ACRL News Issue (B) of College & Research Libraries


184 / C&RL News ■ March 2000

SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS
Ivy Anderson, Gail McMillan 
& Ann C. Schaffner, editors

T h e  o p e n  a r c h i v e s  i n i t i a t i v e

F orging a p a th  to w a rd  in te ro p e ra b le  a u th o r s e lf-a rc h iv in g  systems

by Richard E. Luce

E fforts aimed at giving authors control over 
the communication and distribution of 

their work, in the form of electronic author 
self-archiving systems, are gaining ground. 
The Universal Preprint Service (UPS) initia
tive, now known as the Open Archives Ini
tiative, is one such effort that has been widely 
publicized and often misreported in recent 
accounts. The initiative’s goals are to develop 
a framework for a “universal e-print archive” 
and to establish interoperability standards 
supporting the search and retrieval of e-print 
papers from all disciplines. The hope is to 
catalyze progress towards new scholarly pub
lishing models over the next five-to-ten years.

Background
Scholarly communication has long suffered 
from the lag time between summarizing re
search results in a publishable article and the 
formal publication of the article. In certain 
areas of scholarly activity, electronic preprint 
archives have become an established medium 
to communicate non peer-reviewed results 
of ongoing research quickly.

The trend began in high energy physics 
in 1991 and, since then, the centralized xxx 
preprint archive founded by Paul Ginsparg 
at Los Alamos National Laboratory has be
come a global repository for research in phys
ics. xxx (also known as arXiv.org) houses 
more than 122,000 papers, and is mirrored

worldwide in 15 countries, with over 60,000 
users daily, xxx has now expanded to incor
porate mathematics, non-linear sciences and 
computer science.

Similar efforts are taking place in other 
disciplines. CogPrints is modeled on xxx and 
focuses mainly on a collection of papers in 
cognitive science, psychology, neurology, 
linguistics, and related fields. NCSTRL (Net
worked Computer Science Technical Reports) 
is a similar initiative, providing a point of 
access for technical reports in computer sci
ence that are either submitted to the CoRR 
(Computing Research Repository), a part of 
xxx, or to decentralized departmental archives 
that cooperate in the initiative. Archives in 
the NCSTRL initiative share the Dienst proto
col, which enables the creation of library-
like services that support searching and 
browsing the archive.

Along the same lines, the RePEc (Research 
Papers in Economics) initiative provides au
thors with the option to submit working pa
pers to a departmental archive or, if one does 
not exist, to the EconWPA archive at Wash
ington University.

The NDLTD project (Networked Digital Li
brary of Theses and Dissertations) aims at 
building a digital library of electronic theses 
and dissertations (ETD) authored by students 
of member institutions. NDLTD addresses is
sues such as the creation of a workflow to

About the author
Richard E. Luce is library director and Library Without Walls project leader of the Research Library at Los Alamos National 
Laboratory, e-mail: rick.luce@lanl.gov

mailto:rick.luce@lanl.gov


C&RL N e w s ■  M a rc h  2 0 00 /  185

s u b m i t  E T D s ,  t h e  d e v e l o p m e n t  o f  a n  X M L  

D o c u m e n t  T y p e  D e f i n i t i o n  f o r  E T D s  a n d  t h e  

s u p p o r t  o f  a  d i g i t a l  l i b r a r y  f o r  E T D s .  R e c e n t l y ,  

N I H  h a s  e x p r e s s e d  a  s t r o n g  i n t e r e s t  i n  t h e  

e s t a b l i s h m e n t  o f  P u b M e d  C e n t r a l ,  a n  e - p r i n t  

i n i t i a t i v e  f o r  b i o l o g y  d e s c r i b e d  i n  t h e  f i r s t  c o l

u m n  i n  t h i s  s e r i e s  (C & R L  N e w s , J a n u a r y  2 0 0 0 ) .  

A l l  o f  t h e s e  p r e p r i n t  i n i t i a t i v e s  e n d e a v o r  t o  

o p t i m i z e  s c h o l a r l y  c o m m u n i c a t i o n  b y  o v e r

c o m i n g  t h e  b a r r i e r s — f i n a n c i a l ,  l e g a l ,  e t c . —  

w h i c h  t h e  t r a d i t i o n a l  f r a m e w o r k  h a s  e s t a b

l i s h e d .

