Three sermons concerning the sacred Trinity by John Wallis. Wallis, John, 1616-1703. 1691 Approx. 174 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 55 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2004-11 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A67417 Wing W611 ESTC R17917 12211688 ocm 12211688 56317 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A67417) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 56317) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 904:24) Three sermons concerning the sacred Trinity by John Wallis. Wallis, John, 1616-1703. [4], 102, [2] p. Printed for Tho. Parkhurst ..., London : 1691. Reproduction of original in Huntington Library. Advertisement: p. 102. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Trinity -- Sermons. Sermons, English -- 17th century. 2004-04 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2004-07 SPi Global Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2004-08 Rachel Losh Sampled and proofread 2004-08 Rachel Losh Text and markup reviewed and edited 2004-10 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion THREE SERMONS Concerning the Sacred Trinity . By JOHN WALLIS , D. D. Professor of Geometry , in the University of Oxford . LONDON : Printed for Tho. Parkhurst , at the Bible and Three Crowns , in Cheapside , 1691. TO THE READER . THE first of the three Sermons here following , is Printed according as it was Preached in Oxford , in the Year 1664. ( accommodated to that time and place ; ) but it was , for the Substance of it , Preached in London Twenty Years before that time . Which I mention to shew , that the Construction which I give of the Words , is not a new forced Notion , just now taken up to serve a turn ; or ( as somebody is pleased to call it ) Equally New and Cautious : But , what I did , so long ago , take to be a then received Truth . And , I since find , it is at least as old as St. Austin's Epist. 174. The other Two are lately added , in pursuance of some other Discourses lately made publick , concerning the Sacred Trinity . Wherein much of what was said before , scatteringly , ( as those who wrote against it gave occasion ; ) is now inlarged and put into a little better Order . If what I have done may be serviceable to the Truth , and to the Church of God : I have what I did desire , and shall not think the Labour ill bestowed . A SERMON Preached to the UNIVERSITY of Oxford . Decemb. 27. 1664. JOH . xvij . 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . And this is life eternal , that they might know thee the onely true God , and Jesus Christ , whom thou hast sent . I Need not apologize for the seasonableness of this Text ; by telling you , that the Subject Matter of it , suites well with the great Solemnity , which at this time we celebrate ; and the Pen-man , with that of the day : Because a Discourse on such a Subject , can never be unseasonable to a Christian Auditory . Especially to such as , whose profession being to seek after Knowledge , should not decline that of God and Christ , the chief of all . Nor will it be any Exception hereunto : That it is no news , but well known already : Not only because That there be many who pretend to know what they do not , or do in effect deny ; and That there be many things , which , though we know well , we have need enough to be minded of : But even because I do not find that many persons are wont to be displeased with being often minded of those things wherein they think that either their Interest or Excellency lies ; more than a good Wit when commended , or a fair Lady with being told she is handsome ; even though sometimes ( as we are wont to say ) they know it but too well already . And therefore , since to know God and Christ is both our Interest and our Commendation ; it will not , I hope , seem grievous to any to hear it discoursed of ; to the end that those who know it not may be incited to learn it , and those who know it , may take content in it . And I shall as little apologize for a plain Discourse on this Subject : Since it is both my Profession and Practice , to Demonstrate or make things as plain as I can ; not to perplex or make them intricate ; which may amuse the Auditors , or sometimes please or tickle them ; but is not wont either to Teach , or Perswade : like too much of Ornament , which doth but disguise the native Beauty ; or too much Trimming , which hides the Cloth. The words read , are our Saviour's Words ; addressed to his Father in the behalf of his Disciples : And are a part of that Prayer with which he closeth his large Exhortation , or Farewel-Sermon to his Disciples , the night before he was to suffer ; of which we have a large rehearsal in the three foregoing Chapters , the 14 th , 15 th , and 16 th : which this 17 th . closeth with a Prayer . He begins his Prayer , with a Petition concerning Eternal Life , which he was to bestow ( according to the Power his Father had granted him ) to as many as He had given him ; that is , to as many as should effectually believe in him . To which Petition he subjoins this Exegetical Epiphonema , And this is life eternal , that they may know thee the only true God , and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent . We may consider the words either according to a Synthetic or an Analytic method , as the Schools speak : The former of which they commonly follow in Sciences Theoretical ; the latter in Practical . If considered Synthetically ; they present us with , First , The Cause , or Principle ; The Knowledge of God and Christ : and , Secondly , The Effect , or Consequent resulting from it ; Eternal Life . If Analytically ; we have in them , First , A glorious End proposed ; Eternal Life : and , Secondly , The Means proportionate thereunto ; The Knowledge of God and Christ. In the former way , the Result of them is to this purpose ; That the excellent Knowledge of God and Christ , is attended with this most glorious Consequent , Eternal Life . In the latter way , it amounts to thus much : That the way or means to Eternal Life , is the Knowledge of God and Christ. Nor is it much material , whether of the two ways we take them ; Synthetically , or Analytically : whether we take them as a Theorem ; affirming this Effect , of that Cause : or as a Problem ; directing to these Means for such an End. Yet I chuse rather to take them in the latter consideration , ( though not exclusive of the former ; ) Because , this Epiphonema taking its rise from the mention made of Eternal Life , in the former verse ; ( not from a former mention of the Knowledge of God and Christ ; ) it seems to be rather intended as a Direction how to attain Eternal Life ; than , an account of the Effect of such a Knowledge . But , in doing the one , it doth the other also . I shall begin , first , with that which lies first in the order of the word ; The End proposed ; or the Effect , or Consequent of this Knowledge ; the Happiness which doth attend it : which , for its Excellency , is called Life , and , for its Duration , Eternal . This is life eternal . The word Life I take to be here used in a figurative sense ; and to import Good or Happiness : like as , its contrary , Death , especially Death Eternal , to import Misery . There is indeed , at least , a threefold Life commonly mentioned ; and , in proportion thereunto , a threefold Death : Natural , Spiritual , and Eternal . Life Natural , ( which is indeed the proper acceptation of the word Life , or the first signification of it , ) is more easily apprehended , than expressed . It imports that active state or condition which ariseth from the Union of the Soul and Body , as well in Man , as in other Animals ; ( not to mention that of Plants : ) the destruction or want of which , upon the Soul's departure , we call Death . 'T is that , according to which , in common speech , a Man or Beast is said to be alive or dead . Now this Life , is , of all natural Goods , looked upon as the chiefest ; and consequently Death the greatest of natural Evils : Because Life is that foundation or first good , which makes us capable of what else is so : and with our Life , we lose all the rest . Hence that in Job 2.4 . Skin for skin , and all that a man hath , will he give for his life . And that of Solomon ; A living Dog is better than a dead Lion , Eccles. 9.4 . For , when Life is gone , there succeeds an incapacity , not only of Doing , but also of Enjoying Good. From this consideration it is , that the other significations of the word have their Original . For Life being looked upon as the greatest natural Good , and Death as the greatest natural Evil ; The one ( by a Synechdoche speciei ) is frequently used ( both in sacred and profane Authours ) to signify Good indefinitely , especially the greatest Good ; and the other , in like manner , to signifie Evil , especially the greatest Evil. The one is put for Happiness , and the other for Misery . And then , again , ( by a Synechdoche generis ) this general notion of Good or Evil , Happiness or Misery , implied in the words Life and Death , becomes applicable to this or that particular Good and Evil , as occasion serves . Suppose the Spiritual Life of Grace , or Death in Sin : And the Eternal Life of Glory in Heaven , or the Eternal Death of Torment in Hell. Thus , Deut. 30.19 . I have set before you ( saith Moses to Israel ) life and death , blessing and cursing : ( where Life and Death , are made equivalent to Blessing and Cursing ; ) therefore chuse life ( saith he ) that thou and thy seed may Live ; that is , that you may be Happy . So at ver . 15. of the same Chapter ; I have set before you ( saith he ) life and good , death and evil . Where Life and Good are put exegetical each of other , and so Death and Evil. And in the same sense it is the Poet tells us , Non est Vivere , sed Valere , vita . Thus God to Adam in Paradise ( for 't is no new Trope , nor of yesterday ) In the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death ; that is , thou shalt become miserable : For we know that Adam did not the same day die a natural Death ; but some hundreds of years after : but he did that day begin to be in a state of Misery , whereof his natural Death was but a part . So , Rom. 6.23 . The wages of sin is death ; where the comprehension of all the Evils or Misery which sin deserves , or God inflicteth for it , is called Death : like as on the contrary , all the Happiness , which the Saints enjoy , is , on the same account , called Life ; The gift of God is eternal Life , through Jesus Christ our Lord. So here : By Life we understand Happiness ; contrary to which is the Death of Misery : and then ( by a Metalepsis , or double Trope , ) that Happiness in special , which the Saints enjoy in Glory ( though not exclusive of what they have before ; ) and that Misery which in Hell attends the wicked . 'T is true indeed , that the condition of the Saints in Glory , after the Resurrection , may , even in a proper sense , be called Life ; because of that Union , which shall then be , of Soul and Body ; and the exercise of ( at least the most noble ) faculties of Life . Yet do not I take that to be the true import of the Word here . For though it be true , that the Saints in Glory , have not only an Union of Soul and Body , but likewise a knowledge or sense of that estate wherein they are , ( which may import not only a Life , but even a Rational Life : ) yet as true it is , that the Damned in Hell have so too ; ( for their Souls and Bodies shall not be less United ; nor shall they be Insensible of their Woful condition : ) yet is not that estate of theirs called a Life ( though naturally it be so , and it is their misery that it is so , ) but Eternal Death ; because a Life of Wo and Misery ; not of Bliss and Happiness : A Living Misery , being , in this sense , the truest Death . Secondly , As it is called Life for its Excellency , so , for its Duration , it is called Eternal . It is very usual in Scripture , in the use of Allegories , or Figurative expressions , to add some kind of Epithet to distinguish the word so used from the same in its native signification : And , when the word is used so as to express figuratively somewhat more excellent than it self , the Epithet hath somewhat of additional exellency in it . Thus Christ is said to be the Spiritual rock , 1 Cor. 10.4 . the Living Bread , or Manna that came down from Heaven , Joh. 6.50 . to distinguish the words , so metaphorically used , from the Rock and Manna literally spoken of , in the story of their travails in the Wilderness . And the Church of Christ , as Living stones , become a Spiritual house , and a Holy priesthood , to offer up Spiritual sacrifices to God , 1 Pet. 2.5 . Where the Epithets serve both for distinction from the material Stones and Temple , the Levitical Priesthood , and corporeal Sacrifices ; and for the commendation or preheminence of those before these . So the new heaven , and the new earth , and the new Jerusalem , Rev. 21.1 , 2. Jerusalem that is above , Gal. 4.26 . And Matth. 26.29 . I will drink no more ( saith Christ ) of the fruit of the vine , till I drink it New with you in my Father's kingdom : Not that Christ did intend anew to drink of such wine in his Father's Kingdom ; but of a New wine , another sort of wine than that commonly so call●d ; to wit , those spiritual Joys in his Father's Kingdom , which should more refresh their Hearts and Souls , than this wine did their Bodies . So ; I am the true vine , and my Father is the husbandman , Joh. 15.1 . I am the good shepherd , Joh. 10.11 . Not that Christ was more truly a Vine , in propriety of speech , than that which we so call ; or indeed a Shepherd , who took the care of Sheep : But that there was in Christ somewhat of another kind much more eminent , than that of the Vine , which did yet in some measure resemble it ; and , a much greater Care , but of another nature , of those he calls his Flock , than a Shepherd hath of his Sheep . So here ; This is life eternal : Not a natural Life , ( such as is commonly meant by the word Life , ) a life of the Body , which after a short time is to be exchanged for Death ; but a Life , a Happiness , of another nature ; a far more excellent Good than what we call Life , which doth but very imperfectly express it ; An Eternal Life . And this Eternity , as it serves , in general , to distinguish this word Life from the ordinary acceptation ; and doth import , for the kind of it , somewhat much more excellent : So it doth particularly point out that Everlasting Duration of this so great a Happiness . 'T is that which , though indeed it have a Beginning , shall never have an End. And upon this account it is , that it is so often called Eternal Life , and Life Everlasting ; that it were endless to enumerate the places where it is so called . An eternal inheritance ; A house eternal in the heavens ; An inheritance incorruptible , and undefiled , which fadeth not away ; A kingdom which cannot be moved ; An eternal weight of glory ; When our mortal shall have put on immortality . And this consideration of Eternity , added to that of Life ; this everlasting Duration , to that unspeakable , unimaginable Happiness ; renders this Eternal Life , a perfect Felicity and every way compleat . For that Perfection of Degree , imported in the word Life , can admit of no addition , but that of Perfect Con●in●ance , which the word Eternal assures us of . Like as , on the other hand , that perfection of Misery , which attends the wicked , is capable of no greater Aggravation , than that of Perpetuity : sealed up in that sad expression of a Living Misery , Eternal Death . You have them both paralleled in Matth. 25.46 . These shall go into everlasting punishment , but the righteous into life eternal . I have now done with the first part , the Happiness here proposed ; Eternal Life . Before I come to the s●●ond , The knowledge of God and Christ ; it will 〈◊〉 requisite to consider , a little , the conne●●●● of these together , in the word , Is ; This is 〈◊〉 Eternal . Which is capable of a double ac●●ptation . For it may be understood either as a Formal , or as a Causal predication . This is life eternal ; that is , Herein consisteth eternal life . Or else thus ; This ●s life eternal , that is , This is is the way or means , to attain eternal Life . The former of these is very agreeable to the doctrine of the Schoolmen ; who generally place the Happiness of Heaven in the Beatifick Vision ; in the seeing or knowing of God. Grounded on such places as that of Matth. 5.8 . Blessed are the pure in heart , for they shall see God. 1 Cor. 13.9 , 10 , 12. We know but in part , and we prophesie but in part ; but when that which is perfect shall come , then that which is in part shall be done away : We now see through a glass darkely , but then face to face : Now I know in part , but then shall I know even as also I am known . 2 Cor. 3.18 . We all with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord , are changed into the same image , from glory to glory . 1 Joh. 3.2 . Beloved , now are we the sons of God , and it doth not yet appear what we shall be : but we know , that when he shall appear , ( or , when it shall appear ) we shall be like him : for we shall see him as he is . With others of the like import . And certainly that Perfection of Knowledge , shall be at least a great part of that Happiness , which we expect in Heaven ; as from these and other the like places is well collected . So that it is not improperly said , that Eternal Life doth , at least in part , consist in such a knowledge . Nor is it any sufficient Objection hereunto , to say , That , it is not by knowledge only , as an Act of the Understanding , that we enjoy God , wherein our Happiness consists ; but by an Act of the Will also , chusing and closing with , and delighting in him . For though this be true ; yet neither is the Knowledge here spoken of , a bare Speculative , or Notional Knowledge , wherein the Understanding is alone concerned : But an Active , Operative Knowledge ; such as brings the Will , Affections , and all the Faculties into a proportionate Conformity thereunto . And in such a Knowledge of God in the Understanding , attended with such a Conformity in the Will and other Faculties , it is not to be denyed that our Happiness doth consist ; even that of Eternal Life . Yet ( without excluding this sense ) I take the words here to be rather a Causal Predication : assigning the way or Means whereby Eternal Life is attained . This is life eternal , that is , this is the Way to attain Eternal Life ; To know thee the only true God , &c. The knowledge of God and Christ , being the direct way to attain Eternal Life . Parallel to which , is that of our Saviour , Joh. 12.50 . His commandment is life everlasting . And very frequent elsewhere are such Metonymies of the Effect for the Cause . I am the resurrection , and the life , saith Christ , Joh. 11.25 . that is , The Authour of it . So Luk. 12.15 . Man's life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth ; that is , it doth not depend upon it ; it is not secured by it : or a Christ elsewhere , Matth. 