—h ~Yrs. n tv. „ and chamber^ Fairfax 11 Fairy. F A I [4° advance in their paflage up and dotvn j fo tliat if any veiTels are ancliored therein, they are laid to lie in t \t , fair-way. . FAIRFAX, F.DWARD, natural fon of Sir I nomas Fairfax, was an Englilh poet who lived in the reigns of Elizabeth and James I. He wrote feveral poetical pieces, and was an accomplilhed genius. Dryden in¬ troduces Fairfax with Spenfer, as the leading writers of the times *, and even leems to give the preference to the former in the way of harmony, when he obferves that Waller owned himfelf indebted for the harmony of his numbers to Fairfax’s Godfrey of Boulogne. He died about the year 1632, at his own houfe called New- hall, in the parilh of Fuyfton, between Denton and Knarelhorough, and lies under a marble done. Fairfax, Sir Thomas, general of the parliamen¬ tary forces againft Charles I. in 1644. See {frlijlory of) Britain, N° 127. etfeq. He refigned in 1650; after which he lived privately, till he was invited by Geiteral Monk to aflift him againft Lambert’s army. He cheerfully embraced the occafion} and, on the third of December 1659, appeared at the head of a body of gentlemen of X orklhire; when, upon the reputation of his name, a body of 12,000 men for- fook Lambert and joined him. He was at the head of the committee appointed by the houfe of commons to attend King Charles II. at the Hague, to defire him fpeedily to return to England 5 and having rea¬ dily aflifted in his reftoration, returned again to his feat in the country j where he lived in a private^ man¬ ner till his death, which happened in 1671, in the 60th year of his age.—He wrote, fays Mr Walpole, Memorials of Thomas Lord Fairfax, printed in 1699*, and was not only an hiftorian, but a poet. In Mr Thorefby’s mufeum were preferved in manufcript the following pieces : The Pfalms of David, the Can¬ ticles, the Songs of Mofes, and other parts of Scrip¬ ture, verfified , a poem on Solitude j Notes of Ser¬ mons, by his lordlhip, by his lady daughter of Ho¬ race Lord Vere, and by their daughter Mary the wife of George fecond duke of Buckingham: and a Trea- tife on the Shortnefs of Life. But of all Lord Fairfax’s works, fays Mr Walpole, the moft remarkable were the verfes he wrote on the horfe on which Charles II. rode to his coronation, and which had been bred and prefented to the king by his lordlhip. How muft that merry monarch, unapt to keep his coutenance on more ferious occafions, have fmiled at this awkward homage from the old victorious hero of republicamfm and the covenant ! He gave a collection of manufcnpts to the Bodleian library. FAIRFORD, a town in Gloucefterlhire, with a market on Thurfdays. It is remarkable for the church, which has curious painted glafs windows. They are faid to have been taken in a fhip by John lame, Efq. towards the end of the 15th century, who built the church for their fake. T-hey are preferved entire, and the figures are extremely well drawn and colouied. They reprefent the moft remarkable hiftories in the Old and New Teftament. They are frequently vifited by travellers, and many go on purpole to view them, as one of the greateft curiofities in England. 1 he painter was Albert Durer. W. Long. 1. 46. N. Lat. 51. 42. ' FAIRY, in ancient traditions and romances, fig- V&L. VIII. Part II. ] F A I nifies a fort of deify, or imaginary genius, converfant on the earth, and diftinguilhed by a variety of fantal- tical aftions either good or bad. They were moft ufually imagined to he women of an order fuperior to human nature, yet fubjeCt to wants, paflions, accidents, and even death j fprightly and bene¬ volent while young and handfome ; morofe, peevith, and malignant, if ugly, or in the decline of their beauty j fond of appearing in white, whence they are often called the white ladies. _ Concerning thefe imaginary beings, no lets a. perton then Jervaiie of Tilleberry, marfhal of the kingdom of Arles, who lived in the beginning of the 13th cen¬ tury, wTrites thus in a wrork infcnbed to the empeior Otho IV. “ It has been afferted by perfons of un¬ exceptionable credit, that fairies ufed to choofe them- felves gallants from among men, and rewarded their attachment with an affluence of wordly goods*, but if they married, or boafted of a fairy’s favours, they as feverely fmarted for fuch indifcretion.” The like tales ftill go current in Languedoc *, and throughout the whole province, there is not a village without fome ancient feat or cavern which had the honour of being a fairy’s refidence, or at leaft fome fpring where a. fairy ufed to bathe. This idea of fairies has a near affinity with that of the Greeks and Romans, concern¬ ing the nymphs of the woods, mountains, and fpnngs } and an ancient fcholiaft on Theocritus fays, “ The nymphs are demons which appear on the mountains in the figure of women and what is more furprifing, the Arabs and other orientals have their ginn and peri, of whom they entertain the like notions. But fairies have been likewife defcribed as of either fex, and generally as of minute ftature, though^ capable of affuming various forms and. dimenfions. The moft: charming reprelentation imaginable of thefe children of romantic fancy, is in the Midfummer Night's Dream of Shakefpear *, in referring to wdiich, wTe no doubt have been anticipated by the recolkaion of almoft every reader. Spenfer’s Faery Queene is an epic poem, under the perfons and chara£ters of fairies. I his fort of poetry raifes ^ pleafing kind of horror in the mind of the read¬ er, and amufes his imagination wTith the ftrangeuefs and novelty of the perfons who are reprefented in it j but, as a vehicle of inftru£lion, the judicious objeft to it, as not having probability enough to make any moral impreffion. The belief of fairies ftill fubfifts in many parts of oiyr own country. The “ Swart fairy of the mine” (of German extra&ion), has fcarce yet quitted our fub- terraneous works j (vid. next article.) Puck, or Ro¬ bin Good-Fellow, ftill haunts many of our villages. And in many parts of Scotland, new bom children are watched till the chriftening is over, left they Ihould be ftolen or changed by fome of thefe fantaftical exiftences. # Fairy of the Mine; an imaginary being, an inhabitant of mines. The Germans believed in two fpecies j one fierce and malevolent: the other a gentle race, appear¬ ing like little old men dreffed like the miners, and not much above two feet high. Thefe wander about the drifts and chambers of the works j feem perpetually j E employed,, F A K r 402 ] FA K employed, yet do nothing \ Tome feem to cut the ore, or fling what is cut into veltels, or turn the windlafs : but never do any harm to the miners, unlefs provoked ; as the leniible Agricola, in this point credulous, relates in lus book tic Animantibus Subterraneis. Fairy Circle or Ring, a phenomenon pretty fre¬ quent in the fields, &x. fuppofed by the*vulgar to be traced by the fairies in their dances. There are two kinds of it 5 one of about feven yards in diameter, con¬ taining a round bare path, a foot broad, with green grafs in the middle of it. The other is of different bignefs, encompaffed with a circumference of grafs. Meff. Jefl'op and Walker, in the Philofophical Tranfac- tions, aferibe them to lightning 5 which is thought to be confirmed by their being moil frequently produ¬ ced after ftorms of that kind, as well as by the colour and brittlenefs of the grafs roots when firil obferved. Lightning, like all other fires, moves round, and burns more in the extremity than in the middle : the fecond circle arifes from the firft, the grafs burnt up growing very plentifully afterwards. Others maintain that thefe circles are made by ants, which are fre¬ quently found in great numbers therein.—Mr Cavaiio, in his treatile on ele&ricity, does not think that light¬ ning is at all concerned in the formation of them : “ They are not (fays he) always of a circular figure ; and, as 1 am informed, they feem to be rathqr beds of muflirooms than the effedls of lightning.” » We have frequently obferved beds of muflirooms ar¬ ranged in a circular form like -what are called fairy rings •, but it will be difficult to account for the mufli- room feed being difpofed in this manner. It is prob¬ able that the feed is difperfed over the whole field, and remains dormant till it is afted on by fome flimulus to excite its vegetating pow’ers. Perhaps this ftimulus is atmofpheric electricity, which acting on particular fpots only, produces on them an abundant crop of mufhrooms, wffiile none appear in other places. FAITH, in Philofoplnj and Theology, that affent which we give to a propofition advanced by another, the truth of wffiich we do not immediately perceive from our own reafon or experience } or it is a judgment or affent of the mind, the motive wffiereof is not any in- trinfic evidence, but the authority or teftimony of fome other who reveals or relates it. Hence, as there are two kinds of authorities and teftimonies, the one of God, and the other of man, faith becomes diilinguilhed into divine and human. Divine Faith, is that founded on the authority of God •, or it is that affent wre give to what is revealed by God. The objedts of this faith, therefore, are matters of revelation. See Revelation and Religion. Human Faith, is that whereby we believe what is told us by men. The objedl hereof is matter of human teftimony and evidence. See Metaphysics. Faith, in pradlical theology, makes the firft of the theological virtues or graces. Faith in God, in this fenfe, denotes fuch a convic¬ tion of his being, perfedlions, charadler, and govern¬ ment, as produces love, trull, worftiip, obedience, and relignation. Faith in Chrill, as it has been defined by fome, is a mere affent to the gofpel as true ; according to others, it fignifies fuch a perfuafion that he is the Meffiah, and fuch a defire and expectation of the blefiings which he F has promiled in his gcfpel to his fincere difciples, as engage the mind to fix its dependence upon him, and , fubjedt itfelf to him in all the ways of holy obedience. See Theology. Faith, likewife, in refpedt to futurity, is a moral prin¬ ciple, implying filch a convidlion of the reality and im¬ portance of a future Hate, as is fufficient to regulate the temper and condudt. Faith, or Fidelity (Fides), was deified by the an¬ cient Romans, and had a temple in the Capitol confe- crated to her by Attilius Catalinus. Her priefts wore . white veils : unbloody facrifices wrere offered to her, and the greatell oaths were taken in her name. Ho¬ race clothes her in white, places her in the retinue of Fortune, and makes her the filler of Juliice, Od. 24, 35. 1. i. Public Faith is reprefented in a great number of medals) fometimes with a balket of fruit in one hand, and fome ears of corn in the other ; and fome¬ times holding a turtle-dove. But the moll ufual fym- bol is two hands joined together. The inferiptions are generally, Fides Augujli, Fides Fxercitus, or Fides Mi- hturn, &c. . FAITHFUL, an appellation affirmed by the Ma¬ hometans., See Mahometans. FAITHORN, William, an ingenious Englifli ar- till, a native of London, w’as the difciple of Peak the painter, and worked wfith him three or four years. At the breaking out of the civil wrar, Peak efpouied the caufe of his fovereign : and Faithorn, who ac¬ companied his mailer, was taken prifoner by the re¬ bels at Baringhoufe, from whence he was fent to Lon¬ don, and confined in Alderfgate. In this uncomfort¬ able fituation he exercifed his graver; and a fmall head of the firil Villars duke of Buckingham, in the ftyle of Melan* is reckoned among his performances at that time. The folicitations of his friends in his fa¬ vour at laft prevailed j and he was releafed from pri- fon, with permiflion to retire to the continent. In France he found prote£lion and encouragement from the Abbe de Marolles ; and it was at this time that he formed an acquaintance with Nanteuil, from whofe inltrublions he derived very confiderable advantages. About the year 1650 he returned to England, and foon after married the filler of a Captain Ground. By her he had twTo fons } Henry, who was a bookfel- ler, and William an engraver in mezzotintd. Fai¬ thorn opened a Ihop near Temple-Bar, wffiere he fold not only his owm engravings, but thofe of other Eng¬ lifli artills, and imported a confiderable number of prints from Holland, France, and Italy. About the year 1680, he retired from his (hop, and refided in PrintingTIoufe Yard 5 but he Hill continued to w-ork for the bookfellers, efpecially Royllon, Martin, and Peak the younger, his former mailer’s brother. He painted portraits from the life in crayons 5 which art he learned of Nanteuil during his abode in France, He alfo painted in miniature; and his performances in both thefe ftyles were much elteemed. His fpirits were broken by the indiferetion and diffipation of his fon William ; and a lingering confumption put an end to his life in 1691. He wrote a book Fpon Drawing, Graving, and Etching, for which he was celebrated by his friend Thomas Flatman the poet. FAKIRS, Indian monks or friars. They outdo thp F A . L c 4 Fakirs, tlie ieventy and mortification of the ancient Ancho- 1 aIa“ia', rets 01* Solitaries. Some of them make a vow of con¬ tinuing all their lifetime in one pollute, and keep it effeclually. Others never lie down ; but continue in a Handing pollute all their lives, fupported only by a Hick, or rope under their arm pits. Some mangle their bodies with fcourges and knives. They look upon themfelves to have conquered every paflicn, and triumphed over the world j and accordingly fcruple not, as if in a Hate of innocence, to appear entirely naked in public. The common people of EaH India are thoroughly perfuaded of the virtue and innocence of the fakirs ; notwithflanding which, they are accufed of commit¬ ting the moll enormous crimes in private. They have alfo another kind of fakirs, who do'not pra&ife fuch feverities : thefe Hock together in com¬ panies, and go from village to village 5 prophefying, and telling fortunes. They are wicked villains, and it is dangerous for a man to meet them in a lone place: neverthelefs the Indian idolaters have them in the ut- moll veneration. They make ule of drums, trumpets, and other mufical inllruments, to roufe their fouls, and work themfelves up to an artificial ecHafy, the better to publiHi their pretended prophecies. Some of the votaries of thefe fages moH devoutly kifs their privy parts ; and they receive this monHrous declaration of refpefl with a kind of ecHatic pleafure. The moil lober and difereet Indians confult them in this prepoHerous attitude ; and their female votaries converfe with them a confiderable time with the mod indecent freedom. The fire they burn is made of cows dung, dried in the fun. When they are difpofed to fleep, they repofe themfelves on cows dung, ahd fometimes on ordure itfelf. They are fo indulgent towards every living creature, that they fuffer themfelves to be overrun with vermine, or Hung by infers, without the leafl re- lu&ancy or complaint. It is more than probable, thofe Indian friars have fome fecret art to lull their fenfes afleep, in order to render themfelves in a great mealure infenfible of the excedive torments they voluntarily undergo. Oving- ton alfures us, that “ as he was one day in an affem- bly of fakirs, he obferved, that they drank opiates in- lufed in water ; the intoxicating virtue thereof was enough to turn their brain.” The garment of the chief fakirs confills of three or fqur yards of orange-coloured linen, which they tie round them, and a tiger’s Ikin, which hangs over their Ihoulders. Their hair is woven in trefles, and forms a kind of turban. The luperior of the fakirs is dillin- guilhed from the reft by having a greater number of pieces in his garment, and by a chain of iron, two yards long, tied to his leg. When he defigns to red in any place, a garment is fpread upon the ground ■, on which he fits and gives audience, whilit his difciples publifh his virtues. _ Some perfons of quality in India have become fa¬ kirs : among others, five great lords belonging to the court of Schah Gehan, Mogul of the Indies. It is faid, there are about two millions of fakirs in the EaH In¬ dies. FALASHA, a people of Abyflinia, of Jewifh ori¬ gin, deferibed by Mr Bruce, who was at great pains to 03 ] F a L acquaint himfelf with their hiflory by cultivating the Falafr. friendfliip of the mofi learned perfons among them he could meet with. According to the accounts received from them, the Falalha are the defeendants of thofe Jews who came from Palefline into Ethiopia, as attendants of Menilek the fon of the queen of Sheba or Saba by Solomon. 1 hey agree in the relations given by the Abyflinians of that princefs, but deny that the poilerity of thofe who came with Menilek ever embraced the Chriilian religion, as the Abyflinians fay they did. They fay, that at the decline of the Jewifli commerce, when the ports of the Red fea fell into the hands of other na¬ tions, and no intercourfe took place betwixt them and Jeruialem, the Jewilh inhabitants quitted the fea coafls and retired into the province of Dembea. While they remained in the cities on the Red fea, they exercifcd the trade of brick and Tile making, pottery, thatching houfes, &c. and after leaving the lea coafls, they choie the country of Dembea on account of the plenty of materials it afforded for exerciling the trades they pro- feffed. Here they carried the art of pottery to a great degree of perfeftion, multiplied exceedingly, and became very numerous and powerful about the time that the Abyflinians were converted to Chriflia- nity. As this event was accounted by them an apof- tafy from the true religion, they now feparated them¬ felves from the Abyflinians, and declared one Phineas, of the line of Solomon, their kiug. Thus they fay, they have Hill a prince of the houfe of Judah for their fovereign, though their affertion is treated with con¬ tempt, and a nickname beflowed on the Falalhan fa¬ mily by the other Abyflinians. About the year 960, the queen of this people, after extirpating the Abyfii- nian princes on the rock Damo, affumed the fove- reignty of the whole empire, which they retained for fome time , but their power being by degrees reduced, they were obliged to take up their relidence among the rugged mountains of Samen ; one of which they chofe for their capital, and which has ever fince been called the Jew's Rock. About the year 1600, they were al- moli entirely ruined by an overthrow from the Abyfli¬ nians, in which both their king and queen were flain ; fince which time they have been in lubje&ion to the emperors of that country, but are Hill governed by their own princes. When Mr Bruce was in Abyflinia they were fuppofed to amount to about 100,000 effeclive men. Gideon and Judith were the names of the king and queen at that time ; and thefe, according to our author, feem to be preferred to others for the royal family. I he language of this people is very different from the Hebrew, Samaritan, or any other which the Jews ever fpoke in their own country. On being interro¬ gated concerning it by Mr Bruce, they faid, that it was probably one of thofe fpoken by the nations on the Red fea, among whom they had fettled at their firfl coming. They arrived in Abyflinia fpeaking Hebrew, and with the advantage of having books in that lan¬ guage ; but had now forgot it, which indeed is not to be wondered at, as they had loll their Hebrew' books, and were entirely ignorant of the art of writing. At the time of their leaving jerufalem, they were in pof- feflion both of the Hebrew and Samaritan copies of the law j but when their fleet was deffroyed in the 3 E 2 time F A L t 4°4 J F A L Falcade time of Reiioboam, and no fartlier communication with H Jerufalem took place, they were obliged to ufe tranf- rakon- ktions of the Scriptures, or thofe copies which were m poffeflion of the fhepherds, who, they fay, were all Jews before the t me of Solomon. On being aiked, however, where the fliepherds got their copy, and being told, that, notw'ithftandxng the 111 valion of II- gypt by Nebuchadnezzar, there was Hill a commu¬ nication with Jerufalem by means of the Ilhmaelite Arabs through Arabia, they frankly acknowledged that they could nor tell : neither had they any memo¬ rials of the hiftory either of their own or any other country j all that they believed in this .cafe, being de¬ rived from mere tradition, their hiftories, if any ex- iPed, having been deftroyed by the famous Moorilh captain Gragne. They fay that the firlt book of Scrip¬ ture they received was that of Enoch , and they place that of .1 ob immediately after it, fuppofing that patriarch to have lived foon after the flood. They have no copy of the Old Teftament in the Falalha language,, what they make ufe of being in that of Geez. This is fold to them by the Abyflinian Chriftians, who are the only {bribes in that country. No difference takes plaoe about corruptions of the text j nor do the Falafha know any thing of the Jewilh Talmud, I argum, or Cabala. See Abyssinia. FALCADE, in the manege, the motion of a horfe when he throws hiipfclf upon his haunches two or three times, as in very quick curvets *, which is done in form¬ ing a flop and half Hop. See Stop. FALCATED, fomething in the form of a fickle : thus the moon is faid to be falcated when ftie appears horned. FALCO, the £agle and hawk, a genus of birds be¬ longing to the order of accipitres. See Ornithology Index, FALCON, or Faucon, a bird of prey of the hawk kind, fuperior to all others for courage, docility, gen- * Sec Fates, tlenefs, and noblcnefs of nature *. Several authors take the name falcon to have been occafioned by its crooked talons or pounces, which refemble a falx or fickle. Giraldus derives it a falcando, becaufe it flies in a curve. The falcon, or falcon gentle, is both for the fill and for the lure. In the choice, take qne that has wade noftrils, high and large eyelids, a large black eye •, a round head, fomewFat full on the top j barb feathers on the clap of the beaks, which fhould be fhort, thick, and of an azure colour j the breafl large, round, and flefhy j and the thighs, legs, and feet, large and ftrong, with the fear of the foot foft and bluifh : the pounces fhould be black, with wings long and croffing the train, which ftiould be fliort and very pliable. The name falcon is reftrained to the female : for the male is much fmaller, weaker, and lefs courageous, than the female-, and therefore is denominated7^/, or tircelet. The falcon is excellent at the river, brook, and even field j and flies chiefly at the larger game, as rvild g|?ofe, kite, crow-, heron, crane, pye, flioveler, See. ^ For farther particulars, fee Falconry and Hawking. The cuflom of carrying a falcon extended to many countries, and was efteemed a diftinftion of a man of rank. The Welfli had a faying, That you may know a gentleman by his hawk, Ijorfe, and greyhound. In fadl, a perfon of rank feldom went without one on his hand. Harold, afterwards king of England, is painted going on a mofl: important embaffy, with a hawk on his hand and a dog under his arm. Henry \ L is re- prefented at his nuptials, attended by a.nobleman and his falcon. Even the ladies were not without them in earlier times for in an ancient fculpture in the church of Milton Abbas, in Dorfetfhire, appears the confort of King Athelftan with a falcon on her royal fill tear¬ ing a bird. FALCONER, a perfon who brings up, tames, and makes, that is, tutors and manages, birds of prey j as falcons, haw-ks, &c. See Falconry. The grand fignior, it is faid, ufuahy keeps 6000 fal¬ coners in his fervice.—The French king had formerly a grand falconer, which w:as an office difmembeied from that of great hunter, grandnueneur. Hiftorians take no¬ tice of this poll as early as the year I 250* A falconer fliould be well acquainted with the qua¬ lity and mettle of his haw’ks, that he may know which of them to fly early and which late. Every night aftei flying he fhould give them calling j one while plumage, fometim.es pellets of cotton, and at another time phyfic, as he finds neceffary. He ought alfo every evening to make the place clean under the perch, that, by her caft- mg he may know whether the wrants fcouring upwards or downwards. Nor muff he forget to water his haw k every evening, except on fuch days as fhe has bathed ^ after which, at night, fhe flould be put into a warm room, having a candle burning by her, where fhe is. to fit unhooded, if file be not ramage, that fhe may pick and prune herfelf.——A falconer ftiould always carry proper medicines into the field, as hawks frequently meet with accidents there. Neither muff; he forget to take with him any of his hawking implements j and it is neceffary he fhould be fkilful in making lures, hoods of all forts, jeffes, bewets, and other, furniture. Nei¬ ther ought he to be without his coping irons, to cope his hawk’s beak when overgrowm, and to cut her pounces and talons as there fhall be occafion. nor fliould his cauterizing irons be wanting. Falconer, William, an ingenious Scots failor, who, about the year 1762, came up to London with a pretty pathetic poem, called the Shipwreck, founded on a dif- after of his own experience. The publication of this piece recommended him to the late duke of York j and he would in all probability have been fuitably preferred, if a fecond fhipwreck, as may be fuppofed, had not proved fatal to him, and to many gentlemen of rank and fortune with whom he failed. In 177°5 be went out a volunteer in the Aurora frigate, lent to carry Meffrs Vanfittart, Scrafton, and Ford, the fupervifors appointed to regulate our Eaft India fettlements y which veffel, after it had touched at the Cape, of Good Hope, was never more heard of. Before his departure, he publifhed a very ufeful Marine Dictionary, in one vo¬ lume 410. FALCONRY, a kind of fport or amu.fement, re- fpefting the antiquity of which different opinions have been entertained by the learned. It is denied by Blondus, Laurentius Valla, and others, that the an¬ cient Greeks knew any thing about falconry but the learned Profeffor Becknvmn, on the moff unequivocal authority, maintains that they did. He admits that they might be ignorant of the art of hawking, or of chafing Falconer*. Falconry. •m I' A L [ 40 Falconn-. dialing game with birds trained for that purpofe j but 1-“—v——1 he contends that they employed fome fpecies of the moft rapacious of the winged tribe in hunting and fowling. In the days of Ctefias, the Indians hunted hares and foxes by means of rapacious birds } and Ariftotle fays exprefsly, “ In Thrace, the men go out to catch birds with hawks. They beat the reeds and bulhes which grow in marfhy places, in order to raife the fmall birds, which the hawks purfue and drive to the ground, where the fowlers kill them with poles.” Refpecting Thrace, which is fituated above Amphi- polis, a wonderful circumtlance is related, which to many may appear almoft incredible. We are informed that boys went into the fields, and purfued birds by the afliftance of hawks. When they found a convenient place for their purpofe, they called their hawks by their particular names, which came immediately on hearing their voices, and purfued the birds into the bulhes, where ^ the boys killed them with flicks, and thus made them their prey. When the hawks themfelves laid hold of any birds, they threw them to the fowlers, and recei¬ ved, for their fidelity, a lhare of the game. If we add the fpaniel, now employed to find out the game, the hood placed upon the head of the hawk, and the thong for holding it, we may clearly perceive in thefe ancient accounts the pra&ice of modern times. Falconers ftill give a portion of the game to the hawk, as was the ufual practice of the boys at Thrace. According to the teftimony of Phile, Pliny, TElian, and others, the birds were fometimes driven into nets by the hawks employed in 'thefe fports. From India and Thrace, therefore, it feems manifeft, that the Greeks obtained their firft information as to the method of fowling with birds of prey •, but they themfelves do not appear to have adopted the prattice at a very early period. In Italy, however, it muft have been extremely well underftood, fince it is mentioned by Martial and Apuleius as a thing everywhere known. After be¬ ing once known, it was never totally forgotten ; but it Ihared the fate of other inventions in this refpecfl, that it was originally admired, and afterwards much negledl- ed, by which means it received no material improve¬ ments for a confiderable time ; yet it was at length brought to the utmoft perfeftion. We find mention made of this fport in the Roman laws, and in many authors of the fourth and fubfequent century. In the time of Conftantine the Great, Julius Firmicus Mater- nus aflures us, according to the fuperftitious notions of that period, that fuch as are born under certain figns, will become great fportfmen, and keep hounds and fal¬ cons. Sidonius, who flourilhed about the end of the fifth century, praifes Herdicius, the brother of his wife, becaufe he was the firfl in his territories who pra&ifed hunting and fowling with dogs and hawks. Falconry appears to have been carried to the greateft perfe&ion, and to have been much efteemed at the chief courts of Europe, fo early as the 1 2th century, for which reafon fome have aferibed the invention to the emperor Frederic I. whereas he appears to have been only the firft who introduced the pra6!ice into Italy, according to the teftimony of Rodericus and Collenuc- cio ; and Frederic II. wrote a book entitled, De arte venandi cum avibus, to which the practice has been much indebted. Falconry has had a number of admi¬ rers among the fair fex, perhaps in a fuperior degree to 5 1 F A L any other fport or amufement whatever of a fimilar na- Falconry ture 5 but their attachment was deftroyed by the inven- 1 ,”'y ' tion of gunpowder, which was accompanied both with alarm and danger. We conclude our remarks on the hiftory of falconry with an obfervation of Demetrius, who flouriflied in the 13th century, and who exprefsly •wrote at large upon this fubjeft. He defires fportfmen to fay their prayers (T«* Sitv iTrixctterxims) before they go out to the field, which appears wholly incompatible with the pradtice of modern times, and feems as impious as to crave afliftance of God when preparing for a piratical expedition. Falconry, the art of training all manner of hawks, but more efpecially the larger ones called fa/cons, to the exercife of hawking. See Hawking. When a falcon is taken, (he muft be feeled in fuch a manner, that, as the feeling fiackens, fire may fee what provifion lies before her j but care ought to be taken, not to feel her too hard. A falcon or hawTk newly ta¬ ken firould have all new furniture, as new jelTes of good leather, mailled leafires with buttons at the end, and new bewets. There Ihould alfo be provided a fmall round ftick, to ftroke the hawk •, becaufe, the oftener this is done, the fooner and better will fire be manned. She muft alfo have two good bells, that fire may be found when fire fcattereth. Her hood flrould be well fafhioned, railed, and emboffed againft her eyes, deepr and yet ftrait enough beneath, that it may faften about her head without hurting her 5 and her beak and talons muft be a little coped, but not fo near as to make them bleed. If it be a foar-falcon, which had already palled the feas, fire will indeed be harder to reclaim, but will prove the beft of falcons. Her food muft be good and warm, and given her twice or thrice a-day, till fire be full gor¬ ged : the beft for this purpofe is pigeons, larks, or other live birds j becaufe fire muft be broken off by degrees from her accuftomed feeding. When fire is fed, you muft hoop and lure, as you do when you call a hawk, that fire may know when you intend to give her meat. On this occafion Ihe muft be unhooded gently 5 and alter giving her two or three bits, her hood muft be pur on again, when (he is to get two or three bits more. Care muft be taken that ihe be clofe feeled ; and after three or four days, her diet may be lefiened : the falco¬ ner letting her every night to perch by him, that he may awaken her often in the night. In this manner he muft proceed, till he find her to grow tame and gentle; and when Ihe begins to feed eagerly, he may give her a Iheep’s heart. He may now begin to unhood her in the day time $ but it muft be far from company, firft giving her a bit or two, then hooding her gently, and giving her as much more. When Ihe is lharp fet, he may now unhood her, and give her fome meat juft againft his face and eyes, which will make her lefs a- fraid of the countenance of others. She muft be borne continually on the fill, till Ihe is properly manned, cau- fing her to feed in company, giving her in the morning, about funrife, the wing of a pullet; and in the evening, the foot of a hare or coney, cut off above the joint, flayed and laid in water, which being fqueezed, is to be given her with the pinion of a hen’s wing. For tw7o or three days give her walhed meat, and then plumage in more or lefs quantity as Ihe is thought to be more or lefs foul within. After this, being hooded again, Ihe is Falconry, Falerii. F A L [ 406 ] is to get nothing till ftte has gleamed and call, when a bies, (Servius). little hot meat may be given her in company} and, to¬ wards evening, Ihe may be allowed to plume a hen’s wing in company alfo. Cleanfe the feathers of her call¬ ing,0 if foul and flimy ; if Ihe be clean within, give her gentle callings 5 and when Ihe is reclaimed, manned, and made eager and lharp fet, he may venture to feed her on the lure. However, three things are to be confidered before the lure be Ihowed her } 1. That Ihe be bold and fami¬ liar in company, and not afraid of dogs and horfes. 2. Sharp fet and hungry, having regard to the hour of morning and evening, when you would lure her. 3. Clean within, and the lure well garnilhed with meat on both fxdes; and when you intend to give her the length of a lealh, you mult abfcond yourfelf. She mull alfo be unhoodcd, and have a bit or two given her on the lure as Ihe fits on your fill} afterwards take the lure from her, and hide it that lire may not fee it} and when Ihe is unfeeled, call the lure fo near her, that Ihe may catch it within the length of her lealh, and as foon as lire has feized it, ufe your voice as falconers do, feeding her upon the lure, on the ground, with the heart and warm thigh of a pullet. Having fo lured your falcon, give her but little meat in the evening ; and let this luring be fo timely, that you may give her plumage, and a juck of a joint next morning on your fill. When Ihe has call and gleamed, give her a little reaching of warm meat. About noon, tie a creance to her lealh j and going into the field, there give hen a bit or two upon her lure : then unwind the creance, and draw it after you a good way 5 and let him who has the bird hold his right hand on the talfel of her hood, ready to unhood her as foon as you begin to lure } to which if flie come well, floop round¬ ly upon it, and haflily feize it, let her call two or three bits thereon. Then, unfeizing and taking her oft the lure, hood her and give her to the man again 5 and, going farther off, lure and feed her as before. In this manner is the falconer to proceed, luring her every day farther and farther off, till ihe is accuflomed to come freely and eagerly to the lure} after which fhe may be lured in company, taking care that nothing af¬ fright her. When ftte is ufed to the lure on foot, fhe is to be lured on horfeback j which may be effecled the fooner, by cauftng horfemen to be about her when Ihe is lured on foot. When Ihe has grown familiar to this way, let fome- body on foot hold the hawk, and he on horfeback mull •call and cafl the lure about his head, the holder taking off the hood by the taffel ; and if fhe feize eagerly on the lure without fear of man or horfe, then take off the creance, and lure her at a greater diflance. And if you would have her love dogs as well as the lure, call dogs when you give her her living or plumage. See Hawking. FALERII, in Ancient Geography, a town of Etru¬ ria, on the weft or right fide of the Tiber •, Falifci, the people of the town and territory. The territory was famous for its rich paftures 5 hence the gramen Falifcnm in authors. Eutropius and Frontinus call the town Fa- lifei; which, according to the laft, was furnamed Colo- via Junonta. The Falifci are called JEqui by Virgil 5 bec aufe thev afforded fupplemental laws to the 12 ta- F A L Here they made an excellent faufage, FaWnirs czlltd Venter Falifcus (Martial). . Falkirk. When the Falifci were befieged by Camillus, a v ... , fchoolmafter went out of the gates of the city with his pupils, and propofed to betray them into the hands ot the Roman enemy, that by luch a poffefiion lie might eafily oblige the place to furrender. Camillus heard the propofal with indignation, and ordered the man to be ftripped naked, and whipped back to toe. town, by thofe whom his perfidy wifhed to betray. This inftance of generofity operated upon the people fo powerfully ^ that they furrendered to the Romans. ' FALERNUS, Mans MaJJicus fo called, (Martial) ; Falernus ager, a diitrid at the foot of Mount Maflicus in Campania j famous ror its generous w ines, (Hoi ace, Pliny). Now called Monte MaJJico. FALISCI. See Falerii. FALKIA, a genus of plants belonging to the hex- andria clafs. See Botany Index. FALKIRK, a town of Stirlingfhire in Scotland, fituated in W. Long. 3- 4^- Lat. 56. 20. It is. a large ill built place, and is fupported by great fairs for^black cattle from the Highlands, it being comput¬ ed that 24,000 head are annually fold there. A great deal of money is alfo got here by the carriage of goods landed at Carron wharf to Glafgow. Ibis town is re¬ markable for a battle fought in its neighbourhood between Edward I. of England, and the Scots com- __ manded by the fteward of Scotland, Cummin of Ba- denoch, and Sir William Wallace. Ihe lattei had been invefted with the fupreme command 5 but perceiv¬ ing that this gave umbrage to the nobility, he refigned his power into the hands of the noblemen above men¬ tioned, referving to himfelf only the command of a fmall body who refufed to follow another leader. The Scots generals placed their pikemen along the front, and lined the intervals between the three bodies of which their army was compofed, wdth archers: and dreading the great luperiority of the Englifti cavalry, endeavour¬ ed to fecure their front by palliladoes tied together w ith ropes. The battle was fought on the 22d of July 1 298. The king of England divided his army likewife into three bodies 3 and by the fupenority of his archers, de¬ feated the Scots with great daughter. Wallace alone preferved entire the troops he commanded ; and retiring behind the Carron, marched leifurely along the banks of that river, which protefted him from the enemy. In this battle fell John de Graham, a gentleman much celebrated for his valour, and ftyled the right hand of the gallant Wallace. His epitaph is ftill to be feen on a plain ftone in the churchyard of ialkirk. On the 1 8th of January 1746, a battle was fought here between the king’s forces commanded by General Hawley, and the Highlanders headed by Charles Stuart. The for¬ mer wTas feized wdth a panic, and lied : but Colonel Hulk with tw'O regiments, who kept their ground, pre¬ vented the Highlanders from purfuing their vitfory. Extenfive ruins are perceived in the neighbourhood of this town, fuppofed by fome antiquarians to have been the capital of the Picftifli government •, but others be¬ lieve them to be the remains of fome Roman ftations. FALKLAND, a fmall town of Fifelhire in Scot¬ land, made a royal burgh by James II. in 1458. ' Here flood one of the feats of the Macduff's earls of Fife. On the 2 F A L [ 407 ] the attainder of Munro Stewart, the 17th earl, it be¬ came forfeited to the crown in 1424. James V. who grew very fond of the place, enlarged and improved it. The remains evince its former magnificence and ele¬ gance and the fine tafte of the princely arcjiitea. The gateway is placed between two fine round towers j on the right hand joins the chapel, whofe roof is of wood, handfomely gilt and painted, but in a moft ruinous con¬ dition. Beneath are feveral apartments. The front next to the court was beautifully adorned with ftatucs, heads in bafs relief, and elegant columns, not reducible to any order, but of fine proportion, with capitals ap¬ proaching the Ionic fcroll. Beneath fome of thefe pil¬ lars was infcribed I. R. M. G. 1537. or Jacobus Rex, Maria de Guife.—This place was alfo a favourite refi- dence of James VI. on account of the fine park and plenty of deer. The call fide was accidentally burnt m the time of Charles II. and the park ruined during Cromwell’s ufurpation, when the fine oaks, were cut. dowrn in order to build the fort at Perth. Ibis place gives title of vifcount to the Englilh family of Carey ; Sir Henry Carey being fo created by James \ I. 1620. His fon was the celebrated Lucius, who facrificed his life in a fit of loyal defpair at the battle of Newbury, and from whom the prefent family is lineally de- fcended. Falkland, Lord. See Carey. FALL, the defcent of a heavy body towards the centre of the earth. It is alfo the name of a meafure of length ufed in Scotland, containing fix ells. Fall of Man, in {acred hiltory, that terrible event by which fin and death were introduced into the world. See Adam, and Antediluvians, and Original. Sin. The account which Moles gives of this tranfaftion is extremely brief and concife. The ferpent, he informs us, being mere fubtle than any beaft of the field, alked the woman, whether it was true that God had not granted her and her hufband leave to eat of ever^y tree in the garden ? She anfwered, That God had allow’ed them to^eat of all, except only the fruit of the tree in the midlt of the garden ; which he commanded they ihould not tafte, nor fo much as touch, left they fhould die. The ferpent replied, That they fhould not die j for God knew the virtue of the tree j and that, fo foon as they ate of it, their eyes w'ould be opened, and they would' become like gods, knowing good and evil.. Eve, feeing the fruit tempting to the view, took of the fruit and ate j and gave alfo to her hufband of it, and he did eat. Immediately the eyes of both were opened ; when perceiving they were naked, they fewed fig leaves together and made themfelves aprons.. A- dam and Eve, hearing the voice of God walking in the garden in the cool of the day, hid themfelves among the trees } but, on God’s calling for Adam, he excuf- ed himfelf for not appearing, becaufe he was naked. God demanded of him, who it wras that told him he was naked j and whether he had difobeyed Ins com¬ mand, in eating the forbidden fruit ? Adam confeffed that the woman had offered him the fruit, and he had tailed it. She, being examined likewife, acknow¬ ledged what fhe had done 5 but faid, the ferpent had feduced and deceived her. God then proceeded to judgment ; he firft curfed the ferpent above all beafts, and condemned him to go on his belly, and eat the duft ; adding, that he would put enmity between him nnd the woman, and their offspring ; that the feed of the woman fhould bruife the lerpent’s head, who fhould bruife the other’s heel. The woman was fubje&ed to the pains of childbirth, as well as to the dominion of her hufband j and as to the man, God curfed the ground for his Eke, declaring, that it fhould bring forth thorns and thirties, and he fhould earn his bread by the fweat of his brow, till he returned to the duft, from whence he was taken. At laft, having clothed them both with fkins, he turned them out ol the gar¬ den, left they fhould take of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever : then, to prevent any attempt to return to their former habitation, he placed cherubims at the eaft of the garden, and a flaming fword which turned every way, to guard the paffage to the tree of life. This concife account being, at firft view, encumber¬ ed with fome difficulties, feveral learned and pious men have been inclined to believe the whole ought to be taken in an allegorical fenfe, and not according to the ftri&nefs of the letter : they allege, that the an¬ cients, and particularly the eaftem nations, had two different ways of delivering their divinity and philolo- phy, one popular, and the other myfterious •, that the Scripture ufes both occafionally ; fometimes accommo¬ dating itfelf to the capacities of the people, and at other times to the real but more veiled truth 5 and that, to obviate the many difficulties which occur in the literal hiftory of this fad cataftrophe, the fafeft way is to underftand it as a parabolical ftory, under which the real circumftances are difguifed and concealed, as a myftery not fit to be more explicitly declared. Though it cannot be denied that fome of the an¬ cient philofophers affe&ed fuch an allegorical way of writing, to conceal their notions from the vulgar, and keep their learning within the bounds of their own fchool ; yet it is apparent Mofes had no fuch defign j and as he pretends only to relate matters of fa£l, juft as they happened, without art or difguiie, it cannot be fuppofed but that this hiftory of the fall is to be taken in a literal fenfe, as well as the reft of his writings. It is generally agreed, that the ferpent which tempted Eve was the devil, who envying the privileges cf man 111 innocence, tempted him, and was the came of his forfeiting all thole advantages which he had received from God at his creation •, and that to this end he af- .fumed the form of a ferpent. Thefe interpretations are fupported by many paffages of Scripture, where the devil is called the ferpent, and the old ferpent, (St* John viii. 44. 2 Cor. xi. 3. and Rev. xii. 9.) Some be¬ lieve that the ferpent had then the ufe of fpeech, and converfed familiarly with the woman, without her con¬ ceiving any diftruft of him ■, and that God, to puniih the malice with which he had abufed Eve, deprived him of the ufe of fpeech. Others maintain, that a real ferpent having eaten of the forbidden fruit, Eve from thence concluded, that fhe too might eat of it without danger •, that in effe£t fhe did eat of it, and incurred the difpleafute of God by her difobedience. This, fay thefe laft authors, is the plain matter of fad which Mofes w^ould relate under the allegorical repre- fentation of the ferpent converfing with Eve. The opinion of fuch as believe this rvas not a real ferpent, but only the devil under that name, is no let H&dIc '• Fallacy .11. Fallopian. F A L liable to exception than any of the reft the devil is frequently ftyled in Scripture the ferpsnt, and the old ferpent, yet why he ftiould be called the mojl fubtle beaft of the field, we cannot conceive •, neither will the punilhment intlicled on the ferpent fuffer us to doubt, but that a ferpent’s body at lead; was employ¬ ed in the tranfaclion. The nature of the forbidden fruit is another circum- ftance in this relation that has occafioned no lefs va¬ riety of conjectures, ihe Rabbins believe it was the vine ; others that it was wheat ; and others, from the circumftance of Adam and Eve’s covering themfelves with fig leaves immediately after their tranfgreflion, tell us, that this fruit mult have been the fig 5 feme think it was the cherry *, and the generality of the Latins will have it to be the apple. Thofe who admire allegorical interpretations, will "have the forbidden fruit to have been no other than the fenfual act of generation, for which the punilhment. in- flifted on the woman was the pain of childbearing. But this opinion has not the leaft foundation in the ■words of Mofes, efpecially if we confider that Adam knew not his wife till after their expullion out of Pa- radife. Many have been the fuppofitions and conjectures upon this fubjeft in general j and fome have fo far in¬ dulged their fancy in the circumftances of the fall,, that they have perverted the whole narration of Mofes into a fable full of the moft lhameful extravagancies. FALLACY, a deception, fraud, or falie appear¬ ance. The Epicureans deny that there is any fuch thing as a fallacy of the fenfes : for, according to them, all our fenfations and perceptions, both of fenfe and phantafy, are true 5 whence they make fenfe the primary criterion of truth. The Cartefians, on the other hand, maintain, that we fhould fufpeef as falfe, or at moft as dubious, every thing that prefents itfelf to us by means only .of the external fenfes, becaufe they frequently deceive us. They add, that our fenfes, as being fallacious, were never given us by nature for the difeovery of truth, or the contemplation of the principles of things; but only for pointing out to us what things are convenient or hurtful to our bodies. The Peripatetics keep a middle courfe. They fay, that if a fenfible objeef be taken in its common, or ge¬ neral view, the fenfe cannot be deceived about it; but that if the objeft be taken under its fpecific view, the fenfe may be miftaken about it, from the want of the difpofitions neceffary to a juft fenfation, as a difor- der in the organ, or any thing uncommon in the me¬ dium : thus, in fome diforders of the eye, all objeCts appear yellow, a ftick in Water appears broken or crooked, &c. FALLING sickness, or Epilepsy. See Medi¬ cine Index. -Falling-Stars. See Star. FALLOPIAN tubes, in Anatamij, two duffs arif- ing from the womb, one on each fide of the fundus, and thence extended to the ovaries, having a confider- able lhare in conception. They are called tubce, from their form, which bears fome refemblance to a trum¬ pet t and thpir denomination Fallopinnce, they take r 408 ] f a l For though from Gabriel Fallopius, mentioned in the next luficie. See Anatomy Index. FALLOPIUS, Gabriel, a moft celebrated phyfi- cian and anatomift, was born at Modena in Italy, in the year 1523, and defeended of a noble family. He made feveral difeoveries in anatomy, one of which was that of the tubes, called from him the Fallopian tubes. He travelled through the greateft part of Europe, and obtained.the charaffer of being one of the ableft phy- ficians of his age. He was made profeffor of anatomy at Pifa in the year 1548, and at Padua in the year 1551 : here he died in 1562, aged 39. His writings which are numerous, were firft printed feparately, and afterwards collefted under the title of .