W h i l e  o t h e r  d i s c i p l i n e s  a n d  i n s t i t u t i o n s  

h a v e  b e g u n  t o  c r e a t e  p u b l i c  r e s e a r c h  a r c h i v e s  

a l o n g  t h e  l i n e s  p i o n e e r e d  a t  L o s  A l a m o s ,  w h a t  

i s  n e e d e d  a r e  c o n v e n t i o n s  t h a t  a r c h i v e s  c a n  

a d o p t  t o  e n s u r e  t h a t  t h e y  w o r k  t o g e t h e r .  I d e

a l l y , a n y  s c h o l a r  s h o u l d  b e  a b l e  t o  f i n d  a n y  

p a p e r  i n  a n y  o f  t h e s e  p r e p r i n t  o r  e - p r i n t  a r

c h i v e s  f r o m  a n y  d e s k t o p  w o r l d w i d e ,  a s  i f  t h e y  

w e r e  a l l  i n  o n e  v i r t u a l  p u b l i c  l i b r a r y .  T h e  

i n f o r m a t i o n  i n d u s t r y  is  s l o w l y  b e g i n n i n g  t o  

u n d e r s t a n d  t h e  p o t e n t i a l  o f  t h e  p r e p r i n t  c o n

c e p t ,  r e g a r d i n g  it e i t h e r  a s  a n  o p p o r t u n i t y  

f o r  c o l l a b o r a t i o n ,  a s  a  c h a l l e n g e ,  o r  a s  a  t h r e a t .

T a k in g  t h e  f i r s t  s t e p — U PS I n it ia t iv e
I n  A p r i l  1 9 9 9 ,  a  c a l l  f o r  p a r t i c i p a t i o n  w a s  p u t  

o u t  t o  e x i s t i n g  e - p r i n t  s y s t e m s  t o  m o b i l i z e  a  

c o r e  t e c h n i c a l  g r o u p  t o  w o r k  t o w a r d s  a c h i e v

i n g  a  u n i v e r s a l  s e r v i c e  f o r  n o n  p e e r - r e v i e w e d  

s c h o l a r l y  l i t e r a t u r e .  S u c h  a  u n i v e r s a l  s e r v i c e  

i s  c o n s i d e r e d  a s  t h e  f u n d a m e n t a l  a n d  f r e e  

l a y e r  o f  s c h o l a r l y  i n f o r m a t i o n ,  o n  t o p  o f  w h i c h  

b o t h  f r e e  a n d  c o m m e r c i a l  s e r v i c e s  c o u l d  

f l o u r i s h .

P a u l  G i n s p a r g ,  H e r b e r t  V a n  d e  S o m p e l  

a n d  I , f r o m  L o s  A l a m o s  N a t i o n a l  L a b o r a t o r y ,  

i n i t i a t e d  t h e  U P S  I n i t i a t i v e  c a l l  f o r  p a r t i c i p a

t i o n . W e  b e l i e v e d  t h a t  i m p o r t a n t  s t e p s  t o w a r d s  

t h e  e s t a b l i s h m e n t  o f  s u c h  a  u n i v e r s a l  s e r v i c e  

c o u l d  b e  t a k e n  b y  i d e n t i f y i n g  o r  c r e a t i n g  

i n t e r o p e r a b l e  t e c h n o l o g i e s  a n d  f r a m e w o r k s  

f o r  t h e  d i s s e m i n a t i o n  o f  a u t h o r  s e l f - a r c h i v e d  

d o c u m e n t s  ( t e r m e d  e - p r i n t s ) .  T h e  d r i v i n g  

f o r c e s  b e h i n d  t h e  i n i t i a t i v e  w e r e  t h e  p e r c e p

t i o n  t h a t  m a n y  y e a r s  o f  t h e o r e t i c a l  d i s c o u r s e  

h a v e  r e s u l t e d  i n  f e w  f u n d a m e n t a l  m e t h o d ological

c h a n g e s ,  a n d  o u r  h o p e  t h a t  m o r e -

r a p i d  p r o g r e s s  c o u l d  b e  c a t a l y z e d  b y  a  c o n

s o r t i u m  o f  i n t e r e s t e d  p a r t i e s  f o c u s i n g  d i r e c t l y  

o n  t h e  r e l e v a n t  t e c h n o l o g i c a l  i s s u e s .