4.4 . ( out of Deut. 8.3 . ) Man liveth not by bread alone , &c. And Moses , speaking of their diligent observing the Commands of God , Deut. 32.47 . This is your life , ( saith he ) and through this thing you shall prolong your days : ( where the latter Clause is enegetical of the former : ) just in the same form with the words here , This is life eternal ; that is , hereby they shall attain eternal Life . This therefore being the most plain and simple Interpretation of the Words : We are now to enquire particularly , what that is that Christ here says to be Eternal Life , or rather the Way thereunto . That they may know thee the only true God ; and , whom thou hast sent , Jesus Christ. Which contains in brief the Doctrine of the Gospel , or Christian Religion : Distinguished into two parts , The Knowledge of God , and The Knowledge of Jesus Christ. Both which are necessary to bring us to Eternal Life . I shall speak , first , to the former of these two ; the Knowledge of God ; that is , of God the Creatour and Lord of all ; as contradistinguished to that of Christ the Redeemer . 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , That they might know thee the only true God. By Thee , or the Person here spoken to , we are to understand God , the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ ; ( For to him it is manifest , that Christ doth here direct his Prayer : ) Yet not so much in his Personal as in his Essential consideration . For it is not the Personality , but the Essence of the Father , that determines him to be the only true God. We have therefore , in the Object of this Knowledge , at least , these Three Propositions : I. That there is a God. II. That there is but One ( True ) God. III. That God , the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ , is this God. I. The First of these strikes at Atheism , or those that deny a God. And that we know thus much is necessary from that of Heb. 11.6 . He that cometh unto God , must believe that God is , and that he is a rewarder of those that diligently seek him . 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . He must believe , That there is a God. Nay , he must believe also somewhat of What he is : Not fansie to himself somewhat under the name of God , which indeed is not a God ; or notions inconsistent with that of a Deity ; as those , Psal. 50.21 . Thou thoughtest that I was altogether such a one as thy self : or the like . For to believe such a false notion of God , is not to believe a God , but to believe an Idol . We are next to know , as that there is a God ; so , That there is but One God. I mean ; But One True God. For there are indeed , as the Apostle tells us , 1 Cor. 8.4 , 5 , 6. Gods many , and Lords many ; that is , there are that are called Gods , ( for so he explains himself ) but to us there is but One God ; We know , ( saith he ) that there is no other God but One. And this indeed depends upon the former . For he that doth , according to a true notion of God , know That there is a God ; must needs know also that there is but One. For the true notion of God , including Infinite , Absolute , Perfect , &c. must needs also include Unity ; for it is inconsistent that there should be many such . So that , in a manner , Polytheism includes Atheism . He that believes many Gods , doth , in effect , not believe any : that is , not any such Being as of which it is impossible there should be more than One. We are , Thirdly , to know , that This God , is that onely True God. I say , This God ; whom we have variously designed in Scripture , by several Characters . The God that made Heaven and Earth : The living God : The God of Israel : The God whose name is Jehovah : And ( as here , and elsewhere frequently in the New Testament ) the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. By which and other the like Characters , he is distinguished from all false Gods , from all pretended Deities . This God we are to know to be the onely True God. But , when I say , That the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ is this onely True God ; I add , That this appertains not so much to his Personality as to his Essence . For though the three Persons in the Sacred Trinity , be distinguished each from other by their Personalities , ( the Father is not the Son , nor the Son the Father , &c. ) yet they all communicate in the common Essence ; whereby the Son as well as the Father , and the Holy Ghost as either , is this Onely True God. The Person of the Father is indeed True God , but not according to his Personality , but according to his Essence . And the Person of the Son is God also , and the True God ; yet not another , but the same True God. And the Holy Ghost likewise . According to that of Joh. 10.30 . I and my Father are One : That is , One mod , though not One Person . And 1 Joh. 5.7 . There are Three that bear record in Heaven , the Father , the Word , and the Holy Ghost ; and these Three are One. Three , and yet One. Three Persons , yet but One God. They are all this One , this Onely True God ; beside whom there is no God. I know there are some who would be glad to take advantage of this place , to the Derogation of the Divinity of Christ , and of the Holy Ghost . As if it were here affirmed , That the Father onely were True God : and therefore , not the Son , nor the Holy Ghost . But the Cavil is obvious , and the Answer easie . It is not said that the Father Onely is True God ; but that the Father is the onely True God ; he is that God beside whom there is no other True God : which may well enough be said , though the Son also ( as indeed he is ) be that same True God ; and the Holy Ghost likewise . Indeed should we say , That the Son were also True God , and another God ; the Father could not then be said to be the Onely True God , since that there would be another True God beside this . ( And the like of the Holy Ghost . ) But to say that the Son is the Same True God , is well consistent with it . For though another Person than the Father be True God , yet , because not Another God , this One God remains still the Onely True God. And the original words are to this purpose very clear ; 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . Where the Article 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 coming before 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , ( not after it ) doth determine it to be a restriction of the Praedicate , not of the Subject . 'T is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . Not Thee onely to be the True God ; but ( as we truly render it ) Thee to be the onely True God. That is ; To know Thee to be that God , beside which God there is no other True God ; though another beside Thee be likewise this onely True God ; viz. the same God with Thee , though not the same Person . It excludes only a Plurality of Gods , not a Plurality of Persons in the same God-head . 'T is true indeed , That this Divinity , is not , in this place , so directly Affirmed , either of the Son , or the Holy Ghost : But , neither is it Denyed : And therefore it is to receive its decision from other places where it is affirmed clearly . And thus much concerning the first branch of this Knowledge , the Knowledge of God. To know Thee , the only True God. There is another piece of Knowledge necessary to the attainment of Eternal Life ; the Knowledge of Christ. For so it follows , And Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent . 'T is true , that had we continued in that Estate wherein Man was at first Created , there had been no necessity of this second branch of Knowledge . For , had there been no Sin , there had been no need of a Saviour : and consequently , not of this knowledge of Jesus Christ. A knowledge of God , the onely True God , with an Obedience conformable thereunto , had then been enough to make us Happy . But Man , by his Fall , having contracted an Estate of Misery ; there is now no Restitution to our lost Happiness , but by a Redemption ; and there is no Redemption , but by Jesus Christ. For as there is but One God ; so , but One Mediator between God and Man , the Man Christ Jesus , 1 Tim. 2.5 . Neither is there any other name given to men , whereby we must be saved , but that of Jesus Christ of Nazareth ; whom they Crucified , and God raised from the dead : ( Act. 4.10 , 12. ) There is no Salvation in any other . It is necessary therefore , to the attainment of Eternal Life , that we know Him , in this Capacity . What we are to know concerning him , though we cannot expect , in so few words , to have clearly set down , without a Comment from other places to give light to them : Yet at least three things seem in these words to be pointed at ; His Divinity , His Incarnation , and His Mediatory Office. 1. His Divinity ; in that he is the Son of God. For he calls him Father , whom he says we must know to be the onely True God. Indeed , were he onely the Son of God in such a sense as Adam is so called , Luke 3.38 . or the Angels thought to be , Job 1.6 . that is , by Creation ; for as Saints are so called ( Rom. 8. and elsewhere , ) that is , by Adoption ; it would not iner a Divinity . But to be ( as Christ is ) the Son of God by Eternal Generation , argues a Communication in the same Nature . As the Apostle infers , Heb. 1.5 . For to which of the Angels said he at any time , Thou art my Son , this day have I begotten thee ? This onely begotten of the Father , must needs be also of the same nature with the Father ; and therefore , God , as he is . And this Argument , ( however now perhaps there are who endeavour to elude it ) the Jews , his Enemies , thought to be conclusive . For when they observed him to call God his Father , or pretend himself to be the Son of God ; especially , the Christ the Son of God ; they did not understand him to speak in such a sense as when themselves were commonly wont so to speak ( as Joh. 8.41 . We are not born of fornication ; we have one Father , even God ; ) but in such a sense as they judged Blasphemous , ( and had been so indeed , had it not been true ; ) who therefore sought the more to kill him , ( Joh. 5.18 . ) because he said , That God was his Father ; making himself Equal with God. And the High Priest ( Matth. 26.65 . ) rent his Cloths , saying , He speaketh Blasphemy , when our Saviour affirmed before him , That he was the Christ , the Son of God. 'T was manifest therefore , that he so spake , and they so understood him , of such a Son-ship as argued a Divinity , a being equal with God. 2. His Humanity , or Incarnation , is pointed at , in these words , whom thou hast sent . For by the Fathers sending him , or his coming into the World , is clearly meant his being Incarnate , or made Man. As Gal. 4.4 . God sent his Son made of a Woman . And Joh. 1.14 . The Word was made Flesh , and dwelt amongst us . 3. His Mediatory Office , is implyed as well in the Title Christ , added to his Name Jesus ; as in that of his being sent by God. Jesus the Christ , or Jesus the Messiah , whom thou hast sent . For as his Name Jesus doth design the Person ; so the Title Christ , that is Messiah , ( that in Greek , answering to this in Hebrew , and both signifying the Anointed ) doth import the Office , to which he was designed , and for which he was sent . For God did not send him , to no purpose ; but sent him for this end , for this Work , To be the Mediator between God and Man ; To reconcile us to the Father ; To make an Atonement or Propitiation for us . To take away the sins of the World ; To obtain Eternal Redemption ; To procure an Everlasting Inheritance ; a purchased Possession ; To make Intercession for us ; To save to the uttermost those that come unto God by him . Or , as Joh. 3.16 , 17. ( where all the three Particulars are likewise intimated ) God therefore sent his onely begotten Son into the World , that whosoever believes in him should not perish , but have Everlasting Life . And now , having gone through the whole Text , we might , if time would suffer , look back upon it to take a new Survey thereof , and collect from thence some of those particular deductions which might concern our practice . For certainly , the Knowledge which Christ here declares necessary to Eternal Life , and the means conducing thereunto , is not a bare Notional knowledge , or a pure speculative Belief , ( such as the Devils may have as well as we ; ) but an operative Knowledge , a practical Faith , a Faith fruitful in good Works ; without which those speculative notions will never bring us to Heaven . And therefore , without ingaging in the nice Disputes , of Justification by Faith alone , or Works concurring thereunto ; this is on all hands agreed without dispute , That Faith without good Works will never justify us . Whatever their influence be , in Justification ; their Presence at least is necessary . Without Doing , we cannot , in God's account , be reputed either to Believe or Know. Those that obey him not , are reckoned , in God's account , amongst those that Know not God : at least amongst those who profess they know God , but do in their works deny him . Who shall be so far , by such a Knowledge , from obtaining Eternal Life , that Christ shall come in flaming fire to take vengeance on them , and to punish them with everlasting destruction , from the presence of the Lord , and from the glory of his Power . In particular : If we know God , to be the onely True God ; Then must we Love him , Fear him , Worship him , and Obey him . Nor doth the knowledge of Christ , as Mediator , abate any thing of this Duty . For though he came to take away the Curse of the Law , by being made a Curse for us ; yet not our Obligation thereunto . He came not to destroy the Law , or make it less obligatory to duty , but to fulfill it . I may add ; That , those , who will not acknowledge themselves under the Obligation of it , have reason to fear , they be yet under the Curse of it . Again , If we know Christ whom he hath sent ; It will be our duty then to Believe in him ; ( For 't is , to those onely , that Christ doth give eternal life . ) And , so to Believe in him , as to Obey him ; For , to those who obey not the Gospel of his Son , it is , that Christ shall render vengeance in flaming fire . Furthermore : If in this Christ we hope to have Eternal Life ; how should this excite our Rejoicing and Thankfulness for so great Salvation ! Not by Rioting and Drunkenness ; by Revelling , and Debauchery ; ( which is the Abuse , not the Celebration , of this Solemnity , in memory of Christ's Incarnation ; ) But by a pious Remembrance and Commemoration of that Redemption obtained for us : such as may be to the Honour , not the Reproach , of him that came to Redeem us from our vain Conversation : That , denying ungodliness and worldly lusts , we should live Godly , Righteously , and Soberly in this present World : Looking for that blessed hope , and the glorious appearing of the Great God , and our Saviour Jesus Christ ; who gave himself for us , that he might redeem us from all iniquity , and purify unto himself , a peculiar People , zealous of good Works . To whom with the Father and the Holy Ghost , be Glory for evermore . The End of the First Sermon . A Second SERMON Concerning the TRINITY : TO THE UNIVERSITY of Oxford . April 26. 1691. JOH . xvij . 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . And this is life eternal , that they might know thee the onely true God , and Jesus Christ , whom thou hast sent . IT is now a great many years since , in this Place ( if not to this Auditory ) I did discourse of these Words . I shall repeat very little of that Discourse : But think fit to add somewhat to what was then said . Our Saviour , in the three Chapters next foregoing ( the 14 th , 15 th , and 16 th . Chapters of S. John's Gospel ) had made a large Discourse to his Disciples ( after his Institution of the Lord's Supper ) the night before he was to Die ; which ( in this 17 th . Chapter ) he closeth with a Prayer , to his Father , in their behalf . Wherein having made mention of Eternal Life ( ver . 2. ) which he was to give , to as many as the Father had given him , ( that is , to as many as should ●ffectually Believe in him ; ) he subjoins this E●●phonema , And This is Life Eternal , That they might know Thee , the only True God ; and , whom thou hast sent , Jesus Christ. In which words , we have Two things proposed to us : The Christian's Happiness ; And , The M●ans w●ereby it is to be attained . I. The C●ristian's Happiness , is called Life , as to its Exc●●●ency : and Eternal , as to its Duration . W●ich is Begun here , in the Kingdom of Gra●● : and is to be Perfected , and for ever Con●inued , in that of Glory . II. The Means to attain it , is the Knowledge of God and Christ. Where , by Knowledge , I do not understand a meer Notional or Speculative Knowledge ; ( For such I presume the Devils may have in as large a proportion as any of us , and yet never attain Eternal Life : ) But an Active , Practical Knowledge : Such a Knowledge as is attended with Faith and with Practice suitable thereunto . As in that of Isa. 53.11 . By his Knowledge , ( that is , by the Knowledge of Him ) shall my righteous Servant justifie many : That is , by Faith in him , attended with a suitable Practice to it . The Object of this Knowledge is declared to be twofold . 1. The Knowledge of God ; and 2. The Knowledge of Christ. To know Thee the onely True God ; that 's one part : And ( whom thou hast sent ) Jesus Christ ; that 's the other . And each of these contains several Particulars . The former of them contains at least these Three . 1. That there is a God. 2. That there is but One ( True ) God. 3. That the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ , is this Onely True God. He is that God , besides which God , there is no other True God. And , though Jesus Christ be God also ; yet not another God , but the same True God. For He and the Father are One. Joh. 10.30 . In the latter of them ( the Knowledge of Christ ) are Three things also . 1. His Divinity . 2. His Humanity . And 3. His Mediatory Office. Which are here briefly insinuated ; and are elsewhere more fully expressed . 1. His Divinity , in that he is the Son of the Father , who is the Onely True God : Not by Creation , as Adam and the Angels are called the Sons of God : nor by Adoption , as are the Righteous , who truly believe in Christ : But by Generation , as the Onely Begotten of the Father , ( Joh. 1.14 . ) and therefore of the same Nature with the Father . 2. His Humanity ; implyed in these words , Whom Thou hast sent . That is , So sent as to be made of a Woman : so sent as to be made Flesh. Gal. 4.4 . Joh. 1.14 . 3. His Mediatory Office : implyed in the Title Christ , added to the Name Jesus , ( And , whom Thou hast sent , Jesus Christ. ) He was so sent , as to be the Christ , the Messias . So sent , as that the World through him might be Saved : So , as that whosoever Believes in him should not Perish , but have Everlasting Life . Joh. 3.16 , 17. Of all which Points I did then Discourse more largely ; and therefore do now but name them . But I did then further observe , from the Order of the Words , ( to obviate a Cavil of the Socinians , ) that the Word Onely ( 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ) is here Restrictive , not of ( the Subject ) Thee ; but of ( the Predicate ) the True God. Of which I intend ( with God's Assistance , and your Patience ) to speak further at this time . Objection I. The first and great Objection of the Socinians , from this place , against the Divinity of Christ , and the Doctrine of the Trinity , is this If the Father be the onely true God ; then the Son , or Holy-Ghost , is not God , or not the True God ; but the Father onely . To which I shall give Three things in Answer . 