n C7^- F/3 to give to of public arther, the and an an- ig money, mankind, ^ a bro- , and >e ye i not. doth 1 in pter ,t a it is ry tShr.rity. C H A [ 401 ] C H A proved. Some may perifti by fucb a conduft. Men are fometimes overtaken by diltrefs, for which all other relief would come too late. Befides which, re- folutions of this kind compel us to offer fuch violence to our humanity, as may go near, in a little while, to fuffocate the principle itfelf; which is a very ferious confideration. A good man, if he do not furrender himfelf to his feelings without referve, will at leaft lend an ear to importunities which come accompanied with outward attellations of diflrefs; and after a patient hearing of the complaint, will direft himfelf by the circumrtances and credibility of the account that he receives. There are other fpecies of charity well contrived to make the money expended go far; fuch as keeping down the price of fuel or provifions in cafe of a mono¬ poly or temporary fcarcity, by purchafing the articles at the beft market, and retailing them at prime coll, or at a fmall lofs •, or the adding a bounty to a parti¬ cular fpecies of labour, when the price is, accidentally deprelfed. The proprietors of large eftates have it in their power to facilitate the maintenance, and thereby en¬ courage the eftablifhment of families (which is one of the nobleft purpofes to which the rich and great can convert their endeavours), by building cottages, fplit- ting farms, erefting manufaflures, cultivating waftes, embanking the fea, draining marfhes, and other expe¬ dients, which the fituation of each eltate points out. If the profits of thefe undertakings do not repay the expence, let the authors of them place the difference to the account of charity. It is true of almoft all fuch proje£ls, that the public is a gainer by them, whatever the owner be. And where the lofs can be fpared, this confideration is fufficient. It is become a queftion of fome importance, Under what circumftances wmrks of charity ought to be done in private, and when they may be made public with¬ out detracting from the merit of the aftion ? if indeed they ever may, the Author of our religion having de¬ livered a rule upon this fubjeCl, which feems to enjoin univerfal fecrecy. ‘‘When thou doell alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doth 5 that thy alms may be in fecret: and thy Father which feeth in fecret, himfelf lhall reward thee openly.” (Matth. vi. 3, 4.) From the preamble to this prohibition, it is plain, that our Saviour’s foie defign was to forbid ojlentation, and all publifhing of good works which pro¬ ceeds from that motive. “ Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to befeen of them ; otherwife ye have no reward of your Father, which is in heaven ; therefore, when thou doefl thine alms, do not found a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do, in the fy- nagogues and in the ftreets, that they may have glory of men. Verily I fay unto thee, they have their re¬ ward,” v. 2. There are motives for the doing our alms in public befides thofe of oftentation 5 with w'hich therefore our Saviour’s rule has no concern : fuch as to teftify our approbation of fome particular fpecies of charity, and to recommend it to others •, to take off the prejudice wrhich the want, or, which is the fame thing, the fuppreftion, of our name in the lift of con¬ tributors, might excite againft the charity or againft curfelves. And fo long as thefe motives are free from any mixture of vanitv, they are in no danger of invad- Vox,. V. Part. XL ' ing our Saviour’s prohibition : they rather feem to comply with another direftion which he has left us : “ Let your light fo fliine before men, that they may fee your good works, and glorify your Father wdiich is in heaven.” If it be neceffary to propofe a precife diftinClion upon the fubjeft, there can be none better than the following : When our bounty is beyond our fortune or ftation, that is, when it is more than could be expeCled from us, our charity ftrould be private, if privacy be prafticable : when it is not more than might be expedited, it may be public : for wTe cannot hope to influence others to the imitation of extraordi- nary generofity, and therefore wrant, in the former cafe, the only juftifiable reafon for making it public. The pretences by which men excufe themfelves from giving to the poor are various j as, 1. “ That they have nothing to fpare i, e. no¬ thing, for which they have not fome other ufe ; no¬ thing, which their plan of expence, together with the favings they have refolved to lay by, will not exhauft ; never refleifling whether it be in their power, or that it is their duty, to retrench their expences, and con- tra£l their plan, “ that they may have to give to them that need or rather that this ought to have been part of their plan originally. 2. “ That they have families of their own, and that charity begins at home.” A father is no doubt bound to adjuft his economy with a view to the reafonable de¬ mands of his family upon his fortune ; and until a fuf- ficiency for thefe is acquired, or in due time probably will be acquired (for in human affairs probability is enough, he is juftified in declining expenjive liberality j for to take from thofe who want, in order to give to thofe who want, adds nothing to the flock of public happinefs. Thus far, therefore, and no farther, the plea in queftion is an excufe for parfimony, and an an- fw’er to thofe wrho folicit our bounty. 3. “ That charity does not confift in giving money, but in benevolence, philanthropy, love to all mankind, goodnefs of heart,” &c. Hear St James. “ If a bro¬ ther or After be naked, and deftitute of daily food, and one of you fay unto them, depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled, notwithftanding ye give them not thofe things which are needful for the body, what doth it profit ?” (James ii. 15, 16.) 4. “ That giving to the poor is not mentioned in St Paul’s defeription of charity, in the 13th chapter of his firft epiftle to the Corinthians.” This is not a defeription of charity, but of good nature ; and it is not neceffary that every duty be mentioned in every place. 5. “ That they pay the poor rates.” They might as well allege that they pay their debts ; for the poor have the fame right to that portion of a man’s property which the laws affign them, that the man himfelf has to the remainder. 6. “ That they employ many poor perfons —for their own fake, not the poor’s—otherwife it is a good plea. Cfcarity. 7. “ That the poor do not fuffer fo much as w e imagine •, that education and habit have reconciled them to the evils of their condition, and make them eafy under it.” Habit can never reconcile human na¬ ture to the extremities of cold, hunger, and thirft, any more than it can reconcile the hand to the touch 3 E of C H A [ 4°2 1 C H A Charity, of a red-hot Iron : befides the queftion is not, how un- v happy any one is, but how much more happy we can make him ? 8. “ That thefe people, give them what you will, will never thank you, or think of you for it.” In the firft place, this is not true : in the fecond place, it was not for the fake of their thanks that you relieved them. 9. “ That we are fo liable to be impofed upon.” If a due inquiry be made, our motive and merit is the fame : befide that the diftrefs is generally real, what¬ ever has been the caufe of it. 10. “ That they ihould apply to their pariihes.” This is not always practicable : to which we may add, that there are many requifites to a comfortable fub- liftence, which parifti-relief does not always fupply j and that there are fome who w'ould fuffer almoft as much from receiving parifh-relief as by the want of it; and laftly, that there are many modes of charity, to which this anfwer does not relate at all. 11. “ That giving money encourages idlenefs and vagrancy.” This is true only of injudicious and indif- criminate generofity. 12. “ That we have too many objeCls of charity at home to beftow any thing upon ftrangers } or that there are other charities wThich are more ufeful, or ftand in greater need.” The value of this excufe depends entirely upon the fa&, whether we aClually relieve thofe neighbouring objeCls, and contribute to thofe other charities. Befides all thefe excufes, pride, or prudery, or delicacy, or love of eafe, keep one half of the world out of the way of obferving what the other half fuffer. Chjritt Schools, are fchools ereCled and maintain¬ ed in various parifhes by the voluntary contributions of the inhabitants, for teaching poor children to read, write, and other neceffary parts of education. See School. Brothers of Charity, a fort of religious hofpitallers, founded about the year 1297, fince denominated Bil- letins. They took the third order of St Francis, and the fcapulary, making the three ufual vows, but with¬ out begging. Brothers of Charity, alfo denote an order of hofpi¬ tallers, ftill fubfifting in Romilh countries, whofe bufi- nefs is to attend the fick poor, and minifier to them both fpiritual and temporal fuccour. They are all laymen, except a few priefts, for ad- miniftering the facraments to the fick in their hofpi- tals. The brothers of charity ufually cultivate bota¬ ny, pharmacy, furgery, and chemiftry, which they praftife with fuccefs. They were firft founded at Granada, by St John de Dieu ; and a fecond eftablifhment was made at Madrid in the year 15 ^3 : the order was confirmed by Grego¬ ry XIII. in 1572: Gregory XIV. forbade them to take holy orders; but by leave of Paul V. in 1609, a few of the brothers might be admitted to orders. In 1619 they were exempted from the jurifdiftion of the biftiop. Thofe of Spain are feparated from the reft ; and they, as well as the brothers of France, Germany, Poland and Italy, have their diftinft generals, who refide at Rome. They were firft introduced into France by Mary Charles. of Medicis in 1601, and have fince built a fine hofpital Charity in the Fauxbourg St Germain. Charity of St Hippolitus, a religious congregation, founded about the end of the 14th century, by one Ber- nardin Alvarez, a Mexican, in honour of St Plippolitus the martyr, patron of the city of Mexico ; and ap¬ proved by Pope Gregory XIII. Charity of our Lady, in church hiftory, a religious order in France, which, though charity was the princi¬ pal motive of their union, grew in length of time fo diforderly and irregular, that their order dwindled, and at laft became extinft. There is ftill at Paris, a religious order of women, called nuns hofpitallers of the charity of our lady. The religious of this hofpital are by vow obliged to admi- nirter to the neceflxties of the poor and the fick, but thofe only women. CHARLATAN, or Charletan, fignifies an em- . piric or quack, who retails his medicines on a public flage, and draws people about him with his buffoone¬ ries, feats of adlivity, &c. The word, according to Calepine, comes from the Italian, ceretano; of Caretumt a town near Spoletto in Italy, where thefe impoftors are faid to have firft rifen. Menage derives it from ciarlatano, and that from circulatorius, of circulator, a quack. CHARLEMAGNE, or Charles I. king of France by fucceflion, and emperor of the weft by conqueft in 800 (which laid the foundation of the dynafty of the weftern Franks, who ruled the empire 472 years till the time of Rodolphus Aufpurgenfis, the founder of the houfe of Auftria). Charlemagne was as illuftrious in the cabinet as in the field ; and, though he could not write his name, was the patron of men of letters, the reftorer of learning, and a wife legifiator ; he want¬ ed only the virtue of humanity to render him the moft accompliftied of men; but when we read of his behead¬ ing 4500 Saxons, folely for their loyalty to their prince, in oppofing his conquefts, we cannot think he merits the extravagant encomiums beftow'ed on him by fome hiftorians. He died in 814, in the 74th year of his age, and 47th of his reign. ^ France had nine fovereigns of this name, of whom Charles V. merited the title of the wife, (crowned in 1364 died in 1380) : and Charles VIII. fignalized himfelf in the field by rapid viflories in Italy ; (crown¬ ed in 1483, died in 1498.) The reft do not deferve particular mention in this place. See (Hijlory of) France. CHARLEMONT, a town of the province of Namur in the Auftrian Netherlands, about 18 miles fouth of Namur. E. Long. 4. 40. N. Lat. 50. 10. Charlemont is alfo the name of a town of Ire¬ land, fituated on the river Blackwater, in the county of Armagh, and province of Ulfter, about fix miles fouth-eaft of Dungannon. W. Long. 6. 50. N. Lat. 50. 16. CHARLEROY, a ftrong town in the province of Namur in the Auftrian Netherlands, fituated on the ri¬ ver Sambre, about 19 miles weft of Namur. E. Long. 4. 20. N. Lat. 50. 30. CHARLES Martel, a renowmed conqueror in the early annals of France. He depofed and reftored Childeric C H A [ 403 ] C H A Charles. Childeric Idng of France j and had the entire govern- ment of the kingdom, once with the title of mayor of the palace, and afterwards as duke of France; but he would not accept the crown. He died regretted, in 741. Charles le Gros, emperor of the weft in 88 r, king of Italy and Suabia, memorable for his reverfe of fortune j being dethroned at a diet held near Mentz, by the French, the Italians, and the Germans, in 887 : after which he was obliged to fubfift on the bounty of the archbilhop of Mentz. He died in 888. Charles V. (emperor and king of Spain), was fon of Philip I. archduke of Auftria and of Jane qu£en of Caftile. He was born at Ghent, February 24. 1500. and fucceeded to the crown of Spain in 1517. Two years afterwards he was chofen emperor at Francfort after the death of Maximilian his grandfather. He was a great warrior and politician : and his ambition was not fatisfied with the many kingdoms and pro¬ vinces he poffeffed j for he is fuppofed, with reafon, to have afpired at univerfal empire. He is faid to have fought 60 battles, in moft of which he was viftorious. He took the king of France (Francis I.) prifoner, and fold him his liberty on very hard terms yet after¬ wards, when the people of Ghent revolted, he alked leave to pafs through his dominions : and though the generous king thus had him in his power, and had an opportunity of revenging his ill treatment, yet he re¬ ceived and attended him with all pomp and mag¬ nificence. He facked Rome, and took the pope pri¬ foner $ and the cruelties which his army exercifed there are faid to have exceeded thofe of the northern barbarians. Yet the pious emperor went into mourn¬ ing on account of this conqueft : forbade the ringing of bells ; commanded proceflions to be made, and prayers to be offered up for the deliverance of the pope his prifoner j yet did not inflift the leaft punilhment on thofe who treated the holy father and the holy fee with fuch inhumanity. He is accufed by fome Romilh writ¬ ers of favouring the Lutheran principles, which he might eafily have extirpated. But the truth is, he found bis account in the divifions which that fedf occafioned $ and he forever made his advantage of them, fometimes againft the pope, fometimes againft France, and at other times againft the empire itfelf. He was a great traveller, and made 50 different journeys into Germany, Spain, Italy, Flanders, France, England, and Africa. Though he had been fuccefsful in many unjuft enter- prifes, yet his laft: attempt on Metz, which he befieged with an army of 100,000 men, was very juft, and very unfuccefsful. Vexed at the reverfe of fortune which feemed to attend his latter days, and oppreffed by ficknefs, which unfitted him any longer for holding the reins of go¬ vernment with fteadinefs, or to guide them wdth ad- drefs, he refigned his dominions to his brother Ferdinand and his fon Philip 5 and retreated to the monaftery of St Juftus near Placentia in Eftrema- dura. When Charles entered this retreat, he formed fuch a plan of life for himfelf as would have fuited a pri¬ vate gentleman of moderate fortune. His table was neat, but plain *, his domeftics few ; his intercourfe with them familiar ; all the cumberfome and ceremo¬ nious forms of attendance on his perfon were entirely abolifhed, as deftruffive of that focial eafe and tran- Char'«. quillity which he courted in order to foothe the remain- ‘■“■"V”"’” der of his days. As the mildnefs of the climate, toge¬ ther with his deliverance from the burdens and cares of government, procured him at firft a confiderable remiflion from the acute pains of the gout, with which he had been long tormented, he enjoyed perhaps more complete fatisfadion in this humble folitude than all his grandeur had ever yielded him. The ambitious thoughts and projefts which had fo long engroffed and difquieted him were quite effaced from his mind. Far from taking any part in the political tranfadions of the princes of Europe, he reftrained his curiofity even from an inquiry concerning them ; and he feemed to view the buiy fcene which he had abandoned with all the contempt and indifference arifing from his thorough experience of its vanity, as well as from the pleafing refledion of having difentangled himfelf from its cares. Other amufements, and other fubjeds, now occupied him. Sometimes he cultivated the plants in his gar¬ den with his own hand $ lometimes he rode out to the neighbouring wood on a little horfe, the only one that he kept, attended by a Angle fervant on foot. When his infirmities confined him to his apartment, which often happened, and deprived him of thele more adive recreations, he either admitted a tew gentlemen who refided near the monaftery to vifit him, and en¬ tertained them familiarly at his table *, or he employed himfelf in ftudying mechanical principles, and in form¬ ing curious works of mechanifm, of which he had al¬ ways been remarkably fond, and to which his genius was peculiarly turned. With this view he had enga¬ ged Turriano, one of the moft ingenious artifts of that age, to accompany him in his retreat. He laboured together with him in framing models of the moft ufe- ful machines, as wTell as in making experiments with regard to their refpedive powers ; and it was not fel- dom that the ideas of the monarch aflifted or perfeded the inventions of the artift. He relieved his mind at intervals with flighter and more fantaftic works of me¬ chanifm, in fafhioning puppets, which, by the ftrudure of internal fprings, mimicked the geftures and adions of men, to the no fmall aftoniftiment of the ignorant monks, who, beholding movements which they could not comprehend, fometimes diftrufted their own fenfes, and fometimes fufpeded Charles and Turriano of be¬ ing in compad with invifible powers. He was parti¬ cularly curious with regard to the conftrudion of clocks and watches $ and haviiig found, after repeated trials, that he could not bring any two of them to go exadly alike, he refleded, it is faid, with a mixture of fur- prife as well as regret, on his own folly, in having be- ftow'ed fo much time and labour in the more vain at¬ tempt of bringing mankind to a precife uniformity of fentiment concerning the intricate and myfterious doc¬ trines of religion. But in what manner foever Charles difpofed of the reft of his time, he conftantly referved a confiderable portion of it for religious exercifes. He regularly at¬ tended divine fervice in the chapel of the monaftery, every morning and evening j he took great pleaiure in reading books of devotion, particularly the works of St Auguftine and St Bernard ; and converfed much with his confeffor, and the prior of the monaftery, 3 E 2 on C H A Charles, on pious fubjecls. Thus did Charles pafs year of his retreat in a manner not unbecoming a man perfeflly difengaged from the affairs of this pre- fent life, and Handing on the confines of a future world, either in innocent amufements which foothed his pains, and relieved a mind worn out with excel- iive application to bufmefs •, or in devout occupations, which he deemed neceffaryin preparing for another ftate. But, about fix months before his death, the gout, after a longer intermiflion than ufual, returned with a proportional increafe of violence. His fhattered con- ffitution had not ftrength enough remaining to with- ftand Rich a {hock. It enfeebled his mind as much as his body 5 and from this period we hardly difcern any traces of that found and mafculine underftanding which diftinguiftied Charles among his cotemporaries. An illiberal and timid fuperftition depreffed his fpirit. He had no relifh for amufements of any kind. He endea¬ voured to conform, in his manner of living, to all the rigour of monaftic aufterity. He defired no other fociety than that of monks, and was almoft continu¬ ally employed in chanting with them the hymns of the miffal. As an expiation for his fins, he gave himfelf the ditcipline in fecret, with fuch feverity, that the whip of cords which he employed as the inftrument of his punifhment, was found, after his deceafe, tinged with his blood. Nor w7as he fatisfied with thefe a£ls of mortification, which, however fevere, were not unexampled. T he timorous and diftruftful folicitude which ahvays accompanies fuperftition, ftill continu¬ ed to difquiet him, and depreciating all that he had done, prompted him to aim at fomething extraordina¬ ry, at fome new and fingular aft of piety, that would difplay his zeal, and merit the favour of heaven. The aft on wdiich he fixed was as wild and uncom¬ mon as any that fuperftition ever fuggefted to a dif- ordered fancy. He refolved to celebrate his owrn ob- fequies before his death. He ordered his tomb to be erefted in the chapel of the monaftery. His domef- tics marched thither in funeral proceffion, with black tapers in their hands. He himfelf followed in his fhroud. He was laid in his coffin with much folem- nity. The fervice for the dead was chanted ; and Charles joined in the prayers which were offered up for the reft of his foul, mingling his tears with thofe which his attendants filed, as if they had been cele¬ brating a real funeral. The ceremony clofed with fprinkling holy water on the coffin in the ufual form, and, all the affiftants retiring, the doors of the chapel were (hut. Then Charles rofe out of the coffin, and withdrew to his apartment, full of thofe awful fenti- ments which fuch a fingular folemnity was calculated to infpire. But either the fatiguing length of the ce¬ remony, or the impreffion which this image of death left on his mind, affefted him fo much, that next day he was feized with a fever. His feeble frame could not long refift its violence •, and he expired on the 21 ft of September, after a life of 58 years 6 months and 21 days. Charles I. 1 Kings of Britain. See Britain, Charles II. 3 N° 49 254. Charles Xli. king of Sweden was born in 1682. By his father’s wall, the adminiftration was lodged in the hands of the queen dowager Eleonora, with five lenators, till the young prince was 18 : but he was [ 404 ] c H A the firft declared major at 15, by the ftates convened at Stock¬ holm. The beginning of his adminiftration raifed no favourable ideas of him, as he was thought both by Swedes and foreigners to be a perion of mean capaci¬ ty. But the difficulties that gathered round him, foon afforded him an opportunity to difplay his real charac¬ ter. Three powerful princes, Frederick king of Den¬ mark, Auguftus king of Poland and eleftor of Saxony, and Peter the Great czar of Mufcovy, prefuming on his youth, confpired his ruin almoft at the fame in- ftant. Their meafures alarming the council, they w'ere for diverting the ftorm by negotiations} but Charles, with a grave refolution that altonifhed them, faid, “ I am refolved never to enter upon an unjuit war, nor to put an end to a juft one but by the deftruftion of my enemies. My refolution is fix¬ ed : I will attack the firft who ihall declare againft me j and when I have conquered him, I may hope to ftrike a terror into the reft.” The old counfel- lors received his orders with admiration •, and were ftill more furprifed when they faw him on a hidden renounce all the enjoyments of a court, reduce his table to the utinoft frugality, drefs like a common fol- dier, and, full of the ideas of Alexander and Caffar, propofe thefe twTo conquerors for his models in every thing but their vices. The king of Denmark began by ravaging the territories of the duke of Holftein, Upon this Charles carried the war into the heart of Denmark, and made fuch a progrefs that the king of Denmark thought it beft to accept of peace, which wTas concluded in 1700. He next refolved to ad¬ vance againft the king of Poland, wffio had blocked up Riga. He had no fooner given orders for his troops to go into winter quarters, than he received advice that Narva, where Count Horne was governor, was befieged by an army of 100,000 Mufcovites. This made him alter his meafures, and move toward the czar ; and at Narva he gained a furprifing viftory, which coft him not above 2000 men killed and wound¬ ed. The Mufcovites were forced to retire from the provinces they had invaded. He puriued his con- queits, till he penetrated as far as wffiere the diet of. Poland was fitting •, when he made them declare the throne of Poland vacant, and eleft Staniflaus their king : then making himfelf mafter of Saxony, he ob¬ liged Auguftus himfelf to renounce the crown of Po¬ land, and acknowledge Staniftaus by a letter of con¬ gratulation on his acceffion. All Europe was furprif¬ ed with the expeditious finifiling of this great negotia¬ tion, but more at the difintereftednefs of the king of Sweden, who fatisfied himfelf with the bare reputa¬ tion of this viftory, without demanding an inch of ground for enlarging his dominions. After thus re¬ ducing the king of Denmark to peace, placing a new king on the throne of Poland, having humbled the emperor of Germany, and protefted the Lutheran re¬ ligion, Charles prepared to penetrate into Mufcovy, in order to dethrone the czar. He quickly obliged the Mufcovites to abandon Poland, purfued them into their own country, and won feveral battles over them. The czar, difpofed to peace, ventured to make fome propofals j Charles only anfwered, “ I will treat with the czar at MofcowT’ When this haughty anfwes was brought to Peter, he faid, “ My brother Charles ftill affefts to aft the Alexander, but I flatter my. felt Charles. C H A Charles, felf lie 'will not in me find a Darius.” The event —'Y”—'' juftified him : for the Mufcovites, already beaten into difcipline, and under a prince of fuch talents as Peter, entirely deftroyed the Swedifh army at the memorable battle of Pultowa, July 8. 