“ Opera genui- na omnia, tarn pradlica quam theoretica, in tres to- mos diftributa.” They were printed at Venice in 1585 and in 1606, at Franc-fort in 1600, cum operum ap- pendice ; and in 1606, in folio. FALLOW, a pale red-colour, like that of brick , half burnt *, fuch is that of a fallow deer. Fallovt Field, or Fallow ground; land laid up, or that has been untilled for a confiderable time. FALLOWING of Land, a particular method of improving land. See Agriculture Index. FALMOUTH, a port town of Cornwall in Eng¬ land, fituated in W. Long. 5. 30. N. Lat. 50. 15. on a fine bay on the Englilh channel. It is the richeft and moft trading town of the county, and larger than Sny three of its boroughs that fend members to parliament. It is fo commodious a harbour, that ftrips of the great- eft burden come up to its quay. It is guarded by the caftle of St Mawes and Pendennis, on a high rock at the entrance : and there is fuch Ihelter in the many creeks belonging to it, that the whole royal navy may ride fafe here in any wind, it being next to Plymouth and Milford-Haven, the beft road for {hipping in Great Britain. It is well-built} and its trade is confider- ably increafed fince the eftabliftiment of the packet- boats here for Spain, Portugal, and the W eft. Indies, which not only bring vaft quantities of gold in fpecie and in bars, on account of the merchants in London 5, but the Falmouth merchants trade with the Portuguefe in fhips of their own, and they have a great {hare alfo in the gainful pilchard trade. The cuftom-houfe for moft of the Comifti towns, as well as the head collec¬ tor, is fettled here;, where the duties, including thofe of the other ports, are very confiderable. It is a corpo¬ ration, governed by a mayor and alderman. Here is a market on Thurfday, and fairs July 27. and Otto- ber 30. FALSE, in general, fomething contrary to truth, or not what it ought to be : thus we fay a falfe ac¬ tion, falfe weights, falfe claim, &c. False Aflion, if brought againft one whereby he is caft into prifon, and dies pending the fuit, the law gives no remedy in this cafe, becaufe the truth or falfe- hood of the matter cannot appear before it is tried : and if the plaintiff is barred, or non-fuited at com¬ mon law, regularly all the puniftiment is amerce- ment. . False Imprifonment, is a trefpafs committed againft a perfon, by arrefting and imprifoning him without juft caufe, contrary to law ; or where a man is un¬ lawfully detained without legal procefs: and it i? al- f* 1 falfe il Fama. F A M [ fo ufed for a writ which is brought for this trefpafs. a perfon be any way unlawfully detained, it is falie imprifonment 5 and conlideraole damages are recover¬ able in thofe a&ions. False News, /^reading of, in order to make difcord between the king and nobility, or concerning any great man of the realm, is punifhable by common law with fine and imprifonment ; which is confirmed by ftatutes Weftm. I. 3 Edw. I. cap. 34. 2 Ric. II. flat. 1. cap. 5. and 12 Ric. II. cap. tl. False Oath. See Perjury. False Prophecy. See Prophecy. False Quarter, in Farriery. See (Quarters, Far¬ riery Index. False Bay, a bay lying to the eaftward of the Cape of Good Hope •, frequented by veffels during the pre¬ valence of the north-wefterly winds, wdrich begin to exert their influence in May, and render it dangerous to remain in Table bay. It is terminated to the eaft¬ ward by Falfe Cape, and to the weftward by the Cape of Good Hope. It is ,8 miles wide at its entrance, and the two capes bear due eaft and welt from each other. . . FALSI CRIMEN, in the civil law, is fraudulent iu- bomation or concealment, with defign to darken or hide the truth, and make things appear otherwife than they are. The crimen falfi is committed, I. By words, as when a wdtnefs fwears falfely. 2. By writing, as when a man antedates a contract, or the like. 3- dly deed, as when he fells by falfe weights and meafures. FALSIFY, mLaw, is ufed for proving any thing to be falfe. Hence we find, Falsifying a record, for fhowing it to be erroneous. Thus lawyers teach, that a perfon purchaling land of another, who is afterwards outlawed of felony, &c. may falfify the record, not only as to the time wdierein the felony is fuppofed to have been committed, but alfo as to the point of the offence. But wThere a man is found guilty by verdicf, a purchafer cannot falfify as to the offence ; though he may for the time, where the party is found guilty generally in the indi&ment, becaufe the time is not material upon evidence. FALSTAFF. See Fastolff. FALX, in Anatomy, a part of the dura mater, de- fcending between the two hemifpheres of the brain, and feparatmg the fore part from the hinder. It is called falx, i. e. “ fickle,” becaufe of its curvature, occafioned by the convexity of the brain. It divides the brain as low as the corpus callofum. FAMA CLAMOSA, in the judicial procedure of the church of Scotland, a ground of affion before a prefby- tery againfl one of its members, independent of any regular complaint by a particular accufer. See Pres¬ bytery. Any perfon who is of a good charafter, may give to the prefbytery a complaint againft one of their members •, but the prefbytery is not to proceed to the citation of the perfon accufed, until the accufer under his hand gives in the complaint, wfith fome account of its probability, and undertakes to make out the libel, under the pain of being confidered as a flanderer. W hen fuch an accufation is brought before them, they are obliged candidly to examine the affair. But, belides this, the prefbytery conflders itfelf obliged to proceed againff any of its members, if a fama clamola of the Vql, VIII. Part II. 409 ] F A M If fcandal is fo great that they cannot be vindicated un- lefs they begin the procefs. This they can do with¬ out any particular acculer, after they have inquired in¬ to the rife, occafion, and authors, of this report. It is a maxim in the kirk of Scotland, that religion muft fuffer if the fcandalous or immoral actions of a mini- Iter are not corredted. And wherever a minifter is re¬ puted guilty of any immorality (although before the molt popular preacher in the kingdom), none almcfl will attend upon his miniltry. Therefore the preibyte- ry, for the fake of religion, is obliged to proceed againft a minifter in cafe of a fama clamofa. This, however, is generally done with great tendernefs. Alter they have confidered the report railed againft him, then they order him to be cited, draw out a full copy of what is reported, with a lift of the witneffes names to be led for proving this allegation. He is now to be formally fummoned to appear before them ■, and he has warning given him, at leaft 10 days beiore ths? time of his compearance, to give in his anfwers to what is termed the libel-, and the names of the witneffes ought alfo to be fent him. If at the time appoint¬ ed the minifter appear, the libel is to be read to him, and his anfwers are alfo to be read. If the libel be found relevant, then the prefbytery is to endeavour to bring him to a confeflion. If the matter confefled be of a fcandalous nature, fuch as uncleannefs, the prefby¬ tery generally depofe him from his office, and ap¬ point him in due time to appear before the congrega¬ tion where the fcandal was given, and to make public confeffion of his crime and repentance. If a minifter abfent himfelf by leaving the place, and be contuma¬ cious, without making any relevant excme, a new ci¬ tation is given him, and intimation is made at his own church when the congregation is met, that he is to be holden as confeffed, fince he refufed to appear be¬ fore them ; and accordingly he is depofed from his of~ fice. , FAME, a heathen goddefs, celebrated chiefly by the poets. She is feigned to have been the laft of the race of Titans produced by the earth, to have her palace in the air, and to have a vaft number of eyes, ears, and tongues. She is mentioned by Hefiod, and particular¬ ly delcribed by Ovid and Virgil. FAMES canina, the fame with Bulimy* FAMIA, or Afamia, the modern name of one of the ancient Apameas. See Apamea. FAMILIARS of the Inquisition, perfons who affift in apprehending fuch as are accufed, and carry¬ ing them to prifon. I hey are affiftants to the inquili- tor, and called familiars, becaufe they belong to his family. In fome provinces of Italy they are called crofs-bearers, and in others xhc fcholars of St Peter the martyr; and they w ore a crofs before them on the out- fide garment. They are properly bailiffs of the inqui- fition J and the vile office is efteemed fo honourable, that noblemen in the kingdom of Portugal have been ambitious of belonging to it. Nor is this furpnfing, when it is confidered that. Innocent III. granted very large indulgences and privileges to thefe familiars j and that the fame plenary indulgence is granted by the pope to every Tingle exercife of this office, as was granted by the Lateran council to thofe who fuccour- ed the Holy Land. When feveral perfons are to be taken up at the fame time, thefe familiars are com- r 5 p mandea Fa ilia jl. , Familiars. FAN [ 4i' Family tnandcd to order matters, that they may know nothing 1! of one another’s being apprehended ; and it is related, i:‘m- that a father and his three fons, and three daughters, who lived together in the fame houfe, were carried pii- foners to the" inquifition without knowing any thing of one another’s being there till feven years afterwards, when they that were alive were releafed by an act of faith. FAMILY denotes the perfons that live together in one houfe, under the direction of one head or chief manager. It alfo fignifies the kindred or lineage of a perfon } and is ufed by old writers for a hide or por¬ tion of land fufficient to maintain one family. See Hide. Family, in Natural llijlory, a term ufed by autnors to exprefs any order of animals, or other natural pro¬ ductions of the fame clafs. FAMINE, dearth, or' fcarcity of food. For pre- fervatives againft hunger in times of famine, fee the article Hunger. FAN, a machine ufed to raife wind, and cool the air by agitating it. That the ufe of the fan wTas known to the ancients is very evident from what J. erence fays, Cape hoc flabellum, et ventulum huic fic facito ; and from Ovid, Art. Amand. I. 161. Profuit et tenues ventos tnovi/fe flabello. The fans of the ancients were made of different ma¬ terials j but the moft elegant were com'pofed of pea¬ cocks Feathers, or perhaps painted fo as to reprefent a peacock’s feather. The cuftom which now prevails among the ladies, of wearing fans, was borrowed from the call, where the hot climate renders the ufe of fans and umbrellas almoft indifpenfable. In the eaft they chiefly ufe large fans made of fea¬ thers, to keep off the fun and the flies. In Italy and Spain they have a large fort of fquare fans, lidpended in the middle of their apartments, and particularly over the tables : thefe, by a motion at firft given them, and which they retain a long time on account of their per¬ pendicular fufpenlion, help to cool the air and drive off flies. In the Greek church, a fan is put into the hands of the deacons in the ceremony of their ordination, in al- lufton to a part of the deacon’s office in that church, which is to keep the flies off the priefls during the ce¬ lebration of the facrament. What is called a fan amongft us and throughout the chief parts of Europe, is a thin Ikin, or piece of pa¬ per, taffety, or other light fluff, cut femicircularly, and mounted on feveral little, ftisks of wood, ivory, tortoifeftiell, or the like. If the paper be Angle, the flicks of the mounting are pafted on the leaft ornamen- ed Ade : if double, the flicks are placed betwixt them. Before they proceed to place the flicks, which they call mounting the fan, the paper is to be pjaited in fuch a manner, as that the plates may be alternately inward and outward. It is in the middle of each plait, which is ufually about half an inch broad, that the flicks are to be pafted j and the e again are to be all joined and ri- vetted together at the other end 3 they are very thin. d } FAN and fcarcely exceed one-third of an inch in breadth 3 and Fas where they are pafted to the paper, are Hill narrower, FarJaw continuing thus to the extremity of the paper. 1 he . ' A .. two outer ones are bigger and ftronger than the others. The number of flicks rarely exceeds 2 2. The flicks are ufually provided by the cabinetmakers or toy¬ men 3 the fan-painters plait the papers, paint, and mount them. The common painting is either in colours or gold leaf, applied on a Alvered ground, both prepared by the goldbeaters. Sometimes they paint on a gold ground, but it is rarely 3 true gold being too dear, and falfe too paltry. To apply, the filver leaves on the paper, they ufe a compofltion, which they pretend is a great fecret, but which appears to be no other than gum arabic, fugar-candy, and a little honey, melted in common water, and mixed with a little brandy. This compofltion is laid on with a fponge 3 then lay¬ ing the Alver leaves thereon, and preffing them gent.y down with a linen ball fluffed with cotton, they catch hold, and adhere together. When, mftead of Alver, gold ground is laid, the lame method is obferved. I he ground being well dried, a number of the papers are well beaten together on a block, and by this means the Alver or gold get a luftre as if they had been bur- niftied. Fan is alfo an inftrument to winnow corn. The machine ufed for this purpofe by the ancients leems to have been of a form flmilar to ours. I ne fan, which Virgil calls tnyfica vannus lacchi, was ufed at initiations- into the myfleries of the ancients : For as the perfons who were initiated into any of the myfteries, wTere to be particularly good, this inftrument, which feparates the wheat from the chaff, was the fltteft emblem that could be of fetting apart the good and virtuous from the vicious and ufelefs part of mankind. It. is flgu- ratively applied in a Amilar manner in Luke iii. 17- FANATICS, wild, enthuflaftic, yiAonary perfons, who pretend to revelation and infpiration. The ancients called thofe fanatici who paffed their time in temples (fana), and being often feized with a kind of enthuflafm, as if infpired by the divinity, {flowed wild and antic geflures. Prudentius reprefents them as cutting and flafhing their arms with knives. Shaking the head was alfo common among the fana¬ tici 3 for Lampridius informs us, that the emperor Heliogabalus was arrived at that pitch, of madnefs, as to {flake his head with the gaffied fanatics. Hence the word wTas applied among us to the Anabaptifts, Qua¬ kers, &c. at their flrft rife, and is now an epithet given to the modern prophets, Muggletonians, &c. FANCY, or imagination. See Imagination. FANIONS, in the military art, fmall flags carried along with the baggage. FANNERS, a machine for winnowing corn, or for feparating the chaff from the grain. See, for its de» feription, Mechanics. FANSHAW, Sir Richard, famous for his em- baffies and writings, was the tenth and youngeft fon of Sir Henry Fanihaw of Ware Park in Hertfordlhire, where it is luppofed he was born about the year 1607. He diftinguiffied himfelf fo early by his abilities, that in 1635 he was taken into government employments by King Charles I. and fent reAdent to the court of Spain 3 whence being recalled in, the beginning of the * ' • tvqubks Farce. FAR [41 F.uuP.. troubles in 1641, be adhered to the royal intereft, and 11 was employed in feveral important matters ot itate. During; his vacant hours he wrote divers poems, and made feveral tranflations. At the Reftoration it was expedted he would have been made one ot the fecreta- ries of date however, he was made mailer of the re- quefts j a ftation in thofe times of confiderable_ profit* Afterwards, oil account of his {kill in the Latin lan¬ guage, he was made fecretary for that tongue. In 1661, he was fent envoy to the king of Portugal. In 1662, he was again fent to that court with the title ot amba/fador, and negotiated the marriage of his matter King Charles II. with the infanta Donna Cathenna. Upon his return he was made one of the privy coun¬ cil. In 1664, he was fent ambaifador _to both the courts of Spain and Portugal} at which time the foun¬ dation of peace betwixt thofe Crowns and England was laid by him. His conduct during his former employ¬ ments in thofe courts gained him Inch high efteem there, that his reception was magnificent, exceeding ail that were before, which thofe kings declared was not to be a precedent to fucceeding ambalTadors. He died at Madrid in 1666, on the very day he had fix¬ ed for fetting out on his return to England. Befides fome original poems, and other tranflations, he P’-'-f*" lifhed a tranflation of Bathifta Guarini’s Pajlor tiuo^ and another of the Liifiad of Camoens. Among his pofthumous publications are, “ Letters during his embaflies in Spain and Portugal', with his life pie- fixed.” k - . FANTASIA, in the Italian mufic, fignifiesyWy > and is ufed for a compofition, wherein the compoier ties himfelf to no particular time, but ranges accord¬ ing as his fancy leads, amidft various movements, dif¬ ferent airs, &.c. This is otherwife called the capricious jiyle: before fonatas were ufed, there were many of this kind, fome of which remain even now. FANUM, among the Romans, a temple or place confecrated to fome deity. I he deified men and wo¬ men among the heathens had likewife xhdu fana ; even the great philofopher Cicero ereitted one to his daugh¬ ter Tullia. _ - Fanum Vacua o’, in Ancient Geography, a village ot the Sabines, fituated between Cures and Mandela-, where flood the temple of Vacuna, goddefs of the idle or unemployed, in an old decayed ftate : and hence the epithet putre, ufed by Horace. Nowr called Vocone, in the Ecclefiaftic State. FARANDMAN, a traveller, or merchant flran- ger, to whom, by the laws of Scotland, juftice ought to be done with all expedition, that his bufinefs or journey be not hindered. FARCE, was originally a droll, petty fliow, or en¬ tertainment, exhibited by charletans, and their buf¬ foons, in the open ftreet to gather the crowd together. The word is French, and fignifies literally, “ force¬ meat or fluffing.” It was applied on this occafion, no doubt, on account of the variety of jells, gibes, tricks, &c. wherewith the entertainment was interlarded. Some authors derive farce from the Latin facetia ; o- thers from the Celtic farce, “ mockery j” others from the Latip farcire, “ to fluff.” At prelent it is removed from the ffreet to the theatre } and inftead of being performed by merry- andrews to amufe the rabble, is acted by comedians, t ] F A ft and become the entertainment of a polite audience. Poets have reformed the wildnefs of the primitive far¬ ces, and brought them to the tafle and manner of co¬ medy. The difference between the two on our ftage is, that comedy keeps to nature and probability, and therefore is confined to certain laws prefcribed by an¬ cient critics j whereas farce diialiows of all laws, cr ra ¬ ther fets them afide on occafion. Its end is purely to make merry -, and it flicks at nothing which may con¬ tribute thereto, however wild and extravagant, rlence the dialogue is ufuaily low, the perfons of inferior rank, the fable or attion trivial or ridiculous, and na true and truth everywhere heightened and exaggera¬ ted to afford the more palpable ridicule. FARCIN, or Farcy, a difeafe in horfes, and fome-. times in oxen, &c. fomewhat of the nature of a Ra¬ bies or mange. See Farriery Index. FARDING-DEAL, the fourth part of an acre ot land. See Acre. FARE, moll commonly fignifies the money paid for a voyage, or paffage by water j but, in London, i< is what perfens pay for being conveyed, from one pam of the town to another in a coach or chair. FAREWELL-CAPE, the moil foutherly promon¬ tory of Greenland-, in W. Long. 50°, and N. Lat. 6o° FAR IN, or Farm. See Farm. FARINA, a Latin term fignifying meal, or the flour of corn. See Corn'. _ . Farina Facundans, among •Fotani/Is, the fuppoied impregnating meal or dull: on the apices or antherae oi flowers. See Poelent» __ # . The manner of gathering the farina of plants for microfcopical obfervations is this : Gather the flowei s in the midfl of a dry funlhiny day when the dew is perfectly off, then gently fliake off the farina, or light¬ ly brulh it off with a foft hair-pencil, upon a piece of white paper ; then take a Angle talc or ifinglafs be¬ tween the nippers, and, breathing on it, apply it in- ftantly to the farina, and the moifture of the breath will make that light powder flick to it. If too great a quantity be found adhering to the talc, blow a little of it oft j and, if there is too little, breathe upon it a- gain, and take up more. When this is done, put the talc into the hole of a Aider, and, applying it to the microfcope, fee whether the little grains are laid as you defire •, and if they are, cover them up with another talc, and fix the ring •, but be careful that the talcs do not prefs upon the farina in fucli a manner as to alter its form. FARLEU, money paid by the tenants in the weft of England, in lieu of a heriot. In fome manors of Devonihire, farleu is often diftinguilhed to be the belt goods, as heriot is the bell beaft, payable at the death of a tenant. FARM, FarIn, or Perm, (Firma), in Law, figni¬ fies a little country mefluage or diilridt, containing houfe or land, with other conveniences j hired, or taken by leafe, either in writing, or parole, under a certain yearly rent. See Lease. This in divers parts is differently termed : m the north, it is a tack ; in Lancaihire, fermeholt; in Ef- fex, a wike, &c. In the corrupted Latin, firma fignified a place m- clofed or Ihut in : whence, in fome provinces, Menage 3 Y '2 oblerveg, FAR L 41 Farm, obferves, they call cloferie, or clofure, what in others v ' they call ^ farm. Add, that we find locare adfirmam, to fignify to let to farm ^ probably on account of the iureliold the tenant here has in comparifon of tenants at will. ’ . Spelman and Shinner, however, choofe to derive the word farm from the Saxon farms, ox feoi me, that is, victus, “ provifion j” by reafon the country people and tenants anciently paid their rents in vi&uals and other neceffaries, which w’ere afterwards converted in¬ to the payment of a fum ot money. ^Whence a farm was originally a place that furnilhed its landlord with provifions. And among the Normans they ftill di- llinguilh between farms that pay in kind, i. e. provi¬ fions, and thofe which pay in money 5 calling the for¬ mer limply ferities, and the latter blanche ferme, “ white ferm.” Spelman (hows, that the word firma, anciently fig- mfied not only what we now call a farm, but alfo a feaft or entertainment, which the farmer gave the pro¬ prietor or landlord, for a certain number of days, and at a certain rate, for the lands he held of him. Thus fearme in the laws of King Canute is rendered by Mr Lambard, viBus : and thus we read of reddere firmam nnius noBis, and redd eh at unum diem defrma; which denote provifion for a night and day, the rents about the time of the conqueft being all paid in provifions j which cuftom is faid to have been firfi: altered under King Henry I. We alfo fay to farm duties, imports, &c. Culture of a Farm. See Agriculture. Farm, as connefted with gardening, and fufceptible of embellhhment. See Gardening. In fpeculation, it might have been expe&ed that the firft effays of improvement Ihould have been on a farm, to make it both advantageous and delightful ;. but the fa ft was othemife: a fmall plot was appropriated to pleafure ; the reft was referved for profit only. And this may, perhaps, have been a principal caufe of the vicious tafte which long prevailed in gardens. It was imagined that a fpot fet apart from the reft Ihould not be like them : the conceit introduced deviations from nature, which w'ere afterwards carried to fuch an excefs, that hardly any objetts truly rural were left within the enclofure, and the view of thofe without was generally excluded. The firft ftep, therefore, to¬ wards a reformation, was by opening the garden, to the country, and that immediately led to afiimilating them •, but ftill the idea of a fpot appropriated to plea¬ fure only prevailed, and one of the lateft improve¬ ments has been to blend the ufeful with the agreeable 5 even the ornamental farm was prior in time to the more rural; and we have at laft returned to fimplicity by force of refinement. 1. The ideas of paftoral poetry feem now to be the -ll fam'.0" ftandard 0f t},at Simplicity ; and a place conformable to them is deemed a farm in its utmoft purity. An al- lufion to them evidently enters into the defign of the Leafowes (a), where they appear fo lovely as to en¬ dear the memory of their author •, and juftify the re¬ putation of Mr Shenftone, who inhabited, made, and 2 ] F A R celebrated the place : it is a perfeft pi&ure of his ^ mind, fimple, elegant, and amiable *, and will always fugged: a doubt, whether the fpot infpired his verfe, or whether, in the fcenes which he formed, he only rea¬ lized the paftoral images which abound in his fongs. The whole is in the fame tafte, yet full of variety ; and, except in two or three trifles, every part is rural and natural. It is literally a grazing farm lying round the houfe ) and a walk, as unaffefted and as unadorned as a common field-path, is conduced through the fe- veral enclofures. But for a detail of the plan and fcenery, as illuftrative of the prefent fubjecl, the read¬ er is referred to the particular defcription of the Lea¬ fowes publifhed by the late Mr Dodlley. We fhall only take notice of one or two circumftances independent on the general delineation. The art with which the divifions between the fields are diverfified is one of them. Even the hedges are diftinguifhed from each other: a common quickfet fence is in one place the feparation : in another, it is a lofty hedge-row, thick from the top to the bottom ; in a third, it is a continued range of trees, with all their Items clear, and the light appearing in the intervals between their boughs, and the bufhes beneath them j in others, thefe lines of trees are broken, a few groupes only being left at different diftances } and fometimes a wood, a grove, a coppice, or a thicket, is the apparent boundary, and by them both the fhape and the ftyle of the enclofures are varied. The infcriptions, which abound in the place, are an¬ other ftriking peculiarity : they are well known and juftly admired ; and the elegance of the poetry, and the aptnefs of the quotations, atone for their length and their number. But, in general, infcriptions pleafe no more than once : the utmoft they can pretend to, except w’hen their allufions are emblematical, is to point out the beauties, or defcribe the effedfs, of the fpots they belong to } but thofe beauties and thofe ef- fecls muft be very faint, which ftand in need of the af- fiftance. Infcriptions, however, to commemorate a de¬ parted friend, are evidently exempt from the cenfure js the monuments would be unintelligible without them j and an urn, in a lonely grove, or in the midft of a field, is a favourite embellifhment at the Leafowes : they are indeed among the principal ornaments of the place j for the buildings are moftly mere feats, or little root- houfes; a ruin of a priory is the largeft, and that has no peculiar beauty to recommend it: but a multiplici¬ ty of objefts are unneceffary in the farm j the country it commands is full of them *, and every natural ad¬ vantage of the place within itfelf has been difcover- ed, applied, contrafted, and carried to the utmoft perfedlion, in the pureft tafte, and with inexh audible fancy. Among the ideas of paftoral poetry which are here introduced, its mythology is not omitted : but the al¬ lufions are both to ancient and to modern fables 5 fometimes to the fairies 5 and fometimes to the naiads and mufes. The objetts alfo are borrowed partly from the fcenes which this country exhibited fome centuries ago, and partly from thofe of Arcadia : the priory, Farm, (a) In Shropfhire, between Birmingham and Stourbridge. Patm. Of an an¬ cient farm. FAR t 4i priory, and a Gothic feat, ftill more particularly cha- raaerifed by an infcription m obfolete language and the black letter, belong to the one j the urns ^irgi ^ obeliik, and a ruilic temple of Pan, to the other. Al thefe allufions and objecfs are indeed equally rural. but the images in an Englifh and claffical eclogue are not the fame-, each fpecies is a diftin^ imitative cha- rafter. Either is proper j either will raife the farm it is applied to above the ordinary level; and_ within the compafs of the fame place both may be introduced 5 but they ihould be feparate : when they are mixed, they counteraaone another; and no repreientation is pro¬ duced of the times and the countries they refer to. A certain diilrid fhould therefore be allotted to each, that all the fields which belong to the refpeaive characters may lie together, and the correfpondmg ideas be pre- ferved for a continuance. mi 2. In fuch an affortment, the more open and poldhed fcenes will generally be given to the Arcadian (hep- herd ; and thofe in a lower degree of cultivation, will be thought more conformable to the manners of the ancient Britifti yeomanry. We do not conceive that the country in their time was entirely cleared, or di- ftinaiy divided; the fields were furrounded by woods, not bv hedges ; and if a confiderable traa of improved land lay together, it (till was not feparated into a num¬ ber of inclofures. The fubjefts, therefore proper to re¬ ceive this character, are thofe in which cultivation (eems to have encroached on the wild, not to have fubdued it; as the bottom of a valley in corn, while the fides are (till overgrown with wood ; and the outline of tnat wood indented by the tillage creeping more or lets up the hill. But a glade of grafs, thus circumdanced, does not peculiarly belong to the fpecies; that may occur in a park or paftoral farm ; in this, the paftures (hould rather border on a wafte or a common: it arge, they may be broken by draggling bullies, thickets, or coppices ; and the fcattered trees (hould be befet witn brambles and briars. All thefe are cxrcumdances which improve the beauty of the place; yet appear to be only remains of the wild, not intended for embelhik- ment. Such interruptions mud, however, be lets fre¬ quent in the arable parts of the farm ; but there t e opening may be divided into feveral lands, didmguilh- ed, as in common fields, only by different forts of grain. Thefe will diffidently break the famenefs of the (pace ; and the tillage does not furniffi a more pleafing (cene, than fuch a fpace fo broken, if the extent be moderate, and the boundary beautiful. r \s much wood is elfential to the char after, a (pot may eafily be found, where turrets rifing above the co¬ vert, or fome arches feen within it, may have the re- femblance of a cadle or an abbey. The partial conceal¬ ment is almod neceffary to both ; for to accord with the age, the buildings mud feem to be entire; the ruins of them belong to later days: the difguife is, however, advantageous to them as objefts; none can be imagined more pifturefque, than a tower bolomed in trees, or a duller appearing between the Items and the branches. But the fuperditions of the times tur- niffi other objefts which are more within compais: hermitages were then real; folitary chapels were com¬ mon ; many of the fprings of the country being deem¬ ed holy wells, were didinguilhed by little Gothic domes built over them ; and every hamlet had its crofs, even Farm 3 ] FA R this, when perfeft, fet on a little ruitic pillar, and that, raifed upon a bafe of circular deps, may in fome fcenes be conliderabie : if a fituation can be found for a May- pole, whence it would not obtrude itfclf on every view, that alfo might not be improper; and an ancient cnurch, however unwelcome it may be when it breaks into the defign of a park or a garden, in (uch a farm as this would be a fortunate accident: nor. would the old yew- in the church-yard be indifferent ; it would be a me¬ morial of the times when it was uteful. Many other objefts, fignificant of the manners of our ancedors, might perhaps, upon recollection, occur ; but thefe are amply fufficient for a place of confiderable extent; and cottages mud abound in every age aod every country ; they may therefore be introduced m different forms and pofitions. Large pieces of water are alfo particularly proper.; and all the varieties of rills are confident with every fpecies of farm, from the concurrence of fo many agreeable circumdances m this, be the force or the effect of the charafter what it may, a number of pleafing fcenes may be exhibited ei¬ ther in a walk or riding, to be contraded to thoie which in another part of the place. may be Formed on Arcadian ideas; or even to be fubdituted in their dead, if they are omitted. . , . . . ofafumf 3. A part may alfo be free from either of thefe imita-^^. live charafters, and laid out in a common fimple (arm. Some of the greated beauties of nature are to be found in the fields, and attend an ordinary date oi cultiva¬ tion : wood and water may there be exhibited m ieye- ral forms and difpofitions ; we may enlarge or divide the inclofures ; and give them fuch (hapes and bounda¬ ries as we pleafe; every one may be an agreeable (pot y together, they may compofe beautiful views ; the arable, the padure, and the mead, may fucceed one another ; and now and then a little wild may be intermixed with¬ out impropriety ; every beauty, in diovt, which is not tinufual in an inclofed country, whether it antes from negleft or improvement, is here in its piace. . The buildings, alfo, which are frequent in fuch a country, are often beautiful objefts; the church the manfion are confiderable : tne farm-yard itfelf, if an advantageous (Ituation be chofen for it ; if the ricks, and the barns, and the out-houfes, are ranged with any defign to form them into groups, and if they are properly blended with trees ; may be made a piftu¬ refque compofition. Many of them may be detached from the group, and difperfed about the grounds . the dove-cote, or the dairy, may be feparated from the reft; they may be elegant in their forms, and pla¬ ced wherever they will have the heft effeft. A com¬ mon barn, accompanied by a clump, is fometimes pleafing at a diftance ; a Dutch barn is fo when near ; and a hay-ftack is generally an agreeable circum- ftance in any polition. Each of thefe may be (ingle ; and befides thefe, all kinds of cottages are proper. Among fo many buildings, fome may be converted to other purpofes than their conftruftion denotes; and, whatever be their exterior, may within be made agreeable retreats, for refreffiment,. indulgence, or (belter. With fuch opportunities of improvements, even to- decoration within itfelf, and with advantages of pio- fpeft into the country about it, a fimple faim may un doubtedly be delightful. It will be particu ar y ac~ FAR [ 414 ] FAR vliole a vi- he is Of an orna- taented f*rm. FafRi. 'ceptable to the owner, if it be elofe to his park or his garden : the objecls which conftantly remind him of his rank, impofe a kind of conftraint j and he feels himfelf relieved, by retiring fometknes from the fplen- dor of a feat into the limplicity of a farm : it is more than a variety of fcene s it is a temporary change of iituation in life, which has all the charms of novelty, eafe, and tranquillity, to recommend it. A place, therefore, can hardly be deemed perfedl, which is not provided with fuch a retreat. But if it be the oi the place, it feems inadequate to the manfion : litor is difappointed 5 the mafter is diflatisfied ’, not fufficiently difHnguifhed from his tenants 3 he milles the appendages incidental to his feat and his fortune 5 and is hurt at the limilarity of his grounds with the country about them. A pafioral or an ancient farm is a little above the common level j but even thefe, if brought cl»fe up to the door, fet the houfe in a field, where it always appears to be negledled and naked. Some degree of polilh and ornament is expected in its ■ immediate environs ; and a garden, though it be but a fmall one, fhould be interpofed between the manfion and any fpecies of farm. 4. A fenfe of the propriety of fuch improvements about a feat, joined to a talte for the more Ixmple de¬ lights of the country, probably fuggeited the idea of an ornamental farm, as the means of bringing every ru¬ ral circumilance within the verge of ti garden. This idea has been partially executed very often $ but no¬ where, perhaps, fo completely, and to fuch an extent, as at Woburn farm, (near Weybridge in Surry.) The place •contains 150 acres: of which near 35 are adorned to the highefl degree •, of the reft, about two thirds are in pa- fture, and the remainder is in tillage. The decorations are, however, communicated to every part: for they are ftifpofed along the fides of a walk, which, with its ap¬ pendages, forms a broad belt round the grazing- grounds •, and is continued, though oh a more con- trafled fcale, through the arable. This walk is pro¬ perly garden 5 all within it is farm ■, the whole lies on the two Tides of a hill, and on a flat at the foot of it: the flat is divided into corn-fields *, the paftures occupy the hill; they are furrounded by the walk, and crofted by a communication carried along1 the brow, which is alfo richly dreffed, and which divides them into two lawns, each completely encompaffed ■with garden. Thefd are in themfelves delightful ; the ground in both lies beautifully : they are diverfified with clumps and fingle trees *, and the buildings in the walk feem to belong to them. On the top of the hill is a large oclagon ftructure j and, not far from it, the ruin of a chapel. To one of the lawns the ruin appears, on the brow of a gentle afeent, backed and grouped with wood 5 from the other is feen the odlagon, upon the edge of a fteep fall, and by the fide of a pretty grove, which hangs down the declivity. This lawn is further embellifhed by a neat Gothic building j the former by the houfe, and the lodge at the entrance ■, and in both, other objedls of lefs confequence, little feats, alcoves, and bridges, continually occur. The buildings are not, however, the only orna¬ ments of the walk j it is Ihut out from the country, for a confiderable length of the way, by a thick and lofty hedge-row, which is enriched with woodbine, jef- famine, and every odoriferous plant whole tendrils will entwine with the thicket. A path, generally of fand or gravel, is conduced in a waving line, fometimes elofe under the hedge, fometimes at a little diftance from it ; and the turf on either hand is diverfified with little groups of ftirubs, of firs, or the fmalleft trees, and often with beds of flowers : thefe are rather too profufely ftrewxd, and hurt the eye by their little- neffes } but then they replenifli the air with their per¬ fumes, and every gale is full of fragrancy. In fome parts, however, the decoration is more chafte } and the walk is carried between larger clumps of evergreens^ thickets of deciduous fhrubs, or Hill more confiderably open plantations. In one place it is entirely Ample, without any appendages, any gravel, or any funk fence to feparate it from the lawn j and is diftinguiihed on¬ ly by the richnefs of its verdure, and the nicety of its prefervation. In the arable part it is alio of green fward, following the direftion of the hedges about the feveral inclofures : thefe hedges are fometimes thicken¬ ed with flowering ftirubs •, kmd in every corner or va¬ cant fpace, is a rofary, a elofe or an open clump, or a bed of flowers : but if the parterre has been rifled for the embeliifhment of the fields, the country has on the other hand been fearched for plants new in a garden : and the ftirubs and the flowers which ufed to be deem¬ ed peculiar to the one, have been liberally transferred to the other 5 while their number feems multiplied by their arrangement in fo many and fuch differeot difpo- fitions. A more, modetate ufe of them would, how¬ ever, have been better •, and the variety more pleafing, had it been lefs licentious. But the excefs is only in the borders of the walk ; the feenes through which it leads are truly elegant, every¬ where rich, and always agreeable. A peculiar cheer- fulnefs overfpreads both the lawns, arifing from the number and the fplendor of the objecls with which they abound, the lightnefs of the buildings, the inequa¬ lities of the ground, and the varieties of the plan¬ tations. The clumps and the groves, though feparate- ly fmall, are often maffed by the perfpedtive, and ga¬ thered into confiderable groups, which are beautiful in their forms, their tints, and their pofitions. The brow of the hill commands two lovely profpedls : the one gay and extenfive, over a fertile plain, watered by the Thames, and broken by St Anne’s Hill and Windfor Caltle ; a large mead, of the moft luxuriant verdure, lies juft below the eye, fpreading to the banks of the river ; and beyond it the country is full of farms, vil¬ las, and villages, and every mark of opulence and cul¬ tivation. The other view is more wooded : the fteeple of a church, or the turrets of a feat, fometimes rife above the trees 5 and the bold arch of Walton bridge is there a confpicuous objecl, equally Angular and noble. The inclofures on the flat are more retired and quiet j each is confined within itfelf; and all toge¬ ther they form an agreeable contrail to the open ex- pofure above them. With the beauties which enliven a garden are every¬ where intermixed many properties of a farm : both the lawns are paftured ; and the lowing? of the herds, the bleating of the fiieep, and the tinklings of the bell-wed- der, refound through all the plantations : even the clucking of poultry is not omitted for a menagerie of a very Ample defign is placed near the Gothic buildings a Faint, FAR [4 Farmer, a fmall Terpentine river is provided for tlie water-fowl j •—\ while the others ftray among the flowering ftmibs on the banks, or draggle about the neighbouring lawn : and the corn fields are the fubjedls of every rural employ¬ ment which arable land from feed-time to harvelt can fumifti. But though fo many of the circumftances occur, the fimplicity of a farm is wanting) that idea is loft in fuch a profulion of ornament ) a -rufticity of charafter cannot be preferved amidft all the elegant decorations which may be lavifhed on a garden. FARMER, he that tenants a farm, or is leflee thereof. Alfo generally every leffee for life, years, or at will, is called farmer. As this word implies no my- ftery, except it be that of hufbandry, hulbandman is the proper addition for a farmer. Farmer, Hugh, an Engliih clergyman and a man of literature, belonging to the proteftant nonconformifts, was defcended from people of refpedlability in NortE Wales, and drew his firft breath at Shrewfbury, in the year 1714. Or Charles Owen was for fome time his tutor, and prior to that period he was educated at a fchool in Llanegrin. His parents from the firft having de- figned him for the miniftry, he was fent to profecute his ftudies under the juftly celebrated Dr Doddridge at Northampton, in 1730. Here, by the reftitude of his condudl and wonderful proficiency, he gained the efteem of that great man, who always fpoke of him in the moft refpe&ful terms. Having completed his academi¬ cal ftudies, Mr Farmer became the chaplain of William Coward, Efq„ of Walthamftow, in the county of Effex, and was at the fame time cholen minifter to a dilfent- ing congregation in that village. Notwithftanding the gratitude with which Mr Coward ought to be remem¬ bered by many for his charitable inftitutions, he had certain peculiarities of temper wftiich rendered him a very difagreeable domeftic. His doors w^ere (hut at an uncommonly early hour of the night, and neither vifitor nor conftant refident could aftenvards obtain admiflion. Mr Farmer having one evening been detained a little beyond that hour, found the doors ftiut againft him, and was under the neceflity of applying to a William Snell, Efq. folicitor, a man of eminence, and pofleffed of many excellent qualifications, in whofe family he remained for 30 years, living in the greateft friendfhip and intimacy. In this gentleman’s houfe he gradually prepared thofe valuable treatifes, and dilfertations which were afterwards given to the public, and acquired him fo much celebrity as a man of letters. He alfo continued - to difcharge the duties of his minifterial function to the people of WalthamftowT. When a day of thankfgiving was appointed for the fortunate fuppreflion of the rebellion in 17455 Far¬ mer preached a fermon on that occafion which was pub- lilhed the following year. His next work -was of con- fiderably greater importance, and wras entitled, “ An Inquiry into the Nature and Defign of our Lord’s temp¬ tation in the wildernefs.” 