Chap. II. HERA Of Lines. ones being always next to that of the blue ones. Vair is ufually of lix rows 5 if there be more or fewer, the number ought to be exprefied j and if the colours are different from thofe above mentioned, they muft like- Vvife be expreifed. I he Englifh multiply thte furs* as well as the names of the tinctures, though no other nation has adopted luch varieties. Thus they give us, 1. ff kite, which is the natural colour of the ermine j but it is ui'ed on no other occafion but in the defcfip- tions of mantles. 2. Ermines, which is the fame w ith contra-ermine. 3. Erminois; the field is Or, the powdering Sable, (N° 13.). For the ufe of this fur Guillim cites Bara, p. 14.; but no fuch fur is to be found in Bara. 4* Pean; the field is Sable, the powdering Or, (N° 14.). The French ufe no fuch term : but they call all furs or doublings des pannes or pennes ; which term has pofTibly given rife to this miftake, and many others, in thofe who do not underftand the French language. \5- Erminites; the fame as Ermine, with the addi¬ tion of a red hair on each fide of the black. Sir George M‘Kenzie calls thefe diftinaions “ but fancies* for er¬ minites fignifies properly little ermines:'1 6. Counter-vair; when the bells of the fame tindure bafe, and point againft point, 7. Potent-counter-potent, anciently called Vairy-cuppy, as when the field is filled with crutches or potents counter-placed, (N° 17.). It may not be improper to obferve, that the ufe of the tindures took it§ rife from the feveral colours ufed by warriors whilft they were in the army, which S. de Petra Sanda proves by many citations. And becaufe it was the cuftom to embroider gold and filver on filk, or filk on cloth of gold and filver, the heralds did therefore appoint,* that in imitation of the clothes fo embroidered, colour fhould never be ufed upon co¬ lour, nor metal upon metal. Sect. III. Of the Lines ufed in the parting of Fields. Escutcheons are either of one tindure, or more than one. Thofe that are of one only, that is, when fome metal, colour, ot fur, is fpread all over the fur- face or field, fuch a tindure is faid to be predominant: but in fuch as have on them more than one, as mod have, the field is divided by lines j which, according to their divers forms, receive various names. Lines may be either flraight or crooked. Straight lines are carried evenly through the efcutcheon : and are of four difi’erent kinds j viz. a perpendicular line J ; a horizontal, — ; a diagonal dexter, a diagonal fi- nifter, /. Crooked lines are thofe wdiich are carried unevenly through the efcutcheon wdth rifing and falling. French armorills reckon 11 different forts of them ; Guillim Vol. X. Part II. 7 L D R V. 40 s admits of 7 only; but there are 14 diftind kinds, Of Lines, the figures and names of which are as jm fig. 1. N° 1—14. viz. I. The engrailed. 2. The inveded. 3. The wavy. 4. The embattled, or crenelle. 5. The nebule. 6. The. raguly. 7. The indented. 8. The dancette. 9. The dove-tail. 10. The grafted, n. The embattled aronde. 12. I he battled embattled. 13. The patee or dovetail. 14. Champaine. The principal reafon why lines are thus ufed in he¬ raldry, is to difference bearings which would be other- wife the fame ; for an efcutcheon charged with a chief engrailed, differs from one charged with a chief wavy, as much as if the one bore a crofs and the other a laltier. As the fore-mentioned lines ferve to divide the field, it muff be obferved, that if the divificn confiffs of twro equal parts made by the perpendicular line, it is called parted per pale ; by the horzontal line, parted per fefs ; by the diagonal dexter, parted per bend; by the diago¬ nal finifler, parted per bendfinifer ; examples of which will be given in the fequel of this treatife. It a field is divided into four equal parts by any of thefe lines, it is faid to be quartered $ which may be done two ways, viz. (Quartered or parted per crofs ; which is made by a perpendicular and horizontal line, which, eroding each other at the centre of the field, divide it into four equal parts called quarters. See Plate CCLIV. under fig. I. (a). Quartered or parted per fdltier; which is made by two diagonal lines, dexter and finiffer, that crofs one another in the centre of the field, and likewife divide it into four equal parts. Ibid. I he efcutcheon is fometimes divided into a greater number of parts, in order to place in it the arms of the feveral families to which one is allied ; and in this cafe it is called ^genealogical atchievement. Thefe divifions may confiff of 6, 8, 1 2, and 16, quarters fas under fig. 1. (a)], and even fometimes of 20, 32, 64, and upwards; there being examples of fuch divifions frequently exhi¬ bited at pompous funemls. An extraordinary inftance of this kind was exhibited at the pompous funeral of the Vifcountefs Townfhend, whofe corpfe was brought from Dublin cable in Ireland to Rainham- hall in Norfolk, one of the principal tenants on horfe- back carrying before the hearfe a genealogical banner, containing the quarterings of his lordihip’s and her ladyfhip’s family, to the amount of upwards of 160 coats. Sir George Booth, reblor of the valuable living of Aihton under Line, hears fix diftiiift coats of arms in his ihield; viz. thofe for Booth, Barton, Venables, Mount fort, Aihton, Egerton ; and has be- fides a right to 37 other coats: but Sir William Dug- dale very juftly objefts to fo many arms being cluftered together in one ihield or banner, on account of the dif¬ ficulty of knowing and diftinguiihing one coat of arms from another, 3 E Sect, bitLlIdUre^Lare ftl11 ,lntr(i)ducccI Jn,t0 Engliih coats of arms, but for particular reafons, which heralds can 0f t])e ordinaries ^ ^ by ^ Frencil frequently taken for a principal figure, and numbered among the reft 402 HERA of > -v—1 Sect. IV. Of the Differences of Coats of Arms. Armorists have invented divers differences or cha- radleriflical marks, -whereby bearers of the fame coat of arms are diftinguifhed each from others, and their nearnefs to the principal bearer denronftrated. Ac¬ cording to J. Guillim, thefe differences are to be confi- dered either as ancient or modern. Art. i. Of Ancient Differences. Thofe he calls ancient differences confifl. in hordures (a) j which is a bearing that goes all round, u'd paral¬ lel to the boundary of the efcutcheon, in form of a hem, and always contains a fifth part of the field in breadth. Bordures were ufed in ancient times for the diftinguifh- ing not only of one nation or tribe from another, but alio to note a diverfity between particular perfons de- fcended of one family and from the fame parents. This diflinftion, however, was not exprefsly fignified by invariable marks j nor were bordures always ap¬ propriated to denote the different degrees of confan- guinity •, for, as Sir Henry Spelman obferves in his Afpilogia, p. 140, ancient heralds, being fond of per- fpicuous differences, often inverted the paternal tinfture, or fometimes inferted another charge in the efcutcheon, fuch as bends, croflets, cantons, or the like j which ir¬ regularity has, I fuppofe, induced modern armorilts to invent and make ufe of others.” Plate There are bordures of different forms and timSlures, €CLV. as in the examples, fig. 3. N° 1. is “ Sable, a Bordure Argent *, borne by the right hon. Sackville Tufton, earl of Thanet.—When-a bordure is plain, you are not to mention it, as it is al¬ ways underflood fo in heraldry, though it be not ex- preffed ; but if it has any other form, you are to fig- nify it. 2. “ Gules, a Bordure engrailed Argent j” borne by the right hon. Charles Gray, Lord Gray 'Ihis is called engrailed, from the French word engrele, which fignifies a thing the hail has fallen upon and broken eff the edges, leaving it with little femicircles ftruck out of it. 3. “ Gules, a Bordure engrailed Or borne by the right hon. George Talbot, earl of Shrewfbury. You muft obferve, that in a bordure or ordinary formed of thefe lines, the points are reprefented on all fides to¬ wards the field, and the femicircles turned towards the bordure or ordinary. 4. “ Argent, a Bordure invefted Azure.”—This is quite contrary to the laft 3 for as the other turns its points from the bordure into the field, fo contrarywife this does, by the inverfion of the points from the field into the bordure. Such a charge or any other formed of thefe lines is feldom to be met with in Englifli coats of arms. 5. “ Gules, a Bordure indented Argent.”—The word indented requires very little explanation, the fig- nification being obvious to all perfons, from its figure, which is compofed of tracks refembling teeth, called in Latin dentes. 6. “ Azure, a Bordure Ermine.” 7. “ Vert,, a Bordure Vair.” 8. “ Ermine, a Bordure compony, or gobony, Or L D R Y. Chap. If, and Sable.”—This is fo termed from its being com- Ancient pofed of fmail and equal pieces. I. Guillim calls this Differences, bordure gobonated, which implies the fame meaning j ^ but the word being obfolete, is not ufed by modern heralds. 9. “ Quarterly, Azure and Gules, a bordure com¬ pony Argent and Azure borne by his grace Henry Somerfet, duke of Beaufort, &c. 10. “ Azure, a Bordure counter-compony Argent and Gules.”—Obferve, that the counter-compony does always confifl of two tracks and no more. 11. “ Or, a bordure cheeky Argent and Sable.”— This has a great refemblance with the laft bordure,. having only one track more ; therefore you muft take care, before you blazon, to number them, or elfe you may eafily err in taking the one for the other. I 2. “ Gules, a Bordure Argent, charged with eight Trefoils flipped proper, that is, Vert.”—All nations ufe few terms in blazoning bordures $ but Englifli ar- morifts, in order poflibly to raife the dignity of this fcience, have perplexed it, and rendered it unintelli¬ gible to all foreigners, by introducing into it feveral myftical proper names, among which may be reckoned the following ones, viz. They call a bordure, if char¬ ged with eight plants, fruits, flowers, or leaves, verdoy of fuch vegetables j or enaluron of fuch birds j emirny of hearts ; perfew of furs ; and entoyre of inanimate things of wrhat kind foever. 13. “ Gules on a Bordure Azure, eight Stars Or.” 14. “ Argent, a Bordure compony of the laft: and Gules, the firft charged with Roles of the fecond, barb¬ ed and feeded proper.” This bordure is borne by his grace Charles Lenox duke of Richmond, &c. 15. “ Ermine, with a Bordure engrailed Gules j” the coat of arms of the right hon. Henry-Benedidl Barnewall, Vifcount Kingfland, &c. of Ireland.—This ancient and noble family is of French extraction, and allied to the dukes of Little-Bretagne, where the name continues ftill in great repute. 16. “ Argent, a Bordure Sable charged with eight Befants j” borne by the right hon. Cole, Lord Ranelagh, of Ireland. 17. “ Party per pale Argent and Gules, a Bordure charged wdth eight Efcalops counterchanged $” the coat of arms of the right hon. William Maule, earl of Panmure, &c. of Ireland. This very ancient family is originally French, and derives its furname from the toyrn and lordlhip of Maule in Normandy, where the fame arms are ftill to be feen in the parilh-church. 17. “ Azure, a Bordure quarterly, the firft and fourth Ermine, the fecond and third counter-compcny Argent and Azure.” 19. “ Purpure, a Bordure compony Or and Gules, each of the laft charged with a Befant,” 20. “ Quarterly Or and Gules, within a Bordure Vert, charged with eight Efcalops Or.” We fhall conclude this head with obferving, that a Lordure is never of metal upon metal, and feldom of colour upon colour, but rather of the tinfture which the principal bearing or charge is of. I hus Sir — , Dalziel of Glenae, whofe predeceflor was a younger brother of the noble family of Camw7ath, has, within a Bordure Argent, the paternal coat of the ancient name of Dalziel, viz. Sable, a hanged man with his arms extended. Argentformerly they carried um hanging w Chap. II. HERA Modern hanging on a gallows. This bearing, though fo very differences. Ungular for a coat of arms, was given as a reward to v one of the anceftors of the late Robert Dalziel, earl of Carnwath, to perpetuate the memory of a brave and hazardous exploit performed, in taking down from a gallows the body of a favourite and near relation of King Kenneth II. hung up by the Pifts j which ftory is thus related by Alexander Nilbet : “The king being exceedingly grieved that the body of his minion and kinfman Ihouid be fo difgracefully treated, he proffered a great reward to any of his fubjedts who would ad¬ venture to refcue his corpfe from the difgrace his cruel enemies had unjuftly put upon it: but when none would undertake this hazardous enterprife, at laft a x Valorous gentleman came and faid to the king, Dafeie/, which fignifies ; “ I dareand he did adluRlly per¬ form that noble exploit to the king’s fatisfadlion and his own immortal honour, and in memory of it got the aforefaid remarkable bearing : and afterwards his pofterity took the word Dalxiel for their furname, and the interpretation of it, I dare, continues even to this day to be the motto of "hat noble family.” We can have no better proof of rhe truth of this tradition than this, that the heads of this ancient family have for many ages carefully retained this bearing without any alteration or addition. Art. 2. Of Modern Differences. The modern differences which the Englifh have adopted not only for the diftinguifhing of ions iffued out of one family, but alfo to denote the difference and fubordinate degrees in each houfe from the original anceftors, are nine, viz. CCLIV For the heir or firft fon, the Label $ 2d fon, the under fig. i. ^'re^centi 3^ ^on> the Mullet j 4th fon, the Martlet j (A). 5th fon, the Annulet ; 6th fon, the Flower-de-luce 5 7th fon, the Rofeg 8th fon, the Crofs moline; 9th fon, the Double Quater-foil. By thefe differences, the fix fons of Thomas Beau¬ champ, the 15th earl of Warwick, who died in the 34th year of King Edward III. are diftinguiftred in an old window of the church of St Mary at Warwick j fo that although they are called modern differences, their ufage with the Englifti is ancient. It muft be obferved, that, of all the forementioned marks of diftinftion, none but the label is affixed on the coats of arms belonging to any of the royal family j which the introducers of this peculiarity have, however, thought proper to diftinguiffi by additional pendants and diftinft charges on them. As to the diftindlion to be made in the arms of the offspring belonging to each of the above-mentioned Plate ^rot:^ers» ^ ^ expreffed by figures on the top and CCLV margin °f the table contained in fig. 4. For inftance, The heir or firft fon of the fecond houfe, beareth a crefcent charged with a label during his father’s life only. The fecond fon of the fecond houfe, a crefcent charged with another crefcent. The third fon of the fecond houfe, a crefcent charged with a mullet. The fourth fon of the fecond houfe, a crefcent charged with a martlet. The fifth fon of the fecond houfe, a crefcent charged with an annulet. The fixth fon of the fecond houfe, a crefcent charged with a ffower-de-luqe; and fo on of the other fons, taking care to have them of a different tin&ure. L D 11 Y. 403 In what part of the efcutcheon thefe differences Modern fltould be borne is not certain ; for Guillim, Morgan, and others, give us many different examples of their pofitiom The honour-point would be the propereft place, if the arms wrould admit of it j but that is not always the cafe, as that part may be charged with fome figure in the paternal coat, which cannot with propriety receive the difference. There are inftances where thefe are borne as perfect coats of arms, as the examples fubjoined to the Table of Houfes fufficiently ffiow ; which are to be blazoned thus : The firft is “ Azure, a Label Argent.”—When fuch a label is borne as a difference, the pendants, ac¬ cording to G. Leigh, fignify that he is but the third perfon j the dexter pendant referring to his father, the finifter to his mother, and the middle one to himfelf. The fecond is “ Argent, a Label of fine points Azure j” borne by the name of Hentington. If a label has more or lefs Wian three pendants or points, they are to be expreffed as in the foregoing example The third is “ Azure, a Crefcent Argent,” borne by the name of Lucy.—The reafon G. Leigh affigns for the fecond foil’s having a crefcent for a difference is to (how that he ffiould increafe the family by adding to it riches and reputation. The fourth is “ Argent, a Mullet Sable, on a Chief Azure, a Fleur-de-lis Or $” borne by the name of Rogers, in Gloucefterfliire.—A mullet or fpur was appointed for the third fan’s difference, as the laft mentioned author fays, to ffiow that he ffiould follow chivalry. The fifth is “ Azure, a Fleur-de-lis Argent ;” borne by the right hon. Henry Digby, Baron Digby of Geaffiil, in King’s county, Ireland. Thefe few examples, among many more that might be given, demonftrate the impropriety of adopting thefe modern differences, as they are called, for marks of cadency to diftinguiffi the different branches of a family : for it is impoffible to diftinguiffi the uncle or grand-uncle, from the nephew, or grand-nephew', if each of them are fecond, third, or fourth fons; and in the courfe of fucceffion thefe differences would mul¬ tiply to fuch a number, that it would be impoffible to delineate them diftindtly in moft cafes. But as they are given by moft of the Engliffi writers on heraldry, though no foreign nation ufes them, it was thought proper to infert them here. Sifters, except of the blood-royal, have no other mark of difference in their coats of arms, but the form of the efcutcheon (as obferved before) ; therefore they are permitted to bear the arms of their father, even as the eldeft fon does after his father’s deceafe. The reafon of which is by Guillim faid to be, that when they are married, they lofe their furname, and receive that of their huffiands. Next to thefe diminutions, G.. Leigh, J. Guillim, and after them Dr Harris in his Lexicon Technicum, fet forth at large divers figures, which they pretend were formerly added to the coats of fuch as were to be puniffied and branded for cowardice, fornication, flander, adultery, treafon, or murder, for which they give them the name of abatements of honour $ but as they produce but one inftance of fuch whimfical bear¬ ings, we have not inferted them here. Befides, arms 3 F 2 kemg 4°+ HERA Honour- being marks of honour, they cannot admit of any note rable.O'di-0f infamy J nor would any body now-a-days-bear them s—' . if they were fo branded. It is true, a man may be degraded lor divers crimes, particularly high treafon ; but in fuch cafes the efcutcheon is reverfed, trod upon, and torn in pieces, to denote a total extindion and luppreflion of the honour and dignity of the perfon to whom it belonged. Plate CCLV. Chap. III. Of the Charges. Armorists call a charge wdratfoever is contained in the field, wdiether it occupy the whole or only a part thereof. All charges are diftinguifhed by the names of honourable ordinaries, fub-ordinaries, md com¬ mon charges. Honourable ordinaries, the principal charges in he¬ raldry, are made of lines only, which, according to their difpolition and form, receive different names. Sub-ordinaries are ancient heraldic figures, frequent¬ ly ufed in coats of arms, and which are diftinguifhed by terms appropriated to each of them. Common charges are compofed of natural, artificial, and even chimerical things j fuch as planets, creatures, vegetables, inftruments, &c. Sect. I. Of Honourable Ordinaries. The moft judicious armorifts admit only of nine ho¬ nourable ordinaries, viz. The Chief The Pale The Bend The Bend finifter The Fefs The Bar The Cheveron The Crofs and The Saltier. Of thefe, but fix have diminutives, which are called as follows: That of the chief is a fillet; the pale has a pallet and endorfe ; the bend, a bendlet, cofi, and ribband; the bend finifter has the ficarp, and baton ; the bar, the clofiet and barulet ; the cheveron, a chevronel and couple- clofie. All which will be treated of in their order. Art. i . Of the Chief. The chief is an ordinary determined by an hori¬ zontal line, which, if it is of any other form but ftraight, muft be expreffed. It is placed in the upper part of the efcutcheon, and containeth in depth the third part of the field. Its diminutive is a fillet, the content of which is not to exceed one fourth of the chief, and ftandeth in the loweft part thereof. This ordinary is fubjeft to be charged with variety of fi¬ gures 5 and may be indented, wavy, nebule, &c. as in the examples, fig. 5. N° 1. is “ Or, a Chief indented Azure j” borne by the right hon. Edmund Butler, Vifcount Mount- garret, &.c. of the kingdom of Ireland. This great and illuftrious family of the Butlers, fo renowned for the many valiant and loyal perfons it has produced, is defeended from the ancient counts of Brion in Norman¬ dy ; but iince King Henry II. conferred the office of chief butler of Ireland upon one of the family, he and his fucceffors have affumed the name of Butler. 2. u Azure, a Chief engrailed Or.” 3. “ Argent, a Chief invefted Vert. ” 4- 5- 6. 7- Of the Chief. D R Y. Chap. HI. “ Vert, a Chief undy Or.” “ Azure, a Chief nebule Argent.” “ Or, a Chief cheeky Azure and Argent.” . “ Ermine, a Chief quarterly Or and Gules j” borne by the name of Peckham. 8. Argent, a Chief Sable, in the lower part thereof a Fillet of the Field.” 6. “ Azure, fretty Argent, a Chief Or j” borne by the right lion. Hayes St Leger, Vifcount Do- neraile, &c. of the county of Cork in Ireland. This ancient and noble family is of French extradlion •, and is defeended from Sir Robert Sent Legere, Knight, who, in 1066, accompanied William duke of Nor¬ mandy in his expedition into England j and the fa¬ mily have a tradition, that he, with his own hand, lupported the laid duke when he quitted the (hip to land in Suflex. 10. “ Argent, on a Chief engrailed Azure, a T ortoife paflant Or j” borne by the name of Bid- good. ti* <£ Argent, on a Chief Gules, two Spur revels Or; borne by the right hon. John St John, Lord St John of Bletftioe, &c. Of this ancient family, which derive their furname from a place called St John in Normandy, was John de St John, Efq. who ha- ving a principal employment in the army of the Nor¬ man duke, attended him in his expedition into Eng¬ land. “ Argent, on a Chief Vert, two Spears Heads 12. ere£! of the Field, the points imbrued Gules $” borne by the right hon. George Brodrick, Vifcount Middle- ton, &.c. of the kingdom of Ireland. This family is lineally defeended from George de Brodrick, who came into England in the reign of William II. 13. “ Or, on a Chief Sable, three Efcallops of the field,” for the name of Graham; and borne quartered in the arms of his Grace William Graham, duke, mar¬ quis, and earl of Montrofe, &c. with Argent three Rofes Gules. According to the Scots w'riters this great and noble family is defeended from the renowned Greme or Grame, who in the year 404 was general of King Fergus II.’s army, and in 420 forced his way through the wrall built by the Romans between the rivers Forth and Clyde to keep out the Scots from molefting them in their poffeffions, and the laid breach has ever fince been called Gratne's Dike. 14. “ Argent, on a Chief indented Gules, three Croffes pattee of the Field ; borne by the right hon. John Percival earl of Egmont, &c. This very ancient and noble family is fuppofed, from circumftances little flrort of pofitive proof, to have fprung from a younger branch of the fovereign dukes of Bretagne in France, of the fame name. They w^ere tranfplanted into Nor¬ mandy before the conqueft, poffeffed of great eftates and powder, and invefted with the office of chief butler. Upon the Norman invafion, two of this family came over into England with the Conqueror, from one of which the defeent of the prefent earl of Egmont is de¬ duced by the cleareft and moft indifputable proofs of hiftorians and records. 15. Azure, on a Chief indented Or, three Spur- revels Gules $” borne by the right hon. Charles Moore, earl of Drogheda, &c. of the kingdom of Ireland. This noble family, which is of French extraction, came into England foon after the conqueft, and made their firft Chap. III. HERA Of the firft residence In the manor of Moore-court, in the , county of Kent. 16. “ Ermine, on a Chief indented Azure, three ducal coronets Or j” borne by the name of Lytton. 17. “ Azure, on a Chief Or, three Martlets Gules,” for the name of Wray ; and borne by Sir Cecil Wray, Bart, of Lincolnllnre. 18. “ Ermine, on a Chief Gules j five Lozenges of the firll borne by the name of Dixin. 19. “ Argent, fretty Gules, on a Chief of the fecond, three Leopards Faces Or borne by the right hon. Henry Liddel, Lord Ravenfworth. This noble lord is defcended from the ancient lords of Liddle-caitle, in the county of Durham, where they have been proprietors of great coal-mines time out of mind. 20. “ Ermine, a Chief party per pale Azure and Or \ on the dexter the Sun in his fplendour, on the fini- fler a Crofs pattee Gules.” The arms of the bilhopric of Raphoe, in the kingdom of Ireland. Art. 2. Of the Pale. The Pale is an ordinary, confifting of two perpen¬ dicular lines drawn from the top to the bafe of the e- fcutcheon, and contains the third middle part of the field. Its diminutives are, the pallet, which is the half of the pale ; and the endorfe, which is the fourth part of a pale. This ordinary and the pallet may receive any charge, but the endorfe fhould not be charged. The endorfe, befides, is never ufed, according to J. Leigh, but to accompany the pale in pairs, as cotices do the bend ; but Sir John Feme is of a different opi- Plate ni°n- fig- 6. CCLV. Ex. 1. “ Gules, a Pale Or j” by the name of Grand- main. 2. “ Party per Pale Argent and Gules, a Pale counterchanged. 3. “ Argent, a Pale between two Endorfes Gules.” 4. “ Party per Pale, iff, Paly of fix Argent and Sable, 2d, Azure borne by the name of Trenchard. 5. “ Paly of fix Or and Azure.” 6. “ Argent, three Pallets undy Sable j” by the name of Downes. 7. “ Party per Pale, Argent and Gules;” borne by the right honourable John Waldegrave, Earl Walde- grave, &c. This noble earl is defcended from John de Waldegrave, who was (heriff of London in the year I 205, in the feventh year of King John. 8. “ Party per Pale indented, Or and Gules j” borne by the right honourable Thomas Bermingham, baron of Athenry, in the kingdom of Ireland. Of this ancient and noble family, which are of Englilh extrac¬ tion, and took their name from the town of Berming¬ ham in the county of Warwick, was William de Ber- mingham, who was poffeffed of the town of that name in the reign of Henry II. which continued in that fa¬ mily till the reign of Henry VIII. 9. “ Quarterly per Pale dove-tail, Gules and Or j” borne by the right honourable Thomas Bromley, Lord Montfort, &c. ihis noble lord is maternally defcend¬ ed from Sir Walter Bromleghe of Bromleghe, in the county of Stafford, who fiourilhed in the reign of King John. Sir Thomas Bromley, another of his lordfhip’s ancefiors, was conftituted lord high chancellor of England, 21 Elizabeth j in which poll he died, 29 E- lizabeth. L B n Y. 405 10. “ Argent, a Pale flory counterflory Sable.” Of the ir. “Argent, a Pale lozengy Sable j” borne by. the name of Savage. —y—~ 12. “ Argent, a Pale indented Vert j” borne by the name of Dickfon. “ 13. “ Argent, on a Pale engrailed Sable, three Crefcents Or j” borne by the name of Ap^ly. 14. “ Ermine on a Pale engrailed azure, three Lion’s Heads couped Or j” borne by the name of A- very. 15. “ Vert, on a Pale radiant Or, a Lion ram¬ pant Sable j” borne by the right honourable James O’Hara, Lord Tyrawley, &c. in the kingdom of Ire¬ land. This noble lord is defcended from Milefius king of Spain, by his eldelf fon Hiberius, w-ho, with his brother Heremon, eftablilhed a colony in Ireland. Sir Charles 0‘Hara, father to the prefent lord, was created baron of Tyrawley by Queen Anne, Jan. 10. 1706, be¬ ing at that time a lieutenant-genera.!, and colonel of the royal regiment of fufileers : and the next year was made general in Spain, where this fon, Lord James, was W'ounded at the battle of Almanza. 16. “ Azure, a Pallet Argent.” 17. “ Vert, an Endorfe Or.” 18. “ Argent, on two Pallets Sable, fix Crofs- croflets fitchy Or j” borne by the name of Betimes, of the county of Salop. 19. “ Argent, two Endorfes Gules, in Chief three Mullets Sable j” borne by the name of Vautort. 20. “ Azure, on a Pale walled with three pieces on each fide Or, an Endorfe Sable j” borne by the name of Sublet de Noyers, a family of diffin&ion in France. Art. 3. Of the Bend and Bend-sinister. The bend is an ordinary formed by two diagonal lines, drawn from the dcxter-chief to the finiffer-bafe : and contains the fifth part of the field in ^breadth, if un¬ charged ; but if charged, then the third. Its diminu¬ tives are, the bendlet, which is the half of a bend ; the coil or cotice, when two of them, accompany a bend, which is the fourth part of a bend 5 and the ribband, the moiety of a coft, or the eighth part of the field. There is alfo the bend-finiller, which is of the fame breadth as the bend, but drawn the contrary way : this is fubdivided into a fcrape, which is the half of the bend, and into a baton, which is the fourth part of the bend, but does not extend itfelf to the extremities of the field, there being part of it feen at both ends. See the examples, fig. 7. pj ( Ex. 1. “ Argent, a Bend wavy Sable 5” borne by CGLVL the right honourable John Wallop, earl of Portfmouth, &c. This noble earl is defcended from the Wallops of Hampfhire, a Saxon family, who were poffeffed of. lands to a confiderable value in the county at the time of the conqueft. 2. “ Cheeky Or, and Azure, a Bend Ermine j” borne by the right honourable John Ward, Vifcount Dudley and Ward, &c. The anceffors of this noble lord were anciently of the county of Norfolk, of which was Simon Ward, who had large poffeflions in the reign of Edward I. and was in France and Scotland in the reigns of King Edward II. and III. 3- “ Azure, a Bend engrailed Argent, between two Cotices Or 5” borne by the right honourable Matthew Fortefcue, Lord Fortefcue, as alfo by the. right 4°6 HERA Of the right honourable Hugh Foi tefcue-Aland, Baron Forte- i -e”( ’ , fcue, in the kingdom of Ireland, this laft nobleman bearing a crefcent in his arms for difference. The fa¬ mily of Fortefcue is defcended from Sir Richard le Forte, a perfon of extraordinary ftrength and courage, who accompanied William duke of Normany in his fn- vafion of England ; and bearing a ftrong iliield before the duke, at the battle of Haftings, had three horfes killed under him, and from that fignal event the name and motto of the family were aflumed; for the Latin word fcutum, or the old French word efcue “ a fhield,” being added to forte “ ftrong,” compofe their name ; and the motto is, Forte fcutum falus ducum. 4. “ Sable, a Bend Argent between two Cotices in¬ dented Or j” borne by the name of French. 5. “ Paly of fix Or and Sable, a Bend counter- changed borne by the right honourable Frederick Calvert, Baron Baltimore. Tho original of this family is from an ancient and noble houfe of that furname in the earldom of Flanders, -whereof Sir George Calvert, knight, among other honourable employments, was fecretary of ftate to King James I. by whom he was created a baron, Feb. 20. 1624, and from whom he had a grant to him, and his heirs, of the province of Mary¬ land and Avalon in America. 6. “ Party per Bend crenelle Argent and Gules f borne by the right honourable Edmund Boyle, earl of Cork and Orrery, &c. in the kingdom of Ireland. This noble lord is faid to be defcended from Sir Philip Boyle, a knight of Arragon, who, in the reign of King Henry VI. tilted at a tournament with Sir Jofeph Aftley, knight of the Garter. 7. “ Argent, three Bendlets enhanfed Gules as the Englifti exprefs it, but the phrafe enhanfed is ufed by no other nation. The proper blazon of this arms is, Parted per bend, ift bendy of fix gules, and argent 5 2d of the laft. Borne by the right honour¬ able William Byron, Lord Byron. From Doomfday- book it appears, that this family was poffefled of numer¬ ous manors and lands in the reign of the Conqueror \ and that Sir John Byron, one of his lordftiip’s an- ceftors, attended King Edward III. in his wars in France. 8. “ Ermine, a Bend voided Gules j” borne by the name of I reton. 9. “ Argent three Bendlets wavy Azure j” borne by the name of WUbraham. 10. “ Bendy of fix pieces Argent and Azure.” Ob- ferve, that when the Ihield is filled with an equal num¬ ber of bendlets of metal and colour, it is called bendy ; but if the number of them is unequal, they are to be blazoned by the name bendiets, and their number fpe- cified. 11. “ Party per Bend Azure and Argent, two Bend¬ lets engrailed counterchanged $” borne by the name of Frenes. 12. “ Quarterly, Or and Gules, a Bend over-all Vair ;” borne by his grace Lionel Cranfield Sackville, duke of Dorfet and earl of Middlefex, &c. The an- ceftors of this family were lords of the town and feig- niory of Sackville in Normandy, and came over with the Conqueror whlen he invaded England in 1066. 13. “ Gules on a Bend Argent, three Trefoils Hip¬ ped proper borne by the right honourable George William Hervey, earl of Briftol, See. This noble lord 1 L D R \. Chap. Ill, derives his pedigree from Robert Fitz-Hervey, aOftheFefs younger fon of Hervey duke of Orleans, who came and Bar. over from France with William the Conqueror. u—y— 14. “ Argent, on a bend Gules coti fed Sable; three pairs of Wings conjoined of the firftborne by the right honourable Richard Wingfield, Vifcount Powers- court, in the kingdom of Ireland. This noble lord is denominated from the manor of Wingfield in Suffolk, where they had a feat before the Norman conqueft called Wingfeld-cajlle. ' I5' Gules, on a Bend centre Ermine cotifed Or, three Boars Heads couped Argent ;” borne by the right honourable George Edgcumbe, Lord Edgcumbe, &c. The anceftors of this noble lord received their name from the manor of Edgcumbe in Devonlhire. One of this lord’s anceftors was Sir Richard Edgcumbe, who came over to England with the earl of Richmond) having a great ftiare in the vidlory he obtained over King Richard III. at Boftvorth, by which the earl made his way to the throne of England. 16. “ Argent, a Bend-finifter Gules.” 17. “ Or, a Bendlet Gules.” 18. “ Argent, a Ribband Gules.”—The name of this bearing- correfponds well with its form, being both long and narrow, which is the ftiape of a ribband. 19. “ Azure, a Scrape Or.”—This bearing, as Guillim obferves, is that kind of ornament called now- a-days a Scarf which is ufed by officers on duty, and ufually w-orn after the fame manner. 20. This contains three Batons. The firft is corn- pony ermine and azure ; fet over the royal arms, for his grace William Fitzroy duke of Cleveland. The fe- cond is compony argent and azure ; fet over the royal arms, for his grace Auguftus Henry Fitzroy, duke of Grafton. 7 he third is gules, charged with three rofes argent, feeded and barbed proper ; fet over the royal arms, for his grace George Beauclerk, duke of St Al¬ bans. The grandfathers of thefe noble dukes being na¬ tural fons of King Charles II. is what entitles them to the royal arms. Art. 4. Of the Fess and Bar. The Fefs is an ordinary which is produced by two parallel lines, drawn horizontally acrofs the centre of the field, and contains in breadth the third part there¬ of. Some Englifti writers fay it has no diminutive, for a bar is a diftimft ordinary of itfelf. The Bar, according to theit-definition, is formed of two lines, and contains but the fifth part of the field : which is not the only thing wherein it differs from the fefs; for there mhy be more than one in an efcutcheon, placed in different parts thereof, whereas the fefs is limited to the centre-point; but in this the French differ trom them. The bar has two diminutives; the barulet, which containsAhe half of the bar ; and the clofet, which is the half of the barulet. When the ihield contains a number of bars of metal and colour al¬ ternate, of even number, that is called barn; of fo many pieces, exprefling their number. See the ex- Plate amples, fig. 8. CCWX N° 1. is “ Argent, a Fefs indented Sable :” borne by the right honourable John Weft, Earl Delaware, &c. 7 his noble family is defcended from the Wefts, a great family in the weft of England ; but in the reign of Edward II. they appear to have been feifed of ma¬ nors Chap. III. HERA Of the Fefs nors and lands in the county of Warwick. Sir Tho- and Bar. mas knight, one of his lord drip’s anceftors, being at the battle of Creffy, and there taking John the French king prifoner, had granted him, for that remarkable adiion, an augmentation to his atchieve- ment, viz. a Crampette Or, diftinguifhed by the chape of a fword in the middle j the chape being given him by the laid king, as an acknowledgment of his be¬ coming his prifoner: his cognizance was a rofe parted per pale, argent, and gules j which two badges are Hill borne in the atchievement of the prefent Lord De¬ laware. 2. “ Argent, a Fefs wreathed Azure and Gules borne by the right honourable John Carmichael, earl of Hyndford. Of this ancient family, which is faid to alfume their furname from the lands of Carmichael, in the county of Lanark, in Scotland, where they Hill have their chief feat, was Sir John Carmichael, who accompanied Archibald, earl of Douglas, to the aflid- ance of Charles VI. of France, againft the Englilh ; and fignalizing his valour at the battle of Baughey in April 1421, and breaking his fpear when the French and Scots got the vidlory, had thereupon added to his paternal coat, a dexter arm holding a broken fpear, which is now the creH of the family. 3. “ Party per Fefs Or and Argent, a Fefs nebule Gules borne by the name of A-iteftied. 4. “ Party per Fefs indented Or and Azure j” borne by the name of Saunders. 5. “ Cheeky Or and Azure on a Fefs Gules, a Crefcent Argent for difference borne by the right honourable Plugh Clifford, Lord Clifford, of Chudley. This noble lord is defeended from Walter de Clifford, of Clifford caille, in the county of Hereford, who came over into England with the Conqueror j of which fa¬ mily was fair Rofamond, miff refs to King Henry II. 6. li Argent, on a Fefs Azure, three Lozenges Or j” borne by the right honourable Eaffl Fielding, earl of Denbigh and Defrnond, &c. This noble earl is defeended from the earls of Hapfburg, in Germany. Geoffrey earl of Hapfburg, being opprelfed by Ro- dolph emperor of Germany, came over into England, and one his fons ferved King Henry III. in his wars, whofe anceftors laying claim to the territories of Lauf- fenburg and Rhin-Fielding, in Germany, he took the name of Fielding. 7. “ Or, on a Fefs Gules, three Fleurs-de-lis of the firft }” borne by the name of Lermard. This is in the firft and fourth quarters of the right honourable Thomas Barret Lennard Lord Dacre’s arms. 8. “ Ermine, on a Fefs Gules, a Lion paffant Or 5” borne by the right honourable John Proby, Baron Carys- fort, &c. in the kingdom of Ireland. 9. “ Sable, a Fefs Ermine, between three Cref- cents Or j” borne by the right honourable George William Coventry, earl of Coventry, &c. This noble earl is defeended from John Coventry, a native of the City of Coventry, and afterwards mercer and lord mayor of London, in the reign of Henry V. : from whom de¬ feended Thomas Coventry, one of the juftices of the court of common-ideas, in the reign of Queen Eliza¬ beth ; whofe fon Thomas was recorder of London, and afterwards lord keeper of the great feal in the reien of King Charles I. JO. “ Sable, a Fefs cheeky, Grand Azure, between L D R Y. 407 three Befgnts j” borne by the right honourable Ridge- Of the Fefr way Pitt, earl and baron of Londonderry, &c. Of and Bar. this noble family, which wTere anciently of Bandfort, '1'" “v in the county of Dorfet, was Thomas Pitt, Efq. wEo, in the reign of Queen Anne, was made governor of Fort St George in the Eart Indies, wdiere he refided many years, and purchafed a diamond, which he fold to the king of Fiance for 125,000!. fterling, weighing 136 carats, and commonly known at this day by the name of Pul's diamond. 11. “ Or, on a Fefs Sable, between three Mufcovy Ducks proper, a Rofe of the Field j” borne by- the right honourable John Bateman, Vifcount Bateman, &c. Of this noble family, which was anciently feated at Halefbrook, near St Omers in Flanders, was Giles Bateman, Efq. whofe fon was a merchant of London, and was father to Sir James Bateman, knight, who, in 1712, was chofen member of parliament for Ilchefter in the county of Somerfet, and re-chofen in 1713. 12. “ Sable, on a Fefs Argent, between three Leo¬ pards paffant guardant Or, three Efcalops Gules borne by the right honourable Wills Hill, earl of Hillf- borough, S;c. Of this family, which, in the reign of Queen Elizabeth, were of note in the county ofDowne, was Sir Mofes Hill, who, during O’Neile’s rebellion, was one of thofe gentlemen who affociated under the earl of Effex to fupprefs it \ and afterwards ferved un¬ der Arthur Lord Chicheffer, lord deputy, and by King James I. was appointed provoft-marfhal of the whole province of Ulfter in Ireland. 13. “ Gules, two Bars Or5” borne by the right honourable Simon Harcourt, earl of Harcourt, Sic. This noble earl is defeended from the Harcousts of Normandy, who took their name from a place called Harcourt, in that province, where the family ufually refided. Gervaife, count de Harcourt, with his two fons Jeffrey and Arnold, came over with the Conqueror, when he invaded England in 1066. 14. “ Ermine, two Bars Gules 5” borne by the right honourable Thomas Nugent, earl of Weftmeath, Baron Delvin. 15. “Argent, twm Bars indented Sable;” borne by the right honourable Godart Ginkle, earl of Ath- lone. Godart, who was the firft earl, was defeended ot a very ancient family in the united provinces of Hol¬ land, where hf was baron de Reede and Ginkle, Sec. In 1691, he was a lieutenant-general of King William’s forces in Ireland; where, in June the fame year, he took Ballymore for the Englifti ; and, in July following, the Iriih town of Athlone, which laft exploit is one of the greateft recorded in hiftory. 16. “ Argent, three Bars gemels Gules ;” borne by the right honourable Richard Barry, earl of Barry more, Sec. This noble family, who have been renown¬ ed for their loyalty and valour, are faid to derive their furname from the iftand of Barry, in the county of Gla¬ morgan, in Wales ; and from their riches and eftates have been called by the people Barrymore, or the Great Barry. 17. “ Or, a Fefs-couped Gules, between two Lions paffant Sable ;” borne by the right honourable Samuel Maftiam, Lord Mafham, Sec. Fhis noble lord is de¬ feended from Sir John Maftiam, who ftourilhed in the reign of King Henry VI. and was buried at Thorne- ham, in the county of Suffolk, iy I4i;5. Jt8.. ' 4*8 HERA Of the iS. “ Argent, a Lion rampant guardant Gules, Uicvfct-on. debrutfed by a Fefs Azure, between three Etoiles if- fuing out of as many Crefcents of the fecond;” borne by the right honourable Robert Dillon, earl of Rofcom- inon, &c. in the kingdom of Ireland. This noble family is derived from Logan, furnamed Di/une dr J?e/ion, which fignifies brave and valiant, to tvhom the duke of Aquitaine gave his daughter in marriagej in whofe right, after her father’s death, he became prince and fovereign of Aquitaine, which continued in his pofterity till Henry II. married Alionora, daughter and heir to William V. duke of Aquitaine, and about 1172 obtained that principality by fuperior force ; and, to prevent any didurbance, brought Sir Henry Delion or Dillon, and his brother Thomas, then infants, to England, their father being flain. 19. “ Or, two Bars Azure, a Chief quarterly of the the fecond and Gules, the ill and 4th charged each with two Fleurs-de-lis of France; the 2d and 3d with a Lion of England j” borne by his grace John Man¬ ners, duke of Rutland, marquis of Granby, &c. This chief w as anciently Gules; and the charge thereon is an honorary augmentation, Ihowing his grace’s defcent from the blood-royal of King Edward IV. 20. “ Barry of ten pieces Argent and Azure, over all fix Efcutcheons ; 3, 2, r, Sable, each charged with a Lion rampant of the firll, armed, and lan- gued Gules, a Crefcent for difference}” borne by the right honourable James Cecil, earl of Salifbury, &c. This noble earl is defcended from the famous William Cecil, Lord Burleigh, ftatefman in the reigns of Ed¬ ward VI. and Elizabeth. This great man left two Ions, Thomas and Robert, who were both made earls in one day, May 4. 1603. Robert, the younger fon, anceftor of the prefent noble lord, was created earl of Saliibury in the morning j and Thomas, the eldeft, earl o£ Exeter in the afternoon. Art. 5. Of the Cheveron. The Cheveron, which reprefents two rafters of a houfe well joined together, or a pair of compaffes half open, takes up the fifth part of the field with the Englifii, but the French give it the third. Its diminu¬ tives are, The cheveronel, which contains the half of a cheveron ; and the couple clofe, which is the half of a cheveronel, that is, its breadth is but the fourth part of a cheveron. Leigh obferves, that this laft diminu¬ tive.is never borne but in pairs, or with a cheveron be¬ tween turn of them. The French have but one dimi¬ nution of this ordinary called Etaije, containing the ‘^late third part of its breadth. CLVI. Examples of cheverons are given in fig. 9. viz. 1. “ Argent, a Cheveron Gules between three Tor- teaux j” borne by the right hohourable Bennet Sher- rard, earl of Harborough, &c. This noble earl is lineally defcended from Scherard, wdio was poffeffed of manors and lands to a great value in the counties of Chelhire and Lancalhire in the reign of William the Conqueror. Geoffroy, another of this earl’s anceflors, was three times fheriff of Rutlandlhire, in the reigns of King Edward IV. and King Richard III. 2. “ Sable, a Cheveron between three Etoiles Ar¬ gent j” borne by the right hon. Marmaduke Lang- dale, Lord Langdale. This noble lord is defcended from the Langdales of Yorkfnire, who refided at the 2 L D R Y. Ghap. Ill, town of Langdale, from whence they took their name, Of the in the reign 'of King John 5 but his anceftor, who Oheveroru makes the greateft figure in hiftory, is Sir Marma- duke Langdale, who raifed forces in the north of Ena-, land in defence of King Charles 1.5 was victorious ixi nurribeliefs battles and lieges ; and when his majefty, by the united forces of England and Scotland, was at length overpowered, he attended King Charles II. in his exile, and returned to England with his majefty at the reftoration. 3. “ Sable, a Cheveron between three Leopards Heads Or j” borne by the right hon. William Went¬ worth, earl of Strafford, &c. All gehealogifts agree, that the name of Wentworth is of Saxon original, and taken from the manor of Wentworth in Yorklhire, where, in the reign of William the Conqueror, lived Reginald de Wenteworde, as it is fpelt in Doomfday- book. 4. “ Argent, a Cheveron between three Grif¬ fons paffant Sable, a Crefcent for difference borne by the right hon. Heneage Finch, earl of Ailesford, &c. This family is defcended from Herbert FitZ- Herbert, earl of Pembroke, and chamberlain to King Henry I. They took the name of Finch in the reign of King Edward I. One of the anceftors of this fa¬ mily was the right hon. Heneage Finch, earl of Not¬ tingham, who was conftituted lord high-chancellor of England in 1675 ; and lord high-fteward on the trials of Philip earl of Pembroke, and William vifcouiit Stafford, in 16S0. 5. “ Azure, a Cheveron Ermine, between three Efcalops Argent j” borne by the right hon. George Townftiend, Vifcount Towmfhend, &c. This family is of Norman extra&ion, and came into England about the time of the conqueft. Charles, lord vifcount Townftiend, grandfather of the prefent vifcount, was appointed principal fecretary of ftate in the reign of King George I. in 1720, and continued fo to the end of his majefty’s reign j when, upon refigning the feals, they w’ere returned to him again by his late majefty King George II. who continued him in that honour¬ able office to the year i7d°* 6. “ Azure, a Cheveron between three Mullets Or borne by the right honourable John Chetwund vifcount ChetW'ind, &c. of the kingdom of Ireland. Of this family, which hath been of great antiquity in the county of Salop, taking their furname from Chet- wTynd in that county, was Adanl de Chetwynd, wffio married Agnes daughter of John Lord Lovel, baron of Dockinges, and lord of Minfter Lovel in Oxfordihire j and by her had iffue Sir John de Chetvvynd, who, in the 37th of Henry III. had a charter of free-warren, through all his demefne in the counties of Salop, Staf¬ ford, and Warwick. 7. “ Argent, a Cheveron Gules, between three fquare Buckles Sable 5” borne by the right honourable Mat¬ thew Ducie-Mdrton, Lord Ducie, &c. This nobles lord is defcended from the Ducies in Normandy. Af¬ ter they came into England, King Edward I. conferred on them the lordlhip of Morton in Staffordffiire, and fe~ veral other lordffiips and manors, which the family en¬ joyed for many years. Sir Robert Ducie, one of his lordffiip’s anceftors, was lord mayor of London in the reign of King Charles I. and though he lent his ma* jefty 80,cool, which was loft by the king’s being drive*! Chap. III. HERA Of the driven out of London, he died, however, worth Cheveron. 400,000!. s.-—v——j g. {{ ^rgent> a Cheveron Cheeky Gules, and of the Held, between three Bugle-horns ftrung Sable, garnilhed of the fecond borne by the right honour¬ able Lord Hugh Semple, Lord Semple. The princi¬ pal family of this name was Semple of Eliotflon in Ren- frewfliire, where they had large poflellions and offices, as Itewards and bailiffs under the family of Stewart, pro¬ prietors of that county before they came to the crown. The firft Lord Semple was Sir Robert, who, being- much in favour with King James IV. was by him crea¬ ted Lord Semple in 1489. 9. “ Argent, a Cheveron engrailed between three Lions paffant Sable j” borne by the right honourable and the reverend Philip Smithe, Vifcount Strangford. One of this lord’s anceftors was John Smithe, Efq ; who acquired a confiderable eftate whilft he was farm¬ er of the cuftoms in the reign of Henry VIII. He left two fons, John and Sir Thomas j which laft was fent ambaffador by King James I. to the emprefs of Ruffia. 1 IO-. “ Quarterly Argent and Azure, a Cheveron engrailed counter-changed borne by the name of Chamber. 11. “ Party per Cheveron engrailed Gules and Ar¬ gent, three X albots Heads eraied counter-changed j” borne by the right honourable Anthony Duncombe, Lord Feverffiam, &c. His lordlhip is defeended from the Duncombes of Barley-end in Buckinghamffiire. Sir Charles Duncombe, uncle to the prefent lord, was lord mayor of London in 1709; and this nobleman was created Lord Feveriham and baron of Dowton in Wilt- ffiire, June 23. 1744. 12. “ Paly of fix, Argent and Gules, on a Che¬ veron Azure, three Crofs-croflets Or j” borne by the name of Carpenter, Baron Carpenter, of Killaghy in Ireland. This ancient and noble family are of great antiquity in the county of Hereford, and have been lords of the manor of the Home in the parilh of Del- wyn, near Weobley, for above 300 years. George, the firff Lord Carpenter, was fo created May 4. 1 719. 13. “ Azure, on a Cheveron Or, between three Befants, a Bay Leaf Proper $” borne by the right hon¬ ourable ;Tames Hope, earl of Hopeton, &c. This noble family is defeended from Henry Hope, a native of Holland, who, about two centuries ago, came over and fettled in Scotland. Charles Hope, Efq. grand¬ father of the prefent earl, was created an earl by Oueen Anne, April 13. 1703. 14* “ Vert, on a Cheveron between three Unicorns Heads erafed Argent, horned and maned Or, three Mullets Sable borne by the name of Ker, being the iff and 4th quarters in the arms of his grace John Ker, duke of Roxburgh, &c. This ancient family is faid to come from Normandy. John Ker, marquis of Beau¬ mont and Cesford, the firll duke of Roxburgh, was fo created April 27. 1707. 15. “ Azure, on a Cheveron Or, between three Bears Heads couped (Argent, muzzled Gules, a Roe¬ buck’s Head erafed, between two Hands holding Daggers all properborne by the right honourable Donald Mackay, Lord Reay. This family is faid to derive their defeent from Alexander, a younger fon of Ochonacker, who, about the end of the twelfth cen- Vol, X. Part II, LDRV 40 tury, came from Ireland j and the fourth in defeent Of the from him was Donald of Strathnavern, whofe fon was Crofs. named 2 More; and from him began the furname of Mac T, Mackie, or Mackay. Donald, the firlt lord of this family, was created baronet in 1625, and on June 20. 1628, was created Baron Reay of the county of Caithnefs, by Charles I. 16. “ Ermine, on a Cheveron Azure, three Foxes Heads erafed Or, and in a Canton of the fecond a Fleur-de-lis of the third borne by the right hon- ouiable Stephen, earl of Ilchefler, &.c. Of the family of I ox there have been many perfons of note living m the counties of Dorfet, Somerfet, Wilts, and Hants, particularly Richard Fox, bilhop of Winchefter. His lordlhip was created Lord Ilchefter and Baron Strange- ways, May n. 1741, 14 Geo. II. and earl of Ilche- ffer in June 1736. 17. “ Or, two Cheveronels Gules j” borne by the right honourable John Monfon, Lord Monfon. This noble lord is defeended from John Monfon, who flou- nlhed in the reign of King Edward HI. from whom defeended another John, who attended King Henry V. in his wars in France. Sir John Monfon, Bart, father of the prefent lord, was created Lord Monfon, May 28. 1728. J 18. “ Orj on a Fefs, between two Cheveronels Sable, three Crofs-crollets of the firff borne by the right honourable George Walpole, earl of Orford, &c. Xhis family took their name from Walpole in Norfolk, where they refided before the conqueft. Sir Robert Walpole was, in King George II.’s reign, eleaed knight of the garter in 1726, and created earl of Or¬ ford, February 9. 1741-2. 19. “ Azure, three Cheveronels interlaced Or, and a Chief ot the laft j” borne by the name of Fil¬ ling h. 20. “ Argent, three Cheveronels Gules, in Chief a Label Azure borne by the right honourable Wil¬ liam V ildman Barrington, Vifcount Barrington, &c. X his family is of Norman extra6Xion j in wffiich duchy, whilft it continued annexed to the Englifti crown, there w'ere to be feen the remains of a caftle, bearing the name of Chute, or Shute, and formerly in the family, with other monuments in feveral towns of that duchy. John Shute, the late Vifcount Barrington, was in 1708 made a commiffioner of the cuftoms, and fucceeded to the eftates of Francis Barrington, Efq.; and of John Wild man of the county of Berks, who made him their heir 5 and in purfuance of the will of the former, he took the name and arms of Barrington. On June n. 1720, he was created Vifcount Barrington. Art. 6. Of the Cross. The Crofs is an ordinary formed by the meeting of two perpendicular with two horizontal lines in the fefs-point, where they make four right angles; the lines are not drawn throughout, but difeontinued the breadth of the ordinary, which takes up only the fifth part of the field when not charged j but if charged, then the third. It is borne as well engrailed, in¬ dented, &c. as plain. There is fo great a variety of croffes ufed in he¬ raldry, that it would be a very difficult talk to treat of them all. Guillim has mentioned 39 different forts ; De la Columbiere, 72 3 Leigh, 46; and Upton declares 3 F he 4io Of the Crofs. Plate, ecLvi. I H E R A he dares not afcertain all the various erodes borne in arms, for that they are almoft innumerable •, there¬ fore, as all their forms cannot be expected here, we will only take notice of fuch as are moft commonly feen at prefent in coats-of arms. See Fig. 10. The fir ft is “ Quarterly, Ermine and Azure, a Crofs Or 5” borne by his grace Thomas Olborne duke of Leeds, &c. This noble duke is defeended from the honourable family of the Ofbornes of Alhford, in the county of Kent 5 Sir Thomas Ofborne, the grand¬ father to the prelent duke, was advanced to the peer¬ age by King Charles II. 2. “ Gules, a Crofs engrailed Argent, a Lozenge in the dexter-chief of the lecond borne by the right honourable Edward Leigh, Lord Leigh. This family took their furname from the town of High Leigh in Chefhire, where they refided before the Norman con- queft. Sir Thomas Leigh, the firft lord of this fami¬ ly, was created Baron Leigh of Stonely, by King Charles I. on July i. 1643. 3. “ Gules, a Crofs Argent fretty Azure:” borne by the right honourable .Nicholas Taaffe, Vifcount Taaffe, of Corran, &c. in Ireland. Of this noble and ancient family was Richard Taaffe, who lived in 128 as in 1306 did John Taaffe, who was archbilhop'of Ar¬ magh j and, in 1479, t^e or^c1' t^ie Garter being eftablilhed in Ireland, Sir Nicholas Taaffe was one of the firft members 5 and John, his fon and heir, wras created a baron and vifcount by Charles I. Auguft 1. 1628. 4. “ Sable, a Crofs raguly Or 5” borne by the name of Stovoay. 5. “ Argent, on a Crofs Sable, a Leopard’s face Or borne by his grace Henry Brydges duke of Chandos, &c. The anceftors of this noble family took their name from the city of Bruges in Flanders ; and one of them came over wdth William the Conqueror, and had a confiderable ftiare in the viftory obtained near Haftings in Suffex, 1066. James, the father of the prefent duke, was created Vifcount Wilton and earl of Caernarvon, Oftober 19. 1714; and marquis of Caernarvon and duke of Chandos, 30. I7I9> 6. “ Or, on a Crofs Sable, a patriarchal Crofs of the Field j” borne by the right honourable Thomas Vefey, baron of Knapton in the kingdom of Ireland. The truly noble family of Vefcey or Vefey, derives its origin from Charles the Great, king of France, and emperor of the weft^ who died at Aix-la-Chapelle in Germany, January 28. 814. His lordihip’s father was created a peer April 10. 1750' 7. “ Argent, on a Crofs Gules, five Efcalops Or 5” borne by the right honourable William Villiers earl of Jerfey, Sec. This noble earl is defeended from the fa¬ mily of Villiers in Normandy, fome of whom came over to England with the Conqueror •, feveral manors and lands in England being foon after granted to Pagan de Villiers, one of this earl’s anceftors. The firft peer of this family was created a baron and vifcount, March 20. 1690. 8. “ Sable, on a Crofs within a Bordure engrailed Or, five Pellets borne by the right honourable Francis Greville, earl of Brooke and Warwick, &c. The anceftors of this noble family are of Norman ex- tra£tion, and came over with William the Conqueror, who conferred manors and lands on them in England, L D R Y. Chap, ill, of a confiderable value j and at length they obtained Of the the government of the caftle of Warwdck, the prefent Crofs. feat of the family. Sir Fulke, the firft peer of this fa-' mily, was created Baron Brooke by King James I. January 9. 1620. 9. Argent, a Crofs botonny Sable,” borne-by the name of Winwoocl. jo. “ Or, a Crofs-croftet Gules,” borne by the name of Taddington. 11. “ Azure, a Crofs potent fitchy Or.” This en- fign is faid to have been borne by Ethelred king of the Weft Saxons ; and croffes ol this fort are frequent¬ ly met with in coats of arms. 12. “ Party per pale, Gules and Argent •, a Crofs potent quadrate in the Centre, between four Crofles pattee counter-changed 5” the arms of the epifcopal fee of Litchfield and Coventry. This fee wTas originally fixed at Litchfield ; from thence removed to Chefter, and from both to Coventry. It contains the whole county of Stafford, except two parifties ; all Derby- ftrire ; the better part of Warwicklhire, and near half Shropftu’re •, divided into the four archdeaconiJes of Coventry, Stafford, Derby, and Salop. The parifiies are 5 97 in number ; but, including chapels, they amount to 643. 13. “ Azure, a Crofs moline Argent j” borne by bis grace Cavendilh Bentinck, duke of Portland, &c. This noble duke is defeended from a very ancient and diftinguiihed family in the United Provinces of Holland, of which w^as William Bentinck, Eiq. wTho in his youth was page of honour to William prince of Orange, afterwards William III. king of Great Bri¬ tain, and, on the acceflion of William and his con- fort, was made' groom of the ftole, privy-purfe to his majefty, lieutenant-general of his majefty’s ar¬ my, &,c. and alfo created baron of Cirencefter, Vii- count Woodftock, and earl of Portland, April 19. 1689. 14. “ Argent, a Crofs patonce Sable 5” borne by the name of Rice. 15. “ Sable, a Crofs pattee Argent j” borne by the name of Maplefden. 16. “ Azure, a Crofs flowery Or; borne by the name of Cheney.—This is faid to have alio been the arms of Edwdn, the firft Chriftian king of Northum¬ berland. 17. “ Argent, fix Crofs-croftets fitchy 3, 2, I, I Sable, on a Chief Azure, two Mullets pierced Or,” borne by his grace Henry Clinton, duke of New- calile, &.c. This noble family is defeended from Jef¬ frey de Clinton, lord chamberlain ,and treafurer to King Henry I. grandfbn to William de Tankerville, chamberlain of Normandy; from whom defeended William de Clinton, chief juftice of Chefter, governor of Dover caftle, lord warden of the king’s forefts fouth of Trent. Edward Lord Clinton, another of this noble earl’s anceftors, was conifituted lord high- admiral of England for life, in the reign of Queen Elizabeth, who created him earl of Lincoln, May 4. lSl*- 18. “ Gules, a Cheveron between ten Croffes pat¬ tee, fix above and four below, Argentborne by the right honourable Frederick Auguftus Berkeley, earl of Berkeley, &c. This noble family is defeended from Robert Fitz-Harding, who obtained a grant of Berke- Chap. III. HERA ley-caftle in Gloucefterfliire, which the family flill in¬ herits, and from whence they obtained the furname of Berkeley, from Henry duke of Normandy, afterwards king ol England; the faid Robert Fitz-Harding was defcended from the royal line of the kings of Denmark. 19. “ Azure, three mullets Or, accompanied with feven Crofs-croflets fitchy Argent, three in Chief, one in Fefs, two in Flanks, and the laft in Bafe borne by the right honourable James Somerville, Lord So¬ merville. The firft of this name on record is Sir Wal¬ ter de Somerville, lord of Wichmore, in the county of Stafford, who came to England with William the Con¬ queror. 20. “ Gules, three Crofles recercelee, voided Or, a Chief vairy ermine and contre ermine borne by the right honourable John Peyto Verney, Baron Wil¬ loughby de Broke. This noble lord is defcended from William de Vernal, who ffouriffied in the reign of King Henry I. 1119. Art. 7. Of the Saltier. The Saltier, which is formed by the bend and bend- finifler eroding each other in right angles, as the in- * terfefling of the pale and fefs forms the crofs, con¬ tains the fifth part of the field ; but if charged, then the third. In Scotland, this ordinary is frequently called a St Andrew's Crofs. It may, like the others, p]ate be borne engrailed, wavy, &c. as alfo between charges CCLVII. or charged with any thing. See examples, fig. 11. N° I. is “ Argent, a Saltier Gulesborne by his grace James Fitz-Gerald, duke of Leinfter, See. This noble lord is defcended from Otho, or Other, a rich and powerful lord in the time of King Alfred, de¬ fcended from the dukes of Tufcany; who palling from Florence into Normandy, and thence into England, there the family ffourilhed, until Richard Strongbow, earl of Pembroke, their kinfman, engaged them to partake in his expedition to Ireland, in which Maurice Fitz-Gerald embarked, and was one of the principal conquerors of that kingdom, for which he was reward¬ ed with a great eftate in lands in the province of Lein- ffer, and particularly the barony of Offaley, and the caftle of Wicklow; and died, covered with honours, in the year 1177, 24 Henry II. 2. “ Gules, a Saltier Argent, between twelve Crofs- croflets Or;” borne by the right hon. Other-Lewis Windfor Hickman, earl of Plymouth, &c. This noble earl is defcended from Robert Fitz-Hicman, lord of the manor of Bloxham, Oxfordlhire, in the 56 Hen. III. 1 27 2; and he is maternally defcended from the noble family of the Windfors, who were barons of the realm at the time of the conqueil. 3. “ Vert, a Saltier wavy Ermine borne by the name of IVaketnan of Beckford, in Gloucefterihire. 4. “ Ermine, a Saltier counter-compony Or and Gules ;” borne by the name of Ulmjlon. 5. “ Argent, a Saltier Azure with a Bezant in the centre ; borne by the right hon. Philip Yorke, earl of Hardwicke, &c. He was in October 1733 conftituted lord chief-juftice of the king’s bench, and November 23. in the fame year, created Baron Hard¬ wicke of Hardwicke. <5. “ Argent on a Saltier Gules an Efcalop Or;” L D R Y. 41: the arms of the biflioprick of Rocheffer.—This clio- Of the cefe, the leaft in England, comprehends only a fmall Saltier, part of Kent, in which there are 150 churches and chapels; and the two pariihes of Ifelham in Cam- bridgefhire, and Frekenham in Suffolk. It has only one archdeacon, that of Rochefter. For many years it was in the immediate patronage of the archbiihop of Canterbury. 7. “ Party per Saltiere, Azure and Argent, on a Saltier Gules, a Crefcent of the fecond for difference ;” quartered by the' right hon. William Hall Gage, Vif- count Gage, of Caftle-Ifland in Ireland. This noble family is ol Norman extraction, and derives defeent from de Gaga or Gage, who attended William I. in his ex¬ pedition to England ; and, after the eonquelt thereof, wras reivarded with large grants of lands in the forelt of Dean, and county of Gloucefter, near wdiich forelt he fixed his relidence, by building a feat at Clerenwell, in the fame place where the houfe of Gage now Itands: he alfo built a great houfe in the town of Cirenceffer, at which place he died, and wras burled in the abbey there. Sir Thomas Gage, the eighth baronet, was created baron of Caitle-Bar, and Vilcount Gage, 1721. 8. “ Gules, on a Saltier Argent, a Rofe of the firit barbed and feeded proper;” borne by the right hon. George Neville, Lord Abergavenny, premier baron of England. 9. “ Or, on a Saltier Azure, nine Lozenges of the firff ;” the paternal arms of the right hon. John Dalrymple, earl of Stair, &c. OF this family, which took their furname from the barony of Dalrymple, lying on the river Dun in Ayrihire, Scotland, was Adam de Dalrymple, who lived in the reign of Alex¬ ander III. 10. “ Argent, on a Saltier engrailed Sable, nine Annulets Or;” borne by the name of Leak. 11. “ Gules, a Saltier between four Crefcents Or;” borne as the fecond and third quarters in the coat-of- arms of the right honourable Charles Kinnaird, Lord Kinnaird. George Kinnaird, Efq. one of the pre- fent lord’s anceftors, being of great fervice to King Charles II. during the ufurpation of Oliver Cromwell, he was by that prince, at his refforation, made one of the privy-council; and December 28. 1682, created a baron. 12. “ Argent, a Saltier engrailed between four Ro- fes Gules,” for Lennox ; and borne as firft and fourth quarters in the coat-of-arms of the light hon. Francis Napier, Lord Napier. This family is faid to be de¬ fcended from the ancient thanes or ftewards of Len¬ nox in Scotland, but took the furname of Napier from the following event. King David II. in his wars with the Engliih, about the year 1344, convocating his fubjefts to battle, the earl of Lennox fent his fe- .cond fon Donald, with fuch forces as his duty obliged him ; and, coming to an engagement, where the Scots gave ground, this Donald, taking his father’s ftandard from the bearer, and valiantly charging the enemy with the Lennox men, the fortune of the battle changed; and they obtained the victory : whereupon every one advancing, and reporting their afts, as the cuftom was, the king declared they had all behaved valiantly, but that there was one among them who had na pier, that is, no equal; upon which the faid Donald took the ^3 F 2 name HERA name of Napier, and had, in reward for his good fer- vices, the lands of Gosfield, and other eftates in the county of Fife. 13. “ Gules, a Saltier Or, furmounted of another Vert,” for the name of Andrews; and borne by Sir William Andrews, bart. of Denton in Northampton- fliire, who is defeended from Sir Robert Andrews of Normandy, knight, who came into England with Wil¬ liam the Conqueror. Sir William Andrews, the firft baronet of this family, was created December 11. 1641. 14. “ Azure, a Saltier quarterly quartered Or and Argent.” The arms of the epifcopal fee of Bath and Wells.—The diocefe of Bath and Wells contains all Somerfetlhire, except a fewr churches in Briftol. And in it there are three archdeaconries, viz. thofe of Wells, Bath, and Taunton. The number of the parifhes is 388, though, according to fome, the total number of the churches and chapels amounts to 503. 15. “ Party per Saltier Argent and Gules, a Saltier coun ter-ch an ged.” 16. “ Party per Pale indented Argent and Sable, a Saltier counter-changed 5” borne by the name of Scote. 17. “ Argent, three Saltiers couped and engrailed Sable $” borne by the name of Benton. 18. “ Argent, a Saltier Gules, and a Chief Er¬ mine }” borne by the right hon. Francis Thomas Fitz-Maurice, earl of Kerry, &c. This very ancient and noble family is a branch of the family of Kildare, who are originally defeended from the great duke of Tufcany, and of which was Otho, a noble baron of Italy, whofe fon Walter, attending the Norman conqueror into England, was made conftable of the caltle of Windfor. Raymond, one of the prefent earl’s ancef- tors, had a principal hand in the reduftion of Ireland to the fubjeftion of Henry II. and Dermoid Mac- Carty, king of Cork, fought his aid againft his fon Cormac O’Lehanagh, which he undertook, and deli¬ vered the king from his rebellious fon •, for which that prince rewarded him with a large tra6l of land in the county of Kerry, where he lettled his fon Maurice, who gave his name to the county, which he called Clan- Alaurice, and is enjoyed by the prefent earl of Kerry, who is Vifcount Clan-Maurice. Thomas the firfl earl, and father of the lail, was the 21 ft Lord Kerry, who was t reated earl January 17. 1722. 19. “ Sable, a Saltier Argent, on a Chief Azure, three Fleurs-de-lis Or borne by the right hon. John Fitz-Patrick, earl of Upper Oflbry, and baron of Gowran in Ireland. This moft ancient and princely family is defeended from Heremon, the firft monarch of the Milefian race in Ireland and after they had aflumed the furname of Fitz-Patrick, they were for many ages kings of Ofibry, in the province of Leinfter. John, the firft earl of this family, fucceeded his father Richard as Lord Gowran, June 9. 1727, was created earl Odlober 5. 1751, and died 1758. 20. “ Party per Pale Argent and Gules, three Sal¬ tiers counter-changed ;” borne by the name of Lane. Thefe arms are alfo borne, without the leaft alteration, by the name of Kingstnan; for which fimilitude we can no otherwdfe account, than by fuppofing there has been fotne quftake made through many tranferiptions, L D R Y. Sect. II. Of Sub-Ordinaries. Chap. HI. Sub- Ordinaries. Besides the honourable ordinaries and the diminu¬ tions already mentioned, there are other heraldric fi¬ gures, called fub-ordinaries, or ordinaries only, which, by reafon of their ancient ufe in arms, are of worthy bearing, viz. The Gyron, Franc-quarter, Canton, Pairle, Fret, Pile, Orle, Inefcutcheon, Treffure, An¬ nulet, Flanches, Flafques, Voiders, Billet, Lozenge, Gutts, Fufil, Ruftre, Mafcle, Papillone, and Diapor, See Plate CCLIV. fig. 1. (a.) The Gyron is a triangular figure formed by two lines, one drawn diagonally from one of the four an¬ gles to the centre of the fhield, and the other is drawn either horizontal or perpendicular, from one of the fides of the fhield, meeting the other line at the cen¬ tre of the field. Gyronny is faid, when the field is covered with fix, eight, ten, or twelve gyrons in a coat-of-arms: but a French author would have the true gyronny to confift of eight pieces only, as in the fig. which reprefents the coat-of-arms of Flora Campbell countefs of Loudon, &c. whofe anceftor was created baron of Loudon in 1604 by James VI. and earl of the fame place, May 12, 1633, the 9th of Charles I. The Franc-quarter is a fquare figure, which occu¬ pies the upper dexter quarter of the ihield. It is but rarely carried as a charge. Silveftra Petra Sandla has given us a few’ inftances of its ufe. The Canton is a fquare part of the efcutcheon, fomewhat lefs than the quarter, but without any fixed proportion. It reprefents the banner that wras given to ancient knights-bannerets, and, generally fpeaking, pofiefies the dexter-chief point of the Ihield, as in the fig.; but fliould it pofiefs the finifter corner, which is but feldom, it muft be blazoned a canton-finifter. James Cotes reckons it as one of the nine honour¬ able ordinaries, contrary to moft heralds opinion. It is added to coats of arms of military men as an aug¬ mentation of honour : thus John Churchill, baron of Eyemouth in Scotland, and one of the anceftors of the prefent duke of Marlborough, being lieutenant ge¬ neral to King James II. received from him a canton ar¬ gent, charged with the red-crofs of England, added to his paternal coat, “ which is Sable, a lion rampant Argent.” The Pairle is a figure formed by the conjun&ion of the upper half of the faltier with the under half of the pale. The Fret is a figure reprefenting two little flicks in faltier, with a mafcle in the centre interlaced. J. Gib¬ bon terms it, the heralds true-lovers knot; but many diffent from his opinion. Fretty is faid when the field or bearings are covered with a fret of fix, eight, or more pieces, as in the fig. The word frettif may be ufed without addition, when it is of eight pieces •, but if there be lefs than that num¬ ber, they muft be fpecified. The Pile, which confifts of two lines, terminating in a point, is formed like a wedge, and is borne en¬ grailed, wavy, &.c. as in the fig. It iffues in general from the chief, and extends towards the bafe; yet there are fome piks borne in bend, and ifiuing from other parts Chap HI. HERA Sub- parts of the field, as may be feen in Plate CCLVII. Ordinaries^ j 2> , 2) &c. ' The Orle is an ordinary compofed of two lines go¬ ing round the fhield, the fame as the bordure, but its breadth is but one half of the latter, and at iome di- flance from the brim of the fhield, as in the fig. The Inefcutcheon is a little efcutcheon borne w ith¬ in the Ihield *, which, according to Guillim’s opinion, is only to be fo called when it is borne fingle in the fefs point or centre ; fee the fig. on Plate CCLIV. but modern heralds, wfith more propriety, give the name of inefcutcheon to fuch as are contained in I late CCLVII. fig. 12. N° 2. and call that which is fixed on the fefs-point efcutcheon of pretence, which is to con¬ tain the arms of a wife that is an heireis, as mention¬ ed above. The Treffure is an ordinary commonly fuppofed to be the half of the breadth of an orle, and is generally borne flowery and counter-flowery, as it is alio very often double, and fometimes treble. See the fig. (Plate CCLIV). This double-treffure makes part of the arms of Scotland, as marlhalled in the royal at- chievement, Plate CCLIX. fig. 2i. N° 7* an^ ^vas granted to the Scots kings by Charlemagne, being then emperor and king of France, when he entered into a league with Achaius king of Scotland, to fliow' that the French lilies fliould defend and guard the Plate Scottifh lion. CCLIV. The Annulet, or ring, is a well known figure, and is frequently to be found in arms through every kingdom in Europe. The Flanches are formed by two curved lines, or fe- micircles, being always borne double. See the figure. W. Leigh obferves, that on two fuch Flanches two fundry coats may be borne. The Flafques referable the flanches, except that the circular lines do not go fo near the centre of the field j (fee the figure). .1. Gibbon would have thefe twro ordinaries to be both one, and wrote funk; alleging, that the tw'o other names are but a corruption of this laft : but as G. Leigh and .1. Guillim make them two diftin& and fubordinate ordinaries, wfe have inferted them here as luch. The Voiders are by Guillim confidered as a fubor¬ dinate ordinary, and are not unlike the flafques (fee the figure), but they occupy lefs of the field. The Billet is an oblong fquare figure, twice as long as broad. Some heralds imagine, that they reprefent bricks for building; others more properly confider them as reprefenting folded paper or letters. The Lozenge is an ordinary of four equal and pa¬ rallel fides, but not reftangular *, two of its oppofite angles being acute, and the other two obtufe. Its fhape is the fame with thofe of our wfindow-glafles, before the fquare came fo much in falhion. See the figure. Gutts, or drops, are round at bottom, waved on the fides, and terminate at the top in points. Heralds have given them different names according to their different tin&ures thus if they are Yellow" White Red Blue Cd'Or ■ they are called -j ^ l_de Larmcs L D R Y. bS } - called [fe The Fufil is longer than the lozenge, having Its up¬ per and lower part more acute and fharp than the other two collateral middle parts, which acutenefs is occafioned by the Ihort diflance of the fpace between the two collateral angles j which fpace, if the fufil is rightly made, is always ihorter than any of the four equal geometrical lines whereof it is compofed. See the fig. ibid. The Ruftre is a lozenge pierced round in the middle (fee the figure.) They are called by the Germans rut ten. Meneftrier gives an example of them in the arms of Le- baret in France, argent three ruffres azure. The Mafcle is pretty much like a lozenge, but voided or perforated through its whole extent, ihowing a nar¬ row border, as in the figure. Authors are divided about the relemblance } lome taking it for the maih of a net, and others for the Ipots of certain flints found about Rohan ; and as no writer has given a clearer^ ac¬ count in fupport of this laid opinion than Colombiere, author of La Science Hera/dique, we fliall tranfcribe it for the fatisfaftion of the curious. “ Rohan (fays he) bears Gules, nine Mafcles Or, 3, 3, 3. Opinions have varied very much about the original of the mafcles or maflres, as being iomewhat like the maflies of nets: but for my own part, having often obferved that thofe things which are remarkable and Angular in fome countries, have fometimes occa¬ fioned the lords thereof to reprefent them in their efcutcheons, and to take them for their arms, I am of opinion, that the lords of Rohan, who, I believe,, are the firft that bore thofe figures in their arms though defcended from the ancient kings and princes of Bre¬ tagne, took them, becaufe in the mold ancient vifcounty of Rohan, afterwards erefded into a duchy, there are abundance of fmall flints, which being cut in two, this figure appears on the infide of them j as alfo the carps, which are in the filh-ponds of that duchy, have the fame mark upon their fcales 5 which, being very extraordinary and peculiar to that country, the an¬ cient lords of the lame had good reafon, upon obfer- ving that wonder, to take thofe figures for their arms, and to trafmit them to their poiderity, giving them the name of macles, from the Latin word macula, fig- nifying a fpot; wdience fome of that houfe have taken for their motto, Sine macula macla, that is, A mafcle without a fpot.” Papillone is an expreflion ufed for a field or charge that is covered with figures like the fcales of a fiflr. Monf. Baron gives as an example of it the arms of Monti, Gueules Papelone d’Argent. The proper term for it in Englilh would be fcallop work. Diapering is faid of a field or charge lhadowed with flourilhings or foliage with a colour a little darker than that on which it is wrought. The Germans frequent¬ ly ufe it j but it does not enter into the blazoning or defcription of an arms, it only ferves to embellilh the coat. If the fore-mentioned ordinaries have any attributes, that is, if they are engrailed, indented, wavy, &c. they muft be diftin&ly fpecified, after the fame manner as the honourable ordinaries. See examples of fubordinaries, gcc. fig. xii. I. “ Gules,.. 4T3 Sub- Oi dinaries. 414- HERA Sub- r. tl Gules, an Orle Ermine j” borne by the name Ordinane-. cf Humframville. ' “ Argent, three Inefcutcheons Gules borne CCLYII. by the name of Hay, and the 2d and 3d quarters in the coat-of-arms of the right hon. Thomas Hay, earl ef Kinnoul, &c.—The firil of the name of Hay that bore thefe arms, got them, as Mr Nifbet obferves, becaufe he and his two fans, after having defeated a party of the Danes at the battle of Loncarty, anno 942, were brought to the king with their Ihields all llained with blood. 3. “ Argent, a Fret Sable-,” borne by the right hon. Lionel Talmalh, earl of Dyfart, &c. This fami¬ ly was advanced to the peerage by King Charles I. in 1646. 4. “ Or fretty of Gules, a Canton Ermine borne by the right hon. Henry Noel, earl of Gainfborough, &c. This nobleman is defcended from Noel, who came into England with William the Conqueror, and, in confideration of his fervices, obtained a grant of feveral manors and lands of very great value. Sir Edward, who w?as knighted by King James on his ac- ceflion to the throne, and created a baronet June 29. 1611, was the firil advanced to the honour of Baron Noel, March 23. 1616. 5. “ Girony of eight Pieces Or and Sable the ill and 4th quarters of the coat-of-arms of the right hon. John Campbell, earl of Breadalbane, &c. This ancient and noble family is defcended, in a regular fuc- ceffion, from Duncan the firft Lord Campbell, ancellor of the family of Argyll. John, the firit earl, in con¬ fideration of his perfonal merit, was, from a baronet, created Lord Campbell, Vifcount Glenorchie, and earl of Breadalbane, Jan. 28. 1677, Charles II. 6. “ Lozengy Argent and Gulesborne by the right hon. George Eitz-William, Earl Fitz-William, &c. This noble earl is defcended from Sir William Fitz-William, marlhal of the army of William the Conqueror at the battle of Haftings in Suffex, by which viftory that prince made his wray to the throne. 7. “ Sable, a Mafcle within a Treflure flowery Ar¬ gent borne by the name of Hob/ethorne. 8. “ Gules, three Mullets Or, within a Bordure of the latter, charged with a double TreiTure flowery and counter-flowery with Fleurs-de-lis of the firft borne by the noble family of Sutherland, &c. This family, in the peerage, is among the oldeft in Britain, if not in all Europe; the title of earl being conferred on one of their anceftors in 1067. 9. “ Azure, a Pile Ermine,” for the name of Wyche; and is quartered as firft and fourth in the coat-of-arms of Sir Cyril Wyche, Bart. 10. “ Or, on a Pile engrailed Azure, three Crofs- crollets fitchy of the firft j” borne by the name of Rigdon. 11. “ Or, on a Pile Gules three Lions of England between fix Fleurs-de-lis rfzurej” the firft and fourth quarters of his grace Edwjard Seymour duke of Somer- fet, &c. granted him by King Henry VIII. on his mar¬ riage w-ith the lady Jane Seymour. 12. “ Ermine, tw-o Piles iffuing from the dexter and finifter fides, and meeting in bafe Sable 5” for the name of Holies. 13. “ Argent, three Piles, one iffuing from the Chief 1 L D R Y. Chap. III. betw-een the others reverfed, Sable for the name of Common Hulfe, and borne by Sir Edward Hulfe, Bart. < Charges. 14. “ Azure, a Pile wavy bendways Qr 5” borne' ~v by the name of Oldham.— Fhere is no mention made of its iffuing out of the dexter corner of the efcut- cheon, for this is fufticiently determined by the term headways. 15. “ Or, three Piles in Bend, each point enfeign- ed with a Fleur-de-lis Sable }” borne by the name of Norton. 16. “ Argent, three Piles meeting near the point of the bafe Azure;” borne by the name of Bryan. 17. “ Party per Pale and per Bend Or and Azure counterchanged ;” borne by the name of Johnfon.—. This bearing is equal to two gyrons; lee p. 41 2. col. 2. 18. “ Party per Pale and per Cheveron Argent and Gules counterchanged.” 19. “ Party per Pale chappe Or and Vert counter- changed.” This is a bearing ieldom to be met with. 20. “ Party per Fefs Gules and Argent, a Pale counterchanged;” borne by the name of Lavider. Sect. III. Of Common Charges borne in Coats-of-arms. It has bee . already obferved, that in all ages men have made ufe of the reprefentation of living creatures, and other fymbolical figns, to diftinguiih themfelves in war; and that thefe marks, which w-ere promifcu- oufly ufed for hieroglyphics, emblems, and perfonal de¬ vices, gave the firft notion of heraldry. But nothing fhows the extent of human wit more, than the great variety of thefe marks of diftindtion, fince they are compofed of all forts of figures, fome natural, others artificial, and many chimerical ; in allufion, it is to be funpofed, to the flate, quality, or inclination of the bearer. Hence it is, that the fun, moon, ftars, comets, me¬ teors, &c. have been introduced to denote glory, gran¬ deur, power, &c. Lions, leopards, tygers, ferpents, flags, &.c. have been employed to fignify courage, ftrength, prudence, fwdftnefs, &c. T he application to certain exercifes, fuch as war, hunting, mufic, &c. has furnifhed lances, fwords, pikes, arms, fiddles, &c. Architefture, columns, cheverons, &c.; and the other arts feveral things that relate to them. Human bodies, or diftindl parts of them, alfo clothes, and ornaments, Lave, for fome particular intention, found place in armory ; trees, plants, fruits, and flowTers, have likewife been admitted to denote the rarities, advantages, and Angularities, of different countries. The relation of fome creatures, figures, &c. to par¬ ticular names, has been likewife a very fruitful lource of variety in arms. Thus the family of Coningfby bears three coneys ; of Arundel, fix fwai!owrs ^ of Ur- fon, a bear ; of Lucie, three pikes, in Latin tres lucios pifces; of Starkey, a ftork ; of Czftleman, a caftle triple-tow-ered; of Shuttlewerth, three weavers fhut- tles, &c. Befides thefe natural and artificial figures, there are chimerical or imaginary ones ufed in heraldry, the re- fult of fancy and caprice ; fuch as centaurs, hydras, phoenixes, griffons, dragons, £ by George I. 20. “ Party per Pale Azure and Gules, three Lions rampant Argent y1 borne by Herbert earl of Pem¬ broke, &.c. This noble family is defcended from Henry Fitz-Roy, natural fon to Henry I. Sir William Her¬ bert, one of the ancetlors ot the prefent earl, was mat¬ ter of the horfe to King Henry VIII. lord preiklcnt of the marches of Wales, and knight of the garter. He was alfo, by that king, advanced to the dignity of Ba¬ ron Herbert of Caerdiff, OH. 10. 1551, and the very next day created earl Ji Pembroke.—Obferve, that it a lion, or any other beat!, is reprefented with its limbs and body feparated, fo that they remain upon the field at a fmail diftance from their natural places, it is then termed Dchache or couped in all its parts ; of which ve¬ ry remarkable bearing there is an inftance in armoury, which is, “ Or, a Lion rampant Gules, dehache, or couped in all its parts, within a double Treflure dowery and counter-fiowery of the fecond j” borne by the name of Maitland. IV. Examples of other Quadrupeds, and their Parts, borne in Coats-of-Arms. Fig. x<5. 1. “ Sable, a Camel ftatant Argent 5” borne by the name of Camel. 2. “ Gules, an Elephant ilatant Argent, tulked Or.” 3. “ Argent, a Boar ftatant Gules, armed Or $” borne by the name of Trevoarthen. 4. “ Sable, a Bull paffant Orborne by the name of Filz-Gtffrey. 5. “ Sable, three Nags Heads erafed Argent borne by Blayney, Baron Blayney of Monaghan, in Ireland. This noble family is defcended in a direft line from Cadwallader, a younger fon of the prince of Wales j and the firft peer was Sir Edward Blayney, knight, who was created a baron by King James I. July 29. 1621. 6. “ Argent, three Boars Heads erafed and ereH Sable, langued Gules,” for the name of Booth. 7. “ Azure, three Boars Heads erafed Or quar¬ tered by his grace Alexander Gordon duke of Gordon, &c. Of this great and noble family, which took their furname from the barony of Gordon in the county of Berwick, there have been, befides thofe in North Bri¬ tain, feveral of great diftinHion in Mufcovy ; and in the time of King Malcolm IV. 1160, this family was very numerous, and flouriftied in the county afore- faid. 8. “ Argent, three Bulls Heads erafed, Sable, arm¬ ed Or 5” borne by Skeffington, earl of Maflareene, &c. of Ireland. This ancient and noble family derives its name from the village of Skeflmgton, in the county of Leicefter, of which place Simon Skeffington was lord in the reign of Edward I. and from him defcended Vol. X. Part IJ. L D R Y. 4T7 Sir William Skeffington, knight, made fo by King . Birds, Henry VII. . 9. “ Argent, two Foxes counter-faliant, the dexter furmounted of the linifter Gules 5” for the name of Kadrod Hard, an ancient Britilh family, from which is defcended Sir — W ynne, Bart, who bears this quartered, fecond and third, in his coat-of- arms. 10. “ Argent, three Bulls paflant Sable, armed and unguled Or j” for Aftdey, and quartered by the right honourable Anthony-Aftiley Cooper, earl of Shaftelbu- ry, &c. This noble earl is defcended from Richard , Cooper, who flouriftied in the reign of King Hen. VIII. and purchafed the manor of Pauiet in the county of Somerfet, of which the family are ftill proprietors. But his anceftor who makes the greateft figure in hifto- ry is Sir Anthony-Athley Cooper, who was created Baron Aflftey of Winbourn, April 20. 1661, and af¬ terwards earl of Shaftelbury April 23. 1672. 11. “ Ermine, three Cats pafiant in Pale Argent y1 for the name of Adams. 12. “ Gules, two Grehounds rampant Or, refpeHing each other j” borne by the name of Dogget. 13. “ Or, an Afs’s Plead erafed Sable borne by the name of Hachwell. 14. “ Gules, three Lions gambs erafed Argent j” for the name of Newdigate. 15. “ Argent, three Lions Tails erected and erafed Gules p’ borne by the name of Cork. 16. “ Azure, a Buck’s Head caboffed Argent borne by Legge, earl of Dartmouth, &c. This noble family is defcended from Signior de Lega, an Italian nobleman, xyho flouriftied in Italy in the year 1297. What time the family came into England is uncertain *, but it appears they were fettled at Legge-place, near Tunbridge in Kent, for many generations •, and P'ho- mas, one of their anceftors, was twice lord-mayor of London, viz. in 1346 and I353’ 17. “ Argent, two Squirrels fejant adoffee Gules,” for the name of Samwell. 18. “ Gules, a Goat paffant Argent p’ borne by tie name of Baker. 19. “ Sable, a Stag Handing at gaze Argent;” borne by the name of ‘Jones, of Monmouthftiire. 20. “ Azure, three Holy Lambs Or borne by the name of Row. V. Examples of Birds, Fijhes, Reptiles, &c. 1. “ Ermine, an Eagle difplayed Sable borne by Fig. 17. the name of Beddingfield. 2. “ Gules, a Swan clofe properborne by the name of Leigham. 3. “ Argent, a Stork Sable, membered Gules j” borne by the name of Starkey. 4. “ Gules, a Pelican in her neft with wings elevat¬ ed, feeding her young ones Or ; vulned proper borne by the name of Came. 5. “ Argent, three Peacocks in their pride proper borne by the name of Pavone. 6. “ Sable, a Goffiawk Argent, perching upon a ftock in the Bafe-point of the Efcutcheon of the fecond, armed, jeffed, and belled Or;” borne by the name of IVhee/e. 3G 7- H E R A 7. “ Or, a Ravfen proper j” borne by the name of Corbet. • 8. “ Argent, three Cocks Gules, crefted and jow- lopped Sable, a Crefcent furmounted of a Crefcent for difference 5” borne by Cockayne, Vifcount Cullen, of Donegal in Ireland. Of this ancient family was An¬ dreas Cockayne of Afhburne in the county of Derby, who lived in the 28th year of Edward I. Charles, foil to Sir William Cockayne lord-mayor of London, 1619, was the firft who was advanced to the peerage, by Charles I. Auguft 11. 1642. 9. “ Sable, a Dolphin naiant embowed Or j” borne by the name of Sijmonds. This animal is borne by the eldeft fon of the French king, and next heir to the crown, no other fubjefl in that kingdom being permit¬ ted to bear it. In England, where that rule cannot take place, there are feveral families that have dolphins in their coats-of-arms. 10. “ Argent, three Whales Heads ere£l and erafed Sable 5” borne by the name of Whalleij. 11. “ Gules, three Efcalops Argent-,” borne by Keppel, earl of Albemarle, &c. This family is de- fcended from Arnold Jooft van Keppel, a nobleman of the province of Guelderland in Holland, who came over into England with the prince of Orange in 1688, to whom he was then a page of honour, and afterwards mailer of the robes, and was by him created a peer of England, by the title of earl of Albemarle, in the duchy of Normandy in France, February 10. 1696. 12. “ Azure, three Trouts fretted in Triangle Ar¬ gent j” borne by the name of Troutbeck. 13. “ Vert, a Grafshopper paffant Or.” 14. “ Azure, three Bees two and one volant in pale Argent j” borne by the name of Bye. 15. “ Vert, a Tortoife paffant Argent-,” borne by the name of Gawdy. 16. “ Gules, an Adder nowed Or borne by the name of Nathiley. Adders, fnakes, and ferpents, are faid to reprefent many things, w-hich being according to the fancy of the ancients, and a few modern authors who have adopted their opinions, it is needlefs to en¬ large upon. It is certain they often occur in armory ; but the noblefl is that of the duchy of Milan, viz. “ Argent, a Serpent gliding in Pale Azure, crowned Or, vorant an Infant iffuing Gules.” The occafion of this bearing was this : Otho, firft vifcount of Milan, going to the Holy Land with Godfrey of Bouillon, de¬ feated and flew in fing-le combat the great giant Volux, a man of extraordinary ftature a>nd ftrength, who had challenged the braveft of the Chriflian army. The vifcount having killed him, took his armour, and among it his helmet, the creft whereof was a ferpent fwallow- ing an infant, worn by him to ftrike terror into thofe who fhould be fo bold as to engage him. 17. “ Ermine, a Rofe Gules barbed and feeded pro¬ per j” borne by Bofcawen Vifcount Falmouth, &c. This family is defcended from Richard Bofcawen, of the town of Bofcawen, in the county of Cornwall, who flouriftied in the reign of King Edward VI. Hugh, the firft peer of this ancient family, was created baron of Bofcawen Rofe, and Vifcount Falmouth, on the 13th of June 1720, 6th of George I. 1 8. “ Azure, three Laurel leaves flipped Or 5” borne by the name of Levefon, and quartered by the right ho- L D R Y, Chap. III. nourable Granville-Levefon Gower, earl of Gower, Artificiaf &C. Figures. 19. “ Azure, three Garbs Or 5” borne by the name ' y of Cuming. Thefe are ftieaves of wheat } but though they were barley, rj-e, or any other corn whatfoever, it is fufticient, in blazoning, to call them Garbs, tell¬ ing the timfture they are of. 20. “ Gules, three Cinquefoils Argent -,” borne by Lambart, baron of Cavan, &.c. in Ireland. Of this ancient family, which is of French extraftion, was Sir Oliver, who in the reign of Queen Elizabeth, attend¬ ing the earl of Eflex to Spain, was there knighted by him, and afterwards returning with that earl into Ire¬ land, was, for his Angular fervice in the north againft O’Neal earl of Tyrone, made camp-mafter-generai, and prefident of Connaught ^ and February 17. 1617, was created Lord Lambart and baron of Cavan by King James I. It muft be obferved, that trees and plants are fome- tlmes faid to be trunked, eradicated, fruftuated, or ra- guled, according as they are reprefented in arms. Art. 2. Of Artiitcial Figures borne in Coats-of- Arms. After the various produflions of nature, artificial fi¬ gures, the objects of arts and mechanics, claim the next rank. They may be diftributed into the following claf- fes, viz. Warlike injlruments; as fwords, arrows, battering- rams, gauntlets, helmets, fpears, pole-axes, &c. Ornaments ufed in royal and religious ceremonies $ as crowns, coronets, mitres, wreaths, crofters, &c. Slrcliite&ure; as towers, cattles, arches, columns,, plummets, battlements, churches, portcullifes, &c. Navigation; as {hips, anchors, rudders, pendants, fails, oars, mails, flags, galleys, lighters, &c. All thefe bearings have different epithets, ferving ei¬ ther to exprefs their pofition, difpofition, or make2 viz. fwords are faid to be erebl, pommeled, hiked, &c.-, arrows, armed, feathered, &c •, towers, covered, em¬ battled, &c. -, and fo on of all others, as will appear by the following examples. 1. “ Sable, three Swords, their points meeting in F,g. xg, the Bafe Argent, pommeled and hiked Or, a Crefcent in chief of the fecond for difference $” borne by Powlet, duke of Bolton, &c. This noble duke is defcended from Flercules, lord of Tournon in Picardy, who came over to England with Jeffrey Plantagenet earl of An¬ jou, third fon of King Henry II. and among other lands had the lordihip of Paulet in Somerfetftnre conferred on him. William Powlet, the firft peer of this illuftrious and loyal family, was treafurer of the houfehold to King Henry VIII. and by him created Baron St John of Bafing, in the county of Southampton, March 9. 1538. 2. “ Argent, three Battering-rams barways in Pale, headed Azure and hooped Or, an Armulet for differ¬ ence borne by Bertie, earl of Abington, &c. The firft of the family of Bertie that bore the title of earl of Abington was James Bertie Lord Norris of Rycote, being created earl, Nov. 30. 1682, by Charles II, 3. 5. “ Gules, two Helmets in chief proper, garnifhed Or, in a Bafe of a Garb of the third j” borne by Chol- mondeley, earl of Cholmondeley, &c. This noble earl is defcended from the ancient family of Egerten in Chelhire, which flourilhed in the time of the conqueft, from whom alfo the duke of Bridgewater was defcended. The firft Englifh peer of this branch was Hugh Vif- count Cholmondeley of Kells, in Ireland, who, joining with thofe who oppofed the arbitrary meafures of King James II. was on the acceffion of King William and Queen Mary created Lord Cholmondeley of Nampt- wich, in the county of Chefter. 6. “ Argent, a Ship with its fails furled up Sable 5” quartered by Hamilton, earl of Abercorn, &c. The defcent of this noble family is from that of the duke of Hamilton : for James, the fourth Lord Hamilton and fecond earl of Arran, marrying Lady Margaret Doug¬ las daughter of James the third earl of Morton, by her had four fons, James, John, Claud, and David : where¬ of Claud was progenitor of the lord we are now fpeak- ing of } and in conlideration of his merit and loyalty to Mary queen of Scots, James VI. created him Lord Pailley in 1591, as alfo earl of Abercorn, baron of Ha¬ milton, &.c. July 10. 1606. 7. “ Or, an Anchor in pale Gules j” quartered by the moft noble George Johnlfon, marquis of Annan- dale, &c. The Johnllons are an ancient and warlike family, and derive their furname from the barony of Johnfton in Annandale. 8. “ Sable, three Spears heads ereft Argent, im¬ brued Gules, on a chief Or, as many Pole-axes A- zure $” borne by King, Lord King, &c. Peter King, Efq. the firft lord of this ancient family, wTas chofen re¬ corder of the city of London, July 27. 1708, and on the 12th of September following had the honour of knighthood conferred on him. He was conftituted lord-chief-jullice of the common pleas in the firft year of King George I. 1714 5 on the 5th of April follow¬ ing was fworn of his majefty’s moft honourable privy- council, and on May 19. 1723 was created a peer of this kingdom by the title of Lord King, baron of Ock¬ ham. 9. “ Gules, three Clarions Or j” quartered by Car¬ teret, earl of Granville, &c. This ancient family derives its pedigree from Offerey de Carteret, who attended .William the Conqueror in his defcent upon England, and contributed to the victory he obtained L D R Y. 419 over King Harold, at Haftings in Suffex, io56 J he Artificial had manors and lands in England conferred on him by Dg^res. ^ that prince, as a reward for his eminent fervices. v George the firft earl was, in confideration of his own merit and the lervices oi his anceftors, created a peer of Great Britain, October 19. 1681. 10. “ Argent, a Maunch Sable borne by Haft¬ ings, earl of Huntingdon, &c. This family is de¬ fcended from Hugh de Haftings, a younger fon of the ancient and noble family of the Haftings, earl of Pem¬ broke, of which family was William de Haftings, fteward of the houfehold to King Henry I.—William, the firft Lord Haftings, was created a baron on July 6. 1461, by King Edward IV. 11. “ Azure, a 'circular Wreath Argent and Sable, with four Hawks Bells joined thereto in quadrature Or borne by Jocelyn, Vifcount Jocelyn, &c. This noble family is of great antiquity ; for, afteF the Ro¬ mans had been mailers of Britain 500 years, wearied with the wars, they took their final farewel of it, and carried away with them a great many of their brave old Britilh foldiers, who had ferved them in their wars both at home and abroad, to whom they gave Amo- rica in France, for their former fervices, -which coun¬ try was from them afterwards called Little Britain. It is fuppofed that there were fome of this family amongft them •, and that they gave the name of Joce¬ lyn to a town in this country, which ftill preferves that name; and it is thought probable that they return¬ ed with William the Conqueror ; for wre find, in 1066, mention made of Sir Gilbert Jocelyn. The firft lord of the family, was created Baron Newport, of Newport in Ireland, on Nov. 29. 1743, and vifcount in Nov. I7SI* 1 2. “ Gules, three Towers Argent quartered by Fowler, Vifcount Alhbrook, &c. William Fowler, Efq. was advanced to the peerage by King George II. and created baron of Caftle Durrow, in the county of Kilkenny, 061. 27. 1733 ; and his fon was created Vifcount Alhbrook, of Alhbrook in Ireland, on Sep¬ tember 30. 1751 } now extinft. 13. “ Gules, two Keys in Saltier Argent, in Chief a Royal Crown proper the arms of the archbilhopric of York. 14. “ Gules, two Swords in Saltier Argent, pom¬ meled and hiked Or 5” the arms of the bilhopric of London. 15. “ Sable, a Key in Bend, furmounted by a Crolier in Bend linifter, both Or j” the arms of the . bilhopric of St Afaph. 16. “ Gules, two Keys adoffee in Bend, tire upper- moft Argent, the other Or, a Sword interpofed be¬ tween them in Bend-linifter of the fecond, pommeled, and hiked of the third j” the arms of the bilhopric of Winchefter. 17. “ Gules, three Mitres with their pendants Or j” the arms of the bilhopric of Chefter. 18. “ Sable, three Ducal Coronets paleways Or the arms of the bilhopric of Briftol. 19. “ Gules, a Sword erefl in pale Argent, pom¬ meled and hiked Or, furmounted by two Keys in Saltiemif the laft j” the arms of the bilhopric of Exeter. ... 26. “ Gules, three Ducal Coronets, Or j” the arms of the bilhopric of Ely. 3 G 2 Art. HER A 420 Chimerical Figures. Art. 3. Of Chimerical Figures. The laft and the cddelt kind of bearings in coats-of- arms, is comprehended under the name of chimerical figures; that is to fay, fuch as have no real exigence, but are mere fabulous and fantaltical inventions. 1'hete charges, griffons, martlets, and unicorns excepted, are fo uncommon in Britilh coats, that in order to make up the fame number of examples hitherto contained in each collection, feveral foreign bearings are introduced here •, which, horvever, as they are conform to the laws of heraldry, will alfo contribute both to entertain and inftruCt the reader. Thofe molt in ufe are the follow¬ ing, viz. Angels, Cherubims, Tritons, Centaurs, Martlets, Griffons, Unicorns, Dragons, Mermaids, Satyrs, Wi- verns, Harpies, Cockatrices, Phoenixes. Thefe, like the foregoing charges, are fubjedt to va¬ rious pofitions and difpofitions, which, from the princi¬ ples already laid down, wall be plainly underltood from the following examples. Fig. ip. N° 1. is “ Gules, an Angel ftanding affrontee, with his hands conjoined and elevated upon his bread, ha¬ bited in a long Robe clofe girt Argent, his Wings dif- played Or 5” borne by the name of Bra rigor de Ccrevi- fia, a foreign prelate, who atTifled at the council of Conilance, 1412. This example is quoted by Guiliim, Seft. III. Chap. I. 2. “ Sable, a Cheveron between three Cherubim Or borne by the name of Cltaloner, of Yorklhire and Chefhire. 3. “ Azure, a Fefs indented between three Cheru¬ bim Argent.” Thefe arms were granted to John Ayde, Efq. of Doddington in Kent, by Sir William Segar, garter. 4. “ Gules, a Cherub having three pair of Wings, the uppermoft and lowermoft counter-croffed Saltier- W'ays, and the middlemoft difplayed Argent}” borne by the name of Buocafoco, a foreign prelate. This ex¬ ample is copied from Meneftrier’s Methode du Blafon^ p. 120. N° viii. 5. “ Azure, a Griffon fegreant Or, armed and langued Gules, between three Crefcents Argent quartered by Bligh, Lord Clifton, &c. The ancellor of this noble family, who lived ih London, going over to Ireland in the time of Oliver Cromwell, as an agent to the adventurers there, acquired a good eftate, and laid the foundation for the grandeur of this family. 6. “ Gules, three Martlets Or j” borne by the name of Macgill. Guillim obferves, that this bird, which is reprefented without feet, is given for a difference to younger brothers, to put them in mind, that, in order to raife themfelves, they are to truft to their wings of virtue and merit, and not to their legs, having but little land to fet their feet on. y. “ Azure, three Mullets Argent within a double Treffure counter-flowery Or, in the centre a Martlet of the laft j” borne by Murray, Lord Elibank. Sir Gi¬ deon Murray, knighted by King James VI. by whom he was made treafurer-depute, wras third fon of Sir Andrew Murray of Blackbarony. His fon Patrick, in refpe£l of his loyalty to Charles I. was on May 16. 1628 made a baronet, and in 1643 created Lord Eh- bank. L t) R Y. Chap. IV. 8. “ Sable, a Cockatrice difplayed Argent, crefted, membered, and jowllopped Gules.” 9. “ Argent, a Mermaid Gules, crined Or, holding in her right hand a Comb, and in her left a Mirror, both proper j” borne by the name of Ellis. 10. “ Argent, a Wivern, his Wings elevated, and his Tail nowed below him Gules j” borne by the name of Drakes. 11. “ Or, a Dragon paffant Vert.” 12. “ Gules, a Centaur or Sagittary in full fpeed reguardant proper.” This was the coat of arms of Stephen furnamed of Blois, fon to Adela daughter of William the Conqueror, and of Stephen earl of Blois 5 and on this defeent grounding his pretenfion to the crowrr of England he was proclaimed king in 113?, and reigned to the 25th of October 1154. 13. “ Argent, an Unicorn fejant Sable, unguled and horned Or borne by the name of Hai ling. 14. “ Argent, a Dragon’s Head erafed Vert, hold¬ ing in his Mouth a finifter Hand couped at the Wriit Gules borne by the name of Williams. 15. “ Gules, three Unicorns Heads couped Or borne by the name of Paris. 16. “ Argent, a Wivern volant Bendways Sable j” borne by the name of Raynon. 17. “ Azure, a Lion Sejant guardant winged Or, his Head encircled with a Glory, holding in his fore¬ paws an open book, wherein is written, Pax tihiy Marce, Evangeli/la meus ; over the dexter fide of the Book a Sword ere£t, all proper.” Thefe are the arms of the republic of Venice. 18. “ Azure, a Bull faiiant and winged Or,” borne by the name of Cadenet, a family of dittindlion of Pro¬ vence. Crowns. 19. “ Argent, a Wivern with a hum vi Face af¬ frontee hooded, and winged Vert,” borne by the name of Buferaghit an ancient and noble family of Luques. 20. “ Azure, a Harpy dilplayed, armed, crined, and crowned Or.” Thefe are the arms of the city of Nuremberg in Germany. To the forementioned figures may be added the montegre, an imaginary creature, fuppoled to have the body of a tyger with a fatyr’s head and horns} al¬ fo thofe which have a real exiftence, but are faid to be endowed with extravagant and imaginary qualities, viz. the falamanfier, beaver, cameleon, &c. Chap. IV. Of the External Ornaments of Efcut- cheons. The ornaments that accompany or furround efeut- cheons were introduced to denote the birth, dignity, or oftice, of the perfons to whom the coat-of-arms ap- pertaineth ; which is pra&ifed both among the laity and clergy. Thofe moft in ufe are of ten lorts, viz. Crowns, Coronets, Mitres, Helmets, Mantlings, Cha¬ peaux, Wreaths, Crefts, Scrolls, Supporters. Sfxt. I. Of Crowns. The firft crowns wTere only diadems, bands, or fillets j afterwards they were compofed of branches of divers trees, and then flowers were added to them. Among / ( Chap. TV. HERA Crowns. Among the Greeks, the crowns given to thofe who ' carried the prize at the Ilihmian games, were of pine •, at the Olympic, of laurel} and at the Nemean, of fmAlage. The Romans had various crowns to reward martial exploits and extraordinary fervices done to the repub¬ lic ; for which fee the detached article Crown in this Dictionary, and Plate CLXIV. Examples of fome of thefe crowns are frequently met with in modern atchievements, viz. i. i he mural crown in that of Lord IVlontfort, which was conferred on Sir John Bromley, one of his lordlhip’s anceftors, as an augmentation to his arms, for his great courage at the- battle of Le Croby. Part of the creft of Lord Archer is alfo a mural crown. And there are no lefs than ten Englifh baronets, w’hofe arms are ornamented wdth the fame crown. 2. The naval or roltral crown is ftill ufed with coats-of-arms, as may be feen in thofe of Sir William Burnaby, Bart, now admiral of the red fquadron, and of John Clerke, Efq. as part of their crefts. 3. Of the cajirenfe or vallary crown, we have inftances in the coats-of arms of Sir Reginald Graham, and of Ifaac Akerman, Efq. 4. The crelt of Grice Blackney, Efq. is encompafled with a civic crown. 5. The radiated crown, according to J. Yorke, was placed over the arms of the kings of England, till the time of Edward III. It is itill ufed as a creft on the arms of fome private families j thofe, for example, borne by the name of Whitfield, are ornamented with it. The celeftial crown is formed like the radiated, with the addition of a ftar on each ray v and is only ufed upon tomb-ftones, monuments, and the like.— Others of the ancient crowns are Itill borne, as crelts, by feveral families. But modern crowns are only ufed as an ornament, which emperors, kings, and independent princes fet on their heads, in great folemnities, both to denote their fovereign authority, and to render themfelves more awful to their iubjects. Thefe are the molt in uie in heraldry, and are as follows : Tig. 20. The imperial crown (N° 1.) is made of a circle of gold, adorned with precious Itones and pearls, height¬ ened with fleurs-de-lis, bordered and feeded with pearls, raifed in the form of a cap voided at the top like a crefcent. From the middle of this cap rifes an arched fillet enriched with pearls, and furmounted of a mound, whereon is a crofs of pearls. The crown of the kings of Great Britain (2.) is a circle of gold, bordered with ermine, enriched with pearls and precious ftones, and heightened up with tfour croffes pattee and four large fleurs-de-lis alter¬ nately ; from thefe rife four arched diadems adorned with pearls, which clofe under a mound, furmounted of a crofs like thofe at bottom. Mr Sandford, in his Genealogical Hiftory, p. 3^1* remarks, that Ed¬ ward IV. is the firft king of England that in his feal, or on his coin, is crowned with an arched dia¬ dem. The crown of the kings in France (3.) is a circle enamelled, adorned with precious Hones, and heighten¬ ed up with eight arched diadems, riling from as many fleurs de-lis, that conjoin at the top under a double fleur-de-lis, all of gold. The crowns of Spain, Portugal, and Poland, are all three of the fame form, and are, among!! others, L D R Y. 421 thus deferibed by Colonel Parfons, in his Genealogical Coronet- Tables of Europe, viz. A ducal coronet, heightened v up with eight arched diadems that fupport a mound, eniigned with a plain crofs. Thofe of Denmark and Sweden are both of the fame form, and confifl of eight arched diadems, riling from a marquis’s coronet, which conjoin at the top under a mound eniigned with a crofs- bottony. # . The crowns of moll other kings are circles of gold, adorned with precious ftenes, and heightened up with large trefoils, and clofed by four, fix, or eight diadems, fupporting a mound, furmounted of a crofs. The Great Turk (4.) bears over his arms a tur¬ ban, enriched with pearls and diamonds, under two coronets, the firll of w'hich is made of pyramidical points heightened up with large pearls, and the upper- moll is furmounted wdth crefcents. The Pope, or bilhop of Romq, appropriates to hini- felf a Tiara (N° 5.), or long cap of golden cloth, from which hang two pendants embroidered and fringed at the ends, Jemee of croffes of gold. This cap is enclofed by three marquifes coronets ; and has on its top a mound of gold, whereon is a crofs of the fame, which crofs is fometimes reprefented by engravers and pain¬ ters pometted, recrofled, florvery, or plain.