements of the sort under consideration was felt to be primarily through the libraries constitut- ing the membership of the Association of Research libraries. T h e conference laid upon the Board on Resources of American Libraries the responsibility of continuing the study of the problems discussed and of proposing practical steps in the direction of library specialization. Carl M . W h i t e presented to the conference at its last meeting a statement of general principles in accord- ance with which a program of specializa- tion should be developed. T h r o u g h o u t the discussions it was clear that the Library of Congress was regarded by the conference as central in any move- ment of the sort under discussion. T h e conference urged that every effort be made to develop fully the Library of Congress Union Catalog, and expressed the hope that means would be found to publish in book form the author catalog of the library. M r . MacLeish, who was present the first day, described the new Experimental Division of Library Coop- eration in the Library of Congress. I t was set up, he explained, to aid the li- braries in developing cooperative agree- ments, though not to dictate them. T h e conference expressed its belief that the agency would be of marked assistance. T h i s summary statement is by no means (Continued on page 367) SEPTEMBER, 1941 349 Readings in Business Administration MA R I A N C. M A N L E Y , business branch librarian, Newark Public Library, supplies the following annotated list of recent articles in the field of business administration which have marked application to libraries. Benge, E. J. Job Evaluation and Merit Rating: a Manual of Procedures. N a - tional Foreman's Institute, Inc., Deep River, Conn. 1941. 73p. plus 26 charts. $7.50. T h e first p a r t d i s c u s s e s n e w s o l u t i o n s , j o b e v a l u a - t i o n m e t h o d s , t h e f a c t o r c o m p a r i s o n m e t h o d , u s i n g t h e j o b c o m p a r i s o n s c a l e , e t c . M e r i t r a t i n g i s c o v - e r e d i n t h e s e c o n d p a r t a n d a b i b l i o g r a p h y i s i n - c l u d e d a f t e r e a c h s e c t i o n . P a r t t h r e e c o n t a i n s i l l u s - t r a t e d c h a r t s a n d c a s e m a t e r i a l , w h i c h w i l l e n a b l e t h e r e a d e r t o b e t t e r u n d e r s t a n d a n d a p p l y t h e p r i n c i p l e s d i s c u s s e d . Jackson, J. J. "Organization Plans." Per- sonnel Journal 19:378-84, Apr. 1941. T h e g e n e r a l p r i n c i p l e s a n d b e n e f i t s o f a d e f i n i t e o r g a n i z a t i o n p l a n a r e d i s c u s s e d f r o m b o t h t h e e x e c u - t i v e ' s a n d w o r k e r ' s v i e w p o i n t s . Knowles, A . S. "Measuring Salesmen's Performance." Advanced Management 4:50-57, Apr.-June 1941. M e r i t r a t i n g a s a m e t h o d t o a v o i d s n a p j u d g m e n t a n d t o p r o m o t e b e t t e r u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f w o r k a n d m e n i s d i s c u s s e d i n r e l a t i o n t o s a l e s m e n . T h e q u a l i t i e s c o n s i d e r e d a r e a s i m p o r t a n t i n t h e l i b r a r y field. T h e m e t h o d s d i s c u s s e d m a y b e a s e f f e c t i v e l y a p p l i e d . Mapel, E. B. "Stimulating Employee Self- Improvement." Personnel Journal 19: 316-24, M a r . 1941. T h e u s e o f q u e s t i o n n a i r e s o f t h e " t r u e a n d f a l s e " a n d " m u l t i p l e c h o i c e " t y p e a r e d i s c u s s e d a s a m e a n s o f s t i m u l a t i n g e m p l o y e e s ' i n t e r e s t i n a n d i m p r o v i n g t h e i r k n o w l e d g e a n d p e r f o r m a n c e o f t h e i r j o b s . S a m p l e s a n d t e s t s a r e g i v e n . Riegel, J. W . Salary Determination. Uni- versity of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1940. 278p. $3. A p r a c t i c a l a i d i n a d j u s t i n g t h e s a l a r i e s o f e m - p l o y e e s a c c o r d i n g t o t h e r e l a t i v e d i f f i c u l t y a n d i m - p o r t a n c e o f t h e i r p o s i t i o n s a n d t h e i r p r o f i c i e n c y . E x p l a i n s h o w t o m a k e a s a l a r y s u r v e y , h o w t o d e t e r m i n e k e y s a l a r i e s i n a s a l a r y s c h e d u l e , h o w t o a n a l y z e a n d v a l u e u n c o m m o n p o s i t i o n s o f a r o u t i n e t y p e , h o w t o d e v e l o p p e r f o r m a n c e r a t i n g p l a n s , h o w t o l i n k p e r f o r m a n c e r a t i n g t o j o b v a l u a - t i o n , a n d h o w t o a p p r a i s e m a n a g e r i a l a n d t e c h n i c a l p o s i t i o n s . B a s e d u p o n a n i n v e s t i g a t i o n o f p r a c t i c e s i n f o r t y s e l e c t e d c o m p a n i e s . Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co. Industrial Relations Manual. Part I. Jan. 16, 1940. A n i l l u m i n a t i n g a n a l y s i s o n s a l a r y a n d e m p l o y m e n t p o l i c i e s , g r o u p i n g o c c u p a t i o n s a s u n s k i l l e d , s k i l l e d , i n t e r p r e t a t i v e , c r e a t i v e , e x e c u t i v e , a d m i n i s t r a t i v e , a n d p o l i c y . P o s i t i o n s f a l l i n g i n e a c h g r o u p a r e _ n o t e d a n d t h e g r o u p i n g p e r m i t s a q u i c k a p p r o x i m a t i o n o f t h e r e l a t i v e i m p o r t a n c e o f a n e w p o s i t i o n u n r e l a t e d t o o t h e r s . Wilking, S. V . "Reading Ability and Ex- ecutive Ability." Personnel Journal 12:34- 37, M a y 1941. T h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f s p e e d i n g u p t h e e x e c u t i v e ' s f u n c t i o n i n g b y m e a n s o f i m p r o v i n g h i s r e a d i n g s k i l l i s r e l a t e d t o t h e p r e s e n t n e e d f o r e f f i c i e n c y d u r i n g t h e n a t i o n a l e m e r g e n c y . Conference on Library Specialisation (Continued from page 349) a complete record of the topics considered. M r . M c M u r t r i e brought forward pro- posals for developing by cooperative means adequate subject bibliographies. T h e sub- ject of cooperative storage warehouses, with reports concerning progress of these projects at Boston and Chicago, was given attention. T h e relationship of micro- photography to library specialization was not ignored, though there seemed to be an undercurrent of feeling that salvation was not to be awaited from any mechan- ical device. A complete stenographic rec- ord of the conference proceedings is available on microfilm. Plans for publica- tion in edited form are in process. SEPTEMBER, 1941 367