/c/3.1 \ % A DEMPSTER'S PATENT CANVAS. In such a country as Great, Britain, any real and sub¬ stantial improvement in an article of prime necessity, one at first sight should imagine, would meet immediate and universal patronage. It is, however, a well known fact, that no new invention, let it be as excellent as possible, will, or can be, suddenly adopted. People must first be convinced, by actual experience, that it really possesses the merits attributed to it. This is an obstacle that every one, who attempts to introduce any improvenfent, must lay his account with. It, besides, not unfrequently hap¬ pens, when the invention is of such importance as to af¬ fect the immediate interests of a large class of manufac¬ turers, that methods are fallen upon, so far to prejudice the public mind, as to prevent any trial of Consequence taking place during the currency of the patent, if such lias been obtained ; and the patentee, far from reaping any profit from his discovery, has only the mortification to see those very people, with many advantages on their side, strike into the path that he, alone, had chalked out. Although nearly five years have elapsed since a patent was obtained by Cathcart Dempster of St Andrews, for a most important improvement in the manufacture of Sail-canvas, yet has he hitherto been only able to establish its reputation on the East and West coasts of Scotland, and on board a few East India ships from the port of London. And even to do thi^ required no small exer¬ tion. For he had not only to surmount the common ob¬ stacles opposed to every one in his situation, but to de¬ monstrate, by actual proof, that an unfavourable report, which had been industriously circulated, had no founda¬ tion in fact. No one ventured to say that his canvas was made from coarse or ill prepared materials, or that it was liable to mildew. But another expedient was fallen upon. It was roundly asserted that it ‘would stretch a great deal when put to use, from the peculiar circumstance of its' being entirely composed of twine. This having some de- gree of plausibility, had the effect to deter many from making trial of it, as they were aware that such a fault would render some kind of sails perfectly useless. The Patentee now thinks himself fortunate, that this ideal fault having been strenuously urged, he has at length, on a fair trial being made, succeeded in convincing many of its fu¬ tility; for he now has it in his power to state, that this, the only objection that was ever found against his invention, is more than obviated ; as all who have had actual expe¬ rience of the Patent canvas, declare that it stretches less than common sailcloth- Dempster’s Patent Canvas, both in warp and weft, is made from two-ply twine of nearly the same grist, pro¬ perly prepared by boiling or bleaching before it is weav¬ ed. Its strength is so extraordinary, that No. 3. or 4. may be safely used in place of No. 1. of common sail¬ cloth ; and with this great advantage, that it is so pli¬ able and easily handed, that those who heretofore went to sea in a vessel with ten seamen, now find eight perfect¬ ly sufficient; and, from the peculiar circumstance of this kind of cloth being weaved without the assistance of starch, or any other kind of dressing whatever, its great strength is never impaired by the unavoidable bane of ordinary canvas—rot and mildew. From the closeness of its texture, it holds a better wind than the other; and this superiority it continues to maintain in spite of the weather; for as it has no extraneous matter to lose, it is evident that the action of the weather will rather tend to thicken than to thin the fabric, as the twine will gradu¬ ally plump out and fill up the interstices. Common can¬ vas, as is well known, gets more and more porous every i day, from the rain washing out parj; of the glutinous I dressing unavoidably used in the process of its manufac¬ ture. Enough of this, however, remains, to be the effi¬ cient cause of mildew. But though it were possible to remove this leaven of putrefaction, yet, from the impro¬ per construction of the fabric, it cannot last any length of time ; for, as the grist of the single yams of which this canvas is made, is four or five times coarser in one direc¬ tion of the fabric than in the other, the fine thread of the warp will be protruded from the general suiface, (as it were on a ridge) by. the coarse thread of the weft, and must be soon cut through by rubbing against every ob¬ ject with which it comes in contact-of course, the cloth falls to pieces, The patent canvas, on the contrary, be¬ ing altogether composed of twine of nearly the same size, has a more equal surface and bearing in both directions; and, therefore, is by no means so much exposed to injury from friction ; of consequence, it must last a great deal longer than the other. This last consideration alone should entitle the Patent Canvas to a decided preference over the common sort. But when we take into the ac¬ count how much its superior strength tends to the preserve ation of ufes and peopertt, there surely can be no hesi, tation. The small difference of price betwixt this and other sail-cloth, may, perhaps, act as a restraint on some peo¬ ple } but, to this, may be opposed the old saying, ‘ that those who buy dearest generally buy cheapest.’ For if the patentee can believe the uniform testimony of every one who has made trial of his article for any length of time, it in the long run (independent of the security it affords) turns out fifty per cent, cheaper than any other canvas. In some measure to elucidate this, he begs leave only to state, that he now supplies a considerable part of the shipping of Dundee with his canvas ; from which he will venture to draw the inference, that if this was not found to be a matter of considerable economy, no such preference would be given over their own sailcloth, which forms the chief staple manufacture of the place, and, it ig believed, is there made in greater quantity than in any other part of the kingdom. The present price of Patent Canvas is Subjoined. If, however, the raw material continues to advance, it must be increased. But it n?ay be observed, that/ the usual difference betwixt the Patent, and Common, Boiled or Bleached Canvas, is about fourpence a yard. There are two kinds of the Patent Canvas,—Bleached anJ Boiled. The Patentee would however recommend the latter, not only as it is cheaper, but, in his opinion, better than the former. The bleached kind is made merely in compli¬ ance with the taste of some of his customers ; but he con¬ ceives the additional expense absolutely thrown away, as the boiled is fully stronger, and, from the nature of its preparation, in a short time becomes nearly as white. Nor has it in any instance, more than the other, been known to mildew. Present Price of Dempster's Patent Camas, Bleached, 2s, 8d.l . XT Boiled, r 2s. Sd.jP61'^’^ L The lighter kinds fall a halfpenny per ytyd on every Number. 7 Cf Orders, addressed to the Patentee, will be attend ed to, in regular succession, according to their dates, St Andreips, Fifeshire,") 7th January, J809. j D. IViflisw. Printer, Edinburgh. V P H O [ 401 ] P H O Phocsea Phlogifton owing to tlie important difcovery of tLe exigence of heat in a ftate of compofition with other matter. Heat , thus combined lofes its activity or becomes infenfible, jutt in the fame way as any other active fubftance lofes its apparent qualities in compofition. Acids, for ex¬ ample, when combined in a certain proportion with fub- ilances for which they have ftrong attra&ion, as alkalies or abforbent earths, lofe all their obvious acid qualities, and the compound turns out mild, and totally conceals the acid which it contains. In a fimilar manner, heat, when combined in certain proportions with other mat¬ ter, lofes its fenfible qualities, and the compound con¬ ceals the heat which it contains. Heat, in this combin¬ ed ftate, was called by its ingenious difcoverer, Dr Black, late7it heat, and it was found to be very abundant in the atmofphere, which owes its exiftence as. an elaftic fluid to the quantity of latent heat that it contains. Af¬ ter this difcovery was made, Dr Crawford, confidering that air was abforbed by a burning body, concluded that the heat which appears in the combuftion of a com- buftible body, is the heat that had before exifted in the air which was confumed by the burning body. M. Lavoifier and others, profecuting this inquiry, found that the combuftible body, while it is burning, unites with the bafts of the air, and that the heat which the air contained, and which was the caufe of the air exift- ing in the ftate of air, is expelled. This abforption of the bafts of the air by the burning body, and the reduc¬ tion of this bafts to a folid form, accounts for the in- creafe of weight which a body acquires by burning j or, in other words, gives a reafon why the matter into which a combuftible body is converted by combuftion, is heavier than the body from which it was produced. The fame abforption of air is obfervable, when a metal is converted into a calx, and the additional weight of the calx is found to be precifely equal to the weight of the air abforbed during the calcination. On thefe princi¬ ples, therefore, we now explain the phenomena in a much more fatisfaftory manner than by the fuppofition of phlogifton, or a principle of inflammability. See Chemistry. PHLOMIS, the Sage-tree, or Jerufalem Sage; a genus of plants belonging to the didynamia clafs. See Botany Index. PHLOX, Lychnidea, or Baftard Lychnis; a genus of plants belonging to the pentandria clafs. See Bota¬ ny Index. PHLYCTENAE, in Medicine, fmall eruptions on the Ikin. PHOC A, a genus of quadrupeds of the order of ferae. . See Mammalia Index. PHOCyEA, the laft town of Ionia, (Mela, Pliny) ; of yEolis, (Ptolemy), becaufe fttuated on the right cr north fide of the river Hermus, which he makes the boundary of iEolis to the fouth. It flood far in the land, on a bay or arm of the feaj had two very fafe har¬ bours, the one called Lampter, the other Naujiathmos, (Livy). It was a colony of lonians, fituated in the ter¬ ritory of yEolis, (Herodotus). Maflilia in Gaul was again a colony from it. Phocceenfes, the people, (Livy) *, Phocaicus, the epithet, (Lucan) 5 applied to Marfeilles. It was one of the 1 2 cities which affembled in the pan¬ ionium or general council of Ionia. Ancient Some writers tell us, that while the foundations of vol! vi. city were hying, there appeared near the .{hare a Vol. XVJ. Part II. great ftioal of fea-calves; whence it was called Phoceca, Fliorrea the word phoca fignifying in Greek a fea-calf. Ptole-—“v-—" my, who makes the river Hermus the boundary be¬ tween yEolia and Ionia, places Phocaea in Atclis 5 but all other geographers reckon it among the cities of Io¬ nia. It flood on the fea-coaft, between Cuma to the north, and Smyrna to the foulh, not far from the Her¬ mus ; and was, in former times, one of the molt wealthy and powerful cities of all Alia j but is notv a poor beg¬ garly village, though the fee of a bilhop. The Phocte- ans were expert mariners, and the firft among the Greeks that undertook long voyages} which they performed in galleys of fifty oars. As they applied themfelves to trade and navigation, they became acquainted pretty early with the coafts and iflands of Europe, where they are faid to have founded feveral cities, namely, Velia in Italy ; Alalia, or rather Aleria, in Corlica ; and Mar¬ feilles in Gaul. Neither were they unacquainted with Spain j for Herodotus tells us, that in the time of Cyr^s the Great, the Phocaeans arriving at Sarteffus, a city m the bay of Cadiz, were treated with extraordinary kind- nefs by Arganthonius king of that country ; who, hear¬ ing that they were under no fmall apprehenfion of the growing power of Cyrus, invited them to leave Ionia, and fettle in what part of his kingdom they pleafed. The Phocaeans could not be prevailed upon to for- fake their country j but accepted a large fum of money, which that prince generoufly prefented them with, to de¬ fray the expence of building a ftrong wall round their city. The wall they built on their return j but it was unable to refift the mighty power of Cyrus, whofe ge¬ neral Harpagus, invefting the city with a numerous ar¬ my, foon reduced it to the utmoft extremities. The Phocaeans, having no hopes of any fuccour, offered to capitulate j but the conditions offered by Harpagus feeming fevere, they begged he would allow them three days to deliberate j and in the mean time, withdraw his forces. Harpagus, though not ignorant of their defign, complied with their requeft. The Phocaeans, taking advantage of this condefcenfion, put their wdves, chil¬ dren, and all their moft valuable eff'efts, on board feve¬ ral veffels wThich they had ready equipped, and convey¬ ed them fafe to the ifland of Chios, leaving the Perfians in poffeflion of empty houles. Their defign was to pur- chafe the Oeneftian iflands, which belonged to the Chians, and fettle there. But the Chians not caring to have them fo near, left they fliould engrofs all the trade to themfelves, as they were a feafaring people, they put to fea again ; and, having taken Phocaea, their native country, by furprife, put all the Perfians they found in it to the fword. They went to Corfica ; great part of them however returned very foon, as did the reft alfo in a fewr years. They then lived in fubjedlion either to the Perfians, or tyrants of their own. Among the lat¬ ter we find mention made of Laodamus, who attended Darius Hyftafpis in his expedition againft the Scythians; and of Dionyfius, who, joining Ariftagoras, tyrant of Miletus, and chief author of the Ionian rebellion, re¬ tired, alter the defeat of his countrymen, to Phoenicia, vf'here he made an immenfe booty, feizing on all the {hips he met with trading to that country. From Phoe¬ nicia he failed to Sicily, wrhere he committed great de¬ predations on the Carthaginians and Tufcans ; but is faid never to have molefted the Greeks. In the Roman times the city of Phocaea fided with 3 E Antiochus HO [ 402 ] P H O whereupon it was befieged, ta- Narfes, who then commanded the troops quartered on Ancient Uuiv. Hijl voi. xv. P Antrochus the Great x hen, and plundered, by the Roman general; but allow¬ ed to be governed by its own laws. In the war which Atillonxns brother to Attains, king of Pergamus, raff¬ ed againfl the Romans, they aflifted the former to the utmoll of their power 5 a circumftance which fo difpleaf- ed the fenate, that they commanded the town to be de- molilhed, and the whole race of the Phocseans to be ut¬ terly rooted out. This fevere lentence would have been put in execution, had not the Maffilienfes, a Phocsean colony, interpofed, and, with much difficulty, afluaged the anger of the fenate. Pompey declared Phocaea a free city, and reftored the inhabitants to all the privile¬ ges they had ever enjoyed; whence, under the firft em¬ perors, it was reckoned one of the moil flourilhing cities of all Alia Minor. This is all we have been able to collecl from the ancients touching the particular hiftory of Phccaea. PHOCAS, a Roman centurion, was raifed to the dignity of emperor by the army, and was crowned at Conftantinople about the year 603. The emperor Mauritius, who w'as thus deferted both by the army and the people, fled to Chalcedon with his five children, whom Phocas caufed to be inhumanly murdered before his eyes, and then he murdered Mauritius himfelf, his brother, and feveral other perfons who were attached to that family. Phocas, thus proclaimed and acknowledged at Con¬ ftantinople, fent, according to cuftom, his own image and that of his wife Leontia to Rome, where they were received with loud acclamations, the people there being incenfed againft Mauritius on account of the cruel exac¬ tions of the exarchs, and his other minifters in Italy. Gregory, furnamed the Great, then bifhop of Rome, icaufed the images to be lodged in the oratory of the martyr Caefarius, and wrote letters to the new emperor, congratulating him upon his advancement to the throne, which he faid was effeded by a particular providence, to deliver the people from the innumerable calamities and heavy oppreffions under which they had long groan¬ ed. Had we no other character of Phocas and Leontia but that which has been conveyed to us in Gregory’s letters, we fnould rank him amongft the beft princes mentioned in hiftory ; but all other writers paint him in quite different colours; and his aftions, tranfmitted to us by feveral hiftorians, evidently fpeak him a moft cruel and blood-thirfty tyrant. He wTas of middling ftature, fays Cedrenus, deformed, and of a terrible af- pect : his hair w'as red, his eye-brows met, and one of his cheeks was marked with a fear, which, when he was in a paffion, grew black and frightful : he was greatly addhfted to wane and women, blood-thirfty, inexorable, bold in fpeech, a ftranger to compaffion, in his principles a heretic. He endeavoured, in the beginning of his reign, to gain the affe&ions of the people by celebrating the Circenfian games with extra- ' ordinary pomp, and diftributing on that occafion large fums among the people •, but finding that in (lead of applauding they reviled him as a drunkard, he order¬ ed his guards to fall upon them. Some were killed, many w7ounded, and great numbers were dragged to prifon : but the populace rifing, fet them at liberty, and thenceforth conceived an irreconcileable averfion to the Plioeas Phocion. tyrant. As foon as the death of Mauritius was known, the frontiers of Perfia, revolted. Phocas, however, ma¬ naged matters fo as to gain him over to his inlereft, and, then treacheroufty and cruelly burnt him alive. He en¬ deavoured to ftrengthen his caufe by refpeftable allian¬ ces 5 but his cruelty was fuch as to render him generally hated, for he fpared neither fex nor age, and amongft others he murdered Conftantina the widow of Mauri¬ tius, and her daughters. Thefe cruelties were at length the caufe of his downfall. He became uni- verfally hateful 5 and perfons in great authority near his perfon confphed againft him. This confpiracy, how¬ ever, was difeovered, and the perfons concerned in it were all put to death. The following year, however, 61 o, he was overtaken by the fate he had fo long de- ferved. Heracli.us, the fon of the governor of Afi ica, who bore the fame name, taking upon him the title of em¬ peror, and being acknowledged as fuch by the people of Africa, failed from thence with a formidable fleet, and a powerful army on "board, for Conftantinople, while Nicetas marched thither by w?ay of Alexandria and the Pentapolis, Heraclius fleered his courfe to Abydus, wher'e he was received with great demonftrations of joy by feveral perfons of rank, who had been baniflied by Phocas. From Abydus he failed to Conftantinople, where he engaged and utterly defeated the tyrant’s fleet. Pliocas took refuge in the palace ; but one Photinus, whofe wife he had formerly debauched, pur- fuing him with a party of foldiers, forced the gates, dragged the cowardly emperor from the throne, and having ftripped him of the imperial robes, and clothed him with a black veft, carried him in chains to Heracli¬ us, who commanded firft his hands and feet, then his arms, and at laft his head, to be cut off: the remaining part of his body was delivered up to the foldiers, who burnt it in the forum. We are told, that Heraclius having reproached him with his evil adminiftration, her anfwered, with great calmnefs, “ It is incumbent upon you to govern better.” Such wTas the end of this cruel tyrant, after he had reigned feven years and fome months. PHOCILIDES, a Greek poet and philofopher of Miletus, flouriftied about 540 years before the Chriftian era. The poetical piece now extant, attributed to him, is not of his compofition, but of another poet who lived in the reign of Adrian. PHOCION was. a diftinguiftied Athenian general and orator in the time of Philip II. of Macedon. His character is thus deferibed in the Ancient Univerfal Hiftory. “ He was too modeft to felieit command, nor Ancient did he promote wars that he might raife his authority by Univ- Hijl- them 5 though, taken either as a foldier, orator, ftates-vo ’ v‘ man, or general, he was by far the moft eminent Athe¬ nian of his time. As he was a moft difinterefted patri¬ ot, he could entertain no great affedlion for Philip : but as he perfeftly well knew the difpofition of his country¬ men, and howr unlikely they wrere long to fupport fuch meafures as were neceffary to humble the Macedonian power, he did not exprefs himfelf vehemently, but cbofe rather to cultivate the efteem which on all occafions Philip {bowed for the ftate of Athens, as a mean of preferving her, when fhe fhould be reduced to that fitua- tion which he conceived they wanted virtue to prevent. From this chara&er the reader wall eafily difeern that Demofthenes PRO [ 403 1 PRO Phocion. Demoftiienes and he could not well agree. The former was always warm, his language copious, and his deligns extenlive ) and Phocion, on the other hand, was of a mild temper, delivered his opinion in very few words, and propoled fchemes at once necelfavy and eai'y to be effected. Yet he feldom or never concurred with the people, but fpoke as poignantly againft their vices as Demoffhenes himfelf; infomuch that this orator once told him, ‘ The Athenians, Phocion, in fome of their mad fits, will murder thee.’ ‘ The fame (anfwered he) may fall to thee, Demofthenes, if ever they come to be fober.” He was afterwards appointed to command the army which was lent to affiit the Byzantines againft Philip, rshom he obliged to return to his own dominions. This truly great man, whom (though extremely poor) no fum could bribe to betray his country, and who at every rilk on all occafions gave them found advice, was at length acculed by his ungrateful countrymen. This event happened in the year before Chrift 318. Pie was fent to Athens by Polyperchon head of a faction in Macedonia, together with his friends, chained in carts, with this meflage, “ That though he was convinced they were traitors, yet he left them to be judged by the Athenians as a free people.” Phocion demanded whe¬ ther they intended to proceed againft him by form of lawT; and fome crying out that they would, Phocion demanded how that could be if they were not allowred a fair hearing : but perceiving, by the clamour of the people, that no fuch thing w’as to be expe&ed, he ex¬ claimed, “ As for myfelf, I confefs the crime objcdled to me, and fubmit to the judgement of the law} but confider, O ye Athenians, what have thefe poor inno- - cent men done that they fhould be involved in the fame calamity with me ?” The people replied with great vociferation, “ They are your accomplices, and that is enough.” Then the decree was read, adjudging them all to death, viz. Phocion, Nicocles, Aheudippus, Aga- mon, and Pythocles ^ thefe were prefent : Demetrius, Phalereus, Callimedon, Charicles, and others, were con- . demned in their abfence. Some moved that Phocion might be tortured before he w’as put to death 5 nay, they were for bringing the rack into the afiembly, and torturing him there. The majority, however, thought it enough if he wras put to death, for which the decree wTas carried unanimoufiy ; fome putting on garlands of flowers when they gave their votes. As he wras going to execution, a perfon who wras his intimate friend afked him if he had any meflage for his fon ? “ Yes,” re¬ plied Phocion *, “ tell him it is my laft command that he forget how ill the Athenians treated his father.” The fpleen of his enemies was not extinguifhed with his life: they pa fled a decree whereby his corpfe was bar.iihed the Athenian territories ; they likewife forbade any Athenians to furnifli fire for his funeral pile. One Conopian took up the corpfe, and carried it beyond Eleufina, where he borrowed fome fire of a Megarian woman and burned it. A Megaiian matron, who at¬ tended with her maid, raifed on the place an honorary . monument; and having gathered up the bones, carried them home, and buried them under her own hearth ; praying at the fame time thus to the Penates : “ To you, O ye gods, guardians of this place, I commit the precious remains of the moft excellent Phocion. Pro- tedf them, I befeech you, from all infults j and deliver them one day to be repofiied in the fepulchre of his an- Phocion, ceflors, when the Athenians (hall become wifer.” It, Phons. ^ was not long before this opportunity occurred. When "~"v the Athenians began to cool a little, and remember the many fervices they had received from Phocion, they de¬ creed him a ftatue of brafs ; ordered his bones to be brought back at the public expence j and decreed that his accufers ihould be put to death. Agnonides, who wras principally concerned in that tragedy, fuffered j but Epicurus and Demophilus, w’ho wrere alto accomplices in it, fled. How’ever, Phocion’s fon met with them, and executed his revenge upon them •, which w’as almoft the only good action he ever performed, as he had a very fmall Jffiare of his father’s abilities, and not any of his virtues. Such is the ficklenefs and fuch the injuftice of popular governments j failings which, if we are to judge from univerfal experience, are abiblutely infepa- rable from them. PHOCIS, (Demofthenes, Strabo, Paufanias) j a country of Greece, contained between Boeotia to the ealt and Locris to the weft, but extending formerly from the Sinus Corinthiacus on the fouth to the fea of Euboea on the north, and, according to Dionyfius, as far as Thermopylae j but reduced afterwards to narrower bounds. Phocenfes, the people ) Phocicus, the epithet, (Juftin) •, Bellurn Phocicum, the facred war which the Thebans and Philip of Macedon carried on againft them for plundering the temple at Delphi ; and by which Philip paved the wray to the fovercignty of all Greece, (Juflin.) Its greateft length w’as from north to fouth, that is, from 38° 45' to 390 20', or about 35 miles; but very narrow’ from eaft to weft, not extending to 30 miles, that is, from 230 io' to 230 40' at the wd- deit, but about 23 miles towards the Corinthian bay, and much narrower flill towards the north. This coun-^Y; Hl" try is generally allowed to have taken its name from Phocus the fon of Ornytion, a native of Corinth ; but having been foon after invaded by the Eginetae, under the conduct of another Phocus, who w’as the fon of Ea- cus king of Enopia, the memory of the firft infenfibly gave w ay to that of the fecond. In Phocis there were many celebrated mountains, fuch as Cythaeron, Helicon, and Parnassus. The lait two we have already noticed in the order of the al¬ phabet. Cythaeron was confecrated to the mufes as wrell as the other two. and was confequently much cele¬ brated by the poets. Both it and Plelicon contend with Mount Parnaffus for height and magnitude. There were no remarkable rivers in Phocis except Cephifus, which runs from the foot of ParnaflTus northward, and empties itfelf in the Pindus, w'hich was near the boundary of that kingdom. It had feveral very confiderable cities •, fuch as Cyrra, Criffa, and AntecyrA, which, accord¬ ing to Ptolemy, w’ere on the fea coafts ; and Pythia, Delphi, Daulis, Elatia, Ergofthenia, and Baulia, which were inland towns. Elatia w’as the largeft and richeft after Delphi. Deucalion was king of that part of Phocis w’hich lies about Parnaifus, at the time that Cecrops llourifhed in Attica ; but the, Phocians afterwards formed them- felves into a commomvealth, to be governed by their ge¬ neral aflfemblies, the members of w’hich w’ere chofen from among themfelves, and w’ere changed as often as occafiou required. Of the hiftory of the Phocians but little is known till the time of the holy war, of which 3 E 2 w;e P H O r 404 ] P H O Piiocis we have the following account in the Ancient Univer- Pk M . . fal Hiftory. i oe^nicia-i « The Phocians having prefumed to plough the terri¬ tories of the city of Gyrra, cohfecrated to the Delphic god, were fummoned by the other Grecian dates before the court of the Amphidtyons, where a conhderable fine was impofed upon them for their facrilege. They re- fufed to pay it, on pretence that it was too large $ and at the next aflembly their dominions were adjudged con- fifcated to the ufe of the temple. This fecond fentence exafperated the Phocians dill more 5 who, at the indi- gation of one Philomelus, or, as he is called by Plu¬ tarch, Philomedes, feized upon the temple, plundered it of its treafure, and held the facred depofitum for a con- fiderable time. This fecond crime occafioned another ' affembly of the Amphi&yons, the refult of which was a formal declaration of war againd the Phocians. The quarrel being become more general, the feveral dates took part in it according to their inclinations or intered. Athens, Sparta, and fome others of the Peloponnefians, declared for the Phocians j and the Thebans, Theffali- ans, Locrians, and other neighbouring dates, againd them. A war was commenced with great fury on both lides, and dyled the holy war, which laded ten years j during which the Phocians, having hired a number of foreign troops, made an obdinate defence, and would in all probability have held out much longer had not Phi¬ lip of Macedon given the finidiing droke to their total defeat and punidunent. The war being ended, the grand council affembled again, and impofed an annual fine of 60 talents upon the Phocians, to be paid to the temple, and continued till they had fully repaired the damage it had fudained from them ; and, till this repa¬ ration fhould be made, they were excluded from dwell- ’ ing in walled towns, and from having any vote in the grand affembly. They did not, however, continue long under this heavy fentence : their known bravery made their adidance fo neceffary to the reft, that they were glad to remit it ; after which remiflion they continued to behave with their ufual courage and refolution, and foon obliterated their former guilt.” We cannot finifh this article without mentioning more particularly Daulis, rendered famous, not fo much for its extent or richnefs, as for the dature and prowefs of its inhabitants ; but dill more for the inhuman repad which was ferved up to Tereus king of Thrace by the women of this city, by whom he was foon after murder¬ ed for the double injury he had done to his fider-in-law Philomela, daughter of Pandion king of Athens. See Philomela. * JPHOEBUS, one of the names given by ancient my- thologids to the Sun, Sol, or Apollo. See Apollo. PHOENICIA, or more properly Phoenice, the an¬ cient name of a country lying between the 34th and 36th degrees of north latitude j bounded by Syria on Phoenicia, the north and