—It is a difficult matter to alcertain the time when the popes affumed the three forementioned coronets. A patch- ed-up fucceflion of the holy pontiffs, engraved and pub- lilhed fome years ago by order of Pope Clement XIII. for the edification of his good fubjedls in Great Bri¬ tain and Ireland, reprefents Marcellus, wdio was cho- fen bilhop of Rome anno 310, and all his fucceffors, adorned with fuch a cap : but it appears, from very good authority, that Boniface VIII. wTho was elected into the fee of Rome anno 1295, firft compaffed his cap with a coronet’, Benedict XII. in 1335* added a Lcond to it •, and John XXIII. in 1411, a third; with a view to indicate by them, that the Pope is the fove¬ reign prieft, the fupreme judge, and the foie legillator among!! Chriftians. Sect. II. Of Coronets. The coronet of the prince of Wales, or eldeft fon* of the king of Great Britain (N° 7 ), was anciently a circle of gold fet round with four croffes pattee, and as many fleurs-de-lis alternately ; but lince the reftoration, it has been clofed with one arch only, adorned wfith pearls, and furmounted of a mound and crofs, and bordered with ermine like the king’s. Befides the aforefaid coronet, his royal highnefs the prince of Wales has another diftinguilhing mark of honour, peculiar to himfelf, called by the vulgar the- prince's arms, viz. A plume of three oftrich-feathers, with an ancient coronet of a prince of Wales. Under it, in a fcioll, is the motto, Ich Dicn, which in the German or old Saxon language lignifies, “ I ferve (fee N° 6.). This device was at firft taken by Edw ard prince of Wales, commonly called the black prince, after the famous battle of Creffy, in 1346, where ha¬ ving with his own hand killed John king of Bohemia, he took from his head fuch a plume, and put it on his own. The coronet of all the immediate fons and bro¬ thers of the kings of Great Britain, is a circle of gold, bordered j. a HERA bordered with ermine, heightened up with four fleurs- de-lis, and as many crofl'es pattee alternate, (fee N° 8.). —The particular and diftinguiflung form of fuch co¬ ronets as are appropriated to princes of the blood-royal, is defcribed and fettled in a grant of Charles II. the 13th of his reign. The coronet of the princeffes of Great Britain is a circle of gold, bordered with ermine, and heightened up with croffes-pattee, fleurs-de-lis, and llrawberry leaves alternate (N° 9.) ; whereas a prince’s coronet has only fleurs-de-lis and croflfes. A duke’s coronet is a circle of gold bordered with ermine, enriched with precious flones and pearls, and fet round with eight large ilrawberry or parfley leaves j (N° 10.). A marquis’s coronet is a circle of gold, bordered with ermine, fet round with four ftrawberry leaves, and as many pearls on pyramidical points of equal height, al¬ ternate j (N° 11.). An earl’s coronet is a circle of gold, bordered with ermine, heightened up with eight pyramidical points or rays, on the tops of which are as many large pearls, and are placed alternately, (with as many ftrawberry- leaves, but the pearls much higher than the leaves : (N° 12.). A vifcount’s coronet differs from the preceding ones as being only a circle of gold bordered with ermine, with large pearls fet clofe together on the rim, with¬ out any limited number, which is the prerogative above the baron, who is limited : (fee N° 13.)* A baron’s coronet, (No 14.), which was granted by King Charles II. is formed with fix pearls fet at equal diftances on a gold circle, bordered with ermine, four of which only are feen on engravings, paintings, &.c.to fhow he is inferior to the vifcount. The eldeft fons of peers, above the degree of a ba¬ ron, bear their father’s arms and fupporters with a label, and ufe the coronet appertaining to their father’s fecond title j and all the younger fons bear their arms with pro¬ per differences, but ufe no coronets. As the crown of the king of Great Britain is not quite like that of other potentates, fo do moft of the coronets of foreign noblemen differ a little from thofe of the Britifh nobility 5 as for example, the coronet of a French earl is a circle of gold with 18 pearls fet on the brim of it *, a French vifcount’s coronet is a circle of gold only enamelled, charged with four large pearls; and a French baron’s coronet is a circle of gold enamelled and bound about with a double brace¬ let of pearls ; and thefe coronets are only ufed on French noblemen’s coats-of-arms, and not worn on their heads, as the Britifh noblemen and their ladies do at the king’s coronation. Sect. III. Of Mitres. The archbifhops and bifhops of England and Ire¬ land place a mitre over their coats-of-arms. It is a round cap pointed and cleft at the top, from which hang two pendants fringed at both ends ; with this difference, that the bifhop’s mitre is only furrounded with a fillet of gold, fet with precious (tones, (fee fig. 23. N° 6.) whereas the archbifhop’s iflfues out of a ducal coronet, (fee fig. 20. N° 15.). I L D ft Y. Chap. IV- This ornament, with other mafquerade garments, Helmets is ftill worn by all the archbifhops and bifhops of the aiK* church of Rome, whenever they officiate with folem- Mantling- nity ; but it is never ufed in England, otherwife than on coats of arms, as before-mentioned. Sect. IV. Of Helmets. The Helmet was formerly worn as a defenfive wea¬ pon, to cover the bearer’s head, and is now placed over a coat-of-arms as its chief ornament, and the true mark of gentility. There are feveral fcrts, di- ftinguifhed, iff, by the matter they are made of; 2dly, by their form 5 and, 3dly, by their pofition. iff, As to the matter they are, or rather were, made of: The helmets of fovereigns were of burnifhed gold damafked ; thofe of princes and lords, of iilver figured with gold ; thofe of knights, of fteel adorned with filver, and thofe of private gentlemen of polifhed ffeel. 2dly, As to their form : Thofe of the king and the royal family, and noblemen of Great Britain, are open- faced and grated, and the number of bars ferv«s to diffinguilh the bearer’s quality 5 that is, the helmet ap¬ propriated to the dukes and marquifes is different from the king’s, by having a bar exatfly in the middle, and two on each fide, making but five bars in all, (fee fig. 21. N° 1.) wdiereas the king’s helmet has fix bars, viz. three on each ;fide, (ibid. N° 7’)' The other grated helmet with four bars is common to all degrees of peerage v a marquis. The open-faced helmet without bars Jenotes baronets and knights. The clofe helmet is for all efquires and gentlemen. 3dly, Their pofition is alfo looked upon as a mark of diftin&ion. The grated helmet in front belongs to fovereign princes. The grated helmet in profile is common to all degrees of peerage. The helmet Handing direct without bars, and the beaver a little open, denotes baronets and knights. Laitly, the iide- ftanding helmet, with the beaver clofe, is the way of wearing it amongft efquires and gentlemen. See N° 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7, inferted in fig. 21. Ornaments. Sect. V. Of Mantlings. MaNTLINGS are pieces of cloth jagged or cut into flowers and leaves, which now-a-days ferve as an orna¬ ment for efcutcheons. They ivere the ancient cover¬ ings of helmets, to preferve them, or the bearer, from the injuries of the weather, as alfo to prevent the ill confequences of their too much dazzling the eye in adtion. But Guillim very judicioufly obferves, that their fhape muff have undergone a great altera¬ tion fince they have been out of ufe, and therefore might more properly be termed flourijbings than mant- lings. See the examples annexed to the helmets repre- fented in fig. 21. The French heralds affure us, that thefe mantlings were originally no other than ffiort coverings which commanders wore over their helmets, and that, going into battles with them, they often, on their coming away, brought them back in a ragged manner, oc- cafioned by the many cuts they had received on their heads: and therefore the more hacked they were, the more t Chap. IV. HERA ChapeaMx, more honourable they were accounted •, as our colours Wreatiu, jn tjme 0f war are more efteemed for having been &.C i • o , (hot through m many places. Sometimes Ikins of bealfs, as lions, bears, &c. were thus boi-ne, to make the bearer look more terrible, and that gave occalion to the doubling of mantlings with furs. L D R Y. 423 Archer’s which is, “ Out of a mural crown Or, a Wyvern’s head Argent.” There are feveral inftances of crefts that are relative to alliances, employments, or names j and which on that account have been changed. The Scroll and Supporters. Sect. IX. Of the Scroll. Sect. VI, Of Chapeaux. A Chapeau is an ancient hat, or rather cap, of dig¬ nity worn by dukes, generally fcarlet-coloured velvet on the outiide, lined and turned up with fur ; of late frequently to be met with above an helmet, inftead of a wreath, under gentlemen’s and noblemen’s crefts. Heretofore they were feldcm to be found, as of right appertaining to private families ; but by the grants of Robert Cooke, Clarencieux, and other fucceeding heralds, thefe, together with ducal coronets, are now frequently to be met with in families, wrho yet claim not above the degree of gentlemen. See the repre- fentation of the chapeau, N° 5. fig. 21. Sect. VII. Of Wreaths. The Wreath is a kind of roll made of two Ikains of filk of different colours twdfted together, which an¬ cient knights wmre as a head-drefs wrhen equipped for tournaments. The colours of the filk are always taken from the principal metal and colour contained in the coat of-arms of the bearer. They are ftill ac¬ counted as one of the leffer ornaments of efcutcheons, and are placed between the helmet and the creft : (fee fig. 21. N° 6.). In the time of Henry I. and long af¬ ter, no man, who was under the degree of a knight, had his creft fet on a wreath •, but this, like other pre¬ rogatives, has been unfringed fo far, that every body now-a^days wears a wreath. Sect. VIII. Of Crefs. The Creft is the higheft part of the ornaments of a coat-of-arms. It is called cref, from the Latin wmrd crifa, which fignifies comb or tuft, fuch as many birds have upon their heads, as the peacock, phea~ fant, &c. in allufion to the place on which it is fixed. Crefts wTere formerly great marks of honour, be- caufe they wTere only worn by heroes of great valour, or by fuch as w’ere advanced to fome fuperior military command, in order that they might be the better di- llinguiftied in an engagement, and thereby rally their men if difperfed ; but they are at prefent confidered as a mere ornament. The creft is frequently a part either of the fupporters, or of the charge borne in the escutcheon. Thus the creft of the royal atchievement of Great Britain is a “ Lion guardant crowned,” as may be feen in fig. 21. N° 7. The creft of France is a double Fleur-de-luce. Out of the many crefts borrowed from fupporters, are the following, viz. The duke of Montagu’s, “ A Griffon’s head coup’d Or, back’d and wing’d Sable,” the marquis of Rock¬ ingham’s, “ A Griffon’s head argent, gorg’d with a ducal coronet : the earl of Weftmoreland’s, “ A Bull’s head Argent, py’d Sable, armed Or j and Lord The Scroll is the ornament placed above the creft, containing a motto, or Ihort fentence, alluding thereto, or to the bearings *, or to the bearer’s name, as in the two followdng inftances. The motto of the noble earl of Cholmondeley is, Caffs tutiffma virtus ; i. e. “ Virtue is the fafeft helmet j” on account of the hel¬ met in the coat-of-arms. The motto of the right honour¬ able Lord Fortelcue is, Forte fcutum fa/us ducum ; i. e. “ A ftrong ihield is the fafety of the commanders alluding to the name of that ancient family. Some¬ times it has reference to neither, but expreffes fome- thing divine or heroic j as that of the earl of Scarbo¬ rough, which is, Mur us cereus confcientia fana; i. e. “ A good confcience is a wall of brafs.” Others are enigmatical ; as that of the royal atchievement, which is Dieu ct mon Droit, i. e. “ God and my rightin¬ troduced by Edward III. in 13,40, when he affumed the arms and title of king of France, and began to profecute his claim, which occafioned long and bloody wars, fatal by turns to both kingdoms : or that of the prince of Wales, which is Ich dien, “ I ferve,” the origin of which has been already mentioned. Mottos, though hereditary in the families that firft took them up, have been changed on fome particular occafions, and others appropriated in their ftead, in¬ ftances of which are fometimes met with in the hiftory of families. Sect. X. Of Supporters. Supporters are figures Handing on the fcroll, and placed at the fide of the efcutcheon ; they are fo called, becaufe they feem to fupport or hold up the Ihield. The rife of fupporters is, by F. Meneftrier, traced up to ancient tournaments, wherein the knights caufed their Ihields to be carried by fervants or pages under the difguife of lions, bears, griffons, blackamoors, &c. who alfo held and guarded the efcutcheons, which the knights were obliged to expofe to public view for fome time before the lifts w'ere opened. Sir George Mackenzie, who diffents from this opinion, fays, in his Treatife on the Science of Heraldry, chap. xxxi. p. 93. “ That the firft origin and ufe of them was from the cuftom which ever was, and is, of leading fuch as are invefied with any great honour to the prince who confers it : thus, when any man is created a duke, marquis, or knight of the garter, or any other order, he is fupported by, and led to the prince betwixt, two of the quality, and fo receives from him the fymbols of that honour ; and in remembrance of that folemnity, his arms are thereafter fupported by any two crea¬ tures he choofes.” Supporters have formerly been taken from fuch animals or birds as are borne in the Ihields, and fometimes they have been chofen as bear¬ ing fome allufion to the names of thofe whofe arms they are made to fupport. The fupporters of the arms of Great Britain, fince King James the Firft’s acceftion . 424 HERA "Suppoitrr? acceOloTi to tlje throne, are a Lion ram par, t guard ant 1— crowned Or, on the dexter fide, and an Unicorn Argent, crowned, armed, unguled, maned and gorged with an an¬ tique Crown, to which a chain is afiixed, all Or, on the fitliftef *, as it appears by fig. 21. N° 7. This laft figure reprefents the coat-of-arms of the king of Great Britain, or the royal atchievement, as it has been marlhalled fince the acceffion of King •George I. in 1714, and is blazoned as follows, viz. ARMS. Quarterly, in the firfi grand quarter Gules, three Lions rampant guardant in pale Or, the imperial enfigns of England j impaled with Or, a Lion rampant, within a double trefifure fiowery and countir-fiowery Gules, the royal arms of Scotland. The fiecotid is Assure, three Fleurs-de-lis Or, the arms of France. The third is Assure, a Harp Or, firinged Argent, the eniign of Ireland. The fourth grand quarter is Gules, t wo Lions pajjant guardant in pale Or, for Brunfwick } impaled with Or femee of Hearts' Proper, a Lion rampant A- zure, for Lunenburg ; with grafted in hafe Gules a Horfe current Argent, for ancient Saxony j and in a (Heldfurtout Gules, the Crown of Charlemagne Or, as ' arch-treafurer of the empire •, the xchole within a Gar¬ ter, inferibed with this motto, Honi soit qui MAE Y tense, as fovereign of that noble order, given by the founder King Edward III. CREST. On a Helmet full-faced, grated and fur- mounted of a Crowh, a Lion guardant crowned Or ; the mantlings of the lafi, and lining, Ermine. SUPPORTERS. On the Dexter fide a Lion rampant guards Or, crowned as the Crejl. On the Si- nijlerfide an Unicorn Argent, crowned, armed, maned, and unguled Or, gorged with an antique Crown ; a Chain affixed thereto, refie&ing over the back, andpqffing over the hind legs of the lafi, both fianding on a Scroll in¬ feribed with this motto, Dieu ET MON DROIT, from which iffiue the two Royal Badges of his Majefifs chief Dominions, viz. on the Dexter fide a Rofe party per Pale Argent and Gules, fialked and leaved proper, for Eng¬ land ; and on the Sinifier fide a Thifile proper, for Scot¬ land ; being fo adorned by King James I. upon hisfuc- ceeding to the crown of England. As king of Scot¬ land, he bore two unicorns, as above, for his fupporters; but upon the union of that kingdom with England, 1603, he introduced one of the above fupporters on the finilter fide of the royal atchievement, and which conti¬ nues to this day. It is to be obferved, that bearing coats-of-arms fupported, is, according to the heraldrical rules oi England, the prerogative, ill, Of thofe called nobilcs majores, viz. dukes, marquifes, earls, vifeounts, and barons *, 2d, Of all knights of the Garter, though they fhould be under the degree of barons •, 3d, Of knights of the Bath, who both receive on their creation a grant of fupporters. And, laftly, of fuch grants as the king chcofes to bellow this honour upon 5 as in the in- flance of Sir Andrew Fountain, who w-as knighted by Philip earl of Pembroke, when lord lieutenant of Ire¬ land, Fountain being then his fecretary *, and. on his return to England, King William granted him fup¬ porters to his arms, viz. two Griffins Gules and Or. In Scotland, all the chiefs of clans or names have the urivilege of claiming fupporters 5 alio the baro¬ nets." But by aft of parliament, 10th September L D R Y. Chap. V, 1672, none are allowed to ufe either arms or fupport- Rules of ers, under a penalty and confifcation of all moveables Heraldry, whereon arms are put, without the Lord Lyon’s au* 4 thority. Chap. V. Gf the Rules or Laws of Heraldry. The feveral efcutcheons, tinftures, charges, and ornaments of coats-of-arms, and their various proper¬ ties, being now explained ; it may not be improper to fubjoin fuch rules for blazoning the fame, as the an¬ cient ufage and laws of heraldry have ellabliOied a- mongft us. _ 1 I. The firfi and moll general rule is, to exprefs one’s felf in proper terms, lo as not to omit any thing that ought to be fpecified, and at the fame time to be clear and concife without tautology j as in Ex. xiv. Chap. III. art. 1. and alfo in Ex. 11. art. 7. wherein thefe expreffions of the Yield, or of the Firfi, prevent the repetition of the forementioned tinfture. II. One mull begin with the tinfture of the field, and then proceed to the principal charges which pol- fefs the moll honourable place in the ihield, fuen as Fefs, Cheveron, &c. always naming that charge firil which lies next and immediately upon the field 5 as in Ex. 15. Chap. III. art. 5. III. After naming the tinfture of the field, the honourable ordinaries, or other principal figures, you mull fpecify their attributes, and afterwards their me¬ tal or colour, as in Ex. 16. Examples of Effigies, &c. IV. When an honourable ordinary, or feme one figure, is placed upon another, whether it be a kefs, Cheveron, Crofs, &c. it is always to be named after the ordinary or figure over which it is placed, with one of thefe exprefiions,yi/r tout, or over all, as in Ex. 20. Chap. III. art. 4. V. In the blazoning of fuch ordinaries as are plain, the bare mention of them is fufficient; but if an ordi¬ nary Ihould be made of any of the crooked lines men¬ tioned above, its form mull be Ipecified 5 that is, whether it be Engrailed, Wavy, &c. as in Ex. 1. 2. 3. Chap. III. art I. VI. When a principal figure poflefies the centre of the field, its polition is not to be exprelfed : or (which amounts to the fame thing) when a bearing is named, without fpecifying the point where it is placed, then it is underilood to poflefs the middle of the Ihield $ as in Ex. 15. Examples of other Quadrupeds, &c. VII. The number of the points of mullets or liars mull be fpecified when more than five and alfo if a mullet or any other charge be pierced, it mull be men¬ tioned as fuch, to diilinguilh it from what is plain ; as in Ex. 13. 14. Examples of Celefiialfigures. VIII. When a ray of the fun, or other fingle figure* is borne in any other part of the efcutcheon than the centre, the point it iffues from mull be named j as in Ex. 3. Examples of Celefiial figures. IX. The natural colour of trees, plants, fruits, birds, &c. is no otherwife to be exprefled in blazon¬ ing but by the word proper, as in Ex. 2. 7. Examples of Birds, &c.} but if difcoloured, that is, if they differ from their natural colour, it mull be particularized ; as in Ex. 1.2. Examples of other Quadrupeds, &c. X. When three figures are in a field, and their pro- fition 2 ( Chap. VI. ^ H E 11 A Marflial- fition is not mentioned in the blazoning, they are al- ling- ways underltood to be placed, two above, and one be- low . as in ftg. 23. N° 3. XI. When there are many figures of the fame fpe- cies borne in a coat-of-arms, their number muft be obferved as they ftand, and diftinftly exprefied 5 as in Ex. 1. Of Artificial Figures, Ac. But for the better underftanding of this laft rule, we have inferted examples of the dijferent clifpojitions of figures, wherein they are properly reprefented, viz. Two may be ranged in Pale, in Fefs, &c. See fig. 22. N° i and 2. Three, may be 2 and 1, as alfo in Bend, &c. See N° 3 and 4. placed 2 and 2, or cantoned, as in L 1) R Y 425 1, in Crofs; or 2, 1, 2, in Salfier. See See N° 10. 3, 2, 1, in Pile. Four, N° 5. Five, r, 3, N° 6 and 7. Six, 3, 2, 1, in Pile; or 2, 2, 2, Paleways. See N° 8 arid 9. Eight, in Orle, or on a Bordure. Fine, 3, 3, 3, Barvyays j or 3, See N° 1 1 and 1 2. Ten, 4, 3, 2, 1, in Pile ; or elfq 4, 2, 4, Barways. See N° 13 and 14. Twelve, are placed 4, 4, 4, Barways. See N° 15. There are other pofitions called irregular; as for example, when three figures which are naturally placed 2 and 1, are difpofed 1 and 2, &c. It muft alfo be obferved, that when the field is ftmved with the fame figures, this is expreffed by the word fetnee : but, ac¬ cording to a French arrnorift’s opinion, if the figures llrewed on the field are whole ones, it muft be denoted by the words fans notnbre ; whereas, if part of them is cut otf at the extremities of the efcutcheon, the word Jemee or ferni is then to be ufed. Chap. VI. Of MarJJjalling Coats-of-anns, By marfsailing coats-of-arms, is to be underftood the art of difpofing divers of them in one efcutcheon, and of diftributing their contingent ornaments in proper places. Various caufes may occafion arms to be thus con¬ joined, wFich J. Guillim comprifes under two heads, viz. manifejl and ohfcure. What this learned and judicious herald means by manifejl caufes in the marfhalling of coats-of-arms, are fuch as betoken marriages, or a fovertign’s gift, grant¬ ed either through the fpecial favour of the prince, or for fome eminent fervices. Concerning marriages it is to be obferved, I. When the coats-of-arms of a married couple, defeended of diftinft families, are to be put together in one efcutcheon, the field of their refpeftive arms is conjoined Paleways, and blazoned parted per pale, Ba¬ ron and Femme, two coats;firjl, Ac. In which cale the baron’s arms are always to be placed on the dexter fide, and the femme’s arms on the finifter fide, as in N° I and 2, fig. 23. OJ arms tnarfisalled, which are, 1. The coat-of-arms of the Rev. Edward Barnard, D. D. chaplain in ordinary to his majefty, provoft of Etcn-college, canon of Windfor, &c. impaled with that of S. Hagatt, his fpoufe. 2. x he coat-of-arms of the Rev, Thomas Dampier, VOL. X. Part II. D. D. chaplain in ordinary to his majefty, prebendary Marflia!- of Durham, canon of Windfor, &.c. impaled wuth that JinS' of F. Walker, his fpoufe. 'r"“ If a widower marry again, his late and prefent wife’s arms are, according to G. Leigh, “ to be both placed on the finifter fide, in the efcutcheon with his own, and parted per Pale. The firft wife’s coat fhall Hand on the Chief, and the fecond on the Bafe ; or he may fet them both in Pale with his own, the firft: wife’s coat next to himfelf, and his fecond outermoft. If he Ihould marry a third wife, then the two firft matches fliall ftand on the Chief, and the third fhall have the wdiole Bafe. And if he take a fourth wife, flie muft participate one half of the Bafe wfith the third wife, and fo will they feem to be fo many coats quartered.’’ But it muft be obferved, that thefe forms of impaling are meant of hereditary coats, whereby the hufband ftands in expe&ation of having* the hereditary pofleffions of his wife united to his pa trimony. II. In the arms of femmes joined to the paternal coat of the baron, the proper differences by which they were borne by the fathers of fuch women muft be in¬ ferted. III. If a coat-of-arms that has a Bordure be im¬ paled with another, as by marriage, then the Bordure muft be w'holly omitted in the fide of the arms next the centre. IV. The perfon that marries an heirefs, inftead of impaling his arms with thofe of his wife, is to bear them in an efcutcheon placed in the centre of his flneld, after the fame manner as the baronet’s badge is marfhalled in Ei° 3. and which, on account of its fhowing forth his pretenfion to her eftate, is called an efcutcheon of pretence, and is blazoned furtout, i. e. over-all, as in the efcutcheon borne in the fourth quar ter of the royal atchievement. But the children are to bear the hereditary coat-of-arms of their father and mother quarterly, which denotes a fixed inheritance, and fo tranfmit them to pofterity. The firft and fourth quarters generally contain the father’s arms, and the fecond and third the mother’s; except the heirs Ihould derive not only their eftate, but alfo their title and dig¬ nity, from their mother. V. If a maiden or dowager lady of quality marry a commoner, or a nobleman inferior to her rank, their coats-of-arms may be fet afide of one another in two leparate efcutcheons, upon one mantle or drapery, and the lady’s arms ornamented according to her title* Re N° 4, and 6, which reprefent the coats-of-arms of Gen. C. Montagu, and Lady Elizabeth Villiers Vif- countefs Grandifon. VI. Archbi(hops and biftiops impale the arms dif¬ ferently from the fore-mentioned coats, in giving the place of honour, that is, the dexter fide, to the arms of their dignity, as it is expreffed in N° 6. which re- prefents the coat-of-arms of Dr Philip Yonge, Lord bi-hop of Norwich. It may be obferved of the’ above prelates, that they thut: bear their' arms parted per Pale, to denote their being joined to their cathedral church m a fort of fpintual marriage. . vVith. reipeft to fuch armorial enfigns as the fove- reign thinks fit to augment a coat-of-arms with, they may be marihalled various ways, as may be feen by the arms of his grace the duke of Rutland, inferted in 3 H fig< 8. Plate etxx. HERA fig. 8. N° 19. and the example contained in fig. it. N° 11. To thofe augmentations may be added, ift, The baronet’s mark of dilfindion, or the arms of the pro¬ vince of Ulfter in Ireland, granted and made heredi¬ tary in the male line by King Tames I. who eroded this dignity on the 22cl of May 1611, in the 9th vear of his reign, in order to propagate a plantation in the fore-mentioned province. This mark is y/r- srent, a fmijler Hand couped at the Wriji, and ere Bed Gules ; which may be borne either in a canton, or in an efcutcheon, as will belt fuit the figures of the arms. See fig. 23. N° 3. which reprefents the coat-of-arms of Sir William Lorrayne, of Kirk-harle, Northumber¬ land, and are thus blazoned : Quarterly, Sable and Argent, a plain Crofs counter-quartered of the Field. The Creft,—A Lei rel-lree couped, two branchesfprout- ing out proper, and fixed to the lower part thereoj with a Belt Gules, edged and buckled Or. This, according to tradition in the family, was granted for fome worthy adion in the field. 2dly, The ancient and refpedable badge of the moft noble order of the Garter, militated by King Edward HI. 1349, in the 27th year of his reign j and which, ever iince its inftitution, has been looked upon as a great honour bellowed on the nobleft per- fons of this nation and other countries. This honour¬ able augmentation is made to furround, as with a gar¬ ter, the arms of luch knights, and is inlcnbed with this motto, Ihnifoit qui nial y penfe: fee N° 7. which reprefents the coat-of-arms of his grace the duke of Montagu, earl of Cardigan, Earon Brundenel of Stan- ton-Wevil, conftable and lieutenant of Windfor-caftle, knight of the moft noble order of the Garter, and baronet, prefident of St Luke’s Hofpital, and F. R. S. This nobleman, whofe arms were Argent, a Cheve- ron Gules between three Morions proper, has, lince the deceafe of John duke of IVIontagu, taken the name and arms of Montagu, on account of his being married to Lady Mary Montagu, youngeft daughter and one of the co-heireffes of his grace. So far the caures for marlhalling divers arms in one ft field, Sec. are manifeji. As to fuch as are cafted oh- jcure, that is, when coats-of-arms are marfliailed in fuch a manner, that no probable reafon can be given why they are lo conjoined, they mull be left to heralds to explain, as being the prepereft perfons to unfold thefe and other myfteries of this fcience. Chap. VII. Of Funeral Efcutcheons. After having treated of the effential parts of the coats-of-arms, of the various charges and ornaments ufually borne therewith, of their attributes and difpo- fitions, and of the rules for blazoning and marlhalling them, we fhall next deferibe the ftveral funeral efcut¬ cheons, ufually called hatchments; whereby may he known, after any perfon’s deceafe, what rank either he or lire held wThen living y and it it be a gentleman’s hatchment, whether he was a bachelor, married man, or widower, with the like diflindlions for gentlewo¬ men. The hatchment, fig. 24. N° 1. reprefents fuch as are a affixed to the fronts of koufes, when any of the nobility L D R Y. Chap. VII. the arms therein being thofe of a pri- Of Efcut- and gentry dies # w vate gentleman and his wife parted per pale j the dex¬ ter fide, which is Gules, three Bars Or, for the huf- band-, having the ground without the efcutcheon black, denotes the man to be dead •, and the ground on the finiiler fide being white, fignilies that the wife is living, which is alfo tlemonll rated by the fmall hatchment, N° 2. which is here depibled without mantling, helmet, and creft, for perfpicuity’s fake only. Wh en a married gentlewoman dies firft, the hatch¬ ment is diftinguilhed by a contrary colour from the former ; that is, the arms on the finifter fide have the ground without the efcutcheon brack 5 whereas thofe on the dexter fide, for her furviving hulband, are upon a white ground : the hatchment of a gentlewoman is, moreover, differenced by a cherub over the arms inllead of a creft. See N° 3. When a bachelor dies, his arms may be depicled fingle or quartered, with a creft over them, but never impaled as the two firft are, and all the ground with¬ out the efcutcheon is alfo black. See N° 4. ^ When a maid dies, her arms, which are placed in a lozenge, may be fingle or quartered, as thole of a bachelor 5 but, inftead of a creft, have a cherub over them, and all the ground without the efcutcheon is afio black. See N° 5. When a widower dies, his arms are reprefented im¬ paled with thofe of his deceafed wife, having a helmet, mantling, and creft over them, and all the ground with¬ out the efcutcheon black. See N° 6. When a widow dies, her arms are alfo reprefented impaled with thofe of her deceafed hulband, but enclo- fed in a lozenge, and, inftead of a creft, a cherub is placed over them ; all the ground without the efcut¬ cheon is alfo black. See N° 7* If a widower or bachelor ihould happen to be the laft of his family, the hatchment is depided as.in N° 6. and that of a maid or widow, whole family is extinct by her death, is depided as in N° 7. with this diffe¬ rence only, that a death-head is generally annexed to each hatchment, to denote, that death has conquer¬ ed all. By the fore-mentioned rules, which are fometin.es negleded through the ignorance of illiterate people, may be known, upon the fight of any hatchment, what branch of the family is dead and by the heLs.et or coronet, what title and degree the deceafed perfon w^as of. The fame rules are obferve-J with refped to the el- cutcheons placed on the hearfe and horfes ufed in pom¬ pous funerals, except that they are not furmounted with any creft, as in the foregoing examples ox hatchments, but are always plain. It is neceffary, however, to.en- fipn thofe of peers with coronets, and that ol a maiden lady with a knot of ribbands. In Scotland, a funeral efcutcheon not only (hows forth the arms and condition of the defund, but is alfo a proof of the gentility of his defeent 5 and fuch perlons for whom this fpecies of efcutcheon can be made out,, are legally entitled to the charafler of gentlemen, of blood, which is the higheft fpecies of gentility. The Englifli hatchment above deferibed exhibits no more than a right to a coat-of-arms which may be acquired by purchafe, and is only the firft fiep towards eftabliih- ing gentility in a family. cheons. / HE HAIj \) E Y . /. (A). l.INE, S 1) IFF K H E X C E S^vr . C_ ftWct/. r^rrr^rr^nrr\ 3. ris/is //am/. 0. • //{/'/ari'. ^v__r\_£lxv=, M/ywvyW'A /VVVWAVVWAVWA I'LfV^r mm/a/?/■>/a/ a it,/- 12. t//A/t///,-,/ />////a///-//. 13. '/7a■ C/J,>r,/a//. —2^r^Jsr^L^r j 1. SS/t- / //a //tf/a / //,-. ^ (/',*/<■<•/,/ '■is ///'/'/>/. J* /at///, /a ////////. t. /a/,-/. “ , 1 o.. y'/'/r,-/-,//> /a. ■ „ s' /’ /7 y " 6- ^,,^/',l%£//a/m-/m/. . /// /t,a/-,/u-a/ '//a^//,/'//'>/.k(///ar/,-/-,t/c///sr,///s/i/. //yra/t. / a/t/’tt. t^/a. //•/-. t///a/,•///•/(-,>/t. • ^/,/.a//<,\ t //a//,/a/. / ,’/,/<•/>/. - ^/<>Jy’//,/<’• ^ y ^ S'//,)//. ' //a.i,/', //-.>. // ///a// // y. >//. /. (1J). /■ r ESC FT F HE f) N 8 . CCLIV . '//i.//./,;/'■ >/. t - / I <• ///, ////);/,.//„7^, y,-'v. 1 'yy/~ //■ S-AXrTIKltS! . ILKIIAT.IVRT. lJJale CCLVJt \ /2. OR DIN ARTS "*C. i/t- RFriRIE^ ^C. 2 CCLVJU. Animals fc i a Vi I UUj /. AIIT IF ICIA L Fig V R E s Birds jc r //XY/fS/f // .v/. I HEK^VLJD R Y. ■Jfttfss/ A'in? /see. C K OWS S VX. *2. c' UI SP O SI T TOZKT S. .Plate C C1.X . MllJl AT,J)RX cZ ‘l. t , '//ar'i/uf//<’s/. Wn 'r//ss n/} K AH 1, of X. oxrp o iry E A RJj of I ‘ -SI i ' i -. KMI.IX K if A S TEK of L OUT5 OTT .S' E^\RJ. of XOEE r o_lv-ie Ko S S of I .BAi.SAfion'Ayl S F. ARE of 11. J XI. I Til (J Q H- mm l.OiW imtTilirOX'Tl X OEIJ Drum no .v n H A R .L of 1 liR'" i ;; :^frfejif Tfo^oj ^ v -aMm Chap. VII. HERA OfEfcut- The funeral efcutcheon, as exhibited in Scotland, , cbeon!i- France, and Germany, is in form of a lozenge, above fix feet fquare, of black cloth ; in the centre of which is painted, in proper colours, the complete atchieve- ment of the defunft, with all its exterior ornaments and additional marks or badges of honour j and round * the fides are placed the lixteen arms of the families from which he derives his defcent, as far back as the grandfather’s grandfather, as the proofs of his genti¬ lity : they exhibit the armorial bearings of his father and mother, his twTo grandmothers, his four great¬ grandmothers, and his eight great-grandmothers mo¬ thers j if all thefe families have acquired a legal right to bear arms, then the gentility of the perfon whofe E D R Y. 427 proof it is muft be accounted complete, but not other- OF Efcut- vife. On the four corners are placed mort-heads, k cl*eons- . and the initials of his name and titles or delignation ; and the black interftices are femee or powdered with tears, as in the figure, N0 8. which is the efcutcheon of the right honourable James 5th earl of Balcarras, chief of the ancient furname of Lindefaij. On the morning of the interment, one of thefe is placed on the front of the houfe where the deceafed lies ; and another on the church in which he is to be buried, which after the burial is fixed above the grave. The pall, too, is generally adorned with thefe proofs of gentility, and the kories of the hearfe with the de« fun&’s arms. HER Heraldus HERALDUS, Desiderius, in French Herault, a H counfellor of the parliament of .Paris, has given good uus PJ?nts Pr?ofs of uncommon learning by very different works. C v-. His Adverfaria appeared in 1599 ; which little book, if the Sca/igerana may be credited, he repented the having publifhed. His notes on Tertullian’s Apology, on Minutius Felix, and on Arnobius, have been elleemed. He alfo wrote notes on Martial’s Epigrams. He difguifed himfelf under the name of DavidLeidh- rejerus, to write a political dilfertation on the inde¬ pendence of kings, fome time after the death of Henry IV. He had a controverfy with Salmafius, De jure Attico cc Romano; but did not live to finifh what he had written on that fubjeft. What he had done, however, was printed in 1650. He died in June 1649. Guy Patin fays, that “ he was looked upon as a very learn¬ ed man, both in the civil law and in polite literature, and wrote with great facility on any fubjefl he pitched on.” Gaille, fpeaking of fuch Proteftant writers as condemned the executing of Charles I. king of Eng¬ land, quotes the Pacijique Royal en deuil, by Herault. J lib author, fon to our Deliderius Heraldus, was a minifter in Normandy, when he was called to the fer- vice of the Walloon-church of London under Charles I. and he was fo zealous a royalift, that he w'as forced to fly to France, to efcape the fury of the commonwealth- men. He returned to England after the Reftoration, and refumed his ancient employment in the Walloon- church at London 5 fome time after which he obtained a canonry in the cathedral of Canterbury, and enioved it till his death. PIERB, in Bolarnj, a name by which Linnreus de¬ nominates that portion of every vegetable which arifes from the root, and is terminated by the frunification. It comprehends,^ 1. The trunk, ftalk, or ftem. 2. The leaves. 3. Thofe minute external parts called by the fame author the fulcra or fupports of plants. 4. The ouds, or, as he alfo terms them, the winter-quarters of the future vegetable. Herb-Chriftopher. See Actea, Botany Index. Herb-Robert, (a fpecies of Geranium). See Ge¬ ranium, Botany Index. HERBACEOUS plants, are thofe which have iucculent ftems or ftalks *hat die down to the ground H E R every year. Of herbaceous plants, thofe arc annual Herbage which perilh ftem and root and all every year ; bien¬ nial, which fubfift by the roots two years; perennial Herbert. which are perpetuated by their roots for a feries of v years, a new ftem being produced every fpring. HERBAGE, in Law, fignifies the pafture provided by nature for the food of cattle $ alfo the liberty to feed cattle in the foreft, or in another perfon’s ground. HERBAL, fignifies a book that treats of the claffes, genera, fpecies, and virtues of plants. Herbal, is fometimes alfo ufed for what is fome- times called hortus fccus, or a collection of dried plants. HEBBELOL, Bartholemew d’, a French writer, eminent for his oriental learning, was bom at Paris in 1625. .He travelled feveral times into Italy, where he obtained the efteem of fome of the moft learned men of the age. Ferdinand II. grand duke of Tuf- cany, gave him many marks of his favour ; a library being expofed to fale at Florence, the duke defired him to examine the manufcripts in the oriental lan¬ guages, to felea. the belt of them, and to mark the price which being done, that generous prince pur- chafed them, and made him a prefent of them. M. Colbert being at length informed of Herbelot’s merit, recalled him to Paris, and obtained a penfion for him I500 livres : he afterwards became fecretary and in¬ terpreter of the oriental languages, and royal profef- for of the Syriac tongue. He died at Paris in 169J. His piincipal work is entitled Ribliotheque Orientale, which he firft wrote in Arabic, and afterwards tranf- lated into French. It is greatly efteemed. M. Her¬ belot’s modefty was equal to his erudition 5 and his uncommon abilities were accompanied with the ulmoft probity, piety, and charity, which he praftifed through the whole courfe of his life. HERBERT, Mary, countefs of Pembroke, was filler of the famous Sir Philip Sidney, and wrife of Hen¬ ry earl of Pembroke. She was not only a lover of the mufes, but a great encourager of polite literature 5 a charafter not very common among ladies. Her bro¬ ther dedicated his incomparable romance Arcadia to her, from which circumftance it hath been called The Countefs of Pembroke's Arcadia. She tranllated a dra- 3 H 2 raatric HER [ 42? ] HER Herbert- matic piece from the French, entitled Antonins, a tra- Y—" gedy j though it is faid (hie was aflifted by her lord’s chaplain, Dr Babington, afterwards biihop ol Exeter. She alfo turned the Pfalms of David into Englifh metre; but it is doubtful whether thefe works were ever print¬ ed. She died in 1621 ; and an exalted charafter of her is to be found in Francis Oihorne’s memoirs of King James I. Herbert, Edward, Lord Herbert of Cherbury in Shropflnre, an eminent Englifh writer, w'as born in 1581, and educated at Oxford j after which he tra¬ velled, and at his return was made knight of the Bath. James I. lent him ambaffador to Louis XIII. in behalf of the Proteftants who were befieged in Several cities of France ; and continued in this ftation till he was re¬ called, on account of a difpute between him and the conftable de Luines. In 1625 he wTns advanced to the dignity of a baron in the kingdom of Leland, by the title of Lord Plerbert of Caftle Itland and in 1631 to that of Lord Herbert of Cherbury in Shroplhire. After the breaking out of the civil wars, he adhered to the parliament j and in 1644 obtained a penfion, on account of his having been plundered by the king’s^ forces. Fie wrote a Hitlory of the Life and Reign of Henry VIII. which was greatly admired ; a treatile De veritate; and feveral other works. He died at London in 1648. , . , “ Lord Herbert (fays Mr Granger), Hands m the fir'd rank of the public minifters, hillorians, and phi- lofophers of his age. It is hard to fay whether his per- fon, his underftanding, or his courage, was the moll extraordinary ; as the fair, the learned, and the brave, held him in equal admiration. But the lame man was wife and capricious •, redreliled wrongs, and quarrelled for punctilios *, hated bigotry in religion, and was him- felf a bigot to philofophy. He expofed himfelf to fuch dangers as other men of courage would have care¬ fully declined : and called in queftion the tundamen- tals of a religion which none had the hardinels to dn- pute befides himfelf. Herbert, William, earl of Pembroke, was bom at Wilton in Wiltfhire, 1580-, and admitted to New- college in Oxford in IC92, where he continued about two years. In 1601 he fucceeded to his father’s ho¬ nours and ell ate ', was made K. G. in 1604; and go¬ vernor of Portfmouth fix years after. In 1626 he was elefted chancellor of the univerfity of Oxford j and about the fame time made lord fleward of the king’s houfehold. He died fuddenly at his houfe called Baynard's cajlle, in London, April 10. 1630 ‘, accord¬ ing to the calculation of his nativity, fays Wood, made feveral years before by Mr Thomas Allen .of Gloucetler- hall. Clarendon relates concerning this calculation, that fome confiderable perfons conneaed with Lord Pembroke being met at Maidenhead, one of them, at fupper drank a health to the lord fteward •, upon which another faid, that he believed his lordthip was at that time very merry j for he had now outlived the day, which it had been prognofticated upon his .nativity he would not outlive ; but he had outlived it now, for that was his birth day, which had completed his age to to years. I be next morning, however, they re¬ ceived the news of his death. Whether the noble hi- Ilorian really believed this and other, accounts relating to altrology, apparitions, providential interpofitions, Sec. which he has inferted in his hillory, we do not prefume to fay: he delivers them, however, as if he did not aClually dilbelieve them. Lord Pembroke was not only a great favourer of learned and ingenious men, but was himfelf learned, and endued with a con¬ fiderable (hare of poetic genius. All that are extant of his produClions in this way were puhlifhed with this title : “ Poems written by William earl of Pembroke, &c. many of which are anfwered by way of repartee by Sir Benjamin Rudyard, with other poems written by them occafionally and apart, 1660, 8vo. Herbert, Sir Thomas, an eminent gentleman of the Pembroke family, was born at York, where his father was an alderman. William earl of Pembroke fent him to travel at his expence in 1626, and he (pent four years in vifiting Afia and Africa : his expectations of preferment ending with the death of the earl, he went abroad again, and travelled over feveral parts, of Europe. In 1634, he publiihed, in folio, A Relation of lome Years I ravel into A-frica and the Gieat Alia, efpecially the Territories of the Perfian monarchy, and fome parts of the Oriental Indies and iiles adjacent. On the breaking out of the civil war, he adhered to the parliament •, and at Oldenby, on the removal or the king’s fervants, by defire of the commiflioners from the parliament, he and James Harrington were retained as grooms of his bed-chamoer, and attended him even to the block. At the reftoration he was cre¬ ated a baronet by Charles II. for his faithful fervices to his father during his two lall years. In 1678 he wrote Threnodia Carolina, containing an account of the two lafi: years of the life of Charles I. and he af- filled Sir William Dugdale in compiling the third vo¬ lume of his MonaJHcon Anglicanum. He died at York in 168 2, leaving feveral MSS. to the public library at Oxford, and others to that of the cathedral.at York. HERBIVOROUS animals, thofe which feed only on vegetables. HERCULANEUM is the name of an ancient city of Campania in Italy, which was deftroyed by an eruption of Vefuvius in the firlt year of the emperor Titus, or the 79th of the Chriftian era, and lately rendered famous on account of the curious monuments of antiquity difcovered in its ruins 5 an account of which has been publiihed by order of the king of Naples, in a work of fix volumes folio.—The epocha of the foundation of Herculaneum is unknown. Dio- nyfius Halicamaffenfis conjedlures that it may be refer¬ red to 60 years before the war of Troy, or about 1342 years before Chrill ; and therefore that it lafted about 1400 years. The thicknefs of the heap of lava and allies by which the city was overwhelmed, has been much in- creafed by fiery llreams vomited fince that cataftrophe 5 and now forms a mafs 24 feet deep, of dark gray Hone, which is eafily broken to pieces. By its non- adhefion to foreign bodies, marbles and bronzes are preferved in it as in a cafe made to fit them •, and exadl moulds of the faces and limbs of ftatues are.frequently found in this fubllance. The precife fituation of this fubterraneous city was not known till the year 1713, when, it was accidentally difcovered by fome labourers, who, in digging a well, Ilruck upon a llatue on the benches of‘the theatre. Many others were afterwards dus out and fent to France by the prince of Elboeuf. O Knf Herbert Hercu'a- H E R [ But little progrefs was made in the excavations Charles infant of Spain afcended the Neapolitan throne •, J by whofe unwearied efforts and liberality a very con- fiderable part of Herculaneum has been explored, and fuch treafures of antiquity drawn out as form the moll curious mufeum in the world. It being too arduous a talk to attempt removing the covering, the king contented himfelf with cutting galleries to the princi¬ pal buildings, and, caufing the extent of one or two of them to be cleared. Of thefe the theatre is the mod confiderable. On a balludrade w^hich divided the or- chedra from the dage wTas found a row of datues ; and, on each fide of the pulpitum, the equedrian figure of a perfbn of the Nonia family. They are now placed under porticoes of the palace 5 and from the great rarity of equedrian datues in marble would be very va¬ luable objecfs, were their workmandiip even lefs ex¬ cellent than it is : one of them in particular is a very fine piece of fculpture. Since the king of Spain left Naples, the digging has been continued, but with lefs fpirit and expenditure : indeed the collection of curio- fities brought out of Herculaneum and Pompeii is al¬ ready fo confiderable, that a relaxation of zeal and aClxvity becomes excufable. They are now arranged in a wing of the palace *, and conlill not only of datues, buds, altars, infcriptions, and other ornamental ap¬ pendages of opulence and luxury ; but alfo comprehend an entire affortment of the domedic, mufical, and chi- rurgical indruments ufed by the ancients 5 tripods of elegant form and exquifite execution, lamps in endlefs variety, vafes and bafons of noble dimenfions, chande¬ liers of the mod beautiful lhapes, pateras and other appurtenances of facrifice, looking-glades of polifh- ed metal, coloured glafs, fo hard, clear, and well darned, as to appear emeralds, fapphires, and other precious Hones •, a kitchen completely fitted up with copper-pans lined with filver, kettles, ciilerns for heat¬ ing water, and every utenlil necedary for culinary purpofes ; fpecimens of various forts of combudibles, retaining their form though burnt to a cinder ; corn, bread, fidi, oil, wine, and flour ; a lady’s toilet, fully furnithed with combs, thimbles, rings, paint, ear¬ rings, &c. Among the datues, which are numerous, connoidears allow the greated lhare of nserit to a Mer¬ cury and a deeping faun : the buds fill feveral rooms 5 but very few of the originals whom they were meant to imitate are known. The doors are paved with an¬ cient molaie. Few rare medals have been found in thefe ruins 5 the molt curious is a gold medallion of Augudus druck in Sicily in the 15th year of his reign. The frefco paintings, which, for the fake of preferva- tion, have been torn od' the w^alls and framed and glazed, are to be feen in another part of the palace. “ The elegance of the attitudes, and the infinite va¬ riety of the fubjefls (Mr Swinburne obferves), damp them as performances v/orthy of the attention of artids and antiquarians; but no pictures yet found are ma- derly enough to prove that the Greeks carried the art of painting to as great a height of perfedtion as they did that of datuary. Yet can we fuppofe thole au¬ thors incapable of appreciating the merits of an Apelles or a Zeuxis, who with fo much critical difcernment have pointed out the beauties of the works of a Phidias or a Praxiteles, beauties that w^e have dill an oppor¬ tunity of contemplating ? would they have bellowed 429 ] HER till equal praifes upon both kinds of performances if either Hercules, of them had been much inferior to the other i1 I think 1 " 'v it is not probable 5 and wTe mull prefume, that the ca¬ pital productions of the ancient painters, being of more peritbable materials than butts and datues, have been dedroyed in the fatal difaders that have fo often affli&ed both Greece and Italy. Herculaneum and Pompeii were but towns of the fecond order, and not likely to polTefs the malterpieces of the great artids, which wrere ufually dedined to adorn the more celebra¬ ted temples, or the palaces of kings and emperors.” A more valuable acquifition than bronzes and pictures- was thought to be made, wfflen a large parcel of manu- fcripts was found among the ruins. Hopes wrere en¬ tertained that many works of the claffics, which time has deprived us of, were now going to be redored to light, and that a new mine of fcience wras on the point of being opened. But the difficulty of unrolling the burnt parchment, of pading the fragments on a flat furface, and of deciphering the obfcure letters, have proved fuch obflacles, that very little progrefs has been made in the work. A pried invented the method of proceeding ; but it would require the joint labours of many learned men to carry on fo nice and tedious an operation with any fuccefs. The plan is dropped ; and the manufcripts now lie in dudy heaps, as uielefs to the learned world as they had been for the preceding feventeen centuries. HERCULES, in fabulous hidory, a mod renowm- ed Grecian hero, who after death w^as ranked among the gods, and received divine honours. According to the ancients, there wrere many perfons of the lame name. Diodorus mentions three, Cicero fix, and fome authors extend the number to no lefs than forty-three. Of all thefe, one generally called the Theban Hercules, is the moil celebrated ; and to him, as may eafily be imagined, the ablions of the others have been attribu¬ ted. Fie is reported to have been the fon of Jupiter by Alcmena (wife to Amphitryon king of Argos), whom Jupiter enjoyed in the ihape of her hulband while he wras abfent ; and in order to add the greater drength to the ckild, made that amorous night as long as three. Amphitryon having foon after accidentally killed his uncle and father-in-law Ele&ryon, was obli¬ ged to fly to Thebes, where Hercules was born. The jealoufy of Juno, on account of her hulhand’s amour . with Alcmena, prompted her to deflroy the infant. For this purpofe (he fent twro ferpents to kill him in the cradle, but young Hercules drangled them both. He was early indrufted in the liberal arts, and Cador the fon of Tyndarus taught him how to fight, Eurytus how to (hoot with a bow and arrow's, Autolicus to drive a chariot, Linus to play on the lyre, and Eumolpus to fing. Fie, like the red of his illudiious contemporaries, foon after became the pupil of the centaur Chiron, and under him he perfefted and rendered himfelf the mod valiant and accompliflied of the age. In the 18th year of his age he refolved to deliver the neighbourhood of Mount Cithaeron from a huge lion which preyed on the flocks of Amphitryon his fuppofed father, and which laid wafle the adjacent country. He went to the court of Thefpius king of Thefnis, who (hared in the general calamity ; and he received here a tender treatment, and was entertained during 50 days. The 50 daughters of the king became mothers by Hercules during H E H [ 430 1 H E ?V Ilercule?. during Iris flay at Thefpis, and fome fay that it was ef- v 1 fedted in one night. After he had deitroyed the lion of Mount Citheeron, he delivered his country from the annual tribute of xoo oxen which it paid to Ergipus. Such public fervices became univerfally known 5 and Creon, who then fat on the throne of Thebes, reward¬ ed the patriotic deeds of Hercules by giving him his daughter in marriage, and entruffing him with the go¬ vernment of his kingdom. Euriilheus, the fon of Amphitryon, having fucceeded his father, foon became jealous of Hercules •, and fear¬ ing lell he might by him be deprived of his crown, left no means untried to get rid of him. Of this Her¬ cules was not infenfible, becaufe he was perpetually en-> gaging him on fome defperate expedition •, and there¬ fore went to confult the oracle. But being anfwered that it was the pleafure of the gods that he fhould ferve Euriflheus 1 2 years, he fell into a deep melan¬ choly, which at lalt ended in a furious madnefs •, du¬ ring which, among other defperate aflions, he put away his wdfe Megara, and murdered all the children lie had by her. As an expiation of this crime, the king impofed upon him twelve labours furpaffing the power of all other mortals to accomplifh, which never- thelefs our hero performed with great eafe. The fa¬ vours of the gods had indeed completely armed him when he undertook his labours. He had received a coat of armour and helmet from Minerva, a fword from Mercury, a horfe from Neptune, a fhield from Jupi¬ ter, a bow and arrows from Apollo, and from Vul¬ can a golden cuirafs end brazen bufkin, with a cele¬ brated club of brafs according to the opinion of fome writers. The firfl labour impofed upon him was the killing of a lion in Nemea, a wood of Achaiaj wdiofe hide was proof againft any weapon, fo that he w'as forced to feize him by the throat and ftrangle him. He carried the dead bead on his fhoulders to Mycenae, and ever after ^clothed himfelf with the Ikin. Euriftheus was fo aflonifhed at the fight of this bead, and at the cou¬ rage of Hercules, that he ordered him never to enter the gates of the city when he returned from his expe¬ ditions, but to wait for his orders without the walls. He even made himfelf a brazen veffel into which he retired whenever Hercules returned.—The fecond la¬ bour wTas to dedroy the Lernaean hydra, which had feven heads according to Apollodorus, 50 according to Simonides, and 100 according to Diodorus. This celebrated monder he fird attacked with his arrows ; but foon after he came to a clofe engagement, and by means of his heavy club he dedroyed the heads of his enemy. This, however, was produftive of no advan¬ tage j for as foon as one head was beaten to pieces by the club, immediately tw7o fprang up 5 and the labour of Hercules would have remained unfinifhed, had not he commanded his friend lolas to bum with a hot iron the root of the head which he had crufhed to pieces. This fucceeded •, and Hercules became victorious, open¬ ed the belly of the monder, and dipped his arrows in the gall to render the wmunds which he gave fatal and incurable.—He w'as ordered in his third labour to bring alive and unhurt into the prefence of Euridheus a dag, famous for its incredible fwiftnefs, its golden horns, and brazen feet. This celebrated animal fre¬ quented the neighbourhood of Cknoe $ and Hercules I w’as employed for a whole year in continually purfuing Hercules, it : at lad he capght it in a trap, or when tired, or, J according to others, by (lightly wounding it and leflen- ing its fwiftnefs.—The fourth labour wras to bring alive to Euridheus a wdld boar which ravaged tha neighbourhood of Erymanthus. In this expedition he dedroyed the centaurs, and caught the boar by clofely purfuing him through the deep Inow. Euridheus rvas fo frightened at the fight of the boar, that, according to Diodorus, he hid himfelf in his brazen vefiel for fome days.—In his fifth labour Hercules was ordered to clean the dables of Augeas, where 3000 oxen had been confined for many years.—For his fixth labour he was ordered to kill the carnivorous birds which rava¬ ged the country near the lake Stymphalis in Arcadia. —In his feventh labour he brought alive into Pelopon- nefus a prodigious wild bull wdiich laid wade the iiland of Crete.—In his eighth labour he w'as employed in obtaining the mares of Diomedes, which fed upon hu¬ man flelh. He killed Diomedes, and gave him to be eaten by his mares, which he brought to Euridheus. They were fent to Mount Olympus by the king of Mycenae, where they were devoured by the wild beads j or, according to others, they were confecrated to Ju¬ piter, and their breed dill exided in the age of Alex¬ ander the Great.—For his ninth labour, he was com¬ manded to obtain the girdle of the queen of the Ama¬ zons.—In his tenth labour he killed the monder Ge- ryon king of Gades, and brought to Argos his nume¬ rous docks which fed upon human defh. This was in Iberia or Spain •, in the furthed parts of which he ere£led his two pillars, as the utmod limits of the then known world. Thefe ten labours he atchieved, as the fable fays, in about eight years. In this lad expedi¬ tion he is likewife affirmed to have killed Antaeus, a famous giant of a mondrous fize, who, wffien wTeary with wredling or labour, was immediately refreihed by touching the earth. Hercules overcame him in wued- ling, and dew' him ; and after him the tyrant Bufiris, in his way through Egypt. This bloody man ufed to facrifice all his gueds and drangers upon his altars; and defigning to have done the fame by Hercules, was dain by him, together with all his attendants.—His eleventh labour was the carrying aw^ay the HefperiaR golden apples kept by a dragon : (See Hesperides). —The twelfth and lad, and mod dangerous of his la¬ bours, was to bring upon earth the three-headed dog Cerberus. Defcending into hell by a cave on Mount Taenarus, he was permitted by Pluto to carry awTay his friends Thefeus and Pirithous, who were con¬ demned to punilhment in hell, and Cerberus alfo was granted to his prayers, provided he made ufe of no arms but only force to drag him awray. Hercules, as fome report, carried him back to hell after he had brought him before Euridheus. Many other exploits are faid to have been performed by Hercules ; in particular, he accompanied the Ar¬ gonauts to Colchis before he delivered himfelf up to the king of Mycenae. He affided the gods in their wars againd the giants, and it was through him alone that Jupiter obtained a vidlory. He conquered Lao- medon, and pillaged Troy. When lole, the daughter of Eurytus king of CEchalia, of wffiom he was deeply enamoured, was refufed to his intreaties, be became the prey of a fecond fit of infanity, and he murdered Iphitus, H E R [ 431 ] HER Hercules Iphxtus, the only one of the fons of Eurytus who fa- voured his addrefies to dole. He was fome time after purified of the murder, and his infanity ceafed ; but the gods perfecuted him, and he was vifited by a dif- order which obliged him to apply to the oracle of Delphi for relief. The coldnefs with which the Pythia received him irritated him, and he refolved to plunder Apollo’s temple and carry away the facred tripod. Apollo oppofed him, and a fevere conflifl was begun, which nothing but the interference of Jupiter wdth his thunderbolts could have prevented. He w^as upon this told by the oracle that he muft be fold as a Have, and remain three years in the moil abjefl fervitude to recover from his diforder. He complied ; and Mer¬ cury, by order of Jupiter, conducled him to Omphale, queen of Lydia, to whom he was fold as a Have. Here he cleared all the country from robbers; and Omphale, wdro was aitonithed at the greatnefs of his exploits, married him. Hercules had Agelaus and I^amon by Omphale, from whom Crcefus king of Lydia was de- fcended. He became alfo enamoured of one of Om- phale’s female fervants, by whom he had Alceus. Af¬ ter he had completed the years of his (lavery, he re¬ turned to Peloponnefus, wdiere he re-efcabliihed on the throne ot Sparta Tyndarus, who had been expelled by Hippocoon. He became one of Dejanira’s fuitors, and married her after he had overcome all his rivals. He was obliged to leave Calydon his father-in-law’s kingdom, becaufe he had inadvertently killed a man with a blow of his fill, and it was on account of this expulfion that he was not prefent at the hunting of the Calydonian boar. From Calydon he retired to the court of Ceyx king of Trachinia. The king re¬ ceived him and his wife with great marks of friendlhip, and purified him of the murder which he had commit¬ ted at Calydon. Hercules was Hill mindful that he had once been refufed the hand of lole ; he therefore made war againit her father Eurytus, and killed him with three of his fons. lole fell into the hands of her father’s murderer, and found that fhe w^as loved by Hercules as much as before. She accompanied him on Mount CEta, where he wras going to raife an altar and offer a folemn facrifice to Jupiter. As he had not then the fhirt and tunic in which he arrayed him- ie!r to offer a facrifice, he ient Lichas to Trachin to his wife Dejanira, in order provide himfelf a proper diefs. Dejanira had fome time before been attempted by the Centaur Neflus, as be was ferrying her over the river Euenus; and Hercules beholding it from the fhore, had given him a mortal wound with an arrow. The monfter finding himfelf dying, advifed her to mix iome oil witn the blood which flowed from his wound, and to anoint her hufband’s fhirt with it, pretending that it would infallibly fecure him from loving anv other* woman ; and Ihe, too well apprifed of bis inconllancy, bad a finally prepared the poifoned ointment accord- ingly. Lychas coming to her for the garments, un- foitunately acquainted her with his having brought away lole; upon wmch (he, in a fit of jealoufy, anoint¬ ed his fhirt with the fatal mixture. This had no fooner touched his body, than he felt the poifon diffufe itfelf through ail his veins; the violent pain of which caufed him to difhand hL army, and to return to Trachin. His torment ftill increafing, he fent to confu.lt the- oracle for a cure ; and -was anfwered, that he fhould Hercule*. caufe himfelf to be conveyed to Mount CEta, and there —v— rear up a great pile of wood, and leave the reft to Ju¬ piter. By the time he had obeyed the oracle, his pains being become intolerable, he drefled himfelf in his martial habit, Hung himfelf upon the pile, and defired tlie byitanders to fet fire to it. Others fay that he le:t tne charge or it to his fon Philoftetes; W'ho having performed his father’s command, had his bow and ar¬ rows given him as a reward for his obedience. At the fame time Jupiter, to be as good as his word, fent a flafh of lightning, which confumed both the pile and the hero ; infomuch that loliius, coming to take up his bones, found nothing but afhes : from which they concluded, that he was paffed from earth to heaven, and joined to the gods. His friends fhowed their gratitude to his memory by railing an altar Where the burning pile had Hood. Menoetius the fon of Adtor offered him a facrifice of a bull, a wild boar, and a goat, and enjoined the people of Opus yearly to ob- ferve the fame religious ceremonies. His worfhip foon became as univerfal as his fame ; and Juno, who had once perfecuted him with fuch fury forgot her refent- ment, and gave him her daughter Hebe in marriage. Hercules has received many furnames and epithets, either from the place where his worfhip was eilablifhed, or fiom the labours which he atchieved. His temples were numerous and magnificent, and bis divinity revered. No dogs or flies ever entered his temple at Rome ; and that of Gades, according to Strabo, was always forbidden 40 women and pigs. The Phoenicians of¬ fered quails on his altars ; and as it was fuppofed that he prefided over dreams, the fick and infirm were fent to fleep in his temples, that they might receive in their dreams the agreeable prefages of their approaching re¬ covery. J he white poplar was particularly dedicated to his fervice. It is obferved, that there are none even of the twelve great gods of antiquity that have fo many ancient mo¬ numents relating to them as Hercules. The famous ffatue of Hercules, in the Farnefe palace at Rome, is well known to the connoiffeurs : this reprefents him rclling after tne laff of his twelve labours above recited, leaning, on Ids club, and holding the apples of the Hefperides in his hand. In this ffatue, as in all the other figures of him, he is formed, by the breadth of his fhoulders, the fpacioufnefs of his chert, the large- nefs of his fize, and the firmnefs of his mufcles, to exprefs ftrength and a capacity of enduring great fa¬ tigue, which conrtituted the chief idea of virtue among the ancient heathens. His other attributes are his hoo s fkin, his cluo, and his bow.—Hercules is re- prefented by the ancients as an exemplar of virtue : however, the Hercules Bibax, or drunken Hercules, is no uncommon figure; and his amours are deferibed both by the poets and artills. I hus, the Cupids are made to take away his club, and lie is exhibited in the pofture of bending under a little boy ; by which actions v. e perctftve, that he who conquered all difficulties was a flave to love. His children are as numerous as the labours and difficulties which be underwent; and indeed they became fo powerful foon after his death, that they alone had the courage to invade all Peloponnefus. See Heraclid®. Xhe- HE R [ Jf mules Right. The aputheofis of Hercules, or the enablifliment of i*. his altars in the principal cities of Greece, is fixed by Hereditary -j'hrafybulus 29 years before the taking of Troy. Hercules has been particularly honoured by the Greeks under the name of Mufagetes, “ the conductor of the Mufesand at Rome under that of Hercules Mufarurn. He is reprefented on medals with a lyre in his hand ; and the reverfe is marked with the figure of the nine Mufes, with their proper fymbols. Hercules, in HJlronomy, one of the conftellations of the northern hemifphere.—-The ftars in the conftel- lation Hercules in Ptolemy’s catalogue are 29 ; m Tycho’s, 28-, in the Britannic catalogue, 113. Hercules's Pillars, in antiquity, a name given to two lofty mountains, fituated one on the mod louthern extremity of Spain, and the other on the oppofite part of Africa. They were called by the ancients Abyla and Calpe. They are reckoned the boundaries of the labours of Hercules-, and according to ancient tradi¬ tion, they were joined together till they were fevered by the arm of the hero, and a communication opened be¬ tween the Mediterranean and Atlantic feas. PIERCYNIA silva, in Ancient Geography, the larged of foreds. Its breadth was a journey of nine days to the bed traveller. Taking its rife at the limits oi the Helvetii, Nemetes, and Rauraci, it run along the Da¬ nube to the borders of the Daci and Anartes, a length of 60 days journey, according sto Caefar, who appears, to have been well acquainted with its true breadth, feeing it occupied all Lower Germany. It may there¬ fore be confidered as covering tiie whole of Germany ; and mod of the other foreds may be confidered as parts of it, though didinguidied by particular names : confe- quently the Hartz, in the duchy of Brunfwic, which rrave name to the whole, may be confidered as one of its parts. The name Hartz denotes “ refinous,” or, “ pine- trees.” By the Greeks it is called Orcynius, as a name common to all the foreds in Germany; in the fame manner as Hcrcijniits was the name given by the Ro¬ mans -, and both from the German Hartz. HERD, among hunters, an affemblage of black or fallow beads in contradidinclion to flock. See Flock.—In the hunting language there are various terms ufed for companies of the divers kinds of game. We fay a herd of harts or bucks, a bevy of roes, a rout of wolves, a richefs ab. martens, &c. HEREDITAMENTS, whatever moveable things a perfon may have to himfelf and his heirs by way of inheritance; and which, if not otherwife bequeathed, defcend to him who is next heir, and not to the exe¬ cutor as chattels do. HEREDITARY, an appellation given to what¬ ever belongs to a family by right of fucceflion from heir to heir. Hereditary is alfo figuratively applied to good or ill qualities fuppofed to be tranfmitted from father to fon : thus we fay virtue and piety are hereditary qua¬ lities in fuch a family \ and that in Italy the hatred of families is hereditary. And indeed the gout, king’s evil, niadnefs, &c. may really be hereditary difeafes. Hereditary Right, in the Britilh conftitution. The grand fundamental maxim upon which theywj- corona, or right of fuccefiion to the throne of Britain depends, Sir William Blackdone takes to. be this : That the crown is, by common law and conftitutional cutlom, 432 ] H £ R hereditary ; and this in a manner peculiar to itfelf : but Hereditary that the right of inheritance may from time to time Riglit. be changed or limited by a£l of parliament \ under which limitations the crown ftill continues hereditary. x. The crown is in general hereditary, or defcend- ible to the next heir, on the death or demife of the laft proprietor. AH regal governments muft be either he¬ reditary or elective : and as there is no inftance where- . in the crown of England has ever been afferted to be eleflive, except by the regicides at the infamous and unparalleled trial of King Charles I. j it muft.pf confe- quence be hereditary. Yet in thus afferting. an he¬ reditary right, a jure divino title to the throne is by no means intended. Such a title may be allowed to have fubfified under the theocrative eftabliihments of the chil¬ dren of Ifrael in Palelline 5 but it never yet fubfilled in any other country 5 fave only fo far as kingdoms, like other human fabrics, are fubjefl to the general and ordinary difpenfations of Providence. Nor indeed have a jure divino and an hereditary right any nect iary connexion wfith each other $ as fome have very weakly imagined. The titles of David and Jehu were equally jure divino as thofe of either Solomon or Ahab ; and yet David flew' the fons of his predeceifor, and Jehu his predeceffor himfelf'. And when our Kings have the fame warrant as they had, whether it be to lit upon the throne of their fathers, or to defiroy the houfe of the preceding lovereign, they will then, and not before, poffefs the crown of England by a right like theirs, immediately derived from heaven. The hereditary right, which the law^s of England acknowledge, owes its origin to the founders of our conftitution, and to them "only. It has no relation to; nor depends upon, the civil laws of the Jews, the Greeks, the Romans, or any other nation upon earth •, the. municipal laws of one fociety having no conneftion with, or influence upon, the fundamental polity of another. The found¬ ers of our Englifh monarchy might perhaps,.h they had thought proper, have made it an elective mo¬ narchy ; but they rather chofe, and upon good rea- fon, to eltablifn originally a fucceflion by imheritance. This has been acquiefced in by general confent, and ripened by degrees into common law; the veiy lame title that every private man has to his own eftate. Lands are not “naturally defcendible, any more than thrones: but the law has thought proper, for the be¬ nefit and peace of the public, to efiablifh hereditary fucceflion in the one as well as the other. It mull be owned, an ele&ive monarchy feemS to be the moll obvious, and belt fuited of any to the rational principles of government, and the freedom of human nature; and accordingly we find from hiftory, that, m the infancy and firit rudiments of almoft^ every ftate, the leader, chief magiilrate, or prince, nath ufually been eleaive. And, if the individuals who compoie that Hate could always continue true to firft principles, uninfluenced by pafiion or prejudice, unalfafled by cor¬ ruption, and unawed by violence, . eleaive fucceflion were as much to be defired in a kingdom as m other inferior communities. The heft, the wifefl, and tne braved man, would then be fure of receiving that crown which his endowments have merited ; and the.fenfe oi an unbiased majority would be dutifully acqmeiced m by the few who were of different opinions.. But hiltory and obfervation will inform us, that elections 0- c^y HER [ 43.3 ] H E. R Hereditary kind (in the prefent ftate of human nature) are too fre- 'quently brought about by induence, partiality, and ar¬ tifice : and, even where the cafe is otherwife, thefe pra&ices will be often fufpe&ed, and as conftantly charged upon the fuccefsful, by a fplenetic difappointed minority. This is an evil to which all focieties are liable ; as well thofe of a private and domeftic kind, as the great community of the public, w’hich regulates and includes the reft. But in the former there is this ad¬ vantage, I hat fuch fufpicions, if lalfe, proceed no far¬ ther than jealoufies and murmurs, which time will ef¬ fectually (upprefs , and, if true, the injullice may be remedied by legal means, by an appeal to thofe tribu¬ nals to which every member of fociety has (by beco¬ ming fuch) virtually engaged to lubmit. Whereas, in the great and independent fociety which every nation compofes, there is no fuperior to refort to but the law of nature ; no method to redrefs the infringements of that law, but the adlual exertion of private force. As therefore between two nations, complaining of mutual injuries, the quarrel can only be decided by the law of arms j fo in one and the fame nation, when the funda¬ mental principles of their common union are fuppofed to be invaded, and more efpecially wdien the appoint¬ ment of their chief magiftrate is alleged to be unduly made, the only tribunal to which the complainants can appeal is that of the God of battles, the only procefs by w'hich the appeal can be carried on is that of a ci¬ vil and inteftine war. An hereditary fucceflion to the crown is therefore now eftablifhed, in this and moft other countries, in order to prevent that periodical blood- flred and mifery, which the hiftory of ancient imperial Rome, and the later experience of modern times, has fhown to be the confequences of ele6five king¬ doms. 2. But, fecondly, as to the particular mode of in¬ heritance. It in general correfponds with the feodal path of defcents, chalked out by the common law in the fucceflion to landed eftates ; yet with one or two material exceptions. Like them, the crown will de- fcend lineally to the iflue of the reigning monarch j as it did from King John to Richard II. through a re¬ gular pedigree of fix lineal generations As in them the preference of males to females, and the right of primogeniture among the males, are ftriaiy adhered to. Thus Edward V. fucceeded to the crown, in pre¬ ference to Richard his younger brother, and Elizabeth his elder fifter. Like them, on failure of the male line, it defcends to the iflue female ; according to the ancient Britilh cuftom remarked by Tacitus, So/en/ fee- tmnarum duFtu be Hare, etfexum in imperils non difeernere. Thus Mary I. fucceeded to Edward VI. j and the line of Margaret queen of Scots, the daughter of Henry VII. fucceeded, on failure of the line of Henry VIII. his fon. But among the females, the crown defcends by right of primogeniture to the eldeft daughter only and her iflue •, and not, as in common inheritance, to all the daughters at once ; the evident neceflity of a foie fucceftion to the throne having occafioned the royal law of defcents to depart from the common law in this refpea : and therefdre Queen Mary, on the death of her brother, fucceeded to the crown alone, and not in partnerfhip with her fifter Elizabeth. Again, the doanne of reprefentation prevails in the defeent of the crown, as it does in other inheritances ; whereby Vol. X. Part 11, * the lineal defeendants of any perfon deceafed ftand in the fame place as their anceftor, if living, would have done. Thus Richard II. fucceeded his grandfather Edward III. in right of his father the black prince j to the exclufion of all his uncles, his grandfather’s younger children. Laftly, on failure of lineal defeen¬ dants, the crown goes to the next collateral relations of the late king •, provided they are lineally defeended from the blood-royal, that is, from that royal flock which originally acquired the crown. Thus Henry I. fucceeded to William II. John to Richard I. and James I to Elizabeth •, being all derived from the Con¬ queror, who was then the only regal flock. But herein there is no objedlion (as in the cafe of common de- feentsj to the fuccefiion of a brother, an uncle, or other collateral relation, of the half-blood j that is, where the relationfhip proceeds not from the fame couple of anceftors (which conftitutes a kinfman of the whole blood), but from a fingle anceftor only ; as wdien two perfons are derived from the fame father, and not from the fame mother, or vice verfa : provided only, that the one anceftor, from whom both are de¬ feended, be that from whofe veins the blood-royal is communicated to each. Thus Mary I. inherited to Edward VI. and Elizabeth inherited to Mary j all born of the fame father, King Henry VIII. but all by different mothers. See the articles Consanguinity, Descent, and Succession. 3. The doftrine of hereditary right does by no means imply an indefeafible right to the throne. No man will aflert this, who has confidered our laws, con- ftitution, and hiftory, without prejudice, and with any degree of attention. It.is unqueftionably in the breaft of the fupreme legiftative authority of this kingdom, the king and both houfes of parliament, to defeat this hereditary right j and by particular entails, limita¬ tions, and provifions, to exclude the immediate heir, and veil the inheritance in any one elfe. This is ftridlly confonant to our laws and conftitution j as may be ga¬ thered from the expreflion fo frequentlv ufed in our ftatute-book, of “ the king’s majelly, his heirs, and fucceflbrs.” In which we may obferve, that as the wrord heirs neceflarily implies an inheritance or here¬ ditary right generally fubfifting in the royal perfon j fo the word fuccejfors, diftindlly taken, muft imply that this inheritance may fometimes be broken through; or, that there may be a fucceflbr, without being the heir of the king. And this is fo extremely reafon- able, that without fuch a power, lodged fomewhere, our polity would be very defective. For, let us barely fuppofe fo melancholy a cafe, as that the heir-apparent fhould be a lunatic, an idiot, or otherwife incapable of reigning ; how miferable would the condition of the nation be, if he were alfo incapable of being fet afide , —It is therefore neceflary that this power Ihould be lodged fomewhere ; and yet the inheritance and regal dignity would be very precarious indeed, if this power were exprefsly and avowedly lodged in the hands of the fubjeft only, to be exerted whenever prejudice, ca¬ price, or difeontent, (hould happen to take the lead. Confequently it can nowhere be fo properly lodged as in the two houfes of parliament, by and with the con- fent of the reigning king ; who, it is not to be fup¬ pofed, will agree to any thing improperly prejudicial to the rights of his own defeendants. And therefore in 3 I tho HER [ 434 J 'H E R Hereditas, the king, lords, and commons, and parliament aflem- H ere ford our laws have exprefsly lodged it. ‘ 4. But, fourthly, However the crown may be li¬ mited or transferred, it Hill retains its defcendible qua¬ lity, and becomes hereditary in the wearer of it. . And hence in our law the king is faid never to die in his political capacity •, though, in common with other men, he is fubjecf to mortality in his natural: becaufe immediately upon the natural death of Henry, Wil¬ liam, or Edward, the king furvives in his fucceffor. For the right of the crown veils, eo ui/lanti, upon his heir j either the hccres natus, if the courfe of defcent remains unimpeached, or the lucres faElus, if the in¬ heritance be under any particular fettlement. So that there can be no interregnum • but, as Sir Matthew Hale obferves, the right of fovereignty is fully invelled in the fucceffor by the very defcent of the crown. And therefore, however acquired, it becomes in him abfo- lutely hereditary, unlefs by the rules of the limitation it is otherwife ordered and determined : In the fame manner as landed eilates, to continue our former com- parifon, are by the law hereditary, or defcendible to the heirs of the owner 5 but Hill there exiHs a power, by which the property of thofe lands may be tranf- ferred to another perfon. If this transfer be made ilmply and abfolutely, the lands will be hereditary in the new owner, and defcend to his heir at law : but if the transfer be clogged with any limitations, condi¬ tions, or entails, the lands muH defcend in that chan¬ nel, fo limited and prefcribed, and no other. See Succession. HER ED IT AS jacens, in Scots Laxu. An eflate is faid to be iti hereditatejacente, after the proprietor’s death till the heir’s entry. HEREFORD, which in Saxon Hgnifies the ford of the army, the capital of Herefordfhire in England, fituated in W. Long. 2. 35. N. Lat. 52. 6. It is fuppofed to have rifen out of the ruins of Kenchefler, in its neighbourhood, which Camden believes to have been the Ariconium of Antoninus. It is very plea- fantly fituated among meadows and corn-fields, and is aim off encompaffed with rivers. It feems to _ have owed its rife, or at leaft its increafe, to the building and dedicating a church there to Ethelbert king of the Eaft Angles, who w^as murdered in the neigh¬ bourhood, and afterwards taken into the catalogue of martyrs ; foon after it became a bifiiop’s fee, and in confequence of that a confiderable place. In 1055 it was facked, the cathedral deftroyed, and its biffiop Leofgar carried awav captive by Gryflin prince of South-Wales, and Algar, an Englifhman, who had rebelled againff Edward the Confeffor. Harold forti¬ fied it with a broad and bigh rampart •, and it appears by Doomfday-book, that there w’ere no more than 300 men within and without the wall. A very large and ffrong caffle was built by the Normans along the Wye, and the city walled round. The prefent ftately cathedral was founded in the reign of Henry I. by Bifhop Reinelm, but enlarged and beautified by his fucceffors. It fuffered much in the barons wars and w-as often taken and retaken in the war between King Charles 1. and the parliament. This city is pretty large, and had once fix churches*, but two wrere de- ftrcyed in the civil W’ars. It is not very populous nor well built, many of the houfes being old. Its manu¬ factures are gloves and other leathern goods j and its corporation confiffs of a mayor, fix aldermen, a high Hereford- fteward, deputy-fleward, and town-clerk *, who have a flnre~ fword-bearer and four ferjeants at mace. Each of the companies enjoys diffimSt laws and privileges by their charter, and each has its hall. The cathedral, which w'as built in 1050, and deffroyed by the Welih in 1060, but rebuilt in the reign of the Conqueror, or, as fome fay, in that of Henry I. is a beautiful and magnificent ftrufture, but being greatly decayed, part of it was deftroyed by the fall of the tower in Sep¬ tember 1786, and the fpire on another tower was ta¬ ken down to be rebuilt at the fame time. Here is an hofpital well endowed for 16 poor people ; and two cha- rity-fchools, one for 60 boys, the other for 40 girls. The chapter-houfe, which was once a very, elegant building, built about the year 1079, is now in ruins Here were formerly two or three priories. Almoft the only drink here is cyder, which is both cheap and good, the very hedges in the country being planted with apple-trees. The city gave the title of earl to the noble family of the Bohuns j then of duke to Henry of Lancafter, afterwards Henry IV. king of England j after him, of earl to Stafford earl of Buck¬ ingham j then of vifcount to Devereux earl, of Effex, which a collateral branch of his family Hill enjoys, and is thereby the premier vifcount of England. Herefordshire, a county of England nearly of a circular form, bounded on the eaft by Worcefter and Gloucefter, on the fouth by Monmouthftfire, on the weft by Radnorfhire and Brecknockfhire, and on the north by Shroplhire. Its length from north to fouth is 46 miles, its breadth from eaft to weft. 40. It contains 8 market towns, 87 vicarages, 176 pariftres, and 391 villages. This county contains, according to the returns made to the houie of commons, in conle- quence of an act of parliament, paffed in 1801 for af- 1 certaining the population of the kingdom, 17 >OC)3 houfes, occupied by 18,822 families j of this number 43,955 were males, and 45,236 females ; 31,261 perfons were employed in agriculture, and, 8588 in trade, manufac¬ tures, &c. The total number amounted to 89,191 perfons. It is divided into 11 hundreds, and lends eight members to parliament, namely, two knights for the (hire, and two for each of the following tov\ns, Hereford, Lempfter or Leominftcr, and Weobly. The air of this county is allowed to be as pleafant, fweet, and wholefome, as that of any other in Eng¬ land, there being nothing either in the foil or fituation to render it otherwdfe. The foil throughout is excel¬ lent, and inferior to none, either for grain, iruit, or pafture, fupplying the inhabitants plentifully.with all the neceffaries of life ; but that by. which it is diffm- guilhed from moft others, is its fruit, elpecially apples, of which it produces fuch quantities, that the cyder made of them is not only fufficient for their own con- fumption, though it is their ordinary drink, but alfo in a great meafure for that of London and other parts. That in particular which is made from the apple called redjlreak, is much admired, and has a body almoft equal to that of white-wine. The county is well fup- plied with umod and w'ater j for, befides leffer ftreams, there are the rivers Erome, Loden, Lug, Wye, Wadel, Arro, Dare, and Monow ; the laft of which is large, and all of them are well ftored with fdh, particularly the Wye, which breeds falmon. It lies in the diocefe of JJerefordj and Oxford circuit. herenausen, HER L Herefy. of Germany near of Great Britain. Hetenaufen HERENAUSEN, a palace Hanover, belonging to the king , Here are lodgings for all the court j and a garden of vail; extent, in which are fine waterworks, a labyrinth, and many other curiofities worthy the oblervation of a traveller. KERENTHALS, a town of Brabant in the Au- ftrian Netherlands, in the quarter of Antwerp 5 feated on the river Nethe, in E. Long. 4. 54. N. Lat. 51. 13. HERESY, in Law, an offence againft ChriJlianity, confifting in a denial of fbme of its effential doctrines, publicly and obilinately avowed ; being defined, fen- tentia rerum divinarum humano f? fu excogitata, palam doSia et pertinaciter defenfa. And here it muft be acknowledged that particular modes of belief, or un¬ belief, not tending to overturn Chriftianity itfelf, or to lap the foundations of morality, are by no means the objeft of coercion by the civil magiftrate. What doc¬ trines ihall therefore be adjudged herefy, rvas left by our old conftitution to the determination of the eccle- fiaflical judge ; who had herein a moft arbitrary lati¬ tude allowed him. For the general definition of an heretic given by Lyndewode, extends to the fmalleft deviations from the doflrines of the holy church : hce- reticux efl qui dubitat de fide cathohca, et qui negligit fervare ea, qiue Romana ecclefia Jlatuit, feu fervare de¬ er ever at. Or, as the ftatute 2 Ken. IV. c. 15. ex- prelTes it in Englifh, “ teachers of erroneous opinions contrary to the faith and bleffed determinations of the holy church.” Very contrary this to the ufage of the firfl general councils, which defined all heretical doc¬ trines with the utmoll precifion and exaftnefs. And what ought to have alleviated the punifhment, the un¬ certainty of the crime, feems to have enhanced it in thofe days of blind zeal and pious cruelty. It is true, that the fanftimonious hypocrify of the canonifts rvent at nrft no farther than enjoining penance, excommuni¬ cation, and ecclefiaftical deprivation, for herefy j though afterwards they proceeded boldly to imprifonment by the ordinary, and confifcation of goods in pios ufus. Bat in the mean time they had prevailed upon the vveaknels of bigotted princes to make the civil power fubfervient to their purpofes, by making herefy not only a temporal, but even a capital, offence : the Ro- mith ecclefiaftics determining, without appeal, what¬ ever they pleafed to be herefy, and (hifting off to the lecular arm the odium and drudgery of executions ; with which they themfelves were too tender and deli¬ cate to intermeddle. Nay, they pretended to intercede and pray, on behalf of the convidted heretic, ut citra mortis periculum fententia circa eum moderetur : well knowing that at the fame time they were delivering the unhappy vidlim to certain death. Hence the capital punifhments inflidled on the ancient Donatiffs and Ma- nichaeans by the emperors Theodofius and Juifinian : hence aifo the conftitution of the emperor Frederic mentioned by Lyndewode? adjudging all perfons with¬ out dillindlion to be burnt with fire wrho were convic¬ ted of herefy by the ecclefialiical judge. The fame emperor, in another conftitution, ordained, that if any temporal lord, when adrnonifhed by the church, ftiould negledl to clear his territories of heretics within a year, it ftiould be lawful for good catholics to feize and oc¬ cupy the lands, and utterly to exterminate the hereti¬ cal poffeffors. And upon this foundation was built 435 1 HER that arbitrary power, fo long claimed and fo fatally ex¬ erted by the Pope, of difpofing even of the kingdoms ' of refradlory princes to more dutiful fons of the church. The immediate event of this conftitution was fome- thing lingular, and may ferve to illuftrate at once the gratitude of the holy fee, and the juft punifhment of the royal bigot j for, upon the authority of this very conftitution, the pope afterwards expelled this very em¬ peror Frederic from his kingdom of Sicily, and gave it to Charles of Anjou. Chriftianity being thus deformed by the dsemon of perfecuticn upon the continent, we cannot expedt that our own ifland ftiould be entirely free from the fame fcourge. And therefore we find among our ancient precedents a w-rit de fueretico comburendo, which is thought by fome to be as ancient as the common law itfelf. However, it appears from thence, that the con- vidfion of herefy by the common law was not in any petty ecclefiaftical court, but before the archbifhop himfelf in a provincial lynod ; and that the delinquent was delivered over to the king to do as he ftiould pleafe with him : fo that the crown had a controul over the fpiritual power, and might pardon the convift by if- fuing no procefs againft him ; the writ de fueretico com ■ burendo hdng not a writ of courfe, but iffuing only by the fpecial diredlion of the king in council. But in the reign of Henry IV. when the eyes of the Chriftian world began to open, and the feeds of the Protertant religion (though under the opprobrious name of lollardy) took root in this kingdom ; the clergy, ta¬ king advantage from the king’s dubious title to demand an increafe of their own power, obtained an adt of par¬ liament, which ftiarpened the edge of perfecution to its utmoft keennefs. For, by that ftatute, the diocefan alone, without the intervention of a fynod, might con¬ vict of heretical tenets 5 and uniefs the convidt abjured his opinions, or if after abjuration he relapfed, the ftie- riff was bound ex ofiicio, if required by the biftiop, to commit the unhappy vidtim to the flames, without wait¬ ing for the confent of the crown. By the ftatute 1 Hen. V. c. 7. lollardy was alfo made a temporal of¬ fence, and indictable in the king’s courts; which did not thereby gain an exclufive, but only a concurrent, jurifdidtion with the biftiop’s confiftory. Afterwards, when the final reformation of religion began to advance, the power of the ecclefiaftics was fomewhat moderated; for though what herefy is, was not then precifely defined, yet we are told in fome points what it is not: the ftatute 25 Hen.fVIII. c. 14. declaring, that offences againft the fee of Rom e are not herefy; and the ordinary being thereby reftrained from proceeding in any cafe upon mere fufpicion ; that is, uniefs the party be accufed by two credible witneffes, or an indidfment of herefy be firft previoufty found in the king’s courts of common Jaw. And yet the fpirit of perfecution was not yet abated, but only diverted into a lay channel. I1 or in fix years afterwards, by ftatute 31 Hen. VIII. c. 14. the bloody law of the fix articles was made, which eftabliftied the fix moft contefted points of popery, tranfubftantiation, commu¬ nion in one kind, the celibacy of the clergy, monaftic vows, the facrifice of the mafs, and auricular confeffion j which points were ii determined and refolved by the moft godly.ftudy, pain, and travil of his majefty : for which his moft humble and obedient fubjects, the lords 3*3 fpiritual Herefy. HER * [ 43^ ] HER Herefy. fpiritucil 7in<\ temporal and the commons, in parliament —v—affembled, did not only render and give unto his high- nefs their moft high and hearty thanks j” but did alfo enaft and declare all oppugners of the firft to be here¬ tics, and to be burnt with fire and of the five laft to be felons, and to fuffer death. The fame ftatute eftabliih- ed a new and mixed jurifdidfion of clergy and laity tor the trial and conviftion of heretics \ the reigning prince being then equally intent on deftroying the fupremacy of the bifhops of Rome, and eflablifning all other their corruptions of the Chriftian religion. Without perplexing this detail with the various re¬ peals and revivals of thele fanguinary laws in the two fucceeding reigns, let us proceed to the reign of Queen Elizabeth; when the reformation was finally eitablilhed with temper and decency, unfullied with party-rancour, or perfonal caprice and refentment. By ftatute 1 Eliz. c. 1. all former ftatutes belonging to herefy are repealed, which leaves the jurifdidlion ol he» refy as it flood at common lawT*, viz. as to the infli&ion of common cenfures, in the eccleliaftical courts; and in cafe of burning the heretic, in the provincial fynod only. Sir Matthew Hale is indeed of a different opinion, and holds that fuch power refided in the diocefan alfo j though he agrees that in either cafe the writ de hceretico comburendo was not demandable of common right, but grantable or otherwife merely at the king’s difcretion. But the principal point now gained was, that by this ftatute a boundary is for the firft time fet to what fhall be accounted herefy 5 nothing for the future being to be fo determined, but only fuch tenets, as have been heretofore fo declared, 1. By the words of the holy fcriptures *, or, 2. By the firft four general councils, or fuch others as have only ufed the words of the holy fcriptures } or, 3. Which (hall hereafter be fo declared by the parliament, with the affent of the clergy in convocation. Thus was herefy reduced to a greater certainty than before j though it might not have been the worfe to have defined it in terms ftill more precife and particular : as a man continued ftill liable to be burnt, for what perhaps he did not underhand to be herefy, till the ecclefiallical judge fo interpreted the words of the canonical fcriptures. For the writ de Jueretico comburendo remained ftill in force } and we have inftances of its being put in exe¬ cution upon two Anabaptifts in the feventeenth of E- lizabeth, and two Arians in the ninth of James I. But it was totally abolilhed, and herefy again fubje&ed on¬ ly to ecclefiaftical corredlion, pro fa lute animee, by vir¬ tue of the ftatute 29 Car. II. c. 9.: for, in one and the fame reign, our lands were delivered from the flavery of military tenures ; our bodies from arbitrary impn- fonment by the habeas corpus a£l 5 and our minds, from the tyranny of fuperftitious bigotry, by demolilhing this laft badge of perfecution in the Englilh law. Every thing is now as it (hould be, with relpeft to the fpiritual cognizance, and fpiritual punifhment of herefy : unlefs perhaps that the crime ought to be more ftridlly defined, and no perfecution permitted, even in the ecclefiaftical courts, till the tenets in queftion are by proper authority previoufly declared to be heretical. Under thefe reftriflions, it feems neceffary for the fup- port of the national religion, that the officers of the church {hould have power to cenfure heretics ; yet not to harafs them with temporal penalties, much lefs to exterminate or deftroy them. The legiflature hath in- Heretic deed thought it proper, that the civil magiftrate fliould ^ lj^_ again interpofe, with regard to one fpecies of herefy , very prevalent in modern times •, for by ftatute 9 & 10 W. III. c. 32. if any perfon educated in the Chriftian Religion, or profeffing the fame, ffiall by writing, print¬ ing, teaching, or advifcd fpeaking, deny any one of the perfons in the Holy Trinity to be God, or maintain that there are more gods than one, he lhall undergo the fame penalties and incapacities which were juft now mentioned to be infli&ed on apoftacy by the fame ftatute. HERETIC, a general name lor all fuch perfons under any religion, lo. efpecially. the Chriftian, as pro- fefs or teach religious opinions contrary to the efta- bliihed faith, or to wdiat is made the ftandard of or¬ thodoxy. See Heresy. HERETOCHS, among our Saxon anceftors, fig- nified the fame with dukes or duces, denoting the com¬ manders or leaders of their armies. It appears, from Edward the Confeffor’s laws, that the military force of this kingdom was in the hands of the dukes or heretochs, who were conftituted through every province and county in the kingdom, being ie- le&ed out of the principal nobility, and fuch as were moft remarkable for hding fapientes, f deles, iif ammoji. Their duty was to lead and regulate the Englifh armies, with a very unlimited power •, and becaufe of their great power, they were eledted by the people in their full af- fembly, or folkmote, in the fame manner as fheriffs ■were elefted. HERFORDEN, or Heryvarden, a free and im¬ perial town of Germany, in the circle of Weftphalia* and capital of the county of Ravenffierg. Here is a fa¬ mous nunnery belonging to the Proteftants of the con- feffion of Augfburg, whofe abbefs is a princefs of the empire, and has a voice and place in the diet. It is feated on the river Aa. E. Long. 8. 47. N. Lat. 52. 12. HERGRUNDT, a town of Upper Hungary, re¬ markable for its rich mines of vitriol. Thofe who work in the mines have built a fubterraneous town, which has a great number of inhabitants. E. Long. 18. 15* N. Lat. 48. 30. HERIOT, in Law, a cuftomary tribute of goods and chattels, payable to the lord of the fee on the de- ceafe of the owner of the land. See Tenure. Heriot is of two forts—viz. 1. Heriot-cuftom, where heriots have been paid time out of mind by cufiom, after the death of a tenant for life. In fome places, there is a cuftomary compofition in money, as 10 or 20 (hillings in lieu of a heriot, by which the lord and te¬ nant are both bound, if it be an indftputably ancient cuftom } but a new compofition of this fort will not bind the reprefentatives of either party. 2. I leriot-iervice, w’hen a tenant holds by fuch fervice to pay .heriot at the time of his death j which fervice is expreffed in the deed of feoffment.—For this latter the lord lhall dif- train 1 and for the other he ftiall ftize, and not diftrain. If the lord purchafe part of the tenancy, heriot-fervice is extmguifhed j but it is not fo of heriot-cunom. HER1SSON, in Fortification, a beam armed with a great number of iron fpikes with their points out¬ wards, and fupported by a pivot on which it turns. Thefe ferve as a barrier to block up any paffage, and are frequently placed before the gates, and more efpe cially the wficket-doors, of a town or fortrefs, to ferure thole HER [ 437 ] HER Heritable thofe paflages which muft of neceffity be often opened and (liut. 'rdo HERITABLE rights, in Scots Law, fignify all rights affefting lands, houfes, &c. or any immoveable fubjed. HERITAGE, in Scots Law, lands, houfes, or any immoveable fubjetl, in contradiftinftion to moveables or moveable fubje£ls. It alto fometimes fignifies fuch immoveable property as a perfon fucceeds to as heir to another, in contraditlinftion to that which he himfelf purchafes or acquires in any other manner, called con- quejl. HERMAEA, in antiquity, ancient Greek fellivals in honour of the god Hermes or Mercury. One of thele was celebrated by the Pheneatae in Arcadia j a fecond by the Cyllenians in Elis j and a third by the Tanagrasans, where Mercury was reprefented with a ram upon his (boulder, becaufe he was faid to have walked through the city in that pollure in time of a plague, and to have cured the lick ; in memory of which, it was cuftomary at this feftival for one of the moll beautiful youths in the city to walk round the walls with a ram upon his (boulder.—A fourth feltival of the fame name was obferved in Crete, when it was ufual for the fervants to fit down at the table while their mailers waited ; a cultom which was alfo obferved at the Roman Saturnalia. HERMANN, Paul, a celebrated botanift, was born at Halle in Saxony, and praftifed phyfic in the illand of Ceylon, r* d the Cape of Good Hope, after which (in 1679) he was chofen profeflbr of botany at Ley¬ den, and fuperintendant ©f the botanical garden, in which fcience he obtained the higheft reputation, and died in the year 1695. His firft publication, in 1687, was a catalogue of plants in the garden of the univer- fity,—a garden which, in feven years he had fo much enriched with plants from the Ealt and Weft Indies, that it nearly rivalled the very firft in Europe. His me¬ thod of botanical claflification is contained in his Florcc Lugduno-Balavce Flores, publilhed in 1690. His Pa- radifus Batavus, &.c. was publiftied after his deceafe, by William Sherard, wThich contains many rare, and fome entirely new fpecies, delineated in a very elegant manner. The reft of Hermann’s works are, Mufcei India Catalogus, continens varia exotica animalia, in- feBa, vegetabilia, miner alia ; Lapis Lydius Mater ice Medtcce, in which laft his new charaflers of plants are made ufe of to illuftrate their medical properties. At his death he left behind him 450 fine drawings, and a numerous collection of dried plants, which ferved for the bafis of the Flora Ceylanica of Linnaeus, and alfo a catalogue of plants of the Cape of Good Plope. Dr Hannes addrefled to him a beautiful Latin ode, which is (till preferved 5 but many of the treafures of his in- duftrious life were itrangely neglected, and allowed to be dtfperfed. HERMANNIA, a genus of plants belonging to the rnonodelphia clafs, arid in the natural method rank¬ ing under the 37th order, Columnifercc. HERMANS TADr, a handfome, populous, and ftrong town of Hungary, capital of Tranfilvania, with a bhhop’s fee. It is the refidence of the governor of the province ; and is feated on the river Ceben, in E. Long. 24. 40. N. Lat. 46. 25. HERMAPHRODITE, is generally underftood to fignify a human creature poflefTed of both fexes, or Herma- who has the parts of generation both of male and fe- male. The term however is applied alfo to other ani¬ mals, and even to plants.—The word is formed of the Greek a compound of Mercury, and AtpgacWn Venus; q. d. a mixture of Mercury and Venus, i. e. of male and female. For it is to be ob¬ ferved, Hermaphroditus was originally a proper name, applied by the heathen mythologifts to a fabulous dei¬ ty, whom fome reprefent as a fon of Hermes, Mercury, ■ and Aphrodite, Venus \ and who, being defperately in love with the nymph Salmafis, obtained of the gods to have his body and hers united into one. Others fay, that the god Hermaphroditus was conceived as a com- pofition of Mercury and Venus ; to exhibit the union between eloquence, or rather commerce, whereof Mer¬ cury was god, with pleafure, whereof Venus was the proper deity. Laftly, others think this junftion in¬ tended to (how that Venus (pleafure) was of both fexes ; as, in effedl, the poet Calvus calls Venus a god* Pollentemque Deum Vencrem. As alfo Virgil, HLneid, lib. ii. Difcedo, ac ducente Deo Jlammam inter et hojles Expeditor M. Spon obferves, Hefychius calls Venus Aphroditos: and Theophraftus affirms, that Aphroditos, or Venus, is Hermaphroditus; and that in the iftand of Cyprus (he has a ftatue, which reprefents her with a beard like a man.—The Greeks alfo call hermaphrodites androgyni, q. d. men-women. See the article Andro¬ gynes. In a treatife by Mr Hunter, in the 69th volume of the Philofophical Tranfadlions, hermaphrodites are di¬ vided into natural and unnatural or monftrous. The firft belongs to the more fimple orders of animals, of which there are a much greater number than of the more per- fedl. The unnatural takes place in every tribe of ani¬ mals having diftinfl fexes, but is more common in fome than in others. The human fpecies, our author ima¬ gines, has the feweft ; never having feen them, in that fpecies, nor in dogs; but in the horfe, flieep, and black cattle, they are very frequent. From Mr Hunter’s account, however, it does not appear that fuch a creature as a perfect hermaphrodite has ever exifted. All the hermaphrodites which he had the opportunity of feeing had the appearance of females, and were generally faved as fuch. In the horle they are very frequent j and in the mod perfedl of this kind he ever faw, the tefticles had come down out of the abdomen into the place where the udder (hould have bfeen, and appeared like an udder, not fo pendulous as the fcrotum in the male of fuch animals. There were alfo two nipples, of which horfes have no> perfedl form ; being blended in them with the (heath or prepuce, of which there was none here. The ex¬ ternal female parts were exadlly limilar to thofe of a perfect female 5 but inftead of a common-fized clito¬ ris, there was one about five or fix inches long y which- when ereft, flood almoft diredtly backwards. A foal afs very fimilar to the above was killed, and the following appearances were obferved on difledtion. The tefticles were not come down as in the former, poflibly HER t 433 ] HE R Henna- potTibly bccaufe the creature was too young. It had phrodite. aif0 tvvo nipples ; but there was no penis palling round """ v" the pubes to the belly, as in the perfefl: male als. The external female parts w7ere flmilar to thofe of the Ihe- afs. Within the entrance of the vagina w7as placed the clitoris $ but much longer than that of a true fe¬ male, being about five inches long. The vagina was open a little farther than the opening of the urethra into it, and then became obliterated : from thence, up to the fundus of the uterus, there was no canal. At the fundus of the common uterus it was hollow, or had a cavity in it, and then divided into two, viz. a right and a left, called the horns of the uterus, which were alfo pervious. Beyond the termination of the two horns were placed the ovaria, as in the true female 5 but the Fallopian tubes could not be found.—From the broad ligaments, to the edges of which the horns of the uterus and ovaria were attached, there palled to¬ wards each groin a part fimilar to the round ligaments in the female, which were continued into the rings of the abdominal mufcles •, but with this difference, that there were continued with them a procefs or theca of the peritonaeum, fimilar to the tunica vaginalis com¬ munis in the male afs •, and in thefe theca were found the tefticles, but no vafa deferentia could be obferved pafling from them. In molt fpecies of animals, the produ£tion of her- maphrodites appears to be the effefl of chance, j but in the black cattle it feems to be an eltablilhed principle of their propagation. It is a well known fa£t, and, as far as has yet been difcovered, appears to be univerfal, that when a cow brings forth two calves, one of them a bull, and the other a cow to appearance, the cow is unfit for propagation, but the bull-calf becomes a very proper bull. They are known not to breed 5 they do not lhow the leaft inclination for the bull, nor does the bull ever take the leaft notice of them. Among the country people in England, this kind of calf is called ■a free-mart in } and this fingularity is juft as well known among the farmers as either cow or bull. When they are preierved, it is for the purpofes of an ox or fpayed heifer j viz. to yoke with the oxen, or fatten for the table. They are much larger than either the bull or the cow, and the horns grow longer and bigger, being very limilar to thofe of an ox. J he bellow7 of a free-martin is alfo fimilar to that of an ox, and the meat is limilar to that of the ox or fpayed heifer, viz. much finer in the fibre than either the bull or cow •, and they are more fufceptible of growing fat with good food. By fome they are fuppofed to exceed the ox and heifer in delicacy of tafte, and bear a higher price at market*, this, however, does not always hold, and Mr Hunter gives an inftsmee of the contrary. I he Romans, vyho called the bull taunts, fpoke alfo of taura in the femi¬ nine gender different from cows. Stephens obferves, that it was thought they meant by this word barren cows, who obtained the name becaufe they did not conceive any more than bulls. He alfo quotes a paffage from Columella, lib. vi. cap. 22. “ And, like the taurw, which occupy the place of fertile cows, Ihould be re- ieeded or fent away.” He likewife quotes Varro? De re rufica, lib. ii. cap. 5. “ The cow which is barren is called tauraP From wdiich we may rcafonably con- je&ure, that the Romans had not the idea of the cir- cumftances of their produ&ion. Of thefe creatures Mr Hunter difiedled three, and Herma- the following appearances w7ere obferved in the moft P‘llQ *te' perfeft of them.