8vo. In this work it was the defign of Mr Farmer to prove that the whole was tranf- afted in vilion, the different ftages of which were intend¬ ed to point out to him the difficulties and duties of his fubfequent miniftry. The originality of thought and profound erudition which this work difplayed, foon gave it a very extenfive circulation, and called forth the exertions of thofe who were of an oppofite opinion. received one reply under the title of “ Chrift’s temp- 5 3 .F A. R tations real fadfs,” which poffeffed confiderable merit, Farmer, but much inferior to Mr Farmer’s for energy of ex- v——v— preflion, depth of thinking, and force of argument. But the moft mafterly, perhaps, of all Mr Farmer’s literary produdtions, was his “ Differtation on Miracles, defigned to fhew that they are arguments of a divine in- terpofition, and abfolute proofs of the miflion and doc¬ trine of a prophet.” Some have believed, and perhaps not without reafon, that this work has no proper rival, notwithftanding the many able treatifes upon that fub- jedl which have made their appearance in different ages. It was firft publiftied in the year 1771. But as great talents are frequently envied, and as this infernal prin¬ ciple is the prolific fource of calumny and detraction, fo this fupereminent work of Mr Farmer was declared to have been chiefly borrowed from Mr le Moine on the fame fubjedt 5—a flander which Mr Farmer refuted in a very able and fatisfadtory manner. In the year 1775, he publiflied his celebrated “ Effay on the De¬ moniacs of the New Teftament,” which may be con- fidered as a mafterly completion of the defign he had in view by his differtation on miracles. The hypothefis he adopted had been formerly defended with great ability by Mede, Sykes, Lardner, and others j but it was referved for the critical acumen of Mr Farmer to free it completely from thofe difficulties wftiich ftill hung around it. His effay on demoniacs wras fucceflive- ly attacked by Dr Worthington and Mr Fell, both of them men of confiderable erudition, but much inferior to their able antagonift. Mr Farmer having continued for feveral years the foie pallor of the congregation at Walthamftow, an able colleague wras appointed him in 1761, in confe- quence of which he became the afternoon preacher to the congregation of Salter’s-hall, in the city of London, and foon after the Tuefday ledlurer at the fame place. He refigned his minifterial employments as he advanced in years, which the people commited to his charge very much regretted. In the year 1785 his eyes gave him very much trouble, of the fight of which he was nearly deprived, but by means of a furgical operation, he was for fome time enabled to refume his ftudies. But mor¬ tality is the inevitable lot of all men, and the growing infirmities of Mr Faraaer brought him to the grave in 1787, in the 73d year of his age. By his laft will he had ordered all his manufcripts to be burnt after his death, a circumftance which men oF letters have juft reafon to lament. It is no doubt the duty of executors to pay attention to the will of the de- ceafed 3 yet for the benefit of the Chriftian world they- wmuld have been juftified in taking a certain latitude in the explanation of. his meaning 3 as it does by no means appear probable that he meant to confign to the flames his manufcript entitled, “ A Differtation on the ftory of Balaam,” which appeared wnitten in a fair hand, as if manifeftly intended for the prefs. When wre fay that Mr Farmer wras a confummate fcholar, we truft that his numerous and able wTorks will fully juftify the affer- tion 3 and his talents as a preacher were equally con- fpieuous. His voice was remarkable for its clearnefs and harmony, and his whole manner was peculiarly im- preflive. His piety was not morofe, his converfation was lively, and his whole deportment was a beautiful tranf- cript of his moral injunftions. Farmer, Richard, D. D. a fcholar and critic cf confiderable F A R [ 416 3 FAR Farmer, coniidcrable eminence, ivas the Ton or a holier at Lei- —^ ; cefter, at which place he was born in the year I735- Here he received the rudiments of his education, and was afterwards a ftudent at Cambridge, and penfioner of Emanuel college. He was conlidered as a young man well acquainted with books, was much efteemed among his friends, and looked upon as poffeffed of lively parts, even before he acquired any extraordinary repu¬ tation as a fcholar. He was made B. A. in i757> an^ M. A. in 1760. Seven years after this period, having been for fome time a curate, he took the degree of B. D. and became a preacher at Whitehall. Befides the attention he paid to the Grecian and Roman authors, he profecuted the ftudy of books in his own language, printed on black-letter, which laid the foundation of a work that added more to his literary reputation than any other performance. This was “ An Effay on the learning of Shakefpeare,” which he publilhed in 1766 Men of letters had long turned their attention to the learning of Shakefpeare, in order to afcertain its real ex¬ tent. It could not be queftioned that he was acquainted with the hiftory and mythology of the ancients, but it was ftill a matter of difpute from what fources that acquaint¬ ance was derived. To obviate this difficulty, Mr Far¬ mer’s knowledge of books enabled him to demonftrate, that tranflations of the far greater part of claffical authors wrere to be met with in the time of the celebrated dra- matift ; and as he proved that Shakefpeare had even copied the blunders and errors of fuch tranllations, he made it manifeft beyond the poffibility of a rational doubt, that he was wholly incapable of confulting the originals. This effay palled through three editions in a very Ihort time ; was much admired for the fprightli- nefs of its compolition, and the generality were perfuaded that he had fully eftabliffied his point. This performance brought him fo much into notice, as to become extremely favourable to his profeffional advancement. By the intluence of Biihop Hurd, he pro¬ cured the chancellorihip and a prebend in the cathe¬ dral of Lichfield, and in 1755 he was elefted mailer of Emanuel college, and took the degree of D. D. He was foon after conilituted principal librarian to the uni- veriity, and ferved in turn the office of vice-chancellor. He w7as made prebendary of Canterbury by Lord North, at that time prime minifter, and Mr Pitt made him twice' an offer of a biffiopric •, but the conllraints and folemnity of the epifcopal charafler were not congenial to his natural temper, on which account he declined the offer, and having refigned his office as prebendary, he ac¬ cepted of a refidentiaryffiip of St Paul’s. T.his obliged him to refide three months annually in London, which he fpent with pleafure and advantage in the company of literary characters. From nature he inherited a fund of good humour, and wras of fuch an obliging turn, that he buried party fpirit in the fatisfaftion which he found in the performance of beneficent aClions. Though in general an enemy to reforms of any kind, and anxious to preferve things as they were, both in church and Hate, he was inftrumental in amending the police of Cam¬ bridge, efpecially as it related to the paving and light¬ ing of the ftreets. At his mitigation alfo, monumental fculpture was admitted into the cathedral of St Paul’s, which will continue to exhibit a linking proof of national gratitude, and ferve to cover the nakednefs of $he walls, Farmer It was at one time the intention of Dr Farmer to pub- liffi a hiltory of the town and antiquities of Leicelter, parJ'ibi^ the expences to be defrayed by fubfcription j but either his independent circumltances, or a degree of native in¬ dolence, made him relinquiffi the delign, and the few materials he had collected were given to Mr John Nichols, at that time engaged in an elaborate work on the fame fubjeCt. After a painful illnefs of fome length. Dr Farmer died at Emanuel college in the month of September, 1797, in the 62d year of his age. Dr Parr wrote an epitaph for his tombltone, in which we find the following teftimony to his worth. “ Vir facetus et dulcis, feltique fermonis, Grace et Latine doCtus, in ex- plicanda veterum Anglorum poefi fubtilis et elegans.” He had a confiderable library, in which were a valt number of books purchafed at the Halls of London, and afterwards difpofed of for much more than they colt. Farmer, in mining, is the lord of the field, or one that farms the lot and cope of the king. FARN islands, two groups of little illands and rocks, 17 in number, lying oppofite to Bamborough cattle in Northumberland. At low water the points of feveral others are vifible befides the 17 juft mention¬ ed. The neareit ifland to the ffiore is called the Houfe- iJlanJ, and lies exaCtly one mile and 68 chains from the coaft. The molt diftant is about feven or eight miles. Their produce is kelp, feathers, and a few feals, which the tenant watches and (hoots for the fake of the oil and (kins. Some of them yield a little grafs that may ferve to feed a cow or two , which the people tranf- port over in their little boats. The largeft or Houfe- ifland is about one mile in compafs, and has a fort and a lighthoufe. It contains about fix or (even acres of rich pafture j and the ffiore abounds with good coals which are dug at the ebb of tide. St Cuthbert is faid to have patted the two laft years of his life on this ifland. A priory of BenediCtines was afterwards efta¬ bliffied here, for fix or eight monks, fubordinate to Durham. A fquare tower, the remains of a church, and fome other buildings, are ftill to be leen on this ifland ; and a ftone coffin, which is pretended to be that of St Cuthbert. At the north end of the ifle is a deep chalm, from the top to the bottom of die rock, communicating with the fea $ through which, in tempeftuous weather, the water is forced with great violence and noife, and forms a fine jet u eau of 60 feet high. It is called by the inhabitants of the oppofite coaft, the Churn. One of the iflands in the molt diftant group is called the Pinnac/es, from fome vaft columnar rocks at the fouth end, even at their fides, flat at the tops, and entirely covered with guillemots and ffiags. The fowlers pafs from one to the other of thefe columns by means of a board, which they place from top to top, forming a narrow bridge over fuch a dreadful gap that the very fight of it ftrikes one wuth horror. FARN ABIE, Thomas, fon of a carpenter at London, born in 1575, (laid a ffiort while at Oxford j where being enticed to abandon his religion, he went to Spain, and was there educated in a college belong¬ ing to the Jefuits. Being weary of their fevere difci- pline, he went with Sir John Hawkins and Sir Francis Drake in their laft voyage in 1395. He was after- v-ards a foldier in the Low Countries : but being redu¬ ced i'arnham, Farnovians. FAR t 4I’f 3 FAR ded to great want, returned to England, wbere wan¬ dering about for feme time under the name of Thomas Bainrafe, the anagram of his name, he fettled at Mat¬ tock in Somerfetlhire, and taught a grammar-fehool with good reputation. He removed to London, and opened a fchool with large accommodations for young gentlemen. While he taught this fchool, he was made mailer of arts at Cambridge, and incorporated into the univerfity of Oxford. Thence he removed, in 1636, to Seven-oaks in Kent} and taught the fons of feveral noblemen and gentlemen, who boarded with him, with great fuccefs, and grew rich. His wrorks gained him reputation. Upon the breaking out of the civil com¬ motions in 1641* he w’tis call into prifon. It wra^s de¬ bated in the houfe of commons, whether he ihould be fent to America \ but this motion being rejected, he was removed to Ely-houfe in Holborn, and there he died in 1647. htr Farnabie was a tfery eminent gram¬ marian j and many writers have fpoken with great ap¬ probation of his labours. M. Bayle in particular fays, His rtotes upon liiott of the ancient Latin poet& have been of very great ufe to young beginners $ being thort, learned, and defigned chiefly to clear up the text. FARNHAM, or Fernham ; a town of Surry, and capital of the hamlet of its own name, 41 miles from London on the Wmcheiter road. It is a large popu¬ lous place, fituated on the river Wey, and fuppofed to have its name from the fern which abounded here. ^It was given by the Weft Saxon king E.tnelbald to the fee of Winchefter ; the bifhops of which have general¬ ly refided in the caftle here, in the fummer time, ever fince the reign of King Stephen, whofe brother, its then bifliop, firft built it It rvas a magnificent iirudlure, wdth deep moats, ftrong Avails and towers at proper diftances, and a fine park \ but it is much decayed. The town, which has many handfome houfes, and wrell ]paA'«d ftreets, is governed by 1 2 mafters or burgedes, of Avhom two are bailiffs, (chofen annually). 1 hey have the profit of the fairs and markets, and the aflize of bread and beer j and hold a court every three weeks, which has power of trying and determining all aclions under 40s. From Michaelmas to Chnftmas here is a good market for oats $ and one of the greateft wheat markets in England, efpecially between All-Saints day and mid-fummer. The toll-difti here Avas once reckon¬ ed worth 200I. a-year •, but it is much diminiftied, fince the people about Chichefter and Southampton be¬ gan to fend their meal to London by fea. But this lofs is amply made up by the vaft growth m hops here, of which there are 300 or 400 acres of plantations a- bout this town, and they are faid to outdo the Kentilh hop-yards both in quantity and quality. I his town fent members to parliament in the reign of Edward II. but never fince. The magiftrates have their privileges from the bi/hop of Winchefter, to whom they pay an ■acknowdedgment of I2d. a-yefcr. The market is on Thurfday : fairs, Holy Thurfday, June a!} and Novem¬ ber 2. Here are a free fchool, and a great market for Welfti bofe. c n. c FARNOVIANS, m ecclefiaftical hiftory, a feet of Socinians, fo called from Staniflaus Farnbvius, Avho fe- parated from the other Unitarians in the year 1 'jbB, and was folloAved by feveral perfons eminent for their learning. This feft did not laft long •, for having loft their chief, who died in 1615, it 'vvas fcattered Vol. VIII. Part II. abroad and reduced to nothing. Famovius Avas enga¬ ged by Goneftus to prefer the Arian fyftem to that ot the Socinians, and confequently afferted, that Chriit had been produced out of nothing by the Supreme Be¬ ing before the creation of this tetreftrial globe. His fentiments concerning the Holy Ghoit are not certainly knoAvn j however, it appears that he warned his difei- ples againft paying the tribute of religious Avorlhip to the Divine Spiriu FARQUHAR, George, an ingenious poet and dramatic wTriter, the fon of a clergyman in Ireland, Avas born at Londonderry in 1678. He Avas fent to Trinity College, Dublin j but his volatile difpofition not relifhing a college life, he betook himfelf to the Ua *e *, where, haA'ing dangeroufly wounded a brother-affor m a tragic feene, by forgetting to change his fword for a foil, it fhocked him fo much that he left the Dublin thfeatre and went to London. Here he procured a lieu- tenant’s commiftion by the intereft of the earl of Or rery ", which he held leveral years, and gave manv proofs both of courage and conduct. In 1698, he wrote his firft comedy called Love and a Bottle 5 w7hich, for its fprightly dialogue and buiy feenes, was well re¬ ceived* In the beginning of the year I'joo, whicn Avas the jubilee year at Rome, he brought out his Conitant Couple, or a Trip to the Jubilee : and fuited Mr Wilks’s talents fd well in the charackr of Sir Harry Wildair, that the player gained almoft as much reputation as the Doet* This tempteci him to continue it m snotncA comedy called Sir Harry W^ildair, or Lhe fequel ot the Trip to the Jubilee ; in which Mrs Oldfield acquired great applaufe. In IJ0 2, he publilhed his Milcella- nies, which contain a A'ariety of humorous tallies of fancy. In 1703* appeared the Inconftant, or the Way to Win him : in i704> a farce called the Stagc-coach in 1705, The Twin Rival? j and in 1706, the Recruit¬ ing Orticer, founded on his own obfervations Avhile on a recruiting party at Shrewfbury. His laft comecy AA’as the Beaux Stratagem, of which he did not live to enjoy the full fuccefs. Mr Farquhar married in 17^3; Before that time his manner of life had been rather dif- fipated. The lady, therefore, who afterwards became his Avife, having fallen violently in love with him, but judging that a gentleman of his humour would not ea- ftly be draivn into the trammels of matrimony, contri¬ ved to have it given out that (he was poffeffed of a large fortune ; and finding means aftenvards to let Mr Far¬ quhar knoAV her attachment to him, intereft and A'anity got the better of his paffion for Aioerty, ana the lady and he Avere united in the hymeneal bands. But how great was his difappointment, when he found afl his profpedfts overclouded fo early in lue (for he wa^ then no more than 24), by a marriage from which he had nothing to expect but an annual increaie of family, and an enlargement of expence in confequence of it far be¬ yond what his income would lupport. V et, to bis ho¬ nour be it told, though he found himfelf thus deceived in a moft eflential particular, he never was- known once to uphtaid his Avife with it ; but -gencroully forgave an impofition which love for him alone had urged her to, and even behaved to her with all the tendernefs and de¬ licacy of the moft indulgent hufband. Mrs harquhar, however, did not very long enjoy the Happiness ihe had purchafed by this ftratagem •, for the eircumftances that attended this union were in fome refpect perhaps the 3 G meafts FAR [ 4L Farquhar. means of fhortening the period of the captain’s life, v-"—' ;Forj finding himfelf confiderably involved in debt in confequence of their increafing family, he was induced to make application to a certain noble courtier, who had frequently profeffed the greateft friendlhip for him, and given him the ftrongeit alfurances of his intended fervices. This pretended patron repeated his former declarations j but, expreffing much concern that he had nothing at prefent immediately in his power, advifed him to convert his commiflion into money to anfwer his prefent occafions, and allured him that in a Ihort time he would procure another for him. Farquhar, who could not bear the thoughts of his wife and family being in diftrefs, followed this advice, and fold his com- FARR INTRODUCTION. I Origin of rT',HE term farrier is probably a corruption of fcrrier, •oAtrv*1 Er.^/ernznx, from the verb ferrer, to Jhoe a horfe ; ' all thefe words being derived from the Latin ferrum, “ irony There is no doubt that the word farrier was at firft ufed to denote a perfon who Ihod horfes, but as thefe perfons were for a long period the only horfe- cloBors, the term was foon ufed in the more extenlive fenfe of horfe-doBor or horfe-leech ; and hence far¬ riery came to lignify the art of curing the difeafes of horfes. There can be little doubt that the word farrier was originally fpelt ferrier or ferrer; as we meet with this latter orthography in fome of our older writers. Thus Blundeville,who wrote in the time of Queen Elizabeth, in his “ Addrefs to the Gentlemen of England,” book iv. has the following fentence. “ All horfes, for the moll part, do come into their decay, fooner than they Ihould do, by one of thefe four waies j that is to fay, either for lacke of being well bred, or through the rafhnefs of the rider, the negli¬ gence of the keeper, or elfe through the unlkilfulneffe of the ferrery Again, the fame author mentions, “ Martin Ghelly of Alton, called Martin Alman, chiefe ferrer to the a. queen’s magiftie.” v'eterinary Farriery, in the ufual acceptation of the word, forms only a part of that more general art, which has been commonly called the veterinary art; by which is under- llood the art of medicine as applied tq the inferior ani¬ mals, which has been long called by the French /’ art veterinaire, or medicine veterinaire. This word veteri¬ nary is of very ancient date, being derived from'the Latin veterinarius, which is ufed by Columella to de¬ note a horfe-doclor, or cattle-doBor. The term veteri¬ nary, being derived from veterinus, qu. veheterinus, a vehendo, carrying, is properly applicable only to beafts of burden •, but veterinary medicine is now commonly employed in a more comprehenlive fenfe, to denote the art of curing the difeafes of domejlic animals in general. Term ex- The French, who appear to have firlt ufed the term Sended. in this general fenfe, ufually diftinguilh that part of the ajt v^hich we call farriery by the appellation of Hip- 8 ] FAR million j but, to his great mortification and difappoint- Farrier. ment, found, on a renewal of his application to this in- w— human nobleman, that he had either entirely forgotten, or had never intended to perform, the promife he had made him. This diilrafting frullration of all his hopes fixed itfelf fo ftrongly on our author’s mind, that it foon brought on him a lure, though not a very fudden, de- clenfion of nature, which at length carried him off the ftage of life in 1707, before he arrived at 30 years of age.—His comedies are fo diverting, and the charadlers fo natural, that his plays ftill continue to be repre- fented to full houfes. FARRIER, one whofe employment is to Ihoe hor¬ fes, and cure them when difeafed or lame. I E R Y. piatrique, from a horfe, and phyjiciatu ■ Thus, they have a Cours d'HippiatriqUe, a Diciionaire d'Hippiatrique, &c.. As there are confiderable advantages attending the confideration of the difeafes of the feveral domeftic ani¬ mals in the fame treatife, we propofe, in the prefent article, not to confine ourfelves to the medical treatment of tire horfe, but to extend our views to the difeafes of Rich other of the domellic animals, as are of moll im¬ portance to man, particularly the ox, Iheep, and dog. The difeafes of the hbrfe, as they are better known, and more interefting, than thofe of the other domellic animals, will of courfe occupy the greatelt lhare of our attention. The difeafes of the dog have been as yet too little inveftigated for us to give a very fatisfadtory ac¬ count of them } but as the fubjeCl of veterinary medi¬ cine has of late been much cultivated, it is probable that thefe, as well as fome other obfeure difeafes of ani¬ mals, may ere long receive fome elucidation. If any confiderable improvements or difeoveries lhall be made before the completion of our work, we lhall notice them under Veterinary medicine. It may be thought, that, confidering veterinary medi- Obje&ioirr cine in this extenfive point of view, it would have been anfwered*. more corredl to defer the fubje£t to the article Veteri¬ nary j but moll of our readers who have been ac- cuftomed to fee in our dictionary the article Farriery, will expeft an account of, at leaft, the difeafes of the horse, under this article, and would probably not be pleafed to have this delayed till nearly the end of the work y befides, it is of little importance under which article the difeafes of animals are treated of, as, when we have once defined our terms, wTe cannot be mif- underftood, provided we always employ them in the fenfe of the definition. Again, as the term veterinary has departed from its original lignification, there can be no objeftion to our employing the vrord farriery, a term that is more familiar, in the fame general fenfe. In fad, it has been fo employed by a late writer on the fubjeCl, Mr Feron, who has entitled his wTork, “A new Syllem of Farriery,” though he profefles to treat in it of*the horfe, ox, and Iheep. In this article, then, wre lhall ufe farriery as fynony- mpus writh veterinary art, and lhall confider both as the Inportance of the fub- je<3 6 To the ve¬ terinary pra<5lition- 7 To the farmer and country gentleman. 8 To the me¬ dical prac¬ titioner. FARR t/ie art of preferring the health and curing the difeafes of domeftic animals. 'i^he ftudy of veterinary medicine muft be an intereft- ing objedt to every perfon, whofe profeflion, or iituation in fociety, requires him to attend to the comforts and difeafes of domeftic animals. To the veterinary pra&itioner, the ftudy of the prin¬ ciples of his art, the hiftory of the difeafes which he is called on to relieve, and the methods of treating them that have been found moft fuccefsful, are as effential, as the ftudy of the human economy, and the difeafes to which it is expofed, are to the medical praftitioner. A farrier who has ftudied his art fcientifically, is as much fuperior to the ignorant empiric, to whofe mercy the lives and limbs of horfes and cattle are ufually intruft- ed j as the regular phyfician to the illiterate quack, who puffs off his pernicious noftrums in every news¬ paper, and enriches himfelf, by impoftng on the credu¬ lity and folly of the public. The neceffity of a regular education to the farrier, as well as to the furgeon or phy¬ fician, which had long been feen, has led to the inftitu- tion of veterinary fchools ; at firft in France, and with¬ in thefe few years in England. Of thefe we ftiall pre- fently give an account. To the farmer and country gentleman this fubjecl rmift be highly interefting. They will find their ac¬ count in being able themfelves to fuperintend the ma¬ nagement of their horfes, dogs, fheep, and cattle, fo as beft to preferve their health, and relieve their difeafes, without relying implicitly on their grooms, huntfmen, and farriers, herdfmen and cattle-doftors, who are pro¬ bably, either notorioufly ignorant, or are induced from interefted views, or a fellow-feeling, to prolong the cure, and pick the pockets of their mafters (a). Thefe gentlemen therefore cannot employ a part of their leifure time to greater advantage than in acquiring a knowledge of the difeafes of domeftic animals. The medical pradlitioner who wifhes to derive an advantage from analogy in fome of the obfcure difeafes to which the human frame is fubjeft, and wdiich would probably receive confiderable elucidation from a com- parifon with fimilar difeafes that affefl the inferior ani¬ mals, muft engage with peculiar intereft, in a refearch that promifes fo w-ell to repay his labour. “ It is not a little remarkable, (fay the editors of a wcll-condmfted medical journal), that the difeafes of horfes, cattle, and flieep, which occur fo frequently, and are fo ferioufly lamented, (hould be fo imperfectly underftood. No greater benefit could be conferred on phyfical fcience than a complete hiftory of the difeafes of our domeftic animals, efpecially if given by any one endowed by na¬ ture with fuperior acutenefs, and a talent for obferva- tion, improved by habit and experience *, who could defcribe the fymptoms and appearances of the different diforders, point out the analogies wdth thofe incident to the human body, deteCt thofe minute circumftances I E R Y, 419 which ferve to diftinguiih them, clafs them under their IntroHuc- proper heads, and correct all the confuiion in which , they now lie involved. Veterinary medicine has lately occupied fome fhare of attention, chiefly as relating to horfes, and as a diftinct purfuit from the general ftudy of all the difeafes of animals, but confidered apart from any relation or inquiry concerning the treatment of the morbid ftates of the human fyrtem. It is in this laft point of view, that comparative pathology feems to 1 ^ 'fn<* rr r r . • n , 1 • n •r • , 1 Sur.Journ. oner 10 many luDjects worthy mveltigation j and, .whenv,j j looked upon in this light, it ftrikes us as one of thofe p. 440. itudies qua: ad nos pertinent, et qace nefcire malum ejl*. 9 We (hall fee, from the hiftorical {ketch of farriery, Farriery which will immediately be given, that the art never ™u<:h ln" made any confiderable progrefs, or affirmed any thing like a fcientific form, till it attracted the attention ofiritn> men who had made the human economy their ftudy. Almoft the only rational improvements, that have been made in the art, were either fuggefted or carried into cffecl by medical men 5 and nothing will contribute fo much to its perfection as the intereft which the profeflion has lately {hewed to it, and the attention that has of late been paid to the ftudy of comparative anatomy and pathology. _ .is The healing art in general muft profit by this. Analogy There is not only an intimate connection between the het„ ftruflure of man and that of the inferior animals 5 but, , efpecially in thofe that have been domefticated, the dif-0f anjma[s> eafes of both are nearly allied. The murrains, that in the early part of the laft cen¬ tury fo frequently attacked the horned cattle through¬ out almoft all Europe, nearly depopulating moft of the farms, are very analogous to fome of the epidemic dif¬ eafes of man ; and peftilential difeafes among cattle, have not unfrequently been the forerunners of fimilar epidemics among the human race. Homer, in de- fcribing the plague that haraffed the Grecian camp, in confequence of the affront given by Agamemnon to the prieft of Apollo, fays that the domeftic animals were firft affefled. Ovgvxs ftw vgcolcv i7rd%Clo. xou xv'jx; dgyaj, Avlai> i/refl ccirrew /SsAes epttis, II. i. 50. “ On mules and dogs th’ infe&ion firft began, “ And laft the vengeful arrows fix’d in man.” Pope. The plague of boils that raged among the Egyptians (Exod. ix. 10.) affefted both man and beaft. Similar inftances are related both by facred and profane hifto- rians. Almoft the whole tribe of inflammations, even the gout (according to Van Swieten), are found to affedf the domeftic animals, are produced by the fame caufes, 3 G 2 and (a) It may be thought by fome, that we have gone too far in accufing the farriers and grooms, &c. of having a fellow-feeling ; but, when it is known,, that “ a part of every {hilling paid to common farriers, is in jbme fhape returned to the groom, as a fee or perquifite j” that “ the fervant receives at leaft five per cent, froth the farrier on every bill paid by his mailer $” and that “ if a horfe dies under the care of a farrier, he generally be¬ comes the property of the groom j” (See Veterinary Tranfa&ions, N° 1. Introduction) j it will be allowed that there is Ernie ground for the furmife. IT A farrier Oiouid be acquainted ■with me¬ dicine. FARR and yield to the fame treatment as in the human fyftem. Domeftic animals are fubjeft to eruptive difeafes, both chronic, and fuch as are attended with fever ; and both are very fimilar to thofe by which man is affected. It is pretty certain that the fmallpox fometimes rages among flieep, as we fhall fee hereafter-, and a com- pla'nt very like the mealies often attacks fwine. Some of them are transferable to man and to this trans¬ ference in the cafe of the cowpox, a bleffing which will render immortal the name of JENNER, we owe the probable annihilation of one of the moft dreadful peffs that ever affedled the human race. Scrofula and confumption attack monkeys. Apo¬ plexy, epilepfy, and many others of what are called ner¬ vous difeafes, indigeftion, and even mental derangement, are not uncommon among domeftic animals \ fpafmodic affeflions are very frequent among them, and it is faid, that for one cafe of tetanus or locked jaw among the human fpecies in thefe climates, there are ten or twenty among horfes. The analogy might be purfued much farther ; but what has been ftated is fufficient to ftiew the advantages that medical men may derive from the ftudy of veteri¬ nary medicine. Many obfeure and dangerous difeafes may thus in time be illuftrated or mitigated j and the effeft of doubtful remedies may be afeertained by ex¬ periments on the inferior animals. For, though there are a few inftances of different efte&s following the ex¬ hibition of the fame medicines in man and animals ybt, on the whole, the analogy is nearly as complete with refpedft to remedies as difeafes (b). It will appear, from what has been faid, that the reafoning, and much of the treatment, in the difeafes of animals mull be nearly the fame as in man, and, of courfe, that the veterinary practitioner will gain much by acquiring a knowledge of human medicine. Were the practitioners in farriery generally inftruCted in the principles of medicine, little more would be required, in a treatife on farriery, than to point out the difference in the ftruCture and functions of domeftic animals, to de- feribe the difeafes peculiar to thefe, and to mark the varieties that it is neceffary to obferve in the treatment of difeafe and the adminiftratiem of remedies. But, as many of thefe gentlemen have not the opportunity of attending medical leCtures, and moft of them have not received an education that would enable them to under- iland the language in which medical writings are ufual- ly’compofed j it becomes neceffary in. a treatife of this kind to accommodate the language to the tafte and capacity of general readers, and to introduce much that will be found in other articles on fubjeds jconneft- ed with medicine. To prevent repetition, as much as poftible, and to avoid fwelling this article to a greater length than is neceffary, we lhall, however, where the i E R Y. fimilarity of the fubjecl will admit of it, occailonally Introduc* refer to fome of the medical articles in this didionary. , tl°n- , The fuccefsful praCtice of farriery, like that of me- I2 dicine in general, requires that the praClitioner fhould Knowledge poffefs a confiderable fhare of knowledge. It is not fuf- requifite fof ficient to have been long in the habit of managing ve^e^‘ borfes and cattle j this indeed, to a perfon of a ftrong mind, and attentive obfervation, will furniih a coulider- able number of faCts, with ref^eCl to the fymptoms and progrefs of the difeafes to which domeftic animals are fubjeCt. But, to mark the minute differences between fuch as referable each other, to inveftigate their caufes, and to contrive a rational mode of treatment, requires a much greater Ihare of abilities, and much mor^ ex- tenfive information, than we can exped to find among grooms and fhepherds, or falls to the lot of moft of thofe, w-ho call themfelves farriers and cattle-dodors. It muft be obvious to every thinking mind, that no Anatomy pradice either in medicine or farriery can be rational, phyk-* but fuch as is founded on a comprehenfive knowledge0 °§1' of the ftrudure and fundions of thofe animals, the treatment of whofe difeafes is the objed of that prac¬ tice. The firft thing, therefore, neceffary to the vete¬ rinary praditioner is, to acquire fome idea of the ana¬ tomical ftrudure of the domeliic animals. We have al¬ ready, in the fecond part of the article Anatomy, giv¬ en a general account of the ftrudure of quadrupeds j and in exemplifying this, in the chapter on the ana¬ tomy of a dog, we pointed out the moft ftriking pecu¬ liarities that are to be found in this animal , as we have done with refped to ruminating animals, viz. the cow and ftieep, in the fucceeding chapter of that part. To that article we muft refer our readers for the anatomical part of our fubjed, as far as relates to the ox, the flieep, and the dog. It will naturally be ex- peded, that a defeription of the ftrudure of the horfe ftiould be given in this article but this defeription muft, in general, be concife, as the nature of our plan prevents us from enlarging on the fubjed, excepting in thofe parts where a pretty minute knowledge appears to be neceffary. Thofe who wifti to ftudy the anatomy of the horfe minutely, may eonfult Vitet’s Medicine Veterinaire-, tom. i. 5 Blaine’s Outlines, and Stubb’s elegant work- on the anatomy of the horfe. The praditioner fhould take every opportunity of in- fpeding the bodies of thofe animals that die of difeafes, which are very important, or which are not very well underftood. Morbid diffedions often throw confider- able light on the nature and treatment of difeafes j and it fortunately happens, that with refped to domeftic animals, thefe diffedions are very eafy, and are not ob- ftruded by thofe abfurd prejudices, which, efpecially in this country, are oppofed to the diffedion of human bo¬ dies. In treating of the difeafes of domeftic animals, in a / F> j One of the moft remarkable cafes of anomaly in the effed of remedies is that of arfenic, which, in the quantity of a few grains will prove a deadly poifon to man and moft animals, but may be given vith impunity to . Jborfes to the amount of two drams or more. The ftory of the different effeds of antimony, on hogs and monks, is well known. See Antimony. As to the example of white vitriol, (fulphate of zinc), which proves emetic in the human fubjed, but produces no fuch effed in the horfe 5 it is owing to the different ftrudure of the ftomach in this animal, by which he is incapable of vomiting. Colocynthis, or hitter apple, is well known to be a molt violent purgative to man, but in the horfe it has produced no effed, in the enormous dofe oifour ounces*. FARRIERY. Introduc¬ tion. 14 Natural feiltory. *5 Giemiftry a future part of this article, we (hall give a concife view of the appearances on diiledlion, as far. as tney have been afcertained, whenever they tend to illuftrate the nature, caufes, or treatment of the difeafe under confideration. . The ftudy of the functions of domeftic animals ought to go hand in hand with that of their ftruaure j and the ftudent will hnd it of confiderable advantage to compare the funftions of thefe animals with thofe of mam This comparative view will be given in fome fu¬ ture article. In the prefent treatife, we can only/peak of the functions of domeftic animals, as fat as it is ne- ceffary to illuftrate the nature or the treatment of their ' The natural hiftory of thefe animals ought to form a. part of the ftudies of the veterinary practitioner. It is a fubiedt that is not only highly curious and intereft- ing, but extremely ufeful. We find, that thefe ani¬ mals, in their native fields, enjoy a ftate of health and vigour, which is interrupted only by thofe accidents to which a life of liberty and wildnefs may expofe them. It is only when they are received under the protection of man,* that they become fubject to difeafe. It is therefore an interesting inquiry, to examine into their native habits •, as, in our endeavours to preferve their health, we ihould, as nearly as is compatible with conve¬ nience’and economy, imitate the habits that are found to prevail amongft thefe animals in a ftate of nature. It is the province of the naturalift to defcribe the external con¬ formation of thefe animals, and the advantages, and de¬ feats dependant on it, that fit or diiqualify them for the various purpofes, for which they are deftined^ under the fervice of man; it is his bufmefs to defcribe the methods of breeding thefe animals- in a ftate of nature, and how far this may be improved for the purpofes of domeftication, and to detail the method of training and managing them. Many of thefe circumftances are treated of by fome of the writers on the veterinary art, in a complete fyftem of which they ought not proper¬ ly to be omitted. We (hall, however, not treat of them in this article, as, according to the plan of our work, they more properly fall to be confidered under the ar¬ ticle Mammalia, in which will be given the natural hiftory of all quadrupeds. Chemiftry muft form a neceffary part of the ftudies of every man who engages in the praftice of medicine, whether human or veterinary, as, without a knowledge of its principles, neither the funftions of the animal economy, the intimate ftrufture of its component parts, nor the aftion of many remedies, can be properly un- derftood. In the article Chemistry, we have pre¬ pared abundant matter for the reader to make himfelf acquainted with the elements of that admirable fci- 42? immediately after treating 01 the anatomy of the horfe. ' J It is of confiderable confequemce, that the perion ^ who undertakes the management ot domeftic animals, Hygeiology ihould make himfelf acquainted with thofe circumftan¬ ces which experience has (hewn to be moil favourable to the prefervation of their health, and the prevention of their difeafes. This fubjeft forms what may be cal¬ led veterinary hygeiology ; and will be. confidered at fome length in the fourth part of this article. iS Before the praftitioner can attempt to remove or al-Matena leviate the difeafes to which-domeftic animals aie fuo- v jeft, he muft acquire a competent knowledge of the re¬ medies employed for that purpofe, their nature, ufes, and dofes, as adapted to the different animals, in vari¬ ous fituations, and various difeafes ; with the methods of preparing and compounding them into, the leveral forms that are ufually employed *, and with the beft means of adminiftering them. This comprehends what is called the veterinary materia medico7 and will form the fubjeft of our fifth part. With this previous knowledge, the veterinary flu- lattice, dent is prepared to enter on the confideration of the difeafes, which will be treated of in the fixth part of our article. He muft be particularly attentive to the fymptoms of each difeale, as, on an accurate knowledge of thefe, will depend the means of diftinguiftiing thofe complaints, which upon a fuperficial view.bear con- fiderable refemblance to each other, but which require a very different, and perhaps oppoiite mode, of treat¬ ment. He muft attend to the greater or lefs violence of thefe fymptoms, to the nature of the. part which they attack, and to the greater or leis rapidity of their progrefs ; as thefe circumftances muft confiderably in¬ fluence the judgment he is to form of the danger, and probable termination, of the difeale. He muft, as far as poflible, inveftigate the caufes, that appear to have produced the difeafe in queftion, or which leem to- ag¬ gravate or keep up the morbid fymptoms } as on the removal or mitigation of thele caufes, muft depend the only rational and fcientific method of cure. Laltly, he muft make himfelf acquainted with the treatment that experience has found moft fuccefsful in the cure of each particular difeale, as well as with tnat which haS been found to be attended with little or no advan- tage. # _ As the proper means of attaining the beft informa¬ tion is of the greateft importance, we fhall here give Mr Blaine’s inftruftions on this point. u The mode in which any art is attained, muft be in a. great meafure direfted by the future views of the. It appears to me that there are three diitinft 16 Surgery. ence. ners. The praftitioner, whether of human or veterinary me¬ dicine, who is a proficient in anatomy, wants but a little manual dexterity, and fome praftical experience, to make him a tolerable furgeon. The operations to be performed on brutes are few, and thefe are in general very clumfily executed. Humanity, however, as well 3s prudence, will readily point out to the farriei tne ne- celfity of learning the beft methods of performing thele operations with dexterity and defpatch, fo as to give the leaft pain to the unfortunate animals that are placed under his care. We fhall defcribe \he ufual operations clafies of perfons, who are likely to ftudy this.branch of ufeful knowledge. The firft are perfons of enlarged minds, and extended fortunes. I he fecond are bur¬ geons, whofe fituation in country villages may render their fervices in this art highly ufeful, upon occafions when no farrier is at hand, or, in the end, in cafes in which farriers of the common clafs are unable to judge. The third are farriers themfelves, or perfons intending to profefs veterinary medicine. Gentlemen and amateurs, who wifh to accumulate information on this curious and interefting fubjeft, within the reach of the veterinary college, will find their account in attending a courfe of leftures there y it not-, 422 FARR IntroduC- not, they fliould apply themfelves to the ftudy of the , tl°n' more general parts of the body, both of the human and animal 5 the latter, I hope, they may attain by the fol¬ lowing (beets. They may diredl the collar-maker, huntfman, or tanner, to cut up their dead horfes in their prefence. They may (tudy phyfiology in a plea- fant and interefling manner, from the ingenious work on this fubjeft by Mr Saumarez. The lighter parts of the veterinary art may be acquired with pleafure, from the elegant publication of Mr Richard Lawrence of Birmingham, and a courfe of chemiftry will amply re¬ ward them (or their pains in acquiring it. “ A good furgeon has travelled three-fourths of the road towards making a good veterinarian, but he rnuft diligently travel the remainder to arrive at excellence. He mud by no means fit down contented with the ana¬ logy between the human and brute ; which, if he does, will lead him into very great error 5 for though this analogy is in mod cafes very driking, yet there are others in which the fimilarity fails, and he is left to aft upon other principles. Hence in thofe difeafes that are conquered or mitigated by vomiting in the human 5 in the horfe he muft-purfue another mode of treatment. In acute difeafes removed by purging in the human, his attempts on the horfe would probably fail j as before the effefts were produced, the animal might be pad re¬ lief. It mud be remembered that the operations of me¬ dicines are very different in the one, and the other. It is not fufficient that a furgeon has an intimate acquain¬ tance with the human framej he mud be equally conver- fant with the animal he treats, or he will treat in vain ; particularly thofe difeafes originating in a peculiarity of form from the human, as all the difeafes of the feet. He (houldmake himfelf particularly converfant with the fpecific difeafes of the horfe, which bear no analogy to any thing in the human body ; as farcy, glanders, llrangles, greafe, &c. From the great drength of the arterial iydem, he mud ever be aware how prone the difeafes of the horfe are to a rapid termination, and hence that his treatment mud be decifive and energetic •, therefore, in all cafes, he mud be very attentive to diagnodics. But what will much embarrafs a furgeon in praftifing the veterinary art, will be a want of knowledge of the general ufages, nomenclature, and idiom, if I may fo exprefs it, among grooms and farriers ; without an ac¬ quaintance with which, thefe people at once deleft and defpife the praftitioner. It diould be the bufinefs there¬ fore of the furgeon, with his other acquifitions, to learn their manners, and to make himfelf acquainted with their terms. X lie third clafs of perfons, either farriers already praftifing, or perfons intending to praftife, will eafily gain that. When it is in their poiver, I would ad- vife their taking the advantage of the veterinary col- lege } but when they cannot, I would recommend the profecution of their dudies in a regular manner. Begin by fird reading fome general defcription of the human bo¬ dy, fuch as Symond’s Anatomy, or the anatomical part of the prefent work, carefully ; let them pay atten¬ tion to the funftions and ufes of the parts, particularly where the fame ufes are brought about by a variation in drufture j this enlarges the mind, and prepares it to re¬ ceive the benefits of difleftion, which (hould now be proceeded to. Any fmall animal may be fird diffefted, to enable the learner to ufe his indruments properly. He may then proceed to diffeft the horfe with fome 4 I E R Y. authorities by him, which will affid him at fad to make Introduce out parts, but too fcrupulous an attention to numerous t'on- defcriptions will only bewilder. The neceffary indruc- ‘ tions for diffeftion, and the prefervation of parts, may be gained, by a recourfe to Poole’s Anatomical Indruc- tor, which is. profeffedly written to indraft the pupil in thefe particulars. When he is well acquainted with the appearance of the animal in health, he (hould take every opportunity of examining difeafed appear¬ ances, which are feldom wanting at the tan-yard or the kennel. He diould nowrmake himfelf acquainted more intimately with phyfiology, for which purpofe he may read Haller’s works j there is at prefent a trandation of Cuvier’s I reatife on Comparative Anatomy, which he may likewife avail himfelf of. When he has become acquainted with pathology, as at prefent received, he may perufe the older authors on farriery*, to this drould fucceed a knowledge in chemidry, preceded by an ac¬ quaintance with the materia medica $ the proper works for which he may fee by a reference to that article, and * Blaine s nothing wall now be wanting, but experience and prac- 0u*Una’ tice to perfeft him*.” vo '1- , Since the edablidrment of a veterinary fchool in Bri- Me am of tain, little is wanting to promote the progrefs and im-Promolin£a provement of the veterinary art, as far as relates to the knowl.edge difeafes of horfes. But the art, with refpeft to the me- of farner^ dical treatment of other animals, is dill in the mod de¬ plorable date of imperfeftion. Propofals have been made for improving cattle medicine j and among thefe, w*e think the following of Mr John Lawrence, entitled to attention j though, probably the propofer’s lid of works may be much improved and enlarged, by refer¬ ring to the account of authors which will be immediate- !y given. 2r Mr Lawrence’s propofal is (Imply, “ that the affair of Mr Law¬ providing the country with regular-bred furgeons, for 1 enCe'i pm- the praftice of cattle medicine, be immediately under- P°^ak taken by the agricultural focieties $ at lead, that the experiment be made by fome of the mod confiderable each fociety engaging a gentleman of that defcription’ at a fufhcient and relpeftable annual dipend. The con- traft may run in fuch form, that (hould the furgeon’s annual emolument from praftice come diort of the fiipulated dim, the deficiency (hould annually be made up by his patrons the fociety. No perfon to be engaged on any pretence, but who (hall have received the ufual education of a furgeon, and have attended the hofpitals the ufual length of time. A feleftion of Veterinary text-books to be made, and the books purchafed for the ufe of the furgeon, but to remain the property of the fociety. This may confid of Gibfon’s lad edition, two vols. Bracken, Bartlett, Ofmer, Layard, with our late w nters j and Lafoile and Bourgelat from the French with whatever may have been publilhed fince their time[ by authority of the French veterinary fchools. All the members of the fociety and their conneftions, as far as their influence may extend, to entrud the care of their difeafed animals to the furgeon appointed, at a fair and liberal charge for his attendance and medicines. The furgeon to keep a regular hidoiy of all the cafes which (hall come under his infpeftion, including the prefumed caufes and iymptoms of the difeafe, wdth the probable methods of prevention, his mode of treatment, a particu¬ lar detail of the medicines prelcnbed, their operation, with every relative and ufeful remark which may occur! A Part I. FAR R Hiftory. A clear written copy of fucli veterinary tranfaftions, to *■ 'f—1 be delivered annually, and on a certain day, to the fo- * L^r ciety» to remain at their difpofal ix ' ^ is of conliderable confequence for the praftitioner Importance to be informed of the rife and progrefs of the art of being ac-w]dch he profefles, and to be acquainted with the prin- l ; C1'pa' authors that have written on the fubjeft. We f 5 hi all here, therefore, give a brief iketch of the hiftory of Farriery, with a concife view of the writings that have I E R Y. 423 appeared from the earlieft authentic records to the pre- Hiftory. fent time (1806.) |—y—. Though we ftiall enumerate all the authors that have written profeiTedly on this fubjeft, who appear deferving of notice, 'we lliall here charadfterize only the general treatifes, referving our remarks on fuch works as have appeared on individual difeafes, &c. to that part of our treatife, in which we (hall confider thefe fubjedts. PARTI. HISTORY. *3. Early hi¬ ftory of the art very ob- feure. „ *4 Coltimella. Celius. Vegetius. *7 Ruelli’s eolledtion. THE early hiftory of farriery, as of every other art and fcience, is involved in great obfeurity. We (hall not attempt to penetrate the cloud that hangs over the ancient ftate of the art, or to fupply the want of fadls, by conjedlures, which, however rational, can lead to no certain or ufeful concluftons. There feems no doubt that in the time of Hippo¬ crates, and probably long before, the medical practi¬ tioner exercifed his office in favour of the domeftic ani¬ mals, as well as of man ; and Galen feems to have been well {killed in the knowledge and treatment of fome of the difeafes of animals. Perhaps the earlieft authentic writings on the fubjedt of the veterinary art, now extant, are to be found in the works of Columella, the celebrated Roman author on huffiandry, who, in his work De Re Rijlica, has given many feniible directions for the management of hoffes and cattle. Columella lived about the fecond'century, under the reign of the Roman emperor Tiberius, or, as fome fay, of Claudius Caefar. It is underftood that Celfus, the elegant imitator of Hippocrates, who lived fome time before Columella, wrote much on the difeafes of animals 5 but none of his waitings on this fubjeCt have furvived the general wreck of fcience and literature that accompanied the fall of the Roman empire. We have no certain accounts of any author who wrote exprdfsly on this fubjeCt earlier than Vegetius, who llouriffied, as is fuppofed, fometime in the fourth century, and probably during the reign of the em¬ peror Valentinian the third. The work of Vegetius, De Arte Veterinarian is ftill confidered as extremely valu¬ able, as it has handed down to us the only certain ac¬ count of the opinions and pra&ice of the early practi¬ tioners in this art; The body of the work appears to have been compiled from the moft celebrated Greek writers on the fubjeft. It is divided into four books j the prefaces or introductory chapters to which are written in very elegant language. An edition of Vegetius was publiffied at Bafil, in 1574 j arid the work has been tranflated into feveral modern languages. Such of our readers as wiffi for a particular account of the contents of Vegetius’s treatife, will find a copious analyfis of it, in the third volume of M. Vitet’s Medicine Veterinaire. A collection of fragments of ancient writers on the veterinary art, was made by Ruellius, phyfician to Francis I. king of France. It was firft publiffied in Latin, in the year 1530-, and afterwards, in 1637, the original Greek tvas publiffied. The y/riters who con~ tributed to this collection were chiefly Abfyrtus, Eu- melus, Hierocles, Petagonius, and Theomeftus. Some part of this collection is tolerably good} but, on the whole, it appears to be a ftrange jumble of good, bad, and indifferent, collected without judgment, and ar¬ ranged without tafte. 