1709; on which decifive day, Charles loft the fruits of nine years labour, and of almoft 100 battles ! The king, with a fmall troop, purfued by the Mufcovites, paffed the Borifthenes to Oczakow in the Turkifh territories : and from thence, through defert countries, arrived at Ben¬ der; where the fultan, when informed of his arrival, fent orders for accommodating him in the beft man¬ ner, and appointed him a guard. Near Bender Charles built a. houfc, and intrenched himfelf; and had with him l8bo men, who were all clothed and fed, with their horfes, at the expence of the grand fignior. * Here he formed a defign of turning the Ottoman arms upon his enemies ; and is faid to have had a pro- mife from the vizir of being fent into Mufcovy with 200,000 men. While he remained here, he infenfibly acquired a tafte for books: he read the tragedies of Corneille and Racine, with the works of Defpreaux, whofe fatires he relifhed, but did not much admire his other works. When he read that paffage in which the author reprefents Alexander as a fool and a mad¬ man, he tore out the leaf. He would fometimes play at chefs : but when he recovered of his wounds, he re¬ newed his fatigues in exercifing his men ; he tired three horfes a-day ; and thofe who courted his favour were all day in their boots. To difpofe the Ottoman Porte to this war, he detached about 800 Poles and Coffacks of his retinue, with orders to pafs the Niefter, that runs by Bender, and to obferve what paffed on the frontiers of Poland. The Mufcovite troops, difperfed in thofe quarters, fell immediately upon this little company, and purfued them even to the territories of the grand fignior. This was what the king expe&ed. His irfinifters at the Porte ex¬ cited the Turks to vengeance ; but the czar’s money removed all difficulties, and Charles found himfelf in a manner prifoner among the Tartars. He imagined the fultan was ignorant of the intrigues of his grand vizir. Poniatowfky undertook to make his complaints to the grand fignior. The fultan, in anfwer, fome days after, fent Charles five Arabian horfes, one of which was covered with a faddle and houfing of great richnefs ; with an obliging letter, but conceived in fuch general terms, as gave reafon to fufpeift that the mi- nifter had done nothing without the fultan’s content : Charles therefore refufed them. Poniatowfky had the courage to form a defign of depofing the grand vizir, who accordingly was deprived of his dignity and wealth, and banifhed. The feal of the empire tvas given to Numan Cuproughly ; who perfuaded his ma¬ iler, that the law forbade him to invade the czar, who had done him no injury ; but to fuccour the king of Sweden as an unfortunate prince in his dominions. He fent his majefty 800 purfes, every one of which amounted to 500 crowns, and advifed him to return peaceably to his own dominions. Charles rejefled this advice, threatening to hang up the balhaws, and fhave the beards of any janizaries who brought him fuch meffages, and fent wmrd that he fhould depend upon the grand fignior’s promife, and hoped to re¬ enter Poland as a conqueror with an army of l urks. C H A After various intrigues at the Porte, an order *was Charlen fent to attack this head of iron, as he was called, and -v—“- to take him either alive or dead. He flood a fiege in his houfe, with forty domeflics, againft the Turkifh army ; killed no lefs than 20 janizaries with his own hand ; and performed prodigies of valour on a very un- neceffary and unwarrantable occafion. But the houfe being fet on fire, and himfelf wounded, he was at lafl taken prifoner, and fent to Adrianople, where the grand fignior gave him audience, and promifed to make good all the damages he had fuflained. At lafl, after a flay of above five years, he left Turkey ; and, having difguifed himfelf, traverfed Wallachia, Tranfylvania, Hungary, and Germany, attended only by one perfon : and in fixteen days riding, during which time he never went to bed, came to Stralfund at mid¬ night, November 21. 1714. His boots were cut from his fwollen legs, and he W’as put to bed ; where, when he had flept fome hours, the firft thing he did wras to review his troops, and examine the ftate of the fortifi¬ cations. He fent out orders that very day to re¬ new the war -with more vigour than ever. But af¬ fairs were now much changed : Auguftus had recover¬ ed the throne of Poland ; Sweden had loft many of its provinces, and was without money, trade, credit, or troops. The kings of Denmark and Pruffia feized the ifiand of Rugen ; and befieged him in Stralfund, which furrendered ; but Charles efcaped to Carlfcroon. When his country was threatened with invafion by fo many princes, he, to the furprife of all Europe, marched into Norway with 20,000 men. A very few Danes might have flopped the Swedifh army ; but fuch a quick invafion they could not forefee. Europe was yet more at a lofs to find the czar fo quiet, and not making a defcent upon Sweden, as he had before agreed with his allies. This inaflion was the confe- quence of one of the greateft defigns, and at the fame time the moft difficult of any that urere ever formed by the imagination of man. In fhort, a fcheme was fet on foot for a reconciliation with the czar ; for re¬ placing Staniflaus on the throne of Poland ; and fetting James II.’s fon upon that of England, befides re- ftoring the duke of Holflein to his dominions. Charles was pleafed w'ith thefe grand ideas, though without building much upon them, and gave his minifter leave to a£l at large. In the mean time, Charles was going to make a fecond attempt upon Norway in 1718 ; and he flattered himfelf with being mafler of that kingdom in fix months ; but while he was exa¬ mining the works at Frederickfhall, a place of great ftrength and importance, which is reckoned to be the key of that kingdom, he was killed by a fbot from the enemy, as has been generally believed,, though it has been alfo reported that he fell by the treachery of one of his own officers, who had been bribed for that pur- pofe. This prince experienced the extremes of profperity and of adverfity, without being foftened by the one or diflurbed for a moment at the other ; but was a man rather extraordinary than great, and fitter to be ad¬ mired than imitated. He was honoured by the Turks for his rigid abftinence from wine, and his regularity in attending public devotion. As to his perfon, he was tall and of a noble mein, had a line open forehead, large blue eyes, flaxen hai?, fail t 4°5 1 Charles C H A [ 406 fair complexion, a handfome nofe, but little beard, and a laugh not agreeable. His manners were harfh and aultere, not to fay favage : and as to religion, he was indifferent towards all, though exteriorly a Lu¬ theran, and a ftrong believer in predeftination. A few anecdotes will illuftrate his charafler. No dangers, however great, made the leaf! impreffion upon him. When a horfe or two were killed under him at the battle of Narva, in 1700, he leaped nimbly upon frelh ones, faying, “ Thefe people find me exercife.” One day, when he was dilating letters to a fecretary, a bomb fell through the roof into the next room of the houfe where they were fitting. The fecretary, terri¬ fied left the houfe fhould come down upon them, let his pen drop out of his hand : “ What is the matter?'’ fays the king calmly. The fecretary could only reply, “ Ah, Sir, the bomb.” “ The bomb (fays the king) i what has the bomb to do with what I am dilating to you ! Go on.” He preferved more humanity than is ufually found among conquerors. Once, in the middle of an aftion, finding a young Swedifh officer wounded and unable to march, he obliged the officer to take his horfe, and continued to command his infantry on foot. The princefs Lubomirfki, who was very much in the intereft and good graces of Auguftus, falling by accident into the hands of one of his officers, he ordered her to be fet at liberty : faying, “ That he did not make war with ■women.” One day, near Leipfic, a peafant threw himfelf at his feet, with a complaint againft a grenadier, that he had robbed him of certain eatables provided for himfelf and his family. “ Is it true (faid Charles fternly), that you have robbed this man ?” The fol- dier replied, “ Sir, I have not done • near fo much harm to this man as your majefty has done to his mafter; for you have taken from Auguftus a kingdom, whereas I have only taken from this poor fcoundrel a dinner.” Charles made the peafant amends, and par¬ doned the foldier for his firmnefs : “ However, my friend (fays he to him), you will do wTell to recolleft that if I took a kingdom from Auguftus, I did not take it for myfelf.” Though Charles lived hardily himfelf, a foldier did not fear to remonftrate to him againft fome bread, which was very black and mouldy, and which yet was the only provifion the troops had. Charles called for a piece of it, and calmly ate it up faying, “ that it was indeed not good, but that it might be eaten.” From the danger he was in in Poland, when he beat the Saxon troops in 1702, a comedy was exhibited at Marienburg, where the combat was reprefented to the difadvantage of the Swedes. “ Oh, (lays Charles, hearing of it), I am far from envying them in this pleafure. Let them beat me in the theatres as long as they will, provided I do but beat them in the field.” He wrote fome obfervations on war, and on his own campaigns from 1700 to I7°9 • ^,u': '■^e MS* was loft at the unfortunate battle of Pultowa. CHARLES’S CAPE, a promontory of Virginia, in North America, forming the northern headland of the ftrait that enters the bay. of Chefapeak. Charles's Fort, a fortrefs in the county of Corke, and province of Munfter, in Ireland, fituated at the mouth of Kinfale harbour. W. Long. 8. 20. N. Lat. 51. 21. * I C H A Charleston, the metropolis of South Carolina,Charlefton. is the moft coniiderable town in the ftate *, fituated in the diftridt of the fame name, and on the tongue of land formed by the confluent ft reams of Aftfley and Cooper, which are fliort rivers, but large and naviga¬ ble. Thefe waters unite immediately below the city, and form a fpacious and convenient harbour j which communicates with the ocean juft below Sullivan’s iflandj which it leaves on the north, feven miles fouth- eaft of Charlefton. In theie rivers the tide riles, in common, about 64 feet j but uniformly rifes 10 or 12 inches more during a night tide. The faft is certain ; the caufe unknown. The continual agitation which the tides occafion in the waters which almoft furround Charlefton, the refrelhing fea breezes which are re¬ gularly felt, and the fmoke arifing from fo many chim¬ neys, render this city more healthy than any part of the low country in the fouthem ftates. On this ac¬ count it is the refort of great numbers of gentlemen, invalids from the Weft India iflands, and of the rich planters from the country, who come here to fpend the fickly months, as they are called, in queft of health and of the focial enjoyments which the city affords. And in no part of America are the focial bleffings en¬ joyed more rationally and liberally than here. Unaf- fedled hofpitality, affability, eafe of manners and ad- drefs, and a difpofition to make their guefts welcome, eafy, and pleafed with themfelves, are charafleriftics of the refpedtable people of Charlefton. In fpeaking of the capital, it ought to be obferved, for the honour of the people of Carolina in general, that ■when in com¬ mon with the other colonies, in the conteft with Bri¬ tain, they refolved againft the ufe of certain luxuries, and even neceffaries of life j thofe articles, which im¬ prove the mind, enlarge the underftanding, and cor- re£t the tafte, were excepted 5 the importation of books was permitted as formerly. The land on which the town is built, is flat and low, and the water brackilh and unwholefome. The ftreets are pretty regularly cut, and open beautiful profpe£ls, and have fubterranean drains to carry off filth and keep the city clean and healthy 5 but are too narrow for fo large a place and fo warm a climate. Their general breadth is from 35 to 66 feet. The houfes which have been lately built, are brick, with tiled roofs. The buildings in general are elegant, and moft of them are neat, airy, and well furnilhed. The public buildings are, an exchange, a ftate-houfe, an armoury, a poor-houfe, and an orphan’s houfe. Here are feveral refpeftable academies. Part of the old barracks has been handfomely fitted up, and converted into a college, and there are a number of ftudents ; but it can only be called as yet a refpeftable academy. Here are two banks, a branch of the national bank, and the South Carolina bank, eftabliftied in 1792. The houfes for public worlhip are two Epifcopal churches, two for Independents, one for Scotch Prefbyterians, one for Baptifts, one for German Lutherans, two for Methodifts, one for French Proteftants, a meeting- houfe for Quakers, a Roman Catholic chapel, and a Jewith fynagogue. Little attention is paid to the public markets ; a great proportion of the moft wealthy inhabitants hav¬ ing plantations from which they receive fupplies of al- moft every article of living. The country abounds with Charles’s Wain II Queen Charlotte’s 111 and. C H A [ 407 ] C H A with poultry and wild ducks. Their beef, mutton and veal are not generally of the bell kind) and few filh are found in the market. In 1787, it was computed that there were 1600 houfes in this city, and 15,000 inhabitants, including 5400 Haves ; and what evinces the healthinefs of the place, upwards of 200 of the white inhabitants wrere above 60 years of age. In I79l> there were 16,359 inhabitants, of whom 7684 were Haves. This city has often fuffered much by fire : the laft and moft de- ftru&ive happened as late as June 179^* Charlefton was incorporated in and divided into three wards, which chofe as many wardens, from among whom the citizens eleft an intendant of the city. The intendant and wardens form the city-coun¬ cil, who have power to make and enforce bye-laws for the regulation of the city. The value of exports from this port, in the year ending November 1787, amounted to 505,278!. 19s. 5d. fterling. The number of veflels cleared from the cuftomhoufe the fame year, was 947* meafuring 62,118 tons $ 735 of thefe, meafuring 41,531 tons, were American ; the others belonged to Great Bri¬ tain, Ireland, Spain, France, and the United Nether¬ lands. Charles's lVainv vc^Aflronomy, feven flars in the conftellation called CJrfa Majory or the Great Bear. CHARLETON. an ifland at the bottom of Hud- fon’s bay, in North America, fubjedl to Great Britain. W. Long. 80. o. N. Lat. 52. 30. Charleton, Walter, a learned Englifh phyfician, born in 1619, was phyfician in ordinary to Charles I. and Charles II. one of the firft members of the royal fociety, and prefident of the college ot phyficians. He wrote on various fubjedls 5 but at laft his narrow cir- cumftances obliged him to retire to the ifland of Jer- fey, where he died in 1707. CHARLOCK, the Englilh name of the Rapha- nus : it is a very troublefome weed among corn, be¬ ing more frequent than almoft any other. There are two principal kinds of it: the one with a yellow flower, the other with a white. Some fields are particularly fubje6t to be overrun with it, efpecially thofe which have been manured with cow dung alone, that being a manure very favourable to the growth of it. The farmers in fome places are fo fenfible of this, that they always mix horfe dung with their cow dung, when they ufe it for arable land. When barley, as is often the cafe, is infefted with this weed to fuch a degree as to endanger the crop, it is a very good method to mow down the charlock in May, when it is in flower, cut¬ ting it fo low as juft to take off the tops of the leaves of barley with it : by this means the^ barley will get up above the weed: and people have got four quarters of grain from an acre of fuch land as would have fcarce yielded any thing without this expedient. Where any land is particularly fubje6t to this weed, the beft method is to fow it with grafs feed, and make a pafture of it j for then the plant will not be trouble- fome, it never growing where there is a coat of grafs upon the ground. ^yeen CH .RLOTTE’s Island, an ifland in the , South fea, firft difcovered by Captain Wallis in the Dolphin, in 1767, who took poffeflkm of it in the name of King George III, Here is good water, and Charpen- tier. plenty of cocoa nuts, palm nuts, and fcurvy grafs. The Queen ^ inhabitants are of a middle ftature, and dark com-s plexion, with long hair hanging over their ftioulders} the men are well made, and the women handfome } their clothing is a kind of coarfe cloth, or matting, which they faften about their middle. ^ueen Charlotte's IJlands, a clufter of South fea iflands, difcovered in 1767 by Captain Carteret. He counted feven, and there were fuppofed to be many more. The inhabitants of thefe iflands are defcribed as extremely nimble and vigorous, and almoft as well qualified to live in the water as upon land: they are very warlike: and, on a quarrel with fome of Captain Carteret’s people, they attacked them with great re- folution } mortally wounded the mafter and three of the failors; were not at all intimidated by the fire arms j and at laft, nowithftanding the averfion of Captain Carteret to ftied blood, he was obliged to fe- cure the watering places by firing grape Ihot into the 'woods, which deftroyed many of the inhabitants. Thefe ifl^nds lie in S. Lat. 11°. E. Long. 164°. They are fuppofed to be the Santa Cruz of Mandana, who died there in 1595. CHA.RM, a term derived from the Latin carment “ a verfe j” and ufed to denote a magic power, or fpell, by which, with the afliftance of the devil, forcerers and witches were fuppofed to do wonderful things, far furpaffing the power of nature. CHARNEL, or Charnel house, a kind of por¬ tico, or gallery, ufually in or near a churchyard, over which wTere anciently laid the bones of the dead, after the flefh was wholly confumed. Charnel-houles are now ufually adjoining to the church. CHARON, in fabulous hiftory, the fon of Erebus and Nox, whofe office was to ferry the fouls of the deceafed over the waters of Acheron, for which each foul was to pay a piece of money. For this reafoa the Pagans had a cuftom of putting a piece of money into the mouth of the dead, in order that they might have fomething to pay Charon for their paffage. CH ARONDAS, a celebrated legiflator of the Thu- rians, and a native of Catanea in Sicily, flouriftied 446 before Chrift. He forbade any perfon’s appearing armed in the public affemblies of the nation ; but one day going thither in hafte, without thinking of his fword, he was no fooner made to obferve his miltake than he ran it through his body. CHAROST, a town of France, in Berry, with the title of a duchy. It is feated on the river Arnon. E. Long. 2. 15. N. Lat. 46. 56. CHAROUX, a town of France, in the Bourbon- nois, feated on an eminence, near the river Sioulle. It has two parifhes, which are in different diocefes. E. Long. 3. 15. N. Lat. 46. 10. CHARPENTIER, Francis, dean of the French academy, w’as born in 1620. His early capacity in¬ clined his friends to educate him at the bar : but he was much more delighted with the ftudy of languages and antiquity than of the law 5 and preferred repofe to tumult. M. Colbert made ufe of him in eftabliftr- ing his new academy of medals and infcriptions ; and no perfon of that learned fociety contributed more than himfelf toward that noble feries of medals which were ftruck on the confiderable events that diftinguifh- ed the reign of Louis XIV. He publilhed feveral works, Cl* an¬ ti Charta. C H A [ 408 work?) which were all well received 5 and died in j CHARR. See Salmo, Ichthyology Index. CHARRON, Peter, the author of a book entitled Of IVifdorn, which gained him great reputation, was born at Paris in the year 1541. After being advocate in the parliament of Paris for five or fix years, he ap¬ plied himfelfto divinity ; and became fo great a preach¬ er, that the bifhops of feveral diocefes offered him the high ell dignities in their gift* Ho died at Paris, fud- denly in the ftreet, November 16. 1603. CHART, or Sea Chart, an hydrographical map, or a projeftion of fome part of the earth’s fuperficies in piano, for the ufe of navigators. Charts differ very confiderably from geographical or land maps, which are of no ufe in navigation. Nor are fea charts all of the fame kind, fome being what we call plane charts, others IVEercator charts, and others globular charts. Plane Chart, is a reprefentation of fome part of the fuperficies of the terraqueous globe, in which the me¬ ridians are fuppofed parallel to each other, the paral¬ lels of latitude at equal diftances, and confequently the degrees of latitude and longitude everywhere equal to each other. See Plane Chart. Mercator's Chart, is that where the meridians are ilraight lines, parallel to each other, and equidiftant j the parallels are alfo ftraight lines, and parallel to each other : but the diftance between them increafes from the equinoftial towards either pole, in the ratio of the fecant of the latitude to the radius. See Na¬ vigation. Globular Chart, a meridional projeaion, wherein the diftance of the eye from the plane of the meridian, upon which the projection is made, is fuppofed to be equal to the fine of the angle 450. This projection comes the neareft of all to the nature of the globe, be- caufe the meridians therein are placed at equal di¬ ftances ; the parallels alfo are nearly equidiftant, and confequently the feveral parts of the earth have their proper proportion of magnitude, diftance, and litua- tion, nearly the fame as on the globe itfelf. See Glo¬ bular ProjeEhon. Hydrographic Charts, (beets of large paper, where¬ on (everal parts of the land and fea are defcribed, with their refpeCtive coafts, harbours, founds, flats, rocks, (helves, fands, &c. together wdth the longitude and la¬ titude of each place, and the points of the compafs. See Mercator's Chart. Seltnographic Charts, particular defcriptions of the fpots, appearances, and maculae of the moon. See A- stronomy Index. Topographic Charts, draughts of fome fmall parts of the earth only, or of fome particular place, with¬ out regard to its relative fituation, as London, York, &c- CHARTA, or Carta, primarily figmfies a fort of paper made of the plant papyrus or biblus. See Paper and Charter. Charta Emporetica, in Pharmacy, &c. a kind of paper made very foft and porous, uied to filter with¬ al. See Filtration, &c. Charta is alfo ufed in our ancient cuftoms for a charter, or deed in writing. See Charter. 