1. This Argument is a plain Fallacy ; which they put upon us , by a willful perverting the Order of the Words . For it is not said Thee Onely to be the True God , ( as if not the Son also , or the Holy-Ghost , were the True God , but the Father onely : ) But , to Know Thee ( not Thee onely , or Onely Thee , ) to be the Onely true God. Nor is it so in our Englis● Translation onely ; but in the Original Greek : 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . It is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . Where the Article 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 coming after 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , and before 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , doth determine the Restrictive 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , not to be applied to the Subject 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , but to the Predicate , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . Just as , in our English , the Article The , coming between Thee and Onely , doth confine the word Onely , not to Thee ( that went before , ) but to True God , which follows . To know Thee ( not onely Thee , ) the onely true God. That is , to know Thee to be that God , beside which God , there is no other true God. Which we readily Acknowledge , and Profess . And then the Socinians Argument will appear just in this Form : The God of Abraham is the Onely true God ; And therefore not the God of Isaac , nor the God of Jacob. Yes , say I ; the God of Isaac is the same God with the God of Abraham ; And therefore the True God as he is . And the God of Jacob , likewise . And this one Answer doth fully satisfy the Objection , and there needs no more . Yet I shall add Two other things ( though they might here be spared ) because they may be of use elsewhere . 2. I say further : If it had been said ( as it is not ) Thee Onely ; yet even this would not exclude any who is the same with Him. And therefore , not the Son , nor the Holy-Ghost ; since they are One and the same God with Him. ( I and the Father are One , Joh. 10.30 . These Three are One , 1 Joh. 5.7 . ) To which purpose , consider we what we have Jer. 16.14 , 15. and again Jer. 23.7 , 8. Behold the days come , saith the Lord , that it shall no more be said , The Lord liveth that brought up the Children of Israel out of the land of Egypt ; But , The Lord liveth that brought up the Children of Israel from the land of the North , or out of the North Country . Now we are told by God himself , Exod. 20.2 , 3. I am the Lord thy God , which brought thee out of the land of Egypt , — Thou shalt have no other God but ME. Shall we therefore argue thus ; The God who brought Israel out of Egypt , is the onely true God ; and we must have no other God but HIM . Therefore , not him who brought Israel out of the North-Country ? Yes , say I , Him also . For the God who brought them out of the North-Country , is the same God , with him who brought them out of Egypt , ( not another God , though designed by another Character , ) and therefore , in having Him , we have not another God. So here ; To Know thee onely ( if it had been so said , as it is not ; ) it had implied no more but thus , Not any who is not the same God with Thee . To Know Thee Onely ( and not any other , who is not the same God with Thee ) to be the true God. Which therefore would not exclude the Son nor Holy Ghost , who are the same God with the Father . But of this Answer , there is no need in this place , because it is not said Thee Onely , or onely Thee . 3. I say further ; If it had been said ( as it is not ) Thee Onely , ( as the Socinians would have it to be understood ; ) I would then say , This were an Essential Predication , rather than a Personal . That is , That the Predicate True God , is affirmed of him in regard of his Essence , rather than of his Personality . As belonging to the Essence , which is common to the Three Persons , not as peculiar to the Person of the Father . Like as if it were said , David the King of Israel , or David the Father of Solomon , is a Reasonable Creature , or endued with Reason ; this being endued with Reason , doth not belong to him as King of Israel , nor as Father of Solomon ; but , as he is a Man ( though denominated by these Relations , ) and is equivalent to this , The Man ( who is Father of Solomon , and King of Israel ) is endued with Reason . So if it be said , that David King of Israel , and He onely , was Father of Solomon : it is not intended , that he was so as King of Israel ( much less , in that capacity Onely , ) but rather , as the Man who begot him ; though designed by that Character . So here ; God the Creator is the Onely True God : and God the Redeemer likewise ; ( Thus saith the Lord thy Redeémer the Holy One of Israel , the Lord of Hosts , I am the First and I am the Last , and beside ME there is no God , Isa. 41.14 . Isa. 44.6 . applyed to Christ , Rev. 1.8 , 17. Rev. 22.13 , 16. ) Shall we therefore argue , That God the Redeémer is the Onely True God , and beside Him there is no God , therefore not God the Creator ? No , we must not so argue . For it is not as Redeemer , or as Creator , that he is the Onely True God , but as God. ( It may be praedicatio 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , but not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . ) For he was the Onely True God from all Eternity ; but it was in Time that he made the World , and was the Redeemer of Mankind . And this both the Arian , and the Socinian , must needs acknowledge as to the place before us . For when Christ saith , To know Thee ( Father ) the Onely True God ; it cannot ( according to their Principles ) be said of him as Father of our Lord Jesus Christ , but as God. For if Christ be onely a Titular God , or a Creature-God , ( as they would have it , ) there was a time , or moment , when he was not , ( 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , ) and therefore , when God was not his Father . But he was the Onely True God from all Eternity ; and therefore must be here so called , not as Father of our Lord Jesus Christ , but as God. Not according to his Personality , but according to his Essence ; which , we say , is common to the Three Persons : Who are the same God , though under different Denominations . But these two latter Answers , ( though they be True and Solid , ) are not necessary to this place ; because it is not said Thee Onely . Yet I here name them , because they may be of use to answer some like Objection raised from some other place . The full import of the words , is this , That the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ , is that God , beside which God , there is no other True God. Or , There is no other True God , beside that God , which is the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. And this we do fully agree with , when we say , That the Son and the Holy-Ghost , are not another God , but the same True God with the Father . Objection II. It may perhaps be next Objected , That though this place do not Deny the Son and Holy Ghost to be the True God , ( meaning thereby , the same God with the Father : ) Yet neither doth it Prove them so to be . I answer . 'T is true : This place alone , ( without the concurrence of others ) doth not Prove the Trinity . ( And it is much if it should , where there are but Two mentioned . ) Nor is it brought by us to that purpose . We only Answer the Objections brought against it by others , from this place : And leave the Proof of it to be fetched from other places in concurrence with this . I have observed elsewhere ( Lett. 3. ) that if we should read it thus , To know Thee to be the Onely True God ; and him also whom thou hast sent , Jesus Christ , ( as implying him also to be the same True God : ) Or thus , To know Thee , and ( whom thou hast sent ) Jesus Christ , the Only True God : The words will well bear it , without any force put upon them . Nor is this only a new Notion of my own . For I ( since ) find , that S. Austin had said the same long ago , in his Epist. 174. ( speaking to Pascentius , an Arian , concerning this place ) De Patre tantummodo vos vultis intelligi , quod ait , Ut cognoscant Te unum verum Deum , & , quem misisti Jesum Christum ; Ubi nos subaudimus , etiam Jesum Christum verum Deum : Ut haec sit sententia , Te , & , quem misisti , Jesum Christum , cognoscant unum verum Deum . Ne illa consequatur absurditas , ut , si propterea non est verus Deus Jesus Christus , quia dictum est Patri , Te unum verum Deum : propterea non sit Dominus Pater , quia dictum est de Christo , Unus Dominus . Where he takes the meaning to be this , To know Thee , and , whom thou hast sent , Jesus Christ , the Onely True God ; which he backs with this Argument ; Because if we should here on this account exclude the Son from being the True God ; we might , for the same reason , exclude the Father from being the Lord , because it is said ( 1 Cor. 8.6 . ) One Lord , Jesus Christ. Yet even this , though it might prove it , as to the Son , it would not hence conclude it , as to the Holy-Ghost . But the concurrence of other places , will prove it more clearly as to both . I shall shew it of each . As to the Son , we have it clearly affirmed , by the same S. John , ( who best understood the import of his own words ) that he is also the True God ; ( so that it was not intended here to exclude him . ) 1 Joh. 5.20 . We are in him that is True , even in his Son Jesus Christ : This is the True God ▪ ( And therefore not onely the Father . ) And he had before told us ( from Christ's own words ) Joh. 10.30 . I and my Father are One. Nor is it here meant of one in Testimony , as the Socinians would have it understood elsewhere , ( there being in the Context here no mention of Testimony at all : ) But it must be meant of One God. And this is manifest from the Inference which the Jews made from it . For they did thereupon take up stones to stone him , as for ( what they call ) Blasphemy : Because thou ( say they ) being a Man , makest thy self God , ver . 31 , 32 , 33. For which Inference there had been no Pretence , if by One , they had not understood One God. And the High Priest in like manner , Matth. 26.63 , 64 , 65. I adjure thee ( saith he ) by the Living God , that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ , the Son of God ; To which when Christ had answered , Thou hast said , ( dicis quod res est , ) He rent his clothes , saying , He hath spoken Blasphemy , What further need have we of witnesses ? For to say that he was the Christ , the Son of God ; or ( as it is in Mark 14.61 . ) The Christ , the Son of the Blessed ; was understood by them to be the same , as to call himself Go● . Which had been Blasphemy , had it not been True. And what is said of Christ , Joh. 10.30 . I and the Father are One ; is said of all Three , by the same St. John , ( ● Joh. 5.7 ) The Father , the Word , and the Holy Ghost ; th●se Three are One. Objection III. It is Objected , that these words , last cited , are said to have been wanting in some Translations , or some ancient Copies . Answ. Be it so . And so are some whole Epistles wanting in some Translations . And considerable parts of some other Chapters . But we are not therefore to cast them away as not Genuine . The II d. and III d. Epistles of St. John , and that of Jude , are said to have been wanting in the Syriack and Arabick Translations : And the Story of the Woman taken in Adultery , Joh. 8. wanting in the Gothick Gospels : And part of the last Chapter of St. Mark 's Gospel , is said to be wanting in some Books : And the Doxology in the close of the Lord's Prayer : And the like in divers others . But we must not thence conclude them not to be Genuine , and put them out of our Bibles , because they have chanced to be omitted in some Books . And it is so far from being strange , that such Omissions should sometimes happen ; that it is very strange ( if there were not a great Providence of God to preserve the Scriptures pure and entire ) that there should be no more such mistakes than what are found . For ( before the convenience of Printing was found out ) when Copies were to be singly transcribed one from another , and even those but in a few hands : 'T was very possible , ( and hardly avoidable , ) even for a diligent Transcriber , sometime to skip a line . Especially , ( which is the case here ) when some of the same words do again recur after a line or two ; Men are very subject , both in Writing and Printing , ( as those well know who are versed in either , ) to leap from one word , to the same recurring soon after . Nor is such Omission ( when it happens ) readily discerned , if ( as here ) the sense be not manifestly disturbed by it . Now when such variety of Copies happens ( that words be found in some , which are wanting in others , ) this must either happen by a Casual mis-take , ( without any design of Fraud : ) or by a willful Falsification ; as to serve a particular turn ; ( which I take to be the case of the Papists , Indices Expurgatorii . ) And , as to the words in question ; If the difference of Copies happened at first by a Casual mistake , ( as I am apt to think , ) 't is very easy for a Transcriber ( unawares ) to leave out a Line which was in his Copy ( especially where such omission doth not manifestly disturb the sense ; ) but not to put in a line which was not there . And , in such case , the Fuller Copy is likelyest to be True , and the Omission to be a Fault . Which happening ( as it seems it did ) some hundreds of years ago , in some one Copy ; it might easily pass ( unobserved ) into many others transcribed thence ( and so to others derived from those Transcripts . ) But an Insertion ( of what was not in their Copy ) must needs be willful , and not casual . On the other side ; If this variety of Copies were at first from a willful Falsification ; It is much more likely to be a willful Omission of the Arians , in some of their Copies , ( which might be done silently , and unobserved ; ) than by a willful Insertion of the Orthodox . For the Insertion of such a clause , if wholly New , and which had never before been Heard of ; would have been presently detected by the Arians , as soon as ever it should be urged against them . Nor was any advantage to be made of it by the Orthodox , since the Divinity of Christ ( which was the Point then in question ) might be as strongly urged from that in St. John's Gospel , I and the Father are One , as from this in his Epistle , These Three are One. And therefore it is not likely that the Orthodox should willfully make any such Falsification , from whence they could promise themselves no advantage . Nor do I find , it was ever charged upon them by the ancient Arians in those days : though Athanasius and others urged it against them . And in very ancient Copies , in which it had been left out , it is found supplied in the Margin , as having been faultily omitted . And it is the more likely to be Genuine , because in this clause ( The Father , the Word , and the Holy-Ghost ) the second Person is called sunpliciter , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , the Word ; which is St. John's Language , both here , and in his Gospel , Joh. 1. And is ( I think ) peculiar to him ; and not so used by any other of the Holy Writers of the New Testament . I do not deny but that this second Person may be called the Word of God , in Heb. 11.3 . By Faith we understand that the Worlds were framed by the Word of God. And 2 Pet. 3.5 , 7. By the Word of God were the Heavens of old , and the Earth , &c. and by the same Word they are kept in store . As he is by the same St. John , Rev. 19.13 . His name is called , the Word of God. But to call him the Word absolutely ( without other addition ) I think is peculiar to St. John. And therefore much more likely in this place , to have proceeded from the same Pen , and not to have been inserted by an Interpolater some hundreds of years after . And that clause These Three are One , in the Epistle , agreeing so well with I and the Father are one in the Gospel , is a further confirmation of their being both from the same Pen. Add to this , That the Antithesis which we find in the 7 th and 8 th Verses , is so very Natural ; that it is a great Presumption to be Genuine . There are Three that bear record in Heaven , The Father , the Word , and the Holy-Ghost , and these Three are One : And there are Three that bear witness in Earth , The Spirit , and the Water , and the Blood , and these Three agree in One. Which as it stands , is very Natural ; but the latter clause would seem lame without the former : and the words in Earth wholly redundant in the latter , if not by Antithesis to answer to the words in Heaven , in the former Verse . And that it was anciently so read , appears from St. Cyprian , by whom it is twice cited ( in his Book De Unitate Ecclesiae , and in his Epistle ad Jubaianum ) before the Arian Controversy was on foot . In the former place , ( arguing for the Church's Unity , not to be broken by Schisms ) he speaks thus . Dicit Dominus , Ego & Pater unum sumus . Et iterum de Patre & Filio & Spiritu Sancto , scriptum est , Et hi tres unum sunt . Et quisquam credit hanc Unitatem de divina firmitate venientem , sacramentis coelestibus cohaerentem , scindi in Ecclesia posse ? That is , Our Lord saith , I and the Father are One : And again , of the Father , Son and Holy Ghost , It is Written , These Three are One. And who can believe , that this Unity of the Church , proceeding from this Firm Union in God , and united by the Heavenly Sacraments , can be separated in the Church ? Where he argues for the Unity of the Church ( not to be divided by Schism ) by two Arguments from this place . One from the firm Unity of God ; noted in ver . 7. The Father , Son , and Holy Ghost are One ; from whom this Church proceeds , ( de divina firmitate venientem . ) The other , from their being United by the same Sacraments ( sacramentis coelestibus cohaerentem ) which relates to ver . 8. The Spirit , the Water , and the Bloud agree in One. Which double Argument , from the two Verses , shew that , then , they were both read . And , as to the former of them ( which is that in question ) He cites it again , in his Epistola ad Jubaianum ; where , disputing against Bapt●sm by Hereticks , he thus argues ; Si baptizari quis apud Haereticos potuit ; utique & remissam peccatorum consequi potuit . Si peccatorum remissam consecutus est ; & sanctifica●us est , & templum Dei factus est . Quaero , Cujus Dei ? Si Creatoris ; non potuit , qui in eum non credidit . Si Christi ; nec hujus potuit fieri templum , qui negat Deum Christum . Si Spiritus Sancti ; [ cum tres Unum sint , ] quomodo Spiritus Sanctus placatus esse ei potest , qui aut Patris aut Fi●ii inimicus est ? That is ; If by Hereticks one could be baptized ; then he might obtain remission of sins : If he obtain remission of sins , then is he sanctified , and become the Temple of God. I ask then , of What God ? Of the Creator ? that he cannot be , who did not in Him believe . Of Christ ? Neither can he be His Temple , who denies Christ to be God. Of the Holy Ghost ? No. Fo● , seeing these Three are One , How can the Holy Ghost be at Peace with him who is at Enmity with either the Father or the Son ? 