—The external parts were rather (’mailer *Y~” than in the cow. The vagina paffed on as in the cow to the opening of the urethra, and then it began to contradl into a fmall canal, which palled on to the di- vifion of the uterus into the two horns *, each horn paf- fing along the edge of the broad ligament laterally to¬ wards the ovaria. At the termination of thefe horns were placed both the ovaria and tellicles, both of which were nearly about the fize of a imall nutmeg. No Fallopian tubes could be found. To the tefticles were- vafa deferentia, but imperfeift. The left one did not come near the tefticle the right only came clofe to it, but did not terminate in the body called epididymis. They w7ere both pervious, and opened into the vagina near the opening of the urethra.—On the pofterior furface of the bladder; or between the uterus and blad¬ der, were the tw7o bags called the veficulw feminales in the male, but much (mailer than what they are in the bull : the dudfs opened along with the vafa def- ferentia. Concerning hermaphrodites of the human fpecies, much has been written, and many laws enadfed about them in different nations j but the exiftence of them is ftill difputed. Dr Parfons has given us a treatife on the fubiedt, in which he endeavours to explode the no¬ tion as a vulgar error. According to him, all the her¬ maphrodites that have appeared, were only women whofe clitoris from iome caule or other wav overgrown y and, in particular, that this was the cafe with an An¬ gola woman Ihown at London as an hermaphrodite lome time ago. Among the reptile tribe, indeed, fuch as w7orms, fnails, leeches, &c. hermaphrodites are very frequent. In the memoirs of the French academy, we have an ac¬ count of this very extraordinary kind of hermaphro¬ dites, which not only have both fexes, but do the office of both at the fame time. Such are earth-worms, round-tailed worms found in the intellines of men and horfes, land-fnails, and thofe of frelh waters, and all the forts of leeches. And, as all thefe are reptiles, and without bones, M. Poupart concludes it probable, that all other infefts which have thefe tvvo characters are alfo hermaphrodites. The method of coupling pra£tifed in this clafs of hermaphrodites, may be illuftrated in the inftance of earth-w7orms. Thefe little creatures creep, two by two, out of holes proper to receive them, where they difpofe their bodies in fuch a manner, as that the head of the one is turned to the tail of the other. Being thus ftretched lengthwife, a little conical button or pa¬ pilla is thruft forth by each, and received into an aper¬ ture of the other. Thefe animals, being male in one part of the body, and female in another, and the body ftexible withal, M. Homberg does not think it impol- fible but that an earth-worm may couple with itfelf, and be both father and mother of its young ; an obfervation which, to fome, appears highly extrava¬ gant. Among the infe£!s of the foft or bonelefs kind, there are great numbers indeed, which are fo far from being hermaphrodites, that they are of no fex at all. Of this kind are all the caterpillars, maggots, and worms, pro¬ duced of the eggs of flies of all kinds: but the reafon 3 her' [ 439 ] HER • Heim a- of this is plain ; thefe are not animals in a perfedl Hate, pbrcdite ^ut cj;fgUifes under which animals lurk. They have no Hermes ^ufinefs with the propagating of their fpecies, but are i to be transformed into animals of another kind, by the putting oft' their feveral coverings, and then only they are in their perfedl ftate, and therefore then only ihow the difterences of lex, which are always in the diflindl animals, each being only male or female. Thefe copulate, and their eggs produce thefe crea¬ tures, which {how no fex thl they arrive at that per¬ fect ftate again. Hermaphrodite F/ozvers, in Botany. Thefe are io called by the fexualifts on account of their contain¬ ing both the antherae and ftigma, the fuppofed organs of generation, within the lame calyx and petals. Of this kind are the flowers of all the claffes in Linnaeus’s fexual method, except the clafles moncecia and dioecia; in the former of w7hich, male and female flowers are produced on the fame root; in the latter, in diftindl plants from the fame feed.—In the clafs po/ygamia, there are always hermaphrodite flowers mixed with male or female, or both, either on the fame or diftindt roots. In the plaintain-tree the flowers are all herma¬ phrodite 5 in fome, however, the anther* or male or¬ gan, in others the iligma or female organ, proves ab¬ ortive. 1 he flowers in the former clafs are ftyled fe¬ male hermaphrodites; in the latter, male hermaphrodites. —Hermaphrodites are thus as frequent in the vege¬ table kingdom as they are rare and fcarce in the ani¬ mal one. HERMAS, an eccleliaftical author of the firft cen¬ tury ; and according to Origen, Eufebius, and Jerome, the fame whom St Paul falutes in the end of his epiftle to the Romans. He wrote a book in Greek fome time before Domitian’s perfecution, which happened in the year pj. This wmrk is entitled The Pafor, from his reprefenting an angel fpeaking to him in it under the form of a ftiepherd. The Greek text is loft, but a very ancient Latin verflon of it is Hill extant. Some of the fathers have conftdered this book as canonical. The belt edition of it is that of 1698, where it is to be found among the other apoftolical fathers, illuftra- ted wuth the notes and corredlions of Cotelerius and Le Clerc. With them it wras tranflated into Englilh by Archbilhop Wake, the beft edition of which is that of 1710. Hermas, a genus of plants belonging to the polyga- mia clafs. See Botany Index. HERMES, or Herma, among antiquaries, a fort of fquare or cubical figure of the god Mercury, ufually made of marble, though fometimes of brafs or other ma¬ terials, without arms or legs, and planted by the Greeks and Romans in their crofs-ways. Servius gives us the origin thereof, in his comment on the eighth book of the Aineid. Some ftiepherds, fays he, having one day caught Mercury, called by the Greeks Hermes, afleep on a mountain, cut off his hands 3 from which he, as well as the mountain where the ac¬ tion was done, became denominated Cyllenius, from xvAAef, maimed: and thence, adds Servius, it is that cer¬ tain ftatues ^without arms are denominated Hennefes or Hernue. But this etymology of the epithet of Cyllenius contradicts moft of the other ancient authors ; wflio de- jt. e it hence, that Mercury v/as borne at Cyllene a city of Elis, or even on the mountain Cyllene itfelf, which Hermetic • had been thus called before him. ^ ^ ^ Suidas gives a moral explication of this cuftom of p0crates" making ftatues of Mercury without arms. The Her- u—v.... \ mefes, fays he, were ftatues of ftone placed at the vefti- bules or porches of the doors and temples at Athens 3 for this reafon, that as Mercury was held the god of fpeech and of truth, fquare and cubical ftatues were pe¬ culiarly proper 3 having this in common with truth, that on what fide foever they are viewTed, they ahvays appear the fame. It muft be obferved, that Athens abounded more than any other place in Hermefes : there were abun¬ dance or very fignal ones in divers parts of the city, and they were indeed one of the principal ornaments of the place. They were alfo placed in the high-roads and crofs-ways, becaufe Mercury, who was the courier of the gods, prefided over the highways 3 whence he had his furname of Trivius, from trivium ; and that of Via- eus, from via. From Suidas’s account, above cited, it appears, that the terms, termini, ufed among us in the door-cafes, bal¬ conies, &c. of our buildings, take their origin from thefe Athenian Hermefes, and that it was more proper to call them hermetes than termini, becaufe, though the Roman, termini were fquare ftones, whereon a hand was fre¬ quently placed, yet they were rather ufed as land-marks and mere ftones than as ornaments of building. See the articles Mercury and Thoth. HERMETIC, or Hermetical Art, a name given to chemiftry, on a fuppofition that Hermes Trifmegi- ftus was the inventor thereof, or that he excelled there¬ in. See Thoth. Hermetical Philofophy is that which undertakes to folve and explain all the phenomena of nature, from the three chemical principles, fait, fulphur, and mer¬ cury. Hermetical Phyfc, or Medicine, is that fyftem or hypothefis in the art of healing, which explains the caufes of difeafes, and the operations of medicine, on the principles of the hermetical philofophy, and parti¬ cularly on the fyftem of alkali and acid. Hermetical Seal, a manner of flopping or clofing glafs veflels, for chemical operations, fo very accurately, that nothing can exhale or efcape, not even the moft: fubtile fpirits. It is performed by heating the neck of the veffel in the flame of a lamp till it be ready to melt, and then with a pair of pincers twilling it clofe toge¬ ther. This they call putting on JLr/we.r’j-yr’tf/. There are alfo other ways of fealing veffels hermetically 3 viz. by flopping them with a plug or ftopple of glafs, well luted into the neck of the veffel 3 or by turning another ovum philofophicum upon that wherein the matter is con¬ tained. HERMHARPOCRATES, or Hermarpocra- TES, in antiquity, a deity, or figure of a dsity, com- pofed of Mercury, and Harpocrates the god of Si¬ lence. M. Spon gives us a hermharpocrates in his Rech. Cur. de PAntiquite, p. 98. fig. 15. having wings on his feet like Mercury, and laying his finger on his mouth like Harpocrates. It is probable they might mean, by this cpmbination, that filence is fometimes elo¬ quent. HERMIANI, HER t 44° 1 HER Her niani HERMIANI, or Hermiatit/E, a fed of heretics II in the fecond century, thus called from their leader ermo ac- j^erm;as> They were alfo denominated Se/euciani. 1 v n 1 One of their diftinguifhing tenets was, that God is corporeal. Another, that Jefus Chriff did not alcend * into heaven with his body, but left it in the fun. HERMIONE, in Ancient Geography, a confider- able city of Argolis. It was in ruins (except a few temples) in the time of Paufanias *, who fays that the new city was at the diftance of four fladia from the promontory on which the temple of Neptune flood. It gave name to the Sinus Hermionicus, a part of the Si¬ nus Argolicus. HERMIT, or Eremit, Eremita, a devout per- fon retired into folitude, to be more at leifure for prayer and contemplation, and to difencumber himfelf of the affairs of this world.—The word is formed from the Greek defert or wildernefs; and according to the etymology, fhould rather be wrote Eremit. Paul furnamed the Hermit, is ufually reckoned the firft hermit 5 though St Jerome at the beginning of the life of that faint fays, it is not known who was the firft.—Some go back to John the Baptift, otheis to Elias : others make St Anthony the founder of the •eremitical life j but others think that he only rekind¬ led and heightened the fervour thereof, and hold that the difciples of that faint owned St Paul of Ihebes for the firft that pra&ifed it. The perfecutions of Decius and Valerian are fuppofed to have been the occafion.—Several of the ancient hermits, as St An¬ thony, &c. though they lived in deferts, had yet num¬ bers of religious accompanying them. There are alfo various orders and congregations of re¬ ligious diftinguifhed by the title of hermits; as, hermits of St Auguftine, of St John Baptift, of St Jerome, of St Paul, &e. _ r a Hermit the, Peter Gautier, a French officer or A- miens in Picardy, who quitted the military profel- fion, and commenced hermit and pilgrim. He tra¬ velled to the Holy Land about the year 1093 •, and 1 making a melancholy recital of the deplorable fitua- tion of a few Chriftians in that country to Pope Ur¬ ban II. and at the fame time enthufiaftically lament¬ ing that Infidels fhould be in poffefiion of the famous city where the Author of Chriftianity firft promulgated his facred doftrines, Urban gave him a fatal commii- fion to excite all Chriftian princes to a general war ngainft the Turks and Saracens the poffeffors of the Holy Land. See Croisade. HERMITAGE properly figmfies a little hut or habitation, in fome defert place, where a hermit dwells. , v • Hermitage is alfo popularly attributed to any religi¬ ous cell, built and endowed in a private and recluie place, and thus annexed to fome large abbey, of whic the fuperior was called hermita. HERMODACTYL, in the Materia Medico, a root brought from Turkey. It is of the ftiape of a heart flatted, of a white colour, compaa,yet eafy to be cut or powdered j of a vifcous fweetifh tafte, with a light degree of acrimony. Hermodaftyls were of great repute a- mong the ancients as a cathartic ; but thofe we now meet with in the {hops have very little purgative virtue*, Neumann declares he never found them to have any cffe.a at all.—The hermodaayl is the root of the Goi- Hermus. -chicum variegatum, according to fome j others fuppofe Hermoge* it to be the root of the iris tuberofa. n,^ HERMOGENES, the firft and moft celebrated architea of antiquity, was, according to Vitruvius, •— born at Alanbada, a city in Caria. He built a tem¬ ple of Diana at Magnefia •, another of Bacchus at Tros ; and was the inventor of feveral parts of archi- teaure. He compofed a book on the fubject, which is loft. PlERMOGENES-TarfenJis, a rhetorician and orator, and w-ho was in every refpea a prodigy. At 17 years of age he publilhed his fyftem of rhetoric, and at 20 his philofophic ideas: but at 25 he forgot every thing he had known. It is faid, that his body being opened after his death, his heart was found of an ex¬ traordinary fize, and all over hairy. He died about 168 B. C. HERMOGENIANS, a feft of ancient heretics, denominated from their leader Hermogenes, who lived towards the clofe of the fecond century. Hermogenes eftabliffied matter as his firft principle •, and regarding matter as the fountain of all evil, he maintained that the world, and every thing contained in it, as alfo the fouls of men and other fpirits, were formed by the Deity from an uncreated and eternal mafs of corrupt matter. The matter of Hermogenes, with regard to the origin of the world and the nature of the foul, were warmly oppofed by Tertullian. The Hermogenians were divided into feveral branches under their refpedlive chieftains, viz. Hermiani, Seleu- cians, Materiari, &c. HERMON, or Aermon, in Ancient Geography, a mountain of the Amorites, called Samor by the Phoeni¬ cians, and Sanir or Senir by the Amorites, on the- eaft of Jordan. It is alfo called (Moles) ; but muft not be confounded with the Sion of Jerufalem. By the Sidonians it wras called Scinon ; in the yulgate, it is called Sanon. Joffiua informs us, that it was the dominion of Og king of Baffian *, which muft.be un- derftood of its fouth fide. It is never particularly mentioned by profane writers *, being comprifed under the appellation Lihanus, or Antihbanus, with which mountain it is joined to the eaft. It is alfo called Har¬ monium plurally, Pfalm xlii. 6. becaufe it was extenfive, and contained feveral mountains. HERMOPOLIS, in Ancient Geography, the name of feveral cities in Egypt, dedicated as the name imports, to Hermes or Mercury. Near one of thefe cities, pro¬ bably Hermopolis Magna, w^as fituated a moft magni¬ ficent temple, of which the portico only now' remains. It was vilited by Denon who accompanied the French army in their expedition to Egypt, in 17995 and he defcribes it as a moft beautiful monument ot an¬ cient architefture, and a fplendid relic of the higheft antiquity. Among the hillocks within 300 or 400 yards of the portico, enormous blocks of ftone are ieen buried in fand, and regular architedure beneath them, which appear to form an edifice containing columns ol granite, juft rifing above the prefent level of the foil. Every part of this edifice is covered with hieroglyphics. Conneded with the fcattered fragments of the great temple, a mofque has been built, in which is a number of columns of cipoline marble. Near this is the village of Achmunin, which contains 50QO inhabitants. . HERMUS, in Ancient Geography, a river oi loma $ which Hero. HER [ 441 ] H Hetnandria which rifing near Dorylaeum, a town of Phrygia, in a hero of the Iliad is Achilles mountain facred to Dindymene or Cybele, touched j Myfia, and ran through the Regio Combufta, then through the plains of Smyrna down to the fea, carry¬ ing along with it the Pa&olus, Hyllus, and other lefs noble rivers. Its waters were faid, by Virgil and other poets, to roll down gold. HERNANDRIA, Jack-in-a-box -tree : a genus of plants belonging to the monoecia clafs j and in the natural method ranking under the 38th order, Tricoc- cce. See Botany Index. HERNE, a town of Kent, fix miles from Canterbu¬ ry, 12 from Margate, and 14 from Feverlham. The church is a large ancient ftrufture, with a tower of flint, and has fix flails of the cathedral kind, with divifions of the choir from the nave by a carved fcreen of oak. The church is 113 feet long. The ftone font is very ancient. Here the great Dr Ridley, the Englifh mar¬ tyr, was vicar. Here is a commodious bay, frequented by colliers, &c. HERNIA, in Medicine and Surgery, a defcent of the inteftines or omentum out of their natural place j or rather, the tumour formed by that defcent, popular¬ ly called a rupture. The word is Latin, hernia, and originally fignifies the fame with tumor feroti, called alfo ramex. Prifcian obferves, that the ancient Marfi gave the appellation hernia to rocks ; whence fome will have hernias thus called propter duritiem, on account of their hardnefs. Scaliger choofes rather to derive the word from the Greek £gvej, ramus, branch. See Surgery Index. HERNIARIA, rupture-wort, a genus of plants belonging to the pentandria clafs; and in the natural method ranking under the 1 ith order, Sarmentacece. See Botany Index. HERO, in Pagap mythology, a great and illuf- trious perfon, of a mortal nature, though fuppofed by the populace to partake of immortality, and after his death to be placed among the number of the gods. I he word is formed of the Latin heros, and that of the Greek femi-deus, “ demi god.”—The Greeks crefted columns and other monuments over the tombs of their heroes, and eftablifhed a kind of worfhip in honour of the manes both of their heroes and heroines. .1 he Romans alfo raifed ftatues in honour of their he¬ roes ; but there were fix of their heroes of a fuperior order, and who were fuppofed to be admitted into the community of the twelve great gods : thefe were Her¬ cules, Bacchus, Efculapius, Romulus, Caftor, and Pollux. Writers have diftinguilhed between the wor- fliip which the ancients paid to their heroes and that offered to their gods.. The latter, it is faid, confifted of facrifices and libations; the former was only a kind of funeral honour, in which they celebrated their ex¬ ploits, concluding the rehearfal with feafls. Hero is alfo ufed in a more extenfive fenfe, for a great, illuftrious, and extraordinary perfonage j par¬ ticularly in refpeft of virtues. I. Bouhours makes this diftin&ion between a great man and a .hero, that the latter is more daring, fierce, and enterprifing: and the former more prudent, thought¬ ful, and referved. In this fenfe wt: properly fay, Alexan¬ der was a hero, Julius Casfar a great man. Hero of a poem or romance, is the principal perfo¬ nage, or he who has the chief part in it. Thus the Vol. X. Part II. E R , of the Odyffey, Ulyffes 5 of the AHneid, Aineas ; of Taffo’s Jerufalem, God¬ frey of Boulogne •, of Milton’s Paradife Loft, Adam \ though Mr Dry den will have the devil to be Milton’s hero, becaufe he gets the better of Adam, and drives him out of Paradil’e. Hero, in fabulous hiftory, a famous prieftefs of Venus, lived at Abydos, in a tower lituated on the banks of the Hellelpont. She being beloved by Lean- der, who lived at Seftos on the other fide of the ftrait, he every night fwam over to vifit her, being direfted by a light fixed on the tower. But the light being put out in a ftormy night, the youth miffed his w^ay, and was drowned ; on w hich Hero threw herfelf into the fea, and periftied. Hero, the name of two celebrated Greek mathe¬ maticians j the one called the old, and the other the young, Hero. The younger was a difciple of Ctefibius. They are known by twm works tranflated into Latin by Barochius j Spira/ium liber, by Hero fenior ; and Traclat. artis et machin. militar. by Hero junior. They flourilhed about 130 and 100 B- C. HEROD, lurnamed the Great, was born about 71 years before the commencement of the Chriltian era. When about 25 years of age, his father Antipater made him governor of Galilee, where he diftinguiihed him- felf by fupprefimg a band of robbers, and executing their ringleader. For this action, as it -was performed by his own authority, and without trial of the crimi¬ nals, he was ordered to appear before the fanhedrim j but by the influence of his party and the favour of the high prieft, he efcaped judgment. During the civil war between the republican and Ca5rarian parties, He¬ rod joined Caflius, and was made governor of Ccele- fyria. He caufed Malichus to be affaffmated for having poifoned his father, and ingratiated himfelf with Mark Antony. After being an exile for fome time in Egypt, he found means to arrive at Rome, where Antony re¬ ceived him with great kindnefs, and the fenate made choice of him to the crown of Judea, about 40 years before the birth of Chrift. It w^as in ihe poffeflion of Antigonus at that time, and he had confequently to fight his way to it. He was finally viftorious, Anti¬ gonus was taken prifoner, and Herod fucceeded to the regal dignity in the year 37 before Chrift. In filling his empty coffers he was guilty of many cruel extortions, and it is but juft to add, that he performed many a£ts of clemency. He fent for the aged high prieft Hyrcan, who had been depofed, and treated him with the great- eft kindnefs, and raifed Ariftobulus, the brother of his beloved Mariamne, to the pontifical dignity. Soon af¬ ter, indeed, from a fit of jealoufy, he caufed him to be drowned in a bath. He was accufed to Antony by his mother-in-law, and he appointed his uncle Jofeph to govern in his abfence, charging him to put the queen to death, if his trial Ihould prove fatal to him, as he could not fupport the idea of her falling into the po- feflion of another. Herod received a vifit from Cleopatra, who is re* ported to have had amorous intentions with regard to him, which he prudently drfappointed, for fear of the vengeance of Antony j but he fully fatisfied her avarice with the moft ample donations. When hoftilities com¬ menced between Antony and O&avius, he raifed an army to join the former, but had firft to contend with 3 K Malchps, Item, Herod. H E R [ 442 ] H E R Herod, Maklms, king of part of Arabia, wbom be defeated, —and compelled to fue for peace. After the battle of Aftium, he refolved to make terms with the vittor, to prepare for which he put the aged Hyrcan to death, and embarked for Rhodes, where Auguihis at that time was. He appeared before the emperor in all the mlig- nia of royalty except his diadem, boldly relating all the fervices he had performed to his benefadlor Antony, and obferved that he was willing to transfer the fame gratitude to a new patron, from whom he might hold his crown and kingdom. . . . Auguftus was llruck with the magnanimity ol this defence, and replaced the diadem on his head. When Augultus paffed through Syria in his way to and horn Egypt he was magnificently entertained by Herod, for which he reftored him the whole of his dominions, and even enlarged them. Before his interview with Augul¬ tus Herod had given a fecond order refpedting the mur¬ der of ilariamne ; and growing jealous of Sohemus, her laft guardian, he foon after had her condemned and exe¬ cuted, in fpite of the folemn proteftations of her inno¬ cence. His remorfe on this occafion was dreadlul, and no feenes of riot and debauchery could banilh her from his mind. He would frequently call aloud upon her name and ordered his attendants to bring her into his prefence, as if unwilling to forget that fire was no more. He built a theatre and amphitheatre at Jerufalem, lor the purpofe of celebrating games in honour of Augul¬ tus, which exafperated the Jews to fuch a degree that a confpiracy was formed againft him, and on the detec¬ tion of it, the principal contrivers were pumlhed with a mercilefs feverity. . f He built feveral firong fortreffes m different parts of Judea for his own fecurity, one of which, m honour o the emperor, was denominated Csefarea. 1 o upply in fome meafure the lofs of Mariamne, lie married another lady of the fame name, the beautiful daughter of a prieft, whom he raifed to the fupreme pontificates He was in fuch favour with Auguftus, that he_was appoint¬ ed imperial procurator of Syria, and obtained a tetrar- chy for his brother. To conciliate the favour of he Jews, he undertook the vaft work of rebuilding the temple of Jerufalem, and by conftantly employing a whole army of workmen for a year ana a half, this mag¬ nificent edifice was completed. In the courfe of ano¬ ther vifit to the emperor, Herod obtained new favouis, particularly a grant of half the produce of the mines of Cyprus, and the overfeerlhip of the reft. After this he dedicated his new city of Caffarea when he exhibit¬ ed fo much profufe magnificence, that Auguftus faid, his foul was too great for his kingdom. He procured the condemnation and the death of his two fons by tne firft Mariamne, for which he has been bitterly accuied ; but when we recoiled that he took the greateft care of the two fons whom each left behind him, we mult con¬ clude that there was more reafon for their punilhment than fome are willing to allow. The charge brought againft them was an unnatural confpiracy againft his life and crown, and it feems to have been fairly fubflan- tiated. His ungrateful brother Pheroras, and his fa¬ voured fon Antipater confpired againft him. Soon af¬ ter the difeovery of it the former died, and the latter went to Rome. r u' The birth of Chrift happened m the 33d year of his reign, which is faid to have been foon followed by that ad of barbarous cruelty, the maffacre of the children Herod of Bethlehem, inftigated by iealoufy of this king of the IIerJi inf Jews in a fpiritual fenfe, of whofe birth he obtained v—_ information from the magi. It is to be obferved that the account of this deed is no where to be met with but in St Matthew’s gofpel, for while Jofephus leems to dwell with ftudied minutenefs on the cruelties of Herod, he gives not a lingle hint refpeding this maffacre. As Antipater was returning from Rome, he was arrefied by his father’s orders, tried and condemned for trea- fonable pradices. Thefe calamities, joined to a fhat- tered conftitution, threw Herod into a loathfome ^ dif- temper, accompanied with remarkable fymptoms, which has fometimes been confidered as a judgment from hea¬ ven. He ordered the fentence againft Antipater to be put in execution, and appointed his fon Archelaus to i’ucceed him on the throne. According to Jofephus, he colleded together at Jericho the chief perfons among the Jews, where he ordered them to be ihut up in the circus, giving ftrid orders to his fifter Salome to ha\e them all maffacred as foon as he breathed his laft. This order v;as never executed, but rve very much doubt the veracity of Jofephus whether it was ever g1^** The molt bloody monfter that ever exifted, was chief¬ ly pleafed with fuch ads of cruelty as he could either perform in perfon, witnefs by the agency of his (laves, or know to be doae during his lifetime •, but this iup- pofed pofthumous cruelty of Herod is wholly unac¬ countable. If it was a dually the cafe, we can account for it upon no principles of human depravity, and it is wholly unique in the annals of tyranny. His remains were interred with great pomp and mag¬ nificence ; and although his memory has been confign- ed tp deteftatioo and abhorrence, his great talents and the glories of his reign, confpire to aflign him a dii- tinguifhed place in the lift of fovereigns. HERODIAN, an eminent Greek hiftonan, who fpent the greateft part of his life at Rome, fiourhhed in the third century, in the reigns of Severus, Cara- calla, Heiiogabalus, Alexander, and Maximm. His hiftory begins from the death of Marcus Amelinthe Philofopherj and ends with the death of Balbinus and Maximin, and the beginning of the reign of Gor¬ dian. It is written in very elegant Greek 5 and there is an excellent tranflation of it into Latin, by Ange- lus Politianus. Herodian has been pubhflied by Henry Stephens in 410, in 1581 ; by Boeder, at Strafburg, in 1662, Bvoj and by Hudfon, at Oxford, in 1699, HERODIANS, a fed among the Jews at the time of our Saviour : mentioned Matth. xxu. 16. Mark 111. 6. n * i ^ The critics and commentators are very much divided with regard to the Herodians. St Jerome, 111 his Dia¬ logue againft the Luciferians, takes the name to have been given to fuch as owned Herod for the Meffidn, and Tertullian and Epiphanius are of the fame opi¬ nion. But the fame Jerome, in his Comment on St Matthew, treats this opinion as ridiculous and main¬ tains, that the Pharifees gave this appellation by way of ridicule to Herod’s foldiers who paid tribute to the Romans 5 agreeable to which the Syrian interpreters render the word by the domejhcs of Heiod, 1. e. » courtiers.” M. Simon, in his notes on the 22d chap¬ ter of Matthew, advances a more probable opinion. H E R [ 443 ] HER Herodotus. The name llcrodian he imagines to have been given - k-j ^ as aJhere(i to Herod’s party and interefl:; and were for preferving the government in his family, about which were great diviiions among the Jews.—F. Hardouin will have the Flerodians and Sadducees to have been the fame.—Hr Prideaux is of opinion that they derived their name from Herod the Great, and that they were diftinguilhed from the other Jews by their concurrence with Herod’s fcheme of fubjedd:- ing himfelf and his dominions to the Romans, and likewile by complying with many of their heathen ufages and cufloms. This fymbolizing with idolatry upon views of intereft and worldly policy, wras probably that leaven of Herod, againft which our Saviour cau¬ tioned his ddciples. It is farther probable that they wrere chiedy of the fedt of Sadducees 3 becaufe the leaven of Herod is alfo denominated the leaven of the Sadducees. HERODOTUS, an ancient Greek hitforian of HalicarnaxTus in Caria, fon of Lyxus and Dryo, was born in the firft year of the 74th Olympiad, that is, about 484 B. C. The city of Halicarnaffus being at that time under the tyranny of Lygdamis grandfon of Artemilia queen of Caria, Herodotus quitted his country and retired to Samos •, from whence he tra¬ velled over Egypt, Greece, Italy, &c. and in his tra¬ vels acquired the knowdedge of the hiftory and origin of many nations. He then began to digelF the ma¬ terials he had collected into order, and compofed that hiftory which has preferved his name among men ever lince. He wrote it in the Hie of Samos, according to the general opinion.—Lucian informs us, that when Herodotus left Caria to go into Greece, he began to coniider with himfelf What he Ihould do to be for ever known, And make the age to come his own, in the moft expeditious way, and with as little trouble as poffible. His hiftory, he prefumed, would eaffty procure him fame, and raife his name among the Gre¬ cians in whofe favour it was written : but then he fore- faw that it would be very tedious to go through the feveral cities oi Greece, and recite it to each refpedftive city 3 to the Athenians, Corinthians, Argives, Lace¬ demonians, &c. He thought it moft proper there¬ fore to take the opportunity of their afiembling all together 3 and accordingly recited his work at the Olympic games, tvhich rendered him more famous than even thole who had obtained the prizes. None were ignorant of his name, nor was there a Angle perfon in Greece wdio had not feen him at the Olympic games, or heard thofe fpeak of him who had feen him there. His work is divided into nine books 3 which accord¬ ing to the computation of Dionyfius Halicarnallenfis, contain the moft remarkable occurrences within a pe- 0^24° years; from the reign of Cyrus the firft king of Perfia, to that of Xerxes when the hiftorian was living. I hefe nine books are called after the names of the nine mufes, each book being diftinguifti- ed by the name of a mufe 3 and this has given birth to two difquifitions among the learned : 1. Whether they were fo called by Herodotus himfelf 3 and, 2. For what realbn they w7ere fo called. As to the firft, it is ge¬ nerally agreed that Herodotus did not impofe thefc names himfelf 3 but it is not agreed why they were impofed by others. Lucian tells us, that thefe names were given them by the Grecians at the Olympic games, when they were firft recited, as the belt compliment that could be paid the man who had taken pains to do them fo much honour. Others have thought that the names of the mufes have been fixed upon them by way of reproach 3 and were defigned to intimate, that Hero¬ dotus, inftead of true hiftory, had written a great deal of fable. But, be this as it will, it is certain, that with regard to the truth of his hiftory, he is acculed by feveral authors; and, on the other hand, he has not wanted perfons to defend him. Aldus Manutius, Joa¬ chim Camerarius, and Henry Stephens, have written apologies for him 3 and, among other things, have very jultly obferved, that he leldom relates any thing of doubtful credit without producing the authority on which his narration is founded 3 and, if he has no cer¬ tain authority to fix it upon, ufes always the terms ut ferunt, ut ego audivi, &c. 1 here is aicribed alfo to Herodotus, but falfely, a Life of Homer, which is ufually printed at the end of his work.—He wrote in the Ionic dialed!, and his ftyle and manner have ever been admired by all people of tafte. I here have been feveral editions of the works of this hiftorian 3 two by Henry Stephens, one in I57°» anb the other in 1592 3 one by Gale at Lon¬ don in 16793 and one by Gronovius at Leyden in 1715, which is the laft and belt, though not the beft. printed. HEROIC, fomething belonging to a hero, or he¬ roine. Thus we fay, heroic adlions, heroic virtue, he- foic ftyle, heroic verfe, heroic poet, heroic age, Sec. Heioic Age, is that age or period of the world wherein the heroes, or thole called by the poets the children oj the gods, are fuppofed to have lived.—The heroic age coincides with the fabulous age. Heroic Poem, is that which undertakes to deferibe fome extraordinary adtion or enterprife. Plomer, Vir- gi|, Statius, Lucan, Taflb, Camoens, Milton, and Vol¬ taire, have compofed heroic poems. In this fenfe, heroic poem coincides with epic poem. Heroic Verfe, is that wherein heroic poems are uiually compoled 3 or, it is that proper for fuch poems. In the Greek and Latin, hexameter verfes are peculiarly denominated heroic verfes, as being alone ufed by Homer, Virgft, &c. Alexandrine verfes, of 1 2 fyllables, were formerly called heroic verfes, as being fuppofed the only verfe proper for heroic poetry 3 but later writers ufc • verfes of ten fyllables. HEROINE, Heroina, or Herois, a woman that has the qualities and virtues of a hero, or that has done fome heroic adfion. HERON. See Ardea, Ornithology Index. This bird is a very great devourer of fifh, and will do more mifehief to a pond than even an otter. Some fay that an heron will deftroy more fitli in a tveek than an otter will in three months 3 but that feems carrying the matter too far. People who have kept herons, have had the curioftty to number out the fifti they fed them with into a tub of w'ater ; and counting them again afterwards, it has been found that a heron will eat 50 moderate-fized dace and roaches in a day. It has been found, that in carp-ponds vifited by this bird, one heron will eat up 1000 ftore carp in a year, and 3 K 2 will HER [ 444 will hunt them fo clofe that very few can efcape. . rIhe readieft method of deftroying this mifehievous bird is by fiihing for him in the manner of pike, with a baited hook ; the bait confiding of fmall roach or dace, and the hook fadened to one end of a^ drong line,’made of fdk and wire twided together. To the other end of the line is faftened a done of a pound weight •, and feveral of thefe baited lines being funk bv means of the done in different parts of the pond, in a night or two the heron w ill not fail of being taken by one or other of them. HERPES, in Medicine, a bilious pudule, which ] HER They are in full roe at the end of June, and continue Herring, in perfection till the beginning of winter, when they ' v " begin to depolit their fpawn. There are different names given to preferved her¬ rings, according to the different manners wherein they are ordered i as, i. Seo-Jitcks; which are Inch as aie caught all the fiihing feafon, and are but once packed. A barrel of thefe holds fix or eight hundred •, eight barrels go to the ton by law ; a hundred of herrings is to be a hundred and twenty ", a lad is ten thouiand, and they commonly reckon fourteen barrels to the Eft. 2. There are others, repacked on fhore, called repack- HERPES, m Medicine, a u mus Pu ’ , 7 • . feventeen barrels of fea*fticks commonly breaking out in different manners upon the fkm, accord- ^ fourteen of repacked herrings, ingly receives different denominations. See M D ^k ^ ^packing them is, to take out the ^HERRERA tordesillas, Anthony, a Spanifli hiftorian, the fon of Roderic de Tordeflllas and Agnes de Herrera, it being the cuftom of that country to bear the mother’s name, was born in I5^5‘ •r^e was ^ecre' tary to Vefpafian de Gonzaga, viceroy of Navarre and Valentia, and afterwards appointed royal hiftoriogra- pher for the Indies by Philip II. to which a liberal pen- fion was attached. While he held this office, he wrote his general hidory of the Indies in 4 vols folio, com¬ prehending the whole of the Spaniih tranfaClions theie, from I492°t0 1 554. The celebrated Scottlfl, hillorian Dr Robertfon, fays of it, that it “ furmflies the Imleft and moft accurate information concerning the conqueft of Mexico, as well as every other traniathion of Ame¬ rica. The induftry and attention with which he con- fulted not only the books, but the original and public records, were fo great, and be ufually judges ol the evidence before him with fo much impartiality and can¬ dour that his decads may be ranked among the mod ju¬ dicious and ufeful hiftorical collections.” Herrera hke- w’ile compofed a general hidory of his own time, from irrito 1 co8, which is not fo much admired. His death, which happened in 1625, prevented him from enjoying the office of fecretary of date, which Phi¬ lip IV. defigned for him on the very firft vacancy. Herrera, Ferdinand de, a Spamfti poet of the 16th century, was a native of Seville. In the year 1582, he publiflied a colkaion of poems of the lyric and heroic fpecies, which were reprinted in 1619. Ey thefe he obtained a confiderable reputation as a favourite of the mufes, and made him be regarded as tne hid lyric poet belonging to Spain. As to his dyle, it is gene¬ rally allowed to be neat, elegant, copious, and correct. He likewife publidied an edition of Garcilaffo de la . . 1 4.1— v r\ k I it r\rn c ega, with notes ; a narrative of the war of Cyprus, and of the battle of Lepanto. # - HERRING, in Ichthyology, a fpecies of Glupea. The name herring is derived from the German heer, an army, which expreffes their number, when they mi¬ grate into our feas. Herrings are found in great plenty from the highed northern latitudes as low as the.north¬ ern coads of France. They are alfo met with in vad fhoals on the coad of America, as low as Carolina : thev are found alfo in the fea of Kamtfchatka, and po - fibly reach Japan : but their winter rendezvous is with¬ in the arftic circle, whither they retire after fpawmng, and where they are provided with plenty of infect food. For an account of the remarkable migration of her¬ rings, and the hidory of the fifhery, &c. fee CLUPEA and Herring-FnHEKY. herrings, w'adi them out in their own pickle, and lay them orderly in a tredi barrel theie nave no fait put to them, but are clofe packed, and headed up fworn cooper, with pickle, when the barrel is half full. The pickle is brine ; fo drong as that the herring will fwim in it. 3. Summers, are fuch as the Dutch cbafeis or divers catch from June to the 15th of July, ihcle. are fold away in fea-dicks, to be fpent prefently, in re¬ gard of their fatnefs j becaufe they will not endure re¬ packing. They go one with another, full and fhottea *, but the repacked herrings are forted, the full herrings by themfelves. 4. The Jhottey and fick herrings, by themfelves •, the barrel whereof is to be marked didinft- ly. y. Crux herrings; which are fuch as are caught after the x 4th of September. Thefe are cured with that kind of fait called fait upon fait, and are carefully- farted out, all full herrings, and ufed in the repacking. 6. Corved herrings. Thefe lerve to make red herrings, being fuch as are taken in the Yarmouth feas, fiom th< end of Augud to the middle of Offober 5 provided they can be earned aihore within a week, more or le.s, al¬ ter they are taken. Thefe are never gipped but rowed in fait, for the better preferving of them, till they can be brought on fhore •, and fuch as are kept to raa^e red herrings are wadied in great vats in fredi water, be¬ fore they are hung up in the herring-hangs or red-her¬ ring houfes. _ As for the manner of falling herrings. The nets be¬ ing haled on board, the tidies are taken out, and put into the warbacks, which dand on one fide of the vei- fels. When all the nets are thus unloaded, one fills the gippers bafkets. The gippers cut their throats, take out their guts, and fling out the full herrings into one baiket, and the ftiotten into another. One man takes the full baiket when they are gipped, and carries them to the rower-back, wherein there is fait. One boy rows and flirs them about in the fait, and another takes them, thus rowed, and carries them in baffiets to the packers. Four men pack the herrings into one barrel, and lay them, one by one, flraight and even 5 and another man, when the barrel is full, takes it from the packers. It is left to dand a day, or mote, open t« fettle, that the fait may melt and ddfolve to pickle •, after which it is filled up, and the barrel headed, ihe pickle is to be drong enough to Main a herring *, othenvife the fifti decay in it. Herring, Thomas, archbiihop of Canterbury, .me¬ morable for his attachment to civil and religious liber¬ ty, was the fon of a clergyman, and born in the year 1693. He received his grammar-fehool education at Herring. H E R [ 445 ] HER Wifbech in the ifle of Ely j and at the age of i 7 was fent to Jefus college in the univerfity of Cambridge, at which place he was made B. A. in 1714, and the title or degree of A. M. was conferred upon him about three years afterwards. In the year 1722, he was appointed chaplain to Dr Fleetwood, bilhop of Ely, who gave him two redfories j and in 1726 he was nominated preacher to the honourable fociety of Lincoln’s Inn. He was chofen chaplain in ordinary to his majeity about thejfarae period, and obtained from Cambridge the degree of D. D. in the year 1728. Bilhop Fleet- wood, his worthy patron, declared to his friends, that he never heard a fermon from Dr Herring which he would not have been proud to be the author of himfelf.. In 1731, he was chofen redlor of Blechingley in Sur¬ rey ; the fame year appointed dean of Rochefter, and the king promoted him to the fee of Bangor in the year 1737. Fie was appointed archbilhop of York in 1743 ; and it was peculiarly fortunate for the country at that critical juncture, that a man of his principles and public fpirit was raifed to iuch an exalted rank. The rebellion in Scotland was fo artfully concealed by its friends in England, that it was fcarcely believed the Highlanders were in arms, till the royalifts were de¬ feated at the battle of Preftonpans. Amidft the uni- verfal confternation which this event occalioned, Arch¬ bilhop Herring; roufed the people to a fenfe of their danger, contributed to remove the panic, and encoura¬ ged them to unite with firmnefs and vigour in the de¬ fence of their country. A meeting of the nobility, gentry, and clergy, w'as held at York, where the archbilhop addreffed them in a very able and animated fpeech, requefting them to unite as one man in averting the prefent danger, to pre- ferve their happy conllitution, and contribute to a fub- feription for railing troops in defence of the country. The whole alfembly entered warmly into his view's, and immediately fubferibed about 40,000k for the im¬ portant purpofe recommended by his grace. On the death of Archbilhop Potter, which happened in 1747* Dr Herring w’as tranflated to the fee of Canterbury. In 1753 he was feized with a violent fever, which brought him to the verge of the grave •, and although he fo far recovered that he languilhed for a few years, yet his ilrength and fpirits were very much exhauiled, and he expired in 1756, in the 63d year of his age. He was buried, according to his owm defire, without any pomp or parade, and no monument vras erected to his memory. We are informed by Mr Duncombe, that the arch- bilhop’s perfon w’as tall and comely ; his conliitution, from his tendered: youth, weak and delicate •, his ad- drefs eafy, engaging, and polite. He was generous without prodigality, magnificent wdthout profufion, and humble without meannefs. In his life-time he could never be prevailed upon to publilh any ©f his fermons j but after his death Mr Duncombe publilhed feven fer- mons on public occafions, in one volume odtavo, giv¬ ing in the preface feme account of the author’s life. In the Monthly Review he was termed “ a prelate of uncommon virtues, a man of extraordinary accomplilh- ments, a candid divine, a polite fcholar, a warm lover of his country, a true friend to liberty, religious as well as civil, and of courfe, a moft fmcere hater of perfccu- tipn.” HERRNHUT, or Herrnhuth, the firil and moil Her.nhut^ conliderable fettlement of the United Brethren, com- ' ^ J monly called Moravians, lituated in Upper Lufatia, upon an eilate, belonging to the family of Nicolas Lewis Count Zinzendorf, about 50 miles eait of Dref- den. See the article United Brethren. The building oi this place was begun in I727 fome emigrants from Moravia, who forfook their pol - fedions on account of the perfecution they luftered as Proteftants from the Roman Catholics, and being well received by Count Zinzendorf, cleared a fpot of ground allotted to them by him upon the rife of an hill called the Hutberg, or Watch-hill, from which they took occafion to call the new' fettlement Herrnhut, or tlje Watch of the Lord. More emigrants taking re¬ fuge with them, and many other perfons joining their congregation, the buildings increafed confiderably j and at prefent Herrnhut is a regular and well-built village, containing about 1300 inhabitants, all members of the Church of the United Brethren. Befides the miniller and his affitlants, a wrarden is appointed, who preiides in the veilry, and fuperintends the temporal concerns of the fettlement. The Brethren dilfinguilh themfelves by a plain and uniform drefs, the women having re¬ tained the drefs of the countries from which the firfl emigrants proceeded, not from any fuperllitious attach¬ ment to old forms, but from a defire to preclude vani¬ ty and ufelefs expence. As molt of the fettlements of this community refemble each other, both in the difpo- fition of their buildings and in their internal regula¬ tions, we wall give a Ihort Iketch of Herrnhut, as the pattern from wdiich the relt w'ere copied, though there are others in which the buildings are more regularly planned. The chapel, which is fituated in a large fquare, is a fpacious and neat building, furnilhed with a good organ and moveable forms, but no pewTs. The men fit on one fide, and the women on the other, en¬ tering at feparate doors. Befides the ulual Sunday’s fervice, the congregation meets here every evening and the children every morning. The dwellings of the mi- niiler and warden of the congregation form one, and a fchool-houfe the other, wing to the chapel. From the chapel an avenue of trees leads to the burying-ground, which is a large fquare field on the declivity of the Hutberg, and at fome diftance from the village. Se¬ veral walks bordered by trees, and furnilhed with feats, furround and interfe£I it. The grave-ftones and graves are all of equal fize, and placed in regular row's; only the vault of Count Zinzendorf, as lord of the manor, is larger than the reft. Burials are performed with great folemnity,, but no mourning dreffes ufed.—On one fide of the fquare, in which the chapel Hands, is a large building, inhabited by the fingle men, with workihops, outhoufes, anchgardens, exclufive of the dwelling rooms. The main building contains a neat chapel, in which a fhort morning and evening fervice is performed for the inhabitants •, a dining-hall; and a dormitory, in which each has a feparate bed. The latter is a lofty room* furnilhed with large windows and ventilators, fo as to admit and preferve a pure air. For the lick, apart¬ ments are allotted, and fick waiters appointed. The number of inhabitants in one room is proportioned to its fize, but there are many who have rooms to them¬ felves. No one lives here by compulfion. Each in¬ habitant pays for rent and board a moderate fum, fixed by. HER [ 446 ] H E R Ilerriiliut. by a committee of overfeers, in which the warden of the houfe prefides ; whofe bufmefs it is to maintain good order, attend to the external welfare of the houfe and its inhabitants, and by his advice and adlivity to pre¬ vent every evil arifing from external fources. Beiides the warden, an unmarried clergyman refides in the houfe, appointed to attend to the moral condudt and ipiritual concerns of all the Angle men belonging to the congregation. He hears their complaints, aflilts them with good advice, and ufes all his influence for their benefit, and for the prevention of any evil that would undermine their fpiritual happinefs.— On the other tide of the fquare is another large building, inhabited by Angle women 5 with a chapel, dining hall, dormitory, and a large garden. The internal regulations are ex¬ actly the fame with thofe of the horde of the Angle men. There are likewife houfes for widowers and widows, who find in them an agreeable retreat, with board and lodging. The poor are cared for and maintained ; for which purpofe feveral charitable inftitutions exift in the congregation.—The manor-houte, the houfe of Count Reufs, the (hop and linen warehoufe, are the moft con- fiderable buildings in Herrnhut ; the family houfes are built in regular llreets, opening into the fquare. Both the flreets and houfes are kept clean ; and befides a watchman at night, an officer is appointed to attend to good order in the day. All itrangers are treated with civility 5 but neither drunken nor diforderly vifitors nor beggars are fuflfered to infeft the flreets. d he latter receive an alms, and are then delired to proceed, i. he principal trade carried on at Herrnhut is in linen j be¬ fides which tire work done there by taylors, glovers, fhoemakers, cabinet-makers, filverfmiths, and other ar¬ tificers, is well known for its good quality. They have their firfl: prices, and never make any abatement. Every workman receives his wages ; no community of goods exifiing among the brethren, as is falfely fuppo- fed ; and the contributions towards the fupport of the ellabliihment at large, the millions, and other chari¬ table inftitutions, are voluntary. The building and in- creafe of this fettlement occaiioned no fmall furprife in the adjacent country j and both in I732> I73^> an^ 1737, commhfioners were appointed to examine into the dodlrines and proceedings'of the brethren at Herrn- hut. The commiffioners made a favourable report •, and ever fince both Herrnhut and other fettlements of the United Brethren in Saxony have been protedled, and even feveral immunities offered them by the court, but not accepted. Herrnhut was vifited in 1766 by the late emperor Jofeph II. after his return from Drefden, by the prefent king of Pruflia, and by feveral other royal perfonages, who expreffed their fatisfaftion in ex¬ amining its peculiar regulations. The United Brethren have fettlements in Saxony, Silefia, and other parts of Germany *, in Holland, Denmark, England, Ireland, and America. In England, their principal fettlements are at Fulnec near Leeds, and Fairfield near Manchef- ter. In Greenland, North and South America, the Weft Indies, and Ruifia, they have miflions for the propagation of Chriftianity among the heathen ; and in many parts have had confiderable fuccefs. See Bufching's Account of the Rife ami Progrefs of the Church of the Brethren, Halle 1781 *, and Crania's Hifory of the Brethren, London 1780. Herrnhut, JVieu', the firfl; million fettlement of the United Brethren, in the ifland of St Thomas in the Weft Hermhut Indies, under the Danilh government, begun in 17'to; TT Ji .1 • -n- • u • b j ’ j 5 toy- Herfillon. their miliionaries having endeavoured to propagate , Chriftianity among the negro (laves ever fince i7T> and fuffered many hardlhips and perfecutions, from which their converts were not exempted. Many of the planters finding in procefs of time that the Chriftian flaves were more tra&able, moral, and induftrious, than the heathen, not only countenanced but encouraged their endeavours. Tiiefe were alfo greatly facilitated by the protehlion of the king of Denmark. The fettlement coniifts of a fpacious negro church, a dwel- ling-houfe for the miifionaries, negro-huts, out-houfes, and gardens. From this place the illands of St Croix and St Jan were at fir ft fupplied with million aries ; and the Brethren have now two fettlements in each. The negro converts belonging to their church a- mount in thofe three illands to near eight thoufand fouls. Herrnhut, New, is alfo the name of the oldeft mif- fion fettlement of the United Brethren in Greenland. It is fituated on Balls River, a few' miles from the fea, near Da vis’s Straits, on the w?eftern coaft of Greenland, not far from the Danifti colony Godhaab. The two firft miffionaries were fent from Herrnhut in the year 1733, and their laudable intentions were favoured by the king of Denmark. They had to ftruggle in this uncultivated, frozen, and favage country, with in¬ conceivable hardlhips, and found at firft great difficulty in acquiring the language of the natives. However, after fix years labour and perfeverance, they had the fatisfaflion to baptize four perfons, all of one family : and from that time the million began to profper, fo that in the fucceeding years two other fettlements were begun, called Lichtenfels and Lichtenau: All of them continue in profperity. i\.bout 13CO of the na¬ tives have been chriftianized fince the beginning of this million. See CranlAs Hifory of Greenland, London, 1777. HERSCHEL, the name by which the French, and moft other European nations, call the planet difeovered by Dr Herfchel in the year 1781. The Italians call it Uranos, and the Britilh, Georgium Sidus. HERSE, In Fortification, a lattice, or portcullis, in form of a harrow, befet with iron fpikes. The wmrd herfe is French, and literally fignifies “ harrow being formed of the Latin herpex or irpex, which de¬ notes the fame. It is ufually hung by a rope faftened to a moulinet ; to be cut, in cafe of furprife, or wLen the firft; gate is broken with a petard, that the herfe may fall, and flop up the paffage of the gate or other en¬ trance of a fortrefs. The herfe is otherwife called a famafin, or cataract; and when it confifts of ftraight flakes, without any crofs-pieces, it is called orgues. Herse, is alfo a harrow, which the befieged, for w'ant of chevaux de frife, lay in the way, or in breach¬ es, with the points up, to incommode the march as w'ell of the horfe as of the infantry. HERSILLON, in the military art, a fort of plank or beam, ten or twelve feet long, whofe two fides are driven full of fpikes or nails, to incommode the inarch of the infantry or cavalry. The word is a diminutive of herfe ; the herfillon doing the office of a little herfe. See Herse. % HERTFORD. Hertford II Hervey. HER [ 447 ] HER HERTFORD. See Hartford.—In the account given of this county under the latter name, it was omitted to mention that the Eaft India Company had eftablithed a college in it, where perfons are to be pro¬ perly qualified for filling places of truft and importance in the government of India. It is compofed of a fchool, into which boys may be admitted at an early age, and a college for ftudents, 15 years old, in which they are to continue till they have completed their 18th year, or till the dire&ors fend them to their particular deftinations. In the fchool, the chief intention is to qualify them for public bufinefs, and the firft depart¬ ments of commercial life. The ftudents of the college are to hear public leisures, fimilar to thofe which are delivered in the univeifities. The means of inftrufting them in the elements of oriental literature will alfo be attended to, for which purpofe they will be taught the rudiments of the Afiatic, Arabic, and Ferfian lan¬ guages, and the hiftory, cuftoms, and manners of the eaftern nations, as well as the political and commercial relations fubiifting between Great Britain and India. The college is to be under the authority of a princi¬ pal and feven profefibrs, befides a French mailer, a drawing-mafter, a fencing-mailer, and other fuitable in- flrudlors. The principal is required to preach in the college chapel, in rotation with fuch of the profeftbrs as are in holy orders, and to bear his part in performing the other funftions of religious worftiip. The ledlures of the profeffor^are to be arranged un¬ der the following heads 5 viz. oriental literature ; ma¬ thematics and natural philofophy ; daflical and general literature ; law, hiftory, and political economy. It is propofed to divide the college year into two terms of 20 weeks each, and the laft week of each term is to be dedicated to the examination of the ftu¬ dents. A lift of their names wftio are found to have made the greatell proficiency, will be tranfmitted to the court of direftors, who will reward merit in fuch a manner as may be agreed upon by the college commit¬ tee. The utmoft attention will be paid to their moral and religious inftruflion, comprehending an account of the evidences, doftrines, and duties of divine revela¬ tion. The college and fchool were opened on the 3d of February 1806, for the reception of ftudents and pupils. The mafter of the fchool is to receive 70 guineas an¬ nually, without any additional charge, and ftudents are to pay 50 guineas to the company at the commence¬ ment of each term, for which they will receive every accommodation except a few articles of private conve¬ nience. Every kind of extravagant expence is to be difeouraged. HERTHA, or Herthus, in Mythology, a deity worfhipped by the ancient Germans. This is mention¬ ed by Tacitus, in his book De Moribus Germanorum, cap. 40. Voflius conjectures, that this goddefs was Cybele : but fhe was more probably Terra or the Earth ; becaufe the Germans Hill ufe the word hert for the earth, whence alfo the Englifh earth. HERTZBERG, a confiderable town of Germany, in the electorate of Saxony, and on the confines of Lu- fatia. E. Long. 13. 37. N. Lat. 51. 42. HERVEY, James, a pious and ingenious divine of the church of England in the 18th century, a writer of very great popularity among people of the Calviniitic Hervey. perfuafion, was born at Hardingftone in the year 1714. He was educated at the free grammar-fehool of North¬ ampton, where he acquired a competent knowledge of the Greek and Latin languages j and in 1731 he was fent to the univerfity of Oxford. The firft two or three years of his refidence at that feminary were fpent, we are told, without much application to ftudy, and there¬ fore without making much improvement 5 but after¬ wards becoming acquainted with thofe w7ho zealoufly ftudied what they called primitive Chrijlianitiy, after- wards termed Methodi/ls, he became ftrongly attached both to piety and learning. Independent of his other ftudies, he learned anatomy from Dr Keil, and natu¬ ral philofophy from Dr Derham’s Phyfico and Aftro- theology j and by the perufal of Mr Spence’s effay on Pope’s Odyfley he improved his ftyle. He attempted the Hebrew language without a teacher, and after re- linquiftiing the Itudy of it in defpair, he refumed his labours, and became a tolerable proficient in that for¬ bidding language. In the year 1740 he was curate of Biddeford in De- vonihire, where he had only 60I. a-year, including a ftated colleClion made by his friends. On the death of the reClor he was dilmifled by the new incumbent, con¬ trary to the earned expoftulation of the parithioners, who offered to maintain him independent of the reftor. In 1743 he became curate to his father, who held the living of Wefton-Favell in Northamptonlhire, and con¬ tinued in that ftation till 1730, when his health was rapidly declining, from his intenfe application to ftudy, and a conftitution naturally delicate. Having been art¬ fully decoyed to London for a change of air, he conti¬ nued about two years in that metropolis, and was loon recalled to Wefton-Favell to fucceed his father. He got both the livings of Wefton and Collingtree in the fame neighbourhood, and in 1752 was made M. A. He attended to the duties of both parifhes alternately with a curate, in the difeharge of which he was fervent and indefatigable. He feldom made ufe of notes in the pulpit, and conilantly catechifed the children of his pa- rilhioners, nor did he negle£f his paftoral vifitations at their own houfes. So great were his exertions, that he brought on a decline, accompanied with an inceifant cough and acute pains, all which he fupported, not only with fortitude, but without a fingle expreflion of peevifhnefs. He died without a groan on the 25th of December 1758, about 44 years of age. His piety was ardent and fincere, although in the eftimation of good judges he was rather enthufiaftic. He was unquefh’onably a man of the moft unblemilhed moral deportment; his temper was difinterefted, and he was truly humble without affectation. To fociety he was juft and punc¬ tual, and candid to people of every defeription. The 700I. which he received for his Meditations, were ap¬ plied to the relief of the indigent and diftreffed. He was fuch a rigid Calviniit that he was almoft an anti- nomian, whenever he fpoke of imputed rigbteoufnefs. His erudition was refpectable, but not fuch as to place him among fcholars of the firft rank, although he leems to have been mafter of the claflics. Many have ad¬ mired the ftyle of his writings, but a judge muft cer¬ tainly pronounce it by far too diffufe to be termed ele¬ gant, for it is neither chafte, manly, nor nervous. ^ Belkles Hervey- -Iflancl H E S t 44* Befules his Meditations, he publiilied remarks on Lord Bolingbroke’s letters on the ufe and ftudy of hi- ftory, fo far as they relate to the hiftory of the Old Teftament j Theron and Afpafio j Afpafio Vindicated, and Sermons on the Trinity, &c. publilhed from his own MSS. after his death. HERVKY-IJlatuI, one of the South Sea iflands difco- vered by Captain Cook, September 23. 1773, who gave it that name in honour of the earl of Briltol. It is a low ifland, fituated in W. Long. 158. 54. S. Lat. 19. 8. HESBON, Esebon, or Hefebon, in Ancient Geo¬ graphy, the royal city of the Amorites, in the tribe of Reuben, according to Mofes: 1 hough in Jolhua xxi. 39. where it is reckoned among the Levitical cities, it is put in the tribe of Gad •, which argues its fituation to be on the confines of both. HESIOD, a very ancient Greek poet *, but whether cotemporary with Homer, or a little older or youngei than him, is not yet agreed among the learned j nor is there light enough in antiquity to fettle the matter ex- attly. His father, as he tells us in his Opera et Dies, was an inhabitant of Cuma, one of the Eolian iiles, now called Taio Nova ; and removed from thence to Afcra, a little village of Bceotia, at the foot of Mount Helicon, where Heliod was probably born, and called, as he often is, j^fcrceus, from it. Of what quality his father was, is nowhere laid ; but that he was driven by his misfortunes from Cumae to Afcra, Hefiod hirofelf informs us. His father feems to have profpered better at Afcra than he did in his own country } yet Hefiod could arrive at no higher fortune than keeping Iheep on the top of Mount Helicon. Here the mufes met with him, and entered him into their fervice : Erewhile as they the fhepherd fwain behold, Feeding beneath the facred mount his fold, With love of charming fong his breafi: they fir’d, There me the heav’nly mufes firft infpir’d There, when the maids of Jove the filence broke, To Hefiod thus, the fhepherd fwain they fpoke, &c. To this account, which is to be found in the beginning of his Generatio Deorum, Ovid alludes in thefe two lines : Nec mihi funt vifce Clio, Clutfque for ores, Servanti pecudes vallibus Afcra tins. Nor Clio nor her fitters have I feen, As Hefiod faw them in the Afcraean green. On the death of the father, an eftate was left, which ought to have been equally divided between the two brothers Hefiod and Perfes j but Perfes defrauded him in the divifion, by corrupting the judges. Hefiod was fo far from refenting this injuftice, that he expreffes a concern for thofe miftaken mortals who place their hap- pinefs in riches only, even at the expence of their vir¬ tue. He lets us know, that he was not only above want, but capable of aflifting his brother in time of need •, which he often did though he had been fo ill ufed by him. The laft circumftance he mentions rela¬ ting to himfelf is his conqueft in a poetical contention. Archidamus, king of Euboea, had inftituted funeral games in honour of his owrn memory, which his Ions afterwards took care to have performed. Here He¬ fiod was a competitor for the prize in poetry j and won I 5 ] H E S a tripod, which he confecrated to the mufes. Hefiod Hc fper having entered himfelf in the fervice of the mufes, left K ., s off the paftoral life, and applied himfelf to the ftudy of arts and learning. When he was grown old, for it is agreed by all that he lived to a very great age, he re¬ moved to Locris, a town about the fame diilance from Mount Parnaffus as Afcra was from Helicon. His death was tragical. The man with whom he lived at Locris, a Milefian born, ravilhed a maid in the lame houfe j and though Hefiod w'as entirely ignorant of the fail, yet being malicioully accufed to her brothers as an accomplice, he wras injurioufly flain with the ravilh- er, and thrown into the fea. The Theogomj, and Works and Days, are the only undoubted pieces of this poet now extant: though it is fuppofed that thefe poems have not defcended perfe£t and finilhed to the prefent time. A good edition of Hefiod’s works was publilh¬ ed by Mr Le Clerc at Amfterdam in 1701. HESPER, Hesperus, in AJlronomy, the evening ftar j an appellation given to Venus when Ihe follows or fets after the fun. The wwd is formed of the Greek 'Es-TTigoj \ and is fuppofed to have been originally the proper name of a man, brother of Atlas, and father of the Hefperides. Diodorus, lib. iii. relates, that Hefperus having af- cended to the top of Mount Atlas, the better to ob- ferve and contemplate the ftars, never returned more •, and that hence he was fabled to have been changed in¬ to this ftar. HESPERIA, an ancient name of Italy 5 fo called by the Greeks from its weftern fituation. Hefperia was alfo an appellation of Spain j but with the epithet ultima (Horace), to diftinguilh it from Italy, which is called Hefperia magna (Virgil), from its extent of em¬ pire. HESPERI cornu, called the Great Bay by the author of Hanno’s Periplus; but moft interpreters, following Mela, underftand a promontory ; fome Cape Verd, others Palmas Cape : Voflius takes it to be the former, fince Hanno did not proceed fo far as the latter cape. HESPERIDEiE, in Botany (from the Hefperi¬ des) •, golden or precious fruit: the name of the 19th order in Linnaeus’s Fragments of a Natural Method. See Botany. HESPERIDES, in the ancient mythology, were the daughters of Hefper or Hefperus, the brother of Atlas. According to Diodorus, Hefperus and Atlas were two brothers who poffeffed great riches in the weftern parts of Africa. Hefperus had a daughter called Hef¬ peria, who married her uncle Atlas, and from this mar¬ riage proceeded feven daughters, called Hefperidei from the name of their mother, and Atlantides from that of their father. According to the poets, the Hefperides were three in number, 4Egle, Arethuia, and Hefper- thufa. Hefiod, in his Theogony, makes them the daughters of Nox, Night, and leats them in. the fame place with the Gorgons ; viz. at the extremities of the weft, near Mount Atlas : it is on that account he makes them the daughters of Night, becaufe the fun fets there. The Hefperides are reprefented by the an¬ cients as having the keeping of certain golden apples, on the other fide the ocean. And the poets give them a dragon to watch the garden where the fruit grows j this dragon they tell us Hercules Hew, and carried off H E S [ 449 ] H E S HefpericJes the apples.—Pliny and Solinus will have the dragon to II be no other than an arm oi the fea, wherewith the gar- , (jen was encompafled, and which defended the entrance thereof. And Varro fuppofes, that the golden apples were nothing but fheep. Others, w'ith more probabili¬ ty, fay they were oranges. The Gardens o f the Hespkridks are placed by fome authors at Larache, a city of Fez ; by others at Bernich a city of Barca, which tallies better with the fable. Others take the province of Sufa in Morocco for the ifland wherein the garden was feated. And, laftly, Rudbecks places the Fortunate Iflands, and the gar¬ dens of the Hefperides, in his own country Sweden. HESPFRIDUM insul®, in Ancient Geography, iflands near the Hefperi Cornu; but the accounts of them are fo much involved in fable, that nothing cer¬ tain can be affirmed of them. HESPERI3, ROCKET, Dame's Violet, or queen's gil/ifiower ; a genus of plants belonging to the tetrady- namia clafs 5 and in the natural method ranking under the 3Qth order, Siliquofe. See Botany Index. HESPERUS, in fabulous hiftory, fon of Cephalus by Aurora, as fair as Venus, was changed into a liar, called Lucifer in the morning, and Hefperus in the evening. See Hesper. HESSE, a country of Germany, in the circle of the Upper Rhine \ bounded on the fouth by the bi- fhoprick of Fulda 5 on the call by the principalities of Hersfeld, Thuringia, and Eichsfeld, as alfo by that of Calenburg ; on the north by the bithoprick of Pader- born and Waldeck, the duchy of Weftphalia, and the county of Witgenilein •, and on the w’eft, by Naffau- Dillenburg, the county of Solins, and Upper-Ifenburg. in the above limits, the county of Katzenellnbogen and fome other tendtories are not included. The whole country, in its utmoil length, is near 100 miles, and in fome places near as much in breadth. The air is cold, but wholefome *, and the foil fruitful in corn, wine, wood, and pailure. The country abounds alfo in cattle, filh, and game j fait fprings, baths, and mi¬ neral waters. The hills, which are many, yield filver, copper, lead, iron, alum, vitriol, pit-coal, fulphur, boles, a porcelain earth, marble, and alabafter. In the Eder, gold is fometimes found $ and at Franken- berg a gold mine was formerly wrought. Befides many leffer dreams, Heffe is watered by the following rivers, viz. the Lhan, the Fulda, the Eder or Schw7alm, the Werra or Wefer, and Diemel. The Rhine alfo and the Mayne pafs through the country of Katze¬ nellnbogen. This country, like moll others in Ger¬ many, has its Rates, confiding of \\\t prelates, as they are called, the nobility, and the towns. The diets are divided into general and particular, and the latter into the greater and fmaller committees. The houfe of Heffe is divided into two principal branches, viz. Caf- Jel and Darmftadt, of which Philipfdale, Rhinfeldts, and Homburg, are collateral branches ; the two firft of Heffe-Caffel, and the laft of Heffe-Darmftadt. Their rights and privileges are very conliderable. In par¬ ticular, they have feveral votes at the diets of the em¬ pire ; and caufes, not exceeding 1000 florins, are de¬ termined by the courts of the country, without appeal. The princes of Heffe-Caffel are not of age till they are 25, but thofe of Heffe-Darmftadt are fo at 18. The right of primogeniture hath been eftablifhed in Vol. X. Part II. 1 both houfes. The revenues of Darmfladt are faid to amount to near 100,000!. a-year, and thofe of Heffe- Caflel to near 200,000!. The fmall county of Schaum- berg alone yields, a revenue of io,ocol. and that of Katzenellnbogen, wnth the forefts of Richardfwalde, it is laid, wras farmed near 200 years ago at 12,000!. The prince of Heffe-Caffel has 40 or 50,000 men in his dominions fit to bear arms j and the troops that he hires out have often brought him in large fums, efpe- cially from Great Britain. He keeps a Handing ar¬ my of 15,000 men. This family is allied to moft if not all of the Proteftant princes in Europe. The branches of Caffel, Homburg, and Philipfdale, are Cal- viniits; that of Darmftadt, Lutherans j and that of Rhinfeldts, Roman Catholics. The prince of Hefle- Caflel, in the year 1749, embraced the Roman Catho¬ lic reli ion ; but in 1754 drew up, and confirmed by oath, an inftrument, of which all the Proteftant princes are-guarantees, declaring that the eftablithed religion of His dominions Ihould continue in every refpefl as be¬ fore, and that his children fliould be brought up and inftruffed therein. Here, as in the other Proteftant Lutheran countries of Germany, are confiftories, fuper- intendants, and infpe&ors of the church. In the whole landgraviate are three univerfities, befides Latin fchools and gymnafia, for the education of youth. The manu¬ factures of Heffe are linen cloth, hats, ftockings, gloves, paper, goldfmiths wares j and at Caffel a beautiful por¬ celain is made. I hey have alfo the fineft wool in Ger¬ many ; but are reproached with want of indufiry, in exporting inftead of manufaRuring it themfelves.—'This is fuppofed to have been the country of the ancient Catti, mentioned by Tacitus, &c. who in after-ages, "ere called Chatti, Chaji, Haft, and HeJJi. The two chief branches of Caffel and Darmftadt have many rights and privileges in common, which we have not room to fpecify. Both of them have a feat and vote in the college of princes at the diet of the empire, and thofe of this circle. Each of thefe princes, befides their guards and militia, maintains a confiderable bodv both of horfc and foot. HESSIAN FLY, a very mifchievous infedf wdiich lately made its appearance in North America ; and wffiofe depredations threaten in time to deftroy the crops of wheat in that country entirely. It is, in its perfefl ftate, a finall winged infeft ; but the mifchief it does is while in the form of a caterpillar ; and the difficulty of deftroying it is increafed by its being as yet unknown where it depofits its eggs, to be hatched before the firft appearance of the caterpillars. Thefe mifchievous infedts begin their depredations in autumn, as loon as the wheat begins to ffioot up through the ground. They devour the tender leaf and ftem with great voracity, and continue to do fo till flopped by the froft ; but no looner is this obftacle removed by the warmth of the Ipring, but the fly appears again, laying its eggs now, as has been fuppofed, upon the ftems of the wheat juft beginning to fpire. The caterpillars, hatched from thefe eggs, perforate the ftems of the re¬ maining plants at the joints, and lodge themfelves in the hollow wuthin the corn, wffiich lhowrs no fign of difeafe till the ears begin to turn heavy. The ftems then break 5 and being no longer able to perform their office in fupporting and fupplying the ears wdth nou- rilhment, the corn perilhes about the time that it goes 3 L into Heftlau Fly. H E S [ into a milky flate. Thefe infers attack alio i barley, and timothy-grafs, tliougk tkey feem to pre- ' fer wheat. The deftruction occafioned by them is defcribed in the American Mufeum (a magazine pub- liftred at Philadelphia) for February 1787, in the fol¬ lowing words 1 ii It is well known that all the crop's of wheat m all the land over wThich it has extended, have fallen before it, and that the farmers beyond it dread its approach ; the profpedt is, that unlefs means are difcovered to prevent its progrefs, the whole con¬ tinent will be overrun 5—a calamity more to be dread¬ ed than the ravages of w'ar.” This terrible infedt appeared firll in Long Illand during the American war, and was fuppofed to have been brought from Germany by the Heffians 5 whence it had the name of the Hejfian jhj. From thence it has proceeded inland at the rate of about 15 or 20 miles annually 5 and by the year. 1789 had reached 200 miles from the place where it was firft obferved. At that time it continued to proceed with unabating in- creafe } being apparently Hopped neither by rivers nor mountains. In the fly Hate it is likewife exceedingly troublefome •, by getting into houfes in fwarms, fall¬ ing into victuals and drink } filling the windows, and flying perpetually into the candles. It ftill continued to in felt Long Ifland as much as ever; and in many places the culture of wheat was entirely abandoned. The American States are likewife infefted with ano¬ ther mifchievous infect, named the I irgiman wheat-fly. This, however, has not yet palled the river Delaware 5 though there is danger of its being gradually inured to colder climates fo as to extend its depredations to the northern colonies alfo. But it is by no means the fame with the Heflian fly. The wheat fly is the fame with that -whofe ravages in the Angumois in France are recorded by M. Du Hamel j it eats the grain, and is a moth in its perfeft flate. On the other hand,, the Heflian fly has hitherto been unknown to naturalifts *, it eats only the leaf and flalk 5 and, in its perfedl ftate, is probably a tenthredo, like the black negro-fly of the turnip. As of late years great quantities of wheat were im¬ ported from America into Britain, it became an ob- je its eggs, or caterpillars j Juch infedls as wTere found in fome difeafed fpecimens being only the weevils common in England as wHl as m other countries j though fome which were infpec- ted in the month of Auguft this year contained the chryfalis of fome infers, which Sir Jofeph Banks was of opinion might be the flying weevil j and as he did not know wffiether thefe would revive or not, he gave it as his opinion, that the cargo in which the) were found ought not to be fuffered to come into the kingdom. 5. In order to procure all the intelligence that could be had concerning thefe infefts, the duke of Dorfet addreffed a letter to the Royal Society of Agriculture in Fiance, to know whether any of them exifts in that country, d he report of the fociety wTas accompanied with a drawing of two infeas; one of which was fup- pofed to be the caterpillar of the Heffian fly, from its attacking the wheat only when in the herb; begin¬ ning its ravages in autumn, reappearing in the fpring, and undergoing the metamorphofes already mentioned! lat infe£t (fay the fociety), wffiofe havock has been well known m America only fince 1776, does not Ap¬ pear to differ from it, as well as w^e can judge from a very fliort defeription of thofe which have been obferved in the north, and of which the hiftory is contained in the different volumes of the academy of fciences of Stockholm. We know that there exift in France ca- terpillars whofe manner of living refembles that of thole infers; but the mifehief which they do to corn Having never been confiderable enough to attraft the attention of government, and not having been ourfelves 1 45' ] H E S engaged in following in detail the hiftory of that fpe- cies of caterpillar, we regret not being able to fay any thing particular upon that fubjeft.” ‘ The reft of the report contains an account of the living weevil. . Fuither recourfe was now had to America for information. Ihe marquis of Caermarthen wrote to Sir John lemple at New York, the Britiffi conful ore- nerai; and this gentleman applied to Colonel Morgan, who had been more curious with refpeift to this infeft than any other perfon with whom he was acquainted. His account was, that the Heffian fly was firft intro¬ duced into America by means of Come ftraw made ule of in package, or otherwife landed on Long Ifland at an early period of the late war; and its firft appear¬ ance was in the neighbourhood of Sir William Howe’s debar cation, and at Flat Buffi. From thence it fpread in every direction, but at firft very flowlv; and it was not till the year 1786 that they reached Mr Morgan’s farm, fituated not quite 50 miles from New York. No damage was done the firft feafon and very little the fecond ; but in 1788 they were materially damaged, and in fome places totally deftroy- ed all round. “ The name of Hefian Jhj (fays Mr Morgan) was given to this infett by myfelf and a friend early after its firft appearance on Long Ifland.” In a letter to General Walhington, dated July 31ft 1788, Mr Morgan treats particularly of the inleft it- feif, and mentions feveral experiments made by himfelf to oppofe its depredations. The refult of thefe was, that good culture of ftrong foil, or well manured lands, may lometimes produce a crop of wheat or barley, when that fowed on poor or middling foil, without the other advantages, will be totally deftroyed. “ But (fays he) as the infefl lives in its aurelia ftate in ftraiv and litter through the winter, I find that unmixed barn¬ yard manure fpread on the land in the fpring multi- plies the fly to an aftonilhing degree : hence the farmer will fee the neceflity of mixing his yard will earth and marie in heaps; adding, where he can do it, a quan¬ tity of lime, and changing the heaps, after they have undergone the neceffary fermentation that their parts may be well incorporated, and a new digeftion brought on, which will effeftually deftroy the infeds. Rolling of wheat juft before the firft frofts in autumn, and foon after the laft in fpring, or before the wheat begins to pipe or fpindle, has alfo a good effect. In the firft place, it is a part of good culture; and, fecondly, the roller cruffies and deftroys a great proportion of the miefts. Top-dreffings of lime, or of live affies, are uieful as manures, and may (when applied about the times I have mentioned as proper for rolling) be of- fenfive to the infeft ; but if ufed in fufficient quantity to deftroy them, would, I believe, deftroy the wheat alfo In the year 1782, a particular fpecies of wheat was in¬ troduced on Long Ifland, which is found to refill the fly, and to yield a crop when all other wheats in the lame neighbourhood are deftroyed by it. But as this wheat has been incautioufly fowed in field with other kinds, it has generally become fo mixed by the far¬ mers, as to fuffer in its character in proportion to this mixture ;infomuch, that fome farmers, from inatten¬ tion to this circumftance, have condemned it altogether, fortunately, however, fome crops have been preferved from this degeneration ; and I was fo lucky as to pro¬ cure the whole of my laft year’s feed of the pureft kind : 3 L 2 the Heffi Fly H E S [ 45 the confequence of which has been a good crop, whilit my neighbours fields, fowed with other kinds ot wheat, have been either totally defiroyed or materially m- iured. I have fatisfied myfelf that this fpecies ot wheat was brought to New York in 1782-, that a cargo ot it was then fent to Meffrs. Underhill’s mill to be ma- nufa£tured into Hour j and that, from feed faved out of this parcel, the yellow-bearded. wheat was propaga¬ ted. It is a generally received opinion, that the capa¬ city of the yellow-bearded wheat to refill the attacks of the fly is owing to the hardnefs or fobdity ot the ft raw •. but when we relief! that other wheats are lome- times wholly cut off in the fall of the year, and fome- times early in the fpring, before the feafon of its run¬ ning to ftraw, we Ihall be induced to alhgn form other caufe. I cannot point out more than two diftmdions of this from other wheats. This firft is in the ear, at or after harveft. The obvious difference, then, is m the colour of the chaff. The fecond can only be ob- ferved by the miller, who fays, ‘ this grain requires to be more aired and dried than any other wheat before grinding, or it will not yield its flower fo kindly, as it is of a more oily nature •, but when thus aired and dri¬ ed, the quality and quantity of its flour are equal to that of the belt white wheat.” , , , , . 7. In a letter from Mr Wadfworth, dated 22a Au- guil 1788, we are informed, that the experiments made with elder juice, recommended as a preventive of this evil by Mr Bond, were fallacious, and had fail¬ ed in every inftance in 1785 5 but the efficacy of the yellow-bearded wheat in refilling the attacks of the _y is confirmed. The progrefs of the fly northward is like wife confirmed 5 but we are told that it has di (ap¬ peared in many places near New York, where it form¬ erly abounded. „ . 8. In confequence of the correfpondence between the marquis of Caerraarthen and Mr Bond, the latter made very particular inquiry concerning this milchie- vous infedl, and has given a better account of it than any of the above. “ The Heflian fly (fays he) is a fmall dark fly, with thin, long, black legs 5 clear tranl- parent wings, extending far beyond the body 0. the trunk ; with fmall, though perceptible, horns or feelers proiefting from the fnout. Thefe I have ieen appear in iize and fhape like a little fly which attacks cheefe in this country, and which is very clofely watched by the keepers of dairies here, as productive of the worm or fkippers which deftroy cheefe 5 and it is remar - able, that the worm produced from the egg of t le Heffian fly, though rather thinner and longer bears a ftrong refemblance to the worm in cheefe. T ne horns which evidently appear on the Heflian fly may be provided by nature as feelers to enable them to peifo- rate hard grain, as well as grain in a loiter ifate^ though I have not yet feen any perfon who has perceived the egg, worm, or fly, in the grain of the wheat, or who has found any nit, mucus, or even dull, in the dry thaw, in ricks or barns, to induce a belief that the egg is there depofited after the harveft. One publication, fianed a Landholder, goes fo far as to favour the idea that the fly even perforates the feed, and depofits its en-gs therein. His ideas have been condemned, as tending to miflead others 5 but by no means confuted cither by reafon or experiment. An obfervation I made myfelf, gave me feme caufe to apprehend that the 2 ] RES idea mentioned in the paper figned a Landholder was founded in fad : Upon examining a barn, m a country w'herein the fly had not been known to injure the hal¬ ve ft fthough it has now certainly made its appearance there within a few weeks), I obferved in the flaws and apertures where the wood was decayed, over which cobwebs were woven, feveral of thefe flies entangled in the webs, many of them dead, but fame alive, and ftruo-gling to difengage themfelves 5 from hence I con¬ cluded that there was a propenfity m the fly to get in- ciuaea uiai j ^ to the mow, but whether with a purpoie of mere ihei- ter and nurture, or with a view to depofit its eggs, I am at a lofs to decide.. o Mr Bond then refers to fame obfervations by a Mr Potts and Mr Cleaver, which, with feveral other- papers on the fubjeeff, he bad inclofed in bis letter to the marquis. The former was a farmer in the county of Chefter, who flacked his wheat in autumn 1788, at a time when the fly had not been feen in or near that county. About fix or feven weeks after the harveft he had occafion to threfh fome of his wheat 5 and with a view to prevent its Mattering and wafting, he t.rrew the iheaves from the rick upon a large flieet. Un ta¬ king up the fheaves to carry them to the threilung- floor, he perceived a great number ot flies, anfwenng precifely the defeription of the Heffian fly, lying upon the ffieet, fome dead, and others in a torpid fxate ; from whence he concluded that the fly had got a footing in his rick 5 but from'any examination either of the flraw or grain, no trace of the eggs being de¬ pofited was difeovered. Mr Cleaver, a farmer m the fame county, apprehending that the fly might ap¬ proach his'neighbourhood, fowed fome wheat m his warden, which grew fo as to appear above ground m lefs than a fortnight, when a violent north-eaft wind came on 5 and immediately after he perceived fmall clouds of flies over and about the wheat he had fown. He examined the grain in a few days 5 and found that numbers of the flies had depofited their eggs in the heart of the main ftalk, and many of them lay dead on the ground where the wheat was fown, and near it. Many of the eggs w ere found in the italk -, and fome fmall white worms produced from other eggs were lately difeovered in the ftalk very near the root of the wheat. Wherever thefe worms were louno, the whole of the individual ftalk was perceptibly changed in point of colour, tending to a yellowilh caff ; the top hanging down quite flirunk and wit er- ed. In fome of the wheat which was carefully ex¬ amined the eggs were found within the ftalk, ot a verT minute fizfand whitifh colour, with fomethmg of a yellow 'tinge. In thofe where the worm was formed, it was carefully wrapped up grounded by different coats of the fhoot in which it lay, as it it had been fkilfully and tenderly rolled up for its pre- fervation-, around it the ftalk was plainly eaten away fome nearly through. The worm ftrongly reiembles the fkipper in cheefe, fomewhat thinner, and rather longer, of a whitilh call. The ground on which this wheat was fown was rich garden ground high and dry, the natural foil a ftrong red clay 5 of the {hoots, of which there were many in one duller, m proportion to their number, were hurt by the y. This was imputed to the ftrength or the foil which producing a rebuff powerful growth, refilled, mjr H E S [ 453 ] Heflian great degree, the attack of the fly, though the weak therefore recommends fiy- flioots fuffered generally. ^ . , 10. A llmilar account of tlie Hefflan fly is given by Mr Jacobs, an experienced farmer in the county or Montgomery. From his obfervations the egg is utually depofited in the funnel or flieath, a little above the nr it ioint. When the eggs are laid in the autumn or fpring, they are utterly deftruaive of the growth ot the wheat; but when they are depofited Ihortiy be¬ fore the harveft, the grain or even the ftalk is fcarcely affeaed, efpecially in rich ground. The egg, he lays, is at Aril very minute ; it grows rapidly, "becomes lull and large, and turns to a brown hue; in fize and co¬ lour very like a flax feed. A material difference was alfo perceived between rich and poor ground with re- fpea to the ravages of the fly 5 but none between moilt and dry foils. He is alfo of opinion that the yellow- bearded wheat will reflft the attacks of the fly ; and that rolling and feeding the wheat will be of great ler- vice** xx, A farmer in Jerfey, who dates his letter from Hunterdon, Jan. 30. 1787, oblerves, that though the fly is fuppofed to advance about 15 miles annually, and neither waters nor mountains obitruhl its paftage j yet when diffurbed, he never faw them take a flight of above five or fix feet; neverthelefs they are fo a£Hve, that it is very difficult to catch them. They nvft appear towards the end of September ; and loon after their eggs appear hatched, in colour and fize like a flax feed : they are very low at the joints \ fome even in the ground ; and here they harbour all winter. On their Aril: appearance in any diflrift, their numbers be¬ ing fmall they feldom cut off the crop in this ftate, which is often the cafe the fecond or third year. In the fpring, after warm weather, they again appear as a fmall worm, and deftroy the crop. I he remedies propofed by this farmer are, fowing upon rich ground, eider, and rolling. A gentleman whofe account was dated on the Arfl of November 1786, fays, that their eggs referable what is commonly called the Jli/-b/ow on meat, being very fmall, and only one in a place. Soon after, the other blades of wheat proceeding from the fame kernel inclofe the Arfl:, the egg is covered, and agreeable to the ufual progrefs of infers arrives at the iiate of a wrorm, and defeends towards the root,, where it confumes the tender blade, fometimes deftroying die whole crop in the fall ", but if, by reafon of the fer¬ tility of the foil, and other concurrent circumftances, the vegetation is fo rapid as to baffle their eftorts, fome of the latter-laid eggs, when at the worm-ftate, en¬ trench themfelves in the ground to the depth of an inch or more, where he had found them after fevere H E S frofl-s changed from a white to a greenifh colour, and almoft tranfparent •, from this they proceed to the au- relia ftate, and thus continue probably in the ground till the fpring, when the fly is again produced, which again lays its eggs, and finifhes the work begun in.the fall, to the total deftruflion of the crop. Another piece of intelligence he gives, but not from his own obferva- tion, that by feeding the wheat very clofe in the win¬ ter and fpring, if the land is rich, it will again fpring up, and the worms do not much injure the fecond growth. By another correfpondent we are informed, that maritime places are lefs liable to be infefted with the fly than the interior parts of the country j and — an experiment, that fine fait ftiould be fprinkled on the wheat juft before, or very u foon after, the appearance of the fly. By others, elder has been much recommended, as well as rolling, &c. though the bearded wheat already mentioned feems to be the only effetftual remedy. 12. By another communication from Mr Morgan to the Philadelphia Society for promoting. agriculturer. he informs us, that he had made himfelf acquainted with the fly by breeding a number of them from the chryfalis into the perfeft ftate. The fly is at firft of a white body with long black legs and whilkers, fo fmall and motionlefs as not to be eafily perceived by the naked eye, though very difcernible with a micro- fcope ; but they foon become black and very nimble, both on the wing and feet, being about the fize of a fmall ant. During the height of the brood in June, where 30 or 100 of the nits have been deposited on one ftalk of wheat, he has fometimes difeovered, even with the naked eye, fome of them to twift and move on being dlfturbed : this is while they are white } but they do not then travel from one ftalk to another, nor to different parts of the lame ftalk. I he ufual time of their fpring-hatching from the chryfalis is in May. “ Thofe (fays he) who are doubtful whether the tly is in their neighbourhood, or cannot find their eggs or nits in the wheat, may fatisfy themfelves by opening their window's at night and burning a candle in the room. The fly will enter in proportion to their num¬ bers abroad. The firft night after the commencement of wheat harveft, this feafon, they filled my dining¬ room in fuch numbers as to be exceedingly trouble- fome in the eating and drinking veffels. Without ex- aggeration I may fay, that a glafs tumbler from which beer had been juft drunk at dinner, had 500 flies in it in a few minutes. The windows are filled with them when they defire to make their efcape. T hey are very difiinguilhable from every other fly by their horns or whilkers.” With regard to the cure, it feems to be confirmed that the fowing of that called the yellow- bearded wheat can only be depended upon. The fly in¬ deed will relide in fields of this wheat, and lay its eggs upon the ftalks j but no injury was ever known to hap¬ pen, except in one Angle inftance, where it was Town in a field along with the common fort, and that in a veiy fmall proportion to it. By another account, how¬ ever, we are told that the yellow-bearded wheat is equal¬ ly liable to be deftroyed in the autumn with the com¬ mon kind ; fo that the only method of fecuring the crop is by fowing it late in the leafon, when the fly is moftly over. 13. The utmoft pains were taken by the Britilh government to find out whether this deltrmftive inleft exifts in Germany or any of the northern countries of Europe ", but from the accounts received, it appears that it has not hitherto been obferved, or at leaft il it exifts, the damage done by it is too inconftderable to attraft notice. 14. From the whole correfpondence on this fubjeft, which from the abridgment juft now given of it is evidently fomewhat difeordant, Sir Jofeph Banks drew up a report for the privy council,dated March 2. 1789, in which he ftates the following particulars: 1. The appearance of the fly in Long Bland was firft obler- ved in 1779* We muft fuppofe this to be meant that Heflian Fly. H E S. [4 'Heffian tliat its deftructive efFefts becarne 'tben fii-ft percep- I tible for it feems undoubtedly to have been known in the year 1*776. 2. The opinion of Colonel Mor¬ gan, that it was imported by the Hcfiians, feems to be •erroneous, as no fuch infect can be found to exilt in Germany or any other part of Europe. 3. Since its firft appearance in Long Illand it has advanced at the rate of 13 or 20 miles a-year, and neither waters nor mountains have impeded its progrefs. It was feen eroding the Delaware like a cloud, from the Fall’s Towndiip to Makefield 5 had reached Saratoga 200 miles from its fird: appearance, infefting the counties ot Middlelex, Somerfet, Huntington, Morris, SulTex, the neighbourhood of Philadelphia, all the wdreat coun¬ ties of Connedlicut, &c. committing the mod dread¬ ful ravages; attacking wheat, rye, barley, and timothy- grafs. 4. The Americans who have fuffered by this infeft, fpeak of it in terms of the greateft horror. In Colonel Morgan’s letter to Sir John Temple, he ufes the following expredions. “ Were it to reach Great Britain, it would be the greateft fcourge that idand ever experienced 5 as it multiplies from heat and moi- flure, and the moil intenfe froils have no effeft on the egg or aurelia. Were a fmgle ftrawr, containing the infedl, egg, or aurelia, to be carried and fafely depo- dted in the centre of Norfolk in England, it 'would multiply in a few years, fo as to deftroy all the wheat and barley crops of the whole kingdom. There can¬ not exid: fuch an atrocious villain as to commit fuch an a6I intentionally. 5. No fatisfaftory account of the mode in which this infedl is propagated has hither¬ to been obtained. Thofe which fay that the eggs are depofited on the ftalk from fix or eight to 50, and by their growth comprefs and hinder the ftalk from grow¬ ing, are evidently.erroneous, and the authors of them have plainly miftakeu the animal kfelf for its eggs. It « fufincient to remember, that eggs do not grow or increafe in bulk, to prove that what they obferved was not eggs. 6. The landholder’s opinion, that the eggs are depofited on the ripe graL s of wrheat, though contradicted by Colonel Morgan, is not difproved, as the colonel advances no argument againft it. 7. A letter dated New York, September 1. 1786, fays, that the eggs are depofited on the young blade, refembling what we call a Jly-blow in meat •, very fmall, and but one in a place : but this, though the only natural mode of accounting for the appearance of the infedt, had it been trud, mud: undoubtedly have been confirmed by numbers of obfervations. 8. Even though this Ihould be found hereafter to be the cafe, there wall ftill re¬ main a danger of the aurelias being beaten off by the flail from the draw in threlhing the wheat, and im¬ ported into Britain along with it; the prefence of thefe flies in barns having been fully proved by the bEferva- tions of Meffrs Potts and Bond. 9. None of the re¬ medies propofed againft this deftrudlive infedt have been in any degree effedlual, excepting that of fowing the yellow-bearded wheat •, the ftraw of wdnch is fuf- ficiently ftrong to refill the imprelfion of the infedl, and even if its eggs are depofited upon it, receives little injury in point of produce in grain: this provides, howrever, no remedy for the lofs of the barley crop, nor for that which mull be incurred by fowing the yellow-bearded wheat on lands better fuited by nature for the produce of other kinds: it appears alfo that 3 4 ] H E S this very kind is hable to degenerate, and probably Heffian from a different caufe than that propofed by Colonel F1y* Morgan/ viz. the mixture with common wheat. 9. ‘T—” Though the Agricultural Society at Philadelphia, as well as Colonel Morgan, have declared their opinions deciiively, that no danger can aale from wheat import¬ ed into Britain, as the infedl has no immediate con- neclion with the grain; yet with nearly, if not exadlly the fame materials before him which thefe gentlemen were furnilhed with, Sir Jofeph Banks could not avoid drawing a conclufion diredtly contrary ; and he con¬ cludes his report with the words of Mr Bond in a let¬ ter to the marquis of Caermarthen. “ Satisfadlory as it would be to my feelings to be able to fay with preci- fion, that I apprehend no danger of extending the mifehief by feed, my duty urges me to declare, that I have not beard or feen any conclufive fadt by which I could decide on a matter of fuch importance; and till that teft occurs, the wifdom of guarding againft fo grievous a calamity is obvious.” On the 27th of April the fame year, another pa¬ per, by wTay of appendix to the foregoing, w7as given in by Sir Jofeph Banks. In this he again obferves, that none of the deferiptions of any European infedt hitherto publithed anfwer exadlly to the Heffian fly. In a letter from Mr Bond to the marquis of Caermar¬ then, he mentions another kind of infedl in the ftate of Maryland, called by wTay of eminence the Jhj ; and which in feme things refembles the Heffian fly, though it cannot be accounted the fame. It makes its way into the mow, and bites the ends of the grain percep¬ tibly, and no doubt depofits its eggs in the grain it- felf •, fince it has been obferved, that wheat recently threlhed, and laid in a dry warm place, will foon be covered with an extreme clammy cruft, which binds the wheat on the furface together in fuch a way as to admit its being lifted in lumps; but the wheat beneath will not be hurt to any confiderable depth. Such is the quality of this fly, that if the hand be inferted in¬ to the heap affedled by it, wTatery blifters are imme¬ diately raifed ; and the farmers and flaves, riding up¬ on bags of this infedled wdieat, never fail to be feverely bliftered thereby. “ This infedl (fays he) is called in Maryland the Revolution J1yy by the friends of the Britifh government •, but from all I can learn it is not the fame infedl which originated on Long Bland, and is called the Hejfian Jly (by way of opprobrium) by thofe who favoured the revolution. All the papers I have read on the Heflian fly are very inaccurate, not to fay contradidlory ; and I am convinced it is by no means a fettled point at this moment, in what manner and place the eggs of thefe infedls are depofited. The policy w'hich induced government to open the ports being founded on an appearance of a fcarcity of corn, that evil may be remedied by the admiffion of flour inftead of grain; and though the countries from whence the flour is carried will have the advantage of the manufadlure, ftill that cannot be reckoned as an ob- jedt, when oppofed in the fcale to an evil of fuch im- menfe magnitude as the introdudlion of fo deftrudtive an infedl may occafion. The ravages here are beyond conception ruinous. Many farmers have had their crops fo completely cut off as to be left without bread- corn or even feed-corn. If the meafure of confining the importation to flour alone ftiould be adopted, great attention i 1 H E T [ 455 ] H £ T Hefythius attention fliould be paid to the quality of the flour ad- Heterodox ^nto t^e Britifh ports. An infinite deal of the . ^ wheat of the lafl: harveft is of a ;very wretched qua¬ lity ; and ftratagems will be pracdifed to give an ex- tenfive vent to fo effential a ftaple of the middle ftates of America.” In another letter to the fame nobleman, Mr Bond expreffes himfelf to the following purpofe. “ I have not been able to collect any decided information which fixes the efi'ential point, how far the infect may be communicated by feed. It is a matter at this time quite undecided here : nor have I heard or obferved any very conclufive reafon to fuppofe that the fly makes its way generally into barns and ricks. A very intel¬ ligent farmer in the county of Bucks, informed me that it was the prevailing opinion there, and fo I found it, that the fly did not, either in the field or in the mow, affedl the grain of the wheat: a neighbour of his, in threlhing the little wheat he had faved laft har- veft, obferved the fly rile from the flraw in great num¬ bers wherever it was ftruck by the flail 5 but though it was at firft prefamed that the fly had infinuated it- felf into the mow for the purpofe of depofiting its eggs jn the grain or in the ftraw, no trace of the egg could be difcovered from the appearance of any mucus or duft, either in the grain or in the ftraw ; hence it was inferred that all the mi (chief was done in the field.” HESYCHIUS, the mofl: celebrated of all the an¬ cient Greek grammarians whofe works are now extant, was a Chriftian 5 and, according to fome, the fame with Hefychius patriarch of Jerufalem, who died in 609. He wrote a Greek lexicon; which, in the opi¬ nion of Cafaubon, is the moil learned and ufeful work of that kind produced by the ancients. Schrevelius publifhed a good edition of it in 1668, in qto, with notes ; but the bell is that of John Alberti, printed at Leyden in 1746, in two vols folio. HETERIARCH, H^iteriarcHa, in antiquity, an officer in the Greek empire, whereof there were two fpecies •, the one called fimply heteriarch, and the other great heteriarch, who had the direction of the former. The work is Greek, formed of the Greek focius, “ companion, ally,” and impcrium, “ command.” Their principal function was to com¬ mand the troops of the allies j befides which,, they had fome other duties in the emperor’s court, defcribed by Codin, Be Officiis, cap. 5. N° 30, 31, 32, 37. HETEROCLITE, Heterocliton, in Grammar, an irregular or anomalous word, which either in de- clenfion, conjugation, or regimen, deviates from the ordinary rules of grammar. The word is Greek, ers?a- ’cAirav ; formed of fnge; alter, “ another, different,” and xAnw, “ I decline.” Heteroclite is more peculiarly applied to nouns which v.iry or are irregular in point of declenfion ; having fewer cafes, numbers, &c. than ordinary ; or that are of one declenfion in one number, and another in ano¬ ther : as Hoc vas, vajis ; hcec vafa, vaforum. HE1 ERODOX, in Polemical ‘Theology, fomething that is contrary to the faith or doctrine eftabliffied in the true church. The word is formed of the Greek higodofa; a compound of mga? “ alter,” and opi¬ nion.” Thus, we fay a heterodox opinion, a heterodox Hetera- divine, &c. The word Hands in oppofition to orthodox. gene'ty HETEROGENEITY, \n Phyfics, the quality or HeJiria< difpofition which denominates a thing heterogeneous. 1 The word is alfo ufed for the heterogeneous parts themfelves: in which fenfe, the heterogeneities of a body are the fame thing with the impurities thereof. HETEROGENEOUS, or Heterogeneal, liter¬ ally imports fomething of a different nature, or that con fifts of parts of different or diffimilar kinds \ in oppofition to homogeneous. The word is Greek ; formed of alter, “ different,” and ysv«? genus, “ kind j” q. d. com- pofed of different kinds of parts. Heterogeneous Light, is by Sir Ifaac Newton faid to be that which confifts of rays of different degrees of refrangibility. Thus the common light of the fun or clouds is heterogeneous, being a mixture of all forts of rays. Heterogeneous Nouns, one of the three variations in irregular nouns j or fuch as are of one gender in the fingular number, and of another in the plural.—Hete¬ rogeneous, under which are comprehended mixed nouns, are fixtold. 1. Thofe which are of the mafculine gender in the fingular number, and neuter in the plu¬ ral ; as, hie tartar us, luxe tartar a. 2. Thofe which are rnafeuline in the fingular number, but mafculine and neuter in the plural ; as, hie locus, hi loci et hcec loca. 3. Such as are feminine in the fingular number, but neuter in the plural 3 as, hcec carbafus, et hcec carbafa. 4. Such nouns as are neuter in the fingular number, but mafculine in the plural 3 as, hoc coslum, hi cadi. 5. Such as are neuter in the fingular, but neuter and mafculine in the plural 3 as, hoc rajlrum, hi rajlri, et hcec rajlra. And, 6. Such as are neuter in the fingu¬ lar, but feminine in the plural number; as, hoc epulum, lice epulce. Heterogeneous Quantities, are thofe which are of fuch different kind and conlideration, as that one of them, taken any number of times, never equals or ex¬ ceeds the other. _ Heterogeneous Surds, are fuch as have different ra¬ dical figns 3 as >Jaa, and 3*Jbb; ^9, and HETEROSCII, in Geography, a term of relation, denoting fuch inhabitants of the earth as have their fliadows falling but one way, as thofe who live between the tropics and polar circles 5 whofe ffiadows at noon in north latitude are always to the northward, and in fouth latitude to the fouthward. HETH, the father of the Hittites, was the eldefi: fon of Canaan (Gen. x. 15.), and dwelt fouthward of the promifed land, at Hebron or thereabouts. Ephron, an inhabitant of Hebron, w-as of the race of Heth* and this whole city in Abraham’s time was peopled by the children of Heth. There are fome who main¬ tain that there was a city called Heth, but we find no footfteps of it in the Scripture. HETRURIA, and Etruria, a celebrated country of Italy, at the weft of the Tyber. It originally con¬ tained 12 different nations, wffiich had each their re- fpeeftive monarch. Their names were Veientes, Clu- fini, Perufini, Cortonenfes, Arretini, Vetuloni, Volater- rani, Rufellani, Volfcinii, Tarquinii, Falifci, and Cse- retani. Phe inhabitants were particularly famous for their fuperftition and ftncl confidence in omens, dreams, auguries^ « c / Hevxi It Hewfon. E X Properties of tlie Blood, Hexacnord and tire Lymphatic Syttem, 2 vols 5 and diluted with HeJjpIa< Di Monro the difcovery of the lymphatic iyitem ot / vefiels m oviparous animals. He died m 1 HEXACHORD, in ancient mufic, a concord call¬ ed bv the moderns zjtxth. HEXAGON, in Geometry, a figure of fix fides and angles; and if thefe fides and angles are equal, it is call¬ ed a regular hexagon. HEXAHEDRON, in Geometry, one of the five platonic bodies, or regular folids, being the fame with ci cube* HEXAMETER, in ancient poetry, a kind of verfe confifting of fix feet •, the firit four of which may be indifferently either fpondees or daftyles •, the filth is generally a daftyl, and the fixth always a fpondee. Sucn is the following verfe of Horace : 1 23 Jut pro\leJfe vo\lunt, aut\ dele\Bare po\etce HEXAMILION, Hexamilt, or Hcxamilmm, a celebrated wall, built by the emperor Emanuel in 1413 the ifthmus of Corinth. It took its name Irom H E W [ 4SC 1 .. . H auguries, &c. They all [.rovcu powerful and refolUte He wrote Inquiries into the enemies to the rifing empire of the Romans, and were t conquered only after much effufion of blood. HEV7EI, in Ancient Geography, one of the feven tribes who occupied Canaan *, a principal and numerous people, and the fame with the KadmonA, dwelling at the foot of Hermon and part of Libanus, or between Libanus and Hermon (Judges ni. 3.). J o that Loch- art refers the fables concerning Cadmus and his wire Harmonia, or Hermonia, changed to ferpents; the Hevi denoting a wild beaft, fuch as is a ferpent. Cad¬ mus, who is^ faid to have carried the ufe of letters to Greece, feems to have been a Kadmonsean ; of whom the Greeks fay that he came to their country from Phoenicia. . • , HEUCHERA, a genus of plants belonging to the pentandria clafs. See Botany Index. HEVELIUS, or HEVELKE,. 