2 ] C H A Magna Charta, the great charter of the liberties of Britain, and the bafis of our laws and privileges. ^ This charter may be faid to derive its origin from King Edward the Confeffor, who granted feveral pri¬ vileges to the church and (late by charter . thefe liber¬ ties and privileges w;ere alfo granted and confirmed by King Henry I. by a celebrated great charter now' loft j but wdiich wTas confirmed or re-enafted by King Hen¬ ry II. and King John. Henry III. the fucceffor of this laft prince, after having caufed 1 2 men make inquiry into the liberties of England in the reign of Henry I. granted a new charter *, wdiich was the (ame as the pre- fent magna charta. This he feveral times confirmed, and as often broke •, till, in the 37th year of his reign, he wTent to ^Veftminfter Hall, and there, in prefence of the nobility and biftiops, who held lighted candles in their hands, magna charta was read, the king all the time holding his hand to his bread, and at laft folemn- ly fwearing faithfully and inviolably to obferve all the things therein contained, &c. Then the bilhops ex- tinguiftiing the candles, and throwing them on the ground, they all cried out, “ Thus let him be extin- gufthed, and (link in hell, who violates this charter.” It is obferved, that, notwithftanding the folemnity of this confirmation, King Henry, the very next year, again invaded the rights of his people, till the barons entered into a war againft him j when, after various fuccefs, he confirmed this charter, and the charter or the foreft, in the 52d year of his reign. This charter confirmed many liberties of the church, and redreffed many grievances incident to feodal te¬ nures, of no fmall moment at the time j though now, unlefs confidered attentively and with this retrofpeft, they feem but of trifling concern. But, befides thefe feodal provifions, care was alfo taken therein to protect the fubjed againft other oppreffions, then frequently arifing from unreafonable amercements, from illegal diftreffes or other procefs for debts or fervices due to the crown, and from the tyrannical abufe of the pre¬ rogative of purveyance and pre-emption. It fixed the forfeiture of lands for felony in the fame manner as it dill remains; prohibited for the future the grants of exclufive filheries; and the ereftion of new bridges fo as to opprefs the neighbourhood. With refpeft to private rights, it eftabliilred the teftamentary power of the fubjeft over part of his perfonal eftate, the reft being diftributed among his wife and children j it laid down the law of dower, as it hath continued ever fince j and prohibited the appeals of women, unlefs after the death of their hulbands. In matters of public po¬ lice and national concern, it enjoined an uniformity of weights and meafures ; gave new encouragements to commerce, by the protection of merchant ftrangers; and forbade the alienation of lands in mortmain. With regard to the adminiftration of juftice •, befides prohi¬ biting all denials or delays of it, it fixed the court of common pleas at Weftminfter, that the fuitors might no longer be haraffed with following the king’s per- fon in all his progreffes ; and at the fame time brought the trial of iffues home to the very doors of the free¬ holders, by direfting aflizes to be taken in the proper counties, and eftablilhing annual circuits : it alfo cor- reaed fome abufes then incident to the trials by wager of law and of battle j direfted the regular award¬ ing Mag-na Charta C H A [ 409 ] G H A Chattel ing of inquefts for life or member; prohibited the I! king’s inferior minifters from holding pleas of the Charter crownj or trying any criminal charge, whereby many 1Ki't/~ - forfeitures might otherwife have unjuftly accrued to the exchequer ; and regulated the time and place of holding the inferior tribunals of juftice, the county- court, Iheriff’s torn, and court leet. It confirmed and eftabliihed the liberties of the city of London, and all other cities, boroughs, towns, and ports of the king¬ dom. And laftly (which alone would have merited the title that it bears, of the great charter), it proteft- ed every individual of the nation in the fr ee enjoyment of his life, his liberty, and his property, unlefs declared to be forfeited by the judgment of his peers, or the law of the land. This excellent charter, fo equitable, and beneficial to the fubjeft, is the moft ancient written law in the kingdom. By the 25th Edward I. it is ordained, that it {ball be taken as the common law 5 and by the 43d Edward III. all ftatutes made againft it are declared to be void. CHARTEL, in Law, a written inftrument, or evi¬ dence of things afted between one perfon and ano¬ ther. The word charter comes from the Latin charta, anciently ufed for a public and authentic aft, a dona¬ tion, cmitraft, or the like ; from the Greek %xer^, “ thick paper” or “ pafteboard,” whereon public afts were wont to be written. Britton divides charters in¬ to thofe of the king, and thofe of private perfons. 1. Charters of the king, are thofe whereby the king paffeth any grant to any perfon or body politic, as a charter of exemption, of privilege, See. charter of pardon, whereby a man is forgiven a felony, or other offence committed againft the king’s crown and dignity j char¬ ter of the foref, wherein the laws of the foreft are comprifed, fuch as the charter of Canutus, &c. 2. Charters of private perfons, are deeds and inftru- ments for the conveyance of lands, &c. And the pur- chafer of lands fhall have all the charters, deeds, and evidences, as incident to the fame, and for the main¬ tenance of his title. CHARTER-Govcrnments in America. See Colony. CuARTER-Land, fuch land as a perfon holds by char¬ ter j that is, by evidence in writing j otherwife called freehold. CHARTERPARTY, in commerce, denotes the inftrument of freightage, or articles of agreement for the hire of a veffel. See Ireight, &c. The charterparty is to be in writing j and to be fign- ed both by the proprietor or the mafter of the {hip, and the merchant who freights it. It is to contain the name and the burden of the veflel j the names of the mafter and the freighter *, the price or rate of freight $ and the time of loading and unloading 1 and the other conditions agreed on. It is properly a deed, or poli¬ cy, whereby the mafter or proprietor of the veflel engages to furnilh immediately a tight found veflel, well equipped, caulked, and flopped, provided with an¬ chors, fails, cordage, and all other furniture to make the voyage required, as equipage, hands, viftuals, and other munitions; in confideration of a certain fum to be paid by the merchant for the freight. Laftly, The {hip with all its furniture, and the cargo, are reflec¬ tively fubjefted to the conditions of the charterparty. The charterparty differs from a hill of lading, in that Vql. V. Part II. the firft is for the entire freight, or lading, and that Cnartophy- both for going and returning ; whereas the latter is on- ly for a part of the freight, or at moft only for the charybdis. voyage one way. -y Boyer fayTs, the word is derived from hence, that per medium charta incidebatur, et fc fiebat charta par¬ tita ; becaufe, in the time when notaries were lef$ common, there was only one inftrument made for both parties : this they cut in two, and gave each his portion 5 joining them together at their return, to * know if each had done his part. 'Phis he obferves to have been praftifed in his time } agreeable to the me¬ thod of the Romans, who, in their ttipulations, ufed to break a ftaff, each party retaining a moiety thereof as a mark. CHARTOPHYLAX, the name of an officer of the church of Conftantinople, who attends at the door of the rails when the facrament is adminiftered, and gives notice to the priefts to come to the holy table. He reprefents the patriarch upon the bench, tries all ecclefiaftical caufes, keeps all the marriage regifters, affifts at the confecration of bilhops, and prefents the bilhop eleft at the folemnity, and likewife all other fubordinate clergy. I his office refembles in fome fhape that of the hibliothecanus at Rome. CHARTRES, a large city of France, in the pro¬ vince of Orleannois, fituated on the river Eure, in E. Long. 1. 32. N. Lat. 48. 47. It is a bifhop’s fee. CHARTREUSE, or Chartreuse grand, a ce¬ lebrated monaftery, the capital of all the convents of the Carthufian monks, fituated on a fteep rock in the middle of a large foreft of fir trees, about feven miles north-eaft of Grenoble, in the province of Dauphiny in France. E. Long. 5. 5- N. Lat. 45. 20. See Car¬ thusians. From this mother-convent, all the others of the fame order took their name j among which was the Char- treufe of London, corruptly called the charterhoufe, now converted into an hofpital, and endowed with a reve¬ nue of 600I. per annum. Here were maintained 80 decayed gentlemen, not under 50 years of age ; alfo 40 boys are educated and fitted either for the univerfity or trades. Thofe fent to the univerfity have an exhibition of 20I. a-year for eight years : and have an immediate title to nine church-livings in the gift of the governors of the hof¬ pital, who are fixteen in number, all perfons of the firft diftinftion, and take their turns in the nomination of penfioners and fcholars. CHARTULARY, Chartularius, a title given to an ancient officer in the Latin church, who had the care of charters and papers relating to public affairs. The chartulary prefided in ecclefiaftical judgments, in lieu of the pope. In the Greek church the chartulary was called chartophylax ; but his office was there much more confiderable ; and fome even diftinguifh the char¬ tulary from the chartophylax in the Greek church. See Chartophylax. CHARYBDIS, in Ancient Geography, a whirlpool in the ftraits of Meffina, according to the poets; near Sicily, and oppofite to Soylla, a rock on the coaft of Italy. Thucydides makes it to be only a ftrong flux and reflux in the ftrait, or a violent reciprocation of the tide, efpecially if the wind fets fouth. But on di¬ ving into the Charybdis, there are found vaft gulfs 3 -F and C H A [41 Chafe, and whirlpools below, which produce all the commo- ' " v ' u-* tion on the furface of the water. Charybdis is ufed by Horace to denote a rapacious proftitute. „ . CHASE, or Chace, in Law, is ufed for a driving of cattle to or from any place j as to a diftrefs, or fort- let, &c. Chase, or Chace, is alfo a place of retreat for deer and wild beafts ; of a middle kind between a foreft and a park, being ufually lefs than a foreft, and not poffeffed of fo many privileges 5 but wanting, v. g. Seecourts of attachment, fwainmote, and juftice feat*. Yet it is of a large extent, and ftocked both with a greater diverftty of wild beafts or game, and more keepers than a park. Crompton obferves, that a fo¬ reft cannot be in the hands of a fubjeft, but it forth¬ with lofes its name, and becomes chafe; in regard all thofe courts lofe their nature when they come into the hands of a fubjedtand that none but a king can make a lord chief juftice in eyre of the foreft. See Justice in Eyre. The following hiftory of the Engliftr chafe is given Britijb ]YJr Pennant. “ At firft the beafts of chafe had Zool.1.^2. this wllole ;{|and for their range • they knew no other limits than the ocean, nor confeffed any particular ma- fter. When the Saxons had eftabliftred themfelves^ in the heptarchy, they were referved by each fovereign for his own particular diverfion. Hunting and war, in thofe uncivilized ages, were the only employ of the great} their a£tive, but uncultivated minds, being fuf- ceptible of no pleafures but thofe of a violent kind, fuch as gave exercife to their bodies, and prevented the pain of thinking. “ But as the Saxon kings only appropriated _ thofe lands to the ufe ©f forejls which were unoccupied, fo no individuals received any injury ; but when the Con- queft had fettled the Norman line on the throne, this paftion for the chafe was carried to an excefs, which involved every civil right in a general ruin : it fuper- feded the confideration of religion even in a fuperfti- tious age : the village communities, nay even the moft facred edifices, were turned into one vaft wafte, to make room for animals, the objecfls of a lawlefs ty¬ rant’s pleafure. The new foreft in Hampfhire is too trite an inftance to be dwelt on 5 fanguinary laws were enafted to preferve the game j and in the reigns of William Rufus, and Henry I. it was lefs criminal to deftroy one of the human fpecies than a beaft of chafe. Thus it continued while the Norman line filled the throne ■, but when the Saxon line was reftored under Henry II. the rigour of the foreft laws was immediate¬ ly foftened. “ When our barons began to form a power, they claimed a vaft, but more limited, traft for a diverfion that the Englifh were always fond of. I hey were very jealous of any encroachments on their refpe&ive bounds, which were often the caufe of deadly feuds $ fuch a one gave caufe to the fatal day of Chevy-chafe ; a fa£t which, though recorded only in a ballad, may, from what we know of the manners of the times, be founded on truth •, not that it was attended with all the circumftances which the author of that natural but heroic compofition hath given it} for, on that day neither a Percy nor a Douglas fell: here the poet feems to have clawed his privilege, and mixed with o ] C H A this fray feme of the events of the battle of Otter- Chafe. bourne. . “ When property became happily more divided by the relaxation of the feodal tenures, thefe exten- five hunting grounds became more limited j and as tillage and huibandry increafed, the beafts of chafe were obliged to give w'ay to others more ufeful to the community. 1 he vaft traffs of land, before dedicat¬ ed to hunting, w7ere then contrafted 5 and, in propor¬ tion as the ufeful arts gained ground, either loft their original deftination, or gave rife to the invention of parks. Liberty and the arts feem coeval ; for when once the latter got footing, the former prote&ed the labours of the induftrious from being ruined by the li¬ centious fportfman, or being devoured by the obje£ts of his diverfion : for this reafon, the fubje£ts of a def- potic government ftill experience the inconvenien¬ ces of vaft waftes and forefts, the terrors of the neighbouring hufbandmen j while in.our well regu¬ lated monarchy very few chafes remain. The Eng- lifh ftill indulge themfelves in the pleafures of hunting*, but confine the deer kind to parks, of w'hich England, boafts of more than any other kingdom in Europe. The laws allow7 every man his pleafure } but confine them in fuch bounds as prevent them, from being in¬ jurious to the meaneft of the community. Before the Reformation, the prelates feem to have guarded fuffi- ciently againft this want of amufement, the fee of Nor¬ wich, in particular, being poffeffed, about that time, of thirteen parks.” Chase, in the fea language, is to purfue a Ihip j which is alfo called giving chafe. Stern-CHASE, is when the chafer follow’s the chafed aftern dire&ly upon the fame point of the compafs. To lie with a /hip's fore foot in a Chase, is to fail and meet with her by the neareft diftance j and fo to crofs her in her way, or to come acrofs her fore-foot. A {hip is faid to have a good chafe, when fhe is fo built forward on, or a-ftern, that ftie can carry many guns to fhoot forwards or backwards ; according to which the is faid to have a good forward or good fern chafe. . Chase Guns, are fuch whofe ports are either in tne head (and then they are ufed in chafing of others) j or in the ftern, which "are only ufeful when they are pur- fued or chafed by any other Ihip. Chase of a Gun, is the whole bore or length of a piece taken withinfide. Wild-goofe Chase, a term ufed to exprefs a fort of racing on horfeback ufed formerly, which refembled the flying of wild geefe ; thofe birds generally going in a train one after another, not in confuted flocks as other birds do. In this fort of race the two horfes, after running twelve fcore yards, had liberty, which horfe foever could take the leading, to ride what ground the jockey pleafed., the hindmoft horfe being bound to follow him within a certain diftance agreed on by the articles, or elfe to be whipped in by the tryers and judges who rode by and whichever boric could diftance the other won the race. This fort of racing was not long in common ufe *, for it was found inhuman, and deftruttive to good horfes, when two fuch were matched together. For in this cafe neither was able to diflance the other till they were both ready to fmk under their riders $ and often two very good C H A [ ' 411 ] (.< II A Chafing good horfes were both fpoiled, and the wagers forced heart 5 but all to no purpofe. He then endeavoured < Chaftlty. II to be drawn at laft. The mifchief of this fort of to extort her compliance by the moft terrible threat- v~”” Chaftity. rac;ng brought in the method now in ufe, of run- enings. It was in vain. She ftill perfifted in her re- ning only for a certain quantity of ground, and deter- folution $ nor could die be moved even by the fear of mining the plate or wager by the coming in firft at the death. But when the monfter told her that he would firft defpatch her, and then having murdered a (lave, Chasing of Gold, Silver, &c. See Enchasing. would lay him by her fide, after wftiich he would fpread CHASTE tree. See Vitex, Botany Index. a report, that having caught them in the aft of adul- CHASTITY •, Purity of the body, or freedom tery, he had punifhed them as they deferved •, this from obfcenity.—The Roman larv juftifies homicide feemed to lhake her refolution. She hefitated, not in defence of the chaftity either of one’s felf or rela- knowing which of thefe dreadful alternatives to take, tions 5 and fo alfo, according to Selden, flood the law whether, by confenting to difhonour the bed of her in the Jewdfti republic. Our law likewife juftifies a hulband, whom fhe tenderly loved ; or by refufing, to woman for killing a man who attempts to ravifh her. die under the odious charafter of having proftituted So the huifeand or father may juftify killing a man who her perfon to the luft of a fiave. He faw the ftruggle attempts a rape upon his wife or daughter; but not of her foul *, and feizing the unlucky moment, obtain- if he takes them in adultery by confent; for the one is ed an inglorious conqueft. Thus Lucretia’s virtue, forcible and felonious, but not the other. which had been proof againft the fear of death, could Chaftity is a virtue univerfally celebrated. There is not hold out againft the fear of infamy. The young indeed no charm in the female fex that can fupply its prince, having gratified his paflion, returned home as in place. Without it, beauty is unlovely, and rank is triumph. On the morrow, jLucretia overwhelmed with contemptible ; good breeding degenerates into wan- grief and defpair, fent early in the morning to defire her tonnefs, and wit into impudence. Out of the nume- father and her hulband to come to her and bring with rous inftances of eminent chaftity recorded by authors, them each a trufty friend, affuring them there was no the two following are felefted on account of the leffon time to lofe. They came with all fpeed, the one ac- afforded by the different modes of conduft which they companied with Valerius (fo famous after under the exhibit. name of Publicola), and the other with Brutus. The Lucretia was a lady of great beauty and noble ex- moment (he faw them come, flie could not command traftion ; (he married Collatinus, a relation of Tar- her tears; and when her hulband aiked her if all was quinius Superbus king of Rome. During the fiege well ? “ By no means,” faid (lie, “ it cannot^be well of Ardea, which lafted^much longer than was expefted, with a woman after (he has loft her honour. Yes, Col- the young princes paffed their time in entertainments latinus, thy bed has been defiled by a ftranger : but *Liv. 1. i. and diverfions. One day as they were at fupper *, at my body only B polluted : my mind is innocent, as c. 56—60. Sextus Tarquin’s the king’s eldeft fon, with Colla- my death (hall witnefs. Promife me only not to fuffer Dionyf. liv. t;nuSj Lucretia’s hufband, "the con verfation turned on the adulterer to go unpuniftied : it is Sextus Tarqui- p. 261 merit of their wives : every one gave his own the nius, wTho laft night, a treacherous gueft, or rather cruel iS- 1. iii. preference. “ What fignify fo many words ?” fays foe, offered me violence, and reaped a joy fatal to me j 9.*' Collatinus ; “ you may in a few hours, if you pleafe, but, if you are men, it will be ftill more fatal to him.” be convinced by your owm eyes, how much my Lu- AH promifed to revenge her ; and at the fame time, cretia excels the reft. We are young : let us mount our tried to comfort her wdth reprefenting, “That the horfes, and go and furprife them. Nothing can bet- mind only fins, not the body ; and where the confent ter decide our difpute than the ftate we (hall find them is wanting, there can be no guilt.” What Sextus in at a time, when moft certainly they will not expeft deferves,” replies Lucretia, “ I leave you to judge ; us.” They were a little warmed wdth wine : “ Come but for me, though I declare myfelf innocent of the on, let us go,” they all cried together. They quickly crime, I exempt not myfelf from punilhment. No galloped to Rome, which was about twenty miles from immodeft w’oman (hall plead Lucretia’s example to Ardea, where they find the princeffes, wives of the outlive her diftionour.” Thus faying, (he plunged voung’Tarquins, furrounded with company, and every into her bread a dagger (lie had concealed under her circumftance of the higheft mirth and pleafure. From robe, and expired at their feet. Lucretia’s tragical thence they rode to Collatia, where they faw Lucre- death hath been praifed and extolled by Pagan writers, tia in a very different fituation. With her maids about as the higheft and moft noble aft of heroifm.. The her, die was at work in the inner part of her hcufe, Gofpel thinks not fo : it is murder, even according to talking on the dangers to which her hulband was ex- Lucretia’s owm principles, fince (lie puniftied with death pofed. The viftory was adjudged to her unanimoufly. an innocent perfon, at leaft acknowledged as fuch by She received her guefts with all poflible politenefs and herfelf. She was ignorant that our life is not in our civility. ' Lucretia’s virtue, which (hould have com- own power, but in his difpofal from whom we receive manded refpeft, was the very thing which kindled in it. St Auftin, who carefully examines, in his book De the bread of Sextus Tarquin a ftrong and deteftable Civitate Dei, what we are to think of Lucretia’s death, paflion. Within a few days he returned to Collatia 5 confiders it not as a courageous aftion (lowing from and upon the plaufible excufe he made for his vifit, he a true love of chaftity, but as an infirmity of a woman was received with all the politenefs due to a near rela- too fenfible of wordly fame and glory , and who, from tion, and the eldeft fon of a king. Watching the fit- a dread of appearing in the eyes of men an accomplice teft opportunity ^ he declares the paflion (he had excit- of the violence (he abhorred, a.id of a dime to which ed at his laft vifit, and employed the moft tender entrea- (he was entirely a ftranger, commits a real crime upon ties, and all the artifices poflible to touch a woman’s herfelf voluntarily and defignedly. But what cannot 3 F 2 be J Chateu- Chinon. C H A . t 41 Chiomara be fufficiently admired in this Roman lady, is her ab¬ horrence of adultery, which fhe feems to hold fo de- teftable as not to bear the thoughts of it. In tnis fenfe, Are is a noble example for all her fex. . Chiomara, the wife of Ortiagon, a Gaulifli prince, * was equally admirable for her beauty and chaftity. During the war between the Romans and the Gauls, A. R. 563, the latter were totally defeated on Mount Olympus. Chiomara, among many other ladies, was taken prifoner, and committed to the care of a centu¬ rion, no lefs paffionate for money than women. . He at firft endeavoured to gain her confent to his infa¬ mous defires 5 but not being able to prevail upon Hr, and fubvert her conflancy, he thought he might em¬ ploy force with a woman whom misfortune had redu¬ ced to flavery. Afterwards, to make her amends for that treatment, he offered to refiore her liberty j but not without ranfom. He agreed with her for a certain fum, and to conceal this defign from the other Ro¬ mans, he permitted her to fend any of the prifoners (lie fhould choofe to her relations, and affigned a place near the river where the lady fhould be exchanged for gold. By accident there was one of her own Haves amongft the priioners. Upon him (lie fixed j and the centurion foon after carried her beyond the advanced ports, under cover of a dark night. T. he next evening two of the relations of the princefs came to the place appointed, whither the centurion alio carried his cap¬ tive. When they had delivered him the Attic talent they had brought, which was the fum they had agreed on, the lady, in her own language, ordered thofe wdro came to recerve her to draw their fwords and kill tire centurion, w7ho was then amufing himfelf with weigh¬ ing the gold. Then, charmed with having revenged the injury done her chaftity, fhe took the head of the officer, which ffie had cut off with her own hands, and hiding it under her robe, went to her hufband Ortiagon, who had returned home after the defeat of his troops. As foon as ffie came into his prefence, ffie threw the centurion’s head at his feet. He was ftrangely fur- prifed at fuch a fight : and afked her whofe head it was, and what had induced her to do an aft fo un¬ common to her fex ? With her face covered with a hid¬ den bluffi, and at the fame time exprefling her fierce indignation, ffie declared the outrage which had been done her, and the revenge {he had taken for it. Dur¬ ing the reft of her life, ffie ftedfaftly retained the fame attachment for the purity of manners which conftitutes the principal glory of the fex, and nobly fuftained the honour of fo glorious, bold, and heroic an aftion. This lady was much more prudent than Lucretia, in revenging her injured honour by the death of her ra- vaifher, rather than by her own. Plutarch relates this faft, in his treatife upon the virtue and great aftions of women ; and it is from him we have the name of this, which is ivell worthy of being tranfmitted to po- fterity. The above virtue in men is termed continence. See Continence. CHATEAU-briant, a town of France in Brit¬ tany, w’ith an old caftle. W. Long. 1. 