ead, by Judcea on the fouth, and by the ' v- 1 Mediterranean on the weft. Whence it borrowred its name is not abfolutely certain. Some derive it from jnc;ent one Phoenix 5 others from the Greek word phoenix, fig- Univ. Hijt. nifying a palm or date, as that tree remarkably abound- vol. ii. ed in this country. Some again fuppofe that Phoenice is originally a tranilation of the Hebrew word Edom, from the Edomites who fied thither in the days of Da¬ vid. By the contraction of Canaan it was alfo called Chna, and anciently Rhabbothin and Colpitis (a). The Jews commonly named it Canaan ; though fome part of it, at lead, they knew by the name of Syrophcenice (b). Bochart tells us that the mod probable etymology is Phene Anak, i. e. “ the defendants of Anak.” Such were the names peculiar to this fmall country j though Phoenice was fometimes extended to all the maritime countries of Syria and Judea, and Canaan to the Phili- ftines, and even to the Amalejsites. On the contrary, thefe two names, and the reft, wTere mod generally fwal- lowed up by thofe of Paleftine and Syria (c). There is fome difagreement among authors with re- fpeft to the northern limits of this country. Ptolemy makes the river Eleutherus the boundary of Phoenice to the north ■, but Pliny, Mela, and Stephanus, place it in the ifland of Aradus, lying north of that river. Strabo obferves, that fome will have the river Eleuthe¬ rus to be the boundary of Seleucis, on the fide of Phoe¬ nice and Ccelefyria. On the coaft of Phoenice, and fouth of the river Eleutherus, ftood the following cities : Simyra, Orthofia, Tripolis, Botrys, Byblus, Palaeby- blus, Berytus, Sidon, Sarepta, Tyrus, Palsetyrus. Phoenice extended, according to Ptolemy, even be¬ yond Mount Carmel *, for that geographer places in Phoenice not only Ecdippa and Ptolemais, but Sycami- num and Daera, which ftand fouth of that mountain. Thefe, however, properly fpeaking, belonged to Pale¬ ftine. We wall not take upon us to mark out the bounds of the midland Phoenice. Ptolemy reckons in it the following towns $ Area, Paige byblus (Old Byb¬ lus), Gabala, and Caefaria Paniae. This province was confiderably extended in the times of Chriftianity j when, being confidered as a province of Syria, it inclu¬ ded not only Damafcus but Palmyra alfo. The foil of this country is good, and productive of many neceffaries for food and clothing. The air is wholefome, and the climate agreeable. It is plentifully watered by fmall rivers} which, running down from Mount Libanus, fometimes fwell to an immoderate de¬ gree, either increafed by the melting of the fnows on that mountain, or by heavy rains. Upon thefe occa- fions they overdow, to the great danger and hinderance. of the traveller and damage of the country. Among thefe rivers is that of Ai>onis. It (a) This lad name is a tranflation of the firft. Rabhotfen is in Hebrew, a great gulf or bay. From rabhotfen, by changing the Hebrew tf into the Greek t, comes rabboten ; and, with a little variation, rhabbothin. KeAiros, colpos, is Greek alfo for a bay or gulf; whence it appears that colpitis or colpites is a tranflation of rabbothin. (b) Bochart fuppofes that the borderers, both upon the Phoenician and Syrian fide, were called by the common- name of Syrophcenicians, as partaking equally of both nations. (c) Or rather Phcenice, Paleftine, and Syria, were promifeuoufly ufed for each other, and particularly the two former. Phoenice and Paleftine, fays Stephanus Byzantinus, were the fame. As for Syria, we have already obfer- ved, that in its larged extent it fometimes comprehended Phoenice and Coelefyria. Herodotus plainly confounds thfffe three names) we mean, ufes one for the other indifferently. P H O [ 405 ] P H 0 »• It is univerfally allowed that the Phoenicians were Canaanites (d) by defcent: nothing is plainer or lefs contefted, and therefore it were time loft to prove it. We flrall only add, that their blood muft have been mixed with that of foreigners in procefs of time, as it happens in all trading’ places •, and that many ftrange families muft have fettled among them, who could confequently lay no claim to this remote origin, how much foever they may have been called Phoenicians, and reckoned of the fame defcent with the ancient proprietors. The Phoenicians were governed by kings j and their territory, as fmall a Hip as it was, included feveral king¬ doms j namely, thofe of Sidon, Tyre, Aradus, Berytus, and Byblus. In this particular they imitated and ad¬ hered to the primitive government of their forefathers j who, like the other Canaanites, were under many petty princes, to whom they allowed the fovereign dignity, referving to themfelves the natural rights and liberties of mankind. Of their civil laws we have no particu¬ lar fyftem. With regard to religion, the Phoenicians wrere the moft grofs and abominable idolaters. The Baal-berith, Baalzebub, Baalfamen, &c. mentioned in Scripture, were fome of the Phoenician gods j as were alfo the Moloch, Aftitaroth, and Thammuz, mentioned in the facred writings.—The word Baa/, in ilfelf an appella¬ tive, was no doubt applied to the true God, until he rejected it on account of its being fo much profaned by the idolaters. The name was not appropriated to any particular deity among the idolatrous nations, but was common to many ; however, it was generally imagined that one great God preftded over all the reft. Among the Phoenicians this deity was named Baal-famen ; whom the Hebrews would have called BaalJhemim, or the God of heaven. In ail probability this was alfo the principal Carthaginian deity, though his Punic name is unknown. We have many religious rites of the Car¬ thaginians handed down to us by the Greek and Roman writers j but they all beftowed names of their own gods upon thofe of the Carthaginians, which leads us to a knowledge of the correfpondence between the charafters of the Phoenician and European deities. The principal deity of Carthage, according to Diodorus Siculus, was Chronus or Saturn. The facrifices offered up to him were children of the beft families. Our author alfo tells us, that the Carthaginians had a brazen ftatue or colof- fus of this god, the hands of which were extended in a61 to receive, and bent downwards in fuch a manner, that the child laid thereon immediately fell down into a hollow where there was a fiery furnace. He .adds alfo, that this- inhuman pradfice feemed to confirm a tradition, handed down to the Greeks from very ear¬ ly antiquity, viz. that Saturn devoured his own chil¬ dren. The goddefs Cceleftis, or Urania, was held in the higheft veneration by the Carthaginians. She is Phoerie a, thought to have been the fame with the queen of hea- » _ ven mentioned in Jeremiah, the Juno Olympia of the Greeks. According to Hefychius, the fame word ap¬ plied in the Punic language both to Juno and Venus: Nay, the ancient Greeks frequently confound Juno, Venus, and Diana or the moon, all together 5 which is to be attributed to the Egyptians and Phoenicians, from whom they received their i’yftem of religion 5 wTho feem in the moft ancient times to have had but one name for them all. Befides thefe there were feveral other deities of later date, who were worfliipped among the Phoeni¬ cians, particularly thofe of Tyre, and confequently among the Carthaginians alfo. Thefe were Jupiter, Apollo, Mars, and Bacchus. Jupiter was worftiipped under the name of Belus or Baal. To him they addref- fed their oaths •, and placed him for the moft part, as there is reafon to believe, at the head of their treaties. The fame name was alfo given to the other two, whence they were frequently miftaken for one another. Apollo or the fun, -went either by this name limply, or by others, of which this made a part. The Carthaginian fuperftition, however, was not con¬ fined to thefe deities alone. They worthipped alio the fire, air, and other elements; and had gods of rivers, meads, &c. Nay, they paid divine honours to the fpi- rits of their heroes, and even to men and women them¬ felves while yet in life ; and in this adoration Hannibal the Great had for fome time a ihare, notwithftanding the infamous condu6l of his countrymen towards him at laft. In order to worlhip thole gods with more con- vemency on all occafions, the Carthaginians had a kind of portable temples. Thefe were only covered chariots, in which were fome fmall images reprefenting their fa¬ vourite deities; and which were drawn by oxen. They were alfo a kind of oracle ; and their refponfes were un- derftood by the motion impreffed upon the vehicle. This was likewife an Egyptian or Libyan cuftom 3 and Tacitus informs us that the ancient Germans had fome- thing of the fame kind. The tabernacle of Moloch is thought to have been a machine of this kind 3 and it is not improbable that the whole was derived from the ta¬ bernacle of the Jews in the wildernels. Befides all the deities above-mentioned, we ftill find another, named the Daemon or Genius of Carthage, mentioned in the treaty made by Philip of Macedon and Hannibal. What this deity might be, we know not 3 however, it may be obferved, that the pagan world in general believed in the exiftence of demons, or intel¬ ligences who had a kind of middle nature between gods and men, and to whom the adminiftration of the world was in a great meafure committed. Hence it is na wonder that they fttould have received religious honours. For when once mankind were poffeffed with the opinion that they were the minillers of the gods, and trufted with the difpenfation of their favours, as well as the in- flidlion (d) Bochart infinuates that the Canaanites were afiiamed of their name, on account of the curfe denounced on their progenitor, and terrified by the wars fo vigoroufiy and fuccefsfully waged on them by the Ifraelites, purely be- eaufe they were Canaanites 3 and that therefore, to avpid the ignominy of the one and the danger of the other, , they abjured their old name, and changed it for Phoenicians, Syrians, Syrophoenicians, and Affyrians. Heideuger conje6tures alfo that they were afhamed of their ancefter Canaan. P H O fliclion of tlieir punifliments, it is natural to fuppofe that they would be defirous of making their addreffes to them. See Astarte and Polytheism. Herodotus iuppoies the Phoenicians to have been cir- cumcifed j but Jofephus aiTerts, that none of the nations included under the vague name of Paleftine and Syria ufed that rite, the Jews excepted ; fo that if the Phoe¬ nicians had apciently that cuftom, they came in time to negleft it, and at length wholly laid it alkie. They abltained however from the flelh of (wipe. Much is faid of their arts, fciences, and manufactures; but as what we find concerning them is couched in ge¬ neral terms only, rve cannot defcant on particulars. The Sidonians, under which denomination we compre¬ hend the Phoenicians in general, were of a molt happy genius. They were from the beginning addifted to philofophical exercifes of the mind 5 infomuch that a Sidonian, by name Mofchus, taught the doCtrine of atoms before the Trojan wTar : and Abomenus of Tyre puzzled Solomon by the fubtilty of his queftions. Phoenice continued to be one of the feats of learning, and both Tyre and Sidon produced their philofophers of later ages ; namely, Boethus and Diodatus of Sidon, Antipater of Tyre, and Appollonius of the fame place; who gave an account of the writings and difciples of Zeno. For their language, fee Philology, n° 61. As to their manufa&ures, the glafs of Sidon, the purple of Tyre, and the exceeding fine linen they wove, were the produCt of their cuvn country, and their own in¬ vention : and for their extraordinary fkill in working metals, in hewing timber and Hone ; in a word, for their perfeCt knowledge .of what was folid, great, and ornamental in architecture—we need only put the read¬ er in mind of the large lhare they had in erecting and decorating the temple at Jerufalem under their king Hiram. Their fame for tafte, ,defign, and ingenious invention, was Inch, that whatever was elegant, great, or pleafing, whether in apparel, veffels, or toys, was diitinguilhed by way of excellence with the epithet of Sidonian. The Phoenicians were likewife celebrated merchants, navigators, and planters of colonies in foreign parts. As merchants, they may be faid to have engroffed all the commerce of the weftern world : as navigators, they were the boldeft, the moft experienced, and greateft dif- coverers, of the ancient times : they had for many ages no rivals. In planting colonies they exerted themfelves fo much, that, confidering their habitation was little more than the flip of ground between Mount Libanus and the fea, it is furprifing how they could furnifli fuch fupplies of people,- and not wholly depopulate their na¬ tive country. It is generally fuppofed that the Phoenicians were in¬ duced to deal in foreign commodities by their neigh¬ bourhood with the Syrians, who were perhaps the mofl: ancient of thofe who carried on a conflderahle and regular trade with the more eaftcrn regions: and this conjeChire appears probable at leaft; for their owm territory was but fmall, and little able to afford any confiderable exports, if we except manufactures : but that their manufactures were anyways confiderable till they began to turn all the channels of trade into their own country, it is hard to believe. In Syria, which was 1 a large country, they found ftore of productions of the natural growth of that foil, and many choice and uf'e- 2 406 ] P H O ful commodiles brought from the eaft. Thus, having Phoenicia. a kite coail, with convenient harbours, on one fide, and ~—'» ^ excellent materials for {hip-building on the other; per¬ ceiving how acceptable many commodities that Syria furnifiled would be in foreign parts, and being at the fame lime, perhaps, fhown the w ay by the Syrians them¬ felves, who may have navigated the Mediterranean—■ they turned all their thoughts to trade and navigation, and by an uncommon application foon eclipfed their fters in that art. It were in vain to talk of the Edomites, who fled hi¬ ther in David’s time ; or to inquire why Herodotus fup- pofes the Phoenicians came from the Red fea ; their ori¬ gin we have already feen. That feme of the Edomites fled into this country in the days of David, and that they were a trading people, is very evident: what im¬ provements they brought with them into Phoenice,- it is hard to fay ; and by the wTay, it is as difficult to afeertain their numbers. In all probability they brought with them a knowdedge of the Red fea, and of the fouth parts of Arabia, Egypt, and Ethiopia; and by their informa¬ tion made the Phoenicians acquainted with thofe coalfs ; by which means they were enabled to undertake voy¬ ages to thofe parts, for Solomon, and Pharoah Nee ho, king of Egypt. Their whole thoughts were employed on fchemes to advance their commerce. They affe&ed no empire but that of the fea; and feemed to aim at nothing but the peaceable enjoyment of their trade. This they extend¬ ed to all the known parts they could reach ; to the Britifti ifles, commonly under-flood by the Caffiterides ; to Spain, and other places in the ocean, both within and without the ftraits of Gibraltar; and, in gene¬ ral, to all the ports of the Mediterranean, the Black fea, and the lake Maeotis. In all theie parts they had fettlements and correlpondents, from winch they drew what was ufeful to themfelves, or might be fo to others'; and thus they exercifed the three great, branches of trade, as it is commonly divided into importation, expor¬ tation, and tranfportation, in full latitude. Such was their fea-trade ; and for that w hich they carried on by land in Syria, Mefopotamia, Affyria, Babylonia, Pcr- fla, Arabia, and even in India, it was of no lefs extent, and may give us an idea of what this people once was, how rich and how defcrvedly their merchants are men¬ tioned in Scripture as equal to princes. Their coun¬ try was, at that time, the great wareheule, where every thing that might either adminifter to the neceflities or luxury of mankind was to be found ; which' they diilri- buted as they judged would be the heft for their own intereft. The purple of Tyre, the glafs of Sidon, and the exceeding fine linen made in this country, together with other curious pieces of art in metals and w>ood, al¬ ready mentioned, appear to have been the chief and al- mofl only commodities of Phoenice itfelf. Indeed their territory was fo final!, that it is not to be imagined they could afford to export any of their own growth ; it is more likely that they rather wanted than abounded with the fruits of the earth. Having thus fpoken in general terms of their trade, we fhall now touch upon their {hipping and forne things remarkable in their navigation. Their larger embar- lations were of two forts ; they divided them into round fliips or gauli; and long flops, galleys, or triremes. When they drew7 up in line of battle, the gauli were dif- pofed P H O [ 407 ] P H O Phoemrop. pofed at a fmall diftance from each other in the wings, teruS or in the van and the rear : their triremes were con- ^ Phopiyx. ^ tra(^e(j together in the centre. If, at any time, they obferved that a ftranger kept them company in their voyage, or followed in their track, they were Hire to get rid of him if they could, or deceive him if pofiible 5 in which policy they went fo far, as to venture the lofs of their ihips, and even their lives; fo jealous ivere they of foreigners, and fo fcenacioufly bent on keeping the whole trade to themfelves. In order to difcourage other na¬ tions from engaging in commerce, they praftifed pi¬ racy, or pretended to be at war with fuch as they met when they thought themfelves ftrongett. This was but a natural ftroke of policy in people who grafped at the whole commerce of the then known world. We mull not forget here the famous fifhery of Tyre, which fo re¬ markably enriched that eiiy. See Astronomy, n°« 7. Ophir, and Tyre. PHOENICQPTERUS, or Flamingo, a genus of bird? belonging to the order of grallce. See Ornitho¬ logy Index. PHOENIX, in AJlronomy. See Astronomy Index. Phoenix, the Great Palm, or Date tree, a genus of plants belonging to the order of palmae. See Botany Index. As the account of this valuable plant already given in its proper place, under Botany', is rather ihort to be fatisfaflory, we lhall here enter a little more into the detail of its natural hiftory. There is only one fpecies, viz. the daclylifera, or common date-tree, a na¬ tive of Africa and eaftern countries, where it grows to ;o, 60, and 100 feet high. The trunk is round, upright, and iiudded with protuberances, which are the veftiges of the decayed leaves. From the top iiTucs forth a clufter of leaves or branches eight or nine feet long, ex¬ tending all around like an umbrella, and bending a lit¬ tle towards the earth. The bottom part produces a number of ftalks like thole of the middle, but feldom {hooting fo high as four or five feet. Thefe ftalks, fays Adanfon, diffule the tree very confiderably ; fo that, wherever it naturally grows in forefts, it is extremely difficult to open a paffage through its prickly leaves. The date-tree was introduced into Jamaica foon after the conqueft of the ifland by the Spaniards. There are however, but few of them in Jamaica at this time. The fruit is fomewhat in the fhape of an acorn. It is com- pofed of a thin, light, and glofly membrane, fomewhat pellucid and yellowiffi ; which contains a fine, foft, and pulpy fruit, which is firm, fweet, and fomewhat vinous to the tafte, efculent, and wholefome; and within this is inclofed a folid, tough, and hard kernel, of a pale grey colour on the outfide, and finely marbled within like the nutmeg. For medicinal ufe dates are to be chofen large, full, frefli, yellow on the furface, foft and tender, not too much wrinkled; fuch as have a vinous tafte, and do not rattle when ftiaken. They are produced in many parts of Europe, but never ripen perfeftly there. The bell are brought from Tunis; they are alfo very fine and good in Egypt and in many parts of the eaft. Thofe of Spain and France look well; but are never perfectly ripe, and very fubject to decay. They are prei'erved three different ways ; feme preffed and dry ; others preffed more moderately, and again moiftened with their own juice ; and- others not preffed at all, but moiftened with the juice of other dates, as they are packed up, which is done in balkets or {kins. Thofe preferved in this laft way are much the beft. Dates Phoenix, have always been efteemed moderately ftrengthening and —w"- aftringent. Though the date tree grows everywhere indiferimi- nately on the northern coafts of Africa, it is not cul¬ tivated with care, except beyond Mount Atlas; be- caufe the heat is not fufficiently powerful along the coafts to bring the fruits to proper maturity. We ffiall here extradl iome obfervations from Mr l)es Fontaines relpedting the manner of cultivating it in Barbary, and on the different ufes to which it is applied. All that part of the Zaara which is near Mount Atlas, and the only part of this vaft defert wTh:ch is inhabi¬ ted, produces very little corn ; the foil being fandy, and burnt up by the fun, is almoft entirely unfit for the cultivation of grain, its only produftions of that kind being a little barley, maize, and forgo. The date-tree, however, fupplies the deficiency of corn to the inhabitants of thefe countries* and furniffics them with almoft the whole of their fubfiftence. They have fiocks of {beep ; but as they are not numerous, they preferve them for the fake of their wool; beiides, the llefti of thefe animals is very unwholefome food in countries that are exceffively warm ; and thefe people, though ignorant, have probably been enabled by ex¬ perience to know that it was falutary for them to ab- ftain irom it. The date trees are planted without any order, at the diftance of 12 feet one from the other, in the neighbourhood of rivulets and ftreams which iflue from the land. Forens of them may be feen here and there, fome of which are feveral leagues in cir¬ cumference. The extent of thefe plantations depends upon the quantity of water which can be procured to water them: for they require much moiiture. All thefe forefts are intermixed with orange, almond, and pomegranate trees, and with vines which twift round the trunks of the date trees; and the heat is ftrong enough to ripen the fruit, though they are never ex poled to the fun. Along the rivulets and ftreams, dykes are eredfted to ftop the courfe of their waters, in order that they may be diftributed amongft the date trees by means of fmall canals. The number of canals is fixed for each individual ; and in feveral cantons, to have a right to them, the proprietors are obliged to pay an annual fum proportionable to the number and extent of their planta¬ tions. Care is taken to till the earth well, and to raife a circular border around the root of each tree, that the water may remain longer and in larger quantity. The date trees are watered in every feafon, but more particu¬ larly during the great heats of fummer. It is generally in winter that new plantations of this tree are formed. For this purpofe thofe who cultivate them take {hoots of thofe which produce the beft dates, and plant them at a fmall diftance one from the other. At the end of three or four years thefe {hoots, if they have been properly taken care of, begin to bear fruit; but this fruit is as yet dry, without fweetnefs, and even without kernels ; they never reach the higheft degree of perfection of which they are fufceptible till they are about 15 or 20 years old. Thefe plants are however produced from the leeds ta¬ ken out of the fruit, provided they are freffi. They ftiould be fown in pots filled wfith light rich earth, and plunged into a moderate hotbed of tanners bark, which. ftiould / P H O [40 Phoenix, {liould be kept in a moderate temperature of heat, and ^ the earth frequently refrelhed with water. When the plants are come up to a proper fize, they (hould be each planted in a feparate fmall pot, filled with the fame light earth, and plunged into a hotbed again, obferving to refrelh them with water, aS alfo to let them have air in proportion to the warmth of the feafon and the bed in which they are placed. During the fummer time they Ihould remain in the fame hotbed } but in the be¬ ginning of Auguft, they Ihould have a great lhare of air to harden them againlt the approach of winter ; for if they are too much forced, they will be fo tender as not to be preferved through the wunter without much difficulty, efpecially if you have not the conveniency of a bark dove to keep them in. The foil in which thefe plants ffiould be placed, mult be compofed in the fol- « lowing manner, viz. half of light freffi earth taken from a patture-ground, the other half fea fand and rotten dung or tanners bark in equal proportion ; thefe ffiould be carefully mixed, and laid in a heap three or four months at lead before it is ufed, but ffiould be often turned over to prevent the growth of weeds, and to fweeten the earth. The trees, however, which fpring from feed never produce fo good dates as thofe that are raifed from ffioots •, they being always poor and ill taded. It is un¬ doubtedly by force of cultivation, and after feveral ge¬ nerations, that they acquire a good quality. The date trees which have been originally fown, grow rapidly, and we have been aiTured that they bear fruit in the fourth or fifth year. Care is taken to cut the in¬ ferior branches of the date tree in proportion as they rife and a piece of the root is always left of fome inches in length, which-affords the eafy means of climbing to the fummit. Thefe trees live a long time, according to the account of the Arabs and in order to prove it, they fay that when they have attained to their full growth, no change is obferved in them for the fpace of ' three generations. The number of females which are cultivated is much fuperior to that of the males, becaufe they are much more profitable. The fexual organs of, the date tree grow, as is well known, upon different dalks, and thefe trees dower in the months of April and May, at which time the Arabs cut the male branches to impregnate the female. For this purpofe, they make an incifion in the trunk of each branch which they wiffi to produce fruit, and place in it a dalk of male dowers 5 without this pre¬ caution the date tree would produce only abortive fruit (a). In fome cantons the male branches are only Ihaken over the female. The praftice of impregnating the date tree in this manner is very ancient. Pliny de- 8 ] P H O fcribes it very accurately in that part of his work where he treats of the palm tree. There is fcarcely any part of the date tree which is not ufeful. The wood, though' of a fpongy texture, lads fuch a number of years, that the inhabitants of the country fay it is incorruptible. They employ it for mak¬ ing beams and indruments of huffiandry j it burns dow- ly, but the coals which refult from its combudion are very drong, and produce a great heat. The Arabs drip the bark and fibrous parts from the young date trees, and eat the fubdance which is in the centre ; it is very nouriffiing, and has a fweet tade : it is known by the name of the marrow of the date tree. They eat alfo the leaves, when they are young and ten¬ der, with lemon juice 5 the old ones are laid out to dry, and are employed for making mats and other works of the fame kind, wffiich are much ufed, and with wffiich they carry on a confiderable trade in the interior parts of the country. From the fides of the dumps of the branches which have been left arife a great number of delicate filaments, of wffiich they make ropes, and which might ferve to fabricate cloth. Of the fredi dates and fugar, fays Haffelquid, the Egyptians make a conferve, which has a very pleafant tade. In Egypt they ufe the leaves as fiy-fiaps, for driving away the numerous infedls wffiich prove fo troublefome in hot countries. The hard boughs are ufed for fences and other purpofes of huffiandry 5 the principal dem for building. The fruit, before it is ripe, is fomewffiat adringent 5 but when thoroughly mature, is of the nature of the fig. The Senegal dates are ffiorter than thofe of Egypt, but much thick¬ er in the pulp, which is faid to have a fugary agree¬ able tade, fuperior to that of the bed dates of the Le¬ vant. A wffiite liquor, known by the name of v/z’/£, is drawm alfo from the date tree. To obtain it, all the branches are cut from the fummit of one of thefe trees, and after feveral incifions have been made in it, they are covered with leaves, in order that the heat of the fun may not dry it. The fap drops dowm into a veffel placed to receive it, at the bottom of a circular groove, made below the incifions. The1'mi Ik of the date tree has a fweet and agreeable tade wffien it is new •, it is very refrediing, and it is even given to fick people to drink, but it generally turns four at the end of 24 hours. Old trees are chofen for this operation, becaufe the cutting of the branch¬ es, and the large quantity of fap wffiich dows from them, greatly exhaud then*, and often caufe them to de¬ cay. The male flowers of the date tree are alfo ufeful. They Phoeri.r. (a) The celebrated Linnaeus, in his Differtation on the Sexes of Plants, fpeaking of the date tree, fays, “ A female date-bearing palm flowered many years at Berlin without producing any feeds j but the Berlin people taking care to have fome of the bloffoms of the male tree, which was then flow'ering at Leipfic, fent to them by the pod, they obtained fruit by thefe means j and fome dates, the offspring of this impregnation, being planted in my gar¬ den, fprung up, and to this day continue to grow vigoroufly. Koempfer formerly told us, how necefl'ary it w^as found by the oriental people, who live upon the produce of palm trees, and are the true Lotoplwgi, to plant fome male trees among the females, if they hoped for any fruit: hence it is the praftice of thofe w ho make w ar in that part of the world to cut dowm all the male palms, that a famine may afflilt their proprietors j fometimes even the inhabitants themfelves deflroy the male trees when they dread an invafion, that their enemies may find no fufle- Itance in the country.” \ 4 P H O [ 409 ] P H 0 P'hocnix. They are eaten when ftill tender, mixed up with a little *’ v T lemon iuice. They are reckoned to be very provoca¬ tive : the odour which they exhale is probably the caul’e of this property being afcribed to them. Thefe date trees are very lucrative to the inhabi¬ tants of the defert. Some of them produce 20 bunches of dates ; but care is always taken to lop off a part of them, that thofe which remain may become larger j 10 or 12 bunches only are left on the moft vigorous trees. It is reckoned that a good tree produces, one year with another, about the value of 10 or 12 (hillings to the proprietor. A pretty confiderabie trade is carried On with dates in the interior part of the country, and large quantities of them are exported to France and Ita¬ ly. The crop is gathered towards the end of Novem¬ ber. When the bunches are taken from the tree, they are hung up in fome very dry place where they may be (heltered and fecure from infefts. Dates afford wholefome nourifhment, and have a very agreeable tafte when they are frdh. The Arabs eat them without feafoning. They dry and harden them in the fun, to reduce them to a kind of meal, which they lay up in ftor-e to fupply themfelves with food during the long journeys which they often undertake acrofs their deferts. This limple food is fufficient to nourilh them for a long time.