'John, an eminent aftronomer, was born at Dantzic in 1611. H_ iludie in Germany, England, and France, and every where obtained the elleem of the learned. He was the hrit that difeovered a kind of libration of the moon, and made feveral important obfervations .on the other planets. He alfo difeovered feveral fixed liars, which he named the firmament of Sohiefli, in honour of John III. king of Poland. His wife was alio well ikilled in afironomy, and made a part of the obfervations pub- lilhed by her hulband. In 1673 he_ publilhed a de- feription of the inftruments with which he made his obfervations, under the title of Machina Calf is : and in 1679 he publiihed the fecond part of this work*, but in September the fame year, while he was at a feat in the country, he had the misfortune to have his houle at Dantzic burnt down. By this calamity he is laid to have fuftained a lofs of feveral thoufand pounds ; having not only his obfervatory and all his valuable in- .ftruments and apparatus deftroyed, but alfo a great number of copies of his Machina Ccelejlis ; which acci¬ dent has made this fecond part very fcarce, and conle- nuehtly very dear. In the year 1690 were puDiilhed Finnamentum Sobiefcianum and Prodromus aftronomicce ct novee tabula folares, una cum cat a logo fix arum, m ivhich he lays down the neceffary preliminaries for taking an exaft catalogue of the liars. But both thefe works are pofthumous : for Hevelius died m 1687, on his birth-day, aged 76. He was a man greatly efteemed by his countrymen, not only on account of his great reputation and Ikill in aftronomy, but as a very excel¬ lent and worthy magiftrate. He was madd a burgo- mafter of Dantzic ; which office he is faid to have exe- _ comam...* — —, cuted with the utmoft integrity and applaule. He was c0’ iled and& publiffied bv Origen, with a view ot alfo very highly dleemed by foreigners ; and not only > F ^ text from future corruptions, and by thofe Ikilled in afironomy and the fciences, but y J. , f t had been already introduced. over njt. _ , „ .f. %fix, and ftiXiev, which in the vulgar Greek figmhes a mile, as being fix miles long. The defign of the hexamilion was to defend Pelopon- nefus from the incurfions of the barbarians. Amurath II. having raifed tne liege of Conftantinople m the year 1424, demolilhed the hexamilium, though he had before concluded a peace with the Greek emperor. I he Ve¬ netians reitored it in the year 1463, by 30,000 work¬ men, employed for 15 days, and covered by an army commanded by Bertoldo d’Efte general of the land forces and Louis Laredano, commander ot the lea.— The Infidels made feveral attempts upon it 5 but were repulfed, and obliged to retire from the neighbourhood thereof: but Bertoldo being killed at the Age of Corinth, which was attempted foon after, Bertino Cai- cinato, who took on him the command of the army, abandoned, upon the approach of the beglerbeg, both the fiege and the defence of the wall which had coil them fo dear *, upon which it was finally demollfhed. HEXANDRIA, in Botany, (from \lJtx, and a man); the name of the fixth clafs in Linnaeus’s fexual method, confifting of plants with hermaphrodite flowers, which are furniffied with fix ffamma or male organs, that are of an equal length. See Botany HFXAPLA f formed of i%fix, and I open, l unfold), in church-hiftory, a Bible difpofed in fix co¬ lumns *, containing the text, and divers verfions there¬ by thofe Ikilled in afironomy — - - . - foreign princes and potentates : as appears abundant y from a colleftion of their letters which was printed at Dantzic in the year 1683. TT • , n HEUSDEN, a ftrong town of the United 1 ro- vinces, in Holland, feated on the river Maefe, among marffies, with a handfome caftle, in E. Long. 5. 3. N.Lat. 51.47. . . HEWSON, William, a very ingenious anatomilt, was born in 1739. He became affiftant to _Dr Hunter, and was afterwards in partnerlhip with him *, but on their difagreement, read anatomical le&ures at his own boufe (in which he was feconded .by Mr Falconer), to correct thofe that had been already introduced. Eufebius, Hift. Eccl. lib. vi. cap. 16. relates, that Origen, after his return from Rome under Caracalla, applied himfelf to learn Hebrew, and began to colled the feveral verfions that had been made of the facred writings, and of thefe to compofe his letrapia and Hexapla 3 others, however, will not allow him to have begun till the time of Alexander, after he had retired into Paleftine, about the year 231. . , To conceive what this Hexapla was, it muff be ob- ferved, that, befides the tranflation of the facred wn- tings, called the Septuagint, made under Ptolem^Ph.- HEX [ 457 ] HEY Hesapla. ladelphu% above 280 years before Chrift, the Scripture had bee 1 iince trandated into Greek by other interpre¬ ters. The firft of thofe verfions, or (reckoning the Septuagint) the fecond, was that cf Aquila, a profe- lyte Jew, the firft edition of which he publifhed in the 1 2th year of the emperor Adrian, or about the year of Chrift 1 28 ; the third was that of Symmachus, pub- lilhed, as is commonly fuppofed, under Marcus Aure¬ lius, but, as fome fay, under Septimius S^verus, about the year 200 *, the fourth was that of Theodotion, prior to that of Symmachus, under Commodus, or about the year I'Jy. Thefe Greek verfions, fays Dr Kennicott, were made by the Jewrs from their corrupt¬ ed copies of the Hebrew, and were defigned to ftand in the place of the Seventy, againft which they w'ere prejudiced, becaufe it feemed to favour the Chriftians. The fifth wTas found at Jericho, in the reign of Cara- calla, about the year 217; and the fixth was difcover- ed at Nicopolis, in the reign of Alexander Severus, about the year 228 : laftly, Origen himfelf recovered part of a feventh, containing only the Pfalms. Now' Origen, who had held frequent deputations wdth the Jews in Egypt and Paleftine, obferving that they ahvays objedted againft thofe palfages of Scrip¬ ture quoted againfl: them, and appealed to the Hebrew text ; the better to vindicate thofe paflages, and con¬ found the Jew's by Ihowing that the Seventy had given the lenfe of the Hebrew, or rather to ihow by a num¬ ber of different verfions what the real fenfe of the Pie- brew was, undertook to reduce all thefe feveral verfions into a body along with the Hebrew text, fo as they might be ealily confronted, and afford a mutual light to each other. He made the Hebrew text his ftandard : and allowr- ing that corruptions might have happened, and that the old Hebrew copies might and did read differently, he contented himfelf with marking fuch words or fenten- ces as w’ere not in his Hebrew text, nor the later Greek verfions, and adding fuch words or fentences as were omitted in the Seventy, prefixing an afterilk to the ad¬ ditions, and an obelilk to the others. In order to this, he made choice of eight columns : in the firft he gave the Hebrew text in Hebrew cha- radlers ; in the lecond the fame text in Greek charac¬ ters ; the reft were filled with the feveral verfions above- mentioned ; all the columns anfw?ering verfe for verfe, and phrafe for 'phrafe j and in the Pfalms there W'as a ninth column for the feventh verfion. This work Origen called Hexa/>/a,q. d.fex- tuple, or work of fix columns, as only regarding the firft fix Greek verfions. See Tetrapla. Indeed, St Epiphanius, taking in likewdfe the two oolumns of the text, calls the work Ociap/a, as confift- ing of eight columns. 'Phis celebrated work, which Montfaucon imagines confifted of fitty large volumes, perilhed long ago, probably with the library at Ctefarea, where it was preferved, in the year 653 5 though feveral of the an¬ cient wniters have preferved us pieces thereof: parti¬ cularly St Chryioftom on the Pfalms, Philoponus in his Plexameron, &c. Some modern writers have ear- neftly endeavoured to colleft fragments of the Hexa- pla, particularly Flaminius Nobilius, Drufius, and F. Montfaucon, in two folio volumes, printed at Paris in Vox*. X. Part II. HEXASTYLE, in ArckiteBurei a building with Hexaftyle fix columns in front. II. HEXHAM, a town of Northumberland, fituated , near the conflux of the north and fouth Tyne. It is commonly fuppofed to be the Alexodunum of the Ro¬ mans, where the firft cohort of the Spaniards were in garrifon. It w^as made a bifliop’s fee by Etheldreda, wife of King Egfred, in the year 675. Its firft bi- fliop St Wilfred built here a moft magnificent ca¬ thedral and monaftery, and it was poffeffed by feven bifhops fucceftively 5 but being very much infeited by the Danes, the fee was removed to York. The towti and priory were deftroyed by the Scots in 1296, and pillaged again in 1346. There was a remarkable and bloody battle fought near this town between the houfes of Lancafter and York, wherein the former were defeated, chiefly by the extraordinary bravery and condudl of John Nevil, Lord Montacute, who w^as for that reafon created earl of Northumberland. The prefent town is not populous, and the ftreets are nar¬ row, with ill-built houfes. The market-place, near the centre of the town, is a fpacious fquare, and is fup- plied by a fountain with water. Among the remains of ancient ftruttures is a gateway of ancient architec¬ ture, leading to the priory, but of a much older date. I here are twm ancient towers in the town, one. of wffich is ufed as a feftions-houfe, and was formerly an exploratory tower; the other is on the top of a hill tow-ards the Tyne, of remarkable architedlure, which has been much higher than at prefent, and has two dungeons within it, befides feveral chambers wdth very little narrow wdndows. The towm has a charity or gram- mar-fchool. It was in 1571 annexed to the county of Cumberland : but only in civil matters; for its ec- clefiaftical jurifdiMw’r* immenfe frozen cafcade, the furface wavy, as of water ^ at once fixed, or in its headlong courfe fuddenly petri- . lied. Round about us were many high, bare, dony ridges; and clofe by our tent, one with a wide bafis, and a dender rill of water, clear, foft, and warm, run¬ ning in a fmall channel on the top. A woman was walking linen in it, with a child at her back ; and. be¬ yond were cabins of the Turcomans, danding didindl, much neater than any we had feen, each with poultry feeding, and a fence of reeds in front. “ It is an old obfervation, that the country about the Maeander, HIE [ 461 ] HIE Hierapolis. Maeander, the full being light and friable, and full of falts generating inflammable matter, was undermined by fire and water. Hence it abounded in hot fprings, which, after paffing under-ground from the refervoirs, appeared on the mountain, or were found bubbling up in the plain or in the mud of the river : and hence it was fubjeft to frequent earthquakes*, the nitrous vapour comprefled in the cavities, and fublimed by heat for fer¬ mentation, burfting its prifon with loud explofions, agi¬ tating the atmofphere, and fhaking the earth and wa¬ ters with a violence as extenfive as deftruflive 5 and hence, moreover, the peftilential grottoes, which had fubterraneous communications with each other, derived their noifome effluvia j and ferving as fmaller vents to thefe furnaces or hollows, were reparded as apertures of hell, as pafiages for deadly fumes rifing up from the realms of Pluto. One or more of the mountains per¬ haps has burned. It may be fufpeded, that the fur- face of the country has in fome places been formed from its own bowels: and in particular, it feems probable, that the hill of Laodicea was originally an eruption.” “ The hot waters of Hierapolis have produced that moft extraordinary phenomenon, the cliff, which is one entire incruftation. They were anciently renowned for this fpecies of transformation. It is related, they chan¬ ged fo eafily, that being conduced about the vineyards and gardens, the channels became long fences, each a fingle 'ftone. They produced the ridges by our tent. The road up to the ruins, which appears as a wide and high caufeway, is a petrification ; and overlooks many green fpots, once vineyards and gardens, feparated by partitions of the fame material. The furface of the flat, above the cliff, is rough with done and with channels, branching out in various directions, a large pool over¬ flowing and feeding the numerous rills, fome of which fpread over the Hope as they defcend, and give to the w hite ftony bed a humid look, refembling fait or driven fnow when melting. This cruft, which has no tafte or Kbit cruft fmell, being an alkaline fubftance, will ferment with ac^s ’ anc^ Picerini relates, that trial of it had been made with fpirit of vitriol. The waters, though hot, were ufed in agriculture. “ Tamerlane, when he invaded this country, en¬ camped for the fummer at Tanguzlik, where many of his men were deftroyed by drinking of a fpring which ftagnated and petrified. The Turkifh name Pambouk fignifies ; and, it has been faid, refers to the white- nefs of the incruftation. “ The fhepherd-poet of Smyrna, after mentioning a cave in Phrygia facred to the Nymphs, relates, that there Tuna had once defcended from the fky to En- dymion, while he wTas fleeping by his herds •, that marks of their bed w-ere then extant under the oaks ; and that in the thickets around it the milk of cows had been fpilt, which men ftill beheld w'ith admiration (for fuch was the appearance if you faw it very far off) *, but that from thence flowed clear or w^arm water, w’hich in a littie while concreted round about the channels, and formed a ftone pavement. The writer defcribes the cliff of Hierapolis, if I miftake not, as in his time ; and has added a local ftory, current when he lived. It was the genius of the people to unite fiftion with truth $ and, as in this and other inftances, to dignify the tales of their mythology with fabulous evidence taken jrom the natural wonders in which their country abound- HierapoKs. “ We afcended in the morning to the ruins, which are on a flat, paffing by fepulchres with infcriptions, and entering the city from the eaft. We had fbon the theatre on our right hand, and the pool between us anct the cliff. Oppofite to it, near the margin of the cliff,- are the remains of an amazing ftrufture, once perhaps baths, or, as we conjedfured, a gymnafium \ the huge vaults of the roof ftriking horror as we rode underneath. Beyond it is the mean ruin of a modern fortrefs ; and farther on are maflive walls of edifices, feveral of them leaning from their perpendicular, the ftones diftorted, and feeming every moment ready to fall; the effetfts and evidences of violent and repeated earthquakes. In a recefs of the mountain on the right hand is the area of a ftadium. Then again fepulchres fucceed, feme nearly buried in the mountain-fide, and one, a fquare building, with an infeription in large letters. All thefe remains are plain, and of the ftone created by the wa¬ ters. The fite has been computed about two hundred paces wide and a mile in length. “ After taking a general furvey, we returned to the theatre, intending to copy infcriptions, and examine more particularly as we changed our ftation. We found this a very large and fumptuous ftrufture, and the leaft ruined of any we had feen. Part of the front is Hand¬ ing. In the heap which lies in confuiion, are many fculptures well executed in baffo relievo: with pieces of architrave inferibed, but disjoined; or fo encumbered with maffive marbles, that we could colletl from them no information. The character is large and bold, with ligatures. The marble leats are ftill unremoved. The numerous ranges are divided by a low femicircular wall, near mid way, with infcriptions on the face of it, but moft illegible. I copied a ftrort but imperfeft one, in which Apollo Archegetes or The Leader is requefted to be propitious. In another compartment, mention is made of the city by its name Hierapohs; and on a third is an encomium in verfe, which may be thus tranflated, “ Hail, golden city Hierapolis, the fpot to be preferred before any in wide Alia ; revered for the rills of the Nymphs ; adorned with fplendor.” The Nymphs pre- lided over fprings and fountains. “After attentively viewing them, and confidering their height, width, and manner of arrangement, I am incli¬ ned to believe, that the ancient Aiiatics fat at their plays and public fpeftacles like the modern, with their legs croffed or gathered under them ; and it is probable up¬ on carpets. “ The waters of Hierapolis were furprifingly attem¬ pered for tinging wool, with a colour from roots rival¬ ling the more coftly purples; and were a principal fource of the riches of the place. The company of dyers is mentioned in the infeription on the fquare building among the fepulchres. The heroum or monument was to be crowned by them with garlands or feftoons q-f- flowers, The fprings flowed fo copioufiy, that the city was full of fpontaneous baths; and Apollo, the tutelar deity of the Hierapolitans, with iEfculapius and Hy- giea, on their medals, bear witnefs to the medicinal vir¬ tues which they pouefs. The people, in fome of their infcriptions, are ftyled the mojifplsndid^ and the fenate- the mqflpowerful. % “ The- HIE [ 462 ] HIE ’Hlerapolis <{ The pool before the theatre has been a bath, II and marble fragments are vifible at the bottom of 4 '^rCh’ . the water, which is perfectly tranfparent, and of a bri¬ ny tatte. “ Hierapolis was noted, befides Its hot waters, for a plutonium. This was an opening in a fmall brow of the adjacent mountain, capable of admitting a man, and very deep, with a fquare fence before it, inclofing about half an acre ; which fpace wTas filled with black thick mill, fo that the bottom could be fcarcely difcerned. The air, to thofe who approached it, was innocent on the outfide of the fence, being clear of the mift in fe- rene weather, it remaining then within the boundary j but there death abode. Bulls, as at Nyfa, dropt down, and were dragged forth without life •, and fome fpar- rows which Strabo let fiy inftantly fell fenfelefs. But eunuchs, the priefts of Magna Mater, or Cybele, could go in quite to the aperture, lean forward, or enter it unharmed j but they held their breath, as their vifages tefiified, and fometimes until in danger of fuflfocation. Strabo, the relater, was in doubt whether all eunuchs -could do this, or only they of the temple j and whether they were preferved by Divine Providence, as in cafes of enthufiafm, or were polfelfed of fome powerful an¬ tidotes. But it is likely this mift was the condenfed fleam of the hot rvaters, made noxious by the qualities of the foil} and that the whole fecret of the priefts con¬ futed in carrying their faces high in the air, as another fpe61ator has obferved they always did and in avoid¬ ing refpiration when they Hooped. 1 had hoped the defcription of this fpot would have enabled me to find it, but I fearched about for it unfuccefsfully. “ We defcended to our tent at the approach of even¬ ing by a fteep track down the cliff, beginning beyond the pool, in which we alfo bathed with pleafure, on the fide next the gymnafium. Our way was often rough and ilippery, refembling ice, and our horfes with difficulty preierved their footing. When arrived at our tent, I renewed my inquiries for the plutonium j and an old Turk, with a beard as white as fnow, told me he knew the place, that it was often fatal to their goats; and accounting for the effecl, laid, it was believed to be the habitation of a daemon or evil fpirit. We afcended again early in the morning to the theatre, where he had promifed to join us; and a live fowl wras intended to be the martyr of experiment.” But our author was Interrupted by fome banditti, and obliged to leave Hie¬ rapolis in hafte. HIERARCHY, among divines, denotes the fubor- dination of angels. Some of the rabbins reckon four, others ten, orders or ranks of angels j and give them different names according to their different degrees of power and knowledge. Hierarchy, likewife denotes the fubordination of the clergy, ecclefiaftical polity, or the conftitution and government of the Chriftian church confidered as a fo- ciety. HIERES, tWname of fome fmalliflands lying near the eoaft of Provence in Ttance, oppofite to the towns of Hieres and Toulon, where the Engliffi fleet lay many months in 1744, and blocked up the TWch and Spa- nlfh fleets in the harbour of Toulon. Hieres, a town of Provence in France, feated on the Mediterranean fea, It is a pretty little town* and was formerly a colony of the Marfiliansj and pilgrims ufed Htero to embark here for the holy tland. But its harbour be- H. ing now choaked up, it is confiderable only for its fait- works. E. Long. 6. 13. N. Lat. 43. 7. y— HIERO I. and II. kings of Syracufe. See Syra¬ cuse. HIEROCLES, a cruel perfecutor of the Chri- ftians and a violent promoter of the perfecution under Dioclefian, flouriftied in 302. He wrote fome books again ft the Chriftian religion $ in which he pretends fome inconfiftencies in the Holy Scriptures, and com¬ pares the miracles of Apollonius Tyameus to thofe of our Saviour. He was refuted by Laflantius and Eu- febius. The remains of his works were collected into one volume odtavo, by Biihop Pearfon •, and publiflied in 1654, with a learned differtation prefixed to the work. HlEROCLES, a Platonic philofopher of the fifth cen¬ tury, taught at Alexandria, and was admired for his elo¬ quence. He wrote feven books upon Providence and Fate : and dedicated them to the philofopher Olympio- dorus, who by his enjbaflies did the Romans great fer- vice under the emperors Honorius and Theodofius the younger. But thefe books are loft, and we only know them by the extra&s in Photius. He wrote alfo a Com¬ mentary upon the golden verles of Pythagoras j which is ftill extant, and has been feveral times publilhed with thofe verfes. HIEROGLYPHICS, in antiquity, myftical cha- rafters, or fymbols, in ufe among the Egyptians, and that as well in their writings as infcriptions ; being the figures of various animals, the parts of human bodies, and mechanical inftruments. The word is compofed of the Greek facer, “ holy,” and yXvtpiiv failpere, “ to engrave',” it being the cuftom to have the walls, doors, &c. of their temples, obelilks, &c. engraven with fuch figures. Hieroglyphics are properly emblems or figns of divine, facred, or lupernatural things \ by which they are di- ftinguilhed from common fymbols, which are figns of fenfible and natural things. Hermes Trifmegiftus is commonly efteemed the in¬ ventor of hieroglyphics : he firft introduced them into the heathen theology, from whence they have been tranfplanted into the Jewifti and Chriftian. Sacred things, fays Hippocrates, Ihould only be communicated to facrcd perfons. Hence it was that the ancient Egyptians communicated to none but their kings and priefts, and thofe who wrere to fucceed to the priefthood and the crown, the fecrets of nature, and the fecrets of their morality and biftory ; and this they did by a kind of cabbala, which, at the fame time that it inftru&ed them, only amufed the reft of the people. Hence the ufe of hieroglyphics, or myftic figures, to veil their morality, politics, &c.^ from pro¬ fane eyes. This author, it may be obferved, and many others, do not keep to the precife character.o.f a hieroglyphic, but apply it to profane as well as divine things. Hieroglyphics are a kind of real chara&er, which do not only denote, but in fome meafure expref^, the things. Thus, according to Clemens Alexandri- nus, Strom, v. a lion is the hieroglyphic of ftrength and fortitude ; a bullock, of agriculture $ a borfe, of liberty ; a fphinx, of fubtilty, &c. Such HIE [ 463 Hierogly- Such Is the opinion that has generally been embraced, both by ancient and modern writers, of the origin and ~ ufe of hieroglyphics. It has been almoft uniformly maintained, that they were invented by the Egyptian prieds in order to conceal their wifdom from the know¬ ledge of the vulgar-, but the late BHhop Warburton hath, with much ingenuity and learning, endeavoured to (how that this account is erroneous. According to this writer, the firft kind of hiero¬ glyphics were mere pi&ures, becaufe the molt natural way of communicating our conceptions by marks or figures was by tracing out the images of things; and this is aftually verified in the cafe of the Mexicans, whofe only method of writing their laws and hiftory was by this picture-writing. But the hieroglyphics invented by the Egyptians were an improvement on this rude and inconvenient effay towards writing, for they contrived to make them both pictures and cha¬ racters. In order to effeCt the improvement, they were obliged to proceed gradually, by firft making ] H I E the principal circumftance of the fubjeCt Hand for the whole as in the hieroglyphics of Horapollo, which reprefent a battle of two armies in array by two hands, one holding a fliield and the other a bow : then put¬ ting the inftrument of the thing, whether real or me¬ taphorical, for the thing itfelf, as an eye and fceptre-to reprefent a monarch, a {hip and pilot the governor of the univerfe, &c.: and finally, by making one thing ftand for or reprefent another, where their obfervations of nature or traditional fuperftitions led them to difcover or imagine any refemblance: thus, the univerfe was defigned by a ferpent in a circle, whofe variegated fpots denoted the ftars ; and a man who had nobly furmount- ed his misfortune was reprefented by the Ikin of the hy¬ aena, becaufe this was fuppofed to furnilh an invulner¬ able defence in battle. The Chinefe writing, he obferves, was the next kind of improvement in the ufe of hieroglyphics. The Egyptians joined charafteriftic marks to images ; the Chinefe threw out the images and retained only the contraCled marks, and from thefe marks proceeded let¬ ters. The general concurrence of different people in this method of recording their thoughts can never be fuppofed to be the effeCt of imitation, finifter views, or chance ; but muft be confidered as the uniform voice of nature fpeaking to the rude conceptions of mankind : for not only the Chinefe of the Eaft, the Mexicans of the Weft, and the Egyptians of the South, but the Scythians likevvife of the North, and the intermediate inhabitants of the earth, viz. the Indians, Phoenicians, Ethiopians, &c. ufed the fame way of writing by pic¬ ture and hieroglyphic. The bilhop farther {hows, that the feveral fpecies of hieroglyphic writing took their rife from nature and neceftity, and not from choice and artifice, by tracing at large the origin and progrefs of the art of fpeech. He proceeds to Ihow how in procefs of time the Egyp¬ tian hieroglyphics came to be employed for the vehicle of myftery. They ufed their hieroglyphics two ways; the one more fun pie, by putting the part for the whole, which wasithe curiologic hieroglyphic j and the other more artificial, by putting one thing of refembling qualities for another, called the tropical hieroglyphic ; thus the moon was fometimes reprefented by a half circle and fometimes by a cynocephalus. They em¬ ployed their proper hieroglyphics to record openly and Hieroglyi plainly their laws, policies, public morals, and hiftory, plucs> and all kinds of civil matters : this is evident from their obelilks, which are full of hieroglyphic characters, de- —y——J ligned to record lingular events, memorable aftions, and new inventions and alfo from the celebrated in- fcription on the temple of Minerva, at Sais, where an infant, an old man, a hawk, a fifti, and a river-horfe, ex- prefled this moral fentence : “ All you who come into the world and go out of it, know this, that the gods hate impudence.” However, the tropical hierogly¬ phics, which were employed to divulge, gradually pro¬ duced fymbols which were defigned to fecrete or con¬ ceal : thus Egypt was fometimes exprefled by the cro¬ codile, fometimes by a burning cenfer with a heart upon it ; where the fimplicity of the firft reprefen- tation and the abftrufeneis of the latter Ihow, that the one was a tropical hieroglyphic for communica¬ tion, and the other a tropical fymbol invented for fecrecy. Enigmatic fymbols were afterwards formed by the afiemblage of different things, or of their properties that were lefs known j and though they might have been intelligible at firrt ; yet when the art of writing was invented, hieroglyphics were more generally dif- ufed, the people forgot the fignification of them, and the priefts, retaining and cultivating the knowledge of them becaufe they were the repofitories of their learn¬ ing and hiftory, at length applied them to the purpofe of preferving the fecrets of their religion. Symbols were the true original of animal-worlhip in Egypt, as Sir John Marfham conjedtures, Can. Chron. p. 58. becaufe in thefe hieroglyphics was recorded the hiftory of their greater deities, their kings, and law¬ givers, reprefented by animals and other creatures. The fymbol of each god was well known and familiar to his worftiippers, by means of the popular paintings and engravings on their temples and other facred mo¬ numents j fo that the fymbol prefenting the idea of the god, and that idea exciting fentiments of religioil^ it was natural for them, in their addreffes to any par¬ ticular god, to turn to his reprefentative mark or fym¬ bol ; elpecially when we confider farther, that the Egyptian priefts feigned a divine original for hierogly¬ phic charadlers, in order to increafe the veneration of the people for them. Ihefe would of courfe bring on a relative devotion to thefe fymbolic figures, which, when it came to be paid to the living animal, would foon terminate in an ultimate worfliip. Another confequence of the facrednefs of the hiero¬ glyphic characters was, that it difpofed the more fu~ perftitious to engrave them on gems, and wear them as amulets or charms. This magical abufe feems not to have been much earlier than the eftablilhed worfhip of the god Serapis, which happened under the Ptole¬ mies, and was firft brought to the general knowledge of the world by certain Chriftian heretics and natives of Egypt, who had mixed a number of Pagan fuper¬ ftitions with their Chriftianity. Thefe gems, called abraxas, are frequently to be met with in the cabinets of the curious, and are engraven with all kinds of hieroglyphic characters; To thefe abraxas-fucceed the talifmans. HIEROGR AMMATISTS, ( Hierogrammateiy, i.e. holy regi/lers, were an order of priefts among the ancient H I E Kierortun- ancient Egyptians, who prefided over learning, and re- cy ligion. They had the care of the hieroglyphics,, and Hierophan- were expofitors of religious doffrines and opinio^ns. tes. They were looked upon as a kind of prophets} and it is pretended, that one of them predidfed to an Egyp¬ tian king, that an Ifraelite (meaning Mofes), eminent for his qualifications and atchievements, would leflen and deprefs the Egyptian monarchy.—The hierogram- matei wTere always near the king, to affift him with their informations and counfels. The better to fit them for this, they made ufe of the fkill and know¬ ledge they had acquired in the flars and the motions of the heavenly bodies, and even of the writings of their predeceffors, wherein their functions and duties were delivered. They were exempted from all civil employments, were reputed the fir ft perfons in dignity next the king, and bore a kind of feeptre in form of a ploughlhafe.- After Egypt became a province, of the Roman empire, the hierogrammatei funk into neglect. . „ HIEROMANCY, in antiquity, that part of divi* ration which predicted future events from obfeiving the various things offered in facrifice4 See Divina¬ tion and Sacrifice. HIEROMNEMON, among the ancient Greeks, fignified a delegate chofen by lot, and lent to the great council of the Amphi&yons, where he. was to take care of wdrat concerned religion. The hieromne- monies wrere reckoned more honourable than the other members of that affembly, the general meetings of tvhich were always fummoned by them, and their names were prefixed to the decrees made by that council. HIEROMNEMON (compofed of “ facred,” and pivYipuv “ one who advertifes or puts in mind of), _ an officer in the ancient Greek church, whofe principal fundion was to ftand behind the patriarch at the fa- «iranients, ceremonies, &c. and {how him the prayers, bfalms, &c. which he was to rehearfe. He alfo clo¬ thed the patriarch in his pontifical robes, and affigned the places of all thofe who had a right to be around him wdren feated on his throne) as the mafter of the ceremonies now' does to the pope. HIERONYMUS. See Jerome. IJIEROPHANTES, or Hierophanta, (from Upoi /io/y, and (pouvopou I appearin antiquity, a prieft among the Athenians. The hierophantes W'as properly the chief perfon that officiated in the Eleufinia, that great folemmty facred to Ceres. _ , This office was firft executed by Eumolpus, and continued in his family for 1200 years, though when any perfon was appointed to this dignity he was requi¬ red always to live in celibacy. St Jerome fays, that the hierophantes extinguilhed the fire of luft by drinking cicuta or the juice of hem¬ lock, or even by making themfelves eunuchs* Apol- lodorus obferves, that it was the hierophantes who in- ilrufted perfons initiated into their religion in the myfteries and duties thereof, and that it w'as hence he derived his name : for the fame reafon he was called firophetes, “ the prophet.” He had officers under him 'to do the fame thing, or to affift him therein, who were alfo called prophetes and exeges, i. e. “ explainers of divine things.” 464 ] HI G To the hierophantes it belonged to drefs and adorn H e’--ihy. the ftatues of the gods, and to bear them in proceffions * * and folemn ceremonies. Highgate. HIEROPHYLAX, an officer in the Greek church —^, who was guardian or keeper of the holy utenfils, veft- ments, &c. anfwering to our facriita or veftry-keeper. HIGH, a term or relation, importing one thing’s being fuperior or above another : thus we fay, a htg/i mountain, the high court of parliament, high relievo, &c. High, in mufic, is fometimes ufed in the fame fenie wdth /oud, and fometimes in the fame fenfe with acute. High Dutch, is the German tongue in its greateft purity, &c. as fpoken in Mifnia, &c. High Operation, in chirurgery, is a method of ex- tradling the ftone ; thus called, becaufe the ftone is taken out at the upper part of the bladder. See Sur¬ gery. High Vlaces, were eminences on which the heathens ufed to worlhip their gods, chofen for that purpole as being fuppofed to be nearer heaven their conftant reii- dence. The Jews are frequently blamed for their at¬ tachment to high-places, after the manner of the Gen¬ tiles j though their profeuchec were frequently upon mountains with groves planted about them. v\ here high-places are reprobated in feripture, therefore, we fhould underftand them as abufed and proftituted to idolatrous purpofes. Before the temple was built, there was indeed nothing in the high-places very con¬ trary to the law, provided God only was adored there, and that no incenfe or viftims wmre offered to idols. Under the judges they feem to have been tolerated •, and Samuel offered facrifices in feveral places befides the tabernacle, where the ark was not preient. Even in David’s time, they facrificed to the Lord at Shilo, Jerufalem, and Gibeon ; but after the temple was built, and a place prepared for the fixed fettlement of the ark, it was no more allowed of to facrifice out of Jerufalem. Solomon, in the beginning of his reign, went a pilgrimage to Gibeon} but from that time we fee no lawful facrifices offered out of the temple. High Priejl. See Pontifex and Priest. High Way, a free paffage for the king’s fubjefts: on which account it is called the king's high way, though the freehold of the foil belong to the owner of the land. Thofe ways that lead from one town to an¬ other, and fuch as are drift or cart ways, and are for all travellers in great roads, or that communicate with them, are high wrays only} and as to their reparation, are under the care of furveyors. HIGH-WAY-MEN, are robbers on the high way \ for the apprehending and taking of whom, a reward of 40I. is given by the ftatute of 4 and 5 W. and M. to be paid within a month after convi&ion by the theriff of the county ; to which the ftatute 8 Geo. II. cap. 6. fuperadds 1 oh to be paid by the hundred indemnified by fuch taking. ' HIGHAM FERRERS, an ancient borough of North- amptonftiire in England, which has its name from the family of the Ferrers, to whom it formerly belonged, and who had a caftle in its neighbourhood. It fends one member to parliament. E. Long. 1. 40. N. Lat. 52. 2o. HIGHGATE, a village five miles north of Lon¬ don. It has its name from its high lituation, and trom 2 h I G [ 46s ] H I G Hig-Mand- a gate fet up there about 400 years ago, to receive L eis‘ toll for the bifhop of London, when the old miry road from Gray’s-Inn lane to Barnet wras turned through the biilrop’s park. There wras a hermitage where the fchapel now Hands j and one of the hermits earned a caufeway to be made between Highgate and Iflington, with gravel dug out of the top of the hill, where there is now a pond. Near the chapel, in 1562, lord chief baron Cholmondely built and endowed a free fchool, which was enlarged in 1570 by Edwin Sandys bilhop of London.— This village is a noted and airy retirement for the gentry and wealthy citizens *, and is a place of good accommodation, beiides its affording a delightful and pieafant prolpedt over the city and adjacent coun- try. HIGHLANDERS, a general appellation for the inhabitants of the mountainous parts of any country. In Britain, the name is appropriated to the people who inhabit the mountainous parts of Scotland, to the north and noith-well, including thofe of the Hebrides or Weftern illes.— They are a branch of the ancient Celtas , and undoubtedly the defeendants of the firit inhabitants of Britain, as appears from the many mo¬ numents of their language Hill retained in the mofl an¬ cient names of places in all parts of the illand. The Highlanders, or, as they are often termed by ancient authors, the Caledonians, were always a brave, warlike, and hardy race of people ; and, in the remoteH times, feem to have pefieffed a degree of refinement in fenti- ment and manners then unknown to the other nations that furrounded them. This appears not only from their own traditions and poems, but alfo from the teHimony of many ancient authors. This civilization was probably owing in a great mealure to the order of the bards, or Druids, and fome other inHitutions peculiar to this people, The ancient Highlanders lived in the hunting Hate till fome time after the era of Fingal, who was one of their kings towards the clofe of the third century. For fome ages after that, they turned their chief attention to the pailoral life, which afforded a lefs precarious lubfiflence. Till of late, agriculture in moil parts of the Highlands made but little progrefs. Ihe Highlanders always enjoyed a king and go¬ vernment of their oum, till Kenneth 1YTAlpine (anno #45)> having fubdued the Pi&ifh kingdom, transferred thither the feat of royalty. This event proved very unfavourable to the virtues of the High¬ landers, which from this period began to decline. The country, no longer awed by the prefence of the foyereign, fell into anarchy and confufion. The chief¬ tains began to extend their authority, to form fa&ions, and to foment divifions and feuds between contending clans. The laws were either too feeble to bind them, or too remote to take notice of them. Hence fprung all thole evils which long difgraced the country, and dilturbed the peace of its inhabitants. Robbery or plunder, providing it was committed on any one of an advene clan or tribe, was countenanced and authorifed j and their reprifals on one another were perpetual. I hus quarrels were handed down from one generation to another, and the whole clan were bound in honour to efpoufe the caufe of every individual that belonged to it. By this means the genius of the people was greatly altered j and the Highlanders of a few apes Vol. X. Part II. back were almoft as remarkable for their irregular and Highland- diforderly way of life as their predeceffors were for. ers . their civilization and virtue. It is from not attending y to this diHinftion between the ancient Highlanders and their poHerity in later times, that many have doubted the exiflence of thofe exalted virtues aferibed by their poets to the more ancient inhabitants of the country. But now that the power of the chieftains is again abo- lithed, law eflablilhed, and property fecured, the genius of the people (where it is not hindered by fome other extraneous caufe) begins again to Ihow itfelf in its ge¬ nuine colours 5 and many of their ancient virtues begin to fliine with confpicuous luHre. Jultice, generofity, honelty, friendihip, peace, and love, are perhaps no¬ where more cultivated than among this people. But one of the HrongeH features which marked the charac¬ ter of the Highlanders in every age, was their hofpita- lity and benevolence to Hrangers. At night the tra¬ veller was always fure to find a hearty welcome in whatever houfe he fliould go to j and the hoH thought himielf happier in giving the entertainment than the gueH in receiving it. Even with regard to their ene¬ mies, the laws of hofpitality wTere obferved with the molt facred regard. They who fought againH each other in the day, could in the night feaft, and even lleep together, in the fame houfe. From the fame principle, they were, in moH other cafes, fo faithful to their trull, that they rarely betrayed any confi¬ dence repofed in them. A promife they thought as binding as an oath, and held it equally inviolable and facred. The Caledonians in all ages have been much addicted to poetry and mufic. The poems of Otfian, fo uni- verfally repeated, and fo highly edeemed by every Highlander, are a flrong proof of the early proficiency of this people in the poetical art. Even to this day, notwithdanding the many difadvantages they labour under, the mofl illiterate of either fex difeover fre¬ quently a genius for poetry, which often breaks forth in the mofl: natural and Ample ftrains, when love, grief, joy, or any other fubjedl of fong, demands it. Where- ever their circumflances are fo eafy as to allow them any refpite from toil, or any cheerfulnefs of fpirits, a good portion of their time, eipecially of the winter- nights, is ftill devoted to the fong and tale. This laft fpecies of compofition is chiefly of the novel-kind, and is handed down by tradition like their poems. It was the work of the bards j and proved, while they exifled, no contemptible entertainment. But fmee the extin£lion of that order, both the Gaelic poems and tales are in a great meafure either loft or adulterated. —The genius and chara&er of the Gaelic poetry is •well known. It is tender, Ample, beautiful, and fublime. Among the ancient Highlanders, the harp was the chief inftrument of mufic. It Anted the mildnefs of their manners, and was well adapted to the peace and quiet which they enjoyed under their own kings. In a later period, however, when the conftant quarrels of their chiefs, and the endlefs feuds of contending clans, turned all their thoughts to war, it was forced to give place to the bag-pipe, an inftrument altogether of the martial kind, and therefore well fuited to the ftate of the country at that time. But ever Ance the caufe which had brought this inftrument in vogue has ceafed 3 N to Highland¬ ers. H I G [466 to operate, the attention to it has been on the decline •, fo that the harp, with very little encouragement, might again refume the feat from which it was once expelled. „The mod, and efpecially the oldeft of the High¬ land mufic, having been compofed to the harp, is of a foft, tender, and elegiac call, as belt fuited to the p-enius of that initrument. Thefe pieces are generally expreflive of the paffions of love and grief. Other pieces, which were compofed in their Hate of w7ar, and adapted to a different inftrument, are altogether bold and martial. And many are of a fprightly and cheerful call, the offspring of mirth, and the fport of fancy in the feafon of feftivity. Many of thefe Lft are of the chorus kind : and are fung in almofl all the exercifes in which a number of people are engaged, fuch as rowdng, reaping, fulling, &c. Phe time of thefe pieces is adapted to the exercifes to which they are refpeaively fung. They greatly forward the work and alleviate the labour. The particular mufic which generally ufed by the Highlanders in their dances ] H I G is well known by the name of Strathfpey reels. Xhe language of the Highlanders is llill the Gaehc j which, with many of their cufloms and manners, has been fecured to them by their mountains and faftneffes, amidft the many revolutions which the reft of the ifiand has undergone in fo long a courfe of ages. The Gaelic feems to be the oldeft and pureft dialed! which remains of the Celtic, as appears from its approach* ino- the neareft to the names of places, &c. which that language left in moft countries where it prevailed, and from its moft obvious affinity to thofe tongues, ancient or modern, which have been in any meafure derived from the old Celtic. The Gaelic has all the marks of an original and primitive language. Moft of the words are expreflive of feme property or quality of the ob- iedls which they denote. This, together with the variety of its founds (many of which, efpecially ot thofe that exprefs the foft and mournful paffions, are peculiar to itfelf), renders it highly adapted for poetry It is generally allowed to have been the language oi court; in Scotland, till the reign of Malcolm Canmore. The Gaelic epithet of Can-more, or ‘4 large_ head,” by which this king is diftinguithed, feems to intimate fo much. In feme particular parliaments at leaft, it was fpoken much later, as in that held by Robert the Bruce at Ardchattan. That it has been formerly a good deal cultivated, appears from the ftyle and com¬ plexion of its poems and tales, and from feveral. an¬ cient MSS. that have come down to the prefent time. To ftrangers the Gaelic has a forbidding afpeft, on ac¬ count of the number of its quiefeent confonants (which are retained to mark the derivation of words and their variation in cafe and tenfe), but its found is abun¬ dantly mufical and harmonious j and its genius ftrong and mafeuline. Its alphabet confifts of 18 letters, ot which one is an afpirate, 1 2 are confonants, and five are vowels. The Highlanders are beginning of late to apply to learning, agriculture, and efpecially to commerce, for which their country, everywhere indented with arms of the fea, is peculiarly favourable. Cattle is the chief ftaple of the country j but it produces more grain than would fupply its inhabitants, if fo much of it were not confumed in whitky. The natives are beginning to avail themfelves of their mines, woods, wool, and filheries1, and by a vigorous application, with Highmore.^ the due encouragement of government, may become a v "'" profperous and uleful people. The Highlanders are of a quick and penetrating ge¬ nius, ftrongly tin6fured ■ with a curiofity or thirl! of knowledge, which difpofes them to learn any thing very readily. They are adlive and induftrious, where oppreffion does not difeourage them by fecluding even the hope of thriving. They are remarkably bold and adventurous, which qualifies them for being excellent feamen and foldiers. They are generally of a middle fize, rather above it than otherwife; their eyes are brifk and lively, their features diftinftly marked, and their perfons tight and wTell made. I heir countenance is open and ingenuous, and their temper frank and communicative. HIGHMORE, Jc^RFH, Efq. an eminent painter, was boin in the panfh of St James's, Garlickhithe, London, June 13. 1692, being the third fon of Mr Edward Highmore, a coal-merchant in Thames-ftreet. Having fuch an early and ftrong inclination to paint¬ ing, that he could think of nothing elfe with pleaiure, his father endeavoured to gratify him in a propolal to his uncle, who was ferjeant-painter to King William, and with whom Mr (afterwards Sir James) Thornhill had ferved his apprenticelhip. But this was afterwards for good reafons declined, and he was articled as clerk to an attorney, July 18th 1707-, but fo much again!!, his own declared inclination, that in about three yeais he began to form refolutions of indulging his natural difpoliticn to his favourite art, having continually em¬ ployed his leifure hours in defigning, and in the ftudy of geometry, perfpedlive, architedlure, and anatomy, but without any inftrudlors except books. He had afterwards an opportunity of improving himfelf in ana¬ tomy, by attending the ledftures of Mr Chefelden, be- fides entering himfelf at the painters academy in Great Oueen-ftreet, where he drew 10 years, and had the honour to be particularly noticed by Sir God¬ frey Kneller, who diftinguiffied him by the name of “ the Young Lawyer.” On June 13th 17I4> clerkffiip expired j and on March 26th lytji .^e' gan painting as a profeftion, and fettied in the C1)y* In the fame year Dr Brook Taylor publilhed his “ Li¬ near Perfpedtive: or, a new method of reprefenting juftly all manner of objeas as they appear to the eye in all fituations.” On this complete and univerfal theory our artift grounded his fubfequent praaice *, and it has been generally allowed, that few, if any, of the proiel- fion at that time wTere fo thorough mafters of that ex¬ cellent but intricate fyftem. In 1716, he ^married Mifs Sufanna Hiller, daughter and heirefs of Mr An¬ thony Hiller of Effingham in Surrey a young lady in every refpedl worthy of his choice. For Mr. Chefe.l- den’s “ Anatomy of the Human body,” publiffied in 1722, he made drawings from the real fubjediS at the time of diffedlion, two of which were engraved for that work, and appear, but without his name, in tables xii. and xiii. In the fame year, on the exhibition of « The Confcious Lovers,” written by Sir Richard Steele, Mr Highmore addreffed a letter to the author on the limits of filial obedience, pointing out a mate¬ rial defedf in the charadler of Bevil, wdth that clear- nefs and precifion for which, in converfation and wri¬ ting, he was always remarkable, as die pencil by no means H I G [ 467 ] H I G Highmore, means engroffed his whole attention. His reputation '—-v 1 and bufinefs increafing, he took a more confpicuous ftation, by removing to a houfe in Lincoln’s-Inn Fields, in March 1723-45 and an opportunity foon of¬ fered of introducing him advantageoufly to the nobi¬ lity, &c. by his being defired, by Mr Pine the en¬ graver, to make the drawings for his prints of the knights of the bath, on the revival of that order ia 1725. In confequence, feveral of the knights had their portraits alfo by the fame hand, fome of them whole lengths 5 and the duke of Richmond, in particular, was attended by his three efquires, with a perfpec- tive view of King Henry Vllth’s chapel. This capi¬ tal pifture is now at Godwood. And our artift was fent for to St James’s by George I. to drawT the late duke of Cumberland, from which Smith fcraped a mez- zotinto. In 1728, Mr Hawkins Browne, then of Lincoln’s- Jnn, who had ever a juft fenfe of his talents and abili¬ ties, addreifed to him a poetical epiftle “ On Defign and Beauty 5” and, fome years after, an elegant Latin Ode, both now collefted in his poems. In the fum- mer of 1732, Mr Highmore vifited the continent, in company with Dr Pemberton, Mr Benjamin Robins, and two other friends, chiefly with a view of feeing the gallery of pidlures belonging to the eleftor Palatine at Duffeldorp, colle&ed by Rubens, and fuppofed the heft in Europe. At Antwerp alfo he had peculiar pleafure in contemplating the works of his favourite mafter. In their return they vifited the principal towns in Holland. In 1734, he made a like excurfion, but alone, to Paris, where he received great civilities from his countrymen then there, particularly the duke of Kingfton, Dr Hickman (his tutor), Robert Knight, Efq. (the late caflrier), &c. Here he had the fatis- faftion of being (hown, by Cardinal de Polignac, his famous group of antique ftatues, the court of Lyco- medes, then juft brought from Rome, and fince pur- chafed by the king of Pruflia, and deftroyed at Char- lottenbourg in 1760 by the Ruffians. In 1742, he had the honour to paint the late prince and princefs of Wales for the duke of Saxe Gotha; as he did fome years after the late queen of Denmark for that court. The publication of “ Pamela,” in 1744, gave rife to a fet of paintings by Mr Highmore, which were en¬ graved by two French engravers, and publifhed by fubfcription in 1745. In the fame year he painted the only original of the late General Wolfe, then about 18. His Pamela introduced him to the acquaintance and friendfhip of the excellent author whole pifture he drew, and for whom he painted the only original of Dr Young. In 1750 he had'the misfortune to lofe his wife. On the firft inftitution of the academy of painting, fculpture, &c. in 1753, he wras elefted one of the profeflbrs 5 an honour which, on account of his many avocations, he defired to decline. In 1754 he publilhed “ A critical examination of thofe two Paintings [by Rubens] on the Ceiling of the Ban- queting-houfe at Whitehall, in which Archite&ure is introduced, fo far as relates to Perfpedlive 5 to¬ gether with the Difcufiion of a Queftion which has been the Subjeft of Debate among Painters print¬ ed in 410. In the folution of this queftion, he pro- ^ed thcjt Rubens and feveral other great painters were miftaken in the pra&ice, and Mr Kirby and fe- Highmore, veral other authors in the theory. And in the 17th volume of the “ Monthly Review,” he animadverted (anonymoufly) on Mr Kirby’s unwarrantable treat¬ ment of Mr Ware, and detefted and expofed his er¬ rors, even when he exults in his own fuperiof fcience. Of the many portraits which Mr Highmore painted, in a large prattice of 46 years (of which feveral have been engraved), it is impoflible and ufelefs to difcufs particulars. Some of the moft capital in the hiftorical branch, which w^as then much lefs cultivated than it is at prefent, fliall only be mentioned, viz. “ Hagar and Ilhmael,” a prefent to the Foundling-hofpital : “ The good Samaritan,” painted for Mr Shepherd of Camp- fey Alh : “ The finding of Mofes,” purchafed at his fale by Colonel (now General) Lifter: “ The Harlowe family, as defcribed in Clarilfa,” now in the poffeflion of Thomas Watkinfon Payler, Efq. at Heden in Kent: “ Clariffa,” the portrait mentioned in that work : “ The Graces unveiling Nature,” drawn by memory from Rubens : “ The Clementina of Grandifon, and the queen mother of Edw'ard IV. with her younger fon, &c. in Weftminfter-abbey the three lalt irrthc pofleffion of his fon. In 1761, on the marriage of his daughter to the reverend Mr Duncombe, fon to one of his oldeft friends, he took a refolution of retiring from bufinefs, and difpofing of his colle&ion of pictures, which he did by auftion, in March 1762, and foon after removed to his fon-in-lawr’s at Canterbury, where he palfed the re¬ mainder of his life wdthout ever revifiting the metro¬ polis. But though he had laid down the pencil, he never wanted employment : fo aftive and vigorous w^as his mind, that, with a conftitntional flow of fpirits, and a relilh for inftruftive fociety, he was never lefs “ alone than when aloneand, befides his profeflion- al purfuits above mentioned, to philofophy, both na¬ tural and moral, and alfo divinity, he laudably dedica¬ ted his time and attention. No man had more clear- nefs and precifion of ideas, or a more ardent defire to know the truth 5 and, when known, confcientioufly to purfue it. With ftrong paflions, ever guided by the ftri&eft virtue, he had a tender, fufceptible heart, always open to the diftrefs of his fellow-creatures, and always ready to relieve them. His capital work of the literary kind w^as! his “ Practice of perfpe&ive, on the principles of Dr Brook Taylor, &c.” written many years before, but not publilhed till 1763, when it was printed for Nourfe, in one vol. qto. This not only evinced his fcientific knowledge of the fulqeft, but removed, by its perfpicuity, the only objedHon that can be made to the fyftem of Dr Taylor. It ac¬ cordingly received, from his friends and the intelligent public, the applaufes it deferved. In 1765 he pub- liflied (without his name) Obfervations on a Pamph¬ let entitled, “ Chriftianity not founded on Argument 5” in which, after ftiowing that it is a continued irony, and lamenting that fo ample a field (hould be offered the author of it for the difplay of his fophiftry ; he gives up creeds, articles, and catechifms, as out-works raifed by fallible men, and, confining himfelf to the de¬ fence of the gofpel, or citadel, fhowrs, that pure primi¬ tive Chriftianity, though affaulted by infidels, will ever remain impregnable. His opinion of Rubens may be 3 N 2 feen H I G ilighmore.leen in the Gentleman’s Magazine for p. 353, Highneft. un(jer title of “ Remarks on lome paflages in Mr ^ Webb’s inquiry into the Beauties of painting, &c.” In the lame year he publilhed, with only his initials, “ J. H.” two fmall volumes of “ Ellays, moral, religi¬ ous, and and mifcellaneous 5 with aTranllation in prole of Mr Browne’s Latin Poem on the Immortality of the Soulfelefled from a large number written at his lei- fure, at different periods of life. “ As fuch (lays Dr Hawkefworth) they do the author great credit. rihey are not excurfions of fancy, but efforts of thought, and indubitable indications of a vigorous and adtive mind.” In the Gentleman’s Magazine for 17^9> P' communicated “ A natural and obvious Manner of condrucfing Sun-dials, deduced from the Situation and Motion of the Earth with refpedl to the Sun,” explained by a fcheme. And in that for 177^1 P* 52^» his remarks on colouring, fuggelled by way of a note on the “ Epiftle to an eminent Painter,” will Ihow that his talents were by no means impaired at the age of 86. Indeed he retained them to the laft, and had even ftrength and fpirits fulficient to enable him to ride out daily on horfeback the fummer before he died. A ftrong conlfitution, habitual temperance, and con- ifant attention to his health in youth as well as in age, prolonged his life, and preferved his faculties to his 88th year, when he gradually ceafed to breathe, and, as it were, fell alleep on March 3. 1780. He was in¬ terred in the fouth aille of Canterbury cathedral, lea¬ ving one fon, Anthony, educated in his own profelfionj and a daughter, Sufanna, mentioned above. His abilities as a painter appear in his works, which will not only be admired by his contemporaries, but by their pollerity j as his tints, like thofe of Rubens and Vandyck, inftead of being impaired, are improved by time, wThich fome of them have now withftood above 60 years. His idea of beauty, when he indul¬ ged his fancy, was of the highelt kind j and his know¬ ledge of perfpedlive gave him great advantages in fa¬ mily-pieces, of which he painted more than any one of his time. He could take a likenefs by memory as well as by a fitting, as appears by his picture of the duke of Lorrain (the late emperor), which Faber en¬ graved j and thofe of King George II. (in York-af- iembly-room) j Queen Caroline, the two Mifs Gun¬ nings, &c. Like many other great painters, he had “ a poet for his friend,” in the late Mr Browne ; to which may be added a poem addreffed to him in 17 26, by the reverend Mr Bunce, at that time of Trinity- hall, Cambridge, who fucceeded Mr Highmore, and in 1780 was vicar of St Stephen’s near Canterbury.^ HIGHNESS, a quality or title of honour given to princes.—The kings of England and Spain had formerly no other title but that of highnefs \ the firlt till the time of James I. and the fecond till that of C arles V. The petty princes of Italy began firft to be complimented with the title of highnefs in the year 1630.—The duke of Orleans aflumed the title of royal highnefs in the year 1631, to diftinguith himfelf from the other princes of France. The duke of Savoy, afterwards king of Sardinia, bore the title of royal highnefs, on account of his preten- fions to the kingdom of Cyprus.-—It is faid that duke only took the title of royal highnefs, to put himfelf [ 468 J H I L above the duke of Florence, who was called great duke; but the great duke afterwards aflumed the title of royal highnefs, to put himfelf on a level with the duke of Savoy. The prince of Conde fir ft took the title of mof ferene highnefs, leaving that of fimple highnefs to the natural princes. HILARIA, in antiquity, feafts celebrated every year by the Romans on the 8th of the kalends of April, or the 25th of March, in honour of Cybele the mother of the gods. The hilaria were folemnized with great pomp and rejoicing. Every perfon drelfed bimfelf as he pleafed, and took the marks or badges of wdiatever dignity or quality he had a fancy for. The ftatue of the god- dels was carried in proceffion through the ftreets ol the city, accompanied by multitudes in the moft fplendid attire. The day before the feftival wTas fpent in tears and mourning. Cybele reprefented the earth, which at this time of the year begins to feel the kindly Hilaria warmth of the Ipring 5 fo that this ludden tranfition from lorrow to joy was an emblem of the viciilitude of the feafons, which lucceed one another. The Romans took this feaft originally from the Greeks, who called it q. d. afcenfus; the eve of that day they fpent in tears and lamentations, and thence denominated it KX'rxZxtns, defcenjus. Afterwards, the Greeks took the name from the Romans ; as appears from Photius, in his extradl of the life of the philofopher Ifidore. Cafaubon maintains, that befide this particular figni- fication, the wwd hilaria was alfo a general name for any joyful or feftival day, whether public or private and domeftic. But Salmafius does not allow of this. ^ » Triftan, tom. i. p. 482, diftinguifhes between hilaria and hilarise. The former, according to him, rvere public rejoicings j and the latter, prayers made in confequence thereof; or even of any private feaft or rejoicing, as a marriage, &c. rIhe public lafted feve- ral days j during which, all mourning and funeral ce¬ remonies wTere fufpended. HILARIUS, an ancient father of the Chriftian church, who fiourifhed in the 4th century. He wTas born, as St Jerome informs us, at Poidliers, of a good family j who gave him a liberal education in the Pa¬ gan religion, and which he did not forlake till he was arrived at maturity. He wras advanced to the bi- fhopric of Poiaiers in the year 355, according to Ba¬ ronins : and became a moft zealous champion for the orthodox faith, particularly againft the iirians, who were at that time gaining ground in France. He af- fembled feveral councils there, in which the determi¬ nations of the (ynods of Rimini and Seleucia wrere con¬ demned. He wrote a treatife concerning fynods j and a famous work in 12 books on the Trinity, which is much admired by the orthodox believers. He died in the latter end of the year 367. His works have been many times publilhed •, but the laft and bed edition of them was given by the Benediflines at Paris in 1693. HILARODI, in the ancient mufic and poetry, a fort of poets among the Greeks, who wrent about fing- ing little gay poems or fongs, fomewhat graver than the Ionic pieces, accompanied w'ith fome inftrument. From the ftreets they were at laft introduced into tragedy. H I L [ 469 ] H I L Hilary tragedy, as the magodi were into comedy. They !i appeared dreffed in white, and were crowned with Hl11' , gold. At firft they wore ihoes 5 but afterwards they aftumed the crepida, being only a foie tied over with a ftrap. HILARY-term. Term. H1LDESHEIM, a fmall diftridl of Germany, in the circle of Lower Saxony. It lies between the du¬ chies of Lunenburg and Brunfwick \ and may be about ♦ 25 miles from eaft to weft, and 36 from north to fouth. It is watered by the rivers Leine and Innerfty. The (oil is fertile 5 and its principal places are Peine, Sar- iled, Bruggen, and Alveld. Hildeftieim, from whence . it takes its name, is governed as an imperial city. Its bilhop is now elector of Cologne. Hildesheim, a ftrong city of Germany, in Lower Saxony, with a Roman Catholic biftiop’s fee, whofe bifnop is fovereign. It is a free imperial city, though in lome things dependent on the biihop. It is a large town, well built and fortified. It is divided into the Old Town asd the New, which have each their fepa- rate council. It is feated on the river Irneft, in E. Long. 10. o. N. Lat. 52. 17. HILL, a term denoting any confiderable eminence on the earth’s furface. It is fometimes fynonymous with the word mountain; though generally it denotes only the leffer eminences, the word mountain being particularly applied to the very largeft. See Moun¬ tain, Geology Index. Hill, Aaron, a poet of confiderable eminence, the fon of a gentleman of Malmefbury-abbey in Wilt- ftiire, was born in 1685. His father’s imprudence having cut off his paternal inheritance, he left Weftminfter fchool at 14 years of age j and embarked for Conftan- tinople, to vifit Lord Paget the Engliftr ambaffador there, who was his diftant relation. Lord Paget recei¬ ved him with furprife and pleafure, provided him a tu¬ tor, and fent him to travel: by which opportunity he : inculcating the belief of an eternal and omnipotent Be¬ ing ; their fubordinate deities Brimha, Vifhnou, and Sheevah, being only reprefentatives of the wifdom, goodnefs, and power, of the fupreme God Brama. All created things they fuppofe to be, types of the at¬ tributes of Brama, whom they call the principle of truth, the fpirit of wifdom, and the fupreme being ; fo that it is probable that all their idols were at firfl only defigned to reprefent thefe attributes. There are a variety of fedls among the Hindoos : two great clalfes we have mentioned already, viz. the worfhippers of Vifhnou, and thofe of Sheevah *, and thefe diflinguifh themfelves, the former by painting their faces with an horizontal line, the latter by a per¬ pendicular one. There is, however, very little diffe¬ rence in point of religion between thefe or any other Hindoo fefls. All of them believe in the immortality of the foul, a flate of future rewards and punifnments, and tranfmigration. Charity and hofpitality are in¬ culcated in the flrongefl manner, and exifl among them not only in theory but in practice. “ Hofpitality (fay they) is commanded to be exercifed even towards an enemy, when he cometh into thine houfe ; the tree doth not withdraw its ffiade even from the wood-cut¬ ter. Good men extend their charity even to the vileil animals. The moon doth not withhold her light even from the Chandala.” Thefe pure doclrines, however, are intermixed with fome of the vilefl and mofl abfurd [ 472 ] H I N their ufe, fuperflitions ; and along with the true God they wor- Hindoos. ffiip a number of inferior ones, of whom the principal v 1 are : 4 x. Bawaney, the mother of the gods, already men-Account of tioned. and fuperior to all but Brama himfelf} but all the'r Pr‘.n* ties. Different Tedts. the other goddeffes are reckoned inferior to their godsJ;‘Pa or lords. 2. Brimha, in the Shanfcrit language faid to mean “ the wifdom of God and who is fuppofed to fly on the wings of the hanfe or flamingo ; an image of which is conflantly kept near that of the god in the temple where he is worlhipped. He has a crown on his head, and is reprefented with four hands. In one of thefe he holds a feeptre, in another the facred books or Ve- dam, in the third a ring or circle as the emblem of eternity, fuppofed to be employed in affifling and pro- tedling his Works. 3. Serafwatej, the goddefs or wife of Brimha, pre- fides over mufic, harmony, eloquence, and invention. She is alfo faid to be the inventrefs of the letters called Devanagry, by which the divine will was firil promul¬ gated among mankind. In the argument of an hymn addreffed to this goddefs, fhe is fuppofed to have a number of inferior deities adling in fubordination to her. Thefe are called Rags, and prefide over each mode, and likewife over each of the feafons. Thefe feafons in Hindoflan are fix in number; viz. 1. The Seefar, or dewy feafon. 2. Heemai, or the cold fea- fon. 3. Vafant, the mild feafon or fpring. 4. Grefsh- ma, or the hot feafon. 5. Varfa, the rainy feafon. 6. Sarat, the breaking up or end of the rains. The Rags, in their mufical capacity, are accompa¬ nied each with five Ragnies, a kind of female deities or nymphs of harmony. Each of thefe has eight fons or genii; and a diflindl feafon is appointed for the mufic of each rag, during which only it can be fung or play¬ ed ; and this at diflindl or dated hours of the day or night. A feventh mode of mufic belonging to Deipec, or Cupid the inflamer, is faid once to have ex- illed, but now to be loll; and a mufician, who attempt¬ ed to reflore it, to have been confumed with fire from heaven. 4. Viflmou, the mofl celebrated of all the Indian deities, is fuppofed to fly or ride on the garoora, a kind of large brown kite, which is found in plenty in the neighbourhood ; and on which Viflmou is feme- times reprefented as fitting ; though at others he is reprefented on a ferpent with a great number of diffe¬ rent heads. At fome of his temples the Bramins accuflom all the birds they can find, of the fpecies above mentioned, to come and be fed ; calling them by linking upon a brafs plate. This deity is faid to have had ten different incarnations to deflroy the giants with which the earth wTas infeiled ; and in thefe he is reprefented in as many different figures, all of which are to the lafl degree fantaflic and monflrous. His common form is that of a man with four hands, and a number of heads fet round in a circle, fuppofed to be emblems of omnifcience and omnipotence. In his firft incarnation he is reprefented as coming out of the mouth of a fifh, with feveral hands containing fwords, &c. In another he has the head of a boar with mon- ftrous tufks, beating a city in the air, and Hands upon a vanquifhed giant with horns on his bead. In others of his incarnations, he has the head of a horfe or other animals. H I N L 473 3 H I N ISindoos. ajiimals, with a great number of arm's brandiiiing ' fwords, &c. In fome parts of his charader this deity is repre- fented not ars a deftroyer, but a preferver of mankind ; and he is then diftinguiihed by the name of Hary, Birtiop Wilkins defcribes an image of him in this cha- ra£ter at a place named Jehan-queru, a fmall rocky illand of the Ganges in the province of JBahar. This image is of a gigantic lize, recumbent on a coiled ferpent, ■whofe numerous heads are twilled by the artill into a kind of canopy over the lleeping god, and from each of its mouths iffues a forked tongue, as threatening de- ifru£lion to thofe who (hould dare to approach. 5. Shee-vah is reprefented under a human form, though frequently varied, as is alfo his name ; but he is moll frequently called Shcevah and Mahadeg. In his dellroying charafter he is reprefented as a man with a fierce look, and with a fnake twilled round his neck. He is thought to prelide over good and evil fortune, in token of which he is reprefented with a crefcent on his head. He rides upon an ox. 6. Vikrama, the god of vidlory, is faid to have had a particular kind of facrifice offered to him, fomewhat like the fcape-goat of the Jews, viz. by letting a horfe loofe in the forell, and not employing him again. 7. Yatn Rajah, or Darham Rajah, is reprefented as the judge of the dead, and ruler of the infernal regions, in a manner fimilar to the Minos and Pluto of the an¬ cient Greeks. He is the fon of Sour, “ the fun,” by Bi/oohama daughter of the great architedl of the hea¬ venly manlions, and patron of artificers. He rides upon a buffalo, with a fceptre in his hand, having two aflillants, Chiter and Gopt; the former of whom re¬ ports the good, and the latter the bad a£lions of men. Thefe are attended by two genii, who watch every in¬ dividual of the human race 5 Chiter’s fpy being on the right, and Gopt’s on the left. The fouls of deceafed perfons are carried by the jambouts or mef- fengers of death into the prefence of Darham, where their adlions are inllantly proclaimed, and fentence paf- fed accordingly. The infernal manfions are named by the Hindoos Narehha, and are divided into a great number of places, according to the degrees of punilh- ment to be endured by the criminal •, but eternal pu- nilhment for any offence is fuppofed to be inconfiltent wfith the goodnefs of God. Inltead of this, the Hin¬ doos fuppofe, that after the fouls of the wicked have been punilhed long enough in Narekha, they are fent back into the world to animate other bodies either of men or bealls, according to circumltances. Thofe who have lived a life partly good and partly-bad, are likewife fent back to this wrorld ; and thefe trials and tranfmigrations are repeated till they be thoroughly purged of all inclination to fin. But as for thofe holy men who have fpeat their lives in piety and devotion, they are inftantly conveyed by the genii to the man- lions of celeftial blifs, where they are abforbed into the univerfal fpirit •, a ftate, according to every idea we can form, equivalest to annihilation ! 8. Krifhen and the nine Gopia, among the Hindoos, correfpond with Apollo and the nine mufes of the Greeks. I his deity is reprefented as a young man fometimes playing on a flute. He has a variety of names, and is fuppofed to be of a very amorous com¬ plexion, having once refided in a diffridt named Birge, Vol. X. Part II. where he embraced almoff all the women in the coun- Hindoas. try. From his refidence here, or from thefe amorous exploits, he is fometimes called Birge-put. 9. Kanuc-dcva, the god of love, is laid to be the fon of Maya, or the general attradlive power 5 married to Retty, or slffeEiion. He is reprefented as a beautiful youth, fometimes converfing with his mother or con- lort in his temples or gardens $ at other times riding on a parrot by moonlight : And Mr Forfler informs us, that on the taking of Tanjore by the Englifli, a cu¬ rious pifture wTas found, reprefenting him riding on an elephant, the body of which was compcfed of feven young women twilled together in fuch a manner as to reprefent that enormous animal. This is fuppofed to be a device of a fimilar nature with that of the Greeks, wdro placed their Eros upon a lion ; thus intimating, that love is capable of taming the fierce!! of animals. 'The bo\v of this deity is faid to be of fugar-cane, or of flowers, and the firing of bees : he has five arrows, each of them tipped wuth an Indian bloffom of an heating nature. His enfign is a filh on a red ground, carried by the foremofi of his attendant nymphs or dancing girls. 10. Lingam, correfponding to the Priapus or Phal¬ lus of the ancients, is worfliipped by the Hindoos in order to obtain fecundity. This deity is adorned the more fervently, as they depend on their children for performing certain ceremonies to their manes, which they imagine will mitigate their puniihment in the next world. The devotees of the god go naked, but are fuppofed to be fuch fandlified perfons, that women may approach them without any danger. They vow perpetual chafiity j and death is the confequence of a breach of their vow. Hulhands whofe waves are bar¬ ren invite them to their houfes, where certain cere¬ monies, generally thought to be effedtual, are per* formed. Befides thefe, there is a number of other gods whofe charadler is lefs eminent ; though it feems not to be afeertained diftindlly, even by the Hindoos themfelves, what particular rank each deity holds with refpedl to another. Some of thefe deities arc, 11. Narcd, the fon of Brimha, and inventor of a fretted inftru- ment named Vene. 12. Lechmy, the goddefs of plen¬ ty, and wife of Vifhnou. 13. Gowry, Ka/q, from Ka/a “ time j” the wife of Sheevah, and goddefs of defirudlion. 14. Varoona, the god of the feas and waters, riding on a crocodile. 15. Vayoo, the god of the winds, riding on an antelope with a fabre in his hand. j6. Agnee, the god of fire, riding on a ram. 17. Vafoodka, a goddefs reprefenting the earth. 18. Pakreety, or nature, reprefented by a beau¬ tiful young woman. 19. Sour or Shan, the fun 5 call¬ ed alfo the king of the liars and planets, reprefented as. fitting in a chariot drawn by one horfe, fometimes with feven and fometimes with twelve heads. 20. Sangia, the mother of the river Jumna, and wife of the fun. 21. Chandava, the moon, in a chariot drawn by antelopes, and holding a rabbit in her right hand. 22. Vreekafpaty, the god of learning, attended by beau- tiful young nymphs, named Veedyadhares, or profeffors of fcience. 23. Ganes, the god of prudence and poli¬ cy, worfliipped before the undertaking of any thing of confequence. 24. Fame, reprefented by a ferpent with a great number of tongues ; and known by feveral 3 O names-. Hindoos. Their de¬ migods. Manner of worfhip. 7 Their de ',’9’tees. H I N ftames. 25. Deirma-deva, the w times reprefented by a white bull. 26. Virfavana or Cobhair, the god of riches, reprelented by a man riding on a white horfe. 27. Dhan-wuntanj, the god of me¬ dicine. Belides thefe fupreme deities, the Hindoos have a number of demigods, who are fuppofed to inhabit the air, the earth, and the waters, and in fliort the whole world j fo that every mountain, river, wood, town, village, See. has one of thefe tutelar deities, as was the cafe among the weilern heathens. By nature thefe demigods are fubjecl to death, but are fuppofed to obtain immortality by the ufe of a certain drink named Amrutt Their exploits in many initances refemble thofe of Bacchus, Hercules, Thefeus, &c. and in a beautiful epic poem named Raney an, we have an ac¬ count of the wrars of Ram, one of the demigods, with Ravana tyrant of Ceylon. All thefe deities are worfliipped, as in other coun¬ tries, by going to their temples, failing, prayers, and the performance of ceremonies to their honour. They pray thrice a day, at morning, noon, and evening, turning their faces towards the eaft. They ufe many ablutions, and, like the Pharifees of old, they always waih before meals. Running water is alw7ays preferred for this purpofe to fuch as ilagnates. Fruits, flowers, incenfe, and money, are offered in facrifice to their idols j but for the dead they offer a kind of cake named Peenda ; and offerings of this kind always take place on the day of the full moon. Nothing fanguinary ts known in the wTorihip of the Hindoos at prefent, though there is a tradition that it was formerly of this kind*3; nay, that even human facrifices were made ufe of: but if fuch a cuflom ever did exift, it muff have been at a very diftant period. Iheir facred v/ritings in¬ deed make mention of bloody facrifices of various kinds, not excepting even thofe of the human race : but fo many peculiarities are mentioned with regard to the proper vi&ims, that it is almoft impoffible to find them. The only inftance of bloody facrifices we find on re¬ cord among the Hindoos is that of the buffalo to Ba- waney, the mother of the gods. Among the Hindoos there are two kinds of wor- fhip, diftinguiffied by the name of the worfhip of the inv'Jible God and of idols. The wmrihippers of the in- vifible God are, ftri&ly fpeaking, deifts : the idolaters perform many abfurd and unmeaning ceremonies, too tedious to mention, all of which are conduced by a bramin ; and during the performance of thefe rites, the dancing w’omen occafionally perform in the court, linging the praifes of the deity in concert with various inftruments. All the Hindoos feem to wrorfhip the fire; at leaft they certainly pay a great veneration to It. Biftiop Wilkiss informs us, that they are enjoined to light up a fire at certain times, which muff be pio- duced by the fridlion of tw7o pieces of wood of a par¬ ticular kind 5 and the fire thus produced is made ufe of for confuming their facrifices, burning the dead, and in the ceremonies of marriage. Great numbers of devotees are to be met with every where through Hindoftan. Every caff is allowed to affume this way of life excepting the Chandalahs, who are excluded. Thofe held moft in efteem are named Seniajfes and Jogeys. The former are allowed no other Hindoo*. t 474 ] H I N god of virtue, fome- clothing but what fuffices for covering their nakednefs, nor have they any worldly goods befides a pitcher and “ ftaff} but though they are ftriftly enjoined to medi¬ tate on the truths contained in the facred writings, they are exprefsly forbidden to argue about them. They muff eat but once a day, and that very fparingly, of rice or other vegetables j they muff alfo Ihow the moil perfeef indifference about hunger, thirff, heat, cold, or any thing whatever relative to this world •, looking forward with continual defire to the reparation of the foul from the body. Should any of them fail in this extravagant felf-denial, he is rendered fo much more criminal by the attempt, as he negledled the duties of ordinary life for thofe of another which he was not able to accompliffn The Jogeys are bound to much the fame rules, and both lubjedt themfelves to the moft extravagant penances. Some wall keep their arms conftantly ftretched over their heads till they become quite withered and incapable of motion ; others keep them croffed over their breaft during life- j while others, by keeping their hands conftantly (hut, have them quite pierced through by the growth of their nails. Some chain themfelves to trees or parti¬ cular fpots of ground, which they never quit 5 others refolve never to lie down, but fleep leaning againft a tree : but the moft curious penance perhaps on record is that of a Jogey, w7ho meafured the diftance between Benares and Jaggernaut with the length of his body, lying down and rifing alternately. Many of thefe en- thufiafts will throw themfelves in the way of the cha¬ riots of Vifhnou or Sheevah, which are fometimes brought forth in proceffion to celebrate the feaft ot a temple, and drawn by feveral hundreds of men. Thus the wretched devotees are in an inftant cruihed to pieces. Others devote themfelves to the flames, in order to fliow their regard to fome of their idols, or to appeafe the wrath of one whom they fuppofe to be offended. A certain fet of devotees are named Pandarams ; and another on the coaft of Coromandel are named Cary- Patra Pandarams. The former rub themfelves all oyer with cow-dung, running about the country finging the praifes of the god Sheevah whom they worlhip. The latter go about afldng charity at doors by ftriking their hands together, for they never fpeak. They accept of nothing but rice j and when they have got as much as will fatisfy their hunger, never give thera- felves any trouble about more, but pafs the reft of the day in the (hade, in a ftate of fuch fupiim indolence as fcarcely to look at any objedt whatever. 1 he Tadinums are another fet of mendicants, who fing the incarna¬ tions of Viftmou. They have hollow brafs rings round their ancles, which they fill with pebbles j fo that they make a confiderable noife as they walk ; they beat like- w7ife a kind of tabor. _ _ 8 The greateft Angularity in the Hindoo religion Mildnefs of however, is, that fo far from perfecuting thofe of a the Hindoo contrary perfuafion, which is too often the cafe withrellglon* other profeffors, they abfolutely refufe even to admit of a profelyte. They believe all religions to be equally acceptable to the Supreme Being •, afligmng as a rea- ^ fon, that if the Author of the univerfe preferred one to another, it would have been impoflible for any other to have prevailed than that which he approved. Every religion. II I N [ 475 1 H I N Hindoo?. Their mar. xi3gM. religion, therefore, they conclude to be adapted to the country where it is eftabliihed } and that all in their original purity are equally acceptable. Among the Hindoos, marriage is confidered as a re¬ ligious duty ; and parents are ftri£Uy commanded to marry their children by the time they arrive at eleven years of age at fartheft. Polygamy is allowed ; but this licence is feldom made ufe of unlefs there (hould be no children by the firft wife. In cafe the fecond wife alio- proves barren, they commonly adopt a fon from among their relations. The Hindoos receive no dower with their wives j but, on the contrary, the intended hufband makes a prefent to the father of his bride. Neverthelefs, in many cafes, a rich man will choofe a poor relation for his daughter j in which cafe the bride’s father is at the ex- peuce of the wedding, receives his fon-in-law into his houfe, or gives him a part of his fortune. I he bride¬ groom then quits the dwelling of his parents with cer¬ tain ceremonies, and lives with his father-in-law. Many formalities take place between the parties even after the match is fully agreed upon ; and the celebration of the marriage is attended with much expence $ magnificent proceflions are made, the bride and bridegroom fitting in the fame palankeen, attended by their friends and re¬ lations ; fome riding in palankeens, ibme on horfes, and others on elephants. So great is their vanity indeed on this occafion, that they will borrow or hire numbers of thefe expenfive animals to do honour to the cere¬ mony. The rejoicings lad feveral days; during the evenings of which, fire-works and illuminations are dif- played, and dancing-women perform their feats j the whole concluding with alms to the poor, and prelents to the bramins and principal guefls, generally confid¬ ing of fhawls, pieces of muffin, and other cloths. A number of other ceremonies are performed when the parties come of age, and are allowed to cohabit toge¬ ther. The fame are repeated when the young wife be¬ comes pregnant j when (he pafies the feventh month without any accident 5 and when Ihe is delivered of her child. The relations affemble on the tenth day after the birth, to adid at the ceremony of naming the child ; but if the bramins be of opinion that the afpe61 of the planets is at that time unfavourable, the ceremony is delayed, and prayers offered up to avert the misfor¬ tune. When the lucky moment is difcovered, they fill as many pots wfith water as there are planets, and offer a facrihce to them j afterwards they fprinkle the head of the child with water, and the bramin gives it fuch a name as he thinks bed adapted to the time and cir- cumdances $ and the ceremony concludes with prayers, prefents to the bramins, and alms to the poor. Mo¬ thers are obliged to fuck’9 vtheir own children j nor can this duty be difpenfed with except in cafe of ficknefs. New ceremonies, with prefents to the bra¬ mins, take place, when a boy comes of age to receive the dring which the three fird cads wear round their waid. Boys are taught to read and write by the bramins, of children. w^° keep fchools for that purpofe throughout the coun¬ try. They ufe leaves indead of books, and write with a pointed iron indrument. The leaves are generally chofen of the palm-tree, which being fmooth and hard, and having a thick fubdance, may be kept for almod any length of time, and the letters are not fubje£l to 10 Education grow faint or be effaced. The leaves are cut into flips ^ Hind-os, ^ about an inch broad, and their books confid of a num- y "M~ J ber of thefe tied together by means of a hole in one end. Sometimes the letters are rubbed over with a black powder, to render them more legible. When they wuite upon paper, they make ufe of a fmall reed. Sometimes they are initiated in writing by making letters upon fand drewed on the floor } and they are taught arithmetic by means of a number of fmall peb¬ bles. The education of the girls is much more limited $ feldom extending farther than the articles of their re¬ ligion. 1 r Among thefe people the cudom of burning the dead Barbarous prevails univerfally j and the horrid practice of wivescuftom of burning themfelves along with their deceafed hufbands^urnin? was formerly very common, though now much lefs fo. themfelYe3. At prefent it is totally prohibited in the Britilh domi¬ nions 5 and even the Mohammedans endeavour to dif- countenance a practice fo barbarous, though many of their governors are accufed of conniving at it through motives of avarice. At prefent it is mod common in the country of the Rajahs, and among women of high rank. This piece of 'barbarity is not enjoined by any law exiding among the Hindoos } it is only faid to be ftro- per, and rewards are promifed in the next world to thof*: who do fo. But though a wife choofes to outlive her hufband, (he is in no cafe whatever permitted to marry again, even though the marriage with the former had never been completed. It is unlawful for a woman to burn herfelf if die be with child at the time of her huf- band’s deceafe, or if he died at a didance from her. In the latter cafe, however, die may do fo if die can pro¬ cure his girdle or turban to be put on the funeral pile along wfith her. Thefe miferable enthufiads, who de¬ vote themfelves to this dreadful death, fuffer with the greated condancy ; and Mr Holwel gives an account of one who, being told of the pain die mud fuffer (with a view to diffuade her), put her finger into the fire and kept it there for a confiderable time ; after which die put fire on the palm of her hand, with incenfe up¬ on it, and fumigated the bramins who were prefent. Sometimes a chapel is erefted on the place where one of thofe facrifices has been performed ; fometimes it is inclofed, flowers planted upon it, and images fet up.— In fome few places the Hindoos bury their dead •, and fome women have been known to fuffer tbemfelves to be buried alive with their deceafed hufbands: but the indances of this are dill more rare than thofe of burn¬ ing.—No woman is allowed any inheritance among the Hindoos; fo that if a man dies without male iffue, his edate goes to his adopted fon or to his neared re¬ lation. 12 The Hindoos, though naturally mild and timid, will Tnftances of on many occafions meet death with the mod heroic in-,ieroifIIj trepidity. An Hindoo who lies at the point of death, ^j,n{f00S1C will talk of his deceafe wfith the utmod compofure j and if near the river Ganges, will defire to be carried out, that he may expire on its banks. Such is the ex- Cedive veneration they have for their religion and cu- doms, that no perfon wfill infringe them even to pre- ferve his own life. An Hindoo, we are told, being ill of a putrid fever, was prevailed upon to fend for an Eu¬ ropean phyfician, who prefcribed him the bark in wfinej but this was refilled wfith the greated obdinacy even 1 O 2 to H I N [ Hindoos. }3 Their gene- ral £< arac- ter. * 14 /Lrrefs of the to the very iaft, though the governor hirufelf joitred in his folicitations, and in other matters had a coniiderable influence over him. In many inftances thefe people, both in ancient and modern times, have been known, when clofely beiieged by an enemy whom they could not refill, to kill their wives and children, let fire to their houfes, and then violently rulh upon their adver- laries till every one was deftroyed. Some Seapoys, in the Brithh fcrvice, having been concerned in a mu¬ tiny, were condemned to be blown away from the mouths of cannon. Of th.ele lome were grenadiers, who cried *ut, that as they had all along had the poll of honour, they favv no reafon why they fhould be denied it now j and therefore delired that they might be blown away rirft. This being granted, they walked forward to the guns with compoiure, begged that they might be fpa- red the indignity of being tied, and, placing their breads clofe to the muzzles, were fhot away. The com¬ manding officer was fo much affeCled with this in* fiance of heroifm, that he pardoned all the reft. In ordinary life the Hindoos are cheerful and lively j fond of converfation and amufements, particularly dan¬ cing. They do not, however, learn or praftife dancing themfelves, but have women taught for the purpofe j and in beholding thefe they will fpend whole nights. They diiapprove of many parts of the education of European ladies, as iuppofing that they engage the attention too much, and draw away a woman’s affedlion from her hufband and children. Hence there are few women in Hindoflan who can either read or write. In general they are finely fhaped, gentle in their manners, and have foft and even mufical voices. The women of Kalhmere, according to Mr Forfler, have a bright olive com¬ plexion, fine features, and delicate fhape ; a pleafing freedom in their manners, without any tendency to im- modefiy. The drefs of the modefl women in Hindoflan con- fids of a clofe jacket, which covers their breads, but perfe£l!y fliows their form. The deeves are tight, and reach half way to the elbows, with a narrow border painted or embroidered all round the edges. Indead of a petticoat, they have a piece of white cotton cloth wrapped round the loins, and reaching near the ancle on the one fide, but not quite fo low7 on the other. A wide piece of muflin is thrown over the right fhoulder ^ which, pading under the left arm, is eroded round the middle, and hangs down to the feet. The hair is ufu- ally rolled up into a knot or bunch towards the back part of the head ; and fome have curls hanging before and behind the ears. They wear bracelets on their arms, rings in their ears, and on their fingers, toes, and ancles j with fometimes a fmall one in their no- flril. The drefs of the dancing women, who are likewife votaries of Venus, is very various. Sometimes they wear a jama, or long robe of wrought mudin, or gold and filver tidue *, the hair plaited and hanging down be¬ hind, with fpiral curls on each fide of the face. They ■are taught every accompli fhment which can be fuppo- fcd to captivate the other fex; form a clafs entirely dif¬ ferent from the red of the people, and live by their own rules. Their clothes, jewels, and lodging, are confider- td as implements of their trade, and mud be allowed them in cafes of confifcation for debt : They may drink fuirituous liquors, and eat any kind of meat except 476 ] H I N beef: Their dunce* are find to referable pretty exactly Hindoos* thofe of the ancient Bacchanalians reprefented in feme "" ^ of the ancient paintings and has reliefs. In fome of their dances they attach gold and filver bells to the rings of the fame metals they wear on their ancles. r5 '['he men generally lliave their heads and beards, Dre& of tha leaving only a pair of fmall whilkers and a lock on themen* back part of their head, which they take great care to preferve. In Kalhmere and fome other places, they let their beards grow to the length of two inches. Hiey wear turbans on their heads •, but the Bramins who officiate in the temples commonly go with their heads uncovered, and the upper part of the body naked : round their fhoulder they hang the facred firing called Zennar, made of a ki id of perennial cotton, and com- pofed of a certain number of threads of a determined length. The Khatries wear allb a firing of this kind, but compofed of fewer threads; the Bhyfe have one with flill fewer threads, but the Sooderas are not al¬ lowed to wear any firing. The other drefs of the Bra¬ mins confifls of a piece of white cotton cloth wrapped about the loins, defeending below the knee, but lower on the left than on the right fide. In cold weather they fometimes put a red cap on their heads, and wrap a fhawl round their bodies.—The Khatries, and moll other of the inhabitants of this country, wear alfo pie¬ ces of cotton cloth wrapped round them, but which co¬ ver the upper as well as the lower part of the body. Ear-rings and bracelets are worn by the men as well as women : and they are fond of ornamenting themfelves with diamonds, rubies, and other precious llones, when they can procure them. They wear flippers on their feet of fine woollen cloth or velvet, frequently fembroi- dered with gold and filver 5 thofe of princes being fome¬ times adorned with precious ftones. The lower daffes wear fandals or flippers of coarfe woollen cloth or lea¬ ther. Thefe flippers are always put off on going into any apartment, being left at the door, or given to an attendant \ neverthelefs the Hindoos make no com¬ plaints of the Europeans for not putting off their ffioes when they come into their houfes, which muff certainly appear very uncouth to them. Hindoo families are always governed by the eldeft male, to whom great refpeft is fhevvn. Filial venera¬ tion is carried to fuck an height among them, that a fon will not fit down in the prefence of his father until ordered to do fo: and Mr Forfter obferves, that during the whole time of his refidence in India, he never faw a dived inftance of undutifulnefs to parents; and the fame is related by other writers. ^ The houfes of the Hindoos make a worfe appearance-pheir than could be fuppofed from their ingenuity in other houfes. refpeds. In the fouthern parts of the country, the houfes are only of one ftory. On each fide of the door, towards the ftreet, is a narrow gallery covered by the Hope of the roof which projeds over it, and which, as far as the gallery extends, is fupported by pillars of brick or wood. The floor of this gallery is raifed about 20 inches above the level of the ftreet, and the porters, or bearers of palankeens, with the foot foldiers named Peons, who commonly hire themfelves to noblemen, of¬ ten lie down in this place. This entrance leads into a court, which is alfo furrounded by a gallery like the for¬ mer. On one fide of the court is a large room, on a level with the floor of the gallery j open in front, and fpread H I N [ 477 ] H I N Hir.does. 17- Learning of the Bra- mins. IS Metaphy- _ 19 THieir aftro- ivorry. fpread with mats and carpets covered with white cotton cloth, where the matter of the houfe receives vifits and tranfadls bufinefs. From this court there are entrances by very fmall doors to the private apartments. In the northern parts, houfes of two or three ttories are com¬ monly met with. Over all the country alfo we meet with the ruins of palaces, which evidently fliow the magnificence of former times. The Bramins of India were anciently much cele¬ brated for their learning, though they now make a very inconfiderable figure in comparifon with the Europeans. According to Philoftratus, the Gymnofophitts of Ethi¬ opia were a colony of Bramins, who, being obliged to learve India on account of the murder of their king near the banks of the Ganges, migrated into that country. The ancient Bramins, however, may juftly be fuppo- fed to have cultivated fcience with much greater fuccefs than their defendants can boaft of, confidering the rui¬ nous wars and revolutions to which the country has been fubje&ed. Metaphyfics, as well as moral and na¬ tural philofophy, appear to have been well underftood among them ; but at prefent all the Hindoo knowledge is confined to thofe whom they call Pundits, “ doctors or learned men.” Thefe only underftand the language called Shanfcrit or Sanfcrit, (from two words fignify- ing perfection) j in which the ancient books were writ¬ ten. The metaphyfics of the Brarains is much the fame with that of fome ancient Greek philofophers. They believe the human foul to be an emanation from the Deity, as light and heat from the fun. Gowtama, an ancient metaphyfician, diftinguilhes two kinds of fouls, the divine and vital. The former refembles the eternal fpirit from which it came, is immaterial, indivilible, and without pattions ; the vital foul is a fubtile element which pervades all things, diftinft from organifed mat¬ ter, and which is the origin of all our defires. The external fenfes, according to this author, are reprefen- iations of external things to the mind, by which it is furnilhed with materials for its various operations ; but unlefs the mind aitt in conjumttion with the fenfes, the •peration is loft, as in that abfence of mind which takes place in deep contemplation. He treats likewfife of reafon, memory, perception, and other abtlradt fubje&s. He is of opinion, that the wrorld could not exift without a firft caufe ; chance being nothing but the effeft of an unknowm caufe : he is of opinion, however, that it is folly to make any conjeftures concerning the beginning or duration of the world. In treating of providence, he denies any immediate interpofition of the Deity j maintaining, that the Supreme Being having created the fyftem of nature, allowed it to proceed according to the laws originally impreffed upon it, and man to follow the impulfeofhis own defires, rettrained and condu&ed by his reafon. His doiftrine concerning a future ftate is not different from what we have already ftated as the belief of the Hindoos in general. According to Bifhop Wilkins, many of them believe that this world is a ftate of rewards and puniftiments as well as of probation j and that good or bad fortune are the effecfts of good or evil adlions committed in a former ftate. The fcience for which the Bramins,. however, were moft remarkable, is th,at of aftronomy ; and in this their progrefs was fo great, as even yet to furniih matter of admiration tp the moderns.—The Europeans firff , be¬ came acquainted with the Indian aftronomy in l(S8 ;, Hindoos, from a Siamefe MS. containing rules for calculating the places of the fun and moon, brought home by M. Lou- bere the French ambaffador at Siam. The principles on which the tables in this MS. were founded, however, proved to be fo obfcure, that it required the genius of Caftini to inveftigate them. The miflionaries after¬ wards fent over two other fets of tables from Hindo- ftan; but no attention was paid to them till M. le Gen- til returned from obferving the tranfit of Venus in 1769. During the time of his ftay in Hindoftan, the Bramins had been much more familiar with him on ac¬ count of his aftronomical knowledge, than they ufually were with Europeans; and he thus had an opportunity of obtaining coniiderable infight into their methods of calculation. In confequence of this inftruflion he pub- &d‘n. VhlK lilhed tables and rules, according to the Indian method, Tranfi in the academy of fciences for 1772 ; and in the expla¬ nation of thefe M. Bailly has employed a whole vo¬ lume. The objefls of this aftronomy, according to Mr Playfair, are, 1. Tables and rules for calculating the places of the fun and moon. 2. Of the planets. 3. For determining the phafes of eclipfes. They divide the zodiac into 27 conftellations, probably from the motion of the moon through it in 27 days ; and to this lunar motion the Profeffor afcribes the general divifion of time into weeks, which has prevailed fo univerfally through¬ out the world,. The days of the week were dedicated to the planets, as by the ancient heathens of the weft, and in precifely the fame order. The ecliptic is divid¬ ed into figns, degrees, and minutes, as with us : and indeed their calculations are entirely fexagefimal, the day and night being divided into 60 hours; fo that each of their hours is only 24 of our minutes, and each of their minutes 24 of our feconds. The requifites for calculating by the Indian tables are, 1. An obfervation of the celeftial body in fome part moment of time, which- is commonly called the Epoch of the tables. 2. The mean rate of the pla- net’s motion. 3. The correction on account of the irregular motion of the body, to be added or fubtraft- ed from the mean place, according to circumftances. They calculate the places of the fun and moon, not from the time of their entrance into Aries, but into the moveable Zodiac. Thus the beginning of the year is continually advancing with regard to the feafons ; and in 24,000 years will have made, the complete round. The mean place of the fun for any time is deduced on the fuppofition that 800. years- contain 292,207 days; from whence, by various calculations, the length of the year comes out only x' 53" greater than that of De la Caille; which is more accurate than any of our ancient aftronomical tables. In the equation of the fun’s centre, however, they commit an error of no lefs than 16' : But Mr Playfair is of opinion that this cannot be afcribed wholly to their inaccuracy, as there was a time when their calculation approached very near the truth ; and even at prefent the error is lefs than it ap¬ pears to be. The motions of the moon are deduced from a cycle of 19 years ; during which (he makes nearly 235 revo¬ lutions ; and which period conftitutes the famous cycle fuppofed to have been invented by Meton the Athe¬ nian aftronomer, and from him called the Metonic Cy¬ cle. They are likewife furprifingly exatt in calcula¬ ting: H I N [ 478 ] HIM Hindoos, ting tlie moon’s apogee and fome of the inequalities of v her motion •, they know the apparent motion of the fixed ftars eaAward, and the Siamefe tables make it only four feconds too quick } which ftill (hows a great accuracy of calculation, as Ptolemy the celebrated aftronomer made an error of no lefs than 14 feconds in calculating the fame thing. M. Caffini, however, in¬ forms us, that thefe tables are not calculated for the me¬ ridian of Siam, but for a place 180 15' to the welt- ward of it, which brings us very near the meridian of Benares, the ancient feat of Indian learning. Phis likewife agrees with wdiat the Hindoos call their firft meridian, wdiich paffes through Ceylon, and the banks of the river Remananur. It muft be obferved, how¬ ever, that the geography of the Hindoos is much more inaccurate than their aftronomy. The date of the Siamefe tables is not very ancient 5 and that of the table above mentioned fent from Hin- doflan by the miflionaries is ffill more modern. Thefe, however, are written in fuch an enigmatical manner, that the miffionary who fent them was unable to tell their meaning j and Mr Playfair fuppofes that even the Bramins themfelves were ignorant of it. Neverthelefs they were deciphered by M. le Gentil j who thinks that they have the appearance of being copied from in- fcriptions on ftone. The minutes and feconds are not Tanged in vertical columns, but in row's under one ano¬ ther, and without any title to point out their meaning or connexion. The tables of Trivalore are among the mod remark¬ able of all we are yet acquainted with. Their date, according to Mr Playfair, coxrefponds with the year 3102 B. C. thus running up to the year of the world 902, when Adam wTas fliil in life. 1 his era is famous in Hindoftan, under the name of Ca/yougham: and as this extraordinary antiquity cannot but create fome fuf- picion, Mr Playfair has been at fome pains to determine whether it h real or fk'litious, i. e. whether it has been determined by aftual obfervation, or derived by calcu¬ lation from tables of more modern date. The refult of his labours is, that we are to account the Calyougham as determined by oblervation j and that had it been otherwife, we muft have been furniftied with infallible methods of dete&ing the fallacy. His reafons for this opinion are, * l. The talk would have been too difficult, even for modern aftronomers, to make the neceftary calculations without taking into account the difturbances arifing from the aftion of the heavenly bodies upon one ano¬ ther, and with which we cannot fuppofe the ancient aftronomers to have been equally well acquainted with the moderns. By reafon of thefe variations, as well as from the fmall errors unavoidable in every calcula¬ tion, any fet of aftronomical tables will be found pro- digioufly inaccurate wdien applied to any period very far diftant from the time of obfervation. Plence, fays our author, “ it may be eftabliffied as a maxim, that if there be given a fyftem of aftronomical tables, founded on obfervations of an unknown date, that date may be found by taking the time when the tables reprefent the celeftial motions moft exaftly.” This indeed might be done, provided we were furniffied with any fet of per- fe£Uy accurate tables with wdnch w'e could compare the fufpe&ed ones j and Mr Playfair thinks it “ a very r-eafonable poftulatum,” that our moderp aftronomical 3 tables, though not perfe&ly accurate, are yet capable Hindoo*, of determining the places of the celeftial bodies with- v ",UJ out any lenfible error for a longer period than that of the Calyougham. 2. By calculation from our modern tables, it appears that the place of the liar Aldebaran, at the commence¬ ment of the Calyougham, differs pnly 53' from what the Indian tables make it. He thinks this coincidence the more remarkable, as the Bramins, by realon of the inaccuracy of their own date, would have erred by four or five degrees, had they calculated from their moil modern tables dated in 1491. 3. At the commencement of this epoch (which ac¬ cording to M. Bailly, happened at midnight between the 17th and 18th of February 3 1 o 2 B. C. the fun was in 10s 30 38' 13" by the Indian tables. But the mean longitude of the iun, according to the tables of M, de la Caille, for the lame time, comes out to be only 10s i° 5’ 5 7", fuppofing the preceffion of the equinoxes to have been the fame at that tii»e as now. M. de la Grange, however, has demonftrated, that, in former ages, the preceffion of the equinoxes was lefs than at prefent ; whence there arifes an equa¬ tion of i° 45' 22" to be added to the fun’s place al¬ ready mentioned 5 and thus it will differ only 47 from the radical place in the tables of Trivalore. Notwith- ftanding this reafoning, however, Mr Playfair thinks that no ftrefs is to be laid upon this argument, as it de¬ pends on the truth of a conjeftureof M. Bailly that the place of the fun above mentioned was not the mean but the true one. 4. The mean place of the moon at Benares, calcula¬ ted from Mr Mayer’s tables, for the 18th of February 3102 B. C. will be to* 0° 51' 16", provided her mo¬ tion bad all that time been equable : but the fame aftro¬ nomer informs us, that the motion of the moon is fub- jeft to a fmall but uniform acceleration, about 9" in 100 years ; which, in an interval of 4801 years, muft have amounted to 50 45' 44" ; which added to the preceding, gives ics 6° 37' for the true place of the moon at the commencement of the Calyougham. Now the place of this luminary, at that time, by the tables of Trivalore, is 10s 6° the difference is lefs than two- thirds of a degree, which, for fo remote a period, and confidering the acceleration of the moon’s motion, for which no allowance could be made in an Indian calcu¬ lation, is a degree of accuracy that nothing but adlual obfervation could have produced.—This conclufion is confirmed by a computation of the moon’s place from all the tables to which the Indians could have any ac- cefs, and of which the enormous errors w’ould inftantly {how the deception. Thus, by the tables of Ptolemy, the place of the fun would be io° 21' 15" greater ; and that of the moon 1 x° 52' 7" greater than has juft been found from the Indian tables. By thofe of Ulug Beg, the place of the fun would be i° 30', and that of the moon 6°, different from what it is by the Indian tables { and in like manner our author (hows that the Indian calculations could not be derived from any other fet of tables extant. In like maimer, he (hows that, with re¬ gard to the mean place of the moon, there is a coinci¬ dence for a period of more than 4000 years between the tables of Mayer and thofe of India named Chrifna- bouram ; which, though they bear a more modern date than thofe of Trivalore, are thus probably more ancient. “ Front H 1 N [ 479 1 H I N Hindoes. “ From this remarkable coincidence (fays Mr Playfair), u', v1 we may conclude, with the higheft probability, that at leaft one fet of thefe obfervations on which the tables are founded, is not lefs ancient than the era of the Ca- lyougham : and though the poffibility of their being feme ages later than that epoch is not abfoiutely ex¬ cluded, yet it may, by ft riff mathematical reafoning, be inferred, that they cannot have been later than 2000 years before the Chriftian era. 5. Since the time that M. Bailly wrote, every argu¬ ment refpedling the acceleration of the moon’s motion has become more worthy of attention, and more con- clufive. For that acceleration is no longer a mere em¬ pirical equation introduced to reconcile the ancient ob¬ fervations with the modern, nor a fairMcon-y’draWS the ^ollowing conclufions with refpedt to Indian cerning the ahronomy- The obfervations on which it is founded, IndiarTa- were made more than 3000 years before the Chriftian ftronoroy, era ; and, in particular, the places of the fun and moon? at the beginning of the Calyougham, were de¬ termined by atftual obfervation. 