College and Research Libraries KEYES D. METCALF Six Influential Academic and Research Librarians IT HAS BEEN DIFFICULT to select a half dozen persons as subjects for this arti- cle, because I have known or known about so many important librarians dur- ing my library career, which began in 1902. I find on checking that I have met seventy-nine of the ninety presidents of the ALA in the past 100 years and had indirect connection with three of the other eleven. I shall simplify the ar- rangement of my story by dealing with the individuals concerned in order of their birth dates. I never met two of the men included here; they died before my library career commenced, though after I was born. With each of the four oth- ers I had professional dealings and friendly associations for an average of over forty years. WILLIAM FREDERICK PooLE William Frederick Poole was the sec- ond president of the American Library Association. His term began in 1885, and he was reelected the following year, making him one of the four men who have held that office for more than a. one-year term. The others were his prede- cessor, Justin Winsor, Melvil Dewey, and Herbert Putnam. It had been hoped that the 1853 Library Conference, at which Mr. Poole had an important part, would be the first of a series of annual occurrences. But, because of a series of mishaps, the next meeting did not come until the 1876 conference. Poole had 332 I William Frederick Poole the distinction of being the only librari- an who had an important p;1rt in both of these meetings. He was born in De- cember 1821, one month before my fa- ther's birth. Lack of funds delayed his graduation from Yale until 1849. While going to college, he served as librarian of the Brothers in Unity Society Li- brary, and by the time he graduated he had already published Poole's Index, a deservedly famous reference work which, in its later editions, is still in use. .~ After Poole's death, in 1894, his index was continued for some seventeen years, in one form or another, edited by Wil- liam I. Fletcher, one of Dewey's suc- cessors at Amherst, on a partially coop- erative basis. It was then found that it could no longer compete with H. W. Wilson's Readers' Guide. My library sis- ter, Antoinnette Metcalf, prepared the index for the Harper's Monthly during the last of these years. Soon after I took charge of the stacks in the New York Public Library in 1913, I was asked by Harry Miller Lydenberg to go down to the New York Mercantile Library and arrange to bring back with me that library's gift of a large quanti- ty of volumes. The library had stored them, because of lack of space, on the tops of bookcases in great piles three feet high. Over them I found about an inch of dust so I bought a pair of over- alls before I brought them down from their perches. Among them were many, comparatively scarce, bound volumes in- dexed in Poole, that the New York Pub- lic Library did not have. Most of these were published before the Astor Li- brary was founded in the middle of the last century. In checking, I found that the New York Public Library had lacked, surprisingly, well over 1,100 vol- umes that were indexed in Poole, and several hundred of these were among the Mercantile Library's discards. I immediately decided to take on as a special project an attempt to complete the library's collection of Poole sets and began to check the current second-hand book catalogs and continued this as what might be called my ijrst "research project," until I left the library in 1937. By this time the missing volumes had been reduced to well under fifty. In the meantime a second large windfall had come with volumes transferred to the New York Public Library from the New York Society Library, which was found- ed in the 1750s and was the third oldest surviving proprietary library in the Tnfiuential Librarians I 333 country. Again we found hundreds of volumes indexed in Poole not yet in the New York Public Library. My other special interest in Mr. Poole comes from the fact that he was ·the first, and, to all intents and purposes, the only librarian in his day who pur- sued a special interest in library build- ing planning and had an important in- fluence in that field. He might well be regarded as our first library building planning consultant. During the last forty-five years I have been one of his numerous successors, a group which in- cludes James Thayer Gerould, Joseph Wheeler, Ralph Ellsworth, Ellsworth Mason, Hoyt Galvin, Ralph Ulveling, and Charles Mohrhardt. Mr. Poole was librarian of the Bos- ton Athenaeum from 1856 to 1869, and my wife, Elinor Gregory Metcalf, was his fourth successor in this position. In spite of never having met Mr. Poole, I have a feeling that I knew him. Mr. Poole's life has been written by