—-The inhabitants of the Zaara procure alfo from their dates a kind of honey which is exceed¬ ingly fweet. For this purpofe they choofe thofe which have the fofteft pulp ; and having put them into a large jar with a hole in the bottom, they fqueeze them by placing over them a weight of eight or ten pounds. —The iroft fluid part of the fubftance, which drops through the hole, is what they call the honey of the date. Even the ftones, though very hard, are not thrown away. They give them to their camels and fheep as food, after they have bruifed them or laid them to foften in water. The date, as well as other trees which are cultivated, exhibits great variety in its fruit, with refpecf to ffiape, fize, quality, and even colour. There are reckoned to be at leaft twenty different kinds. Dates are very liable to be pierced by rvorms, and they foon corrupt in moift or rainy weather. From what has been faid, it may eafily be perceived, that there is, perhaps, no tree whatever ufed for fo ma¬ ny and fo valuable purpofes as the date tree. Thoenix, in antiquity, a famous bird, which is ge¬ nerally looked upon by the moderns as fabulous. The ancients fpeak of this bird as fingle, or the only ono of its kind ; they defcribe it as of the fize of an eagle; its head finely crefted with a beautiful plumage, its neck covered with feathers of a gold colour, and the reft of its body purple, only the tail white, and the eyes fpark- ling like ftars: they hold, that it lives 560 or 600 years in the wildernefs •, that when thus advanced in age, it builds itfelf a pile of fweet wood and aromatic gums, and fires it with the wafting of its wings, and thus burns itfelf; and that from its afhes arifes a worm, which in time grows up to be a phoenix. Hence the Phoenicians gave the name of phoenix to the palm-tree ; becaufe when burnt down to the root it rifes again fairer than ever. In the fixth book of the Annals of Tacitus, fe<5t. 28. Vol. XVI. Part II. it is obferved that, in the year of Rome 787, the phoe¬ nix reviiited Egypt 5 which occafioned among the learn¬ ed much fpeculation. This being is facred to the fun. Of its longevity the accounts are various. The common perfuafion is, as we have mentioned above, that it lives 500 years j though by fome the date is extended to 1461. The feveral eras when the phoenix has been feen are fixed by tradition. The firft, we are told, was in the reign of Sefoftris ; the fecond in that of Amafis 5 and, in the period when Ptolemy the third of the Ma¬ cedonian race was feated on the throne of Egypt, an¬ other phoenix dire&ed its flight towards Heliopolis. When to thefe circumftances are added the brilliant ap¬ pearance of the phoenix, and the tale that it makes fre¬ quent excurfions with a load on its back, and that when, by having made the experiment through a long trad! of air, it gains fufficient confidence in its own vigour, it takes up the body of its father and flies with it to the altar of the fun to be there confumed ; it cannot but appear probable, that the learned of Egypt had enveloped under this allegory the philofophy of co¬ mets. Phoenix, fon of Amyntor king. oi^Vrgos by Cleo- bule or Hippodamia, was preceptor to young Achilles. His father having proved faithlefs to his wife, through fondnefs for a concubine called C/i/tia, Cleobule, who was jealous of him, perfuaded her fon Phoenix to ingra¬ tiate himfelf with his father’s miftrefs. Phoenix eaiily fucceeded ; but Amyntor difeovering his intrigues, he drew a curfe upon him, and the fon was foon after de¬ prived of his fight by divine vengeance. Some fay that Amyntor himfelf put out his fen’s eyes, which fo cruelly provoked him that he meditated the death of his father. Reafon and piety, however, prevailed over paffion ; and that he might not become a parricide, Phoenix fled from Argos to the court of Peleus king of Phthia. Here he was treated wdth tendernefs j Peleus carried him to Chiron, who reftored his eyefight; foon after which he was made preceptor to Achilles, his benefactor’s fon. He was alfo prefented with the government of many ci¬ ties, and made king of the Dolopes. He went with his pupil to the Trojan war ; and Achilles was ever grate¬ ful for the inftru&ions and precepts which he had re¬ ceived from him. After, the death of Achilles, Phoenix, with others, was commiffioned by the Greeks to return into Greece, to bring to the war young Pyrrhus. This commiffion he fuccefsfully performed ; and after the fall of Troy, he returned with Pyrrhus, and died in Thrace. He was buried, according to Strabo, near Trachinia, where a fmall river in the neighbourhood received the name of Phoenix. There was another Phoenix, fon of Agenor, by a nymph who was called Telephajfa, ac¬ cording to Apollodorus and Mofchus, or, according to others, Epimedufa, Perimeda, or Agriope. He was, like his brother Cadmus, and Cilix, fent by his father in purfuit of his After Europa, whom Jupiter had carried away under the form of a bull •, and when his inquiries proved unfuccefsful, he fettled in a country, wffiich, ac¬ cording to fome, was from him called Phoenicia. From, him, as fome fuppofe, the Carthaginians were called Pceni. PHOLAS, a genus of fhell-fiffi belonging to the or¬ der of vermes teftacea. See Conchology Index. The wrord pholas is derived from the Greek, and fig- nifies fomelhing which lies hid. This name they derive 3 F from Phoenix, Pholas. P H O [ 410 ] P H O from their property of making themfelves holes in the earth, faBtl, wood, or ftone, and living in them. The means of their getting there, however, are as yet en¬ tirely unknown. All that we can know with certainty is, that they mud have penetrated thefe fubdances when very fmall; becaufe the entrance of the hole in wdiich the pholas lodges is always much lefs than the inner part of it, and indeed than the diell of the pholas itfelf. Hence fome have fuppofed that they were hatched in holes accidentally formed in dones, and that they natu¬ rally grew of fuch a drape as was neceffary to fill the ca¬ vity. The holes in which the pholades lodge are ufually twice as deep, at lead, as the diells themfelves are long j the figure of the holes is that of a truncated cone, ex¬ cepting that they are terminated at the bottom by a rounded cavity, and their pofition is ufually fomewhat oblique to the horizon. The openings of thefe holes are what betray the pholas being in the done j but they are always very fmall in proportion to the fize of the fidr. There feems to be no progreffive motion of any animal in nature lb dowr as that of the pholas} it is immerfed in the hole, and has.410 movement except a fmall one to¬ wards the centre of the earth j and this is only propor¬ tioned to the growth of the animal. Its work is very difficult in its motion *, but it has great time to perform it in, as it only moves downward, finking itlelf deeper in the done as it increafes itfelf in bulk. That part by means of which it performs this, is a fieffiy fubdance placed near the lower extremity of the drell } it is of the drape of a lozenge, and is confiderably large in propor¬ tion to the fize of the animal j and though it be of a foft fubdance, it is not to be wmndered at that in fo long a time it is able, by condant wTork, to burrow into ■a hard done. The manner of their performing this may be feen by taking one of them out of the done, and pla¬ cing it upon fome foft clay j for they will immediately get to work in bending and extending that part allotted to dig for them, and in a few hours they will bury them¬ felves in the mud in as large a hole as they had taken many years to make in the done. They find little re- fidance in fo foft a fubdance •, and the neceffity of their hiding themfelves evidently makes them haden their work. The animal is lodged in the lowTer half of the hole in the done, and the upper half is filled up by a pipe of a fleffiy fubdance and conic figure, truncated at the end : this they ufually extend to the orifice of the hole, and place on a level with the furface of the done} but they feldom extend it any farther than this. The pipe, though it appears fingle, is in reality compofed of tw-o pipes, or at lead it is compofed of two parts fepara- ted by a membrane. The ufe of this pipe or probofeis is the fame with that of the probofeis of other diell-fifh, to take in feawvater into their bodies, and afterwards to throw it out again. In the middle of their bodies they have a fmall green veffel, the ufe of which has not yet been difeovered. This, when plunged in fpirit-of-wine, becomes of a purple colour: but its colour on linen does not become purple in the fun like that of the murex. The pholas is remarkable for its luminous quality, which was noticed by Pliny, who obferves that it diines in the mouth of the perfon who eats it; and if it touch his hands or clothes, it makes them luminous. He alfo lays that the light depends upon its moidure. The light of this fidi has furnidied matter for various obfervations and experiments to M. Reaumur and the Bolognian aca¬ demicians, efpecially Beccarius, wdio look fo much pains with the fubject of phofphoreal light. M. Reaumur obferves, that whereas other fiffies give light when they tend to putrefcence, this is more lu¬ minous in proportion to its being freffi j that when they are dried, their light will revive if they be mold- ened either with freffi or fait water, but that brandy immediately extinguidies it. He endeavoured to make this light permanent, but none of his fchemes fuc- ceeded. The attention of the Bolognian academicians was en¬ gaged to this fubject by M. F. Mardlius in 1724, who brought a number of thefe fiffies, and the dones in which they were inclofed, to Bologna, on purpofe for their examination. Beccarius obferved, that though this fiffi ceafed to dune when it became putrid, yet that in its mod putrid date it would ffiine, and make the water in which it was immerfed luminous when it was agitated. Galeatius and Montius found that wine or vinegar extinguilhed this light; that in common oil it continued fome days, but in rectified fpirit of wine or urine hardly a minute. In order to obferve in what manner this light was af¬ fected by different degrees of heat, they made ufe of a Reaumur’s thermometer, and found that water rendered luminous by thefe fiffies increafed in light till the hear, arrived to 450, but that it then became fuddenly extinft, and could not be revived again. In the experiments of Beccarius, a folution of fea-falt increafed the light of the luminous water ; a folution of nitre did not increafe it quite fo much. Sal ammoniac diminilhed it a little, oil of tartar per deliquium nearly extinguiffied it, and the acids entirely. This water, poured upon freffi calcined gypfum, rock-cryftal, ce- rufe, or lugar, became more luminous. He alfo tried the effeCls of it when poured upon various other fub- ftances, but there was nothing very remarkable in them. Afterwards, ufing luminous milk, he found that oil of vitriol extinguilhcd the light, but that of tartar in¬ creafed it. This gentleman had the curiofity to try how differ¬ ently coloured fubftances were affeded by this kind of light j and having, for this purpofe, dipped feveral rib¬ bons in it, the while came out the brighteft, next to this was the yellow, and then the green 5 the other colours could hardly be perceived. It was not, however, any particular colour, but only light, that was perceived in this cafe. He then dipped boards painted with the dif¬ ferent colours, and alfo glafs tubes filled with fubftances of different colours, in water rendered luminous by the fiffies. In both thefe cafes, the red was hardly vifible, the yellow was the brighteft, and the violet the dulieft. But on the boards, the blue was nearly equal to the yel¬ low, and the green more languid ; whereas in the glaf- fes, the blue was inferior to the green. Of all the liquors to which he put the pholades, milk was rendered the moft luminous. A fingle pholas made feven ounces of milk fo luminous, that the faces of perfons might be diftinguiffied by it, and it looked as if it were tranfparent. Air appeared to be neceffary to this light : for when Beccarius put the luminous milk into glafs tubes, no "agi¬ tation would make it ffiine unlefs bubbles of air were mix¬ ed Pholas. P H 0 [41 Pholeys. ed with it. Alto Montius and Galeatius found, that, in —v ' ‘ an exhautted receiver, the pholas loft its light, but the water was fome times made more luminous : which they afcribed to the riftng of bubbles of air through it. Beccarius, as well as Reaumur, had many fchemes to render the light of thefe pholades permanent. For this purpofe he kneaded the juice into a kind of pafte with llour, and found that it would give light when it was immerfed in warm water •, but it anfwered beft to pre- ferve the fiftr in honey. In any other method of prefer- vation, the property of becoming luminous would not continue longer than fix months, but in honey it had lafted above a year j and then it would, when plunged in warm water, give as much light as ever it had done. See Barbut’s Genera Vermium, p. 14. &c. PHOLEYS, or Foulies, are a people of Africa, of very peculiar manners. Some authors tell us, that the kingdom of Pholey, from whence they derive their name, is divided from that of Jaloff by a lake called in the language of the Mundingoes Cayor; and that it ftretches from eaft to weft about 180 miles; but that, though it extends a great way louth, its limits in that direftion are not exactly afcertained. Mr Moore, however, gives a very different account, and fays, that the Pholeys live in clans, build towns, and are in very kingdom and country on each fide of the river ; yet are not fubjedl to any of the kings of the country, though they live in their territories j for if they are ufed ill in one nation, they break up their towns, and remove to another. They have chiefs of their own, who rule with fiach moderation, that every a£! of government feems rather an aft of the people than of one man. This form of government is eafily adminiftered, becaufe the people are of a good and quiet difpofition, and fo well inftrufted in what is juft and right, that a man who does ill expofes himfelf to univerfal contempt. The natives of all thefe countries, not being avari¬ cious of land, defire no more than they can ufe ; and as they do not plough with horfes or other cattle, they can ufe but very little ; and hence the kings willingly allow the Pholeys to live in their dominions, and cul¬ tivate the earth. The Pholeys have in general a tawney complexion, though many of them are of as deep a black as the Mundingoes $ and it is fuppofed that their alliances with the Moors have given them the mixed colour be¬ tween the true olive and the black. They are rather of a low ftature, but have a genteel and eafy fhape, with an air peculiarly delicate and agreeable. Though they are ftrangers in the country, they are the greateft planters in it. They are extremely indu- ftrious and frugal, and raife much more corn and cot¬ ton than they confume, which they fell at reafonable rates ; and are fo remarkable for their hofpitality, that the natives efteem it a bleffing to have a Pholey town in their neighbourhood j and their behaviour has gain¬ ed them fuch reputation, that it is efteemed infamous for any one to treat them in an unhofpitable manner. Their humanity extends to all, but they are doubly kind to people of their race ; and if they know of any one of their body being made a Have, they will rea¬ dily redeem him. As they have plenty of food, they never fuffer any of their own people to want j but fup- 1 j p H o port the old, the blind, and the lame, equally with the Pholeys, others. • • Thefe people are feldom angry ; and Mr Moore ob- ferves that he never heard them abule each other ; yet this mildnefs is far from proceeding from want of cou¬ rage, they being as brave as any people of Africa, and very expert in the ufe of their arms, which are javelins, cutlaffes, bows and arrows, and upon occafion guns. They uiually fettle near fome Mundingo town, there being fcarce any of note up the river that has not a Pholey town near it. Moft of them fpeak Arabic, which is taught in their fchools j and they are able to read the Koran in that language, though they have a vulgar tongue called Pho'ey. They are ftrift Maho¬ metans, and fcarce any of them will drink brandy, or any thing ftronger than fugar and water. They are fo Ikilful in the management of cattle, that the Mundingoes leave theirs to their care. The whole herd belonging to a town feed all day in the favannahs, and after the crop is off, in the rice-grounds. They have a place without each tow n for their cattle, fur- rounded by a circular hedge, and within this enclofure they raife a ftage about eight feet high, and eight or ten feet w-ide, covered with a thatched roof j all the fide* are open, and they afeend to it by a ladder. Round this ftage they fix a number of ftakes, and when the cattle are brought up at night, each beaft is tied to a feparate flake with a ftrong rope made of the bark of trees. The cows are then milked, and four or five men flay upon the ftage all night with their arms to guard them from the lions, tygers, and other wdld beafts. Their houfes are built in a very regular manner, they being round ftruc- tures, placed in rcw7s at a diftance from each other to ar^'d fire, and each of them has a thatched roof fome- wmat refembling a high-crowmed hat. They are alfo great huntfinen, and not only kill lions, tygers, and other wild beafts, but frequently go 20 or 30 in a company to hunt elephants q whofe teeth they fell, and whofe flefti they fmoke-dry and eat, keeping it for feveral months together. As the elephants here ge¬ nerally go in droves of 100 or 200, they do great mifehief by pulling up the trees by the roots, and trampling down the com j to prevent which, when the natives have any fufpicion of their coming, they make fires round their corn to keep them out. They are almoft the only people who make butter, and fell cattle at fome diftance up the river. They are very particular hi their drefs, and never wear any other clothes but long robes of white cotton, which they make themfelves. They are always very clean/ efpecially the women, who keep their houfes exceedingly neat. They are, however, in fome particulars very fuperftitious : for if they chance to know that any perfon who buys milk of them boils it, they will from thenceforth on no con- fideration fell that perfon any more, from their imagin¬ ing that boiling the milk makes the cow-s dry. PHOLIS, in Natural Hi/lory, is an old name for gypfums or plafter-ftones. The name is derived from i England ; but, upon the firil trial, appeared to have loft their vegetating power. We underftand how¬ ever that it has fince fucceeded with the aid of artificial heat. The filamentous parts of different vegetables have been employed in different countries for the fame me¬ chanic ufes as hemp and flax among us. Putrefadlion, and in fome degree alkaline lixivia, deftroy the pulpy or fleftiy matter, and leave the tough filaments entire. Ey curioufly putrefying the leaf of a plant in water, we obtain the fine flexible fibres which conftituted the bafis of the ribs and-minute veins, and which form as it were a Ikeleton of the leaf. In Madagafcar, different kinds of cloth are prepared from the filaments of the bark of certain trees boiled in ftrong ley } and fome of thefe cloths are very fine, and approach to the fofinefs of filk, but in durability come ftiort of cotton : others are coarfer and ftronger, and laft thrice as long as cotton ; and of thefe filaments they make fails and cordage to their vef- lels. The ftalks of nettles are fometimes ufed for like purpofes, even in France ; and Sir Hans Sloane relates, in one of his letters to Mr Rdy, that he has been inform¬ ed by feveral, that muflin and callico, and moft of the Indian linens, are made of nettles. A itrong kind of cloth is faid to be prepared in fome of the provinces of Sweden of hop-ftalks j and in the Tranfaftions of the Swedilh Academy for 1750, we have an account of an experiment relating to this fubjedl : A quantity of ftalks was gathered in autumn, which was equal in bulk to a quantity of flax fufficient to yield a pound after prepara¬ tion. The ftalks were put into water, and kept covered with it during the winter. In March, they were taken out, dried in a ftove, and dreffed as flax. The prepared filaments weighed nearly a pound, and proved fine, foft, and white ; they were fpun and wove into fix ells of fine ftrong cloth. Unlefs the ftalks are fully rotted, which will take much longer time than flax, the woody part * 12] P II O will not ieparate, and the cloth Avill prove neither white PLofphite nor fine. • P PHOSPHATE is a faline body compofed of phof-,1 ^ U1S' phoric acid united to lome bale, as for initance, lime, which is called phofphate of lime. For an account of the different phofphates, fee Chemistry and Minera¬ logy Index. PHOSPHORUS, a name given to certain fubftan- ces which {bine in the dark without emitting heat. Ey this circumftance they are diftinguiftied from the pyro¬ phoric which though they take fire on being expofed to tire air, are yet entirely deftitute of light before this ex- polure. Phofphori are divided into feveral kinds, known by the names of Bo/ognian phofphorus, Mr Canton's phof- phorus, Baldwin''s phofphorus, phofphorus of urine, &.c. gf which the laft is by far the moft remarkable both with refpedt to the quantity of light which it emits, and its property of taking fire and burning very, fiercely upon being llightly heated or rubbed. For the method of pre¬ paring thefe, and for an account of their properties and combinatiens, fee Chemistry Index. PHOTINIANS, in ecclefiaftical hifiory, were a fed! of heretics in the fourth century who denied the divinity of our Lord. They derive their name from Phot intis their founder, who was biilrop of Sirmium, and a dif- ciple of Marcellus. Photinus publifhed ih the year 343 his notions refpefting the Deity, which were repugnant both to the orthodox and Arian fyftems. He aflerted, that Jefus Chrift was born of the Holy Ghoft and the Virgin Mary } that a certain divine emanation, which he called the Word, defeended upon Plim ; and that be- caufe of the union of the divine word with his human nature, Fie was called the fon of God and even God himfelf; and that the Holy Ghoft w as not a perfon, but merely a celeftial virtue proceeding from the Deity. Both parties condemned the biftrop in the councils of Antioch and Milan, held in the years 345 and 347. He was condemned alfo by the council at Sirmium in 351, and was afterwards degraded from the epifcopal dignity, and at laft died in exile in the year 372 or 375. His opinions were afterwards revived by Soci- nus. PHOTIUS, patriarch of Conftantinople, was one of the fineft geniufes of his time, and his merit raifed him to the patriarchate •, for Bardas having driven Ignatius from the fee, Photius was confecrated by Afbeftus in 859. He condemned Ignatius in a fynod, whereupon the pope excommunicated him, and he, to balance the account, anathematized the pope. Baftlius of Macedon, the emperor whom Photius had reproved for the murder of Michael the late emperor, expelled him, and reftored Ignatius j but afterwards re-eftabliftied Photius, upon Ignatius’s death, in 878. At laft, being wrongfully accufed of a confpiracy againft the perfon of Leo the philofopher, fon and fucceffor to Baftlius, be was expel¬ led by him in 886, and is fuppofed to have died loon after. He wrote a Bibliotheca, which contains an exa- men of 280 authors : we have alfo 233 epiftles of his ; the Nomacanon under 14 titles ; an abridgement of the adfts of feveral councils, &c. This great man was born in Conftantinople, and was defeended from a very illu- ftrious and noble family. His natural abilities were very great, and he cultivated them with the greateft af- ftduity. Photius, Phi.tfe P H R [ 41 fiduity. There was no branch of literature, whether facred and profane, and fcarcely any art or fcience, in which he was not deeply verled. Indeed he appears to have been by far the pie..! Left man of the age in which he lived : and was fo intimately concerned in the chief tranfadtions of it, that ecclefiahical writers have-on that account called it Seculum Photianum. He was firft raifed to the chief dignities of the empiie, being made principal fecretary of date, captain of the guards, and a fenator. In all thefe llations he acquitted himfelf with a diftinblion fuitable to his great abilities j for he was a refined ftatefman, as well as a profound fcholar. His rife to the patriarchate was very quick 5 for when he was chofen to that cilice he was only a layman : but that he might be as it were gradually raifed to that dignity, he was made monk the firft day, reader the next, and the following days fub-deacon, deacon, and prieft. So that in the fpace of fix days he attained to the higheft office in the church. On the whole, however, his ardent love of glory and unbounded ambition made birn commit ex- ceiles which rendered him a fcourge to thofe about him. Fabricius calls his Bibliotheca or library, non liber, fed inf.gnis thsfaurus, “ not a book, but an illuftrious treafure,” in which are contained many curious things, relating to authors, and many fragments of works which are no where elfe to be found. It was brought to light by ikndreas Schottus, and communicated by him to David Hoefchelius, who caufed it to be printed in 1601. Schottus, confidering the great utility of this work, tranf- lated it into Latin, and printed his tranflation alone in 1606. The Greek text, together with the .tranflation, was afterwards printed at Geneva in 1611. PHOTOMER, an in ft rumen t for afeertaining the in- tenfity of light. See Optics Index. PHRAATES, or Phrahates. There were four kings of this name in Parthia. See Parthia. PHRASE, in Grammar, an elegant turn or manner of fpeech, peculiarly belonging to this or that occafion, this or that art, or this or that language. Thus we fay, an Italian phrafs, an eaftern phrafe, a poetical phrafe, a rhetorical phrafe. Phrase is fometimes alfo ufed for a fhort fentence or fmall fet or circuit of words conftrufted together. In this fenfe, Father. Buffier divides phrafes into complete and incomplete. Phrafes are complete where there is a noun and a verb, each in its proper function } i. e. where the noun exprefles a fubjefl, and the verb the thing affirmed of it. Incomplete phrafes are thofe where the noun and the verb together only do the office of a noun j confifting of feveral words without affirming any thing, and which might be expreffed in a Angle word. Thus, that which is true, is an incomplete phrafe, which might be ex- preiTed in one word, truth ; as, that which is true fatif- fies the mind. i. e. truth fatisfies the mind. PHRASEOLOGY, a collection of the phrafes or ele¬ gant expreffions in any language. See Phrase. PHREATIS, or Phreattium, in Grecian antiquity, was a court belonging to the civil government of Athens, fituated upon the fea-thore, in the Piraeus. The name is derived from xtto tv (pgsaflo?, becaufe it flood in a pit; or, as others fuppofe, from the hero Phreatus. This court heard fuch caufes as concerned perfons who had fled out of their own country for murder, or thofe that fled for involuntary murder, and who had afterwards committed 3 ] P H R !•: y a. a deliberate and wilful murder. The firft who was tried Phreatis in this place was Teucer, on a groundlefs fufpicion that he had been accefl'ory to the death of Ajax. The ac- cufed was not allowed to come to land, or fo much as to call anchor, but pleaded his caufe in his bark j and if found guilty, was committed to the mercy of the winds and waves, or, as i’ome lay, fuffered there condign pu- nifhment •, if innocent, he was only cleared of the iecond fad, and, according to cuftom, underwent a twelve- month’s banifliment for the former. See Potter’s G/v Antiq. yol. i. p. 111. PHRENETIC, a term ufed to denote thofe who, without being abfolutely mad, are fubjedl to fuch ftrong failles of imagination as in ibme meafure pervert their judgement, and caiife them to aft in a way different from the more rational part of mankind. PHRENITIS, the fame with Phrensy an in¬ flammation of the meninges of the brain, attended with an acute fever and delirium. See Medicine, N° 176 •, ftrange degree of phrenzy which of France, in the article France, a genus of infefts, belonging to See Entomology Ir.dex. i-ila. From whence it indent li¬ ft iv erf a l alfo an account of a attacked Charles VI. N° 88, 90. PHRYGANEA, the order neuroptera. PHRYGIA, a country in derived its name is not certain : fome fay it was from the river Phryx (now Sarabat), which divides Phry¬ gia from Caria, and empties itielf into the Plermus; others from Phrygia, the daughter of Afopus and Eu- ^ ^ ropa. The Greek writers tell us, that the country took "uflGry, its name from the inhabitants, and thefe from the townvol. in.’ of Brygium in Macedonia, from whence they firft paffed'P 44L&C into Afia, and gave the name of Phrygia or Brygia to the country where they fettled. Bochart is of opinion that this traft was called Phrygia from the Greek verb “ to burn or parch 5” rvhich, according to him, is a tranflation of its Hebrew name, derived from a verb of the fame fignification. No lefs various are the opinions of authors as to the exaft boundaries of this country ; an uncertainty which gave rife to an obfervation made by Strabo, viz. that the Phrygians and Myfians had diftinft boundaries ; but that it was fcurce poflible to afeertain them. The lame writer adds, that the Trojans, Myfians, and Lydians, arc, by the poets, all blended under the common name of Phrygians, which Claudian extends to the Pifidians, Bithynians, and lonians. Phrygia Proper, according to Ptolemy, whom we choofe to follow, was bounded on the north by Pontus and Bithynia •, on the weft by Myfia, Troas, the Afigean fea, Lydia, Maeonia, and Caria ; on the fouth by Lycia •, on the eaft by Pamphy- lia and Galatia. It lies between the 37th and qxft de¬ grees of north latitude, extending in longitude from 56 to 62 degrees. The inhabitants of this country, men¬ tioned by Ptolemy, are the Lycaones and Anthemilenii, towards Lycia; and Moccadelis or Moccadine, the Cyddefes or Cydiffes towards Bithynia ; and between thefe the Peltini or Speltini, the Moxiani, Phylacenfes, and Hierapolitae. To thefe we may add the Berecyn- tes mentioned by Strabo. Phrygia is commonly divided into the Greater and Leffer Phrygia, called alfo Troas. But this divifion did not take place till Troas was fubdued by the Phry¬ gians ; and hence it is more confidered by fome Roman writers as a part of Phrygia, than Bithynia, Cappado- P H It [4 • ‘Phrygia, cxa, or any other of the adjacent provinces. In after ages, the Greater Phrygia was divided into two didrifts or governments; one called Phrygia Pacatiana, from Pacatianus, who, under Conftantine, bore the great of¬ fice of the prsefeftus prsetorio of the Ead ; the otlier Phrygia Salutaris, from fome miraculous cures fuppof- ed to have been performed there by the archangel Mi¬ chael. This country, and indeed all Afia Minor, as lying in the fifth and fixth northern climates, was in ancient times greatly celebrated for its fertility. It abounded in all forts of grain y being, for the mod part, a plain country covered with a deep rich foil, and plentifully watered by fmall rivers. It was in fome parts produc¬ tive of bitumen and other combudible fubdances. It was well docked with cattle, having large plains and padure grounds. The air was anciently deemed mod pure and wholefome, though it is now in fome parts thought extremely grofs, great part of the country ly¬ ing uncultivated. In Phrygia Major were anciently feveral cities of great celebrity $ fuch as Apanea, Laocicf.a, Hiera- polis, Gordium, &c.