20. N. Lat. 47. 40. CHATEAV-Chinon, a town of France in Nivernois, and capital of Morvant, with a confiderable manufac¬ ture of cloth. E. Long. 3. 48. N. Lat. 47. 2. 2 ] C H A Chateav-Dauphin, a very ftrong caftle of Piedmont Chat^a- in Italy, and in the marquifate of Saluces, belonging n to the king of Sardinia. It was taken by the com- Chatham. bined army of France and Spain in 1744,-and was re- ^ ftored by the treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle. . , CiiATEAU-du-Loire, a town of 1( ranee, m Maine, famous for fuftaining a fiege of feven years againft the Count of Mans. It is feated'on the river Loire, in L. Long. o. 25. N. Lat. 47. 40. Chateau-Duu, an ancient town of France, and ca¬ pital of the Dunois, with a caftle and rich monaftery ; feated on an eminence near the river Loire, in E. Long. I. 26. N. Lat. 48. 4. CuATEAV-Neuf, the name of feveral towns of France, viz. one in Perche j another in Angumois, on the river Charente, near Angoulefme j a third in Berry, feated on the river Cher j and feveral other fmall places. CHATEAU-Portien, a town of France, in Champagne, and in a diftrift called Portien, ■with a cattle built on a rock, near the river Aifne. E. Long. 4. 23. N. Lat. 49. 35. CHATEAu-Penaud, a town of France, in tne Gate- nois, where clothes are made for the army, and where there is a trade in faffron. E. Long. 4. 25. N. Lat. 48. o. This is alfo the name of a town of Touraine, in France, with the title of marquifate. E. Long. 2. 41. N. Lat. 47. 22. Chateau-Roux, a town of France, in Berry, with the title of a duchy. It has a cloth manufafture, and is feated in a very large pleafant plain on the river Indre, in E. Long. 1. 47. N. Lat. 46. 49. CuATEAU-Phiery, a town of France, in Champagne, with the title of a duchy, and a handfome caftle on an eminence, feated on the river Maine, in E. Long. 3. 23. N. Lat. 49. 12. CaATEAU-Vi/ain, a town of h ranee, in Champagne, with a caftle, and the title of a duchy 5 feated on the river Anjou. E. Long. 2. 59. N. Lat. 48. o. CHATEL, or C hate, a towm of Lorraine, in the Vofque, feated on the river Mofelle, eight miles from Mirecourt. Chatel-Allan, a maritime town of France, in Sain- tonge, five miles from Rochelle formerly very confi¬ derable, but now greatly decayed. CtSATEL-Chalon, atownof France, in Tranche Comte, remarkable for its abbey of Benediftine nuns. E. Long. 5. 25. N. Lat. 46. 50. CHATELET, a town of the Netherlands, in Na¬ mur, feated on the Sambre, in the biffiopric of Liege. E. Long. 4. 28. N. Lat. 50. 25. Chatelet, the name of certain courts of juftice eftabliffied in feveral cities in France. The grand chatelet at Paris is the place where the prefidial or ordinary court of juftice of the provoft of Paris is kept ; confifting of a prefidial, a civil chamber, a criminal chamber, and a chamber of policy, d he little chatelet is an old fort, now ferving as a priion. CHATELLERAULT, a town of France, in Poi¬ tou, with the title of a duchy •, feated in a fertile and pleafant country, on the river Vienne, over which there is a handfome rtone bridge. E. Long. o. 40. N. Lat. 46. 34. CHATHAM, a town of Kent, adjoining to Ro- chefter, and feated on the liver Medway. It is the principal C H A [ 4i3 1 c H A Chatigan principal ftation of the royal navy 5 and the yards and ed with his ufual fignatnre, D. B. that is, Dunbelmus Chattertw. 11 magazines are furnilhed with all kinds of naval ftores, Brijlohenjis. i he former contains fliovt extrads ^irora Chatterton. a$ well as materials for building and rigging the largeft two MSS. “ written 300 years ago by one Rowley^ a ' ^ ' men 0f war. The entrance into the river Medway monk,” concerning drefs in the age of Henry II. ; the is defended by Sheernefs and other forts ; notwith- latter, “ Ethelgar, a Saxon poem,” in bombaft prole. Handing which, the Dutch fleet burnt feveral fhips of In the fame magazine for May 1769, are three commu- war here in the reign of Charles II. after the peace of nications from Briltol, with the fame fignatine D. B» Breda had been agreed upon. In the year 1757, by one of them entitled “ Obfervations upon Saxon He- dire&icm of the duke of Cumberland, feveral addition- raldry, with drawings of Saxon Achievements j” and al fortifications were begun at Chatham ; fo that now in the fubfequent months of 1769 and 1770, there are the fhips are in no danger of an infult either by land feverai other pieces in the lame magazine, whicn a,c. or water. It has a church, a chapel of eafe, and a undoubtedly of his compofition. Ihip ufed as a church for the failors. It has likewife In April 1770, he left Briftol, difgufled with his about 500 houfes, moftly low, and built with brick j profellion, and irreconcilable to the line of life m the ftreets are narrow, and paved j and it contains which he was placed ; and coming to London in hopes about 3000 inhabitants. The principal employment of of advancing his fortune by his pen, he funk at once the labouring hands is fhip-building in the king’s yard from the fublimity of his views to an abfolute depen- and private docks. This town gave title of earl to dence on the patronage of bookfellers. 1 hings how- that great Hatefman William Pitt in the reigns of ever, feem foon to have brightened up a little with him j Geor re II. and III. E. Long. o. 40. N. Lat. 51. for, May 14. he writes to his mother, in high fpints, 20 b upon the change of his fituation, with the following CHATIGAN, a town of Afia, in the kingdom of farcaftic refleftion upon his former patrons at BriftoL Bengal, on the moft eafterly branch of the river Gan- “ As to Mr , Mr , Mr , Sec, &c. they pes. It is but a poor place, though it was the firlt rate literary lumber fo low, that I believe an author, the’ Portuguefe fettled at in thefe parts, and who Hill in their eftimation, muft be poor indeed : but here keep a fort of poffeffion. It has but a few cotton ma- matters are otherwife. Had Rowley been a Londoner nufa&ures •, but affords the beft timber for building of inftead of a Briftowyan, I could have lived by copying any place about it. The inhabitants are fo fulpicious his works.” In a letter to his lifter, May 30. he informs of each other, that they always go armed with a her that he is to be employed in writing a voluminous fword, ptftol, and blunderbufs, not excepting the priefts. Hiftory of London, to appear m numbers the begin- It is fubiea to the Great Mogul. E. Long. 91. 10. ning of next winter. Meanwhile, he had written fome- N. Lat. 23. o. thinS in Praife of Bechford, then lord mayor, which CH ATILLON sur Seine, a town of France, in had procured him the honour of being prefented to his Burgundy, divided into two by the river Seine. It is lordlhip ; and, in the letter juft mentioned, he gives 32 miles from Langres, and 40 from Dijon ; and has the following account of his reception with certain iron works in its neighbourhood. E. Long. 4. 33. obfervations upon political writing. “ 1 he lord mayor N Lat 47 4:. received me as politely as a citizen could : but the devil CHATRE a town of France, in Berry, feated on of the matter is, there is no money to be got on this the river Indre, 37 miles from Bourges. It carries fide of the queftion.—However, he is a poor author on a confiderable trade in cattle. E. Long. 1. 55. who cannot write on both fides.—ElTays on the patriotic N Lat 46. 3 3. ficle wil1 fetch no m®re than what,ttie copy is fold for. CHATTELS, a Norman term, under which were As the patriots themfelves are fearching for places, anciently comprehended all moveable goods j thofe im- they have no gratuity to fpare.—On the other hand, moveable being termed fief or fee. unpopular eflfays will not even be accepted, and you muft Chattels, in the modern fenfe of the word, are pay to have them printed j but then you ieldom loie all forts of o-oods, moveable or immoveable, except fuch by it, as courtiers are fo fenftble 01 their deficiency in as are in the nature of freehold. merit, that they generoufly reward all who know how CHATERER. See Ampelis, Ornithology /«- to daub them with the. appearance of it.” ‘ He continued to write incefiantly in various perio- CHATTERTON, Thomas, a late unfortunate dical publications. July txth, he tells his filler that poet whofe fate and performances have excited in no he had pieces laft month in feveral magazines ; in The fm dl degree the public attention, as well as given rife Gofpel Magazine, The Town and Country, The Court to mu-h literary controverfy. He was born at Briftol, and City, The London, the Political Regifter, &c. Nov 2b. 1752 ; and educated at a charity fchool on But all thefe exertions of his genius brought in fo little St Auguftine’s Back, where nothing more was taught profit, that he was foon reduced to the extremeft indi- than reading, writing, and accounts. At 14 years of gencey fo that at laft, opprelTed with poverty and age, he was articled clerk to an attorney at Briftol, difeafe, in a fit of defpair he put an end to his exift- with whom he continued about three years ; yet, though ence, Auguft 1770, with a.dofe of poifon. This un- his education was thus confined, he diicoveted an early fortunate perfon, though certainly a moft extraordin«ry turn towards poetry and Enghfh antiquities, and parti- genius, feems yet to have been a moft ungracious com- cularly towards heraldry. How foon he began to be pofition. He was violent and impetuous to a ftrange an author is not known. In the Town and Country degree. From the firft of the above cited letters he Magazine for March 1769, are two letters, probably feems to have had a portion of ill humour and fple-m from him, as they are dated from Briftol, and fubferib- more than enough for a lad of 17 ; and the editor c€ C H A [41 •Chatterton. his Mifcellanies records, “ that he pofleffed all the vi- ' ces and irregularities of youth, and that his profligacy was at leaft as confpicuous as his abilities.” In 1777 were publiflied in one volume Bvo, “ Poems, fuppofed to have been written at Briftol, by 1 homas Rowley and others, in the 15th century : the greateft part now firlt publilhed from the moft authentic copies, with an engraved fpecimen of one of the MSS. To which are added, a Preface, an introduftory Account of the feveral Pieces, and a Gloffary.” And in 1778, were publifhed, in one volume Bvo, “ Mifcellanies in Profe and Verfe by Thomas Chatterton, the fuppofed author of the Poems publifhed under the names of Rowley, &c.” Of Rowley’s poems, we have the following account in the preface, given in the words of Mr George Cat- cot of Briftol, to whom, it is faid, the public is in¬ debted for them. “ The firft difcovery of certain MSS. having been depofited in Redclift church above three centuries ago, was made in the year 1768, at the time of opening the new bridge at Briftol ; and was owing to a publication in Farley’s Weekly Journal, Oft. ift, containing an account of the ceremonies obferved at the opening of the old bridge, taken, as it was faid, from a very ancient MS. This excited the curiofity of fome perfons to inquire after the original. The printer, Mr Farley, could give no account of it, or of the perfon who brought the copy } but, after much in¬ quiry, it was difcovered that this perfon was a youth between 15 and 16 years of age, whofe name was Thomas Chatterton, and whofe family had been fex- tons of Redclift church for near 150 years. His fa¬ ther, who was now dead, had alfo been mafter of the free fchool in Pile ftreet. The young man was at firft very unwilling to difcover from whence he had the ori¬ ginal : but, after many promifes made to him, was at laft prevailed on to acknowledge that he had received this, together with many other MSS. from his father, who had found them in a large cheft in an upper room over the chapel, on the north fide of Redclift church.” It is added, that foon after this Mr Catcot commenced an acquaintance wdth Chatterton, and partly as pre- fents, partly as purchafes, procured from him copies of many of his MSS. in profe and verfe ; as other co¬ pies were difpofed of in like manner to others. It is concluded, however, that whatever may have been Chatterton’s part in this very extraordinary tranfaftion, whether he was the author, or only (as he eonftantly afierted) the copier of all thefe produftions, he appears to have kept the fecret entirely to himfelf, and not to have put it in any one’s power to bear certain teftimo- ny either of his fraud or of his veracity. This affair, however, hath fince become the founda¬ tion of a mighty controverfy among the critics, which hath yet fcarcely fubfided. The poems in queftion, publilhed in 1777, were republifhed in I77^j with an “ Appendix, containing fome obfervations upon their language tending to prove that they w'ere written, not by any ancient author, but entirely by Chatter¬ ton.”" Mr Warton, in the third volume of his Hiftory of Englifh Poetry, hath efpoufed the fame fide of the queftion. Mr Walpole alfo obliged the wmrld with a Letter on Chatterton, from his prefs at Straw-berry hill. On the other hand have appeared, “ Obfervations” up¬ on thefe poems, “ in which their authenticity is afcer- 1 4 ] C H A tained,” by Jacob Bryant, Efq; 1781, 2 vols. 8\'0. j Chaucer. ^ and another edition of the “ Poems, w-ith a Comment,1 1 v "li> in which their antiquity is confidered and defended, by Jeremiah Miiles, D. D. dean of Exeter, 1782,” 4to. In anfwer to tbefe two works, we have had three pamphlets: 1. “ Curfory Obfervations on the Poems, and Remarks on the Commentaries of Mr Bryant and Dr Miiles ; with a falutary propofal addreffed to the friends of thofe gentlemen.” 2. “ An Archaeological Epiftle to Dean Miiles, editor of a fuperb edition of Rowley’s Poems, &c.” 3. “ An Inquiry into the au¬ thenticity of the Poems attributed to Thomas Rowley, in which the Arguments of the deans of Exeter and Mr Bryant ate examined, by Thomas Whrton j” and other pieces in the public prints and magazines : All prepa¬ ratory to the complete fettlement of the bufinefs in “ A Vindication of the Appendix to the Poems called Rowley’s, in reply to the Anfwers of the dean of Exe¬ ter, Jacob Bryant, Efq-, and a third Anonymous Wri¬ ter ; with fome further Obfervations upon thofe Poems, and an Examination of the Evidence which has been produced in fupport of their Authenticity. By Tho¬ mas Tyrwhitt, 1782,” 8vo. CHAUCER, SiRGEOFREY,an eminent Englilh poet in the 14th century, born at London in 1328. After he left the univeifity, he travelled into Holland, France, and other countries. Upon his return he entered him¬ felf in the Inner Temple, where he ftudied the muni¬ cipal laws of England. His firft ftation at court was page to Edward HI. and he had a penfion granted him by that prince till he could otherwife provide for him. Soon after w-e find him gentleman of the king’s privy chamber next year, ftiield-bearer to the king. Efteemed and honoured, he fpent his younger days in a conftant attendance at court, or for the moft part liv¬ ing near it, in a fquare ftone houfe near the park-gate at Woodftock, ftill called Chaucer's Houfe. Soon after, having got the duke of Lancafter for his patron, Chaucer began every day to rife in great- nefs. In 1373, he was fent with other perfons to the republic of Genoa to hire fhips for the king’s navy (our want of fhipping in thofe times being ufually ap¬ plied by fuch means) •, and the king was fo well fatis- fied with his negotiation, that, on his return, he ob¬ tained a grant of a pitcher of wine daily in the port of London, to be delivered by the butler of England j and foon after was made comptroller of the cuftoms for wool, wool fells, and hides ; an office which he difcharged with great diligence and integrity. At this period,°Chaucer’s income was about 1000I. a-year j a fum which in thofe days might well enable him to live, as he fays he did, with dignity in office, and hof- pitality among his friends. It was in this meridian blaze of profperity, in perfeft health of body and peace of mind, that he wrote his moft humorous poems. His fatires againft the priefts were probably written to oblige his patron the duke of Lancafter, who favoured the caufe of Wickliff, and endeavoured to expofe the clergy to the indignation of the people. In the laft; year of Edward III. our poet was employed in a com- miffion to treat with the French ; and in the begin¬ ning of King Richard’s reign, he was in fome degree of favour at court. The duke of Lancafter at laft finding his views checked, began to abandon Wickliff’s party : upon which C H A [41 Chaucer, which Chaucer likewise, how much foever he had v—- efpoufed that divine’s opinions, thought it prudent to conceal them more than he had done. With the duke’s intereft that of Chaucer entirely funk ; and the former paffing over fea, his friends felt all the malice of the oppofite party. Thefe misfortunes occafioned his writing that excellent treatife, The 'Tejlament of Love in imitation of Boethius on the Confolation of Philofo- phy. Being much reduced, he retired to Woodftock, to comfort himfelf with ftudy, which produced his ad¬ mirable treatife of the Afrolabe. The duke of Lancafter at lad furmounting his trou¬ bles, married Lady Catharine Swynford, lifter to Chau¬ cer’s wife j fo that Thomas Chaucer, our poet’s fon,^ became allied to moft of the nobility, and to feveral of the kings of England. Now the fun began to ftiine upon Chaucer with an evening ray \ for by the influ¬ ence of the duke’s marriage, he again grew to a con- fiderable (hare of wealth. But being now 70, he re¬ tired to Dunnington caftle near Newbury. He had not enjoyed this retirement long before Henry IV. fon of the duke of Lancafter, aflumed the crown, and in the firft year of his reign gave our poet marks of his favour. But however pleafing the change of affairs might be to him at firft, he afterwards found no fmall inconveniences from it. The meafures and grants of the late king were annulled : and Chaucer, in or¬ der to procure frefh grants of his penfions, left his re¬ tirement, and applied to court : where, though he gained a confirmation of fome grants, yet the fatigue of attendance, and his great age, prevented him from enjoying them. He fell fick at London : and ended his days in the 72d year of his age, leaving the world as though he defpifed it, as appears from his fong of Flie from the Prefe. The year before his death he had the happinefs, if at his time of life it might be fo call¬ ed, to fee the fon of his brother-in-law (Hen. IV.) feat- ed on the throne. He was interred in Weftminfter ab¬ bey, and in 15 <;6, Mr Nicholas Bingham, a gentleman of Oxford, at his own charge, ere6led a handfome mo¬ nument for him there. Caxton firft printed the Can¬ terbury Tales j but his works were firft colle&ed and publilhed in one volume folio, by William Thynne, London, 1542. They were afterwards reprinted in 1561, 1598, 1602. Oxford, 1721. Chaucer was not only the firft, but one of the beft poets which thefe kingdoms ever produced.^ He was equally great in every fpecies of poetry which he at¬ tempted ; and his poems in general poffefs every kind of excellence, even to a modern reader, except me¬ lody and accuracy of meafure ; defedfts which are to be attributed to the imperfeft ftate of our language, and " the infancy of the art in this kingdom at the time when he wrote. “ As he is the father of Englifti poetry ("fays Mr Dryden) fo I hold him in the fame degree of veneration as the Grecians did Homer, or the Romans Virgil. He is a perpetual fountain of good fenfe, learned in all fciences, and therefore fpeaks properly on all fubjefts. As he knew what to fay, fo he knows alfo when to leave off; a continence which is praflifed by few writers, and fcarcely by any of the ancients, ex¬ cept Virgil and Horace.” This character Chaucer cer¬ tainly deferved. He had read a great deal; and was a man of the world, and of found judgment. He was the firft; Englifti poet who wrote poetically} as Dr John- 5 1 c H A fon obferves in the preface to his Diflionary, and (he Cnalas might have added) who wrote like a gentleman. He had alfo the merit of improving our language confider- ably, by the introdu£tion and naturalization of words from the Provencal, at that time the moft poliftied dia¬ led in Europe. CHALCIS, in Ancient Geography, the country of the Chauci, a people of Germany : divided into the Minores, now Eaf Friefand, and the county of Olden¬ burg ; and into the Majores, now the duchy of Bre¬ men and a part of Lunenburg. CHAUD Medley, in Law, is of much the fame im¬ port with Chance Medley. The former in its etymo¬ logy fignifies an affray in the heat of blood or paflion : the latter, a cafual affray. The latter is in common fpeech too often erroneoufly applied to any manner of homicide by mifadventure ; whereas it appears by the flat. 24 Hen. VIII. c. 5. and ancient books (Standf. P. C. 16.), that it is properly applied to fuch killing as happens in felf-defence upon hidden encoun- t-C i • f* CHAL, a town of the Eaft Indies, on the coaft of Malabar, in the province of Blagana, and kingdom of Vifapour. Its river affords a good harbour for fmall veffels. The town is fortified, and fo is the ifland on the fouth fide of the harbour. It had formerly a good trade, but is now miferably poor. It was taken by the Portuguefe in 1507, to whom it ftill belongs. It is 15 miles fouth of Bombay, and five miles from the fea. E. Long. 72. 45. N. Lat. 18. 30. CHAULIEU, William Amfryede, Abbe d’Amale, one of the moft polite and ingenious of the French poets, was born in !639> anc^ ^'ec^ at aSe of 84. The moft complete edition of his poems is that printed in two vols. 8vo. in 1733* CHAUMONT, a town of France, in Champagne, and in the diftrift of Baflignq of which it is the capi¬ tal. It is feated on a mountain near the river Marne. E. Long. 5. 15. N. Lat. 48. 6. CHAUNE, a town of France, in Picardy, and in the diftria of Sanfterre, with the title of a duchy. E. Long. 2. 55. N. Lat. 49. 45. CHAUNTRY. See Chantry. CHAUNY, a town of Fiance, in Picardy, feated on the river Oile, in Chantry. E. Long. 3. 17. N* Lat. 49. 37. . . CHAUVIN, Stephen, a celebrated mimfterof the reformed religion, born at Nifmes, left France at the revocation of the edia of Nantz, and retired to Rot¬ terdam, where he began a new ’journal des Sgavans ; and afterwards removing to Berlin, continued it there three years. At this laft place, he was made profef- for of philofophy, and difcharged that office wfth much honour and reputation. His principal work is a phi- lofophical di&ionary, in Latin, which he published at Rotterdam in 1692 ; and gave a new edition of it much augmented, at Lewarden, in 1703, folio. He died in 1723, aged 83. CHAVEZ, a ftrong town ofTralos-Montes in Por¬ tugal, feated at the foot of a mountain on the river Tamega. It has two fuburbs, and as many forts; one of which looks like a citadel. Between the town and fuburb of Magdalena, is an old Roman ftone bridge about 92 geometrical paces long. W. Long. 7. !• N. Lat. 41. 