An essay towards the allaying of George Fox his spirit
         Crisp, Thomas, 17th cent.
      
       
         
           1695
        
      
       Approx. 32 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 5 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images.
       
         Text Creation Partnership,
         Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) :
         2007-10 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1).
         A35008
         Wing C6950
         ESTC R24130
         07952230
         ocm 07952230
         40706
         
           
            This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of
             Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal
            . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
          
        
      
       
         Early English books online.
      
       
         (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A35008)
         Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 40706)
         Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 1204:9)
      
       
         
           
             An essay towards the allaying of George Fox his spirit
             Crisp, Thomas, 17th cent.
          
           8 p.
           
             Printed for T.C. and sold by John Gwillim,
             London :
             1695.
          
           
             Attributed to T. Crisp.
             Reproduction of original in the British Library.
          
        
      
    
     
       
         Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.
         Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors.
      
       
         EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.
         EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).
         The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.
         Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.
         Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.
         Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.
         The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.
         Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).
         
          Keying and markup guidelines are available at the
           Text Creation Partnership web site
          .
        
      
       
         
         
      
    
     
       
         eng
      
       
         
           Fox, George, 1624-1691.
           Society of Friends -- Controversial literature.
        
      
    
     
        2006-08 TCP
        Assigned for keying and markup
      
        2006-08 Apex CoVantage
        Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images
      
        2006-10 Mona Logarbo
        Sampled and proofread
      
        2006-10 Mona Logarbo
        Text and markup reviewed and edited
      
        2007-02 pfs
        Batch review (QC) and XML conversion
      
    
  
   
     
       
         
         
           
             An
             Essay
             towards
             the
             Allaying
             of
          
           George
           Fox
           
             his
             Spirit
          
           .
        
         
           CHristian
           Friend
           ,
           I
           desire
           that
           my
           Imperfections
           ,
           nor
           these
           Quakers
           revilings
           may
           not
           prejudice
           thee
           ,
           against
           the
           impartial
           and
           serious
           reading
           of
           this
           Discovery
           ,
           for
           they
           cannot
           represent
           me
           a
           greater
           sinner
           than
           (
           I
           thank
           God
           )
           I
           think
           my self
           to
           be
           ,
           but
           they
           by
           their
           villifying
           of
           me
           shew
           the
           weakness
           of
           their
           cause
           and
           the
           wickedness
           of
           their
           spirits
           ;
           for
           the
           controversy
           between
           us
           is
           not
           what
           
             T.
             C.
          
           is
           ,
           but
           whether
           or
           no
           
             G.
             Fox
             ,
             &c.
          
           have
           printed
           so
           as
           I
           charge
           them
           ,
           and
           whether
           or
           no
           those
           Expressions
           objected
           against
           by
           me
           be
           not
           unchristian
           and
           contemptable
           ;
           if
           they
           be
           not
           ,
           then
           I
           have
           wronged
           them
           ,
           but
           if
           they
           be
           the
           product
           of
           Ignorance
           or
           worse
           ,
           then
           the
           Authors
           thereof
           were
           false
           Prophets
           ,
           Diviners
           and
           Conjurers
           by
           G.
           Fox's
           own
           judgment
           in
           print
           .
           I
           desire
           you
           only
           to
           judge
           of
           the
           Tree
           by
           its
           fruit
           ,
           and
           remember
           that
           altho'
           the
           poor
           Ass
           was
           beat
           by
           the
           mad
           ,
           angry
           and
           covetous
           Prophet
           ,
           yet
           the
           poor
           Ass
           saw
           the
           Angel
           when
           he
           did
           not
           .
           These
           Quakers
           charge
           me
           for
           short
           quoting
           of
           G.
           F's
           words
           ,
           of
           which
           fault
           
             G.
             F.
          
           is
           herein
           proved
           grosly
           guilty
           :
           My
           charge
           was
           not
           on
           the
           Quakers
           in
           general
           ,
           but
           particular
           Persons
           ,
           which
           I
           distinguished
           from
           christian
           Quakers
           by
           the
           Term
           of
           
             Foxonian
             Quakers
          
           ,
           but
           others
           by
           covering
           and
           justifying
           the
           wicked
           have
           made
           themselves
           guilty
           ,
           and
           this
           Discovery
           is
           not
           uncovering
           of
           Nakedness
           ,
           but
           warranted
           by
           their
           own
           practice
           and
           in
           print
           .
           This
           is
           not
           in
           Answer
           to
           the
           High
           Priest's
           Servant
           
             Ed.
             Pennington
          
           .
        