—There were alfo fome famous rivers luch as Marfyas, Maeander, &c. The Maean- der is now called Madre or l.lindre, and was much ce¬ lebrated by the ancients for its windings and turn¬ ings ; from whence all fuch windings and turnings have been denominated mceanders. The Phrygians accounted themfelves the mod an¬ cient people in the world. Their origin, however, is ex¬ tremely dark and uncertain. Jofephusand St Jerome fay, they were defcended from Togarmah, one of Gomer’s fions 5 and that they were known to the Plebrews under the name of Tigrammanes. The Heathen authors derive them from the Brygians, a people of Macedonia. But this is but mere conjefture •, and it is a conjecture to¬ tally unfupported, except by the fimilarity of names. Bochart thinks that the Phrygians were the offspring of Gomer the elded fon of Japhet j the word Phrygia being the Greek tranflation of his name. Jofephus makes Gomer the father of the Galatians \ hut he, by the Galatians, mud neceffarily mean the Phrygians in¬ habiting that part of Phrygia which the Galatians had made themfelves maders of j the defendants of Gomer being placed by Ezekiel northward of Judiea, near Togarmah (which Bochart takes to be Cappadocia), long before the Gauls paffed over into Ada. We are willing to let Gomer enjoy the fine country which Bo¬ chart is pleafed to give him, and allow him the honour of being the progenitor of the Phrygians, fince we know no other perfon on whom it can be conferred with any degree of probability. The ancient Phrygians are defcribed as fuperditious, voluptuous, and effeminate, without any prudence or fcrefight, and of fuch a fervlle temper, that nothing but dripes and ill ufage could make them comply with their duty ; which gave rife to feveral trite and well 4 ] P H R known proverbs (a). They are faid to have been the Plirygia. fird inventors of divination by the finging, flying, and v-—» feeding of birds. Their mufic, commonly called the Phrygian mood, is alleged by fome as an argument of their effeminacy. This government was certainly monarchical; for all Phrygia was, during the reigns of fome kings, fubjeft to one prince. Ninnacus, Midas, Manis, Gordius, and his defendants, were undoubtedly fovereigns of all Phry¬ gia. But fome time before the Trojan war, we find this country divided into feveral petty kingdoms, and read of divers princes reigning at the fame time. Apol- lodorus mentions a king of Phrygia contemporary with Ilus king of Troy. Cedrenus and others fpeak of one Teuthrans, king of a fmall country in Phrygia, whofe territories were ravaged by Ajax, himfelf flain in Angle combat, his royal feat laid in afhes, and his daughter, by name Tecmeffa, carried away captive by the con¬ queror. Homer makes mention of Phoreys and Af ani- us, b»th princes and leaders of the Phrygian auxiliaries that came to the relief of Troy. Tantalus was king of Sipylus only, and its diftrift ; a prince no lefs famous for his great wealth, than infamous for his covetoufnefs and other deteftable vices. That Phrygia was fubdued either by Ninus, as Diodorus Siculus informs us, or by the Amazons, as we read in Suidas, is not fufficiently warranted. Moft authors that fpeak of Gordius tell us, that the Phrygians having fent to confult an oracle in order to know how they might put an end to the inteftine broils which rent their country into many fac¬ tions and parties, received for anfwer, that the moft effeftual means to deliver themfelves and their coun¬ try from the calamities they groaned under, was to commit the government to a king. This advice they followed accordingly, and placed Gordius on the throne. A pamea was the chief emporium of all Afia Minor. —Thither reforted merchants and traders from all parts of Greece, Italy, and the neighbouring ifiands. Be- fides, we know- from Syncellus, that the Phrygians were for fome time mafters of the fea; and none but trading nations ever prevailed on that element. The country produced many choice and ufeful commodi¬ ties, which afforded confiderable exports. They had a fafe coaft, convenient harbours, and whatever may in¬ cline us to think that they carried on a confiderable trade. But as moft of the Phrygian records are loft, we will not dwell on conjeftures lb difficult to be afcer- tained. We have no fet form of their laws; and as to their learning, fince we are told that for fome time they enjoyed the fovereignty of the fea, we may at leaft allow them a competent Ikill in geography, geome¬ try, and aftronomy } and add to thefe, from what we have faid above, a more than ordinary knowledge of mufic. Some have been of opinion that the Phrygian lan¬ guage bore a great refemblance to the Greek 5 but the (a) “ Phryges fero fapiunt, Phryx verberatus melior, Phryx non minus quam Spyntharus, &c.which pro¬ verbs intimate their fervile temper ; and fnow that they were more fit to bewail misfortunes in an unmanly manner, than to prevent them by proper meafures. Their mufic, too, was fuited to their effeminate temper. The Doric mood was a kind of grave and folid mufic; the Lydian a doleful and lamentable harmony; but the Phrygian chiefly calculated to effeminate and enervate the mind. But this charafter is contradifted by others. 3 PER [4 Phrygia the contrary is manxfeft from the few Phrygian words ii which have been tranfmitted to us, and carefully col- J-'hryne. ^ gy Bochart and Rudbechius. To tfrefe we may V add the authority of Strabo, who, after attempting to derive the name of a Phrygian city from the Greek, concludes, that it is a difficult matter to difcover any fimilitude between the barbarous words of the Phrygian language and the Greek. The Phrygian tongue, after the experiment made by Pfammetichus king of Egypt, was looked upon by the Egyptians as the molt ancient language of ihe world. But other nations, particular¬ ly the Scythians, refufed to fubmit to their opinion, as founded on an argument of no real weight. “ As the two children (fay they) had never heard the voice of any human creature, the word bee, or behkos, the firft they uttered, was only an imitation of the goats that had fuelled them, and happened to be a Phrygian word fignifying bread (b). We have already faid, that the Phrygians were fuper- flitipus; their idols were confequently very numerous. The chief of thefe was Cybele, who went by a variety of names. (See Cybele). They alfo worffiipped Bac¬ chus under the name of Sabazios ; and his prieits they called Sabot. The hiltory of their kings is dark and uncertain, and the dates of their feveral reigns and actions cannot now be fixed ; we ffiall refer fuch of our readers, therefore, as wiffi to know what is certain refpefting them, to the Ancient Univerfal Pliftory, already quoted more than once in the prefent article. See alfo Gordius, Midas, &c. For Phrygia Minor, fee Troy. PHRYGIAN stone, in Natural Hi/lory, is the name of a ftone deferibed by the ancients, and ufed by them in dyeing ; perhaps from fome vitriolic or alumi¬ nous fait contained in it, which ferved to enliven or fix the colours ufed by the dyers. It w^as light and fpungy, refembling a pumice •, and the wffiiteft and lighted wrere reckoned the bed. Pliny gives an account of the me¬ thod of preparing it for the purpofe of dyeing, which was by moidening it with urine, and then heating it red hot, and differing it to cool.—This calcination was repeated three times, and the done was then fit for ufe. Diof- corides recommends it in medicine after burning j he fays it was drying and adringent. Phrygians, a chridian fea. See Cataphry- gians and Montanists. PHRYNE, was a famous proditute, wffio flourished ' at Athens about 328 years before the Chridian era. She was midrefs of Praxiteles, who drewT her picture, which wras one of his bed pieces, and was placed in the temple of Apollo at Delphi. We are told that Apelles painted his Venus Anadyomene after he had feen Phryne on the fea-ffiore naked, and with diffievelled hair. Phryne became fo very rich by the liberality of her lovers, that ffie offered to rebuild Thebes at her own expence, wffiich Alexander had dedroyed, provided this inffription wras placed on the wTalls : Alexander di- ruit, fed meretrix Phryne refecit; which was refufed. See Plin. 34. c. 8. There wras another of the fame name who was accufed of impiety. When ffie found 5 ] PER that ffie was going to be condemned, ffie unveiled her Pbrymcus bofom, which fo influenced her judges, that ffie was im- m M mediately acquitted. ■ .. (-- ^ PHRYNICUS, a general of Samos, w ho endeavour¬ ed to betray his country, &c. -A flatterer at Athens. A tragic poet of Athens, difciple to Thtfpis. Pie was the firft who introduced a female chara&er on the ftage. PHRYNIS was a mufician of Milylene. He was the firft who obtained a mufical prize at the Panathenaea at Athens. He added two drings to the lyre, which had always been ufed with feven by ail his predeceffors. He flouriffied about 438 years before the Chridian era. We are told that hr. was originally a cook at the houfe of Hiero king of Sicily. There w'as another of the fame name, a writer in the reign of Commodus, who made a colledlion, in 36 books, of phrafes and fentences from the bed Greek authors, Sec. PHRYXUS, in fabulous hiftory, was a fon of Atha- mas king of Thebes, by Nephele. When his mother was repudiated, he wras perfecuted wnih the mod inve¬ terate fury by his dep-mether Ino, becaufe he was to fit on the throne of Athamas, in preference to the children of a fecond wife. His mother apprized him of Ino’s intentions upon his life •, or, according to others, his preceptor 5 and the better to make his efcape, he fe- cured part of his father’s treafures, and privately left Bosotia wdth his filler Helle, to go to their friend and relation Aretes king of Colchis. They embarked on board a ffiip, or, as ive are informed by the fabulous account of the poets and mythologids, they mounted on the back of a ram, wffiofe fleece was of gold; and proceeded on their journey through the air. The height to which they were carried made Helle giddy, and ffie fell into the fea. Phryxus gave his After a decent burial on the fea-fliore, and after he had called the place Hellefpont from her name, he continued his flight, and arrived fafe in the kingdom of iEetes, where he effered the ram on the altars of Mars. The king received him with great tendernefs, and gave him Chalciope his daughter in marriage. She had by him Phrontis Melas, Argos Cylindrus, whom fome call Cytorus. He was afterwards murdered by his father- in-lawT, who envied him the poffeffion of the golden fleece; and Chalciope, to prevent her children from {haring their father’s fate, fent them privately from Colchis to Boeotia, as nothing was to be dreaded there from the jealoufy or refentment of Ino, wffio was then dead. The fable of the flight of Phryxus to Colchis on a ram has been explained by fome, who obferve, that the ffiip on wffiich he embarked wras either called by that name, or carried on her prow a figure of that’ animal. The fleece of gold is accounted for, by ob- ferving that Phryxus carried awray immenfe treafures from Thebes. Phryxus was placed among the conftel- lations of heaven after death. The ram wffiich carried him to Afia is faid to have been the fruit of Neptune’s amour writh Theophane the daughter of Altis. This ram the gods had given to Athamas in order to reward his piety and religious life ; and Nephele procured it for (b) Goropius Becanus makes ufe of the fame argment, to prove that the High Dutch is the original or mother-, tongue of the world, becaufe the wrord beher.'m that language fignifies “ a baker,” p h y r 4i Plitiiiriafis her children, juft as they were going to he facrificed to Pov'-dterr the jealoufy of Ino. Phryxus’s murder was fome time after amply revenged by the Greeks •, it having occa- fioned the famous expedition atchieved under Jafon and many of the princes of Greece, which had for its objedf the recovery of the golden fleece, and the punilh- ment of the king of Colchis for his cruelty to the fon of Athamas. PHTHIRIASIS, the Lousy Evil, from exifting 2 P H Y t 4i7 1 PHY Phyfician. exifting In, nature. In this fenfe we fay a phyfical point, in oppolition to a mathematical one, which only exifts in the imagination j a phyfical fubflance or body, in op- pofition to fpirit, or metaphyfical fubftance, &c. PHYSICIAN, a perfon who profefTes medicine, or the art of healing difeafes. See Medicine. PHYSICIANS, College of, in London, ’Edinburgh, and Phyficiaus, Dublin. See COLLEGE of Phyfcians. Phyfico- PHYSICO-mathematics, includes thofe branches ma^esnia* of phyfics which, uniting obfervation and experiment to 1 y ■ mathematical calculation, undertake to explain the phe¬ nomena of nature. PHYSICS, General de-'“P'A KEN in ite mofl enlarged fenfe, comprehends fimtion of 1. whole fludy of nature j and Natural Philo- P1JICS’ sophy is a term of the fame extent: but ordinary language, and efpecially in this country, employs both - of thefe terms in a much narrower fenfe, which it is pro- 2 per in this place to determine with fome precifion. A-more Under the article Philosophy, we gave a particu- particular lar account of that view of nature in which the ob- of thTrcnn our altenti°n are confidered as conne6ted by o tne term. gaufa(-jon. anJ we were at fome pains to point out the manner in which this fludy may be fuccefsfully cultivated. By a judiciou^ employment of the means pointed out in that article, we difcover that the ob- je£ls of our contemplation compofe an Universe, which confills, not of a number of independent ex- iftences folitary and detached from each other, but of a number of fubftances conne&ed by a variety of relations and dependencies, fo as to form a whole which may with great propriety be called the System of Na¬ ture. This affembling of the individual objects which com¬ pofe the univerfe into one fyftem is by no means the work of a hafty and warm fancy, but is the refult of fober contemplation. The natural hiftorian attempts in vain to defcribe objects, by only informing us of their fhape, colour, and other fenfible qualities. He finds himfelf obliged, in defcribing a piece of marble, for inflance, to tell us that it takes a fine polifh ; that it flrikes fire with fleel $ that it burns to quicklime , that it diffolves in aquafortis, and is precipitated by alkalies; that with vitriolic acid it makes gypfum, &c. &c. &c. and thus it appears that even the defcription of any thing, with the view of afcertaining its fpecific nature, and with the foie purpofe of difcrimination, cannot be accomplifhed without taking notice of its various rela¬ tions to other things. But what do we mean by the nature of any thing ? We are ignorant of its effence, or what makes it that thing and no other thing. We mull content ourfelves with the difcovery of |its qualities or properties; and it is the alfemblage of thefe which we call its nature. But this is very inaccurate. Thefe do not conftitute its elfence, but are the confequences of it. Yet this is all we fhall ever know of its nature. Now the term property is nothing but a name expref- ilng fome relation which the fubftance under confidera- tion has to other things. This is true of all fuch terms. Gravity, elafticity, fenfibility, gratitude, and the like, exprefs nothing but certain matters of fad, which may be obferved refpefting the objeft of our contempla¬ tion in different circumftances of fituation with regard to other things. Gur diftinfl notions of individuals, therefore, imply their relations to other things. The flighted obfervation of the univerfe (hows an evident connexion between ail its parts in their va- Vol. XVI. Part II. rious properties. All things on this earth are conneft-All paits of ed with each other by the laws of motion and of mind. t^e un‘" We are connected with the whole of the folar fyftemW^^1- by gravitation. If we extend our obfervations to thenec^e(jia fixed ftars, the connexion feem s to fail j but even here their va- it may be obferved. Their inconceivable diftance, it 'i0115 F°* is true, renders it impoflible for us to obtain any exten- Penties* five information as to their nature. But thefe bodies are conne&ed with the folar fyftem by the famenefs of the light which they emit with that emitted by our fun or any (hining body. It moves with the fame velocity, it confifts (in moft of them at leaft) of the fame colours, and it is reflefted, refra£ied, and inflefted, according to the fame laws. ^ In this unbounded fcene of contemplation, our at- Our atten- tention will be direfted to the different claffes of ob-tlon natu- jefts nearly in proportion to the intereft we take in™^^^ them. There is nothing in which we are fo much tlie firft ia_ interefted as our fellow men ; and one of the firft fteps ftance to that we make in our knowledge of nature, is an ac- °ur fellow quaintance with them. We learn their difiinEiive na- meri‘ ture by attending to their charaBerifiic appearances j that is, by obferving their aftions. We obferve them continually producing, like ourfelves, certain changes in the fituation or condition of furrounding objects; and thefe changes are evidently direfted to certain ends which refpeB themfelves. Obferving this fubferviency of the effects which they produce to their own accom¬ modation, we confider this adjuftment of means to ends, as the effedl of an intention, as we experience it to be in our owrn cafe, where we are confcious of this in¬ tention, and of thefe its effedls. We therefore inter¬ pret thofe aftions of other men, where we obferve this Nature of adjuftment of means to ends, as marks or figns of in- tention in them fimilar to our own. And thus a qua¬ lity, or power, or faculty, is fuppofed in them by means of its fign, although the quality itfelf is not immedi¬ ately cognifable by our fenfes. And as this intention in ourfelves is accompanied by perception of external objedls, knowledge of their properties, defire of good, averfion from evil, volition, and exertion, without all of which we could not or would not perform the aclions wdiich w'e daily perform, we fuppofe the fame perception, knowledge, defire, averfion, volition, and exertion in them. Thus, by the conftitution of our mind, we confider the employment of means, by which ends terminating in the agent are gained, as the natural figns of defign or intention. Art, therefore, or the employment of means, is the natural fign of intention ; and wdierever we ob- lerve this adjuftment of means to ends, we infer the a- gency of defign. A fmall acquaintance with the objefts around us, obliges us to extend this inference to a great number of beings befides our fellow men, namely, to the whole 3 G animal 4' 8 PH Y Introduc- animal creation : for in all we obfcrve the fame fub- ■ t'^n' ferviency to the ends of the agent, in the changes which we find them continually producing in the ob¬ jects around them. Thefe changes are all adjufted to their own well-being. In all fuch cafes, therefore, rye are forced, by the conftitution of our own minds, to infer the exiitence of defign or intention in thefe beings alfo. But in numberlefs changes produced by external ob¬ jects on each other, we obferve no fuch fitnefs in the eftecls, no fuch fubferviency to the well-being of life agent. In fuch cafes, therefore, wre make no fuch in- 6 ference of thought or defign. All objects Thus, then, there is prefewted to our obfervation an divided in- important dhtinction, by which we arrange all exter- ;imfun^r^ na^ °-je(^ts two claffes. The fir ft refembles our- thinking felves, in giving external marks of that thought or in¬ beings. tention of which we are confcious j and we fuppofe in them the other properties which w-e difcover in our- felves, but cannot immediately obferve in them, viz. thought, perception, memory, forefight, and all that colleftion of faculties which we feel in ourfelves, and which conftitute the animal. The other clafs of objects exhibits no fuch appearances, and we make no fuch in¬ ference. And thus we divide the wThole of external nature 7 into the claffes of thinking and unthinking beings. I;Jow we Our firft judgements about thefe claffes will be very knowletl^16 ^naCcurate ’ an<^ we will naturally afcribe the differ- ©fmind.6 enceb which we do not very wTell underftand, to the differences in organical ftrudlure, which wTe clearly ob¬ ferve. But when we have knocked down or perhaps fmothered an animal, we find that it no longer gives the former marks of thought and intention, and that it now refembles the clafs of unthinking beings : And yet it ftill retains all that fitnefs of organical ftruifture which it had before j it feems only to want the intention and the will. This obliges us to conclude that the diftinc- tion does not arife from a difference in organical ftruc- ture, but from a diftinft fubftance common to all think¬ ing beings, but feparable from their organical frame. To this fubftance we afcribe thought, intention, contriv¬ ance, and all that colledtion of faculties which we feel in ourfelves. To this fubftance in ourfelves we refer all fenfations, pleafures, pains, remembrances, defires, pur- pofes $ and to this aggregate, however imperfe&ly un- derftood, we give the name mind. Our organical frame, which feems to be only the inftrument of infor- g mation and operation to the mind, we call our body. The nature As the animating principle is not, like our body, the ©f mind as immediate objecft of the fenfes, we naturally conceive humankind*1' to a ^fiance effentially different from thofe which in rude are the. objects of our fenfes. The rudeft people have ages. fliown a difpofition to form this conclufion. Obferving that animal life was connected with breathing, it was natural to imagine that breathing was living, and that breath was life. It is a remarkable fa the therefbre can have none of the other properties which °f the are not cognofcible by the fenfes. Thefe* have all the ^ e'* properties which our fenfes can difcover; and we can have no evidence of their having any other, nor indeed any conception of their having them. This clafs is not confined to the unorganized maffes of matter ; for we fee that the bodies of animals lofe after death that organical form, and are aflimilated to all the reft of unthinking beings. It has arifen from fuch views as this, that while all nations have agreed to call this clafs of objeds by the name body, which originally expreffes our organical frame, fome nations, farther ad¬ vanced in cultivation or refinement, have contrived an abftrad term to exprefs this general lubftance of which all inanimate beings are compofed. Such a term we have in the words materies, vXr,. It Matter, jhen, is that fubftance which is immediate-The diftinc- ly cognofcible by our fenfes. Whatever, therefore, tion be- is not thus immediately cognofcible by our fenfes is tw?en ma* not material, and is expreffed by a negative term, and'^matedll called immaterial': hence it is that mind is faid to be fubftances immaterial. It is of importance to keep in mind this h very im- diftindion, merely grammatical. Little more is ne-l301^111* ceffary for deteding the fophifms of Helvetius, Mira- beau, and other fages of the Gallic fchool, who have been anxious to remove the ties of moral and religious obligation by lowering our conceptions of our intel- ledual nature. It will alfo ferve to (how how haftily they have formed their opinions who have aferibed to the immediate agency of mind all thofe relations whicli are obferved in the adions of bodies on each other at a diftance. The conneding principles of fuch rela¬ tions e dijlante (if there be any fuch), are not the im¬ mediate objeds of our fenfes : they are therefore im. material. But it does not follow that they are minds. There may be many immaterial fubftances which are not minds. We know nothing of any objed what¬ ever but by the obfervation of certain appearances which fuggeft to our minds the exiftence and agency of its qualities or powers. Such phenomena are the natural figns of thefe qualities, and it is to thofe figns that we muft always have recourfe when we with to conceive PHYSICS. Introduc- conceive without ambiguity concerning them. What ti°n. js {]ie charafterihic phenomenon of mind, or what is v ' the dijlinguijhinv quality which brings it into view ? It is intention : and it may be aflerted with the utmolf confidence, that rve have no other mark by which mind is immediately fuggefted to us, or that rvould ever have made us fuppofe that there exifted another mind befides our own. The phenomenon by which this quality is luggefted to us is art, or the employment of means to gain ends $ and the mark of art is the fup- pofed conducivenefs of thefe ends to the well-being of the agent. Where this train is not obferved, defign or intention is never thought of \ and therefore where intention is not perceived in any immaterial fubftance, if any fuch has ever been obferved, it is an abufe of language to call it mind. We do not think that even perception and intelligence entitle us to give the name mind to the fubftance in which they are inherent, be- caufe it is from marks of intention alone that we infer the exiftence of mind j and although thefe muft be accompanied with perception and intelligence, it does not follow7 that the fubftance which can perceive and underftand muft alfo defire and propofe. However difficult we may find it to feparate them, they are evi¬ dently feparable in imagination. And let not this afler- tion be too haftily objefled to \ for the feparation has been made by perfons moft eminent for their knowledge and difcernment. When Leibnitz afcribed to his mo- NADES, or what we call the ultimate ATOMS of. matter, a perception of their fituation in the univerfe, and a mo¬ tion precifely fuited to this perception, he was the far- theft in the world from fuppofing them animated or en¬ dowed with minds. It is true indeed, that others, wdio think and call themfelves philofophers, are much more liberal in their application of this term. A modern au¬ thor of great metaphyfical eminence fays, “ I call that mind wThich moves, and that body which is moved.” This clafs t?f philofophers alfert that no motion whatever is begun except by the agency of an animating princi¬ ple, which (after Ariftotle) they call Nature, and W'hich has in thefe days been exalted to the rank of a god. All this jargon (for it is nothing elfe) has arifen from the puzzle in wfttich naturalifts think themfelves involved in attempting to explain the production of mo¬ tion in a body at a diftance from that body which is conceived as the caufe of this motion. After having been reluCtantly obliged, by the reafonings of Newton, to abandon their methods of explaining fuch phenomena by the impulfes of an intervening fluid, nothing feepa- ed left but the affertion that thefe motions were pro¬ duced by minds, as in the cafe of our owm exertions. Thefe explanations (if they dtferve the name) cannot be objected to in any other w’ay than as an abufe of language, and as the introduction of an unmeaning iar- gon. We have, and can have, no notion of mind differ¬ ent from thofe of our owm minds ; and we difcover the exiftence of other minds as w7e difcover the exiftence of bodies, by means of phenomena which are charafteriftic of minds, that is, wdiich refemble thofe phenomena that follow the exertion of our own mental faculties, that is, by the employment of means to attain felfilh ends; and where fuch appearances are not obferved, no exift¬ ence of a mind is inferred. When wre fee a man fall from the top of a houfe, and dalh out his brains on the pave¬ ment, we never afcribe this motion to his mind. Al- 419 though the fitnefs of many of the celeftial motions for Introduc- moft important purpofes makes us fuppofe defign and , tl0n' . contrivance fomewhere, and therefore a Supreme Mind, v"_ ' wc no more think of inferring a mind in the earth from the fitnefs of its motions for purpofes moft beneficial to its inhabitants, than of inferring a mind in a bit of bread from its fitnefs for nourifhing our bodies. It is not from the mere motions of animals that their minds are inferred, but from the conducivenefs of thefe motions to the well-being of the animal. 