45. CHAZELLES, C H A Cfnazelle?, CHAZELLES, Joan Matthew, Chazinza- mathematician and engineer, was born at Lyons rians- in 1657. M. du Hamel, with whom he got acquaint- * " ~v cd, finding his genius incline towards aftronomy, pre- fented him to M. Caflini, who employed him in his ob- fervatory. In 1684, the duke of Mortemar made ufe of Chazelles to teach him mathematics ; and, the year after, procured him the preferment of hydrography profeffor for the galleys of MarfeUles, where he let up a fchool for young pilots defigning to lerve abroad the galleys. In 1686, the galleys made four little campaigns, or rather four courfes, purely for exerche. Chazelles went on board every time with them .. kept his fchool upon the fea, and Ihow’ed the practice of what he taught. In the years 1687 and 1688, he made two other fea campaigns, in which he drew a gieat many plans of ports, roads, towms, and forts, which were lodged with the minifters of Hate. At the be¬ ginning of the w’ar, which ended with the peace of Ryfvvick, fome marine officers, and Chazelles among the reft, fancied the galleys might be fo contrived as to live upon the ocean •, that they might ferve to tow the men of wTar w?hen the wfind failed or proved con¬ trary, and alfo help to fecure the coaft of hiance upon the ocean. Chazelles was fent to the weft coafts m July 1689, to examine the prafticablenefs of this icheme 5 and in 1690, fifteen galleys new built fet fail from Rochefort, and cruifed as far as Torbay, in Eng- and, and proved ferviceable at the defeent upon 1 in¬ mouth. After this, he digefted into order the ob- fervations he had made on the coafts of the ocean j and drew diftina: maps, with a portulan to them, viz. a large defeription of every haven, of the depth, the tides, the dangers and advantages difeovered, &c. Thefe maps were inferted in the Neptune Frangoife, publiffied in 1692, in which year Chazelles was engi¬ neer at the defeent at Oneille. In 1693, Monfieur de Pontchartrain, then fecretary of ftate for the ma¬ rine, and afterwards chancellor of France, refolved to get the Neptune Frangoife carried on to a fecond vo- luine, which was alfo to take in the Mediterranean. Chazelles defired that he might have a year’s voyage on this fea, for making aftronomical obfervations 5 and the requeft being granted, he palled by Greece, Egypt, and the other parts of Turkey, with his quadrant . and telefcope in his hand. When he was in Egypt, he meafured the pyramids : and finding the fides of the largeft precifely facing the four cardinal points, natu¬ rally concluded this pofition to have been intended, and alfo that the poles of the earth and meridians had not fince deviated. Chazelles likewife made a report of his voyage in the Levant, and gave the academy all the fatisfaftion they wanted concerning the pofition of Alexandria : upon which he was made a member of the academy in 1695. He died in 1710. CHAZINZARIANS, a fed of heretics who rofe in Armenia in the feventh century. I he word is formed of the Armenian chu%iis^ ii crofs. FLey aie alfo called Jlaurolatrce, which in Greek fignifies the fame as Cha'zin'zarians in Armenian, viz. adorers^ of the crofs ; they being charged with paying adoration to the crofs alone. In other refpe&s they were Nefto- rians j and admitted two perfons in Jefus Chrift. cephorus aferibes other fingularities to them } particu¬ larly their holding an annual feaft in memory of the [ 416 ] C H A a celebrated dog of their falfe prophet Sergius, wffirch they called CheLpeak Check. ✓7 ** / o' 7/7/7 »*/ry p r CHESAPEAK bay, in North America, the en¬ trance betwreen Cape Henry and Cape Chailes, run¬ ning up 300 miles between Virginia and Maryland. It is navigable almoft all the way for large ffiips, and has feveral navigable rivers that fall into it, by means of wdiich (hips go up to the very doors of the planters, to take in their lading of goods.—Here was a fea en¬ gagement in 1781 between the Britiih fieet under Ad¬ miral Graves confifting of 19 fliips of the line, and the French fleet of 24 line-of-battle fhips under the Count de Graffe, which ended in the Count’s keeping poffeffion of the bay, by which Lord Cornwallis and his whole army wTere made prifoners of war at V ork- town, being invefted both by fea and land by very fu- perior numbers. CHEATS, are deceitful praaices in defrauding, or endeavouring to defraud, another of his known right, by means of fome artful device, contrary to the plain rules of common honefty : as by playing with falls dice, or by caufing an illiterate perfon to execute a deed to his prejudice, by reading it over to him in wmrds different from thofe in which it wjas written, gcc. If any perfon deceitfully get into his hands or poffeffion any money or other things of any other per- fon’s, by colour of any falfe token, See. being convia- ed, he ftiall have fuch puniftiment by imprifonment, fetting upon the pillory, or by any corporeal pain ex¬ cept pains of death, as (hall be adjudged by the per¬ fons before whom he (hall be convifted.——As there are frauds which may be relieved civilly, and not punifhed criminally j fo there are other frauds which in a fpe- cial cafe may not be helped civilly, and yet fhall be pu¬ nifhed criminally. Thus, if a minor goes about the towm, and, pretending to be of age, defrauds many perfons by taking credit for a confiderable quantity of goods, and then infilling on his nonage, the perfons in¬ jured cannot recover the value of their goods, but they may indnfl and punifh him for a common cheai. Per¬ fons conviaed of obtaining money or goods .by falfe pretences, or of fending threatening letters m older to extort money or goods, may be punifned with fine or imprifonment, or by pillory, w'hipping, or tranfpoi- tation. CHEBRECHIN, a town of Poland, in the province* of Ruffia and palatinate of Bellkow. It is feated on the declivity of a hill, and the river Wierpi waters its walls, and afterwards falls into the river Bog. The Jew’s there are very rich. E. Long. 23. 51, N. Lat. 50. 35. CHECAYA, in Turkiffi affairs, the fecond officer of the janizaries, who commands them under the 3g3> and is otherwdfe called protogero. There is alfo a checaya of the treafury, ftables, kit¬ chen, &c. the word fignifying as much as lieutenant, or the fecond in any office. CHECK, or Check-RoII, a roll or book, wherein are contained the names of fuch perfons as are attend¬ ants and in the pay of the king, or other great perfon- ages, as their houfehold fervants. Clerk of the Check in the king's houfehold, has the check and controlment of the yeomen of the guard, and all the uffiers belonging to the royal family,, al¬ lowing their abfence or defefts in attendance, or dimi- niftiincr CHE [41 nlfiling their wages for the fame, &c. He alfo, by himfelf or deputy, takes the view of thofe who are to watch in the court, and has the fetting of the watch, Clerk of the Check in the royal dock yards, an oni¬ cer who keeps a mufter or regifter of all the men em¬ ployed aboard his majefty’s fhips and veffels, and alfo of all the artificers and others in the fervice of the na¬ vy at the port where he is fettled. Check, in falconry, a term ufed of a hawk, when the forfakes her proper game, to fly at pies, crows, rooks, or the like, that crofs her in her flight. CHECKY, in Heraldry, is when the ihield, or a bordure, &c. is chequered, or divided into chequers or fquares, in the manner of a chefsboard. This is one of the mofl noble and moft ancient fi¬ gures ufed in armoury j and a certain author faith, that it ought to be given to none but great warriors, in token of their bravery *, for the chefsboard repre- fents a field of battle j and the pawns placed on both fides reprefent the foldiers of the two armies, which move, attack, advance, or retire, according to the will of the gamefters, who are the generals. This figure is always compofed of metal and colour. But feme authors would have it reckoned among the feveral forts of furs. CHEEK, in Anatomy, that part of the face fituat- ed below the eyes on each fide. Cheeks, a general name among mechanics, for al- moft all thofe pieces of their machines and inftruments that are double and perfeftly alike. Thus, the cheeks of a printing prefs are its two principal pieces : they are placed perpendicular, and parallel to each other j ferving to fuftain the three fommers, viz. the head, flielves, and winter, which bear the fpindle, and other parts of the machine. See Printing Prefs. The cheeks of a turner's lathe, are two long pieces of wood, between which are placed the puppets, which are either pointed or otherwife, ferving to lupport the work and the mandrils of the workman. Thefe two pieces are placed parallel to the horizon, feparated from one another by the thicknefs of the tail of the puppets, and joined with tenons to two otner pieces of wood placed perpendicularly, called the legs of the lathe. Cheeks of the glacier's vice, are two pieces of iron joined parallel at top and bottom; in which are tne axles, or fpindles, little wheel, cufhions, &c. whereof the machine is compofed. The cheeks of a mortar, or the brackets, in artillery, are made of ftrong planks of wood, bound with thick plates of iron, and are fixed to the bed by four bolts; they fife on each fide of the mortar, and ferve to keep her at what elevation is given her, by the help of llrong bolts of iron which go through both cheeks, both under and behind the mortar, betwixt which are driven quoins of wood 5 thefe bolts are called the brack¬ et bolts, and the bolts which are put one in each end of the bed, are the traverfe bolts, becaufe with hand. fpikes the mortar is by thefe traverfed to the right or left. ... • r* Cheeks, in Ship-budding, are twm pieces or tim¬ ber, fitted on each fide of the mall at the top, ferv¬ ing to ftrengthen the mails there. The uppermoft bail oj piece of timber in the beak of a fliip is called Vox. V. Part II. 7 ] CHE the cheek. The knees which fallen the beak head to , Caiecfc- : the fhip are called cheeks ; and the fides of any block, or the fides of a Ihip’s carriage of a gun, are alfo called cheeks. CHEESE, a fort of food prepared of curdled milk purged from the ferum or whey, and afterwards dried for ufe. Cheefe differs in quality according as it is made from new or fkimmed milk, from the curd which feparates fpontaneoully upon Handing, or that which is more fpeedily produced by the addition of runnet. Cieam alfo affords a kind of cheefe, but quite fat and butyra- ceous, and which does not keep long. Analyzed che¬ mically, cheefe appears to partake much more of an animal nature than butter. It is infoluble in every li¬ quid except fpirit of nitre, and caullic alkaline ■iey* Shaved thin, and properly treated with hot vvater, it forms a very llrong cement if mixed with quicklime . ^ When prepared with the hot water, it is recommended in the Swedilh Memoirs to be uied by anglers as a bait i it may be made into any form, is not foftened by the cold wTater, and the filhes are fond of it. As a food, phyficians condemn the too free ufe of cheele. When new, it is extremely difficult of digellion : when old, it becomes acrid and hot 5 and, from Dr Perci- val’s experiments, is evidently of a feptic nature. It is a common opinion that old cheefe digefts every thing, yet is left undigelled itlelf j but this is without any folid foundation. Cheefe made from the milk of ftieep digefts fooner than that from the milk of cows, but is lefs nourilhing ; that from the milk of goats digefts fooner than either, but is alio the leail nou- rilhing. In general, it is a kind of food fit only for the laborious, or thofe whofe organs of digeftion are ftrong- r 1 • j- Every country has places noted for this commodity . thus Cheffiire and Gloucefter cheefe are famous in Eng¬ land ; and the Parmefan cheefe is in no lefs repute a- broad, efpecially in France. I his fort of cheefe is entirely made of fvveet cow milk : but at Rochefort 111 Languedoc, they make it of ewes milk ; and in other places it is ufual to add goat or ewes milk in a certain proportion to that of the cow. There is liken lie a kind of medicated cheefe made by intimately mixing the expreffed juice of certain herbs, as fage, baum, mint, &.C. with the curd before it is falhioned into a cheefe. The Laplanders make a fort of cheefe of the milk of their rein deer which is not only of great ler- vice to them as food, but on many other occafions. L is a very common thing in thefe climates to have a limb numbed and frozen with the cold . their ieniv.ciy for this is the heating an iron red hot, and thrufting it through the middle of one of thefe cheefes j they catch wffiat drops out, and with this anoint the limb, which foon recovers. They are fubjeft alfo to coughs and difeafes of the lungs, and thefe they cure by the fame fort of medicine : they boil a large quantity of the cheefe in the frefli deer’s milk, and drink the decoc¬ tion in large draughts warm feveral times a-day. I hey make a lefs ftrong decoftion of the fame kind alfo, wffiic h they ufe as their common drink, for three or four days together, at feveral times of the year. 101 an account of the different procefies for making cheese, fee Cheese, Agriculture Index. CheesE-Reswet. See Galium and Runnet. 3 q CHEGOE, CHE [41 Chegoe CHEGOE, or Nigua, the Indian name of an in- fe£l common in Mexico, and alfo found in other hot countries where it is called pique, is an exceeding fmall animal, not very unlike a flea, and is bred in the duft. It fixes upon the feet, and breaking infenfibly the cu¬ ticle, it neflles betwixt that and the true Ikin, which alfo, unlefs it is immediately taken out, it breaks, and pierces at laft to the flelh, multiplying with a rapidity almofl: incredible. It is feldom difeovered until it pierces the true fldn, when it caufes an intolerable itching. Thefe infefls, with their aftonifliing multi¬ plication, -would foon depopulate thofe countries, were it lefs eafy to avoid them, or were the inhabitants lefs dexterous in getting them out before they begin to fpread. On the other hand, nature, in order to leflen the evil, has not only denied them wings, but even that conformation of the legs and thofe ftrong mufcles which are given to the flea for leaping. The poor, however, who are in fome meafure doomed to live in the duft, and to an habitual negledl of their perfons, fuffer thefe infe£ts fometimes to multiply fo far as to make large holes in their flefli, and even to occafion dangerous wounds. CHEIRANTHUS, stock-gilliflower, or Wall- Jlouoer. See Botany Index. CHEKAO, in Natural Hlftory, the name of an earth found in many parts of the Ealt Indies, and fometimes ufed by the Chinefe in their porcelain ma- nufaftures. It is a hard and ftony earth 5 and the manner of ufing it is this: they firfl: calcine it in an open furnace, and then beat it to a fine powder. This powder they mix with large quantities of water : then llirring the whole together, they let the coarfer part fubfide j and pouring off the relt yet thick as cream, they leave it to fettle, and ufe the matter which is found at the bottom in form of a foft parte, and will retain that humidity a long time. This fupplies the place of the earth called hoaebe, in the making of that elegant fort of china-ware which is all white, and has flowers which feem formed by a mere vapour within its furface. The manner of their ufing it is this: they firtt make the veffel of the common matter of the ma- nufaflure \ when this Is almoft dry, they paint upon it the flowers, or whatever other figures they pleafe, with a pencil dipt in this preparation of the chekao ; when this is thoroughly dry, they cover the whole veffel with the varnifh in the common way, and bake it as ulual. The confequence is, that the whole is white : but the body of the veffel, the figures, and the varnifh, being three different fubftances, each has its own par¬ ticular white } and the flowers being painted in the fineft white of all, are diftindlly feen through the var¬ nifh upon the veffel, and feem as if traced by a vapour only. The hoache does this as well as the chekao j and has befides this the quality of ferving for making the porcelain ware either alone, or in the place of ka¬ olin : the chekao has not this property, nor any other fubftance befides this hoache, which appears to be the fame with our fteatites or foap-rock. CHE.KE, Sir John, a celebrated ftatefman, gram¬ marian, and divine, of an ancient family in the ifle of Wight, was born at Cambridge in the year 1514, and educated at St John’s college in that univerfity j where, after taking his degrees in arts, he was firft chofen Greek lecturer, and in 1540 profefl.br -of that lan- I 8 ] CHE guage, with a ftipend of 40I. a-year. In this ftation Cheke, he was principally inftrumental in reforming the pro- Chc-kyang. nunciation of the Greek language, which, having been much negledled, was imperfectly underftood. About the year 1543 he was incorporated mafter of arts at Oxford, where, we are told, he had rtudied for fome time. In the following year he was fent to the court of King Henry VIII. and appointed tutor for the La¬ tin language, jointly wdth Sir Anthony Cooke, to Prince Edward, about which time he was made canon of the college newly founded in Oxford : wherefore he muft have now been in orders. On the acceflion of his royal pupil to the crown, Mr Cheke was firft re¬ warded with a penfion of 100 merks, and afterwards obtained feveral confiderable grants from the crown. In 1550 he was made chief gentleman of the privy- chamber, and was knighted the following year; in 1552, chamberlain of the exchequer for life ; in 1553, clerk of the council j and foon after fecretary of ftate and privy-councillor. But thefe honours were of ftiort duration, tlaving concurred in the meafures of the duke of Northumberland for fettling the crown on the unfortunate Jane Grey, and a&ed as her fecretary during the nine days of her reign, on the acceflion of Queen Mary, Sir John Cheke was fent to the tower, and ftript of the greatert part of his poffeffions. In. September 1554 he obtained his liberty, and a licenfe from her majefty to travel abroad. Pie went firft to Bafil, thence to Italy, and afterwards returned to Strafburg, where he was reduced to the neceflity of reading Greek leftures for lubfiftence. In 15^6 he fet out in an evil hour to meet his wife at Bruffels : but, before he reached that city, he was feized by or¬ der of King Philip II. hoodwinked, and thrown into a waggon ; and thus ignominioufly conduced to a fliip, which brought him to the tower of London. He foon found that religion was the caufe of his im- prifonment; for he was immediately vifited by two Romifli priefts, who pioufly endeavoured to convert him, but without fuccefs. However, he was at laft vifited by Fleckenham j who told him from the queen, that he muft either comply or burn. This powerful argument had the defired effetff ; and Sir John Cheke accordingly complied in form, and his lands, upon cer¬ tain conditions, were reftored ; but his remorfe foon put an end to his life. He died in September 1557, at the houfe of his friend Mr Peter Ofborne in Wood- ftreet, London, and was buried in St Alban’s church. He left three fons, the eldeft of whom, Henry, was knighted by Queen Elizabeth. He wrote 1. A Latin tranflation of two of St Chryfoftom’s homilies. Lond. 1543, qto. 2. The PJurt ot Sedition. Lond. 1549, 1576, 1641. 3. Latin Tranflation of the Englifli Com- rimnion Service. Printed among Bucer’s opufcula. 4. Depronuneiatione Greeca. Bafil, 1555, 8vo. 5. Se¬ veral letters publifhed in his life by Strype ; and a great number of other books. CHE-KYANG, or Tche-kianG, a maritime pro¬ vince of China, and one of the moil; confiderable in the empire •, is bounded on the fouth by Fo-kien ; on the north and weft by Kiang-nan and Kiangfi ; and on the eaft by the fea. The air is pure and healthful, and the foil fertile, being watered by a number of ri¬ vers and canals, as well as Iprings and lakes. The chief produce is filk ) a vaft quantity of which is cul¬ tivated CHE [ 419 ] CHE Che-kyang. tivated here, and for which the whole country is cover- y—cd with mulberry trees. Thefe are purpofely checked in their growth by the natives, experience having taught them, that the leaves of the fmalleft trees pro¬ duce the beft filk. The fluffs made in this province, which are embroidered with gold and filver, are rec¬ koned the beft in the empire j and notwithftanding a vaft exportation to the Japan and Philippine iflands, as well as to every part of China, and to Europe, fuch an abundance is left in the province, that a complete fuit of filk may be bought here as cheap as one of the coarfeft wToollen in France. This province is alfo remarkable for a particular fpe- cies of mufhrooms, which is exported to every part of the empire. They are pickled, and then dried ; W'hen they will keep good for a whole year. When ufed they muft be foaked in water, which renders them as frelh as at firft. Here alfo the tallow tree is met with ; and the province affords excellent hams, and thofe fmall gold fifties with which the ponds are ufually flocked. Che-kyang contains 11 cities of the fitft clafs, 72 of the third, and 18 fortreffes, which, in Europe, would be accounted large cities. The principal of thefe are, I. Hang-tcheou-fou, the metropolis, accounted by the Chinefe to be the paradife of the earth. It is four leagues in circumference, exclufive of the fuburbs; and the number of its inhabitants are computed at more than a million, and 10,000 workmen are fuppofed to be employed within its walls in manufa&uring of filk. Its principal beauty is a fmall lake, clofe to the walls on the weftern fide, the water of which is pure and limpid, and the banks almoft everywhere covered with flowers. Its banks are likewife adorned with halls and open galleries fupported by pillars, and paved with large flag ftones for the convenience of thofe who are fond of walking j and the lake itfelfis interfered with caufeways cafed with cut ftone, openings covered with bridges being left in them for the paffage of boats. In the middle are two iflands with a temple and feveral pleafure houfes, and the emperor has a fmall palace in the neighbourhood. The city is garrifoned by 3000 Chinefe and as many Tartars, and has under its jurif- didlion leven cities of the third clafs. 2. Hou-tcheou- fou is alfo fituated on a lake, and manufa£l:ures an in¬ credible quantity of filk, infomuch, that the tribute of a city under its jurifdi£lion amounts to more than qoo,ooo ounces of filver. 3. Ning-po-fou, by Euro¬ peans called Liampo, is an excellent port, opponte to Japan. Eighteen or twenty leagues from it is an ifland called Tcheou-chan, where the Englilh firft land¬ ed on their arrival at China. 4. Ning-po is remarK- able for the filk manufactured there, which is much efteemed in foreign countries, efpecially Japan, W’here it is exchanged for gold, filver, and copper. 5. Chao- hing-fou, fituated in an extenfive and fertile plain, is re¬ markable for a tomb about half a league diftant, which is faid to be that of Yu. The people of this province are faid to be the moft verfed in chicanery of any in China. 6. Tchu-tcheou-fou, remarkable for having in its neighbourhood pines of an extraordinary fize, capable of containing 40 men in their trunks. 1 he inhabitants are ingenious, polite, and courteous to Chelidonias ftrangers, but very fuperftitious. n ^ ■„ CHELIDONIAS, according to Pliny, an anniver-. te‘”‘ ' » fary wind, blowing at the appearance of the fwallows j otherwife the Favonius, or Zephyrus. CHELIDONIUM, celandine, and horned or prickly poppy. See Botany Index. CHELIDONIUS lapis, in NaturalHi/lory, a ftone faid by the ancients to be found in the ftomachs of young fwallovvs, and greatly efteemed for its virtues in the falling ficknefs. CHELM, a town of Poland, capital of a palatinate of the fame name. It is fituated in the province of Red Ruflia. E. Long. 23. 30. N. Lat. 51. 25. CHELMSFORD, the county town of Effex, fi¬ tuated on the river Chelmer, in E. Long. o. 30. N. Lat. 51.40. It fends two members to parlia¬ ment. CHELONE. See Botany Index. CHELSEA, a fine village fituated on the northern bank of the river Thames, a mile weft ward of Weft- minfter, remarkable for a magnificent hofpital of in¬ valids and old decrepid foldiers; and a pleafure houfe, called Ranelagh, to which a great deal of fine com¬ pany refort in fummer j and a noble botanic garden belonging to the company of apothecaries. The roy¬ al hofpital of invalids was begun by Charles II. car¬ ried on by James II. and finilhed by King William. It confifts of a vaft range of buildings, that form three large fquares, in wdiich there is an uncommon air of neatnefs and elegance obferved. It is under the di- reftion of commiflioners, who confift generally of the officers of ftate and of war. There is a governor with 500I. falary, a lieutenant-governor with 400I. and a major with 250I. befides inferior officers, ferjeants, corporals, and drums, vdth above 400 mcn> who all do garrifon duty j and there are above 10,000 out- penfioners who receive an annuity of 7]. 12s. 6d. each ; all which expence is defrayed by a poundage deduced from the army, deficiencies being made good by parliament.—The botanic garden is very extenfive, enriched with a vaft variety of domeftic and exotic plants, the original flock of which was given to the apothecaries of London by Sir Hans Sloane.—At Ra¬ nelagh garden and amphitheatre, the entertainment is a fine band of mufic, with an organ and fome of the beft voices: and the regale is tea and coffee. CHELTENHAM, or Chiltenham, a market town of Gloucefterfhire, feven miles north-eaft of Gloucefter. W. Long. 2. 10. N. Lat. 51. 50. It is chiefly remarkable for its mineral waters, of the fame kind with thofe of Scarborough. See Scarbo¬ rough. CHEMISE, in Fortification, the wall with which a baftion, or any other bulwark of earth, is lined for its greater fupport and ftrength : or it is the folidity of the wall from the talus to the ftone row. Fire Chemise, a piece of linen cloth, fteeped in a compofition of oil of petrol, camphor, and other com- buftible matters, ufed at fea to fet fire to an enemy’s veffel. 