         
           AS
           is
           said
           in
           Acts.
           8.
           so
           it
           hath
           been
           in
           these
           days
           ,
           there
           was
           a
           Man
           called
           
             G.
             Fox
          
           ,
           into
           whom
           a
           Spirit
           entred
           ,
           giving
           out
           that
           himself
           was
           some
           great
           One
           ,
           to
           whom
           most
           of
           the
           Quakers
           gave
           heed
           ,
           saying
           ,
           This
           is
           the
           great
           power
           of
           God
           ,
           and
           having
           in
           his
           life
           ,
           and
           also
           since
           his
           death
           ,
           extolled
           this
           
             G.
             Fox
          
           above
           what
           they
           ought
           ,
           
             W.
             P.
          
           especially
           ,
           saying
           ,
           
             Many
             have
             done
             well
             ,
             but
             thou
          
           Dear
           George
           
             excellest
             them
             all
          
           ,
           but
           it
           was
           in
           self-exalting
           and
           abusing
           others
           ,
           and
           having
           contemned
           Water-baptisme
           ,
           Lord's
           Supper
           and
           the
           Scriptures
           ,
           he
           invents
           an
           Image
           of
           Female-prelates
           in
           their
           Church
           ,
           and
           these
           his
           chief
           Priests
           make
           an
           Idol
           thereof
           ,
           and
           deck
           it
           with
           high
           Titles
           ,
           as
           
             the
             great
             and
             good
             Ordinances
             of
             Jesus
             Christ
             ,
             which
             he
             hath
             set
             up
             in
             his
             Church
             ,
          
           and
           he
           
             G.
             F.
          
           says
           to
           these
           Women
           when
           so
           met
           by
           his
           Order
           about
           the
           10th
           .
           hour
           of
           the
           day
           ,
           G.
           F.
           saith
           ,
           
             whose
             mouth
             the
             Lord
             opens
             in
             the
             Womens
             meeting
             to
             praise
             him
             ,
             they
             are
             to
             be
             obedient
             ,
          
           as
           if
           the
           Lords
           opening
           their
           mouths
           were
           not
           sufficient
           without
           his
           license
           ,
           and
           of
           this
           Image
           they
           have
           in
           print
           also
           since
           his
           death
           ,
           with
           other
           of
           his
           Appointments
           said
           ,
           
             You
             know
             Friends
             that
             all
             the
             meetings
             mens
             and
             Womens
             ,
          
           &c.
           
             were
             set
             up
             by
             the
             Power
             ,
             Spirit
             and
             wisdom
             of
             God
             ,
          
           so
           indespensable
           Duties
           as
           they
           say
           ,
           in
           the
           room
           of
           them
           two
           ,
           Water-baptisme
           and
           the
           
           Lord's
           
             -
             supper
          
           .
           I
           considering
           the
           evil
           consequences
           of
           these
           things
           ,
           and
           knowing
           by
           the
           rule
           given
           in
           Scripture
           ,
           
             (
             viz.
          
           That
           the
           Tree
           may
           be
           known
           by
           its
           fruit
           )
           that
           this
           Spirit
           of
           theirs
           is
           not
           of
           Christ
           but
           that
           Man
           of
           Sin
           ,
           who
           exalteth
           himself
           above
           all
           that
           is
           called
           God
           ,
           &c.
           
           I
           say
           ,
           these
           considerations
           
           me
           to
           discover
           ●o
           others
           the
           fruits
           of
           the
           Spirit
           of
           
             G.
             F.
          
           in
           hopes
           that
           many
           amongst
           them
           who
           be
           honest
           would
           condemn
           those
           Wickednessess
           ,
           and
           so
           clear
           themselves
           thereof
           ;
           for
           indeed
           although
           they
           charge
           me
           with
           Envy
           ,
           &c.
           
           God
           knows
           its
           false
           ,
           for
           they
           are
           to
           me
           many
           of
           them
           ,
           as
           St.
           Paul
           saith
           the
           Jews
           were
           to
           him
           ,
           and
           I
           never
           had
           any
           prejudice
           against
           any
           of
           them
           ,
           but
           know
           they
           exalted
           themselves
           too
           much
           and
           despised
           others
           ,
           as
           the
           proud
           Pharisees
           ,
           excusing
           their
           Contempts
           of
           our
           Lord
           Jesus
           of
           Nazareth
           his
           sufferings
           and
           blood
           ,
           and
           the
           Scriptures
           ,
           Magistrates
           ,
           and
           almost
           all
           Christians
           ever
           since
           the
           Apostles
           to
           the
           worlds
           end
           ,
           except
           themselves
           ,
           and
           this
           I
           have
           in
           print
           proved
           ,
           and
           in
           this
           and
           other
           their
           wickedness
           they
           are
           uncharitable
           and
           unchristian
           ,
           and
           scandalous
           to
           the
           protestant
           Religion
           ,
           especially
           England
           ,
           and
           if
           they
           do
           own
           the
           true
           Faith
           and
           Scriptures
           ,
           and
           our
           Lord
           Jesus
           of
           Nazareth
           truly
           ,
           they
           must
           condemn
           and
           disown
           them
           printed
           Expressions
           tending
           to
           the
           contrary
           ;
           for
           the
           Matter
           in
           controversy
           is
           not
           what
           thy
           now
           say
           they
           believe
           ,
           but
           about
           what
           is
           in
           print
           from
           