2s It is laid that Xenophon, who lived three or four Xenophon, hundred years before the Chriftian era, wrote a fmall treatife in twelve chapters, on the training, manage¬ ment, and external figure of horfes} but, as he fays little or nothing with refpeCt to their difeafes, he cannot properly be ranked among the writers on veterinary me¬ dicine. A blank of more than a thoufand years now occurs Dark ages, in the hiftory of farriery. During this long period of darknefs, ignorance, and barbarity, the veterinary art, like moft others, rather went back than advanced. During fome part of this gloom, however, the art of fhoeing horfes with iron appears to have been invented 5 an art which feems to have contribute 1 not a little to throw the management of this noble animal into the hands of a fet of errant blockheads, wffio wrere now firft called farriers. We cannot here enter on a difeuffion of the medical pretenfions of thefe guardians of the health of horfes. They have been amply commented on, by fome of the beft writers on the fubjeft of far¬ riery, as Gibfon, Bracken, Lafoffe, and particularly Mr John Lawrence, to wffiofe ufeful and humane trea¬ tife on horfes we refer our readers for fome very fpirited remarks on the fubjeCt, The firft modern writer on farriery, whom we can Ruini, mention, is Carlo Ruini, an Italian, who, in 1618, pub- liflied at Venice his Anatomia del Cavallo. This work, of which very few copies are now to be found, is em- belliffied with many copperplates, which, for the time when they were engraved, are very elegant. It is faid that many fucceeding writers on the anatomy of the horfe have been indebted to them for moft of their figures. 31 -> We now come to a period at which the veterinary Prog refs of art began to affume fomething of a fcientific form. I:|rn':ry Many writers of eminence began to appear both in * ‘dnCe* France and England, countries which have been the moft diftinguifhed for their attention to the manage¬ ment and difeafes of domeftic animals. As the French writers were the firft, who did any thing coniiderable towards the improvement of farriery, we {hall trace the progrefs of the art in that country, before we examine the improvements it has received in England. In 1698 Solleyfel publiffied his grand work, “ Le Solleyfel. parfah FARRIER Y- Part I. 33 Appear¬ ance of the murrain in -Europe. 34 Sauvages. 35 Eftablilh- ment of veterinary fchools. 3* Bou«gelat. barfait tiarechal? the Complete Borfemm, a work, which pained its author a high reputation, and was long the only guide, as well in farriery as m the ma- M Solleyfel was principal riding-mailer in France, this fituation led* him to pay much attention to tue difeafes of horfes •, and being a man ot conliderab . Cities, and enlightened underftandmg, he law toe errors that prevailed in his time y and his genius and experier ce led him to expoft and to correa them H. praftical obfervations and remarks, which it would be out of place to particularize m this early pert of our ar¬ ticle, in general merit conliderable attention. His ob¬ fervations on the external figure of the bor e, and of his blemilhes and defecls, are alfo very valuable. It *s much to be regretted that this ingenious author had fiot ftudied the anatomy of the horfe, as he would then have avoided many errors and much fabe re^on S» into which his ignorance of anatomy betra> e - . Solleyfel’s work palled through many editions, and was tranllated into moll of the modern languages, lion of it into Englith was executed by Sir William Hope, one of his pupils, early in the i8th centui>; The dreadful havock committed by the murrains or •epidemic difeafes among horned cattle that ravaged Europe during the firll half of the 18th century, at¬ tracted the attention of medical men, and thus led t e wav to a greater improvement m the veterinary art, than it had ever before experienced. Thele epidemic* were firll defcribed by two Italian phyficians^ Ramaz- zini, in a treatife Dc Contagione Epidermca ; and La - cifi, phyfician to the pope, m a treatife De Bovina Pejle. But the moll celebrated works on FevJum§ eP^ demic feem to have been written by the f^u 7 France. Among the firll appeared a memoir by M. Hermant, phyfician to the king. r nr i In 1746 was publilhed a memoir Sur la Mafadie Ep.- demiquedes Boeufs du Vivarais, by the celebrated no o- l08AWAe middle of this century, the *rft “'g w'£ taken towards the eftabMrment of fchools for the public inftruaion of praflitioners m farneiy. One o the mod celebrated of thefe was the veterinary college °f Over'this inftitution prefided the famous Bourgelat, an^e that will be ever refpeaable m of farriery. Befides his office of profeffor at Lyons, he .vas infpeaor general of the veterinary fchools m France •, commiffary general to the royal IHbles •, ho¬ norary member of the Royal Acad^iy of Pans and member of the Royal Academy of Berlin. M Bour¬ gelat was a voluminous writer, and moll of his vorks are IliU in much repute. In 1752, ^ P^ffied E/e- mens d'Uippiatrique, “ Elements of Farriery, o vois. The firll volume is divided into eight chapters, comprehending the knowledge of the boric, as far as regards his external form. The firft chapter treats of the denomination and divifion of the parts that compo e the body of this animal-, the fecond treats of the beauties and defe&s of the fore part of the horfe or what the French writers call I'Avant Main the third treats of the beauties and defers of the feveral parts o the body -, the fourth, of the beauties and defers of the hind part of the horfe, or PArnere Main ; the fifth, different marks of horfes the fixth, of the m«ans o'f afeertaining the age of horfc j the feventh, of the geometrical proportions of the hone , and t e eg.*, The fecond volume deferibes the anatomy of the horfe, as far as relates to the bones, the integuments, t ie mufcles, and blood-veffelsaiffi the third volume concludes the anatomy with ^ a defcnption of -he part, that conipoie the head and chell.^ f , r f In M; Bourgelat’s materia medica, for the u e ot the veterinary pupils, came cut. Soon after was pubhlhed his Elementary Treatife on the Anatomy of tne Horfe, which is the moll complete work of thd kind that has ever vet appeared. In 1766 he publilhed his Element¬ ary Botanical Demonftrations, tor the ufe or the pupil* of the veterinary college. He hkewiie gave *0 the world a treatife on bandages applicable to the hm . M. Bcurgelat alfo furniihed many tne bell articles on farriery for the French Encyclofedie. 37 Aoout this time appeared a number of works on the Buffon and manege, and on natural hiltory, particularly a work by Eaubenton. M. de la Guerincere, entitled Ecole de Uvalene, and the celebrated natural hiftory by M de Buffon and Daubenton-, but as thefe works have little connedion with the difeafes of animals, which they mention only incidentally, we (hall not h*re particularize their con- ^Contemporary with Bourgelat, and equal to him in Lafle the celebritv, flourilhed Lafoffe the Elder, a member of Elder. Royal Academy of Sciences at Pans, and fauier to the king of France. He made many difcoveneS, and introduced feveral valuable improvements in the art ot farriery, particularly an improved method of Ihoemg and a treatife on the glanders. Thefe were at fiift communicated in the form of memoirs to the Fienc academy, and publilhed in their annals. They were afterwards collected in 1754 into one volume under the title of Obfervations et Decottvertes Faitesfur des thevaux i “ Obfervations and Difcovenes on Hor es. We fliall have occafion, in future parts of our afticw, o . confider the merits of thele memoirs which were well received, and have contributed much to the advance¬ ment of farriery. The elder Lafoffe alfo wrote fome of the articles on farridry in the Encyclopedie. T f ffu 39 He was foon followed by his fon Lafoffe the L,,f0(fethl Younger, who occupied the fame poll as his_ lather, younger and has acquired much refutation, by followng his fleps, and extending his improvements. He pnouthed in j 766, his Guide de Marecha!; or Farrier s Guide , a work well known in this country though it has never, we believe, appeared in an Enghflt drefs. It is divided into five parts, treating, ill. Of the means of afeertaining the age of horfes, and a iuccma enumera¬ tion of the feveral parts; 2d, Or the blunders and tricks of farriers; 3d, Of the internal difeafes of the horfe ; 4th, Of the external difeafes, and the mod im¬ portant operations ; and, 5th, 01 ihoemg. m is charaaerized by M. Vitet as one of tne moll accu¬ rate, iimpleil, and moll/.cccVe, that had ever appeared. The anatomical part of the work is Ihort, but compre. Wive, and is illuftrated bv fome tolerably good pla es It apueats to have been a lort of text-book to a courle of leftures on farriery, which were afterwards, in 17,,, publilhed in a fuperb form, with 65 colouied plate , under the title of Ceuri de Htppmtrujue; 01 Lourle Part T. FARE. Hiftory. . 43 Garfault. 41 Ronden. *2r La maifon ruftique. Vitet. of Farriery,’? This work is extremely fcarce in Britain, where, according to Mr Blaine, there are only three copies of it 5 one of which belongs to the Medi¬ cal Society of Woolwich 5 another is in the hands of a Mr Mathaila, ci-devant pupil of the Veterinary College 5 and he believes Mr Morecroft has a third. But the principal work of the younger Lafofl'e is his Ditfionaire d' Hippiatnque, in four volumes, which is little known in this country, and which we have not feen. Mr Blaine calls it “ the bell praftical fyftem of farriery that had ever appeared.” In 1803 was publiihed an abridgement of M. Lafoffe’s Guide, of which an Englifh tranflation has lately ap¬ peared under the title of The Veterinarian’s Pocket Manual. It is a ufeful little book, but it is a pity that the author or tranflator had not obferved a more me¬ thodical arrangement. Though, for the fake of uniformity, we have men¬ tioned the younger Lafoffe immediately after his fa¬ ther ; there were many works publiihed in France be¬ tween the Memoirs and the Guide. In 1755, M. Garfault publiihed his Nouveauparfait Marechal, an improvement on the Parfait Marechal of Solleyfel. It is divided into feven treatifes j on the Conformation of the Horfe 5 on Haras, or on the Me¬ thod of Breeding; on Stables 5 on the Difeafes of Horfes $ on Operations ; on Shoeing ; and on Horfe Medicines. This work is not without defefts, but, for the moll part, it is very good, and by no means de- ferves the brief chara&er given of it by Mr Blaine in his Hiltory of the Veterinary Art, that it “ does not feem to merit any diftindtion in this place.” The articles on farriery in the Encyclopedic that had been written by Bourgelat and Genfon, called forth a wTork from M. Ronden, fenior, farrier to the larger ftables of the king •, who, in 1759, publilhed Obferva- tions fur les Articles de /’ Encyclopedic concernant la Marechallerie. They appear to be ingenious, and con¬ tain much practical information. In 1763 there appeared at Paris a work on agricul¬ ture in two volumes 4to, entitled, La Nouvelle Maifon Rufiquey which contains much ufeful matter refpedling the breeding, management, and difeafes of domeftic animals, as well fowls as quadrupeds. The contagious epidemics among horned cattle Hill appeared occalionally in France and other parts of Europe j and many eflfays were written on them by va-. rious phylicians, particularly by M. Bovand of Befan- 9011, in 1766; by M. Leclerc and M. Barbaret, of Paris, in the fame year. In 1768 Daubenton, the celebrated naturalilf, al¬ ready mentioned, publiihed a memoir on the mechanifm of rumination in Iheep ; and in 1769, appeared a fmall volume entitled La Medicine des Betes a Laine ; 11 the Medical Treatment of Sheep.” Between 1776 and 1782, M. Vitet, a phylician at -Lyons, publhhed his Medecme Vetennaire, in 3 vols 8vo. of which the firft contains a pretty full account of the anatomy of the horfe and ox, with fome judici¬ ous remarks on the beauties and defects of both, and on fome of the more important operations to which they are expofed ; the fecond treats of the difeafes of horfes, fheep, and cattle^ and the third gives an account of the remedies employed in veterinary medicine j and ends with a copious analyfis of moft of the continental writ- Vol. VIII. Part II. 44 1 E R Y. ings, and a few Englilh, that had appealed on the fub* jedf, from Vegetius to 1770. M. Vitet’s work is, for the mod part, a compilation from the bed writers who have gone before him ; but as he had read much, and appears to have feledted with judgment, his book is one of thofe which may be con- fulted with advantage. We know that it bears a high charafter in France, and is often quoted with rel'pech We are therefore difpofed to rate it at a higher value than a late writer has done •, and are inclined to lufpeft that fome of thofe who a dec! to think lightly of it are indebted to it for much more than the “ names of many of thofe who have written on this fubjeft.” Much about this time, but in what precife year we Rozier.' cannot fay, the abbe Rozier, well known as the editor of the early volumes of the journal de Phyfquey publiih¬ ed his Cours d' Agriculture et de Medicine Veterinaire ; a work of much reputation in France, but, we believe little known on this fide the water. 45 Another work appeared about this time on the epi- demies among cattle, entitled Recherches Hifloriques et « Phyfques fur les Maladies Epixootiques ; “ Hidorical and Philofophical Refearches relpefting Epizootic Dif¬ eafes,” by M. Paulet. It contains an abridgement of almoll all that had been written on the fubjefr, and is particularly valuable.for the account of the morbid ap¬ pearances that were difeovered on diife&ion. We diall finilh our account of French writers in the words of Mr Blaine. “ After the death of Bourgelat and Lafofle, we hear Hazard of no character of any great eminence for fome years $anc* G11* but it appears, that fince the revolution, the fubjedf hasbert’ again been more diligently dudied, and the names of Chabert and Hazard dand forward. Soon after, or about the time above alluded to, there appeared a con- fiderable wrork, called, The Rational Didtionary of Medicine, Surgery, and Farriery, in fix volumes j and very foon after, a Veterinary Didtionary, by Buchon ; but it has no merit fuperior to that of Lafofle. In 1787, M. Chabert publilhed a Treatife on the Mange of Horfes 5 fince which he has likewife publifhed upon the peripneumonia of black cattle. There has alfo ap¬ peared an Elfay on the Greafe of Horfes, which gained the prize medal of the ., fociety for the promoting the health of animals ; to which is joined a report on thick wind and on broken wind j but we are not aw are who is the author. In 1788, there came out a treatife on the haras, with the method of Ihoeing, cutting, and all the lefier operations, tranfiated from the Spanidi of Hart¬ mann, by Huzard. Likewife “ Indrudlions and Obfer- vations on Domedic Animals, with remarks on the breeding, rearing, buying and felling ; with an analyfis of previous authors, by Chabert,-Handrin, and Huzard. The above authors have alfo publiihed, conjointly, a Veterinary Almanack, containing the hidory and pro- grefs of animal medicine, fince the edabliihment of the veterinary fchools. In 1791, M. Lampagieu Lapole, veterinary furgeon, publifhed obfervations on the health of the animals of St Domingo, dedicated to the veteri- » stained nary college at Alfort. In 1797, M. Chabert and Outline'* M. Huzard publifhed, by order of government, a treatife vol. i. on afeertaining the exidence of the glanders, the means ^ 47. of preventing it, and dedroying the infection.” * famer Son Before we detail what has been done in Britain for,ht conti- the advancement of the art, we mud take a curforynent. 3 H view 43 GoeLcke. 49 Saunier, So Jiinnaeus. e,h Ilaftfer. 52 Reynier, S3 iljlrunan! 54 fianaper. FARR view of tlie principal writings that appearec daring tne 18th century in the reft of Europe. _ In 1730, Goelicke, a German, publifhed a treatile in uto, De Lue Contagiofa Bovium ; “ On the Contagi¬ ous Difeafe of Cattle in which the fymptoms ol the murrain that raged in Flanders about that time are well defcribed j and there are added the appearances on dn- feftion. t j In 1734, appeared at the Hague a work^entitled La parfaite Connoiffance des Chevaux ; “ The Complete Knowledge of Horfes j” by John Saunter, and Gaipard his fon. The latter boafts of this work, that it was drawn up from the lectures of his father, an experi¬ enced man ; and that it contains the refult of numerous experiments on fubjefts of every defcnption, and dil- eafes of every fpecies j that it is the labour of the hie ol two men, the offspring of their continual application and ftudy. After all their boafting, however, the work ©f Mynheers Saunier is little worth. In 1745 and 1746, appeared two other treaties on the epidemic of cattle by Mau'chard and Ens.^ ^ Pa 1740, the illuftrious and indefatigable Einno publifhed at Upfal his Pan Suecicus, in which there is little that relates to our fubjecl, if tve except a table ol fuch plants as are eaten or refufed by the domeltic ani¬ mals, which is curious and ufeful. Some time before 1756, Frederic Haftfer, a Swede, publiihed Inftruclions for Improving the Breed ol Sheep, which was in much repute, and was tranilated into French. In 1762, M. Reynier of Laufanne publilhed a trea¬ ts fe on a contagious* inflammatory diforder that raged among horfes and cattle, and wdiich the Genevefe call¬ ed la louvet. This will be confidered hereafter. In the fame year there appeared at Vienna a work on the epidemic of cattle by Dr Pleneiz 5 and in 1765 Mich. Sagard of the fame city publiflied a work on a contagious diftemper that the year before attacked the cattle in the circle of Iglaw in Moravia; and was at¬ tended with an appearance of aphthous crufts in the . ^ Of late veterinary medicine has been much cultivat¬ ed in Spain, where the works of Hartmann are held m much efteem. In that country, it is faid, a work on farriery in nine volumes has been lately publilhed ; but of this we know nothing. - . . We muft not clofe our account of continental writers without mentioning the name of the illuftrious Camper, whofe works were lately colle&ed and publiflied at Pans. Befides along defeription of the ftructure of the oran-ou- tang, andfome leffer effays on comparative anatomy, thele volumes contain an elaborate hiftory of the epizootic difeafe that raged among the cattle on the continent m the middle of laft century, in the form of lectures. We ftiall fpeak of this work hereafter. We have thus brought the hiftory o. this art on the continent in a concife manner, down to the prelent time ; and from it may be learned what improvements have originated there, and at what periods. It would appear, that when the fcience began to command at¬ tention, from the exertions of Francis^ the firft, and Vegetius became ftudied, had it progreflively improved in the degree it might be fuppofed to be placed by a converfance with this author, it would ere this have been more approximating to perfection : but mftead oi 1 e r Y. proceeding on the rational ivftem of Vegetius it dwmd- HUtor?*, led again into ignorance of barbarity j and the recipes - of manege-matters, and the operations of blackfmiths, were the only oftenlible marks of its afliftance. From this ftate the practitioner became in fome degree roufed by the improved fyftem of Solleyfei 5 but he could only combat prefent errors, he could not point the way to future improvement, for he w7as ignorant of the ground¬ work whereon to build it, i. e. the anatomy of the ani¬ mal. This defeft was only in a fmall degree fupphed by the labours of Ruini, and in fome meafure faither affifted by the demonftrations of Bourgelat. Many of the remaining errors were combated by Lafofle w ith great advantage 5 and his experiments and difeoveries on glanders, the rationality and improvements of his mode of (hoeing, entitle him to great merit. Yet, though by thefe exertions, and by the eftabhfliment of veterinary feminaries, the art affumed a more regular and fcientific form, its attainments were by no means adequate to its opportunities *, which vras almoit wholly owing to an obftinate adherence to the humoral patho- logy, by which the treatment of internal and acute difeafes continued inert and unfuccefsful. I heir pre- feriptions were filled with decodions of fimples, and they wrere utterly unacquainted with the medicinal vir¬ tues of the more active remedies in ufe among us. Un¬ der an opinion that the blood and humours w ere the conftant (eat of difeafe, they wrere continually wattling them fweet with correctors; entirely ignorant or un¬ mindful of the derangements of the folids, and of the connexions between living blood and living. veffels. Nor did this influence only their treatment of internal and acute difeafes -j but even of local and chronic affec¬ tions : hence their mode of treating farcy, greale, and other complaints of a fimilar nature, wTere equally inert, and all evinced an erroneous pathology. Upon 51 care¬ ful and unprejudiced review of the ftate of farriery a- mong ourfelves, and on the continent of Europe, we are not inclined to think it had any advantages of mo¬ ment at the beginning of the war in their favour j though it muft be allowed, wTe are indebted^ to them for many improvements, and for the firft hints towards the eftablifhment of a regular fchool of the art among us. Since the war, our means of communication are fo few, that we are not aware of what is doing among our neighbours. But though farriery, as a branch of veterinary medicine here, has kept nearly equal pace with its continental improvements, I do not think (days Mr Blaine,) the treatment of other animals, particular¬ ly of oxeny cows, and Jheep, has been equally attended to; and, in this particular, I am difpofed to think we are behind hand with them. Their fevere vifitations of * Blaitu>s the epizootic diftemper have made them more attentive Outline,. to this branch of the art.” * , ^ . o SSr In taking a view of the hiftory of farriery, or. ninary medicine in general, in our own country, it bmajn, be feen, that we were much longer in improving the art and reducing it under a rational and fcientific form, than our neighbours on the continent. Our earlieft writers on the difeafes of horfes and cattle, were deplor¬ ably ignorant, not only of all principles of general me ¬ dicine and found practice, but even frequently of the common appearances of the difeafes, which they profei- fed to cure. ' s,5 Our firft writers on the treatment of the difeafes of JiQlfiCSj 57 5® Markham. * 59 Baret. 6o Duke of Newcaftle. 6i Snape. 62 Gibfon, FARR horfes, were, as in France, chiefly riding-mafters ; and of thefe, the firft that feems worthy of notice is Blun- deville, who lived, as we have already obferved, in the reign of Queen Elizabeth. His work appears to have been principally compiled from the writings of Vege- tius, and other ancient writers1, and it contains little that can entitle it to any diftin&ion, as a work of uti¬ lity. It may, however, be perufed as a literary curio- fity. The names of many writers, after Blundeville, are mentioned by thofe who have written on the hrftory of farriery ; but they are all ftill inferior to Blundeville, except perhaps Burden, on whqfe work, notes were written by Dr Bracken. About the end of the 17 th century, lived Gervafe Markham, a name in high repute amongll grooms and farriers, even to this day. He publilhed a work on Farriery, which he called his Mai/ier Peecef and which is one of the ftrangeft compounds of nonfenfe and abfur- dity that has ever appeared on the fubjedf. In the opinion of Mr Lawrence, Markham was no¬ thing more than a mere vulgar and illiterate compiler ; and his works, fome few things excepted, are fluffed with all the execrable tralh that had 'ever been invented by any wTriter, or pra&ifed by any farrier, ancient or mo¬ dern, on the fubjedf of horfes. It is neceffary, how¬ ever, that wTe do juftice to the chara&er ©f Gervafe Markham 5 he certainly poffeffed a fpecies of merit wThich has not defeended to all his fucceffors, the copy- ifts and plagiarifts ; he very honeftly gives the names of thofe authors from whom he derives his know¬ ledge. Some years after Markham, Michael Baret publifli- ed a book, which he called the Vineyarde of Horfetnan- fhip. This wre have never feen, but it appears to be of fome repute. The next writer on this fubjeft, is the duke of NewTcaftle, who gave to the wTorld a moft fu- perb work on an improved method of breeding and ma¬ naging horfes. This work bears a very high character, not only from the name of the illuftrious perfon by whom it wras compofed, but from its owm intrinfic merit. The duke is quoted with refpedt by moft fucceeding writers; and his work has been tranflated into French, German, Dutch, and Italian. It chiefly relates to horfemanlhip, but as it contains fome excellent obfervations and max¬ ims on the breeding of horfes, it naturally comes to be confidered here. In the latter end of the 17th century, Andrew Snape, ■who was farrier to Charles II. publilhed a large work on the anatomy of the horfe, illuftrated with many cop¬ perplates. Thefe plates appear not to have been taken from his own diffeeftion, but are moftly copied from preceding authors, efpecially from Ruini. Mr Blaine, however, is miftaken in afferting that fome of them are copied from Saunier, as Snape’s work wras publilhed in 1683, whereas Saunier’s did not appear, (according to Vitet) before 1734. It is faid that Snape had projeft- ed a larger work on the difeafes of horfes, but this he did not live to execute. Early in the 18th century, farriery experienced a conliderable improvement from the writings of Mr William Gibfon. This gentleman had been a furgeon in the army, but relinquifhed that fituation for the prac¬ tice of farriery, which he probably expedted to find mere profitable. Mr Blaine places this writer in the I E R Y. 427 middle of the laft century but his firft work entitled Hiftory. “ The Farrier’s New Guide,” was certainly publilhed previous to the year 1721, as w'e have feen a feeond edition of it advertifed in that year. This wras the moft fcientific work on the difeafes of horfes, that had then appeared in the Englilh, or perhaps any language. The detail of fymptoms is in general juft, accurate, and. the plan of treatment advifed is for the moft part very judicious. The anatomical part of Mr Gibfonfs work is not fo valuable, being frequently incorredf, and evi¬ dently not the refult of his own obfervation. The Farriers Guide was foon followed by The Farriers Dif- penfatory, containing an account of the remedies em¬ ployed in farriery, and the means of preparing and ex¬ hibiting them. This work is far inferior to the former* and is now of little ufe. In 1721, Mr Gibfon publilh¬ ed a fmall work on The True Method of Dieting Horfes* which contains fome judicious remarks on the means of preferving the health of this ufeful animal j as alfo on the breeding of horfes : with fome obfervations on their external form, their fagacity, and habits. This book mull have been very valuable at the time of its publica¬ tion, but is now in a great meafure fuperfeded by Clark and other later writers. About 1750, Mr Gibfon publifhed a larger work, On the Dileafes of Horfes, in which he has brought to¬ gether the fubftance of his former works on farriery, ■with fome improvements. There is, we believe, a later edition of it in two vols. Mr Gibfon mull be conlider- ed as oi>e of thofe to whom farriery is moft indebted for its improvements. He was almoft the firft, at leaft in this country, to refeue the art from the hands of the illiterate empirics, to point out their blunders, and cor¬ rect their errors. Mr John Lawrence, who has given a very full account of Mr Gibfon in the firft volume of his treatife on horfes, perhaps goes too far in ranking him on an equality with fome of our prefent writers ; while thefe again have erred as much on the other fide, in detracting from the merits of a man to whom they are all more or lefs indebted for much of their moft valuable matter. Gibfon was followed in his plan for the improvement Bnckea. of farriery by Dr Bracken, a phyfician at Lancafter, and a pupil of Boerhaave, who publilhed a -work called Farriery Improved. “ Bracken (fays Mr Blaine) was phyfician of great abilities and extenfive knowledge in his profeflion j a man of confiderable erudition, a fportf- man, and a wit of a peculiar caft. His works have by fome been as much admired and read for the peculiar v ftyle in which they are written, and that peculiar free¬ dom and non-obfervance of rule or form, as for the real information they contain. Though there is great ingenuity in his writings, and though in many refpeCts he improved upon Gibfon, yet as a praftical work it was much inferior ; nor was his information given in a way that could benefit the gene¬ rality of his readers : independent of his ftyle being too peculiar, and his reafoning too abftrufe for farriers, his manner of purfuing his fubjeCl wTas fo defultory, that few readers had patience to follow him. Neverthelefs his works, which were feveral, and paffed through many editions, have raifed him a fame that can only die with the fcience.” Thefe two writers may juftly be confidered as the fathers of Englilh farriery •, they eftablilhed their fyftem 3 H 2 on \ 64 Bartlct. Dfmer. 66 Brocldefby 67 Layard. dark. FARR on the only fare foundation, the analogy which prevail¬ ed between the ftrudlure, economy, and difeafes of man and of brutes. The belt pradtice irf this country has been derived from their iniimetions •, and their works formed an example, by following which, later writers have greatly improved the art. The next writer of reputation was Mr John Bartlet, alfo a medical man, who about the middle of the laid century publiihed his, Gentleman’s I arriery, and after- wards his Veterinary Pharmacopeia. Bartlet had for¬ med himfelf on the model of Gibfon and Bracken, the belt parts of whofe writings he has given in his farriery, condenfed into a more compendious view. He alfo en¬ riched his work by the molt material improvements of LafoiTe, whofe memoirs on Ihoeing and on glanders, he tranllated into Englilh. Soon after Bartlet, appeared Mr William Ofmer, a furgeon and a fportfman, who pradtifed farriery in Ox¬ ford Itreet, London. He was the principal means of in¬ troducing into this country the French mode of (hoe¬ ing, which, in his treatife on the lamenefs of horfes, he adapted to the Englilh manners, fo as to render of fer- Tice, what had been before nearly ufelefs and impracti¬ cable. Mr Ofmer’s mode of (hoeing will be mention¬ ed hereafter. From the above wTorks many compilations were foon made 5 thefe were generally below medio- crity, amongft which, one called the Farrier’s Dic¬ tionary, though a very wretched compofition, met with a very rapid iale. We muft except from thefe a fmall treatife by a Mr Blount, furgeon, which is above the common clafs, and worthy of notice, from an ingenious contrivance, illuftrated by a plate, for fecuring a frac¬ tured limb. In the year 1746, Dr Richard Brocklelhy, a friend of Dr Mead, publiihed a pamphlet on the diforder that ^uft before raged among horned cattle. It (liould feem that this book is very little known beyond the circle of medical men, as we have not feen it referred to by any writer on the difeafes of cattle. Brocklefby was followed on the fame fubjeft by Dr Layard. We (hall fpeak particularly of thefe two authors, when we come to treat of the murrains. About 30 years ago, Mr James Clark, farrier to his majefty for Scotland, publifhed an ingenious Treatile on Shoeing, and on the Difeafes of the Feet of Horfes. This was foon followed by his Treatife on the Preven¬ tion of Difeafes Incidental to Horfes. By this latter work Mr Clark has acquired much reputation, as a feientifre farrier, and a fenfible wrriter. It contains fome judicious obfervations on (fables, diet, and exercife, on blood-letting, rowels, and fetons ; with remarks on the ufes and adminiilration of the more common reme¬ dies. Mr Clark’s book is in general .well calculated to produce a more judicious and humane method of treat¬ ing horfes, than ufually prevails. But it would have been more ufeful, had the author omitted much of the theoretic difeuflion, into which he has entered on fome parts of the animal economy, on the nature of difeafe, and on the adtion of remedies. Mr Clark is a good practical writer, but his theory is often very lame, or I E R Y. Parti. very obfeure. He had an eafy opportunity of attending Hi (lory. the medical lectures, which were taught at Edinburgh v in his youth, when the humoral pathology and the theory of Boerhaave were in full vogue. Mr Clark has here and there interfperfed among his practical re¬ marks much of this old leaven. But as he probably had not received fuch a previous liberal education as might (it him for the judicious application of what he heard, he is often deficient in that theoretical know¬ ledge which he takes fo much pains to difplay. ^ Some years before the publication of Mr Clark’s laft Lord Pets- mentioned treatife, viz. in 1778, Lord Pembroke favour-broke, ed the public with his excellent differtation on the management of dragoon horfes, with fome remarks on (hoeing. This work is entitled, Military Equitation,, or a Method of Breaking Horfes. Though the obfer¬ vations, contained in his lordihip’s work, were intended for the ufe of the Britifh cavalry, they are for the mod part applicable to horfes in general, and well merit the attention of farriers and others concerned in the manage¬ ment of horfes. We do not well underftand what Mr Blaine means by afferting that Lord Pembroke derived the principle of his medical hints from Mr Clark. If he means that his lordlhip borrowed any thing from Mr Clark’s treatife on preventing the difeafes of horfes, he is certainly miftaken, as the firft edition of this treatife, which rve believe has not been reprinted, ap¬ peared in 1788, and in it Mr Clark often quotes Lord Pembroke’s wTork (c). 70 Much about this time Mr Stubbs publilhed his ele- Stubbs, gant plates of the anatomy of the horfe, of which work, as the produftion of an artift, we cannot fpeak too high¬ ly. Mr Stubbs is a very eminent painter of animals, and to much profeffional excellence in this capacity, he has added a confiderable (hare of anatomical know¬ ledge. Hence his figures are in general extremely correcf, and will be found very ufeful to thofe who have not the opportunity of availing themfelves of real fubjedfs. . . 71 One of the lateft writers on the fubjedl of farriery isTaplm. Mr Taplin, who for fome time enjoyed a confiderable reputation, both as a practitioner and as a writer. But this reputation has been materially fuMied, fince it was difeovered, that Mr Taplin is not only ignorant of the anatomy of the horfe, but has liberally copied from thofe very writers whom he takes every opportunity to vilify and abufe. As from his flagrant plagiarifm and arrogance, Mr Taplin has well deferved the dr effing which he has recently received from feveral late writers, we (hall turn him over into the hands of one of his rivals, who does not feem difpofed to (how him any mercy. “ This gentleman likewife began his career as a fur¬ geon, but turned afide to the then more profitable track of farriery. Mr Taplin fet out by decrying all that had gone before him, all that were in pradiice with him, and in fadt every thing that has been done by any one fince. Yet Mr Taplin’s works are faid to be compila¬ tions from thofe very authors whom he abufes ; and, in fome inftances, after abufing egregioufly, he copies liter¬ ally. (c) We find that Lord Pembroke’s work was firlt publifhed about 1761. I he edition mentioned in the text is, we believe, the feeond, \ Fart 1. FARR Kiftory, ally. Unfortunately for this gentleman, from fome late 1 1 " v' improvements, the people of this country have learned to diftmguifh in this art, as well as in others, between fcientific inveftigation and verbofe quackery. Had Mr Taplin fet out by ftudying the llrudlure and economy of the animal, he might, and undoubtedly would, have proved an ornament" to the profeffion ; but when he permits his works to go through fo many editions, in the face of criticifms from all quarters, with a chapter on difeafes of a part that has no exiftence in the jiorfe, i. e. the gall bladder, we muft be aware that he is en¬ tirely ignorant of that, upon which every pretenfion to grofefftonal merit muft be grounded. Mr Taplin in¬ dulges himfelf in the molt unreftrained freedoms in fpeaking of thofe who have gone before him, yet copies* verbatim from them *, he cannot wonder, therefore, that he has been treated with confiderable feverity by later writers j nor can he be furpnfed that a practice fo » Blaine's begun and fo continued has ended as his has Outlines, Mr Taplin is the author of feveral works on farriery, -vol. i. p. 63. pjjs £1.q; publication was, we believe, The Stable Di- reftory, which had a great fale. He next publilhed a larger work, m two volumes, and lately he has fent out a fmall pamphlet called Multum in parvo, which is fuppofed to be merely intended to advance the fale of 72 his prepared horfe medicines. London vo The end of the 18th century will ever be memora¬ terinary ble in the hiftory of farriery, for the eftablilhment of codege- an inftitution for the public teaching of the veterinary art in England, in imitation of thofe fchools in France of which we have already fpoken. St Eel. The veterinary college owes its origin to M. St Bel, a French gentleman, born at Lyons, and who was firft junior affiftant to the profeffor of the Royal Veterinary College there, and afterwards profeflbr of anatomy at the veterinary college of Montpelier. I his gentleman came to Britain in 1788, and publifhed propofals for eftablifhing a veterinary fchool in this kingdom. Thefe propofals did not, at that time, meet with encourage¬ ment ; but two years after, when M. St Bel, driven from his native country by the horrors of the revolu¬ tion, again vifited England, his propofals were taken again into confideration by an agricultural fociety at Ockham in Hampfhire. It had been the intention of this fociety, to fend two young men to France, to ftudy the veterinary art fcientifically *, but on hearing the pro¬ pofals of M. St Bel, they abandoned this idea, and ap¬ pointed a committee to confult with him on the beft means of forming a fchool for teaching the art in this kingdom. To this fchool they gave the name of the Veterinary College of London ; and M. St Bel was ap¬ pointed the firft profeflbr. The following gentlemen were appointed to tlie mar nagement of this inftitution. His Grace the Duke of Northumberland, Prefident. Earl Grofvenor, Earl Morton, Earl of Oxford, Lord Rivers, Sir George Baker, Bart. Sir T. C. Bunbury, Bart. M. P. Sir W. Fordyce, John Hunter, Efq. > Vice Prefid- I E R Y. 429 Sir John Ingleby, Bart. M. P. j Hiftory. Sir H. P. St John Mildmay, Bart. u-— G. M. Afcough, Efq. Mr John Baynes, Mr J. Burgefs, Rev. T. Burgefs, Rev. J. Cook. Dr Adair Crauford, John Gretton, Efq. Dr Hamilton, Mr Rennet, Dr D. Mapleton, Granville Penn, Efq. Mr William Stone, Richard Tophane, Efq. Dr Williams, J. Wollafton, Efq. Meffrs Ranfom, Moreland, and Hammerfly, A houfe wras taken, for the purpofe of the inftitu¬ tion, and pupils were admitted to board in the houfe. The fuccefs of this inftitution, at firft, by no means-* anfwered the expectations of the founders. It appears that M. St Bel was prevented, by the embarrafled ftate of his circumftances, from executing the office of pro¬ feflbr, with that ardour and aCtivity, which was necef- fary to the reputation of the infant fchool j and indeed it feems, from the fpecimen he has left us of his pro- feffional abilities, that thefe wrere not adequate to the- office he had undertaken. He poflefled confiderable in- duftry, and it is probable that, had he lived, he w-ould have fucceeded better than his outfet had promifed. But, in the year 1793, he was attacked with an iilnefs, which proved fatal in about a fortnight. M. St Bel left behind him feveral w*orks, viz. An Eflay on the Geometrical Proportions of Eclipfe. Lec¬ tures on the Elements of Farriery. The art of Horfe- fhoeing, wdth Obfervations on the Difeafes of the Feet. And a volume of pofthumous works. We do not pretend to give our own opinion as to the merits of thefe works, as we have not feen them. But it is faid that the Eflay is merely an application of the proportions long ago laid down by Bourgelat in his Elemens d'Hippiatrique, to a particular cafe 5 and that many of his meafurements are incorreCl. Mr Blaine roundly taxes him with tranflating Lafofle to furniffi matter for his Elements, and refers for proof of this to the defeription and treatment of quittor in St Bel’s E- lements, and Lafoffe’s DiBionaire d'EUppiatrique. Mr Blaine brings many other inftances of M. St Bel’s want of information and fcience, for which we muft re¬ fer our readers to Mr Blaine’s Outlines of the Veteri¬ nary Art. On the death of M. St Bel, there appears to have W' been a competition for the vacant chair, between two - gentlemen, who were both well qualified to fill it, Mr Edward Coleman and Mr Morecroft. Both of thele gentlemen had been bred to forgery-, and the former had acquired much reputation by an ingenious Eflay on Sulpended Refpiration. The latter was lately re¬ turned from France, where he had been ftudying the veterinary art. We are not acquainted with the parti¬ culars Directors. Treafureni*. 75 Mr Cole¬ man ap¬ pointed profeffor. 7*. Examining ^committee. FARR culars of this competition ; but the choice of the fub- fcribers fixed on Mr Coleman, under whofe manage¬ ment the college has acquired confiderable reputation. The election of Mr Coleman was followed by fome new regulations. An anatomical theatre was fitted up, with difledling rooms for the ufe of the Undents. A medical committee wras alfo appointed for the purpofe of examining the pupils, who had completed their education at the college, previoufiv to their receiving a diploma as veterinary furgeons. This committee, in 1801, was compofed of the following gentlemen. Dr Fordyce, fenior phyfician to St Thomas’s hofpital. Dr Relph, phyfician to Guy’s hofpital. Dr Babington, Do. Dr Bailie, phyfician to St George’s hofpital. Mr Cline, furgeon to St Thomas hofpital. Mr Home, furgeon to St George’s hofpital. Mr Aftley Cooper, furgeon to Guy’s hofpital. Mr Abernethy, furgeon to Bartholemew’s holpital. Mr Wilfon, lecturer on anatomy and furgery ; and Mr Coleman, profelfor of the college. The following are the regulations of this ufeful infti- tution as publiftied in the year 1801. Regulations The fubfcribers of the veterinary college pay two ot the col- gUineas per annum, or twenty guineas for life. For ie^e* this fubfcription each fubfcriber is entitled to fend, when fick or lame, any number of horfes to the vete¬ rinary ftables, where no charges are made for medi¬ cines, attendance, or operations. The fubfcriber pays only for the keep and fhoeing of his horfe, which is generally lefs than the adtual expence incurred by the college. A committee of ftablers is appointed to exa¬ mine the quality of the forage, and to regulate the price of the keep of horfes. For fome years pad, the fubfcribers paid only 2s. 6d. per night; but in confe- quence of the great advance in hay, corn, and ftraw, and the college, by this moderate charge, having fuf- tained a confiderable lofs, the keep of horfes is now fix¬ ed at 3s. per night. A feparate committee infpefts the accounts of the college, and three times in the year reports to the general meeting the date of the finances of the college. No horfes but thofe the property of fubfcribers are admitted into the veterinary dables ; but the profeffor is allowed private practice, and horfes not belonging to fubfcribers may be fent to the college for the profeffor’s opinion. The horfes not intended to be left in the dables of the college may be fent for the profeffor’s advice on Mondays, Wednefdays, and Fridays, from twelve to two o’clock. Where medicines are requifite, they are prepared for fubfcribers horfes at very reduced prices j and the college receives all emoluments which may arife from the fale of horfe medicines. The expences incurred by fubfcribers, for Ihoeing, for the keep of horfes, or for medicines, mud be paid for before the animal be taken from the college. And as fome Ioffes have been fudained from the drift letter of this regulation not having been always attended to, the clerk has now received pofitive orders from the commit¬ tee, not to allow any horfe, before all the expences are paid, to be taken from the college. The horfes are pla¬ ced under the direftion of the profeffor, who refides on the fpot, and the medicines he preferibes are compound¬ ed by a proper perfon employed for that purpofe. 4 I E R Y. Part It As the great objeft of the veterinary edablilhment Hiftory. is to form a national fchool for the improvement of far- )r~~~ riery, pupils paying twrenty guineas are admitted into the college to learn the veterinary art. Leftures are given by the profeffor o#i the forma¬ tion, economy, and difeafes of horfes, and other do- medic animals j and mod of the eminent medical teachers in London, with a liberality peculiar to them- felves, have allowed the veterinary pupils to hear their leftures without any fee or reward. The veterinary dudents attend leftures on human anatomy and phyfio- logy, on the principles a!nd praftice of furgery, on the materia medica, and chemidry, and praftice of phyfic. The period requifite for obtaining a competent know¬ ledge of the veterinary art, is regulated by the talents, previous information, and indudry of the individual pu¬ pil. The dudents continue to attend the college until they are examined and approved by the medical com¬ mittee. Thofe pupils who are duly qualified receive a diploma; but thofe who are found on examination to be deficient, are rejefted. There are four general exa¬ minations in the year. When examined and approved, if no objeftions are made to their conduft, during their dudy at the veterinary college, they may be recom¬ mended to any regiment of cavalry, not already provi¬ ded with a veterinary furgeon. No fees of any kind are allowed by the college to any of the fervants of fubfcribers; neither are the fer- vants of the college permitted to receive any perqui- fites from the fubfcribers. A veterinary college has alfo been edablilhed near. Birmingham, and it is faid that others are in contem¬ plation in other parts of the empire. The advantages that have already accrued from this edablidiment, to veterinary medicine in general, and to our national cavalry in particular, are very confider¬ able. Almod every regiment of cavalry has been fup- plied from the college, with a veterinary furgeon 5 and many of thefe gentlemen have publiihed works which, for the mod part, do much credit to themfelves and their academy. In 1798, Mr Coleman publidied the fird volume, and in 1802, the fecond, of Obfervations on the Struc¬ ture, Oeconomy, and Difeafes of the Foot of the Horfe. This is a mod ufeful and valuable wrork, but it is too fplendid and codly, efpecially the fecond vo¬ lume, for general circulation. The fird volume con¬ tains a very full account of the method of dioeing praftifed at the veterinary college, of which we diall give an abdraft hereafter. About this period, appeared alfo a pamphlet by Mr Coleman, On the Formation and Ufes of the natural Frog of the Horfe, with the defeription of an artificial Frog. In 1801, appeared the fird number of the Veterinary Tranfaftions, publiihed by order of the fubfcribers. This pamphlet commences with a long introduftion, dating the objeft of the inditution, the progrefs which it had made, and the caufes that tended to prevent its complete fuccefs. Thefe originate partly in the party oppofition of the common farriers, wbo deem it theit intered to do all in their power to circumvent the viewTs of the fubfcribers: but they have dill more been derived from the underhand malice of grooms and fervants, with whofe intered the inditution, from the liberal manner in which Part I. Hiftory. 73 Bracey Clarke. . .79 Riding. So Denny. 8r White. 