T h e  U P S  m e e t i n g '  w a s  h e l d  i n  S a n t a  F e ,  

N e w  M e x i c o  o n  O c t o b e r  2 1 - 2 2 .  T h e  p a r t i c i

p a n t s  i n  t h e  m e e t i n g  w e r e  d i g i t a l  l i b r a r i a n s  

a n d  c o m p u t e r  s c i e n t i s t s  s p e c i a l i z i n g  i n  

a r c h i v i n g ,  m e t a d a t a ,  a n d  i n t e r o p e r a b i l i t y ,  a n d  

t h e y  i n c l u d e d  t h e  f o u n d e r s  o f  t h e  p r i n c i p a l  

p u b l i c  r e s e a r c h  a r c h i v e s .  T h e  p a r t i c i p a n t s  

w e r e  d i v e r s e  i n  t h e i r  u n d e r l y i n g  m o t i v a t i o n s ,  

b u t  e n t i r e l y  u n i f i e d  i n  t h e i r  o b j e c t i v e  o f  p a v

i n g  t h e  w a y  f o r  u n i v e r s a l  p u b l i c  a r c h i v i n g  o f  

t h e  s c i e n t i f i c  a n d  s c h o l a r l y  r e s e a r c h  l i t e r a t u r e  

o n  t h e  W e b .  S p o n s o r s h i p  f o r  t h e  m e e t i n g  w a s  

o b t a i n e d  f r o m  t h e  C o u n c i l  o n  L i b r a r y  a n d  

I n f o r m a t i o n  R e s o u r c e s ;  t h e  D i g i t a l  L i b r a r y  

F e d e r a t i o n ;  S P A R C ; A R L ; a n d  t h e  R e s e a r c h  

L i b r a r y  a t  t h e  L o s  A l a m o s  N a t i o n a l  L a b o r a

t o r y .

A  s e t  o f  o b j e c t i v e s  w a s  o u t l i n e d  f o r  t h e  

m e e t i n g .  T h e s e  o b j e c t i v e s  s u p p o r t e d  t h e  

d e v e l o p m e n t  o f  s o l u t i o n s  t o  s o m e  o f  t h e  

p u r e l y  t e c h n i c a l  o b s t a c l e s  t o  a  m o r e - e f f e c

t i v e  e l e c t r o n i c  s c h o l a r l y  c o m m u n i c a t i o n  s y s

t e m  a n d  c e n t e r e d  a r o u n d  t h e  f o l l o w i n g  c o n

c e p t s :

1 . s t i m u l a t i n g  t h e  a d o p t i o n  o f  t h e  p r e

p r i n t  c o n c e p t  i n  a ll a r e a s  o f  s c h o l a r l y  r e s e a r c h ;

2 .  i n t e g r a t i n g  p r e p r i n t  s e r v i c e s  i n t o  t h e  

s c h o l a r l y  d o c u m e n t  s y s t e m  o f  s c h o l a r l y  j o u r

n a l s ,  A & I  s e r v i c e s  a n d  l i b r a r i e s ;

3 .  c r e a t i n g  s e a r c h  a n d  r e t r i e v a l  f u n c t i o n

a l i t y  f o r  p r e p r i n t  a r c h i v e s  t h a t  c a n  b e  s i m u l

t a n e o u s l y  u s e f u l  f o r  d i s c i p l i n e - s p e c i f i c ,  c r o s s -

d i s c i p l i n a r y ,  i n t e r - i n s t i t u t i o n a l  a n d  i n t r a - i n s t i

t u t i o n a l  p u r p o s e s ;

4 .  d e v e l o p i n g  u s e r - f r i e n d l y  s y s t e m s ,  i . e . ,  

a l o n g  t h e  l i n e s  o f  e s t a b l i s h e d  s e a r c h  a n d  r e

t r i e v a l  m e t h o d s ;  a n d

5 .  i n c l u d i n g  t h e  f u l l  r a n g e  o f  m e t a - d a t a ,  

f u l l - t e x t ,  a n d  c i t a t i o n  d a t a .