William L. Williamson, in his William Frederick Poole and the Modern Library Move- ment.1 JusTIN WINSOR Justin Winsor was born in 1831 and became a librarian by an unusual route. In 1866 he was appointed a trustee of the Boston Public Library, and he be- came the librarian, or superintendent as he was called, only two years later as a result of a report on the library which he had written. This report pleased the other trustees so much that they offered him the position, succeeding Charles Coffin Jewett. (Jewett had been the first librarian of the Smithsonian Institution and the first advocate of cooperative cataloging who did anything about it; it was he who was more responsible than anyone else for the 1853 Library Con- ference.) Nine years later, in the autumn of 1877, after several disagreements, to put it mildly, with the city authorities and his trustees, Mr. Winsor moved to Har- 334 I College & Research Libraries • July 1976 vard. He had turned down that assign- ment earlier after tentatively accepting it. When the city authorities made trou- ble for him again, he reversed himself once more and became the librarian of Harvard College. I have been told that Mr. Winsor reported his final accept- ance at Harvard only a few hours be- fore Melvil Dewey ( Melvil Dui if you prefer it that way, as he sometimes did) arrived in Cambridge at President Eliot's request, prepared to accept the position that Winsor had just taken. Winsor was the first president of the American Library Association. He served in that position for nine consecu- tive terms and was elected again in 1897, so that he could represent the Amer- ican Library Association at the Second International Library Conference in London later that year, shortly before his death. I have chosen Winsor to write about for several personal reasons. First, Mr. Winsor was my fourth predecessor at Harvard College, just as Poole was Elinor's fourth predecessor at the Bos- ton Athenaeum. Second, his only daughter was a very close friend of my wife's mother, and his granddaughter is a good friend of the Harvard and Radcliffe libraries as well as of my own family. Third, I sat during my eighteen years at Harvard at the very unusual desk that Mr. Winsor purchased for his own use in 1877 when he first came to Harvard. It was so large that it had ample knee- holes on all four sides, to say nothing of four sliding shelves over its four sets of drawers. On the under side of one of the sliding shelves I found a no- tation in Mr. Winsor's handwriting reading, "Purchased in November, 1877, The Office of Justin Winsor Harvard University Archives Harvard University Archives Justin Winsor Justin Winsor." The desk is still in use by one of my successors, Louis Martin. Mr. Winsor had a superstructure built over the desk to hold maps, in which he was greatly interested, but this had dis- appeared before my time. Fourth, the Harvard Library's finan- cial officer when I came to Harvard in 1937, Mr. Gookin by name, had worked for Mr. Winsor as a young man, typing letters for him on the first typewriter that the library owned; it was purchased especially for Mr. Gookin, who was al- ways glad to talk to me about Mr. Win- sor. Fifth, I kept near my desk Mr. Win- sor's handwritten order book of instruc- tions to the staff. It said among many other things that staff .members must be sure not to use the library telephone (note: not telephones) for persoJ?,al calls, and other strict rules which were pertinent in the nineteenth century, but many of which seem completely out- dated or perhaps absurd today. Mr. Winsor was a historian of note Influential Librarians I 335 and perhaps the leading cartographer of his time. His writings on Boston and on American history are still important and useful. In one way he might be called very much up to date because he taught a course in the field of geogra- phy but refused to give marks to the students at the end of the term. Finally, as a result of this, President Eliot told him that he could no longer teach the course. A biography of Mr. Winsor by Joseph Alfred Borome goes into his ca- reer in detail. 