'T is manifest therefore that , These Three are One , was thus read in Cyprian's time ; as being by him twice cited , before the Arian Controversie was on foot . And ( before him ) it is cited by Tertullian , in his Book adversus Praxeam , cap. 25. Connexus Patris in Filio , & Filii in Paracleto , tres efficit cohaerentes , alterum ex altero : qui Tres Unum sunt , ( non Unus : ) quomodo dictum est , Ego & Pater Unum sumus ; ad Substantiae Unitatem , non ad Numeri Singularitatem . Where he doth not only cite the place , but doth likewise Parallel and Compare , These Three are One , ( in this place ) with I and the Father are One , ( in the other place ) as being of a like import . That is , The Connexion of the Father with the Son , and of the Son with the Paraclete or Holy Ghost , makes these coherent one with the other : Which Three are ONE , ( Unum not Unus , One Thing , not One Person ; ) like as it is said , I and the Father are One , ( one Thing ) as to the Unity of Substance , though not as to Singularity of Number . They are One Being , One Substance , though otherwise they may be Three . 'T is therefore no New Interpolation ; but was anciently so read by Cyprian and Tertullian ( the two most ancient of the Latin Fathers ) long before the Arian Controversie was on foot . And hath been urged by others afterward , against the Arians . Nor is there any prejudice ( that I know of ) against its being so read as now we read it , save that some of the Fathers ( it is said ) have omitted to Urge it against the Arians , when there hath been occasion of so doing . But this ( beside that it is onely a Negative Argument , and I know not how well grounded ) might very well happen , if it chanced to be wanting in that particular Copy which such Father used . ( For we are not to suppose they had then such plenty of Bibles as are now in our hands ; but some one Manuscript Copy was to serve many . ) And because that in St. John's Gospel , I and the Father are One , did fit their purpose as well , or rather better , than this in his Epistle , These Three are One. For the Controversie , then on foot , was not so much that of the Trinity , as that of the Divinity of Christ. To return , therefore , to the place which is before us ; From what hath been said , it is manifest enough , that St. John , in calling the Father , the Onely True God , did not intend to exclude the Son , from being the same True God ; whom himself doth elsewhere call the True God also , 1 Joh. 5.20 . No more ( I say ) than what is said , by name , of God the Redeemer ( Isa. 44.6 , 8. ) is to be thought exclusive of God the Creator , or God the Father ; Thus saith the Lord , the REDEEMER , the Lord of Hosts , I am the first , and I am the last , and beside ME there is no God. Which is applied to Christ in particular , Rev. 22 . 1● , 16. But is not exclusive of the Father ; because God the Creator ( or God the Father ) is the same God with God the Redeemer , and therefore not another God beside him . And therefore both of them ( or rather , the same God under both Considerations ) indifferently called ( especially in the Old Testament ) God indefinitely , the Lord of Hosts , the Holy One of Israel . Nor is that which is said of Christ , 1 Tim. 6.14 , 15 , 16. Our Lord Jesus Christ , who Onely hath Immortality , intended to exclude the Father ; as if the Father were not also Immortal , or were not ( what is there said of Christ ) the blessed and onely Potentate , the King of kings , and the Lord of lords . But only , that our Lord Jesus Christ , is that God , which ( God ) is the blessed and onely Potentate , the King of kings , and Lord of lords , and who only hath Immortality . And ( as was before noted by S. Austin . ) The Father is not excluded from being Lord , notwithstanding that of 1 Cor. 8.6 . To us there is but One God , the Father ; and One Lord Jesus Christ : or that of Eph. 4.5 , 6. One Lord , one Faith , One Baptism , one God and Father of all . For the Father , and the Son , are the same God , the same Lord. The same of whom it is said , Isa. 45.5 . I am the Lord and there is none else , there is no God beside me . And again , ver . 6. I am the Lord and there is none else . Where note , that the Word Father , in that phrase , God and Father of All , is different from the sense of it , in the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ : that relating to the common Nature ; this to the Person . And as in these places , what is sa●d of the Son , ( that he onely hath Immortality , that he is the onely Potentate , that he is the One Lord , that beside him , the Redeemer , there is no God , ) are not to be understood exclusive of the Father ; so what is here said of the Father , ( that he is the Onely True God ) is not to be understood exclusive of the Son ; who is not another , but the same True God. I thought here to have inserted ( as in a proper place ) a Discourse of some other Points relating to the Trinity ; which I find it necessary here to omit ( or to defer it to some other occasion ) that I be not prevented by the time in what I have to say further . That there is a God the Creator , a God the Redeemer , and a God the Sanctifier ; and that these are the same God ; I think cannot reasonably be Denied . I shall shew it of each . As to God the Creator , we are told , Gen. 1.1 . In the beginning God Created the Heaven and the Earth . ( And , to the same purpose , in many other places . ) And , I think , there is none doubts , but that this Creator , is the True God , the Supreme God. And in Jer. 10.11 . God doth by this Character distinguish himself from all other ( pretended ) Gods , The Gods that have not made the Heavens and the Earth , they shall perish from the Earth , and from under these Heavens . As to God the Redeemer ; I know that my Redeemer liveth , saith Job , Ch. 19.25 . By which Redeemer doubtless he meant the Living God , a God who did then Live ; a God who was , then , in Being , and not ( as the Socinians would have us think ) who was not to Be , till Two Thousand years after . And Isa. 44.6 . Thus saith the Lord the Redeemer , the Lord of Hosts , I am the first and I am the last , and beside Me there is no God. Which Redeeme● , must needs be the same God , with God the Creator , the Lord of Hosts . As to God the Sanctifier ; Purge me with hyssop ( saith David ) and I shall be clean ; wash me , and I shall be whiter than snow : Create in me a clean heart , O God ; and renew a right spirit within me , ( Psal. 51.7 , 10. ) Which certainly are works of Sanctification ; and the God , to whom David prayed , is doubtless the Living God , a God then in Being . And when God promiseth ●o Israel , I will give them a hear● to k●ow me ; and they shall return unto me with their whole heart , Jer. 24.7 . I will give them one heart , and one way , that they may fear me for ever ; I will put my fear in their hearts , that they shall not depart from me , Jer. 32.39 , 40. I will give them one heart , and put a new spirit within them ; I will take away the heart of stone and give them a heart of flesh , Ezek. 11.19 . and 36.26 . I will put my Law in their inward parts , and write it in their hearts , Jer. 31.33 . The Lord thy God will circumcise thine heart , and the heart of thy seed , to love the Lord thy God with all thine heart , and with all thy soul , that thou mayst live , Deut. 30.6 . All these are sanctifying works ; and that God who doth them , is God the Sanctifier And it is the same God , who doth thus Sanctifie , that is the Creator and the Redeemer . Now this God the Creator , God the Redeemer , and God the Sanctifier , I take to be the same with what we otherwise call , God the Father , God the Son , and God the Holy Ghost . And our Church doth so expound it in her Catechism ; First , I learn to believe in God the Father , who hath Made me and all the World : Secondly , In God the Son , who hath Redeemed me and all Mankind : Thirdly , In God the Holy Ghost , who Sanctifieth me and all the Elect people of God. And it is no more absurd or inconsistent , to say , that God the Father , God the Son , and God the Holy-Ghost , are the same God ; than to say , that God the Creator , God the Redeemer , and God the Sanctifier , are the same God. As they stand related to us , they are called God the Creator , God the Redeemer , and God the Sanctifier . As to the different Oeconomy , amongst themselves , one is called the Father , who is said to Beget ; another the Son , who is said to be Begotten ; a third , the Holy-Ghost , who is said to Proceed or Come forth ; But are all the same God. Objection IV. But then here I meet with another Objection , on which the Socinians lay great weight . If God the Creator , God the Redeemer , and God the Sanctifier , or God the Father , God the Son , and God the Holy-Ghost , be the same God , they cannot then be Three Persons : And if they be Three Persons , they must be Three Gods. For like as Three Persons , amongst Men , doth signifie Three Men ; so Three Persons , who are God , must be Three Gods. Contrary to the First Commandment , which allows us to have but One God. To which I answer ; First , This is only to cavil at a Word , when they have nothing of moment against the Thing . So that if in●●ead of saying ●hese Three Persons are One God , we say , These Three are One God , or give them another Name instead of Persons , or say these Three Somewhats , without giving them a Name , this Objection is at an end . 2. I say further ; 'T is very true , that , in our English Tongue , by another Person , we sometimes understand another Man , ( because that other Person is , very often , another Man also . ) But it is not always so ; nor is that the proper Signification of the Word ; but an Abusive sense put upon it . And the reason of using the word Person in this abusive or improper sense ; is , for want of an English word to answer the Latin word Homo , or the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , which might indifferently relate to both Sexes . For the word Man doth properly relate to the Male , and Woman to the Female . And if the word Man be sometimes so used as to imply the Woman also ; it is ( by a Synecdoche ) putting the Name of One Sex , to signifie Both. And 't is for want of such a Word ( which might indifferently relate to both Sexes ) that we sometime make use of Person in a borrowed sense , rather than to use a Circumlocution of Man and Woman , by naming both Sexes . And if we should use such Circumlocution of Man and Woman ; yet even this would not reach the whole Species . For we do not use to call them Man and Woman , till they be of a considerable Age ; before which time they are called Children ; and therefore to comprehend the whole Species , we say , Man , Woman , and Child . We do indeed , sometimes , to that purpose , make use of the word Mankind , ( adding the word kind to that of Man , to Ampliate the Signification of it . ) But this relates only to Genus Humanum in a Collective sense ; not to Homines taken Distributively . For we do not say a Mankind , two Mankinds , &c , as we say Homo , Homines . We are fain , therefore , for want of a proper English word , to make use of Person in a borrowed sense to answer the Latin Homo . But the Ancient Fathers , who first applied the word Persona to the Sacred Trinity , did not speak English. And therefore we cannot , from the present use of the word Person in our Language , conclude in what sense they used the word Persona . 3. Again ; the Schoolmen in later Ages , have yet put another sense on the word Persona , peculiar to themselves ; extending it indifferently to Men and Angels ; ( for want of a proper word of that Extent ; ) so as to signifie ( with them ) what they call Suppositum Rationale , or what we call a Reasonable Creature . ( And , in imitation of them , some others have since so used it . ) But this is a New sense , of later Ages , since the time of those Fathers , ( nor do the Schoolmen , in this sense , without a Metaphor , apply it to the Sacred Trinity . ) We cannot therefore conclude from hence , What was the Fathers sense of it . 4. To find out therefore the true sense of t●e word Person as applied to the Trinity ; we are not so much to consider , what now-a-days the word doth sometime signifie with us in English ; nor what sense the Schoolmen have put upon it since the time of those Fathers : As , what was the true sense of the word Persona , at or before their times , in approved Latin Authours . Which is quite another thing from either of these senses . For what in English we sometimes mean by Three Persons ( taken indifferently for Men , Women , and Children , ) the Latins would not have called tres Personas , but tres Homines : Though , if considered in such Relations , as Father , Mother , and Child , they might so be called tres Personae . Nor do I find that in approved Latin Authours , the word Persona was wont to be attributed by them ( as by the Schoolmen it hath since been ) to Angels ; nor to their Genii , or Heathen Gods. But , 5. It did signifie the State , Quality , or Condition of a Man , as he stands Related to other Men. ( And so I find the Latin word Persona Englished in our Dictionaries . ) Suppose , as a King , a Subject , a Father , a Son , a Neighbour , a Publick or Private Person , a Person of Honour , and the like . And so , as the Condition varied , the Person varied also , though the same Man remained . As if an ordinary Person , be first made a Knight , and then a Lord ; the Person or Condition is varied , but he is still the same Man that he was before . And he that is this Year , a Lord Mayor , may be , next Year , but an Alderman , or not so much . Hence are those Latin Phrases , frequent in approved Authours ; Personam imponere ( to put a Man into an Office , or confer a Dignity upon him ; ) Induere personam ( to take upon him the Office ; ) Sustinere personam ( to Bear an Office , or Execute an Office ; ) Deponere personam ( to Resign the Office , or lay it down ; ) so , Agere personam ( to Act a Person , ) and many the like . So that there is nothing of Contradiction , nothing of Inconsistence , nothing Absurd or Strange in it , for the same Man to sustain divers Persons , ( either successively , or at the same Time ; ) or divers Persons to meet in the same Man ; according to the true and proper Notion of the word Person . A Man may , at the same time , sustain the Person of a King , and of a Father , if invested with Regal and Paternal Authority ; ( and these Authorities may be Subordinate one to another ; ) and he may accordingly Act sometime as a King , and sometime as a Father . Thus Tully , ( who well understood the Propriety of Latin words ) Sustineo Unus tres Personas ; meam , Adversarii , Judicis , ( I being One and the same Man , sustain Three Persons ; That of my Own , that of my Adversary , and that of the Judge . ) And David was , at the same time , Son of Jesse , Father of Solomon , and King of Israel . And this takes away the very Foundation of their Objection ; Which proceeds upon this Mistake , as if Three Persons ( in a proper sense ) must needs imply Three Men. 6. Now if Three Persons ( in the proper sense of the word Person ) may be One Man ; what hinders but that Three Divine Persons ( in a sense Metaphorical ) may be One God ? What hinders but that the same God , considered as the Maker and Sovereign of all the World , may be God the Creator , or God the Father ; and the same God considered , as to his special Care of Mankind , as the Ruthour of our Redemption , be God the Redeemer , or God the Son ; and the same God , as working effectually on the Hearts of his Elect , be God the Sanctifier , or God the Holy-Ghost ? And what hinders but that the same God , distinguished according to these three Considerations , may fitly be said to be Three Persons ? Or ( if the word Person do not please ) Three Somewhats that are but One God ? And this seems to me a Full and Clear Solution of that Objection , which they would have to be thought Insuperable . Objection V. It may perhaps be Objected further , Why must we needs make use of the word Person ; and call them Three Persons , if Three Somewhats will serve as well ? I answer , First , We have no such need of the word Person , but that we can spare it . Hypostasis will serve our turn as well . And if they think the Latin word Persona , be not a good Translation of the Greek Hypostasis ; Let them retain the Greek word . ( We mean the same by both . ) And then perhaps they will find themselves at a loss , to fasten some of their Objections upon the word Hypostasis , which they would fasten upon Persona . 2. But , Secondly , If the Thing be thus far agreed , That these Three Somewhats ( thus considered ) may be One God : I see not why they should contend with us about the Name Person . For this is only to quarrel about a Word , or Name , when the Notion is agreed . 3. If it were admitted ( which I see no reason for ) that the word Person doth not fitly express that Notion which it is intended to design ; the most that can be inferred from it , is but , That we have not given it so fit a Name : And , to cavil at that , when the Notion intended by it is understood ; were just as if one should argue , There never was such a Man , as whom they called Pope Pius ; because the Man , who was so called , was not a Pious Man. 4. But I see not why the word Person should not be thought a very fit word for this purpose . For Two of these Three are represented to us in Scripture under the Names of Father and Son ; and this Son as Begotten of the Father ; ( and therefore these Names are not to be quarrelled with : ) But all this in a Metaphorical sense ; ( For no Man can suppose , that this Father doth so Beget this Son , as these words do properly signifie amongst Men ) . Now the Relations of Father and Son , in a proper sense , are such as are properly denoted by the word Persona , in its proper Acceptation . And consequently the Father and Son , in a Metaphorical sense , may ( by a Continuation of the same Metaphor ) be fitly called Persons , in that Metaphorical sense . And in what sense they be Father and Son , in a like sense they be Persons , according to the Propriety of the Latin word Persona . For such Relatives the Latins called Personas . And if the Father and Son may fitly be so called ; no doubt but the Holy Ghost may be so called also , as One Proceeding or Coming forth ( 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ) from them . As in Joh. 14.26 . The Comforter , which is the Holy Ghost , whom the Father will send in My name , he will teach you all things . And Joh. 15.26 . The Comforter , whom I will send you from the Father , even the Spirit of Truth , which proceedeth from the Father , He shall testifie of Me. Where it is manifest , that , in what sense the Father and Son are to be reputed Persons ; the Comforter or Holy Ghost , is , in the same sense , so to be reputed . So that ( I think ) I have clearly Vindicated , not only the Notion , That these Three Somewhats may be One God ; But the Name also , That these Somewhats , may fitly be called Persons . Objection VI. I shall name but one Objection more , which when I have satisfied , I shall conclude for this time . That 6 th . Objection ( and 't is but a weak one ) is this . The Trinitarians do not all agree , but differ among themselves , in expressing their Notions in this Matter . Very well . And do not the Antitrinitarians differ much more ? Doth not the Arian and the Socinian differ as much from one another , as either of them do from us ; ( and declare that they so do ? ) And do not the Arians among themselves , and the Socinians amongst themselves , differ more than do the Trinitarians ? Certainly they do . It must be confessed , that different Men , as well in the same as in different Ages , have very differently expressed