3G2 CHEMISTRY. [ 420 ] C H E M I INTRODUCTION. i /CHEMISTRY is defined by Dr Black, to be “ the Definition. ftudy of the effects produced by heat and by mixture, in all bodies, or mixtures of bodies, natural or artificial, with a view to the improvement of the arts, and the knowledge of nature or, according to the definition propofed by the learned editor of his lec¬ tures, “ chemilfry is the ftudy of the effedts of heat and mixture, with the view of difcovering their gene¬ ral and fubordinate laws, and of improving the ufeful arts.” Fourcroy has defined “ chemiftry to be that fcience which teaches the knowledge of the intimate and reci¬ procal a&ion of all the bodies in nature on one ano¬ ther.” To this definition it has been objected, that it requires much explanation, that the terms reciprocal and intimate adtion not being readily underftood, would need new definitions to explain them, and that it em¬ braces more than what ftridlly belongs to the fcience of chemiftry. When motion is communicated, or ta¬ ken away by the collifion of different bodies, the ac¬ tion between thefe bodies is intimate and reciprocal $ but the ftudy of this adtion belongs to mechanics, and not to chemical fcience. Perhaps no definition of chemiftry has yet been gi¬ ven which is of fufhcient logical precifion to be entire¬ ly free from objedlion. The objedf of chemiftry, however, admits of no ambiguity. It is the province of natural hiftory to arrange and diftribute natural bo¬ dies into claffes and orders, each being accurately cha- radterized, fo that the objedfs which it includes may be readily recognized and diftinguifhed by eafy marks of reference. Mechanical fcience is employed about the external properties of bodies, and their effedls on each other, the force and meafure of which is fubjedt to calculation •, but it is the objedt of chemiftry to dif- cover the component parts of bodies, to examine the properties and ufes of the combinations formed, either naturally or artificially, from thefe fimple fubftances, and to obferve and trace the laws by which thefe com¬ binations take place. Sect. I. Divifion of Natural Knowledge. Variety of When we confider the immenfe and endlefs variety objedls im- 0f 0bjefts which prefent themfelves to the eye, it muft menic' appear, at firft fight, impoflible to acquire even a ge¬ neral knowledge of their qualities and properties. And, indeed, the longeft life, with the moft vigorous mind and the moft indefatigable induftry, would be greatly in¬ adequate to the talk of examining every individual ob- - jedl. Hence it is, by a law of the human mind, that we arrange the objedts of our inveftigations into certain claffes, the individuals of which are found to poffefs certain general properties. Thefe are again fubdivid- ed into other claffes with additional diferiminative marks ; and thefe laft are ftill farther fubdivided, till v/e arrive at the individual ^ and, if the arrangement S T R Y. be corredl, this muft poffefs all the charadleriftic marks of reference to the general and fubordinate divifions of that clafs of objedts to which it belongs. In this w>ay the mind is aided in its inveftigations, and the commu¬ nication of knowledge is facilitated and improved. ^ Thus it is the province of natural hiftory to arrange Natural the objedls which come under our obiervation, and to deferibe them with fuch precifion and accuracy as they may be eafily diftinguilhed from each other. It may be confidered as a deferiptive view of the material world in a ftate of reft or inadtion, without taking in¬ to account the motions or mutual adiion of bodies on each other. It is the firft fuccefsful ftep in the pro- grefs of knowledge. 4 But the operations of nature are feldom at reft. Natural Change lucceeds change, new combinations are form-1 1 oiopuj- ed and new produdlions make their appearance. T he primary planets revolve round the fun as their centre j the lecondary planets, or the moons, attradled by the primary, perlorm fimilar revolutions; the air of the atmofphere preffes on the lurface of the earth with a certain force ; a ftone, w-hen unfupported, falls to the earth in a courfe diredted towards its centre j water deprived of a certain portion of heat becomes folid, and appears in the form ol ice } when combined with a greater portion of heat than w hat is neceffary to retain it in the fluid ftate, it affumes the form of vapour, af- cends into the atmofphere, is there by certain procel- fes, robbed of its heat, and re-appears in the form of rain ; or, when a greater portion is abftradled, takes that of fnow or hail, and falls to the earth. A feed is put into the ground ; and it heat, air, and moifture be applied, it germinates and fprings up } and, with the addition of light, if the operation of the lame agents be continued, it becomes a new plant, puts forth leaves and flow:ers, and produces feeds fimilar to that from which it fprung. 5 Now to determine what are thefe changes, to ob- Phyfics. ferve the law^s by which fuch changes are effe&ed, and to afeertain the meafure and quantity of the effect pro¬ duced, belong to that department of knowledge which is included under the general term natural philofophy or phyfics. But of thefe changes or motions, fome are obvious and palpable, others entirely elude our fenfes. We fee a ftone defeend to the earth ; and experience informs us, that it falls with a force in a certain pro¬ portion to its weight and the height from which it fell. The peculiar change or motion which takes place when water affumes the folid form, when a fluid undergoes the procefs of fermentation, or when a combuftible bo¬ dy is burned, is altogether imperceptible. Theie mo¬ tions are too minute to be recognized. The effedl is produced before w^e can difeover the change. ^ Thus natural philofophy divides itfelf into two great Cliemiftry, branches. The obje£ls of the JlrJl are the fenfible changes or motions wdrich are obierved in the material, world 5 and the confideration of thefe objefts is, pro¬ perly fpeaking, natural philofophy or phyfics. The fecond great branch which is employed in difcovering the C H E M I Introduc- tlie laws, and apnrerht’ng tVie effefts, of the infenfible bon. motions of bodio», conllitutes the fcience of chemi- ^ v ftry (a). Sect. II. Of the ObjeSis and Importance of Chemi/Iry. The importance and extenfive utility of this fcience muft appear obvious to thofe who have at all confider- ed the fubjeft. But for the fake of thofe who are yet unacquainted with it, we (hall take a general view of 7 the obje&s which it embraces, and the advantages to Ufefulin be derived from the ftudy of chemiftry, whether in ex- natural'11^ plaining many of the flriking operations of nature, or phenome- in improving the arts of life. naj The moft wonderful effedls, after frequent repeti¬ tion, become familiar, and ceafe to produce any emo¬ tion in the mind. It is on this account that many of the moft ftriking appearances of nature pafs unheeded as trifling occurrences, and are unnoticed by common obfervers. Had we been always accuftomed to the ri¬ gour of winter, and never knorvn the genial warmth of fpring, or experienced the ripening ftrmmer’s heat, the aftonilhing changes effefted by the return of thefe. feafons could not fail to fill us with admiration. Thefe changes are of fuch univerfal influence, that they are limited to no department of nature. Their beneficial effefts are felt in the inanimate, as well as in the animated creation. The fame power which is feen in the gay profufion of the vegetable tribes, rettores to a new exiftence myriads of animals, whofe vital funftions had been fufpended. The air, the earth, the waters, fwarm with life. The principal agent in the produiftion of thefe chan¬ ges is heat; an agent, the moft powerful and irrefifti- ble in its operations, unlimited in its effefts, and ex¬ tenfive in its importance and utility. This agent, therefore, afting fo powerfully in chemical operations, becomes an effential objeft of chemical fcience. Clofe- ly connefted with heat is light, which is alfo a power¬ ful agent in many of the proceffes of nature. This, too, is neceffarily a fubjeft of chemical inveftigation, not lefs curious and interefting. Such, indeed, is the univerfal importance of light and heat in all the pro- celfes of nature, that no change takes place, no new combination is formed, or new produft makes its ap¬ pearance, in which the one or the other, or both, are not evolved or abforbed. In the knowledge of the conftitution of the atmo- fphere, in inveftigating the changes to which it is fub- jeft, the variations of temperature, winds, dew, rain, hail and fnow, chemiftry is our principal, our only fa- tisfadlory guide. Thefe remarkable changes are to be confidered as immenfe chemical operations, and can only be explained by chemical laws. To man in ®ut ^ ^ infinite variety of objefts the ftudy of from which man muft derive the means of his comlort, his happinefs and his luxuries, the means, it might be added, of his very exiftence, chemiftry affords him the moft important aid. Whether his refearches- be car¬ ried into the mineral, the vegetable, or the animal S T R Y. 421 kingdoms, the ftudy and cultivation of chemical fci- Introduc- ence become effentially requifite for the fuccefsful pro- tlon‘ , grefs of his inveftigations. ^ Of the importance of chemiftry to the mineralogift, Minerals, the limited and unfettled ftate of this fcience previous to the improvements of modern chemiftry, is a convin¬ cing proof. In miner ftogy, the knowledge of che¬ miftry is not only neceffary in detedling and difcrimi- nating the various fubftances of which the globe which we inhabit is compofed, in feparating and purifying thefe fubftances, but alfo in preparing and accommo¬ dating them to the numerous purpofes of life. IO Of the knowledge which we poffefs of the vegeta- Vegetables ble kingdom, chemiftry furnifhes a very large (hare. It is from this fcience that we derive the means of tracing the progrefs of vegetation, of illuftrating the peculiar funftions of plants, and difcovering the com¬ pounds which are formed from a few fimple principles, the nature and properties of thefe compounds, and their relative proportions, which exhibit an immenfe variety of new produftions, many of them of the utmoft im¬ portance to man, on account of their nutritious quali¬ ties, or indiredlly ufeful to him by affording nourifh- ment to thofe animals which he employs as food. Hence the advantage of applying chemical knowledge to agriculture, in determining the nature of the foil fit for the reception of plants, their proper food, and the mode of fupplying it in the preparation of manures. With thefe objedfs in view, chemirtry holds out incal¬ culable advantages in the improvement of many de¬ partments of agriculture and rural economy, many of which, from the rapid and fuccefsful progrefs of the fcience, there is room to hope, may be foon ob¬ tained. Ir Nor is the application of chemical fcience to the Animals, economy of animals lefs limited in its importance and utility. It not only contributes to the means of de- compofing animal matters, and of exhibiting and ex¬ amining leparately the conftituent parts of animal fub¬ ftances ; but alfo ferves to explain in fome meafure many of the effential fundlions of the living animal body : fuch are digeftion, refpiration, fecretion, which, fo far as matter is concerned, and the changes which it undergoes, are to be confidered as true chemical proceffes, and can only be inveftigated by chemical principles. But it is here neceffary to obferve, that the fun&ions of the living vegetable or animal, cannot be wholly accounted for from the nature of chemical aflion, without taking into confideration the exiftence of the vital principle, which counterafts and regulates the operation of chemical agents, aids and promotes the beneficial effefts of thofe that are ufeful to its health and growth, and refills and dettroys thofe that are hurtful. T7t The utility of chemiftry in medicine is too obvious Medicine, to require much illuftration. Such, indeed, is its im¬ portance that it is now univerfally received and ac¬ knowledged as one of the effential branches of medical education. So far as the principles of chemiftry can be applied in inveftigating the nature of the fundlions of (a) For this view of the divifion of natural knowledge, we are indebted to the Introduflory Lcflures of Pro-- feffor Robifon of Edinburgh. 422 C H E M I 13 The arts. Introduc- of the animal body in a ftate of health, or can be em- tl0n- ployed in accounting for the irregular a£Hon of thefe powers, whether exceflive or deficient, which indicates a deranged ftate of the funftions, and conftitutes dif- eafe, its relation to medicine muft be confidered clofe and intimate. But the medical art comprehends more than a bare knowledge of the ftruflure and functions of the animal body. It alfo includes an accurate knowledge of the fubftances employed as remedies, of their nature and properties as fimple fubltances, and their new qualities and effe&s under new combina¬ tions. This knowledge can only be acquired by the lludy of chemiftry, which is indebted to medicine for fome part of its progrefs as an art, in the difcoveries which w'ere accidentally made by the rude and un¬ certain experiments of medical pradlitioners in the early ages, to afcertain the fenfible qualities and falu- tary effedls of the remedies which they employed. Chemiftry, by its rapid progrefs in modern times, has amply repaid thefe advantages, and in the hands of the intelligent and accurate obferver, has greatly con¬ tributed to give more rational and fimple views of me¬ dical fcience. In confidering the application of chemifiry to the improvement of the arts of civilized life, a wide field of contemplation opens to our view. So extenfive indeed are its influence and importance, that in moil of the arts, many of the proceffes, in fome ail that are employed, depend on chemical principles. Barely to mention fome of thefe arts will afford am¬ ple illuftration of its extenfive utility. In the art of ex- trafting metals from their ores, in purifying and com¬ bining them with each other, and in forming inflru- ments and utenfils, whether for ufeful or ornamental purpofes, almoft all the proceffes are purely chemical. The effential improvements which modern chemiftry has introduced in the manufa£ture of glafs and porce¬ lain fhew its importance and utility in thefe arts. Nor has it contributed lefs by the application of its princi¬ ples to the arts of tanning, foapmaking, dyeing, and bleaching. All the procefteS in baking, brewing, and diftilling, moft of the culinary arts, and many others in domeftic economy, are chemical operations. In fhort, wherever, in any of the proceffes of nature or of art, the addition or the abftraftion of heat takes place j wherever fubftances in combination are to be decom- pofed or feparated j wdierever the union of fimple fub- ftances is wanted, and new compounds are formed, there effefts are produced which can only be explain¬ ed and underftood by chemical principles. From this view of the extenfive application of che¬ mical fcience in explaining many of the operations of nature, and in elucidating many of the proceffes of the arts of life, thofe who have not confidered the objefts which it embraces will be enabled to judge of the im¬ portance of this ftudy. But however much we may be interefted in obferv- ing and admiring the changes and effedls produced by -chemical aftion, if we extend our views, and confider S T R Y. chemiftry as a fcience, as the fubjeft of philofophical Introdue- inveftigation, it will command a greater (hare of our ^ , attention and ftudy. And perhaps thcie is no ftudy better calculated to promote and encourage that ge-As a fci- nerous and ardent love of truth which confers dignity ence. and fuperiority on thofe who fuccefsfully purfue it. Chemiftry is not one of thofe barren difcuflions which terminate in the difcovery of fome fpeculative truth, which is merely gratifying to curiofity. In this view, indeed, no fcience holds out more interefting fubje&s of refearch, in the fingular and furprifing changes which everywhere prefent themielves. And it is furely no fmall recommendation to the ftudy of chemiftry, that while we ftore the mind with intereft¬ ing truths, we add fomething to the flock of human knowledge, which is perhaps immediately applicable to fome of the moft important purpofes of life. . 1 hus might the value of the fa&s and difcoveries in any fcience be fairly eftimated, in proportion as they en¬ large our refources by their ufeful application, and win¬ tered and gratify the mind as fubjedls of curious fpe- culation. From both thefe confiderations the whole range of chemical fa£ts derives the higheft value ; and from thefe confiderations chemiftry is entitled to a di- ftinguiflied place among the fciences. _ I5 Chemiftry has yet a higher claim to our attention in con- and confideration, as it affords us fome of the moft templating ftriking proofs of the wifdom and beneficence of the works Creator of the univerfe. A machine conftru&ed byu 'u human art is admired according to the fimplicity of its contrivance, and the extent of its uiefulnefs j and in proportion to the perfection which we dilcover, we^ eftimate the ingenuity and excellence of the plan of the artift. But the works of man, with all his boafted {kill and attainments, fink into nothing when brought into comparifon with the works of nature. In our examination of the former, every ftep of our progrefs is obfcured with defeCls : in contemplating the latter, we behold perfeClion rife on perfection, and new won¬ ders meet our view. By the aid which wje derive from chemiftry we are enabled to take 3 minuter furvey of the great fyftem of the univerfe. And fo far as our limited powers can comprehend it, the whole is nicely balanced and adjufted, and all its changes tend to the moft beneficial purpofes. What on a fuperficial view were feeming imperfeCtions and defeCts, a clofer infpec- tion points out to be real excellencies. In all the changes which are conftantly going forward, the more clofely we obferve and examine them, the more we {hall admire the fimple means by which they are ac- compliftied, and the intelligent defign and perfeCt wifdom which are difplayed in the beneficial ends to which they are direCted. Sect. III. Hijlory of Chemijlry. The word chemiftry, which is fuppofed to have been of Egyptian origin, feems to have been firft ufed in a very extenfive fenfe (b). It appears to have in¬ cluded (b) According to fome it is derived from the word kcma, which was fuppofed to be a book of feciets given to the women by the demons. Others derive it from Cham the fon of Noah, from whom Egypt took the name of Chemie. or Chamie. Sometimes the origin of the word is afcribed to Chemmis, a king of the Egyptians j and an art C H E M eluded all the knowledge which the ancients poffeffed of natural objefts. It was afterwards more limited in its fignification, and folely confined to the art of working metals. The great importance which the antients attached to this art was probably the caufe of this limitation. Such indeed was its importance, that thofe who were fuppofed to have difeovered or im¬ proved it, were regarded by mankind as their greateft benefaftors. They were raifed above the level of the human race, were deemed worthy of being enrolled among the gods; and temples and ftatues were confe- crated to their honour. It is not neceffary minutely to trace the hiftory of chemillry to the remote periods of antiquity, or labour to prove its origin to be coeval with the early ages of the world. Man indeed could not exill: long without fome knowledge of chemical procefles ; and as he im¬ proved in civilization and accurate obfervation, this knowledge muft have been improved and extended. Tubal-Cain, who is mentioned in the facred Scriptures, as a worker in metals, and is fuppofed to have given rife to the fabulous itory of Vulcan, in antient mytho- j5 logy and poetry, is confidered by fome as the firfl Chemi'try chemift whofe name has been tranfmitted to the pre- exiftal as fent time. But although the working of metals, and other chemical arts, were known in the early ages of the wmrld •, and among the Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans, many of the arts dependent on chemillry had reached fome degree of perfeftion ; yet this knowledge mull be regarded as confifting only of a number of fcattered, unconne£led fadls, which deferve not to be dignified with the name of fcience. A carpenter may ereft a piece of machinery, arranged and conltrudled exaftly limilar to what he has feen, without the know¬ ledge of a fingle principle of its conftru6tion ; but the man of fcience, wTho can neither handle the axe nor the chiflel, obferves and eftimates the power and operation of all its parts, and determines the general effeft of the whole machine. Nor will it afford us much inftruflion to purfue the fuppofed hillory of chemiltry, even to a later period. Mofes, who is faid to have been Ikilled in all the wifdom of the Egyptians, has been ranked among the number of the firft chemifts 5 and as a proof of his knowledge of chemiftry, the means he employed of dilfolving the golden calf made by the Ifraelites, to render it potable, are adduced. It is faid, that Demo¬ critus, of all the Greeks wTho travelled into Egypt to acquire knowledge, was alone admitted into their my- among the lleries. According to Diodorus Siculus, the art of Egypna s, chemillry had made very confiderable progrefs among the Egyptians. The knowledge of their priells is fuppofed to have confifled chiefly of chemical proceffes. They xvere acquainted, it is faid, with the preparation of many medicines, perfumes, plaflers, and foaps $ they ufed burnt alhes as cauftic fubllances j they fabricated bricks, glafs, porcelain j they painted on glafs, and pradlifed the art of gilding with filver and gold. They extradled natron or foda from the mud of the Nile. *7 I S T R Y. 423 They prepared alum, fea-falt, and fal ammoniac ; and Introduc- befides working in gold and copper, they poffdfed tIon- many other proceffes in metallurgy. The extradlion of oils, and the preparation of wine and vinegar, were W'ell known ; and they were alfo acquainted with the art of dying filk by means of mordants. xS Fewer traces of chemillry are found among theGreeks> Greeks, although they derived the knowledge of many of their arts from Egypt. The ancient philofophers of Greece, as Pythagoras, Thales, and Plato, were more devoted to the cultivation of mathematical and aftro- nomical knowledge, than the phyfical fcicnces. Some chemical arts, however, were not unknown to this people. The alloy of metals formed at Corinth, has been much celebrated. Cinnabar was employed in fome parts of Greece. Tychius knew’ the art of tan¬ ning leather j Plato has deferibed the procefs of filtra¬ tion •, Hippocrates was acquainted with that of calci¬ nation ; Galen fpeaks of dillillation per defeenfum, and the word etnbic is mentioned by Diofcorides a long time before the Arabic particle al was prefixed to it. According to Athenaeus, there wTas a manufactory of glafs eftablilhed at Lefbos. Democritus of Abdera pre¬ pared and examined the juices of plants : Ariltotle and Theophraltus treated of Hones and of metals. it) The Phoenicians are fpoken of as being acquainted cen^c with the making of glafs, and the celebrated Tyriananfs purple was found among this people. They were alfo fkilled in the working of metals and other mineral fub- ftances. The Perfians are faid firft to have diftinguifti- ed the metals by the names of the planets, which they retained for many centuries. 20 Among the Chinefe, if we may believe their hifto-Chinefe*. rians, many chemical arts wTere known from the earlieft ages : they were acquainted with nitre, borax, alum, gunpowder, verdigris, mercurial ointments, fulphur, and colouring matters 5 nor w'ere the arts of dying linen and filk, paper-making, manufacturing of pottery and porcelain, unknown. They were fkilled in the art of alloying metals, and in the working of ivory and of horn. From the early knowledge which the Chinefe poffeffed of thefe arts, they have been fuppofed by fome to have been a colony from Egypt. 2I The w'ars in which the Romans were almoft con-Romans, ftantly engaged, and the fpirit which prompted them to military affairs, gave them neither time nor talle to cultivate and improve the arts of peace. Chemiftry, therefore, appears to have been little known among that people. Petronius indeed fpeaks of malleable glafs, w^hich was prefented to Caefar j and the fame, or a fimilar faCl, is mentioned by Pliny with regard to Tiberius. But this art, it appears, was long known before the time of the Romans. To us it may appear fomewhat lingular, that che¬ miftry, now of fuch univerfal importance to mankind, fhould be indebted, in fome meafure, for its origin as an art, and for fome part of its progrefs, to one of the lefs noble or generous of the human pafiions. Yet, in its early dawn, it was cultivated by men who were in- ftigated and fometimes to the Greek word %vy.os, which fignifies liquid, becaufe the art was at firft applied in the pre¬ paration of liquids j and fometimes to the Greek verb “ to pour out,” becaufe chemiftry is the art of fufing metals. 