12 The term mind therefore, in the ordinary languageTiie mind of all men, is applied to what defires and wills at the^Py11^ fame time that it perceives and underftands. If we duces mo-" call that mind which produces motion, we muft derive tion, but our notions of its qualities or attributes from obferving that which their effeds. We muft therefore difcover the general c*ehres and laws by which they aCt, that is, the general laws ob-'Vl‘S’ ferved in thofe motions which we confider as their ef- fefts. Now7 thefe are the general law’s of motion ; and in none of thefe can we find the leaft coincidence with what w7e are accuftomed to call the laws of mind. Nay, it has been the total want of fimilarity which has given rife to the diftin&ipn which all men, in all ages and countries, have made between mind and matter. This diftinftion is found in all languages *, and it is an unpar¬ donable liberty which men take with language when they ufe a term of diftinEiion, a fpec 'fc term, to exprefs things of a different Ipecies. What thefe authors have been pleafed to call mind, the whole world befides have called by another name, force; which, though borrow¬ ed from our own exertions, is yet fufficiently diftincffive, and never leads us to confound things that are differ¬ ent, except in the language of fome modern philofo¬ phers, who apply it to the laws of the agency of mind ; and, when fpeaking of the force of motives, &c. com¬ mit the fame miftakes which the follow7ers of Ariftotle commit in the ufe of the term mind. Force, in the lan¬ guage of thefe philofophers, means what connefls the operations of mind ; as mind, in the language of Lord Monboddo, is that which connedls the operations of body. Thofe are not lefs to blame who confider this Nature The prin. of Ariftotle, this principle of motion, as an exiftence or fubftance different both from matter and from the^y1”^.1101 minds of intelligent creatures. Ariftotle calls it in fome froni matter places cea-Ki^ might wTith equal propriety, and and mind, equal confiftency with his other dodirines, have called mind, iirirsg rjAec, or an oaring Swains. Befides, w7e have no evidence for the feparaLility of this rntring 4/v%yi from body as we have for the feparability of fuch minds as our own, the genuine ■^vxca. Nay, his whole doc¬ trines, when maturely confidered, affume their abfolute infeparability. This docdrine of elemental minds, therefore, as the Elemental immediate caufes of the phenomena of the materialmmds are an abate of world,, is an abufe of language. It is a jargon ; and it iangua„e. is a frivolous abufe, for it offers no explanation what- s ‘G ' ever. The phenomena are totally unlike the phenome¬ na of ordinary minds, and therefore receive no explana¬ tion from them ; and fince our knowledge of thefe yuaji minds muft be derived entirely from the phenomena, it wull be precifely the fame, although we exprefs it in common language. We fliall not indeed raife the won¬ der of our hearers, as thofe do who fill the wrnrld with minds which they never fufpeded to exift ; but we fliall 3 G 2 not PHYSICS. The dread ful confe- quences of inateria- fil'm. \6 The extent of philofo- phical kudy. not bewilder their imaginations, confound their ideas, and miilead their judgements. We flatter ourfelves that our readers will not think . thefe oblervations unfeafonable or mifplaced. Of all miflakes that the naturalill can fall into, there is none more fatal to his progrefs in knowledge than the con¬ founding things which are effentialiy different j and of all the diftindtions which can be made among the ob¬ jects of our contemplation, there is none of equal phi- lofophical importance with this between mind and mat¬ ter : And when we confider the confequences which na¬ turally follow from this confuflon of ideas, and particu¬ larly thofe which follow from finking the mental facul¬ ties of man to a level with the operations of mechanics or chemiftry, confequences which the experience of the prefent eventful day Ihows to be deftrudlive of all that is noble or defirable in human nature, and of all that is comfortable in this life, and which blafts every hope of future excellence—we cannot be too anxious to have this capital diftindlion put in the plaineft point of view, and expreffed in the moft familiar charadfers, “ fo that he who runneth may read.” When we fee the frenzy which the reafoning pride of man has raifed in our neighbourhood, and hear the didlates of philofophy in- ceffantly appealed to in defence of whatever our hearts fhudder at as {hocking and abominable j and when we fee a man (a), of great reputation as a naturalift, and of profeffed humanity and political moderation, congra¬ tulating his countrymen on the rapid improvement and almoft perfedtion of philofophy j and after giving a (hort fketch of the conflitution of the vifible univerfe, fum- ming up all with a table of eledfive attradfions, and that particular combination and mode of cryftallization which conffitutes God (horrefco referens!)—is it not full time for us to flop Ihort, and to alk our own hearts “ whither are you wandering ?”■—But found philofophy, reafoning from effedts to their caufes, will here liften to the words of our facred oracles: “ By their fruits ye lhall know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thirties ?” The abfurd confequences of the flop¬ tical philofophy of Berkeley and Hume have been thought, by men of undoubted difcernment, fufficient reafons for rejedling it without examination. The no lefs abfurd and the (hocking confequences of the mecha¬ nical philofophy now in vogue ihould give us the fame abhorrence ; and fliould make us abandon its blood-ftain- ed road, and return to the delightful paths of nature, to lurvey the works of God, and feaft our eyes with the dilplays of mind, which offer themfelves on every hand in defigns of the moft extenfive influence and the moft beautiful contrivance. Following the guidance of hea¬ venly wifdom, we (hall indeed find, that “ all her ways are ways of pleafantnefs, and all her paths are peace.” Such is the fcene of our obfervation, the fubjedl of philofophical ftudy. Its extent is almoft unbounded, reaching from an atom to God himfelf. It is abfolute- ly neceffary for the fuccefsful cultivation of this immenfe field of knowledge, that it be committed to the care of different cultivators, and that its various portions be treated in different ways : and, accordingly, the various Introdue- taftes of men have given this curiofity different direc- tion. tions ; and the ftudy, like all other talks, has been pro- * 1 "' moted by this divifion of labour. Some philofophers have attended only to the appear¬ ances of fitnefs wdiich are exhibited in every quarter of the univerfe; and by arranging thefe into different claf- fes, and interpreting them as indications of thought aad intention, have acquired the knowledge of many claffes of fentient and intelligent beings, actuated by propenfi- ties, and direfted by reafon. jy While the contemplation of thefe appearances indi-The nature cates thought and defign in any individual of one ofan^u^e*°f thefe claffes, and brings its propenfities and purpofes *B" of action, and the ends gained by thefe a£lions, into view, the contemplation of thefe propenfities, purpofes, and ends, occafions an inference of a much more gene¬ ral kind. All thefe intelligent beings'give indications of knowledge and of power j but their knowledge bears, in general, no proportion to their power of pro¬ ducing changes in nature, and of attaining important ends •, and their power is neither always, nor in the moft important cafes, the confequence of their know¬ ledge. Where the effect of their adlions is moft emi¬ nently conducive to their important interefts, the power of attaining thefe valuable ends is generally independent on any attention to the fitnefs of the means, and the ex¬ ertion is frequently made without even thinking of the important end. The wrell-being of the individual is fe- cured againft any danger from its ignorance, indolence, or inattention, by an inftindtive propenfity, which leads it to the performance of the neceffary aftion, which is thus made immediately and ultimately defirable, with¬ out any regard to its ultimate and important end. Thus, in our own nature, the fupport of animal life, and the improvement ©f the means of fubfiftence by a knowledge of the objedls which furround us, are not entrufted to our apprehenfions of the importance of thefe ends, but are committed to the furer guides of hunger and curio- flt^' ., . rS The fame obfervers difcover a connexion between There is a the individuals of a clafs, different from that which connexion arifes from the mere refemblance of their external ap- between pearance, or even of their propenfities and purfuits > duals'of^" the very circumftances which produced the claflifica- ciafs 0f ani., tion. They obferve, that thefe propenfities are fuch, mals differ- that while each individual feeks only its own enjoy-ent from ment, thefe enjoyments are in general fuch as contri- bute to the fupport of the fpecies and the enjoyment ern nce' of other individuals. Thus, in the claffes of animals, and in human nature, the continuance of the race, and the enjoyment of the whole, are not entrufted to the apprehenfion we entertain of the importance of thefe ends, but are produced by the operation of fexual love and the love of fociety. The fame obfervers find that even the different claffes There is al- of fentient beings are connefled together ; and while f° a fink of the whole of each clafs aim only at their own enjoy-10”ne<^‘on ment, they contribute, in fome way or other, to the tvell-being of the ether claffes. Even man, the felfilh ings ot dif- lord ferent claff fes. (a) M. de la Metherie, editor of the Journal de PhijJique. January and July. See his prefaces to the volumes for 1792 and 1793* PHY Ifttroduc- lord of this fublunary world, is not the unconnected tio^ inhabitant of it. He cannot, in every inftance, reap '' vall the fruits of his lituation, without contributing to the enjoyment of thoufands of the brute creation. Nay, it may be proved to the fatisfaCKon of every intelligent man, that while one race of animals, in confequence of its peculiar propenfities, fubfiits by the deitruftion of another, the fum total of animal life and enjoyment is prodigioufly increafed. See a very judicious dilTertation on this curious and puzzling fubject, entitled A P/iilo- fophical Survey of the Animal Creation; where it appears that the increafe of animal life and enjoyment which is produced by this means, beyond what could poffibly obtain without it, is beyond all conception. See like- wife the lafl edition of King's Origin of Evil, by Dr Law 20 late bifhop of Carlifle. The end of Thus the whole affemblage feems conneCled, and this connec-j0intly employed in increafing the fum total of poflible fion ]:iappinefs> This fitnefs of the various propenfities of tion ofVa'p- fentient and intelligent beings, this fubferviency to a pmefs. 1 general purpofe, ftrikes thefe obfervers as a mark of intention, evidently dhlinct from, and independent of, all the particular intentions, and fuperior to them all j and thus it irrefiftibly leads them to infer the exiltence of a supreme mind, direding the whole of this in¬ tellectual system, while the individuals of which it conlifts appear the unconfcious intlruments in the hand of a great Artift, with which he executes his grand and beneficent purpofes. But the obfervation goes yet further. The bodies of the inanimate creation are not only connected with each other by a mutual dependence of properties, and the relation of caufation, but they are alfo connected with the fentient beings by a fubferviency to their purpofes of enjoyment. The philofopher obferves that this connection is admirably kept up by the con- Itancy of natural operations and the expectations of intelligent beings. Had either of thefe circumftances been wanting, had either the operations of nature been without rule, or had fentient beings no perception or expectation of their uniformity } the fubferviency would be totally at an end. This adjuftment, this fitnefs, of which the effeCt is the enjoyment of the fentient inha¬ bitants of the univerfe, appear to be the effeCt of an intention of which this enjoyment is the final caufe. This eonftancy therefore in the operations of nature, both in the intellectual and material wrorld, and the concomitant expectation of fentient beings, appear the effeCts of laws impofed on the different parts of the univerfe by the Supreme Mind, who has formed both thefe claffes of beings fo admirably fuited to each other. To fuch obfervers the world appears a WORK OF art, a fyftem of means employed for gaining certain pro- pofed ends, and it carries the thoughts forward to an artist •, and we infer a degree of fkill, power, and good intention in this Artift, proportioned to the in¬ genuity, extent, and happy effeCt which we are able to difcern in his works. Such a contemplation of na¬ ture, therefore, terminates in Natural Theology, or the difcovery of the exiftence and attributes of Our mode G°D* of reafoning Our notions of this Supreme Mind are formed from on the ope- the indications of defign which we obferve, and which rations of we interpret in the fame way as in the aCtions of men. 31 All nature, animate and inani¬ mate, thinking, and un¬ thinking, is con¬ certed. The origin of natural theology. SICS. 42£ Thefe notions, therefore, will differ from our notions Ir.troduc- of other minds only in the degrees which we are able to , tl0r!- , obferve, and which we affign to thefe faculties j for the phenomenon or the effeCt is not only the mark, but alfo the meafure of its fuppofed caufe. Thefe degrees mult be afcertained by our own capacity of appreciating the extent, the multiplicity, and the variety of the contri¬ vance. Accordingly, the attributes of the Supreme Mind, in the theological creed of a rude Indian, are much more limited than in that of a European philoib- pher. In proportion as our underftandings are enlar¬ ged, and as our acquaintance with the operations of na¬ ture around us is extended, we fhall perceive higher de¬ grees of power, of fkill, and of kind intention: and fince we find that the fcene of ebfervation is unbounded, we cannot affix any boundaries to thefe attributes in our own imagination, and we are ready to fuppofe that they are infinite or unbounded in their own nature. When our attentive furvey of this univerfe, and a careful com- parifon of all its parts, as far as we can underftand or appreciate them, have made us conclude that it is one defign, the work of one Artijl; we are under the neceffity of inferring, that, with refpeCt to this univerfe, his power, wifdom, and benevolence, are indeed infi- nite. _ 24 When men have been led to draw’ this conclufion from nie fyftem the appearances of fitnefs wffiich are obferved every- of nature where around them, they confider that conftancy which15 S°ver^" they obferve in natural operations, whether in the ma-eeraUaws. terial or the intelleftual fyftem, and that expectation of, and confidence in, this conftancy, wdiich renders the univerfe a fource of enjoyment to its fentient inhabitants, as the confequences of laws impofed by the Almighty Artift on his works, in the fame manner as they would confider the conftancy in the conduCt of any people as the confequences of laws promulgated and enforced by the fupreme magiftrate. There can be no doubt of this view of nature being The nature extremely captivating, and likely to engage the curio- and pro- fity of fpeculative men*, and it is not furprifing that °cthe the phenomena of mind have been keenly ftudied in all ages. This part of the ftudy of nature, like all others, was firft cultivated in fubferviency to the wrants of focial life \ and the general laws of moral fentiment were the firft phenomena which wrere confidered with 26 attention. This gradually ripened into a regular fyf-The rife of tem of moral duty, accompanied by its congenial ftudy, rl10raI fen' the inveftigation or determination of the fummurn nutn, or the conftituents of human felicity j and thefeduty, tw70 branches of intelleftual fcience were always kept in a ftate of alfociation by the philofophers of antiquity. Jurifprudence, the fcience of government, legiflation, and police, wrere alfo firft cultivated as arts, or at leaft in immediate fubferviency to the demands of cultivated fociety; and all thefe fo nearly related parts of the ftudy of human nature, had made a very confiderable progrefs, in the form of maxims or precepts for dire£t- ing the conduft, before fpeculative men, out of mere curiofity, treated them as fubjedls of philofophical ftudy Our moral fentiments, always involving a feel¬ ing of obligation, are exprelfed in a language con.- fiderably different from the ufual language of purs philofophy, fpeaking of things which ought to be, rather than of things which are; and this diftinftion of lan¬ guage was increafed by the very aim of the writers,. which 5 42 2 PHY . The origin telledtual Sciences. Introduc- which was generally to influence the conduct as well non. , as the opinions of their fcholars. It was referved for v modern times to bring this fludy into the pure form of philofophy, by a careful attention to the phenome¬ na of moral fentiment, and claffing thefe according to their generality, and afcertaining their refpeftive ranks by an appeal to experiment, that is, to the general conduct of mankind : and thus it happens that in the modern treatifes on ethics, jurifprudence, &c. there is lefs frequent reference made to the qfficia or duties, or to the conftituents of the fttinmum hokum, than among the ancients, and a more accurate defcription of the human mind, and difcrimination of its various moral feelings. It was hardly poflible to proceed far xA in thefe dif- of logic and quifitions without attending to the powers of the un- other in- dei-ftanding. Differences of opinion were fupported by reafonings, or attempts to reafohing. Both tides could not be in the right, and there muft be fome court of appeals. Rules of argumentation behoved to be acquiefced in by both parties; and it could hardly efcape the notice of fome curious minds, that thei'e were rules of truth and falfehbod as well as of right and wrong. Thus the human underjlanding became an objeft of ttudy, fii-ft in fubferviency to the demands of the mofalitls, but afterwards for its own fake ; and it gradually grew up into the fcience of logic. Still further refinement produced the fcience of metaphyfics, or the philofophy of univerfals. But all thefe were in fa£i pofterior to the doctrines of morals j and dif- quifitions on beauty, the principles of tafte, the pre¬ cepts of rhetoric and criticifm, were the laft additions to the ftudy of the phenomena of mind. And now, fince the world feems to have acquiefed in the mode of inveftigation of general laws by experiment and obfervation, and to agree that this is all the know¬ ledge that we can acquire of any fubjeft whatever, it is to be expected that this branch of philofophical dif- cuffxoh will attain the fame degree of improvement (eftimated by the coincidence of the dodtrines with fadt and experience) that has been attained by fome others. The occupations, however, of ordinary life have oftener diredted our efforts towards material objedts, aS The par¬ tial prac¬ tice of na- and engaged our attention on their properties and re- tural phi- ]atJons; and as all fciences have arifen from arts, and lofophy preceded its ftudy as a fci- were originally implied in the maxims and precepts of thofe arts, till feparated from them by tlxe curious fpeculatift, the knowledge of the material fyftem of nature was poffeffed in detached fcraps by the pradti- tioners in the various arts of life long before the natu¬ ral philofopher thought of colledling them into a body of fcientific dodlrines. But there have not been want¬ ing in all ages men of curiofity who have been ftruck by the uniformity of the operations of nature in the material world, and were eager to difcover their caufes. Accordingly, while the moralifts and metaphyficians turned their whole attention to the phenomena of mind, and have produced the fciences of pneumatolo- gy, logic, ethics, jurifprudence, and natural theology, thefe obfervers of nature have found fufficient employ¬ ment in confidering the phenomena of the material world. The bodies of which it confifts are evidently con- 3 S I c s. nedled by means of thofe properties by which we Introdue- obferve that they produce changes in each other’s fi- < ^on- tuation. This alfemblage of objedb may therefore be juftly called a fyftem. We may call it the material The nature system. It is frequently termed NATURE j and the of the ma- terms NATURAL APPEARANCES, natural causes, na- teiial fy- tural laws, have been generally reftridled to thofe which take place in the material fyftem. This re- nition of ftridtion, however, is improper, becaufe there is no dif- that and ference in the manner in which we form our notions other of thofe laws, and reafon from them, both with re- terms» fpedl to mind and body. Or if there is to be any reftriflion, and if any part of the ftudy of the univerfe is to be excluded in the application of thefe terms, it is that part only which conliders moral obligation, and rather treats of what ought to be than of what is. As has been already obferved, there is a confidferable dif¬ ference in the language which muft be employed ; but ftill there is nont: in the principles of inveftigation. - We have no proof for the extent of any moral law but an appeal to the feelings of the hearts of men, indi¬ cated by the general laws or fafts which are obferved in their actions. . But this is only a queftion of the propriety of lan-- The unre- guage. And no great inconvenience would ax-ife from ftn&ed the reftri£tion now mentioned if it were, fcrupuloufly adhered to; but unfortunately this is not always the t^efe0nae cafe. Some authors ufe the term natural law to ex- terms are prefs every coincidence of faft; and this is certainly pled, and the proper ufe of the term. The French writers ge-{.tsbacl con- nerally ufe the term lei phyfique in this enlarged fenfe. ences* But many authors, milled by, or taking advantange of, the ambiguity of language, after having eftablifhed a law founded on a copious and perhaps unexcepted in- duction of the phenomena of the material fyftem (iri which caffe it muft be confidered in its reftri&ed fenfe), have, in their explanation of phenomena, extended their pidnciple much farther than the induction on which they had founded the exiftence of the phyfical law. They have extended it to the phenomena of mind, and have led their followers into great and dan¬ gerous miftakes. Languages, like every other pro¬ duction of human Ikill, are imperfeCt. They are de¬ ficient in terms, and are therefore figurative. The moft obvious, the moft frequent, and the moft inte- refting ufes of language, have always produced the appropriated terms, and the progrefs of cultivation has never completely fupplied new ones. There are cer¬ tain analogies or refemblances, or certain affpeiations of ideas, fo plain, that a term appropriated to one Very familiar objeft will ferve to fuggeft another ana¬ logous to it, when aided by the concomitant circum- ftances of the difeourfe ; and this with fufficient pre- cifion for the ordinary purpofes of focial communica¬ tion, and without leading us into any confiderable miftakes: and it is only the rare and refined difquifi- tians of the curious fpeculatift that bring the poverty and imperfeftion of language into view, and make us wiffi for words as numerous as our thoughts. There is hardly a fentence, even of common difeourfe, in which there are not feveral figures either of fingle words or of phrafes ; and when very accurate dxfcrimi- nation is reqxxired, it is almoft impoflible to find words or phrafes to exprefs diftinClions which we clearly feel. We believe it impoffible to exprefs, by the fcanty vo¬ cabulary m P H Y S Intrcxluc- tiotl. ' 31 The term phyjics de¬ fined as it is generally underftood in Britain. 32 The phe¬ nomena of the mate¬ rial fyftem arranged into two clafles. 33 Examples of thofe of the firfi: clafs. cabulary of tue Hebrews, tbe nice diftiinStions of thought which are row familiar to the European phi- lofopher. In nothing dees this imperfection of lan¬ guage appear fo remarkably as in what relates to mind. Being a late lubject of feparate difeuffion, and intereft- ing only to a few fpeculatilis, we have no appropriated vocabulary for it ; and all our difquifitions concerning its operations are in continual metaphor or figure, de¬ pending on very flight analogies or refemblances to the phenomena of the material world. This makes tire utmoft caution neceflary j and it juftifies the Bri- tiflr philofophers, who have been tbe moft fuccefsful in profecuting tbe ftudy of the intellectual fyftem, for having, alma ft without exception, reftriCted the terms natural laws, natural caufes, natural philofophy, and fuch like, to the material fyftem. With us pneuma- tology makes no part of phyftcs. And we may ven¬ ture to affirm, that the fciences have fared better by the reftriClion of the terms. In no country has tbe fpirit of liberal difeuffion been more encouraged and indulged than in Britain 5 and her philolophers have been equally eminent in both branches of fcience. Their performances in ethics, jurifprudence, and na¬ tural theology, are confidered by all our neighbours as tbe fountains of knowledge on thefe fubjeCls; and Locke and Clarke are names no lefis familiar on the continent than Newton. The licentious and degrading doCtrxnes of the Gallican fchool have as yet made little irapreflion here } and man is ftill confidered among us as a glorious creature, born to, and fitted for, the nobleft profpeCts. Phyfics, then, is with us the ftudy of the material fyftem, including both natural hiltoiy and philofophy. The term is not indeed very familiar in our language *, and in place of physic us and difeiplina physica, we more generally ufe the terms naturalijl and natural knowledge. The term naturalpJiilofophi/, in its common acceptation, is of lefs extent. The field of phyfical inveftigation is ftill of prodigious extent 3 and its difterent quarters re¬ quire very different treatments, make very different re¬ turns, and accordingly have engaged in their particular cultivation perfons of very different talents and taftes. It is of fome importance to perceive the diftinftions, and to fee how the wants and propenfities of men have led them into the different paths of inveftigation 3 for, as has been more than once obferved, all fciences have fprung from the humble arts of life, and both go on improving by means of a clofe and conftant cor- refpondence. All the phenomena of tbe material fyftem may be arranged into two clafles, diftinguiftted both by their objeCts and by the proper manner of treating them. ■ The fir ft clafs comprehends all the appearances which are exhibited in the fenjible motions of bodies, and their aClions on each other producingmotion. The lecond clafs comprehends the appearances which are exhibited in the mfenjible motions and adlions of the invifible particles of matter. Of the phenomena of the firft clafs we have examples in the planetary motions, the motions of heavy bodies, the phenomena of impulfe, the motions and aclions of machines, the preffure and motions of fluids, the fenfible aftions of magnetical and eledlrical bodies, and the mo¬ tions of light. * C S. 423 We have examples of the fecond clafs in the pheno- Introduc- mena of heat and mixture, and thofe exhibited in the, ^°n’ growth of animals and vegetables, and many pheno- 2^'“’' mena of folid, fluid, magnetical, electrical, and lumi-and 0f thofe nous bodies, in which no change of place can be ob-of the fe- ferved. Thus it appears that there is a diftinCtion in the phe* ■j-]);s'5a'’r nomena fufficiently great to warrant a diviiion of the ,-angement ftudy, and to make us expeCt a more rapid improve-is appa- ment by this divifion. Nay, the divifion has been''entIy re¬ made by nature itfelf, in the acquaintance which mentural* have attained with her operations without ftudy, be¬ fore fcience appeared, and while art conftituted all our knowledge. 35 Before man had recourfe to agriculture as the moft Of the pro¬ certain means of procuring fubftfttnce, our acquaintance ^ with external fubftances was principally that of the na-^’^jg tural hiilorian 5 confifting of a knowledge of their fitnefs ages, for food, medicine, or accommodation, their places of 1 growth or habitation, and the means of procuring them, 37 depending on their manner of life or exiftence. It re-The origin quired a ftudied attention to thefe circumftances to give °^a&r'cu^" rife to agriculture, which therefore generally made hs fic'^ur^er'v appearance after men had been in the praClice of keep-and che- ing flocks 3 by which means they were more at their miftry. cafe, and had fome leifure to attend to the objedls around them, and in particular to thefe circumftances of foil and weather which affedted the growth of their pafture. When agriculture and a rude medicine were thus efta- bliftied, they were the firft arts which had their founda-- tion in 3. fystem of laws, by which the operations of na¬ ture were oblerved to be regulated ; and with thefe arts we may begin the generalJhidy of nature, which was thus divided into two different branches. The rude phyftcian would be at firft a colle&or of fpeefes ; but by degrees he would obferve refemblances . among the operations of his drugs, and would clafs them according to thefe refemblances. He would thus come to attend lefs to the drug than to its mode of operation 3 and would naturally fpeculate concerning the connection between the operation and the economy of animal life. His art now becomes a fcientific fyftem, connefted by principle and theory, all proceeding on the obfervation of changes produced by one kind of matter on another, but all out of fight. The frequent recourfe to the vege¬ table kingdom for medicines would caufe him to attend much more minutely to the few' plants which he has oc- cafion to ftudy than the hufbandman can do to the mul¬ titude he is obliged to rear. The phyfician mull learn to think, the hufbandman to work. An analogy be¬ tween the economy of animal and vegetable life could hardly fail to engage the attention of the phyfician, and would make him a botanift, both as a claflifier of plants and as a philofopher. He would naturally expeft to unite the fervices of his drugs by .combining them in his recipes, and would be furprifed at his difappointments. Cuiious and unexpeft- ed changes would frequently occur in his manipulations : the fenfible qualities, and even the external appearances of his fimples, would be often changed, and even invert¬ ed by their mixture 3 and their medicinal properties would frequently vanifti from the compound, and new ones be induced. Thefe are curious, and to him inte- refting fads 3 and he would naturally be inquifitive af~ ) ter * % 424 Introduc¬ tion. 38 The origin of the knowledge of the me¬ chanical .powers. 