2. Though the aftro- H'mcfnos; nomy now in the hands of the Bramins is fo ancient in its origin, yet it contains many rules and tables that are of later conftrudlion. 3. The bafts of their four fyftems of aftronomical tables is evidently the fame. 4. The conftrueftion of thefe tables implies a great knowledge of geometry, arithmetic, and even the theoretical part 2I of aftronomy. All this, however, we find contravert-controvert*, ed, or at leaft rendered fomewhat doubtful, by William6^ by Marfden, Efq. who has written a paper on the chrono- logy of the Hindoos in the Philofophical Tranfaftions for j 790. “ The Kalee Toog (fays he), or principal chronological era, began in the year 3102 B. C. ac¬ cording to the common method of computation, or in 3101 according to the aftronomical method, on the x 8th of February, at funrife ; or at midnight, accord¬ ing to different accounts, under their firft meridian of Lauka. At that period it is faid to be afferted by their aftronomers, that the fun, moon, and all the planets, were in conjunftion according to their mean places. The reality of this fa£t, but with confiderable modifica¬ tion, has received a refpeftable famftion from the writ¬ ings of an ingenious and celebrated member of the French academy of fciences, who concludes that the a&ual obfervation of this rare phenomenon, by the Hin¬ doos of that day, was the occafton of its eftablifliment as an aftronomical epoch. Although M. Bailly has fupported this opinion with his ufual powers of reafon¬ ing, and although abundant circumftances tend to prove their early Ikill in this fcience, and fome parts of the mathematics connefted with it ; yet we are conftrained to queftion the verity or poffibility of the obfervation, and to conclude rather that the fuppofed conjunflion was, at a later period, fought for as an epoch, and calculated retrofpeftively. That it was widely mifcalculated too, is fufficiently evident from the computation which M. Bailly himfelf has given of the longitudes of the pla¬ nets at that time, when there was a difference of no lefs than 730 between the places of Mercury and Ve¬ nus. But fifteen days after, when the fun and moon were in oppofition, and the planets far enough from the fun to be vifible, he computes that all, except Ve¬ nus, were comprehended within a fpace of 170; and on this he grounds his fuppofition of an a&ual obferva¬ tion. “ In their current tranfaflions the inhabitants of the pewinfula employ a mode of computation of a different nature, which, though not unknown in other parts of the world, is confined to thefe people among the Hin¬ doos. This is a cycle, or revolving period, of 60 folar years, which has no farther correfpondence with their other eras than that of their years refpeftively commen¬ cing on the fame day. Thofe that conftitute the cycle, inftead of being numerically counted, are diftinguilhed from each other by appropriate names, which in their epiftles, bills, and the like, are inferted as dates, with the months, and perhaps the age of the moon annexed j but in their writings of importance and record, the year of Salaban (often called the Saba year) is fuper- added 5 and this is the more effential, as I do not find it cuftomary to number the cycles by any progrefiive reckoning. In.their aftronomical calculations we ob¬ ferve, that they fometimes complete the year of their era by multiplying the number of cycles elapfed, and adding the complement of the cycle in which it com¬ menced . H 1 N [ 480 ] H I N H^ndoas. menced, as welt as die years of tlie current cycle ; but -—V—from hence we are led to no iatisfa&ory conclufion con¬ cerning this popular mode of eftimating time. The prefumption is in favour of its being more ancient than their hiftorical epochs. The prefent cycle, of which 43 complete years expired in April 1790,^ began in 1747, writh the year of Salaban 1669, and of the grand era 4848. M. le Gentil, to whom Europe is chiefly indebted for what is known of Hindoo aftronomy, has fallen into an unaccountable error with regard to the years of this cycle, and their correfpondence with thole of the Kalee Toog, as appears by the comparative ta¬ ble he has given of them, and other paflages of his work. He feems to have taken it for granted, without due examination, that the years 3600 of the latter mull; have been produced by the multiplication of tne cycle of 60 into itfelf; and confequently that the firfl: year of this grand era mult likewile have been the firfl: of the cycle. But tjiis is totally inconfiftent with the fa£t •, the jKalee Yoog began the 13th year of the cycle of 60 ; and all the reafoniwg founded on the felf-produ£tion and harmony of thefe periods muft fall to the ground.” From what Mr Marfden here fets forth, it is plain that we mult make very confiderable abatements in our confidence of the extreme antiquity of the Hindoos oblervations. Indeed we can fcarce conceive a poflibi- lity of reconciling fuch extravagant antiquity with the authentic hiitories of which we are polTefied, or with thofe of Scripture. The want of an ancient hiftory of Hindoltan leaves us indeed in the dark, and gives room for ingenious and fpeculative men to indulge themfelves in marvellous reveries concerning their antiquity. But the flood, we know, which if it exilted at all, could * See the not be but general over the whole earth *, muft have article deftroyed every monument pf art and fcience •, and it is JJeluge. furely more reafonable to believe, that M. le Gentil, or the molt learned man in the prefent age, has' been miftaken (even though we fliould not be able to deter¬ mine the particular manner), than at once to deny the •authenticity of all hiftory both facred and profane, and attempt to evade evidence which no power of reafonmg can ever fet afide. » I. It is, however, undeniable, that the progrefs of the ■ofthe Hin- Hindoos in geometry as well as aftronomy has been tloos in very grefat in ancient times. Of this a moft remarkable geometry, jnftance is given by Mr Playfair, in their finding out the proportion of the circumference of a circle to its diameter to a great degree of accuracy. This is deter¬ mined, in the Jyeen Jkbery, to be as 3927 to 1250, and which, to do it arithmetically in the fimpleft man¬ ner pofiible, would require the infeription of a polygon of 768 lides •, an operation which cannot be performed without the knowledge of fome very curious properties of the circle, and at leaft nine extractions of the Iquare root, each as far as ten places of decimals. This pro¬ portion of 1250 to 3927 is the fame with that of 1 to 3.1416 ; and differs very little from that of 113 to 355 difeovered by Metrus. He and Vieta were the firlt who furpaffed the accuracy of Archimedes in the folu- tion of this problem •, and it is remarkable that thele two mathematicians flourilhed at the very time that the Ayeen Akbery was compofed among the Hindoos. In geography, however, they are much deficient •, and it w very difficult to find out the. true lituation of the me- 3 ridians mentioned by their authors from what they have HIncara^er h‘s return. that the Rajpoot tribes in Agimere commenced a war Ackbar, a Humaioon was fucceeded by his fon Ack- againft him. On this occafion he headed his armies great ’ at jhat time only 14 years of age. During his alio in perfon ; but having the misfortune to be hem- prince. lOI1g reign of 51 years, he eftabliflied the empire on a med in among the mountains, he would certainly have more lure foundation than it had probably ever been been taken prifoner, had not the enemy thought pro- before ; though even at this time Mr Rennel is of opi- per to allow him to efcape. They allowed alfo the nion, that all the tranquillity enjoyed by the people was emprefs to make her efcape, after fhe had been aftually, taken; H I N [ 486 ] H I N Hind oft an. taken. In 1681 he renewed his mcunions into that 1 vJ country, took and deftfoyed Checlure, committing other devaluations, and everywhere detlroying the Ii.n- doo temples and objefls of worfhip j but notwithftand- ing all his efforts, he was at laft obliged to abandon his enterprise, and allow them to remain in peace. From the year 1678 to the time of his death in 1707? ‘i1- is faid to have been chiefly employed in the Deccan, the greatefl part of which he reduced, and for the lalt five years of bis life is faid to have been actually em¬ ployed in the field. This long abfence from his capi¬ tal could not but be productive of bad confequences. Rebellions broke out in various parts of the empire ■, and during this period, the Jats or Jauts firit made their appearance in the province of Agra. I hey were at firft only a fet of banditti •, but have fince grown to be a very confiderable ftate, and once were of fome confequence in Upper Hin,doftan. After tne 10th year of Aureng-zebe’s reign, however, we know very little of his tranfaCtions, as he would not allow any hi- ftory of it to be written. At the time of his death the empire extended from the 10th to the 35^n degree of latitude, and almoft as many degrees in longitude. 44 His revenue (fays Major Rennel) exceeded 35 mil¬ lions of pounds Sterling, in a country where the pro¬ ducts of the earth are about four times as cheap as in England. But fo weighty a fceptre could be wielded only by a hand like Aureng-zebeV, and we accordingly find, that in a courfe of 50 years after his death, a uc- ccflion of weak princes and wicked minifters reduced this aftonifhing empire to nothing.”^ Aureng-zebe left four fonsj Maufuro, afterwards em¬ peror, under the title of Bahader Shah j Azcm, Kaum Bufh, and Acbar, who had been obliged to fly to Per- fia 30 years before on account of his having engage in rebellion againft his father. A civil war inftantly commenced between Azem and Maufum 5 the event o which was decided in a great battle, where 300,000 combatants were brought into the field on each fide. In this battle Azem was defeated and killed •, aftei which Maufum afcended the throne by the title of Ba¬ hader Shah. He was a prince of confiderable abilities j but the diforders of the empire were already rifen to fuch an height, that during his Ihort reign of five years, he found it impoffible to compofe them, tie was firft engaged in wTar with his brother Kaum Bulb, whom he alfo’defeated and killed ; after which his at¬ tention was engaged by the Seiks, a newr let of religion- ifts, who, during the reign of Shah Jehan, had fileut- ly eftablilhed themfelves along the foot of the eaftern mountains. They now appeared in arms in the pro¬ vince of Lahore, and ravaged the whole country from thence to the banks of the Jumna. The emperor march¬ ed againft thefe adverfaries in perfon, and with great difficulty brought them under fubjeCtion. He then took up his refidence at Lahore, where he died after a ftiort illnefs, without having ever vifited the imperial cities of Agra or Delhi. After the death of Bahader Shah the empire was again contefted among his four fons. Of thefe the fe- cond, named Azem Oothaun, took poffeffion ol the treafures; but was oppofed by his three brothers, who agreed to divide the empire among them. Azem was defeated and killed in a battle, gained chiefly by the vqlour and condu6l of the youngeft named Shah 'jehan ; *3 Its quick decline un¬ der his fuc- ■ceflbrs. wflro feemed refolved to abide by the agreement, and as Hinfloflan. a proof of his fincerity, ordered the treafures to be di- 'V" vided. This was prevented by the intrigues of Zool- fecar-khan, an omrah in high trull. A new civil war commenced, in which Jehan Shah was killed. The two remaining brothers tried their fortune in a third battle, which left Jehauder, the eldeft, in pofleliion of the throne. In nine months he was dethroned by Fe- rakfere, or Furrokfere, fon to the deceafed Azem Oo- ftiaun 5 having, during his Ihort reign, difplayed almoft unparalleled meannefs of fpirit. This revolution was accompliftied by the aftiftance of two brothers, HouiTein Ali Khan and Abdoolla Khan, who had extenfive governments in the eaftern provinces. The calamities of the empire were not at all abated during this reign. In 1713 the Seiks appeared again in arms; and in i 716 were grown fo formidable, that the emperor himfelf was obliged to march againft them ; but we are totally ignorant of the I5 particulars of this campaign. About tins time the Firman Englilh Eaft India company obtained the famous F/r-^nted to^ man or grant, by which their goods of export and im- dia com- port were exempted from duties or cuftoms *, which pany. was regarded as the company’s commercial charter in India, while they flood in need of protection from the priaces of that country. Ferokfere was depofed, and his eyes put out, by the two brothers who had raifed him to the throne ; and in the ccurfe of the fame year two other emperors, whom they afterwards fet up, were depofed and murdered ; and thus, in eleven years after the death of Aureng- zebe, x 1 princes of his line, who had either mounted the throne, or been competitors for it, were extermi¬ nated, while the government declined with fuch rapi¬ dity, that the empire feemed ready to be difmembered to a greater degree than it had even been before the invafion of Tamerlane. In 1718,, the two brothers raifed to the throne Mohammed Shah, the grandfon of Bahader Shah ; but this prince having got fufficient warning by tbe fate of his predeceffors, took care to rid himfelf of thefe powerful lubjefts, though this could not be accomplilhed without a civil war. New ene¬ mies, however, ftarted up. Nizam-al-Muluk, viceroy of the Deecam, had been for fome time augmenting his power by every poffible method, and was evidently afpiring at independence. Having received fome af¬ fronts from the two brothers, who for fome time had ruled every thing with an abfolute fway, he thought proper to retire to his government. In 1722 he was invited to court, and offered the place of vizier or prime minifter, but declined accepting it, while the growing and formidable power of the Mahrattas furniffied him with a pretence for augmenting his army. At laft;, having by the year 1738 attained a fufficient degree of {Length to accompliih his purpofes, and confident of his having a large party at court, he came thither attended by a great body of armed followers. Find¬ ing, however, that the intereft of the emperor was ftill too powerful for him, he invited the celebrated Perfian T7 ufurper Nadir Shah, commonly known by the name Inv (ion 0/ of Khouli Khan, to invade Hindoftan. The invitation N3*dir was accepted, and Nadir entered the country without ',ha ’ oppofition. The imperial general Douran being killed in a fkirmiftx, no decifive engagement took place ; and the Perfian chief, though far advanced into Hindoftan, vet H I N [ 4S7 ] H I N ili; doftan. yet looked upon matters to be fo uncertain, that he v v—— offered to evacuate the country and retire for 50 lacks of rupees, about half a million fterling. The intrigues of the Nizam and his party hindered the emperor front complying with this moderate demand 5 inflead of which he abfurdly threw himfelf upon the ufarper’s mercy, who then took poffeffion of Delhi, demanding a raniom of 30 millions fterling. At an interview with the emperor, he fcverely reprimanded him for his m;i- condudt; however, he told him, th'at as he was of the race of Timur (Tamerlane), who had not offended the reigning family of Perfia, he would not take the em¬ pire from him •, only as he had put him to the trouble of coming fo far to lettle his affairs, he initfted that his expences Ihould be paid. The unfortunate emperor made no anlwer to this fpeech •, but Nadir took care to enforce the latter part of it. Some time after the departure of the emperor, Nadir went to the camp to pay him a vifit •, where he feized upon 200 cannon, with fome treafure and valuable effects, fending them off immediately to Candahar. He then marched back to Delhi, where a mob arofe about the price of corn. As Nadir Shah was endeavouring to quell it, a mufket was delignedly fired at him, by which he narrowly el- 18 caped being killed. Exafperated at this, he command- inhabitants ecl an indifcriminate maffacre to be made, which his cruel foldiers inftantly put in execution with the greateft L 'alacrity, and ( 20,000, or, according to others, 150,000, of the miferable inhabitants were ilaughtered without mercy. This was followed by a feizure of all the jewels, plate, and valuable articles which could be found, befides the exadion of the 30 millions, which was done with the utmoft rigour j infomuch that many of the inhabitants chofe rather to put an end to their own lives than to bear the torments to which they were fubje&ed in cafe of inability to pay the fum im- pofed upon them. During thefe horrid fcenes, Nadir caufed the marriage of his fon to be celebrated with a grand daughter of Aureng-zebe •, and after having ex¬ torted every thing which he demanded, at laft took leave of the emperor with every mark of friendship. He put the crown upon his head with his own hands ‘7 and after having given him fome falutary advice rela¬ tive to the government of his empire, he fet out from Delhi on the 6th of May 1739. By this invafion the empire fuftained prodigious lofs. Since the arrival of Nadir in Hindoftan, about 200,000 people had been deffroyed, and goods and treafure car¬ ried off to the amount of 125 millions fferling. Mo¬ hammed had ceded to the ufurper all the provinces of Hindoftan fituated to the weft of the Indus. His de¬ parture left the Nizam in poffedion of all the remain¬ ing power of the empire, which he inftatly made u!e of to eftablilh himfelf in the fovereignty of the Deccan. The province of Bengal had already become indepen¬ dent under Aliverdy Cawn, in the year 1738 ; and not long after, it was invaded by a vaft army of Mahrattas under fancftion of the emperor’s name •, who being un¬ able to fatisfy them in the arrears of tribute be had been obliged to confent to pay, fent them into Bengal to colleft for themfelves. About the fame time, the Rohillas, a tribe from the mountains which lie between India and Perfia, eretfted an independent ftate on the eaft of the Ganges, within 80 miles of Delhi. The total diffolution of the empire feemed now to TO Miferable ftate of Hindo'tan after his departure. be fall approaching. In the confuiion which took Hindoftan. place after the murder of Nadir Shah, Abdallah, one ' v of his generals, feized upon the eaftern part of Perfia, and the adjoining provinces of India, which had been ceded to Nadir by Mohammed Shah 5 which he formed into a kingdom ftill known by the name of Canda¬ har or Ahdcdli; of which a more particular account is given in the fubfequent part of this article. This year Mohammed Shah died, after a reign of 29 years-, which, conlidering the fate of his immediate predeceffors, and the anarchy univerfally prevalent- throughout Hindoftan, muft be accounted very won¬ derful. He was fucceeded by his fon Ahmed Shah } during whofe reign, which lafted about fix years, the total divifion of the remainder of the empire took place. Nothing now remained to the family of Ta¬ merlane but a fmall trach of territory round the city of Delhi, now no longer a capital, and expofed to the re¬ peated depredations of invaders, with confequent maf- facres and famines. The laft army which could with propriety be termed imperial, was defeated by the Ro- billas in 1749 ; by which their independence was fully eftabliihed jn the eaftern parts of the province of Del¬ hi. The Jauts, or .Tats, a Hindoo tribe, eftablifhed themfelves in the province of Agra ; the Deccan and Bengal were feized upon by their viceroys, Nizam and Aliverdy. Oude was feized on by Seifdar Jang (fa¬ ther to the late Sujah D owl ah) -, Allahabad by Moham¬ med Kooli. Malwa was divided between the Poonah Mahrattas and feveral native princes and Zemindars : Agimere reverted of courfe to its ancient lords, the Raj ¬ poot princes; and the Mahrattas, in addition to their proper fhare of Malwa, poffeffed the greateft part of Guzerat, Berar, and Oriffa; befides their ancient do¬ minions in the Deccan. Thefe people werp^now be¬ come fo powerful, that they were courted and employed by the contending parties, like the Swifs- in Europe; with this difference, that the Swifs are paid by thofe who employ them, whereas the Mahrattas al¬ ways take care to pay themfelves. Abdalla having eftablifhed his empire in the manner above related, en¬ tered Lahore and Moultan, or the Panjab, with a view to conqueft. “ The whole country of Hindoftan was in commotion (fays Major Rennel) from one entrance to the other, each party fearing the machinations of attacks of the other ; fo th^t all regular government was at an end, and villainy was praclifed in every form. Perhaps in the annals of the world it has feldom hap. pened that the bonds of government were fo fuddenly diffolved, over a portion of country containing at leaf! 60 millions of inhabitants. 20 In 1748 the Nizam died at the age of 104, and was P‘rft inter.- fucceeded by his fon Nazirjung, to the prejudice of his|^re”fe ot^ eldeft brother Gazi, vizier to the nominal emperor. ar(j The conteft that followed on this occafion for the in the af- throne of the Deccan, and nabobfhip of Arcot, firft fairs of engaged the Erench and Englifii as auxiliaries on 0p-H‘rd°ftar!i' polite fides. This was followed by a long feries of ho- ftilities, which terminated in the total expulfion of the French from Hindoftan, the entire humiliation of the Mogul, and his being reduced to the ftate of depen¬ dence on the Englifh Eaft India company; together with the fubjeffion of a vaft trad of country to the latter. Thefe tranfaclions have occafioned very conuderable revolutions, not only in the country properly called- Hindojlan^ H I N [4 Hindoftan. Hindojlan, but in other places of that extenfive tra6t ' ^ ' called the Eaji Indies : for an account of which, and of 2i lome later revolutions, fee the article India. Different The vail country of Hindoftan, before the revolutions powers alluded to, was divided among the following powers, whidfHin 1' iimur Shah, fon of Ahmed Shah, or Abdallah, doftan is poffeiTed an extent of territory to the north-weft ward divided. before we come to the river Indus. This country, ex¬ tending all the way betwixt India and Perfia, is known by the name of Duran, or 'Duran ; and was poffelled by the Afghans, of whom Abdallah became the fove- reign. He was defcended from an illuftrious family $ and having the misfortune of being taken frifoner by Huffein Khan, theh chief of Candahar, along with his brother Zulfecur Khan, they were releafed by the celebrated Nadir Shah in his paflage through that country to Hindoftan ; but a$ that conqueror ftill looked upon them with a jealous eye on account of their great influence wuth their countrymen, both wrere fent to Mazandaran in Perlia. Plere Zalfecur Khan, the brother of Achmed, died 5 and, fome time after, we find the latter promoted to the command of a body of Afghan cavalry in the Perfian army. He continued attached to the interefts of Nadir while that conqueror lived 5 and even attempted, though ineffedlually, to revenge his death. Proving unfuccefsful in this at¬ tempt, he returned to his own country; and, arriving at Candahar, was faluted chief of the Afghans. In the courfe of a few months he became mafter of all the countries which the Mogul had been obliged to cede to Nadir Shah; and, encouraged by the diftradled ftate of the affairs of Hindoftan at that time, he crofted the Indus, and plundered the country to the fouth- eaft. An indecifive battle fought with the Indian army under the command of the prince royal and vizier, in which the latter was killed, obliged Ahmed to return to his owm territories ; but he foon undertook another expedition, in which he conquered the pro¬ vince of Lahore. In 1755 he returned ; and after flaying fome time at Lahore, marched to Delhi the Capital, having been invited thither, as was fuppofed, by the Mogul himfelf, in order to get rid of the ty¬ ranny of his vizier. The latter vras accordingly de- ferted in a battle by orders of the emperor, and obli¬ ged to lurrender himfelf prifoner ; but inftead of be¬ ing put to death, he had the addrefs to ingratiate himfelf with the conqueror; and the unfortunate Al- lumghire, the Mogul, was obliged to fubmit to be ruled by him as before. Ahmed took care to indem- jiify himfelf for his trouble, by laying the city of Delhi under a heavy contribution; and having ftaid for about a month, during which time he concluded a marriage betwixt his fon Timur and the emperor’s niece, he marched againft a tribe of Hindoos named the Jauts, and conquered the greateft part of the province of Agra. In this expedition he furprifed the city of Matra, famous for being the birth-place of Krijloen, the Apollo of the Hindoos; and facrificed to the Gopia, the mufes of the country. He failed in his attempt to furprife Agra through the refolution of Fazil Cawn the governor; after which he led back his troops to Delhi, where he married the daughter of Mohammed Shah the late emperor, whom Allumghire had in vain iblicited for himfelf. Having fettled his fon Timur in the government of 8 ] H 1 N Lahore, Ahmed quitted Hindoftan, and returned to llindoftan. his dominions, where he found every thing in confu- '— fion. Timur, who during his father’s abfence had been frequently difturbed by the Seiks, a tribe of Hin¬ doos who profefs deifm, was in 1760 driven out by a vaft army of Mahrattas commanded by Ragonaut Row the Peilhwa’s brother, of whom fo much mention has already been made. Next year, however, Ahmed crofted the Indus, and eafily recovered his former ter¬ ritories ; foon after which he became head of a league formed among fome of the Indian princes, in order to oppofe the overgrown power of the Mahrattas. In this enterprife he proved fuccefsful; and overthrew the Mahrattas in a decifive and very bloody battle, in which more than 50,000 of then’i were killed on the fpot. The purfuit lafted feveral days, and their vaft army was totally difperfed ; Ahmed being every where received with acclamations as the deliverer of the faithful. In 1762 he again crofted the Indus, with a view7 to conquer, or rather to exterminate, the Seiks, \vhofe incurfions had become very troublefome, and even dangerous to his kingdom. Having defeated their army, and forced them to take refuge in the woods and ftrong holds, he fet a price on the heads of all thofe w7ho profeffed their tenets; and that with fuch fuccefs, that heaps of them are faid to have been piled up in all the principal towns in thefe parts. At laft, hearing that they had affembled in great numbers to celebrate an annual feftival, he marched wdth an army to furprife them. The Seiks, how7ever, were well provided for his reception, and an obftinate battle enfued. During the time of the engagement an eclipfe of the fun happened, which, though difregarded by the Seiks, greatly difmayed the fuperftitious Moham¬ medans. Ahmed was therefore defeated ; and though he frequently returned, was never able thoroughly to fubdue that people. At laft, having been long afftift- ed with an ulcer in his face, he died on the 15th of July 1773, at a place name Kohtoba, among the mountains of Candahar, to which he had retired for the fake of coolnefs, and was fucceeded by his fon Timur, w7ho ftill continues to enjoy the fovereignty. The dominions of this prince extend a very conlider- able w7ay to the nortlward of the Indus, but he pof- feffes nothing in Hindoftan befides the province of Kaftimire. 2. The Seiks inhabit a country on the other fide of the Indus, and making part of Hindoftan properly fo called. They derive their origin from a Hindoo named Nanuck of the call of Khatry. His father, named Baba Ca/oo, poffeffed a fmall diftricl in the province of Lahore named Tehandi, where Nanuck w7as born in the year 1470. Like other founders of new feds or nations, he is faid during his infancy to have given many indications of his future fuperiority to the reft of mankind. He feems, however, to have received no farther education than what was common to young men of his call, viz. reading, writing, and arithmetic, and hearing the faftras or commentaries on the facred books. In his early youth he was married to a wToman of his own call, by wdiom he had tw-o fons. Being a convert to the worfliip of the Invifible, or deifm, he accuftomed himfeli to declaim againft the folly of wor- (hipping idols, and the impiety of paying adoration to any but the Supreme Being. At the age of 25 he left H I N [ 4S9 1 H I N >{lan. his family to vifit Bengal and the eaftern parts of Hin- doldan ; in a fecond journey he vifited the fouthern, and in a third he went as far as Periia and Arabia. On his return from this laid journey, he expreifed a deiire of remaining in his native country; and was furnithed, according- to his wilh, with a piece of ground on the banks of the river Bavy, about 80 miles north-eaftward from the city of Lahore. Here he took up his reli- dence for the reft of his days 5 and choofmg to be free from the cares of this world, he dwelt at a diftance from his wife and children, who came occaiionally to viiit him. Having acquired great reputation for his piety, wifdom, and learning, he died at the age of 70 $ and fmce his death the place of his abode has obtained the name of Dihra Daira, or “ the place of worlhip.” His eideft fon founded a lebt of devotees named Nanuck Shoiy; but his fecond employed himfelf in the uiual oc¬ cupations of mankind. On account of the oppreffion of the Mohammedan governors, however, he removed from Telvandi, the eftate of his anceftors, and fettled at Kartarpour, which his defcendants itill poffefs. They are refpecfed by the Seiks on account of their being the pofterity of Nanuck, but are not held in any veneration on a religious account. The doclrines of Nanuck were taught by a favourite difciple of his named Lhina, but on whom he beftowed on his death-bed the appellation of Angud. By him the doctrines of the feet were collected in a work •named Pot/iy, or “ the book” ; and an hiftory of the life of Nanuck himfelf was given in another named Jenum Sakky. Both thefe were written in a particular kind of character called Gour Mouekty, and faid to have been invented by Nanuck himfelf. Angud named for his fuccelfor another difciple called Amerd'jfs ; and this method of continuing the fucceifton feems to have been pradtifed as long as the difciples continued to own one fupreme chief. For many years the Seiks lived in peace, and gained the good-will of the Mohammedan governors by their quiet aud inoffenfive behaviour. By degrees their numbers and their power greatly increafed, but in proportion to their good fortune, they feem to have loft their virtue \ fo that their gourous, or chiefs,, who had hitherto borne the charaHer of apoftles, at laft flood forth as military leaders. The firlt of thefe was named Taigh, whofe fucceffor, named Govand Sing, was the tenth and laft of th^ gourous. He engaged in a rebellion againft the government; but was at laft obliged to fubmit, and even attended the emperor Bahader Shah in perfon. At laft he was affaflinated by a Petan foldier, not without a fufpicion of the emperor himfelf being concerned. As he did not name a fucceflbr, his followers chofe a chief for them- felves named Banda, who foon began to make depre¬ dations on his neighbours ; but being at laft taken pri- foner, and fent to Delhi with his family and many of his countrymen, they were all put to an ignominious death. By this execution the Seiks were fo much ex- afperated, that they fwore eternal vengeance againft the Mohammedans, and have ever iince manifefted a moft implacable hatred againft them. Taking advan- tage of the diftraflion of the Mogul empire by the invafion of Nadir Shah, they conquered feveral pro¬ vinces. Wherever they came they threw down the mofques, and obliged every one to quit the country Vol. X. Part II. who refufed to embrace their tenets. The war with H Ahmed Shah has been already mentioned. Since his death they have recovered all the territories they loft during their conteft with him ; and now poffefs the greateft part of Moultan, as well as feveral diilrifts in the province of Delhi 5 including in their territones the whole of that rich country named the Panjab, on ac¬ count of five rivers which defeend from the northern mountains, and inclofe or iriterfedft it, running after¬ wards into the Indus. The Seiks, as has already been mentioned, worfhip one God ; but without image, or believing in any me¬ diator. They eat all kinds of meat except beef; fpa- ring the black cattle, in all probability, on account of their utility. Pork is very generally eaten, probably on account of its being forbidden by the Mohamme¬ dans. They are commonly dreiTed in blue, a colour reckoned unlucky by the other Hindoos. Their drefs confifts of blue trowfers of cotton, a fort of plaid ge¬ nerally chequered with blue and thrown over the right fhoulder, with a blue turban. J heir government is lodged in an affembly of different chiefs ; but, who, as individuals, are independent of one another, and have feparate territories. They meet annually, or oftener if occafton requires, at a place called Antberfer, which is held in a kind of religious veneration where there is a large tank lined with granite, and furrounded with buildings, and beautifully ornamented. Their force is very confiderable, amounting to no fewer than 200,000 cavalry. However, they can feldom be brought to aft in concert, unlefs the whole nation be threatened with fome imminent danger. They are a ftrong hardy race of men, and capable of bearing much fatigue j and fo expert in war, that of late aimoft all the neigh¬ bouring countries have been laid under contribution by them, feveral petty chiefs having confented to pay them a fmall annual tribute in order to avoid their in- curlions. When in the field, none but the principal officers have tents, and thofe extremely final], fo that they may be 11 ruck and tranfported w-ith the greater quicknefs and facility. In cold weather the foldiers wrap themfelves during the night in a coarfe blanket, which in the time of marching is folded and carried on their horfe. Their country is well cultivated, po¬ pulous, and abounding in cattle, particularly horfes, which are reckoned the belt in all Hindoftan. This may probably be owing to the ftuds which were for¬ merly eftablilhed in different places of the province of Lahore on account of the Mogul himfelf. Stallions were fent thither from Perfia and Arabia, and there was a fixed order to fend to the ftuds in Lahore all fuch Arabian and Perfian horfes as by any accident ihould be rendered unfit for mounting. NotwithHand¬ ing their deiftn, the Seiks are faid to have a fuperfti- tious veneration for their fvvord ; infomuch, that before one of them will eat with a perfon of another religion, he draws his fword, and palling it over the victuals, repeats fome words of prayer, after which he will freely partake of them. Contrary to the praHice of all the other Hindoos, they diilike the fmoking of tobacco •, but many of them finoke and chew bang, which fometimes produces a degree of intoxi¬ cation. 3. The provinces of Delhi have, in the courfe of a few years, frequently changed their mailers, but have 3 Q. fcarce H I N [ 49° ] H I N Hintloft an. fcarce at any period during that time been under the authority of the fovereign. Their laid governor was named Nadjiff Khan, under the title of generalidimo of the emperor. He was involved in the ruin of Mo¬ hammed Kouly Khan, coufm to Soujah al Dowlah : after which he went to Caffim Aly Khan nabob of Bengal ; after whofe expuliion he retired with a party of horfe to Bundelcund into the fervice of Rajah Coman Sing. He next joined the Englifh •, and at laid became the general of Shah Allum. With a body of Englilh feapcys who had been put under his command, and fome other troops whom he had taken into his fervice, he fubdued the countries near Delhi, conquered almolb ail the territories of the Jauts, reducing the cities of Agra, Dieg, and other principal towns. Thefe con- queils were indeed effefled in the name of the Mogul, but he derived little benefit from them •, Nadjiff being the real mailer, and keeping poffeffion of them till his death, which happened in 1782: and fince that time the countries we fpeak of have been involved in a fcene of continual anarchy and bloodfhed. 4. Next to the provinces of Delhi are the dominions of the independent rajahs, ■whofe dominions lie conti¬ guous to one another. The principal are thofe oi Joinagar or Jaypour, Joadpour or Marwar, Oudiapour or Chitore, and Jefalmire. Thefe countries are under a kind of feudal conffitution, and every village is ob¬ liged to furnilh a certain number of horfemen at the fihorteft warning. The people are brave, hardy, and very much attached to their refpeclive chiefs 5 and their army is very formidable, amounting when collefted to about 150,000 horfemen. 5. The Jauts were a tribe who followed the occu¬ pation of agriculture in the northern part of Hindof- tan. About 40 years ago they were formed into a nation by Tackou Souragemul, proprietor of an in- confiderable dillriiff. After making himfelf mailer of all the countries dependant on Agra, of the town it- felf, and many other important places, he was killed in battle with Nadjib ul Dowlah, the Rohilla chief, in 1763. Since that time the power of this people has been fo much reduced by domeftic contentions and foreign wars, that the prefent rajah poffeffes only a ffrong town named Bartpoor, with a fmall diilrift around it. The Jauts, however, it is faid, are now manifeiling a martial difpofition, and thus may poffibly be foon in a condition to recover their former extent of territory. 6. The mod confiderable of all the Hindoo powers are the Mahrattas, with whom the Europeans firil became acquainted in their original territories of Ma¬ labar. The firil of their chiefs was named Seeva, or Seeva-jee ; who is faid to have been defcended from the ancient Hindoo emperors, and whofe father was lord of a fmall dillrift, for which he paid tribute to the Mohammedan king of Viziapour. For fome reafon, unknown to us, he was at laft arrefted by order of that king, and died in confinement; but his fon Seeva-jee took up arms in defence of his country, and made himfelf mailer of feveral important places, with a confiderable tra£l of territory, which were afterwaru* ceded to him by the queen-regent, the king of Vizia¬ pour having died foon after the commencement of the war. Seeva-jee having thus eftablifhed himfelf, foon became formidable to his neighbours, Many of the Hindoo princes put themfelves under his protection, and he at Hindoftan. length ventured to make war upon the emperor Aureng- " " ~v J zebe. In this he proved unfuccefsful, was taken prifoner, and carried to Delhi. Having found means, however, to make his efcape, he quickly recommenced hollilities; and the emperor, who was now far advanced in life, thought proper to come to an accommodation with fo troublefome an enemy. On this occafion the Mahrat¬ tas pretend that their prince obtained a grant of 10 per cent, on all the revenues of the Deccan ; which has often ferved as a pretence to invade that country, and levy contributions on the fouthern nabobs. Since that time the Mahrattas have become fo powerful, that all the princes of Hindollan are alarmed when they put themfelves in motion. Their territories extend about xooo miles in length and 700 in breadth •, and they are governed by a number of feparate chiefs, all of whom acknowledge the Ram Rajah as their fovereign, and all except Moodajee Booilah acknowledge the Pailhwa as his vicegerent. The capital of the fovereign was Sattarah ; but the Pailhwa generally refides at Poonah, one degree to the fouthward, and about 100 miles dilfant from Bombay. The country extends along the coaft nearly 'from Goa to Cambay. On the fouth it borders on the territories of Tippoo Saib ; on the call it has thofe of the Nizam and the rajah ot Berar ; and on the north thofe of the Mahratta chiefs Sindia and Holkar. 7. The rajah of Berar, befides that country, has the greateff part of Orixa. His dominions extend about 60c miles in length from eaft to weft, and 250 from north to fouth. The eaftcrn part of Orixa extends along the fea-coaft for about 150 Englilh miles, and divides the Britilh poffeftions in Bengal from thofe commonly called the Northern Circars. On the wreft his territories border upon thofe of the Paiih- wa ; on the fouth, upon thofe of the Nizam, Mahomet Hyat a Patan chief, Nizam Shah, and Ajid Sing. The rajah himfelf refides at Nagarpour, about midway betwixt Calcutta and Bombay. 8. Madajee Sindia has the greateft part of the go¬ vernment of Malva, together with the province of Candeifh. The remainder is under the government of Holkar ; who, as well as Sindia, pretends to be de¬ fcended from the ancient kings of Malva. The prin¬ cipal refidence of Sindia is at Ugein near the city of Mundu, which was once the capital of thefe kings* Holkar refides at Indoor, a town little more than 30 miles to the weftward of the former. The dominions of thefe, and fome other princes of fmaller note, ex¬ tend as far as the river Jumma. The two laft mentioned princes, though properly Mahrattas, own no allegiance' to the Ram Rajah, or great chief to whom the main body are nominally lub- je£t. Some time ago the Mahrattas aimed at the con- queft of all Hindoftan, and even avowed a defign ot expelling all the Mohammedan princes-, but their power was effeftually checked by the Britifti, and their diffen- fions among themfelves put an end to all Ichemes of that kind. Still, however, they were ready to watch every opportunity of invading the territories of their neigh¬ bours ; and their refources being fo conliderable, they wrere defervedly accounted a very formidable enemy. The ftrength of their army confifts chietly in cavalry; and both men and horfe are capable of enduring a great deal H I N [ 49> 1 H I HmJoftan. deal of fatigue. Bodies of 50 or 60,OOO cavalry have been known to travel 50 miles a day for many days together j which, coniidering the exceflive heat of the country, mult certainly appear very furprifing.. The country abounds very much in hories, and there is one kind named the Bheemerteddy horfe, which is greatly elteemed, and fold at a very high price. '1 he com¬ mon horfe of thefe parts is lean and looks ill, but is abundantly fit for the purpofes of war. The only weapon ufed by the horfemen is a fabre } in the ufe ot which they are fo dexterous, that it fs fuppofed tne belt European huflar would not be more than a match for a Mahratta horfeman. There are confiderable duds in every province belonging to the Pailhwa and dif¬ ferent chiefs j and there are likewife many jundis or great herds of horfes belonging to particular perfons, who turn thofe they have no occafion for loofe iu the open plains. The Mahratta horfemen are dreffed in a quilted jacket of cotton, which is fuppofed to be one of the belt defences againlt a fword that can eafily be con¬ trived of equal lightnefs j but the heat of the climate frequently renders it neceffary to be taken off 1 he reft of their drefs confilts of a pair of trowfers, and a kind of broad turban which defcends k>w enough to cover the neck and Ihoulders. In cafes of emergency the horfemen carry provifion both for themfelves and their horfes in fmall bags tied upon the faddles: the food of the rider confifts only of a few fmall cakes with a little Hour or rice, and fome fait and fpices ; the horfe is fed wdth a kind of peas named gram, or with balls made of the flour of thefe peas mixed with but¬ ter, prepared after a certain manner, and named ghee, together with fome garlic and hot fpices. Ihefe balls are given by way of cordial, and have the property of invigorating the animal after extraordinary fatigue. Sometimes it is faid that they add a fmall quantity of bang; a kind of drug which pyffeffes an exhilarating virtue, and produces fome degree of intoxication. The Mahratta cavalry feldom make any ufe of tents 5 even the officers frequently have no other accommoda¬ tion than a fmall carpet to fit and lie on •, and a Angle camel is able to carry the whole baggage of the gene¬ ral. The officers, however, are generally well mount¬ ed, and have fpare horfes in the field. All the fubjedls and vaffals of the Mahratta princes are generally ready to follow them into the field ; and in any cafe in which the honour or intereft of the na¬ tion appears to be concerned, they generally unite in the common caufe. Before they invade any country, the general is at great pains to inform himfelf of the nature and fituation of it; and they have now made incurfions into fo many different parts of Hindo- ftan, that there are very few countries there with which they are not very well acquainted. Iheir great fobriety, and the fatigue they are capable ot undergo¬ ing, render them very dangerous enemies. In all their expeditions the foldier firft provides for his horfe, and then goes to his own meal; after which he lies down contented by the fide of the animal, and is ready to mount him at the firft found of the nagar or great drum. They have their horfes under the moft excel¬ lent management; and by perpetually careffing and converfing with them, the animals acquire a degree of docility and fagacity .unknown in other countries. When on an expedition, the hories are accuftomed to eat grafs pulled up by the roots, which is laid to be very nutritive, and to be deftitute of that purgative quality which belongs to the blade alone. W hen they make an invafion, the devaftation is terrible ; the cattle are driven off, the harveft deftroyed, the villages burn¬ ed, and every human creature deftroyed who comes in their way. Notwithftanding this barbarity in time of war, however, they are very humane in time ot peace, living in great harmony among themfelves, and being always ready to entertain and affift ftrangers. Many of the cruelties they commit may be juftly reck¬ oned the effedls of retaliation for other cruelties exer- cifed upon them by their adverfaries. fIhus, in I771* after having given Hyder Ally a great defeat, they cut off the ears and nofes of a whole regiment of prifoners, and in that condition fent them back to their comman¬ der, in return for his having done the fame to a few prifoners he had taken fome time before. The revenue of the Paiffiwa is very confiderable ; being not lefs than ten millions fterling; but after de du6ting the expence of colledfion, and the expence of troops kept in readinefs for the fervice of the ftate, it is fuppofed that he cannot receive more than four millions. From this again we muft dedudt the ex- pences of the troops immediately belonging to the Paiffiwa himfelf, and which may amount to about three millions fterling ; fo that there remains a furplus only of one million after paying all the neceffary expences of government. This neverthelefs has been managed with fuch economy, that though long and expenfive wars were carried on after the death of Narrain Row, the ftate was not only clear of debt, but there was a furplus of two millions in the treafury, which Rogo- bah diffipated. 9. The Deccan, as left in 1748 by Nizam al Mulek, was by far the moft important and extenfive foubadary or viceroyffiip in the empire. It then furpaffed in fize the largeft kingdom in Europe ; but fince that time many provinces have been conquered by the Mahrattas, and the northern Circars by the Britilh. The poffef- fions of the Nizam ai'e alfo diminifhed by the ceffion of the Carnatic to the nabob of Arcot; great part of the territories of Tippoo Saib ; and many other pro¬ vinces of lefs note. Still, however, the Nizam poffeffes very confiderable territories ; but his finances are in fuch a wretched condition, and his provinces fo ill govern¬ ed, that he is accounted a prince of no confequence, though otherwife he might be reckoned one of the moft confiderable powers of Hindoftan. 10. The dominions of Tippoo Saib, the fon and fuc-- ceffor of Hyder Ally, are bounded on the north by the territories of the Pailhwa ; on the fouth by Travancore, the territory of an independent Hindoo prince ; on the weft by the fea ; and on the eaft by a great ridge of mountains, which feparate them from the territories of the nabob of Arcot. The country lying to the eaftward of thefe mountains is called the Carnatic Payen Ghat, and to the weftward the Carnatic Bhal/a Ghat. The latter belongs to Tippoo Saib ; and the two toge¬ ther make up the country formerly named the Carnatic, though the name is now reftridted to the Payen Ghat. —The fituation of the Bhalla Ghat is confiderably more elevated than the other ; by which means the temperature of the air is much cooler. On the 3 (£ 2 coal! Hindoftan. I H I N [ 492 ] H Hindoftan. coaft of Coromar.del there is a pile of ruins called by became an objedf of form N 22 Govern¬ ment of Hmdoftan. 2d Defence of the Britifh govern¬ ment in the “ eaft. the natives Mc/avipatam, and by the Britiih the /even pagodas. Concerning this there is a tradition, that it once flood at a coniiderable diftance from the fea, though moft of the ruins are now covered with water } and there is likewife a tradition, that- the mountains we fpeak of once formed the boundary of the ocean. The revenue and ftrength of Hyder Ally are' laid to have been greatly exaggerated : the former amounting to no more than four millions annually, though by his econr.my and good management he made it anfwer every purpole both in time of war and peace. He was at great pains to introduce the European disci¬ pline among his troops ; but notwithstanding all his endeavours, he was far from being able to make them cope with the Britifh. The advantages he gained were owing to his vaft fuperiority in cavalry, and the cele¬ rity of his marches } which would have been counter¬ acted had his adverfaries been poffcffed of a good body of cavalry •, and it is probable that the event of the war would have been decided in a fmgle campaign. His fon Tippoo Saib is faid to have been a man of lefs abilities than his father, though more violent in his difpofrtion. Againil this prince hoftilities commenced by the Britifh in conjundlion with the Mahrattas, between whom an alliance had been formed. Tippoo Saib himfelf fell a viClim to his own mifguided bravery at the liege of Se- ringapatam, which furrendered to the Britifh on the 4th of May 1799. With regard to the prefent government of Hin¬ doftan, our limits will not allow us to enter particu¬ larly upon it, nor indeed is it perhaps of any impor¬ tance, as the country is divided into fo many different ■kingdoms, the fovereigns of which, however they may differ in other refpedls, feem all to agree in defpotifm and oppreffion of their fubjefts. As a very confider- able part is now under the dominion of Britain, it may be neceffary to take fome notice of the behaviour of our countrymen in that part of the wmrld, efpecially -as an idea of their excefiive defpotifm and oppreffion of the natives has of late prevailed fo much, that the national character has fuffered confiderably by it. This has arifen partly from the great pains taken to propagate it, and partly from the ignorance of thofe among whom the report was circulated ; and the exaggerated accounts and contentions of the members of the government themfelves, have contributed no lefs to confirm and heighten the prejudices of the public. The Britiih territories in the Eaft Indies were ori¬ ginally under the jurifdiCiion of a governor and 13 members j but this number has fluctuated occafionally from j 4 to 4, at which it was fixed by act of parlia¬ ment. In this council all matters, whether relating to peace or war, government or commerce, were debated, the governor having no other fuperiority than that of giving the calling vote. In other refpefts the whole executive powTer wjas lodged in his hands, and all the eorrefpondence wfith the native princes of India was carried pn by his means, tire difpatches to them be- ing figned by him fingly 5 and all the princes and great men who vifited the prefidency were firft received by him, and hen introduced to the counfellors. He was military governor of Fort William, and commander in chief of the prefidency •, whence, as by his office he was invefted with a confiderable degree of power, he envy and jealoufy to the Hindoftan. members of the council and other confiderable people v__ f in that part of the world. In confequence of this, the government xvas divided into two parties, one fiding with the governor, and the other oppofing him ; in confequence of wffiich, the debates were frequently car¬ ried on with Inch heat and violence, that the records of the company are frequently fluffed with nothing but accounts of the contentions of thefe jarring parties. This indeed may be looked upon as one of the prin¬ cipal caufes by which the reputation of the Britifh go¬ vernment in the eaftern parts of the world has fuffered j for as there were very frequently opinions diametri¬ cally oppofite to one another recorded upon the fame fuojedl, the contending parties in the Britiih parlia¬ ment had always fufficient authority for what they faid, let them take which fide they would : and thus the characters of all concerned in the Eait India go¬ vernment wrere, by one perfon or other, fet forth in the moft opprobrious light. Another fource of reproach to the Britifh govern¬ ment in India was, that the court of directors in Eng¬ land became infefted with the fame fpirit of party and contention which pervaded all other departments of the ftate. Lord Clive and Mr Sullivan were the two great leaders in thefe party difputes ; and as the in- tereft of the one or the other prevailed, different per- fons were appointed to the ad mini fir ati on, and diffe¬ rent meafures adopted. The event of all this vcas, that whenever a new adminiftration was formed, the firft objedl was to condemn the meafures of thofe who had gone before him. Thus, in the year j 764, when Lord Clive was made governor of Bengal, the newT di- redlors reprefented the affairs of the company as in the worft fituation imaginable, from which they could on¬ ly be extricated by the ablities of Clive. On the ar¬ rival of the latter in the eaft, he took care to write home reports to the fame purpofe, and to condemn in the moft violent manner every thing that had been done ; the whole body of the company’s fervants wrere cenfured indifcriminately wfithout being allowed any means of defence, as they were in truth ignorant of the charges brought againft them. When the affairs of the company w?ere brought under a parliamentary review- in the year 1774, the government was brought under a new’ regulation. It now confided of a gover¬ nor-general and four counfellors ; three of whom were fent from England \ two being military gentlemen of high rank,, and the third a gentleman employed in the war-office. On their arrival they proceeded in the fame manner that Lord Clive had done before them : they pronounced in the moft decifive manner, that the company’s affairs wTere in a ruinous ftate •, and that every fpecies of corruption had been practifed by the former government. This general accufation, unfup- ported by any kind of evidence, was the conftant theme of the difpatches fent by them to England \ and thus has the reputation of the Britiih government fuffered exceedingly through the unwarrantable liber¬ ties which its own fervants have been allowed to take with one another. It muft alfo be confidered, that from the remote fituation of India, and the unavoid¬ able ignorance of its affairs on that account, it was eafy for any perfon, whofe malicious purpoles it might fuit, to prejudice the public againft the fervants of the company 11 I N [ 493 ] H I N Hindoftan. company to as great a degree as lie pleafed. Hence ' Tome perfons, loured by difappointment, or envious of the 1’uppofed emoluments of others*, reprefented matters in fuch an unfair light to their correfpondents in Eng¬ land, that the moil unjult and lhameful charges were frequently brought againlt innocent perfons, which they could neither prevent nor defend themfelves againft. The dreadful famine which took place in Bengal in the year 1769, offered to thefe malevolent perfons a moil fruitful lource of calamity; and many individuals were accufed of having brought on this dreadful calamity, which arofe entirely from a natural caufe, viz. the fail¬ ure of the rains, and which no human power could have prevented or removed. Opinions of this kind have not. only been circulated through the ifland of Britain in the moll open man¬ ner, but have even appeared in fome very refpeftable publications. Thus, in Dr Smith’s Treatife on the Wealth of Nations, when fpeaking of the oppreffion arifing from monopolies, and comparing their effedls in different Bates: “ The Englilh company (fays he), have not yet had time to ellablilh in Bengal fo per- feblly deftru£!ive a fyltem. The plan of the govern¬ ment, however, has had exa&ly the fame tendency. It has not been uncommon, I am well allured, for the chief, that is, the firft clerk of a fadlory, to order a peafant to plow up a rich field of poppies, and fow it with rice or fome other grain. The pretence wras to prevent a fcarcity of provifions •, but the real reafon, to give the chief m opportunity of felling at a better price a large quantity of opium he had on hand. Upon other occafions the order has been reverfed, and a rich field of rice or other grain has been plowed up to make room for a plantation of poppies, when the chief faw that extraordinary profit was to be made by opium.” To this, however, the following anfw’er has appeared in a late publication, entitled A ihort Review7 of the Britiffi government in India. “ The poppy is a plant which requires a peculiar foil, and particular care in the culture of it. The medium price of the land on which it is cultivated is about 11 or 12 rupees a bega/i, or one-third of an Englilh acre. It is fowmd at the beginning of October, when the feafon of the perio¬ dical rain expires. The plant begins to be fit for in- ciiion, in order to extract its juice, of which opium is made, about the end of December, and continues fo till March. It requires a dry foil, and can be brought to maturity only in the dry feafon, wTen the periodical rains have ceafed. Paddy or rice lands let on a me¬ dium at three rupees a begah. Rice is fowed about the end of May, juft before the periodical rains com¬ mence. One crop is raifed about the end of Septem¬ ber ; and another, which is the laft, and by far the greateft, about the end of December. It requires a foil faturated with water, and lies foaked in it for a conllderable time. On this account it is fow7ed juft before the periodical rains commence ; and nine-tenths of the quantity of rice produced in the company’s pro¬ vinces grow7 in the kingdom of Bengal, which is fo low and Hat, that the grounds are either overflowed by the rivers Ganges and Burrampooter, with their tributary ftreams, or foaked with the rain which falls and Hag- nates upon them. It is therefore evident, that the foil and the feafon, which alone can fructify the paddy or rice, would rot and deitroy the poppy; and it is there¬ fore as evident, that it is utterly imooffible, from the Hindoftan. nature 6f the two plants, that the one can be plowed ~ v up to lbwT the other.” With regard to the adminiftration of the Britilh af¬ fairs in the Rail Indies, it mull alfo be remarked, that the company now acl in a very different capacity from what they originally did. From a fociety of mer¬ chants, they are now become fovereigns of the coun¬ try to which they trade. The latter charakder was quite foreign to them •, and they have accordingly look¬ ed upon that of merchants to be the principal one, while that of fovereigns was to be only a kind of ap¬ pendage to it. Thus, inftead of adling for the intereft: of the country they govern, and which as fovereigns they naturally ought to do, they have added in many cafes direddly oppoiite to it, which, as merchants, is alfo their natural intereft. Hence alfb, when the ad¬ miniftration in India did any thing in obedience to the orders of the directors, which orders being dictated by merchants, were prejudicial to the interefts of the coun¬ try, that injury has been fometimes unjuftly attributed to their fervants, who added merely in obedience to the orders they received. On the other hand, when the India adminiftration added with the generous fpirit of fovereigns, they w7ere fometimes blamed by the direc¬ tors, who judged as merchants, and fometimes by the miniftry, w7ho were al>vays ready upon the fmalleft pre¬ tence to interfere in tdieir affairs. At the time w;hen the Britilh adminiftration firft commenced in Hindoftan, the Hindoo governors were univerfally named rajahs; but though many of the Hindoo families yet bear that title, it does not appear to refemble, in any manner of way, our titles of nobi¬ lity, or to be a dignity w7hich can be conferred by any of the princes, or even by the Mogul himfelf. Hence, in that part of the w7orld there are no ancient nobility, the titles being conferred merely by ufurpers, w7ho have neither right nor title derived from any thing but violence. In this country we find the title of ‘zemindar very common 5 a word compounded of two others, iigni- fying, in the Periic language, a landholder. It ap¬ pears to have been introduced by the Mohammedans, and to have been a kind of temporary office, preferi- bing the performance of certain duties, and requiring fecurity for the perfonal appearance of the zemindar. He is obliged to attend the exchequer of the king’s chief colleftor, at the commencement of every new year, to fettle his revenues ; and he is not allowed to enter upon the duties of his office for the year with¬ out a fpecial order for that purpofe. On the death of a zemindar, the candidate for fucceftion muft petition the fovereign, engaging himfelf to perform all the fti- pulated duties, and to pay the cuftomary fees ; nor can he enter upon his office without a fpecial invefti- ture. As the zemindars were by virtue of their office invefted with confiderable power, they foon became not only very defpotic in their own dominions, but by degrees began to encroach on the power of the fove¬ reign himfelf. After the irruption of Nadir Shah every thing wras thrown into confufion : the viceroys threw7 off obedience to the emperor, the nabobs threw off all obedience to them, and ufurped their power } at which time it is probable that tdie zemindars likewife affumed powers to which they were by no means in- titfed H I N [ 494 ] H I N Hindoilan. titled from their office. Notwithflanding this, how¬ ever, they were fometimes treated by the Mohammedan governors as mere revenue-officers, and ufed very harffi- ly. At feme times there were a fet of people bound for the zemindars under the title of woodedars; and thefe had either a joint power with the former, or were fuperior to them in the collection of the reve¬ nues ; and fometimes they were fuperfeded by officers appointed immediately by government itfelf, under the various names of aumi/s, talijilders, or fezawruls. —The zemindaries are not limited in extent or value } there being fome in Bengal which yield a revenue as high as 350,000!. flerling, while others fcarcely amount to 350I. ; but all the great zemindars, and many of thefe in middling circumflances, having procured for themfelves the title of rajah, affeCl much pomp and (late in their different diftri&s, and keep their inferiors in as great fubjection as the Mohammedan governors keep them. Some of them alfo have their power aug¬ mented by being of the Bramin call; ; and by the reverence fuppofed to be due to religion on that ac¬ count, joined with the power conferred upon them by the fovereign, they are in general rendered exceedingly defpotic, with an almoft unlimited authority to plunder -their tenants; in which they were indulged by the nabobs, from the motive of plundering them again. From the confultations of the felect committee in 1769, wre are informed that the zemindars have a power of levying fines at pleafure 5 that they raife large fums from duties colleCled in the market 5 and that they frequently oblige the ryots or hufbandmen to work for nothing. In ihort, the fame claims made by the European barons on their vaffals in the times of the feudal fyftem, are now made by the zemindars on the common people of Hindoftan. If one of them is to be married, if he has a child born, if honours are to be conferred upon him ; nay, if he is even to be lined for his own mifconducl, the poor ryot muff always contribute his fliare. Mr Scrofton, in his hi- flory of Hindoftan, fets forth the fituation of the in¬ habitants in the following wmrds :—“ Unhappily for the Gentoos, themfelves are made the minifters of op- preflion over each other •, the Moor-men, haughty, lazy, and voluptuous, make them, of whom they have no jealoufy, the minifters of their oppreffion, which further anfwers the end of dividing them, and prevents their uniting to fling off the yoke ; and by the ftrange intoxication of powTer, they are found ftill more rapa¬ cious and cruel than their foreign matters : and what is more extraordinary, the Bramins ftill exceed the reft in every abufe of power, and feem to think, if they bribe God by beftowing a part of their plun¬ der on cows and faquirs, their iniquities wall be par¬ doned.” From this account of the fituation of the people of Hindoftan under their native rulers, it is by no means probable that they could make a worfe exchange by falling under the jurifdidtion either of the Mohammedans or Europeans. A notion indeed hath been induftrioufly propagated, that the Britiffi government has behaved with the greateft cruelty in colleding the revenues, and that they have even invented tortures to make the rich people difeover their treafures 5 but on examining the matter impartially, the reverfe of this is found to be true. At the time that the Britiffi government in¬ l terfered in the affairs of Hindoftan, the provinces were Hindoftan. found to be in a ruinous ftate, in confequence of the wars which had taken place in the country. Even in the moll fettled ftate, and when' the adminiftration was molt regular, the government w'as altogether defpotic, and the mode of collecling its revenues extremely ar¬ bitrary ; the puniftiments inflicted very cruel 5 and the whole fyftem of government fuch as would be reckon¬ ed quite ffiocking in Europe. It is only within thefe few years that the Britiffi could effedtually interpofe in behalf of the natives ; and in that ihort time it has produced a very confiderable reformation. It is cer¬ tain, that the Britifh government has difeouraged op- preffive meafures as much as poffible ; abolifhed the cruel modes of puniffiment ufed by the Mohammedans j and by inftituting a more regular plan of juftice, has procured eafe and fecurity to the natives, and preferved them in a ftate of tranquillity altogether unknown to them before its commencement. Many inftances of the greateft cruelty exercifed upon the zemindars and other colledtors are to be met with in the hiftory of Bengal, written by a native hiftorian, and tranflated by Gladwin : yet the perfon who exercifed thefe cruel¬ ties was dignified with the titles of the faithfulfervant of the Empire, and the Glory of the State ; which ffiows that the people were abfolutely familiarifed with cruel¬ ty, and did not know wffiat it was to be under a lenient government. Since the Britiffi had the dominion, matters have been totally reverfed, and the Hindoos, inflead of being treated with cruelty, perfecuted on account of their religion, and compelled to renounce it, have been ufed with at leaft comparative lenity, and great indulgence has been fliown to them even in their moft abfurd pra61ices and fuperftitions. When the Bri¬ tiffi government firft accepted of the office of dewanny, or colle&or of the revenues, it was not in their power to interpofe with any kind of efficacy for the relief of the inhabitants; becaufe it wjas at firft thought pro¬ per to allow the taxes to be collected by natives, who would undoubtedly follow their ancient modes of col- ledlion. Even at that time, however, the mildnefs of the Britiffi governors had fome effeft upon the Afia- tics j fo that the people in general were treated with more lenity than formerly : and in the year 1772, when the council of Bengal openly affumed the office of dewan themfelves, an immediate ftop was put to all thofe arbitrary and oppreffive methods which had been formerly in ufe. Formerly fome zemindars had been flogged even to death, by an jnftrument called a korah : but from the moment that the Britifh coun¬ cil took the colledtion into their own hands, not only this inftrument was laid afide, but all kind of corporal puniffiment 5 by wfliich means the feverity of the Mohammedan government has been entirely aboliffi- ed, and no other puniffiments inflidfed in cafes of in- folvency than fuch as are in ufe in our own country. Still, however, in fuch extenfive dominions, where a great {hare of power muft be one way or other com¬ mitted to the natives, it is impoffible but fome arbitrary a£ts muft be committed, as the natives are always prone to a [ 496 ] H I N [4 Mindoftan. xvliicli compofed the revenue, the form of keeping the u—-v— accounts, the computation of time, even the techni¬ cal terms, which ever form the greateft obfcurity in every fcience, differed as much as the foil and produc¬ tions of the province. The nabobs exadled what they could from the zemindars and great farmers of the re¬ venue, whom they left at liberty to plunder all below, referving to themfelves the liberty of plundering them in their turn, when they were fuppofed to have en¬ riched themfelves with the fpoils of the country. The mufaddies, who flood between the nabob and zemin¬ dars, and between them and the people, had each their lhares of the public wealth. Theie profits were confidered as illegal embezzlements, and therefore were taken with every precaution which could enfure fecre- cy ; and being, confequently, fixed by no rule, de¬ pended on the temper, abilities, or power, of each individual for the amount. It therefore became a duty to every man to take the moft effedlual meafures to conceal the value of his property, and evade every in¬ quiry into his conduft; while the zemindars and other landholders, who had the advantage of long pof- ieflion, availe4 themfelves of it by complex diviflons of the lands, and intricate modes of colledlion, to per¬ plex the officers ©f government, and confine the know¬ ledge of the rents to themfelves. The internal ma¬ nagement of each diftridt varied no lefs than that of the whole province. The lands fubjedl: to the fame col- ledlion, and intermixed with each other, were fome held by farm, fome fuperintended by Ihickdors or agents on the part of the colledlor, and wTere left to the zemindars themfelves, under various degrees of controul.” For fome political reafons the company, though they had acquired the dewanny, had not yet chofen to affume the executive part of the office them¬ felves, but committed it to the management of natives, as has already been mentioned, and their plans had been found extremely defective. By the time that Mr Haftings had been inverted with the government, the court of direftors had refolved to change their plan, and openly affume the office of the dewanny ; and the rules eftabliffied by that gentleman for the colleftion of the revenues, his mode of adminirtering juftice, and his police for the government of the country, are ftill obferved with very little variation. The plan for collefting the revenues confifted, in the firfl place, in rendering the accounts as fimple and intelligible as poffible •, in the next, in eftablifhing fixed rules for the colledlion ; and in the third, ma¬ king the mode of them uniform in all parts of the pro¬ vinces ; and in the fourth, providing for the equal ad- miniftration of juffice. The powrer of the zemindars was now circumfcribed, and their extortions thoroughly put a flop to ; many vexatious taxes and tolls were aboliffied, and a new mode of colledting the cufloms was ertablifhed, to the great relief of the merchants : and fo well were all the parts of this plan found to be adapted to the purpofes they were defigned to anfwer, that it has hitherto been made the model of all fubfe- quent regulations. One great objeftion to the India government is, that the Engliffi law, which undoubtedly is better calcu¬ lated than any other for fecuring the liberties of the people, has not yet been adopted in India } whence it is thought that the company’s fervants have ftill ffiovv- H I N ed a difpofftion to opprefs, rather than to relieve, the Kitidoftafi, oppreffed inhabitants of Hindoftan. But in anfwer to 'r* J that it is faid, that the difference betwixt the two coun¬ tries is fo great, that there can be no companion be¬ twixt the one and the other, nor can the conftitution of England be in any degree adapted to that of the other. The religion, laws, manners, and cufloms, of both Hindoos and Mohammedans, are fo effentially dif¬ ferent from thofe of this country, that it is impoffible to affimilate them, fliould ever any thing of the kind he attempted. The only true method therefore of judging whether the prefent ftate of Hindoflan is pre¬ ferable to what it formerly was, is to compare it with what it was under the heft Mogul emperors ; and in this comparifon it muff certainly appear that the pre¬ ference is greatly in favour of the Britifti adminiftra- tion. In Major Rennel’s work we are informed, that during the reign of Ackbar, whom he ftyles “ the glo¬ ry of the honfe of Timur,” the country had never en¬ joyed fo much tranquillity $ “ but this tranquillity would hardly be deemed fuch in any other quarter of the world, and muft therefore be underflood to mean a ftate ffiort of adfual rebellion, or at leaft commotion.” The fame author, fpeaking of the ftate of the Britilh empire there, ufes the following words : “ The Ben¬ gal provinces which have been in our actual poffeffion near 23 years, have, during that whole period, enjoyed a greater fhare of tranquillity than any other part of India, or indeed than thofe provinces had ever expe¬ rienced fince the days of Aureng-zebe.” To this wc may add, that the provinces have not only experienced a perfedl freedom from external invafions, but likewife enjoy a degree of internal tranquillity altogether un- known before, by the fubje&ion and civilization of a fet of banditti who inhabited the hills of Rajemahl, axd infelled the travellers who pafled that way ; a wan¬ dering tribe of religious mendicants, who were wmnt to commit the greatell enormities. Another advantage which the inhabitants of this country reap from the Britifh government, is the fecurity from violence and oppreffion either by their Mohamme¬ dan fuperiors or by one another. Under the article Hin¬ doo we have already mentioned the particular circum- ftances that thefe people are liable to the punifhment of lofing their caft from a variety of caufes, and that this is looked upon by them to be the moft grievous cala¬ mity they can fuffer. The Mohammedan governors frequently took advantage of their fuperftition in this refpeft to opprefs them ; and this circumftance alone frequently produced the moft horrid confufion. In the inftrufiions given to the fupervifors, Mr \erelft informs them, that “ it is difficult to determine whe¬ ther the original cuftoms, or the degenerate manners of the Muflulmans, have moft contributed to confound the principles of right and w^rong of thefe provinces. Certain it is (adds he), that almoft every decifion of theirs is a corrupt bargain with the higheft bidder. Compenfation was frequently accepted of even for ca¬ pital crimes, and fines became at laft an intolerable grievance ; nay fo venal were the judges at that time, that it became at laft a fettled rule to allow each of them a fourth part of any property in difpute as a compenfation for his trouble.—It is impoffible to fup- pofe that fuch monftrous abufes continue under the Britiftr government: on the contrary we muft readily believe. 1 H I N [ 497 ] H I N H'i'.c!oftan. believe, wbat tbe governors themfelves affert, that im* mediately after the provinces fell under Britilh jurif- ditdion, both Hindoos and Mohammedans have been left to the free exercife of their religion, laws, and cu- fcoms. The Hindoos themfelves acknowledge this, and are as well pleafed with the mildnefs of the Britifh government, as they are difpleafed with the fuperftition and cruelty of tbe Mohammedans. Under the Britilh government wre cannot fuppofe but that commerce, to which the inhabitants of this country are fo much ad¬ dicted, will be much more encouraged than by the ava¬ ricious and barbarous Mohammedans. The latter had impofed lo many reilraints upon trade of all kinds, by the multitude of taxes collected at the landing-places, watch-houfes, markets, &c. that it was almoit impof- fible to carry it on with any advantage. Among other falutary regulations, however, enacted by the Britilh government in i']’]!, many of thofe taxes upon com¬ merce were abolithed, and a plan laid for effectually li¬ berating the inhabitants from thofe (hackles by which tueir commerce had been fo long fettered.—Regard has alfo been paid to the inftruCtion of the people in uleful knowledge ; and the feminary eltablilhed at Cal¬ cutta by Sir William Jones, certainly does much ho¬ nour to the founder. Some regard had indeed been paid to this by the Mohammedan emperors j but at the time that the Britilh government commenced, thefe had been entirely negleCted, their endowments re- lumed by government, and even the buildings fallen into ruin. From a comparifon of any government to which the Hindoos have hitherto been lubjeft, with that of Bri¬ tain, indeed, it is evident that the preference mull be given greatly in favour of the latter. At the time when the Britiih firft vifited that country, they were not under tne jurifdiCfion of their native fovereigns, nor had they been fo for a long time before. The Moguls w^ere not only foreigners, but a mod: cruel and deteft- able race of men $ and it wTas by ufurpations of their Owm rebellious fubjefts that the anarchy and confufion was introduced, in which the country was involved for (o long a time. 1 he Brhilh are foreigners as well as the Moguls ; but the latter, who profefs the intolerant fuperftition of Mohammed, fuffer their conduft to be influenced by it in fuch a manner as to treat the natives with the utmoft cruelty. The greateft evil perhaps which refults from the Britiih government is, the ex¬ portation of great funis of money to a foreign coun- tiy ; but tnis evil, with refpedt to the provinces poflef- fed by the Britilh, exifted alfo under the Mohammedan government. The Mogul emperors refided at Delhi, which is far diftant from the provinces of Bengal, Ba- har, and Orifia, the territories now poflefled by Bri¬ tain ; fo that the greateft part of the treafure fent to that capital was totally loft to them. In the time of Aureng-zebe, the emperor’s tribute amounted to three millions fterling ; and of this a confiderable part was fpecie } but fince that time the tribute w7as fixed at only l,25o,00°l. and even this was a vaft fum j to which if we add that carried out of the country by commanders of mercenary troops, who were all foreigners, it is not unreafonable to fuppofe that under the Mogul govern¬ ment matters were ftill worfe, even in this refpeci than under that of Britain. Welhall conclude this apology for the Britifh go- VOL. X. Part II. S vemment, with the following extradl from the treatife Hind oft an, lately quoted, A ftiort Review of the Britilh Govern- " v ment in India. “ A more deteftable or detefted race of people never appeared than the Mohammedan con¬ querors of Jndia $ whether we confider the brutality of their paftions, the bigotry of their religion, the corrup¬ tion of their manners, the barbarity of their education, or the tyranny of their government ? In all thefe re- fpefts they w7ere the terror and abhorrence of the Hin¬ doos, whofe country they invaded, and whofe dominion they ufurped. “ The fanatic ignorance of the favage caliph, which dictated his barbarous reafon for deftroying the Alex¬ andrian library, had neither been tutored nor refined by the Tartar education of Timur and his predeceflbrs. The fame fuperftitious bigotry which incited the Ara¬ bian caliphs to deftroy the monuments of weftern learn- ing, likewife impelled the Tartar khans to overthrow' the religious temples of the eaftern worlhip. At the commencement of the nth century Mahmood entered Hindollan, and in the courfe of 12 expeditions he de- ftroyed the famous temples of Nagracut, Tannafar, Ma- tra, and Sumnaut. In the latter end of the next cen¬ tury, Mahmood Gori penetrated as far as the city of Benares, and committed outrages as Mahmood had done * before at Nagracut and Sumnaut. Tamerlane poflefled as much of this furious zeal as any of his favage prede¬ ceflbrs ; and if the enthufiafm of this deftruftive reli¬ gion had not occafionally abated among fome of his fuc- ceffors, they would fcarce have left a Hindoo temple or prieft in the country they fubdued. “ .Enough, however, had been done to fix an indeli¬ ble ftain on the memory of thofe intolerant tyrants, and to make a lafting impreftion on the minds of the Hindoos, wdio, to the lateft period of the Mogul go¬ vernment, were kept in conftant dread of docftrines, which, to their apprehenfions, feemed to infpire the Mohammedans with facrilegious cruelty. Idolatry is as great an abomination to a Muflulman as it was to the Jews when they moft ftridftly revered the divine command which prohibits it; and moft of the Hindoo ceremonies being confidered by the Mohammedans as afts of idolatry, and all their pagodas as temples of idols, a religious principle excited mutual fentiments of abhorrence and antipathy between the conquerors and their fubjeas. The reft of the charaaer of the Mo¬ hammedans may be fummed up in the concife and em¬ phatic words of Mr Scrafton, who fays, ‘ their diftin- guiftiing qualities are perfidy and fenfuality.’ “ But notwithftanding thefe faa*, and that the hif- tory of their government is a difgufting repetition of oppreflion, maflacres, and rebellion, the fafhion of the times has been to praife it, and to reprefent the fitua- tion of the Hindoos as eafy and happy under it, till they were difturbed in this peaceful ftate of repofe’ and fecurity by the Englifti; who have been defcribed (with unparalleled injuftice) as a fet of rapacious talk- mailers. It furely requires a very fmall degree of re- fleflion to perceive, that fuch reprefentations of the two governments muft, from the very nature of things, be falfe. “ The Mohammedan conquerors came into India from a barbarous region, with minds and manners as uncultivated as the wilds from which they iffued. The only notion th§y had of government was abfolute pov/er 3R in H I N [ 498 ] H I N TTrndoftan. in the fovereign, and abfolute fubmiilion in the fubjeft. " ^ The tenets of their religion, fo far from foftening the ferocity of their nature, ferved only to whet the edge of their perfecution towards the fuffering Hindoos, whom they haraffed without mercy, and deftroyed with¬ out remorfe. The Britilh conquerors came from a country famed for arts and fciences 5 the generous prin¬ ciples of public liberty had been indilled into their minds from their earlieft infancy : the mild tenets of Chriilianity cherilhed and commanded every charitable duty : and they had been taught, by precept and ex¬ ample, to rule with equity, and to obey with freedom. Can it be fuppofed that under thefe circumllances, the two nations fhould have totally changed characters on their coming into India ? That the barbarous and fero¬ cious Tartar Ihould become mild and enlightened 5 that the cultivated and generous Briton fhould have degene¬ rated into a cruel tyrant ; and that the Britilh gover¬ nors fhould have rendered the lituation of their Hindoo fubjeCts worfe than it was under the Mogul emperors ? Reafon revolts at the idea ; and nothing but the ranked; -prejudice could ever luggeit or adopt it.” With regard to the geography of this country, Mr Rennel obferves, that though by the modern Euro¬ peans, Hindoftan has been underftood to mean the trad fituated between the rivers Indus and Ganges on the eaft and weft, the mountains of Thibet and Tartary on the north, and the ocean on the fouth, the extent of Hindoftan, properly fo called, is much more circum- fcj'ibed •, and the name ought only to be applied to that part which lies to the northward of 21° or 22° latitude. The reputed fouthern boundary of Hindoftan is the Nerbudda river as far as it goes, and the northern fron¬ tiers of Bengal and Bahar compofe the remainder. The countries to the fouth of this line are called Deccan by the Indian geographers, and comprehend about one half of the territory generally known by the name of the Mogul Empire. Our author therefore choofes to diftinguifh the northern part by the name of HindoJIan Proper; which has indeed the Indus and mountains of Thibet and Tartary for its weftern and northern boun¬ daries •, but the Burrampooter river is rather to be con- fidered as the’ eaftern boundary than the Ganges ; the latter interfering fome of the richeft provinces in the empire. According to this fuppofttion, Hindoftan Proper will equal in fize the countries of France, Ger¬ many, Bohemia, Hungary, Switzerland, Italy, and the Low Countries ; the Deccan and peninfula being about equal to the Britifh iflands, Spain, and Turkey in Eu¬ rope. Towards the north, Hindoftan is very cold and bar¬ ren ; but towards the fouth, very hot, and fertile m corn, rice, fruits, and other vegetables. The northern pro¬ vinces are very mountainous and fandy 5 while the fouthern are for the moft part level, and well watered with feveral rivers. The moft remarkable mountains are thole which furround it on three fides. Thofe on the weft, feparat- ing it from Perfia, called, in general, Soleyman Kuy, or the mountains of So/eyman, are of a vaft height as well as breadth, and are only palfable in certain places, through which roads have been made for the fake of commerce. The chief are thole which lead to Cabul, Gazna, and Candahar. This great chain of mountains is inhabited by different nations, the principal of which are the Afghans, or Patans, and the Baluches, who Hindoftart. have extended themfelves on the fide of India, as well /—J as Perfia. The mountains on the north are called A'ear- Be th5s. as it will, however, the the crea- w‘1°ie account of the creation refts on the truth of the tionthe Mofaic hiftory; and this we muft of neceftity ac- only pro- cept, becaufe we can find no other which does not * e °ae‘ .either abound with the groffeft abfurdities, or lead us into abiolute darknefs. I he Chinefe and Egyptian pretenfions to antiquity are fo abfurd and ridiculous, O It Y. 507 that the bare reading muft be a fufficient confutation Civil of them to every reafonable perfon. See the articles, Bdory. ^ China and Egypt. Some hiftorians and philofophers ' are inclined to difcredit the Mofaic accounts, from the appearances of volcanoes, and other natural pheno¬ mena : but their objedtions are by no means fufficient to invalidate the authority of the facred waitings; not to mention that every one of their own fyftems is liable to inliiperable objections. See Geoeogy. It is therefore realonable for every perfon to accept of the Mofaic account of the creation as truth : but an hiftorian is under an abfolute neceftity of doing it, be¬ caufe, without it, he is quite deftitute of any ftandard or fcale by which he might reduce the chronology of different nations to any agreement; and, in ihort, without receiving this account as true, it would be in a manner impoflible at this day to write a general hiftory of the world. 1. The trafifaclions during the firft period, viz. from the creation to the flood, are very much unknown, no-^^^ thing indeed being recorded of them but what is to be the fioqds found in the firft lix chapters of Genefis. In general, we know, that men w7ere not at that time in a favage ftate ; they had made fome progrefs in the arts, had invented mufic, and found out the method of working metals. They feem alfo to have lived in one vaft com¬ munity, without any of thofe diviftons into different na¬ tions which have fince taken place, and which evident¬ ly proceeded from the confufion of languages. The moft material part of their hiftory, however, is, that having once begun to tranfgrefs the divine commands, they proceeded to greater and greater lengths of wick- ednefs, till at laft the I3eity thought proper to fend a flood on the earth, which deftroyed the whole hu¬ man race except eight perfons, viz. Noah and his fa¬ mily. This terrible cataftrophe happened, according to the Hebrew7 copy of the Bible, 1636 years after the creation ; according to the Samaritan copy 1307. For the different conjeftures concerning the natural caufes of the flood, fee the article Deluge. ft°ry- eftablilhment in the land of Canaan. For the hiftory of thefe tranfaftions we muft refer to the Old Teftament,Migratioia where the reader will fee that it was attended with of the If- the moft terrible cataftrophe to the Egyptians, andr.ael‘tes with the utter extermination of fome nations, the de-ho‘“ fcendants of Ham, who inhabited Judaea. Whether^^’ the overthrow of Pharaoh in the Red fea could af- fe£l the Egyptian nation in fuch a manner as to de¬ prive them of the greateft part of their former learning, and to keep them for fome ages after in a barbarous ftate, is not eafily determined ; but unlefs this was the cafe, it feems exceedingly difficult to account for the total filence of their records concerning fuch a re¬ markable event, and indeed for the general confufion and uncertainty in which the early hiftory of Egypt is involved. The lettlement of the Jews in the promifed land of Canaan, is fuppofed to have happened about 1491 B. C. iz For near 200 years after this period, we find no Hiftory of accounts of any other nations than thofe mentioned in ^ie <-5rce^s* Scripture. About 1280 B. C. the Greeks began to make other nations feel the effetffs of that enterprifing and martial fpirit for which they were fo remarkable, and which they had undoubtedly exercifed upon one another long before. Their firft enterprife was an in- vafion of Colchis (now' Mingrelia), for the fake of the golden fleece. Whatever was the nature of this ex¬ pedition, it is probable they i'ucceeded in it; anc^ it is likewife probable, that it was this fpecimen of the riches of Afia wffiich inclined them fo much to Afiatic expeditions ever after. All this time wm are totally in the dark about the ftate of Afia and Africa, except in fo far as can be conjediured from Scripture. The ancient empires of Babylon, Affyria, and Perfia, pro¬ bably ftill continued in the former continent, and Egypt and Ethiopia feem to have been conliderable kingdoms in the latter. About 1184 years B. C. the Greeks again diftin- guiffied themfelves by their expedition againrt Troy, a city of Phrygia Minor; wffiich they plundered and burnt, maffacring the inhabitants wuth the moft unre¬ lenting crudity. Atneas, a Trojan prince, efcaped with fome follow7ers into Italy, where he became the remote founder of the Roman empire. At this time Greece was divided into a number of fmall principalities, moft of which feem to have been in fubjedtion to Agamem¬ non king of Mycenae. In the reign of Atreus, the father of this Agamemnon, the Heraclidae, or deicen- dants of Hercules, who had been formerly banilhed by Euryftheus, were again obliged to leave this country. Under their champion Hyllus they claimed the king¬ dom of Mycenm as their right, pretending that it be¬ longed to their great anceftor Hercules, who was un- juftly deprived of it by Euryftheus f. The contro- j '^e verfy was decided by fingle combat; but Hyllus being killed, they departed, as had been before agreed, under a promife of not making any attempt to return for jo years. About the time of the Trojan war, alfo, we find the Lydians, Myfians, and fome other nations of Afia Minor, firft mentioned in hiftory. The names of the Greek ftates mentioned during this uncertain period are, 1. Sicyon. 2. Leleg. 3. Meffina. 4. Athens. 5. Crete, 6. Argos. 7. Sparta. 8. Pelafgia. 9. Theffaly. Seal. .HISTORY. 509 Civil 9. Tlieffaly. 10. Attica. n. Phocis. 12. Locris. Hiftoiy. Ozela. 14. Corinth. 15. Eleufina. 16. Elis. U‘’”'v ' 1 j. Pilus. 18. Arcadia. 19. Egina. 20. Ithaca. 21. Cephalone. 22. Phthia. 23. Phocidia. 24. Ephyra. 25. Eolia. 26. Thebes. 27. Calilta. 28. Etolia. 29. Doloppa. 30. Oechalia. 31. Mycenae. 32. Euboea. 33. Mynia. 34. Doris. 35. Phera. 36. lola. 37. Trachina. 38. Thrafprocia. 39. Myr- midonia. 40. Salamine. 41. Scyros. 42. Hype- ria or Melite. 43. The Vulcanian hies. 44. Megara. 45. Epirus. 46. Achaia. 47. The hies of the Egean fea. Concerning many of thefe we know nothing belides their names : the moft remarkable particulars concerning the reft may be found under their refpec- j. live articles. Of the About 1048 B. C. the kingdom of Judea under Jews. King David approached its utmoft extent of power. In its moft ftourilhing condition, however, it never was remarkable for the largenefs of its territory. In this refpeft it fcarce exceeded the kingdom of Scotland j though, according to the accounts given in fcripture, the magnificence of Solomon was fuperior to that of the moft potent nipnarchs on earth. This extraordina¬ ry wealth was owing partly to the fpoils amaffed by King David in his conquefts over his various enemies, and partly to the commerce with the Eaft Indies which Solomon had eftabliftied. Of this commerce he owed his fhare to the friendftiip of Hiram king of Tyre, a city of Phoenicia, whofe inhabitants were now the moft famed for commerce and fkill in maritime af¬ fairs of any in the whole world. After the death of Solomon, which happened about 975 B. C. the Jewifh empire began to decline ; and loon after many powerful Hates arofe in different parts of the world. The difpofition of mankind in general items now to have taken a new turn, not eafily ac¬ counted for. In former times, whatever wars might have taken place between neighbouring nations, we have no account of any extenfive empire in the whole world, or that any prince undertook to reduce far di- ftant nations to his fubjeclion. The empire of Egypt indeed is laid to have been extended immenfely to the eaft, even before the days of Sefoftris. Of this coun¬ try, however, our accounts are fo imperfecf, that icarce any thing can be concluded from them. But now, as it were all at once, we find almoft every nation aiming at univerfal monarchy, and refufing to fet any bounds whatever to its ambition. The firft fliock given to the Jewifh grandeur was the divifion of the kingdom into two through the imprudence of Reho- boam. This rendered it more eafily a prey to Shifhak king of Egypt j who five years after came and pillaged Jerufalem, and all the fortified cities of the kingdom of Judah. The commerce to the Eaft Indies was now difcontinued, and confequently the fources of wealth in a great meafure flopped ; and this, added to the perpetual wars between the kings of Ifrael and Judah, contributed to that remarkable and fpeedy decline which xs now fo eafily to be ohferved in the Jewifh af¬ fairs. Whether this king Shifhak was the Sefoftris of pro¬ fane writers or not, his expedition again!! Jerufalem as recorded in fcripture feems very much to referable the defultory conquefts afcribed to Sefoftris. His infan¬ try is faid to have been innumerable, compofed of different African nations; and his cavalry 60,000, with Civil 1200 chariots j which agrees pretty well w ith the , Hiftory- , mighty armament afcribed to Sefoftris, and of which v an account is given under the article Egypt, N° 2. There indeed his cavalry are faid to have been only 24,000 ; but the number of his chariots is increafed to 27,000 5 which laft may not unreafonably be rec¬ koned an exaggeration, and thefe fupernumerary cha¬ riots may have been only cavalry ; but unlefs we allow Sefoftris to be the fame with Shifhak, it feems impof- fible to fix on any other king of Egypt that can be fuppofed to have undertaken this expedition in the days of Solomon. Though the Jew’s obtained a temporary deliverance from Shifhak, they w’ere quickly after attacked by new enemies. In 941 B. C. one Zerah an Ethiopian in¬ vaded Judaea with an army of a million of infantry and 300 chariots; but wras defeated with great daugh¬ ter by Afa king of Judah, wdio engaged him with ^ an army of 580,000 men. About this time alfo w’eOftheSy- find the Syrians grown a confiderable people, andrians* bitter enemies both to the kings of Ifrael and Judah j aiming in fa£t at the conqueft of both nations. Their kingdom commenced in the days of David, under Ha- dadezer, whofe capital w’as Zobah, and who probably wras at laft obliged to become David’s tributary, after having been defeated by him in feveral engagements. Before the death of David, however, one Rezon, w’ho it feems had rebelled again!! Hadadezer, having found means to make himfelf mafter of Damafcus, erecfted there a new kingdom, which foon became very power¬ ful. The Syrian princes being thus in the neighbour¬ hood of the two rival Hates of Ifrael and Judah (whofe capitals w’ere Samaria and Jerufalem), found it an eafy matter to weaken them both, by pretending to aflift the one again!! the other ; but a detail of the tranfadlions between the Jews and Syrians is only to be found in the Old Teftament, to wKich we refer. In 740 B. C. how’ever, the Syrian empire w’as totally deftroyed by Tiglath Pilefer king of Affyria ; as w’as alfo the kingdom of Samaria by Shalmanefer his fuc- ceffor in 721 B. C. The people w’ere either maffacred, or carried into captivity into Media, Perfia, and the countries about the Cafpian fea. r. While the nations of the eaft were thus deftroying Of the each other, the foundations of very formidable em- Weftern pires were laid in the weft, which in procefs of time nat‘ona’ were to fwallow up almoft all the eaftern ones. In Africa, Carthage was founded by a Tyrian colony, about 869 B. C. according to thofe who aferibe the higheft antiquity to that city ; but, according to others, it was founded only in 769 or 770 B. C. In Europe a very confiderable revolution took place about 900 B. C. The Heraclidae, w’hom we have formerly feen expelled from Greece by Atreus the father of Aga¬ memnon, after feveral unfuccefsful attempts, at laft conquered the whole Peloponnefus. From this time the Grecian Hates became more civilized, and their hi- ftory becomes lefs obfeure. The inftitution, or rather the revival and continuance, of the Olympic games, in 776 B. C. alfo greatly facilitated the writing not only of their hilfory, but that of other nations ■, for as each Olympiad confifted of four years, the chronology of every important event became indubitably fixed by re¬ ferring it to fuch and fuch an Olympiad. In 748 B. C„ or . S'o HIST Civil or the laft year of the feventh Olympiad, the foun- i Hl^0l'y- [ dations of the city of Rome were laid by Romulus ; and, 43 years after, the Spartan date was new model¬ led, and received from Lycurgus thofe laws, bv obl’er- ving of which it afterwards arrived at fuch a pitch of X5 fp lender. ^‘ate of the 3. With the beginning of the 28th Olympiad, or tl-e^b a^n commences the third general period above- ning1 of the menth°i>ed, when profane hirtory becomes fomewhat third gene- more clear, and the relations concerning the different jal period, nations may be depended upon with fome degree of certainty. The general Hate of the world was at that time as follows.—The northern parts of Europe were either thinly inhabited, or filled with unknown and barbarous nations, the anceftors of thofe who after¬ wards deftroyed the Roman empire. France and Spain were inhabited by the Gomerians or Celtes. Italy was divided into a number of petty Hates, ari- fing partly from Gauliflr and partly from Grecian co¬ lonies ; among whom the Romans had already become formidable. They were governed by their king Ser- vius Tullius 5 had increafed their city by the demoli¬ tion of Alba Longa, and the removal of its inhabitants to.Rome $ and had enlarged their dominions by feve- ral cities taken from their neighbours. Greece was alfo divided into a number of fmall Hates, among which the Athenians and Spartans, being the moH remark¬ able, were rivals to each other. The former had, about 599 B. C. received an excellent legiflation from Solon, and wrere enriching themfelves by navigation and commerce : the latter were become formidable by the martial inHitutions of Lycurgus j and having con¬ quered Meflina, and added its territory to their own, were juHly edeemed the moH powerful people in Greece. The other Hates of mofl confideration were Corinth, Thebes, Argos, and Arcadia. In Ada great revolu¬ tions had taken place. The ancient kingdom of Af- fyria was deflroyed by the Medes and Babylonians, its capital city Ninevah utterly ruined, and the greated part of its inhabitants carried to Babylon. Nay, the very materials of which it was built were carried off, to adorn and give flrength to that Hately metropolis, which was then undoubtedly the firff city in the world. Nebuchadnezzar, a wife and valiant prince, now fat on the throne of Babylon. By him the kingdom of Judrea was totally overthrown in 587 B. C. Three years before this he had taken and razed the city of Tyre, and overrun all the kingdom of Egypt. He is even faid by Jofephus to have conquered Spain, and reigned there nine years, after which he abandoned it to the Carthaginians j but this feems by no means pro¬ bable. The extent of the Babylonian empire is not certainly known : but from what is recorded of it we may conclude, that it was not at all inferior even in this refpedl to any that ever exided j as the feripture tells us it was fuperior in wealth to any of the fucceed- ing ones. We know that it comprehended Phoenicia, Palefline, Syria, Babylonia, Media, and Perfia, and not improbably India alfo •, and from a confideration of this vaft extent of territory, and the riches with whi&h every one of thefe countries abounded, we may form fome idea of t he wealth and power of this mo¬ narch. When we confider alfo, that the whole Hrength of this mighty empire was employed in beautifying the nietropolis, we c annot look upon the wonders of 3 O II Y. that city as related by Herodotus to be at all incredi ble. See Babylon j and Architecture, N° 13. As to what pafied in the republic of Carthage about this time, we are quite in tne dark j there being a chafm in its hidory for no lefs than 300 years. 4. J he fourth general period of hiflory, namely, from the end of tire fabulous times to the conquefi of Babylon by Cyrus, is very droit, including no more than 3 I years, j. ins Hidden revolution was occafioned by the mifeondudt of Evil-merodach, Nebuchadnezzar’s fon, eves in his father’s life-time. For having, in a great hunting match on occafion of his marriage, en¬ tered the country of the Medes, and fome of his' troops coming up at the fame time to relieve the garrifons in thofe places, he joined them to thofe already with him, and without the lead provocation began to plunder and lay wade the neighbouring country. This pro¬ duced an immediate revolt, which quickly extended over all Media and Perfia. The Medes, headed by Ady- ages and his fon Cyaxares, drove back Evil-merodach and his party with great daughter •, nor doth it appear that they were afterwards reduced even by Nebuchad¬ nezzar himfelf. The new empire continued daily to gather drength 5 and at lad Cyrus, Adyages’s grand- ion, a prince of great prudence and valour, being made generalidirno of the Median and Perfian forces, took Babylon itfelf in the year 538 B. C. as related under the article Babylon. During this period the Romans increafed in power under the wife adminidration of their king Servius Tullius, who, though a pacific prince, rendered his people more formidable by a peace of 20 years than his predeceffors had done by all their victories. The Greeks, even at this early period, began to interfere with the Perfians, on account of the lonians or Gre¬ cian colonies in Alia Minor. Thefe had been fub- dued by Crtefus king of Lydia about the year 562, the time of Nebuchadnezzar’s death. Whether the Lydians had been fubdued by the Babylonidi monarch or not, is not now to be afeertained j though it is very probable that they were either in fubjedion to him, or greatly awed by his power, as before his death nothing confiderable was undertaken by them. It is indeed probable, that during the infanity of Nebu¬ chadnezzar, ipoken of by Daniel, the affairs of his king¬ dom would fall into confufion j and many of thofe prin¬ ces whom he formerly retained in fubjedion would fet up for themfelves. Certain it is, however, that if the Babylonians did not regard Croefus as their fubjed, they looked upon him to be a very faithful ally ; info- much that they celebrated an annual fead in comRic- moration of a vidory obtained by him over the Scy¬ thians. After the death of Nebuchadnezzar, Croefus fubdued many nations in Afia Minor, and among the red the lonians, as already related. They were, how¬ ever, greatly attached to his government; for though they paid him tribute, and were obliged to furnidi him with fome forces in time of war, they wTere yet free from all kind of oppredion. When Cyrus therefore was proceeding in his conqueds of different parts of the Babylonidi empire, before he proceeded to attack the capital, the lonians refufed to fubmit to him, though he offered them very advantageous terms. But foon after, Croefus himfelf being defeated and taken pri- foner, the lonians fent ambaffadors to Cyrus, offering to Sea. I. Fourth pe¬ riod. Hi- ftory of the Babylonian, empire. 18 Of the Romans, Greeks, Lydians, and Per¬ fians. Sea. i. HIST Civil Hiftory, . 19 Tifth gene ral period. Hiftory of the Jew?, Babyloni- ans, Egyp¬ tians, See. to fubrmt cn the terms which had formerly been pro* pofed. Thefe terms were now refufed •, and the lo- nians, being determined to refill:, applied to the Spar¬ tans for aid. Though the Spartans at that time could not be prevailed upon to give their countrymen any afliftance, they fent ambafiadors to Cyrus with a threatening meffage ; to which he returned a contemp¬ tuous anfwer, and then forced the lonians to fubmit at diferetion, five years before the taking of Babylon. Thus commenced the hatred between the Greeks and Perfians ; and thus we "fee, that in the two firit great monarchies the feeds of their dfllrudlion -were fowTn even before the monarchies themfelves wfre ellablilhed. For while Nebuchadnezzar was raifing the Babyloniih empire to its utmoft height, his fon was deftroying what his father built up 5 and at the very time when Cyrus rvas eftabliflung the Perlian monarchy, by his ill-timed feverity to the Greeks he made that warlike people his enemies, whom his fucceflbrs were by no means able to refill, and who would probably have overcome Cyrus himfelf, had they united in order to attack him. The tranfaclions of Africa during this period are alrnoft entirely unknown ; though we cannot doubt that the Carthaginians enriched themfelves by means of their commerce, which enabled them after¬ wards to attain fuch a confiderable {hare of power. 5. Cyrus having now become mailer of all the eafl, the Afiatic affairs continued for fome time in a flate of tranquillity. The Jews obtained leave to return to their own country, rebuild their temple, and again eflablifh their worfhip, of all which an account is given in the facred writings, though undoubtedly they muff have been in a flate of dependance on the Perfians from that time forward. Cambyfes the fucceflbr of Cy¬ rus added Egypt to his empire, which had either not fubmitted to Cyrus, or revolted foon after his death. He intended alfo to have fubdued the Carthaginians ; but as the Phoenicians refufed to fupply him with (hips to fight againfl their own countrymen, he was obliged to lay this defign afide. In 517 B. C. the Babylonians finding themfelves grievoufly opprefled by their Perfian mailers, refolved to fhake off the yoke, and fet up for themfelves. For •this purpofe, they took care to ftore their city with all manner of provifions; and when Darius Hyltafpes, then king of Perfia, advanced againll them, they took the moll barbarous method that can be imagined of pre¬ venting an unneceffary confumption of thofe provi- fions, which they had fo carefully amaffed. Having collected all the women, old men, and children, into one place, they flrangled them without dillinffion, whether wives, fathers, mothers, brothers, or filters j every one being allowed to fave only the wife he liked bell, and a maid fervant to do the work of the houfe. This cruel policy did not avail them : their city was taken by treachery (for it was impoffible to take it by force) ; after which the king caufed the walls of it to be beaten down from 2co to 50 cubits height, that their llrength might no longer give encouraore- ment to the inhabitants to revolt. Darius then turned his arms againfl the Scythians; but finding that ex¬ pedition turn out both tedious and unprofitable, he direfted his courfe eaflward, and reduced all the coun¬ try as far as the river Indus. In the mean time, the lonians revolted $ and being alhfled by the Greeks, a CRY. war commenced between the two nations, which was not thoroughly extinguifhed but by the deflruftion of the Perfian empire in 330 B. C. The lonians, how¬ ever, were for this time obliged to fubmit, after a war of fix years j and were treated with great feverity by the Perfians. The conqueft of Greece itfelf was then projected : but the expeditions for that purpofe ended moll unfortunately for the Perfians, and encouraged the Greeks to make reprifals on them, in which they fucceeded according to their utmofl wilhes 5 and had it only been pofiible for them to have agreed among themfelves, the downfal of the Perfian empire would have happened muchfooner than it did. See Athens, Sparta, Macedon, and Persia. In 459 B. C. the Egyplans made an attempt to recover their liberty, but were reduced after a wmr of fix years. In 413 B. C. they revolted a fecond time : and being afhiled by the Sidonians, drew upon the latter that terrible deflruftion foretold by the prophets j while they themfelves were fo thoroughly humbled, that they never after made any attempt to recover their liberty. The year 403 B. C. proved remarkable for the re¬ volt of Cyrus againfl his brother Artaxerxes Mnemon j m which, through his own rafhnefs, he mifearried, and loft his life at the battle of Cunaxa, in the province of 20 Babylon. Ten thoufand Greek mercenaries, who fervedXenophon”! in his army, made their way back into Greece, thoughretreat’ furrounded on all fides by the enemy, and in the heart of a hoflile country. In this retreat they were com¬ manded by Xenophon, who has receded the highefi praifes on account of his conduft and military {kill in bringing it to a happy conclufion. Two years after, the invafions of Agefilaus king of Sparta threatened the Perfian empire with total deftruftion 5 from which, however, it was relieved by his being recalled in order to defend his own country againfl the other Grecian flates 5 and after this the Perfian affairs continued in a more profperous way till the time of Alexander. 