424 C H E M I Introduc- {ligated by avarice to profecute and ftudy it. About tio"* the 10th century, or perhaps earlier, a fet of men v ' arofe, and continued to flouriih till the i6th, who af- 22 fumed by way of diftinftion, the name of alchemijls. The alche- that is, the chemifts, becaufe they confidered themfelves, m^5' on account of the knowledge they pofleffed, more highly favoured than the reft of mankind. It was natural enough for men "who obferved the remark¬ able chianges produced by chemical aftion, to be ftruck with the effefts ; and overlooking the varia¬ tions and differences in the refults of their opera¬ tions, which were the , confequences of partial or inaccurate obfervation, to flatter themfelves that their porver over the fubftances on which they operated, was only limited by their wifhes. Hence, perhaps, originated all the extravagances and follies, fimilar in¬ deed to thofe of fpeculators and proje£lors of every age, with wThich the hiftory and works of the alche- •miftical writers are filled. Many of the alchemifts, it is not improbable, wrere the dupes of their o\vn igno¬ rance and credulity ; but many more, there is little doubt, took advantage of the ignorance and barbarity which prevailed in the dark ages, during which period they chiefly flourifhed, and impofed on the weaknefs and credulity of mankind. It was one of the firft principles among the alche¬ mifts, that all metals are compofed of the fame, in¬ gredients, or, that the fubftances which enter into the compofition of gold, are found in all metals, but mixed with many impurities, from which, by certain proceffes, it might be freed. The great, the conftant objefl of all their labours and refearches was the dif- covery of a fubftance poffeffed of the wonderful pro¬ perty of converting the bafer metals into gold, which, on account of its fcarcity and durability, is more valued and efteemed than the other metals, which are 23 more abundant, and generally more ufeful. This ce- Philofo- lebrated fubftance was denominated the philojopher'1 s pliers ftone.ftone, and thofe who were fo Angularly fortunate as to accompliftr this great difcovery, or thofe to whom it was imparted by others, wrere regarded, as might na¬ turally be expetted, as the peculiar favourites of heaven. When they w7ere in poffeflion of this grand fecret, they were ranked among the higheft order of alchemifts, and then affumed the name of adepts ; and thus initiated, they profeffed themfelves mafters of the enviable fecret of tranfmuting or changing metals of inferior value, into gold. But the adepts never feem to have thought of en¬ riching themfelves by their great difcoveries. 1 hey were too generous to monopolize the W’ealth of the world. They accordingly offered their fervices to others, and liberally propofed to communicate the fruit of their labours for a moderate reward. The ambitious man to procure riches, that he might in- creafe his power, and the opulent man to add to his wealth, eagerly fought after, employed, and encouraged them in the profecution of their extravagant fchemes. They were therefore kept in the pay of princes, to fill and repair their exhaufted treafures, and of great men who afpired after boundlefs wealth. Thefe flat¬ tering hopes, it may well be fuppofed, were never re¬ alized. The rich profpeft fled before them, and the golden prize which they often fuppofed was juft within i-heir reach, eluded their eager grafp. The magni- S T R Y. tude of the plan, however, fired the Imagination, Introduc. and produced fomething like conviction in the mind, of the poflibility, and even certainty, of obtaining the objeCl of all their wifties and all their labours. W ith unabating ardour, with unexampled aftiduity, they pur- fued their refearches, perfuading themfelves and their employers, that they were on the point of being loon in poffeflion of unlimited wealth. < , But the alchemifts beholding man by anticipation poffeffed of immenfe riches, faw that fomething more was requifite, that he might be fecured in the unin¬ terrupted enjoyment of them. Experience fatally taught them, that the feeble frame of man was liable to the pains and languor of difeafe} that gold and filter could neither prevent the fit of a fever, nor give to the poffeffor the bleffings of conftant health. Thus ano¬ ther moft defirable objeft was held up to view, and iner mon ucmauit — -r „ - . 24 deluded their diftempered minds into the ialle hope or Univerfal attaining it. This was the famous panacea, or urn- medicine, verfal medicine, which was to cure all difeafes j and ^ not only to cure, but abfolutely to prevent their oc¬ currence. Thus fortunate in the enjoyment of vaft riches } thus blefled with unbroken health, the defires of man were yet unfatisfied. Another feeming evil ftill remained, which was naturally to be dreaded as the deftroyer of this fancied feene of apparently per- feft felicity. The melancholy refleftion, that it was limited by the fhort fpan of human life, roufed the al¬ chemifts again into exertion, and produced new efforts of ingenuity in their labours, to fecure. to man. ex¬ emption from the common lot of mortality. In ima¬ gination they had difeovered the means of prolonging life at pleafure to an indefinite length,, of .refcuing man from the 'grave, and of making him immortal upon earth. . f f Such were the extraordinary views and puriuits ot the alchemifts. The exaft period of the origin of this ftudy is unknown*, nor can it now be afcer.tained progrefs it had made, or indeed whether it was at all cultivated among the antients. Julius Firmicus Ma- ternus is the firft hiftorian who mentions this ftudy as well known in his day, and the period when he flou- riftred was about the beginning of the ’4th century. A fubfequent author, ALneas Blafius, who.lived in the following century, alfo makes mention of it: and bw- das defines the term by informing us, that it is the art of making gold and filver. Dioclefian, he fays, pro¬ hibited all chemical operations, during his perfecution of the Chriftians, that his fubjefts might not be infti- gated to afts of rebellion againft him by the formation of gold. In fome places where gold is waftied down in minute particles, by brooks and rivulets from the mountains, it is cuftomary to fufpend the {kins ot ani¬ mals in the water, by which means the particles con¬ taining the gold are detained*, a circumftance from which°the fabulous ftory of the golden fleece probably derived its origin. Suidas, however, who. flounihed in the 10th century, is not entitled to any high of credit, efpecially as the antient authors are wholly filent as to the fubjeft of alchemy. . It is from the phyficians of Arabia that we ob¬ tain the moft fatisfaflory evidence concerning al¬ chemy. Avicenna, who lived in the 10th century, is faid to have written on this fubjeft, according to one of his own difciples, who likewife takes notice of C H E M I Zi.troduc- of rofe-water and fome other chemical preparations j tlor1, and in the I 2th century we find the cultivating an ac- ’ ' quaintancewith the cbemifts recommended tojhyficians. Another Arabian writer fays, that the method of pre¬ paring rofe-water, &c. was at that time well under- itood. Thefe proofs of the exiftence of alchemy a- mong the Arabians, and particularly from the particle Al prefixed to it, have induced fome to conclude, that the doflrine of the tranfmutation of metals firft ori¬ ginated with the Arabians, which the crufades were inftrumental in introducing into Europe, as well as the rapid conquefts of the Arabians, in Europe, Afia, and Africa. At that period Europe was in a flate of the utmoft barbarity, owing to the incurfions of the northern nations \ but fome of the fciences, among which alchemy was comprehended, were happily re¬ vived by the Arabians : and about the middle of the 17th century, the extravagance of fuch as were the profeffors of alchemy arrived at its greateft height. It appears that the alchemifts began to be eftablilh- ed in the weft of Europe, as early as the ninth cen¬ tury ; and between the eleventh and fifteenth cen- Principal turies> ftudy was in its moft flourifliing ftate. A- alchetnifts. mong the principal alchemifts who flourifhed during this period, and who were diftinguilhed for their dif- coveries and writings, were Albertus Magnus, Roger Bacon, Arnoldus de Villanova, and Raymond Lully. They all lived in the 13th century. Albertus Magnus was a Dominican monk of Cologne, and was regarded by his cotemporaries, no doubt on account of his ftu- dies, as a magician. He was born in the year t 205, and died in 1 280. He left numerous works, one of the moft curious of wdiich is a treatife entitled De Al- chemia, which exhibits a diftindl view of the ftate of chemiftry at the time he lived. Roger Bacon, ano¬ ther monk, was born in the county of Somerfet in England, in 1214, and died in 1294. He was cele¬ brated for many ingenious inventions and difcoveries in chemiftry and mechanics. Among thefe are men¬ tioned the camera obfcura, the telefcope, and gunpow¬ der. His works difcoyer aftonilhing fagacity and acute- nefs, and confidering the age in which he lived, are compofed with no fmall degree of elegance and con- cifenefs. Some of them, however, bearing the cha- ra£ler of the times, are myftical and obfcure. Ar¬ noldus de Villanova, was a native of Languedoc in France, and was born about the year 1240. He has mentioned the mineral acids, and joined to his chemi¬ cal ftudies, extenfive knowledge in medicine. His writings are diftinguifbed by all the obfcurity of the alchemiftical authors. Raymond Lully, whofe reputa¬ tion raifed him to the rank of adept, was born at Bar¬ celona in 1235. He wrote on ftrong waters and me¬ tals. His laft will and teftament is one of the moft celebrated of his writings, which are not lefs obfcure than thofe of his cotemporaries. About the end of the 14th century, Bafil Valentine, a German Benedi&ine monk, was the firft who for¬ mally applied chemiftry to medicine. He was the original dilcoverer of many of the virtues of antimonial medicines j and in his celebrated treatife on antimony, entitled currus triumphalis antimonn, are found many preparations which have fince been announced to the world as new difcoveries. About the fame time lived Vol. V. Part. II. S T R Y. • 425 Ifaacus Hollandus, whofe works have been greatly Introduc- commended by Boerhaave. t’°n' . In the beginning of the 16th century arofe Paracel- ^ fus, one of the molt extraordinary men who ever lived. Paracelfus He was born in 1493, near Zurich in Switzerland. Of a bold and enterprifing fpirit, he defpifed the com¬ mon rules of conduft by which men are ufually guid¬ ed. By this means he raifed his reputation to a great height ; he became an enthufiaft in chemiftry, and in the application of fubftances prepared by chemical pro- ^ ceffes to the cure of difeafes. He was the firft public the firlt teacher of chemiftry in Europe, having been appointed public to deliver leftures on that fubjeft in the city of Bafil: but his reftlefs fpirit did not permit him to remain long in this fituation. In two years he was involved in a quarrel with the magiftrates, from whom he had re¬ ceived his appointment, and he left the city. Defpi- fing the common principles of medical pratftice, and having performed fome wonderful cures by the free ufe of opium«and of mercury, he thought he had dif- covered the univerfal medicine, and promifed immor¬ tality to himfelf and to his patients. But while he. thus made fuch flattering promifes, his own fate was a fad proof of the futility and abfurdity of his do&rine. For after an almoft uninterrupted courfe of debauchery; having wandered a great part of his life from place to place, he died at an inn in Saltzburg, in the 48th year of his age. A great number of medical praflitioners, in the courfe of the 16th century, adopted and propagated the principles of Paracelfus. Among the moft diftin¬ guilhed of thefe was Van Helmont, a man of confidera- ble genius, who was born in the year 1 Sll' Many of the followers of Paracelfus were greatly devoted to the ftudy sg of chemiftry; and this, with the abfurd and unpvinci-Alchemy pled conduft of their mailer, tended not a little to bring declines, the views and fpeculations of the alchemifts into difre- pute. Chemiftry, now freed from the trammels of al¬ chemy, confided only oi a number of detached, un- connefted fads. To bring thefe facts together in one point of view, and to arrange them into clafles, lo that the knowledge of them might be applied to ufeful pur- pofes, and to thofe objefts to which future refearches might be advantageoully dire&ed, were now wanted. ^ This talk wras accomplilhed by Beecher, who diftin- Chemiftry guilhed himfelf by the extent of his views, in a work adumes the entitled, Phyfica fubterranea, which was publilhed at a Frankfort in the year 1669. This was the firft dawn of chemical fcience, and the publication of Beecher’s work formed an important aera in the hiftory of its pr$grels. _ 30 In taking a retrofpe£live view of the progrefs of Difcoveries chemiftry, previous to the publication of Beecher’s ^ the al- work, we find that a great number of important faifts "hemi1 had been difeovered and colle&ed. To the clafs of acids, the fulphuric, the nitric, and the muriatic were added; the alkalies were better known, and the volatile alkali was obtained from fid ammoniac by Bafil Valen¬ tine, by decompofing it by means of foda or potafs ; the fulphate of potafs prepared in three or four different ways, received as many different names; the nitrate of potafs was called nitre, a name which was formerly ap¬ plied to foda ; Sylvius difeovered the muriate of potafs, which he denominated digeftive fait ; and Glauber, 3 H the 426 C H E M 1 Introduc- tlie fulplidte of foda, to which he gave the name of Uon- wonderful [alt, though better known by the name of ““r^v Glauber’s fait, by which it is {till diftinguifhed. Some of the earthy falts began to be known about this period, and among others the muriate of lime, which received the name of fixed fal ammoniac. The earths themfelves w’ere alfo better knowm } lime water was prepared, and fome of the alkaline fulphu- rets were pointed out and examined. The properties of fome of the metallic falts were fludied and examined ; the nitrate of filver, under the name and form of cryjlals of Diana, and of lapis inf emails ; the muriate of filver, under that of luna cornea. The two muriates of mercury were defcribed, and employed for various purpofes. The red precipi¬ tate, arcanum coralhnum, faccharum faturni or fugar of lead, the butter of antimony, and the pow^der of alga- roth, were either difcovered, or their properties more attentively inveffigated and afcertained. During this period alfo, the diftindfion was made between the brittle and the dudlile metals. Bifmuth, wine, antimony, and even arfenic itfelf, were obtained in a metallic Ifate. A number of oxides, fome metal¬ lic dyes, fulminating gold, turpith mineral, the faline precipitates of mercury, or the mercurial oxides of dif¬ ferent colours j minium and litharge, colcothar, the faffton of Mars, and diaphoretic antimony, were dif¬ covered, and their preparation fufficiently defcribed. During this period, the preparation of oils by diftil- lation commenced, and the diftindlion was made be¬ tween volatile and empyreumatic. Ethers wTere difco¬ vered, and the fpirit of wine was well knowm by the i fame name, alcohol, wThich it at prefent bears. Then- hi- But however extravagant it may feem to us, the hif- ftory ufeful. tory of the alchemifts is inftrudlive, as it affords a ufe- ful leffbn to moderate our expectations in the purfuit of knowledge, and to reftrain them within the bounds which the Almighty has preferibed as the range of our inveftigations ; lor of the knowledge and of the powyer of man, as well as of that of the natural elements, he has probably fixed the limits, and faid : Hitherto lhalt thou come, but no farther. This hiftory is inftruftive alfo, as it prefents a Angular and extraordinary feature in the hiftory of mankind 5 but it is immediately ufe- ful to our prefent purpofe, as it (hews us the commence¬ ment of chemical refearches. It is true, chemiftry in the hands of the alchemifts, like every other depart¬ ment of knowledge during the dark ages, was involved in myftery, and the knowledge of it communicated in a barbarous jargon, to be underftood only by the ini¬ tiated, and fcarcely to be decyphered and comprehend¬ ed at the prefent day, with the afliftance of the exten- five knowledge of chemical fads which we now poffefs. But notwithftanding the extravagance of the objeCls they purfued, the means they employed wTere ufeful to the progrefs of chemiftry. By their inceffant labours, difeovery wras added to difeovery, fa&s were multiplied on fads, but without any regular train of refearch or reafoning being followed. But notwithftanding thefe important difeoveries, it may ^ appear furprifing that they were not more numerous. Their dif- The alchemifts had laboured inceflantly in chemical pur- roveries fuits for near a thoufand years, and with all the zeal and compara- arclour 0f enthufiafts; the labour of whole lives was ex- u ei;. tew. ktnifted, and immenfe fortunes were diftipated in en- S T . R Y. deavouring to obtain the grand objed of all their re- Intioduc- fearches. Confidering the long period during which . , they flourifhed, and the numbers who were employed in thefe purfuits, there is indeed room for w'onder, that they bequeathed to the firft fcientific inquirers fo imall a flock of chemical knowledge. But the fpirit which, prevailed among the alcheraifts was direftly hoftne to the free communication and accumulation of know- ^3 ledge. The prominent feature of the charafter of the The reafon- alchemifts was fecrecy. This indeed was clofely con¬ nected with the nature of the objeft, to attain which, all their purfuits and inquiries were direCted ; and fo ftrongly was this imprefted upon their minds, that they believed, or pretended to believe, that the dreadful wrath of heaven wrould fall on him who ftiould prefume to difclofe to any, but to the initiated, the feciets of tne art. That fpirit, which arofe from motives of avarice and felf-conceit, became at laft one of the leading prin¬ ciples of their conduCf. With fo great, fo important an objeCt in view, as the difeovery of the means of put¬ ting themfelves in pofieflion of unlimited wealth, it is little to be wondered at, if they ftrould carefully con¬ ceal from the world, and even from each other, the fteps in the progrefs which led to the accomplilhment of this end. Thus, all their proceffes were carried on in private, and all their difeoveries wTere kept fecret. In their pretended communication of knowledge with each other, they employed certain figns and figures, and affumed a myfterious mode of writing, that they might be underftood only by adepts, and might be to¬ tally unintelligible to the reft of mankind. Confidering this fpirit, and the charaCler which dif- tinguifhed the alchemifts, it was fcarcely to be expeft- ed that they Ihould reveal to the world, either by fpeech or writing, difeoveries w7hich moft of them pro¬ bably believed were to be of fuch vaft benefit to them¬ felves. And in this view, we ftiould rather be furprifed that any of their proceffes were ever made known. But here vanity, and even avarice, probably had con- fiderable influence in calling forth what they pretend¬ ed was an account of their attainments and diicoveries. Some of the alchemifts, perhaps by means of trick and impofture, had acquired a high reputation for knowr- ledge, and had impofed a belief on many, that they were adually in pefleflion of the philofopher’s ftone. They were therefore fought after, and often received great rewards for their labour, in proving the efteCIs, or trying the fuccefs of this wonderful agent. To be thus employed was perhaps the objeCI of many in ^the publication" of their works. But at the fame time, they cautioufly avoided revealing their knowledge, by em¬ ploying myfterious and metaphorical language.. Thus we may account for the impenetrable obfeurity and numerous abfurdities which characterized their writ- ings. In this view, therefore, of the charaffer of the al¬ chemifts, it is not to be expefted that the ftore of chemical fafts could be very ample from their la¬ bours. And indeed, confidering the caution with which they concealed and carried on all their procehes, it is not improbable that many important ditcoveries were never announced by the firft obfervers •, for the very appearance of any thing new or unexpected, would flatter their hopes that they had advanced another ftep towards the attainment of their objeft, and that the next would Introduc¬ tion. 34 Stahl im¬ proves the theory of Beecher. 35 Chemiftry iludied in 3& Britain. 37 In France. 3^ Black’s dif- -covery. C H E M I would put tliem in full pofleflion of it. Thus, fuch a difeovery would be held inviolably fecret, and in this way it might be loft for ever. We have already mentioned, that the work of Bee¬ cher gave the firft fcientific form to chemical know¬ ledge. This appeared about the middle of the feven- teenth century, w'hen the light of knowledge began to fpread over Europe, and chemiftry received its fhare. The fa61s which had been accumulated by the labours of the alchemifts, and to which Beecher had given a fyftematic form, were ftill farther methodized and extended by his pupil Stahl. Indeed fo much was done by the latter, in fimplifying and improving the theory of his mafter, that it was afterwards deno¬ minated from his name the Stahlian or phlogijlic theory. This theory was then received and adopted by all chemifts, and continued to flourilh for more than half a century. After the middle of the fever.teenth century, the efta- bliftiment of philofophical focieties in Europe greatly contributed to the diffufion of knowledge. It w’as about this time that the academy of fciences was eftablilhed in France, and fome of its members rofe high in re¬ putation by their experiments and dilcoveries in che¬ miftry. The royal fociety of London was alfo found¬ ed about the fame period •, but its members, after the example of Newton, were more occupied in mechani¬ cal philofophy, and paid lefs attention to chemical fei- ence. It was not, however, entirely overlooked. Newton himfelf threw out fome important hints, and took fome general views of chemical phenomena j Boyle, along with his refearches in mechanical philo¬ fophy, profecuted the ftudy of chemiftry ; and the ex¬ periments of Hooke and Mayow, on the nature of com- buftion and refpirable air, difeover no mean degree of fagacity and Ikill in their inveftigations. Towards the middle of the eighteenth century, the ftudy of chemiftry became general, and even falhion- able, in France. Before this time Homberg, Geoffrey, and Lemery, had diftinguiftied themfelves by their chemical experiments and difeoveries. Among thefe Geoffroy is ftill defervedly celebrated for his inven¬ tion of the tables of chemical affinities, an ingenious method of exhibiting, at one view, the principal re- fults of experiments in this fcience. Thefe tables were afterwards improved by feveral chemifts, but efpecially by Rouelle, Wenzel, and Bergman. But the difeovery of Dr Black formed one of the moft important mras in the hiftory of this fcience, and gave a new and unexpefted turn to the views of chemifts. It was the objeft of Dr Black’s refearches to difeover the caufe of the remarkable change which a piece of limeftone undergoes when it is calcined or burnt, and to point out the reafon of the great difference of the properties of this fubftance in its different ftates \ and his inveftigations were crowned with fuccefs. For, in the year 1755, he afeertained that thefe changes were owing to the combination or feparation of a pe¬ culiar kind of air, different in its properties from. the air of the atmofphere. When this air is combined with lime, it is in the mild ftate, or the ftate of limeftone *, rvhen this air is driven off, which is the procefs of calcination or burning, the limeftone has changed its properties ; it is reduced to the cauftic ftate, and has loft confiderably of its weight; and this $ T R Y. 427 lofs of weight, Dr Black proved, was exactly equal to Introduc- the weight of the air wffiich had been driven off. To t'^‘n' , this air Dr Black gave the name of Jixed air ; becaufe, when united to the lime and other fubftances, with wffiich it enters into combination, it is in a fixed ftate. This difeovery, one of the moft important in chemiftry, opened a new field for inveftigation j for it had not been once fufpe£led, that aerial fubftances formed com¬ binations wdth folid bodies. From this time, the progrefs of chemiftry w7as ra¬ pid and brilliant. Fa6Is and difeoveries were daily mul¬ tiplied, and a fpirit of enthufiafm for the ftudy burft ^ forth, and wras diffufed far and wide. In the year Other im- 1774, Dr Prieftley, who had contributed largely toPortan,: ^ the flock of chemical knowledge, difeovered pure orcovenes'' vital air, and that this air only was fit for the purpofes of refpiration and combuftion. In the year 1781 Mr Cavendifh, another ingenious Engliffi chemift, proved that water is not a fimple element, but that it is com- pofed of pure or vital air, and inflammable air ; or, in chemical language, of oxygen and hydrogen. But, previous to this time, two chemifts had ap¬ peared in Sweden, had diftinguifhed themfelves by their zeal, ingenuity and indefatigable induftry, and had merited and obtained the higheft reputation for the valuable difeoveries which they had made in che¬ mical fcience. Thofe who are at all acquainted with the hiftory of chemiftry, need not be told, that thefe celebrated names are thofe of Bergman and Scheele j names which will not be forgotten as long as modefty, candour, and truth, are honoured and refpedled among mankind. In the mean time, the French chemifts w7ere not idle. The celebrated Lavoifier, in conjun&ion with fome of his philofophical friends, confirmed, by the moft deci- five experiments, the truth of Mr Cavendifli’s difeovery of the compofition of wmter, which was now received and adopted by almoft every chemift. The fame un¬ fortunate philofopher, whofe bright career was cut ftiort by the horrors of the French revolution, had, pre¬ vious to the time alluded to, enriched chemical fcience with many valuable and important fads. He had greatly contributed to overthrow7 the phlogiftic theory, by a feries of accurate experiments and obfervations on the calcination of metals. It had now become a que- ftion, whether metals, during the procefs of calcina¬ tion, gave out any fubftance ; that is, whether they contained any phlogifton ; and Lavoifier inconteftably proved, that metals cannot be calcined, excepting in contad with pure air, and that the calx thus obtain¬ ed was, in all cafes, exadly equal to the weight of the metal, and the quantity of air which had difap- peared. Chemiftry, by its rapid and unexampled progrefs, had now fo far extended itfelf, and had accumulated fo large a body of fads, that the barbarous, unmeaning, and arbitrary language which the alchemifts employed to veil their mvfteries, and part of which had been adopted and imitated in language equally obfeure and arbitrary by the earlier chemifts, rendered it extremely difficult to be acquired or underftood. This was^ loud¬ ly and juftly complained of, but the difficulties in the way of remedying it feemed almoft infurmountable. 