524  College & Research Libraries November 2012

In the September 2012 article "Give ’Em What They Want: A One-Year Study of 
Unmediated Patron-Driven Acquisition of e-Books" by Fischer, Wright, Clatanoff, 
Barton, and Shreeves, the "Total Ebrary Usage (%)" column of the "50–100+" row was 
transposed. The correct figure is 0.8 as noted below:

We regret the error.

Errata

Table 9
Total ebrary Usage for 11 Months

User  
Sessions

Titles Used Total ebrary 
Usage (%)

1 3,049 32.5
2 2,580 27.5
3–5 1,982 21.1
6–10 1,042 11.1
11–49 661 7.0
50–100+ 73 0.8
Total 9,387  

or-negative-ones-for-that-matter/; Shankar Vedantam, “Five Ways to Spot a Fake Online Review, 
Restaurant or Otherwise,” The Salt: NPR’s Food Blog, September 12, 2012, accessed October 5, 2012, 
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2012/09/12/160755775/five-ways-to-spot-a-fake-online-review-
restaurant-or-otherwise.

 5. Lawrence Souder, “The Ethics of Scholarly Peer Review: A Review of the Literature,” 
Learned Publishing 24 (2011): 55–72, accessed October 5, 2012, doi: 10.1087/20110109.

 6. Richard Horton (2000), as quoted in Souder, “The Ethics of Scholarly Peer Review,” 55; 
Scott Jaschik, “Journal Editors Promote Pledge of Ethics,” Inside Higher Education, June 12, 2012, 
accessed October 5, 2012, http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/06/12/journal-editors-
promote-pledge-ethics.

 7. Joseph Branin, and others, “Best Practices: A Guide to Best Practices for Editors of Library 
and Information Science Journals,” September 2010, accessed October 5, 2012, http://www.lis-
editors.org/best-practices/index.shtml; Joseph Branin, and others, “A Statement of Ethics for 
Editors of Library and Information Science Journals,” September 2010, accessed October 5, 2012, 
http://www.lis-editors.org/ethics/index.shtml.

 8. Gary Marchionini, “Reviewer Merits and Review Control in an Age of Electronic Manu-
script Management Systems,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems 26, doi: 1402256.1402264.

 9.  “Open Peer Review,” Wikipedia, accessed October 5, 2012, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Open_peer_review.

 10. “Overview: Nature’s Peer Review Trial,” December 2006, accessed October 5, 2012, http://
www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05535.html; “What is Open Peer Review, as 
Operated by the Medical Journals in the BMC Series?,” accessed October 5, 2012, http://www.
biomedcentral.com/authors/authorfaq/medical.

 11. Patricia Cohen, “Scholars Test Web Alternative to Peer Review,” The New York Times, Au-
gust 23, 2010, accessed October 5, 2012, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/24/arts/24peer.html; 
Beth Mole, “The Future of Peer Review in the Humanities is Wide Open,” The Chronicle of Higher 
Education, August 13, 2012, accessed October 5, 2012, http://chronicle.com/article/The-Future-of-
Peer-Review-in/133563/.