9i ' Richard La whence. FARR which it ib conducled, muft certainly clafh. ’Ihe body of the pamphlet is occupied with a very neat view of the confequences and treatment of wounds of joints, and other circumfcribed cavities, and it is concluded by an account of the regulations of the college (fee N° 77.) the lill of the medical committee, a lilt of the examined and approved veterinary furgeons that had at that time palied at the college, and lifts of the then managers and fubfcribers to the inftitution. The firft pupil of the college, as we believe, who diftinguiftied himfclf as an author, was Mr Bracey Clarke •, who, in the third volume of the Linnean Tranfaftions, publilhed a very ingenious paper on the bvtts in horfes and cattle, of which we {hall fpeak here¬ after. About the fame time appeared a fmall volume on Veterinary Pathology, by Mr Riding, veterinary fur- geon to the 18th regiment of dragoons. In 1802, Mr John Denny, of the 10th dragoons, publilhed a fmall volume on the Difeafes of Horfes. In this work. Mr Denny has in general given the prin¬ ciples and pradlice of the veterinary college, and has illuftrated and confirmed thefe by his own attentive ob- iervations and long experience. * In the fame year appeared a very neat Compendium of the Veterinary Art, by Mr James White of the 1 ft Dragoons. This is only a pocket volume, and of courfe is very concife ; but the author has given a very comprehenfive view of the nature and treatment of dif¬ eafes, and of the late improvement in the art of (hoeing introduced into the veterinary college 5 and the work will be found an ufeful companion to the young prac¬ titioner. This volume alfo contains the fubftance of a former work, by the fame author, on the Anatomy and Phyfiology of the Horfe’s Foot. In the year 1804, Mr White publilhed the Veterinary Materia Medica, con taining a brief defcription of the various fubftances em¬ ployed in farriery,,with an account of their particular effefts on the body of the horfe. He occafionally in¬ troduces fome pertinent remarks on the difeafes of the horfe ; and in the latter part of the volume, comprifing the veterinary pharmacopeia, he has given a number of the beft and moft fcientific recipes that he had feen. This work may be confidered as the fecond volume of Mr White’s compendium j and the author conlidered the two volumes, as forming a complete fyftem of the veterinary medicine. Though we are difpofed to think very favourably of thefe volumes, as a practical com¬ pendium, we cannot help thinking that Mr White might have contented himfelf with that modeft title without affuming the more pompous one of a fyftem.. We muft alfo remark, that the materia medica, which is not large, is unneceffarily fwelled by the admiftion of many articles that feem to have been introduced mere¬ ly- to tell us, that they are never ufed in the veterinary pra&ice. Mr White is alfo the author of an Addrefs to the RoyaT Firft Devon Yeoman Cavalry refpe&ing the management of their hprfes, when employed on atftual fervice. In the year 1802, or we believe a little earlier, a work of confiderable elegance was publilhed by Mr Richard Lawrence, veterinary furgeon at Birmingham. As we have not feen this work, we mult copy the fol¬ lowing account of it from Mr Blaine. “ It is much I E R Y. 431 to be regretted that a gentleman who poffeiTes fo much Hiftory. ingenuity, fhould pafs over fubjects of Inch importance in fuch a light curfory manner. The defeription and treatment of fome difeafes occupy fewer lines than (to treat the fubjeft in fuch manner as to prove ufeful) they would require pages. The plates are elegant, and extremely wTell defigned, particularly thofe that regard the proportions and paces of the horfe } thofe that re¬ gard the internal llruclure and difeafes are not fo happy. The didlion is very fuperior. As a cabinet work, it is molt certainly elegant and interefting} but as a ufeful aftiftant to the art itfelf, it does notrank 10high.” S3t In the fame year was publilhed the firft part of a Eo^rdmac^ dictionary of the veterinary art by Mr Thomas Board- man of the third regiment of Dragoons. This work was intended to be completed in lixteen parts. The author feems to have availed himfelf of the lateft and beft information on the feveral articles that compofe his work •, and he has introduced into it a variety of fub- jeCts on the principles of general medicine.- 84, One of the lateft publications by pupils of the veteri- Feroifi- nary college, is a new' fyftem of farriery by Mr John Feron, veterinary furgeon to the thirteenth regiment of Light Dragoons. This work is printed in quarto, and affords a good inftance to what an extent a fmall quan¬ tity of matter may be carried by the modern typogra¬ phical improvements of large type, broad margins, wide fpaces, and frequent breaks. The work is indeed very elegant both in type, and in plates. It alfo con¬ tains fome ufeful information on the external ftruclure of the horfe, with a view to point out and illuftrate tyhat appeared to the author to be the moll perfedl form of a blood horfe, with the blemilhes and defefts which appeared moll likely to impede his velocity.- This appears to be the beft part of the work, and is ■ wrell illuftrated by the plates. The latter half of the book is occupied wfith the confideration of difeafes ^ and here w-e are led, from the author’s title page, to expedl an account not only of the difeafes of horfes, but of the principal epidemics to which cattle, Iheep, &c. are fub~- je£l. Thefe epidemics are however dflcuffed in the courfe of feventeen pages $ but wre are given to un~ derftand that the author intends in a future publican tion to give a full comparative defcription, wuth the proper mode of treatment of every difeafe that affebls domeftic animals. Mr Feron’s obfervations are render¬ ed of much lefs utility than they would otherwife have been, by the want of a proper index, or table of con¬ tents. Thefe are, we believe, the principal publications Frecmae, that have proceeded from the pupils of the veterinary college. A few other works on veterinary medicine Hill remain to be confidered. In 1796, a very elegant work on horfes was publilhed by S. Freeman, E.fq. whofe character is given by Mr Blaine as an amateur in the manege, and a gentleman of fortune, learning and great ingenuity.. This publication confilled in a defcription of the fmilure and economy of the foot, accompanied with a fet of plates highly finilhed in Skelton’s bell llyle.. The fubjefts were diffected under the infpebtion of Mr Home, or an alhllant j and except fome flight errors in the ligaments of the navicular bone, appear very cor- re6t. This publication, for the elegance of its engra¬ vings, and the general fpirit of the whole, will be long without a competitor. It recommends a very ingen;- OU#v 43^ Hiftory. John Law- raiCe. 87 ’tJowning. 83 Impeifec- tion of works on cattle me¬ dicine. F A U K ous mode ot (hoeing, and tfae economy of the foot is likewife very ingenious. About the fame time Mr John Lawrence puhlifhed a fmall volume on horfes, chiefly compofed of extradls from St. Bel, Ofmer, Clarke, and Lord Pembroke •, and in 1798, this gentleman brought forward his phi- lofophical and practical treatife on horfes, a work which is as remarkable for the good fenfe and humanity of the author, as for the whimfical eccentricity and angry ir¬ ritability which he occafionally difplays. The work embraces n great variety of fubjedts. It commences with an account of the prindpal former writers on far¬ riery, in which high eulogies are paid to the memory of Gibfon and Bracken, and a very violent attack is made on the ill-ftarred Mr Taplin. The latter part of the work contains Mr Lawrence’s fyllem of veterinary prac¬ tice, which is chiefly taken from his favourite authors, as Mr Lawrence feems at that time not to have had much pradlical experience. The work alfo contains fome remarks on the difeafes of horned cattle, on the treatment of cows, and on calving, Mr Lawrence has fmee, in 1805,-publiflied a fepa- rate treatife on cattle, in which the management of neat cattle, (beep, and fwdne, are handled in a mafterly man¬ ner ; and a much fuller account of difeafes and their treatment is given than could be expedled in his former treatife. We venture to recommend Mr Lawrence’s works as amongft the mod inftrudlive and moil enter¬ taining that we have met with. Some years ago there appeared a wrork on the de- feription and treatment of the difeafes of cattle, by a Mr Downing, a profefifor of cattle medicine ; w-hich, though very expenfive, fold very fad, and was very ge-' nerally edeemed amongd farmers and graziers. We have not feen this work •, but from the account of it that is given by Mr Blaine in his outlines, it fhould feem that it abounds with important errors, and frequent¬ ly inculcates a dangerous mode of praftice. We can¬ not here enumerate the particular examples brought by Mr Blaine in proof of his alfertions, but we fliall notice the mod important of them under their proper heads. Perhaps no part of veterinary medicine has been fo little cultivated in this country, as that which confiders the difeafes of cattle. There is fcarcely a work on this fubjecl in the Englifh language that is worth perufal. We cannot give a better idea of the little value that mud be placed on thefe works than by the following ex- tradf from Mr Lawrence’s treatife on cattle. “ I have never yet feen any of thefe cattle doBor- ing books y which appeared to me to be written bora fide. Well-intentioned ignorance, if not entitled to refpeft, is at lead venial ; but the flighted examination of mod of thefe printed guardians of the health of cattle, by a perfon qualified to judge, will evince, that they are pre¬ meditated impodures, goods merely varniflied up for fale. They have either the names of living men tack¬ ed to them, who, in the dronged probability, never ei¬ ther did, or could write a line of them, or they are publilhed in the name of fome one of the mighty dead, among coiv-doflors, who mod unfortunately died at lad, •after fixty years pra&ice. One would expecd to find fomething original and valuable, from this long-con¬ tinued and extenfive praftice *, but the difappointment is always complete. The chief of that which we meet with, confids of tranferiptions from former writers, in- 3 I E U Y. Part I. terlarded with learned, medical, and phyfical difTeita- Hiftory. tions, perhaps found anc good enough in their place, to y-— which are loofely and clumiiiy tacked the mod nonfenfical and burlefque appendages by Mr Editor. The medi¬ cinal forms in thefe books, are frequently th« flranged jumble that imagination can conceive. Articles of a dire&ly oppofite nature and intention, are blended in one mafs, which mud inevitably act upon the animal fydem wfith an effeft limilar to that of two men pulling at oppofite ends of a cord. We find balfam of Peru and Glauber’s falts married together, the intent of which, no doubt mud be, as a Suffolk farrier once de- feribed to the late Mr Rufh, “ a kind of heater, and a kind of cooler.” Indeed the far greater number of the preferiptions wear rather the appearance of having been fabricated for the ufe of the book, than of having ever been ufed and approved in real pradlice. One truly laughable cudom was introduced by the book publifhed under the name of Topham’s old one. It was to fub- join to every prefeription of note, a fet character, con¬ ceived in the mod high founding terms of panegyric, at the fame time, with a choice of words, at once fo droll, and fo gravely profeffional, with fo formal an arrange¬ ment, that he mud be a man far furpaflfmg me in gravity, grave as I naturally am, who can perufe them without burding into laughter. It mud not be denied, howr- ever, that thefe books contain a number of ufeful hints, relative to the management and dieting of cattle, whe¬ ther or not fuch may have originated with the doclor, or have been introduced by the editor. They may al¬ fo, to a certain degree, be confulted as to the fymptoms of difeafes, although by no means to be implicitly re¬ lied on even in that refpe£L So far they have their ufe. With regard to doftoring, as it is termed, or preferibing medicines to cattle, they are mod truly blind guides 5 and when, unfortunately, they are fet to lead the blind, the fate of both parties may be very readily anticipated. I am fpeaking of books, which have been publilhed within the lad half century. As to the ancient veterinary ’ivtiters, none of them, not even the celebrated Vegetius, wrere medical men, and their medical praflice is utterly beneath modern notice. The fame kind of books of our old Englifh writers, confid of a ((range medley of ancient pradbice with va¬ rious fage additions of their own. A rational man can¬ not read over fome of their preferiptions without a- mazement, nor a humane one without extreme pity for the haraifed vidlim of fuch mondrous pradlice. By the way, they who, for intereded purpofes, fabricate pre¬ tended cattle medicines, of the effedls of which they are carelefs or ignorant, commit an adt of grofs inhumani¬ ty and crime, in too probably adding to the load of fuf- ferings of a helplefs animal already tortured by difeafe. One of the greated curiofities wTe meet with in the old books, is their grand, univerfal fpecific. It feems as though they judged by a kind of compound arithmeti- co-medical logic, that all medicines being conjoined * L and multiplied one into the other, the produdt mud ne-c/I Cattle, " ceffarily be the prevention or cure of all difeafes.” * g„ Mr Lawrence has excepted from the above general Cniley. condemnation, a work lately publifhed by Mr Gulley, of Northumberland ; which, he fays, ought to be in the hands of every farmer in Great Britain. He confiders it as the only original work in our language, and, as containing in a fmall compafs, a mod valuable fund of inforndttion, Part II. FARR Hiftory. information, chiefly from the author’s own experi- ' ■ "» 1 ence. 90 In the year 1800, Mr Morecroft, the rival candidate Morecroft. Coleman for the profefforfhip of the veterinary college, publifhed a fmall pamphlet containing a cur- fory account of the various methods of ftioeing horfes, with incidental obfervations. This work difplays con- fiderable ingenuity. We (hall notice Mr Morecroft’s 91 method of (hoeing by and by. Blaine. In 1802, appeared Mr Blaine’s Outlines of the Vete¬ rinary Art, or the Principles of Medicine as applied to a knowledge of the ftrufture, funftions, and economy of the horfe, the ox, the (beep, and the dog *, and to a more fcientific and fuccefsful manner of treating their various difeafes •, in two volumes. Mr Blaine is well known as a pra&itioner of veterinary medicine, and as the advertifer of a fpecific againft the diftemper in dogs. In his Outlines, Mr Blaine, after giving a (ketch of the hiftory of medicine in general, enters on the hiftory of veterinary medicine in particular, which he details at confiderable length j not however, without feveral errors, fome of which we have already pointed out. He next proceeds to lay down very briefly what he con¬ ceives to be the proper means for the attainment of the veterinary art. Then follows a long fection on a fub- jedf which we (hould fcarcely expedt to find in a work of this kind, the hiftory of chemiftry. The firft part concludes with a (ketch of comparative anatomy, in which the ftrufture and economy of the ox, (beep, and dog are paffed over much too lightly. i he (econd part, which occupies the reft of the firft volume, and one-half of the fecond, is taken up with a very minute account of the anatomy of the horfe, with fome obfer¬ vations on the economy and ufes of the feveral parts. We confider this as the beft part of Mr Blaine’s book } but we think that he has made it unneceffarily prolix, as by carrying it to fuch an extent, he has not left room for a fatisfaftory account of difeales, which occupy the reft of the fecond volume. Here we cannot but con¬ fider the author as very defective. Neither the fymp- toms nor the treatment are given with that accuracy or precifion, which the public had a right to expert from a pra&itioner of Mr Blaine’s long experience. Many of the difeafes of cattle, (beep, mid efpecially of dogs, are palled over in a manner that is by no means fatisfuc- tory. The work is written in a very flovenly manner, and is everywhere filled with an oftentatious parade of medical phrafeology that muft render it nearly unintel¬ ligible to the generality of readers. In his receipts, Mr Blaine has for the mod part adopted the new no- ' menclature, which, however we may approve in medi¬ cal formulae, we cannot think calculated for the meri¬ dian of farriers. We, however, by no means intend to infinuate that Mr Blaine’s work is without merit : it I E R Y. certainly contains much valuable matter j but we muft repeat that it is not what we (hould have expected from the advantages of information and experience which Mr Blaine appears to have pollefled. In the following year, Mr Blaine publilhed a fmaller work, which he calls a Domeftic Treatife on the dif¬ eafes of horfes and dogs, which appears to be chiefly an abridgement of the Outlines, with a fort of advertife- ment for the fale of Mr Blaine’s patent medicine. In 1802 appeared a General View of the Agricul-Findlater. ture of the county of Peebles, by the Rev. Charles Find- later, mmifter of the parifh of Newlands, in that coun¬ ty. This work, though intended merely as a local fur- vey of the (late of agriculture and improvements in a fmall diftrict, abounds with much excellent matter that muft prove of general utility. Befides the obfervations which the ingenious author has made, on the general management of live (lock, in the body of his work, he has added in one of'his appendices fome valuable infor¬ mation refpe&ing fome of the moft important difeafes of fheep, which are partly furnKhed from the communi¬ cations of Dr Gillefpie, late phyfician in Edinburgh, and Dr Coventry profeflbr of agriculture in that univer- fity, and partly derived from his own experience. 93 In 1803 was publiflaed an elegant work on practical agriculture by Dr R. W. Dickfon •, the fecond volume of which contains much ufeful inftruftion refpedting the choice, breeding, feeding, &c. of all the fpecies of live ftock employed on a farm j with a few veryumncife re¬ marks on the difeafes of each fpecies. But as thefe are merely pra&ical hints, they cannot be of much ufe, ex¬ cept to thofe who are already tolerably acquainted with the fubject. 94 In the fame year, the Rev*William Daniel perform-Daniel, ed a talk, which, however ill fuited to the chara&er and avocation of a clergyman, muft be highly grateful to every lover of the fports of the field, in the publication of his Rural Sports, which contains perhaps the moft com¬ plete account of every thing relating to dogs that is to be found in the Englifh language. Among other fub- jefts connefted with the management of this favourite companion of man, the reverend author takes occafion to treat pretty fully of his difeafes. On this fubjeft, Mr Daniel has not only collected matter from what he con- ceives to be the beft fources, but, what is more ufeful, as well as more to be depended on, he has added much from his own obfervation and experience. p- One of the lateft works on the difeafes of domeftic Hamfoa. animals, which we have feen, is An Enquiry into the Rot in Sheep, and other animals, by Dr Edward Harrifon, a refpedftable phyfician of Horn-caftle, in Lincolnfliire. Of this pamphlet, we (hall fpeak at large, when we come to treat of the difeafe, whofe nature and caufes it is in¬ tended to illuftrate. PART II. ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE HORSE. IN the (ketch which we are to give of the anatomy of the horfe, we muft very lightly pafs over fuch parts as appear not to be of immediate importance in the prac¬ tice of farriery, in order to dwell more minutely on thofe organs that are of greater confequence. Thus we '(hall content ourfelves with giving a tabular view of the Voi,. VIII. Part II. bones and mufcles •, we (hall entirely omit the brain and nerves *, but we (hall deferibe fome of the other vifeera, as the ftomach, and the bowels, fomewhat more mi¬ nutely. We (hall be moft particular on the anatomy of the extremities, efpecially of the feet, as on an accurate knowledge of thefe parts depend the principles of (hoe- 3 I ing> 434 F A R R I E Anatomy of the Horfe. 97 Importance of an accu¬ rate know¬ ledge of the anatomy of tlie foot. * Colunan cn the Jtlorfi s Host, vol.ii. 93 ing} which, without i'uch knowledge, cannot be pro¬ perly underflood, or rationally pradlifed. On the fubjeft of the anatomy of the foot, we lhall be particularly indebted to the writings of Mr Cole¬ man j and we cannot Ihew the importance of the fub- jedt in Ihoeing better than by the following remarks of that gentleman. " “ The organization and fundlions of the foot of the horfe will be found rather complicated 5 but it is of confiderable importance to thofe who with to invelligate the principles, as well as the practice of Ihoeing, to be well acquainted with every part of that organ. The practical part of Ihoeing is often -v^ell executed without an accurate knowledge of the contents of the hoof. “ But, in many cafes, it is very neceffary to be well acquainted with the llrudture and fundtions of the deep¬ er feated parts, and is molt particularly ufeful for the removal of many difeafes incident to the foot. The im- menfe weight fupported by the feet of the horfe, and the rapidity with which this great animal is conveyed from place to place, without violence to the external or internal parts of the foot, naturally excite a delire to afcertain the ciufe of fo wonderful an effedt. If the human foot fupported the fame weight as the foot of the horfe, the fenfible parts would be deltroyed. Without fprings, no external covering could effedtually fupport the weight, and prevent the foot from being fmalh- ed. The phyliologill will receive infinite fatisfadtion in the invelligation of the fundtions of this complicated organ •, he will find as much order and beauty, as much wifdom and utility, in the formation and economy of the foot, as ever was difplayed in the itrudture and ufes of any animal. It will be feen in many initances, that the fame part performs various fundtions, and all of thefe fundtions well •* In our defcription of the ftrudture of the horfe, we ihall, as far as pollible, employ Englilh names to de¬ note the parts defcribed or enumerated, as we think the writers on this fubjedt have done wrong in giving to the parts of the horfe the Latin names that are employ¬ ed in the human anatomy j and we have no doubt that the generality of veterinary Undents mult, from this cir- cumltance alone, be in a great meafure deterred from paying the necelfary attention to fo important a fubjedt. But, that wre may avoid alfedtation, we lhall, wherever it appears neceffary, add the correfponding Latin name, and fome fynonyms of the more refpedtable writers on the anatomy of the horfe. Chap. I. A Sketch of the Bones of the Horfe. R Y. 1. Bones of the Head. A. * c, Half of the frontal bone, which in the horfe is al- , ways compofed of two pieces. e,f One of the two parietal bones. g, b, z, k, The occipital bone, with a procefs at k, that in peculiar to the horfe. /, m, The temple, or temporal bone, of one fide 5 n, the cheek-bone of one fide. 0, One of the fmall bones wdthin the focket of the eye, that anfwers to the os unguis in man. p, p, Bones of the nofe. q, r, r, The upper jaw-bone. t. The intermaxillary bone, or what is ufually called by veterinary writers the inferior jaw-bone. This is not found in the humar^ Ikeleton. u, v. The polterior maxillary bone, whicU anfwers- to the lower jaw-bone in man. Bones of the Spine. B. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, The feven vertebrae of the neck. a, The atlas; b, the fecond vertebra, called in human anatomy, dentata; d, e,f its tranl’verfe procefs; e, its oblique procefs; f its ridge, anfwrering for a fpinous pro¬ cefs ; g, h, 1, k, l, m, n, third cervical vertebra; g, itV body ; above the letter is the hole for the tranfmiffion of the vertebral arterfes and veins; i, k, anterior and po- llerior tranfverfe proceffes; /, a protuberance in the fore part of the body. 8—25,The eighteen vertebrae of the back; zz,the body of each; b, the tranfverfe proceffes that articulate with the ribs ; c, the oblique proceffes ; d, the fpinous proceffes. 26 to 30, The five vertebra; of the loins, which have very long tranfverfe proceffes, though thefe are not very eafily diltinguilhed in the figure, from its having a fide view. x, x, The facrum bone, compofed of five pieces, as in man. From 31 to 43, the 13 bones compofing the tail, an- fwering to the os coccygis in man. Bones of the Trunk. C. a, b, J, 9, The true ribs ; 10 to 18 the falfe ribs; a, the head articulating with the tranfverfe procefs of the firlt dorfal vertebra ; under is feen the lower branch of the head that unites with the feventh cervical and firlt dorfal vertebra; c, the end that unites with the Iternum or brealt-bone ; a, b, c, d, e,f, g, the two hip¬ bones, anfwering to the of a innominate in the human anatomy; a, b, c, the ilium, with its tuberofity a, forming the haunch or hip ; e, f the ifehium ; g, g, the pubis with its junfture or fymphyfis between the two* letters. Fart IX. Anatomy of the Horfe. Skeleton. When we take a general view of the Ikeleton of the horfey.fuppofed to Hand before us, we lhall obferve that, excepting the head and forepart of the neck, the Ikele¬ ton forms nearly a fquare, and approaches more nearly to this form, as the body of the animal is more exadtly proportional. We remark this for the fake of painters and fculptors, who commonly err confiderably with re- fpe£t to their proportion of length and breadth in their figures of the horfe. We Iball divide the Ikeleton into the head, the fpine, the trunk, and extremities. See Plate CCXI. fig. 1, Bones of the Fore Extremity. D. D. e, f, g, h, i, l, m, The fcapula or blade-bone ; e, it§ neck, below which is feen its glenoid cavity ; f, ante- fpinatus foffa ; h, its fpine, which in the human ends in the proceffus acromion, but as there is no clavicle in the horfe, it ends by a tuberofity ; i, coracoid procefs ; be¬ tween m and z, the anterior colta; /, between this and e, polterior colta ; between rn and /, is its bafe, and the line above it marks the extent and fituation of the car¬ tilage of the fcapula ; n, 0, p, q, humerus or arm ; n, its neck, above which is feen its head ; 0, its anterior head, forming, the point of thelhoulder, as it is commonly^ cadled Part II. FARR Anatomy called in tlie liorfes, />, its tuberofity; q, its lower head, of the behind is feen the cavity for the reception of the olecra- , non j r, r, ulna 3 the upper part forms the olecranon or elbow, the lower part is united by ligamentous fibres to the radius 3 s, s, the radius 3 I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, the carpus or knee 31, 1, pifiform 3 2, 2, fcaphoid 3 3,3, lunar 3 4, unciform 3 5, magnum 3 6, cuneiform 3 7, trapezoid 3 w, metacarpus 3 J, canon 3 w, two fmall metacarpals 3 v, w, x, y, z, phalanges 3 t;, fy-ft pha¬ lanx or paftern 3 to, fefamoids; x, coronet-bone, or little paftern 3 y, coffin 3 navicular or j^it-feone. Bones of the Hind Extremity. E. E. /, /, ?w, Thigh-bone 3 //, the neck, above which is the head received into the focket of the pelvis 3 z, great trochanter 3 £, the outer trochanter 3 /, /, the inner tro¬ chanter 3 m, m, the anterior condyles j «, zz, the pofte- rior ditto 3 />, />, femilunar cartilage ; 0, , y, fig. 9. Ciliares, zq w, fig. 9. Temporal, 2, 3, fig. 9^ Canine, 6, 7, fig. 9. m, », fig. 10. Depreffor of the lower lip, 9, 10, fig. 9. r, fig. 10. Elevator of the chin, 12. fig. 9. Dilatators of the noftrils, abed, gf fig. 9. Mufcles of the Neck. Sterno-maftoid; a^b^.c, fig. 9. Coraco-hyoideus, f f fig. 9. and a, by c, dy fig. 10.. Sterno-hyoideus; g, fig. 9. f g, fig. .10. Sterno-thyroideus j by z, k, fig. 10. Tranfverfals^ /z, z, fig. 9. A, B, C, D, E, F, G, fig. 10. Trachelo-maftoid; M, O, P, Q, S, fig. 10. Re&us internus major capitis; z;z, zz, fig. 9. and to, x, yt fig. 10. Intertranfverfales minores colli; 0, fig. 9. Long Part II. Anatomy of the Horfe. FARR Long mufcle of the neck ; q, %. 9. X, Y, fig. 10. Splenius; r, /, fig* 9- Hyothyroidseus ; y, fig. 9. Cricothyroidaeus j 55, fig. 9. Lower confiriftor of the pharynx. Reaus capitis pofticus major j /, «, fig. ir. minor ; a, to, fig. 11. Superior oblique of the head j «, U, fig. 10. Inferior ditto j W, W, fig. 10. Intertranfverfales pofteriores colli y L, &.c. M, &c. fig. n. Intervertebral mufcles. Multifidae fpinae y c, d, fig. 12. Spinales cervicis y R, T, U, fig. 11. I E R Y. Mufcles of the Trunk. External oblique y I, K, L, M, fig. 9. Obliquus internus y s, t, u, w, a, y, fig. IO. Redus abdominis y fig. 10. Tranfverfalis abdominis y />, y, r, fig. II. External intercoftals j 1, 2, &c. fig. II. Internal, ditto ; 3, 4, &c. fig. 11. Semifpinalis and ipinalis dorli y a, b, crd, e,f fig 11. Longiflimus dorfi y g, h, z, hy fig. 11. Sacrolumbal •, /, m, ny &c. fig. 11. Elevators of the ribs y a, b, fig. 1 2. Lateral of the tail j e,f fig. 12. Iiitertranfverfals of the tail j g, &c. fig. 12^ N Elevator of the tail-, z, fig. 12. DepreiTor of the tail y kr fig. I 2. 437 Anatomy of the Horfe. IO^ Table of the mul'cles of the ex- tfemities. Table of the Mufcles of the Extremities. 1. Mufcles of the Tore-leg and Foot. Flame. Trapezius. Larger rhomboid. Rhomboideus major, a b, fig. 9. Triangulaire Vitet. Leffer rhomboid. Levator fcapulce. Leffer peaoral. Depreffor fcapulce. c, d, e,f fig. 9. Triangular. Anterior ferrated. Serratus anticus. g, /z, z, k, /, 0, pt fig. 9* Ante-fpinatus. a, b} c, dy e,f, fig. 9. Poft-fpinatus. /z, k, l, n, fig. 9. Extenfor of the ligament. Latiffimus dorfi. r, j, t, u, w, fig. 9. Common mufcie. Levator humeri. Subfcapular. rz, by fig. II. Origin and Infection. From the 4th, 5th, and 6th cervical vertebrae j from the firft 1 2 or 13 dorfal vertebrae y- and from the cervical ligament, into the fpine of the blade-bone. From the 3d, 4th, 5th, and 6th dorfal verte¬ brae, below the cartilage of the blade-bone, into the whole length of that cartilage. i From the ligament of the neck, at about the 2d vertebra, into the cartilage of the blade- bone. From the lateral part of the breaft-bone, into the upper and fore part of the blade-bone. From the 4th, and 5th vertebrae of the neck, into the upper and fore part of the blade- bone, above the pe&oral. From the true ribs, and from the 6th and 7 th cervical vertebrae, into the laft cervical ver¬ tebra.. From the ante-fpinatas foffa, by two tendons, into the two tuberofities of the head of the fhoulder-bone. From a foffa, fo called, into the outer-fide of the fhoulder-bone. From the coracoid procefs of the blade-bone, into the whole of the capfular ligament. From all the dorfal vertebrae connefted with the mufcles of the back, and with the flefhy pannicle, into the inner tuberofity of the fhoulder-bone, below the blade- bone. From the tuberofity of the temporal bone, and from the four firft cervical vertebrae, into the upper and outward part of the arm. From the hollow of the blade-bone, into the inner fide of the fhoulder-bone. Vfe. To raife and draw backwards1 the blade-bone. To raife the blade-bone, and draw it a little forwards. To draw the blade-bone for¬ ward, when the neck is fix¬ ed, or vice verfa. To draw the blade-bone down¬ wards. To draw the blade-bone for¬ wards. To conned! the blade-bone with the cheft, and to draw it downwards, and fometimes to aflift other mufcles. To extend the fore-leg and move it forwards. To move the fore-leg outward^ and away from its fellow. To prevent the ligament from being pinched between the bones. To draw the fore-leg back¬ ward, and towards the cheft. To raife the arm, and when- that is fixed, to draw the head and neck downwards. To move the arm towards its fellow. Larger-' F A Anrtomy of the Horfe. Name. Larger peftoral. * 2 3 4 5 fig- 9- Sterno-brachial. Coraco-bracliial. Adduftor of the {boulder. Teres major. fig- II- \ It F. I E R Y. Origin and Infertion. From the fide of the breaft-bone, and the cartilages of the fix laft true ribs, into the inner fide of the ihoulder-bone. From the fore part of the breait-bone, into the inner and lower part of the ihoulder- bone, and conneded by expaniion with the radius. From the coracoid procefs of the blade-bone into thd' lower and back part of the fiioulder- bone. From the upper part of the pofterior edge of the blade-bone, into the inlide of the Ihoul- der-bone. t Long abdu&orof the (boulder. Teres ininor. fig- 9- Short abdudor of the (boulder. Anterior radial flexor. Flexor longus. Biceps in human anatomy, i, k, /, ?n, n, fig. io. Oblique brachial flexor. From the pofterior edge of the blade-bone in¬ to the outer tuberofity of the (houlder- bone. Below the laft mufcle, between the laft and the fubfcapula. From the tuberofity of the blade-bone, above the glenoid cavity, into the inner tuberofity of the radius. ✓ ' From the neck of the (houlder-bone into the inner tuberofity of the radius. Fafcialis cubiti. Extenfor longus. t From the pofterior edge of the blade-bone in¬ to the olecranon, or elbow. \ Biceps extenfor cubiti. N, O, P, fig. 9. Internal brachial. a, b, c, fig. 11. Intermediate extenfor. Large extenfor of the canon. Radial extenfor of the canon. b, c,d, fig. 10. ■External flexor of the canon. /, m, fig. 11. Liner flexor of the canon. nop, fig. 11. Flexor of the carpus. « Anterior long extenfor of the foot. The lateral extenfor of the foot. Perforated flexor of the foot. Perforating flexor of the foot. From the whole length of the pofterior edge of the blade-bone into the olecranon. Below the inner fide of the head of the (boulder-bone, into the inner and upper part of the olecranon. From the neck, and fomc part of the (houlder- bone, into the olecranon. From the outer condyle, and tuberofity of the • (houlder-bone, into the anterior tuberofity of the canon-bone. From the fide of the radius downwards from the middle, into the fmall inner metacarpal bone. From the outer condyle of the (houlder-bone, at its back part, into the pifiform, and fmall outer metacarpal bones. From the inner condyle of the flioulder-bone, into the back part of the canon. From the inner condyle of the (houlder- bone, at its back part, into the pififonn bone. From the lower and outer head of the (houlder-bone, and upper part of the ra¬ dius, into the anterior protuberance of the coflin-bone. From the outer head of the radius, pafiing over theicnee through an annular ligament, into the upper and back part of the bone down to the foot. From the inner condyle of the (houlder-bone palling behind the knee, into the arch of the coffin-bone. From the olecranon and the fhoulder-bone at the back part, into the arch of the coffin-bone. ' Part IT. Ufe. Anatomy To draw the fore-leg down- of tlie wards and backwards. Ho^e- r To draw- the fore-legs together, and to aifill the laft: in re- fpiration, when the fore-leg is .fixed. To draw- the arm forwards and outwards. When the blade bone is fixed, to draw the fore-leg up¬ wards and inwards, and vice verfa. To drawr the fhoulder-bone up¬ wards and cutw-ards. To turn the arm. To bend the arm. To turn the fore-arm, and aflift the former in bending;. it. To bind down the mufcles, and aflift in extending the arm. To extend the arm. To oppofe the oblique flexor. To aflift in extending the arrfh To extend the canon. To aflift the former, and turn the foot outwrards. To bend the canon. To afiift the former. To bend the carpus, and ex¬ tricate the ligament. To extend the foot. To aflift the former, if To bend the foot. To aflift the former. 2. Mufcles F A K R I Part II. Anatomy ot the Horfe. Name, is'c. Pofterior gluteus, m, n, o, p, fig. 9* Tenfor vaginae femoris. Fafcia lata. a, b, c, c, D, ej, g, h, fig. 9. Semimembranofus. 17, 18, 19. fig- 9- Eiceps flexor cruris. 3, 4, 5 —11, fig. 9. Pofterior flexor of the leg. The large gluteus. <7, £), r, s, t, fig. 9. Capfular.- a,b,c, fig. 12. Gracilis. e, f, fig. 9. u, w, fig. II. Sartorius. AdduBor longus. A A r, s, fig- ii- 1, ", fig. 12. Large pfoas. Larger internal iliac, e, fig. 10. Leffer internal iliac. PefHneus. j-, fig. 12. Triceps addudftor femcris. Vaftus extemus. «, 0, p, r, j-, t, fig. 10. Straight mufcle of the leg. Rutus cruris, g, h, i, k. fig. 10. Vaftus internus. b, c, fig. 10.. € rural. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, fig. 11. External, obturator. Square mufcle of the thigh. d^uadratus femoris. Gemini, f g, fig. i0. E R Y, 2. Mufcles of the Hind Leg or Foot. Origin and Infertion. From the interior and pofterior angles of the ilium, into the little trochanter of the thigh-bone. From the ^apterior angle of the ilium, into a tendinous expanfion over the thigh. From the tuberofity and lower angle of the ifchium, into the fore part of the thigh¬ bone, and into the tibia. From the tuberofity of the ifchium, and be¬ ginning of the tail, into the inner fide of the fpine of the tibia. Like the former, into the inner condyle of the thigh-bone and upper end of the tibia. From the vertebrae of the loins, and from the facrum, into the great trochanter of the thigh-bone. Rifes from the brim of the acetabulum, into the outer fide of the thigh-bone. From the pubis and ifehium, into the fafcia 1 of the thigh and the inner fide of the head of the tibia. From the inner edge of the brim of the pelvis, into the inner head of the tibia.. From the three laft dorfal, and four firft lumbar vertebrae, and from the two laft falfe ribs, into the inner trochanter of the thigh-bone. From the inner furface of the ilium, into the lefler trochanter of the thigh-bone'. From the inner furface of the ilium, into the leffer trochanter of the thigh-bone. From the fymphyfis pubis, inferted below the laft. From the inner edge of the pubis, from the anterior branch of the ifchium, and from its tuberofity, into the back, of the thigh¬ bone, the upper and inner part of the tibia, and the tuberofity of the thigh-bone. From the great trochanter, and the outer fide of the thigh-bone, into the fide of the knee- pan. From the ilium above the focket, and from the upper part of the thigh-bone, into the upper part of the knee-pan. From the neck, inner tuberofity, and whole inner part of the thigh-bone, into the in¬ ner fide of the knee-pan. From the fore part of the thigh-bone, into the inner fide of the knee-pan. From the inner part of the ifchium, into the hollow of the great trochanter. From the lower part of the tuberofity of the ifchium, into the thigh-bone below the great trochanter. From the ifchium and pubis, one above the. other, inferted into the thigh with the laft. 439 Anatomy ©f the Horfe. Vfe.' To extend the thigh, and draw it outwards. To ftretch the fafcia of the thigh, and draw it inwards. To draw the thigh outwards. To bend the leg, and draw it inwards. To bend the leg. To extend the thigh, and draw it backwards and outwards. To extricate the capfular liga¬ ment. To make one thigh approach its fellow. To affift the former. To bend the thigh. To affift the former. To aflift the former, To bend the thigh. To draw one thigh towards fta fellow. To extend the leg. I To extend the leg ftrongly. To affift the vaftus externus, and laft mufcle. Ditto. To roll the thigh-bone. Aflifts the former. Oppofe the laft. Inner - 4^0 Anatomy of the Horfe. Name, b'c. Inner obturator. I, / 2. Prjrifortn. 2, 3> % Popliteus. 28, 29, fig. II. 1 Tibialis anticus. 14. Gaftrocnemius. Plantar. 40’, fig. 9. Perforated flexor of the foot. Larger perforating flexor of the foot. Leffer perforating flexor of the foot. The long extenfor of the foot. Lateral extenfor of the foot. Leffer extenfor. farriery. Origin and Infertion. From the edge of the thyroid hole, into the thigh with the preceding. From the facrum within the pelvis, inferted as the laft. From the external condyle of the thigh-bone, into the tibia. From the fore part of the external condyle of the thigh-bone, into both canons by two portions. From each condyle of the thigh-bone, into the hock. From the upper part of the fpine of the tibia, inferted as the former. From the hollow between the condyles of the thigh-bone, into each fide of the paf- tern-bone. From the back and outer part of the head of the tibia, into the arch of the coffin-bone. From the back part of the head of the tibia, inferted with the preceding. From the tendon of the extenfor of the ca¬ non, in the anterior protuberance of the coffin-bone. From the outer head of the thigh-bone, and from the head of the fibula, inferted with the laft. From the tendon of the long extenfor to the lateral extenfor. To affift the gemim. Ditto. To draw the leg inwards. To bend the leg ftrongly. To extend the(canon. To bend the pattern and foot. To bend the foot. To affift the former. To extend the foot. Ditto. Part II. Anatomy of the Hoi fe. To draw the tendons of the long and lateral extenfors to¬ gether. The four figures to which we have referred alfo re- prefent the following parts. The broad ligaments of the eyelids} s, t, fig. 9. Alee narium j 2;, fig. 9. Angular vein j 14, fig. 9. Angular artery } 15, fig- 9. Parotid gland 5 26, fig. 9. In the Neck. Common jugular vein ; I, fig. 9. External anterior jugular j 2, fig. 9. . Pofterior external jugular ; 3, fig* 9« Part of the carotid artery 5 4, fig. 9. Branches of the cervical arteries and veins 5 1,2, fig. 10. Thyroid gland •, a, fig. II. Gullet ; f, fig- II. Windpipe j k, fig. 11. Cervical nerves •, 2, fig. 11. Ligament of the neck 5 5, fig. 11. > 7* fig* I 2. External carotid artery j 1, fig- I2* In the Trunk. Epigaftric artery 5 w, fig; 11. External iliac } y, fig- H* The diaphragm j m m, fig. 12. Intercoftal artery 5 />, fig. 12. In the Fore Extremity. Internal plantar vein •, r, fig. 9. Coronary ligament of the foot j 13, fig. 9. Cartilages of the coffin-bone j r, u. - 4 In the Hind Extremity. Vena faphaenaj 21, fig. 9. Capfular ligament of the knee5 3, 4, fig', ic: Sciatic artery *, 34, fig. II. Gluteal artery •, 35, 35, fig. II. Crural vein •, 38, fig. II. Popliteal artery J 39,52, fig- II* vein; 53, fig. II. Crural nerve ; 35, fig* 12. Chap. HI* Of the Stomach and Bowels. i°4 In the horfe there is but one ftomach, which is very Suucture fmall in proportion to his general bulk; and is partly of the membranous, partly cuticular, and partly mufcular.ltomac ' It is fituated immediately behind the diaphragm, in the left hypochondrium, and in part of the epigaftrium, with its expellent orifice extending acrofs the fpine to the right, which is the reafon that lying on that fide is judged more wholefome than fleeping on the left. It has two furfaces, which may be called its fides, though one is pofterior, and the other anterior ; and two ex¬ tremities, a large and a fmall; the fuperior furface of which receives the gullet, and is called its cardiac ori¬ fice; while the former ends in the duodenum, and is termed the pyloric orifice; this extremity, when the ftomach is diftended, is the moft. pofterior of the two: The hollow part fituated fuperiorly, only forms its lejjer curvature, as the lower portion forms its great curvature. • . % Thus when the ftomach is moderately diftended, it lies in an obliquely tranfverfe direction, with its great extremity a littie forwards, and its two orifices ffiperi- or * Blame i Outlines, vol, ii. Part II. FARR Anatomy or, but the cardiac the moft fo, with the lefTer ex- Horfe6 tremIt5r rat^er pofterior to the other, and the great t curvature inferior. It is evident that the fituation of the ftomach muft vary much with, its diftenfion : the foregoing defeription anfwers to it when moderately diftended only ^ but where it is very much filled, the left extremity will prefs upon the diaphragm, and the right will be carried more pofteriorly. In oxen and Iheep, where the firft ftomach is large, it is found, when diftended, to have its left extremity carried quite into the left iliac region j in which part it is ufually pundur- ed, when they are hoved : but fuch an idea of the ftomach of the horfe would prove very erroneous } for this animal has a very fmall one, and therefore its fitu¬ ation can never be fuch *. From a diftended ftomach prelling upon the dia¬ phragm, we are at no lofs to underftand, why breathing is impeded after a foil meal, when a horfe appears to labour for breath; for he is forced to ufe the intercoftal mufcles, and the mufcles of the ftioulder and fore ex¬ tremities, to open the cheft, the pofterior enlargement being prevented from the diaphragm being fixed by the preffure of the ftomach ; hence we fee the great impro¬ priety of galloping horfes after watering, to warm it in their bellies, as it is fooliftily termed. Horfes, when grazing, if they drink, are never obferved to do this $ if it was neceffary, nature would diftate it to them. How hurtful it is likewife to ride hard, after a horfe has been full fed, is equally evinced. The ftomach has externally a covering from the peritoneum, which adheres clofely to it, by means of its cellular portion j and which portion is dipping in between the mufcular fibres. Its middle portion is made up of mufcular fibres, which are more numerous in this animal, than in the ruminant j making this kind of ftomach a medium be¬ tween the membranous one of feme animals, and the true mufcular ftomach of others. The direction of thefe fibres is various ; but they may principally be referred to a longitudinal and a tranfverfe order, though neither of them are regularly fo, and are inter¬ mixed with others, whofe direction is very oblique, and interlaced with each other. The longitudinal plane is the moft external of the two, and appears a con¬ tinuation of the external plane of the cefophagus, with fome original fibres, which fpread over the leffer cur¬ vature, being carried obliquely round, and likewife oyer the great extremity, forming themfelves into a kind of vertex, whofe centre is in the middle of that extremity. The inner plane is by much the larger, and is not quite circular, but {lightly oblique, crofting the obliquity of the longitudinal plane. This circular plane is very thick and ftrong round the cardia, or that extremity into which the oefophagus terminates. They are here fo very thick as to form a true fphinc- Reaions foi ter 5 and to this it is in fome meafure owing, that a aot vomit- ^orfe cannot vomit; for when the circular and longi- ing. tudinal fibres are afting from the pylorus to the cardia, by any irritation that reverfes the ufual motion, pro¬ ducing an effort to vomit, the circular and longitudinal fibres of the cardia being infinitely ftronger and more numerous, are contrafting this orifice (efpecially the circular), as the others are contracting the other parts ; for as the mufcular fibres exift equally throughout the ftomach, by which the motions are effected, it cannot be limply from the exiftence of the circular covering to Vol. VIII. Part II, 105 I E R Y. the firft portion of his ftomach, that he cannot vomit; for it is reafonable to fuppofe the fibres a£t throughout the ftomach by the common confent of parts; nor do they of actual neceflity want an immediate ftimulus to their furfaces; for were this the cafe, the fibres of the oefophagus would not by the prefence of the mafticated bolus be ftimulated to contract through the cuticular coat, which equally here lies over the fibres ; neverthe- lefs, the cuticular coat of the ftomach is probably afliit- ing in this difficulty to regurgitate: it does it by leffening the liability to naufea, which feldom takes place in the horfe ; and as vomiting is only an effort to remove nan- fea or its caufe, fo nature not having given the dif- eafe, has not provided the means for its removal. As likewife vomiting appears to be a reverfing of the peri- ftaltic motion of the ftomach ; which motion, in its na¬ tural ftate, begins from the cardia, and ends at the py¬ lorus ; fo in this reverfed ftate, it commences at the pylorus, and ends at the cardia, thus regurgitating its contents; fo it is very probable that the cuticular covering may leffen this inverted periftaltic motion in the upper portion, though it cannot wholly deftroy it; and hence cannot be the only, or the principal realon of the impoffibility, or rather of the difficulty with which this animal vomits ; for inftances have occurred where it has taken place. A horfe in Suflex was feen to regurgitate a large quantity of grains, and we have heard of one or two other inftances ; but thefe muft be regarded as very rare occurrences. It is not, therefore, that the ftomach of the horfe cannot be irritated to make an attempt to vomit, that no fuch effedt generally takes place ; for though it is but very feldom that naufea occurs, and perhaps never in a ftate of nature, yet it may be excited by means of aconite, hellebore, and fome other fubftances, which have caufed fruitlefs efforts to vomit. But the true and principal reafon that a horfe may be faid, naturally not to be able to vomit, arifes, in that nature has wife¬ ly fo conftrudted the parts, that the very effort to it increafes the refiftance by the very ftrong fphindter placed at the mouth of the cardia. Had this refiftance not been placed, and every means taken to increafe the almoft impoffibility of vomiting in a liorfe, it is evident that from the curtain of the palate flopping the open¬ ing of the mouth, this aftion, had it taken place, would have occafioned fuffocation. The inner coat of the ftomach is compofed of two portions, the one cuticular and the other villous. This fpecies of cuticular cover¬ ing to nearly one half of the ftomach, is peculiar to fuch animals as appear deftined to live on grain, as horfes, affes, rats, and mice ; and this forms a third fpecies of ftomach between the true membranous one of graminivorous animals, and the mufcular of the carni¬ vorous tribes, and it may be confidered in a flight de¬ gree, as a fpecies of gizzard, refembling the ftrubture of thofe animals, as fowls, who have organs to make up for the want of teeth. For a horfe has not the means of re-maftication, as in oxen or Iheep, nor does he ufual¬ ly mafticate his food at firft fufficiently to comminute it j for the wants of the conititution ftimulate him to a hafty deglutition of his food, which, if there was not fome other ftnnfture than that common to ftomachs in general, would not be fufficiently digefted : for the food is (olid, and the ftomach fmall; therefore this cuticular coat may be ui’eful, as its infenfibility allows it to prefs 3 K in 441 Anatomy> of the Horfe. io£» 44' Anatomy of the Horfe. * Blaine s Outlines. 