39. . The origin of mathe- SOatics. PHY ter tire principles whicli regulate thefe changes. His , {kill in this would by degrees extend beyond the imme¬ diate ufe for the knowledge ; and the more curious fpe- culatift would lay the foundations of a moft extenfive and important fcience, comprehending all the phenomena bf heat and mixture. Along with this, and fpringing from the fame fource, another fcience muft arife, contemplating the appear¬ ances of animal and vegetable life, and founded on a careful obfervation and accurate defcription of the won¬ derful machine. The moll incurious of men have in all ages been affefted by the difplays of wifdom and contri¬ vance in the bodies of animals, and immediately enga¬ ged in inveftigation into the ufes and fun£fions of their various parts and organs; The phenomena have been gradually difcriminated and arranged under the various Heads of nutrition, concoftion, fecretion, abforption, af- limilation, rejection, growth, life, decay, difeafe, and death j and, in conformity to the doftrines which have with greater or lefs evidence been eftablilhed on thefe fubjedls, the action of medicines, and the whole practice of phyfic and furgery, has been eftablilhed in the form of a liberal or fcientific art. The hufbandman in the mean time muft labour the ground which lies before him. He, too, is greatly in- terefted in the knowledge of the vegetable economy, afid forms fome fyltems on the fubjeft by which he regulates his labours : but he fees, that whatever is the nature of vegetable life, he muft work hard, and he fearches a- bout for every thing which can tend to diminifti his la¬ bour. The properties of the lever, the wedge, and the inclined plane, foon become familiar to him j and with¬ out being able to tell on what their efficacy depends, he ufes them with a certain fagacity and effeft. The ftrength of timber, the preflure and force of water, are daily feen and employed by him and other artifans who labour for their mutual accommodation ; and fome rude principles on thefe fubje£ls are committed to memory. Many tools and fimple machines are by this time fami¬ liar } and thus the general properties of matter, and the general laws of the adlions of bodies on each other, be¬ come gradually matter of obfervation and refleftion $ and the praftical mechanic will be frequently improving his tools and machines. The general aim is to produce a greater quantity of work by the fame exertion. The attempts to improvement will be aukward, and frequent¬ ly unfuccefsful. When a man finds, that by increafing the length of his lever he increafes his power of over¬ coming a refiftance, a fmall degree of curiofity is lufli- cient to make him inquire in wffiat proportion his advan¬ tage increafes. When he finds that a double length gives him a double energy, he will be furprifed and mor¬ tified to find, that at the end of the day he has not per¬ formed twice the quantity of work : but, after much ex¬ perience, he wall learn that every increafe of energy, by means of a machine, is nearly compenfated by an in¬ creafe of time in the performance of his talk j and thus one of the great and leading principles of pra&ical me¬ chanics was inculcated in a manner not to be forgotten, and the practical mechanic was brought to fpeculate about motion and force, and by gradual and eafy fteps the general laws of fimple motions -were eftabliftied. It is evident that thefe fpeculations cannot be carried on, nor any confiderable knowledge acquired, without fome acquaintance with the art of meafurement: and 4 SICS. the very queftions which the mechanic willies to folve, tntroduc- prefuppofe fome advances in this art, which in procefs of, t‘or,' time refined itfelf into mathematics, the moft perfedt of v - all the fciences. All the phenomena of fenfible motion afford employment to the mathematician. It is perform¬ ed in a double or triple time, through a double or triple fpace, by a double or triple body, by the exertion of a double or triple force, produces a double or triple effedl, is more to the right or to the left, upwards or down¬ wards, &c. In Ihort, every affedlion of motion is an objedl of mathematical difcufiion. Such a fcience muft have appeared ere now in the form of an art, in confe- quencfe of the mutual tranfadlions of men. Thefe among an uncultivated people are chiefly in the way of barter. If I want corn from a peafant, and have nothing to give for it but the cloth which I have made, we muft fall on foftie way of adjufting our terms in refpect of the quan¬ tity. We Ihould foon difcover that the length, and breadth, and depth, of the box or bag, were equally important; and it was not difficult to fee, that if any of them were doubled or tripled, the quantity of grain would be fo too j if two of them were doubled, the grain would be quadrupled j and if all the three were doubled the quantity of grain would be increafed eight times: the fame thing would be obferved with refpeft to my cloth. By fuch tranfadlions as thefe, a few of the pro¬ perties of plane and folid numbers and figures would be¬ come known, and the operations of multiplication and divifion, wdiere arithmetic is combined with geometry : and daily obfervation Ihows us, that the more abftrufe properties of number and figure, which to the generality of mankind are fo infignificant, lay hold on the fancy of fome individuals with fuch force, as to abftraA them from every other intelleftual entertainment, and are ftu- died with a keennefs and perfeverance almoft unequalled in any other walk of fcience. To moft men the per¬ formance of a machine is a more attraflive objeft than the properties of a figure, and the property of a figure more entertaining than that of a number ; but the fa£l feems to have been otherwife. Before Pythagoras had invented the theorem that bears his name (fee Philoso¬ phy, N° 15. and note h), and which is among the firfl: elements of geometry, he had reformed the Grecian mu- lic by the addition of a note to their fcale, and this addi¬ tion proceeds on a very refined fpeculation on the pro¬ perties of numbers; fo that among the Greeks arithme¬ tic muft have made confiderable progrefs, while geome¬ try was yet in its cradle : and we know to what aftonilh- ing length they profecuted the fcience of pure geometry, while their knowledge of mechanical principles was al¬ moft nothing. Alfo the Arabs hardly made any addi¬ tion to the geometry of the Greeks, if they did not ra¬ ther almoft completely forget it; whilft they improved their arithmetic into algebra, the moft refined and ab- llrafted branch of human knowledge. There is fuch a diftance, in point of fimplicity, between pure mathema¬ tics and the mort elementary mechanics, that the former continued to make rapid fteps to improvement in more modern times, while the latter languilhed in its infancy, and hardly deferved the name of fcience till very lately, when the great demand for it, by the increafe and im¬ provement in manufadlures, both interefted many in the ftudy, and facilitated its progrefs, by the multitude of machines which were contriving on all hands by the manufa&urers and artifans : and even at prefent it muft be * PHYSICS. 4° The con nedling Introdtic- be acknowledged, that it is to them that we are indebted lion. for almoft every new invention in mechanics, and that v the fpeculatift feldom has done more than improve the invention, by exhibiting its principles, and thus enabling the artift: to correct its imperfeflions; and now fcience and art go hand in hand, mutually giving and receiving affiftance. The demands of the navigator for mathema- 4ical and aftronomical knowledge have dignified thefe fciences •, and they are no longer the means of elegant amufemcnt alone, but merit the munificence of princes, who have erefted obfervatories, and furnifhed voyages of difcovery, where the mathematical fciences are at the fame time cherilhed and applied to the molt important purpofes. This Ihort Iketch of what may be called the natural hi/lory of physicalfciences will not, we hope, be thought improper or unprofitable. It tends to confirm an afl'er- tion often alluded to, that the profecution of the ftudy o 1 nature will be more fuccefsful, if we imitate her mode of proceeding, and divide the labour. It will be ftill further confirmed by attending to the fcientific differ¬ ence of the phenomena, which marks out a different mode of proceeding, and a difference in the knowledge which wre fhall ultimately acquire, after our moll fuc- cefsfnl refearches. In both claffes of phenomena already diftinguifhed (N° 6.) we muff grant, that the principle which con- principle of nefts the pairs of concomitant events, rendering the one concomi- the infeparable companion of the other, is totally un- tant events known t0 US) becaufe it is not the immediate obje& of unknown. our perception. 41 But in the phenomena of the firft clafs, we fee the In the firft immediate exertion of this principle, whatever it may be 5 C|rer’ tlnT" WC C3n °^^erve t^ie exerti°n with accuracy j w7e can de¬ exertion of teiTnine its kind and degree, which are the figns and this prin- meafures of the kind and degree of the unperceived caufe. This exertion, being always fome modification of motion, allows us to call in the aid of mathematical knowledge, and thus to afcertain with the precifion pe¬ culiar to that fcience the energy of the caufe, judging of the tendency and quantity by the tendency and the quantity of the obferved effeft. But in the fecond clafs of phenomena the cafe is very the fecond: ^fferent- the operations of chemiftry, for inftance, the immediate exertion of the caufe is not perceived : all that we obferve is the affemblage of particles which ob¬ tains before mixture, and that which takes place when it is completed, and which we confider as its refult. The procedure of nature in producing the change is un- feen and unknown. The fteps are hid from our obfer- vation. We are not only ignorant of the caufe which determines one particle of our food to become a part of our body while others are reje&ed, but we do not fee the operation. We are not only ignorant of the caufe which determines a particle of vitriolic acid to quit the folfil alkali with which it is united in Glauber fait, and to attach itfelf to a particle of magnefia already united with the muriatic acid, which alfo quits it to unite writh the alkali, but we do not fee the operation. The par¬ ticles and their motions are not the objects of our fenfes 5 and all that we fee is the Epfom fait and common fait feparated from the water in which we had formerly dif- folved the fal mirabile and the muriated magnefia. The motions, which are the immediate effects of the changing caufes, and therefore their only indications, ch^raBerif- Vol. XVI. Part II. 42.S ciple may be accu¬ rately ob¬ ferved, 42 but not in tics, and meafures, fitted to fhow their nature, are hid Introduc- from our view. t‘on- Our knowledge therefore of thefe phenomena mult be ' ^ ' lefs perfeft than that of the phenomena of the former And therc- clafs 5 and we muft here content ourfelves with the dif- fore the covery of more remote relations and remote caufes, and phenome- with our ignorance of the very powers of nature by f.3 which thefe changes are brought about, and which are are ieis un- cognofcible only by their immediate effe&s, viz. the mo-derftood. tions which they produce unfeen. The knowdedge which wre do really acquire is fomewhat fimilar to what the mechanical philofopher has acquired when he has difcovered, by many experiments and invelligations, that magnets attraft each other by their diflimilar poles, and repel each other by their fimilar poles, and do not a£t at all on any bodies but loadftones and iron. Here wre leave undifcovered all that is moll curious in the phe¬ nomenon, viz. how thefe attra£lions and repulfions are produced ; and even here the magnetical philolbpher has the advantage of feeing the agents and the opera- tion. > But philofophers attending to this circumftance, Though that, even in thefe cafes, the changes are produced by ^,rne phita* motions, or confift in motions, liowevei unperceived h^_ers thefe may be, have concluded, that the laws according tempted to which nature operates in producing thefe changes to explain are fimilar to the laws which regulate her operations in h m by the fenfible ablions of bodies, or are included in them ;the and that the motions, though unfeen, and the moving'n'ot^. forces, are perfeblly fimilar. They have therefore em- * ployed fimilar modes of inveftigation, applying the laws of impulfe, and calling in the aid of mathematical know¬ ledge. Of this we have many examples in the waitings of Dr Freind, Keil, Bernouilli, Hellham, Boerhaave, Hart¬ ley, and others, who have delivered theories of fermen¬ tation, folution, precipitation, cryftallization, nutrition, fecretion, mufcular aftion, nay even of fenfation and intelligence, founded, as they think, on the laws of mo¬ tion, and illuflrated and fupported by mathematical rea- foning. Lord Bacon himfelf, that careful and fagaci- ous dillinguilher of intelle&ual operations, has gone in¬ to the fame track in his explanation of the phenomena of fire and combufiion : and Sir Ifaac Newton has made feveral attempts of the fame kind, although with peculiarities which always charatterife his difcuflions, and make them very different from thofe of an inferior clafs. But the fuccefs of thefe philofophers has hitherto been but their very difcouraging: indeed they had no title to expert attempts any for their whole trains of reafoning have proceededtiave ^eeR on analogies which were not obferved, but affumed or^]luccefs" fuppofed without any authority. There is not that fimi- U ’ larity in the phenomenon, or in the vifible effeft, which is abfolutely neceffary for a fuccefsful reafoning by ana¬ logy. We do not obferve any local motion, any change of f ace, which alone enables us ft> reafon mathemati¬ cally on the fubjeft. And to make the cafe defperate, this ill-founded analogy has been mixed with hypothefes completely gratuitous. Certain forms have been alfign- ed to the particles, and certain modes of aftion have been laid down for them, for whofe reality wf have not the leaf! argument or indication : and to complete the matter, thefe fancied forms and laws of a£lion have been fuch as are either feif-contradictory and ineonfiftent, or 3 H they P H Y S I G S. 45 The advan tage de¬ rived in thefe fpe~ culation? from ma¬ thematical phiiolophy. they have been fuch as, if allowed to aft in a way ana¬ logous to what we obferve in the fennble motions of bo¬ dies, would produce effefts totally different from thofe which are obferved. Thefe atomical theories, as they are called, tranfgrefs every rule of philofophical difcul- lion, and even the belt of them are little better than trilling amufements. By far the greateft part of them only ferve 10 raife a fmile of pity and contempt in every perfon at all acquainted with mechanical philofophy. Whenever we fee an author attempting to expbm thefe hidden operations of nature by invifible fluids, by aethers, by collifrons, and vibrations, and particularly if we fee him in reducing mathematical reafonings into fuch ex¬ planations—the bed; thing we can do is to fhut the Book, and take to fame other fubjeft. That we may not be thought to fpeak prefumptuouily on this occafion, we only beg leave to remind our readers, that the united knowledge of the moft eminent mathematicians of Eu¬ rope has not yet been able to give any thing more than an approximation to the folution of the problem 01 three bodies $ that is, to determine with accuracy the motions of three particles of matter afting on each other in the limp left of all poffible manners, viz. by forces varying as the fquares of the diftances inverfely : and the vibra¬ tions of elaflic bodies, of any but the very fimpleft pof¬ fible forms, are to this day beyond the reach of invefti- gation. WhaJ then (hould be our expeftations in cafes where millions of particles are afting at once, of forms unobferved, and with forces unknown, and where the objeft is not a determination of an average refult of ma¬ ny, where the precife fate of an individual particle need not be known, but where it is this very precife ftate . of each fugle particle that wre want to know ? What can it be but uncertainty and miftake ? . Notwithftanding thefe difeouraging cireumftances, we mull obferve that this kind of inquiry has greatly im¬ proved ot late years, along 'with the improvement and extenfon of mathematical philofophy, and fnce phiio- fophers have given over their incetTant attempts to ex¬ plain every thing by impulfe } and we need not defpair of making fill farther advances, if w*e will content our- felves with going no farther than Newton has done in his explanation of the planetary motions. He has im¬ mortalized his own name, and has added immenfely to our flock of ufeful knowledge : yet he has flopped thort at the difeovery of the faft of univerfal gravitation; and all who have endeavoured to explain or account tor this faft have only expofed themfelves to pity. We may per¬ haps be one day able to demonflrate from the phenome¬ na that the particles of matter have certain mutual ten¬ dencies to or from each other, exerted according to fix¬ ed or invaried rules } and from thefe tendencies we may be able to explain many other phenomena, and predift the confequences, wTith as much certainty and evidence as an aflronomer calculates a future eclipfe. This would he a great acquxfition, and perhaps more is impefhble : and the road to this has been hinted by Sir Ifaac New¬ ton, who has expreffed his fufpicion, that as the great movements of the folar fyftem are regulated by univerfal gravitation, fo the mutual aftions of the particles of mat¬ ter are produced and regulated by tendencies of a fimilar kind, equally but not more inexplicable, and of which the laws of aftion are to be difeovered by as careful an attention to the phenomena, and by the fame patient thinking, which he has employed on the planetary mo¬ tions. And a beautiful introduction to this new and al- Introduc- moft unbounded field of inquiry has been given us by 11 n- the celebrated Abbe Bofcovich, in his Theory of Natu- ral Philofophy* where he has drown how fuch mutual tendencies, futilar in every ultimate particle of matter, and modified by conditions that are highly probable, nay almotf demonftrable, will not only produce ihe fen- fi'ole forms of folidity, hardnefs, elafticity, ductility, flui¬ dity, and vapour, under an inconceivable «»nely of mb- ordinale appearances, and the obierved laws of fenfible motion, but will go dir to explain the phenomena of fu¬ sion, congelation, iolution, crvilaiiization, &c. &c. &c. both in chemiftry and puyfiology. We earneftly recom¬ mend this work to the perufal of all who wifh to obtain a diltinft notion of the internal conflitution of natural bodies, and of the way in which the uniting forces pro¬ duce their ultimate and fenfible effefts. Any -perfon, poffeffed of a moderate fhare of mathematical knowledge, will be convinced that the procefs of nature is not very different from what he deferibes ; and that much of what wc obferve muff happen as he fays, even although the ' ultimate atoms of matter are not inextended mathema¬ tical points, accompanied with attrafting and repelling forces. 47- But we have many fteps to make before we begin this Our igno- ftudy : Nature opens to us an immenfe volume ; and werai,c^ lf doubt not that our pofterity will long find employment^ in the perufal, even though advancing with the eager- h]c jr;tlLa c nefs and fuccefs of the laft century. We have not yet ot know- arrived at the threfhold in many parts of this refearch : 1 cke a- In many parts of chemiftry, for infiance, ne are as yet^T^ uncertain with refpeft to the phenomena themfelves, which are to be the fubjefts of this difeuffion. The compofition of bodies muff be fully underftood before we begin to fpeak of the forces which unite their particles, or {peculate about their modes of aftion. As long as water was confidered as an element, we were ignorant of the forces inherent in its particles ; we are perhaps Hill ignorant of this \ but we now know that they are extremely different from what we formerly fuppofed them to be. It is but in a very few, if in any, cafes of che¬ mical combination, that we even know what are the in¬ gredients : till we know this, it is too foon to fpeculate about their mode of union. Our ignorance in the real events in the animal and vegetable economy is ftill greater. Our firft talk, therefore is to proceed, as we are now doing, in the accurate examination and claffifi- cation of the phenomena themfelves \ and, without at¬ tempting to bring them within the pale of mathematical philofophy, by attempting what are called mechanical explanations, let us give up the confideration of thefe hidden operations, and augment to the utmoft our lift of fecondary laws of vifible but remote conneftions. All the mechanical {peculations of the honourable Robert Boyle about the fenfible qualities of things are now for¬ gotten ; but his chemical experiments preferve all their value, and are frequently referred to. The fame may be faid of the fagacious Dr Hales,' whofe fanciful notions of internal conflifts, and collifions, and vibrations, de¬ rogate nothing from the value of the curious fafts which he has eftablifhed both in the animal and vegetable eco- 48 The parti- vn. n. . 1 - .1 1 j cutar divi- This dlftmftion m the nature of the phenomena, and -or|S of this difference in the nature of the knowledge which phyfical is to be acquired, and the means which are to be em-icience in ployed Britain. PHYSICS. 427 Introtluc- ployed for the fuccefsful profecution of thefe two branch¬ es of general phyfics, has occafioned a ilill farther re- ftriftion (at leaft in Britain) of the term NATURAL phi¬ losophy. It is particularly applied to the ftudy of the phenomena of the firft clafs, while thofe of tlie fecond have produced the fciences of Chemistry and physio¬ logy. Natural philofophy and chemiftry have generally been made particular inftitutions in our feminaries of learning, but phyfiology has more commonly been taught in conjunction wil.h anatomy, medicine, and bo¬ tany. The phenomena of the firft ciafs have been ufually Called MECHANICAL, in order to diftinguilh them from thofe obferved in the operations of chemiftry, and in the animal and vegetable economy •, and the explanations which have been attempted of fome of the laft, by ap¬ plying the laws obferved in the phenomena of the firft elafs, have been called ?nechanicalexplanations. As this firft clafs is evidently but a part of gene¬ ral phyfics, there is fome impropriety in giving the name natural philofophy to a courfe of do&rines which is confined to thefe alone. Indeed at the firft inftitu- tion of univerfities, the ledlures given in the Schola Pkyjtca were much more extenfive, comprehending al- molt all the phenomena of the material world : but as all arts and iciences have improved moft where the la¬ bour has be'en moft divided, it was found more condu¬ cive to the advancement of knowledge that feparate inftitutions fhould be founded for the ftudies of natu¬ ral hiftory, chemiftry, phyfiology, &c.j and thus the phenomena, purely mechanical, and a few others in magnetifm, electricity, and optics, which either were fufceotible of mathematical treatment, or had little connection w ith the ftudies of chemiftry and phyfiology, were left to the care of the profeffor of natural philo- ibphy. As the terms chemiftry and phyfology have been ap¬ plied to two very important branches of general phy¬ fics, we think that a more fpecific or chara&eriftic name might be appropriated to the other, and that it might very properly be termed MECHANICAL philo¬ sophy. It only remains to make a few’’ obfervations on the diftinftive means of profecuting thefe ftudies with fuc- cefs, and to point out fome of the advantages which may reafonably be expecied from a careful profecution . of them : and as the fecond branch has been fully treated under the fcveral articles of Chemistry,- Physiology, &cc. we {hall confine ourfelves to what is ufually called NATURAL PHILOSOPHY. 49 Mechanical MECHANICAL PHILOSOPHY may, in conformity with phiiofophy {Jie foregoing obfervations, be defined, “ the ftudy of the ancfbs’ knfible motions of the bodies of the univerfe, and of their principles a&ions producing fenfible motions, with the view to dif- explained. cover their caufes, to explain fubordinate phenomena, and to improve art.” The principle upon which all philofophical difcuffion proceeds is, that every change ’which we ohferve in the condition of things is confdered by us as an ejfedl, indi¬ cating the agency, charaBerifng the hind, and meafuring tie degree, of its caufe. In the language of mechanical philofophy, the caufe of any change of motion is caaed a moving or chan-Mechanical J ^ ° Philolophy. gmg FORCE. 1 . The difquifitions of natural philofophy muft therefore begin with the confideration of motion, carefully noti¬ cing every affeClion or quality of it, fo as to eftablifh marks and meafures of every change of which it is fuf- ceptible; for thefe are the only marks and meafures of the changing forces. This being done, it only remains to apply them to the motions wdiich we obferve in the univerfe. r 5° From the general principle of philofophical difeuftion !j,e law9 already mentioned, there flow directly two axioms. 1. Every body perfeveres in a fate of ref, or of uniform ai,piu ation. reElilineal motion, unlefs ajfeEled by forne movmgforce. 2. Every change of motion is in the diredhon and in the degree of the force imprejfed. Thefe are ufually called the LAWS of motion. They are more properly law’s of human judgment, with refpeft to motion. Perhaps they are neceffary truths, unlefs it be alleged that the general principle, of which they are neceffary confequences, is itfelf a contingent though uni- verfal truth. By thefe two axioms, applied in abf radio to every variety of motion, yve eftabliih a fyftem of general doc¬ trines concerning motions, according as they are fimple or compounded, accelerated, retarded, rectilineal, cur- vilineal, in fingle bodies, or in fyftems of conneCted bo¬ dies and we obtain correfponding charaCteriftics and meafures of accelerating or retarding forces, centripetal or centrifugal, fimple or compound. We have an illuftrious example of this abftraft fyftem of motion and moving forces in the firft: book of Sir Ifaac Newtbn’s Mathematical Principles of Natural Philofophy. Euler’s Mechanic a fvie Scientia Mot us, Herman’s Pho- ronomia fve de Viribus Corporum, and D’Alembert’s Traite de Dynamique, are alfo excellent works of the fame kind. In this abftract fyftem no regard is paid to the cafual differences of moving forces, or the fources from which they arife. It is enough to characterife a double accelerating force, for inftance, that it produces a double acceleration. It may be a weight, a ftream of water, the preffure of a man •, and the force, of which it is faid to be double, may be the attraction of a magnet, a current of air, or the aftion of a fpring. Having eftablithed thefe general doCtrines, the phi- lofopher now applies them to the general phenomena of the univerfe, in order to difeover the nature of the forces which really exilt, and the laxvs by which their opera¬ tions are regulated, and to explain interefting but fubor¬ dinate phenomena. This is the chief bufinefs of the me¬ chanical philofopher ; and it may with fome propriety be called the mechanical hifory o f nature. cT Some method muft be followed in this hiftory of me- Of the ar- chanical nature The phenomena muft be claffed by rangement means of their refemblances, which infer a refemblance j n|e* in their caufes, and thefe clafles muft be arranged ac-nhewime- cording to fome principle. We have feen no method'na of the which appears to us lefs exceptionable than the follow- univerfe. in?\ . . . . 5* The principle of arrangement is the generality of the The eene- phenomena ; and the propriety of adopting this princi- ! a !ty pie, arifes from the probability which it gives us of more-^^ri1^ readily difoovermg the moft general actuating forces, ^.jncipie whefe agency is implicated in all other phenomena of >t arrange- 3 H 2 lefs ‘lent* 428 Mechanicallefs extent; and therefore fhould be previoufly difeuffed, 1 liilohinh}. we jYjay detect the diferiminating circumftances which ferve to charadterife the fubordinale phenomena, and are thus the marks of the diftinguithing and inferior natural powers. The laws of ^'^e m0^ general of all phenomena is the curvilineal motion are motion of bodies in free fpace ; it is obferved through firft applied the whole extent of the folar fyftem. rnic;f|IOh°~ The mechanical hiftory of nature begins therefore inomena. with aftronomy. Here, from the general phenomena of the planetary motions, is evinced the faB of the mu¬ tual dededlion of every body towards every other body, and this in the inverfe proportion of the fquares of the ditlance, and the diredl proportion of the quantity of ■matter. This is the fa£l of universal gravitation, indicating the agency, and meafuring the intentity, of the univerfal force of mutual gravity. Having eftablithed this as an univerfal fa£t, the na¬ tural philofopher proceeds to point out all the particular fadfs which are comprehended under it, and whofe pecu¬ liarities charafterife the different movements of the folar fyftem. That is, in the language of philofophy, he gives a theory or explanation of the fubordinate phenomena ; the elliptical motions of the planets and comets, their mutual difturbances; the lunar irregularities; the oblate figure of the planets; the nutation of the earth’s axis ; the preceffion of the equinoxes; and the phenomena of the tides and trade winds : and he concludes with the theory of the parabolic motion of bodies projected on the furface of this globe, and the motion of pendu¬ lums. As he goes along, he takes notice of the applications which may be made to the arts of life of the various doftrines which are fucceflivelyeftablifhed ; fuch as chro¬ nology, aftronomical calculation, dialling, navigation, gunnery, and the meafuring of time. If a fquare parcel of fand be lying on the table, and The nature.finger be applied to any part of it to pufh it along ^0^ravita‘ the table, that part is removed where you will, but the PHYSICS. 54 The appli¬ cation of this fei- ence to the arts of life. 55 5* and of co- Jielion. 