             G.
             Fox
          
           ,
           and
           others
           their
           chief
           Rulers
           and
           Teachers
           ,
           whom
           they
           give
           these
           high
           Titles
           to
           ,
           and
           write
           such
           Epistles
           and
           high
           Commendations
           of
           them
           and
           their
           Writings
           ,
           as
           will
           more
           fully
           be
           made
           appear
           
             W.
             P.
          
           and
           many
           more
           of
           them
           have
           done
           of
           and
           to
           
             G.
             Fox
          
           and
           others
           ,
           considering
           W.
           P's
           great
           power
           in
           Pensilvania
           ,
           and
           great
           interest
           in
           all
           the
           Quakers
           in
           England
           and
           elsewhere
           ,
           and
           influence
           over
           them
           ,
           I
           think
           they
           may
           be
           100000
           and
           1000
           of
           them
           preachers
           ,
           and
           may
           have
           1000
           Meetings
           in
           
             England
             ,
             Scotland
             ,
             Ireland
          
           and
           Wales
           ,
           and
           I
           fear
           W.
           P's
           influences
           80000
           of
           them
           ;
           so
           that
           what
           Interest
           ,
           Doctrine
           or
           Men
           he
           espouses
           is
           most
           likely
           to
           prevail
           ,
           Experience
           have
           proved
           the
           truth
           of
           this
           ,
           but
           they
           are
           but
           sowing
           their
           Seed
           now
           ,
           but
           the
           full
           Crop
           and
           effect
           of
           these
           their
           evil
           Labours
           may
           not
           be
           known
           in
           this
           Age
           ,
           and
           indeed
           many
           of
           their
           printed
           Expressions
           are
           so
           contemptious
           of
           our
           Lord
           Jesus
           of
           Nazareth
           ,
           that
           the
           Jews
           or
           Mahometans
           may
           from
           them
           take
           great
           advantages
           to
           deny
           the
           New
           Testament
           in
           part
           ,
           saying
           ,
           Your
           new
           Testament
           says
           ,
           That
           him
           whom
           our
           Rulers
           killed
           was
           the
           Saviour
           ,
           and
           that
           they
           by
           wicked
           hands
           slew
           him
           ;
           but
           the
           Quakers
           says
           ,
           what
           was
           done
           to
           him
           was
           done
           by
           Law
           ,
           and
           in
           a
           great
           part
           by
           due
           execution
           of
           a
           Law
           ;
           also
           they
           say
           the
           Jews
           never
           see
           the
           World's
           Saviour
           ,
           your
           New
           Testament
           says
           ,
           that
           Jesus
           with
           his
           own
           blood
           shed
           without
           the
           gate
           sanctifies
           the
           People
           ,
           but
           these
           Quakers
           say
           his
           Blood
           was
           no
           more
           than
           the
           Blood
           of
           another
           Saint
           .
           Excused
           by
           
             G.
             W.
          
           as
           in
           G.
           K's
           paper
           .
        
         
           Their
           Scripture
           accuse
           our
           Rulers
           for
           cruelty
           to
           Jesus
           of
           Nazareth
           and
           his
           Disciples
           ,
           when
           as
           you
           are
           more
           cruel
           to
           them
           ,
           as
           they
           say
           ,
           and
           these
           Quakers
           say
           ,
           
             His
             Disciples
             loved
             his
             person
             for
             the
             sake
             of
             the
             frame
             ,
             and
             quality
             of
             the
             Spirit
             that
             dwelt
             in
             him
             ,
             or
             else
             what
             is
             his
             person
             more
             than
             another
             person
             :
          
           But
           our
           Rulers
           did
           not
           condemn
           him
           for
           saying
           the
           Son
           of
           God
           was
           in
           his
           prepared
           Body
           ,
           but
           because
           he
           said
           of
           himself
           he
           was
           the
           Son
           of
           God
           ,
           for
           they
           meddled
           with
           nothing
           in
           that
           body
           ,
           only
           a
           Soldier
           with
           his
           sphere
           let
           out
           some
           of
           his
           blood
           ,
           which
           these
           Quakers
           say
           was
           no
           more
           than
           the
           blood
           of
           another
           Saint
           ,
           therefore
           your
           New
           Testament
           seems
           by
           these
           their
           printed
           Doctrines
           to
           charge
           our
           Rulers
           too
           hardly
           in
           saying
           of
           him
           
             whom
             they
             took
             down
             from
             the
             Tree
             and
             laid
             in
             the
             Sepulchre
             —
             That
             through
             this
             Man
             his
             preaching
             Remission
          