themselves , according to their different Sentiments of Personality ; and of the particular Distinctions of the three Persons among themselves . But so it is in all the most obvious things in the world . As , in Time , Place , Space , Motion , and the like . We are all apt to think , that we all know well enough , what we mean by those Words , till we be asked . But if we be put to it , to express our selves concerning any of them , What it is , whether a Thing , or Nothing , or not a Thing , or somewhat of a Thing , and what that somewhat is ; it would be long enough before we should all agree to express our selves just in the same manner ; and , so clearly , as that no man who hath a mind to cavil , could find occasion so to do . I might say the like of Heat and Cold ; of Light , Sight , and Colour ; of Smells , and T●sts , and the different Sorts of them . Can we never be s●id to agree in this , That the Fire doth Burn and Consume the Woo● ; till we be all agreed what is the Figure of those Fiery Atoms ( and what their Motion , and from what Impulse ) which enter the Pores of ●he Wood , and separate its parts , and convert some of them to Smoak , some to Flame , and ●●me to Ashes ; and which to which ; and in what manner all this is done ? What a folly then is it to require that , in the things of God , we should all so agree as to express our thoughts just in the same manner ; as is not possible to do in the most obvious things we meet with ? And , in such a case as wherein to express our Notions , we have no Words but Figurative , it is not to be thought strange , that one man should make use of one Metaphor , and another of another , according as their several Fansies serve . But thus far , I think , the Orthodox are all agreed ; That between these Three , which the Scripture calls The Father , the Son , and the Holy Ghost , or the Father , the Word , and the Spirit , there is a D●stinction , greater than that of ( what we call ) the Divine Attributes ; but not so as to be Three Gods. And this Distinction , they have thought fit to denote by the Word Hypostasis , or Person . They are also all agreed ; that one of these Persons ( namely the Son or the Word ) was Incarnate , or Made Flesh , and did take to himself our Humane Nature . But as to the particular Modes , or Manner How ; either how these two Natures are United , or how these three Persons are Distinguished each from other : we may be content to be Ignorant , farther than God hath been pleased to Reveal to us . We know that our Immortal Soul is joined with an Humane Body , so as to make One Man ( without ceasing , that to be a Spirit , and this to be a Body : ) But 't is hard for us to say How. And accordingly we say , that the Man Christ Jesus , ( without ceasing to be Man , ) and God manifested in the Flesh , ( without ceasing to be God , ) are One Christ : But what kind of Union this is , which we call Hypostatical , we do not throughly understand . We know also that the Father is said to Beget , the Son to be Begotten , the Holy Ghost to Proceed : But neither do we fully understand the import of these Words ; nor is it needful that we should . But , so far as was said before , we do all agree ; and we may safely rest there . Now to God the Father , God the Son , and God the Holy Ghost ; three Persons , but One God ; be Honour , and Glory , and Praise , now and for ever . The End of the Second Sermon . A Third SERMON Concerning the TRINITY . JOH . xvij . 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . And this is life eternal , that they might know thee the onely true God , and Jesus Christ , whom thou hast sent . I Have , in a former Discourse from this Verse , entered upon the Doctrine of the Trinity ; not so much , as being contained in it , as occasioned by it . I have shewed that the word Onely is here restrictive , not of the Subject Thee , but of the Predicate True God. Affirming the Father to be the Onely True God , though not the Father Onely . Nor is it exclusive of the Son , who is also the same True God ; and is so expresly called , by this same Writer , 1 Joh. 5.20 . where ( speaking of Jesus Christ ) he says , This is the True God , and Eternal Life ; as if it were spoken with a direct aspect to the words before us . Now that Christ is often called God , neither the Arians nor the Socinians do deny . And it is so frequent , and so evident , as not to be denyed . Not only in the place last cited , but in many others . Thy throne , O God endureth for ever , Heb. 1.8 . The Word was with God , and the Word was God. Joh. 1.1 . My Lord and my God. Joh. 20.28 . The Being over all , God blessed for ever , Amen . ( Or , the Supreme Being , the ever blessed God. Rom. 9.5 . ) And elsewhere . Objection VII . But to this they Object , That though he be sometime called God ; yet by God is not there meant the Supreme God : But either a mere Titular God , as the Socinians will have it ; ( as one of the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , 1 Cor. 8.5 . one who is called God , but indeed is not , but a mere Man however highly dignified . ) Or ( as the Arians will have it ) that he is God indeed , but not the Supreme God , not the same God with the Father , but an Inferiour God , ( Deus factus ) a made-God , a Creature-God ; who was indeed before the World , but not from Eternity , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , there was ( a Time , a Moment , a Quando ) when he was not , when he had not a Being . In Answer to both which ; I shall endeavour to shew , ( by the most signal Characters , whereby the Supreme God , the Onely true God , is set forth to us in Scripture ; and by which he is therein Distinguished from all false Gods , or other pretended Gods ; ) that Christ is the True God , the Supreme God , the same God with the Father , and not another God. CHARACTER I. The first Character , which we meet with , of this God , is that of Gen. 1.1 . In the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth . Which I think no man doubts but to be meant of the True God , the Supreme God. And by virtue of this , he claims the Sovereignty thereof ; The Earth is the Lord's , and the fulness thereof , Psal. 24.1 . Jehovah , the Lord of all the Earth , Josh. 3.11 , 13. The God of the Heaven , and the God of the Earth , Gen. 24.3 . The Heaven is my Throne , and the Earth is my Footstool , Isa. 66.1 . Behold the Heaven , and the Heaven of Heavens , is the Lord's , the Earth also , and all that is therein , Deut. 10.14 . The same Character is applied to God very often , Isa. 42.5 , 8. Thus saith God the Lord ( Jehovah ) he that created the Heavens and stretched them out ; he that spread forth the Earth and that which cometh out of it ; he that giveth breath unto the people upon it , and spirit to them that walk therein . I am the Lord ( Jehovah ) that is my name , and my Glory will I not give unto another . And Isa. 48.13 . Mine hand hath laid the foundation of the Earth , and my right hand hath spanned ( or spread out ) the Heavens . So Psal. 8.3 . When I consider the Heavens , the work of Thy fingers ; the Moon and the Stars which thou hast ordained . Psal. 146.6 . Which made Heaven and Earth , the Sea , and all that therein is . And many other places , not only in the Old Testament ; but in the New Testament likewise ; as Acts 14.15 . That ye should turn from these vanities unto the Living God , who made Heaven and Earth , and the Sea and all things that are therein . And Acts 17.24 . God that made the World , and all things therein . So Revel . 4.11 . Thou hast created all things . Chap. 14.7 . Him that made Heaven and Earth , and the Sea , and the Fountains of Water . And it is the distinctive Character , whereby he doth distinguish himself from all other pretended Gods , Jer. 10. Where he who at ver . 10. is called The Lord , the true God , the living God , an everlasting King , at who 's wrath the Earth shall tremble , and the Nations shall not abide his indignation ; doth at ver . 11. give this defiance to all other Gods , Thus shall ye say to them ; The Gods which have not made the Heavens and the Earth , they shall perish from the Earth , and from under these Heavens . Now this Character we find ascribed to Christ. Not only , where it is spoken as of God indefinitely , but to be understood of Christ ; ( as are some of the places already mentioned : ) But even where it is particularly applied to him . I shall begin with that of Joh. 1.1 , 2. where we have a large Discourse of him , In the beginning was the Word , and the Word was with God , and the Word was God. Where , by the Word is meant Christ , as is evident from the further descriptions of him in the following verses ; 'T is he of whom John the Baptist came to bear witness , ver . 7 , 8. He who came into the World , but the World knew him not . ver . 10. Who came to his own , but his own received him not ; but to as many as received him , he gave power to become the Sons of God. ver . 11.12 . Who was made flesh , and dwelt amongst us , and we beheld his glory ; the glory as of the onely begotten of the Father . ver . 14. He of whom John bare witness and cryed , saying , This is he of whom I spake , He that cometh after me is preferred ●efore 〈◊〉 ●or he was before me ; ( not as to his Humane Na●ure ; fo● so , John the Baptist was older than he , by six months , Luk. 1.26 . ) and of his fulness ( saith St. John ) we have all received grace for grace ; For the Law was given by Moses , but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ , ver . 15 , 16 , 17. 'T was Jesus Christ therefore that is here called the Word . Now of this same Word , it is said , The same was in the beginning with God ; All things were made by him , and without him was not any thing made which was made , ver . 2 , 3. He was in the World , and the World was made by him , ver . 10. Consonant to that of Heb. 11.3 . The Worlds we refrmed by the Word of God : and 2 Pet. 3.5 . By the Word of God the Heavens were of old , and the Earth standing in the Water and out of the Water . And by the same Word , the heavens and earth are kept in store , or preserved , ver . 7. And to the same purpose , Col. 1.16 , 17. By him were all things created , that are in heaven , and that are in earth . And he is before all things , and by him all things consist . And Heb. 1.2 . By whom also he made the Worlds . In Psal. 102. we have a long Prayer ( to the Supreme God doubtless ) which bears this title , A Prayer of the Afflicted , when he is overwhelmed , and poureth out his complaint before the Lord , ( the Lord Jehovah . ) It begins thus , Hear my Prayer , O Lord , ( Jehovah ) and let my cry come unto thee . And at the same rate he proceeds , addressing himself to the same God all along . And at ver . 24 , 25 , 26 , 27. he speaks thus , O my God , thy years are throughout all Generations ; Thou of old hast laid the Foundations of the Earth , and the Heavens are the work of thy hands ; ( who is the same God therefore of whom Moses had before said , In the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth , Gen. 1.1 . ) They shall perish ( as the Psalmist proceeds ) but thou shalt endure : Yea all of them shall wax old as a Garment , as a vesture shalt thou change them and they shall be changed : But thou art the same , and thy years shall have no end . And doubtless the Psalmist , when he made this long Prayer , thought not of addressing himself to any other than the Supreme God. ( Not to a God who had not , then , a Being , nor was to have till a Thousand Years after , as the Socinians would have us think of Christ. ) He prays to God as his Redeemer ; that is , to Christ. And that Christ is that God to whom he did thus address , we are expresly told , Heb. 1.8 , 10 , 11 , 12. But unto the Son he saith , — Thou , Lord , in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the Earth , and the Heavens are the Works of thine hands ; They shall perish , but thou remainest : and they all shall wax old as doth a Garment , and as a vesture shalt thou fold them up , and they shall be changed ; but thou art the same , and thy years shall not fail . All which is plainly cited from that Psalm . Christ therefore is that God to whom that Prayer was made ; the same Supreme God , who created the Heaven and the Earth : even Jesus Christ , the same yesterday and to day and for ever , Heb. 13.8 . And it is very frequent in Scripture , that what in one place is spoken of God Indefinitly ( without specification of this or that Person ) is elsewhere applied to one or other of the Persons in particular , as that of the Creation is here to Christ , the Redeemer ; as being the same God who is the Creator also . And that of Redemption , to God the Creator ( who is the Redeemer also ) Isai. 43.1 . Thus saith the LORD ( Jehovah ) that Created thee , — Fear not , for I have Redeemed thee . So that God the Creator , and God the Redeemer , are the same God. CHARACTER II. The next Character I shall insist upon , is that whereby God denotes himself to Moses , Exod. 3.13 , 14 , 15. I Am that I AM ; and I AM hath sent me unto you . When God was sending Moses to the Children of Israel , in order to their deliverance out of Egypt , Moses puts this Question , When I come to the Children of Israel , and shall say them , The God of your Fathers hath sent me unto you ; and they shall say , What is his Name ? What shall I say to them ? 'T is certainly , therefore the True God , that is here spoken of : Let us see what is the Character that this God gives of himself . And God said unto Moses , I AM THAT I AM : And he said , Thus shalt thou say to the Children of Israel , I AM hath sent me unto you . This therefore is a proper Character of the True God. I am that I am , ( Ehjeh asher Ehjeh , ) or I am , who AM ; or I am , He who AM , so the vulgar Latin ; ( Ego sum QVI SVM ; ) and ( QUI EST ) He that IS , hath sent me : As if , what God says of himself ( in the first Person ) I that AM , were proper for Moses to say of him ( in the third person ) He that IS . And so the Septuagint , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , I am , He that AM , or He that IS ; and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ( He that IS ) hath sent me . Where simply TO BE , is made a Distinctive Character of God , as he whose Essence is To be ; and it is Impossible for him Not to Be. Who IS of Himself ( or rather Himself IS ) without deriving ought from any other ; and from whom all other Beings , have their Being . Who giveth to all , life and breath and all things ; In whom we live and move and have our Being , Act. 17.27 , 28. Who hath first given to him ? that is , None hath : He receives nothing ( aliunde ) from ought else ; but of him , and through him , and to him are all things , Rom. 11.35 , 36. who is therefore called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . The same notion the Heathens also had of the Supreme God. Hence Aristotle calls him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , the Being of Beings ; and Plato 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , the self Being ; who himself IS , and gives Being to all else . And ( being thus self-existent ) he must be also a Necessary Being ( Ens Necessarium ) and Eternal , ( for if ever he had not been , it were impossible he should ever Be ; for how could Nothing make it self to be : ) and likewise Infinite ( as the Source of all Being . ) All which the Heathen acknowledged ( as consonant to Natural Light ) as well as We. Now this same Character I Am , or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ( which is the word whereby the Greek Septuagint doth here render the Hebrew word Ehjeh , which we translate I AM ) that is I who AM , or He who IS , we find signally applied to Christ , Rom. 9.5 . He that IS . For what there we render , Who IS , in the Greek is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , He that IS , or the Being : With this addition , over all ; ( the Being , over all , or the Supreme Being : ) with this further Character , God Blessed for ever ; ( or the ever blessed God. ) Amen . Where it is not amiss to note , that the Blessed ( 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ) was an usual Title whereby they were wont to design the True God. And accordingly , that question which Caiaphas the High Priest , puts to our Saviour , Mat. 26.63 . I adjure thee by the Living God , that thou tell us , whether thou be the Christ , the Son of God ; is in Mark 19.53 . Art thou the Christ , the Son of the Blessed , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . Where no man doubts but that by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , is meant , the Supreme God. And when Christ is here called , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , ( the Supreme Being , the ever-Blessed God ; ) with the Solemn note of Asseveration , Amen : It is certainly too August a Title for any less than the Supreme God , the Only God. The same Character we have of him again , Rev. 1.8 . where we have not only the Title 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , importing his Being , but the additional intimation of his Eternity , through all the variety of continued Duration , past , present , and to come . Where we are to observe , that at ver . 4. we have this Character of God ●ndefinitely , without restriction to this or that Person in the Deity , ( as appears by its being contradistinct to Christ personally considered , ver . 5. ) Grace be unto you and peace , ( 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ) from him which Is , and which Was , and which is to come , — and from Jesus Christ , &c. Where it is manifest from the unusual construction , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 &c. that the Title 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , ( who is and was , and shall be ) is taken , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , as the Grammarians speak , ( as one undeclined-Substantive joined with the Article 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ) as being ( all together ) one joint title of God , Indefinitely taken , ( because of that contradistinction which follows ; And from Jesus Christ ; ) and with particular respect ( as the Margin of our Bible directs ) to that of Exod. 3.14 . 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , I am 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , or He who AM ; and can relate to none but the Supreme God. Now what is thus said of this God indefinitely , at ver . 4. is again repeated of Christ in particular at ver . 8. ( with a further addition of Omnipotence , ) I am Alpha and Omega , the Beginning and the Ending ( the First and the Last ) saith the Lord , which Is , and which Was , and which is to Come ; the Almighty . So that he is here design'd , not only by his Absolute Being ; but by his Eternity also , through all variety of continued duration , ( past , present , and future ; ) who Is , and Was , and shall Be ; who was the First ( before whom nothing was ) and the Last ( after whom nothing shall be ; ) and , by his Omnipotence , the Almighty . The same title of Alpha and Omega , the First and the Last , is given him in divers other places ; as at ver . 