2 HERBERT PuTNAM Herbert Putnam, who is remembered primarily as the Librarian of Congress .for the forty years from 1899 to 1939, Library of Congress Herbert Putnam 336 I College & Research Libraries • July 1976 was born in 1861. He was a Harvard graduate, a member of the Putnam pub- lishing family, and trained as a lawyer. But before admission to the bar, he be- came the librarian of the Minneapolis Athenaeum and later of the Public Li- brary in the same city. He then prac- ticed law briefly in Boston, before be- coming the librarian of the Boston Pub- lic Library, which was in somewhat of a crisis in 1895 while its great McKim, Mead and White library building was under construction. Not long after this, when the appointment of a new Li- brarian of Congress was under consid- eration, Herbert Putn.am was a repre- sentative of the American Library As- sociation at the congressional hearing. He made such an impressive presenta- tion that three years later, when the po- sition was again open due to the death of John Russell Young (who was a journalist, not a librarian), President McKinley appointed Putnam to the post. He finally retired in 1939, after forty years of service but continued for many more years to go into an office as.,.. signed to him in the library. He livecf until he was ninety-four in 1955. I first met Mr. Putnam in the fall of 1911 when Mary Wright Plummer, the principal of the Library School of the New York Public Library, arranged to have him speak to the school's first class, of which I was a member. During the Christmas holidays in 1913, I visited the Library of Congress for the first time in order to fulfill one of the require- ments for the diploma of the library school. I was a shy young man, and I was alone, not having come with the others in the class, which was made up largely of girls. I did not dare to ask to see Mr. Putnam, but while looking around the reading room, I saw him proceeding briskly past the round circu- lation desk, walking very straight as he always did and, I am sure, trying to con- ceal the embarrassing fact that one of his garters was dragging along behind him, still attached to a sock that had fallen down to his shoe-top. Although I saw him at American Li- brary Association meetings several times after 1913, it was not until seventeen years later, in 1930, that I had my first opportunity to talk with him. In con- nection with my work as chairman of the American Library Association co- operative cataloging committee for a half a dozen years, beginning in 1930, I spent approximately one day a month at the Library of Congress with Wini- fred Gregory, who was in charge of the committee's work. On arriving at the Li- brary of Congress on the night train from New York, I was generally waiting .at the door to enter the library when it was opened. I always went directly to Mr. Putnam's office to make a courtesy call as I did riot think it proper to be talking with members of his staff on li- brary problems without his knowledge. He was always .at his desk. He customari- ly arrived in his office between 7: 00 and 7:30a.m., long before opening time. He always greeted me cordially. Sometimes he asked me to lunch with him at noon in the library cafeteria which was then in the library tower. He often invited me to go around the library with him on one of his regular d.aily tours through it, and as we walked he would talk with me about the problems he faced in the library. Cooperative cataloging work started to go very well, increasing the number of Library of Congress printed cards considerably. In due course it was found that the library's catalogers were unwilling to accept the copy for the cards that came in from the cooperating libraries. They held them up and re- vised them, thus delaying their publica- tion as well as adding to the cost of the whole procedure. Mr. Hastings, Miss Gregory, and I were all concerned. Fi- nally I spoke strongly tp Mr. Putnam. In his younger days he had been a very able administrator and judge of the I J '] ~ ability of librarians and had built up a superb staff between 1900 and 1920. But by 1930 he had lost contact with the younger members of the profession. The quality of the staff had deteriorat- ed as a result of his shyness and aloof- ness-as well as from poor salaries and poor selection. Mr. Putnam _said he would do something about the head of the catalog department so as to improve the situation we had talked about. The next morning he made . what proved to be a poor appointment. The individual was a very capable man who had good ideas, but he was completely unable to put them into effect with a group of "perfectionist" catalogers. (I have al- ways felt somewhat responsible for that appointment. ) As a result, the situation did not improve, and the American Li- brary Association committee agreed that there was nothing to do but wait for Mr. Putnam's retirement, keeping the project alive even if it were less suc- cessful than had been hoped. I hesitated to write the foregoing paragraph because Dr. Putnam, like the two men of whom I have written earlier in this article, and the three who fol- low, were among our greatest librarians. Indeed, these six men did more, per- haps, than any others to bring American libraries to the stage they had reached by 1940 ( Melvil Dewey and John Shaw Billings might be added to the list) . I met Melvil Dewey on three occasions but never felt acquainted with him; I