107 Bowels. F A R II in a fmall degree upon the food, and perform a flight trituration upon it. This cuticular coat is fpread over the firft portion of the ftomach, taking in all the great extremity, and forming between a third and half of its extent. "it is formed into folds at the cardia in the fame manner as at the internal part of the oefophagus} but as foon as it has palled this orifice, thefe folds take an irregular direftion, but are lefs than thofe formed on the villous furface. The villous or fenfible portion of the ftomach, though it occupies more of the length of the ftomach, yet per¬ haps in real extent is little more than half of its furface. It unites with or is connefted to the cuticular. Its ex¬ ternal furface is firm, and appears as it were a diftindf portion, but is only denfe cellular fubftance, which has given rife to the defcription of four tunics to the ftomach. The tunica vil/ofa is fo called from its re- lemblance to the pile of velvet 5 its fine villi are pro¬ bably the extreme fine ends of velfels fecreting the gaf- tric juice. The villous coat being much larger in ex¬ tent than the mufcular, is thrown into folds, which are more confiderable than thofe of the cuticular coat. Thefe are largeft at the portion toward the great extre¬ mity, and are irregularly waving : towards the duode¬ num they become lefs, and when at the pylorus they form a fold that makes a kind of valve to this part of the ftomach, preventing the return of the food, and its too fpeedy pafiage out. The folds not only hinder the too fpeedy paflage of the food, but by this means apply the gaftric juice more certainly to all the parts} but the principal end is to increafe the feereting furface, which is here more extenlive than thofe of the human *.. The remainder of the alimentary canal is continued from the lower orifice of the ftomach, to the anus, or end of the paffage, forming a long canal of different di- menfions, called mteftines. T hey are ufually divided into fmall and large. In fome animals they hardly merit this diftinclion, there being but little difference in point of fize : but in the horfe, the proportion is very different; the fmall inteftines being not much larger than the human, but the large of an immenfe bulk. This canal is connected through its wdiole extent to membranous produftions of the peritoneum, efpecially to thofe called mefenlery and mefocolon. The whole canal varies in point of length in different fubjefts ; but is feldom lefs than 24 yards, and often more. The in¬ teftines are contained within a prolongation of the peri¬ toneum, which arifes in moft inftances from the mefen- tery : the two folds of this membrane feparate and fur- round the inteftines, forming their external coat. The next coat is mufcular, and formed of two layers of fibres, a longitudinal and a circular ; the latter are in greater proportion, and by the contratlion of thefe the vermi¬ cular motion, called periflailic, is performed, from the longitudinal fibres flightly fhortening them, and the circular diminifhing their fize. Within this mufcular coat there is a quantity of cellular membrane rather more denfe than in fome other parts \ and this ufed to be regarded as a coat, and w7as called the nervous, but is only a layer of cellular membrane. The third and inner coat of the inteftines is the villous, wdiich is very vafcular and fenfible. There are no confiderable folds of the inner tunic of the inteftines, as in the human. In this animal thefe are rendered unneceffary by the great I E R Y. Part II. length of his inteftines, and the flow paffuge of the ali- Anatomy ments through them by this length and his pofition. H^fe The firft portion of the bowels, which anfwers to the l —, duodenum in man, though in the horfe it is nearer 20 108 inches than 12, is attached to the ftomach, having its Firft por- pyloric orifice ending in it j its courfe in the horfe isb°n' rather different from that in the human, and by this it acquires a more complete covering from the peritoneum. It hangs loofe and pendulous, being attached to the concave furface of the liver, where making a turn, it is fixed to the vertebrae: it then takes the name oijeju¬ num. It appears rather larger in circumference than the other fmall inteftines, and is remarkable for having the pancreatic and biliary duels penetrating it, fometimes entering it obliquely clofe together, and fometimes at a diftance from each other. . 109 The jejunum and ilium differ very little from the fame Je.iunuin’ bowels in the human ipecies. no The great inteftines are very properly fo called in Large m- the horfe ; and as they have very little relemblance to1"' mes* the human large inteftines, they require a particular de¬ fcription. 111 The ccecum is fituated in the back part of the belly,C3ecum’ and is a very large canal, which is entered abruptly by the ilium. The fore part of this canal proje&s for¬ ward two or three feet, into a fort of bag of the fame ftze of the colon ; but the back part terminates in what is called a blind end. I he Ccecum ufually occu¬ pies the right fide of the belly, and appears imme¬ diately on opening the peritoneum, with its commence¬ ment from the colon and ilium in the right iliac region, extending forwards to the right fide, with its blind end clofe to the diaphragm and liver. This termi¬ nation is not furniftied, as in fome animals, with an appendix vermiiormis, but terminates by a fimple blind end. Through the peritoneal covering are feen four mufcular longitudinal bands, extending from the extremity along the mufcular coat, and dividing tne gut into four longitudinal portions. One or two of thefe are ufually covered with fat, and are not fo re¬ gularly longitudinal as the others. The internal mem¬ brane is folded up between the longitudinal bands, and by interfering them forms numerous cavities called the cells. On the flighteft inipeftion we fee a great peculiarity in the form of the caecum of the horfe j and in a more accurate view, are ftruck with the importance of the ftru£lure to this animal, and are led to confider the caecum as little lefs than a fecond ftomach. This is in fact the cafe ^ for the food coming in a macerated mafs from the fmall inteftines, is mixed in the caecum, with the bile, and pancreatic juice, and here undergoes a farther change, to which the ftrufture of the caecum is evidently favour¬ able, as it is fitted to retain the mafs for a confiderable time within it, and to circulate it through all its parts. It has twro blind ends, one forming its bafis, and near this enters the ilium ; the other forming its point, and extending up towards the diaphragm. From one part of the bale the colon commences by a very contracted portion, for the purpofe of preventing the entrance of the contents of the ilium, till they have paffed through the caecum. In many animals the caecum is a very inconfiderable part; in fome it has one or more appendicles; in others it is almoft entirely wanting ; and of the Hcrfe. H* Colon. Part II. FARR Anatomy and in all but the horfe its ufe is oblcure, and apparent¬ ly not very important •, but in the horfe it is certainly little lefs than a fecond ilomach, for its whole Urufture proves, that it is purpofely deligned that all the food taken in (hall be poured into the bafe of this gut, by the contraction of which it fhall be forced towards the apex, and either in its paffage or return ihall be de¬ tained in the cells to be in fome way farther acted upon, and to undergo fome change neceffary to the fyftem. Having undergone this change, whatever it is, it is forced into the colon. The colon commences fmall from the fide of the bafe of the caecum y and as the ilium cannot be faid to enter it together with the csecum, as in fome animals, there is in the horfe no fuch part as the valve of the colon pro¬ perly fo called. The ilium has, however, a fort of pro- trufion with its inner membrane, by which in fome mea- fure it prevents the return of the contents of the csecum. As the colon paffes, it is farther contracted, and then enlarges into a very long and large canal, which, after having made nearly the 1x11016 circumfer¬ ence of the belly, is again {lightly contracted. It then again enlarges, paffes again round the belly, and is a third time contracted, juft where it ends in the reCtum or ftraight gut. The fmall inteftines reft on the turns of the colon and on the caecum. The colon is furnifli- ed with four ligamentous bands in its large portion, but there are only two in the fmall portions y thefe form longitudinal fraena, which are interfeCted again by in¬ ternal folds, fo as to form the cells of the colon. It is connected and fupported in its fituation by that portion of the mefentery termed mefocolon. This inteftine is very different- in the horfe to what it is in moft other animals, in confequence of its variations in fize, being in moft other inftances of one general fize y it is likewife this gut and the caecum that are the principal feat of the inflammation arifing from violent purging medicines. Tire recium is the continuation of the colon, and paffes backwards from the lumbar vertebra2 to the anus. Its mufcular coat is thicker than that of the other in¬ teftines, and it is thrown internally into cavities by the inner membrane, in fome manner fimilar to the cells of the colon, though lefs y were it not for this, the inteftine might be too conftantly ftimulated to expel its contents, but by this means the faeces are received and retained till they are collected in a confiderable quantity, when they are expelled. The reClum is attached to the fpine and facrum by the peritoneum, is here called meforec- tum y but the true fold of peritoneum does not invert its whole portion, but leaves it as it approaches the rec¬ tum, wdiich is at this place only covered writh the cel¬ lular part of it. The mefentery bands of the re&um are very ftrong, and terminate at the anus in a kind of li¬ gamentary expanfion attached to the os coccygis. The anus is the termination of the reClum, and is opened by the force of the periftaltic motion and the confent of the parts, and (hut by a mufcular band round the extremity of the gut called the fphin&er. It is likewife elevated and retracfed by two pair of mufcles. Chap. IV. Of the Foot. Ik our account of the anatomy of the horfe’s foot, it will be neceffary to defcribe only one foot, as thdfe be- longing to both extremities are limilar in ftruchire. 1 *3 Rega„ The emperor alfo fpeaks of horfe-ftioe nails by the appellation of and mentions that a certain number of pounds of iron ftrould be given out from the imperial (lores to make mXiyxix, and other horfe furniture. The an¬ tiquity of horfe-ftioes is alfo confirmed by their being fpoken of in the "writings of Italian, French, and Englifti au¬ thors of the fame century. “ When Boniface marquis of Tufcany, one of the richeft princes of his time, went to meet Beatrix, his bride, mother of the well-known Matilda, about the year 1038, his whole train were fo magni¬ ficently decorated, that his horfes were not (hod with iron, but with filver. The nails were even of the fame me¬ tal ) and when any of them dropped out, they belonged to thofe who found them. The marquis feems to have imitated Nero ; but this anecdote may be only a fiiftion. It is related by a cotemporary writer, but unfortunate- - ly, his account is in verfe 5 and the author, perhaps, fenfible of his inability to make his fubjeft fuffieiently intereft- ing by poetical ornaments, availed himfelf of the licence claimed by poets to relate fomething fingular and uncom¬ mon. However this may be, it is certain that the (hoes of the horfes muft have been faftened on with nails, other- wife the author could not have mentioned them. “ Daniel the hiftorian, feems to give us to underftand, that in the ninth century, horfes were not (hod always, but only in the time of froft, and on other particular occafions. The pra&ice of (hoeing appears to have been introduced into England by William the Conqueror. We are informed that this fovereign gave the city of Nor¬ thampton as a fief, to a certain perfon, in confideration of his paying a dated fum yearly for the (hoeing of horfes j and it is believed that Henry de Ferrers, or de Ferriers, who came over with William, and wffiofe defendants (till bear in their arms fix horfe-fhoes, received that furname, becaufe he was entrufted with the infpedlion of the farriers. We may here obferve, that horfe-ftioes have been found with other riding furniture, in the graves of fome of the old Germans and Vandals in the northern countries} but the antiquity of them cannot be Acer- tained.” Beckman on Inventions, voL ii. 448 Operations *34 Defe&s of the com¬ mon mode. FARRIERY. Part III. , 135 "Latofle's jinethod. 136 Ofmer’s ■method. m Lord Pem¬ broke’s me •thod. • fuppofe, to adapt it better, and make it fit clofer to the hoof. — • The confequences of this method of {hoeing muft be, t. That the funftion of the bars, whatever it may be, (and we have {hewn that they are intended to prevent contraction of the feet,) muft be deftroyed. 2. That cut¬ ting away the frog, expofes this part to injury, and is ■productive of many difeafes. 3. That the heels of the ilioe being higher than the toe, will prevent the frogs from embracing the ground, for which we have (hewn ■they were naturally intended. 4. That by making the {hoe concave at the quarters, and placing the nails near the heels, the growth of the cruft in thefe parts is im- ■peded, and thus the foot is contracted, and its proper Ihape deftroyed. 5. That by faftening the {hoe near the infenfible frog at the heels, the proper aCtion of the frogs and foie, as a fpring to aflift the motions of the animal, is deftroyed. 6. That by putting on the ihoe hot, the moifture of the crufts is dried up, and thus the contraction of the foot is {till farther increafed j and, 7. That by making the flioes rounded next the ground, the fure footing of the horfe is greatly leffened, much to the danger of his rider. The firft modem writer who attempted to reform the common mode of {hoeing, appears to have been La- foffe. It is true that an excellent mode of {hoeing was recommended about 300 years ago by Caefar Fiafchi, an Italian writer on horfemanftiip; but his plan never came into general ufe, and Lafoffe appears to have all the merit of the improvement, as it is more than probable that he had never feen Fiafchi’s work. The {hoe re¬ commended by Lafoffe was what he called the half¬ moon Jlooe, being nearly femicircular, and reaching little further than to the middle of the foot ; the nails being placed round the toe. Lafoffe’s {hoe was never very generally employed in this country, even though the improvement was rendered familiar by Bracken and Bartlet, who, as we have faid, tranflated Lafoffe’s treatife into Englilh. It has been confidered as ufeful in fome cafes of difeafed feet, and for ftrong feet which have begun to contraCl, or appear likely to do fo, pro¬ vided fuch horfes are not employed on very hard, rough .roads; but it is by no means applicable to the majority of our horfes. Its principal difadvantages appear to be, that the heels wrear too faft, and that in running, horfes are apt to flip with it. Mr William Ofiner, whofe work on {hoeing we have mentioned in N® 65. improved confiderably on the {hoe of Lafoffe. He forbade the frogs and bars to be cut away, except when they were ragged. He however, remarks, that the feet of all horfes ftiould be pared ac¬ cording to their length j the cruft being made perfectly fmooth by paring or rafping. His ilioe was everywhere of an equal thicknefs, rather narrower behind than be¬ fore, of a flat furface next the ground, and bevilled away from about the middle of its breadth inwards, leaving a flat furface for the cruft to reft on. The next improver of {hoes was Lord Pembroke, ■though Mr Blaine moft unaccountably places him after Mr Clark. Lord Pembroke’s remarks on flioeing are exceedingly ingenious. He obferved that the weight of lhoes muft, in a great meafure, depend on the qua¬ lity and hardnefs of the iron. If the iron be very good it will not bend, and in this cafe the flioes cannot oof- fibly be too light ) care, however, muft be taken, that I they be made of a thicknefs fo as not to bend, for Operations, bending would tear out the nails, and ruin the hoof. y-— That part of the flioe which is next the horfe’s heel, muft be narrower than anywhere elfe, that ftones may be thereby prevented from getting under it, and flick¬ ing there, which otherwife would be the cafe, becaule the iron when it advances inwardly beyond the bearing of the foot, makes a cavity, wherein ftones being lodged, would remain, and by preffing againft the foot, lame the horfe. The part of the ftioe which the horfe walks upon, ftiould be quite flat, and the infide of it likewife *, and only juft room enough ftiould be left next the foot, to put in a picker, (which ought to be ufed every time the horfe comes into the liable, and often on marches) and alfo to prevent the flioe’s preffmg upon the foie. Three, or at moft four nails of a fide, hold better than a greater number, and keep the hoof in a far bet¬ ter ftate. He advifes that the toe of the horfe be cut fquare and ftiort, and that no nails be placed in that part. By thefe means narrow heels are prevented, and many good effects produced. His lordftiip advifed the hinder feet to be ftiod in the fame manner as the fore¬ feet, except in hilly and flippery countries, where the ftioes on the hinder feet may be a little turned up be¬ hind. The utmoft feverity, (fays Lord Pembroke), ought be infli&ed on all thofe who clap {hoes on hot. This unpardonable lazinefs of farriers in making feet fit {hoes, inftead of making ftioes fitting feet, dries up the hoofs and utterly deftroys them. Frequent removals of flioes are detrimental, and tear the foot, but fometimes they are very neceffary. This is an inconvenience which half {hoes are liable to (though excellent in feveral other refpefls), for the end of the {hoe being very fliort, is apt to get foon into the foot, and confequently then muft be moved. 138 The ihoe recommended by Mr Clark did not differClark's very much from that of Ofmer. He does not, how~met*loc1‘ ever, recommend the hollowing of the furface of the fhoe next the foot. Mr Clark recommended that the hoof and frog fhould not be pared or cut away without neceflity, and was much againft railing the heels with calkins ; to the ufe of which he preferred that of an ice nail. He, however, admits, that fliarp calkins may be neceffary in hilly countries. ^ The ihoe originally ufed at the veterinary college by Method of the fixft profeffor, was very fimilar to that of Ofmer 5 the veteri- but when Mr Coleman fucceeded to the profefforftiip *lary co'- he adopted the half-moon ftioe introduced by Lafoffe. ° This was, however, foon given up, as experience {hew¬ ed that it was not adapted to the generality of horfes in this country. Within thefe few years, a method of flioeing has been introduced by Mr Coleman, which appears in moft inftances preferable to any former me¬ thod. We Ihall therefore confider it pretty much at large. Mr Coleman has laid down two general principles, I4° by which the praftice of (hoeing for all horfes, in every country, muft be invariably followed. “ So long as nails and iron are employed to protedl the hoof, the cruft is the part that Ihould receive the nails, and the prefllire of the ftioe} and the foie of every horfe em¬ ployed for every purpofe, is a part that fliould not be in contact with the flioe.” Thefe are Mr Coleman’s general rules, and to thefe it muft be added, that the free Part III. FARR Operations, frog Hiould, in almofl every cafe, be allowed to come '""""V" in contact with the ground, where this is practicable, whenever the horfe fets down his foot. Two general circumftances are to be obfefVed in fhoeing j the cutting of the hoof, artd the application of the ihoe. Some parts of the hoof require to be re¬ moved, before the (hoe can be applied j while others mult be carefully preferved. Thefe circumltances are at lealt of as much confequence as the form of the fhoe, but are not in general fo fully attended to. In Mr Coleman’s method of fhoeing, he firft recom¬ mends that a part of the homy foie between the whole length of the bars and cruft, be pared away with a drawing knife, as the heels of the foie cannot receive the preflure of the fhoe, without corns being produced. The foie muft therefore be laid hollow, that it may not come in contaCl with the Ihoe. This he confiders of the greateft confequence. The heels of the fhoe muft be made to reft on that part of the hoof where the bars unite with the cruft. See fig. 19. If the heels have been previoufly lowered by means of the butteris, there may perhaps not be left fufhcient foie to admit of the application of the drawing knife, without penetra¬ ting to the fenfible foie ; fo that it is better, firft to cut the foie, as it may then be eafily determined how far the heels may be lowered, and the toe Ihortened, with propriety. When the hoof is cut in this way, the foie readily defcends when the hoof touches the ground, without being obftrutfted by the fhoe ; and ftones, or other foreign bodies that have gotten between the fnoe and the hoof, are thus readily pufhed out. It is found by experience, that the foie never fuffers from ftones and gravel, when there is fufhcient fpace left between the bars and the cruft. The cavity between the foie and ftioe fhould alio be left fufftciently wide after the ihoe is applied, to admit of the introduction of a large horfe-picker, efpecially between the bars and the cruft. If the foie fliould be naturally concave, a ihoe that has a flat furface next the hoof will not touch any part of the foie when applied to the cruft ; and even fhould the foie be flat, or rounded in the middle or towards the toe, yet the quarters and heels may generally be made fufhciently hollow by the drawing knife, to avoid preifure on a flat ihoe. I41 If it is found that a ihoe with its upper furface flat, does not leave a fpace large enough to admit the picker between it and the foie, it is neceffary to make either the foie or the fhoe a little holloiv. Sometimes the foie appears ragged and in flakes, and of conflderable thicknefs. It is then proper to make the whole of the lole hollow with the drawdng knife, before attempting *0 lower the heels or fhorten the toe. When the foie is made hollowq the fhoe will reft only on the cruft ; but if we cannot hollow the foie, we muft, to prevent preiTure, make the upper furface of the ihoe hollow. As the hoof .is aftvays growing, and is preferved from friftion by the fhoe, it is neceffary to pare the toe of the cruft about once in every month. The more we can remove from the toe of the. cruft, in hoofs that are not well ihaped, the fooner we fhall be able to apply a fhoe of the proper form and thicknefs. Bars and “ f)ars an(f frog fhould never be removed, hog not to Where there are ragged and detached parts of the frog, be cut it is better that they ihould be cut with any fmall knife, awrfy. by the groom, than by the farrier; for if the latter is Vol. VIII. Part II. I E R Y. 449 Once allowed to touch the frog, the found parts a*e Operations, generally deftroyed. Where the frogs are not large 1 " — and projecting, and the heels are higher than the frogs, then it is advifeable to lower the heels, which may be done by a rafp, or the butteris 5 for in every cafe we are to endeavour to bring the frog in contaCf with the ground. We fhould never lofe fight of this principle, that the frog muft have preffure, or be difeafed. If the frog does not touch the ground, it cannot perform its ufe 5 and no organ can be preferved in health, that does not perform the funftions for which it wras made.* £0 Neverthelefs, w'here the frog has been difqnalified for 0„ ^ its fun&ions for a confiderable period, and become io{tr Horn's it muft be accuftomed to preffure by degrees.” * vol. i. When it is neceffary for the horfe to work, though his frog is foft and difeafed, it muft be gradually accuf¬ tomed to preffure, by cutting down the hoof about one- tenth of an inch at every frelh Ihoeing, that the frog may become hard, and equally protuberant with the heels. If the horfe be not required to labour, much advantage will be derived from allowing him to ftand in the ftable without fhoes. 144 The feet of moft horfes have been deformed by bad Shoe to be management. It will therefore be neceffary to ufe a aclaPted particular fhoe to each particular form of hoof. Anyt^'' hoot' one form employed indiferiminately for all feet, can¬ not be alike fuccefsful for all. It is from not having fufficiently attended to this fimple faCt, that the fhoe recommended by the veterinary college has not been more generally adopted. It is therefore neceffary to vary the length, breadth, and thicknels of the Ihoe, according to the form of the hoof to which it is to be applied. If the heels or fore-feet are two inches and a half or more in depth ; if the frog be found and prominent, and the roads dry, the toe of the hoof only requires to be fhortened, and afterwards covered by a fhort fhoe, which may be^ made of the ufual thicknefs at the toe, but muft be thinner gra¬ dually towards the heel. The proportional thick¬ nefs of a fhoe of this kind for a common faddle-horfe, as recommended by Mr Coleman, is three-eighths of an inch at the toe, and one-eighth at the heel. By means of fuch a fhoe the frog is completely brought in con- tad! with the ground ; the heels are expanded ; and corns, thrulhes, and canker are prevented. The horfe may continue to wear fuch a ihoe as long as the wea¬ ther is warm, and the ground dry. Race-horfes, who generally have the heels high, and 145 the cruft thicker and ftronger than heavy horfes, may generally wear fhort fhoes, at leaft on the fore-feet- But fuch as have weak legs, bent knees, long pafterns, or low heels, muft not wear fuch a fhoe. r . A long fhoe is neceffary in wet weather, and even in changes to fummer, when the heels of the hoofs are low. In win-be made ter, when the heels are too high, they fhould be lower- gradually, ed by means of a rafp, rather than fuffered to wear down, by being expofed to the ground with a fhort ihoe 5 for moifture is very dpftrudlive to the hoof j and thus as great a part of it may be removed as is necef¬ fary. Befides, when a horfe has been accuftomed to high-heeled fhoes, if he was fuddenly made to wear thole with thin heels, the frog might be bruifed or in¬ flamed, and the mufcles and tendons of the leg confi- derably drained. It is therefore neceffary to bring the heels of the fhqe to the proper degree of thinnefs gra- 3 L dually, \ fucceeding *47 148 450 F A Operations, dually, obferving that the heels of each *Y-f^oe be made fomewhat thinner than thofe of the iaft. In general, as much as poffible of the homy part of the hoof next the toe is to be removed, and as little iron employed next the heels every time of fhoeing, till the feet be brought as nearly as may be to their natural lhape. In horfes that have been accudomed to wear Ihoes of an equal thicknefs all round,, and where the frog is healthy, we may in general apply a (hoe, much thicker at the toe than the heel, by paring dorm the toe, and taking nothing from the heel j and if a horfe appear to fufter no inconvenience from a thin-heeled ihoe, during the firft month after it is applied, it may be continued with fafety, and will greatly improve the hoof. In young horfes, however, that have never been fhod, and in horfes jult taken up from grafs, the toe feldom ad¬ mits of being pared down, and a thin-heeled (hoe can¬ not be applied at once. In all cafes where the frog does not embrace the ground with a thin fhoe, the heels mult be lowered ; and if the horfe has been accuftomed to wear high- heeled fhoes, both the (hoe and the hoof muft be gra¬ dually lowered, till the frog can fafely and eafily per¬ form its proper funftion. A few horfes require to be (hod in a manner differ¬ ent from that which we have deferibed, but ftill de¬ pendant on the fame principles. Different weights of fhoes are required for different horfes. Mr Coleman lays down the following propor¬ tions, for horfes of various deferiptions. A moderate-fized coach-horfe will require a weight coach-horfe of fhoes and nails, from eighteen to twenty ounces 5 an inch wide, and half an inch thick at the toe, and three- fourths of an inch wide, and one-fixth of an inch thick at the heels. An ordinary faddle-horfe will require only from 12 to 14 ounces; and the fhoe may be three-fourths of an inch wide at the toe, and half an inch at the heel, and three-eighths of an inch thick on the outfide of the toe, but only one-eighth at the infide of the toe, and at the heel. The fhoe mofl recommended by Mr Coleman, is concave on its upper furface, where the foie is flat or convex, but it is flat on the reft of the upper furface ; but if the foie admits of being hollowed, the whole up¬ per furface may be flat. It is regularly concave on its lower furface next the ground *, and it is faftened to the cruft by means of eight nails placed round from the toe backwards, fo as to leave a part of the fhoe about an inch and a half from the heel. Hunting-horfes ufually require an additional nail on each fide, next the quar¬ ter. The nail-holes are made with a punch of a wedge¬ like form, and to correfpond to this the heads of the nails are made conical, fo that as long as any part of the head of- the nail remains in the hole, the fhoe can¬ not eafily come off. For hunters, and fuch horfes as run in fhafts, it is re¬ commended by Mr Coleman to turn up the outer heel j but, as in this way there is often fome inequality of po- fition, the outer heel of the foot is to be lowered, while the inner heel of the fhoe is fomewhat thickened. By thtfe means cutting is avoided. In fuch horfes as have weak low heels, Mr Cole¬ man recommends the «fe of the bar-jhoe, as the bar a£- II R I E R Y. Part HI. 149 Weight of Sioes. *5 For a 151 A faddle horfe. IS* Coieman’s ordinary fhoe. *53 C'4 fords a fupport to the frogs, without wearing out the Operations heels. When the bar-fhoe has been employed long —y—— enough to admit of the heels growing to the proper fize, the ordinary thin-heeled fhoe may be adopted. The method re«ommended by Mr Coleman, as de¬ feribed above, has been for fome time followed with confiderable fuccefs by the board of ordnance, whofe horfes, as well as thole of the Britilh cavalry in gene¬ ral, are now fhod after this manner. The method has, however, met with confiderable oppofition, partly from fuch as do not underftand the principles on which it is founded, and partly from its having been too haftily adopted, in cafes to which, as Mr Coleman himfelf allows, it is not generally applicable; Fig. 19. and 20. illuftrate Mr Coleman’s method of fhoeing. Fig. 19. reprefents the hoof turned upxvards, to (hew the manner in which the fhoe is applied. It may be feen from this figure that the wreb of the fhoe is hollow; that the heels at a a are narrower than the other parts of the fhoe, and that the nails are placed all round from the toe backwards. Fig. 20. fhews that the heels of the fhoe are much thinner than the point, and alfo fhews the manner in which the nails are rivetted or clinched on the outfide of the hoof round the toe and cruft. r The only remaining method of ihoeing that we fhall jyfr r!^.re_ here mention, is that of the ingenious Mr Morecroft. This croft’s me- gentleman has acquired much celebrity by his invention tbod. of cajUng fhoes, by finking them in dies, by which means horfes may be fitted with any fhoes beft adapted to their hoofs. Mr Morecroft’s fhoe differs from Of- mer’s, in being concave within for more than half its width. He condemns the ufe of calkins, on the prin¬ ciple that the public roads are now much mftre folid than when calkins were in general ufe $ and, confe- quently, that inftead of finking them into the ground, they rather tend to raife the heels above it, and thus the frog is prevented from receiving the neceffary preffure. Mr Morecroft, however, allow-scalkins to heavy draught- horfes, for whom he recommends two on each fhoe j but in lighter horfes of the fame defeription, one on the , outfide of each fhoe. The latter is alfo recommended for hunters, but for other riding horfes, he forbids the ufe of calkins. The number of nails in Mr Morecroft’s fhoe is ufually eight, but in heavy draught-horfes they are noi to be placed on the fides of the ftioe, but all round at equal diftances, leaving a fpace at the heels of about two inches or two inches and a half. In frofty weather, Mr Morecroft recommends nails with a lo¬ zenge head, or a double counterfink, terminating in an edge inftead of coming to a point, which greater breadth of furface prevents its being rubbed away fo faft as a point. The thicknefs in the middle gives it ftrength, and the regular taper to the fhank caufes it to apply exadfly to the fide of the hole in the fhoe, by which it is equally fupported, and prevented from bending or breaking. , Mr Coleman confidering preffure as neceffary to the Coleman’ healthy aftion of the frog, has contrived a method of artificial affording this preffure in thofe cafes in which, from dif-h'°g. eafed feet, or bad management in fhoeing, it cannot naturally receive it j and where, if the heels were lowered, in order to bring the frog in contact with the ground, there wnuld be danger of draining the tendons. Mr Coleaiaii’s patcat artificial frogs, are intended to pro¬ duce / Part III. FARR Operations, duce preffure oh the natural frogs, while the horfes are ftanding in the liable, and thus to give time for the growth of the heels, and to avoid the evils that would arife from lowering thefe too fuddenly, or from allow¬ ing the frog to remain elevated above the ground. For the particulars of this ingenious invention, we mult re- 157 fer to Mr Coleman’s pamphlet. Shoes for Where oxen are worked in farming bufmefs like *A!sn’ horfes, it is generally thought neceffary to defend their hoofs in a fimilar manner by means of iron fhoes. The form and manner of fitting thefe do not appear to be univerfally the fame in all places •, nor are we acquaint¬ ed with the methods ufually praftifed. We know that M. St Bel recommended the following methods; either to flioe the ox with a flat plate of iron, having fix or feven nail-holes on the outer edge, accompanied with a projection of four or five inches of iron at the toe, which pafling the cleft of the foot, is bent over the hoof: or with eight flioes, one under each nail 5 otherwife with four, one under each internal nail *, or only two, one un- - der the external nail of each fore-foot. Chap. II. Of Cafing. 15S Galling. There are feveral tedious and painful operations that we are fometimes obliged to perform, and which it wrould be difficult, or impoflible to execute, were the animal left at full liberty to refill us. It is, therefore, neceffary to render ourfelves completely mailers of him, by throwing him down on the ground, and in a conve¬ nient fituation, fo as not to expofe him or ourfelves to in¬ jury. This operation is called cafing, and is ufually thus performed. The firfl: objeft is to prepare a thick bed of ftraw or litter, not lefs than eight feet fquare, to prevent the animal from being hurt in the fall. If the liable be fufficiently large to admit of the bed being made there, it is to be preferred, as, during the operation, to pre¬ pare for which calling is neceffary, the parts operated on will fuffer lefs from expofure to the air in the liable, than without doors. But, if there is not room in the liable, the bed mult be made in the liable-yard, or rather, if poffible, in fome field or park adjoining. The animal is now to be brought to one fide of the bed •, a ilrong leather ilrap, with a buckle at one end, and having an iron ring fixed to it, at a convenient dif- tance from the buckle, is to be fixed round the paltern of each of the four legs, in fuch a way, that the rings of the Itraps that are round the fore-feet ihall be di- redled backwards, and thofe of the ftrans on the hind- feet Ihall be oppofite to thefe ; while the buckles point oiUwards, to prevent hurting the animal. A pretty flrong cord, ten or twelve feet long, is to be fattened to the ring of that Ilrap that has been placed on the fore-foot on that fide of the animal which is farthell from the bed : from this ring it is to pafs through the ring on the hiud-foot, on the fame fide, from which it paffes through the ring on the other hind-foot, then . through the ring on the other fore-foot, and laft- ly, through that to which it was firil fattened. The animal being thus fettered, a number of men are to place themfelves befide him, fo that he may be between them and the bed, while others are to Hand on the oppofite fide of the litter. Now, the men that are befide the I E R Y. 451 animal, laying hold of the end of the rope, are to pull Operations.- gradually with confiderable force, fo as to bring the four feet of the animal as near as poffible together. When this is done, the men on the other fide, ftanding in a row, one at the head of the animal, another at his chell, a third at his haunches, a fourth at his tail, &c. pull the animal toward them and complete his fall. It is neceffary to obferve that the men who pull the rope, and thofe who receive the animal on the bed, mutt not adl at the fame time ; as in this cafe the Ihock would be fo great and fudden, as probably to occafion fome accident, either to the men or to the animal. It is alfo proper to remark, that the animal mutt be call in fuch a manner, that the part to be operated on may be fully in the view and reach of the operator. When the animal is once on the bed, his head mutt be held down by a man, and it will be proper to cover his eyes. Another affillant mull Hand by the cord, which for greater fecurity, Ihould be fattened with a knot at the firft ring. There are fome little niceties to be obferved in call¬ ing an animal, according to the operation that is in¬ tended to be performed on him ; but of thefe we Ihall fpeak, when we defcribe the operations themfelves. Chap. III. Of Bleeding. 159 Bleeding is diftinguilhed into general and local. Bleeding. General bleeding is performed for the purpofe of taking away a quantity of blood from the general mafs, and confitts in opening fome large vein, or fome confider¬ able branch of an artery. The vein ufually opened, in horfes and cattle, is the vein that runs along the neck, and which is called the jugular vein. This vein may be eafily felt, as it is generally confiderably raifed above the mufcies. The vein is ufually opened by means of a fleam, which is forced into the vein, by ilriking it with a fmall wrood- en mallet, called by farriers a blood-Jlich. There are many objedlions to this mode of bleeding. In the firll place, it is extremely clumfy ) and, if the vein happens to roll, which is very commonly the cafe, a large wound may be made in the fldn, without drawing blood. Again, thefe animals, efpecially horfes, are ealily fright¬ ened by any fudden motion of the hand ; and fome per- fons have a w-ay of ffiaking the blood-ftick before they give the ftroke ; and, in doing this, they often ufe more exertion than is neceffary. The animal alarmed at thefe ftrange motions, toffes up his head, and thus rend¬ ers the llroke uncertain. Many prefer the ordinary lancet ufed by furgeons $ and, in feveral cafes, particularly of local bleeding, this is the moll convenient inftrument. But in •open¬ ing the jugular vein, we do not confider it as much fuperior to the common fleam. When this latter is employed, the back of it Ihould be made of confider¬ able thicknefs, as, when it is too narrow, as is commonly the cafe, when the inftrument is ftruck with the Hick, it finks into the channel of the vein, which is often not open¬ ed, as the prominent mufcies of the neck recei ve the ftroke. For moll purpofes of bleeding, we would recommend the fpring-fleam, as being eafily applied, and much ^^ ^ more certain in its effefl. tiling a li¬ lt is a common praflice with grooms and farriers, gature to tie a rope or other ligature about the nfeck of the about the 3 L 2 animal,tieclc* .452 . FARR Operati< n1;. aiiiinal, previous to the bleeding in the jugular vein. * They do this from a fuppohtion that the vein will thus fwell the more readily, and that it -will be opened with greater certainty. But this ligature is in molt cafes unneceffary, and will at fome times be highly dangerous. Where exercife is not improper before bleeding, it will be fufficient that the animal be gently trotted pre¬ vious to the operation, as thus the circulation will be promoted, and the fuperficial veins will be fufficiently filled with blood. Where general exercife is improper or inadmiflible, the filling of the vein may eafily be pro¬ moted by brifldy rubbing the neck for fome time with a wifp of ftraw or hay •, and juft before applying the fleam, it wall be proper to prefs with one finger upon *that part of the vein that is between the fhoulder and the place where the fleam is applied. • The danger of a ligature will appear both from rea- fon and experience. When the ligature is faftened round the neck, it produces a fweliing of the vein on each fide 5 and thus the circulation being in a great meafure impeded, and the return of much of the blood from the head prevented, an accumulation of blood takes place in the veffels of the brain. If the ligature be continued round the neck, which muft happen when, by wrant of dexterity of the operator, or by the horfe being, frightened, the vein has not been opened at the firft attempt, the ftagnation of the blood in the head goes on to an alarming degree, and the horfe not un- irequently falls down in ah apoplectic fit. “ In fuch cafes, (fays Mr Clark), I have obferved the operator greatly difconcerted, and defift from any further at¬ tempts to draw blood at that time, being prepofleffed with the idea that the horfe was vicious and unruly, although the very treatment the horfe had juft under¬ gone rendered bleeding at this time the more neceflary, in order to make a fpeedy revulfion from the veffels of the head j therefore a ligature or bandage ought never to be ufed till fuch time as the opening is made into the vein, and even then it will not be neceflary at all times, if the horfe can ftand on his feet, as a moderate preflure with the finger on the vein will make the blood flow freely $ but if the horfe is lying on the ground, a ligature will be neceflary.” But further, the concufliotv or ftiock the horfe re¬ ceives from his falling down, in the above fituation, which will always happen if the ligature is too long continued, may caufe a blood-veflel in the head to burft, and death may be the confequence. The place wdiere the vein is to be opened is of fome confequence, as, when the opening is made too far from the head, where the vein lies deep among the mufcles, both the vein is not fo eafily opened, and the wound is not fo readily healed. The moft proper place for open¬ ing the jugular vein is about an inch below the joining of the fmall branches that come from the lower jaw. This is generally about a hand-breadth from the head, but it may be eafily feen by the fweliing of the vein when preflure is made on its trunk. before opening the vein, it is ufual to wet the hairs that lie above it, and to. ftroke them in the direftion gf the intended orifice. This is a good praftice, as the inftrument thus pafles though the ikin more readily, not having to overcome the refiftance of the hair. In mentioning the direction of the orifice, it is wrorth while to remark, that this fhould neither be longitudinal nor I E R Y. Part III. XSt Place where the vein is to fce opened. diredlly acrofs the vein, but rather oblique ; as the flow Operations- of blood from an oblique orifice is moft eafily flopped. ” ' When the vein is opened, it is highly proper in cafes to catch the blood in fome convenient veflel. It t0 is a very abfurd practice, although it is commonly adopted, to allow the blood to flow at random on the ground or on a dunghill, by which means no precife eftimate can be made of the quantity of blood taken away. This may either be fo fmall, as to be of no ad¬ vantage •, or it may be fo confiderable as to produce fainting, before the operator thinks of flopping the ori¬ fice. For the purpofe of meafuring the quantity of blood taken away, Mr White recommends a graduated tin veflel, capable of containing five quarts y every pint being marked on the infide of the veflel, fo that the quantity of blood that is taken off may be exactly known. The blood fhould always be preferved, that we may judge from its appearance of the nature of the difeafe, and whether it is proper, or not, to repeat the operation. If the blood continues fluid for a confider¬ able time, it fhows that there is an inflammatory ftate of the body y and if a jelly-like fubftance, of a whitifh or light buff colour, and rather firm confiftence, ap¬ pears on the furface after the blood has cooled, and efpecially if the furface is hollowed, we may be cer¬ tain that the animal’s complaint is of an inflammatory- nature, that the bleeding has been proper, and muft be repeated, if the fymptoms continue or increafe y but if the blood coagulates quickly, is. uniformly of a dark liver colour, loofe, and eafily broken,, with a confidet- able quantity of water upon its furface,^ it. denotes de¬ bility, and fhews that the difeafe arifes from a weaknefs of the fyftem y that inftead of bleeding, tonic and cordial * White i medicines are to be employed,, with every thing that may tend to reftore the animal’s ftrength *. When a fufficient quantity of blood has been taken gecuriI1g away, it is for the moft part neceffary to fecure the ori- the orifice, fice, in order to prevent future accidental bleeding. This is ufually done by thrufting a common pin through the lips of the wound, and twining about it a little horfe hair. As in this way the wound often rankles, and becomes a fore difficult to heal, which we are difpofed to attribute to the brafs pin employed, as often as to any other caufe y we would recommend a pin of filver, or at leaft of polilhed fteel. The pin need not pafs through more than the Ikin, and in fome cafes when the horfe can conveniently be faftened to the rack after bleeding, the pin may be entirely difpenfed with. As it is often required to bleed on either ftde of the neck, or on both fides, it is proper that the operator ftiould be able to bleed with either hand. This is in¬ deed not quite fo neceflary in bleeding horfes and cattle,- as in the human fubje£t y but it will be often found very convenient in both. In fome cafes, efpecially in inflammation of the brain, where a fudden and copious lofs of blood is required, it the tempo- becomes neceflary to open the temporal artery. Thisral artery, is eaflly effe&ed, as the artery is fttuated very fuperficial- ly, about an inch and a half backwards from the upper and outer corner of the eye. It is moft conveniently opened with a lancet* and when a fufficient quantity of blood has been drawn, the flow is in general very eaflly flopped by making continued preflure upon the artery y or, if this ftiould not fucceed, and a dangerous effuflon of 1<>S Cafes re¬ quiring bleeding. * White's ZuTnieria I/Iedica. 166 Cautions. Part III. FARR Operations, of blood fliould be apprehended, this may be effe&ually prevented by completely dividing the artery. General bleeding is one of the moft efficacious re¬ medies in moil of the acute difeafes to which horfes and cattle are fubjeft. “ When a herfe appears dull and heavy, (fays Mr White), and indifferent about his food, by bleeding we often prevent a fever. If a horfe is bled at the commencement of a cold, the complaint generally proves moderate, and of fnort continuance. In all cafes of internal inflammation, or fymptomatic fever, bleeding is the mod effential remedy, provided the operation be performed at an early period, and the blood drawn in fufficient quantity. In fuch cafes I have often taken away five quarts, and repeated the operation the. following day, when it.appeared necef- fary. By bleeding copioufly at firfl, thefe formidable difeafes are cruffied at once ; while by fuffering them to proceed, or become at all violent, which they wTill do, unlefs this praftice is adopted (or if only a fmall quantity of blood is drawn) they generally prove fatal; nor w ill bleeding then be of any fervice Mr Clark very juftly remarks, “ that although the cafes which may require bleeding are numerous, yet there is one general caution to be obferved, viz. never to take away blood but when it is abfolutely neceffary j as it is a fluid that may be eafily taken away, but can¬ not be fo eafily replaced ; befides, that the praftice of bleeding frequently, or at Hated times, is exceedingly improper, as it difpofes the body to become lax, wreak, and plethoric. “ In bleeding, therefore, a due regard mufl: always be had to the conftitution, age, ftrength, &c. of horfes, and the ftate or habit of body they are in at the time. “ It is commonly faid that the taking away a little blood from horfes, even when they are in health, or when they are in the leafl: indifpofed, will do no harm : this in one fenfe may be allowed to be literally true j but why draw' blood from them on every trifling oc- cafion, unlefs there may be fuch fymptoms attending as may require it ? I have obferved in many horfes who have been very frequently blooded, and which may be eafily known, from the cicatrices or marks on the neck veins, that their blood had loft much of its tenacity, together with a coniiderable portion of its florid and red colour. Butchers who flaughter calves, may find their account in bleeding them frequently, as it renders their flefh white, by taking away the red par¬ ticles of the blood. But in horfes it is quite otherwife 5 as they are deftined for hard labour and active exercifes, it impairs their conftitutions, fubjecls them tb difeafey and haftens a premature old age. u As the blood of horfes, more efpecially thofe who are conftantly employed in hard labour, or in a£Iive exercifes, when drawn from a vein, appears of a dark- ifh or deep red colour, even in the higheft ftate of health, it is commonly faid to be bad blood, and more fo when a thick yellow or buff-coloured cruft forms on the furface after it is cold hence thefe appearances are faid to require repetition of bleeding ■, for it very un¬ luckily happens, that moft of the difeafes to which hfrrfes are fubjeft are thought to proceed from feme im- * Clark .on purjties or humours, as they are called, in the blood, which require to be drained off by bleeding, and other Mr}//. ^ evacuations V’ 1 E R Y. 453 Topical bleeding is ufeful in feveral cafes, as in in- Operations, flammatory affedfions of the feet, which are often relieved ' ' by opening the coronary veins, or the vein that encir- j0pjcai cles the coffin-bone j in inflammation of the eyes, in bleeding. Vvhich blood may be often drawn, from the angular veins, with confiderable fuccefs; and in affedfions of the mouth, where it is fometimes ufeful to draw blood, by fcarifying the bars of the mouth, or even, in fome urgent cafes, by opening the veins of the palate. To¬ pical bleeding is beft performed with a lancet. Almoft the only method that is pradlifed for bleed-' ing ftieep, or dogs, is to cut off a joint or two of the tail j and this is certainly often produdlive of good eom fequences, as the flow of blood is fometimes pretty con- ftderable. Unfortunately, however, w'e can feldom have recourfe to this mode of bleeding more than once or twice, wffiereas cafes often occur in which it is necef¬ fary to repeat the bleeding. It is alfo a cruel method, and we fee no reafon why the veins in thefe animals may not be opened like thofe of hories and cattle. In the fheep, indeed, the thicknefs of the wool will common¬ ly prevent bleeding in the neck, but the temporal ar¬ tery and the veins of the foot may be opened without difficulty 5 and in moft dogs w^e may bleed in the jugu-- lar-vein with nearly as much eafe, as in the horie or' cowr. Chap. IV. Of making Rowels and Setons. 