2r During all this time, the volatile and giddy temper Hiftory of of the Greeks, together with their enthufiallic defire die Greekv, of romantic exploits, were preparing fetters for them¬ felves, which indeed feerned to be abfoiutely neceffary to prevent them from deilroying one another. A zeal for liberty w^as what they all pretended ; but on every occafion it appeared, that this love of liberty was only a defire of dominion. No Hate in Greece could bear to fee another equal to itfelf 5 and hence their perpetual contexts* for pre-eminence, which could not but weaken the whole body, and render them an eafy prey to an ambitious and politic prince, who was capable of ta¬ king advantage of thofe divifions. Being all equally impatient of reflraint, they never could bear to fubmit to any regular government; and hence their determi¬ nations were nothing but the decifions of a mere mob, of which they had afterwards almoft conflantly reafon to repent. Hence alfo their bafe treatment of thofe eminent men wdiom they ought mod to have honoured-, as Miltiades, Ariflides, Themiftocles, Alcibiades, So¬ crates, Phocion, &c. The various tranfaftions be¬ tween the Grecian flates, though they make a very confiderable figure in particular hiftory, make none at all in a general fketch of the hiftory of the world. We {hall therefore only obferve, that in 404 B. C. the A- thenian power was in a manner totally broken by the taking: HISTORY. Sea. I. taking of their city by the Spartans. In 370 B. C. that of the Spartans received a fevere check from the Thebans at the battle of Leuftra ; and eight years after was ftili further reduced by the battle of Mantinea. Epa- minondas the great enemy of the Spartans was killed ; but this only proved a more fpeedy means of fubju- gating all the dates to a foreign, and at that time defpicable, power. The Macedonians, a barbarous nation, lying to the north of the dates of Greece, were two years after the death of Epaminondas reduced to the lorved ebb by the Illyrians, another nation of bar¬ barians in the neighbourhood. The king of Macedon being killed in an engagement, Philip his brother de¬ parted from Thebes, where he had dudied the art of w:ar under Epaminondas, in order to take polleffion of his kingdom. Being a man of great prudence and poli¬ cy, he quickly fettled his own affairs ; vanquilhed the Illyrians; and being no dranger to the weakened dtua- tion of Greece, began almod immediately to meditate the conqued of it. The particulars of this enterprile are related under the article Macedon : here it is luf- ficient to take notice, that by fird attacking thofe he was fare he could overcome, by corrupting thole whom he thought it dangerous to attack, by fometimes pre¬ tending to a did one date and fometimes another, and by impofing Upon all as bed ferved his turn, he at lad put it out of the power of the Greeks to make any reddance, at lead fuch as could keep him from gaining his end. In 338 B. C. he procured himfelf to be defied general of the Amphi&yons, or council of the Grecian dates, under pretence of fettling fome troubles at that time in Greece •, but having once ob¬ tained liberty to enter that country with an army, he quickly convinced the dates that they mud all fubmit to his will. He w'as oppofed by the Athenians and Thebans j but the intedine wars of Greece had cut oft' all her great men, and no general was now to be found capable of oppodng Philip with fuccefs. The king of Macedon, being now mader of all Greece, projecled the conqued of Ada. 1 o this he was encouraged by the ill fuccefs which had attended the Perdans in their expeditions againd Greece, the fuccelfes of the Greeks in their invadons, and the re¬ treat of the ten thoufand under Xenophon. All thefe events fhowed the weaknefs of the Perdans, their vad inferiority to the Greeks in military fkill, and how ea- dly their empire might be overthrown by a proper 22 union among the dates. Conqueft of -Philip was preparing to enter upon his grand dedgn, Perfia by when he was murdered by fome affaffins. His fon A- lexander was pofleffed of every quality neceffary for the execution of fo great a plan ; and his impetuodty of temper made him execute it with a rapidity un¬ heard of either before or dnce. It mutt be confeffed, indeed, that the Perdan empire was now ripe for de- druftion, and could not in all probability have with- dood an enemy much lefs powerful than Alexander. The Adatics have in all ages been much inferior to the European nations in valour and military fkill. They were now funk in luxury and effeminacy ; and what was worfe, they feem at this period to have been feized with that infatuation and diilraftion of councils which fcarce ever fails to be a forerunner of the dedruSion of any nation. The Perdan miniders perfuaded their fovereign to . rejed the prudent advice that was given 3 Alexander. him, of didreffing Alexander by laying vrnde the coun- Civil try, and thus forcing him to return for want of provi- Hiftory. , dons. Nay, they even prevented him from engaging the enemy in the mod proper manner, by dividing his forces •, and periuaded him to put Charidemus the A- thenian to death, who had promifed with ioo.oco men, of whom one-third were mercenaries, to drive the Greeks out of" Ada. In Ihort, Alexander met with only twro checks in his Perdan expedition. The one was from the city of Tyre, which for (even months re¬ dded his utmod efforts *? the other was from Memnon the Rhodian, who had undertaken to invade Macedo¬ nia. The did of thefe obdacles Alexander at lad got over, and treated the governor and inhabitants with the utmod cruelty. The other was fcarce felt ; for Memnon died after reducing fome of the Grecian illands, and Darius had no other general capable of conducing the undertaking. The power of the Per¬ dan empire was totally broken by the viftory gained over Darius at Arbela in 331 B. C. and next year a total end wms put to it by the murder of the king by Bedus one of his fubjects. 23 The ambition of Alexander rvas not to be fatisded H,s cony with the poffedion of the kingdom of Perda, or indeed of any other on earth. Nothing lefs than the total tions> fubjedfion of the world itfelf feemed fufficient to him ; and therefore he was now prompted to invade every country of which he could only learn the name, whe¬ ther it had belonged to the Perdans or not. In con- fequence of this dilpodtion, he invaded and reduced Hyrcania, Badfria, Sogdia, and all that vaft tradt of country nowr called Buiharia. At lall, having entered India, he reduced all the nations to the river Hypha- ds, one of the branches of the Indus. But when he would have proceeded farther, and extended his con- quefts quite to the eaftem extremities of Ada, his troops podtively refufed to follow him farther, and he w7as conftrained to return. In 323 B. C. this mighty conqueror died of a fever } without having time to fettle the affairs of his vaft extended empire, or even to name his fucceffor. 24 While the Grecian empire thus fuddenly fprung up^i(lory0'! in the eaft, the rival ftates of Rome and Carthage wrere t^ie K"°" • 7 • mans* making condderable advances in the weft. The Ro¬ mans were eftablilhing their empire on the moft folid foundations; to which their particular dtuation natu¬ rally contributed. Being originally little better than a parcel of lawlefs banditti, they were defpifed and hated by the neighbouring ftates. This foon produced wars; in which, at drft from accidental circumftances, and af¬ terwards from their fuperior valour and condudl, the Romans proved almoft conftantly vifforious. The jea- loudes which prevailed among the Italian ftates, and their ignorance of their true intereft, prevented them from combining againft that afpiring nation, and crufti- ing it in its infancy, wTich they might eadly have done ; while in the mean time the Romans, being kept in a ftate of continual warfare, became at laft fuch ex¬ pert foldiers, that no other ftate on earth could refill them. During the time of their kings they had made a very confiderable figure among the Italian nations ; but after their expulfion, and the commencement of the republic, their conquefts became much more rapid and extenfive. In 501 B. C. they fubdaed the Sabines j eight years after, the Latins 5 and 111399 B. C. the city Seft. I. Civil Hiftory. * See Rtme. H I S T city oi' Veii, tlie ftrongeft in Italy, exceeding Rome it- 1'elf, was taken after a fiege of ten years. But in the midit of their fucceffes a hidden irruption of the Gauls had alrnofl: put an end to their power and nation at once. The city wa’s burnt to the ground in 383 B. C. and the capitol on the point of being furprifed, when the Gauls, who were climbing up the walls in the night, were accidentally difcovered and repulfed*. In a (hort time Rome w?as rebuilt with much greater fplendor than before, but now a general revolt and combina¬ tion of the nations formerly fubdued took place. The Romans, however, Hill got the better of their ene¬ mies j but, even at the time of the celebrated Camil- lus’s death, which happened about 352 B. C. their territories fcarce extended fix or feven leagues from the capital. The republic from the beginning was agitated by thofe diffenfions which at laid proved its ruin. I he people had been divided by Romulus into two claffes, namely Patricians and Plebeians, anfwer- ing to our nobility and commonalty. Between thefe two bodies were perpetual jealoufies and contentions j which retarded the progrefs of the Roman conquefts, and revived the hopes of the nations they had conquer¬ ed. The tribunes of the people were perpetually op- pofing the confuls and military tribunes. The fenate had often recourfe to a didlator endowed with abfolute power $ and then the valour and experience of the Ro¬ man troops made them victorious ; but the return of domeftic feditions gave the fubjugated nations an op¬ portunity of lhaking off the yoke. Thus had the Romans continued for near 400 years, running the fame round of wars with the fame enemies, and reap¬ ing very little advantage from their conquefts, till at lalt matters were compounded by chooftng one of the confuls from among the plebeians j and from this time chiefly we may date the profperity of Rome, fo that by the time that Alexander the Great died they were held in confiderable eftimation among foreign nations. The Carthaginians in the mean time continued to an^ofSi”5’ en”c^ themfelves by commerce j but, being lefs con- *R< 0 11 verfant in military affairs, wTere by no means equal to the Romans in power, though they excelled them in ■wealth. A new ftate, however, makes its appearance during this period, which may be faid to have taught the Carthaginians the art of war, and, by bringing them into the neighbourhood of the Romans, proved the firft fource of contention betwreen thefe two power¬ ful nations. This was the ifland of Sicily. At what time people were firft fettled on it, is not now to be afcertained. The firft inhabitants we read of were called Sicani, Siculi, Lce/lrigones, &c. but of thefe we know little or nothing. In the lecond year of the 17th Olympiad, or 710 B. C. fome Greek colonies are faid to have arrived on the ifland, and in a fliort time founded leveral cities, of which Syracufe was the chief. Ihe Syracufans at laft fubdued the original inhabitants : though it doth not appear that the lat¬ ter were ever well affetfled to their government, and therefore were on all occafions ready to revolt. The firft confiderable prince, or (as he is called by the Greeks) tyrant of Syracufe, was Gelon, who obtained the fovereignty about the year 483 B. C. At what time the Carthaginians firft carried their arms into Si¬ cily is not certainly known ; only we are allured, that VOL. X. Part II. 2 5 Of the Caf- and of Si' cily. O R Y. SRI they poffeffed fome part of the ifland as early as 505 B. C. For in the time of the firft confuls, the Ro¬ mans and Carthaginians entered into a treaty chiefly in regard to matters of navigation and commerce 5 by which it was ftipulated, that the Romans who ftiould touch at Sardinia, or that part of Sicily which belong¬ ed to Carthage, fliould be received there in the fame the Carthaginians themfelves. Whence it Civil Hiftory. manner as appears, that the dominion of Carthage already extend¬ ed over Sardinia and part of Sicily : but in 28 years after, they had been totally driven out by Gelon ; which probably was the firft exploit performed by him. This appears from his fpeech to the Athenian and Spartan ambaffadors who defired his aftiftance againlt the forces of Xerxes king of Perfia. The Carthagi nians made many attempts to regain their polTellions in this ifland, which occafioned long and bloody wars be¬ tween them and the Greeks, as related under the ar¬ ticles Carthage and Sicily. This ifland alfo proved the fcene of much (laughter and bloodfhed in the warsi of the Greeks with one another ||. Before the year ^ ^ 323 B. C. however, the Carthagians had made them-anC (elves mailers of a very confiderable part of the ifland ; from whence all the power of the Greeks could not diflodge them. It is proper alfo to obferve, that af¬ ter the deftruftion of Tyre by Alexander the Great, almoft all the commerce in the weftern part of the world fell to the (hare of the Carthaginians. Whether they had at this time made any fettlements in Spain is not known. It is certain, that they traded to that country (or the fake of the iilver, in wrhich it was very rich ; as they probably alfo did to Britain for the tin with which it abounded. 26 6. The beginning of the fixth period prefents us with s.ixth Pc-. a ftate of the world entirely different from the pre-!.10(,‘ fHlf ceding. We now behold all the eaftern part of the ^jacedo- C world, from the confines of Italy to the river Indus, nian eru- and beyond it, newly united into one vaft empire, andPive' at the fame time ready to fall to pieces for want of a proper head ; the wTeftern world filled with fierce and favage nations, whom the rival republics of Carthage and Rome were preparing to enllave as faft as they could. The firft remarkable events took place in the Macedonian empire—Alexander, as already obferved, had not diftinftly named any fucceffor ; but he had left behind him a victorious, and, we may fay, invin¬ cible army, commanded by moft expert officers, all of them ambitious of fupreme authority. It is not to be fuppofed that peace could long be preferved in fuch a fituation. For a number of years, indeed, nothing was to be feen or heard of but the moft horrid flaughters, and wickednefs of every kind, until at laft the mother, wives, children, brothers, and even fifters, of Alexander were cut off; not one of the family of that great con- queror being left alive. When matters were a little fettled, four new empires, each of them of no fmall extent, had arifen out of the empire of Alexander. Caffander, the fon of Antipater, had Macedonia and all Greece j Antigonus, Afia Minor j Seleucus had Babylon and the eaftern provinces 5 and Ptolemy Lagus, Egypt and the w7eftern ones. One of thefe empires,.however, quickly fell j Antigonus being de¬ feated and killed by Seleucus and Lyfimachus at the uattle of Ipfus, in 301 B. C. The greateft part of his dominions then fell to Seleucus j but feveral pro- 3 T vinces 5H Civil Hifto-y. 27 Of ihe Ro¬ mans and Carthagi- »ians. HIST vinces took tke opportunity of thefe confufions to ihake oif the Macedonian yoke altogether : and thus were formed the kingdoms of Pontus, Bithynia, Per- gamus, Armenia, and Cappadocia. The two moft powerful and permanent empires, however, were thofe of Syria founded by Seleucus, and Egypt by Ptolemy Lagus. The kings of Macedon, though they did not preferve the fame authority over the Grecian Bates that Alexander, Antipater, and Callander, had done, yet effectually prevented them from thofe outrages upon one another, for which they had formerly been fo remarkable. Indeed, it is fomewhat difficult to de¬ termine, whether their condition was better or worfe than before they were conquered by Philip •, fmce, though they were now prevented from deiiroying one another, they were moff gvievoufly oppreffed by the Macedonian tyrants. While the ealtern parts of the world were thus de¬ luged with blood, and the fucceffors of Alexander were pulling to pieces the empire which he had efta- bliOied, the Romans and Carthaginians proceeded in their attempts to enllave the nations of the weft. The Romans, ever engaged in war, conquered one city and ftate after another, till about the year 253 B. C. thev had made themfelves mailers of almoft the whole of Italy. During all this time they had met only with a ftngle check in their conquefts, and that was the invafion of Pyrrhus, king of Epirus. That ambitious and fickle prince had proje&ed the conqueft of Italy, which he fancied would be an eafy matter. Accord¬ ingly, in 271 B. C. he entered that country, and maintained a w^ar with the Romans for fix years, till at laft, being utterly defeated by Curius Dentatus, he was obliged to return. The Romans had no fooner made themfelves mafters of Italy, than they wanted only a pretence to carry their arms out of it, and this pretence was foon found out. Being invited into Sicily to affift the Mamer- tines againft Hiero king of Syracufe and the Car¬ thaginians, they immediately commenced a war with the latter, which continued with the utmoft fury for 23 years. The w-ar ended greatly to the difadvantage of the Carthaginians, chieily owing to the bad con- du£t of their generals, none of wffiom, Hamilcar Bar¬ cas alone excepted, feem to have been poffefled of any degree of military fldll j and the ftate had fuffered too many misfortunes before he entered upon the command, for him or any other to retrieve it at that time. The confequence of this war was the entire lofs of Sicily to the Carthaginians 3 and foon after, the Romans feized on the ifland of Sardinia. Hamilcar perceiving that there was now no alter¬ native, but that in a fiiort time either Carthage muft conquer Rome, or Rome would conquer Carthage, bethought himfelf of a method by which his country might become equal to that haughty republic. This was by reducing all Spain, in wffiich the Carthaginians had already confiderable poffeffions, and from the mines of which they drew great advantages. He had, therefore, no fooner finiihed the war with the mercenaries, which fucceeded that with the Romans, than he fet about the conqueft of Spain. This, horv- ever, he did not live to accomplifii, though he made great progrefs in it. His fon Afdrubal continued the war with fuccefs j till at laft the Romans, jealous of o it y. sea. 1. his progrefs, perfuaded him to enter into a treaty with Civil them, by winch he engaged himfelf to make the river H’fta'y- Iberus the boundary of his conquefts. This treaty "" v ” 7 probably was never ratified by the fenate of Carthage, nor, though it had, would it have been regarded by Hannibal, who fucceeded Afdrubal in the command, and had fworn perpetual enmity with the Romans. The tranfabtions of the fecond Punic war are perhaps the moft remarkable which the hiftory of the world can aiford. Certain it is, that nothing can (how more clearly the flight foundations upon which the greateft empires are built. We now fee the Romans, the na¬ tion moft remarkable for their military fldll in the whole world, and who, for more than 500 years, had been conftantly viblorious, unable to refill the efforts of one Angle man. At the fame time we fee this man, though evidently the firll general in the world, loft folely for want of a flight iupport. In former times, the republic of Carthage fupplied her generals in Si¬ cily with hundreds of thoufands, though their enter- prifes were almoft conftantly unfuccefsful; but now Hannibal, the conqueror of Italy, was obliged to abandon his defign, merely for want of 20 or 30,000 men. That degeneracy and infatuation, which never fails to overwhelm a falling nation, or rather which is the caufe of its fall, had now infebted the counfels of Carthage, and the lupplies were denied. Neither was Carthage the only infatuated nation at this time.— Hannibal, whofe prudence never forfook him either in profperity or adverfity, in the height of his good fortune had concluded an alliance with Philip king of Macedon. Had that prince fent an army to the af- fiftance of the Carthaginians in Italy immediately after the battle of Cannae, there can be no doubt but the Romans wrould have been forced to accept of that peace which they fo haughtily refufed j; ; and indeed, { See Car* this offer of peace, in the midft of fo much fuccefs, istl>agei N° an inftance of moderation which perhaps does moreI25* honour to the Carthaginian general than all the mili¬ tary exploits he performed. Philip, however, could not be roufed from his indolence, nor fee that his own ruin wTas connefted with that of Carthage. The Ro¬ mans had now made themfelves mafters of Sicily; after which they recalled Marcellus, with his viblorious ar¬ my, to be employed againft Hannibal } and the con¬ fequence at laft was, that the Carthaginian armies, unfupported in Italy, could not conquer it, but w'ere recalled into Africa, which the Romans had invaded. The fouthern nations feem to have been as blind to their own intereft as the northern ones. They ought to have feen, that it wras neceflary for them to preferve Carthage from being deftroyed ; but inftead of this, Mafiniffa king of Numidia allied with the Romans, and by his means Hannibal v:as overcome at the battle of Zama *, which finiihed the fecond Punic war, *SeeZamtt. in 1 88 B. C. 2s The event of the fecond Punic w?ar determined the Of Egypt fate of almoft all the other nations in the world. All and Syria, this time, indeed, the empires of Egypt, Syria, and Greece, had been promoting their own ruin by mutual wrars and inteftine divifions. I he Syrian empire was nowr governed by Antiochus the Great, who feems to have had little right to fuch a title. His empire, though diminifhed by the defeblion ot the Parthians, was ftill very powerful 2 and to him Hannibal. HIST Civil Hiitorv. 29 Of Greece. Sea. I. Hannibal applied, after he was obliged to leave his country, as related under Carthage, N° 152. Antiochus, however, had not fufficient judgment to fee the neceffity of following that great man’s advice j nor would the Carthaginians be prevailed upon to contribute their alTiftance againlt the nation which was foon to deftroy them without any provo¬ cation. The pretence for war on the part of the Ro¬ mans wTas, that Antiochus w'ould not declare his Greek fubje&s in Alia to be free and independent Hates ; a requifition which neither the Romans nor any other nation had a right to make. The event of all wras, that Antiochus w7as everywhere defeated, and forced to conclude a peace upon very difadvanta- geous terms. In Europe, matters wrent on in the fame way *, the Hates of Greece, weary of the tyranny of the Mace¬ donians, entered into a refolution of recovering their liberties. For this purpofe w'as framed the Achaean $ See Greece. League ; but as they could not agree among them- felves, they at lafl came to the imprudent determination of calling in the Romans to defend them againH Philip king of Macedon. This produced a war, in wdiich the Romans wTere victorious. The Macedonians, however, w7ere Hill formidable ; and as the intention of the Romans to enflave the W’hole world could no longer be doubted, Perfeus, the fucceifor of Philip, re¬ newed the wTar. Through his own cowardice he loll a decifive engagement, and with it his kingdom, which fubmitted to the Romans in 167 B. C. Deftrudlion Macedon being thus conquered, the next Hep was of Carthage utterly to exterminate the Carthaginians 5 whole re- rinth °' Pukk'c, notwithllanding the many difaflers that had befallen it, was Hill formidable. It is true, the Car¬ thaginians were giving no offence j nay, they even made the moff abjeCt fubmiflions to the republic of Rome : but all was not fufficient. War was declared a third time againfl that unfortunate Hate 5 there was now no Hannibal to command their armies, and the city was utterly deHroyed 146 B. C. The fame year the Romans put an end to the liberties they had pre¬ tended to grant the cities of Greece, by the entire de- 31 HruCtion of Corinth. See that article. Hiftoiy of After the death of Antiochus the Great, the af- riP and y" ^a'rs Syr’ia and Egypt w-ent on from bad to worfe. Judaea. The degenerate princes which filled the thron- s of thofe empires, regarding only their own pleafures, either fpent their time in oppreffing their fubieCts, or in attempting to deprive each other of their dominions, by which means they became a more eafy prey to the Jfomans. So far indeed were they from taking any means to fecure themfelves againH the overgrown power of that republic, that the kings both of Syria and Egypt fometimes applied to the Romans as pro- teclors. Their downfal, however, did not happen within the period of which we now treat.—-The only other tranfaction which makes any confiderable figure in the Syrian empire is the opprefficn of the Jew7s by Antiochus Epiphanes. After their return from the Babyloniffi captivity, they continued in fubjedtion to the Perfians till the time of Alexander.—From that time they wrere fubjedt to the kings of Egypt or Syria, as the fortune of either happened to prevail. Egypt being reduced to a low ebb by Antiochus Epiphanes, the Jews fell under his dominion 3 and being feverely O R Y. treated by him, imprudently ffiowed feme figns of joy on a report of his death. This brought him againH them with a powerful army 3 and in 170 B, C. he took Jerufalem by Horm, committing the molt horrid cruelties on the inhabitants, infomuch that they were obliged to bide themlelves in caverns and in boles of rocks to avoid his fury Their religion was totally aboliffied, their tempi*, profaned, and an image of Jupiter Olympius fet up on the altar of burnt-offer¬ ings : wffiich profanation is thought to be the abomina¬ tion of deflation mentioned by the prophet Daniel. This revolution, however, was of no long continu¬ ance. In 167 B. C. Mattathias reHored the true worfhip in molt of the cities of Judea j and in 168 the temple was purified, and the worfliip there reHored by Judas Maccabaeus. This was folkwed by a long feries of wars between the Syrians and Jews, in which the latter were almofl always victorious 3 and before thele wars were finilhed, the deflruftion of Carthage happen¬ ed, which puts an end to the fixth general period form¬ erly mentioned. _ 7. The beginning of the feventh period prefents us Pee with a view of the ruins of the Greek empire in theriod’, „Ge~ declining Hates of Syria and Egypt 3 both of themlYthe ^ much circumfcribed in bounds. The empire of Syria world, at firH comprehended all Alia to the river Indus, and beyond it 3 but in 312 B. C. mofl of the Indian pro¬ vinces wrere by Seleucus ceded to one Sandrocottus, or Androcottus, a native, who in return gave him 500 elephants. Of the empire of Sandrocottus we know nothing farther than that he fubdued all the countries between the Indus and the Ganges 3 fo that from this time w'e may reckon the greateH part of India inde¬ pendent on the Syro-Macedonian princes. In 250 B. C. however, the empire fuilained a much greater lofs by the revolt of the Parthians and Badtrians from Antiochus Theus. The former could not be fubdued ; and as they held in fubjedtion to them the vaH tradt which now goes under the name of Perfa, we muH look upon their defedtion as an irreparable lofs. Whe¬ ther any part of their country wras afterwards recover¬ ed by the kings of Egypt or Syria, is not very certain 3 nor is it of much confequence, fince we are affured that in the beginning of the feventh period, i. e. 146 B. C. the Greek empires of Syria and Egypt were reduced by the lofs of India, Perlia, Armenia, Pon- tus, Bithynia, Cappadocia, Pergamus, &c. The ge¬ neral Hate of the world in 146 B. C. therefore was as follows. In Alia were the empires of India, Par- thia, and Syria, witli the leffer Hates of Armenia, Pontus, &c. above mentioned 3 to which we mud add that of Arabia, which during the fixth period had grown into fome confequence, and had maintained its independency from the days of Iffimael the fon of Abraham. In Africa were the kingdoms of Egypt and Ethiopia 3 the Carthaginian territories, now fub- jeft to the Romans 3 and the kingdoms of Numidia, Mauritania, and Getulia, ready to be fwallowed up by the fame ambitious and infatiable power, now that Carthage was defiroyed, which ferved as a barrier a- gainH it. Fo the fouth lay fome unknown and bar¬ barous nations, fecure by reafon of their fituation and inlignificance, rather than their Hrength, or diflance from Rome. In Europe we find none to oppofe the progrefs of the Roman arms, except the Gauls, Ger- 3 E 2 mans, 5i 6 HISTORY. Sea. I. Civil Hiftory. 33 ConquelB of the Ro¬ mans. mans, and iome Spaniih nations. 'I'hefe were brave indeed j but through want of military Ikill, incapable of contending with fuch mafters in the art of war as the Romans then were. The Spaniards had indeed been fubdued by Scipio Africanus in the time of the fecond Punic war : but, in 155 B. C. they revolted j and, under the conduct of one Viriathus, formerly a robber, held out for a long time againll all the armies the Romans could fend into Spain. Him the conful Ctepio caufed to be murdered about 138 B. C. becaufe he found it impol- lible to reduce him by force. The city ol Numantia defied the whole Roman power for fix years longer ; till at laft, by dint of treachery, numbers, and perfe- verance, it was not taken, but the inhabitants, re¬ duced to extremity by famine, fet fire to their houfes, and periihed in the flames or killed one another, fo that not one remained to grace the triumph of the conqueror : and this for the prefent quieted the reft of the Spaniards. About the fame time Attalus, king of Pergamus, left by will the Roman people heirs to all his goods 5 upon which they immediately feized on his kingdom as part of thofe goods, and reduced it to a Roman province, under the name of Afia Froper. Thus they continued to enlarge their dominions on every fide, without the leait regard to juftice, to the means they employed, or to the miferies they brought upon the conquered people. In 122 B. C. the Balearic iflands, now called Majorca, Minorca, and Ivica, were fubdued, and the inhabitants exterminated ; and foon after, feveral of the nations beyond the Alps were ob¬ liged to fubmit. In Africa the crimes of Jugurtha foon gave this ambitious republic an opportunity of conquering the kingdoms of Numidia and Mauritania: and indeed this is almoft the only w'ar in which we find the Ro¬ mans engaged where their pretenfions had the lead colour of juflice ; though in no cafe whatever could a nation fhow more degeneracy than the Romans did on this occafion. The particulars of this war are re¬ lated under the articles Numidia and Rome. The event of it v/as the total redudlion of the former about the year 105 B. C. but Mauritania and Getulia pre- ferved their liberty for fome time longer. In the eaft, the empire of Syria continued daily to de¬ cline •, by which means the Jews not only had an op¬ portunity of recovering their liberty, but even of be¬ coming as powerful, or at leaft of extending their do¬ minions as far, as in the days of David and Solomon. This declining empire was ftill farther reduced by the civil diffenfions between the two brothers Antiochus Grypus and Antiochus Cyzicenus 5 during which the cities of Tyre, Sidon, Ptolemais, and Gaza, declared themfelves independent, and in other cities tyrants ftarted up who refufed allegiance to any foreign powrer. This happened about 100 B. C. *, and 17 years after, the whole was reduced by Tigranes king of Arme¬ nia. On his defeat by the Romans, the latter redu¬ ced Syria to a province of their empire. The king¬ dom of Armenia itfelf, with thdfe of Pontus, Cappa¬ docia, and Bithynia, foon {hared the fame fate •, Pon¬ tus. the moft powerful of them all, being fubdued about 64 B. C. The kingdom of Judea alio was re¬ duced under the fame power much about this time. This ftate owed the lofs of its liberty to the fame Civil Hiftory. caufe that had ruined feveral others, namely, calling in the Romans as arbitrators between two contending parties. The two fons of Alexander Jannaeus (H'yr- canus and Ariftobulus) contended for the kingdom. Ariftobulus, being defeated by the party of Hyrca- nus, applied to the Romans. Pompey the Great, who adled as ultimate judge in this affair, decided it againft Ariftobulus, but at the fame time deprived Hyrcanus of all power as a king •, not allowing him even to affume the regal title, or to extend his terri¬ tory beyond the ancient borders of Judea. To fuch a length did Pompey carry this laft article, that he obliged him to give up all thofe cities in Coelofyria and Phoenicia which had been gained by his predecef- fors, and added them to the newly acquired Roman province of Syria. Thus the Romans became mafters of all the eaftern parts of the world, from the Mediterranean fea to the borders of Parthia. In the weft, however, the Gauls were ftill at liberty, and the Spanifh nations bore the Roman yoke with great impatience. The Gauls in- fefted the territories of the republic by their frequent in- curfions, which were fometimes very terrible 5 and though feveral attempts had been made to fubdue them, they always proved infufficient till the time of Julius Caefar. By h‘m they were totally reduced, from the river Rhine to the Pyremean mountains, and many of their nations almoft exterminated. He carried his arms alfo into Germany and the fouthern parts of Bri¬ tain ; but in neither of thefe parts did he make any permanent conquefts. The civil wars between him and Pompey gave him an opportunity of feizing on the kingdom of Mauritania and thofe parts of Numi¬ dia w'hich had been allowed to retain their liberty. The kingdom of Egypt alone remained, and to this nothing belonged except the country properly fo call¬ ed. Cyrenaica wTas bequeathed by wall to the Romans about 58 B. C. $ and about the fame time the ifland of Cyprus w7as feized by them without any pretence, ex¬ cept a defire of poffefling the treafure of the king.— The kingdom of Egypt continued for fome time longer at liberty j which in fome meafure muft be aferibed to the internal diflenfions of the republic, but more efpecially to the amours of Pompey, Julius Caefar, and Mark Antony, with the famous Cleopatra queen of Egypt. The battle of Adtium, however, deter¬ mined the fate of Antony, Cleopatra, and Egypt it¬ felf } which laft was reduced to a Roman province about 9 B. C. 34 While the Romans thus employed all means to re- Origin and duce the world to their obedience, they were ma- progrefs of king one another feel the fame miferies at home which ^ars jn they inflidfed upon other nations abroad. The firftRomet civil diflenfions took their rife at the fiege of Numan¬ tia in Spain. We have already obferved, that this fmall city refilled the whole powTer of the Romans for fix years. Once they gave them a moft terrible and fliame- ful defeat, wherein 30,000 Romans fled before 4000 Numantmes. Twenty thoufand were killed in the battle, and the remaining ten thoufand fo Ihut up, that there was no poflrbility of efcaping. _ In this ex¬ tremity they were obliged to negociate wdth the ene¬ my, and a peace was concluded upon the following terms: I. That the Numantines fhould fuffer the Romans to retire pnmolefted j and, 2. I hat Numantia ftiould maintain Sea. I. HIST Civil maintain its independence, and be reckoned among Iliftory. the Roman allies.—The Roman fenate, with an inju- * ~v 1 j^|ce an(j ingratitude hardly to be matched, broke this treatv, and in return ordered the commander of their army to be delivered up to the Numantines 5 but they refufed to accept of him, unlefs his army was deliver¬ ed along with him ; upon which the war was renewed, and ended as already related. The fate of Numantia, however, was foon revenged. Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus, brother-in-law to Scipio Africanus the fe¬ re,nd, had been a chief promoter of the peace with the .Numantines already mentioned, and of confequence had been in danger of being delivered up to them along with the commander in chief. This difgrace he never forgot j and, in order to revenge himfelf, under¬ took the caufe of the plebeians againft the patricians, by whom the former were greatly oppreffed. He be¬ gan with reviving an old law, which had enabled that no Roman citizen thould poilefs more than 500 acres of land. The overplus he defigned to ditlribute among thofe w'ho had no lands, and to reimburfe the rich out of the public treafury. This law met with great op- pofition, bred many tumults, and at laft ended in the death of Gracchus and the perfecution of his friends, feveral hundreds of whom were put to cruel deaths without any form of law. The diiturbances did not ceafe with the death of Gracchus. New contefts enfued on account of the Sempronian law, and the giving to the Italian allies the privilege of Roman citizens. This laft not only produced great commotions in the city, but occafioned ' a general revolt of the ftates of Italy againfl the re¬ public of Rome. This rebellion was not quelled with¬ out the utmofl difficulty ; and in the mean time, the city was deluged wdth blood by the contending factions of Sylla and Marius •, the former of whom lided wdth the patricians, and the latter wdth the plebeians. Thefe difturbances ended in the perpetual didlatorffiip of Syl¬ la, about 80 B. C. From this time we may date the lofs of the Roman liberty •, for though Sylla religned his diftatorffiip two years after, the fucceeding contefts between Caefar and Pompey proved equally fatal to the republic. Thefe contefts were decided by the battle of Pharfalia, by which Caefar became in effedft mafter of the empire in 43 B. C. Without lofs of time he then crofted over into Africa; totally defeated the republican army in that continent *, and, by reducing the country of Mauritania to a Roman province, completed the Ro¬ man conquefts in thefe parts. His viftory over the fons of Pompey at Munda 40 B. C. fecured him from any further apprehenfions of a rival. Being there¬ fore foie mafter of the Roman empire, and having all the power of it at his command, he projefted the great- elf fchemes j tending, according to fome, not lefs to the happinefs than to the glory of his country : when he was aflaffinated in the fenate-houfe, in the 56th year of his age, and 39 B. C. Without inveftigating the political juftice of this aiftion, or the motives of the perpetrators, it is im- poffible not to regret the death of this great man, when we contemplate his virtues, and the defigns which he is faid to have formed : (See Rome). Nor is it poffible to juftify, from ingratitude at leaft, even the moft virtuous of the confpirators, when we conft- 35 O R Y. der the obligations under which they lay to him. x\nd as to the meafure itfelf, even in the view of expedien¬ cy, it feems to be generally condemned. In fadf, from the tranfaffions which had long preceded, as well as thofe w'hich immediately followed, the murder of Cae¬ far, it is evident, that Rome was incapable of pre- ferving its liberty any longer, and that the people had become unfit for being free. The efforts of Brutus and Caffius were therefore unfuccefsful, and ended'in their own deftruttion and that of great numbers of their followers in the battle of Philippi. The defeat of the republicans was followed by numberlefs difturbances, murders, proferiptions, &c. till at laft Qclavianus, ha-Odtavianus ving cut off all who had the courage to oppofe him, Puts an en<* and finally got the better of his rivals by the viftoryt0 rC> at Adliura, put an end to the republic in the year1 27 B. C. The deftruftion of the Roman commonwealth pro¬ ved advantageous to the few nations of the world who ftill retained their liberty. That outrageous defire of conqueft, which had fo long marked the Roman cha- ra£ler, now in a great meafure ceafed 5 becaufe there was now another way of fatisfying the defires of ambi¬ tious men, namely, by courting the favour of the em¬ peror. After the final reduftion of the Spaniards, therefore, and the conqueft of the countries of Maefia, Pannonia, and fome others adjacent to the Roman ter¬ ritories, and which in a manner feemed naturally to be¬ long to them, the empire enjoyed for fome time a pro¬ found peace. The only remarkable tranfaflions which took place during the remainder of the period of which we treat, were the conqueft of Britain by Claudius and Agrico¬ la, and the deftruflion of Jerufalem by Vefpafian and Titus. The war with the Jews began A. D. 67 5 and was occafioned by their obixinately claiming the city of Caefarea, which the Roman had added to the pro¬ vince of Syria. It ended in 73, with the molt terrible deftrudtion of their city and nation j fince which time they have never been able to affemble as a diftinft peo¬ ple. The fouthern parts of Britain were totally fub- dued by Agricola about ten years after. In the 98th year of the Chriftian era, Trajan was created emperor of Rome ; and being a man of great valour and experience in war, carried the Roman con¬ quefts to their utmoft extent. Having conquered the Dacians, a German nation beyond the Danube, and who had of late been very troublefome, he turned his arms eaftward j reduced all Mefopotamia, Cbal- daea, Affyria ; and having taken Ctefiphon, the capi¬ tal of the Parthian empire, appointed them a king, which he thought would be a proper method of keep¬ ing that warlike people in fubjeftion. After this he propofed to return to Italy, but died by the way ; and with his reign the feventh general period above men¬ tioned is concluded. ^ S. The beginning of the eighth period prefents us Eighth pe- with a view of one vaft empire, in which almoft all the ri°d. Ge- nations of the world were fwallowed up. This empire n^ra' ftate comprehended the beft part of Britain, all Spain, France, the Netherlands, Italy, part of Germany, E- gypt,_ Barbary, Bildulgerid, Turkey in Europe, Tur¬ key in Afia, and Perfia. The ftate of India at this time is unknown. The Chinefe lived in a remote part of the world, unheard-of and unmolefted by the weftern nations - HISTORY. Sea. I. nations who ft niggled for the empire of the world. The northern parts of Europe and Afia were filled with barbarous nations, already formidable to the Ro¬ mans, and who were foon to become more fo. The vail empire of the Romans, however, had no fooner attained its utmolt degree of power, than, like others before it, it began to decline. The provinces of Ba¬ bylonia, Mefopotamia, and AlTyria, almoft inltantly revolted, and were abandoned by Adrian the fucceffor of Trajan in the empire. The Parthians having reco¬ vered their liberty, continued to be very formidable enemies, and the barbarians of the northern parts of Europe continued to increafe in ftrengtb ; while the Romans, weakened by inteftine divifions, became daily lefs able to refift them. At different times, however, fome warlike emperors arofe, who put a flop to the in- curfions of thefe barbarians 5 and about the year 215, the Parthian empire was totally overthrown by the Per- fians, who had long been fubjeft to them. This revo¬ lution proved of little advantage to the Romans. The Perfians were enemies ftill more troublefome than the Parthians had been ; and though often defeated, they ftill continued to infeft the empire on the eaft, as the barbarous nations of Europe did on the north. In 260, the defeat and captivity of the emperor Valerian by the Perfians, with the dilturbances which followed, threatened the empire with utter deftruftion. Thirty tyrants feized the government at once, and the barba¬ rians pouring in on all fides in prodigious numbers ra¬ vaged almoft all the provinces of the empire. By the vigorous conduct of Claudius, Aurelian, Tacitus, Pro¬ bus, and Cams, the empire was reftored to its former luftre ; but as the barbarians were only repulfed, and never thoroughly fubdued, this proved only a tempo¬ rary relief. What wTas worfe, the Roman foldiers, grown impatient of reftraint, commonly murdered thofe emperors who attempted to revive among them the ancient military difcipline, which alone could enfure them victory over their enemies. Under Dioclefian, the dif- orders were fo great, that though the government was held by two perfons, they found themfelves unable to bear the weight of it, and therefore took other two partners in the empire. Thus was the Roman empire divided into four parts j which by all hiftorians is faid to have been produ&ive of the greateft mifchiefs. As each of thefe four fovereigns wmuld have as many officers both civil and military, and the fame number of forces that had been maintained by the ftate when governed only by one emperor, the people were not able to pay the fums neceffary for fupporting them. Hence the taxes and impofts were increafed beyond meafure, the inhabitants in feveral provinces reduced to beggary, the land left untilled for want of hands, &c. An end was put to thefe evils when the empire was again united under Conftantine the Great ; but in 33° a mortal blow was given it, by removing the impe¬ rial feat to Byzantium, now Conftantinople, and nyi- king it equal to Rome. The introduclion and efta- blifhment of Chriftianity, already corrupted with the groffeit fuperftitions, proved alfo a moft grievous de¬ triment to the empire. Inftead of that ferocious and obftinate valour in which the Romans had fo long been accuftomed to put their truft, they now imagined them¬ felves fecured by figns of the crofs, and other external fymbols of the Chriftian religion. Thefe they ufed , I as a kind of magical incantations, which undoubtedly Civil proved at all times ineffectual; and hence alfo in fome Hittory. meafure proceeded the great revolution which took place in the next period. ^ 9. The ninth general period (hows us the decline Ninth pe- and miferable end of the weftern part of the Roman £>e'“' empire. We fee that mighty empire, which formerly occupied almoft the whole world, now weakened bywefterH diviiion, and furrounded by enemies. On the eaft,empne., the Perfians on the north, the Scythians, Sarmatians, Goths, and a multitude of other barbarous nations, watched all occafions to break into it ; and mifearried in their attempts, rather through their own barbarity, than the ftrength of their enemies. The devaftations committed by thofe barbarians when they made their incurfions are incredible, and the relation thocking to human nature. Some .authors feem much inclined to favour them ; and even infinuate, that barbarity and ignorant ferocity were their chief if not their only faults : but from their biftory it plainly appears, that not only barbarity and the moft: (hocking cruelty, but the higheft degrees of avarice, perfidy, and dilregard to the moft; folemn promifes, wrere to be numbered among their vices. It was ever a fufticient reafon for them to make an attack, that they thought their ene¬ mies could not refift: them. Their only reafon for making peace, or for keeping it, was becaufe their enemies were too ftrong : and their only reafon for committing the moft horrid maflacres, rapes, and all manner of crimes, was becaufe they had gained a vic¬ tory. The Romans, degenerate as they wTere, are yet to be efteemed much better than thefe favages; and therefore we find not a (ingle province of the empire that would fjbmit to the barbarians while the Romans could poffibly defend them. Some of the Roman emperors indeed withftood this inundation of favages •, but as the latter grew daily more numerous, and the Romans continued to wTeaken themfelves by their inteftine divifions, they were at lafi: obliged to take large bodies of barbarians into their pay, and teach them their military difcipline, in other to drive away their countrymen, or others who invaded the empire. This at laft proved its total de- ftruftion ; for, in 476, the barbarians who ferved in the Roman armies, and were dignified with the title of allies, demanded the third part of the lands of Italy as a reward for their fervices: but meeting with a re- fufal, they revolted, and made themfelves mafters of the whole country, and of Rome itlelf, which from that time ceafed to be the head of an empire of any confequence. This period exhibits a moft: unfavourable view of General the weftern parts of the world : The Romans, from of the the height of grandeur, funk to the loweft flavery,VTOrlt1, nay, in all probability, almoft exterminated •, the pro¬ vinces they formerly governed, inhabited by human beings fcarce a degree above the brutes •, every art and fcience loft j and the favage conquerors even in danger of ftarving for want of a fufticient knowledge of agriculture, having now no means of fupplying themfelves by plunder and robbery as before. Britain had long been abandoned to the mercy of the Scots and Fids 3 and in 450 the inhabitants had called in the Saxons to their affiftance, whom they loon found worfe enemies than thofe againft: whom they had im¬ plored Sea. I. HIST Civil plored their aid. Spain was held by the Goths and Hiftory. Suevians •, Africa (that is, Barbary and Bildulgerid) 1'"¥ v by the Vandals ; the Burgundians, Goths, Franks, and Alans, had creeled feveral fmall dates in Gaul ; and Italy was fubiected to the Heruli under Odoacer, who had taken upon him the title of king of Italy. In the ead, indeed, matters wore an afpe£t fomewhat more agreeable. The Roman empire continued to live in that of Conftantinople, which was fliil very extenlive. It comprehended all Alia Minor and Syria, as far as Perfia ; in Africa, the kingdom of Egypt ; and Greece in Europe. The Perlians were powerful, and rivalled the emperors of Conftantinople ; and beyond them lay the Indians, Chinefe, and other nations, who, unheard- of by the inhabitants of the more weftern parts, enjoyed peace and liberty. The Conftantinopolitan empire continued to decline by reafon of its continual wars with the Perfians, Bul¬ garians, and other barbarous nations ; to which alfo fuperftition and relaxation of military diicipline largely contributed. The Perfian empire alfo declined from the fame caul os, together with the inteftine broils from which it was feldom free more than that of Conftanti¬ nople. The hiftory of the eaftern part of the world during this period, therefore, conlifts only of the wars between thefe two great empires, of which an account is given under the articles Constantinople and Per¬ sia ; and which w;ere productive of no other confe- quence than that of weakening them both, and making them a more eafy prey to thofe enemies who were now as it were in embryo, but ftiortly about to erect an empire almoft as extenlive as that of the Greeks or Ro- 39 mans. Hiftory of Among the weftern nations, revolutions, as might naturally be expended from the charadler of the people, fucceeded one another with rapidity. The Heruli un¬ der Odoacer ivere driven out by the Goths under Theodoric. The Goths were expelled by the Romans ; and, while the two parties were contending, both were attacked by the Franks, who carried off an immenfe booty. The Romans were in their turn expelled by the Goths : the Franks again invaded Italy, and made themfelves mailers of the province of Venetia ; but at laft the fuperior fortune of the emperor of Conftantino¬ ple prevailed, and the Goths were finally fubdued in 553. Narfes, the conqueror of the Goths, governed Italy as a province of the eaftern empire till the year 568, when Longinus his fuccefibr made confiderable al¬ terations. The Italian provinces had ever fince the time of Conftantine the Great been governed by confu- lares, correclores, and prcefides; no alteration having been made either by the Roman emperors, or the Go¬ thic kings. But Longinus, being invefted with abfo- lute power by Juftinian, fuppreffed thofe magiftrates ; - and, inftead of them, placed in each city of note a go¬ vernor, whom he diftinguiflied with the title of duke. I he city of Rome wras not more honoured than any other ; for Longinus, having abolifhed the very name of fenate and confuls, appointed a duke of Rome as well as of other cities. To himfelf he aflumed the title of exarch; and, refiding at Ravenna, his government was flyled the exarchate of Ravenna. But while he was eftablithing this new empire, the greateft part of Italy 40 was conquered by the Lombards. Of. France. In France a confiderable revolution alfo took place. O R Y. 5^9 In. 487, Clovis, the founder of the French mo- Civil narchy, pofieffed himfelf of all the countries lying be- Biff°ry- tween the Rhine and the Loire. By force or treach- v ~ ery, he conquered all the petty kingdoms which had been eretted in that country. His dominions had been divided, reunited, and divided again ; and were on the point of being united a fecond time, when the great impoftor Mahomet began to make a figure in the world. r In Spain, the Vifigoths eredled a kingdom ten years Of Spain.. before the conqueft of Rome by the Heruli. This king¬ dom they had extended eaftward, about the fame time that Ciovis was extending his conquefts to the weft ; fo that the two kingdoms met at the river Loire. The confequence of this approach of fuch barbarous conque¬ rors towards each other was an immediate war. Clovis proved viclonous, and fubdued great part of the coun¬ try of the Viiigoths, which put a final flop to their con¬ quefts on that iide. Another kingdom had been founded in the weftern parts of Spain by the Suevi, a confiderable time before the Romans were finally expelled from that country. In 409 this kingdom was entirely fubverted by Theo¬ doric king of the Goths ; and the Suevi were fo pent up in a Imall diftrief of Lufitania and Galicia, that it feemed impoftible for them to recover themfelves. Du¬ ring the above-mentioned period, however, while the attention of the Goths was turned another wTay, they had found means again to eredl themfelves into an in¬ dependent ftate, and to become mafters of confiderably extended territories. But this fuccefs proved of Ihort duration. In 584 the Goths attacked them ; totally deftroyed their empire a fecond time ; and thus became mafters of all Spain, except fome fmall part which ftill owned fubjection to the emperors of Conftantinople. Ot this part, however, the Goths became mafters alfo in the year 623 ; which concludes the 9th general pe¬ riod. Africa, properly fo called, had changed its mafters Of Africa- three times during this period. The Vandals had ex¬ pelled the Romans, and ere£ted an independent king¬ dom, which was at laft overturned by the emperors of Conftantinople ; and from them the greateft part of it was taken by the Goths in 620. 4. 10. At the commencement of the tenth general pe-Tenth ge- riod (which begins with the flight of Mahomet in n.eral the year 622, from whence his followers date their ^•°n“ era called the Hegira), we fee every thing prepared the Sara-- for the great revolution which was now to take place : eens. the Roman empire in the weft annihilated ; the Per- lian empire and that of Conftantinople weakened by mutual wars and inteftine divifions ; the Indians and other eaftern nations unaccuftomed to war, and ready to fall a prey to the firlt invader; the fouthern parts of Europe in a diltraefted and barbarous ftate; while the inhabitants of Arabia, from their earlieit origin accuftomed to war and plunder, and now uni- ted by the moft violent fuperftition and enthufiaftic de¬ fire of conqueft, were like a flood pent up, and read / to overwhelm the reft of the world.—The "northern na¬ tions of Europe and Alia, however formidable in after times, were at prefent unknown, and peaceable, at leaL with lefpect to their fouthern neighbours; fo that tneie was in no quarter of the globe any power capa¬ ble of oppofing the conquefts of the Arabs. With amazing poral power 520 HIS T Civil amazing celerity, therefore, they overran all Syria, Hiftory. pa]efUne, Perfia, Bukharia, and India, extending their ^ conquelts farther to the eaftward than ever Alexander had done. On the weft fide, their empire extended over Egypt, Barbary, and Spain, together with the iflands of Sicily, Sardinia, Majorca, Minorca, &-C. and many of the Archipelago iflands •, nor were the coafts of Italy itfelf free from their incurfions ; nay, they are even faid to have reached the diftant and bar¬ ren country of Iceland. At laft this great empire, as well as others, began to decline. Its ruin was very ludden, and owing to its internal divifions. Mahomet had not taken care to eftablifh the apoftlefhip in his family, or to give any particular diredtions about a < fucceffor. The confequence of this was, that the ca¬ liphate, or fucceflion to the apoftleftup, was feized by many ufurpers in different parts of the empire ; while the true caliphs, who refided at Bagdad, gradually loft all power, and were regarded only as a kind of high- priefts. Of thefe divifions the Turks took advantage to eftabliftr their authority in many provinces of the Mohammedan empire } but as they embraced the fame religion with the Arabs, and were filled with the fame enthufiaftic defire of conqueft, it is of little confe¬ quence to diftinguiftr between them •, as indeed it fig- nified little to the world in general whether the I urks or Saracens were the conquerors, fince both were cruel, barbarous, ignorant, and fuperftitious. Of the While the barbarians of the eaft were thus grafping Pope's tem-at the empire of the whole world, great difturbances happened among the no lefs barbarous nations of the weft. Superftition feems to have been the ruling mo¬ tive in both cafes. The Saracens and Turks conquer¬ ed for the glory of God, or of his apoftle Mahomet and his fucceffors •, the weftern nations profeffed an equal regard for the divine glory, but which was only to be perceived in the refpeft they paid to the pope and clergy. Ever fince the eftablilhment of Chrifti- anity by Conftantine, the bifhops of Rome had been gradually extending their power j and attempting not only to render themfelves independent, but even to af- fume an authority over the emperors themfelves. The deftruftion of the empire was fo far from weakening their power, that it afforded them opportunities of greatly extending it, and becoming judges of the fovereigns of Italy themfelves, whofe barbarity aud ignorance prompted them to fubmit te their decifions. All this time, however, they themfelves had been in fubjec- tion to the emperors of Conftantinople ; but on the decline of that empire, they found means to get themfelves exempted from this fubje&ion. J he prin¬ cipal authority in the rcity of Rome tvas then engroff- ed by the bifliop ; though pf right it belonged to the duke appointed by the exarch of Ravenna. But though they had now little to fear from the eaftern empe¬ rors, they were in great danger from the ambition of the Lombards, who aimed at the conqueft of all Italy. This afpiring people the biftrops of Rome determined to check*, and therefore, in 726, when Luitprand king of the Lombards had taken Ravenna and expel¬ led the exarch, the pope undertook to reftore him. For this purpofe he applied to the Venetians, who are now firft mentioned in hiftory as a ftate of any con¬ fequence *, and by their means the exarch was reftored. Some time before, a quarrel had happened between % O R Y. the pope (Gregory II.) and Leo emperor of the eaft, about the worthip of images. Leo, rvho it feems, in the midft of fo much barbarifm, had itill preferved fome (hare of common fenfe and reafon, reprobated the worftiip of images in the ftrongert terms, and con- manded them to be deftroyed throughout his domi¬ nions. The pope, whofe caufe was favoured by the moft abfurd fuperftitions, and by thefe only, refufed to obey the emperor’s commands. The exarch of Ravenna, as a fubjedl of the emperor, was ordered to force the pope to a compliance, and even to feize or ai- faflinate him in cafe of a refufal. This excited the pious zeal of Luitprand to afiift the pope, whom he had formerly defigned to fubdue : the exarch was firft excommunicated, and then torn in pieces by the enra¬ ged multitude : the duke of Naples fhared the fame fate ; and a vaft number of the Iconoc/qfls, or Image- breakers, as they were called, were flaughtered with¬ out mercy : and to complete all, the fubjedfs of the exarchate, at the mitigation of the pope, renounced their allegiance to the emperor. Leo rvas no fooner informed of this revolt than he ordered a powerful army - to be raifed, in order to re¬ duce the rebels, and take vengeance on the pope. A- larmed at thefe warlike preparations, Gregory looked round for fome power on which he might depend for protedtion. The Lombards were poffeffed of fuffi- cient force, but they were too near and too danger¬ ous neighbours to be trufted j the Venetians, though zealous Catholics, were as yet unable to withftand the force of the empire *, Spain was overrun by the Sa¬ racens : the French feemed, therefore, the only peo¬ ple to whom it was advifable to apply fot aid j as they were able to oppofe the emperor, and were likewife enemies to his edidl. Charles Martel, who at that time governed France as mayor of the palace, was therefore applied to j but before a treaty could be concluded, all the parties concerned w^ere removed by death. Conftantine Copronymus, who fucceeced Leo at Conftantinople, not only perfifted in the oppofition to image-worfhip begun by his predeceffor, but pro¬ hibited alfo the invocation of faints. Zachary, who fucceeded Gregory III. in the pontificate, proved as zealous an adverfary as his predeceffor. Pepin, who fucceeded Charles Martel in the fovereignty of France, proved as powerful a friend to the pope as his father had been. The people of Rome had nothing to fear from Conftantinople j and therefore drove out all the emperor’s officers. The Lombards, awed by the power of France, for fome time allowTed the pope to govern in peace the dominions of the exarchate *, but in 752, Aftolphus king of Lombardy not only re¬ duced the greateft part of the pope’s territories, but threatened the city of Rome itfelf. Upon this an ap¬ plication was made to Pepin, who obliged Aftolphus to reftore the places he had taken, and gave them to the pope, or, as he faid, to St Peter. The Greek emperor to whom they of right belonged,. remonftra- ted to no purpole. The pope from that time became poffeffed of confiderable territories in Italy j which, from the manner of their donation, go under the name of St Peter's Patrimony. It was not, however, before the year 774 that the pope was fully fecured in thefe new dominions. This was accomplilhed when the kingdom of the Lombards was totally deftroyed Sea. I Seel. I. HISTORY. 45 Oeneial ftate of th world. 4« Eleventh period, '/he cru- fades. by Charlemagne, who was thereupon crowned king of Italy. Soon after, this monarch made himlelf ma¬ tter of all the Low Countries, Germany, and part of Hungary ; and in the year 800, was folemniy crown¬ ed by the pope emperor of the weft. Tims was the world once more divided into three ’ great empires. The empire of the Arabs or Saracens extended from tbe river Ganges to Spain ; compre¬ hending almoft all of Alia and Africa which has ever been Jrnown to Europeans, the kingdoms of China and Japan excepted. The eaftern Roman empire was reduced to Greece, Afia Minor, and the provinces ad¬ joining to Italy. The empire of the weft, under Char¬ lemagne, comprehended France, Germany, and the greateft part of Italy. The Saxons, however, as yet pofteiTed Britain unmolefted by external enemies, though tne feven kingdoms erected by them were engaged in perpetual conteils. The Venetians alfo enjoyed a nominal liberty though it is probable that their ft- tnation would render them very much dependent on the great powers which furrounded them. Of all na¬ tions on earth, the Scots and Pifts, and the remote ones of China and Japan, feem to have enjoyed, from their fituation, the greateft (hare of liberty ; unlefs, per¬ haps, we except the Scandinavians, who, under the names of Danes and Normans, were foon to infeft their fouthern neighbours. But of all tbe European po¬ tentates, the popes certainly exercifed the greateft au¬ thority ; ftnee even Charlemagne himfelf fubmitted to accept the crown from their hands, and his fucceflbrs made them the arbiters of their differences. Matters, however, did not long continue in this ttate. The empire of Charlemagne was on the death of his Ion Lewis divided among his three children. Endlefs difputes and wars enfued among them, till at laft the fovereign power was feized by Hugh Capet in 987. The Saxon heptarchy was diffolved in 827, and the whole kingdom of England reduced under one head. The Danes and Normans began to make de¬ predations, and infeft the neighbouring ftates. The former conquered the Englifti Saxons, and feized the government, but were in their turn expelled by the Normans in 1066. In Germany and Italy the greateft difturbances arofe from the contefts between the popes and the emperors. To all this if we add the internal contefts which happened through the ambition of the powerful barons of every kingdom, we can fcarce form an idea of times more calamitous than thofe of which we now treat. All Europe, nay, all the world, was one great field of battle 5 for the empire of the Mahometans was not in a more fettled ftate than that of the Europeans. Caliphs, fultans, emirs, &c. waged continual war with each other in every quarter j new fovereignties every day fprung up, and were as quickly deftroyed. In Ihort, through the ignorance and barba¬ rity with which the whole world was overfpread, it feemed in a manner impofiible that the human race could long continue to exift ; when happily the crufades, by direfting the attention of the Europeans to one particular objeft, made them in fome ineafure fufpend their daughters of one another. 11. The crufades originated from the fuperftition of the two grand parties into which the world was at that time divided, namely, the Chriftians and Mahometans. Both looked upon the fmall territory of Paleftine, You X. Part II. Civil Hiftory. 47 which they called the Holy Land, to be an invaluable acquilitiou, for which no i’um of money could be an equivalent ; and both took the moft unjuftifiable me¬ thods to accomplifh their defires. The fuperftition of Omar the lecond caliph had prompted him to invade this country, part of the territories of the Greek empe- ror, who was doing him no hurt ; and now when it had been fo long under the fubjeiftion of the Mahometans, a fimilar fuperftition prompted the pope to fend an army for the recovery of it. The crufaders accordingly poured forth in multitudes, like thofe with which the kings of Perfia formerly invaded Greece 5 and their fate was pretty fimilar. Their impetuous valour at firft, indeed, carried every thing before them : they reco¬ vered all Paleftine, Phoenicia, and part of Syria, from the infidels; but their want of conduct foon loft what their valour had obtained, and very few of that vait multitude which had left Europe ever returned to their native countries. A fecond, a third, and feveral other crufades, were preached, and were attended with a like fuccefs in both refpefts : vaft numbers took the crofs, and repaired to the Holy Land 5 which they polluted with the moft abominable mafl'acres and treacheries, and from which very few of them returned. In the third crulade Richard I. of England was embarked, who feems to have been the belt general that ever went into the eaft : but even his valour and fkill were not fufii- cient to repair the faults of his companions; and he was obliged to return even after he had entirely de¬ feated his ahtagonifts, and was within fight of Jerufa- lem. But while the Chriftians and Mahometans were thus ^onquefts fuperftitioufty contending for a fmall territory in the0^6^0" wertern parts of Afia, the nations in the more eafterly*U S* parts were threatened with total extermination. Jen- ghiz Khan, the greateft as well as the moft bloody conqueror that ever exifted, now makes his appeai-ance. The rapidity of his conquefts feemed to emulate thole ol Alexander the Great ; and the cruelties he com¬ mitted were altogether unparalleled. It is worth ob- lerving, that Jengbiz Khan and all his followers were neither Chriftians nor Mahometans, but ftrieft deifts. For a long time even the fovereign had not heard of a temple, or any particular place on earth ap¬ propriated by the deity to himfelf, and treated the notion with ridicule when it was firft mentioned to him. The Moguls, over whom Jenghiz Khan affumed the fovereignty, were a people of Eaft Tartary, divided in¬ to a great number of petty governments as they are at this day, but who owned a fubje&ion to one fovereign, whom they called Vang Khan, or the Great Khaia. Temujin, afterwards Jenghiz Khan, was one of thefe petty princes; but unjuftly deprived of the greateft part of his inheritance at the age of 13, which he could not recover till he arrived at that of 40. This correfponds with the year 1201, when he totally reduced the re¬ bels *, and as a fpecimen of his lenity caufed 70 of their chiefs to be thrown into as many caldrons of boiling water. In 1202, he defeated and killed Vang Khan himfelf (known to the Europeans by the name of Vraf¬ ter ’John of Hfa') ; and poffefting himfelf of his vaft do¬ minions, became from thenceforward altogether irre- fiftible. In 1 206, having ftill continued to enlarge his dominions, he was declared khan of the Moguls and 3 U Tartars: 2 522 HIST Civil Tartars ; and took upon him the title of 'jenghi'z, Khan, Hiftory or The mqfl Great Khan of hhans. This was followed by the reduflion of the kingdom of Hya in China, Tangut, Kitay, Turkeftan, Karazm (the kingdom of Gazna founded by Mahmud Gazni), Great Bukharin, Perlia, and part of India; and all thefe vatl regions were reduced in 26 years. The devaftations and daugh¬ ters with which they were accomplilhed are unparallel¬ ed, no fewer than 14,470,000 perfons being computed to have been maffacr^d by Jenghiz Khan during the laid 22 years of his reign. In the^ beginning of 1227 he died, thereby freeing the world from a molt bloody tyrant. His fucceffors completed the conqueit of Chi¬ na and Korea j but were foiled in their attempts on Cochin-China, Tong-king, and Japan. On the welt- ern fide the Tartar dominions were not much enlarged till the time of Plulaku, who conquered Media, Ba¬ bylonia, Mefopotamia, Aflyria, Syria, Georgia, Ar¬ menia, and almoit all Afia Minor j putting an end to the empire of the Saracens by the taking of Bagdad in 1258. The emoire of Jenghiz Khan had the fate of all others. Being far too extenfive to be governed by one head, it fplit into a multitude of fmall kingdoms, as it had been before his time. All thefe princes, however, owned allegiance to the family of Jenghiz Khan till the time of Timur Bek, or Tamerlane. The Turks, in the mean time, urged forward by the inundation of Tartars who poured in from the eaft, were forced up¬ on the remains of the Greek empire and at the time of Tamerlane above mentioned, they had almoft con¬ fined this once mighty empire within the walls of Con- , ftantinople. Of Tamer- * In the year 1335, the family of Jenghiz Khan be- lane. coming extindl in Perfia, a long civil war enfued •, du¬ ring which Timur Bek, one of the petty princes a- mong which the Tartar dominions were divided, found means to aggrandize himfelf in a manner fimilar to what Jenghiz Khan had done about 150 years before. Jenghiz Khan, indeed, was the model whom he pro- pofed to imitate ; but it muft be allowed that Timur was more merciful than Jenghiz Khan, if indeed the word can be applied to fuch inhuman tyrants. The plan on which Jenghiz Khan conduced his expedi¬ tions was that of total extermination. For fome time he utterly extirpated the inhabitants of thofe places which he conquered, defigning to people them anew with his Moguls •, and in confequence of this refolu- tion, he would employ his army in beheading 100,000 prifoners at once. Timur’s cruelty, on the other hand, feldom went farther than the pounding of 3000 or 400O people in large mortars, or building them among bricks and mortar into a wall. We muft ob- ferve, however, that Timur was net a deift, but a Mahometan, and conquered exprefsly for the purpofe ©f fpreading the Mahometan religion 5 for the Moguls had now adopted all the fuperftitions and abfurdities of Mahomet. Thus w?as all the eaftern quarter of the world threatened anew with the moft dreadful devafta¬ tions, while the weftern nations were exhaufting thexn- felves in fruitlefs attempts to regain the Holy Land. The Turks were the only people who feem at this period to have been gathering lirength, and by their perpetual encroachments threatened to fwallow up the O It Y. Sett. 1. weftern nations as the Tartars had done the eaftern Civil ones. Hiftory. In 1362, Timur invaded Bukharia, which he redu- ced in five years. He proceeded in his conquefts, though not with the fame celerity as Jenghiz Khan, till the year 1387, when he had fubdued all Perfia, Arme¬ nia, Georgia, Karazm, and great part of Tartary. After this he proceeded weftward, fubduing all the countries to the Euphrates \ made himfelf mafter of Bagdad ; and even entered Ruflia, where he mllaged the city of Mofcow. From thence he turned his arms to the eaft, and totally fubdued India. In 1393, he invaded and reduced Syria; and having turned his arms againft the Turks, forced their fultan Bajazet to raife the fiege of Conftantinople. This brought on an en¬ gagement, in which Bajazet was entirely defeated and taken prifoner ; which broke the power of the Turks to fuch a degree, that they vyere not for fome time able to recover themfelves. At lalt this great con¬ queror died in the year 1405, while on his way to conquer China, as Jenghiz Khan had done before The death of Timur was followed almoft immedi-State of the ately by the diffolution of his empire. Moft of the world fines nations he had conquered recovered their liberty. t^at ftraer The Turks had now no further obftacle to their con- queft of Conftantinople. The weftern nations having exhaufted themfelves in the holy wars, as they were called, had loft that infatiable thirft after conqueft wFich for fo long time pofieffed the minds of men. They had already made confiderable advances in civili¬ zation, and began to ftudy the arts of peace. Gun¬ powder was invented, and its application to the pur- pofes @f war already known ; and, though no invention threatened to be more deftrudtive, perhaps none was ever more beneficial to the human race. By the ufe of fire-arms, nations ^re put more on a level with each other than formerly they were ; war is reduced to a regular fyftem, which may be ftudied with as much fuccefs as any other fcience. Conquefts are not now to be made with the fame eafe as formerly ; and hence the kft ages of the world have been much *-more quiet and peaceable than the former ones. In 1453, the conqueft of Conftantinople by the Turks fixed that wandering people to one place ; and though now they poftefs very large regions both in Europe, Afia, and Africa, an effedlual flop hath long been put to their further progrefs. About this time, alfo, learning began to revive in Europe, where it had been long loft ; and the inven¬ tion of printing, wdrich happened about the fame time, rendered it in a manner impoftible for barbarifm ever to take place in fuch a degree as formerly. All nations of the world, indeed, feem now at' once to have laid afide much of their former ferocity ; and, though wars have by no means been uncommon, they have not been carried on with fuch circumftances of fury and favage cruelty as before. Inftead of attempting to enrich themfelves by plunder, and the fpoils of their neigh¬ bours, mankind in general have applied themfelves to commerce, the only true and durable fource of riches. This foon produced improvements in navigation ; and thefe improvements led to the difeovery of many re- gions formerly unknown. At the fame time, the Eu¬ ropean * / Sea. I. Civil Hiftory. HISTORY. S2.3 ropean powers, being at lafl thoroughly fenfible that extenfive conquefts could never be permanent, applied themfelves more to provide for the fecurity of thofe do¬ minions which they already poflefied, than to attempt the conqueft of one another : and this produced the po¬ licy to which fo much attention was lately paid, name¬ ly, the preferving of the balance of Europe ; that is, preventing any one of the nations from acquiring fuffi- cient ftrength to overpower another. In the end of the 15th century, the vaft continent of America was difcovered j and, almoit at the fame time, the paffage to the Eaft Indies by the Cape of Good Hope. The difcovery of thefe rich countries gave a new turn to the ambition of the Europeans. To enrich themfelves, either by the gold and filver produced in thefe countries, or by traffic with the natives, now became the objeft. The Portuguele had the advantage of being the firft difcoverers of the eaft- ern, and the Spaniards of the weftern countries. The former did not negletff fo favourable an opportunity of enriching themfelves by commerce. Many fettlements were formed by them in the Eaft India iflands, and on the continent but their avarice and perfidious beha¬ viour towards the natives proved at laft the caufe of their total expulfion. The Spaniards enriched them¬ felves by the vaft quantities of the precious metals im¬ ported from America, which were not obtained but by the moft horrid maflacres committed on the natives, and of which an account is given under the different names of the American countries. Thefe poffeflions of the Spaniards and Portuguefe foon excited other Euro¬ pean nations to make attempts to {hare with them in their treafures, by planting colonies in different parts of America, and making fettlements in the Eaft Indies : and thus has the rage of war in fome meafure been transferx-ed from Europe to thefe diftant regions •, and, after various contefts, the Britifh at laft obtained a great fuperiority both in America and the Eaft Indies. In Europe the dhly conftderable revolutions which happened during this period, were, The total expulfion of the Moors and Saracens from Spain, by the taking of Grenada in 1491 ; the union of the kingdoms of Arragon and Caftile, by the marriage of Ferdinand and ifabella ; and the revolt of the ftates of Holland from the Spaniards. After much contention and blood- fhed, thefe laft obtained their liberty, and were decla¬ red a free people in 1609 ; fince which time they have continued an independent and very confiderable nation of Europe. In Afia nothing of importance hath happened fince the taking of Conftantinople by the Turks. That continent is now divided among the following nations. The moft northerly part, called Siberia, extending to the very extremity of the continent, is under the power of Ruflaa. To the fouthward, from Afia Mi¬ nor to China and Korea, are the Tartars, formidable indeed from their numbers, but, by realon of their barbarity and want of union, incapable of attempting any thing. The Turks poffefs the weftern part of the continent, called Afia Minor, to the river Euphrates. The Arabs are again confined within their own pen- infula •, which they poffeis, as they have ever done, without owning fubjection to any foreign power. To the eaft of Turkey in Afia lies Perfia, now more con¬ fined in its limits than before j and to the eaftward of Perfia lies India, or the kingdom late of the Mogul, ™vil comprehending all the country from the Indus to the Iilftorlr* Ganges, and beyond that river. Still farther to the eaft lie the kingdoms of Siam, Pegu, Thibet, and Cochin-China, little known to the Europeans. The vaft empire of China occupies the moft eafterly part of the continent 5 while that of Japan comprehends the iflands which go by that name, and which are fuppo- fed to lie at no great diftance from the weftern coafts of America. Iry Africa the Turks poffefs' Egypt, which they conquered in 1517, and have a nominal jurifdiciion over the ftates of Barbary. The interior parts are fill¬ ed with barbarous and unknown nations, as they have always been. On the weftern coafts are many fettle¬ ments of the European nations, particularly the Bri¬ tifh and Portuguefe j and the fouthern extremity is poffeffed by the Dutch. The eaftern coafts are almoft totally unknown. The Afiatic and African iflands are either poffeffed by the Europeans, or inhabited by fa- vage nations. The European nations at the beginning of the 17th century were Sweden, Mufcovy, Denmark, Poland, Britain, Germany, Holland, France, Spain, Portu¬ gal, Italy, and Turkey in Europe. Of thefe the Ruf¬ fians, though the moft barbarous, were by far the moft confiderable, both in regard to numbers and the ex¬ tent of their empire •, but their fituation made them little feared by the others, who lay at a diftance from them. The kingdom of Poland, which was firft fet up in the year 1000, proved a barrier between Ruflia and Germany ; and at the fame time the policy above- mentioned, of keeping up the balance of power in Europe, rendered it probable that no one European nation, whatever wars it might be engaged in, would have been totally deftroyed, or ceafed to exift as a di- ftiinft kingdom. The late difmemberment of Poland, however, or its partition between the three powers Ruflia, Hungary, and Pruflia, was a ftep very incon- fiftent >with the above political fyftem } and it is fur- prifing with what tamenefs it was acquiefced in by the other powers. Subfequent circumftances, particu¬ larly the paflivenefs with which the ambitious defigns of Ruflia againft the Porte have been fo long beheld, feem to indicate a total derelitlion of that fcheme of equilibrium, formerly fo wifely, though perhaps fome- times too anxioufly, attended to. The revolt of the Britifli colonies in America, it WTas hoped by the enemies of Britain, would have given a fatal (hock to her ftrength and wonted fuperiority. The confequences, however, have been very different. Thofe colonies, it is true, have been disjoined from the mother-country, and have attained an independent rank among the nations. But Britain has had no caufe to repine at the feparation. Divefted only of a fplen- did encumbrance, an expenfive and invidious appanage, Hie has been left to enjoy the undivided benefits of her native vigour, and to difplay new energies, which pro- mife her mild empire a long and prosperous duration. On the other hand, it has been faid, the flame which was to have blazed only to hier prejudice, has brought confufion on her chief foe 5 and the ambition and ty¬ ranny of that branch of the houfe of Bour on which has been long the peft of Europe, now lie humbled in the duft. The French, indeed, have thus become a nation 3 U 2 of 524 H I S T Ecclefia- of freemen as rvell as ourfelves, and as well as the A- Hifr'orv rner*c:ans ? who, by the way, ivere never otherwife, nor 'y-L- ever knew what oppreffion was except in inificling it upon their African brethren. But neither is the French revolution an event which Britons, as lovers of liberty and friends to the rights of mankind, fhould regret •, or which, even in a political view, if duly confidered, ought to excite either their jealoufy or apprehenlion. I he papal power, too, is declining; and the period feems to be approaching when the Roman pontiff will be reduced to his original title of bi/bo/) of Rome. Such was the language held for fome years during the progrefs of the French revolution. But the extraordi¬ nary events which have knee occurred, have totally changed the views and fentiments of mankind. The fair profpedl of liberty which the friends of humanity hoped had begun to dawn on France, has quite vanilh- ed ; and unfortunately the moft powerful defpot, as well as the moll capricious tyrant, has feated himfelf on the throne of her ancient kings. The prediction with re¬ gard to the pope was more than verified by this ufurper, at wdiofe nod the head of the catholic church holds his authority ; and at this moment (December 1806) the continent of Europe feems to be threatened wuth uni- verfal fubjugation to the fame reftlefs and ambitious power. Sect. II. Ecclefiajlical Hiforw 5° . Revolutions The hiftory of religion, among all the different na- fdcT^'hn t^°nS t^a1: ^aVe ex^e^ t^e vvor^» is a fubjecl no lefs pen°m ai"’important and intereiling than that of civil hiflory. It is, hotyever, lefs fertile of great events, affords an ac¬ count of fewer revolutions, and is much more uniform, than civil hiftory. The reaibn of this is plain. Reli¬ gion is converfant about things which cannot be feen ; and which of confequence cannot fuddenly and llrong- ly affeft the fenfes of mankind, as natural things are apt to do. The expectation of worldly riches can eafily in¬ duce one nation to attack another ; but it is not ealy to find any thing which will induce a nation to change its religion. The invifible nature of fpi ritual things, the .prejudice of habit and of early education, all ftand ki the way of changes of this kind. Hence the revolu¬ tions in religion have been but few, and the duration of almoft any religion of longer Handing than the moft ce¬ lebrated empires ; the changes which have happened, in general, have acquired a long time to bring them about, and hiftory fcarce affords an inftance of the re¬ ligion of any nation being effentially and fuddenly changed for another. With regard to the origin of religion, we muft have recourfe to the Scriptures ; and are as neceffarily con- ftrained to adopt the account there given, as we are to adopt that of the creation given in the fame book ; namely, becaufe no other hath made its appearance which feems in any degree rational, or confident with it felt.—In what manner the true religion given to A- dam v'as falfified or corrupted by his defeendants before the flood, doth not clearly appear from Scripture. Ido¬ latry i§ not mentioned : neverthelefs we are affured that the inhabitants of the world wrere then exceedingly wicked ; and as their wickednefs did not confift in wor- ftiioping falfe gods, it may be concluded that they wor¬ shipped none at all; i. e. that the crime of the antedi¬ luvians was deifm or aj^eifm. O R Y. Sed. II. After the flood, idolatry quickly made its appear- Ecclefia. ance ; but what gave rife to it is not certainly known. This fuperftition indeed feems to be natural to man, H especially when placed in fuch a fituation that he hath little opportunity of inftrudfion, or of improving his ra- Origin of tional faculties. Ibis leems alfo probable from a idolatry* caution given to the Jews, left, when they looked up to the fun, moon, and ftars, and the reft of the hoft of heaven, they ihould be driven to vcorjhip them. The origin of idolatry among the Syrians and Arabians, and alfo in. Greece, is therefore accounted for with great probability in the following manner by the au¬ thor of The Ruins of Balbeck. t“ In thofe uncomfort¬ able delerts, where the day prefents nothing to the view but the uniform, tedious, and melancholy profpedt of barren lands, the night difclofes a moft delightful and magnificent fpeftacle, and appears arrayed with charms of the moft attractive kind. For the moft part unclouded and ferene, it exhibits to the wonder¬ ing eye the hoft of heaven in all their variety and glo¬ ry. In the view of this ftupendous feene, the tranfi- tion from admiration to idolatry was too eafy to unin- llrudled minds ; and a people whole climate offered no beauties to contemplate but thofe of the firmament, would naturally look thither for the objedls of their worlhip. The form of idolatry in Greece was different from that cf the Syrians ; which perhaps may be at¬ tributed to that fmiling and variegated feene of moun¬ tains, valleys, rivers, woods, groves, and fountains, which the tranfported imagination, in the midft of its pleafing aftonilhment, fuppofed to be the feats of invi¬ fible deities.” A difficulty, however, arifes on this fuppofition ; for if idolatry is naturally produced in the mind of unin- ftrudfed and favage man from a view of the creation, why hath not idolatry of fome kind or other taken place among all the different nations of the world ? This certainly hath not been the cafe ; of which the moil linking examples are the Perfigns of old, and the Moguls in more modern times. Both thefe nations were ft rift deifts; fo that we muft allow fome other caufes to cctrcur in producing idolatry befides thefe al¬ ready mentioned ; and of thefe caufes an imperfeft and obfeure notion of the true religion feems to be the moft: probable. Though idolatry, therefore, was formerly very pre-General ac- valent, it neither extended over the rvhole earth, nor count of were tre fuperftitions of the idolaters all of one kind.the Hea* Every nation had its refpeftive gods, over which one ^per“ more excellent than the reft was faid to preiide ; yet in ’* fuch a manner, that this fupreme deity himfelf was con- trouled by the rigid empire of the fates, or by what philofophers called eternal necefjity. The gods of the eaft were different from thofe of the Gauls, the Ger¬ mans, and the other northern nations. The Grecian divinities differed widely from thofe of the Egyptians, who deified plants, animals, and a great variety of the produflions both of nature and art. Each people alfo had their own particular manner of worlhipping and ap- peafing their refpeftive deities, entirely different from the facred rites of other countries. All this variety of religions, however, produced neither wars nor diffen-- fions among the different nations ; each nation fuffered its neighbours to follow" their own method of worffiip, without difeovering any difpleafure on that account. There, Sea. II. H / ,s Ecclefi i- There is nothing furprifing in this mutual toleration, ftical when we confider, that they all looked upon the world t Hifto'y- as one great empire, divided into various provinces, *—■ a certain order of divinities preiid- ed j for which reafon they imagined that none could behold with contempt the gods of other nations, or force grangers to pay homage to theirs.—The Romans exer- cifed^ this toleration in the moll ample manner ; for though they would not allow any change to be made in the religions that were publicly profeffed in the em¬ pire, nor any new form of worfhip to be openly intro¬ duced, yet they granted to their citizens a full liberty of obferving in private the facred rites of other nations, and of honouring foreign deities as they thought pro¬ per. The heathen deities were honoured with rites and facrifices of various kinds, according to their refpec- tive natures and offices. Their rites were abfurd and ridiculous ; while the priefts, appointed to prefide over this if range worfhip, abufed their authority, by decei¬ ving and impofing upon the people in the groffeil man¬ ner. 5ofre From the time of the flood to the coming of Chrift, idolatry prevailed among almoif all the nations the appear- of the world, the Jews alone excepted ; and even ance of they were on all occaiions ready to run into it, as is Chrift* evident from their hiftory in the Old Teftament. At the time of Cbrill’s appearance, the religion of the Ro¬ mans, as well as their empire, extended over a great part of the world. Some people there wrnre among the heathens who perceived the abfurdities of that fyftem ; but being deilitute of means, as well as of abilities, to eflhhf a reformation, matters went on in their old way. Though there were at that time various fe£!s of pbilofo- phers, yet all of them proceeded upon falfe principles, and confequently could be of no fervice to the advance¬ ment or reformation of religion. Nay, fome, among ■whom were the Epicureans and Academics, declared openly againft every kind of religion whatever. Two religions at this time flourifhed in Palefiine, viz. the .Tewiili and Samaritan ; between whole re- fpeftive followers reigned the moll violent hatred or contempt. The difference between them feems to have been chiefly about the place of worfhip •, which the Jews would have to be in Jerufalem, and the Sa¬ maritans on Mount Gerizzim. But though the Jews were certainly right as to this point, they had greatly corrupted their religion in other refpehfs. They ex¬ pected a Saviour indeed, but they miftook his charac¬ ter •, imagining that he was to be a powerful and war¬ like prince, who fhould fet them free from the Roman yoke, which they bore with the utmoft impatience. They alfo imagined that the whole of religion confift- ed in obferving the rites of Moles, and fome others which they had added to them, without the leaft re¬ gard to what is commonly called morality or virtue; as is evident from the many charges our Saviour brings againft the Pharifees, who had the greateft reputa¬ tion for fanftity among the whole nation. To thefe corrupt and vicious principles, they added feveral ab¬ furd and fuperftitious notions concerning the divine nature, invifible pow’ers, magic, &c. w’hich they had partly imbibed during the Babylonian captivity, and parly derived from their neighbours in Arabia, Sy¬ ria, and Egypt. The principal feels among them TORY. 525 were the Essenes or EfTenians, Pharisees, and Sad- Ecclefia. DUCEES. The Samaritans, according to. the moft ge- neral opinion, had corrupted their religion ftill more than the Jews. When the true religion was preached by the Savi¬ our of mankind, it is not to be wondered at if he be¬ came on that account obnoxious to a people fo deeply funk in corruption and ignorance as the Jews then were. It is not here requilite to enter into the par¬ ticulars of the doftrine advanced by him, or of the oppofition he met with from the Jews 3 as a full account of thefe things, and likewife of the preach¬ ing of the gofpel by the apoftles, may be found in the New Teftament.—The rapid progrefs of the Chriftian religion, under thefe faithful and infpired mini Iters, foon alarmed the Jews, and raifed various perfecutions againft its followers. The Jews, indeed, feem at firft to have been everywhere the chiel promoters of per- fecution 3 for w>e find that they oflicioufly went from place to place, wherever they heard of the increafe of the gofpel, and by their calumnies and falfe fuggeftions endeavoured to excite the people againft T e a; ties. The Heathens, however, though at firft they ihowed no very violent fpirit of periecution againft the Chri- ftians, foen came to hate them as much as the Jews themfelves. Tacitus acquaints us with the caufes of this hatred, when fpeaking of the firft general perfe- cution under Nero. That inhuman emperor having, as was fuppofed, fet fire to the city of Rome, to avoid the imputation of this wickednefs, transferred it on the Chriftians. Our author informs us that they were al- xacitus'3 ready abhorred on account of their many and enormous account of crimes. “ The author of this name {Chrijlians) ” lays the firft he, “ was Christ, who, in the reign of Tiberius, wasP61^*101* executed under Pontius Pilate, procurator of Judaea. y The peftilent fuperftition was for a while fuppreffed : but it revived again, and fpread, not only over Judaea, where this evil was firft broached, but reached Rome, whither from every quarter of the earth is conftantly flowing whatever is hideous and abominable amongft men, and is there readily embraced and praftifed. Firft, therefore, were apprehended iuch as openly avowed themfelves to be of that fe£l 3 then by them were difeovered an immenfe multitude 3 and all were convitled, not of the crime of burning Re—?, but of hatred and enmity to mankind. Their death and tortures W'ere aggravated by cruel derifion and (port 3 for they were either covered with the ikins of wild beafts and torn in pieces by devouring dogs, or fallen- ed to croffes, or wrapped up in combuftible garments, that, when the day-light failed, they might, like torches, ferve to difpel the darknefs of the night. Hence, towards the miferable fufferers, however guil¬ ty and deferving the moft exemplary punithment, com¬ panion arofe 3 feeing they were doomed to periih not with a view to the public good, but to gratify the cruelty of one man.” That this account of Tacitus is downright mifre* prefentation and calumny, muft be evident to every one who reads it. It is impoflible that any perfon can be convi&ed of hatred and enmity to mankind, without fpecifying a number of iadls by which this hatred {bowed itfelf. The burning of Rome would indeed have been a very plain indication of enmity to mankind 5 but of this Tacitus himfelf clears them, and. 526 HIST iicclefia- and mentions no other crime of which they were guil- ^ 15 Probable, therefore, that the only reafon «■ — v-- ■ oi lbis charge againft the Chriftians, w^as their abfo- lute rcfufal to have any fhare in the Roman worihip, or to countenance the abfurd fuperftitions of Paganifm 55 in any degree. Second per- The perfecution under Nero was fucceeded by ano- ution. ther under Domitian j during which the apoftle John was baniflied to Patmos, where he law the vifxons, and wrote the book called his Reve/ation, which completes the canon of Scripture. This perfecution commenced m the 95th year of the Chrilfian era j and John is fuppofed to have written his Revelation the year after, or in the following one. During the firft century, the Chrilfian religion fpread over a great number of different countries 5 but as we have now no authentic records concerning the travels of the apolfles, or the fuccefs which attended them in their miniliry, it is impoffible to determine how far the gofpel w7as carried during this period. We are, however, affured, that even during this early pe¬ riod rany corruptions were creeping in, the progrefs of which was with difficulty prevented even by the -apoffles themfelves. Some corrupted their profeffion by a mixture of Judaifm, others by mixing it with the oriental philofophy; while others wrere already at¬ tempting to deprive their brethren of liberty, fetting themfelves up as eminent pallors, in oppofition even to the apoftles, as we learn from the epilfles of St Paul, and the third epiftle of St John. Hence arafe the fefts of the Gnoltics, Cerinthians, Nicolaitans, Nazarenes, E- bionites, &c. with which the church w7as troubled du¬ ring this centupy. Concerning the ceremonies and method of worihip ufed by the Chriftians of the firft century, it is impof- lible to fay any thing wdth certainty. Neither is the church order, government, and difcipline, during this period, afcertained with any degree of exadlnefs. Each of thofe parties, therefore, which exift at this day, contends with the greateft earneftnefs for that particu¬ lar mode of worihip wffiich they themfelves have adopt¬ ed and fome of the moft bigotted would willingly monopolize the wmrd church in fuch a manner as to ex¬ clude from all hope of falvation every one who is not attached to their particular party. It doth not how¬ ever appear that, excepting baptifm, the Lord’s fup- per, and anointing the lick with oil, any external ce¬ remonies or fymbols were properly of divine appoint¬ ment. According to Dr Molheim, “ there are feve- ral circumftances which incline us to think, that the friends and apoftles of our bleffed Lord either tolerated through neceffity, or appointed for wife reafons, many other external rites in various places. At the fame time, we are not to imagine, that they ever conferred % upon any perfon a perpetual, indelible, pontifical au¬ thority, or that they enjoined the fame rites in all churches. We learn, on the contrary, from authentic records, that the Chriftian wbrlhip w7as from the be¬ ginning celebrated in a different manner in different places •, and that, no doubt, by the orders, or at leaft with the approbation, of the apoftles and their difei- ples. In thofe early times, it was both wife and ne- ceffary to (how, in the eftabliffiment of outward forms of worlhip, fome indulgence to the ancient opinions, O R Y. sea. II. manners, and laws, of the refpe&ive nations to whom £cclefia- the gofpel was preached.” fticai I he fecond century commences with the third year Hllt0l-Y' ; of the emperor Trajan. The Chriftians were ftill per- ^ fecuted ; but as the Roman emperors were for the moft Hiftory of part of this century princes of a mild and moderate feconcl turn, they perfecuted jefs violently than formerly!centur-v* Mai cus Aurelius, notwithftanding the elemenev and philofophy, for which he is fo much celebrated, treated the Chnftians wTorle than Irajan, Adrian, or even Sever us himfelf did, wftio was noted for his cruelty. J his refpite from vigorous perfecution proved a very favourable circumftance for the fpreading of the Chriftian religion ; yet it is by no means eafy to point out the particular countries through which it w7as diffufed. We are, however, affured, that in the fecond century, Chrift was w7orffiipped as God almoft through the whole eaft; as alfo among the Germans, Spaniards, Celtes, and many other nations : but wffiich of them received the gofpel in the firft century, and which in the fecond, is a queftion unanfwerable at this diftance of time. The writers of this century attribute the rapid progrefs of Chriftianity chiefly to the extraordinary gifts that w7ere imparted to the firft Chriftians, and the miracles which were wrought at their command ; without fup- pofing that any part of the fuccefs ought to be aferibed to the intervention of human means, or fecondary cau- fes. Many of the moderns, however, are fo far from being of this opinion, that they are walling either to deny the authenticity of all miracles faid to have been wrought fince the days of the apoftles, or to aferibe them to the pow'er of the devil. To enter into the particulars of this controverfy is foreign to our prefent purpofe j for which reafon we muft refer to the writers of polemic divinity, who have largely treated of this and other points of a fimilar nature. The corruptions which had been introduced in the Ceremonies, firft century, and which wrere almoft coeval with Chri-niultiphed. ftianity itfelf, continued to gain ground in the fecond. Ceremonies, in themfelves futile and ufelefs, but which muft be confidered as highly pernicious when joined" to a religion incapable of any other ornament than the upright and virtuous condudft of its profeffors, wrere multiplied for no other purpofe than to pleafe the ig¬ norant multitude. The immediate confequence of this was, that the attention of Chriftians wras drawn afide from the important duties of morality ; and they were led to imagine, that a careful obfervance of the cere¬ monies might make amends for the negleft of moral duties. I his was the moft pernicious opinion that could poffibly oe entertained j and w^as indeed the very foundation of that enormous fyftem of ecclefiafti- cal power which afterwards took place, and held the whole world in flavery and barbarifm for many ages. Another mifehief was the introduclion of myjlcries, iviyfuries as they w'ere called, into the Chriftian religion fthat is,introduced, infinuating that fome parts of the worffiip in common ufe had a hidden efficacy and power far fuperior to the plain and obvious meaning affigned to them by the vulgar : and by paying peculiar refpeft to thele myfte- ries, the pretended teachers of the religion of Jefus' ac¬ commodated their dodlrines to the tafte of their hea¬ then neighbours, whofe religion confifted in a heap of ^ myfteries, of which nobody knew7 the meaning. I By Sea. II. Etclefia- ftical Hiftory. 59 t. Th i teach¬ ers aiTirme a power over the people. 60 Form of church go¬ vernment. 6t Changes produced by the in- ftitution of councils. HIS T By tliefe, and other means of a fimilar kind, the Chriftian pallors greatly abridged the liberty of their flock. Being mailers of the ceremonies and myileries of the Chriftian religion, they had it in their power to make their followers worfhip and believe whatever they thought proper ; and this they did not fail to make ufe of for their own advantage. They perfuaded the peo¬ ple, that the minifters of the Chriftian church fucceed- ed to the charafter, rights, and privileges, of the Jewifh priefthood j and accordingly the bilhops conftdered themfelves as invefted with a rank and character fimi¬ lar to thofe of the high-priefl among the Jews, while the prefbyters reprefented the priefts, and the deacons the Levites. This notion, which was firft introduced in the reign of Adrian, proved a fource of very confi- derable honour and profit to the clergy. The form of ecclefiaftical government was in this century rendered permanent and uniform. One in- fpe£lor or bifhop prefided over each Chriftian affembly, to which office he was elected by the voices of the whole people. To aftift him in his office, he formed a council of prefbyters, which was not confined to any llated number. To the biiliops and prefbyters the minifters or deacons were fubjetl; and the latter were divided into a variety of clafles, as the different exigen¬ cies of the church required. During a great part of this century, the churches were independent of each other; nor were they joined together by affociation, confederacy, or any other bonds but thofe of charity. Each affembly was a little ftate governed by its own laws, which were either enabled, or at leaft approved of, by the fociety. But in procefs of time all the Chriftian churches of a province were formed into one large ecclefiaftical body, which, like confederate ftates, affembled at certain times, in order to deliberate about the common interefts of the whole. This inftitution had its origin among the Greeks ; but in a fhort time it became univerfal, and fimilar affemblies were form¬ ed in all places where the gofpel had been planted. Thefe aflemblies, which confifted of the deputies or commiflioners from feveral churches, were called fynods by the Greeks, and councils by the Latins 5 and the laws enabled in thefe general meetings were called ca¬ nons, i. e. rules. Thefe councils, of which we find not the fmalleft trace before the middle of this century, changed the whole face of the church, and gave it a new form } for by them the ancient privileges of the people were con- fiderably diminilhed, and the power and authority of the biftiops greatly augmented. The humility, indeed, and prudence, of thefe pious prelates hindered them from affuming all at once the power with which they were afterwards invefted. At their firft appearance in thefe general councils, they acknowledged that they were no more than the delegates of their refpefliye churches, and that they afted in the name and by the appointment of their people. But they foon changed this humble tone; imperceptibly extended the limits of their authority •, turned their influence into dominion, their counfels into laws; and at length openly affeited, that Chrift had empowered them to preferibe to his people authoritative rules of faith and manners. An¬ other effe£l of thefe councils was the gradual abolition of that perfedl equality which reigned among all bi¬ ftiops in the primitive times: iot the order and de- O Pt Y. ' 527 cency of thefe affemblies required, that fome one of Ecclefia- the provincial biftiops met in council fhould be inveft- ed with a fuperior degree of power and authority ; and . ' ^ » hence the rights of metropolitans derive their origin. In the mean time, the bounds of the church were en- «. larged ; the cuftom of holding councils was followed wherever the found of the gofpel had reached; and the univerfal church had now the appearance of one vaft re¬ public formed by a combination of a great number of little ftates. This occafioncd the creation of a new or¬ der of ecclefiaftics, who were appointed in different parts of the world as heads of the church, and whofe office (it was to preferve the confiftence and union of that immenfe body, whofe members were fo widely difperfed throughout the nations. Such was the na¬ ture and office of the Patriarchs; among whom, at length, ambition, being arrived at its moft infolent period, formed a new dignity, inverting the bilhop of Pvome with the title and authority of the Prince of the Patriarchs. 62 During the fecond century, all the fefls continued Account 0? which had fprung mp in the firft, with the addition oft.he A‘fce' feveral others ; the moll remarkable of which were the1105’ jdfcetics. Thefe owed their rife to an error propaga¬ ted by fome doctors of the church, who afferted that Chrift had eftablilhed a double rule of fanciily and virtue for two different orders of Chriftians. Of thefe rules, one was ordinary, the. other extraordinary; the one of a lower dignity, the other more fublime : the firft for perfons in the adlive feenes of life-; the other for- thofe who, in a facred retreat, afpired after the glory of a celeftial ftate. In confequence of this fyftem, they divided into two parts all thofe moral doctrines and inftruSions which they had received either by writing oc tradition. One of thefe divifions they call¬ ed precepts, and the other counfels. They gave the name of precepts to thofe laws that were univerfally obliga¬ tory upon all orders of men ; and that of counfels to thofe which related to Chriftians of a more fublime rank, who propofed to themfelves great and glorious ends, and breathed after an intimate communion with the Supreme Being.—Thus were produced all at once a new fet of men, who made pretenfions to uncommon fandlity and virtue, and declared their refolution of obeying all the precepts and counfels of Chrift, in order to their enjoyment and communion with God here„ and alfo that, after the diffolution of their mortal bo¬ dies, they might afeend to him with the greater fa¬ cility, and find nothing to retard their approach to the centre of happinefs and perfection. They looked up¬ on themfelves as prohibited from the ufe of things- which it was lawful for other Chriftians to enjoy ; fuch as wine, fleih, matrimony, and commerce. They thought it their indifpenfable duty to extenuate their body by watchings, abflinence, labour, and hunger.. They looked for felicity in folitary retreats, and defert places ; where, by fevere and affiduous efforts of fub¬ lime meditation, they raifed the foul above all external objecls, and ail femual pleaiures. J.hey were diitin- guiihed from other Chriftians, not only by the titles of Afcetics, ’Ztsh^ccioi, ExXocra/, and philofophers, but a3!o by their garb. In this century, indeed, thofe who embraced fuen an auilere kind or life, fubmitted them¬ felves to ail tnefe mortifications in private, without breaking afunder their focial bands, or withdrawing themfdvas 528 H I S T Ecclefia- tlicmftlves from mankind ; but in procefs of time they ITftor rctirevi iiito deferts, and, after the example of the Ef- i ^ ■ fenes and Therapetitse, they formed theml’elves into certain companies. This auttere feft arofe from an opinion which has been more or lefs prevalent in all ages and in all coun¬ tries, namely, that religion confrlls more in prayers, meditations, and a kind of fecret intercourfe with God, than in fulfilling the focial duties of life in afls of benevolence and humanity to mankind. Nothing can be more evident than that the Scripture reckons the fulfilling of thefe infinitely fuperior to the obfer- vance of all the ceremonies that can be imagined : yet it fomehow or other happens, that almoft every body is more inclined to obferve the ceremonial part of de¬ votion than the moral J and hence, according to the different humours or conffitutions of different perfons, there have been numberlefs forms of Chriffianity, and the molt virulent contentions among thofe who pro- fefled themfelves followers of the Prince of Peace. It is obvious, that if the moral conduft of Chriltians was to be made the ftawdard of faith, inftead of fpeculative opinions, all thefe diviffons mult ceafe in a moment j but while Chriftianity, or any part of it, is made to confilt in fpeculation, or the obfervance of ceremonies, it is impoffible there can be any end of fe£ts or herefies. No opinion whatever is fo abfurd, but fome people have pretended to argue in its defence 5 and no ceremony fo infignificant, but it hath been explained and fan£lified by hot-headed enthufiafts 5 and hence ceremonies, fedts, and abfurdities, have been multiplied without number, to the prejudice of fociety and of the Chriffian religion. This ihort relation of the rife of the Afcetic fedt will alfo ferve to account for the rife of any other; fo that we apprehend it is needlefs to enter into particulars con¬ cerning the reft, as they all took their origin from the lame general principle varioufly modified, according to the different difpofitions of mankind. The Afcetic fedt began firft in Egypt, from whence it paffed into Syria and the neighbouring countries. At length it reached the European nations : and hence that train of auftere and fuperftitious vows and rites which totally obfeured, or rather annihilated, Chrilti- anity ; the celibacy of the clergy, and many other ab¬ furdities of the like kind. The errors of the Afcetics, however, did not Hop here : In compliance with the doctrines of fome Pagan philofophers, they affirmed, that it was not only lawful, but even praife-worthy to deceive, and to ufe the expedient of a lie, in order to advance the caufe of piety and truth •, and hence the /)ioi/s frauds for which the church of Rome hath been f@ notorious, and w ith which Hie hath been fo often and jultly reproached. As Chriftians thus deviated more and more from the true practice of their religion, they became more zea¬ lous in the external profeffion of it. Anniverfary felti- vals were celebrated in commemoration of the death and refurredtion of Chrill, and of the effufion of the Holy Gholt on the apoltles. Concerning the days Contefts on which thefe feltivals were to be kept, there arofe conc erning violent contefts. The Aliatic churches in general dif- ieftivals. fere(i in this point from thofe of Europe •, and towards the conclufion of the fecond century, Vidtor bifliop of , Rome took it in his head to force the eaitern churches to follow the rules laid down by the weltern ones.