T h e  g r o u p  a g r e e d  o n  a  s e t  o f  m i n i m a l  t e c h

n i c a l  r e q u i r e m e n t s  f o r  a r c h i v e s .  T h e s e  w i l l  

b e  p u b l i s h e d  s e p a r a t e l y  a s  t h e  “S a n t a  F e  C o n

v e n t i o n s ” a n d ,  d u r i n g  t h e  n e x t  s i x  m o n t h s ,

A b o u t  t h e e d i t o r

Ivy A n d e rso n  is  co o rd ¡n a to rfo r D ig ita l A cq u isitio n s a t H arvard U niversity, e-m ail: ivy_anderson@ harvard.edu;  G ail M cM illan 
is h ea d  o f  th e D ig ita l Lib ra ry a n d  A rch ives (fo rm erly  th e Sch olarly C om m unications P roject) a t Virginia Tech U niversity, e-m ail: 
g a ilm a c@ vt.e d u ;  A n n  C. S c h a ffh e r  is a sso cia te  u n iv e rs ity  lib ra ria n  fo r  R e se a rch  S e rv ic e s, In s tru c tio n  ‹S P la n n in g  a t 
B ra n d e is U n iv e rsity , e-m a il: sc h a ffn e @ b ra n d e is.e d u

mailto:ivy_anderson@harvard.edu
mailto:gailmac@vt.edu
mailto:schaffne@brandeis.edu


186 /  C&RL News •  March 2000

w ill be implemented in the existing ar
chives.

Technical su m m a ry
All the participants agreed that scientific pa
pers should be freely accessible to the pub
lic, although individual participants differed 
on specifics, such as how to handle non-peer-
reviewed material. The first meeting concen
trated on the creation of cross-archive end-
user services. The aim was to identify general 
architectural and technical characteristics of 
archive solutions that would facilitate the cre
ation o f such services. These characteristics 
could then be recommended for existing and 
upcoming initiatives.

The meeting began with a presentation 
and demonstration by a team consisting of 
Herbert Van de Sompel, Michael Nelson 
(NASA Langley and Old Dominion Univer
sity), and Thomas Krichel (University of Sur
rey and RePEc initiative). This group had built 
an experimental end-user service providing 
access to data originating from existing archive 
initiatives. The presentation identified prob
lems that arose during the project, and dis
cussion of these problems served to launch 
the meeting discussions.

Participants concluded that many differ
ent archive initiatives were likely to emerge, 
with different conceptual, organizational, and 
technical foundations. For such initiatives to 
become part o f the scholarly communication 
system, interoperability was essential.

Consensus was reached that interoper
ability hinges on a fundamental distinction 
between the archive functions, which include 
data-collection and maintenance, and end-
user functions, like the cross-system search 
and linking prototype service described in 
the opening session. Although archive initia
tives can implement their own end-user ser
vices, it is essential that the archives remain

URLs  E p r i n t  a r c h iv e s

• xxx preprint archive at Los Alamos: 
http://xxx.lanl.org

• CogPrints: http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk
• NCSTRL: http://www.ncstrl.org
• EconWPA: http://econwpa.wustl.edu
• NDLTD: http://www.ndltd.org

“open” to allow others to create such ser
vices.

A discussion on the technicalities of cre
ating end-user services for data originating 
from different archives followed. The group 
recognized that there are basically two ways 
to implement these: a distributed searching 
approach and a harvesting approach. The 
former would require archives to implement 
a joint distributed search protocol, which 
would be difficult. Moreover, there are im
portant problems of scale when implement
ing such distributed search solutions, in light 
of the possible emergence of thousands of 
institutional and/or subject-oriented archives 
worldwide. The group agreed that this was 
not a realistic approach at this time, and that 
a harvesting solution was more appropriate. 
Such a harvesting solution would allow 
trusted parties—the ones that subscribe to the 
Santa Fe Conventions—to collect data selec
tively from different archives. The conven
tions propose adoption of portions of the 
Dienst protocol for the harvesting of data and 
a minimal Dublin Core compliant metadata 
set, called the Santa Fe Set, which should be 
made available by all archives to respond to 
harvesting requests.

The representatives of existing archive ini
tiatives at the meeting, as well as those from 
institutions that are in the process of setting 
up archive initiatives, agreed to comply with 
those guidelines. The Dienst protocol will be 
enhanced to allow for the functions men
tioned above and a minimal Dienst release, 
facilitating the process of making an archive 
compliant to the required aspects of Dienst, 
will be made available. A transport format 
for MARC-formatted metadata will be pro
posed, as well as an XML Document Type 
Definition for the description of the Santa Fe 
Set. The recommendations will be extensively 
documented on a Web site and adoption of 
the recommendations w ill be promoted 
worldwide.