57 Mode of in ve (liga¬ ting the laws of co- hefion. reft remains in its place ; but if it is a piece of fand-ftone of the fame materials and fliape, and the finger is applied as before, the whole is moved ; the other parts accom¬ pany the part impelled by the finger in all its motions. From the moon’s accompanying the earth in all its motions round the fun, we infer a moving force which conne&s the moon and earth. In like manner, we muft conclude that a moving force connetfts the particles of the ftone ; for we give the name force to every thing which produces motion : We call it the force of cohe¬ sion ; a term which, like gravitation, expreffes merely a fa6L This feems to be the next phenomenon of the univerfe in point of extent. Having, from the general phenomenon, eftabliflied the exiftence of this force, the philofopher proceeds to afeertain the laws by which its exertions are regulated; which is the afeertaining its diftinftive nature and pro¬ perties. This he does in the fame wTay that he afeer- tained the nature of planetary gravitation, vi%. by ob- ferving more particularly the various phenomena. Here is opened a moft extenfive and varied field of obfervation, in which it muft be acknowledged that very little regular and marked progrefs has been made. The variety in the phenomena, and the confequent variety in the nature of the connecting forces, appear as yet in¬ conceivably great; and there feems little probability ofMechame*! our being able to deteeft in them all any famenefs, com- PMofophy. bined with the other diftinguiftiing circumftances, as we have done in the cafe of gravity. Yet we ftioulft not defpair. Bofcovich has fhown, in the moft unexcep¬ tionable manner, that although we ftiall fuppofe that every atom of matter is endued with a perfe&ly fimilar force, aiding in a certafti determined ratio of the fmall and imperceptibfe diftances at which the particles of matter are arranged with refpedl to each other, the ex¬ ternal or fenfible appearances may, and muft, have all that variety which we obferve. He alfo fhows very dif- tindlly how, from the operation of this force, muft arife fome of the moft general and important phenomena which charadterife the different forms of tangible bodies. We obferve the chief varieties of the adtion of this corpuscular force on the bodies which we denomi¬ nate hard, /of, folid, fluid, vaporous, brittle, duBile, elaflic. We fee inftances where the parts of bodies avoid each other, and require external force to keep them to¬ gether, or at certain fmall diftances from each other. This is familiar in air, vapours, and all compreflible and elaftic bodies. This is evidently a moft curious and interefting fub- jedl of inveftigation. On the nature and adlion of thefe corpufcular forces depends the ftrength or firmnefs of folids, their elafticity, their power of communicating motion, the preffure, and motion, and impulfe of fluids ; nay, on the fame adlions depend all the chemical and phyfiological phenomena of expanfion, fufion, congela¬ tion, vaporifation, condenfation, folution, precipitation, abforption, fecretion, fermentation, and animal and ve¬ getable concodlion and afllmilation. Out of this immenfe ftore of phenomena, this inex- hauftible fund of employment for our powers of invef¬ tigation, the natural philofopher felefts thofe which lead diredlly to the production or modification of fenfible mo¬ tion. He will therefore confider, l. The communication of motion among detached and H15 pro- free bodies, eftabliftiing the laws of impulfe or collifion. du<^lon This has always been confidered as the elementary doc-Jn^r'ife^has trine of mechanical philofophy, and as the moft familiarbeen 'fad obferved in the material world; and in all ages thought the philofophers have been anxious to reduce all aftions offf'?^ famt* bodies on each other to impulfe, and have never thought a phenomenon completely explained or accounted for * till it has been ftiown to be a cafe of impulfe. This it is which has given rife to the hypothefes of vortices, ethers, magnetic and eleftric fluids, animal fpirits, and a multitude of fancied intermediums between the fenfible maffes of matter, which are laid in common language to aft on each other. A heavy body is fuppofed to fall, becaufe it is impelled by a ftream of an invifible fluid moving according to certain conditions fuited to the cafe. The filings of iron are fuppofed to be arranged round a magnet, by means of a ftream of magnetic fluid iifuing from one pole, circulating perpetually round the magnet, and entering at the other pole, in the fame manner as we obferve the flote-grafs arranged by the current of a brook. _ 59 But the philofopher who has begun the mechanical But this ftudy of nature by the abftraft doftrines of dynamics,0I^n^n is and made its firft application to the celeftial phenome-^fry ^,ue^‘ na, and who has attended carefully to the many ana- 1 na e‘ logics. PHYSICS. 429 Mechanical logics between the phenomena of gravitation and cohe- Philofophy. flori} will be at leaft ready to entertain very different notions of this matter. He will be fo far from think¬ ing that the production of motion by impulfe is the molt familiar faCt in nature, that he will acknowledge it to be comparatively very rare ; nay, there are fome appearances in the faCts, which are ufually considered as inftances of impulffon, which.will lead him to doubt, and almoft to deny, that there has ever been obferved an inltance of one body putting another in motion by com¬ ing into abfolute contaft with it, and itriking it j and he will be difpofed to think that the production of mo¬ tion in this cafe is precifely Similar to what we obferve when we gently pulh one floating magnet towards ano- Motion ther, with their fimilar poles fronting each other. There feems to be will be the fame production of motion in the one and di- produced minution of it in the other, and the fame uniform mo- from the ^ tion of the common centre of gravity: and, in this cafe ^l^n'and ^ magnets, he fees completely the neceflity of a law reaction!11 °f motion, which is not an axiom, but is obferved through the whole of nature, and which receives no explanation from any hypothefis of an intervening fluid, but is even totally inconffftent with them. We mean, “ that every aCtion of one body on another is accompanied by an equal and oppofite aCtion of that other on the firff.” This is ufually called the equality of aclion and reaBion: it is not intuitive, but it is univerfal 5 and it is a necef- fary confequence- of the perfeCt fimilarity of the corpuf- cular forces of the fame kinds of matter. This general faCt, unaccountable on the hypotheffs of impelling fluids, is confidered in the planetary motions as the unequivocal indication of the fameners of that gravity which regulates -them all. The rules of good reafoning fliould make us draw the fame conclufion here, that the particles of tan¬ gible matter are connected by equal and mutual forces, which are the immediate caufes of all their fenflble ac¬ tions, and that thefe forces, like gravitation, vary with every change of diftance and fituation. The laws of collifion and impulfion being now7 efta- bliflied, either as original faCts or as confequences of the agency of equal and mutual forces which conned the particles of matter, the philofopher confiders, 2. The produdion of motion by the intervention of folid bodies, where, by reafon of the cohefion of mat¬ ter, fome of the motions are neceflarily confined to certain determinate paths or diredions. This is the cafe in all motions round fixed points or axes, or along planes or curves which are oblique to the adion of the forces. This part of the ftudy contains the theory of machines, pointing out the principles on which their energy de¬ pends, and confequently furnifhing maxims for their con- ftrudion and improvement. But thefe obfervations do not complete the difeuflion of the mechanifm of folid bo¬ dies : they are not only folid and inert, but they are al- fo heavy ; therefore the adion of gravity muft be com¬ bined with the confeqwences of folidity. This w7ill lead to difeuflions about the centre of gravity, the theory and conftrudion of arches and roofs, the principles of liabili¬ ty and equilibrium, the attitudes of animals, and many particulars of this kind. 3. The philofopher vrill now turn his attention to 61 Of motion as it re- fpects the theory of machines, &c. 62 Mecha¬ nics. 63 The nature and defini- another form, in which tangible matter exhibits many tion of flui- interefting phenomena, vh. fluidity. The firft thing dity. to be attended to here is, What is that particular form of ex fence ? What is the precife phenomenon which cha- Mechanical raderifes fluidity ? What is the definition of a fluid ? ‘Tilofophy.^ This is by no mfeans an eafy queition, and conliderable objedions may be Hated again!! any definition that has been given of it. Sir Ifaac Newton fays, that a fuid is a body whofe particles yield to thefmallefl impreJJiony and by fo yielding are eafdy moved among themfelves. It may be doubted w7hether this be fufhciently precife j what is meant by the fmallcfl imprefjion ? and w7hat is eafily moving ? Is there any precife degree of impreflion to which they do not yield \ and do they oppofe any re¬ finance to motion ? And a ilronger objedion may be made : It is not clear that a body fo conflituted will exhibit all the appearances which a body acknowdedged to be fluid does really exhibit. Euler offers fome very plaufible reafons for doubting whether it will account for the horizontal furface, and the complete propagation of preffure through the fluid in every diredion \ and there¬ fore prefers feleding this lajl phenomenon, the propaga¬ tion of preffure qudqua-verfum, as the charaderiftic of fluidity, becaufe a body having this conftitution (on whatever circumltances it may depend) will have every other obferved property of a fluid. But this definition is hardly fimple or perfpicuous enough *, and we think that the objedions again!! Newton’s more fimple and in¬ telligible definition are not unanfwerable. Bofcovich defines a fluid to be, a body whofe particles exert the fame mutualforces in all directions ; and (hows, that fuch particles mull be indifferent, as to any pofition, with refped to each other. If no external force ad on them,, they wall remain in every pofition, and w ill have no ten¬ dency to arrange themfelves in one pofition rather than another 5 differing in this refped from the particles of folid, or foft, or vifeid bodies j wdiich require fome force to change their refpedive pofitions, and wrhich recover theie pofitions again w7hen but gently difturbed. He il- luftrates this dillindion very beautifully, by comparing a parcel of balls thrown on quickfilver, and attrading each , other, with a parcel of magnets in the fame fituation. The balls will flick together, but in any pojition; whereas the magnets will ahvays affed a particular arrangement. ^ When the charaderiflic phenomenon of fluidity has of the pref- been feleded, the philofopher proceeds to combine this fare and property wdth gravity, and eftabliflies the dodrines ofe9ufl1.bnum* hydrostatics, or of the preffure and equilibrium of°^ fu^s’ or heavy fluids, the propagation of this preffure in every t^Si diredion j and demonftrates the horizontality of furface affumed by all perfed fluids. Thefe dodrines and principles enable us to determine feveral very interefting circumftances refpeding the mutual preffure of folids and fluids on each other; the preflures exerted on the bottoms and fides of veffels •, the fupport and whole mechanifm of floating bodies, &c. He then confiders how fluids will move when their Of the mo*, equilibrium of preffure is deftroyed ; and eftablifhes the h011 dodrines of hydraulics, containing all the modifica-^u^s’ °.r tions of this motion, arifing from the form of the veffels, 1 riUl IC?* or from the intenfity or diredicn of the preffure which occafions it. And this fubjed is completed by the con- fideration of the refiftance which fluids oppofe to the motion of folid bodies through them, and their impulfe on bodies oppofed to their adion. Thefe are very important matters, being the founda tions of many mechanical arts, and furnifhing us writh fome of our moft convenient and efficacious powers for impel.. 430 r n v Mecha:'.!cal impelling maclimes. They are alfo of very difficult dif- Flnlarophy. cu{iion> an(j are by notmeans completely invelligated or 66 eftablifhed. Much remains yet to be done both for per- Th? im- fefting the theories and for improving the arts which de- portance pend on them. and difficul- jj. js evident, that on thefe do&rines depend the branch's of knowledge of the motions of rivers and of weaves •, the fcience. buoyancy, equilibrium, and liability of Ihips; the mo¬ tion of fliips through the waters ; the aftion of the winds on the fails j and the wdiole arts of marine conllrudlion 67 and feamanlhip. The nature There is another general form of tangible matter and defini- wbich exhibits very different phenomena, which are alfo vapour extremely interefting ■, we mean that of VAPOUR. A vapour is a fluid ; and all the vapours that we know are heavy fluids : they are therefore fubje£l to all the laws of preflure and impulfe, wThich have been confidered under the articles Hydrodynamics. But they are fufceptible of great compreflion by the a£iion of ex¬ ternal forces, and expand again when thele forces are removed. In confequence of this compreflion and ex- panflon, the general phenomena of fluidity receive great and important modifications j and this clafs of fluids re¬ quires a particular conlideration. As air is a familiar inftance, this branch of mechanical philofophy has been 6g called PNEUMATICS. The doc- Under this head we confider the preffure of the at- trine of air, mofphere, and its effe6ls, both on folid and fluid bodies, or pneuma- jq produces the rife of waters or other fluids in pumps tlcs’ and fyphons, and gives us the theory of their conftruc- tion : it explains many curious phenomena of nature, fuch as the motions in the atmofphere, and their con¬ nexion with the preffure of the air, and its effeX on the barometer or weather-glafs. Air, when in motion, is called wind; and it may be employed to impel bodies. The theory of its aXion, and of its refiftance to moving bodies, are therefore to be confidered in this place. But befides their motions of progreflion, &c. fuch as we obferve in winds, compreflible or elaflic fluids are fuf¬ ceptible of what may be termed internal motion ; a kind of undulation, where the contiguous parts are thrown into tremulous vibrations, in which they are alternately condenfed and rarefied; and thefe undulations are propa¬ gated along the mafsof elaftic fluid, much in the fame way in which we obferve waves to fpread on the furface of water. What makes this an interefting fubjeX of con- fideration is, that thefe undulations are the more ordi¬ nary caufes of found. A trembling chord, or fpring, or bell, agitates the air adjoining to it: theie agi¬ tations are propagated along the air, and by its in¬ tervention agitate the organ of hearing. The mechanifm of thefe undulations has been much ftudied, and furnifhes 69 a very beautiful theory of mulical harmony. Of the The philofopher examines the law of comprcffibility ■ compreffi- 0f ajr ancj other elaftic fluids ; and thus gets the knowr- elafftc0 ledge of the conftitution of the atmofphere, and of the fluids, and aXion of thofe fluids when employed to impel folid bo¬ lts eonfe- dies. Gunpowder contains an immenfe quantity of per- quences. manently elaftic air, which may be fet at liberty by in¬ flammation. When this is done at the bottom of a piece of ordnance, it will impel a ball along the barrel, and difcharge it from th£ muzzle, in the fame way that an arrow is impelled by a bow. And thus having difcovered in what degree this air preffes in proportion to its expan- fipa, we difcover its aXion on the ball through the vThole 2 3 I C S. length of the piece, and the velocity which it will finally Mechanical communicate to it. Here then is contained a theory of [',hl!oiHPhy^ artilleryand of mines. Chemiftry teaches us, that moft bodies can be con- of the con¬ verted by fire into elaftic fluids, which can be employed verfion of to aX on other bodies in the way of preffure or impuife. Thus they come under the.review of the mechanical phi- lofopher ; and they have become interefting by being em¬ ployed as moving forces in fome very powerful machines. Thefe difcuflions will nearly exhauft all the general mechanical phenomena. There remain fome which are much more limited, but furnifh very curious and im- _portant fubjeXs of inveftigation. The phenomena exhibited between loadftones or mag- Of the phe- nets and iron have long attraXed attention ; and the ufe nomen a of to which the polarity of the loadftone has been applied, kadftone, namely, the direXing the courfe of a fhip through the pathlefs ocean, has rendered thefe phenomena extremely interefting. They are fpecified by the term MAGNETISM. Confiderable progrefs has been made in the arrangement and generalization of them ; but we have by no means been able hitherto to bring them all under one Ample faX. The attention has been too much turned to the difcovery of the ultimate caufe of magnetifm ; whereas we fhould have rather employed our ingenuity in difcover- ing all the general laws, in the fame manner as Kepler and Newton did with refpeX to the celeftial phenomena, without troubling themfelves with the caufe of gravita¬ tion. Dr Gilbert of Colchefter was the firft who con¬ fidered the magnetical phenomena in the truly philofo- phical manner; and his treatife De Magnate may be confidered as the firft and one of the moft perfeX fpeci- mens of the Baconian or induXive logic. It is indeed an excellent performance; and when wTe confider its date, 1580, it is a wonder. iEpinus’s Tentamen Tlieornc Magnelifmi is a moft valuable work, and contains all the knowledge which we have as yet of the fubjeX. ^ There is another clafs of mechanical phenomena which Of electri- have a confiderable affinity with the magnetical; we '-a' phena- mean the phenomena called eeectrical. Certain bo-mena* dies, when rubbed or otherwife treated, attraX and repel other bodies, and occafion a great variety of fenfible mo¬ tions in the neighbouring bodies. Philofophershave paid much attention to thefe appearances of late years, and eftablifhed many general larvs concerning them. But we have not been more fuccefsful in bringing them all under one faX, and thus eftabliftiing a complete theory of them, than in the cafe of magnetifm. Franklin and Aipinus are the authors who have been moft fuccefsful in this refpeX. Dr Franklin in particular has acquired great celebrity by his moft fagacious companfon of the phenomena; which has enabled him to eftablifh a few general lawrs, almoft as precife as thofe of Kepler, and of equally extenfive influence. His difcovery too of the identity of thunder and eleXricity has given an import¬ ance and dignity to the whole fubjeX. 73 There are many phenomena of eleXricity which can-Thefr ties wffiich affedt the ftate of other particles or mafles, at *^ra^°[^s fmaller or at greater diftances from each other according is infuppor- to certain general rules or laws. This ultimate ftep in table by us. the conftitution of things is infcrutable by us. It is ar¬ rogance in the higheft degree for us to fay, that becaufe we do not comprehend how there is inherent in a body any quality by which another body may be affedted at any diftance from it, therefore no fuch quality is pojfible. It is no lefs fo to fay, that matter has no active property but that of moving other matter by impulfe 3 and that becaufe it may be fo moved, and alfo by the agency of our own minds, therefore, wffien it is not moved by im¬ pulfe, it is moved by minds. The fame almighty fiat wffiich brought a particle of matter into exiftence could bring thofe qualities equally into exiftence 3 and the how in both is equally beyond our comprehenfion. But, on the other hand, we muft guard againft thenot j)CW incurious refting on this confideration as a flop to fur-ever, flop ther inquiry. There may be fpecies of matter poftcf-further iu- ftffi quirks. 86 This fhould P PI Y Mechanical fed of the mechanical powers, and which notwilhftand- Phiiokiphy. jng is not cognifable by our fenfes. All the properties ^ of matter are not known to a perfon who is both deaf and blind } and beings poflefled of more fenfes may per¬ ceive matter where we do not j and many phenomena may really be produced by the a£lion of intervening matter, which we, from indolence or from hafte, afcribe to the agency of inherent forces. The induftry of phi- lofophers has already difcovered intermedia in fome cafes. It is now certain that air is the conveyor of found, and it is almoft certain that there is fuch a thing as light. Let us therefore indulge conjeflures of this kind, and examine the conjectures by the received laws of motion, and rejeft them when we find the fmalleft in- confiftency; and always keep in mind that even the moft coincident with the phenomena is ftill but a pof- 3^ Ability. Thefc ob- We may conclude the whole of thefe obfervations fervations vrith the remark, that thefe queftions about the activity a^e I01 or inaflivity of matter are not phyfical, but metaphy- but meta- heal. Natural philofophy, it is true, commonly takes phyficak it for granted that matter is wholly inaftive j but it is not of any moment in phyfics whether this opinion be true or falfe 5 wdiether matter, be afted on according to certain laws, or whether it a‘-v; made all plain when we call this indicated caufe a ten- (lency to the earth ; but we have no notion of this ten¬ dency to the earth different from the approach itfelf. This word tendency, fo falhionable among the followers of Sir Ifaac Newton, is perverted from its pure and ori¬ ginal fenfe. Tendere verfus folem, is, in the language of Rome, and alfo of Newton, to go towards the fun •, but we now ufe the words tend, tendency, to fignify, not the approach, but the caufe of this approach. And when called upon to fpeak ftill plainer, we defert the lafe paths of plain language, and we exprefs ourfelves by meta¬ phor 5 fpeaking of nifus, conatus fefe mutua accedende, vis centripetm, &c. When thefe expreflions have be¬ come familiar, the original fenfe of the word is forgotten, and we take it for granted that the words never had ano¬ ther meaning ; and this metaphor, fprung from the po¬ verty of language, becomes a fruitful fource of mifeon- ception and miftake. The only way to fecure ourfelves againfi: fuch myftical notions as are introduced by thefe means into philofophy, is to have recourfe to the way in which we acquire the knowledge of thefe fancied powers; and then wre fee that their names are only names for phenomena, and that univerfal gravitation is only an univerfal mutual approach among the parts of the folar fyftem. i)X There is one cafe in which we fondly imagine that The abfur- we know' the caufe independent of the effcX, and that ditv of rea- w e could have prediXed the phenomenon a priori %> wefori.inSrt mean the cafe of impulfe : and hence it is that we are^mn!' fo prone to reduce every thing to cafes of impulfion, and that wre have fallen upon all thefe fubterfuges of ethers and other fubtile fluids. Rut w’e might have laved ourfelves all this trouble 5 for after having; by much falfe reafoning and gratuitous affumptions, (hown that the phenomenon in queflion might have been produ¬ ced by impulfe, vTe are no nearer our purpofe, becaufe that property by which matter in motion puts other matter in motion, is known to us only by and in the effeX. 92 The fiiir and logical deduXion from all this is, that We know we muft not expeX any knowdedge of the powers ofnotl!inS°^ nature, the immediate caufes of the motions of bodies, ^te'cTufes but by means of a knowdedge of the motions them- Gf motions felves; and that every miftake in the motions is ac-except by a companied by a fimilar miftake in the caufes. It is knowledge impoflible to demonftrate or explain the gravitation of '!tlie f0' ,r, ,. ... * ri® • r tions them- the planets to him who is ignorant or the properties or (e|ves. the ellipfe, or the theory of gunnery to him wdio does not know the parabola. ^ A notion has of late gained ground, that a man may A man can- become a natural philofopherwdthout mathematical know'- not be a ledge ; but this is entertained by none who have any ma- thematics themfelves •, and furely thofe who are ignorant of mathematics ftiould not be fuftained as judges in this out being a matter. We need only appeal to faX. It is only in mathemati- thofe parts of natural philofophy which have been ma-cian> thematically treated, that the inveftigations have been carried on wdth certainty, fuccefs, and utility. Without this guide, we muft expeX nothing but a fchool-boy’s knowdedge, refembling that of the man who takes up his religious creed on the authority of his prieft, and can neither give a rettfon for what he imagines that he be- 3 I lieves, 434 Mechanical lieves, nor apply it with confidence to any valuable pur- hhiloiophy. pQre Jn iife> \Ye xnay read and be amufed with the trif- ' jing or vague writings of a Nollet, a Fergufon, or a Priefiley j but we hull not underhand, or profit by the truths communicated by a Newton, a D’Alembert, or De la Grange. Thefe obfervations, on the other hand, fhow us the nature of the knowledge which may be acquired, and the rank which natural philofophy holds among the fciences. The mo- Motions are the real and only objects of our obfer- tionsofho-vation, the only fubjefts of our difcufiion. In motion t’ue.s, the are included no ideas but thofe of i’pace and time, the of obferva-^ fubjefls of pure mathematical difquifition. As foon, lion, are therefore, as we have difcovered the faft, the motion, fuhjedts of all our future reafonings about this motion are purely pure ma- mathematical, depending only on the affections of ddl'jihhoii hgurc, number, and proportion, and muff carry along 1 rvith them that demonftration and irrefiltxble evidence which is the boaft of that fcience. To this are we indebted for that accuracy which is attained, and the progrefs which has been made in fome branches of me¬ chanical philofophy *, for when the motions are di ftinelly and minutely underllood, and then confidered only as ma¬ thematical quantities, independent of all phyfical confi- derations, and we proceed according to the juft rules of mathematical reafonmg, we need not fear any intricacy of combfnation or multiplicity of fteps; we are certain that truth will accompany us, even though we do not always attend te it, and will emerge in our final propofition, in the fame manner as we fee happen in a long and intri- „ cate algebraic analyfis. Mechanical Mechanical philofophy, therefore, which is cultivated philofophy in this way, is not a fyftem of probable opinions, but thus cutti- a difciplina accurata, a demonftrative fcience. To pof- d'emo fefs it, however, in this form, requires confiderable tM fcience. preparation. The mere elements of geometry and al¬ gebra are by no means lufficient. Newton could not have proceeded fine “ fua mathefi faccm preferente nd, in creating a new fcience of phyfics, he was obliged PHYSIC S. to fearch for and difeover a new fource of mathematical ruatics ia Britain, The Amen- knowledge. It is to be lamented that the tafte for the table decay mathematical fciences has fo prodigioufly declined in of mathe- counjry Gf late years 5 and that Britain, which formerly took the lead in natural philofophy, (hould now be the country where they are leaft cultivated. Few among us know more than a few elementary doc¬ trines of equilibrium : while, on the continent, we find many authors who cultivate the Newtonian philofophy with great affiduity and fuccefs, and whofe writings are confulted as the fountains of knowledge by all our countrymen who have occafion to employ the difeo- veries in natural philofophy in the arts of life. It is to the foreign writers that we have recourfe in our feminaries, even for elementary treatxfes and while the continent has fupplied us with molt elaborate and ufeful treatifes on various articles, in phyfical aftrono- nomy, practical mechanics, hydraulics, and optics, there has not appeared in Britain half a dozen treatifes worth con fulling for thefe laft forty years ; and this notwkh- ftanding the unparalleled munificence of our prefent the ampleft foverejgnj given more liberal patronage to the mem from" cultivators of mathematical philofophy, and indeed of fhe crown, fcience in general, than any prince in Europe. The 97 notwith- ftanding magnificent eftahlifirmenls of Louis XIV, originated Mechanical from his infatiable atnbition and defire of univerfal in- hhilofophy. flnence, directed by the fagacious Colbert. And his v f patronage being exerted accoxding to a regular plan in the eftablilhment of penfioned academics, and in procur¬ ing the combined eftorts of the mofl eminent of all coun¬ tries, his exertions made a confpicuous figure, and filled' all Europe with his eulogifts. Bat all this was done without the fmalleft felf-denial, or retrenchment of his own pleafures, the expences being fumifhed out of the public revenues of a great and oppreffed nation •, where¬ as the voyages of dilcovery, the expenfive obfervations and geodetical operations in Britain, and the number- lefs unheard-of penixons and encouragements given to men of fcience and aftivity, were all fux-nilhcd out of the private eftate of our excellent fovereign, who feems to delight in repaying, by ev.ery fervice in his power, the attachment of a loyal and happy nation. It is therefore devoutly to be wifixed that his patriotic efforts were properly feconded by thofe whom they are intend¬ ed to ferve, and that the tafte for the mathematical fciences may again turn the eyes of Europe to this coun¬ try for inftrurilion and improvement. The prefent feems a moxft favourable era, while the amazing advances in manufactures of every kind feem to call aloud for the afliftance of the philofopher. What pleafure would it have given to Newton or Halley to have feconded the ingenious efforts of a Watt, a Boulton, a Smeaton, an Arkwright, a Dollond ? and haw mortifying is it to fee them indebted to the fervices of a Belidor, a Boffut, a Clairaut, a Bofcovich ? We hope to be pardoned for this digreflion, and re- tmm to our fubjed. ^ It appears from what has been faid, that mechani-Mechanical cal philofophy is almoft wholly a mathematical ftudy, philofophy and that it is to be fuccefsfully