4^ The French chemifts, however, undertook the arduous™^- talk, and completely fucceeded in their labours. Toture>' 3 H 2 thefe 428 C H E M I Introduc- tliefe illuftrious pliilofopliers we are indebted for the tion. prefent language of cheraiftry, which is fo conftrudted, tjiat every word, and every combination, has an appro¬ priate meaning, and is intended to exprefs the nature and compolition of the fubftance which is reprefented. It is to this improvement in its language, that we are to afcribe the facility and precifion with which the knowledge of chemiftry can now be communicated, and which has undoubtedly contributed greatly to its ge¬ neral diffufion and cultivation. And if there be any ground for hope of its future progrefs, from diftinguhh- ed talents, ardent zeal, and unceafing induftry, thoi'e who are now engaged in the ftudy of this fcience, give fair promife of a rich harveft. Sect. IV. Of the Tiijl Principles of Bodies, and of the Methods of Jiudying and arranging them. Elements of j. According to the ancient philofophers, all matter bodies a- confided of four principles or elements. Thefe were mong the fire^ a;r^ water} anci earth ; and this opinion, with cer- ancients. modigcat;ons> feems to have univerfally prevailed. But the difeoveries of modern chemiftry have proved, that three of thefe elements, at leaft, are compound fubftances. Fire is a compound of light and heat ; air is compofed of oxygen and azotic gafes j and water con- fifts of oxygen and hydrogen. The alchemifts, not fatisfied with this divifion of the principles of bodies, adopted another, which was more appropriate to the nature of their labours and experi¬ ments, and was better calculated to explain the appear- The alche- ances with which they were acquainted. The elements milts. of all bodies, according to their theory, w’ere>//,>//>/jar, and mercury : and thefe were long known among the al- chemifts by the appellation of the trio prima. Thefe prin¬ ciples were admitted by all the alchemiftical writers till the time of Paracelfus,who alfo adopted them, and added two more to the number. Thefe five elements or prin¬ ciples are thus chara&erized. Every thing came un¬ der the name of fait which was foluble and fapid ; all inflammable fubftances were called/z///>£z/r ; and every volatile fubftance, which flies off without burning, w*as called mercury or fpirit. What w^as liquid and inftpid was called phlegm or water; every thing that was dry, infipid, fixed, and infoluble, w^as called earth, or caput mortuum. The two laft, which were added by Para- celfus, are the water and earth of the ancients. Ac¬ cording to the original theory of the alchemifts, all bo¬ dies may be decompofed by fire, and refolved into their three conftituent principles. The mercury or fpirit, during the procefs of combuftion, efcapes in the form of fmoke ; the fulphur is inflamed •, and the fait, which 43 was fuppofed to be the fixed principle, remains behind. Beecher’s But Beecher, whom we have already mentioned as elements. t’ne founder of chemical fcience, perceiving the vague and unfettled notions of the alchemifts, with regard to the principles of bodies, generalized and fimplified ftill more, the chemical fa£ls which were then known. According to his theory, all bodies confifted of earth and water. Under the former he included every thing that was dry, and under the latter, whatever was hu¬ mid. He admitted three earthy principles, namely, the fufible earth, the inflammable earth, and the mer¬ curial earth. The firft was the principle of drynefs, of infufibility and hardnefs. The fufible earth, com- s T R Y. bined with water, compofed an acid, which was call- Introduc¬ ed the univerfal acid, becaufe all other acids owed , non‘ their properties to it. The inflammable earth was confidered as the principle of combuftibility •, and the mercurial earth was the principle of volatility. T he fufible and the mercurial earths, with water, compofe common fait j and the inflammable earth, with the univerfal acid, forms fulphur. The metals were com¬ pofed of thefe three earths in equal proportions. When the mercurial earth was in fmall proportion, the com¬ pound was fone ; when the fufible wras in greater pro¬ portion, the compound was precious fones; and the compounds are the colorific earths, when the inflam¬ mable earth is in the greateft, and the lufible in the fmalleft proportion. ^ This theory of Beecher was confiderably modified Stahi*s. by his pupil Stahl. The inflammable earth of Bee¬ cher feems to have been changed by him into the prin¬ ciple of inflammability or fixed fire, which he diftin- guifhed by the name of phlvgifon. He admitted the univerfal acid, but rejefted the mercurial earth. The number of elements in the theory thus modified by Stahl, amounted to five. Thefe were, air, watert pblogifon, earth, and the univerfal acid. This mode of confidering the elements of bodies, or their firft principles, and of admitting fuch arbitrary and erroneous diftin&ions, is juftly banifhed from che¬ mical fcience. All fubftances are fuppofed to be fim- ple, wdiich have not been decompofed, without regard to their primitive elements or principles, the knowledge of which is, perhaps, beyond the reach of human power ever to arrive at. 2. To acquire the knowledge of thofe properties of bodies, inveftigation of which is properly included un¬ der the chemical fcience, two methods are employed : The one is the method of analyfis or decompofition, the other is that of fynthefis, or compofition. By the one, the different Ample fubftances of which compound bodies confift, are feparated, and their properties individually examined by the other, the Ample fubftances are com¬ bined together, and the properties of the new com¬ pound are confidered and inveftigated. Different kinds or modes of analyfis have been admit-^nalyils. ted and deferibed by chemical writers. Some bodies, when expofed to the a£lion of heat and air, undergo a to¬ tal reparation of their component parts. This is called fpontaneous analyfis. Thus, fome minerals, and all ve¬ getable and animal matters, when they are deprived of life, in favourable circumftances flowly feparate into their component parts \ and in the fame way the prin¬ ciples of which fome liquids are compofed, re-adl on each other, and fpontaneoufly feparate, which gives an opportunity of inveftigating the nature of thefe fub¬ ftances. Analyfis by fire, operates by the accumulation of caloric in bodies ; and by the power wdiich it has of feparating their particles to favour their examination. But this inftrument of analyfis is to be confidered only as one of the means which fhould concur with many others, to throw light on the real compofition of bodies. For it will afterwards appear, that the different quan¬ tities of caloric accumulated in bodies, have the great- eft effefts in giving different refults, and changing the order of decompofition. Another mode of analyfis is by means of re-agents. This 45 Synthefu. C H E M I This is conducted by placing the compound body which is to be examined, in contad with various fubliances, which have the power offeparating its conllituent parts. It is here that the genius and fcience of the chemift appear molt confpicuous j for every fubftance in na¬ ture, and all the products of art, become valuable in- ftruments in his hands, to afcertain the nature, and to examine the properties, of the fubftances which come under his examination. The different means of ana- lyfis which chemilts have employed, to arrive at the knowledge of compound bodies, have been deemed of fuch importance and utility, that chemittry has been called the- fcience of analyfs. Synthefis, or compofition, is the union of two or more limple fubftances. This union, from whence refults a new compound, has become an important ftep in arriving at the knowledge of the properties of bodies, and in forming a number of produfts ufe- ful in the arts, and neceffary to our wants \ and thus it is confidered by chemifts as in fome meafure the in- verfe of the method of analyfis, as the perfe&ion of their art, and one of the great inftruments of their operations. The method of fynthefis or compofition, confidered as a chemical proceis to acquire the know¬ ledge of the intimate and reciprocal adlion of bodies, is in reality more frequently employed than that of analyfis j and the name of the fcience, if we were to regard thefe two methods, fliould rather be called the fcience of fynthejis than the fcience of analyfis. In all cafes of complicated analyfis, the operations are fyn- thetic. Compounds of an inferior order are formed, but more numerous than the firft compounds which were fubje&ed to analyfis or examination. But befides, there are many bodies which have ne¬ ver yet been decompofed. It is only by compofition or fynthefis, that is, by combining them with others, and by examining the nature of the compounds which are formed by this combination, that their chemical properties can be inveftigated. However various the operations of chemiftry may be •, however numerous and different from each other,, the refults which are obtained •, they may all be refer¬ red to analyfis or fynthefis, and be regarded either asr combinations or decompofitions 5 and to thefe two ge¬ neral methods, all our operations may be limited. 3. It muft be univerfally allorved, that it is of vaft importance, in acquiring or communicating knowledge, to have a clear view of the obje£ls of our ftudies j and this becomes the more neceffary, as the fafts in any fcience are accumulated, and the objedls wdrich it comprehends become more numerous. In many of the arrangements of chemical knowledge which have been propofed to the world, the objetffs of this fci¬ ence have been claffed together according to certain refemblances in one or two points, while they are to¬ tally diftinft in all others.. But an arrangement which is founded on the properties and characters of fubftances which have not been fully afeertained and generally admitted, muft tend to obftrutt, rather than facilitate the acquifition of fcience. If, for inftance, the objects of chemical knowledge are to be arranged according to their combuftibility or incombuftibility, the nature of the procefs of combuftion ftiould be fully under- ftood, and the effeft of combuftion on the fubftances to.be claffed in this way, clearly eftablilhed. If all turn. 47 S T R Y. 42!> this has not been previoufly attended to, the principles Introduo- of the arrangement muft be falfe, and muft unavoid- v ably lead to error. As a proof of the truth of our re¬ marks, the fame fubftance has been confidered by one chemift as a combuftible body, while it is arranged by another among the clafs of incombuftibles ; and even by the fame chemift it is faid to be combuftible at one time, and incombuftible at another, according to the theory which then prevails. Without purfuing any method of arrangement founded on particular theories or lyftems, we (hall en¬ deavour, in the following treatife, to lay before our readers a full view of the prefent ftate of chemical fcience ; and in arranging the great body of fa61s of Arrange- which the fcience confifts, we flrall oblerve the twoment* following rules. 1. To introduce the fubttances to be examined according to the fimplicity of their compo¬ fition 5 and, 2. According to their importance as che¬ mical agents. The plan which wTe propofe to purfue, in treating of thefe different claffes of bodies, is, 1. To confider their properties as fimple lubftances, and, 2.The combinations which they form with thofe which have been already deferibed. By this method of arrange¬ ment, and by following out this plan, we hope to have lefs anticipation and repetition than in moft other fyftems which have yet been propofed. But we wifli not to think too confidently of our own labours. We (hall probably be confidered by the world as the worft judges in this cafe ; and we are not too felfiftr to fub- mit to the opinion of thofe to whom it is addreffed, to whofe candour and impartiality wTe implicitly truft. We may however, obferve, that this arrangement has been found extremely convenient for teaching the fcience ; and we hope that our readers will find it equally fo in acquiring the knowledge of it. According to the principles which we have ftated, the following table exhibits a view of the order which we (hall obferve in this treatife. In the prefent ftate of chemical fcience, and in its application to explain the phenomena of nature, or to improve the arts of life, the whole may be conveniently arranged into? twenty chapters. I. Affinity. II. Light. III. Heat. IV. Oxygen Gas. V. Azotic Gas, and its combinations^ VI. Hydrogen, &c. VII. Carbone, &c. VIII. Phosphorus, &c. IX. Sulphur, &c. X. Acids, Sec. 1. Sulphuric,, 2. Nitric, 3. Muriatic, 4. Oxymuriatic, &c. &e. XI. Inflammable Substances. 1. Alcohol, 2. Ether, 3. Oils. XU. Alkalies. 1. Potaftr and its combinations, 2. Soda, &c. 3. Ammonia, &c. * XIIL CHE XIII. Earths. 1. Lime and its combinations, 2. Barytes, &c. 3. Strontites, &c. 4. Magnefia, &c. 5. Alumina, &c. 6. Silica, &c. 7. Yttria, &c. 8. Glucina, &c. 9. Zirconia, &c. XIV. Metals. 1. Arfenic and its combinations. 2. Tungften, &c. 3. Molybdena, &c. 4. Chromium, &c. 5. Columbium, &c. 6. Titanium, &c. 7. Uranium, &c. 8. Cobalt, &c. 9. Nickel, &c. 10. Manganefe, &c. XI. Bifmutb, &c. 12. Antimony, &c. 13. Tellurium, &c. 14. Mercury, &.c* 15. Zinc, &c. 16. Tin, &c. 17. Lead, &c. 18. Iron, &c. 19. Copper, &c. 20. Silver, &c. 21. Gold, &c. 22. Platina, &c. XV. The atmosphere. XVI. Waters. 1. Sea water, 2. Mineral waters. XVII. Minerals. 1. Component parts, 2. Analyfis. XVIII. Vegetables. 1. Functions, 2. Decompofition, 3. Component parts. XIX. Animals. 1. Fundtions, 2. Decompolition, 3. Component parts. XX. Arts and Manufactures. 1. Soaps, 2. Glafs, 3. Porcelain, 4. Tanning, 5. Dyeing, 6. Bleaching. explained. In the above arrangement, the firft chapter treats of affinity, or the laws of chemical adlion. In the two following chapters, the properties of light and heat are detailed. Thefe are confidered as material fubftances 5 but their properties can only be known in combina¬ tion with other bodies, as they have never been found in a feparate date. Oxygen, azote, and hydrogen, which are confidered as the balls of oxygen, azotic, and hydrogen gafes, are treated of in the 4th, 5th, M I s T R Y. and 6th chapters; but thefe fubllances, as well as Introdw. light and heat, are not cognizable by our fenfes., tlon^ They are only known in a ftate of combination, the aeriform or gafeous Hate, when they are combined with caloric, or the matter of heat. The three following fubftances, carbone, phofphorus, and fulphur, which are the fubje&s of the 7th, 8th, and 9th chapters, are confidered as fimple, becaufe they have never been de- compofed. They can be exhibited in the folid ftate. Two of them being very abundantly diffufed in nature, and entering into an immenfe number of combinations with other bodies ; and the third, namely, phofpho¬ rus, poffefling very fingular properties, it becomes of great importance that they fhould be early knowm. The acids are treated of in the 10th chapter. They are naturally arranged in this place, becauie the con- ftituent parts of lome of the moft important are deriv- .si ed from the fubftances which have been already treated of. But the properties of the clafs of acid bodies ought alfo to be early known, becaufe they are the moft powerful inftruments of analylis in the hands of the chemift. Indeed fuch is their importance in his inveftigations, that in many of them he can fcarcely proceed a fingle ftep without their aid. The bodies treated of in the nth chapter, name¬ ly, alcohol, ether, and oils, under the head of in¬ flammable fubftances, are properly introduced, be¬ caufe the nature and properties of the fubftances which enter into their compofition have been previoufly exa¬ mined j becaufe one of them is the refult of a chemical aftion between the acids and alcohol j and becaufe feme of them are employed as chemical agents. In the 12th, 13th, and 14th chapters, the properties and combinations of the alkalies, earths, and metals, are detailed. Excepting one, thefe three claffes of bodies are fimple, undecompounded fubftances. Many of them have long been the fubjefts of chemical invefti- gation, and they afford fome of the moft important and interefting chemical refearches. They are firft to be treated of as fimple fubftances ; and next, as they enter into combination with the different claffes of bodies which are already knowm, particularly with that of the acids, forming the numerous claffes of alkaline, earthy, and metallic falts, moft of which are of vaft importance, not only as objedls of chemical refearcb, but alfo of extenfive utility in the arts of life. In the fix following chapters, our chemical know¬ ledge is to be applied in explaining the appearances of nature, fo far as thefe are fuppofed to depend on che¬ mical aflion. The 15th chapter treats of the chemi¬ cal changes and combinations which take place in the atmofphere. The waters, as they are found on the earth *, the different ingredients with which they are impregnated ; the nature and quantity of thefe ingre¬ dients, and the methods of difeovering and afeertain- ing them, form the fubjeft of the 16th chapter. The 17th chapter is employed in giving a view of the com¬ ponent parts of mineral produ&ions, and in deferibing the methods of analyzing or feparating the parts which enter into their compofition. The funftions of vege¬ tables and animals, or thofe changes which take place ^ in them m the living ftate, which feem to be depend¬ ent on chemical aftionj the changes wffiich they un- ergo y pontaneous analyfis, or reparation into their conftituent parts, and the nature and properties of < thefe 43O Introduc¬ tion. j nity. ill ' ion led C H E M tliefe elements, will be the fubjedt of difcuffion in the ; 18th and 19th chapters. The 20th chapter, in which chemical fcience is applied to the improvement of arts and manufactures, is not one of the lealt important and interefting, and a full view of this part of the fubjeCt would exhauft the whole of the ufeful detail of chemi¬ cal knowledge. But, in the following treatife, it is not propofed to enter at full length into the different branches of the arts and manufactures, but only to give a flight view of their general principles, fo far as they depend on chemiflry, referring for the particular dil- cuffion of each to the different heads under which they will be found arranged in the courfe of the work. Chap. I. Of AFFINITY. Before we enter into the detail of thofe changes which take place by the aCtion of bodies upon each other, producing compounds which are poffeffed of to¬ tally different properties, and thus exhibiting the 'cha¬ racters of chemical addon, it is neceffary to take a view of the eircumftances in which thefe changes are effefted, or in other words, the laws of combination or chemical affinity. The term affinity, which is the expreffion of a force by which fubitances of different natures combine with each other, feems to have been pretty early employed by chemical writers. Barchufen, it would appear, is among thefirft who employedit,andthuscharaCterizes it. “Arc- tam enim atque reciprocam inter fe habent affinitatem.” It was afterwards brought into more general ufe, and its application more precifely defined by Boerhaave*. His words are remarkable. “ Particulae folventes et folu- tae, fe affinitate fuse naturte colligunt in corpora homo- genea.” And to explain his meaning ftill more clear¬ ly, he adds, “ non igitur hie etiam aCtiones mechani- cae, non propulfiones violentae, non inimicitife cogi- tandee, fed amicitia.” To avoid the metaphorical ex¬ preffion affinity, Bergman propofed the term attraShon ; and to diflinguifh chemical attraction, which exifts on¬ ly between particular fubftances, from that attraction which exifts between all the bodies in nature, he pre¬ fixed the word e/eSlive. The word affinity, however, is now generally adopted, and employed by all chemifts. The different tendency of bodies to combine with each other, or the relative degree of affinity which ex¬ ifts between them, could not long be overlooked by thofe whole attention was occupied in obferving che¬ mical changes. And to explain this dmerence of ac¬ tion, a maxim of the fchoolmen was adopted 5 Jimile venit adfimile. The fame doftrine was held by Bee¬ cher, that fubffances which were capable of chemical combination, poffeffed a fimilarity of particles. . Other attempts were made to explain cnemical aCtion, by confidering folvents as confiding of points, finer or coarfer, which were mechanically difpofeti to enter in¬ to the pores of certain fubftances w’hich they were ca¬ pable of holding in folution. But Stahl, as appeals from his works, rejeaed the notion of mechanical force, and afenbes the power of folvents to contaa, or to the attraaion of cohefion. “ Combinationes quaf- cunque non aliter fieri, quam per araam appoiitionem. And afterwards, he fpeaks ftill more precifely when he fays, “ non per modum cunei, neque per modum 111- curfus, in unam particulam feparandam, fed potius per I S T R Y, modum apprehenfionis, feu araae applicationis •,’* and then he adds, “ eft inde rationi quam maxime confen- taneum, quod effeaus tales potius araiore unione fol- ventis cum folvente contingant, quam nuda et fimplici formali inftrumentali divifione •j-.” f Sftcitv. Having made this important ftep in the confidera- ^e^3er' tion of chemical aaion, the experiments and obferva-1 ’ tions of the fagacious chemift led him to conclude, that a combination between two fubftances once form¬ ed, could not be deftroyed, without effeaing a more intimate union of one of the conftituent parts with fome other fubftauce. 52 _ The next ftep in the method of obferving and Tables m- ftudying chemical affinity was made by Geoffroy the'011 e J elder. He colledled the fcattered faifts, to deter¬ mine the force or meafure of their degrees of union, and to eftablifli rules of analyfis and compofition. His firft table of affinity was prefented to the Royal Aca¬ demy of fciences at Paris in the year 1718. This con- fifted only of 17 columns, which w-ere but imperfedlly filled up, and exhibited rules which have been moftly changed ; but with all its errors, it ought to be confi- dered as one of the firft guides to chemical knowledge. ^ The firft material improvement on Geoffroy’s table enlarged^ was made by Geilert, profeffor at Freyburg. In his Chcmia Metailurqica, publiftied in 1750, there is a new table of affinity, which extends to 28 columns. At the bottom of each column there is a lift of fub¬ ftances with which the body at the head of the column had no a