The p a th  fo rw a rd
The Open Archives initiative has created a 
forum to discuss and solve technical matters 
o f interoperability between author self
archiving solutions, as a way to promote their 
global acceptance (see h ttp ://w w w . 
openarchives.org).

(continued on page 202)

http://www
http://xxx.lanl.org
http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk
http://www.ncstrl.org
http://econwpa.wustl.edu
http://www.ndltd.org




2 0 2  / C& RL N e w s  ■  M a r c h  2 0 0 0

b io g ra p h ic a l e n tries a n d  a d e s c rip tio n  o f  the 

d is c o v e ry  that e a rn e d  th e  N o b e l P rize . Access. 
h t t p : / / w w w . s l a c . s t a n f o r d . e d u / l i b r a r y /  

n o b e l.h tm l.

• Contributions o f  20th Century W om en 
to Ph ysics. A n  a rc h iv e  o f  m o r e  th an  80 cita
tio n s o f  w o m e n  w h o  c o n trib u te d  to  p h y sic s  in 

th e  20th cen tu ry c rea te d  b y  th e U C L A  D e p a rt

m e n t  o f  P h y s i c s .  A ccess: h t t p : / / w w w . 
p h y sics.u cla.ed u / ~ cw p / .

History of Physics
• C en ter fo r  the H isto ry  o f  Physics. This 

cen ter, a s e c tio n  o f  th e  A m e ric a n  Institute o f 

P h ysics, has a m issio n  to  p re s e rv e  a n d  m a k e  

k n o w n  th e  h is to iy  o f  m o d e rn  p h ysics a n d  al

lie d  field s, in clu d in g  a s tron o m y, g e o p h y s ic s , 

optics, a n d  the lik e. Access- h ttp://w w w .aip.org/ 

history/.

• H isto ry  o f  Ph ysics G ro u p . Th e  Insti
tu te o f  P h ysics esta b lish e d  this g r o u p  in  1984 

to  s ec u re  th e  w ritten , oral, a n d  instrum ental 

re c o rd  o f  British p h y sic s  f o r  p o s te rity  an d  to  

e x p lo r e  w a y s  in  w h ic h  h isto ry ca n  b e  u s e d  

m o r e  e ffe c tiv e ly  in th e u n d erstan d in g, te a c h

in g, a n d  g e n e ra l c o m m u n ic a tio n  o f  physics. 

Access: h ttp :/ / w w w .io p .o rg / IO P / G rou p s / H P / .

“Scholarly Comm. ” co n t.fro m  page 186)
A g r e e m e n t w a s  re a c h e d  o n  th e  fo llo w in g  

to  p a v e  a p ath  fo rw a rd :

• th e  m in im a l D ie n s t p r o to c o l set w ill b e  

im p le m e n te d  f o r  all arch iv es  that w e r e  re p r e

s e n te d  at th e  m e etin g . T h is  w ill a llo w  fo r  a 

first ro u n d  o f  e x p e rim e n ta tio n  w ith  th e  c re

atio n  o f  e n d -u s e r s e rv ic e s  la y e i'e d  o v e r  e xis t

in g  arch ives;

•  th e re  is an  u rgen t n e e d  to  discuss th e 

m e c h a n is m s  u s e d  to  su b m it m a terial t o  ar

c h iv e s;

• it is im p o rta n t to  h a v e  p resen tation s and/ 

o r  w o r k s h o p s  at u p c o m in g  d ig ita l lib rary c o n

fere n ce s ;

• th e  e x p e rim e n ta l, n o n -p ro d u c tio n  p r o to

ty p e  that w a s  p re s e n te d  at th e  m e e tin g  w ill 

te m p o r a r ily  b e  a v a ila b le  f o r  e x p lo r a t io n  at 

h ttp://u p s.cs.odu .edu . T h e  re p res en ta tiv e s  o f  

O ld  D o m in io n  U n iversity, Los A la m o s  N a tion al 

L a b o ra to ry  R esea rch  Library, a n d  th e  U n iv e r

sity o f  G h e n t e x p re s s e d  th eir in terest in c o n

tin u in g  this p r o to ty p in g  w o r k ; an d

• th e U P S  In itia tiv e  h as b e e n  re n a m e d . It is 

n o w  re fe rre d  to  as th e  O p e n  A r c h iv e s  In itia

tive.