11 , and 17. of the same Chapter , I am Alpha and Omega , the First and the Last ; I am he that liveth and was dead , and behold I am alive for evermore , Amen . And Rev. 2.8 . The first and the last , which was dead and is alive . And again , Rev. 21.6 . and Rev. 22.13 . All relating to Isai. 41.4 . Isai. 44.6 . Isai. 48.12 . where the like had before been said , as a Character ( no doubt ) of the True God. And Isai. 43.10 . Before me there was no God formed , neither shall there be after me . And what can this be other than the Infinite , the Eternal , the Almighty God. The same yesterday , and to day , and for ever , as he is called , Heb. 13.8 . The Blessed , and only Potentate , the King of Kings , and Lord of Lords , who only hath Immortality , &c. as he is described , 1 Tim. 6.14 , 15 , 16. And again , The King of Kings , and Lord of Lords , Rev. 17.14 , and Rev. 19.16 . The Great God , and our Saviour , Tit. 2.13 . Where , our Saviour , is so contra-distinguished , not as another from the Great God , but as another Title of that same Person : He that is our God and Saviour , or God our Saviour , as it is Tit. 3.4 . ( like as God and the Father , Ephes. 5.2 . and again , Col. 3.17 . Giving thanks to God , and the Father . ) For 't is manifest that here ( Tit. 2.13 . ) it is spoken of Christs coming to judgment ; which is here called , the Glorious appearance of the Great God , and our Saviour Jesus Christ ; that is , the glorious appearance of Jesus Christ , who is the Great God and our Saviour ; The title that Jeremy gives to God , Jer. 32.18 . The great and mighty God , the Lord of Hosts is his name . Christ therefore , our Saviour , is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , the Great God. And the Doxology there added , Rev. 1.6 . To him be glory and dominion for ever and ever , Amen ; is equivalent to that of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , Rom. 9.5 . God blessed for ever . And the like , 1 Tim. 6.16 . To whom be Honour and Power everlasting , Amen . And much more , that of Rev. 5.12 , 13 , 14. Worthy is the Lamb , that was slain , to receive Power , and Riches , and Wisdom , and Strength , and Honour , and Glory , and Blessing : ( As High a Doxology as that in the close of the Lords-prayer ; ) To which we have the Acclamation of every Creature ( which is in heaven , and on the earth , and under the earth , and such as are in the Sea , and all that are therein , ) saying , Blessing , Honour , Glory , and Power , be unto him that sitteth upon the Throne , and unto the Lamb for ever and ever . And the four Beasts said , Amen ; And the four and twenty Elders fell down and worshipped him that liveth for ever and ever . Too great things to be said of a mere Creature , or a Titular God ; but very agreeable to Christ , being ( as he is ) the same God with the Father , the only True God. I might here add a like Remark , on that of Isai. 48.12 . Hearken O Israel , I am HE ; I am the First , I am also the Last . And in like manner , Isai. 41.4 . Isai. 43.10 , 13 , 25. Deut. 32.39 . I , even I , am HE ( Hu ) and there is no other God with me , or beside me . ( And to the same purpose elsewhere . ) Ani Hu ; I am HE ; so we render it . I am HE ; What HE ? 'T is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . 'T is the HE Absolutely taken , and Emphatically applied to God. Which I take to be of like import with , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , I AM ; I that Am , or That which IS . * The Greek Septuagint ( in the places cited ) renders Ani Hu by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 : And the vulgar Latin ( indifferently ) by Ego Sum , Ego Ipse , Ego Sum Ipse , Ego Ipse Sum : That is , I am He , or I AM. And Christ , of himself , Joh. 8.58 . 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , Before Abraham was , I AM. And I the rather take it so to signify ( in the places cited ) because I there find it attended ( exegetically ) with an Intimation of his Eternity ; He Is , He is the First and he is the Last ; Before him none Was , and after him none shall Be : He Is , and ever Was , and ever shall Be. CHARACTER III. The next Character that I shall insist upon , is that of the two Proper Names of God , Jah and Jehovah ; which I take to be Proper to God , and Incommunicable to any other . I put them both together , because they be both of the same import ; and indeed , of the same with Ehjeh , ( I AM ) before-mentioned . The chief difference is , that Ehjeh ( I AM ) retains the form of the Verb ; but Jah and Jehovah are Nouns verbal , from Hajah or Havah which signifie to Be : All denoting Gods absolute Being : And All peculiar to the Supreme God , and no where applied in Scripture ( that I know of ) to any other . I know the Socinians would perswade us that Jehovah is sometime given to an Angel , which we do not deny ; but we say that Angel is not a Created Angel , but the Angel of the Covenant , who is God himsel● . The name Jah comes often in the Old Testament , but not so often as Jehovah . Particularly in Psal. 68.5 . Sing unto God , sing praises to his Name , extol him that rideth upon the heavens by his Name JAH . So we find it in our Bibles , and it agrees with the Original . But in our Psalters , ( by a continued mistake , ) instead of Jah or Ya , is printed Yea. * . But this name is no where ( I think ) retained in the Greek Septuagint , ( the Septuagint renders it by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 : ) Nor in the New Testament ( which frequently follows the Septuagints form of Speech , ) unless in the Solemn Form of praise Hallelu-Jah ( which the Greek puts into one word Alleluia ) that is , Praise Jah , or ( as it is usually rendred ) Praise ye the Lord. Which is jointly applied to him that sits upon the Throne and to the Lamb , Rev. 19.1 , 3 , 4 , 6. whom I take to be there meant by the Lord our God , ver . 1. and the Lord God Omnipotent , ver . 6. and the Great God , ver . 17. For the Supper of the Great God , ver . 17. is the same with the Supper of the Lamb , ver . 7 , 9. The name Jehovah is , in the Old Testament , much more frequent ; especially in the Original Hebrew . But in our Translation is frequently rendered by the LORD ; as in all those places ( if the Printers have been careful ) where LORD is printed in Capital Letters . The name Jehovah , is at Exod. 3.14 , ●5 . made equivalent to Ehjeh , I AM. For what is said at ver . 14. Thus shalt thou say unto the Children of Israel , I AM hath sent me unto you ; is thus repeated at ver . 15. Thus shalt thou say unto the Children of Israel , JEHOVAH ( the God of your Fathers , the God of Abraham , the God of Isaac , and the God of Jacob ) hath sent me unto you : with this Addition , This is my name for ever , and this is my memorial unto all generations . And Psal. 81.18 . That men may know , that thou , whose Name alone is JEHOVAH , art the most High over all the earth . In which place , the restrictive word Alone , cannot be understood to affect the word Name , as if it were thus to be construed , ( cujus nomen est Jehovah solum , ) Whose name is Only Jehovah ; ( For God we know had other Names , whereby he is often called : ) But to the word Whose , ( cujus solius nomen est Jehovah , ) To whom Alone ( or to whom Only ) the name Jehovah doth belong . So Isai. 45.5 . I am JEHOVAH and none else ; there is no God beside me . And Deut. 5.35 , 39. JEHOVAH he is God , and there is none else beside him : JEHOVAH he is God in heaven above , and upon earth beneath , there is none else . And Isai. 42.8 . I am JEHOVAH that is my name ; and my Glory will I not give unto another . And Deut. 6.4 . Hear , O Israel , the LORD thy God is one LORD ; or , JEHOVAH thy God is one JEHOVAH ; there is no other Jehovah but he . And Deut. 28.58 . That thou mayest fear this glorious and fearful name , THE LORD THY GOD , or JEHOVAH thy God. And to the same purpose , Deut. 32.39 . 1 Sam. 12.2 . and in many other places . I will not despute , whether this name JEHOVAH , were never made known , till God did thus declare it to Moses , at Exod. 3.15 . It might seem so to be by that of Exod. 6.3 . I appeared unto Abraham , and to Isaac , and to Jacob , by the name of God Almighty , but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them . 'T is true , that God is often so called in the Book of Genesis : But that Book was written by Moses , after the time that Moses speaks of , in Exodus . And Moses might so call him , by a name known at the time when he wrote , though it had not been known at the time whereof he wrote . As when Abraham is said to go forth from Vr of the Chaldees , or of Chasdim , Gen. 11.31 . though Chesed the Son of Nahor ( from whom , in likelihood , the Chaldees were called Chasdim ) was not born till afterwards , as appears Gen. 22.22 . So Exod. 12.40 . where the Children of Israel are said to have sojourned four hundred and thirty years ; it must be reckoned backward as far as Abraham's coming forth from Vr of the Chaldees , at which time they could not be called , the Children of Israel , ( for Israel was not then born , ) but it was that people , who were afterwards called the Children of Israel . And many such Prolepses , or anticipations of Names , there are in all Historians . But , whether it be upon this account , or some other , that he is said , by his Name JEHOVAH not to have been known to them , is not material to our present business . 'T is enough , that Jehovah is now known to be the signal Name of the True God ; and ( I think ) no where given to any other . Now that our Saviour Christ is called Jehovah , is not to be denied . And it is for this reason , that the Socinians would have us think that this Name is not peculiar to God. In Jer. 23.5 , 6. he is called Jehovah Tzidkenu , the LORD our Righteousness . Behold the days come saith the Lord , that I will raise unto David a Righteous Branch ; and a King shall reign and prosper , and shall execute judgment and justice on the Earth ; In his days Judah shall be saved , and Israel shall dwell in safety : ( which is agreed , by Jews and Christians , to be understood of the Messias . ) And this is the name whereby he shall be called ( JEHOVAH Tzidkenu ) the LORD our Righteousn●●s , ( JEHOVAH our Righteousness . ) And to the same purpose , Jer. 33.15 , 16. In Psal. 102. which is called , A prayer of the afflicted , when he poureth out his complaint before the LORD ( Jehovah . ) It begins thus , Hear my prayer O LORD ( Jehovah ) and let my cry come unto thee . And he to whom this prayer is made , is eight or nine times called the LORD ( Jehovah . ) Now he to whom this prayer is made ( we are told , Hebr. 1.8 , 10 , 11 , 12. ) is our Lord Christ ; Vnto the Son he saith , — Thou Lord in the beginning hast laid the foundations of the earth , and the heavens are the works of thy hands ; They shall perish , but thou remainest ; They all shall wax old as a garment , and as a vesture shalt thou fold them up , and they shall be changed ; but thou art the same , and thy years shall not fail . All which is cited out of that Prayer , made to the Lord Jehovah . So I the LORD ( Jehovah ) the first and the last , Isai. 41.4 . Thus saith the LORD ( Jehovah ) before me there was no God , neither shall there be after me , Isai. 43.10 . Thus saith the LORD ( Jehovah , ) the King of Israel , and his Redeemer , ( Jehovah ) the LORD of Hosts , I am the first and I am the last ; and beside Me there is no God , Isai. 44.6 . which are the Characters applied to Christ , Rev. 1.8 , 9. & 2.8 . & 21.6 . & 22.13 . as was shewed before . 'T is true , that in the Greek Septuagint of the Old Testament , the name Jehovah is no where retained ; but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ( I think ) every where put for it . Whether because of a Jewish Superstition , no where to pronounce that Name ; or because it could not conveniently be expressed in Greek Letters ; I will not determine . And for that reason ( because the Septuagints did not use it ) it is not used in the New Testament ( which doth mostly comply with the Language of the Septuagints ; as being the Greek Translation then in use . ) And therefore we are not to look for the Name Jehovah there applied to Christ. But divers places are in the New Testament applied to Christ , wherein the name Jehovah was used in the Old Testament . And the name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ( the Lord ) by which both the Septuagints and the New Testament do constantly render the Hebrew Name Jehovah , is so frequently applied to Christ in the New Testament , as that ( throughout the New Testament ) it is almost his constant Character , the Lord , the Lord Jesus Christ , &c. One Lord Jesus Christ , 1 Cor. 8.6 . Our Lord Jesus Christ , the Lord of Glory , Jam. 2.1 . My Lord and my God , Joh. 20.28 . No man can say that Jesus is the Lord , but by the Holy Ghost , 1 Cor. 12.3 . And elsewhere so often , that none can be ignorant of it . CHARACTER IV. The last Character ( which I shall insist upon ) of the True God , the Only God ; is that of the Lord God of Israel ; Hear O Israel , the Lord our God is one Lord. And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart , &c. Deut. 6.4 . And the Lord thy God , is almost the constant Language of Moses to the Children of Israel : And it is the Character which God directs him to use ; Thus shalt thou say unto the Children of Israel , The Lord God of your Fathers , the God of Abraham , the God of Isaac , and the God of Jacob , hath sent me ; this is my name for ever , and this is my memorial unto all Generations , Exod. 3.15 . and the Lord God of the Hebrews , ver . 18. And elsewhere very often throughout the Bible . And doubtless , he that was the Lord God of Israel , is the true God , the only God. 'T is He who tells us , I am the Lord thy God — Thou shalt have no other God but Me , Exod. 20.3 . And , Besides Me , there is no other God , Isai. 44.6 . and so often elsewhere , that it is needless to name the places . And this Character , as well as the rest , is expresly given to Christ also , Luk. 1.16 , 17. where we are expresly told of John the Baptist , that many of the Children of Israel shall he turn to the Lord Their God ( to the Lord God of Israel : ) for he shall go before Him in the spirit and power of Elias . Now we all know , whose fore-runner John Baptist was ; and before whom he was to go , in the Power and Spirit of Elias . And he before whom he was thus to go , is the Lord God of Israel ; and therefore not only a Titular God , or a Creature God , but the True God , the Supreme God , the same God with that God who is the Lord God of Israel ; whom no man doubts to be the True God , the Supreme God , the Only God. I might add many other Characters given to Christ , proving him to be the True God ; as that Rev. 2.13 . I am he which searcheth the Reins and Hearts , and I will give unto every one according to his Works , ( and to the same purpose , Rev. 22.12 . and elsewhere : ) which God ( the True God ) claims as his peculiar Prerogative , Jer. 17.9 , 10. The heart is deceitful above all things , and desperately wicked , Who can know it ? I the LORD search the Heart , I try the Reins ; to give to every man according to his ways , and according to the fruit of his doings . And to the same purpose , Jer. 11.20 . Jer. 20.12 . 1 Chron. 28.9 . Psal. 7.9 . Psal. 139.1 . and in many other places . And that likewise of Isai 9.6 . His Name shall be called Wonderful Councellor , the Mighty God , the Everlasting Father , the Prince of Peace , &c. with many other Characters of like nature , which can never agree to any but the True God. But it is not my business , in this short Discourse , to say All that might be said ; but what may be sufficient . He therefore that is ( as hath been shewed ) God , the True God ; the Mighty God ; the Everlasting Father ; the Eternal God ; the First and the Last , ( before whom nothing was , and after whom nothing shall be ) that Was , and Is , and shall Be ; the same yesterday , and to day , and for ever ; the Almighty ; by whom the World was made ; by whom all things were made , and without whom nothing was made that was made ; who laid the foundations of the Earth , and the Heavens are the work of his hands ; who , when the Heavens and the Earth shall fail , his years endure for ever ; who searcheth the heart and the reins , to give to every one according to his works ; who is Jehovah ; the Lord God of Israel ; the Supreme being ; which is over all , God blessed for ever ; who is the Blessed and only Potentate , the King of Kings and Lord of Lords , who only hath immortality , to whom be Honour and Power Everlasting , Amen . That God ( I say ) of whom all these great things are said , is ( certainly ) not a mere Titular God , ( who is called God but is not , ) a Creature God , or only a dignified Man. For , if these be not Characters of the True God , by what Characters shall the True God be described ? I know , the Socinians have imployed their Wits to find out some tricks to evade or elude some of these plain places , which I shall not trouble my self , or you to repeat ; or to give an answer to them . For they are so weak , and so forced , that the plain words of Scripture , read together with the forced senses they would put upon them , are answer enough ; nor do they need or deserve any further answer . OBJECTION VIII . The last Objection which I shall now take notice of , is this ; That the Doctrine of the Trinity was not known to the Jewish Church before Christ. To which I answer , 1. If it were not made known to them , it was not necessary for them to know . For matters of pure Revelation , are not necessary to be known , before they are revealed , ( nor farther than they are revealed : ) But may be so to us , to whom they are Revealed . The whole Doctrine of our Redemption by Christ , was ( doubtless ) unknown to Adam before his Fall ; And , had he not fallen , it would have been no fault in him not to have known it at all . And when ( after his fall ) it was first made known to him , ( in that first promise , that the Seed of the Woman should break the Serpents head , Gen. 3.15 . ) it was yet so dark , that he could know very little ( as to the particulars of it ) of what is now known to us . And as God by parcels ( 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ) at sundry times , and in divers manners , declared more of it to Abraham , to David , and the Prophets , so were they obliged to know and believe more of it : and when in the last days he had declared the whole of it by his Son ; Heb. 1.1 , 2. it is now necessary for us to believe much more ; of which they might be safely ignorant . And , of the Trinity likewise , if it were not then revealed . 2. But Secondly , There were many things , which though not fully revealed , so as to be clearly understood by All ; were yet so insinuated , as to be in good measure understood by some ; and would more be so , when the Veil should be taken off from Moses's face , 2 Cor. 3.13 , 15 , 16. Thus the Death and Resurrection of Christ , were not understood , even by his own Disciples , till after his Resurrection . Yet we must not say that these things were not before intimated in the Scriptures ( though covertly ; ) for when their understandings were opened , to understand the Scriptures , and what had been written of him in the Law of Moses , and in the Prophets , and in the Psalms ; they then perceived that it was so written , and that it behooved Christ to Suffer and to Rise from the dead the Third day . Yet this was therein so covertly contained , that they seem no more to have understood it , than that of the Trinity . And St. Paul in the Epistle to the Hebrews , declares a great deal to have been covered under the Jewish Rites and Ceremonies ; which , certainly , most of the Jewish Church did not understand ; though , in good measure , it might be understood by some . I might say the like of the Resurrection ; which was but darkly discovered till Immortality was brought to light through the Gospel , 2 Tim. 1.10 . We must not yet say , it was wholly unknown to the Jewish Church , ( of whom many , no doubt , did believe it : ) Yet neither can we say , it was generally received ; For we know the Pharisees and the Sadduces were divided upon that point , Act. 23.6 , 7 , 8. And so little is said of it in the Old Testament , that those who had a mind to be captious , might have found much more specious pretence of cavilling against it then , than our Adversaries now have against the Doctrine of the Trinity . 