profecuted only undeASja!l^0^ tbis form : but in our endeavours to initiate the young beginner, it will be often found to require more lleadi- cai ftudy. nefs of thought than can generally be expe&ed for keeping the mind engaged in fuch abftradt fpecula- tions. The objeft prefented to the mind is not readi¬ ly apprehended with that vivacity which is neceffary for enabling us to reafon upon it with clearnefs axxd fteadinefs, and it would be very defirable to have (bme means of rendering the conception more eafy, and the ^ attention more lively. This may be done by exhibit-Experi- ing to the eye an experiment, which, though but aments are, ’ fingle faft, gives us a fenfible objeft of perception, *10W^er» which we can contemplate and remember with much f more fteadinefs than any mere creature of the imagi- attention of nation. We could, by an accurate defeription, give young fuch a conception of a room that the hearer flxould minds, perfectly comprehend our narration of any occurrence in it : but one moment’s glance at the room would be infinitely better. It is ufual therefore to employ ex¬ periments to aflift the imagination of the beginner ; and moft courfes of natural philofophy are accompanied by a feries of fuch experiments. Such experiments, con- nefted by a flight train of argumentative difeourfe, may even ferve to give a notion of the general doftrines, fufficient for an elegant amufement, and even tending to excite curiofity and engage in a ferious profecution of the ftudy. Such are the ufual courfes which go by the name of experimental jbhilofophy : but this is PHYSICS. Experimen- is a great mifappllcation of the term ; fuch courfes are tal Philo- little more than illujlrations of known doctrines by ex- fophy. Experimen¬ tal philofo- phy defined and ex¬ plained. ioi A good treatife on the methoi of inquiry by experi- bient very necdTary. t02 An objec¬ tion to ex¬ perimental inquiry. penments. Experimental Philosophy is the inveftigation of general laws, as yet unknown, by experiment; and it has been obferved, under the article Philosophy, that this is the moil infallible (and indeed the foie) way of arriving at the knowledge of them. This is the Novum Grganurn Scientiarum itrongly recommended by Lord Bacon. It was new in his time, though not altogether without example; for it is the procedure of nature, and is followed whenever curioiity is excited. There was even extant in his time a very beautiful ex¬ ample of this method, viz. the Treatife of the Load- ftone, by Dr Gilbert of Colchefter ; a work which has hardly been excelled by any, and which, when we con- lider its date, about the year 1580, is really a wonderful performance. The molt perfedt model of this method is the Optics of Sir Ifaac Newton. Dr Black’s Elfay on Magnefia is another very perfedt example. Dr Franklin’s Theory of Eledlricity is another example of great merit. That the inveftigation is not complete, nor the conclufions certain, is not an objedtion. The method is without fault} and a proper diredtion is given to the mind for the experiments which are ftill neceflary for eftablifhing the general laws. It were much to be wiftied that feme perfon of talents and of extenftve knowledge wTould give a trea- '! tife on the method of inquiry by experiment. Although many beautiful and fuccefsful examples have been given as particular branches of inquiry, we have but too many inftances of very inaccurate and inconclufive in- veftigations. Experiments made at random, aim ©ft without a view, ferve but little to advance our know¬ ledge. They are like ftiapelefs lumps of ftone merely detached from the rock, but ftill wanting the Ikill of the builder to feledt them for the different purpdfes which they may chance to lerve *, while well-contrived experiments are blocks cut out by a Ikilful workman, according as the quarry could furnifti them, and of forms fuited to certain determined ufes in the future edifice. Every little feries of experiments by Margraaf terminates in a general law, while hardly any general conclufion can be drawn from the numberlefs experi¬ ments of Pott. Lord Bacon has written much on this fubjedt, and with great judgement and acutenefs of di- ftindtion } but he has exceeded in this, and has fatigued his readers by his numerous rules j and there is in all his philofophical works, and particularly in this, a quaintnefs and affedtation that greatly obfeure his mean¬ ing, fo that this molt valuable part of his writings is very little read. A formidable objedtion has been made to this me¬ thod of inquiry. Since a phyfical law is only the expreflion of a general fadt, and L eftablifhed only in confequence of our having obferved a fimilarity in a great number of particular fadts •, and fince the great rule of indudtive logic is to give the law no greater ex¬ tent than the indudtion on which it is founded—how comes it that a few experiments muff be received as the foundation of a general inference i* This has been an- fwered in very general terms in the article Philosophy. But it will be ofufe to confider the fubjedt a little more particularly. Our obfervations on this fabject are taken Experimen- from the differtation on evidence by Dr Campbell in his taj •"j)110" Philofophy of Rhetoric. , y‘ . An attentive conftderation of the objedts around us, will inform us that they are generally of a complicated The objec- nature, not only as conftfting of a complication of thofe bon qualities of things called accidents, fuch as gravity, mobility, colour, figure, folidity, which are common ampies to all bodies j but alfo as ccnfifting of a mixture of aftiowingthe variety of fubftances, very dift’erent in their nature and mature and properties ; and each of thefe is perhaps compounded ingredients more fimple. _ - ofTnquiryw Moreover, the farther we advance in the knowledge of nature, we find the more reafon to be convinced, of her conftancy in all her operations. Like caufes have always produced like effects, and like effedts have always been preceded by like caufes. Inconftancy fometimes appears in Nature’s works at jhjl Jlght; but a more re¬ fined experience (hows us that this is but an appearance, and that there is no inconftancy j and we explain it to our fatisfadtion in this way. Molt of the objedts being of a complicated nature, we find, on an accurate ferutiny, that the effedts aferi- bed to them ought often to be folely aferibed to one or more of thefe component parts, while the others either do not contribute to them, or hinder their pro¬ duction •, and the variety of nature is fo great, that hard¬ ly any two individuals of the fame fpecies are in every refpedt like any other. On all thefe accounts we ex¬ pect diffimilitudes in the phenomena accompanying per- fedtly fimilar treatment of different fubjedls of the fame kind) but we find, that whenever we can be affured that the two fubftances are perfedtly alike, the pheno¬ mena arifing from fimilar treament are the fame: and long and extenfive obfervation teaches us, that there are certain circumftances which infure us in the perfedt finfiilarity of conftitution of feme things. Whenever we obferve the effect of any natural agent on one, and but one, of thefe, we invariably expedt that the lame will be produced on any other. Should a botanift meet with a plant new to him, and obferve that it has feven munopetalous flowers, he will conclude with the utmort confidence that every plant of this fpecies will have monopetalous flowers •, but he will not fuppofe that it will have feven, and no more than feven, flowers^ Now thefe two fadts feem to have no difference to warrant fuch a difference in the conclufion 5 which may therefore feem capricious, fince there is but one example of both. But it is not from this example only that he draws the conclufion. Had he never before taken notice of any plant, he would not have reafoned at all from thefe remarks. But Lis mind runs immediately from this unknown fpecies to all the known fpecies of this genus, and to all the genera of the fame order j and having experienced in the figure of the flower an uni¬ formity in every fpecies, genus, and order, which admits of no exception, but, in the number of flowers, a variety as boundlefs as are the circumflances of foil, climate, age, and culture, he learns to mark the difference, and draws the above-mentioned conclufions. Thus we learn, that perfeB uniformity is not to be expedted in any inftance whatever, hecaufe in no initance is the fimplicity of con¬ ftitution fufficiently great to give us affurance of perfedt uniformity in the circumftances of the cafe ; and the ut- 3 I 2 moft 436 Kxpei'imer. tal Ph’io- s fophy. PHYSICS. 104 Mathema¬ tics do pot {uperfede the ufe of experi¬ ment. moft that our experience can teach us is a quick difcri- mination of thofe circumftances which produce the oc- cafional varieties. The nearer that our inveftigations carry us to the knowledge of elementary natures, the more are we con¬ vinced by general experience of the uniformity of the operations of real elements \ and although it may per¬ haps be impoflible for us ever to arrive at the know¬ ledge of the fimpleft elements of any body, yet when any thing appears fimple, or rather fo exactly uniform, as that we have invariably obferved it to produce fimi- lar effects on difcovering any new effedt of this fub- ftance, we conclude, from a general experience of the efficient, a like conftancy in the energy as to the reft. Fire confumes wood, melts lead, and hardens clay. In ihefe inftances it afts uniformly, but not in tbefe only. We have always found, that whatever of any fpecies is confumed by it in one initance, has been coniumed by it on trial at any time. If therefore a trial be made for the firil time of its influence on any particular fub- ftance, he who makes it is warranted to conclude that the effedt, whatever it may be, is a faithful reprcfenta- tive of its dfrdls on this fubitance in all part and future ages. This conclufion is not founded on this fmgle initance, but upon this inftance combined with the ge¬ neral experience of the regularity of this element in its operations. This general conclufion, therefore, drawn from one experiment, is by no means in oppoiition to the great rule of indudtive logic, but, on the contrary, it is the moft general and refined application of it. General laws are here the real fubjedt of confderation ; and a law itill more general, viz. that nature is cenjJant in all its operations, is the inference which is here applied as a principle of explanation of a phenomenon which is itfelf a general law, viz. that nature is corjiant in this operation. The foundation of this general inference from one experiment being fo firmly eftablifned, it is evident that experiments mull be an xnfaliiole method of attain¬ ing to the knowledge of nature 5 and we need only be folicitous that we proceed in a way agreeable to the great rule of indudlive logic ; that is, the fubjedt mull be cleared of every accidental and unknown circum- itance, and put into a fituation that will reduce the interefting circumilance to a Hate ot the greateft pof- frble fimplicity. Thus we may be certain that the event will be a faithful reprefentative of every fimilar cafe : and unlefs this be done in the preparation, nothing can j-efult from the moll numerous experiments but uncer¬ tainty and miftakes. The account which has been given of mechanical philofophy would feem to indicate that experiment was not of much ule in the farther profecution of it. The two laws of motion, with the affiftance of mathematics, feem fully adequate to the explanation of every pheno¬ menon *, and fo they are to a certain degree. But this degree is as yet very limited. Our mathematical know¬ ledge, great as it is in comparifon with that of former times, is Itill infufficient for giving accurate folutions even of very fimple (comparatively fpeaking) queftions. We can tell, with the utmoft precifioh, what will be the motions of two particles of matter, or two bodies, which adt on each other with forces proportioned to the fquares of the diitances inverfely \ but if we add a. third par¬ ticle, or a third body, acting by the fame law, the unit- Expcnmen- ed fcience of all Europe can only give an approximation taj:0^y°" to the folation. 1 y——> What is to be done then in the cafes which come 105 continually before us, where millions of particles are Experiment acting at once on each other in every variety of fitu-15 °ften tlie ation and d:fiance ? How fhall we determine, for in- °ou^cei fiance, the motion of water through a. pipe or fluice when urged by a pi Ron or by its own weight i what will be its velocity and direction ? It is impoffible, in the prefent flute of mathematical knowledge, to tell with any precifion or certainty. And here we mull have recourfe to experiment. But if this be the cafe, mult the experiment be made in every poffible variety of fitu¬ ation, depth, figure, preffure ? or is it poffible to finer out any general rules, founded on the general laws of motion, and rationally deduced from them ? Or, if this cannot be accompliffied, will experiment itfelf furnifh any general coincidences which Ihow fuch mutual de¬ pendences, that we may confider them as indications of general principles, though fubordinate, complicated, and perhaps infcrutable ? This can be difeovered by experi¬ ment alone. 106 The attention of philofophers has been diredled to Accurate each of thefe three chances, and confider able progrefs has been made m them all. Numerous experiments not a]wayS have been made, almoft fufficient to direct the praftice be made, in many important cafes, without the help of any rule or principle whatever. But there are many cafes, and thefe of by far the greateft importance, fuch as the motion of a fliip impelled by the winds, refilled by the water, and tofled by the waves, where diilindt experi¬ ments cannot be made. 107 Newton, Bernouilii, d’Alembert, and others, have Exair ule of laboured hard to deduce from the laws of motion rules for determining what may be called the average mo- tion of water in thefe circumftances, without attempt¬ ing to define the path or motion of any individual par¬ ticle ; and they have actually deduced many rules which have a great degree of probability, it may here be afked, why do you fay probability ? the rules, as far as they go, fhould be certain. So they are : they are ft rift deductions from their premiffes. But the premiffes are only fuppojitwns, of various degrees of probability, ai- fumed in order to fimplify the circumftances of the cafe, and to give room for mathematical reafoning ; therefore thefe deductions, thefe rules, mull be examined by ex¬ periment. Some of the fuppofitions are fuch as can hardly be refufed, and the rules deduced from them are found to tally precifely with the phenomena. Such is this, “ that the velocities of iffuing water in fimilar cir¬ cumftances are in the fub-duplicate ratio of the pref- fures.” And this rule gives a moft important and _ex- tenftve information to the engineer. Gtner fuppofitions are more gratuitous, and the rules deduced from them are lefs coincident with the phenomena. 1 he patient and fagacious Newton has repeatedly failed in his attempts to determine what is the abfolute velocity of water iffuing from a hole in the bottom of a veffel when urged by its weight alone, and the attempts of the others have hardly fucceeded better. Experiment is therefore abfolutely neceffary on this head. Thofe who have aimed at the difeovery of rules pure¬ ly experimental on this fnbjeCt, have alfo been pretty fuccefsful; and- the Chevalier Buat has, from a compari¬ fon lop in naviga¬ tion, PHY Experimen- fon of an Immenfe variety of experiments made by hirri- tal Phiio- felf and various authors, deduced an empirical rule, , fop^y~ , which will not be found to deviate from truth above one part in ten in any cafe which has yet come to our know¬ ledge. This inftance may ferve to Ihow the ufe of experi¬ ments in mechanical philofophy. It is proper in all cafes by way of illuflration ; and it is abfolutely necef- fary in moft, either as the foundation of a charadteriftic of a particular clafs of phenomena, or as argument in fupport of a particular doctrine. Hydroftatics, hydrau¬ lics, pneumatics, magnetifm, eledtricity, and optics, can hardly be ftudied in any other way •, and they are at prefent in an imperfedt ftate, and receiving continual improvement by the labours of experimental philofophers iog in all quarters of the world. The advan- Having m th* preceding paragraphs given a pretty tages de- full enumeration of the different fubjedts which are to nved from be confidered in the ftudy of natural philofophy, it tile. -I 7 will not be neceffary to fpend much time in a detail of the advantages which may reafonably be expedled from a fuccefsful profecution of this ftudy. It (lands in no need of panegyric : its intimate connedlion with the arts gives it a fufficient recommendation to the atten¬ tion of every perfon. It is the foundation of many arts, and it gives liberal afliftance to all. Indebted to them for its origin and birth, it has ever retained its filial attachment, and repaid all their favours with the moft partial afifedlion. To this fcience the navigator muft have recourfe for that aftronomical knowledge which enables him to find his place in the tracklefs ocean ; and although very fmall (craps of this knowledge are fqfficient for the mere pilot, it is neceffary thdt the ftudy be profecuted to tire utmoft by Tome perfons, that the unlearned pilot may get that fcanty pittance which muft diredt his routine. The few pages of tables of the fun’s decli¬ nation, which he ufes every day to find his latitude, required the fucceflive and united labours of all the aftronomers of Europe to make them tolerably exadt : and in order to afcertain his longitude with precifion, it required all the genius of a Newton to detedl the lunar irregularities, and bring them within the power of the calculator ; and, till this was done, the refpedlive- pofition of the different parts of the earth could not be afcertained. Vain would have been the attempt to do this by'geodaetical furveys independent of aftronomical obfervation. It is only from the moft refined mecha¬ nics that we can hope for fure principles to diredt us in the conftrudlion and management of a (hip, the boaft of human art, and the great means of union and communication between the different quarters of the no globc- in archite'c- A knowledge of mechanics not much inferior to ture, this is neceffary for enabling the architect to execute Tome of his greateft works, fuch as the eredtion of domes and arches, which depend on the niceft adjuftment of equilibrium. Without this he cannot unite economy with ftrength 5 and his works muft either be clumfy maf- lir fes or flimfy (hells. in gunnery The effedls of artillery cannot be underftood or fe- and ether cured without the fame knowdedge. engines, The whole employment of the engineer, civil or mi¬ litary, is a continual application of almoft every branch of. mechanical knowledge .5 and while the promifes of SICS. 437 a Smeaton, a Watt, a Belidor, maybe confided in asE5;per>men* if already performed, the numberlefs failures and difap- la^phlio- pointments in the moft important and coftly projedis , y ■ (how us daily the ignorance of the pretending crowd of engineers. The microfcope, the (team-engine, the thunder-rod, are prefents which the world has received from the na¬ tural philofopher } and although the compafs and tele- fcope were the produdlions of chance, they would have been of little fervice had they not been ftudied and im¬ proved by Gilbert, Halley, and Dollond. But it is not in the arts alone that the influence of na¬ tural philofophy is perceived : it lends its aid to every Tcience, and in every ftudy. It is often necelfary to have recourfe to the phiio- ;n |aw fop’ner in difputes concerning property; and many Ex¬ amples might be given where great injuftice has been the confequence of the ignorance of the judges. Know¬ ledge of nature might have prevented many difgrace- ful condemnations for forcery. The hiftorian who is ignorant of natural philofbphy in biftoryy eafily admits the miraculous into his narrations, accom¬ panies thefe with his refledlions, draws confequences from them, and fills his pages with prodigies, fables, and ab- furdity. ° . „4 It is almoft needlefs to fpeak of tbe advantages ;n medi- wdiich will accrue to the phyfician from this ftudy. So cine, clofe is the connedlion between it and medicine, that our language has given but one name to the naturaliil and to the medical philofopher. Indeed, the whole of his ftudy is a clofe obfervation of tire laws of mate¬ rial nature, in order to draw from them precepts to diredt his pradtice in the noble art of healing. Du¬ ring the immaturity of general knowledge, while na¬ tural philofophy was the only ftudy which had acquired any juft pretenfion to certitude either in its principles or method of inveftigation, the phyficians endeavoured to bring the objedls of their ftudy w ithin its province, hoping by this means to get a more diftindl view of it j and they endeavoured to explain the abftrufe pheno¬ mena of the animal fundlions by reducing them all to motions, vibrations, collifions, impulfes, hydroftatic and hydraulic preffures and adlions, with which the mechanical philofophers wrere fo ardently occupied at that time. But unfortunately their acquaintance with nature/was then very limited, and they were but little habituated to the rules of juft reafoning ; and their attempts to explain the economy of animal life by the law's of mechanics did them but little fervice either for the knowledge of difeafes or of the methods of cure. The mechanical theories of medicine, which had confi- derable reputation about the end of the 17th century, were many of them very ingenious, and had an impofing appearance of fymmetry and connedlion ; but are now forgotten, having all been formed on the narrow fup- pofition that matter was fubjedl only to mechanical laws. But the difcovery of error diminilhes the chance of again going w'rong, efpecially when the caufe of error has been difcovered, and the means pointed out of de- tedling the miftakes ; and the vital principle muft com¬ bine its influence with, or operate on, the properties of rude matter. It appears therefore evident that a kno’.v- ledge of the mechanical law's of the material world is not only a convenient, but .a neceffary, accompli(hment to . IT5 in relieion 433 E.TnL™eIvt0 t1ie ^yfician. _ We are fully jm^fied in this opinion, by obferving medical authors of the prefent day intro¬ ducing into medicine theories borrowed from mechani¬ cal philofophy, which they do not underhand, and which they continually mifapply. Appearance of reafoning frequently conceals the errors in principle, and feldom fails to millead. But there is no clafs of men to whom this fcience is of more tervice than to thofe who hold the honour¬ able office of the teachers of religion. Their know¬ ledge in their own fcience, and their public utility, are prodigiouily hurt by ignorance of the general frame and conftitution of nature } and it is much to be la¬ mented that this fcience is fo generally negledled by them, or confidered only as an elegant accompliffirnent: nay, it is too frequently Ihunned as a dangerous attain¬ ment, as likely to unhinge their own-faith, and taint the minds of their hearers. .We hope, however, that few are either fo feebly rooted in the belief of the great do61rir.es of religion as to fear this, or of minds fo bafe and corrupted as to adopt and inculcate a belief which they have any fufpicion of being ill-founded. But many have a fort of horror at ail attempts to account for the events of nature by the intervention of general caufes, and think this procedure derogatory to the Divine nature, and inconfiftent with the do61rine of his particular providence believing, that “ a fparrow does not fall to the ground without the knowledge of our heavenly Father.” d heir limited conceptions can¬ not perceive, that, in forming the general law, the Great Artift did at one glance lee it in its rerhotell and moll minute confequence, and adjuffc the vaft affemblage fo as completely to anlWer every purpefe of His pro¬ vidence. There never wTas a more eager enquirer into the laws of nature, or more ardent admirer of its glo¬ rious Author, than the Hon. Robert Boyle. This gen¬ tleman fays, that he will always think more highly of the {kill and power of that artill who (hcruld conftruft a machine, which, being once fet a going, would of it- lelf continue its motion for ages, and from its inherent principles continue to anfwer all the purpofes for which it was firil contrived, than of him whofe machine re¬ quired the continual aid of the hand which firlf con- itrudlcd it. It is owing to great inattention that this averlion to the operation of fecondary caufes has any influence on our mind. What do we mean by the in- trodu6fion of fecondary caufes r How do we infer the agency of any caufe whatever ? Would we ever have fuppofed any caufe of the operations of nature, had they gone on without any order or regularity ? Or would luch a chaos of events, any more than a chaos of exift- ences, have given us any notion of a forming and direct¬ ing hand ? No ffirely. We fee the hand of God in the regular and unvaried courfe of nature, only becaufe it is regular and unvaried. The philofopher expreffes this by faying, that the phenomena proceed by unalter¬ able laws. Greatly miflaken therefore are they who think that we luperfede the exillence of mind and of providence when we trace things to their caufes. A phyfical law being an unvaried fact, is an indication, and the ftrongeft poffible indication, of an unerring 4 jrer^u. mind, who is incapable of change, and mult do to day /bn’s Lee what He always did : for to change is to deviate from tures on what is belt *. The operations of unerring mind wall £thics. therefore be regular and invariable. Phyfical laws, 2> • PHYSICS. fephy. 116 therefore, or fecondary caufes, are the bell proofs of un- Experiment erring wifdom. Such regularity of conduct is univer- ral Phil°- fally confidered as an indication of wifdom among men., The wife man is known by the conjfancy of his ccn- du6t, while no man can depend on the future conduct of a fool. And what aftoniffiing evidences of wifdom do we not obferve in the general laws of the material world ? They will ever be confidered by the intelligent philo¬ fopher as the moll glorious dilplay of inconceivable wifdom, which has been able, by means fo few and fo fimple, to produce effe6ts which by their grandeur ailo- nifia our feeble underllandings, and by their inexhauftible variety elude all poffibility of enumeration. W hile the teachers of religion remain ignorant of the beautiful law^s of nature, the great chara61eriftics of the wifdom and goodnefs of the Almighty Creator, their hearers are deprived of much fublime pleafurej God is robbed of that praife which he would have re¬ ceived from an enlightened people \ and the only wor- finp he receives is tainted with mean notions of his at¬ tributes, and groundlefs fears of his powder. But befides thefe advantages which accrue io diffe¬ rent claffes of men from this Rudy, there are forne ef- fefts which are general, and are too important to be paffed over unnoticed. f hat fpirit of difpaffionate experimental enquiry 0_ which has fo greatly promoted this Rudy, will carry ther fei- with it, into every fubje6f of enquiry, that precifionenceSi and that conflant appeal to faft and experience which chara6Ierize it. And we may venture to affert, that the iuperior good order and method which diRinguilh feme of the later produftions in other fciences, have been in a great meafure owing to this mathematical fpirit, the luccefs of wduch in natural philofophy has gained it credit, and thus given it an unperceived influence even over thofe who have not made it their Rudy. 1 he truths alfo which the naturaliR difeovers are More ge- fuch as do not in general affeft the paflions of men,neralad- and have therefore a good chance of meeting with avantaSeso^ candid reception. Thofe whofe interefl it is to keep men philofoph in political or religious ignorance, cannot eafily fufpeft bad confequences from improvements in this fcience j and if they did, have hardly any pretext for checking its progrefs. And difeoveries accuflom the mind to no¬ velty ; and it will no longer be Rartled by any confe¬ quences, however contrary to common opinion. Thus the way is paved for a rational and difereet fcepticifm, and a free enquiry on other fubjehfs. Experiment, not authority, will be confidered as the tefl of truth j and under the guidance of fair experience we need fear no ill as long as the latvs of nature remain as they are. Laftly, fince it is the bufinefs of philofophy to de- feribe the phenomena of nature, to difeover their cau¬ fes, to trace the conneflion and fubordination of thefe caufes, and thus obtain a view' of the whole conRitu- tion of nature ; it is plain that it affords the furefl path for arriving at the knowledge of the great caufe of all, of God himfelf, and for forming proper conceptions of him and of our relations to him : notions infinitely more juR than can ever be entertained by the carelefs fpe61ator of his works. Things ■which to this man ap¬ pear folitary and detached, having no other connec¬ tion, PHYSICS. 439 penmen- tion with the reft of the umverfe but the fhadowy and God, and with the hopes of one day enjoying all the fa- Experimew tal Philo, fleeting relation of co-exiftence, will, to the diligent tisfaftion that can ariie from confcious worth and con- fol)hy philofopher, declare themfelves to be parts of a great fummate knowledge; and^ this is the worftiip which God 1 an(j liarinonious whole, connefted by the general laws will approve. “ -This univerfe (fays Boyle) is the mag- of nature, and tending to one grand and beneficent nificent temple of its great Author j and man is ordain- purpofe. Such a contemplation is in the higheft degree ed, by his powers and qualifications, the high prieft of pleafant and cheering, and cannot fail of imprefhng us nature, to celebrate di\me fervice in this temple Oj. the with the wifti to co-operate in this glorious plan, by a£l- univerfe.'” ing worthy of the place we hold among the works of PHYSIOGNOMONIC3, among phyficians, denote fuch figns as, being taken from the countenance, ferve to indicate the ftate, difpofition, &.c. both of the body and mind : and hence the art of reducing thefe figns to- practice is termed physiognomy. PHYSIOGNOM Y i T S a word formed from the Greek