Discussion groups
A  k e y  m a ilin g  list f o r  p h y s ic s  lib raria n s  is 

P A M n e t, th e  d is c u s s io n  list f o r  th e  P h ysics, 

A s tr o n o m y  a n d  M a th e m a tic s  (P A M )  D iv is io n  

o f  th e  S p e c ia l L ib rarie s  A s s o c ia tio n . T h e  p u r

p o s e  o f  P A M n e t is t o  p r o v id e  a fo r u m  f o r  th e  

d iscu ssio n  o f  lib rary a n d  in fo rm a tio n  re s o u rc e  

issu es re le v a n t to  p h y s ic s , a s tro n o m y , an d  

m a th em atics. P A M n e t m a y  b e  u s e d  t o  s e e k  

h e lp  w ith  r e fe r e n c e  q u e s tio n s  a n d  in o b ta in

in g  m a terials, b u t o n ly  w h e n  th o s e  m a terials 

a re  n o t a v a ila b le  th ro u g h  a lib ra ry ’s n o rm a l 

IL L  o r  d o c u m e n t d e liv e r y  s u p p lie rs  o r  w h e n  

tim in g  is critical. T h e  list is o p e n  to  n o n -P A M  

d iv is io n  m e m b e r s . T o  s u b s c r ib e , c o n t a c t 

D a v id  Stern, th e  list o w n e r , at d a v id .e .s te rn @

y a le .e d u .

O th e r m a ilin g  lists re la te d  to  p h y sic s  can 

b e  fo u n d  in  th e  P h ysics s e c tio n  o f  “T h e  D ire c

to ry  o f  S ch o larly a n d  P ro fe s s io n a l E -C o n fe r

e n c e s ,” m a in ta in e d  b y  D ia n e  K o v a c s . Access: 
h t t p : / / w w w . n 2 h 2 . c o m / K O V A C S / S 0 1 0 6 . 

html.

T h e r e  is a p h y s ic s  h ie r a r c h y  o f  d is c u s

s i o n  g r o u p s  in  U s e n e t .  T h e s e  i n c l u d e  

s c i . p h y s i c s ,  s c i . p h y s i c s . r e l a t i v i t y ,  a n d  

sc i.p h y s ic s .re s e a r c h . ■

Some issues and questions
T h e  in itia tive d isc u s se d  a b o v e  raises sev era l 

s o c ia l issues c o n c e r n in g  s c h o la rly  c o m m u n i

c ation . A m o n g  th e  issues o f  r e le v a n c e  to  aca

d e m ic  a n d  re search  institutions a re th e f o llo w

ing:

• W ill th e  institu tion p r o v id e  o r  s u p p o rt a 

d ep a rtm e n ta l o r  in stitu tional e-p rin t a rc h iv e  o f  

au th ors a ffilia te d  w ith  th e institution? I f  so, w ill 

it a d o p t o r  in c o rp o ra te  th e  Santa F e  p ro to c o ls  

to  g a in  w id e r  e x p o s u re  an d  in terop erab ility?

•  H o w  w ill rese arch  lib raries p a c k a g e  an d  

d e liv e r  a ccess to  e -p rin t literature?

• W ith  th e  re s o lu tio n  o f  e -p rin t a rc h iv e  

in te ro p e ra b ility  te c h n ic al issues, w h a t w ill b e  

th e  p ro c e s s  o f  r e s o lv in g  th e  s o c ia l issues c o n

n e c te d  w ith  te n u re  a n d  pub lish in g?

W h ile  it is n o t th e  in te n t o f  th e  O p e n  A r

c h iv e s  In itia tiv e  to  d e a l w ith  th o s e  s o c ia l is

sues, th e ir r e s o lu tio n  w ill b e  a n  im p o rta n t 

fa c to r  in  d e te r m in in g  h o w  q u ic k ly  th e  p a ra

d i g m  f o r  s c h o l a r l y  c o m m u n i c a t i o n  w i l l  

c h a n g e . A t o u r  m e e t in g  in  O c to b e r , w e  tried  

to  la y  th e  g r o u n d w o r k  f o r  te c h n ic a l stan d ard s 

that w ill s u p p o rt n e w  m o d e ls  o f  s c h o la rly  

p u b lis h in g . ■

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/library/
http://www
http://www.aip.org/
http://www.iop.org/IOP/Groups/HP/
http://www.n2h2.com/KOVACS/S0106
http://ups.cs.odu.edu