168 Rowels in horfes and cattle are much the fame asRowellirg iffues in the human body. The operation confifts in defciibed opening the fkin, fo as to infert between it and the cel¬ lular membrane fome foreign body, which is kept there, in order to produce and keep up a fup.puration, or run¬ ning of purulent matter. The operation is ufually per¬ formed in the following manner. An incifion is made through the Akin by means of a very {harp pair of feif- fars, or what appears better, a (harp knife. 'Ihe finger is then introduced below the {kin, to as to feparate it from the ftefti all round, as far as the finger will reach. A piece of leather, about the fizeof a crown-piece, and of a circular form, with a hole cut in the middle, is then inferted between the {kin and mufcles, having been firft anointed with fome ftimulating ointment. A fmall piece of tow or caddice fpread with the fame oint¬ ment, is put over the hole in the centre of the leather ; the Ikin is laid down over all, and the part is covered with a pledget, alfo covered with ointment, to keep out the external air. The leather is left in this Situation for two or three days, during which the parts adjoining the rowel fwell, and at the end of the time there appears a difeharge of a yellowiih matter, which gradually becomes thicker and whiter. In three days at fartheft the part mufl; be examined, and the plug removed from the central hole, to allow the matter to flow out, dhe rowel is now complete, and may be continued as long as {hall be found neceffary. The aftion of the rowel is eafily ex¬ plained ; the leather introduced excites a degree of in¬ flammation between the {kin and the flelh, and no means being taken to check this, it goes on, like moft other inflammations of flelhy parts, to fuppuration. Thus a difeharge is produced ffom the part, which is found to have confiderable effe6! in checking inflam¬ mation of feme more important organ near which the rowel 169 Situations proper for rowels. 170 When im¬ proper. 454 F A II H Operations, rowel has been xnferted. Thus, in fnflammation of the ~ Inngs, after copious bleeding, a rowel in the cheft, like a bliiler in the human body, is found to have confider- able effect in checking the progrels of the difeafe. Rowels may be placed in moft of the ilefhy parts 01 the body ; but they are moft commonly inferted in the belly, the bread, the infide of the thighs, the outfrde of the fhoulders, and the hips. They are fometimes placed between the jaw-bones, below the tongue; but this is very improper, as a good fuppuration can feldom be brought on in this place. It is fometimes found neceffary to make feveral rowels at the fame time; but they fliould always be placed, as nearly as poflible, to the feat of the affedtion which they are intended to relieve. Befides dangerous inflammations, rowels are found feryiceable in large fwellings of the hind legs, in ob- ftinate cafes of greafe, and in drains of the ihoulder. Though rowels are thus found extremely ufeful in many cafes, they are, like many other operations per¬ formed on brute animals, fbmetimes made where they are unneceflary or improper. Where there is confiderable debility, the infertion of a rowrel would be very injudi¬ cious, as it would not fuppurate kindly, and as the dif- charge produced would tend ftill farther to increafe the debility. The difeharge in thefe cafes is ufually thin and ichorous; fometimes they are perfectly dry, and not unfrequently a mortification is produced. When a rowel is found to be attended with any of thefe effedls, it muft be immediately removed, and the parts muft be fomented with a warm decoftion of the chamomile-flowers, and fome ftimulating herbs j or jnuft be bathed with fpirit of wine or oil of turpentine. If gangrene fliould have come on, it will befides be ne- ceflary to adminxfter cordial and ftrengthening reme¬ dies. Setons are inferted through an opening made in two oppofite parts of the fkin, and the extraneous body in¬ troduced is a cord. The opening is made by means of a fharp-pointed in- ftrument with an eye at the other end for receiving the cord. The fides of the inftrument muft be proportion¬ ed to the opening to be made, and the ftze of the cord to be inferted. Setons are particularly ufeful for. the, purpofe of gra¬ dually draining off matter from abfeeffes or fuppurating tumours, that are either fo deeply feated as not to be eafily opened in any other rvay, or fo large that the fudden difeharge of matter from them while opened by the knife, would be attended with bad confequences. They are beft employed in large abfeeffes of the back withers, and the upper part of the neck behind the ears. Setons are alfo attended with the advantage of draining off the matter without expofing the infide of the abfeefs to the air. The method of inferting the feton for the purpofe of opening an abfeefs is this. Wrhen it is found that there is a confiilerable accumulation of matter, the needle, fumiihed with a cord of the proper fize, is to be intro¬ duced at the higheft part of the tumour, and brought out towards its loweft part, fo that the matter may more eafily drain off. The cord, which muft previoufly be rubbed with ftimulating ointment, is now to be cut from the eye of the needle, and then faftened together at both ends, to prevent its being pulled out j but if S 171 Setons. 172 Their ufe. Mode of in' troducing them. I E R Y. PartHI. the cord fnould not admit of being thus tied, a fmallOperations' button of wmod may be faftened on each end. It is v -1 better, however, if pcilible, to tie the ends together, as every time the lore is dreffed, the feton requires to be drawn a little round. When the difeharge appears to be nearly flopped, except what evidently arifes from the prefence of the cord, this may be gradually removed, by drawing out a Angle thread of it at every drefling. In introducing the needle, great care muft be taken to avoid large blood-veffels and nerves; and wdiere there is a danger in encountering thefe, it is better to pals the needle through a {heath. This may eafily be done, by firft making a fmall opening with a lancet at the upper part of the tumour 5 and through this introducing the ftieath, which is to be puftied down till it reaches the part at which the needle is intended to come out. The needle in this way will pafs through the (heath without danger of wounding any important nerve or veffel. CHAP. V. Of Ftring. # x 74 This operation confifts in applying to the Ikin, or Firing, other parts of the body, a metallic inftrument heated to a greater or leffer degree of rednefs. The inftru¬ ment is called a cautery, and the operation w’as wrell known among the ancient furgeons,' by the name of the adtual cautery. The inftruments employed for firing are ufually made of iron, fometimes of copper j but iron is to be preferred. They are of various forms, according to the part to which they are to be applied, and the purpofe for which the operation is to be performed. Thefe will be con- fidered in deferibing the cafes to which firing is appli¬ cable. The operation is found of ufe on feveral occaiions : jt5 1 ft, In order to oppofe the progrefs of mortification. With this view a cautery fhaped like a knife, with a blunt edge and a thick back, is to be employed. This form will alfo anfwer for many other cafes. There fliould be feveral inftruments of the fame kind, that wThen one becomes too cool, another may be ready of the proper degree of heat. 1 he heat of the iron in¬ tended for the prefent cafe fliould be that of a cherry- red. In applying the iron, the parts adjoining to the mortified place are to be paffed over with the edge of the inftrument in fucceffive parallel lines, fo as the heat may penetrate to the living parts, and thus produce fuch a degree of healthy aftion as may enable them to throw off the mortified flough. When the iron has been applied for a fufficient time, which muff be regu¬ lated by the nature of the part, and the extent of mor¬ tification, the wound is to be covered with a pledget fpread with fome ftimulating ointment. 2d, Firing is employed to brace the {kin, and to ftrengthen the finew'S. The inftrument above deferibed is ufed on this occafion, but its heat muft be fomewhat greater. The mode of applying it is to pafs the edge lightly and quickly over the {kin, deferibing parallel lines from one end of the part to the other. When one iron has been ufed in this way, a frefh one is to be taken, and made to retrace the lines firft formed, be¬ ginning w’here the laft iron left off \ and this is to be repeated as often as appears neceffary, taking care not to deftroy the texture of the ikin. It is recommended Part III. FARR Operations, by Tome to apply the hot iron, To as to burn away the ' » hair, for fome time previoufly to firing the ikin ; as much time is otherwife loll before the proper impreflion can be made by the iron. After firing a blitter is fome- times applied, as this is thought to increafe the good effeft produced by the iron. When firing is employed on the hind legs, or on any part where the operator would be expofed to danger from the horfe’s kicking, it is necefiary to confine the legs by means of fetters. 3d, This operation has been found ufeful in fpaving, ring-bones, old callous fwellings of the back finews; and in wind-galls. For this purpofe the irons are ufed as already dire6ied. It is the cuftom with fome far¬ riers to apply a blifler in thefe cafes before firing, in order to reduce the fwelling; as they fuppofe that firing employed 'without this precaution would tend to fix the fwelling, and render it incurable. There is probably little foundation for fuch an idea. 4th, Firing is very frequently had recourfe to by way of a flyptic in flopping or checking profufe bleed¬ ings, from accidental wounds, or furgical operations. The iron employed with this view has generally a rounded extremity, except in the operation of docking, where an iron in the form of a ring is generally em¬ ployed. 5 th. Another ufe of firing is in wounds of the joints, or other circumfcribed cavities, where it is employed to promote a kindly circulation, and confequent granu¬ lation of healthy fleih. It has been employed in thefe cafes by Mr Col eman, with confiderabie fuccefs. 6th, Firing has been found one of the moft effedhial remedies in thofe fuperficial ulcers that accompany farcy or glanders in the horfe j and, Laftly, The ufe of the hot iron has been found the only certain means of preventing the dreadful effects arifing from the bite of a mad animal, when properly applied after cutting out the bitten part. Chap. VI. Of Docking. Docking The honour of having introduced this mofl ufeful firft ufed and humane pradlice, belongs, we believe, folely to this in England, country. It appears that it was in ufe in England, fo long ago as the end of the eighth century; for at a council held there, about that time (concilium Calcliu- tenfe, or council of Calchute), there was a canon enadfl- ed, exprefsly forbidding this praflice, as indecent and abominable. It does not appear that this operation is performed among the Arabians, or other eaftern nations 5 or at leaft, if it be, it is not intended as an ornament to the animal, but either from neceflity, when the tail is dif- eafed, or by way of mark, to diftinguilh fome particular horfe. Docking has been pra£lifed in Germany for about 300 years ; and probably much longer in France. It was certainly unknown to the Italians at the latter end c£ the fifteenth century j for we are told, that when the army of the emperor Maximilian was in Italy in 1497, the Italians were much furprifed to fee his cavalry I?7 mounted on docked horfes. Itsabfurdi- It is ftrange that prejudice and falfe tafle fliould lead ty* mankind to deprive their horfes of a part, which, to the eye of reafon and unfophifticated nature, muft appear not only an ornament to the animalj but as defigned by I E R Y. 455 the Creator as a protection againft flies, gnats, and innu- Operations- merable other winged enemies, which harafs them in 1 the fummer months. It is true indeed, that in Britain, where the fummer heats are in general not fo lafting, or fo violent, as in the more fouthern countries of Europe, thefe infects are not always fo troublefome as they are found in thofe climates. But even here they are fuf- ficiently fo, to render the protection of the tail necef- fary j and when our cavalry are unhappily fent to the continent, the lofs of the horfes tails proves a very feri- ous obftacle to the fuccefs of the troops. More than one inflance of this has occurred. At the battle of Dettingen in 1743, great part of the Britifh cavalry were abfolutely difmounted, from the death of the horfes, occalioned in a great meafure by the torment which they experienced from the bite of gad-flies, and other infehls j and at the battle of Minden, in the feven years war, the cavalry of the allies were thrown into fo much diforder by thefe petty enemies, that they had nearly loft the battle. Lord Pembroke declares, that he has feen the cavalry horfes belonging to our army, fweating, ruftiing againft each other, refufing their food, and abfolutely devoured by flies, for want of their tails to brufh them oflT j while thofe of the horfes of the fo¬ reign cavalry that had not been deprived of this necef- fary defence, were cool, tranquil, fed well, and were in good condition. From the inconveniences which our cavalry have fuffered from the want of the horfes tails, it has been for fome years the cuftom to employ long¬ tailed horfes. The principal reafons that have been aftigned for this abfurd praClice, are, that a long tail is extremely inconvenient to both horie and rider, -when travelling through dirty roads and buftiy forefts ; and that when the tail is of its ordinary length, the animal cannot car¬ ry it in that fine, arched, cocked-tail diredtion, which feems to form one of the chief beauties of the modern racer. We apprehend that few horfes enjoy fuch an ample length of tail as that of the redoubted Hudibras j of whofe horfe we read that, “ His draggling tail hung in the dirt, “ Which on his rider he would flirt, “ Still as his tender fide he prickt “ With arm’d heel, or with unarm’d, kickt.” As to the beauty of a cocked-tailed horfe, -we pro- fefs ourfelves not competent to judge 3 but with due de- ference to the gentlemen of the turf, and the refpddtable fraternity of jockies, we ihould humbly conceive (we fpeak with fubmiflion) that a horfe with a long tail is a much finer object than one that is perpetually perking and wriggling his tail in the air, and expoling his bare breech to the broad flare of open day. Docking is ufuaUy performed on horfes, by laying the Mode of tail upon a block, and chopping off the part by means peiforming of a cleaver or hatchet ftruck with a mallet. Perhaps ^ °Fera- it would be rather lefs bungling to perform the opera-tl0n* tion by means of a knife, and it would not take up much more time. When this is done, the hair muft be previoufly clipped awray, that the knife may cut more eafily j and previous to making the incifion, the fldn Ihould be drawm up forcibly towards the rump. The mcifion may be made by beginning on one fide, and cutting round from below upwards, fo as to perform the whole 456 F A II R Operatioris. wliole as nearly as poiiible at one flroKe. 'When tne fkin and mu Teles have been completed divided, the part of the tail.is to be cut off at the joining of two of the bones as nearly as poffible to the edges^ of the wound, Hill keeping the (kin drawn up. When the part has been removed, the flefli is to be feared all round, with a hot iron, to flop the effulion of olood. I Tm iron employed in Ifrance for this purpole is formed like a ring, To that it is eafily applied to the ileih without in¬ juring the bone. The wound muff be covered from the air, and the animal muff live rather low to prevent inflammation. The practice of nicking, or cutting acrofs the mufcles that draw down the tail, fo that thole which pull it up¬ wards may exert their full power, is ftill more inhuman and abfurd than that of docking •, and as we will con¬ tribute nothing towards extending this abominable practice, we fliall omit the operation altogether. . Chap. VII. Of Cropping. Cropping. % Taste and fafhion have introduced another opera¬ tion, by which the ears of horfes and dogs are changed from their natural fhape and lize, to thofe which are confidered by their owners as more handfome or agree¬ able. The ears of the horfe and the dog are feldomof "fuch a fhape or fize, as to render them inconvenient to the animals, or to unfit them for the purpoles for which nature has defigned them. J his may, however, fome- fames happen j and there are fome cafes of wounds or rtifeafes that may render cropping neceffary: but in per¬ forming this operation, it fhould always be kept in mind, that as no part of the animal is made in vain, no more of the ears fhould be taken away than what is abfolute- ly neceffarv. We not unfrecpiently fee horfes and dogs cropped clofe to their head, a praftice which is cruel and abfurd, and w7hich is always followed by more or lefs deafnefs, and* expofes the animals to much incon¬ venience from the weather. In thofe dogs that are em¬ ployed in rabbit warrens, or for fimilar purpofes, where they are required to enter burrow-s, cropping is attended with the worfl effefts, as the ears of the dog are una¬ voidably expofed to the particles of fand and earth that he brufhes away in his paffage through the burrow. The operation of cropping fcarcely requires deferip- tion. In the dog it is ufually performed by means of a pair of feiffars, but thefe fhould be very fharp. In the horfe, more nicety is required j and a particular inilru- ixient, called the cropping iron, is required, and a fhape of the fize of which it "is intended the ear fhall be, is applied to the ear, to mark the line of feetion. After the ear is cut, the fkin and mufcles recede confiderably from the griflly part 5 but this feems of little confe- quence, and the wound heals in a few days without any other attention, than confining the animal within doors, .and keeping him on a moderate, cooling diet. Horfes ears are fometimes trimmed, as the grooms call it j that is, they are deprived of the fine foft hair that lines the infide of the cavity. I his praflice is equally abfurd with cropping, as wall appear from the following obfervations of Mr Clark. i8o_ u qphe ears of horfes, as of other animals, (fays Mr onrTm-17 Clarke), are covered on the infide with a fhort down, ming fiorffs intermixed with long hairs, which line the external ca- ears. 4 I E R Y. Part III. vity of the ear, which feems defigned by nature to pre- Operation; vent harfh founds from making too great an impreffion' ~v ' upon the brain, and likewife to prevent the cold air, rain, dull, flies, &c. from annoying the internal ear. The means commonly ufed to remove this down, &c. is by the feiffars, the flame of a candle, or that of a burning torch. Both the latter are cruel and barbar¬ ous, and caufe a deal of pain to the animal, not only from the bliilers that fometimes rife on the ears after this manner of fmging them, but likewife from the means that are ufed to make horfes fland with patience to undergo the operation, that is a twitch on the nofe p and perhaps, if he is troublefome to the operator, one put on the ear. It is to be obferved, that horfes are very much guided or directed by the fenfe of hear¬ ing. This is obvious in thofe that hear diftindtly, from the motion of their ears, and the diredtion they give them to whatever quarter any found comes from, the at¬ tention they pay to what paffes around them, or to what is fpoke to them. Many of them, particularly the fineft kind, as they only are liable to this kind of treat¬ ment, have the fenfe of hearing confiderably blunted, if not rendered quite deaf from the above operation. As this operation is generally firft performed on young horfes at the time they are breaking, it is the more hurtful; as the uncommon founds, as the rattling of carriages, drums, &c. which are entirely new to them, and to which they are then more expoled on the roads or in ftreets, mull make the greater impreffion on the fenfe of hearing 5 and perhaps it may be owing to the above caufe only, that many horfes are timorous to pafs carriages, and remain fo ever afterwrards. Another difadvantage which attends this operation upon the ears of horfes, is, that they will not go on cheerfully when travelling in oppofition to the wind, more efpecially if it rains 5 for as the wind and rain get free accefs into the ears, they are continually fliak- * ing their heads and endeavouring to turn from it j and thofe who are of a more impatient temper, will wheel fuddenly round, in order to avoid what gives them fo much uneafinefs. They are then faid to be reftive 5 the whip and fpurs are applied by w7ay of chaftifement for a fuppofed fault only. From what has been faid, it will be obvious, from the practice of taking away the natural covering from the infide of the ears, that the internal ear mult be expofed to be confiderably injured, particularly from cold, dull, &c. which blunts the fenfe of hearing, and perhaps caufes deafnefs 5 for it is obferved in thofe hor¬ fes who have been much ufed to this treatment, that they lofe that lively, active motion of the ears, and ap¬ pear dull and inattentive to what paffes around them, and even to the voice of their keeper *. Chap. VIII. Of Caf ration. xSi It is found of ufe to deprive the males of feveral ofCaftration the domeftic animals, efpecially of horfes and cattle, of the means of propagation, either to render them more mild and tra&able, or, in the cafe of cattle, to promote their fattening, and render their flefh lefs rank. It has been difputed whether the caftration of the ftallion is productive of fuch advantages as are not counterbalan¬ ced by the lofs of ftrength and fpirit, which the animals fuftain Part III. FARR Operations, fuftain by the operation. It is not our intention to dif- l_ 1 v cufs this point, and we iliall here only defcribe the ufu- jSs al modes of performing the operation. Mode of The molt prudent mode of caltrating an adult or caftrating. gr0wn horfe, appears to be the following. Let him be thrown on fome convenient fpot, on the off fide, and when dowrn, let the off hind leg be drawn towards the neck, by which the fcrotum will be fairly expofed. Holding the fcrotum firmly, make a cut at once through it, not of too great length, but fufficient to admit the tefficle being preffed out j this being done, apply the clams or a pair of nippers on the cord within an inch of the teflicle, and hold the clams fufficiently tight to flop the How of blood, but not to bruife the cord j the done may then be cut off with a fcalpel, or it may be feared off with a burning knife. If it is cut off with a fcalpel immediately before the clams let go their hold, fear the end of the cord. Some apply a little powdered refin on it before fearing, after which the clams may be loofened. When this is finifhed, proceed to remove the other in the fame manner. After both are removed, a pledgit of lint, wetted in warmed fpirits, may be introduced juft within the edges of each wxound 5 but no fait fhould by any means be introduced, as is the pradlice of fome farriers ; nor wall any kind of bandage be ealily retained, and if any thing of this kind is ufed, it fhould be very loofely applied, fo as not to irritate. When this operation is performed on a full grown horfe, if he is at all fat, he fhould be previoufly bled, and kept rather low 5 and it will be prudent to choofe mild weather for the operation ; and the place likewdfe he is put into after the operation, fhould be of a moder¬ ate temperature. Sometimes there is a confiderable degree of inflam¬ mation, and when this happens, it is by no means pro¬ per to trot the horfe about as is commonly done, but to bleed and purge, and apply a folution of fugar of lead to the parts. It will alfo be of advantage to infert a feton fmeared with bliftering ointment into the infide of the thigh. Some operators feparate the epididymis from the tef- ticle and fuller it to remain, by which means they think that a portion of the animal’s fpirit is retained. A fimi- lar cuftom is faid to prevail in France ; but the French operators objeft to it, on the idea that it produces fiftu- lous fores in the part. The fa6t is, that when any por¬ tion of the tefticle is fuffered to remain, though it can¬ not fecrete femen, yet it has fome action going on with¬ in, by which it produces fome influence both on the mind and form j and as fuch, the future growth of the animal may perhaps be flightly affefted by it, and per¬ haps his temper too, but the addition to the latter may probably not be a very favourable one *. Where the operation is to be performed, the beft peiforming tjme probalfty when the foal is about three months old, though fome prefer a much more advanced age, as fix, or even 12 months, and more in fome cafes. In all animals there is, however, the leaft dangej of in¬ flammation while they are young in performing fuch operations. Befides it is better to cut colts before they have any propenfity to hanker after mares, and get bad habits. When the foals are early, and the weather is not too hot, the latter end of May or beginning of June may be a good and proper feafon. Vol. VIII. Part II. * Blaine. Outlines^ vol. ii. i83 Time of it, 1 E R Y. 457 Some of the Yorkfhire breeders, however, think that Operations. they find advantage in deferring the operation till the ' horfes are two years old, as they fuppofe they become the ftronger and handfomer for it. And where the ope¬ ration is performed at one year old, they find that the foals have not recovered the check they fuftained by weaning before they experience another in this operation. They experience no greater difference in their recovery at two years old than one. . The foals fhould be kept up fome time before the gelding is to be performed. * * Didfon's The caftrating of male lambs is performed at dif- Agricult. ferent periods in different diftri&s; but it feems the moftvoJ‘ u* proper to be done in the firft fortnight in the ftronger fort of lambs, and in thofe of the weaker kind from a fortnight to three weeks, or a month old, according to circumftances. Some, however, advife its being done at a much later period. When done early, there is, however, the leaft danger of too much infiammation coming on, if the lambs be in a healthy condition. When performed while very young, on tender, delicate lambs, mortification may fometimes be apt to come on and deftroy them, f \ Hid. Chap. IX. Of Spayhig. . . ,s4 Spaying is an operation performed on the females,Spaying. chiefly on cattle and dogs, to prevent their producing young. It confifts i n taking away the ovaries, or thofe appendages to the womb in which are formed the rudi¬ ments of the young. It is fuppofed that it is attended with confiderable advantage, in cows of heifers, as it greatly promotes their fattening. In bitches, it is ge¬ nerally employed to prevent the unpleafant circum¬ ftances that often occur in the time they are in heat. Spaying is ufually performed after the animal has been newly impregnated, as at that time the ovaries are larger than before impregnation, and are of courfe more eafily difcovered. In performing the operation, a cut is made through the integuments of the belly, between the haunch-bone and the laft ribs, and through this opening the fingers are to be introduced. If the animal has not been impregnated, a roundilh hard fubftance wall be felt attached to the loins. This is to be drawn out and cut off, and that on the other fide is now to be felt for, drawn out, and cut aw^ay. The ovaries, as has been faid, wall be much more readily found, efpecially the inmoft one, when the animal is impregnated, as the young within the horns of the womb afford a good di- reclion to the finger. It is fometimes neceffary, when the animal is not in a ftate of impregnation, to make an opening on each fide of the belly, one for the extrac¬ tion of each ovary ; but when this is found requifite, it will be better to delay the fecond operation till the animal is in fome meafure recovered from the firft. When the ovaries have been cut away, the openings muft be clofed by means of a ftitch through the in¬ teguments of the belly, and muft be carefully cover¬ ed with flicking plafter, to prevent the adrniiiion of the external air. Mr Daniel remarks, that this operation does not al- *85 ways fucceed in bitches, unlefs done by a fkilful perfon, w?ho can be relied upon. If it be ill done, although the bitches can have no puppies, they will notwdth- ftanding go to heat, wdiich defeats the purpofe. There is a difference of opinion, whether a bitch Ihould be 3 M fpayed 458 FAR R Operations, {payed before or after foe has had a litter of whelps ; v—-y—j j)anjei} however, has tried, and found both periods to anfwer. The bed time is 14 or 15 days after lire has taken the dog, and wrhen the puppies juft begin to b« knotted within her. All the roots of the veins fhould not be taken away ; her ftrength and fwiftnefs will be injured by fo doing. They ftiould be kept low' for feveral days before the operation is performed, and * Daniel's fed on thin meat for fome time after *. Rural Sports. Chap. X. Of Delivery in Difficult Labours. igg Deliver}'. In general, Nature is all-fufficient for bringing forth the young of domeftic animals, and man has little to do, except to take care that tbe females be not in fuch a fi- tuation as may expofe themfelves or their young to injury. It is proper always to watch a mare, or a cow, that is near the time of bringing forth j and to be at hand, to afford afliftance where neceffary. Mares do not often require afliftance, as with them, difficult labour is un¬ common. Where this does occur, the diredlions we are about to give for the cow', will in general anfwer for the mare. Cows, particularly the fhort-horned fpecies, often need the afliftance of the accoucheur. The natural prefentation of the calf, is with its head and fore-feet, the nofe between the feet, and the back upwards. Downing enumerates feven preternatural pofitions : namely, ift, Reverfe prefentation, or tail firft. 2d, Fore-feet, no head appearing. 3d. Side-belly upwards, head reverfed over one {boulder, legs appearing. 4th, Fore-feet, with head under the briiket. 15th, Head alone, or one fore-leg only with it. 6th, Head and one leg, or head alone. 7th, Calf lying on its back, its four legs folded nearly together, and clofe up to the cow’s back •, the head appearing, or doubled back, even with the ribs, on one lide or other ; one hind-leg, jgy perhaps, appearing. Dirrftions The following general rules are given by Mr Law- for deliver- rence.—Timely afliftance before the cow is exhaufted. ing cows in Extra£lion never to be attempted in an improper pofi- tiotis^01" ti°n. Supple the hand and arm with warm water and frefh lard. Examination beft made, the cow {landing, and in the interval of pains. In pulling at the feet, in- clofe the claws in the hand, that the horn may not bruife the cow'. Navel ftring burfting, and the ufual flux of blood, of no confequence. Inftruments to be r ufed only in the laft refort, and by experienced and fteady perfons only. The proper hook is of hard iron, four inches l6ng, with a loop for the cord at the ftraight end. In a natural pofltion, if the cow fhould want help, the pofition of the calf may be afcertained after the wa- t«rs have been feen. A cord ought to be in readinefs, to attach to the fore legs of the calf, in order to aflift each natural exertion. The head to be kept clear of • obftruclion. Preternatural pofition. N° 1. as above. No at¬ tempt to turn the calf (this pofition being favourable for extraftion), but ufe expedition, for fear it be fuffocated. Prefs the haunches back with the palm of the hand, take hold of the bend of the hough of one leg, pull at it, and reach the foot; both feet may thus be brought lorth. N° 2. Reduce the head to its proper fituation, between the fore-legs, either by hold of the jR>fe, or the I E R Y. Part III. face-bone. A long arm is needful, which muft be kept OperatioRs. to the full extent in the body, that inftant advantage may be taken of every throe, the fingers being proper¬ ly fixed. N° 3. Gently move the calf back, and bring the head forth to the legs. N° 4. Pufh the calf back to find the head 5 pull at the nofe j this requires ad- drefs, but it is ufelefs to employ force, until the head be in its proper place. N0 5 and 6. Pufti the calf back againft the Ihoulders and briiket 5 the feet wall be found folded tinder the belly; bring the feet forward, one at a time, the hand being gently placed on the bend of the knee. Should the head be too much fwelled and bruifed, to be returned, it muft be Ikinned and ampu¬ tated. Diffecl in a ftraight line from the poll to the nofe, force the {kin back over the firft joint of the neck, divide the head from the body, puftiing the latter back to obtain hold of the knees. The loofe {kin muft be pre- vioufly wrapped over the ragged bone, and an affiftant ftrould have fall hold, in order to guide it clear of the haunch-bones of the cow ; fhould it hitch there, put back inftantly. N° 7. If one hind-leg appear, put it back ; the calf cannot be brought forth with a hinder and fore-leg together, and the difference between the knee and hough will be immediately difcovered. The head being doubled back, muft of courfe be reduced to its proper place. The cow being ftrong and quiet, the bufinefs may be effedted with care and patience 3 but ftiould the hook be pofitively neceffary, hold mull be taken, either in the fockets of the eyes, cavity of the ears, or in the jaw. The cafe of dropfy in the calf will ^ ^ be fufficiently apparent by its preternatural fize 3 ufe^ hTtP-T* the knife carefully, Ihould that be neceffary, to pierce voit jp * the belly of the calf. 188 There is a very material obftrudlion which frequent-1° preter- ly happens to the calving of cow's. It is called a hom-™^^.^ ing of the lye or calf-bed, when the paffage of it is con-of the paf. tradled into a very fmall ©ircumference, infomuch, thatfagC. at the full time of geftation, it will not admit fo much as the fmalleft hand, and grows fo finewy or horned, as renders it utterly impoflible for the cow to calve with¬ out afliftance, and many cattle have died under this dreadful inconvenience, when it might have been eafily prevented 3 but fo little has been known hitherto of the difeafes peculiar to bhck cattle, that many thoufands have fallen vidlims to untimely death, that a Ample remedy or operation might have faved. In the cafe before obferved, it muft take a confider- able length of time, before it is contracted, as it is often found 3 but no fufpicion or dread can reafonably take place, until near the time when the beaft has arrived at the end of nine months, her full time of bearing young: when they generally make a regular prepara¬ tion, or falling of the parts of generation, for a few days, or weeks before calving 3 but in cafes of this 4 hornednefs of the calf-bed, it is obferved that they are backward in making thefe neceffary alterations, pre¬ paratory to the approaching change 3 and when this is noticed, more than ufual obfervation ought to be taken, for w'hen they do not prepare in a regular manner, they feHom have the efforts of nature in due courfe, for the delivery of their burthen.—But when the beaft is ob¬ ferved lick for calving, and has reached the end of her time, and any dread of this apprehended, there is no danger or impropriety in fearching with the hand, in ojofcr to fce fatisfied* whether that part is open, or grown PartIV. FARR Hygeiology grown up, as previoufly defcribed j yet the greateft care '“’Y"-'"' is neceflary, that the inquiry be made with judgment, and the hand that is introduced mull be well lathered with foap and water, or greafed with tallow, frefh butter, or fome fuch thing, that will not caufe irritation in the neck of the womb. Now, if it be found in the ftate defcribed in any de¬ gree, and a certainty of the beaft being at its full time, with the common ficknefs and fymptoms for calving, no time fhould be loft until the animal be relieved. The difficulty greatly depends on knowing to what degree it is grown up ; it is fometimes fo ftrait as not to admit the end of a finger, but with fome exertion, it may give fo much way as that a fmall knife may be introduced, whofe blade ftiould not be above an inch and a half in length, and very (harp, with a hollow' on the back part of the point, for the end of the fore-finger to guide the knife when cutting, and to cover the point and edge, when introduced, which muft be covered as much as poflible with the hand. Its handle ought to be fliort, and the fore-finger of the operator fliould always be kept forw-ard on the knife, to prevent any danger that might arife from the edge of it. The homy circle is fometimes fo hard and griftly, that it takes more exer¬ tion than may have been expelled from the nature of the place •, but as foon as it is cut through, the beaft will find a very material difference, and ftrive to void her burden, if poffible, when every exertion of art I E R Y. ought to be ufed for her relief, fered the beaft, fo difordered, to before their eyes, without offering to render her any afliftance, and fome have attempted to take the calf out at the fide of the animal, a pra&ice commonly known by the name of the Caefarean operation j but the other method is to be preferred, when the obftruflion is the refult of hornednefs. But operations of this kind in general fail, from neglefting the attempt until every natural hope is gone, and the patient fo much weaken¬ ed, as to die under the hands of the perfon who has un¬ dertaken the talk. It is, therefore recommended, that, no time be loft in afcertaining the caufe of any delay in calving, and that every exertion be ufed, wffiile the ani¬ mal has ftrength to undergo the operation, and to fecond the attempt. When the bufinefs is happily over, the wounded parts within muft be taken care of, by pro¬ viding one pint of re£lified fpirit of wine camphorated, to anoint the wound, and any other parts which may have been expofed to the air, bruifed, or over diftended. This may be conveyed up the neck of the wmmb by a fyringe, fpunge, or linen rag filled with it, and carried thither by a fmall hand, urell fomented with fome of the foregoing articles for that purpofe. Let the beaft be kept moderately warm, and in a comfortable fituation, allowing her at all times a plentiful fixpply of good, dry, and fweet litter. We have taken the above from Row- lin’s Complete Cow-doftor. * 4 Many people hare fuf- Hygeioiogy die a milerable death PART IV. HYGEIOLOGY; OR, THE MEANS OF PRESERVING THE HEALTH OF DOMESTIC ANIMALS. tSp Before we enter on the confideration of the difeafes, that affeft domeftic animals, whofe medical treat¬ ment is to form the fubjeft of the remaining part of this article j it will be proper to lay down fome inftru&ions for the management of thefe animals in a ftate of health, with a view to that moft important object, the avoiding of the caufes of difeafe. The prefervation of health muft ever be confidered as one of the principal objects of the medical praftitioner, and has exercifed the pens of fome of the moft eminent phyficians in all ages. But the confideration of this fubjefl is ftill more neceffary in the treatment of the inferior animals, than in that of man. In the former the cure of difeafe is rendered much more difficult and precarious, on account of the obfcurity in which the fymptoms are often hid, and the difficulty which we frequently experience in inveftigat- i9« ing the caufes of morbid affeftions. Habita. The management of domeftic animals in a ftate tions. 0f heait;b, chiefly refpefts the habitations in which they are placed, when taken from their native fields j their food and drink j cleanlinefs, and exercife. Chap. I. Of Stablesy Cow-houfeSy and Kennels. In a ftate erf nature, all the animals at prefent under our confideration, are conftantly expofed to the open air, and only feek for fhelter from the inclemencies of the weather under woods and thickets. The young of all thefe animals when domefticated, except the dog, are for a long time left in a fimilar ftate, till, for the convenience of their mafters, it is found neceffary t» place them in habitations. The ftru&ure of thefe, that is of ftables, cowhoufes, and kennels, and the method of treating the animals confined in them, is of the utmoft confequence j as on thefe the animals health and com¬ fort muft in a great meafure depend. I. Of Stables. Stables fhould be built on a dry foil, that is fome-shoidd be what elevated y or, at leaft, they muft not be built in a built on a hollow, or in the neighbourhood of boggy or marlhydry and land. The damp cold air, arifing from moift, low fitua-e!evate<1 tions, is extremely prejudicial to the health of all ani- CC* mals, particularly horfes, and, as we fhall fee hereafter, to Iheep. It renders them fubjeft to colds, rheumatifm, and not unfrequently to fever. Stables built in thefe fituations are therefore always dangerous j and more particularly fo, when the animals return to them after having been heated by violent exercife or labour. r , Stables fliould be roomy in proportion to the number Should be of horfes that it is propofed they ftiould contain. Per- roomy, haps no liable ftiould be made to hold more than five or fix horfes, as many inconveniences arife from keeping too many of thefe animals in the fame apartment. Not only is the air thereby much more vitiated, but the reft and deep, fo neceffary to repair the fatigues of the day, are thus prevented or difturbed. Some horfes will not deep, or even lie down, if not perfedlly at their eafe j and hence, in large ffables, that are made to contain a dozen or more horfes, as is often the cafe in livery fta- 3 M 2 hies* ov 460 F A 11 R Hygeiology bles, and fucb as are attached to large inns, the frequent v' entrance of grooms, oftlers, and other penons ^ with lights, into the liable, and even the reftlefs noife oi fome of the horfes, who are more watchful, or have been lefs fatigued than others, mult be a great distur¬ bance to thefe latter. Where necellity requires a long range of Itables, it is better to have them divided, by thick partition walls, into Separate apartments, each made to contain not more than lix horfes. I he additional ex¬ pence of this would be trifling, compared to the greater eafe and comfort of the animals. It is ufual in large llables, for the fake of keeping more horfes conveniently under the fame roof, to make them double-headed, as it is termed ; that is, to have a range of Halls along each wall, with a fpace between, for perfons to pafs to and fro. Stables of this kind are very improper; the fpace between the two ranges is often fo narrow, that when the oppolite Halls are oc¬ cupied at the fame time, the horfes can reach each other 193 with their hind feet, especially when Handing, as they Double fta- 0f^en at the full length of their halter. Hence, in bles impro- ^ contefts tbat often arife between quarrelfome or met- -er" tlefome horfes, very fevere bruifes, and even lamenefs, are not unufually the confequences of the animals being within each others reach. The danger that threatens paffengers in thefe narrow fpaces is alfo not fmall j we have often trembled, when obliged to pafs between two rows of horfes, kicking and wincing under the curry¬ combs, where the intermediate fpace did not exceed three or four feet. If double-headed Hables muH be ufed, the fpace between the ranges of Halls fliould be at l()A leaH eight feet. Root Ihould The roof of Hables fliould not be low j for, as the not be lc%v. foul an(J vitiated air, generated by refpiration and the exhalations of animal bodies, naturally afeends to the highefl parts, the horfes, who ufually carry their heads very high, are, when the ceiling of the flable is low, ful¬ ly expofed to the noxious influence of this vitiated at- mofphere. This is not the place to enlarge on the vitiation that the air undergoes from the aftion of the animals that are confined in it j this fubjedl has been al¬ ready fully confidered in the article Chemistry when fpcaking of refpiration 5 and, from wdiat has been there delivered, the reader will fee the neceflity of pure air to horfes and other animals as well as man, and will be able to judge of the propriety of the above maxim, and fome others which we fliall prefently lay down. The walls of the Hable ftiould be of Hone or brick, and by no means of wood 5 they ftiould alfo be left bare, or at leafl only covered with plaifler. 