3. I say Thirdly , as of the Resurrection , there were then divers intimations , which are now better understood ( in a clearer light ) than at that time they were : So I think there were also of the Doctrine of the Trinity . I shall instance in some of them . 1. That there was , in the Unity of the God-head , a Plurality of Somewhat ( which now we call Persons ) seems fairly to be insinuated , even in that of Elohim-bara , Gen. 1.1 . ( In the beginning God created , ) where Elohim ( God ) a Nominative Case Plural , is joined with Bara , a Verb Singular ; ( which is as if we should say in English , We Am , or They Doth ; which would to us sound odly , if somewhat of Mystery be not intended in it . ) Nor is it here only , but very frequently , that God is called Elohim in the Plural Number , ( and much oftner than in the Singular Number Eloah , ) as if , though Jehovah be but One , yet Elohim may be Three : Not Three Gods , but Three Somewhats in that One God. ( For though it be Elohim , yet it is Bara : It is So Three , as yet to be One. ) Nor is it Elohajim ( in the Dual Number ) as spoken of Two , or a Couple ; but Elohim ( in the Plural Number ) as of more than Two. This may perhaps be called a Criticism , ( and it is so . ) But I am loth to say , it is purely Casual , and not designed . For many times little Circumstances , and unheeded Expressions ( as at first they may seem to be , ) may ( by the Divine Wisdom ) be fore-designed to some considerable purpose . As , that of , Not a bone of it shall be broken , Exod. 12.46 . Numb . 9.12 . Psal. 34.20 . And that of , they pierced my hands and my feet , Psal. 22.16 . And , they shall look upon him whom they have pierced , Zach. 12.10 . And that , they part my garment among them , and on my vesture they cast lots , Psal. 22.18 . And , they gave me gall for my meat , and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink , Psal. 69.21 . Which are most of them , but Poetical Expressions ; and seemingly casual , and undesigned , as to their Literal Sense ; but were providentially ordered , as being literally to be fulfilled ; as we find in Joh. 19.23 , 24 , 28 , 29 , 36 , 37. and in the places parallel of the other Gospels . I might instance in a great many such , which at first might seem Casual , but were Providentially designed . I shall content my self at present with one more ; which is that of St. Paul , ( which perhaps may be thought to look as like a Criticism as what I mention ) Gal. 3.16 . Now to Abraham and his Seed were the promises made . He saith not , And to Seeds , as of many ; but as of one , And to thy Seed which is Christ. Now the promises made to Abraham , to which he refers , are those Gen. 22.16 , 17 , 18. ( which , I think , is the only place , where , in promises made to Abraham , such mention is made of his Seed . ) By my self have I sworn , saith the Lord ; For because , thou hast done this thing , and hast not withheld thy Son , thine onely Son ; That in blessing I will bless thee , and multiplying I will multiply thy Seed , as the stars of the heaven , and as the sand which is upon the sea-shoar , and thy Seed shall possess the gate of his enemies ; and in thy Seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed ; because thou hast obeyed my voice . By Abraham's Seed , here , is manifestly meant his Children whom God promiseth to multiply . And it might seem to be very indifferent whether to say , thy Seed , or thy Children . But St. Paul was so nice a Critick , as to take advantage of his saying Seed ( in the Singular Number ) and not Seeds or Children ( in the Plural ) as thereby signally denoting ( as principally intended ) that One Seed , which is Christ. Yet are not the rest of the Seed to be quite excluded ( even in that last Clause of it , In thy Seed shall all the Nations of the earth be blessed , ) as appears by Act. 3.25 . And ye ( men of Israel , ver . 12. ) are the Children of the Prophets , and of the Covenant which God made with our Fathers , saying unto Abraham , And in thy Seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed . Whence 't is evident , that seemingly unheeded Criticisms are sometimes Providentially designed . And such I take this of Bara Elohim , to be . And it is taken notice of to this purpose , both by Jewish and Christian writers . The like Plurality seems plainly intimated in the same Chapter , Gen. 1.26 . Let VS make man in OVR image and after OVR likeness . Yet even this Plurality is no other than what in another consideration , is an Vnity ; for so it follows , ver . 27. So God created man in HIS own image . These Plural Somewhats , therefore , are but One God. And 't is but a childish excuse to say , It is the Stile of Princes to speak in the Plural , We and Vs instead of I and Me. 'T is indeed a piece of Courtship at this day , ( and perhaps hath been for some Ages : ) But how long hath it been so ? 'T is not so old as Moses ; much less so old as the Creation . King Pharoah , and Senacharib , and Ahasuerus , were wont to say I , Me , Mine , ( not We , Vs , Ours . ) And Nebuchadnezzar , even in the Height of his Pride , Dan. 4.30 . Is not this great Babylon that I have built , by the might of MY Power , and for the honour of MY Majesty . Here 's nothing of We and Our . This was not Stilus Regius in those days . And if we should here expound it by such an equivalence ; And God said , Let Me make man in My image ; it would scarce sound like good Sense . ( For 't is not usual to speak Imperatively in the First person Singular . ) It seems therefore to imply a Plurality , though not a Plurality of Gods. The like we have Gen. 3.22 . Behold , the man is become like One of Vs. Is this also Stilo Regio , instead of , The man is become like one of Me ? So , Gen. 11.6 , 7. And the LORD ( Jehovah ) said , Let VS go down , and confound their Language . 2. And as these places intimate a Plurality , so I know not but that of Gen. 18. may intimate this Plurality , to be a Trinity . That the appearance there of three Men to Abraham , was a Divine Apparition ( though Abraham did not at first apprehend it so to be ) is evident . For it is expresly said by Moses , ver 1. The LORD ( Jehovah ) appeared unto him in the plains of Mamre ; and he lift up his eyes , and lo Three Men stood by him . So that this appearance of Three Men , was an appearance of the Lord Jehovah . And though we do not find that Abraham doth any where use the word Jehovah in that discourse , ( but Adonai all along : ) Yet Moses the Relater ( where himself speaks ) says every where Jehovah ; though when he recites Abraham's words , it is Adonai : But even Adonai is a word Plural ( as well as Elohim ) that is , my Lords , ( the Singular is Adoni , my Lord ; but seldom said of God. ) Whether it were , that the name JEHOVAH were not then known to Abraham ( according to that of Exod. 6.3 . ) or that Abraham was not at first aware who it was with whom he was then discoursing ; or for what other reason he did avoid using the name Jehovah ; I shall not trouble my self curiously to enquire : But sure we are that Moses tells us , This Apparition of Three Men ( as at first they seemed to be ) was an Apparition of the Lord Jehovah . We need not doubt therefore , but that God appeared there , in this Apparition of Three Men ; which is therefore a fair intimation of a Trinity of Persons . It might perhaps be cavill'd at , if this were all : And so might that of Jonah's being three days and three nights in the Whale's belly , when brought as an Argument to prove our Saviour ought so long to lie in the Grave . But St. Paul tells us , 1 Cor. 15.3 , 4. that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures ; and that he rose again the Third day , according to the Scriptures . ( And Christ in like manner , Luk. 24.46 . ) Yet I know not any thing more clear to that purpose in the Scriptures ( of the Old Testament ) than either this of Jonah's being so long in the Whale's belly ( to which Christ himself alludes , Mat. 12.40 . ) or that of Hos. 6.2 . After two days he will revive us , and the third day he will raise us up . Which seems not to be more express ( for the Resurrection of Christ on the Third day ) than this of Jonah . But such covert Intimations there are in the Old Testament ; of things afterward more clearly discovered in the New. Nor was this unknown to the ancient Jewish Doctors , as appears by what Ainsworth ( in his Notes on Gen. 1. ) cites from thence , ( out of R. Simeon , Ben Jochai in Zoar ; ) Come see the Mystery of the word Elohim : there are three Degrees , and every Degree by it self Distinct ; and yet notwithstanding they are all one , and joined together in One , and are not divided one from another , ( only , there he calls Degrees what we now call Persons . ) So that it was not unknown to the Jews of old , whatever the present Jews think of it . 3. What these Three are , ( the Father , the Word , and the Spirit , ) seems to be likewise intimated in the Story of the Creation , Gen. 1. where they seem to be distinctly named . In the beginning ( Elohim ) God created the Heaven and the Earth , ver . 1. where no man doubts but God the Father is implied , though perhaps not He only . And ver . 2. The Spirit of God moved upon the face of the Waters . Where Ainsworth tells us from the ancient Rabbines whom he cites , they call him , The Spirit of Mercies from before the Lord : The Spirit of Wisdom , called , the Spirit of the Living God : And , The Spirit of the Messias . Of the same Spirit , we have elsewhere mention ; My Spirit shall not always strive with Man , Gen. 6.3 . Take not thine Holy Spirit from me , Psal. 51.11 . The Spirit of the Lord is upon me , Isai. 61.1 . They vexed his Holy Spirit , Isai. 63.10 . and elsewhere . And if it be said , that by the Spirit of God , is meant God himself : we say so too , for we do acknowledge , that the Holy Ghost , is God himself . And , of the Word , there is a like intimation , ver . 3. God Said ( or spake the Word ) Let there be Light , and there was Light. And in like manner , ver . 6 , 9 , 11.14 , 20. God Said , Let there be a Firmament , &c. So Psal. 33.6 , 7. By the Word of the Lord were the Heavens made , &c. He Spake and it was done , He Commanded and it stood fast . And Psal. 148.5 . He Spake the Word and they were made , He commanded and they were created . Consonant to that of Heb. 11.3 . By faith we understand that the Worlds were made by the Word of God. And 1 Pet. 3.5 , 7. By the Word of God the Heavens were of old , and the Earth , &c. And by the same Word they are kept in store , or preserved . In which places , by the Word , so often mentioned , and with such Emphasis put upon it ; seems to be meant , that Word mentioned , Joh. 1.1 , 3 , 10. In the beginning was the Word , ( 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , ) All things were made by Him : The World was made by Him ; just as in Heb. 11.3 . the Worlds were made by the Word of God. Nor was this notion of the Word ( Personally taken ) unknown to the Jewish Doctors . For what we have Psal. 110.1 . The Lord said unto my Lord , ( Dixit Jehova Domino meo ) the Chaldee Paraphrase , renders by Dixit Jehova , ( Bemeimreh ) in Verbo suo meaning , by His Word , the Messias ; and of whom our Saviour himself expounds it , Mat. 22.44 . And it is frequent , in that Paraphrase , by the Word to design the Messias ; * as S. Joh. doth , Joh. 1.1 . In the beginning was the Word . And I put the more weight upon this , because ( as here , Gen. 1.2 , 3. so ) we have in several other places , the Word and Spirit mentioned as concerned in the Creation , Psal. 33.6 . By the Word of the LORD ( Jehovah ) were the Heavens made , and all the Hosts of them by the ( Spirit , or ) breath of his mouth , ( Berwach . ) Where we have Jehovah , his Word , and Spirit . Job 26.12 , 13. He divideth the Sea by his Power , and by his ( Wisdom , or ) Vnderstanding he smiteth through the proud ; By his Spirit he garnisheth the Heavens , his Hand hath formed the crooked Serpent . Where we have the Power of God , the Wisdom of God , and the Spirit of God. And Job 33.4 . ●he Spirit of God hath made me , and the Breath of t●e Lord hath given me Life . So , Psal. 104.24 , 30. O LORD ( Jehovah ) how wonderful are thy Works , in VVisdom thou hast made them all . Thou sendest forth thy Spirit , they are created , and thou renewest the face of the Earth . And it is not amiss here to take notice , that as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies as well ratio as oratio ; so Christ ( 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ) is called the Word of God , and the Wisdom of God. And as in Joh. 1.1 , 3 , 10. it is said of the Word , that in the beginning was the Word , all things were made by Him , and the World was made by him : And Heb. 11.3 . The Worlds were framed by the Word of God. So the same is said of Wisdom , Prov. 3.19 . The LORD by VVisdom hath formed the Earth , by Vnderstanding hath he established the Heavens . And Prov. 8.22 . &c. The LORD possessed me ( Wisdom ) in the beginning of his way , before his works of old ; I was set up from everlasting , from the beginning , ere ever the Earth was ; — When he prepared the Heavens I was there , — When he established the Clouds above , — When he strengthened the Fountains of the deep , — When he appointed the Foundations of the Earth , then was I by him , &c. And accordingly the Holy Ghost is called the Power of God , Luk. 1.35 . The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee , and the Power of the Highest shall over-shadow thee . And 1 Pet. 1.5 . Who are kept by the Power of God , through Faith unto Salvation ▪ which doubtless is not without the operation of the Holy Ghost , working and preserving faith in us . Suitably hereunto , God's Power and Wisdom are oft conjoyned . He is Wise in Heart , and Mighty in Strength , Job 9.4 , &c. He is excellent in Power , and in Judgment , Job 37.13 . But , ( without laying too great a stress on every particular , ) there seems a foundation clear enough to consider the Word of God , and the Spirit of God , as clearly distinguishable , even in the great Work of Creation ; and that the holy Writers , even in the Old Testament , have considered them as distinct ; and that even the Jewish Writers have owned them as such . I know very well that those who have a mind to be captious , may cavil at these places , as the Sadduces of old did at those passages in the Old Testament tending to prove a Resurrection . And not those only , but even some of our own ; who would have us think , that the Fathers before Christ had only Promises of Temporal blessings ( not of Heavenly and Eternal : ) Though St. Paul tells us , ( when , of the hope and resurrection of the dead he was called in question ; ) that he did so worship the God of his Fathers , believing all things which were written in the Law and the Prophets , and had hope towards God ( which they also allowed ) that there should be a Resurrection of the dead both of the Just and Vnjust ; and that it was a promise made of God to their Fathers , to which their twelve Tribes instantly serving God day and night , hoped to come ; which were no other things than what Moses and the Prophets had said should come to pass ; and which to King Agrippa ( who if not a Jew , was at least well acquainted with their Doctrines ) should not seem strange , Act. 23.6 . Act. 24.14 , 15. Act. 26.2 , 3 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 22. And Heb. 11.13 . that all these died in faith , not having received the promises ; ( that is , they died in the belief of better things than what they had yet received : ) But saw them afar off , and were perswaded of them , and embraced them , and confessed , they were but strangers and Pilgrims upon Earth . And our Saviour proves it out of the Old Testament , ( Mat. 22.32 . ) by such an Argument , as if one of us should have urged , it would perhaps have been ridiculed : I am the God of Abraham , the God of Isaac , and the God of Jacob ; Now God is not the God of the dead , but of the living . And the Apostle pursues the same Argument , Heb. 11.9 , 10 , 14 , 15 , 16. They sojourned in the Land of promise , as in a strange Land , dwelling in Tabernacles ( movable from place to place ) for they looked for a City which hath foundations ( a fixed City , not flitting as were those Tabernacles , ) whose builder and maker of God : Declaring plainly that they did seek a Country : Not such as that from whence they came ; but a better Country , that is , a Heavenly : wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God ; for he hath prepared for them a City ; where he directly argues , that God's Promise , to be their God , was a Promise of Heaven . And no doubt but the Prophets , and Men of God , had taught them all along , to put a Spiritual Sense , upon those ( seemingly ) Temporal Promises , ( though the Sadduces would not believe it , but cavilled at it ; ) in so much that not only the Pharisees and Doctors of the Law ; but even the Women embraced it ( even before Christ's Resurrection ; ) I know saith Martha ( of her dead Brother Lazarus ) that he shall Rise again in the Resurrection , at the last day , Joh. 11.24 . And , of such Spiritual Senses , we have copious Instances , in the Epistle to the Hebrews , and elsewhere frequently . And as they did without any reluctances , readily embrace the Doctrine of the Resurrection , when more clearly declared by the Apostles , ( as a thing not wholly new to them ; ) so neither do we find in them any Reluctance to that of the Trinity ( for which , in likelihood , they had in like manner been before prepared : ) but readily closed with the Form of Baptism , in the Name ( not Names ) of the Father , and of the Son , and of the Holy Ghost , Mat. 28.19 . And that Solemn Benediction , 2 Cor. 13.14 . The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ , and the love of God , and the Communion of the Holy Ghost be with you all , Amen . Where we have all the Three Persons reckoned together ; as they are also in that celebrated place , 1 Joh. 5.7 . The Father , the Word , and the Holy Ghost ; these Three are One. And as they had been before by Christ himself , Joh. 14.26 . The Comforter , which is the Holy Ghost , whom the Father will send in My Name , He shall teach you all things . And Joh. 15.26 . The Comforter whom I will send unto you from the Father , even the Spirit of truth , which Proceedeth from the Father , He shall testify of Me. And ( to name no more places ) Mat. 3.16 , 17. Jesus , when he was baptized , went straitway out of the Water : And lo , the heav●ns were opened unto him , and he ( John the Baptist ) saw the Spirit of God descending like a Dove , and lighting upon Him : And lo , a voice from heaven saying , This is My beloved Son , in whom I am well pleased . 