— o it y. Sea. 11. This they abfolutely refufed to comply with : upon Ecdefw- which Victor cut them off from communion with the ca* church of Rome 5 though, by means of the interceftion H'!h>ry' , of fome prudent people, the difference was made up for the prefent. g^ During moft of the third century, the Chriftians Third cen« were allowed to enjoy their religion, fuch as it was,tur.v* without rnoleftatiou. The emperors Maximinus and Decius, indeed, made them feel ail the rigours of a fevere perfecutioa 5 but their reigns were Ihort, and from the death of Decius to the time of Diocletian the church enjoyed tranquillity. Thus vaft multitudes were converted 5 but at the fame time, the dodtrine grew daily more corrupt, and the lives of profefted Chriftians more wicked and fcandalous. New ceremo¬ nies were invented in great numbers, and an unaccount¬ able paflion now prevailed for the oriental fuperftitions concerning demons, whence proceeded the whole train of exorcifms, fpells, and fears for the apparition of evil fpirits, which to this day are nowhere eradicated. Hence alfo the cuftom of avoiding all connedKons with thofe who were not baptized, or who lay under the penalty of excommunication, as perfons fuppofed to be under the dominion of fome evil fpirit. And hence the rigour and feverity of that difeipline and penance impofed upon thofe who had incurred, by their immoralities, the cenfure of the church. Se¬ veral alterations were now made in the manner of celebrating the Lord’s fupper. The, prayers uied on this occafion were lengthened, and the folemnity and pomp with which it was attended were confiderably increafed. Gold and filver veffels were ufed in the ce¬ lebration } it was thought effential to falvation, and for that reafon adminftered even to infants. Baptifm was celebrated twice a-year to fuch as, after a long courfe of trial and preparations, offered themfelves candidates. The remiflion of fins was thought to be its immediate confequence ; while the biffrop, by prayer and impo- fition of hands, was fuppofed to confer thofe fandtify- ing gifts of the Holy Ghoft that were neceffary to a life of righteoufnefs and virtue. An evil demon was fuppofed naturally to refide in every perfon, who was the author and fource of all the corrupt difpofitions and unrighteous aftions of that perfon. The driving out of this demon was therefore an effential requilite for baptifm ; and in confequence of this opinion, the baptized perfon returned home clothed in white gar¬ ments, and adorned with crowns, as facred emblems, the former of their inward purity and innocence, and the latter of their viftory over fin and the world.— Falling began now to be held in more efteem than for¬ merly. A high degree of fandlity was attributed to this pra£Hce ; it was even looked upon as indifpenfa- bly neceffary, from a notion that the demons directed their force chietly againft thofe who pampered them¬ felves with delicious fare, and were lefs troublefome to the lean and hungry who lived under the feverities of a rigorous abftinence.—The fign of the crofs alfo was fuppofed to adminifter a victorious power over all forts of trials and calamities j and was more efpecially confidered as the fureft defence againft the fnares and ftratagems of malignant fpirits j for which reafon, no Chriftian undertook any thing of moment, without arming himfelf, as he imagined, with the power of this triumphant fign. The herefies which troubled the ' Sea. II. HISTORY. ficclefia- ftical Hiftoiy. 65 Fourth cen¬ tury. 66 Chriftia- nity efta- btiflied by Conftan- tine. 67 Increafe of its corrup¬ tions. the church during this century, were the Gnostics, (whofe doftrines were new-modelled and improved by Manes, from whom they were afterwards chiefly call¬ ed Manicheans'), the Hieracites, Noetians, Sabel- LIANS, and Novatians \ for a particular account of which, fee thofe articles. The fourth century is remarkable for the eftablifh- ment of Chrilfianity by law in the Roman empire j which, however, did not take place till the year 324. In the beginning of the century, the empire was go¬ verned by four chiefs, viz. Dioclefian, Maximian, Conftantius Chlorus, and Galerius, under whom the church enjoyed a perfeft toleration. Dioclefian, though much addicled to fuperftition, had no ill-will againft the Chriftians j and Conftantius Chlorus, having aban¬ doned polytheifm, treated them wfith condefcenfion and benevolence. This alarmed the Pagan priefts, whofe interefts were fo clofely connedled with the continuance of the ancient fuperflitions j and who apprehended, not without reafon, that the Chriftian religion would at length prevail throughout the em¬ pire. To prevent the downfal of the Pagan fuperfti¬ tion, therefore, they applied to Dioclefian and Gale¬ rius Csefar, by whom a moft bloody perfecution was commenced in the year 303, and continued till 311. An afylum, however, was opened for the Chriftians in the year 304. Galerius having dethroned Dioclefian and Maximian, declared himfelf emperor in the eaft j leaving ail the weftern provinces, to which great num¬ ber of Chriftians reforted to avoid the cruelty of the former, to Conftantius Chlorus. At length Galerius, being overtaken with an incurable and dreadful dif- eafe, publifhed an edift ordering the perfecution to ceafe, and reftoring freedom to the Chriftians, whom he had moft inhumanly oppreffed for eight years. Galerius died the fame year •, and in a fttort time af¬ ter, when Conftantine the Great afcended the throne, the Chrifiians were freed from any farther uneafinefs, by his abrogating all the penal laws againft them j and afterwards iffuing edifts, by which no other religion than the Chriftian was tolerated throughout the em¬ pire. This event, however, fo favourable to the outward peace of the church, wTas far from promoting its inter¬ nal harmony, or the reformation of its leaders. The clergy, who had all this time been augmenting their power at the expence of the liberty of the people, now let no bounds to their ambition. The bilhop of Rome was the firft in rank, and diihinguilhed by a fort of pre-eminency above the reft of the prelates. He fur- paffed all his brethren in the magnificence and fplen- dor of the church over which he prefided, in the riches of his revenues aud polfeflions, in the number and variety of his minifters, in his credit W’ith the people, and in his fumptuous and fplendid manner of living. Hence it happened, that when a new' pontift' w-as to be chofen by the prefbyters and people, the city of Rome was generally agitated wdth dilfenfions, tumults, and cabals, which often produced fatal confe- q uences. I he intrigues and difturbances w hich pre¬ vailed in that city in the year 366, when, upon the death of Liberius, another pontiff was to be chofen in his place, are a fufficient proof of what we have ad¬ vanced. Upon this occafion, one faftion eleifted Da- mafus to that high dignity j while the oppofite party Vol. X. Part II. chofe Urficinus, a fucceed Liberius. 529 Ectlefia - flical Hiflory. deacon of the vacant church, to This double election gave rife to a dangerous fchifm, and to a fort of civil war wdthin the city of Rome j which wras carried on with the ut- moft barbarity and fury, and produced the moft cruel maffacres and defolations. The inhuman conteft end¬ ed in the vitftory of Damafus; but whether his caufe was more juft than that of Urficinus, is not fo eafily determined. Notwithftanding the pomp and fplendour which fur- rounded the Roman fee, it is certain that the bifhops of Rome had not yet acquired that pre-eminence of power and jurifdiiftion which they afterwards enjoyed. In the ecclefiaftical commonwealth, indeed, they were the moft eminent order of citizens j but ftill they were citizens as well as their brethren, and fubjeft, like them to the laws and edifls of the emperors. All re¬ ligious caufes of extraordinary importance w7ere exami¬ ned and determined either by judges appointed by the emperors, or in councils affembled for that pur- pofe j w'hile thofe of inferior moment wrere decided in each diftrift by its refpedfive biftiop. The ecclefiafti¬ cal law's wTere enadted either by the emperor or coun¬ cils. None of the bilhops acknowledged that they de¬ rived their authority from the permilfion and appoint¬ ment of the biftiop of Rome, or that they were created biftiops by the favour of the apojlolic fee. On the con¬ trary, they all maintained that they were the ambaffa- dors and minifters of Jefus Chrift, and that their au¬ thority was derived from above. It muft, however, be obferved, that even in this century feveral of thofe fteps were laid by which the bifliops of Rome mounted afterwards to the fummit of ecclefiaftical pow'er and defpotifm. This happened partly by the imprudence of the emperors, partly by the dexterity of the Ro¬ man prelates themfelves, and partly by the inconfide- rate zeal and precipitate judgment of certain'biihops. The imprudence of the emperor, and precipitation of the biftiops, W'ere remarkably difeovered in the follow¬ ing event, which favoured extremely the ambition of the Roman pontiff. About the year 372, Valentinian enadled a law, empowering the biftiop of Rome to ex¬ amine and judge other biftiops, that religious difputes might not be decided by any profane or fecular judges. The bifliops affembled in council at Rome in 378, not confidering the fatal confequences that muft arife from this imprudent law both to themfelves and to the church, declared their approbation in the ftrongeft terms, and recommended the execution of it in their addrefs to the emperor Gratian. Some think, indeed, that this law empow’ered the Roman biftiop to judge only the biftiops w ithin the limits of his jurifdidlion ; others, that his power was given only for a certain time, and for a particular purpofe. This laft notion feems the moft probable 5 but ftill this privilege muft have been an excellent inftrument in the hands of fa^er- dotal ambition. By the removal of the feat of empire to Conftanti- Bilhops of nople, the emperor raifed up, in the biftiop of thisRome aRm the exprellion of Ennodius, one of the flatterers o it .Y. 531 of Symmachus (who was a prelate of but ambiguous Ecclefia- fame), that the Roman pontiff was conftituted judge in the place of God, which he filled as the vicegerent of , —( the Moll High. On the other hand, it is certain, from a variety of the moft authentic records, that both the emperors and the nations in general were far from be¬ ing difpofed to bear with patience the yoke or lervi- tude -ythich the fee of Rome was arrogantly irnpofing on the whole church. 7a In the beginning of the feventh century, according Origin of to the moft learned hiftorians, Boniface III. engaged^16 Phocas, emperor of Conftantinople, to take from the bilhop of that metropolis the title of oecumenical or" univerfal bifhop, and to confer it upon the Roman pon¬ tiff j and thus was firlt introduced the fupremacy of the pope. The Roman pontiffs ufed all methods to main¬ tain and enlarge this authority and pre-eminence, which they had acquired from one of the moft: odious tyrants that ever difgraced the annals of hiftory. In the eighth century, the power of the bilhop of Rome, and of the clergy in general, increafed prodi- gioufly. The chief caule of this, befides the fuperfti- tion of the people, was the method at that time ufed by the European princes to fecure themlelves on their thrones. All thefe princes being then employed either in ufurpation or in felf-defence, aiid the whole continent being in the moft unfettled and barbarous condition, they endeavoui-ed to attach warmly to their interefts thefe whom they confidered as their friends and clients. For this purpofe they diftributed among them extenfive territories, cities, and fortreffes, with the various rights and privileges belonging to them *, referving only to themfelves the fupreme dominion, and the military fervice of thefe powerful vaffals. For this reafon it was by the European princes reckoned a high inftance of political prudence to diftribute among the bilhops and other Chriftian doftors the fame fort of donations which had formerly been given to their ge¬ nerals and clients. By means of the clergy, they hoped to check the feditious and turbulent fpirits of their vaffals \ and to maintain them in their obedience by the influence and authority of their bilhops, whofe commands were highly refpefted, and whofe fpiritual thunderbolts, rendered formidable by ignorance, ftruck terror into the boldeft and moft refolute hearts. This prodigious acceftion to the opulence and au¬ thority of the clergy in the weft, began at their head, viz. the Roman pontiff; from whence it fpread gra¬ dually among the inferior facerdotal orders. The bar¬ barous nations who had received the gofpel, looked up¬ on the bilhop of Rome as the fucceifor of their chief druid or high prieft: and as this tremendous druid had enjoyed, under the darknefs of Paganifm, a kind of boundlefs authority ; fo thefe barbarous nations thought proper to confer upon the chief bilhop the fame authority which had belonged to the chief druid. The pope received thefe auguft privileges with great pleafure ; and left, upon any change of affairs, at¬ tempts Ihould be made to deprive him of them, he ftrengthened his title to thefe extraordinary honours by a variety of paffages drawn from ancient hiftory, and, what is ftill more aftoniihing, by arguments of a religious nature. This fwelled the Roman druid to a 1 enormous lize ; and gave to the fee of Rome that high pre-eminence and defpotic authority in civil and 3X2 political 552 political matters, that were unknown to former ages. Hilary. ^encej aniong other unhappy ctrcumftances, arofe >... y~-w that monftrous and pernicious opinion, that fuch per- fons as were excluded from the communion of the church by the pontiff himfelf, or any of the bifhops, thus forfeited, not only their civil rights and advan¬ tages as citizens, but even the common claims and 'privileges of humanity. This horrid opinion, *vhich was a fatal fource of wars, malfacres, and rebellions without number, and which contributed more than any thing elfe to confirm and augment the papal au¬ thority, was borrowed by the clergy from the Pagan fuperftitions.—Though excommunication, from the time of Conftantine the Great, was in every part of the Chriftian world atfended with many difagreeable effedfs 3 yet its higheft terrors were confined to Europe, where its afpedt w as truly formidable and hideous. It acquired alfo, in the eighth century, new acceflions of terror 3 fo that from that period the excommunica¬ tion pradlifed in Europe differed entirely from that which was in ufe in other parts of Chriftendom. Ex¬ communicated perfons were indeed confidered in all places as objedts of hatred both to God and man 3 but they wrere not, on that account, robbed of the privi- . leges of citizens, nor of the rights of humanity 3 much lefs were thofe kings and princes, whom an infolent bifhop had thought proper to exclude from the com¬ munion of the church, fuppofed to forfeit on that ac¬ count their crowns or their territories. But from this century it was quite otherwife in Europe. Excom¬ munication received that infernal power which diifolved all connexions 5 fo that thofe whom the bifhops, or their chief, excluded from church communion, w'ere degraded to a level with the beafls. The origin of this unnatural and horrid power was as follows. On the converfion of the barbarous nations to Chriftian- ity, thefe ignorant profelytes confounded the excom¬ munication in ufe among Chriflians with that which had been pradtifed in the times of Paganifm, and which was attended with all the dreadful effedls above mentioned. The Roman pontiffs, on the other hand, were too artful not to encourage this error 3 and therefore employed all forts of means to gain credit to an opinion fo w7ell calculated to gratify their ambition, and to aggrandize in general the epifcopal 73 order. He becomes The annals of the French nation furnifh us with the a temporal following inftance of the enormous power which was prince. at t}jjs t;me veftecl Ju the Roman pontiff. Pepin, who was mayor of the palace to Childeric III. king of France, and who in the exercife of that high office was poffeffed in reality of the royal power and autho¬ rity, afpired to the titles and honours of majefty alfo, and formed a fcheme of dethroning his fovereign. For this purpofe he aliembled the bates in 7 1; 1 3 and though they were devoted to the intetefts of this am¬ bitious ufurper, they gave it as their opinion that the bifhop of Rome was previoufly to be confulted whether the execution of fuch a fcheme was lawful or not. In eonfequence of this, ambaffadors were fent by Pepin to Zachary, the reigning pontiff, with the follow¬ ing queftion, “ Whether the divine law did not per¬ mit a valiant and warlike people to dethrone a pu- fillanimous and indolent prince %who was incapable ef difcharging any of the functions of royalty 3 and to Sea. 11: fubftitute in his place one more worthy to rule, and Ecciefia- who had already rendered moft important fervices to ftical the Hate r' I he fituation of Zachary, who flood much f Hiftory. ^ in need of the fuccours of Pepin againfl the Greeks ~ v and Lombards, rendered his anfwer fuch as the ufurper defired : and when this favourable decifion of the Ro¬ man oracle was publifhed in France, the unhappy Childeric was flvipped of his royalty without the leall oppofition 3 and Pepin, without the fmallefl refiflance, flepped into the throne of his mailer and his fove1- reign. This decifion was folemnly confirmed by Ste¬ phen II. the fucceffor of Zachary 3 who undertook a journey into France in the year j C4, in order to fo- licit affiflance againil the Lombards. The pontiff at the fame time difiblved the obligation of the oath of fidelity and allegiance which Pepin had fworn to Chil¬ deric, and violated by his ufurpation in the year 751 3 and to render his title to the crown as facred as pof- fible, Stephen anointed and crowned him, with his wife and two ions, for the fecond time. This complaifance of the pope was rewarded with the exarchate of Ra¬ venna and all its dependencies, as we have already re- ^ lated, See C/v// Hi/lory, N° 44. ftpra ; and Hiilory of Italy. In the fucceeding centuries, the Roman pontiffs con- His power tinned to increafe their power by every kind of artifice inerea* and fraud which can difhonour the heart of man 5 and,*63' by continually taking, advantage of the civil diffeniions which prevailed throughout Italy, France, and Ger¬ many, their influence in civil affairs rofe to an enor¬ mous height. The increafe of their authority in reli¬ gious matters was not lefs rapid. The wifefl and moil impartial among the Roman Catholic writers acknow¬ ledge, that from the time of Louis the Meek the an¬ cient rules of ecclefiaflical government were gradually changed in Europe by the counfels and infligation of the church of Rome, and new laws fubflituted in their place. The European princes fuffered themfelves to be diverted of the fupreme authority in religious matters, which they had derived from Charlemagne 3 the power of the bifhops was greatly diminiffied, and even the authority of both provincial and general councils began to decline. The popes, elated wdth their overgrown profperity, and become arrogant beyond meafure by the daily acceffions that were made to their authority, were eagerly bent upon eftablifhing the maxim, That the biffiop of Rome was conflituted and appointed by Jafus Chriil fupreme legiilator and judge of the church univerfal 3 and that therefore the birtiops derived all their authority from him. This opinion, which they inculcated with the utmoft zeal and ardour, was oppo- fed in vain by fuch as were acquainted with the ancient ecclefiartical conllitutions, and the government of the church in the earlier ages. In order to gain credit to this new ecclefiaftical code, and to fupport the preten- fions of the popes to fupremacy, it was neceffary to pro¬ duce the authority of ancient deeds, in order to flop the mouths of luch as were difpofed to fet bounds to their ufurpations. The biihops of Rome wTere aware of this 3 and as thofe means were looked upon as the moft law¬ ful that tended beft to the accomplifhment of their purpofes, they employed fome of their moil ingenious and zealous partifans in forging conventions, ads of council?, epiilles, and fuch like records, byT which it might appear, that in the firft ages of the church the Romaa H 1 S T O R Y. Ecclefia- ftical Hiftory. 75 Extreme infolence -■ of the popes. Sea. IT. H 1 ,S Roman pontiffs were clothed with the fame fpiritual majefty and fupreme authority which they now aifumed. There were not, however, wanting among the bifhops fome men of prudence and fagacity, who faw through thefe impious frauds, and perceived the chains that were forging both for them and the church. 1 he French bilhops diilinguiihed themfelves eminently in this refpeft : but their oppofition was foon quathed j and as all Europe was funk in the groffeft ignorance and darknefs, none remained who were capable of de¬ tecting thefe odious impoftures, or difpofed to fupport the expiring liberty of the church. This may ferve as a general fpecimen of the charac¬ ter and conduCt of the pretended vicegerents of Jefus Chrift to the 16th century. In the nth century, in¬ deed, their power feems to have rifen to its utmoit height. They now received the pompous titles of Maflers of the World, and Popes, i. e. univerfsl fathers. They prefided every where in the councils by their le¬ gates, afl'umed the authority of fupreme arbiters in all controverfies that arofe concerning religion or church- difcipline, and maintained the pretended rights of the church againil the encroachments and ufurpations of kings and princes. Their authority, however, was confined within certain limits : for, on the one hand, it was reftrained by fovereign princes, that it might not arrogantly aim at civil dominion •, and on the other, it was oppofed by the bithops themfelves, that it might not arife to a fpiritual defpotilm, and utterly deftroy the privileges and liberty of fynods and councils. From the time of Leo IX. the popes employed every me¬ thod w'hich the moft artful ambition could fuggeft to remove thofe limits, and to render their dominion both defpotic and univerfal. They not only afpired to the charader of fupreme legiflators in the church, to an unlimited juril'diftion over all fynods and councils whe¬ ther general or provincial, to the foie dilfribution of all ecclefiaftical honours and benefices, as divinely au- thorifed and appointed for that purpofe *, but they car¬ ried their infolent pretenfions fo far, as to give them¬ felves out for lords of the univerfe, arbiters of the fate of kingdoms and empires, and fupreme rulers over the kings and princes of the earth. Hence we find inftan- ces of their giving away kingdoms, and loofing fub- jeffs from their allegiance to their fovereigns ; among which the hilfory of John king of England is very re¬ markable. At laft they plainly aflumed the whole earth as their property, as well where Chriftianity was preached as where it was not *, and therefore, on the difcovery of America and the Eaft Indies, the pope, by virtue of this fpiritual property, granted to ihe Por- tuguefe a right to all the countries lying eaflward, and to the Spaniards all thofe lying to the weft ward, of Cape Non in Africa, w’hich they were able to conquer by force of arms •, and that nothing might be wanting to complete their charafler, they pretended to be lords of the future world alfo, and to have a power of reftrain- ing even the divine juftice itfelf, and remitting that puniOunent which the Deity hath denounced againft the workers of iniquity. All this time the powers of fuperftition reigned Invocations triumphant over thofe remains of Chriftianity - which of I dints, had efcaped the corruptions of the firft four centuries. 1 atcT' *:^e century began the invocation of the hap- w.rodu’ced P.y ^ou^s departed faints. Their affiftance was in- .75 . Chriftiani¬ ty greatly corrupted. T O R Y. S3 3 treated by many fervent prayers, while none flood-up Ecclefia- to oppofe this prepofterous kind of woriliip. The images of thofe who during their lives had acquired the reputation of uncommon fanflity, wTere now honoured with a particular worftiip in feveral places ; and many imagined that this drew into the images the propitious prefence of the faints or celeftial beings wdiich they were fuppofed to reprefent. A fingular and irrefiftible efficacy was attributed to the bones of martyrs, and to the figure of the crofs, in defeating all the attempts of Satan, removing all forts of calamities, and in healing not only the difeafes of the body, but alfo thofe of the mind. The famous Pagan doctrine concerning the pu¬ rification of departed fouls by means of a certain kind of fire, i. e. purgatory, was alfo confirmed and ex¬ plained more fully than it had formerly been •, and every'one knows of how much coniequence this abfurd doftrine hath been to the wealth and power of the Ro- raifh clergy. In the fixth century, Gregory the Great advanced an opinion, That all the words of the facred writings were images of invilible and fpiritual things ; for which reafon he loaded the churches with a multitude of ce¬ remonies the moft infignificant and futile that can be imagined ; and hence arofe a new and moft difficult fcience, namely, the explication of thefe ceremonies, and the inveftigation of the caufes and circumitances whence they derived their origin. A new method was contrived of adminiftering the' Lord’s fupper, with a magnificent aflemblage of pompous ceremonies. This was called the canon of the mafs. Baptiim, except in cafes of neceflity, was adminiftered only on the great ^ feftivals. An incredible number of temples was erec- introduc- ted in honour of the faints. The places fet apart for tion of the public worftiip were alfo very numerous : but now they ma*"5’ were confidered as the means of purchafing the protec¬ tion and favour of the faints •, and the ignorant and barbarous multitude were perfuaded, that thefe de¬ parted fpirits defended and guarded againft evils and calamities of every kind, the provinces, lands, cities, and villages in which they were honoured with temples. The number of thefe temples was almoft equalled by that of the feftivals, which feem to have been invented in order to bring the Chriilian religion as near the mo¬ del of Paganifm as poffible. - In the feventh century, religion feemed to be alto- saperft;- getber buried under a heap of fuperftitious ceremonies jtion ftill the worftiip of the true God and Saviour of the increafev world was exchanged for the worffiip of bones, bits of wood (laid to be of the crofs), and the images of faints. The eternal ftate of mifery threatened in Scripture to the wicked was exchanged for the temporary punilh- ment of purgatory ; and the expreflions of faith in Chrift by an upright and virtuous conduft, for the aug¬ mentation of the richea- of the clergy by donations to the church, and the obfervance of a heap of idle cere¬ monies. New feftivals were ftilfi added j one in par¬ ticular was inftituted in honour of the true crofs on which our Saviour fuffered: and chv.rches were declared to be fandfuaries to all finch as tied to them, whatever their crimes might have been. Superftition, it would feem,, had now attained its higheft pitch ; nor is it eafy to conceive a degree of ig¬ norance and degeneracy beyond what we have already mentioned. If any thing can poflibly be imagined more.' 354 Eccicfia- more contrary to true religion, it is an opinion which Hi ft or v Preva^ec^ the eighth century, namely, That Chri- iuans might appeafe an offended Deity by voluntary a6ts of mortification, or by gifts and oblations lavifin- ed on the church j and that people ought to place their confidence in the works and merits of the faints. The piety in this and fome lucceeding ages confided in building and embellilhing churches and chapels j in en¬ dowing monaderies and bafilics} hunting after the re¬ lics of faints and martyrs, and treating them -with an abfurd and exceffive veneration ; in procuring the in- terceflion of the faints by rich oblations, or fuper- ditious rites ; in wordiipping images j in pilgrimages to thofe places which were edeemed holy, particu¬ larly to Paledine, &c. The genuine religion of Je- fus was now utterly unknown both to clergy and people, if we except a few of its general doedrines con¬ tained in the creed. In this century alfo, the fuper- flitious cuftom offolitary majfcs had its origin. Thefe were celebrated by the pried alone in behalf of fouls detained in purgatory, as well as upon lotne other oc- cafions. They were prohibited by the laws of the church, but proved a fource of immenfe wealth to the clergy. Under Charlemagne they were condemned by a fynod affembled at Mentz, as criminal effects of avarice and lloth. A new fuperdition, however, dill fprung up in the tenth century. It was imagined, from Rev. xx. i. that Antichrid was to make his appearance on the earth, and that foon after the world itfelf would be dedroyed. An univerfal panic enfued ; vad num¬ bers of people, abandoning all their connexions in fo- ciety, and giving over to the churches and monalleries all their wrorldly effeXs, repaired to Paledine, where they imagined that Chrifi would defeend from heaven to judge the world. Others devoted themfelves by a folemn and voluntary oath to the fervice of the churches, convents, and prielthood, whofe Haves they became, in the mod rigorous fenfe of that w7ord, performing daily their heavy talks *, and all this from a notion that the fupreme Judge would diminilh the feverity of their fentence, and look upon them with a more favourable and propitious eye, on account of their having made themfelves the Haves of his miniders. When an eclipfe of the fun or moon happened to be vifible, the cities were deferted, and their miferable inhabitants fled for refuge to hollow caverns, and hid themfelves among the craggy rocks, and under the bending fummits of deep mountains. The opulent attempted to bribe the faints and the Deity himfelf by rich donations confer¬ red upon the facerdotal tribe, who were looked upon as the immediate vicegerents of heaven. In many places, temples, palaces, and noble edifices both pub¬ lic and private, were fuffered to decay, nay, were deli¬ berately pulled down, from a notion that they were no longer of any ufe, as the final diffolution of all things was at hand. In a word, no language is fufficient to exprefs the confufion and defpair that tormented the minds of miferable mortals upon this occafion. The general delufion was indeed oppofed and combated by the difeerning few, who endeavoured to difpel thefe terrors, and to efface the notion from which they arofe in the minds of the people. But their attempts were ineffeXual 5 nor could the dreadful appiehenfions of the fuperftitious multitude be removed before the end of Sea. n. the century, and this terror became one of the acci- EcclefU- dental caufes of the Croisades. ft'ca' That nothing might now be wanting to complete Hiftory. ^ that antichriftian lyffem of religion which had over- fpread all Europe, it was in the nth century deter¬ mined that divine worffiip Ihould be celebrated in the Latin tongue, though now unknown throughout the whole continent. During the whole of this century, alfo, Chriftians were employed in the rebuilding and ornamenting their churches, which they had de- ftroyed through the fuperltkious fear already taken notice of. In much the fame way with what is above related, or worfe if poflible, matters wrent on till the time of the reformation. The clergy were immerfed in crimes of the deepeft dye •, and the laity, imagining them¬ felves able to purchafe pardon of their fins for money, followed the examples of their pallors wfithout remorfe. ^ The abfurd principle formerly mentioned, namely, Extrava- that religion conlifts in aXs of aufterity, and an un-Sant beha- known mental correfpondence with God, produced ^ the moll extravagant and ridiculous behaviour in the faints. devotees and reputed faints. They not only lived among the wild beafts, but alfo after the manner of thefe favage animals: they ran naked through the lonely deferts with a furious afpeX, and all the agita¬ tions of madnefs and frenzy •, they prolonged their wretched life by grafs and wild herbs, avoided the fight and converfation of men, remained almoft motionlefs in certain places for feveral years, expofed to the rigour and inclemency of the feafons, and towards the con- clufion of their lives ftmt themfelves up in narrow and miferable huts •, and all this wTas confidered as true piety, the only acceptable method of worlhipping the Deity and attaining a lhare in his favour.—But of all the inftances of fuperflitious frenzy which difgraced the times we now fpeak of, none was held in higher veneration, or excited more the wonder of the multi¬ tude, than that of a certain order of men who wrere called Stylites by the Greeks, and Sancii Columnaresy or Pillar Saints, by the Latins. Thele wTere perfons of a molt lingular and extravagant turn of mind, who flood motionlefs on the tops of pillars exprefsly raifed for this exercife of their patience, and remained there for feveral years amidft the admiration and applaufe of the flupid populace. The inventor of this ftrange difeipline was one Simeon a Syrian, who began his follies by changing the agreeable employment of a fliepherd for the aufterities of a monkifli life. He be¬ gan his devotion on the top of a pillar fix cubits high j but as he increafed in fanXity, he alfo increafed the height of his pillar, till, towards the conclufion of his life, he had got up on the . top of a pillar 40 cubits in height. Many of the inhabitants of Syria and Pa- leftine, feduced by a falfe ambition and an utter igno¬ rance of true religion, followed the example of this fa¬ natic, though not with the fame degree of aufterity. This fuperftitious praXice began in the fifth century, and continued in the eaft for 600 years. The Latins, however, had too much wfifdom and prudence to imi¬ tate the Syrians and Orientals in this whimfical fuper- ftition ; and when a certain fanatic, or impoftor, named WuljUaicus, ereXed one of thefe pillars in the country of Treves, and propofed to live on it after the manner HISTORY. 1 Se&. II- Ecclefia- ftical Hiltory. So Rife of Ma hometan- iftn. Si State of re- iipion tn the begin¬ ning of the 16th cen- tuiy and fince that time. H I S T of Simeon, the neighbouring biChops ordered it to be pulled down. The praclices of auftere worfhip and difcipline in ether refpeds, however, gained ground throughout all parts of Chriilendom. Monks of various kinds were to be found in every country in prodigious num¬ bers. But though their difcipline was at firft exceed¬ ingly fevere, it became gradually relaxed, and the monks gave into all the prevailing vices of the times. Other orders fucceeded, who pretended to ftill great¬ er degrees of fanftity, and to reform the abufes of the preceding ones ; but thefe in their turn became corrupted, and fell into the fame vices they had bla¬ med in others. The moll violent animofities, difputes, and hatred, alfo reigned among the different orders of monks j and, indeed, between the clergy of all ranks and degrees, whether we conhder them as clafled in different bodies, or as individuals of the fame body. To enter into a detail of their ivranglings and dif¬ putes, the methods which each of them took to ag- grandife themfelves at the ^expence of their neigh¬ bours, and to keep the reft of mankind in fubjedlion, would require many volumes. We fhall only obferve, therefore, that even the external profeffion of the au¬ ftere and abfurd piety which took place in the fourth and fifth centuries, continued gradually to decline. Some there ivere, indeed, who boldly oppofed the tor¬ rent of fuperftition and wickednefs which threatened to overflow' the w'hole wmrld: but their oppofition proved fruitlefs, and all of thefe towards the era of the reformation had been either filenced or deftroyed : fo that, at that time, the pope and clergy reigned over mankind without controul, had made themfelres ma¬ ilers of almoft all the wealth in every country of Eu¬ rope, and may truly be faid to have been the only fo- vereigns ; the reft of the human race, even kings and princes, being only their vaffals and Haves. While the Popifh fuperftition reigned thus violently in the weft, the abfurd doilrines of Mahomet over- fpread all the eaft. The rife of this impoftor is rela¬ ted under the article Arabia. His fucceffors con¬ quered in order to eftablifh the religion of their apoftle j and thus the very name of Chriftianity was extinguifhed in many places w'here it had formerly flourifhed. The conquefts of the Tartars having intermingled them with the Mahometans, they greedily embraced the fu- perftitions of that religion, v'hich thus almoft entirely overfpread the whole continents of Afia and Africa ; and, by the conqueft of Conftantinople by the Turks in 1453, w-as likewife eftablifhed throughout a confxder- able part of Europe. About the beginning of the 16th century, the Ro¬ man pontiffs lived in the utmofl: tranquillity 5 nor had they, according to the appearance of things at that time, any reafon to fear an oppofttion to their autho¬ rity in any refpetl, fince the commotions which had been raifed by the W'aldenfes, Albigenfes, &c. wrere nowT entirely fuppreffed. We muft, not, however, conclude, from this apparent tranquillity and fecurity of the pontiffs and their adherents, that their meafures were univerfally applauded. Not only private perfons, but alfo the moft powerful princes and fovereign ftates, exclaimed loudly againft the tyranny of the popes, and the unbridled licentioufnefs of the clergy of all denominations. They demanded, therefore, a refor.- O Pt Y. 535 mation of the church in its head and members, and a Ecclefia- general council to accomplilh that neceffary purpofe. But thefe complaints and demands were not carried to ; fuch a length as to produce any good effe£l j fince they came from perfons who never entertained the leaft doubt about the fupreme authority of the pope in re¬ ligious matters, and wdro, of confequence, inftead of attempting themfelves to bring about that reformation which vras fo ardently defired, remained entirely in¬ active, or looked for redrefs to the court of Rome, or to a general council. But while the fo much defired re¬ formation feemed to be at fuch a great diftance, it fud- denly arofe from a quarter whence it was not at all expefled. A fingle perfon, Martin Luther, a monk of the order of St Auguftine, ventured to oppofe himfelf to the whole torrent of papal power and defpotifm. This bold attempt w7as firft made public on the 30th of September 1517; and notwdthftanding all the efforts of the pope and his adherents, the dodlrines of Luther continued daily to gain ground. Others, encouraged by his fuccefs, lent their afliftance in the wTork of refor¬ mation ; which at laft produced new churches, founded upon principles quite different from that of Rome, and which ftill continue. But for a particular account of the tranfaflions of the firft reformers, the oppofition they met with, and the final fettlement of the reformed churches in different nations in Europe, fee the articles Luther and Reformation. The ftate of religion in other parts of the wmrld feems as yet to be but little altered. Afia and Africa are funk in the groffeft fuperftitions either of the Ma¬ hometan or Pagan kinds. The fouthern continent of America, belonging to the Spaniards, continues immerfed in the moft abfurd fuperftitions of Popery. The northern continent, being moftly peopled with colonies from Great Britain, profeffes the refornfed re¬ ligion. At the fame time it muft be owned, that fome kind of reformation hath taken place even in Popery and ?4lahometanifm themfelves. The popes have no longer that authority over ftates and princes, even thofe moft bigotted to Popery, which they formerly had. Neither are the lives either of the clergy or laity fo corrupt as they were before. The increafe of learning in all parts of the world has contributed to caufe men open their eyes to the light of reafon, and this hath been attended with a proportional decreafe of fuper¬ ftition. Even in Mahometan countries, that furious enthufiafm which formerly emboldened their inhabitants to face the greateft dangers,, hath now7 almoft vaniflied j fo that the credit of Mahomet himfelf feems to have funk much in the eftimation of his followers. This is to be underftood even of the moft ignorant and bigo¬ ted multitude $ and the fenfible part of the Turks are faid to incline much toxvards deifm. With regard to thofe nations which flill profefs Paganifm, the inter- courfe of Europeans with them is fo fmall, that it is impoffible to fay any thing concerning them. As none of them are in a ftate of civilization, however, it may be coniedlured, that their religion is of the fame unpoliflied call with their manners; and that it confifts of a heap of barbarous fuperftitions which have been handed down among them from time immemorial, and which they continue to obferve without knowing why or wherefore. Sect; . HIST 536 Com por¬ tion of Tliftoiy. Si Cicero’s •'rules. Dt Or at. lib. ii.c. 15. Sect, III. Of the Coinpojition of Hifory. Cicero has given us the 3311016 art of compoiing hiftory, in a very Ihort and comprehet-ifive manner. We lhall iirft tranfcribe ivhat he fays, and then con- fid er the feveral parts of it in their proper order. “ No one is ignorant (fays he), that the firft law in writing hiftory is, Not to dare to fay any thing that is falfe 5 and the next, Not to be afraid to fpeak the truth : that on the one hand there be no fufpicion of affe&ion, nor of prejudice on the other. Thefe foun¬ dations are what all are acquainted with.. But the fuperftrudlure confifts partly in things, and partly in the ftyle or language. The former require an order of times, and defcriptions of places. And becaufe in great and memorable events, we are defirous to know firft their caufes, then the aflions themfelves, and laftly their confequences \ the hiftorian Ihould take notice of the fprings or motives that occafioned them 5 and, in mentioning the fafts themfelves, ftiould not only relate what was done or faid, but likewife in what manner ; and, in treating upon their confe¬ quences, fhow if they were the effefts of chance, wif- dom, or imprudence. Nor fhould he only recite the adlions of great and eminent perfons, but likewife de- fcribe their charafters. The ftyle ought to be fluent, fmooth, and even, free from that harfhnefs and poig¬ nancy which is ufual at the bar.” Thus far Cicero. A hiftory written in this manner, and furnifhed with all thefe properties, muft needs be very entertaining, as well as inftruftive. And perhaps few haVfe come nearer this plan than Tacitus 5 though his fubjeft is attended with this unhappy circumftance, or at leaft unpl^pfant one, that it affords us examples rather of what we ought to avoid than what to imitate. But it is the bufinefs of the hiftorian, as well as of the philofopher, to reprefent both virtues and vices in their proper colours} the latter doing it by precepts, and the former by examples. Their manner is dif¬ ferent *, but the end and defign of both is, or ftiould be, the fame : And therefore hiftory has not improper¬ ly been faid by fome to be moral philofophy exempli¬ fied in the lives and adfions of mankind. We fhall reduce thefe feveral things mentioned by Cicero to three heads, Matter, Order, and Style ; and treat upon each of them feparately. But as Truth is the bafis and foundation of all hiftory, it will be ne- ceffary to confider that in the firft place. Of-hiftoric truth. Art. 1. Of Truth in Hiftory. Truth is, as it were, the very life and foul of hiftory, by which it is diftinguifhed from fable or ro¬ mance. A hiftorian therefore ought not only to be a man of probity, but void of all paflion or bias. He muft have the fteadinefs of a philofopher, joined with the vivacity of a poet or orator. Without the former, he will be infenfibly fwayed by fome paffion to give a falfe colouring to the adlions or charafters he de- icribes, as favour or diftike to parties or perfons affe£t his mind. Whereas he ought to be of no party, nor to have either friend or foe while writing ; but to pre- ferve himfelf in a ft ate of the greateft indifferency to 41, that he may judge of things as they really are in I O R Y. Sea. lit. their orvn nature, and not as conne&ed with this or Compofi- that perfon or party. And with this firm and fedate t'011 ot temper, a lively imagination is requifite j without, Hiftorw which his defcriptions will be flat and cold, nor will he be able to convey to his readers a iuft and adequate idea of great and generous aflions. Nor is the aflift- ance of a good judgment lefs neceflary than any of the former qualities, to diredl him what is proper to be faid and what to be omitted, and to treat every thing in a manner fuitable to its importance. And fince thefe are the qualifications neceffary for a hiftorian, it may perhaps feem the lefs ftrange that we have fo few good hiftories. But hiftorical truth confifts of two parts j one is, Not to lay any thing we know to be falfe : Though it is not fufficient to excufe a hiftorian in relating a falfe- hood that he did not know it was fo when he wrote it, unlefs he firft ufed all the means in his power to inform himfelf of the truth ; for then, undoubtedly, an invincible error is as unpardonable in hiftory as in morality. But the generality of writers in his kind content themfelves with taking their accounts from hearfays, or tranfcribing them from others; with¬ out duly weighing the evidence on which they are founded, or giving themfelves the trouble of a ftrift inquiry. Few will-ufe the diligence neceffary to in¬ form themfelves of the certainty of what they under¬ take to relate. And as the want of this greatly abates the pleafure of reading fuch writers, while perfons read with diffidence j fo nothing more recommends an hiftorian than fuch induftry. Thus we are informed of Thucydides, that when he wrote his hiftory of the Peloponnefian war, he did not fatisfy himfelf with the beft accounts he could get from his countrymen the Athenians, fearing they might be partial in their owm caufe •, but fpared no expence to inform himfelf how the fame fadls were related by their enemies the Lace¬ demonians ; that, by comparing the relations of both parties, he might better judge of the truth. And Polybius took greater pains than he, in order to wwite his hiftory of the Roman affairs •, for he travelled into Africa, Spain, Gaul, and other parts of the wrorld, that by viewdng the feveral fcenes of a&ion, and in¬ forming himfelf from the inhabitants, he might come at a greater certainty of the faffs, and reprelent them in a julfer light. But as an hiftorian ought not to affert what he knows to be falfe ; fo he ftiould likewife be cautious in relating things which are doubtful, and acquaint his readers with the evidence he goes upon in fuch faffs, from wffience they may be able to judge how far it is proper to credit them. So Herodotus tells us what things he faw himfelf in his travels, and, what he heard from the information of the Egyptian priefts and others with wdiom he converfed. And Cur- tius, in the life of Alexander, fpeaking of the affairs of India, ingenuoufly confeffes, that he wrote more than he fully believed. “ For (fays he) I neither dare to affirm politively what I doubt of, nor can I think it proper to omit what I have been told.” By fuch a conduff the author fecures his credit, whether the things prove really true or falfe •, and gives room for further inquiry, without impofing on his readers. The other branch of hiftorical truth is, Not to omit any thing that is true, and neceffary to fet the matter treated of in a cl^ar and full light. In the affions of pait Se&. in. HIST Hiftory. Compofi- pad ages or Jillant countries, wherein the writer has tion at no perfonal concern, he can have no great induce- , ment to break in upon this rule. But where intereit or party is engaged, it requires no fmall candour, as well as firmnefs of mind, conftantly to adhere to it. Affe&ion to fome, averfion to others, fear of dif- obliging friends or thofe in power, will often inter- pofe and try his integrity. Befides, an omiffion is lefs obvious to cenfure than a falfe affertion: for the one may be eaiily aferibed to ignorance or forgetful- nefs; whereas the other will, if difeovered, be com¬ monly looked upon as defign. He therefore who, in fuch circumftances, from a generous love to truth, is fuperior to all motives to betray or ftifle it, juiily de- ferves the charadfer of a brave as well as honed man. What Polybius fays upon this head is very well worth remarking : “ A good man ought to love his friends and his country, and to have a like difpofition with them, both towards their friends and enemies.' But when he takes upon him the charadler of a hidorian, they mud all be forgot. He mud often fpeak well of his enemies, and commend them when their aftions deferve it •, and fometimes blame, and even upbraid his greated friends, when their condudt makes it ne- ceffary. Nor mud he forbear fometimes to reprove, and at other times to commend, the fame perfons j fince all are liable to midake in their management, and there are fcarce any perfons who are always in the wrong. Therefore, in hidory, all perfonal con- iiderations fhould be laid afide, and regard had only to their aefions.” What a different view of mankind and their aflions ihould we have were theie rules obierved by all hi- dorians ? Integrity is undoubtedly the principal qua¬ lification of a hidorian j when we can depend upon this, other imperfeclions are more eafily paffed over. Suetonius is faid to have written the lives of the fird twelve Roman emperors with the fame freedom where¬ with they themfelves lived. What better charadler can be given of a writer i1 The lame ingenuous tem¬ per appears in the two Grecian hidorians above men¬ tioned, Thucydides and Polybius: The former of whom, though banidied by his countrymen the Athe¬ nians, yet expreffes no marks of refentment in his hidory, either againd them in general, or even againd the chief authors of it, when he has occalion to men¬ tion them ; and the latter does not forbear cenfuring what he thought blameable in his neared relations and friends. But it is often no eafy matter to know W'hether a hidorian fpeaks truth or not, and keeps up to the feveral charadfers here mentioned ; though it feems reafonable, upon the common principles of judice due to all mankind, to credit him where no marks of partiality or prejudice appear in his writings. Sometimes, indeed, a judgment may in a good mea- fure be formed of the veracity of an author from his manner of expreffmg himfelf. A certain candour and franknefs, that is always uniform and confident with itfelf, runs through their writings who have nothing in view but truth, which may be judly elleemed as a very good evidence of their dneerity. Whereas thofe who have partial defigns to anfwer are commonly more clofe and covert 5 and if at other times they- af- fume an air of opennefs and freedom, yet this is not condant and even, but foon followed again with the Vol. X. Part II. 537 Compofi- tion of Hiftory. O R Y. appearance of fome bias and referve : for it is very difficult to a£I a part long together without lying open to a difeovery. And therefore, though craft and delign is exceeding various, and, Proteus-like, aflumes very diderent drapes, there are certain characters by which it may often be perceived and detected. Tims, where things are uncertain by reafon of their being reported various ways, it is partiality in a hidorian to give into the mod unfavourable account, where others are as well known and equally credible. Again, it is a proof of the fame bad temper, wffien the fads themfelves are certain and evident, but the delign and motives of thofe concerned in them are unknown and obfeure, to affign fome ill principle, fuch as avarice, ambition, malice, intered, or any other vicious habit, as the caul’e of them. This con dud: is not only un- jud to the petfons whofe aClions they relate ; but hurtful to mankind in general, by endeavouring to dedroy the principal motive to virtue, which fprings from example. Others, who affed to be more covert, content themfelves wnth fufpicious and Hy infinuatious 3 and then endeavour to come off, by intimating their unwillingnefs to believe them, though they would have their readers do fo. And to mention no more, there are others, who, when they have loaded perfons with unjud calumnies and reflections, will allow them fome flight commendations, to make what they have faid before look more credible, and themfelves lefs partial. But the honed and faithful hidorian contemns all fuch low and mean arts 3 he conliders things as they are in themfelves, and relates them as he finds them with¬ out prejudice or affeftion. Art. II. The Subject or Argument of Hidory. The fubjeB in general is faCts, together with fuch things as are either conneCIed with them, or may at^’^01y' lead be requifite to fet them in a jult and proper light. But although the principal defign of hidory be to ac¬ quaint us with fads, yet all fads do not merit the regard of an hidorian 3 but fuch only as may be thought of ufe and fervice for the condud of human life. Nor is it allowable for him, like the poet, to form the plan and fcheme of his work as he pleafes. His bufinefs is to report things' as he finds them, without any co¬ louring or difguife to make them more pleadng and palatable to his reader, which would be to convert his hidory into a novel. Indeed, fome hidories afford more pleafure and entertainment than others, from the nature of the things of which they condd 3 and it may be edeemed the happinefs of an hidorian to meet with luch a fubjed, but it is not his fault if it be otherwife. Thus Herodotus begins his hidory with Ihowing, that the barbarians gaye the fird occafion to the wars be¬ tween them and the Greeks, and ends it with an ac¬ count of the puniffiment which, after fome ages, they fuffered from the Greeks on that account. Such a re¬ lation mud not only be very agreeable to his country¬ men the Grecians, for whofe fakes it was written 3 but likewife very indrudive, by informing them of the juf- tice of Providence in punifhing public injuries in this world, wherein focieties, as fuch, are only capable of puniffiment. And therefore thofe examples might be of ufe to caution them againd the like pradices. On the contrary, Thucydides begins his hidory with the un¬ happy date of his countrymen the Athenians 3 and in 3 Y the 84 538 HIST Conipofi- the courfe of it plainly intimates, that they were the tion of caufe of the calamitous war between them and the . ‘ . Lacedemonians. Whereas, had he been more inclined to pleafe and gratify his countrymen than to write the truth, he might have fet things in fuch a light as to have made their enemies appear the aggreffors. But he fcorned to court applaufe at the expence of truth and jultice, and has fet a noble example of in¬ tegrity to all future hidorians. But as all actions do not merit a place in hiilory, it requires no fmall judge¬ ment in an hiitorian to feletd lucli only as are proper. Cicero obferves very jullly, that hiftory “ is conver- fant in great and memorable aftions.” For this rea- fon, an hiitorian tliould always keep pofterity in view ; and relate nothing which may not, upon fome account or ocher, be worth the notice of after-ages. To de- Icend to trivial and minute matters, fuch as frequently occur in the common affairs of life, is below the dig¬ nity of hiffory. Such writers ought rather to be deemed journalifts than hiftorians, who have no view or ex¬ pectation that their works Ihould furvive them. But the Ikitful hittorian is fired with a more noble ambi¬ tion. His defign is to acquaint fucceeding ages with WThat remarkable occurrences happened in the world before them j to do juftice to the memory of great and virtuous men ; and at the fame time to perpetuate his own. Pliny the younger has fome fine reflections upon this head, in a letter to a friend. “ You advife me (fays he) to write an hiftory •, and not you only, for many others have done the fame, and I am myfelf inclined to it. Not that I believe myfelf qualified for it, which would be radr to think till I have tried it; but becaufe I edeem it a generous action not to fuffer thofe to be forgotten wdiofe memory ought to be eter- nifed ; and to perpetuate the names of others, together with one’s own. For there is nothing I am fo defirous or ambitious of, as t® be remembered hereafter ; which is a thing worthy of a man, efpeeially of one who, con- feious of no guilt, has nothing to fear from poderity. Therefore I am thinking day and night by what means, as Virgil fays, My name To raife aloft : That would fuftice me j for it is above my widi to add with him, and wing my flight to fame. But oh ! I notice fliould be taken of the methods by which they increafed in wealth or power, till they gradually ad¬ vanced to their higbeft pitch of grandeur ; whether by their virtue, the goodnefs of their conftitution, trade, induftry, wars, or whatever caufe. Alter tins the reafons of their declenfion lliould be Ihown ; what were the vices that principally occaftoned it (.oi that is generally the cafe) $ whether avarice, ambition, lux¬ ury, difeord, cruelty, or feveral of thefe in conjunaion. And laftly, where that has been their unhappy fate, how they received their final rum and fubverfion. Isloi. of thefe things Livy had in view when he wrote his hi- ftory of this Roman Hate, as he acquaints his readers in the preface. 44 The accounts (fays he) of what hap¬ pened either before or while the city was building, con¬ fining rather of poetical fables than any certain iccoiui of fadls, I {hall neither affert nor confute them. Let antiquity be allowed to make the origin of their cities more venerable, by uniting things human and. divine. But if any nation may be fuftered to fetch their origin from the gods, fuch is the military glory of the Ro¬ mans, that when they reprefent Mars as the father or their founder, other nations may as eafily acquiefce in this as they do in their government. But I lay no great ftrefs upon thefe things, and others of the Iffie nature, wffiatever may be thought of them. V* hat I am defirous every one ffiould carefully attend to, aie our lives and manners: by what men, and what arts, civil and military, the empire was both acquired and enlarged : then let him obferve, how our manners gra¬ dually declined with our difeipline •, afterwards grew worfe and vvorfe j and at length fo far degenerated, t^at at prelent we can neither bear with our vices noi {auei them to be remedied. I his is the chief benefit and ad¬ vantage to be reaped from hiftory, to fetch inftru'tion from eminent examples of both kinds j in order to imi¬ tate the one, which will be of ufe both to yourlelf and your country, and avoid the other, which aie equally bafe in their rile and event.” Ihus far Livy. And how well he has executed this defign muft be acknow¬ ledged by all who will be at the pains to perufe his work. _ . f 3. But as a particular hiftory confifts in a number of fafts relating to the fame ftate, fuitably connected and laid together in a proper feries j io a geiiei al hiftory is made up of feveral particular hiftories, whofe feparate tranfa&ions within the fame period of time, or part of it, ftiould be fo diftinaiy related, as to caufe no conffi- fion. Such w'as the hiftory of Diodorus Siculus, which contained an account of moft of the eminent ftates and kingdoms in the world, though far the greateft pait of it is now unhappily loft. Of the fame nature is the hi¬ ftory of Herodotus, though not fo extenfive j to whom we are elpecially indebted for the Perfian atiairs. And to this kind may likewife be referred .luftin’s hiftory, though it be only the epitome of a large'r work written by another hand. I he rules proper for conducting fuch hiftories are much the fame as thofe above men¬ tioned concerning particular hiftories ; excepting-what relates'to the order, of which we {hall have occafion to {peak hereafter. . But the hiftories both of particular ftates and thole 2 y 2 which 54° HIST ^ are more gerxeral frequently contain only the af- Hiltory. fflrS °f 1'orr)e ih:rt Pcriod of time. Thus the hiftory of t.je Peloponnefian war, written by Thucydides, com- pnfes only what was done in the firit 20 years of that war, which lafted feven years longer than his account reaches though indeed the reafon of that might be, becaufe Thucydides died before the war was finithed* otherwife he would very probably have continued his’ hiftory to the conclufion of it. But the hiftory of the war between the Romans and King Jugurtha in Afri¬ ca, given us by Salluft, as alfo Ccefar’s hiftories of the Gallic and civil wars, are all confined within a much lefs number of years than that of Thucydides. Nay, Sometimes one fingle tranfaftion is thought fuihcient to furnilh out a hiftcry. Such was the conlpiracy of Ca¬ tiline to fubvert the Roman ftate, written likewife by Salluft. As to more general hiftories, Xenophon’s hi¬ ftory of Greece may be efteemed as fuch •, which in or- oer of time iucceeds that of 1 hucydides, and contains the affairs of 48 years. And Polybius called his a gc- ?tci al hiftory ; which, though it principallyp contained the Roman affairs, yet took in the moft remarkable tranfattions of feveral other ftates, for the fpace of 53 years : tnough it has met with the fame hard fate as that of Diodorus Siculus, fo that only the firft five books out of forty, of which it confifted at firft, now remain entire. And to mention no more, the celebra¬ ted hiftory of Thuanus is another inftance of this fort, in ivhich the principal tranfaftions of Europe for about 60 years, chiefly in the 16th century, are deferibed with that judgment and fidelity, and in a manner fo ac¬ curate and beautiful, that he has been thought fcarcely inferior to any of the ancient hiftorians. Now', in fuch hiftories as thefe, to go farther back than is neceffary to let the fubjedt in a juft light, feems as improper as it is unneceffary. 0 R Y- Sea. 111. adlions. But die moft agreeable feene of hiftory arifes Compofi. the writer acquaints us tion of Hiftory. 85 1 he general fubjedl or argument of hiftory, in its feveral branches, maybe reduced to thefe four heads j narration, rrfte&ions, fpeeches, and digrejftons. Of naira- E By narration is meant a defeription of fadls or tion. adfions, with fuch things as are neceffarily connected with them j namely, perfons, time, place, defign, and event. As to attions themfelves, it is the bufinefs of the hiftbrian to acquaint his readers with the manner in which they were performed ; what meafures were con¬ certed on all fides, and how they were conducted, whether with vigilance, courage, prudence, and cau¬ tion, or the contrary, according to the nature of the action 5 as likewile, if any unforefeen accidents fell out, by which the deligned mcafures w’ere either pro¬ moted or broken. All aftions may be referred to tvvo forts, military and civil. And as war arifes from injuftice and injuries received on one fide or the other, it is fit the reader ftiould be informed who were the aggreffors. For though war is never to be defi¬ ned, yet it is fometimes neceffary. In the defeription of battles, regard fliould be had” equally to both par¬ ties j the number of forces, conduft of the generals in what manner they engaged, what turns and chan¬ ces happened in the engagement, either from accidents, courage, or ftratagem, and how it iffued. The like circumftances fhould all be obferved in fieges and other from a ftate of peace. Here „ ^ wkh the conftitution of ftates, the nature of their laws, the manners and cuftoms of the inhabitants, the ad- v"~' vantages of concord and unanimity, with the difad- vantages of contention and difeord 5 the invention of arts and fciences, in what manner they were impro¬ ved and cultivated, and by whom •, with many other things, both pleafant and profitable in the conduft of life. As to perfons, the chara&ers of all thofe fhould be deferibed u’ho aft any confiderable part in a hiftory. This excites the curiofity of the reader, and makes him more attentive to what is faid of them ; as one is more inquifitive to hear what relates to others in proportion to his knowledge of them. And it will likewife be of ufe to obferve, how their aftions agree with their cha- rafters, and what were the effefts of their different qua¬ lifications and abilities. The circumftances of time and place are carefully to be regarded by an hiftorian, without which his accounts of fads will be frequently very lame and imperfed. And therefore chronology and geography feem not im¬ properly to have been called the tzvo eyes of hiftory. Belides, they very much aflift the memory : for it is much eafier to remember any thing faid to be done at fuch a time, and in luch a place, than if only related in general j nay, the remembrance of thefe often recals thofe things'to mind which otherwife had been oblite¬ rated. By time is meant not only the year of any par¬ ticular era or period ; but likewile the feafon, as” fum~ mer or winter ; and the age of particular perfons. For it is oftentimes from hence that we are principally ena¬ bled to make a juft eftimate of fads. Thus Cicero commends Pompey for undertaking and finilhing the Piratic war at a feafon of the year when other generals would not have thought it fafe to venture out at fea. This double danger, as well from the weather as the pro enemy, confidering the neceflity of the cafe, heightens ManJ'.i the glory of the adion 5 fince to have done the fame thing in fummer would not have been an equal proof of the courage and intrepidity of the general. And there is nothing more furprifing in the conquefts of Alexan¬ der than that he Ihould fubdue fo large a part of the world by the time he was little more than 30 years old; an age at which few other generals have been much di- ftinguiHied. Had we not known this, a confiderable part of his charader had been loft. The like advantages arife from the other circumftan¬ ces of place. And therefore in marches, battles, and other military adions, the hiftorian ftiould take notice of the nature of the country, the paffes, rivers, diftan- ces of places, fituation of the armies, and ftrength of the towns either by nature or art ; from which the read¬ er may the better form a judgment of the difficulties and greatnefs of any enterprife. Caefar is generally very particular in thefe things, and feems to have thought it highly requifite in order to give his readers a juft idea of his adions. The deferiptions of countries, cities, and rivers, are likewife both ufeful and pleafant; and help us tt) judge of the probability of what is related concerning the temper and genius of the inhabitants, their arts, traffic, wealth, power, or whatever elfe is remarkable among them. But an accurate hiftorian goes yet further, and con- fiders Sea. III. H I S T O R Y. 54i Hiftory. Compofi- fiders the caufes of aftions, and what were the dejtgns tion of and views of thofe perfons who were principally con¬ cerned in them. Some, as Polybius has well obferved, are apt to confound the beginnings of aftions with their iprings and caufes, which ought to be carefully feparated. For the caufes are often very remote* and to be looked for at a conliderable difla/hce from the ac¬ tions themfelves. Thus, as he tells us, fome have re- prefented Hannibal’s befieging Saguntum in Spain, and palling the Ebro, contrary to a former agreement between the Romans and Carthaginians, as caufes of the fecond Punic war. But thefe were only the begin¬ nings of it. The true caufes were the jealoulies and fears of the Carthaginians from the growing power of the Romans; and Hannibal’s inveterate hatred to them, with which he had been impreffed from his in¬ fancy. For his father, whom he fucceeded in the com¬ mand of the Carthaginian army, had obliged him, when but nine years old, to take a moll folemn oath upon an altar never to be reconciled to the Romans: and therefore he was no fooner at the head of the army, than he took the firft opportunity to break with them. Again, the true fprings and caufes of aftions are to be diftinguilhed from fuch as are only feigned and pretend¬ ed. For generally the worfe deligns men have in view', the more felicitous they are to cover them with fpecious pretences. It is the hiftorian’s bufinefs, therefore, to lay open and expofe to view thefe arts of politicians. So, as the fame judicious hiltorian remarks, we are not to imagine Alexander’s carrying over his army into Alia to have been the caufe of the w'ar between him and the Perlians. That had its being long before. The Grecians had formerly two armies in Aha, one under Xenophon and the other commanded by Agefi- laus. Now the Aliatics did not venture to oppofe or moleft either of thefe armies in their march. This made King Philip, Alexander’s father, who was an ambiti¬ ous prince, and afpired after univerfal monarchy, think it might be a prafticable thing to make a conquell of Aha. Accordingly, he kept it in his view, and made preparations for it \ but did not live to execute it. That was left for his fon. But as King Philip could not have done this without firft bringing the other flates of Greece into it, his pretence to them wras only to avenge the injuries they had all fuffered from the Per- fians; though the real defign was an univerfal govern¬ ment, both over them and the Perfians, as appeared af¬ terwards by the event. But in order to our being well alfured of a perfon’s real defigns, and to make the ac¬ counts of them more credible, it is proper we ftiould be acquainted with his difpofition, manners, w'ay of life, virtues, or vices •, that by comparing his aftions with thefe, we may fee how far they agree and fuit each other. For this reafon Salluft is fo particular in his defeription of Catiline, and Livy of Hannibal ; by wduch it appears credible, that the one was capable of entering into fuch a confpiracy again!! his country, and the other of performing fuch great things as are re¬ lated concerning him. But if the caufes of aftions lie in the dark, and unknown, a prudent hiftorian wall not trouble himfelf or his readers wuth vain and trifling conjeftures, unlefs fomething very probable offers it- lelf. Laftly, an hiftorian fhould relate the iffue and event of the aftions he deferibes. This is undoubtedly the Compofi- tion of Hiitory. moft ufeful part of hiftory •, fmee the greateft advan¬ tage anting from it is to teach us experience from what has happened in the world before us. When we leam from the examples of others the happy eftefts of wifdom, prudence, integrity, and other virtues, it na¬ turally excites us to an imitation of them, and to pur- fue the fame meafures in our own conduft. And, on the contrary, by perceiving the unhappy confequences which have followed from violence, deceit, ralhnefs, or the like vices, we are deterred from fuch praftices. But fince the wife!! and moft prudent meafures do not always meet with the delired fuccefs, and many crofs accidents may happen to fruftrate the bei! concerted defigns; when we meet with inftances of this nature, it prepares us for the like events, and keeps us from too great a confidence in our own fchemes. However, as this is not commonly the cafe, but in the ordinary courfe of human affairs like caufes ufuaily produce like effefts ; the numerous examples of the happy confe¬ quences of virtue and wifdom recorded in hiftory are fufficient to determine us in the choice of our meafures, and to encourage us to hope for an anfwerable fuccefs, though we cannot be certain we fhall in no inftance meet with a difappointment. And therefore Polybius, very juftly obferves, that “ he who takes from hi¬ ftory the caufes, manner, and end of aftions, and omits to take notice whether the event was anfwerable to the means made ufe of, leaves nothing in it but a bare amufement, without any benefit or inftruftion.” Thefe, then, are the feveral things neceffary to be at¬ tended to in hiftorical narrations ; but the proper dif¬ pofition of them muft be left to the Ikill and prudence of the writer. „ II. ReJleBions made by the writers. Some have con-of retlec- demned thefe, as having a tendency to bias the reader j tions. who ftiould be left to draw fuch conclufions from the accounts of fafts as he fees proper. But fince all readers are not capable of doing this for themfelves, what diladvantage is it for the author to fuggeft to them fuch obfervations as may affift them to make the beft u!e ol what they read ? And if the philofopher is allowed to draw fuch inferences from his precepts as he thinks juft and proper, why has not the hiftorian an equal right to make reflections upon the fafts he re¬ lates ? The reader is equally at liberty to judge for him¬ felf in both cafes, without danger of being prejudiced. And therefore we find, that the beft hitlorians have al¬ lowed themfelves this liberty. It would be eafy to prove this by a large number of inftances, but one or two here may fuffice. When Salluft has given a very diftinft account of the defigns of Catiline, and of the whole fcheme of the confpiracy, he concludes it with this refleftion : “ All that time the empire of the Ro¬ mans feems to me to have been in a very unhappy ftate. For when they had extended their conquefts through the whole world from eaft to weft, and enjoyed both peace and plenty, which mankind efteem their greateft. happinefs; fome perfons were obftinatcly bent upon their own ruin, and that of their country. For not- Bell. Catifr withftanding two decrees were publilhed by the fenate,c. 37. not one out of fo great a multitude was prevailed with, by the rewards that were offered, either to difeover the confpiracy or to leave the army of Catiline. So defpe- rate a difeafe, and as it were infeftion, had feized the minds of moft people !” And it is a very handfome obfervation. 542 Compofi- tion of Hillory. H I $ T O R Y. Sea. III. ss Of fpeech- Lib. xxxi. c- 5- okfer^dtion tliat Livy makes upon the ill-condu£t of Hannibal in quartering his army in Capua after the battle of Cannte ; by which means they loft their mar¬ tial vigour through luxury and eafe. “ Thofe (fays he) who are fkilled in military affairs reckoned this a greater fault in the general, than his-not marching his army immediately to Rome after his vicbory at Cannce j for fuch a delay might have feemed only to defer the viflory, but this ill ftep deprived him of the power to gain it.” The modefty of the hiftorian in this paflage is worth remarking, in that he ftoes not reprefent this as his own private opinion, and by that means under¬ take to cenfure the condudb of fo great a general as Hannibal was, but as the fenfe of thofe who were {kill¬ ed in fuch affairs. However, a hiftorian Iho'uld be brief in fuch remarks ; and confider, that although he does not exceed his province by applauding virtue, ex- prefting a juft indignation againft vice, and interpcfing his judgment upon the nature and confequences of the fafts he relates j yet there ought to be a difference be¬ tween his refleclions and the encomiums or declamations of an orator. III. Speeches inferted by hiftorians. Thefe are of two forts, oblique and diredl. The former are fuch as the hiftorian recites in his own perfon, and not in that of the fpeaker. Of this kind is that of Hannibal in Juftin \ by which he endeavours to perfuade King Antiochus to carry the feat of the war againft the Ro¬ mans into Italy. It runs thus : “ Having defired li¬ berty to fpeak, he faid none of the prefent counfels and defigns pleafed him *, nor did he approve of Greece for the feat of the war, which might be managed in Italy to greater advantage : becaufe it was impoffible to conquer the Romans but by their own arms, or to fub- due Italy but by its own forces 5 fince both the nature of thofe men, and of that war, w’as different from all others. In other wars, it was of great importance to gain an advantage of place or time, to ravage the coun¬ tries and plunder the towns; but though you gain fome advantage over the Romans, or defeat them, you muft ftill fight with them when beaten. Wherefore, Ihould any one engage with them in Italy, it was pofiible for him to conquer them by their own power, ftrength, and arms, as he himfelf had done j but fhould he at¬ tempt it out of Italy, the fource of their power, he would be as much deceived, as if he endeavoured to al¬ ter the courfe of a river, not at the fountain-head, but where its ftreams were largeft and deepeft. This w7as his judgment in private, and what he had offered as his advice, and now repeated in the prefence of his friends 5 that all might know in what manner a war ought to be carried on againft the Romans, who were invincible a- broad, but might be conquered at home. For they might fooner be driven out of their city than their em¬ pire, and from Italy than their provinces *, having been taken by the Gauls, and almoft fubdued by hirnfelf. That he was never defeated till he withdrew' out of their country ; but upon his return to Carthage, the fortune of the w;ar w'as changed with the place.” He feems to intimate by this fpeech, that the Romans were like fome fierce and impetuous animals, wdiich are no otherwdfe to be fubdued than by wounding them in fome vital part. In fpeeches related after this manner, wTe are not neceffarily to fuppofe the hiftorian gives us the very word in which they were at firft delivered, Coinpofi- but only the fenfe. But in diredt fpeeches, the perfon t‘?n himfelf is introduced as addrefling his audience ; and Hiitory. . therefore the words as well as the fenfe are to be fuited to his character. Such is the fpeech of Eumenes, one of Alexander’s pantains and fucceffors, made to his fol- diers when they had traiteroufly bound him in chains, in order to deliver him up to his enemy Antigonus, as we have it in the fame writer. “ You fee, foldiers (fays he), the habits and ornaments of your general, which have not been put upon me by mine enemies j that rvould afford me fome comfort : it is by you, that of a conqueror I am become conquered, and of a general a captive ; though yen have fworn to be faithful to me four times within the fpace of a year. But I omit that, fince relledtions do not become perfons in calamity. One thing I intreat, that, if Antigonus muft have my life, you would let me die among you. For it no way concerns him how or where I fuffer, and I ihall efcape an ignominious death. If you grant me this, I free you from your oath, with which you have been fo often engaged to me. Or, if fhame reftrains you from offering violence to me at my requeft, give me a Iword, and fuffer your general to do that for you without the obligation of an oath which you have fworn to do for your general.” Lib. xiv. But this likewife is a matter in which critics havec* 4* been divided in their fentiments j whether any, or what kind, of fpeeches ought to be allowed in hiftory. Some have thought all fpeeches fhould be excluded : and the reafon given for that opinion is this ; that it breaks the thread of the difeourfe, and interrupts the reader, when he is defirous to come to the end of an adlion, and know' how it iflued. This is true, indeed, when fpeeches are either very long or too frequent ; but otherwife they are not only entertaining, but like¬ wife inftrudlive. For it is of her vice to know the fprings and reafons of aftions •, and thefe are frequently opened and explained in the fpeeches of thofe by whom they w'ere performed. Others therefore have not been againft all fpeeches in general, but only direft ones. And this was the opinion of Trogus Pompeius, as Ju-Lib.xxxvlii, ftin informs us*, though he did not think fit to follow c. 3. him in that opinion, when he abridged him, as we have feen already by the fpeech of King Eumenes. The reafen offered againft direft fpeeches is, becaufe they aie not true ; and truth is the foundation of all hiftory, from which it never ought to depart. Such fpeeches, therefore, are faid to weaken the credit of the wmiter j fince he who will tell us that another perfon fpoke fuch things which he does not know that he ever did fpeak, and in fuch language as he could not ufe, may take the fame liberty in reprefent- ing his adlions. Thus, for example, when Livy gives us the fpeeches of Romulus, the Sabine women, Bru¬ tus, and others, in the firft ages of the Roman ftate, both the things themfelves are imaginary, and the language wholly difagreeable to the times in which thofe perfens lived. Accordingly we find, that when feveral hiftorians relate fome particular fpeech of the fame perfon, they widely differ both in the fubjedt- matter and expreflions. So the fpeech of Veturia, by which (be diffuaded her fon Coriolanus from be- fieging Rome when he came againft it with an army of I Sea. HI. H I S T O R Y. COnipofi- tion of Hiftory. Lib. ii. c. 40. Ant. Rom, lib viii. c. 46. In Corio- lano. See VofT. Ars. Hijl. C. 20. , Lib. iv. c. r. Ann. lib. i. 73- iii- 56> 59- of Volfcians to avenge the injuries he had received, is very differently related by Livy, Dionyfius of Halicar- nafl'us, and Plutarch. Such lifiitious fpeeches there¬ fore are judged more fit for poets, who are allowed a greater liberty to indulge their fancy than hiftorians. And if any difeft fpeeches are to be inferted, they Ihould be fuch only as were really fpoken by the per- fons to whom they are afcrlbed, where any fuch have been preferved. Thefe have been the fentiments of fome critics both ancient and modern. However, there is Icarce an ancient hiftorian now extant, either Greek or Latin, who has not fome fpeeches, more or lefs, in his works ; and thofe not only oblique, but alfo direct. They feem to have thought it a necefi'ary orna¬ ment to their writings : and even where the true fpeech¬ es might be come at, have chofen rather to give them in their own words •, in order, probably, to pyeferve an equality in the ftyle. Since therefore the beft and molt faithful hiff orians have generally taken this liberty, we are to diftinguilh between their accounts of faffs and their fpeeches. In the former, where nothing appears to the contrary, we are to fuppofe they adhere to truth, according to the beft information they could get ; but in the latter, that their view is only to acquaint us with the caufes and fprings of affions, which they choofe to do in the form of fpeeches, as a method moft ornamen¬ tal to the. work, and entertaining to the reader : Though the beft hiftorians are cautious of inferring fpeeches, but where they are very proper, and upon fome folemn and weighty occafions. Thucydides is laid to have been the firft who brought complete and finiftr- ed fpeeches into hiftory, thofe of Herodotus being but Ihort and imperfeff. And though Dionyfius of Hali- carnaffus, in his cenfiire upon Thucydides, feems then to have difiiked that part of his conduff ; yet he after¬ wards thought fit to imitate it in his Antiquities of Rome, where we find many not only oblique, but alfo direff fpeeches. " What has been faid of fpeeches, may likewife be un- derftood of letters, which we fometimes meet with in hiftories •, as that of Alexander to Darius in Quintus Curtius, thofe of Tiberius and Drufus in Tacitus, and many others. Some letters are wholly fiffitious ; and in others perhaps the hiftorian reprefents the fubftance of what was really faid, but gives it his own drefs. Thus we find that (hort letter of Lentulus to Catiline at the time of his confpiracy differently related by Ci¬ cero and Salluft. The reafon of which feems to be this : That as Cicero recited it publicly to the people of Rome in his third oration againft Catiline, it is rea- fonable to imagine he did it in the very words of the letter, which he had by him } whereas Salluft, as an hiftorian, might think it fufficient to give the fenfe of it in his own words. IV. DigreJJions. Thefe, if rightly managed, afford the reader both delight and profit. Like fpeeches, they fhould neither be too long nor frequent \ left they in¬ terrupt the courfe of the hiftory, and divert the reader Jrora the main defign of the work. But now and then to introduce a beautiful deicription, or fome remarkable incident, which may give light to the fubjeff, is fo far from an interruption^ that it is rather a relief to the reader, and excites him to go on with greater pleafure and attention. See further on this head, Oratory, N°.37- Art. III. Of Order. Of order. 543 Competi¬ tion of Since moft hiftories confift of an introduffion and the < ~ » body of the work, in each of which fome order is re- 89 quifite, w7e fhall difeufs them feparately. ‘ 1. The defign of the introduffion is the fame here as in orations. For the hiftorian propofes three things by his introduffion, which may be called its parts 5 to give his reader fome general view of the fubjeff, to engage his attention, and to poffefs him with, a candid opinion of himfelf and his performance. Some have thought this iaft unneceffary for an hiftorian. But if we confider how7 differently mankind are apt to judge of the fame perfons and affions, it feems as requifite for an hiftorian to be well elleemed as an orator. And therefore wTe find fome of the beft hiftorians have not omitted this part. Livy’s introduffion has been very- much applauded by the learned, as a mafterpiece in its kind. It begins with an account of his defign. “ Whether (fays he) it may anfwer any valuable end for me to write the hiftory of the Roman affairs from the beginning of the city, I neither am certain, nor if I wTas ihould I venture to declare it.” Soon after he endeavours to prepare the reader’s attention, by repre- fenting the grandeur and ufefulnefs of the fubjeff: in the following words: “ Either I am prejudiced in favour of my fubjeff, or there never wras any ftate greater, more virtuous, and fruitful of good examples, or in which avarice and luxury had a later admittance, or poverty and thriftinefs were either more highly or longer efteem- ed, they always coveting lefs the lefs they enjoyed.” And then he prefently proceeds to ingratiate himfelf with his readers, and gain their favourable opinion ; “ Although my name is obfeure in fo great a number of writers, yet it is a comfort that they cloud it by their fame and charaffer. But I fhall gain this advantage by my labour, that I ftall be diverted for a time from the profpeff of thole evils which the age has feen for lo many years 5 while my mind is wholly intent upon for¬ mer times, free from all that care which gives the writer an uneafinefs, though it cannot bias him againft tne truth.” In this paflage we fee he endeavours to gain the good efteem of his readers from two very- powerful motives, modefty and a ftriff regard to truth. It may fcarce feem neceffary to obferve, that thofe in- troduffions are efteemed the beft which are rnoft natu¬ ral j that is, fuch as are taken from the fubjeff-matter of the hiftory itielf, and clofely conneffed with it. Such are thofe of Herodotus, Thucydides, Livy, Ta¬ citus, and others. And therefore Salluft is* greatly blamed by Quintilian on the account of his introduc- tions,. which are fo general, that they might fuit other hiftories as well as thofe to which they are prefixed, Introduffions fliould likewife be proportioned to the length of the work. We meet wfith fome few hiftories, in which the writers immediately enter upon their fub¬ jeff, Witnout any introduction j as Xenophon in his Expedition of the younger Cyrus, and Caffar in his Commentaries of the Gallic and Civil Wars. But the latter does not profefs to write a juft.hiftory ; and there¬ fore left himfelf more at liberty, as well in this refpeft as in fome others. 2. But order is principally to be regarded in the body of the work. And this may be managed two ways} either by attending to the time in a chronologi¬ cal 544 Compofi- tion of Hiftory. HISTORY. Sea. III. cal fenes, or tlie different nature and circumftances of the things contained in the hiftory. However, as thefe two methods do not equally fuit all lubje&s, we ftiall a little confider to what kind of hiftories each of them feems more properly adapted. All hiftory then, as we have obferved already, may be reduced to three forts ; biography, the hijlory of particular fates, and the general hiforij of fevcralfates exifting at tne fame time. In biography, or the lives of particular perfons, moft waiters follow the order of time *, though fome reduce them to certain general heads, as their virtues and vices, or their public and private charaifter. Plutarcn and Cornelius Nepos have taken the former method, and Suetonius the latter. As to the hiftory of particular ftates, the order of time is generally beft, as being moft natural and eafy. And therefore it has ufually been obferved by the belt hiftorians, as Thucydides, Livy, and others. ^ iaci- tus, indeed, wrote tw7a diftindft works j one ot which he called Annals, and the other Hifories. And as in both he has kept to the order of time, critics have been at a lofs to affign any other reafon for thefe different titles, unlefs that in the former work he confines him- felf more clofely to the fa£ts thernielves, and does not treat fo largely upon the caufes, manner, or event of them, as he has done in the latter. And even in the circumftances of fa6ls, there is a certain order proper to be obferved, for rendering the account more plain and intelligible. Ihus, for inftance, in the deferip- tion of a battle or fiege, the time fhould firft be known, then the chief perfon or perfons who condufted it, then the number of forces, and other requifites, after¬ wards the nature of the place, then the adlion itfelf, and laftly the event. But fometimes it is neceffary to add the time in which feveral of the other circum¬ ftances happened, efpecially in aftions of any confider- able length. Where the order of thefe circumftances is confufed, it perplexes the account, and renders it both lefs entertaining to the reader, and more difficult to remember. In a general hiftory, the order of time cannot al¬ ways be prelerved j though, where the aftions of dif¬ ferent communities have refpeef to one as the princi¬ pal, they fhould all, as far as poflible, be referred to the tranfaftions of that ftate. But even here the fe¬ veral affairs of thofe different ftates ought to be rela¬ ted feparately, wffiich wull neceffarily occafion the an¬ ticipating fome things, and poftponing^ others, fo that they cannot all ftand in the order of time in which they were performed. However, Velleius Paterculus fays very juftly with regard to this fubjedf, “ lhat every entire action placed together in one view, is much better apprehended than if divided by different times.” In this cafe, therefore, for better preferving the chronology, it is ufual with hiftorians, when they have finiftred any particular narrative, in palling to the next, to exprefs the time by fome fhort and plain transition ; and fometimes to apologize for themfelves, by affigning the reafons of their conduct. So Poly¬ bius, whofe hiftory is of this kind, fays concerning himfelf: “ As in writing the actions of each year, in the order of time, I endeavour to reprefent the affairs of the fame nation together in one fummary view, it is plain that inconvenience muft of courfe attend this 2 Hiftory. way of writing.” Curtius profeffes only to write the G'mp •fi- aCkions of Alexander king of Macedon ; but his hiftory 110,1 of contains in it the principal affairs of the greateft ftates in the world during that period. Now although, in the courfe of thofe tranfaefions, the war between Ar- chelaus governor of Macedonia, and Agis king of Sparta, happened before the battle of Alexander at Arbela ^ yet the hiftorian not only relates that battle firft, but carries on the account of Alexander’s affairs in Afia to the death of Darius without interruption 5 for which he gives this reafon : “ If I fhould relate Lib. v. the affairs of Alexander, which happened in the mean time, either in Greece or Illyricum and Thrace, each in their proper order and time, I muft interrupt the affairs of Afia ; which it is much better to reprefent together in one continued feries as they fell out, to the tlight and death of Darius.” Such anachronifms, • therefore, are nothing more tnan what neceffarily anle fometimes from the nature of the fubject : As every thing, the more complex it is, and contains under it a great number of parts, is more difficult to be digefted in a regular order. But in a hiftory compoled ol fe¬ veral ftates, wffiofe affairs are independent of one an¬ other, the adlions of each nation muft neceffarily be feparated, in order to reprefent them in a juft view, and prevent confufion. ft his is the method which Herodotus has taken, as likewife Diodorus Siculus and Juftin. Now both the pleafure and benefit which fuch hiftories afford, arife from obferving tne conduct of each ftate feparately in the courfe of tiieir attaiis, and then comparing one w’ith the other. And as tne order of time muft frequently be interrupted, it. is not unufual to continue the chronology at proper diftances in relating the affairs of eacn nation ; w'hicn preierves an unity in the wffiole, and connects it in one confiftent body. The divifion of hiftories into books was defigned only for the better diftinftion of the fubject and eafie of the reader. And the dividing thefe books again into chapters, is rather a praftice of later editors (founded, as they have thought, on the lame rea¬ fons), than countenanced by the example of ancient wT'iters. Art. IV. Of Style. An hiftorical ftyle is faid to be of a middle nature, of ftyle. between that of a poet and an orator, differing nom both not only in the ornamental parts, but likewife m the common idioms and forms of expreffion. Cicero obferves, that “ nothing is more agreeable in De Clar. hiftory than brevity of expreflion, joined with purity Or at. c. 75. and perfpicuity.” Purity indeed is not peculiar to hif¬ tory, but yet it is abfolutely neceffary *, for no one will ever think him fit to write a hiftory who is not mafter of the language in which he writes: and there¬ fore when Albinus had written a hiftory of the Roman affairs in Greek, and apologifed for any flips or impro¬ prieties that might be found in the language upon the account of his being a Roman, Cato called him a trifler, for choofing to do that which, after he had done it, he was obliged to afk pardon for doing. Nor is perfpi-GW/. lib. xi, cuity lefs requifite in an hiftorical ftyle. I he nature ofc. 8. the fubjefl plainly directs to this. For as hiftory con- fifts principally in narration, clearnefs and perfpicuity are nowhere more neceffary than in a relation of fads. But tion of Hiftory. Di Orai. lib. ii. c. 15 2©. Sed. in. HIS' Compofi- But thefe two properties are to be accompanied with brevity, fince nothing is more difagreeable than a long j and tedious narrative. And in this refpedt an hiftorical ityle differs both from that of poetry and oratory. For the poet frequently heightens and enlarges his defcrip- tions of fa£ts, by dwelling upon every circumftance, placing it in different views, and embellilhing it with the fineft ornaments of wit and language, to render his images more agreeable ; and the orator often does the like, with a defign to ftrike the paflions. But fuch co¬ louring is not the buiinefs of an hiftorian, who aims at nothing more than a juft and faithful reprefentation of what he relates, in a way beft fuited to its nature, and in fuch language as is moft proper to fet it in a plain and eafy light. Again, Cicero, treating of an hiftorical ftyle, fays : “ It ought to be fluent, fmooth, and even, free from that harftmefs and poignancy which is ufual at the bard’ The properties here mentioned diftinguifli this ftyle from that of judicial difcourfes, in which the orator often finds it neceffary to vary his manner of fpeaking, in order to anfwer different views, either of purfuing an argument, prefling an adverfary, addref- fing a judge, or recommending the merits of his caufe. This occafions an inequality in his ftyle, while he fpeaks fometimes directly, at other times by way of queftion, and intermixes ftiort and concife expreflions with round and flowing periods. But the hiftorian has no neceflity for fuch variations in his ftyle. It is his province to efpoufe no party, to have neither friend nor foe, but to appear wholly difinterefted and indifferent to all; and therefore his language ftiould be fmooth and equal in his relations of perfons and their a&ions. But further: Dionyfius makes “ decency a princi¬ pal virtue in an hiftorian j” which he explains by fay¬ ing, that “ he ought to preferve the charaflers of the perfons and dignity of the actions of wdiich he treats.” And to do this it feems neceffary that an hiftorical ftyle fhould be animated with a good degree of life and vigour; without which neither the characters of eminent perfons, nor their remarkable aftions, which make up the main bufinefs of hiftory, can be duly re- prefented : for even things in themfelves great and excellent, if related in a cold and lifelefs manner, of¬ ten do not affeft us in a degree fuitable to their dig¬ nity and importance. And this feems particularly ne¬ ceffary in fpeeches, in order to reprefent what every one fays, according to his different country, age, tem¬ per, and ftation of life, in the /fame manner we may fuppofe he either really did, or wmuld have fpoken himfelf on that occafion. Befides there are fome fcenes of aCHon which require very pathetic and moving lan¬ guage to reprefent them agreeably to their nature. And in defcriptions, the moft beautiful tropes and lively figures are often neceffary to fet the ideas of things in a proper light. From whence it appears, that painting and imagery make up no finall part of the hiftorian’s province, though his colours are not fo ftrong and glittering as thofe either of the poet or . orator. He ought therefore to be well acquainted with the manners of men and the nature of the paf- fions, fince he is often obliged to defcribe both ; in the former of which Herodotus excels, and Thucydi¬ des in the latter, as Dionyfius has obferved. Vol. X. Part II. 545 Compofi- tion of Hiftoiy. Epiji. ad Cn. Ptm- ptium. f O R Y. Now from thefe feveral propertie* laid down by an¬ cient writers, as requifite for an hiftorical ftyle, it feems upon the whole to agree beft with the middle charatter. And this wfill further appear, by what they fay relating to the ornamental parts of ftyle 5 namely, compofition and dignity. As to the former of thefe, which refpeCts the ftruCture of fentences, and the feveral parts of them, Demetrius remarks, that “ An hiftorical period ought neither to rife very high, nor fink very low, but to preferve a medium.” This fimplicity (he fays) “ becomes the gravity and cre¬ dit of hiftory ; and diftinguithes it from oratory on the one hand, and dialogue on the other.” His meaning is, that hiftorical periods fliould neither be fo full and fonorous as is frequent in oratory j nor yet fo fliort and flat as in dialogue : the former of which, as he fays, require a ftrong voice to pronounce them ; and the latter have fcarce the appearance of periods. So that, according to this judicious writer, the periods beft fuited for hiftory are thofe w’hich, being of a mo¬ derate length, will admit of a juft rife and cadency, and may be pronounced with eafe. And Dionyfius tells us, that “ Hiftory Ihould flow fmooth and even, every where confiftent wfith itfelf, without roughnefs or chafms in the found.” This relates to the harmony of periods, w'hich arifes from fuch a pofition of the words as renders the found pleafant and agreeable, and as he thinks ought to be attended to in hiftory. And as to dignity, which refpeCts the ufe of tropes and figures, the fame author fays, that “ Hiftory fliould be embelliflied with fuch figures as are neither vehement nor carry in them the appearance of art.” This is agreeable to what Cicero obferves, in com¬ paring Xenophon and Califthenes, two Greek hifto- rians. “ Xenophon the Socratic (fays he) wras the firft philofopher, and after him Califthen.es the fcho- lar of Ariftotle, who wrote an hiftory : the latter al- moft like a rhetorician : but the ftyle of the former is more moderate, and has not the force of an orator, lefs vehement perhaps, but in my opinion more fweet De Ora&, and pleafant.” The difference between thefe two“• writers, with regard to their ftyle, confifted chieflyc* I4‘ in the choice of their figures: which in Xenophon were more gentle and moderate, and therefore in the judge¬ ment of Cicero more agreeable to hiftory. Now thefe feveral properties relating to the ornaments of lan- guage, as w«ll as thofe betore mentioned, which by an¬ cient writers have been thought requifite for hiftory, are all fiiited to the middle ftyle, as we have elfewhere Ihown at large. See Oratory, N° 99—121. But notwithftanding this general account of the fe¬ veral properties which conftitute an hiftorical ftyle, it admits of confiderable varieties from the different na¬ ture and dignity of the fubjeCI. The lives of particu¬ lar perfons do not require that ftrength and majefty of exprfflion, nor all thofe ornaments of language, as an hiftory of the Roman empire. And accordingly we find the ftyle of Nepos and Suetonius very diffe¬ rent from that of Livy. The former is fmooth and eafy, fcarce rifing above the low charadter ; but the latter often approaches near to the fublime. And other hiftorians again have kept a medium between thefe. Upon the whole, therefore, we may conclude, that the middle ftyle is the proper charadler for hi¬ ftory j though hiftorians may fometimes fink into the 3 Z low 54-6 HIST Compofi- low character, and at other times rife to the gran¬ deur and magnificence of the fubhme, from the dif¬ ferent nature of their fubjeft, or fome particular parts of it. For that is to be efteemed the proper charac¬ ter of any writing which in the general beft fuits it. And this diltinftion may help us in fome meafure to tion of Hiftory. O R Y. Sea. III. reconcile the fentiments of writers upon this head Compofi. who feem to attribute different characters to an hiito- rical flyle, or at lead to judge where the truth lies •, ■. y‘j fince a variety of ftyle is not only requifite in different fubjeCts, but likewife in different parts of the fame work. Iliilory II Hithe. H I T Histort of Nature, or Natural Hi/lory. See Na¬ tural History. i HISTRIO, in the ancient drama, fignified an aftor or comedian 5 but more efpecially a pantomime, who exhibited his part by geflures and dancing. Livy in¬ forms us that the hiftriones were brought to Roine from Etruria, in the year of the city 391, (Dec. i. lib. 7.) HISTRIX. See Hystrix. HITCHING, a large and populous town of Hart- fordihire in England, fituated near a large wood called Ilitchwood. The manor was the ancient demefne of the kings of England, as it continues at this day; and it has been the dower of feveral of their queens. The town is reckoned the fecond in the county for number of ftreets, houfes, and inhabitants. It was formerly famous for the ffaple commodities of the kingdom, and divers merchants of the ftaple of Calais refided here, fince which that trade is loft. The inhabitants now make large quantities of malt j and the market is one of the greateft in England for wheat. W. Long, o. 10. N. Lat. 51. 58. HITHE, or Hythe, a town of Kent in England, 70 miles from London. It is one of the cinque ports; and had formerly five parilhes, but by the choking up of its harbour and other accidents is now reduced to one. In the reign of Henry IV. numbers of its inhabitants were cut off by a peftilence, 200 of their houfes con- fumed by fire, and five of their {hips funk at fea, with the lofs of 1OO men ; fo that the people were going to abandon the town, had not the king by his charter generoufly releafed to them, for five turns next follow¬ ing, their fervice of five Ihips of 100 men and five horfe, which they were to have furnilhed out and kept at their own charge in the king’s wars for 15 days. It wras firft incorporated by the name of barons of the town and port of Hith ; but the government was after¬ wards changed. It was incorporated by Queen Eliza¬ beth with the name of the mayor, jurats, and common¬ alty of the town and port of Hith, who with the free¬ men eleft the members of parliament. The mayor is chofen yearly on Candlemas-day. Here is a market on Saturdays, and fairs in July and December. From hence to Canterbury is a paved Roman military way, called Stoney Street; and at a little diftance from hence are the remains of the u alls of a caftle, which included 10 acres. There is a remarkable pile of dry bones in the town, 28 feet long, 6 broad, and 8 high ; they are kept in a vault under the church in as good order as books in a library, confiiting of feveral thoufand heads, arms, legs, thigh-bones, &c. fome very gigantic, and appear by an infcription to be the remains of the Danes and Britons killed in a battle near this place, before H O A the Norman conqueft. From hence to Boulogne is reckoned the Ihorteft cut to France. E. Long. 1. 10. N. Lat 51. 8. HITTITES, the defendants of Heth. See Hetii. HIVE, in country affairs, a convenient receptacle for bees. See Apis and Bee. HIVITES, a people defended from Canaan. They dwelt at firft in the country which wras aftenvards pof- feffed by the Caphtoiims, or Philiftines. There were Hivites likewife at Shechem and Gibeon, and confe- quently in the centre of the promifed land ; for the inhabitants of Shechem and the Gibeonites were Hi¬ vites, (Jolhua xi. 19. Genefis xxxiv. 2.). Laftly, there wTere fome beyond Jordan, at the foot of Mount Her- mon (Jolhua xi. 3.). Bochart is of opinion, that Cad¬ mus, who carried a colony of Phoenicians into Greece, was an Hivite. His name, Cadmus, comes from the He¬ brew Keden, “ the eaft,” becaufe he was of the eaftern part of the land of Canaan. The name of his wife Hermione, comes from Mount Kermon, at the foot whereof the Hivites had their dwelling. The meta- morphofis of Cadmus’s companions into ferpents is grounded on the fignification of the name Hivites, which in Phoenician fignifies “ ferpents.” HOACHE, in Natural Hi/lory, a kind of earth approaching to the nature of chalk, but harder, and feeling like foap ; whence fome think that it is either the fame with the foap rock of Cornwall, or very like it. The Chinefe mix it with water till the li¬ quor is of the confiftence of cream, and then varnilh their China ware with it. HOAD LEY, Benjamin, fucceffively bilhop of Bangor, Hereford, Salifbury, and Winchefter, was born in 1676. His firft preferment in the church was the redtory of St Peter le Poor, and the ledlurelhip of St Mildred’s in the Poultry. In the year 1706, he publilhed fome Remarks on the late Bilhop Atterbury’s fermon at the funeral of Mr Bennet, in which Dr At- terbury had, in the opinion of Mr Hoadley, laid down fome dangerous propofitions. Two years, after, Mr Hoadley again entered the lifts againft this for¬ midable antagonift j and in his exceptions againft a fer¬ mon publilhed by Dr Atterbury, intitled “ The Power of Charity to cover Sin,” he attacked the dodor with his ufual ftrength of reafoning and difpaflionate in¬ quiry. In 1709, another difpute arofe between thefe two learned combatants, concerning the dodrine of non-refiftence, occafioned by a performance of Mr Hoadley’s, intitled “ The Meafures of Obedience j” fome pofitions in which Dr Atterbury endeavoured to confute in his elegant Latin fermon preached that year before the London clergy. In this debate Mr Hoadley fignalized himfelf in fo eminent a degree, that Hittites II Hoadley. H O A [ 5 Hoadley. tliat the honourable houfe of commons gave him a k*——V”—' particular mark of their regard, by reprefenting, in an addrefs to the queen, the fignal fervices he had done to the caufe of civil and religious liberty.— The principles, however, which he efpoufed being re¬ pugnant to the general temper of thofe times, drew on him the virulence of a party ; yet it was at this period (1710, when, as he himfelf expreffed fury feemed to be let loofe upon him') that the late Mrs How¬ land prefented him to the reftory of Streatham in Sur¬ ry, unalked, unapplied to, and without his either ha¬ ving feen her or been feen by her. Soon after the ac- cefhon of King George I. Mr Hoadley was confecrated to the fee of Bangor; and, 1717, having broached fome opinions concerning the nature of Chriti’s king¬ dom, &.c. he again became the objesft of popular cla¬ mour. At this juncture he was diftinguilhed by an¬ other particular mark of the royal regard, by means of which the convocation was fucceflively prorogued, and it was not permitted to fit, or do any bufinefs, till that refentment was entirely lubfided. In 1721 he was tranfiated to Hereford \ and from thence, in 1723, to Salifbury. In 1734, he was tranfiated to Winchefter (on the demife of Dr Willis), and pub- lifiied his Plain Account of the Sacrament: a. perform¬ ance which ferved as a butt for his adverfaries to ihoot at; yet impartiality owns it to be dear, rational, and manly, written with great candour and judgment, and fuited to the capacity of every ferious and confiderate inquire!: after truth.