1 he tem¬ perature of the air, in buildings of Hone or brick, is much more equable than in thofe built of wood, they are not fo eafily penetrated by the heat of fummer, m the cold of winter, and they are alfo attended with another important advantage, that they refifl the fpread- ing of fire. The Halls in which the horfes are to Hand fliould be divided from each other by Hrong wooden partitions, that ftiould rife fufficiently high to prevent the horfe from Hep ping over, but not fo high as to impede the free circulation of air, and admiflion of light from one Hall to another. The breadth of each Hall fliould be fuch as will freely admit of the horfe turning himfelf, and ft retching at his full length when he lies down j but they ihould not be fo wide as to allow of his kick- I E R Y. Part IV. *95 Stalk. ing againft the partition. The floor of the Hall fliould Hygeiology have a gentle declivity, from the manger backwards. This allowrs the urine and water to run eafily oh } it ai- fo relieves the fore quarters of the horfe, and adds much to the grace of his appearance behind. Too great a flope, howrever, muft be avoided, as when the de¬ clivity is too rapid, all the weight of the horfe is thrown on his hind legs 3 and, as it is extremely uneafy for the animal to remain long in this pofition, he is obliged to prefs his body forward, which he cannot accomplifti, without keeping the hind legs always on the Hretch 3 the paftern-joint, from its fituation, receives the whole additional weight, and the ligament which connecls it is invariably ftrained in all horfes wfliich are kept in this fort of liable for any length of time. A flope of one inch in fix feet will be fufficient to anfwer every purpofe. This declivity Ihould terminate in a hollow fpace a few inches from the end of the Hall, forming a fort or gutter, extending the whole length of tne Hable, and palling out through the wall at each end, where iron bars fhould be placed, to admit of the water, &c. paf- fing out of the ftable, which is the intention of this gutter, but preventing the intrufion of rats, and other noxious animals. *9® The floor of ftables is commonly paved with Hone, Floor, or hard bricks made for that purpoie. Hhis kind of flooring has the advantage of being _ more durable than any other 3 but it is not wuthout its inconveniencies. The Hones or bricks become fmooth by wearing, and, when the ftable is wet, the horfe, efpecially if he be very frilky, is apt to flip, and endanger ftraining or otherways injuring his limbs. Again, by the pawing, or ftamping, to wfliich thefe animals are often lubjctf, the pavement may be loofened or broken. For thefe reafons, it would perhaps be better that at leaft the Halls Ihould be floored with ftrong oaken planks well feafoned, and laid acrofs the Hall, with their extremi¬ ties below the partitions, and having their joining edges accurately adapted to each other. A flooring of this kind has the advantage of being more elaftic, and of prefervmg a more equable temperature than pavement 3 and it is not liable to the inconveniencies which we have mentioned, as attending this latter. A wTooden flooring is indeed expenfive, but this is more than counterbalanced by the advantages to the horfe. It is of little confequence how the reft of the ftable is cover¬ ed 3 fome gentlemen floor their ftables with a fort of cement which in courle of time becomes as hard as Hone, and has the advantage of being perfeftly fmooth and even. The gutter fliould of courfe be well paved. Ip7 The manger for receiving the horfes corn ftiould be Manger, about a foot broad, and five or fix inches deep. _ The manger is ufually made of wood, and wflien this is the cafe, the boards compofing it ftiould be fo clofely join¬ ed, that the corn cannot get through between them. The front of the manger fliould rife about three feet, or a little more, from the ground 3 fliould flope a little, and fliould terminate above by a ftrong rounded border. This if the manger be made of wood, ftiould be covered wflth tin plate, or white iron, as horfes are very apt, wflien without food, or when allowed to remain long in the ftall, to bite the front of the manger, and thus acquire a very bad habit, which farriers call crib- biting. Some chufe to make the manger of ftone, which Part TV. FARR Hvgeiok sr which has' the advantage of wood in being more durable v—““V J and cleanly, wood acquiring by ufe an unpleafant fmell, and being foon rotted by the moifture of the food, which it often receives. The bottom of the manger fhould Hope a little forwards. The manger is fometimes made to extend the whole length of the liable, when it is in general divided into feveral cavities, one for each horfe. It is of little con- fequence whether it be one continued cavity, or whether there be a feparate manger for each ftall; but the manger Ihould by no means be fupported on legs, fo as to make it moveable, as is fometime's done ; as this prevents the litter from being conveniently flowed below the manger, and expofes the horfe or the manger to accidents. It ftiould therefore be firmly fixed at the back to the wall of the liable, and to each partition of the ftall. Sometimes a hollow is made at one end of the manger, or at one end of each divifion of it, for the purpofe of holding water. When this is done, there Ihould be a hole in the bottom of this cavity fitted wdth a plug, to draw off the water when the horfe has done drinking, or when the manger has been walked. In the middle of the front of the manger, in its thick edge, there is ufually fixed an iron ring, turning eafily in an eye bolt, for the purpofe of palling through the halter, by which the horfe is faftened. Sometimes, in- ftead of this ring, a hole is made through the border of the manger for the halter to pais through •, but as the halter does not flip backwards and forwards eafily through fuch a hole, and wears very fall by rubbing againft the wood, the iron ring is to be preferred. The horfe Ihould always be faftened in fuch a way, as that the halter ftiall Aide backwards and forwards with every motion of the horfe’s head; and he Ihould on no account be tied by the halter, as this expofes him to accidents, 198 by twilling the halter about his neck or legs. Rack. T he rack Ihould be placed at fuch a height above the manger, as that the horfe can eafily-reach it, to pull out the hay; it Ihould be very ftrong and firmly fixed, and Ihould incline a little outwards from the wall of the liable. The bars of which it is compofed, Ihould not be above four or five inches afunder, that the hay may not fall out and be willed. One circumftance particularly to be attended to in the conftrudion of llables is, to preferve a free circula- tion of air. Stables The generality of ftables are by much too dole and' fhould not warm j not a chink is left for the free admiflion of air j be too clofe. ^ joor> an(j w;nclows (if there are any), are made fo clofe, as perfe6tly to exclude the air 5 or, if this is not the cafe, the crevices are frequently Hopped with hay, under the idea that the horfes cannot be kept too warm. This is a moll abfurd and miftaken notion ; and is con- tradi£led both by reafon and daily experience. When we confider that horfes in a Hate of nature, or even in their ufual paftures, are perpetually expofed to the open air. and that, under thefe circumftances, they are more vigorous and active than under the moll attentive care of their mailers, we mull be convinced of the improprie¬ ty of keeping them for hours together in the foul and heated atmofphere of the ordinary clofe ftables. Who¬ ever enters one of thefe ftables when the door is firft opened in the morning, after it has been clofely ftiut up all night, will be able to judge from his own fenfations, I E R Y. 461 whether fuch an atmofphere can be wholefome to the Hygeitflowy animals that breathe it. Eelides the great heat of the "■'* "h liable, which, if many horfes have been ihut up in it all night is nearly intolerable, the air will be found highly impure from the continued refpiration of fo many ani¬ mals, and the Hearns arifing from the exhalations of their bodies, which have probably fweated profufely from having been fo long confined in an atmofphere lo foul and heated. Add to this the impregnation of the air by the effluvia ariiing from the litter, &c ; and it is not eafy to conceive a mere unhealthy lituation for an animal, who, to perform the offices required of him with a£livity and vigour, Ihould be in the full poffeffion of all his ilrength. Now it may eafily be fuppoled, that fuch an air as we have deferibed, cannot be calcu¬ lated to ftrengthen the body of the horfes. On the contrary, it muft be in a high degree weakening and relaxing. In this relaxed ftate, the horfe is probably- taken out immediately into the open air, whatever may be the feafon or weather, and made to enter on his daily talk. The cfleft which fuch a Hidden change muft have on the conftitution of the ftrongeft horfe, need not be deferibed. The Hidden adlipn of the cold and probably moift air on a body that has been expofed for fo many hours to the heated air of the liable, muft be pro¬ ductive of the worft confequences to the health and vigour of the animal. Accordh gly, fevers, colds, rheumatiftii, afthma, and a number of other formidable difeafes, may be traced to this debilitating fource. We Ihould think, that the analogy of nature would have taught men to avoid fuch abiurdities. We learn from thofe authors who have written on the natural hif- tory of the horfe, that the Arabians, who live in tents, and are extremely careful in the management of their horfes, allow them to Hand all day, when not employ¬ ed, at the door of the tent ; and at night bring them"" within the tent, where they lie down in the fame apart¬ ment with their mafter and family, Iheltered indeed from the dews of the night, but freely expofed to the circulation of air that muft conftantly prevail in thefe temporary dwellings.- 2oo' To avoid the inconveniences arifing from confined Mode of air, the liable fhould be made high and roomy j the ventila- door and windows ftiould not be made too dole 5 andtl0n' the liable fhould be provided with proper ventilators. Perhaps a good method of preferving a free circulation- of air in the liable at all times, would be to carry up a flue diagonally through the wall at each extremityj. terminating above in a fort of chimney j and below, - within the liable, in an opening fufficiently wide in any part of the wall that is not immediately within the Hall. zcit The free admiffion of light into ftables is nearly of Windows, as much confequence as that of air. It is a very errone¬ ous opinion which is maintained by fome grooms and liable-keepers, that horfes feed bell in the dark. Thefe animals naturally love the light, and are much more cheerful and fpirited in ftables where this is freely ad¬ mitted, than in the dark and difmal hovels that we fometimes find attached to inns and farm houfes. There is one bad confequence that follows keeping horfes in a dark liable, which does not appear to be fufficiently attended to. By being kept fo long excluded from the light, the horfes eyes become weak, and unable to fup- port the full glare of open day. The pupils being, fo long.; .462 FARRIERY. Part IV. Hygeiology long habituated to an tmufual degree of dilatation, do ' not readily contrafl when the animal is brought out in¬ to the open air j hence his eyes being offended with the ilrong light, to which he is fo little accuitomed, are perpetually winking and watering; the horie appears as if half blind, and Harts and Humbles at almoft every Hep. The liable Ihould, therefore, be fumilhed with glaz¬ ed windows, in number proportioned to the fize of the building. In general, no {tables fliould have fewer than two windows ; and they Ihould be placed in fuch H fituation, as that the horfes may not receive the ray* of light too direftly on their eyes. Where the liable has only one range of flails, this point can be ealily ef¬ fected, and in fuch llables, the windows ihould always be placed at the back of the horfes. But in double flables it is not eafy to place the windows fo as not to incommode fome of the horfes, lince, on whichever lide of the liable they are made, the horfes on that lide are expofed to the full glare of the light ; another argu¬ ment again!! double llables. The windows Ihould by all means be falhed; and Ihould be made to draw down from the top, as well as to be thrown up from below. They Ihould not be made too fmall, and Ihould be carried up as near the ceiling of the liable, as is compatible with the llrength and fymmetry of the building. Windows conltrufted in this wray not only add much to the ap¬ pearance of the llables and to the comfort of the horfes; but they afford one of the bell means of pro¬ moting a free circulation of frelh air through the liable. For by throwing one of them up, and drawing another down, the ventilation becomes nearly as complete as poffible. Nothing has aftonilhed us more, when viewing the handfome offices attached to fome of the gentlemen’s houfes in this country, than to fee the deficiency of the llables in the article of windows. When viewing them from without, we have congratulated the animals con¬ fined in them on the comfort of light and air, which they mull enjoy from the fine falh-windows, which we faw on each fide of the liable door. How great has been our aftonifliment on entering the building, to find all gloomy and dark within; and that the fine falh-win¬ dows which we thought we had feen at a diltance, were nothing but efforts of the painter to deceive our fenfes, and to prefent an appearance of what certainly ought to have been a reality ! We mull be permitted here to draw7 what wre hope will not be confidered as an invidious comparifon be¬ tween the Scotch and Englilh method of lodging their horfes. In England we have rarely feen fuch miferable hovels as, in many parts of Scotland, are ufed to fup- ply the place of llables. We have indeed in the for¬ mer country feen the {tables fometimes very fmall, or even confining of a thatched building not very well de¬ fended from the weather; but they are for the moll part tolerably wrell ventilated, and w7e believe fcarcely ever without windows. jLolts above It is a common practice to build llables of two Ho¬ nes, the upper Hory forming a loft for the purpofe of keeping the horfe’s hay and com ; and in gentlemen’s {tables, where the building is fufficiently large, it is ufual to have apartments on the upper flory for the grooms and other fervants employed about the flables to fleep in. The apartment employed as a hay loft has u{daily a 3 tbe liable . improper. vacancy in-that part of the flooring which is immediate- Hygeiology ly over the rack, for the purpofe of more conveniently —v—~l fupplying the horfes with hay. This mode of building Rabies has its convenience in an economical point of view7, and thefe apartments in the upper flory add much to the {howy appearance of the building ; but there are feveral material objections to this oonftruClion. x. The hay and corn being kept immediately over the liable, are conflantly expofed to the foul and heat¬ ed air and putrid fleams riling up from the flails through the rack, and are thus rendered liable to be heated and mildewed; while the dull riling from the lhaking of tile hay into the rack is very prejudicial to the lungs of the horfes. On this account it is much better, where this can be conveniently done, to keep the hay and com in fome place dillinft from the liable, and bring from time to time a fufficient quantity of hay nearly to fill the rack, into which it might be put while the horfe is abroad. 2. Another ferious objeCtion to having lofts and chambers above the liable, is that the building is thus much more expofed to accidents from fire, owing to the carelefl'nefs of the fervants. And, 3. Thefe apartments above the liable render the latter much too clofe and warm. Where, from convenience or fancy, a gentleman choofes to build his flables in the manner which we have juft deferibed, it will be advifable to have the flooring above the liable made as clofe as poflible, and covered with thin bricks or Hones for the purpofe of checking the progrefs of fire; and for preferving the hay and com as much as may be from the fleams of the liable, a parti¬ tion wall may be raifed from the extremity of the floor¬ ing immediately over the rack all the way to the roof of the loft, wdth a door opening over the rack in each flail. The entrance to the hay loft or chambers above the liable Ihould be without, and by no means, as is generally the cafe, by a trap door and ladder within the liable. If, as we frequently fee in gentlemen’s of¬ fices, the {tables are built on each fide of the coach- houfe, the entrance to the rooms above may be con¬ veniently made by a flair from the coach-houfe. The building of wffiich the liable forms a part, {hould be as much as poffible detached from other buildings, fo as to admit of a free circulation of air all around. 2C3 It is a vile praftice which is common on many farms Stable and in fome inns, to have the dung-hill or midden, ftould be clofe to the liable. This nuifance Ihould be removed ^rom as far as poffible from the door and wrindows of the un^“ liable, as the heat and noifome vapours arifing from the fermenting dung impregnate the air to a confider- able extent. 201 It is of great confequence that the liable be kept Neceffity fweeped and clean. It fhould therefore be regularly °* cleanii- fwept every morning, and every part of the litter thatne * is wet and dirty Ihould be removed to the dunghill, while what is clean and dry Ihould be put up clofe be¬ low the manger, unlefs where the hovfe is lame, or has any affeflion of the feet or limbs, which renders it ne- ceffary for him to ftand upon foft litter. Where the horfe is perfectly healthy, no litter Ihould 'be allowed in the day time, much lefs Ihould the flail be crammed with litter, as is often done, and is fuffered to remain in this fituation for many days, for the purpofe of in- creafing the quantity of manure. Nothing injures the feet £04 Clothing. Part IV. FARR Hygeiology feet of horfes mare, or more frequently produces foft- nefs of the hoof, canker, and greafy heels, than allow¬ ing them to iland night and day on hot, fermenting dung. It is alfo impoflible for the horfe to lie ^down in comfort in fuch a hot-bed ; and if the poor animal is obliged to recline himfelf for a time, he is foon com¬ pelled to rife again, and repeatedly making the fame attempt at reft, and finding it impra&icable, he is for¬ ced at length to ftand altogether, perhaps Ihifting his legs from one part of the ftall to another, to avoid the heat of the dung. Lord Pembroke is of opinion that after working, and at night of courfe, as alfo in lamenefles and fick- nefles, it is good for horfes to ftand on litter j it alfo promotes Haling, &c. At other times it is a bad cuf- tom 5 the conftant ufe of it heats and makes the feet tender, and caufes fwelled legs. Moreover it renders the animal delicate. Swelled legs may frequently be reduced to their proper natural fize, by taking away the litter only, which, in fome ftables, where ignorant grooms and farriers govern would be a great faving of phyfic and bleeding, befides ftraw. “ I have feen, (fays he), by repeated experiments, legs fwell and un- fwell, by leaving litter, or taking it away, like mer¬ cury in a weather-glafs.” It is a very common pra&ice to keep horfes, while in the liable, covered up with warm cloathing. This is in fome cafes necelTary, efpecially when they are un¬ der a courfe of phyfic, or are othenvife fo delicate, as that they would be liable to injury from too much ex- pofure to the air. But its indifcriminate ufe is highly improper, as it tends to render the horfe too delicate, and expofes him to the danger of catching cold when¬ ever he goes out into the air. While a horfe is in com¬ plete health, and Hands idle, he requires very little, if any covering, unlefs the liable be extremely cold, or ill flickered. When indeed he comes into the liable, much heated by violent exercife or hard labour, it may be proper to throw over him a Angle cloth, that he may cool gradually. Some grooms think it neceffary, be- iides enveloping the horfe with body clothes, to gird them fall round his belly with tight rollers} and this is done with the view of taking up the horfe’s belly, as they term it. The praftice is exceedingly abfurd, for thefe tight rollers impede the circulation in the fuperfi- cial veins, produce difficult breathing, and if they be applied, as is often the cafe, after eating, they greatly obftrufl digeftion. To finiih the fubjefl of liable economy, we have only to make a few remarks on currying, or drefling horfes. Fridlion employed on the horfe’s fldn is not only ne¬ ceffary to keep him clean, and to promote the infenfi- ble perfpiration, by freeing the Ikin and hair from im¬ purities, but it is exceedingly ufeful wdien confidered as a kind of exercife. It promotes the free circulation of the blood, which is much impeded by the horfe Handing long idle in the liable ; and it much improves the appearance of the horfe’s coat. Horfes Ihould therefore be regularly dreffed, at leaft twice a-day. There are, however, fome cafes in which general fridhon ought not to be employed-, fuch are cafes of internal inflammation, efpecially of the bowels; or when there is a difeharge of iharp ichorous matter from any part, efpecially the legs and heels. In thefe cafes I E R Y. 46. soj Drefling. the affe&ed parts flrould not be rubbed, as it would HygeiologT tend to increafe the pain and diftrefs arifing from the inflammation. 2. Of Cow-houfes, or Byres. 206 After what we have faid on the conllruclion of fta-Gow-houfes, bles, we need not here enlarge on that of cow-- houfes01 byres’ or cattle byres, as thefe buildings, fo far at leaft as re- . fpecls their outfides, are conftrufted on fimilar princi¬ ples. We lhall take occafion, when treating on the manner of feeding cattle, to deferibe a byre that ap¬ pears to us to afford a good model for buildings^of this kind. It is of material importance in the wintering of young Hock, to keep them more warm, and fheltered from wet, than is ufually done, as by this means they thrive fafter, with a lefs confumption of food, than in the con¬ trary circumftances. This may be effedled, either by tying them up in Halls, in houfes for the purpofe, or by keeping them in good Iheds in well inclofed yards. 207 The queilion of feeding the cattle tied up, or loofeProPr.iet?’ in the yards, in winter, has not been yet decided. °at^ns Each method has probably advantages. In the firft, the cattle thrive better than wdren left at liberty to run about the yards. Mr Marfhall found that in York- fhire, cattle kept tied up, and regularly fed with ftraw in a moderate proportion, did better than in the fouthern parts of the iftand, where left loofe in the midft of greater plenty. Whether this effedl is to be aferibed to the. greater warmth, the refting better, or the being fed more regularly, a/uf eating with an appetite, he cannot determine. Some experiments cf Mr Young’s alfo lead to the conclufion that cattle Hock thrive better when tied up. They likewife Ihow that the practice of tying up is the oaly one that can be had recourfe to, where llraw is not in great plenty, and the quantity of the flock very inadequate to its confumption. In the latter method there is the advantage of a large fupply of manure, efpecially w-here the farmer has the convenience of litter. Where however the farmer has convenience, the former method is probably in ge¬ neral the moil beneficial- In either mode of manage¬ ment much attention is neceffary to keeping the flock conftantly fupplied in an evenly proportioned manner, * as in this way there will be great advantage, both in the faving of food, and the condition of the animals.* ° The neceflity of proviJing ftielter for cattle in badox-houfes* w-eather, is now- w-e believe pretty well underftood by every intelligent farmer j and experience has proved that proper buildings eredled for winter feeding are at¬ tended with confiderable advantages. The erection for this purpofe at Hafod in Wales, the refidence of Tho¬ mas Johnes, Efq. M. P. for the county of Cardigan, and one of the moft eminent improvers of the prefent time, feem to be calculated upon a moderate feale. The whole length of the building is fifty feet, the roof (helving, its chief height being fourteen feet, the lower extremities, one feven and a half, the other fix feet. A (lone wall running up to the fummit, parts the feed- ing-houfe from the other and fmaller apartment, which is a receptacle for dung. Width of the feeding-houfe, nineteen feet within-fide. Stalls each twelve feet long by four feet two inches wide. Gangway three feet and a half, at the heels and tails of the cattle, leading from the doors, the firft door being for the cattle, the other for 464 FARR Hygeiology for tlie attendants. Similar doors at the oppofite ends of the building. Running water in troughs, with racks, and mangers. The cattle lie on wooden platforms, perforated for the paffage of the urine. The urine runs, and the dung is pulhed through apertures in the wall, each of which is two feet fquare, and one be¬ tween every two Halls. 1 here are I 2 wooden flaps or windows to give light and air, to each flail. The dung pit is about twelve feet wide, funk fome feet deep in the earth, extending the whole length of the building. The walls are built partly with ftone, and in part wdth wood, the noof with larch wood, as an ex¬ periment of its durability in that expofure. According to Mr Lawrence, the round or quadrangu¬ lar form might perhaps, either of them, be more economi¬ cal as to fpace and materials for a building to contain a confiderable number. The oxen would moft convenient¬ ly ftand around with their tails toward the wall, contrary to the ufual praftice, for the more eafy throwing out the dung from a gangway, through apertures purpofely made in the wall, into a pit, under cover, funk around the building. The area within would, of courfe, be for feeding, and every neceffary purpofe of attendance. A ftore-chamber above completes the building, the chief objedtion to the form of which, is the greater expence attendant upon the reverfed pofltion of the cattle, which perhaps is compenfated by the great faving of labour, in the more eaflly getting rid of the dung. The gang¬ way will in courfe be fufficiently wide to admit the beafts to and from their flails •, the dung aperture in the wall may be clofed in cold weather.” * Sheep-cots. Of all domeftic animals, Iheep are the moft expofed to the inclemencies of the weather. This arifes chiefly from their numbers, which renders complete fhelter very diflicult \ but even in the cafe of a fmall flock, the prejudices of many feeders have prevented their procuring proper ftielter for their (beep, under the idea that it would render them too lazy to provide for themfelves. Thefe prejudices, however, are gradually wearing away, and few fheep-farrcs are at prcfent unprovided with fhelter, either of trees or buildings. Mr Findlater, in his able furvey of Peebles, ftrongly recommends fhelter for fheep. “ It -would be (fays this gentleman) for the in- tereft of every proprietor of fheep farms, to encourage the farmer to rear fhelter of trees, by allowing him the weedings of the plantation, and becoming bound to pay the farmer, at the rate of perhaps eight-pence or ten-pence a piece, for every tree left Handing at fpecifiecl diftances, at the expiry of his leafe •, fuch an intereft communicated to the farmer, would give the moft ef¬ fectual fecurity for the protection of the trees. Shel¬ ters are alfo procured by buildings, enclofing a fquare open area in the middle, furnifhed with fhades, on every fide. Stells (that is circular fpaces of area, propor¬ tioned to the fize of the flock, enclofed by a five or fix feet wall of ftone, or lod, without any roof) were the primeval fhelters invented by our forefatfcers. The cir¬ cular figure of the building caufes the drifting wind in fnow ftorms to wheel round it, without rifing over it, and depofiting the fnow in the calm region within. The fheep are fed, in wdnter ftorms, with fuch provi- ficn as can be procured, under the trees, in the fheds, and within the circles. Even where no feeding is ad- ininiftered, much advantage refults to the animals, from I E R Y. Part IV. mere defence againft the weather'j and they arc much Hygeiology the more alert in fearching for natural food, fo loon as ' ■' the ftorm ceafes. T he mode of aCting of tne fheep gives a pretty certain indication of the wreather to be expeCted: Upon the near approach of a ftorm, thofe ac- cuftomed to fhelters are obferved to make for their fhelters. Upon the near approach of thawq their pre- fentiment leads them to be lefs induftrious in digging the fnow for food, as if confcious that fuch labour was no longer neceffary.” * * Findlater^t According to Mordaunt, who wrote about the mid- Survey, die of laft century, fheep pens and houfes, were then?* not uncommon in Effex and Gloucefterfhire. He direCts the pens to be made at fome convenient corner of a pafture, or where feveral fields, commons, or paftures meet, fo as to be common to them all. They fhould alfo be ereCted on a dry fpot of ground, and ftones laid at the bottom to keep the fheep dry and clean, whilft under examination. The pens to be divided into parti¬ tions to hold about forty fheep. “ The fheep-houfes, for warmth in the winter feafon, are made low, and a third part longer than broad, and rather large, the fides lined with furze or boards, for warmth j the bottom laid wdth large ftone flabs, and very level, that the urine run not away, but foak into the litter. It wrculd be proper to have the funny fide well lined with moveable hurdles, that when the fun fhines it may be laid open to give the fheep a refrefh- ment, by letting them into fome clofe or croft, where¬ in the fheep-houfe Hands: the houfe to be well cover¬ ed.” 3. Of Dog-kennels. It is ufually recommended to ereCI a particular ^og-ken building, for the foie purpofe of a kennel} and certain- nels* ly where the proprietor’s fortune will admit of it, fuch an appropriate building is to be preferred. A com¬ mon barn has, however, often been employed as a kennel ; and Mr Daniel fays, that the excellence of the hounds kept in fuch a building has been rivalled by few that were lodged in the moft fumptuous edi¬ fices. Whatever may be the form or original intention of the building, cleanhnefs is abfolutely neceffary, both to the nofe of the hound and the prefervation of his health. The fenfe offtJielimg is fo exquifite in a hound, that every flench muft be fuppofed injurious to it j upon that faculty all our hopes depend, and noftrils clogged with the effluvia of a dirty kennel, are ill adapted to carry the fcent over greafy fallows, or guide one through the foil of deer, or over ground tainted by fheep. Dogs are by nature cleanly \ where they lie, if they can avoid it, they feldom dung. Air and frefh ftraw are effential to preferve them healthy. They are fubject to the mange 5 naftinefs very much contributes to this, and although at the firft appearance it may be eafily checked the remedies that are ufed are in them- felves ftrong in their operation, and will do no good to the hounds conftitution. Let the clcanhnefs of the kennel, therefore, be carefully attended to j a refort to thefe remedies will then be unneceffary, and all injury to hounds from this fource will be prevented. On the prefumption that a kennel is to be ere&ed, its fite is ftrongly pointed out by Somerville. Upon 4 Part IV. Hygeiology 211 Size. FARR Upon Tome little eminence erect “ And fronting to the ruddy dawn, its courts “ On either hand wide opening to receive “ The fun’s all-chearing beams, when mild he fliines “ And gilds the mountains tops.” But this feleftion of a high lituation is incompatible with a running brook j and as thefe two advantages can¬ not be united, wrater is to be preferred, with the afpedt to the morning fun as much attended to as poflible. The-number of its inmates mull determine the fize of the kennel; and the architecture fhould be neat, with- 2II out being ufelefsly expenfive. The molt magnificent is Duke of the duke of Richmond’s at GoodwTood, which oolt Richmond’s ipj0ool. and is fufficiently extenfive for two packs of Lennei. hounds. The building comprifes five kennels, two 36 by 15, three 30 by 15, and two feeding rooms 20 by 15 feet, with ftoves to wTarm the air, when too cold. The huntfman and whipper-in have each a parlour, kitchen, and fleeping-room. The nearer to the houfe the kennel is placed the bet¬ ter. There are reafons againft its too clofe approach, but they yield to others which forbid a great diftance. To mention one, derived indeed from a vulgar faying, “ that the mailer’s eye makes the horfe fat j” recolledl that the infpediion of the kennel, is even more needful than that of the liable ; for in both, cleanlinefs is n6 lefs effential than food. The kennel Ihould be of fufficient dimenfions at its firlt building; room for twro kennels Ihould be under the fame roof j when there is but one, it is feldom fweet; and when walhed out, the hounds, particularly in winter, not only fuffer during the time of cleaning, but as long afterwards as it remains wet. The fecond kennel alfords opportunity for drafting the hounds in¬ tended to hunt the next morning. In a few days they wall be drafted with little trouble, will readily anfwTer to their names •, and with equal eafe as a Ihepherd numbers his Iheep, you may count your hounds into the hunting kennel. In a morning, upon the feeder’s firll entering the kennel, he Ihould let the hounds into the outer court j the door of the hunting kennel, when not occupied by the drafted hounds for that day’s hunting, Ihould be opened in bad weather to Ihelter them •, the lodging- room Ihould then be thoroughly cleaned, the windows and doors opened, the litter well fhaken, and the ken¬ nel made fwTeet, before the hounds are again fhut into it. Every omiffion prejudicial to the hounds fhould be immediately pointed out to the feeder, who mufl be made to remedy it 5 and alfo obferve that the great court and the other kennels are equally objects of his at¬ tention. The lodging-room fhould be bricked, and Hoped on both fides to the centre, where fhould be a gutter to carry off the water, that when wrafhed, the floor may be equally dried : but flag-ftones, or large fquare bricks termed parsimonds, are far preferable \ there are fewer interflices, and confequently lefs filth or water can there accumulate, and the furface is fooner dry. Let the floor be kept in thorough repair, that no water may remain in any cavity, until the mafon can be had, when at any time wanted j let the flagnant w'ater be carefully flopped up •, for nothing is more hurtful to hounds, VOL. VIII. Part II. -*3 214 Lodging- room. I E R Y. 465 than damp, or more refrefhing than warmth after hard Hygeiology work. v The kennel fhould have three doors ; two in front and one behind j that in the back to have a lattice window in it, with a wooden fhutter, which is to be kept always clofed, except in fummer, when' it fhould be left open the whole of the day. This door has a two¬ fold utility, it ferves to carry out the dirty flraw, and being oppofite to the window, will admit a thorough air, when the lodging-room is cleaned, which will much contribute to render it fweet and w'holefome^ The front doors wall be ufeful in drying the room when the hounds are out; and as one is to be ihut and the other hooked back, fo as to allow a fingle dog to pals, they are not liable to any objection. The large centre window fhould have a folding fhutter, which at night, according to the wreather, may be wholly or partially clofed ; and thus the warmth of the kennel may be re¬ gulated as is judged moll falutary. The two great lodging rooms are exadlly fimilar, and having a court belonging to each, are diflincl kennels fituated at the oppofite ends of the building. In the centre of the boiling-houfe and feeding-yard, a leffer kennel, either for hounds that are drafted, off, hounds that are fick and lame, or for any other required purpofe, is on eacli fide *, at the back of which, it being but half the depth of the two larger kennels, are places for coals, &c. for the ufe of the kennel. There is allp a fmall building in the rear for hot bitches. Ii5 The inner-court floor fhould be bricked or flagged, Inner couiw and flop'ed towards the centre like thofe of the lodging- room j and water brought in by a leaden pipe, fhould run through the channel in the middle. In the centre of each court is a well fufficiently large to dip a bucket for the purpofe of cleaning the kennel. To keep thefe from wanting repair, they fhould be faced with flone, and to that of the feeding-yard a wooden cover fhould be fixed. The benches, wffiich n\ufl be open to let the urine through, fhould have hinges and hooks in them all, that they may fold up when the kennel is wrafhed. They fhould be made as low as poffible, that when a hound is tired, he may have no difficulty in jumping up, and at no time be able to creep under them. Re- collefl that if, owing to the fmallnefs of the hound, as in beagles, it fhould be difficult to make the benches fufficiently low, it will be proper to nail a lodging pro¬ jecting downwards in the edge, or the benches may be faced with boards at bottom, to prevent the hounds from creeping under. A large bricked court in front, having a grafs court adjoining, and a brook running through the middle of it, completes the kennel. This court fhould be plant¬ ed round, and alfo have fome lime trees and fome horfe chefnuts near the centre for ffiade. Some polls bound round with Itraw, rubbed with galbanum, may be placed fo as to prevent the hounds from making water againfl the trees. The brook may be ufed as a cold bath for hounds lamed, in the flifle, in drains, or for other pur- pofes for which the cold bath is required. A high pal¬ ing fhould inclofe the wffiole, and which, to the height of four feet, ffiould be clofe, the remainder being open, with an interval of two inches between the pales. At the back of the kennel ffiould be a thatched houfe, fenced at the fides, to contain at lead; a load of draw, 3 N a 466 Hygeiology FARRIERY. Part IV. 217 * Daniel's Rural Sports, •vol. i. 21S Diet 219 Pood of horfes. a pit for receiving the tlung, and a gallows for the flefh. If a piece of ground adjoining to the kennel can conveniently be enclofed, for keeping fuch horfes as may be brought alive for the ufe of the hounds, it would be of great fervice, as the diforders of condemn¬ ed horles are not always afcertained } and an opportu¬ nity may thus be offered of inveiligating their nature and progrefs, which may prove advantageous in future fimiiar cafes. The hounds may alfo be brought into this field, to empty themfelves after feeding ; and the draught for the next day’s hunt can be here made with greater accuracy than when they are confined to the kennel. Stoves are ufed in fome kennels ; but a good feeder, and the mop properly applied, render them unneceffary. Should ticks prove troublefome at any time, the wulls of the kennel fhould be well wafhed ; and if that Ihould fail to dellroy the ticks, they mufl be white-wafhed with lime. When the hunting feafon is over, one kennel will be fufficient, and the other with the grafs-yard adjoining to it may be allowed to the young hounds. This fepara- tion, which fhould continue till the feafon commences, is neceffary for preventing many accidents that might otherwife happen at this time of the year. Should there be conveniences, it will be proper to keep the dogs fe- parate from the bitches during the fummer months. When hounds are very riotous, the feeder may fleep in a cot in an adjoining kennel ; if the dogs are well chalufed at the firfl quarrel, his voice will afterwards be fufficient to keep them quiet *. Chap. II. Of Diet, In preferving the health of domeftic animals, much will depend on the quantity and quality of their food, and on the manner in which they are fupplied with it. This fubjeft, therefore, requires fome lhare of our at¬ tention. We have already, in the article Agricul¬ ture, treated pretty much at large on the different kinds of food that are molt proper for horfes, Iheep, and cattle; and have here little to add on that head. Our principal objeft in this chapter will be, to confider the bell means of difpenfing food to the different claffes of domeftic animals, and to defcribe wdiat are confidered the moft beneficial methods pf preparing the food in thofe cafes where its preparation appears to be necef¬ fary. The natural food of the horfe is the Ample herbage of the field, and on it alone he can be conftantly kept in a high ftate of health and vigour, fo long as he lhall not be required to labour ■, and whilft he is employed in labour, grafs in fome form, either dried or green, feems abfolutely neceffary to his maintenance in a healthy ftate. Hay, ftraw, and corn of various kinds have been, from the earlieft time, the common food of hcrfes ; but in Britain, and indeed in France and Ger¬ many, during later periods efpecially, they have re- jedled all other fpecies of horfe-corn; from a well- grounded preference in favour of oats and beans ; the latter for draught-horfes chieriy, or as fubftantial auxi¬ liaries to the oats, imparting as ftrong a nourifhment as the conftitution of the horfe will properly bear, and at the fajne time of a cieannng nature j and are, moreover, the beft and cheapeft in-dcor fattening for almoft alllHygeioIogy domeftic animals. v The fpecies of corn ufually given to horfes in many countries is barley, the bulky provender is ftraw, both of which in warm climates, are faid to be nearly equal in nutriment to our oats and hay. With us, barley is - apt to fcour horfes, and make their urine red, elpecially at its firft being given. Wheat is often given to horles of the great upon the continent •, it is faid when Philip of Spain was in this country, his jennets were- fed upon wheat during the time of icarcity, and this gave great umbrage to the people. There feems to exift no particular difference of qua¬ lity between the white and the black oats, they being equal in weight and thinnels of hulk : thefe criteria, and their being Ihort, are the beft marks ol their goodnefs. It is equally well known that they ftrould be fome months old when ufed, as new oafs are apt to fwell the belly and produce gripes. 22J New beans are improper for horfes, for the fame rea-Egang, fon. The beft remedy is to dry them in a kiln. Old beans fhould be fplit, and given either with bran or chaff; or the beft way would be to break them in a mill. Mr Lawrence fed cart-horfes with beans for nearly feven years, without experiencing any ill effedl from fuch food; but the horfes laboured very hard. Beans contain more folid nourifhment than oats, but of a lefs falubrious nature. Grains conftantly loofen a horfe, and impoverifh his blood 5 bran fcours and v,weakens the entrails ; both of them are good occafional dietetic alteratives. 223 Carrots are faid to purify and fweeten the blood, to Carrots.' amend the wind, and to replenifh after the waftings occafioned by difeafe or inordinate labour. Mr Lawr- rence informs us that he has been accuftomed to ufe them for years in all forms, and to all deferiptions of horfes. They are either given in fpring or autumn to high-fed horfes, as a change of diet, at the rate of one feed per day, in lieu of a feed of corn, or as full fubfift- e»ce to others. They ought to be wafhed clean, and, if large, cut into flat and lizeable pieces. The quantity of carrots for a feed is from half a peck to a peck. ^ The ufual periods of feeding with corn are in this Times5of country, morning, noon, and night. The quantitiesfeeding» each time either a quarter or half a peck, with or with¬ out about two handfuls of beans-, according to the horfe’s ftate of body. Much greater care than is com¬ mon ought to be taken in ftfting the oats clean from duft, and the dung of mice. Water fhould be allowed with¬ out fail twice a-day. There is an error not tmfrequent among liable people, who fuppofe water to be at beft but a kind of neceffary evil to borfes, and therefore' think it a point gained whenever they can find an op¬ portunity to abridge the quantity. But how well fo- ever a horfe may fhift with little or no water while in the field, and while feeding on fucculent meat, much mifehief may enfue from its being withheld j and this may produce coftivenefs, gripes, inflammation of the bowels, perpetual longing, and a danger of drinking to excefs on every opportunity. 224 The well-known ufe of hay is to dilate the body of Hay. the horfe, to fatisfy his appetite with bulk and quanti¬ ty, as corn does with compact and folid nourifhment. Britilh hay, the beft in th§ world, contains great nourilhmentj Part IV. FARR Jlygeiology nouriiljmeftt, and will keep a horfe and even fatten him $ lj" v but he is unable to labour upon hay alone, and experi¬ ence has ftiewn that Bracken’s obfervation of the con- ftant ufe of hay injuring the fight of horfes, particular¬ ly if fuddenly put on fuch food after good keeping, is Very juft. -Hard upland hay is the heft for. race and coach horfes j and it ftiould be of a fine, greenifti colour, fragrant feent, and full of flower. It is faid that horfes and cattle prefer fuch hay as has been fweated, or which has undergone a partial fermentation : and it is even thought that they grow much fooner fat on heated hay than on fuch as has been gotten up dry and cool. There can be no doubt that fweated hay contains a confiderable quantity of fugar, formed during its ftate of fermentation; this may render the hay more pala table to the beafts, but we have fome doubt whether it be fo wholefome as frefh well-coloured hay. Clover-hay, and hay of artificial graffes, from its grofsnefs, is appro¬ priated to cart-horfes. Without attempting to afeertain the precife quantity, it may be laid that hay Ihould be given as often as a horfe has a keen appetite for it; but great care Ihould be taken that fo much be never allowed at once, as that he lliall leave it, and blow upon it. At night a confiderable quantity of hay is ufually left in the rack, and this is no doubt abfolutely neceflary for horfes who are hard worked during the day, as night is their moft leifure time for'feeding ; but •Lawrence it admits of doubt whether horfes who live in a ftate p« Horfes, of luxury, and are but little worked, Ihould be indulged xrQ in much hay at night *. It will obvioufly occur to moft people, that the quan¬ tity and quality of a horfe’s food ftiould be proportioned to his labour ; that horfes who are lightly worked, will not in general require fo much or fo nouriftiing food, as thofe who are conftantly kept to hard labour. It is evident that when horfes ftand idle, and are at the fame time high fed, they are expofed to many dangerous difeafes, as inflammation, flaggers, arifing from a too full habit of body ; and thefe difeafes will be more like¬ ly to come on when a horfe that has been thus fed is fuddenly put to hard labour, or obliged to make any unufual or violent exertion. But this muft not be carried too far. Horles fhould not, becaufe they have little work at the time, be entirely confined to grafs, or grafs and hay, unlefs they are at pafture, and are never worked. For 'while a horfe ftands in the liable, and is liable to be called upon on any emergency, his diet fhould be fo regulated, as that he ftiall neither be fo fat and full of blood, as not to perform occafional wrork without difficulty and danger, nor on the other hand, fo poor and wreak, as to be incapable of fupporting ex¬ ertion without injury to himfelf or rider/ All horfes that are fed on grafs and hay alone, are too weak to perform a good day’s journey without Humbling. A moderate quantity of corn or other hard food, ftiould therefore be allowed to fuch horfes as Hand conftantly in the liable, or w ho, wffiile at palture, are occafionally w'orked. Mr Clark obferves, that throwing great quantities of clean grain before horfes at one time is very improper ; as they eat it too greedily, and fwallow whole mouth¬ fuls of it almofl dry. The moillure in the ftomach, or water drunk immediately after eating, caufes the grain to fwell, and thus the llomach is greatly diilended, and lofcs its contra cling power on the food. By the preffure 1 E It Y. 467 of tiie full itomacii on tne mteltines, the paliage ot the Hygeiologv food backwards is obilrufted, and the confined air, "‘"'V'"'—' arifing from the indigefted food, not having a ready pallage backwards, and horfes not pollening the power of belching, the air becomes rarefied to a great degree, the horfe is feized with colic pains ; as thefe increafe he becomes convulfed, and in many cafes the llomach bur Its. Out of a number of cafes where the above was dftcovered on diffeding the bodies, Mr Clark mentions the twro following. /‘ A young draught-horfe was fed in the morning with too great a quantity of barley mixed w ith pealed and had been allowed to drink water immediately thereafter. He was yoked to a two-wheeled chaife, in order to travel a few miles, and wras obferved about the middle of the day to be very uneafy, frequently at¬ tempting to lie down. A.s foon as he was unyoked he lay dowrn and tumbled about, frequently lying on his* back, Halting up fuddenly and turning his head to¬ wards his belly. He continued thus in great agony till towards next morning, when he died. Upon open¬ ing his body, the ftomach wras found burft, the barley and peafe moftly entire, only greatly fwelled, and the whole contents of the ftomach fpread through the abdo¬ men. “ The other cafe wTas a horfe who had been fed with too great a quantity of oats and barley, and had been allowed to drink water freely afterwards. He was feized with griping pains, fo that he frequently lay down and tumbled, feemingly tortured with the moil acute pains. He died next day. Upon opening his body, the ftomach was found diilended to a moil enor¬ mous fize, but, was not burft. Its coats were fo very thin, from the great diftention it had undergone, that its coheiion was almofi deftroyed, and had more the ap¬ pearance of a coat of mucus, or flime, than the fto¬ mach. The oats and barley were for the mofl: part entire as they w?ere fwallowed, only greatly fwelled from the moiiture they had imbibed. “ From the cafes now related, it will appear howr ne* ceflary it is not to allow horfes to eat too grest a quan¬ tity of clean grain at a time, but to give it in fmall quantities, and repeated the more frequently. At the fame time, it will fhow the propriety of mixing with it a little chopped ftrawq or hay, in order to make them chew it the more thoroughly before they fw-al- low it. This procefs alfo prepares the food for being properly digefted, and not a fingle grain of it is loft * C/aj-/ The method of feeding horfes with bruifed grain Lrcvtniion, and Cut ftraw is recommended by the earl of Pembroke, in his excellent treatife on horfes, as exceedingly proper. “ Every grain (fays he) goes to nouriihment: none is to be found in the dung j and three feeds of it go further than four as commonly given which have not been in the mill. But wffieaten ftraw, and a little hay fometimes mixed with it, is excellent food. To a quantity of corn, put the fame quantity of ftraw. It obliges them to chew their meat, and is many other ways of ufe f.” _ ' f Military Mr Lawrence difapproves of the ufe of ftraw, as Equitation.' containing no nouriihment. In this he probably goes too far, as both horfes and cattle are in draw-yards often fed with little elfe. He prefers chaff, ax cut clover hay, to mix with the corn, efpecially for cart- horfes. Mr Lawrence, however, allows that cutting 3 N 2 up 468 Hygeiology saS Of grinding coin for horfes. F A R R I. E R Y. Part IV. 219 Lawfon’s food for Jiorfes and tattle. ^3° pood of cattle,. up unthrafhed oats for food is a good praftice, particu¬ larly when hay is fcarce 5 as thrafhing and drefling of the oats are thus faved, and it is an economical expendi¬ ture of the oats, which are moreover very frelh, and agreeable to the horfe. It has of late been recommended to bruife the corn in a mill, before giving it to the horfe, and it is certain¬ ly a good praftice, as there is thus little danger of its paffing through the bowels undigefted. It is ufual only to bruife the corn, but Mr Lawrence thinks that it is better to grind them as fine as poffible. Whole corn, -with whatever it may be mixed, will, much of it, be fwallowed in that Hate; a great deal only half mafti- cated, which will elude the digeflive powers of the ani¬ mal, and be eje&ed from his body crude and unbroken. This is particularly the cafe with brood-mares and young flock, the bellies of which are full of flippery grafs ; fuch fliould ever have ground corn, and malhes ihould always be made with it. Ground buck-wheat