4. There is yet another Consideration which doth confirm this opinion , that the Doctrine of the Trinity was not unknown to the Jewish Church before Christ : From the footsteps thereof yet extant in Heathen Writers . 'T is well known ( to those conversant in such Studies ) that much of the Heathen Learning ( their Philosophy , Theology , and Mythology ) was borrowed from the Jews ; though much Disguised , and sometimes Ridiculed by them . Which things though they be Fabulous , as disguised in a Romantick dress : yet they are good Evidence that there was a Truth in History , which gave occasion to those Fables . None doubts but Ovid's Fable of the Chaos ( of which all things were made ) took its rise from Moses's History of the Creation : And Deucalion's Flood , from that of Noah : and the Titan's fighting against the Gods , from the Builders of Babel's Tower : And that of Two-faced Janus , from Noah's looking backward & forward to the World before and since the Flood . And many the like , of which we may see in Natalis Comes , in Bochartus , and others : And of which we have a large Collection in Theophilus Gale's Court of the Gentiles . And in Dr. Duport's Gnomologia Homerica ; wherein is a Collection of Homer's Sayings , which look like Allusions to like Passages in Sacred Scripture ; and seem to be borrowed ( most of them ) from those Books of it , which were written before Homer's time ; who yet is one of the most Ancient and most Famed of Heathen Writers . Plato hath borrowed so much of his Philosophy , History , and Theology , from the Jewish learning , as that he hath obtained the Title of ( 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ) Moses disguised in a Greek dress . And , may seem , because the name of Jews was odious , to cite them rather by the names of certain Barbarians , Syrians , Phoenicians , Egyptians &c. From that Title of God in Exodus , I AM , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , ( or from the Equivalent names of Jah and Jehovah ) he borrows his ( 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , ) the Being , ( or that which Is , ) the very Being , the true Being ; which are the Titles he gives to the Supreme God. For his Immortality of the Soul , he reckons the best Argument to be ( 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . ) a Divine Revelation , which he had by Tradition from certain Ancients , who lived ( as he speaks ) nearer to the Gods , ( as if he had borrowed even this Phrase from Deut. 4.7 . What nation is so great , who hath God so Nigh unto them ? ) And much more , as hath been noted by others . And I am so far from thinking ( as the Socinians would have us ) that St. John did but Platonize , and borrowed his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from Plato's Trinity ; that I rather think , that Plato borrowed his Trinity ( as he did many other things ) from the Jewish Doctrine , though by him disguised : And take it for a good Evidence , that the Doctrine of the Trinity , was then not unknown to them . Aristotle , in the last Chapter of his Book , De Mundo ; which is de Dei Nominibus : He tells us that God , though he be but One , hath many Names : And amongst those many , he reckons that of the Tres Parcae ( 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ) or as we call them , the Three Destinies ( Atropas , Clotho , and Lachesis ; whom he doth accommodate to the three diversities of Time ; past , present , and future , ) to be One of these Names . Which , though numbred as Three , are but this One God. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . ( And cites Plato to the same purpose ) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . So that it seems both Plato and Aristotle were of opinion , that Three Somewhats may be One God. And this , in likelihood , they derived from the Jewish Learning . I might say the like of their three Judges in another World , Minos , Radamanthus and Aeacus . which thing though it be Fabulous , yet it implies thus much , That they had then a Notion , not only of the Soul's Immortality , but also of a Trinity of Persons in another World , who should take Account of mens Actions in this World. And both these Notions they had , no doubt , from the Jewish Learning ; from whence their most sublime Notions were derived . To these I might add that of their three-shap'd Chimaera ; which their Poets feign to have been . 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , as is to be seen in Homer one of their most Ancient Poets . And that of Cerberus , their three-headed Porter of the other World. Which Poetical Fictions , though invented perhaps to ridicule the Trinity ; do yet at last argue that they had then some notices of a Trinity , ( of Three Somewhats which were yet but One. ) For , if they had no notice of it , they could not have ridiculed it . Our Adversaries , perhaps , may please themselves with the Fansy , that Chimaera and Cerberus are brought in to prove the Trinity . But they mistake the point : We are not now Proving the Trinity , ( which is already settled on a firmer Foundation ; ) but inquiring , whether this Doctrine were then known . And as we think it a good argument to prove the Christian Religion , to have been known in Lucian's time , ( and known to him , ) because Lucian doth Scoff at it ; which he could not have done , if he had known nothing of it : So is it a good Argument to prove the Doctrine of the Trinity to have been then known , when it was ridiculed . And it proves also , that there might be then prophane Wits to ridicule it , as there are now to Blaspheme the Trinity , as a three-headed Monster ; and , that this 〈◊〉 Wit of theirs , is not their own , but stollen from wittier Heathens . But , whether it were , or were not , known to the Jewish Church before Christ , ( of which there be great Presumptions that it was so known , as well as that of the Resurrection : ) it is enough to us , that we are taught it now . And , if any will yet be so obstinate as not to believe , either the Resurrection , or the Trinity ; upon pretence that neither of them was known to the Jewish Church , ( or at least , not so clearly , but that they may be able to cavil at places from the Old Testament alledged to prove either ; ) we must leave them to the Wisdom and Judgment of God , till he shall think fit to instruct them better . Now to God the Father , God the Son , and God the Holy Ghost ; Three Persons , but One Eternal and Ever blessed God ; be Praise , Honour and Glory , Now and for Evermore , Amen . FINIS . Advertisement . BY reason of the Authors absence from the Press at so great a distance , some mistakes have happened , both in the Letters and Sermons ; and some things omitted , which should have been inserted in their proper places , but that they came so late to the Printers hands , that it could not well be done without d●scomposing his Affairs . Of both which it is thought fit thus to direct . ERRATA . LEt . I. p. 12. l. 6. for Divisions read Dimensions . p. 13. l 6. dele Three . p 18. l. 7. for Meaning read Memory . Let. II. p. ● . l. 21. for that read shall . Let. III. p. 30. l. 11. as a separate Existence . p 32 l. 7. as to be . p. 37. l. ult . for Those read These . p. 41. l. 18 known p. 57. l. 7. for sure read save . Let. IV. p. 7. l. 20. for toil read talk . p. 11. l. 2. as well as . Let. V. p. 6. l. 22. dele of . p. 7. l. 19. for any read my . p. 11. l. 10. read 1 Joh. 5.20 . p. 12. l. 18. for Israel read Jacob. p. 18. l. 13. doth not well p. 21. l. 14. said so much . Let. VI. p. 4. l. 1. for Nor read Now. p. 9. l. 28. for then read t●ere . p. 10. l. 28. for London read Leyden . p. 11. l. 19. at least . p. 13. l. 30. for This read Thus. p. 14. l. 33. for as read in l. 34. thee only , the. p. 17. l. 6. for Railing read Ranting . p. 18. l. 2. was not then . l. 13. beside that in . Let. VII . p. 6. l 28. Possibility . p. 7. l. 27. for fourt● read fault . p. 10. l. pen. All-comprehensive . p. 12. l. 20. Father . p. 13. l. 5. afte● Notion● , add further than they are revealed . l. pen. Words . p. 14. l. 13. Hands . p. 17. l. 13. to Answer . l. 23. for one read me . Serm. p. 15. l. 14. exegerical . p. 19 l. 7. God. p. 22. l. 19. for for read or . l. 21. for er read fer . P. 61. l. 9. read Author . P. 73. l. 3. read were framed . ADDITIONS . LET. I. p. 2. l. 1. after united , add or intimately One. p. 12. l. 21. after Cube , add , ( there being no limits in nature , greater than which a Cube cannot be ) . Let. III. p. 16. l. 18. Add this Marginal Note , The Saxon word Hel or Helle , ( whence comes the English word Hell , ) doth not properly or necessarily import the place of the Damned ; But may be indifferently taken for Hell , hole , or hollow place : Which are all words of the same original . Helan ( to hide , or cover , ) Hole ( cavitas , ) Hol ( cavus ) hollow . And when it is used in a restrained sense ; it is Metonymical , or Synecdochical ; as when Hole or Pit , is put for the Grave , and the like . p. 19. l. 2. Add , So that I take the plain sense of the words to be this : He was ( for some time ) in that Hell , or Hades ( what ever by that word be meant ) ; wherein ( it is expresly said ) he was not left ; but was Raised from it . p. 44. l. 16. Add , Beside this Letter of thanks from his Partner in the Disputation ; there was another from Sandius himself , ( not Printed , but in Manuscript , ) acknowledging a like conviction . Of which Wittichius recites an Extract , in his Causa Spiritus Sancti Victrix demonstrata , à Christophoro Wittichio . Lugduni Batavorum , apud Cornelium Boutestein , 1682. Let. IV. p. 36. l. 26. after Athanasius , Add , ( 'T is the same thing with me , whether it were written by Him or some Other , as long as I find it agreeable to Scripture . At the end of the same line , Add ( Wherein yet I would not be thought to encourage dangerous Errors : For the Errors are equally Dangerous , and equally Fundamental ; whether I do , or do not Anathematize them . ) p. 38. at the End ; Add Jan. 13. 1690 / 1. Yours , John Wallis . Let. VI. p. 9. l. 25. Add this Marginal Note . Socinus 's Words are these : Velim autem scias , me duplici de causa ( praeter eam quam ipse commemoras ) ab ista quaestione , De Animae Immortalitate , abstinuisse . Nam & mihi res erat cum homine qui me calumniandi , inque omnium invidiam vocandi , omnem occasionem quaerebat . Necdum mihi , quid de quaestione ista statuendum sit , plane exploratum erat ; quemadmodum nec hodie quidem est . Tantum id mihi videtur statui posse ; Post hanc vitam , animam seu animum hominis non ita per se subsistere ut praemia utla poenasvé sentiat , vel etiam ista sentiendi sit capax . Quae mea Firma Opinio facile potest ex Disputatione ista colligi : Cum ex multis quae identidem à me ibi dicuntur ; Tum ex ea ipsa , de qua praecipuè agitur , sententia mea . Nam quamvis , cum ipso Puccio disputans , ( qui , ut immortalitatem primi hominis ante peccatum probaret , animi ipsius Immortalitatem mihi objiciebat , ) ostendi , non propterea dici posse hominem immortalem quia anima ipsius non moriatur : Tamen satis apparet me sentire , non ita vivere , post hominis ipsius mortem , animam ejus , ut per se praemiorum poenarúmve capax existat : Cum in ipso primo homine , totius Immortalitatis rationem uni gratiae Divinae trib●o ; nec in ipsa Creatione quidquam Immortalis Vitae agnosco . Socini Epist. 5. ad Volkelium ; die 16. Novembris , Anno , 1596. Let. VI. p. 12. l. 3. Add this Marginal Note : Sandiru 's Words are these ( cited by Wittichius in his Causa Spiritus Sancti Victrix , pag. 4. ) Jam finitis illis quae ad Librum tuum regerenda duxi ( praeter ea quae satis à Socio meo responsum puto , ) Oro te ne graveris ulteriùs hoc argumentum prosequi ; quò tandem Veritas , si fieri possit , patefiat ; & velut scintilla ex silice ad Chalybem alliso prosiliat . Nam ingenuè fateor , mihi conjecturam mean longè verisimiliorem visam , antequam Librum tuum , quo me docere aggressus es , legissem . Non parùm & contulit ad eam debilitandam , consideratio mea , Joh. 1.32 , 33. & Mat. 4. ●1 . Nam postquam in Baptismo Spiritus Sanctus super Christum descendit , & super eum mansit , eumque in desertum duxit , nec ab eo recessit ; ( cum non verisimile sit Christum tentationem Satanae sine Spiritus Sancti auxilio superâsse ; ) finita demum tentatione dicuntur Angeli accessisse & ministrâsse ei . Quod si itaque conjectura mea consistere non possit , ut vix possit , perpendendum erit , an non Spiritus Sanctus possint esse septem Spiritus Principales ; vel , multitudo Spirituum longè subtiliorum caeteris Angelorum ordinibus , fortean naturâ ipsâ : Et an per hanc hypothesin salvari possint omnes difficultates contra conjecturam meam hactenus product● . Novi quendam qui sentit , Spiritum Sanctum quidem esse unam Personam , camque creatam , sed totum Vniversum Essentia sua pervadentem . Valdè autem dubito an haec sententia subsistere queat . Illa de una Persona Spiritus Sancti comprehensis sub eo Angelis tanquam ejus ministris & satellitibus ; mihi non admodum arridet . Si autem horum nihil verum comperiatur ; tum demum mihi verisimillimum videbitur , Spiritum Sanctum cum Deo Patre ejusque Verbo , unum Deum , unam Substantiam , unum Individuum esse . Notes, typically marginal, from the original text Notes for div A67417-e220 Heb. 9.15 . 2 Cor. 5.1 . 1 Pet. 1.4 . Heb. 12.28 . 2 Cor. 4.17 . 1 Cor. 15.53 . 1 Tim. 2.5 . Col. 10.20 , 21. Rom. 5.10 , 11. & alibi . 1 Joh. 2.2 . Joh. 1.29 . Heb. 9.12 , 15. Eph. 1.14 . Heb. 7.25 . Jam. 2 19. 2 Thes. 1.8 . Tit. 1.16 . Gal. 3.13 . Matth. 5.17 . Joh. 17.2 . 2 Thes. 1.8 . 1 Pet. 1.18 . Tit. 2.12 , 13 , 14. Notes for div A67417-e15010 * For I take the Hebrew Pronouns Hu and Hi , ( which we commonly render by He , She , or It , according as the Gender varies ) to be Derivatives from the Verb Havah or Hajah which signifies To Be. Not that I take Hu to be a proper Name of God ( as are Jah and Jehovah , from the same Verbs , ) But an Appellative w●rd , common to the Creatures also ; but here Emphatically appl●ed to God , ( as are the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . which are common to the Creatures al●o ; for ●hey also are , in their kind , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . ) And the Latin P●onouns is , id , ( that is , he or it ) when Relatively taken , are to be expounded of their Antecedent to which t●●y Relate : But when put A●solutely without an Antecedent ; they are of alike import with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Quid taken Substantively : ( 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ) according ●o which we use to say ( even in our Metaphys●cks ) Ens & Aliquid con●ertunt●r , ( He or It , so taken ar● of the same import , with a Being , or What Is. ) And the Learned Gat●ker ( than whom I do not know that we have a better Critick ; more Judicious or more Acute ; ) though ( in his Book De ●tylo Novi Instrumenti , contra Pfochenium , ) he do n●t take Hu to be a Proper Name of God ( but communicable to Creatures , however here Emphatic●ll● applied to him : ) Yet doth allow , that in these places , and in many others ( o● which he gives divers instances ) it is used for the Ve●b Substantive ( Sum , or Est. ) Which is the same wi●●●hat I say , that it Imports a Being , or to Be , ( and therefore , when signally applied to G●d , ●is Absolute , Infinite , Independent ▪ Self-Being . ) And so , it seems , the Septuagi●ts did 〈◊〉 und●rstand it , who render Ani Hu , by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , I AM ; ( and the Vu●gar Latin b● 〈◊〉 Sum ; ) and in the New T●stam●●t ( which commonly ●ollows the Phrase o● the ●ept●●gints ) Christ says it of himself , Before Abraham Was ( not I Was , but ) I Am , ( 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ) importing ●hereby his Permanent and Ins●ccessive Being : co-exis●ent to all the 〈…〉 ( Successive ) Duration ; Past , Present , and Future : the same Yes●erday , and To-da● ▪ and fo● e●er . The differe●ce between is or id Relatively tak●n ( r●lating to what we call 〈◊〉 Antecedent , ) and the same taken Absolutely ( without such reference to other 〈◊〉 it selfe ; ) is much the same as between ( what the Logi●ians call ) Est secundi ●djecti ( which is but a Copula to join the Predicate with the ●ubject . ) and Est ●●rr● adjecti ; where it self is ( or doth include ) the Predicate . As when S●crat●● Est , 〈◊〉 r●solved by Socrates Est Ens , or Est Existens ; The word Est , so taken , including 〈◊〉 the Copula and the Predicate : Like as id or quid Substantively taken , is not Relative , 〈◊〉 Absolute , and the same with Ens. * In one Great Bible of this Tr●nslation , ( amo●gst Mr. Selden's Books in the Bodleyan Library ) appointed to be read in ●●urches ( as we are told in th● Title page ) printed ( if I do not mis-remember t●e date ) abo●● the Reign of King Edw●rd the Sixth , or the end of King Henry the Eig●th , I find the Name JA. But in all other ( whether Psalters or Bibles , Old or New ) of that Translation ( that I have consulted ) it is Yea. Of which ( I suppose ) the occasion at first was this : The Hebrew Letter , by different persons , is differently called Jod and Yod ; and accordingly that Name to be written in English Ja or Ya . Which being ( it seems ) in some Books written or printed Ya ; some after-Printer thinking it to be mis-printed for yea , did so ( as he thought ) Correct it ; and the Error hath thence been propagated eversince . Yet this having ( it seems ) been discovered by some-body , some while since ; I find in divers late Editions of the Psalter , or Psalms in our Book of Common-prayer , ( which follows that Translation ) it is thus printed praise him in his name , yea , and rej●yce before him , ( with a Comma before and after yea , ) leaving it indifferent , whether to refer Yea ( or Ya ) to the former Clause , as the Name of God ; or , to the latter Clause as the Affirmative particle yea . But in the Original Hebrew , and in all other Translations ( that I have observed ) in any Language , I find the name Jah , or somewhat equivalent thereunto ; as doubtless it ought to be . * So in Isa. 41.10 . Fear not , I am with thee ; and ver . 13. Fear not , I will help thee ; and ver . 14. Fear not , I will help thee , saith the Lord and thy Redeemer ; and ver . 16. The Wind ( or Spirit , Ruach ) shall carry them away , and the Whirl-wind shall scatter them : Is in the Chaldee Paraphrase ( rendred into Latin ) Ne timeas , quia in adjutorium tuum erit Verbum meum . Ne timeas , quia Verbum meum erit in adjutorium tuum . Ne t●meatis , — Verbum meum est in auxilium vestrum , dicit dominus & Redemptor vester . Ventus ( seu Spiritus ) abripiet eos , & Verbum ejus disperget eos , quasi Turbo stipulas . ( Where we have God , his Word , and Spirit . ) So in Isai. 48.11 . For my own sake , for my own sake will I do it : and ver . 12. Hea●ken unto Me : and ver . 13. My hand hath laid the foundation of the Earth , and my right hand hath spanned the heavens : and ver . 15. I , even I have spoken , I have called him : and ver . 16. Come ye near unto me , hear ye this : Are in the Chaldee Paraphrase , Propter Nomen meum , propter Verbum meum faci●m . Obedite Verbo meo . In Verbo meo fundavi terram , & in Potentia mea appendi coelos . ( Where again we have God , his Word , and Power , or Spirit . ) In Verbo meo pepigi pactum cum Abraham patre vestro , & vocavi eum . Accedite ad Verbum meum , audite haec . And , at the like rate , in many other places .