—His latter days were embittered by a moft vile inftance of fraud and ingratitude. The bilhop took a French prieft, who pretended to abjure his religion, under his prote&ion, with no other re¬ commendation than that of his necefiitiesj in return for which ad of humanity, the priefi found an opportunity of getting the bilhop’s name written by his own hand, and, caufing a note of fome thoufand pounds to be placed before it, offered it in payment. But the bilhop deny¬ ing it to be his, it was brought before a court of jufiice, and was there found to be a grofs impofition. The un¬ grateful villain had now recourfe to a pamphlet, in which he charged the bilhop with being a drunkard ; and alleged that he had the note of him when he was in liquor. To this calumny the bilhop made a full and nervous anfvver; in which he expofed the man’s falfehood, and folemnly averred that he was never drunk in his whole life. The world with becoming ardour embraced his defence, and he had the happi- nefs to find himfelf perfedly acquitted even of any fufpicion of fuch a charge. As a writer, he poffeffed uncommon abilities. His fermons (publilhed in 1754 and 1555) are efteemed inferior to few writings in the Engliih language, for plainnefs and perfpicuity, ener¬ gy and ftrength of reaibning, and a free and mafterly manner. In private life, he was naturally facetious, eafy, and complying •, fond of company, yet would frequently leave it for the purpofes of ffudy or devo¬ tion. He was everywhere happy} and particularly in his own family, where he took all opportunities of inffrufting by his influence and example. He died in 1761, aged 83. Befides the works already mentioned, he wrote, 1. Terms of Acceptance, 8vo. 2. Reafon- ablenefs of Conformity. 3. On the Sacrament. His tra6ls and pamphlets are extremely numerous : and the reader may fee a complete catalogue of them in 47 ] HOB his life inferted in the fupplement to the Biographia ‘I°;m ey Britannica. Hobbes Hoadley, Benjamin, M. D. fon of the former, was , —.vl. ’ . born in 1706 ; and ffudied at Bennet college, Cam¬ bridge, under the tuition of Dr Herring afterwards archbilhop of Canterbury. He took his degree in phy- fic \ and particularly applying himfelf to mathematical and philofophical ftudies, was, when very young, ad¬ mitted a member of the royal fociety. He was made regifter of Hereford while his father filled that fee, and was early appointed phyfician to his majelly’s houfe- hold, but died at his houfe in Chelfea in 1757* H6 wrote, r. Three letters on the organs of refpiration, 410. 2. The Sufpicious Hulband, a comedy. 3. Obferva- tions on a feries of eleftrical experiments •, and, 4. Ora~ tio anniverfaria, in Theatre Col. Med. Londin. ex Har- vei infituto habita die OBob. 1742. HQAI-ngan-FOU, a city of China, in the province of Hiang-nan. According to Groiier, it is fituated in a marfh, and is enclofed by a triple wall. As the ground on which it Hands is lower than the bed of the canal, the inhabitants live in continual dread of an inundation. The fuburbs extend to the difiance of a league on each fide of the canal, and form at their extremity a kind oi port on the river Hoang-ho. This place is very po¬ pulous, and every thing in it announces an aiffive and brilk trade. One of thofe great mandarins who have the infpeftion of the canals and navigation, and who are alfo objiged to fupply the court with neceffary pro- vifions, refides here. This city has eleven others under its jurifdi£lion ) two of which are of the fecond, and nine of the third clafs. HOAR-hound. See Marrubium, Botany In¬ dex. HOARSENESS, in Medicine, a diminution of the voice, commonly attended with a preternatural afperity and roughnefs thereof. The parts affecled are the afpera arteria and larynx. For its caufes and cure, fee Medicine Index. HOBAL, in Mythology, an idol of the ancient Arabs, the worlhip of which at Mecca was deftroyed by Mahomet. HOBBES, Thomas, a political writer, was born at Malmfbury in 1588. He was the fon of a clergyman j and having completed his ftudies at Oxford, he was af¬ terwards governor to the eldeft fon of William Caven- difti earl of Devonfhire. He travelled through France and Italy with that young nobleman, and at length ap¬ plied himfelf entirely to the ftudy of polite literature. He tranfiated Thucydides into Englifir ; and publifhed his tranflation in 1628, in order to (how his country¬ men, from the Athenian hiftory, the diforders and con- fufions of a democratical government. In 1626 his patron the earl of Devonftiire died*, and in 1628 his Ion died alfo : which lofs affedled Mr Hobbes to fuch a degree, that he very willingly accepted an offer made him of going abroad a fecond time with the fon of Sir Gervafe Clifton j whom he accordingly accompanied into France, and ftaid there fome time. But while he continued there, he was folicited to return to Eng¬ land, and to refume his concern for the hopes of that family to whom he had attached himfelf fo early, and to which he owed fo many and fo great obligations. In 1631, the countefs dowager of Devonfhire defired to put the young earl under his care, who was then 3 Z 2 about ♦ H OB [ 548 1 HOB Hobbes, about the age of 13. This was very (likable to Mr Hobbes’s inclinations, who difcharged that trull with great fidelity and diligence. In 1634, he republilhed his tranflation of Thucydides, and prefixed to it a de¬ dication to that young nobleman, in which he gives a great charadler of his father, and reprefents in the ilrongeft terms the obligations he was under to that illuftrious family. The lame year he accompanied his noble pupil to Paris, where he applied his vacant hours to the lludy of natural philolophy, and more efpecially to the perfe£l underftanding of mechanifm, and the caufes of animal motion. He had frequent converfa- tions upon thefe fubjedls with Father Marin Merfenne j a man defervedly famous, and who kept up a corre- fpondence with almofl all the learned in Europe. From Paris he attended his pupil into Italy, where at Pifa he became known to that great aftronomer Galileo Gali¬ lei, who communicated to him his notions very freely 5 and after having leen all that was remarkable in that country, he returned with the earl of Devonlhire into England. Afterwards, forefeeing the civil wrars, H went to feek a retreat at Paris ; where, by the good olfices of his friend Father Merfenne, he became known to the famous Renatus des Cartes, and afterwards held a correfpondence with him upon feveral mathematical fubjedls, as appears from the letters of Mr Hobbes pub- lilhed in the works of Des Cartes. But when this philofopher printed afterwards his Meditations, where¬ in he attempted to eftablilh points of the higheft confe- quence from innate ideas, Mr Hobbes took the liberty of diffenting from him 5 as did alfo the French king’s mathematical profeffor, the illuftrious Peter Gaffendi, with whom Mr Hobbes contracted a very clofe friend- ihip, which was not interrupted till the death of the former. In 1642, Mr Hobbes printed a few copies of his famous book De Give, which, in proportion as it became known, raifed him many adverfaries, who charged him with intlilling principles which had a dan¬ gerous tendency. Among many illuftrious perfons who, upon fhipwreck of the royal caufe, retired to France for fafety, was Sir Charles Cavendilh, brother to the duke of Newcaftle, and this gentleman, being (killed in every branch of the mathematics, proved a conftant friend and patron to Mr Hobbes 5 wTho, by embarking in 1645 in a controverfy about fquaring the circle, was grown fo famous for it, that in 1647 he was recommended to inllruft Charles prince of Wales, afterwards King Charles II. in mathematical learning. His care in the difcharge of this office gained him the efteem of that prince in a very high degree: and though he afterwards withdrew his public favour to Mr Hobbes on account of his writings, yet he always retained a fenfe of the fervices he had done him j fhowed him various marks of his favour after he was reftored to his dominions ; and, as fome fay, had his piClure hanging in his clofet. This year alfo W’as printed in Holland, by the care of M. Sorbiere, a fecond and more com¬ plete edition of his book De Give ; to which are pre¬ fixed two Latin letters to the editor, the one by Mr Gaffendi, the other by Father Merfenne, in commen¬ dation of it : and in 1650 was publilhed at London a ixnall treatife of Mr Hobbes’s, entitled. Human Nature; and another De corpore politico, or “ Of the elements ©f the law.” All this time Mr Hobbes had been digefting with great care and pains his religious, political, and moral Hobbes. principles, into a complete fyltem, which he called the ' — Leviathan, and rvhich was printed in Englilh at Lon¬ don in 1650 and 1651. After the publication of his Leviathan he returned to England, and paffed the fum- mer commonly at his patron the earl of Devonlhire’s feat in Derbyfhire, and fome of his winters in town, where he had for his intimate friends fome of the greatelt men of the age. In 1660, upon the reftoration, he quitted the country, and came up to London, where he obtained from the king affurance of protedlion, and had an annual penfion of icol. fettled upon him out of the privy purfe. Yet this did not render him en¬ tirely fafe : for, in 1666, his Leviathan and his trea¬ tife De Give were cenfured by parliament •, which alarmed him very much, as did alfo the bringing in of a bill into the houfe of commons to puniih atheifm and profanenefs. When this llorm was a little blown over, he began to think of procuring a beautiful edition of his pieces that were in Latin ; but finding this im- pradticable in England, he caufed it to be undertaken abroad, where they were publifhed in quarto in 1668, from the prefs of John Bleau. In 1669, he was vi- fited by Coimo de Medicis, then prince, afterwards duke of Tufcany, who gave him ample marks of his elleem and refpefl j and having received his picture, and a complete colleflion of his writings, caufed them to be repofited, the former among his curiofities, the latter in his noble library at Florence. The like vifits he received from foreign ambaffadors and other flrangers of diltindlion ; who were curious to fee a perfon wThofe fingular opinions and numerous writings had made fo much noife all over Europe. In 1672, he wrote his own life in Latin verfe, when, as he obferves, he had completed his 84th year : and, in 1674, he publilhed in Englilh verfe four books of Homer’s Odyffey 5 which was (b well received, that it encouraged him to under¬ take the whole Iliad and Odyffey, which he likewfife performed and publilhed in 1675. About this time he took his leave of London, and went to fpend the remainder of his days in Derbylhire : where, howrever, he did not remain inadlive, notwithftanding his ad¬ vanced age j but publilhed from time to time feveral pieces, to be found in the colleclion of his works. He died in 1679, aged 92. As to his charadler and manners, they are thus de- fcribed by Dr White Kennet, in his Memoirs of the Cavendilh family. “ The earl of Devonlhire (fays he) for his whole life entertained Mr Hobbes in his family, as his old tutor rather than as his friend or confident. He let him live under his roof in eafe and plenty, and in his own way, wuthout making ufe of him in any public, or fo much as domeftic affairs. He would frequently put off the mention of his name, and fay, ‘ He was a humorift, and nobody could account for him.’ There is a tradition in the family, of the manners and culloms of Mr Hobbes, fomewhat obfer- vable. His profeffed rule of health was to dedicate the morning to his exercife, and the afternoon to his liudies. And therefore, at his firll rifing, he walked out, and climbed any hill wnthin his reach 5 or if the w’eather was not dry, he fatigued himfelf within doors by fome exercife or other, to be in a fweat; recom¬ mending that praftice upon this opinion, that an old man had more moifture than heat, and therefore by fucb HOB [ 549 ] HOC Hobbes fuca m&tlon heat was to be acquired and moifture ex- Hobby. pelkd. After this, he took a comfortable breakfaft •, ” ^ and then went round the lodgings to wait upon the earl, the countefs, and the children, and any conlider- able ftrangers, paying fome Ihort addreffes to all of them. He kept thefe rounds till about 12 o’clock, when he had a little dinner provided for him, which he ate always by himfelf without ceremony. Soon af¬ ter dinner he retired to his ftudy, and had his candle with i o or i 2 pipes of tobacco laid by him j then (hut¬ ting his door, he fell to fmoking, thinking, and wri¬ ting for feveral hours. He retained a friend or two at court, and efpecially the lord Arlington, to protedl him if occafion fliould require. He ufed to fay, that it was lawful to make ufe of ill inftruments to do our- felves good : ‘ If I were call (fays he) into a deep pit, and the devil (hould put down his cloven foot, I would take hold of it to be drawn out by it.’ After the re¬ iteration, he watched all opportunities to ingratiate himfelf with the king and his prime minifters; and look¬ ed upon his penlion to be more valuable, as an earneft of favour and proteftion, than upon any other account. His future courfe of life was to be free from dan- er. He could not endure to be left in an empty oufe. Whenever the earl removed, he would go along with him, even to his laft ftage, from Chatfworth to Hardwick. When he was in a very weak condition, he dared not to be left behind, but made his way upon a feather-bed in a coach, though he furvived the jour¬ ney but a few days. He could not bear any difeourfe of death, and feemed to call off all thoughts of it. He delighted to reckon upon longer life. The winter be¬ fore he died, he made a warm coat, which he faid mull: laft him three years, and then he would have fuch ano¬ ther. In his laft ficknefs his frequent queftions were, Whether his difeafe was curable ? and when intimations were given, that he might have eafe, but no remedy, he ufed this expreflion, ‘ I fliall be glad to find a hole to creep out of the world at which are reported to have been his laft fenfible words ; and his lying fome days following in a filent ftupefaftion, did feem owing to his mind more than to his body.’ The reverend Mr Granger obferves, that Hobbes’s ftyle is incomparably better than that of any other wri¬ ter in the reign of Charles I. and was for its uncom¬ mon ftrength and purity fcarcely equalled in the fuc- ceeding reign. “ He has in tranilation (fays he) done Thucydides as much juftice as he has done injury to Homer j but he looked upon himfelf as born for much greater things than treading in the fteps of his predecelfors. He was for ftriking out new paths in fcience, government, and religion ; and for removing the land-marks of former ages. His ethics have a ftrong tendency to corrupt our morals, and his politics to deftroy that liberty which is the birthright of every human creature. He is commonly reprefented as a fceptic in religion, and a dogmatift in philofophy j but he was a dogmatift in both. The main principles of his Leviathan are as little founded in moral or evan¬ gelical truths, as the rules he has laid down for fqua- ring the circle are in mathematical demonftration. His book on human nature is efteemed the beft of his works.” HOBBY, the name ot a hawk called by fome au- tkimsfubbuteo. See Falco, Ornithology Index. It is a hawk of the lure, and not of the fill; and is HabSsy very like the faker, only much lefs. It makes excel- lent fport with net and fpaniels ; for when the birds . fee the hobby, they dare not commit themfelves to the wing, but lie clofe to the ground, and fo are ta¬ ken in nets. Hobby is alfo a name formerly given to ftrong ac¬ tive horfes of a middling fize : they are reported to have been originally natives of Ireland,' and were much liked and ufed. Nags anfwer the fame defeription as to fize, qualities, and employments. HOBGOBLIN, is a name vulgarly applied to fai¬ ries or apparitions. Skinner calls the word robgoblinsy and derives it from Robin Goodfellow, Hob being the nick-name of Robin: but Wallis and Junius, with greater probability, derive it from hopgob/ins, empufce% becaufe they are luppofed to hop without moving both their feet. HOBLERS, or Hobilers, Hobelaru, in our an¬ cient cuftoms, were men who, by their tenure, w?ere obliged to maintain a light horfe or hobby, for the cer¬ tifying any invafion towards the fea-fide.—The name was alfo ufed for certain Irilh knights, who ufed to ferve as light horfemen upon hobbies. HOB-NAIL, a nail with a thick ftrong head, ufed in (hoeing a hobby or little horfe. HOB-NOB, or Hab-NAB, a cant word formed from hap ne hap, and denoting an event which happens at random or by mere chance. HOBOO, a name given by the people of Otaheite, and in the neighbouring illands of the South Sea, to their fuperfine cloth. It is the thinneft and moft fi- nilhed preparation of the aouta. HOBSHEE coffrees, a kind of Abyftinian Haves very frequent in the empire of Hindoftan. They come moftly from a province fubjedft to the Negus of Ethiopia, called Innariah, to the fouth of his other dominions, and bordering upon Negroland in Africa j from whence they are feleded, and a great traffic made of them over all Mogoliftan and Perfia ; but it is chiefly from the ports of Arabia and the Red fea that they are brought. Nothing can be imagined more fmooth and gloffy, and perfeblly black, than their Ikinj in w hich they far furpafs the negroes on the coaft of Guinea ; and, generally fpeaking, have not any thing of their thick lips, though otherwife as woolly haired as they. They are highly valued for their courage, fidelity, and Ihrewdnefs; in which they fo far excel, as often to rife to polls of great honour, and are made governors of places under the title Siddees. PIOBSON’s-choice, a vulgar proverbial expreffion, applied to that kind of choice in which there is no al¬ ternative. It is faid to be derived from the name of a carrier at Cambridge, who let out hackney horfes, and obliged each cuftomer to take in his turn that horfe which flood next the liable door. HOCHE, Lazarus, a republican French general. This extraordinary man, and particular favourite of fortune, was born on the 24th of June 1768, at the village of Montreuil, in the fuburbs of Verfailles. His father, in the early part of his life, had been a foldier but adled afterwards in the. capacity of a menial fer- vant, and was appointed to feed the hounds*of Louis- XV. His mother died loon after the birth of young Hoche, by which he was left in a great meafure defti- tUtCj., HOC r 5 tute, his aged father (then about 72) being unable to ~J contribute to his fupport. By the humanity of an aunt, however, who kept a green ftall at Verfailles, he was refcued from abfolute beggary. She fent him to a fmall fchool, where he acquired a tolerable know¬ ledge of reading and writing, ihewing hhufelf at once the bed and mod mifchievous fcholar in the whole fchool. He was made a chorider by the redlor of St Germain-en-Laye, becaufe he found him to be a boy of a very lively difpofition. He very foon difcovered an infatiable third for information upon every fubjeft, aiking quedions at thofe who were much older than himfelf, and lidening with the utmod attention to the anfwers they returned. The ingenuity of his remarks and enquiries was often perplexing to others j but as he gradually approached towards manhood, a very re¬ markable change took place, both in his manners and difpoiition. His loquacity was lucceeded by a muling, contemplative turn, and he proved by the importance of his converfation, that he had not meditated in vain. Finding that his wants grew7 more numerous than could be fupplied by the indudry of his aunt, he form¬ ed the commendable refolution of earning his owm fub- fidence, and accordingly became a fort of adidant in the royal dables of Verfailles. His ardent charafter, howTever, foon found this fituation by far too degrading ; he already viewed it with abhorrence j and having ac¬ cidentally met with fome part of the wrorks of Roulfeau, a fpirit of independence indantly feized upon him. Ap¬ prehending that he might better his duration by going abroad, to which he was drongly urged by a rafeal w'ho made a prey of him, even offered him money to enable him to profecute the undertaking, and then gave him to underdand that he was now a foldier in the French guards. Hoche, finding it wholly unavailing to remon- drate, was fent at the age of 16 to join his regiment, which wras then quartered at Paris. Here he found himfelf poffeffed of no more than 12^ livres (about 5I. fferling), the united refult of his own economy, and the bounty he received on entering the army. Even out of this fmall fum he was obliged to treat his fellow foldiers with a breakfad, which exhauded his whole dock. A military lite, however, foon appeared to be exaftly fuited to his diipodtion, fo that he furpaffed all the other recruits in the rapidity with which he learned the manual exercife 5 and in a fingle month w7as fit for the veteran ranks. His limbs were admirably proportioned, his drefswas filw’ays neat, and his condudl fo regular, that he was made a grenadier at the requed of the company. He now felt the circumfcribed nature of his education, of which he was afhamed, and he determined to atchieve that by his own exertions which the penury of his rela¬ tions prevented them from accomplilhing. He faw the necedity of a command of books, and as his pay was in¬ adequate to the purchafe of thefe, he determined to make up the deficiency by manual labour, with no fpecies of which was he ever difguded, while it put the means of intelledlual improvement within his reach. He rofe at the dawn of day, either to draw w ater, or trench ground for the gardeners in the vicinity of Paris 5 and at night he embroidered veds and caps. The fruits of his indudry w ere, at the end of the week, divided into three parts; the fird was given to 2 o ] H O C the fubditute who mounted guard for him ; the fecond was devoted to the incidental expences of a convivial hour with his companions; and the third defrayed the expences of the books which he borrmved. He now turned his wdiole attention to the attainment of a better knowledge of his own profedion, and even ventured to point out the radical defeats of the prevailing fydem of military tatties, and reprobated lome of the regulations which obtained in the army. In fpite, however, of the general gravity of his deportment, he was no enemy to occafional conviviality. Having once underdood that a companion had been murdered during a quarrel in the vicinity of the metropolis, he determined not to deep till he had taken vengeance on the affaffm. Marching forth at the head of a body of his companions, to the houfe wdiere the deed w7as perpetrated, he demolidied all the windows, and dedroyed the furniture 5 but for this he was fentenced to three months confinement in the black hole. At the expiration of this period he ex¬ hibited a fpedlacle truly deferving of commiferatidh, be¬ ing deditute of linen, clothes and dioes, his face pale and disfigured, and in this condition he arrived at the barracks, where he was received by his companions with every demondration of joy. He foon after fought a duel with a tyrannical corporal, of whom the whole regiment was afraid except the gallant Hoche. The latter fell, and Hoche received a deep cut in his fore¬ head, which added greatly to his martial appearance. Soon after this period appeared the celebrated pam¬ phlet of Sieves refpedting the Third EJlate, and almod every Frenchman wms ready to prove that he belonged to it. The guards, it is well known, took a decided part with the people ; and on the 14th of July 1789, Hoche, at the head of his companions, was among the fird who feized on the Baltile. The guards were formed into the iC2d, 103d, and 104th regiments, in¬ to the lad of which Hoche was admitted with the rank of fecond adjutant, when he had an opportunity of ma- nifeding his talents in a different channel. Improper hands having obtained the adminidration of the military hofpitai of the French guards, he minutely invedigated the date of the accounts, which had been veiled with ambiguity for the purpofe of deceiving. He amended the difeipline of the army, and his aflive talents did not pals unrewarded. While the regiment was reviewed in the Elyfian fields, Servan, the minider at w7ar, was fo delighted with the platoons of Hoche’s company, that he enquired who the young man was by whom it was conduced, and he bellowed on him fome flattering com¬ pliments, and in four days after fent him the brevet cl lieutenant in the regiment of Rouergue. He left Paris on the 24th of June 1792, in order to join his regi¬ ment, then in garrifon at Thionville. General Leve- neur, who held the command in the ablence of Va¬ lence, fent Lieutenant Hoche with a regiment of huffars, to procure provifions for the troops which Miranda had ordered to lay liege to Maeflricht. This he executed with univerfal applaufe ; and wdierr the army of .the Ardennes was ordered to recrofs the Meufe, Hoche fucceeded in removing the powder from the abbey of Merchen, in bringing away the military ched of the di- vifion, and conducing the fick in the hofpitai, when every thing appeared to be in the power of the enemy’s huffars. Having fought in the capacity of aide-de-camp to General Leveneur, at Gutenhowen, Neerwinden, Boehe. HOG [ 551 J HOC Hoche. the heights of Vertrich, and at Elan gen, the repub- ——v 1' He an army repafl'ed the E)yle, breaking down the bridges j and Iloche enabled it to efTeft a retreat, by difputing every inch of ground along with the rear¬ guard. When Dumourier threw off the diiguife at the camp of Maulde, arrefting the deputies from the convention, General Leveneur entrufled to young Hoche the deli¬ cate charge of carrying the new’s to Paris. His con¬ duit on this occafion was fo highly approved oi by the adminiftvation, that he wTas railed to the rank of ad¬ jutant-general, and chief of battalion j but he de¬ clined a higher rank than captain and aid-de-camp to his patron. When the Britilh troops and the Auftrians befieged Dunkirk, Houchard, who wras ordered to cover the place, threw in fupplies under the command of Souham and Adjutant-general Hoche, the latter of whom in- fpired all around him with enthuliafm ; keeping up the fpirits of the troops and haraffing the enemy by frequent fallies, while the right wung and centre of the befieging army were attacked by Jourdan. Hoche conftrufted feveral advanced works before the place, and for lix Wreeks together was never in a bed. I he reprefenta- tives wuth the army, as a reward for his ailivity, ap¬ pointed him chief of brigade. Having obtained this rank, he wTas fent into Auftrian Flanders, where invariable fuccefs attended all his movements. And when only 24 years of age, he wms appointed commander in chief of the army of the Mo- zelle, which had remained for a long time inactive, and even experienced fome difgrace under Houchard. Few feenes of aftion could be more inaufpicious than that upon which Hoche was now about to enter. I he Auf¬ trians and Pruffians were about 100,000 ftrong, under the command of the firft officers in Europe, which prefented a formidable front from the Upper Palatinate to the Hundfruck : and almoft every pofition might be deemed impregnable. The troops of General Hoche were nearly undifeiplined, and the nature of their litua- tion rendered them difpirited 5 but their leader firlt en¬ deavoured to gain their confidence, wffiich he'conceived made a general invincible *, he reifored military difei- pline •, invefligated the cbara£!ers and talents of his offi¬ cers •, and puniffied or rewarded as neceffity required. To infpire the inhabitants on the frontiers with cou¬ rage was his next obje£f, for which purpofe he viiited the different towms in his vicinity, frequented popular focieties, and addreffed them in perfon j fo that he not only fecured a high degree of confidence, but even pro¬ cured volunteers, clothes, and provifions. Having re¬ ceived inftru£fions from the committee of public fafety to raife the fiege of Bitche and Landau 5 he drew a number of troops from the different garrifons, and on the event of an attack on the quarter he had weakened, he gave orders to General Moreau to ihut himfelf up in Thionville, which place he was charged to defend until death. He formed fuch a general plan of opera¬ tions as gave the ftrongeft evidence of his great milita¬ ry talents ^ for if the fubordinate parts of it mifearned (which was actually the cafe) the grand object, the effefting a junction with Pichegru, who commanded the army on the Rhine, was ftili within his reach. By a fudden and formidable manoeuvre, he fo affoniffied the enemy, that they immediately quitted the Sarre, and after experiencing a defeat, retired towards the heights Hoche. of Blifecaftel, with the lofs of 700 men killed upon the field. The duke of Brunfwick retreated towards Kay- ferlautern, at which place the whole of the Pruffian columns formed a junftion. General Hoche was well aware that his great objeft would be attained, if he could vanquilh the enemy at this place, and therefore he began to fcale the mountains, and when he reached the plain on the top, he found them deeply intrench¬ ed. In defiance of this advantageous pofition, he de¬ termined to give them battle, and as foon as. the fignal gun was fired, he advanced from the ranks, and toffing his hat in the air, he exclaimed, “ Long live the repub¬ lic !” The attack on his part was bold, and the de¬ fence of the enemy was obftinate 5 about 40,000 were engaged on each fide, but the able manner in which the duke of Brunfwick had fortified his pofition, gave him evidently the advantage. After fighting for two days, Hoche obtained little or no advantage. The am¬ munition of the Prufiians being exhaufted, he next day determined to carry their entrenchments at the point of the bayonet; but being informed that they had obtain¬ ed a fupply during the night, he found it neceffary to retreat. But he loon after relieved Landau, and eftedf- #d a junction with General Pichegru, being appointed commander in chief of both armies. The viftorious Hoche afterwards made himfelf mafter of Germerfheim •, Worms and Spires opened their gates to receive him, and Fort Vauban was retaken. It was. his determination to crofs the Rhine at Stralburgh, or Offendorf, and venture into the heart of Germany with 25,000 men ; to which movement Pichegru was un¬ friendly, and had the addrefs to prevail with the repre- fentatives then prefent to refufe their fandfion. Robe- fpierre now regarded him with a jealous eye ; all his plans w'ere treated with unmerited indignity, and hisar- reft was refolved on. This, however, would have been a defperate attempt at the head of his vidlorious troops, and therefore he was offered the chief command of the army of Italy ; but no fooner had he arrived at Nice than he was fent a prifoner to Paris, where he remain¬ ed confined for many months, almoff entirely forgotten. Another temporary revolution procured his liberty, and Carnot confented to his being again employed, although he was far from being his warm friend. Fie was appointed to the command of the army dellined to protect the coaffs of Cherbourg, a fituation which by no means agreed with his difpofition ; for he was often heard to exclaim “ how much happier are they who fight againft the Pruffians !” His fituation was indeed difagreeable, for it> was Frenchmen fighting againft Frenchmen, and he fucceeded a number of ge¬ nerals who had been nearly all of them degraded. His keen difeernment, enabled him to obferve that igno¬ rance and fuperftition were at the bottom of the con- teft, which made him adopt a plan of procedure very different from thofe of his predeceffors 5 and he made this lingular affertion to the committee of public fafety, that a “ few proclamations would be produdlive of in¬ finitely more effedl than fixteen pounders.” He check¬ ed the depredations of his own foldiers, reftored the confidence of the peafantry, and fo highly fatisfied the government, that the command of the diftridl of Breft was committed to him. So profligate and abandoned had been the condmft of his predeceffors, that he could not HOC Koche. not procure a lodging at Rennes, which he had come to proteft from the infurgents, although he offered an extravagant price for it. Soon, however, was he enabled to difarm their prejudices 5 for inftead of hunting down the priefts, he allowed the celebration of the mafs, or¬ dered the clergy to be protedted, and took many of the confeffors into pay. Thefe were not like the plans of fo young a man j they would have done honour to one who had ftudied human nature much longer than he had been in exiitence. We have faid that he protected both the priefts and the people, but he difcovered no difpofition to negociate with the chiefs. But the government having politively ordered him to do fo, he began a treaty w'ith Cormar- tin and fome others, from which he was decidedly of opinion that the chief leaders might be gained over by money, and commiflions in the republican army. He was accuftomed to fay, “ with two hundred thoufand livres and ten pair of epaulets, I could gain over a ma¬ jority of thefe men 5 as for the reft, a cane will fuffice.” The chiefs impofed upon the reprefentatives with the army, but the general was not fo ealily deceived. Cler¬ mont having been permitted to travel through the can¬ tons in which he had fome influence, oftenftbly to put a period to hoftilities, was arrefted by orders of General Hoche, being taken in the a£l of iffuing falfe affignats. Cormartin, another rebel chief, gave the money to the royalifts which he had received from the republic, and re¬ cruited an army of Chouans in the name of Louis XVIII. Government now perceived the neceflity of giving Ge¬ neral Hoche a difcretionary power, w'hoin confequence thereof arrefted Cormartin ; and being apprehenlive that it was the defign of Decils to take polfeflion of the arfenal of Cifay, he marched againft that leader, putting him and 300 of his affociates to the bayonet. When the ill-fated expedition againft Quiberon was undertaken, and an Englifti flotilla with ten thoufand emigrants made a defcent, and took poffeffion, without oppofttion, of Penthievre, and the peninfula it com¬ mands, Hoche having received ftrong reinforce¬ ments, commenced offenfive operations, and determined to carry Fort Penthievre by affault. This was oppofed by the engineers as by far too defperate an under¬ taking, who recommended a regular liege j |but the general was not to be diverted from the fteady execu¬ tion of his purpofe. Having divided his army into three columns, he marched during the night, though affailed by a dreadful tempeft. The fort was difcover¬ ed about the dawm of day, which poured upon them fuch a tremendous fire of grape (hot, that two of the divifions began to retire; but a general cry of viflory foon made them return. Three hundred emigrants were put to death. His next great military project was an expedition againft Guernfey and Jerfey, which wre are told, was rejefted by the influence of Boiffy d’Anglas, who wras at that time a member of the committee of public fafety. But having obtained the chief command of the army of the Weft, the wdiole charge of the wrar in La Vendee was committed to his management, to w-hich he was refolved to put a glorious termination, prefenting the deluded people with the olive branch in one hand, and the fword in the other. Having granted a pardon to all who had been deceived, he propofed to HOC unite the armies of Cherburg, Breft, and the Weft, un- Hoche. der the appellation of the army of the Coafts of the' v— Ocean, which, by the influence of Barras, wus inftantly adopted. Having marched againft Charette with a body of troops, that chief w^as feized and ordered to be executed. In palling through Sarthe, Maine, Loire, and Morbihan, with his movirg columns, he gave no quar¬ ter to the chiefs j but when he beheld the ignorant pea- fantry in arms and at his mercy, he ufed to exclaim, Thefe unfortunate people are Frenchmen! He de¬ clared the principal towns to be no longer in a ftate of fiege, abolilhed martial law', diffolved military tri¬ bunals ; and, after fucceeding in the accomplilhment of his wifhes ra the fpace of eight weeks, he was honoured with the title of Pacificator of La Ven¬ dee. The next objefl which attra&ed his whole attention was the conqueti of England, a country vath which he appears to have been little acquainted. His plan, howr- ever, was much approved of by the minifter of marine (Truguet); but every thing w^as wanting for the accom- ' pliihment of an undertaking fo very extraordinary; and the attempt was rellrifted to Ireland alone. For this purpofe he fet out for Breft, and procured the re¬ moval of Admiral Villaret-Joyeufe, becaufe he w'as ini¬ mical to his favourite projeft. General Hoche fuper- intended the dock yards, battened the public works, and prepared every thing connedled with a great na¬ val equipment. It was the declaration of Rear-admiral Bruix, who fell at Abcukir, that Hoche would become the beft minifter of marine that France ever beheld, if he had only a Angle year’s experience. When every thing was in readinefs for the propofed defcent upon Ireland, General Hoche embarked on board the frigate La Fraternite, this being the firft time he was ever at fea. In a gale of wind he was feparated from his ar¬ my, which confifted of 15,000 men 5 part of the fleet appeared off the coaft of Ireland, and fome Ihips enter¬ ed Bantry bay, but without their general they could undertake nothing j and therefore after holding a coun¬ cil of war, they determined to return. General Hoche arrived fome time after, but learning that the fleet had given up the enterprife, he fleered back to the French coaft, weeping, it is faid, when he got the laft fight of Ireland. It was believed by fome, that General Hoche would be difgraced on account of the total failure of this ex¬ pedition ; but inftead of any fuch attempt, he was cho- fen to the command of the army of the Sambre and Meufe, which at different periods had been commanded by Jourdan, Kleber, and Bernadette. The troops had continued for fome time inadlive, and fo {hocking were the exceffes they had been accuftomed to commit, that the officer whom he fucceeded called them a horde of robbers. Thefe unfavourable circumftances, however did not terrify young Hoche, who commenced his la¬ bours with the reformation ot the officers $ he then bet¬ tered the fituation of the men j attended to the very minutiae of the fervice, and he caft an eagle’s eye on the conduft of the commiffaries. Being alfo entrufted with the adminiftration of the conquered countries, he appointed a board of five members, to redrefs all griev¬ ances which might be brought before it. Having fignified to the enemy that the armiftice was at an end, he difpatched a courier to the dire&ory to inform [ 552 1 K ° D [5 Hoche inform them, “ that he was now ready with a body of II 86,000 men, to proceed towards the Danube, and force I Tod egos, enerny to malie peace on fuch terms as might be advantageous to the republic.” He according began his march, eroded the Rhine without any difficulty, and occupied the heights of Neuwied. He then pur- fued the enemy to Dierdorff, which they were forced to abandon, wffiile he encamped at Montabaur and Al- tenkirchen. I he Auftrians at this time loft 1000 men killed, and 8000 prifoners, with a vaft quantity of kaggage and ammunition. This vidlorious career was Hopped by the news of an armiftice concluded between Bonaparte in Italy and the emperor. He once more turned his attention to the invafion of Ireland, to prepare for which he vifited Paris, and af¬ terwards went to Holland; but while he was march¬ ing a body of troops to Breft, the defeat of the Dutch fleet under Admiral De Winter completely fruftra- ted his deligns. But as the directory was at a lofs for a general of charafter in the metropolis, Hoche was made choice of, afterwards appointed minifter at war, and favoured with the unlimited confidence of Barras. But as it was fufpedled that Hoche was too young to hold that important office, the council of five hundred fent a meffage to the executive power to receive infor¬ mation upon this point, during which General Hoche refigned, and fet off for Charleville, where he had fta- tioned a body of troops for the purpofe, it was believed, of marching to Paris. I hefe orders being counter¬ manded, he fet off for his head quarters. Although the royalift party was gaining ground in the legillature, and the general’s health rapidly on the decline' he de¬ termined to celebrate the memorable 10th of Auguft with great pomp and magnificence. He difpached two confidential officers, Cherin and Angereau, to aiiift in the. revolution which took place in a few days after their arrival in Paris, wdiile he himfelf was labouring under a mortal diftemper. He refufed to comply with the. advice of his phyficians; and when a meffenger arrived with intelligence refpefting the events of the J 8th Fruffidor, he rofe from his bed with this excla¬ mation, “ the republic triumphs !” Soon after this he was appointed to command the army on the Rhine, on which he repaired immediately to Strafburgh. At this place his malady increafed, and perceiving that his end was fall approaching, he pre¬ pared to meet it with undaunted fortitude. He died on the 26th of September 1797. HOCUS POCUS, a cant expreffion with which the. exhibitors of legerdemain tricks generally prefaced their feats. 1 hey are thought to be derived from that arch legerdemain trick of the Romiffi priefts convert¬ ing the facramental bread into Deity ; in which won¬ derful metamorphofis the words hoc ejl corpus made a confpicuous part of the ceremony, and which words may oe confidered as the probable root of our modern hocus-pocus. HOD, a fort of tray for carrying mortar, in ufe among bricklayers. . HOHEGQS, a term purely Greek, fignify- ing guide. The word is chiefly ufed as the title of a book compofed by Anaffafius the Sinate, towards the cloie of the fifth century; being a method of diiputing again ft the heretics, particularly the Acephali. IVTr 1 olan.i has alfo publifhed a differtation under the Vol. X. Part II. 53 1 HOF fame title. Its fubje£l is the pillar of fire, &c. which went before the Ifraelites as a guide in the defert. HODGE-PODGE. See Hotch-fot. HODMAN, a cant term formerly ufed for a young fcholar admitted from Weftminfter-fchool to be ftudent in Chrift church in Oxford. HODY, Humphry, a learned Englhh divine, was born in 1659. At 21 years of age, he publilhed his ce¬ lebrated Differtation againft Arifteus’s hiftory of the 73 interpreters; which was received with great applaufe by all the learned, Ifaac Voffius excepted, who could not bear to have his opinions oppofed by fuch a youth. Twenty years after, he treated the fubjedl more fully in a work entitled, De Bibliorum textihus originalibus, ver- Jionibus Greeds, et Latina vulgala, libri IV. In 1689, he wrote the Prolegomena to John Melala’s Chronicle, printed at Oxford; and the year after wras made chap¬ lain to Dr Stillingfleet biftrop of Worcefter. The deprivation of the nonjuring biffiops engaged him in a controverfy with Mr Dodwell; which recommended him to Archbilhop Tillotfon, to whom, and his fuc- ceffor Dr Tennifon, he was domeftic chaplain. In 1698 he was made regius profeffor of the Greek tongue at Oxford, and archdeacon of Oxford in 1704. On occafion of the controverfy about the convocation, he, in 1701, publifhed A Hiftory of Engliffi councils and convocations, and of the clergy’s fitting in parlia¬ ment, &c. He died in 1706, leaving in MS. An Ac¬ count of thofe learned Grecians who retired to Italy on the taking of Conftantinople, &c. which was publifhed in 1742 by Dr Jebb. HOE, or How, a hufbandman’s tool, made like a cooper’s adz, to cut up weeds in gardens, fields, &.c. This inftrument is of great ufe, and ought to be much more employed than it is in hacking and clearing the feveral corners and patches of land in fpare times of the year, which would be no final] advantage to it. Horfe-HoE, a large kind of hoe drawn by horfes, and ufed to ftir the intervals in the new hufbandry, and clear the corn from w7eeds. See Agriculture. HOEING, in the new hufbandry, is the break¬ ing or dividing the foil by tillage while the corn or other plants arc growing thereon.— It differs from common tillage (which is always performed before the corn or plants are fown or planted) in the time of performing it; and it is much more beneficial to the crop, than any other tillage. This fort of til¬ lage is. performed various ways, and by means of dif¬ ferent inftruments, as deferibed under the article Agri¬ culture. HOEI-tcheou, the moft fouthern city of the pro¬ vince of Kiang-nan in China, and one of the richeft of the empire. The people are economical and temperate, but they are active and enterprifing in trade; they boait of their tea, varnifh, and engravings, which are indeed the moft efteemed in China. It'has dependent upon it fix cities , of the third clafs; the mountains which fur round this canton contain gold, filver, and copper mines. HOEMATOPUS, a genus of birds of the order of grallm. See Ornithology Index. HOFFMAN, the name of feveral eminent phyfi- cians ; of whom Maurice Hoffman, and John Maurice Hoffnaan his fon, pratftifed at Altorf. Maurice died in 1698, leaving behind him many works; and was 4 A fucceeded Hodge* podge II Hoftman. H OG r 554 Hoffn atiifts faccecded by bis fan Jehu Maurice, who wrote as well pea !1 as his father, and died in 1727, highly efteemed by r . n the faculty.—Fiederic Hoftman, probably of the fame family, was born at Magdeburg in 1660. 1 be prin¬ cipal known circumftances of bis life are, his journey into Holland and England, where he became inti- Ynately acquainted with Paul Herman and Robert Eoyle, never taking any Tees, being fupported by his annual Itipend ; his curing the emperor Charles VI. And Frederic I. king of Pruffia of inveterate difeafes j to which may be added, his accurate knowledge of the nature and virtues of mineral waters. He furvived his 80th year, and his works, which are in great efteem, were printed in fix volumes folio at Geneva, in J74°- HOFFMAN I SI’S, in ecclefiaftical hillory, denote thofe who eipouled the fentiments of Daniel Hoffman, profeffbr of the univerfity of Helmlladt, who, from the year 1598, maintained, that philofophy was a mortal enemy to religion, and that what was true in philoio- phy was falie in theology. Thefe abiurd and perni¬ cious tenets occafroned a warm and extenfrve contro- verfy: at length Hoffman was compelled by Julius duke of Brunfwick to retraft his inveflives againfl philofo¬ phy, and to acknowledge, in the mofl open manner, the harmony and uni an of found philofophy with true find genuine theology. HOG. See Sus, Mammalia Index. Hog, on board of a fhip, is a fort of flat fcrubbmg broom, formed by inclofmg a number, of fhort twigs of birch or f'uch wood between two pieces of plank faftened together, and cutting off the ends of the twigs •, and’ ferving to ferape the filth from a fhip’s bottom Under water, particularly in the acf of boot- topping. For this purpofe they fit to this broom a long ftaff with two ropes *, one of which is ufed ,to thru ft the hog under the fhip’s bottom, and the other to guide and pull it up again clofe to the planks. I his bufinefs is commonly performed in the fhip’s boat, Which is confined as clofe as pofhble to the veffel’s fide during the operation, and fhifted from one part of the fide to another till the whole is completed. Hog's Dung is by Mortirper reckoned one of the lichetf man pres vve are acquainted with, and the next in value to fheep’s dung ; and is found to be equal in virtue to twice the quantity of tiny other dung except this. The ancients feem to have been difpleafed with It on account of its breeding weeds; but this is only 'accilfing it of being too rich, for a»t dung will do this when laid too thick. It is an excellent manure for pafture-grounds, and excels ?11 other kinds of dung for trees. The farmers who ufe this dung for their lands, generally take care to fave it, by well-paving •the it yes 5 and’ increafe the quantity by throwing. in /bean-ftalks, (kibble, and many other things, of a like nature : and, by good management of this kind, many farmers have procured 50 or 60 loads of excellent .manure a-year out of a fmall ftye. . The very belt way of ufing this dung is by mixing it with horfe-dung j and for this reafon it is belt to have the ftye near the liable, that the two cleanfings may be mixed in one heap, and ufed together. They have in many parts of Stafford (hire a poor, light, (hallow land, on which they fow a kind of white ] HOG the land is neither able to bear this nor any Hogarth, tiling elfe to advantage for their reaping : but when the peas are ripe, they turn in as many hogs as the quantity of peafe will fatten, fuffering them to live at large, and to remain there day and night : in confe- quence of this, the land will produce good crops of bay for feveral years afterwards •, or, if too poor for that, it will at vvorft raife grais enough to make it good pafture-ground. Hog's Lard. See Axungia, Materia Medic a Index. HOGARTH, William, a truly great and origi¬ nal genius, is faid by Dr Burn to have been the de- feendant of a family originally from Kirkby 1 hore, in Weftmoreland. His father, who had been a fchoolmafter in the fame county, went early to London, where he was employed as a corrector of the prefs ; and appears to have been a man of feme learning, a dictionary in La¬ tin and Engliih, which he compofed for the ufe of fchools, being (till exifting in MS. He married in London, and kept a fchool in Ship-Court, in the Old Bailey. Our hero was born in 1697 or 1698, in the parilh of St Martin, Ludgate. The outfet ot his iite, however, was unpromifing. “ He was bound,” fays Mr Walpole, “ to a mean engraver of arms on plate.” Hogarth probably chofe this occupation, as it requi¬ red fome (kill in drawing : to which his genius was par¬ ticularly turned, and which he contrived aftiduoufly to cultivate. His mafter, it ftnee appears, was Mr Ellis Gamble, a filverfmith of eminence, who refided in Cran- burn-ftreet, Leicefter-fields. In this profefiion it is not unufual to bind apprentices to the Angle branch of engraving arms and cyphers on every fpecies ot metal 'y and in that particular department of the bufinefs young Hogarth was placed 5 “ but, before his time was ex- “ pired, he felt the impulfe of genius, and that it di- “ reifted him to painting.” During his apprentice- fhip, he fet out one Sunday, with two or three com¬ panions, on an excurfion to Highgate. I he weather being hot, they went into a public houfe, where they had not been long before a quarrel arofe between fome perfons in the fame room. One of the difputants ftiuck. the other on the head with a quart pot, and cut him very much* The blood running down tne man s face, together with the agony of the wound, which had dif- torted his features into a mod hideous grin, prefented Hogarth, who (bowed himfelf thus early “ appriled of the mode Nature had intended he ftiould purfue, with too laughable a fubject to be overlooked. He drew out his pencil, and produced on the fpot one of the mort ludicrous figures that ever was feen. W hat rendered this piece the more valuable was, that it ex¬ hibited an exa£t likenefs of the man, with tne portrait of his antagonift, and the figures in cancature of the principal perfons gathered round him.. How long he continued in obfeurity vve cannot ex¬ actly learn ; but the firft piece in which he diftinguifh- ed himfelf as a painter is fuppofed to have been a r*- prefentation of Wanftead Affernbly. . The figures in it, we are told, were drawn from the life, and without any circumftances of burlefque. Fhe faces were faid to be extremely like, and the colouring rather better than in fome of his late and more highly finiftied per¬ formances. From the date of the earlieil plate that, can Hogarth. HOG l 5 can be afcertained to be tbe work of Hogarth, it may be prefumed that he began bufinefs on his own account at leait as early as 1720. His firft employment feems to have been the engra¬ ving of arms and fhop bills, i he next was to dehgn and furniih plates for bookfellers. Mr Bowles, at the Black Horfe in Cornhill, was one of his earlieft. pa¬ trons, whofe prices were very low. His next friend in that line was Mr Philip Overton, who paid him fomewhat better for his labour and ingenuity. There are ftill many family piifures by Hogarth exitting, in the ftyle of ferious converfation-pieces. What the prices of his portraits were, Mr Nichols drove in vain to difcover; but he fufpedls they were_ originally very low, as the people who are beft acquainted with them choofe to be filent on that fubjeft. It happened, in the early part of Hogarth’s liie, that a nobleman who was uncommonly ugly and deformed came to fit to him for his picture. It was executed with a fkill that did honour to the artift’s abilities ; but the likenefs rvas rigidly obferved, without even the neceifary attention to compliment or flattery. I he peer, difgufied at this counterpart his dear felf, ne¬ ver once thought of paying for a reflector that would onlv infult him with his deformities. Some time was fuffered to elapfe before the artid applied for his mo¬ ney 5 but afterwards many applications w'ere made by him (who had then no need of a banker) for payment without fuccefs. The painter, however, at lail hit upon an expedient, which he knew muff alarm the nobleman’s pride, and by that means anfwer his pur- pofe. It was couched in the following card : “ Mr Hogarth’s dutiful refpects to Lord finding that he does not mean to have the pi£hire which wTas drawn for him, is informed again of Mr H’s neceflity for the money J b, therefore, his lordfliip does not fend for it in three days, it will be difpofed of, with tbe addi¬ tion of a tail, and fome other little appendages, to Mr Hare, tbe famous wild-beafl: man ; Mr H. having given that gentleman a conditional promife of it for an exhibition-pifture on his lordfhip’s refufal.” J bis inti¬ mation bad the defired effecL The picture was fent home, and committed to the flames. Mr Walpole has remarked, that if our artift “ in¬ dulged his fpirit of ridicule in pei Tonalities, it never proceeded beyond fketebes and drawings and won¬ ders “ that lie never, without intention, delivered tbe very features of any identical perfon.” Mr Nicholas af- fures us, from unqueib’onable authority, that almofi all the perfonages who attend the levee of the Rake were ui doubted portraits; and that in “ Southwark Fair,” and the “ Modern Midnight Converfation,” as many more were difcoverable. While Hogarth was painting the “ Rake’s Progrefs,” he had a fummer refidence at Ifleworth ; and never failed to queftion the company who came to fee thefe pictures, if they knew for whom one or another figure was defigned. When they guefTed wrong, he let them right. The duke of Leeds has an original feene m the “ Beggar’s Opera,” painted by Hogarth. It is that in which Lucy and Polly are on their knees, before their rtfpecHve fathers, to intercede for the life of the hero of the piece. All the figures are either known or fuppofed to be portraits. If we are not mifinforrr.ed, the late Sir Thomas Robinfon (perhaps better known 5S ] H O G by tbe name of Long Sir Thomas) is landing in one Hogs of the fide-boxes. Macheath, unlike bis fpruce repre-' v Tentative on our prefent ftage, is a flouchmg bully; and Polly appears happily difencumbered of fuch a hoop as the daughter of Peachum within our younger memories has worn. Mr Walpole has a pitlure of a feene in tbe fame piece, where Macheath is going to execution. In this alfo tbe likenefles of Walker, and Mifs Fenton, afterwards duchefs of Bolton (dhe firlt and original Macheath and Polly) are preferved. In the year 1726, when the affair of Mary Tofts, the rabbit-breeder of Godaiming, engaged the public at¬ tention, a few of our principal furgeons fubferibed their guinea a-piece to Hogarth, for an engraving from a ludicrous fketch he had made on that very po¬ pular fubieft. This plate, amongft other portraits, contains that of the St Andre, then anatomift to the royal hbufehold, and in high credit at a furgeon. In 1727, Hogarth agreed with Morris, an upholfterer, to furnith him with a deiign on canvas, reprefenting the element of earth as a pattern for tapeftry. The work not being performed to the fatisfa&ion of Morris, he re- fufed to pay for it; and our artifl, by a fuit at law, re¬ covered the fnoney. In 1730, Mr Hogarth married the only daughter of Sir James Thornhill, by whom he had no child. This union, indeed, was a ftolen one, and confequent- ly without the approbation of Sir James, who, ccnfi- dering the youth of his daughter, then barely 18, and the flender finances of her huiband, as yet an obfeure artirt, was not eafily reconciled to the match. Soon after this period, however, he began his “ Harlot’s Progrefs” (the colfin in the laft plate is inferibed Sept. 2. 1731); and was advlfed by Lady Thornhill to have fome of the feenes in it placed in the way of his father- in-law. Accordingly, one morning early, Mrs Ho¬ garth undertook to convey feveral of them into his dining-room. When he arole, he inquired from whence they came ; and being told by whom they were intro¬ duced, he cried out, “ Very well ; tbe .Wan who can furnilh reprefentations like tbefe can alfo maintain a wife without a portion.” He defigned this remark as an excufe for keeping his purfe-ftrings dole ; but, foon after, became both reconciled and generous to tbe young people. An allegorical ceiling by Sir James Thornhill is at the boule of tbe late Mr Huggins, at Headiy Park, Hants. The fubjeft of it is the ilory of Zephyrus and Flora ; and the figure of a fatyr and others were painted by Hogarth. In 1732, Hogarth ventured to attack P/Ir Pope, in a plate called “ The Man of Tatle containing a view of the Gate of Burlingtoa-houfe, with Pope white- wafhing it a«d befpattering the duke of Chandos’s coach. This plate was intended as a fatire on the tranfiator of Homer, Mr Kent the architecf, and the earl of Burlington. It was fortunate for Hogarth that he efcaped the la ill of the former. Either Hogarth’s obfeurity at that time was his proteffion, or the bard was too prudent to exafperate a painter who had al¬ ready given fuch proof of his abilities for fatire. Soon after his marriage, Hogarth had fummer lodg¬ ings at South Lambeth : and being intimate with Mr Tyres, contributed to the improvement of the Spring Gardens at Vauxhal!, by the hint of embellithing them with paintings, fome of which were the fuggeftiens of 4 A 2 hk HOC [55 Hogarth his owq truly comic pencil. For his alTiftance, Mr 1'yres gratefully prefented him with a gold ticket of admiffion for himfelf and his friends. In 1733, his genius became confpicuoufly known. The third feene of his “ Harlot’s Progrefs” introdu¬ ced him to the notice of the great. At a board of treafury which was held a day or two after the ap¬ pearance of that print, a copy of it was fhown by one of the lords, as containing, among other excellencies, a linking likenefs of Sir John Gonfon. It gave univer- lal fatisfa£tion : from the treafury each lord repaired to the print-fhop for a copy of it, and Hogarth rofe com¬ pletely into fame. f be ingenious Abbe Du Bos has often complained no hiftory-painter of his time went through a fe- . ' aftions, and thus, like an hiilorian, painted the e fortune of an hero from the cradle to the What Du Bos wiihed to fee done, Hogarth He launches out his young adventurer 1 upon the town, and conduits her through ' lit.ides of wretchednefs to a premature :; was painting to the underftanding and ; none had ever before made the pencil • ■ u- to the purpofes of morality and inftruc- ^ ; like t!:is is fitted to every foil and every " ' : he that runs may read. Nor was the Hogarth confined to his perfons. One of •. u illencies conutted in what maybe termed the furniture of his pieces; for as, in fublime and hiftori- cul reprefientalions,’ the fewer trivial circumftances are permitted to divide the fpeclator’s attention from the principal figiu es, the greater is their force ; fo, in fcenes copied from familiar life, a proper variety of little domeftic images contributes to throw a degree of verifimilitude on the whole. “ The Rake’s levee- room,” fays Mr Walpole, “ the nobleman’s dining¬ room, the apartments of the hufband and wife in Mar¬ riage a la Mode, the alderman’s parlour, the bed-cham¬ ber, and many others, are the hiftory of the manners -of the ag-e.*’ In 1745, Hogarth fold about 20 of his capital pic¬ tures by auftion ; and in the fame year acquired addi¬ tional reputation by the fix prints of “ Marriage whom about 157 Were females. Befides the black fwans already mentioned, which the ancients defpaired of ever feeing, this country pro¬ duces that beautiful bird called menura fupsrba, oF which an intereffing defeription is given by Mr Collins, in the fecond volume of his Account of the Englilh Colony. Here alfo there is a confiderable number of very uncommon and exquifitely fragrant flirubs. There is alfo an extraordinary amphibious animal found here, called the ornithorynchus paradoxus, of which Mr Home has given a defeription, which was publiihed in the Philofophical Tranfadfions for t8oi. In 1801, there were in circulation the following coins, which were made legal tenders by authority of the governor. A guinea, A johannes, A half do. A ducat, A gold mohur, A pagoda, A Spaniih dollar, A rupee, A Dutch gilder. An Englifli fliilling, A copper coin of I oz. A do. of 4 oz. A do. of -4 oz. L. s. d. o o o 6 6 o o 6 o JE 2 I 1 4 2 o 1 o o o o o o o 2 O o 9 *7 8 5 2 2 1 o o o 2S In the year 18ci the increafing profperity of the co-in iScw lony was Hill confpicuous, for the live Hock of different individuals confiffed of 6269 fheep, 362 cattie, 211 horfes, 1259 goats, and 4766 hogs-, and what belong¬ ed to government confided of 488 ffieep, 93 1 cattle, and 32 hogs. Individuals had 4857 acres of land fown with wheat, and 3564 acres for maize j and govern¬ ment had 467 acres for the one fpecies of grain, and 300 for the other. 29 In the month of June 1801, there were 5547 per-Population fons of all deferiptions in the fettlement, which with q6i ■> ' - H O L [ 573 ] H O L Holland, p6i at Norfolk iiland, made a total of 6508 perfons ^otiar- fubjeft to the governor’s authority. Holland, in commerce, a fine and clofe kind of linen, fo called from its being firll manula£luied in Holland. HOLLAR, Wlnceslaus, a celebrated engraver, born at Prague in 16^^. His parents were in a gen¬ teel line of life ; and he was at firft defigned for the Rudy of the law. But the civil commotions which happened in his youth, ruining his family affairs, he was obliged to Ihift for himfelf j and by difcovering fome genius for the arts, he was placed with Marian, a very able defigner and engraver of views. Being himfelf a man of great ingenuity, he profited hafiily from the inffrutlion of his tutor. He principally ex¬ celled in drawing geometrical and perfpedtive views and plans of buildings, ancient and modern cities and towns ; alfo landfcapes, and every kind of natural and f artificial curiofities 5 which he executed with a pen in a very peculiar Ryle, excellently well adapted to the pur- pofe. He travelled through feveral of the great cities of Germany : and, notwithfianding all his merit, met with fo little encouragement, that he found it very dif¬ ficult to fupport himfelf. The earl of Arundel being in Germany, took him under his protection, brought him to England, and recommended him to the favour of Charles I. He engraved a variety of plates from the Arundel collection, a#id the portrait of the earl him¬ felf on horfeback. The civil wTars, which happened foon after in England, ruined his fortune. He was ta¬ ken prifoner, with fome of the royal party, and with difficulty efcaped ; wffien he returned to Antw’erp, and joined his old patron the earl of Arundel. He fettled in that city for a time, and publiffied a confiderable number of plates : but his patron going to Italy foon after for the benefit of his health, Hollar fell again in¬ to diffrefs, and wTas obliged to work for the print and booklellers of Antwerp at very low prices. At the re- floration he returned into England 5 wffiere, though he had fufficient employment, the prices he received for his engravings were fo greatly inadequate to the labour neceffarily required, that he could but barely fubfiR, and the plague, with the fucceeding fire of Lon¬ don, putting for fome time an effectual Rop to bufinefs, his affairs were fo much embarraffed, that he was never afterwards able to improve his fortune. It is faid that he ufed to work for.the bookfellers at the rate of four- pence an hour, and always had an hour glafs before him. He was fo very fcrupuloufiy exaCt, that wffien obliged to attend the calls of nature, or wffiilR talking, though with the perfons for whom he was working, and about their own bufinefs, he conflantiy laid down the glafs, to prevent the fand from running. Neverthelefs, all his great indufiry, of which his numerous wmrks bear ample taflimony, could not procure him a fufficient maintenance. It is melancholy to add, that on the verge of his yoth year, he was attached with an execu¬ tion at his lodgings in Gardener’s lane, WeRminRer, wffien he defired only the liberty of dying in his bed, and that he might not be removed to any other prifon than the grave, a favour which it is uncertain whether he obtained or not. He died, however, in 1677.—His works amount nearly to 24,000 prints, according to Vertue’s Catalogue ; and the lovers of art are always zealous to collect them. Generally fpeaking, they are etchings performed almofl entirely with the point, and Holloa their merits are thus charaflerifed by Mr Strutt : “ They poffefs great 1-pirit, with afloniffiing freedom and lightnefs, efpecially W'hen we confider how highly he has finiflied fome of them. His views of abbeys, churches, ruins, &c. with his ffiells, muffs, and every fpecies of firil life, are admirable } his landlcapes fre¬ quently have great merit j and his diflant views of towns and cities are not cnly executed in a very accu¬ rate, but a very pleafing manner.” A fomewhat colder character is given of them by Mr Gilpin in his Efl'ay on Prints: “ Hollar gives us views of particular places, which he copies with great truth, unornamented as he found them. If wre are fatisfied with exadl reprefenta- tions, w?e have them nowhere better than in Hollar’s works ; but if we expeft pictures, wTe mult feek them elfewhere. Hollar was an antiquarian and a draughtf- man, but feems to have been little acquainted with the principles of painting. Stiflhefs is his characler- iRic, and a painful exadlnefs void of taRe. His larger views are mere plans. In fome. of his fmaller, at the expence of infinite pains, fomething of an ef¬ fect is fometimes produced. But in general, w7e con¬ fider him as a repofitory of curiofities, a record of anti¬ quated dreffes, abolilhed ceremonies, and edifices now in ruins.” HOLLOA, in the fea-language, an exclamation of anfw'er, to any perfon wffio calls to another to alk fome queRion, or to give a particular order. Thus if the mailer intends to give any order to the people in the main-top, he previoufly calls, Main top, hoay ! to which they anfwer, Holloa ! to fliow that they hear him, and are ready. It is alfo the anfwer in. hailv ing a ihip at a diRance. See Hailing. HOLLY. See Ilex, Botany Index. Sea-HoLir, See Eryngium, Botany Index. HOLM (Sax. hulmus, infula amnica), denotes an‘ ifle or fenny ground, according to Bede, or a river ifiand. And wffiere any place is called by that name, and this fyllable is joined with any other in the names of places, it fignifies a place furrounded w'ith wrater, as the Flatholmes and Stepholmes in the Severn near Brif- tol j but if the fituation of the place is not near the water, it may then Rgnify a hilly.place *, holm in Saxon fignifying alfo “ a hill or ciifi.” HOLOCAUST (formed from “ whole”, and “ I confume. with fire)”, a kind of facrifice^ . wherein the whole offering is burnt or confumed by fire, as an acknowledgement that God, the creator, preferver, and lord of all, was worthy of all honour and worlhip, and as a token of men’s giving themftlves entirely up to him. It is exiled alio in Scripture a burnt-offering,. Sacrifices of this fort are often mention¬ ed by the heathens as well as Jews; particularly by Xenophon, Cyroped. lib. viii. p. 446. ed. Hutchinf. 1738, who fpeaks of facrificing holocaufis of oxen to Jupiter, and of horfes to the fun ; and they appear to have been in ufe long before the inftitution of the other Jew iih facrifices by the law of Mofes ; (fee Job i. 5. xii. 8. and Gen. viii. 20, xxii. 13.) On this account, the Jews, who would not allow the Gentiles to offer on their altar any other facrifices peculiarly enjoined by the law of Mofes, admitted them by the Jewiffi priefis . to offer holocauflsj becaufe thefe were a fort of facri¬ fices prior to the law, and common to all nations. Du- ♦ rinJL J H O L [5 c'- ring tlieir fubje£Hon to the Romans, it was no uncom- ~ mon thing for thofe Gentiles to offer facritices to the God of Ifrael atjerufalem. Holocaufts were deemed by the Jews the mod excellent of all their facrifkes. It is laid, that this kind of facrifice was in common life among the heathens, till Prometheus introduced the cuftom of burning only a part, and referving the remainder for his own ufe. See Sacrifice. HOLOFERNES, lieutenant general of the armies of Nabuchodonofor king of Affyria, who having in a remarkable encounter overcome Arphaxad king of the Medes, fent to all the neighbouring nations with an intention of obliging them this way to lubmit to his empire, pretending that there could be no power capable of refilling him. At the fame time Holofer- nes, at the head of a powerful army, paffed the Eu¬ phrates, entered Cilicia and Syria, and fubdueu almoff all the people of thefe provinces. Being refolved to make a conqueff of Egypt, he ad¬ vanced towards Judaea, little expecting to meet with any refiftance from the Jews. In the mean time, he was informed that they were preparing to oppofe him ; and Achior the commander of the Ammonites, who had already fubmitted to Holofernes, and was with feme auxiliary troops in his army, reprelented to him that the Hebrews were a people protected in a parti¬ cular manner by God Almighty, fo long as they were obedient to him } and therefore he fliould not flatter himfelf with expeftations of overcoming them, unlefs they had committed fome offence againft God, whereby they might become unworthy of his protection. Holo¬ fernes, difregarding this difeourfe, commanded Achior to be conveyed within fight of the walls of Bethulia, and tied to a tree, and left there, whither the Jews came and loofed him. In the mean time Holofernes formed the fiege of Bethulia ; and having cut oft' the water which fupplied the city, and fet guards at the only fountain which the befieged had near the walls, the inhabitants were foon reduced to extremity, and refolved to furrender if God did not fend them fuccours in five days. Ju¬ dith, being informed of their refolution, conceived the defign of killing Holofernes in his camp. She took her fineft clothes, and went out of Bethulia with her xnaid-fervant •, and being brought to the general, fire pretended that fhe could no longer endure the fins and exceffes of the Jews, and that God had infpired her with the defign of furrendering herfelf to him. As foon as Holofernes faw her, he was taken with her beauty ; and fome days after invited her to a great feaft, which he prepared for the principal officers of his army. But he drank fo much wine, that deep and drunkennefs hindered him from fatisfying his paf- fion. Judith, who in the night was left alone in his tent, cut off his head with his own fword ; and de¬ parting with her fervant from the camp, (he returned to Bethulia With the head of Holofernes. As foon as it was day, the befieged made a fally upon their ene¬ mies, who going into their general’s tent, found his headlefs carcafe wallowing in its own blood. They then difeerned that Judith had deceived them, and fled with precipitation, leaving the camp abounding with rich fpoils j the Jews purfued them, killed a great num¬ ber of them, and returned loaded with booty. 1 here is a great diverfity of opinions concerning the '4 ] H O L time when this war between Holofernes and the Jews HoJogra- happened. Some date it from the captivity of Baby- phum Ion, in the reign of Manaffeh, and pontificate of Elia- „ kim the high-prieft ; others place it at fome time after 1 011 ein- the captivity ; and fome doubt the truth of the whole, tranfaftion. See the article Judith. HOLOGR APHUM (compofed of “ all,” and “ I write”), in the civil law, lomething written wholly in the hand-writing of the perfon who figns it. The word is chiefly ufed in fpeaking of 3 teftament written wholly in the teftator’s own hand. The Romans did not approve of holographic tef- taments 5 and, though Valentinian authorifed them by a novel, they are not ufed where the civil law is in full force. HOLOSTEUM, a genus of plants belonging to the triandria clafs ; and in the natural method rank¬ ing under the 22d order, Carijophyllei. See Botany Index* HOLOTHURIA, a genus of the order vermes, be¬ longing to the clafs mollufca. See Helminthology Index. HOLSTEIN, a duchy of Germany, bounded by the German ocean on the well j the Baltic, or the gulf of Lubeck, on the call j the duchy of Meck¬ lenburg on the fouth-eafl j that of Bremen, with the river Elbe, on the fouth-weft *, and Lauenburg, with the territory of Hamburg, on the fouth. Its greateft length is about 80 miles, and its breadth 60. The diocefe of Eutin, and the county of Ranzau, though they make a part of the duchy of Holftein, yet being lands belonging to the empire and circle, (hall be de- fenbed feparately. A great part of this country confifls of rich marfh land, which being much expofed to inundations both from the fea and rivers, dikes have been raifed at a great expence to guard and Jefend them. The pa- ftures in the marffies are fo rich, that cattle are bred in vaft numbers and fattened in them, and great quantities of excellent butter and cheefe made of their milk. They are alio very fruitful in wheat, barley, peafe, beans, and rape-feed. In the more barren, Candy, and heathy parts of the country, large flocks of (beep are bred and fed : nor are orchards wanting, or woods, efpecially of oak and beech j nor turf, poultry, game, and wild-fowl. Here is a variety both of fea and river fiih •, and the beef, veal, mut¬ ton, and lamb, are very fat and palatable. Holflein is abo noted for beautiful horfes. The gentry ufually farm the cows upon their eftates to a Hollander, as he is called, who for every cow pays from fix to ten rix-dollars ; the owner providing pafture for them in fummer, and draw and hay in winter. It is no un¬ common thing here to drain the ponds and lakes once in three or four years, and fell the carp, lam¬ preys, pikes, and perch, found in them ; then fow them for feveral years after with oats, or ufe them for pafturage j and after that lay them under water again, and breed fi(h in them. There are hardly any hills in the country j but feveral rivers, of which the principal are the Eyder, the Stor, and the Trave. The duchy contains about 30 towns great and fmall \ moft part of the peafants are under villenage, being obliged to work daily for their lords, and not even at liberty to quit their eftates. . The nobility and the proprietors of H O L [ 575 ] Hein, of manors are poffefled of the civil and criminal jurif- Charle ’ diftion, with other privileges and exemptions. For¬ merly there were diets, but now they feem to be en¬ tirely laid alide : meetings, however, of the nobility are ftill held at Kiel. The predominant religion here is Lutheranifm^ with fuperintendencies as in other Lutheran countries. In feveral places the Jews are allowed the exercife of their religion. At Gluck- ftadt and Altena are both Calvinift and Popilh church¬ es j and at Kiel a Greek Ruffian chapel. Befides the Latin fchools in the towns, at Altena is a gymna- frum, and at Kiel an univerfity. Notwithftanding this country’s advantageous fituation for commerce, there are few manufadlures and little trade in it. Hamburg and Lubeck fupply the inhabitants with what they want from abroad ; from whence and Altena they ex¬ port fome grain, malt, grots, flarch, buck-wheat, peafe, beans, rape-feed, butter, cheefe, ffieep, fwine, horned cattle, horfes, and fifh. The manufadffures of the duchy are chiefly carried on at Altena, Kiel, and Gluckftadt. The duchy of Holffein conflfts of the ancient provinces of Holftein, Stormar, Ditmarfli, and Wagria. It belongs partly to the king of Denmark and partly to the dukes of Holftein Gottorf and Ploen. Anciently the counts of Holftein were vaflals of the dukes of Saxony ; but afterwards they received the in- veftiture of their territories from the emperor, or the bifhops of Lubeck in the emperor’s name, though the in- veftiture wras afterwards given by the emperor in perfon. The king of Denmark appoints a regency over his part of Holftein and the duchy of Slefwick, wrhich has its office at Gluckftadt. The feat of the great duke’s privy council and regeflty-court, together with the chief conflftory, wffiich is united to it, is at Kiel: there are many inferior courts and confiftories, from which an appeal lies to the higher. In the duchy of Holftein, the government of the convents and nobility is alter¬ nately in the king and duke for a year, from Mi¬ chaelmas to Michaelmas. The perfon in wffiom the government is lodged adminifters it by his regency. In fome cafes an appeal lies from this court to the Au- lic council or chamber at Wetzlar : the convents, the nobility, and the proprietors of manors in the country, have a civil and criminal jurifdiftion over their eftates. The revenues of the fovereigns arife principally from their demefnes and regalia } befides which, there is a land and feveral other taxes and impofts. The duke’s income, feeling afide his ducal patrimony, has been eftimated at 70,000 or 80,000 pounds. The king ulually keeps here fome regiments of foot and one of horfe. With refpeft to the duke’s military force, it amounts to about 800 men. The king, on account of his (hare in this country, ftyles himfelf duke of Ho/- flem, Stormar, and Ditmarjh. The dukes both of the royal and princely houfe ftyle themfelves heirs of Nor¬ way, dukes of Slefwick, Holftein, Stormar, and Ditmarfb, and counts of Oldenburg and Delmenhorjl. On account of Holftein, both the king of Denmark and the grand duke have a feat and voice in the college of the princes of the empire, and in that of the circle. Together w7ith Mecklenburg they alfo nominate an affeffor for this circle in the Aulic chamber. The matricular af- feffment of the whole duchy is 40 horfe and 80 foot, or 800 florins ; to the chamber of Wetzlar both princes pay 189 rix-dollars, 31 kruitzers. In 1735, duke H O L Frederic C>f Holftein Gottorf founded an order of knighthood here, viz. that of St Anne, the enfign of which is a red crofs, enamelled, and worn pendant at a red ribbon edged with yellow.—The principal places of that part of the duchy belonging to the king of Denmark and the duke of Ploen are Gluckftadt, Itzhoe, Rendfburg, and Ploen j and that part belong¬ ing to the great duke are Kiel, Oldenburg, Preetz, and Altena. HOLT, Sir John, knight, eldeft fon of Sir Tho¬ mas Holt, ferjeant-at-law, w’as born in 1642. He en¬ tered himfelf of Gray’s Inn in 16585 and applied to the common law with fo much induftry, that he foon became a very eminent barrifter. In the reign of James II. he was made recorder of London, which of¬ fice he difcharged writh much applaufe for about a year and a half 5 but loft his place for refufing to expound the law fuitably to the king’s defigns. On the arrival of the prince of Orange, he wras chofen a member of the convention parliament, which afforded him a good opportunity of difplaying his abilities 5 fo that, as foon as the government w'as fettled, he was made lord chief juftice of the court of king’s bench, and a privy coun- fellor. He continued chief juftice for 22 years, with great repute for fteadinefs, integrity, and thorough knowledge in his profeftion. Upon great occaiions he afferted the law with intrepidity, though he thereby ventured to incur by turns the indignation of both the houfes of parliament. He publiffied fome reports, and died in 1709. Holt (Sax.) “ a wood;” wherefore the names of towns beginning or ending with holt, as Buck-holt, &c. denote that formerly there was great plenty of wood in thofe places. HOLY. See Holiness. HOLY-GHOST, one of the perfons of the holy Trinity. See Trinity. Order of the Holy Ghost, the principal military order in France, inftituted by Henry HI. in 1569. It confifts of 100 knights, who are to make proof of their nobility for three defcents. The king is the grand-mafter or fovereign 5 and as fuch takes an oath on his coronation-day to maintain the dignity of the order. The knights wear a golden crofs, hung about their necks by a blue filk ribbon or collar. But before they receive the order of the Holy-Ghoft, that of St Michael is conferred as a neceffary degree 5 and for this reafon their arms are furrounded with a double collar. HOLYHEAD, a town and cape of the ifle of An- glefea in Wales, and in the Iriffi channel, where people ufually embark for Dublin, there being three packet- boats that fail for that city every Monday, Wednef- day, and Friday, wind and weather permitting. It is 276 miles from London, and has a very convenient harbour for the northern trade, when taken ihort by contrary winds. It is fituated near the extremity of the ifle, and is joined to the north-weft part of it by a ftone bridge of one arch. It has a fmall market on Saturdays. 1 he parilh is about five or fix miles long, and two or three broad, bounded nearly by the fea. The church ftands above the harbour, within an old quadrangular fortification, with a baftion at each cor¬ ner built about 450, a mountain near it is ano¬ ther old fortification called Turris Munimentum, which Holt Holyhead. H O L r 576 ] H O L > Holyhead, wliicli is an old ftone wall without mortar, and in its Holy- centre is a {mail turret, and contains a well of water. , Ifland. Holyhead was frequently formerly vilited by .Irilh ro¬ vers, and was defended as a place of confequence. There are leveral remains of old fortifications and Bruidical antiquities in its neighbourhood, as well as chapels of religious rvorfhip. I he parifir church of Holyhead was built in the reign of Edward III. and is in the form of a crofs, with a porch and fteeple very antique. There was an old chapel near the church, now converted into a fchool-houfe. A falt-houfe was, ere£led on an iiland in the harbour in Queen Anne’s reign, but it is now in ruins, i he town is little more than a fifiiing town, rendered confiderable by being the place of paffage to Ireland. It has three good inns. The pafl'age hence to Ireland is in general about twelve hours. There is no frefh w7ater here except from rain, nor any bread fold but what comes from Ireland. A bath and affembly-room wrere erefted here in I77°* Under the mountains that overhang the town is a large cavern in the rock, fupported by natural pillars, called the Parliament-houfe, acceffible only by boats, and the tide runs into it. If this harbour was properly re¬ paired, and ware-houfes built, it would be very conve¬ nient for the Irifh to import fuch of their goods as pay Englifh duty, it being but a few hours fail from Dublin. Befides, the Dublin merchants might come over with the packets to fee their goods landed. I he commodities are, butter, cheefe, bacon, wild-fowl, lobilers, crabs, oyfters, razor- filh, {hrimps, herrings, cod-fifh, whitings, whiting- pollacks, cole-fifli, fea-tenches, turbots, foies, floun¬ ders, rays, and plenty of other filh. On the rocks the herb grows of wdiich they make kelp, a fixed lalt ufed in making glafs, and in alum works. In the neighbourhood there is a large vein of white fulleis earth and another of yellow, which might be ufeful to fullers. On the ifle of Skerries, nine miles to the north, is a light-houfe, which may be feen 24 miles off. Large flocks of puffins are often feen here j they all come in one night, and depart in the fame manner. HOLY-IslaND, a fmall ifland lying on the coaft of England, 10 miles fouth-eaft of Berwick, in Northum¬ berland. Bede calls it a femi-ijland, being, as he obferves, twice an ifland and twdee continent in one day . for at the flowing of the tide, it is encompaffed by water *, and at the ebb, there is an almoft dry paffage, both for horfes and carriages, to and from the main land j from which, if meafured on a ftraight line, it is diftant about two miles eaftward •, but on account of fome quickfands paffengers are obliged to make fo many de¬ tours, that the length of way is nearly doubled. The water over thefe flats at fpring-tides is only feven feet deep.—This ifland was by the Britons called Inis Me- dicante; alfo Lindisfarne, from the fmall rivulet of I .inHi or Landia, which here runs into the fea, and the Celtic word fahren or “ recefs j” and on account of its being the habitation of fome of the firft monks in this country, it afterwards obtained its prefent name of Holy-i/land. It meafures from eaft to weft about two miles and a quarter, and its breadth from north to fouth is fcarcely a mile and a half. At the north- weft part there runs out afpit of land of about a mile in length. The monaftery is fituated at the fouthermoft .extremity} and at a fmall diftance north of it Hands the village. On this ifland there is plenty of fifti and fowl j but the air and foil are bad. There is not a Holy- tree on the ifland. The village, which Hands on a rifing ground, confifts but of a few fcattered houfes, chiefly inhabited by fiihermen ; and it has two inns. The north and eaft coafts are formed of perpendicular rocks, the other Tides fink by gradual Hopes to the fands. There is a commodious harbour, defended by a block-houfe •, which laft was furprifed and taken in 1715, but was foon invefted and retaken. Holy-ifland, though really part of Northumberland, belongs to Durham ; and all civil difputes muft be de¬ termined by the juftices of that county.—It was a very ancient epifcopal feat. Aidan the firft biffiop, after prefiding in it 14 years, died ai 1 was buried here A. D. 651. Finan, his fucceffor, built a wooden church, thatched with reeds, but before the end of the century covered with lead by Biffiop Eadbert. St Cuthbert, who from a poor fhepherd became monk of Melrofs 15 years, was prior here 12 more, when he retired to one of the barren Earn rocks, from whence he was called to this fee, which he held only two years, and returned to his retirement, where he died, and was buried at the eaft end of his oratory, where his ftone coffin is ftill Ihown. His body was found freffi 11 years after his death. Lindisfarne was ruined by the Danes, A. D. 793, when the monks carried his body about for feven iyears, and at laft fettled at Chefter-le-ftreet, whither the fee wras tranflated, a»d where it continued many years. On a fecond deftruc- tion of the monaftery by the Danes they were remo¬ ving to Rippon, but flopped by a miracle at Durham, wffiere the faint continued till the reformation, when his body was found entire, and privately buried in a wooden coffin, as fome pretend, near the clock, but more probably in the ground under where his ffirine flood. The entrochi found among the rocks at Lindisfarne are called St Cuthbert’s beads, and pretended to be made by him in the night. Eighteen bifliops fat here till the removal of the fee to Chefter, which had eight more till the removal to Durham, A. D. 995. Lin¬ disfarne became a cell to that Benedi&ine monaftery, valued at 48k per ann. The north and fouth walls of the church are Handing, much inclined •, part of the weft end remains, but the eaft is down. The columns of the nave are of four different forts, 12 feet high and 5 feet diameter, maffy and richer than thofe of Dur¬ ham ; the bafes and capitals plain, fupporting circular arches. Over each arch are large windows in pairs, feparated by a ffiort column, and over thefe are fmaller Angle windows. In the north and fouth walls are fomo pointed arches. The length of the body is 138 feet, breadth 18 feet, and with the two ailes 36 feet •, but it may be doubted whether there ever was a tranfept. One arch of the centre tow7er remains adorned, as is its entrance from the nave, with Saxon zigzag. Somewhat to the eaft is the bafe of a crofs, and to the weft the prefent pariftr-church. Holt-Rood Dcnj, a feftival obferved by the Roman Catholics, in memory of the exaltation of our Saviour's crofs. See Cross and Exaltation. Ho lx-Well, a town of North Wales, in the county of Flint. It is a place of great note, for the well of St Winnifred, who was reputed a virgin martyr \ and it is much frequented by people that come to bathe in it, as well as by popiflr pilgrims out of devotion. The fpring H O M [ 577 ] HO M Homage fpring gufhes forth with fuch impetuofity, that at a I! fmall diftance it turns feveral mills. Over the fpring Home' is a chapel built upon pillars, and on the windows is painted the hiltory of St Wmnifred’s life. There is a mofs about the well, ■which fome foolifhly imagine to be St Winnifred’s hair. W. Long. 3. 15. N. Lat. 54. 21. HOMAGE, in Law, is the fubmiffion, loyalty, and fervice, which a tenant promifed to his lord when he was firft admitted to the land which he held of the lord in fee ; alio that owing to a king, or to any fuperior. HOMBERG, William, a celebrated phyfician, chemift, and philofopher, was the fon of a Saxon gen¬ tleman, and born in Batavia, in the Eaft Indies, in 1652. His father afterwards fettling at Amfterdam, William there profecuted his ftudies j and from thence removed to Jena, and afterwards to Leiplic, where he ftudied the law. In 1642, he was made advocate at Magdeburg, and there applied himfelf to the ftudy of experimental philofophy. Some time after he travelled into Italy $ and applied himfelf to the ftudy of medi¬ cine, anatomy, and botany, at Padua. He afterwards ftudied at Bologna $ and at Rome learned optics, painting, fculpture, and mufic. He at length travel¬ led into France, England, and Holland j obtained the degree of doftor of phyfic at Wirtemberg •, travelled into Germany and the North j vifited the mines of Saxony, Bohemia, Hungary, and Sweden $ and re¬ turned to France, where he acquired the efteem of the learned. He was on the point of returning into Ger¬ many, when M. Colbert being informed of his merit, made him fuch advantageous offers, as induced him to fix his refidence at Paris. M. Homberg, who was al¬ ready well known for his pholphorus, for a pneumatic machine of his own invention more perfeft than that of Guericke, for his microfcopes, for his difcoveries in chemiftry, and for the great number and variety of his curious obfervations, was received into the academy of fciences in 1691, and had the laboratory of that aca¬ demy, of which he was one of the principal ornaments. The duke of Orleans, afterwards regent of the king¬ dom, at length made him his chemift, fettled upon him a penfion, gave him the moft fuperb laboratory that was ever in the poffeflion of a chemift, and in 1704 made him his firft phyfician. He had abjured the Proteftant religion in 1682, and died in 1715. There are a great number of learned and curious pieces of his writing, in the memoirs of the academy of fciences, and in feveral journals. He had begun to give the elements of chemiftry in the memoirs of the academy, and the reft were found among his papers fit for print¬ ing. Homberg, a town of Germany, in the circle of the Upper Rhine, and landgravate of Heffe, feated ten miles north of Frankfort, and gives title to one of the branches of the houfe of Heffe, who is its fovereign. E. Long. 8. 24. N. Lat. $o. 20. Hdmberg, a town of Germany, in the palatinate of the Rhine, and duchy of Deuxponts. E. Long. 7. 6. N. Lat. 49. 20. HOME, Henry, Lord Kames, an eminent Scot- tiflr lawyer, and author of many celebrated works on various fubje£ts, was defcended of a very honourable and ancient family, and born in the year 1696. Vol. X. Part II. Lord Karnes’s grandfather, Henry Home, was a Home, younger fon of Sir John Home of Renton, who held "V”” the high office of lord juftice-clerk, or chief crimi¬ nal judge of Scotland, in the year 1663. He re¬ ceived the eftate of Kames from his uncle George, brother to the then lord jultice-clerk. The family of Renton is defcended from that of the earls of Home, the reprefentatives of the ancient princes of Northumberland, as appears from the records of the Lion Office. The coimty of Berwick in Scotland has the ho¬ nour of having given birth to this great and ufeful member of fociety. In early youth he was lively, and eager in the acquifition of knowledge. He never at¬ tended a public fchool j but was inftrufted in the an¬ cient and modern languages, as well as in feveral branches of mathematics, and the arts neceffarily con- nefled with that fcience, by Mr Wingate, a man of confiderable parts and learning, wrho fpent many years as preceptor or private tutor to Mr Home. After ftudying, with acutenefs and diligence, at the univerlity of Edinburgh, the civil law, and the muni¬ cipal law of his own country, Mr Home early per¬ ceived that a knowdedge of thefe alone is not fufficient to make an accompliffied lawyer. An acquaintance with" the forms and praftical bufinefs of courts, and efpecially of the fupreme court, as a member of which he wras to feek for fame and emolument, he confidered as effential- ly neceffary to qualify him to be a complete barrifter. He accordingly attended for fome time the chamber of a writer to the fignet, where he had an opportunity of learning the ftyles of legal deeds, and the modes of conducing different fpecies -of bufinefs. This wife ftep, independently of his great genius and unwearied application, procured him, after his admiflion to the bar, peculiar refpeff from the court, and proportional employment in his profeffion of an advocate. Who¬ ever perufes the law-papers compofed by Mr Home when a young man, will perceive an uncommon ele¬ gance of ftyle, befides great ingenuity of reafoning, and a thorough knowdedge of the law and conftitu- tion of his country. Thefe qualifications, together with the ftrength and vivacity of his natural abilities, foon raifed him to be an ornament to the Scottiffi bar j and, on the 2d day of February 1752, he was ad¬ vanced to the bench as one of the judges of the court of feffion, under the title of Lord Kames. Before this period, however, notwithftanding the un¬ avoidable labours of his profeffion, Mr Home had fa¬ voured the world with feveral ufeful and ingenious works. In the year 1728, he publiffied Remarkable Decifions of the Court of Seffion from 1716 to 1728, in one volume folio.—In 1732 appeared Effays upon feveral fubjects in law, viz. "jus tertii; Benejicium ce- dendarum aclionum; Vinco Vincentem; and Prefcrip~ tion; in one volume 8vo. This firft produce of his original genius, and of his extenfive views, excited not only the attention, but the admiration of the judges, and of all the other members of the college of juftice. This work was fucceeded, in the year 1741, by De¬ cifions of the Court of Seffion from its firft inftitu- tion to the year 1740, abridged and digefted under proper heads, in form of a Di£Konary, in two volumes folio : A very laborious work, and of the greateft uti¬ lity to every practical lawyer. In 1747 appeared Effays 4 D upon when his lordihip publilhed a work in one volume 8vo, under the title of rJ he Gentleman Farmer, being an attempt to improve Agriculture by fubjechng it to tne tejl of rational principles. Our limits do not permit us to give details •, but, with regard to this book, we muft inform the public, that all the intelligent farmers in Scotland uniformly declare, that, after perufing Young, Dicklon, and a hundred other writers on agriculture, Lord Karnes’s Gentleman barmer contains the bed practical and rational information on the va¬ rious articles of hufbandry which can any where be obtained. As a practical farmer, Lord Kames has given many obvious proofs of his Ikill. After he fuc- ceeded, in right of his lady, to the ample eftate of Blair-Drummond in the county of Perth, he formed a plan for turning a large mofs, confifting of at leaft 1500 acres, into arable land. His lordihip had the pleafure, before he died, to fee the plan fucceisfully, though only partially executed. The fame plan was afterwards carried on in a much more rapid manner by his fon George Drummond, Efq. But as this is not a proper place for details of this nature, we muft refer the reader to the article Agriculture *, where a par¬ ticular account of this extraordinary, but extenfively ufeful, operation is given. In the year 1773, Lord Kames favoured the wmrld with Sketches of the Hiffory of Man, in 2 vols 4to. This work confifts of a great variety of fails and ob- fervations concerning the nature of man •, the produce of much and profitable reading. In the courfe of his ftudies and reafonings, he had amafled a vaft colleilion of materials. Thefe, when confiderably advanced in years, he digefted under proper heads, and fubmitted them to the confideration of the public. He intended that this book ftiould be equally intelligible to women as to men ; and, to accomplilh this end, when he had occafion to quote ancient or foreign books, he uniform¬ ly tranflated the paflages. The Sketches contain much ufeful information } and, like all his lordlhip’s other performances, are lively and entertaining. We now come to Lord Karnes’s laft wmrk, to which 9 ] H O M he modeftly gives the title of Loofe Hints upon Educa¬ tion, chiefly concerning the culture of the heart. It was publifiied in the year 1781, in one vol. 8vo, when the venerable and aftonilhing author was in the 85th year of his age. Though his lordftiip chofe to caU them Loofe Hints, the intelligent reader will perceive in this compofition an uncommon activity of mind at an age fo far advanced beyond the ufual period of human lite, and an earneft defire to form the minds of youth to honour, to virtue, to induftry, and to a veneration of the Deity. Belides the books w?e have enumerated, Lord Kames publiftied many temporary and fugitive pieces in diffe¬ rent periodical works. In the Eflays Phyflcal and Literary, publiftied by a fociety of gentlemen in Edin¬ burgh, we find compofitions of his lordihip On the Laws of Motion, On the Advantages of Shallow Plough¬ ing, and on Evaporation ; all of which exhibit evident marks of genius and originality of thinking. How a man employed through life in public bufinefs, and in bufinefs of the full importance, could find leifure for fo many different purfuits, and excel in them (a), it is not eafy for a meaner mind to form even a concep¬ tion. Much, no doubt, is to be attributed to the fupe- riority of his genius •, but much muft likewife have been the refult of a proper diftribution of his time. He rofe early •, when in the vigour of life at four o’clock, in old age at fix ; and ftudied all morning. When the court w'as fitting, the duties of his office employed him from eight or nine till twelve or one $ after which, it the weather permitted, he walked for two hours with lome literary friends, and then went home to dinner, Whilft he was on the bench, and wre believe when he was at the bar, he neither gave nor accepted invitations to dinner during the term or fefflon ; and if any friend came uninvited to dinner with him, his lordfhip difplay- ed his ufual cheerfulnefs and hofpitality, but always re¬ tired with his clerk as foon as he had drunk a very few glafles of wine, leaving his company to be entertained by his lady. The afternoon was fpent as the morning had been, in ftudy. In the evening he w'ent to the theatre or the concert, from which he returned to the fociety of fome men of learning, with whom he fat late, and difplayed fuch talents for converfation as are not often found. It is obferved by a late celebrated author, that “ to read, write, and converfe, in due proportions^ is the bufinefs of a man of letters •, and that he who hopes to look back hereafter with fatisfadlion upon paft years, muft learn to know the value of fingle mi¬ nutes, and endeavour to let no particle of time fall ufe- lefs to the ground.” It wras by pra&ifing thefe leffons that Lord Kames rofe to literary eminence, in oppofi- tion to all the obftacles which the tumult of public bu¬ finefs could place in his way. To give a proper delineation of the public and pri- 4 D 2 vate Home. (a) Upon reflefting on the ftudioufnefs of Lord Karnes’s difpofition, and his numerous literary produftions, the reader wall naturally recal to his mind a ftriking fimilarity between his lordthip and the laborious Pliny the Elder. In a letter from Pliny the Younger to Macer, the following paflage occurs, wdiich is equally ap plicable to both : Nonne videtur tibi, recordanti quantum legent, quantum feripferit, nec in ojficiis ulhs, nec in ami- citia principum fuijfe ? which is thus tranfiated by Melmoth : “ When you reflect on the books he has read and the volumes he has written, are you not inclined to fufpe£l, that he never was engaged in the affairs of the public, or the fervice of his prince ?” Home. H O M [ 580 ] H O M vate character of Lord Kames, would far exceed our limits. The writer c.f this article, however, who had the honour of an intimaite acquaintance with this great and good man for more than twenty years, muft be in¬ dulged in adding a few fafts which fell under his own obfervation. Lord Kames was remarkable for public fpirit, to which he conjoined aftivity and great exertion. He for a long trad of time had the principal management of all the focieties and boards for promoting the trade, filheries, and manufactures,,, in Scotland. As condu¬ cive to thofe ends, he was a ftrenuous advocate for making and repairing turnpike roads through .every part of the country. He had likewife a chief lead in the diftribution and application of the funds ariliwg from the eftates in Scotland which had unfortunately been annexed to the crown. He was no lefs zealous in fupporting, both with his writings and perfonal in¬ fluence, literary aflbciations. He was in fome mea- fure the parent of what was called the Phyfical and Li¬ terary Society. This fociety was afterwards incorpo¬ rated into the Royal Society of Edinburgh, which re¬ ceived a charter from the crown, and which is daily producing marks of genius, as well as works of real utility. As a private and domeftic gentleman, Lord Kames was admired by both fexes. The vivacity of his wit, and of his animal fpirits, even when advanced in years, rendered his company not only agreeable, but greatly folicited by the literati, and courted by ladies of the higheft rank and accomplifhments. He told very few ftories ; and rarely, if ever, repeated the fame ftory to the fame perfon. From the neceflity of retailing anec¬ dotes, the miferable refuge of tbofe who, without ge¬ nius, attempt to (hine in converfation, the abundance of his own mind fet him free j for his wit or his learn¬ ing always fuggefted what the occafion required. He could with equal eafe and readinefs combat the opinions of a metaphyfician, unravel the intricacies of law, talk with a farmer on improvements in agriculture, or efti- mate with a lady the merits of the drefs in falhion. In- ftead of being jealous of rivals, the chara£teriftic of little minds, Lord Kames fufifered and encouraged every lymptom of merit that he could difcover in the feholar, or in the loweft mechanic. Before he fucceeded to the eftate of Blair-Drummond, his fortune was fmall. Not- withftanding this circumftance, he, in conjunction with Mrs Drummond, his refpeftable and accomplilhed fpoufe, did much more fervice to the indigent than molt families of greater opulence. If the prefent ne- ceffity was prefling, they gave money. They did more: When they difcovered that male or female petitioners were capable of performing any art or labour, both parties exerted themfelves in procuring that fpecies of work which the poor people could perform. In cafes of this kind, which were very frequent, the lady took charge of the women and his lordfliip of the men. From what has been faid concerning the various and numerous productions of his genius, it is obvious that there could be few idle moments in his long protraCl- ed life. His mind was inceflantly employed j either teeming with new ideas, or puduing aCtive and labo¬ rious occupations. At the lame time, with all this intellectual ardour, one great feature in the character of Lord Kames, beflde his literary talents and his public fpirit, was a remarkable innocency of mind. He not only never indulged in detraction, but when any fpecies of fcandal was exhibited in his company, he either remained filent, or endeavoured to give a dif¬ ferent turn to the converfation. As natural confe- quences of this amiable difpofition, he never meddled with politics, even when parties ran to indecent lengths in this country 5 and what is Itill more remarkable, he never wrote a fentence, notwithflanding his numerous publications, without a direCt and a manifeft intention to benefit his fellow creatures. In his temper he was naturally warm, though kind and affeCtionate. In the friendlhips he formed, he was ardent, zealous, and fincere. So far from being inclined to irreligion, as fome ignorant bigots infinuated, few men poffefled a more devout habit of thought. A conftant fenfe of Deity, and a veneration for Providence, dwelt upon his mind. From this fource arofe that propenfity which appears in all his writings, of invefligating final caufes, and tracing the wifdom of the Supreme Author of nature. But here we muft flop. Lord Kames, to the great regret of the public, died on the 27th day of December 1782. As he had no marked difeafe but the debility neceflarily refulting from extreme old acre, a few days before his death he went to the Court of Seflion, addreffed all the judges feparately, told them he w^as fpeedily to depart, and took a folemn and an affeCfionate farewell. HOMER, the prince of the Greek poets, flourifti- ed, according to Dr Blair, about 900 B. C. accord¬ ing to Dr Prieftley 850, according to the Arundelian marbles 300, after the taking of Troy , and agreeable to them all, above 400 years before Plato and Ariftotle. Seven cities difputed the glory of having given him birth, viz. Smyrna, Rhodes, Colophon, Salamis, Chios, Argos, and Athens $ which has been exprefled by the following diftich : Smyrna, Rhodes, Colophon, Salamis, Chios, Argos, Athence; Orbis de patria cert at, Homer e, tua. We have nothing that is very certain in relation to the particulars of his life. The moft regular account is that which goes under the name of Herodotus, and is ufually printed with his hiftory : and though it is ge¬ nerally fuppofed to be a fpurious piece, yet as it is an¬ cient, was made ufe of by Strabo, and exhibits that idea which the later Greeks, and the Romans in the age of Auguftus, entertained of Homer, we muft con¬ tent ourfelves with giving an abftratft of it. A man of Magnefia, whofe name was Menalippus, went to fettle at Cumae, where he married the daugh¬ ter of a citizen called Homyres, and had by her a daughter called Critheis. The father and mother dy¬ ing, the young woman was left under the tuition of Cleonax her father’s friend, and fuft'ering herfelf to be deluded, was got with child. The guardian, though his care had not prevented the misfortune, was how¬ ever willing to conceal it; and therefore fent Critheis to Smyrna, which was then building, 18 years after the founding of Cumae, and about 168 after the taking of Troy. Critheis being near her time, went one day to a fellival which the town of Smyrna was celebra¬ ting on the banks of the river Meles ; where her pains coming upon her, fhe wras delivered of Homer, whom fhe called Mclefgenes, becaufe he was born on the banks Homer. H O M t 581 ] H a M Homer, banks of that river. Having nothing to maintain her, —-v-— was forced to fpin, and a man of Smyrna called Phemius, who taught literature and mufic, having of¬ ten feen Critheis, who lodged near him, and being plea- fed with her houfewifery, took her into his houfe to fpin the wool he received from his fcholars for their fchooling. Here (he behaved herfelf fo modeftly and difcreetly, that Phemius married her j and adopted her fon, in whom he difcovered a wonderful genius, and the bed natural difpofition in the world. After the death of Phemius and Critheis, Homer fucceeded to his father-in-law’s fortune and fchool; and was admi¬ red, not only by the inhabitants of Smyrna, but by ftrangers, who reforted from all parts to that place of trade. A Ihipmafter called Mentes, who was a man of learning and a lover of poetry, was fo taken with Homer, that he perfuaded him to leave his fchool, and to travel with him. Homer, who had then begun his poem of the Iliad, and thought it of great confequence to fee the places he Ihould have occafxon to treat of, embraced the opportunity. He embarked with Mentes, and during their feveral voyages never failed carefully to note down all that he thought worth obferving. He travelled into Egypt; from whence he brought into Greece the names of their gods, the chief ceremonies of their worlhip, and a more improved knowledge in the arts than what prevailed in his own country. He viGted Africa and Spain •, in his return from whence he touched at Ithaca, where he was much troubled with a rheum falling upon his eyes. Mentes being in halle to take a turn to Leucadia his native country, left Homer well recommended to Mentor, one of the chief men of the illand of Ithaca, who took all poffi- ble care of him. There Homer was informed of many things relating to Ulyffes, which he aftenvards made ufe of in compofing his Odyffey. Mentes returning to Ithaca, found Homer cured. They embarked toge¬ ther ; and after much time fpent in vifrting the coafts of Peloponnefus and the iilands, they arrived at Colo¬ phon, where Homer was again troubled with the de¬ fluxion upon his eyes, which proved fo violent, that he is faid to have loft his fight. This misfortune made him refolve to return to Smyrna, where he finifhed his Iliad. Some time after, the ill pofture of his affairs obliged him to go to Cumae, where he hoped to have found fome relief. Here his poems were highly ap¬ plauded : but when he propofed to immortalize their town, if they would allow him a falary, he was an- fwered, that “ there would be no end of maintaining all the 'Op^oi or “ blind men and hence got the name of Homer. He afterwards wandered through feve¬ ral places, and flopped at Chios, where he married, and compofed his Odyffey. Some time after, having added many verfes to his poems in praife of the cities of Greece, efpecially of Athens and Argos, he went to Samos, where he fpent the winter, fmging at the houfes of the great men, with a train of boys after him. From Samos he went to lo, one of the Sporades, with a de- fign to continue his voyage to Athens •, but landing by the way at Chios, he fell fick, died, and was buried on the fea (bore. - The only inconteftable works wdiich Homer has left behind him are the Iliad and Odyffey. The Batracho- myomachia, or battle of the frogs and mice, has been difputed. The hymns have been difputed alfo, and at¬ tributed by the fcholiafts to Cynsethus the rhapfodift : _ Homer, but neither Thucydides, Lucian, nor Paufanias, have fcrupled to cite them as genuine. Many other pieces are afcribed to him : epigrams, the Eartiges, the Ce- cropes, the deftruftion of Oechalia, of which only the names are remaining. Nothing wras ever comparable to the clearnefs and majefty of Homer’s ftyle; to the fublimity of his^ thoughts ; to the ftrength and fweetnefs of his verfes. All his images are ftriking •, his defcriptions juft and exa£t ; the paflions fo well expreffed, and nature fo juftly and finely painted, that he gives to every thing motion, life, and a