           
           
             of
             Sins
             ,
             and
             that
             by
             him
             all
             that
             believe
             are
             justified
             ,
          
           but
           by
           their
           Doctrine
           it
           seems
           to
           us
           that
           Man
           our
           Rulers
           crucified
           was
           but
           a
           Garment
           or
           Vessel
           that
           Christ
           dwelt
           in
           saying
           ,
           
             The
             same
             Christ
             therein
             crucified
             ascended
             into
             Heaven
             ,
          
           but
           they
           meddled
           with
           nothing
           within
           that
           body
           ,
           nor
           laid
           no
           hands
           on
           Christ
           ,
           as
           your
           New
           Testament
           charges
           them
           .
        
         
           Indeed
           I
           have
           not
           capacity
           to
           express
           how
           destructive
           to
           the
           new
           Testament
           Doctrine
           many
           printed
           Expressions
           of
           G.
           Fox's
           ,
           
             W.
             P.
             G.
             W.
          
           &c.
           are
           or
           may
           be
           ,
           besides
           what
           formerly
           published
           ,
           see
           more
           now
           published
           by
           
             G.
             K.
          
           in
           a
           book
           entituled
           
             A
             true
             Copy
             of
             a
             Paper
             ,
          
           &c.
           from
           page
           17
           to
           the
           end
           ,
           I
           say
           if
           the
           Enemies
           of
           the
           Christian
           Religion
           should
           but
           take
           the
           advantage
           of
           their
           printed
           Contempts
           they
           may
           be
           of
           ill
           consequence
           ,
           and
           hinder
           the
           propagation
           of
           the
           christian
           Faith
           ,
           as
           in
           the
           new
           Testament
           ,
           if
           not
           to
           the
           subversion
           thereof
           .
        
         
           But
           if
           any
           object
           ,
           why
           should
           these
           Quakers
           now
           living
           be
           blamed
           ,
           for
           the
           Errours
           (
           of
           the
           dead
           )
           seeing
           they
           say
           they
           believe
           rightly
           in
           Jesus
           Christ
           .
           I
           do
           believe
           many
           of
           them
           are
           not
           so
           guilty
           as
           them
           who
           wrote
           those
           Errours
           ,
           but
           it
           may
           be
           doubted
           that
           few
           of
           them
           are
           sound
           in
           the
           Faith
           ,
           if
           we
           may
           judge
           by
           their
           dubious
           and
           too-faced
           expressions
           thereabouts
           ;
           also
           their
           great
           enmity
           against
           
             G.
             K.
          
           and
           others
           for
           preaching
           and
           defending
           it
           ,
           and
           if
           they
           do
           truely
           believe
           than
           they
           should
           disown
           them
           printed
           Errours
           of
           
             G.
             Fox
             ,
             &c.
          
           or
           else
           they
           are
           likely
           to
           remain
           and
           poison
           more
           people
           hereafter
           ,
           and
           much
           more
           dangerous
           than
           verbal
           Preaching
           ,
           for
           that
           usually
           reaches
           no
           other
           than
           the
           present
           hearers
           ,
           but
           printed
           books
           are
           for
           posterity
           also
           ;
           especially
           considering
           what
           Monuments
           of
           high
           praises
           they
           have
           printed
           of
           
             G.
             Fox
          
           ;
           and
           others
           the
           broachers
           of
           them
           ;
           But
           the
           reason
           why
           they
           so
           strive
           to
           excuse
           and
           cover
           ,
           and
           will
           not
           disown
           G.
           Fox's
           errours
           is
           not
           commonly
           understood
           ;
           for
           he
           having
           arrogated
           to
           himself
           to
           be
           moved
           and
           guided
           by
           the
           infallible
           Spirit
           ,
           and
           no
           less
           than
           equallity
           with
           God
           and
           Christ
           ,
           and
           they
           having
           owned
           his
           inventions
           or
           dictates
           ,
           as
           from
           God
           immediately
           ,
           and
           his
           Writings
           allowing
           to
           be
           Titled
           
             The
             Word
             of
             the
             Lord
          
           ,
           and
           yet
           called
           Blasphemy
           to
           term
           the
           Scripture
           so
           ;
           nay
           ,
           
             D.
             S.
          
           a
           christian
           Quaker
           did
           but
           propose
           to
           have
           some
           Amendments
           or
           Corrections
           of
           his
           and
           others
           Errours
           they
           exceedingly
           reviled
           him
           in
           print
           ,
           and
           give
           a
           caution
           to
           
             whom
             presume
          
           (
           mind
           that
           )
           
             to
             amend
             what
             they
             apprehend
             offiensive
             ,
             least
             they
             be
             found
             touching
             the
          
           Lord
           's
           
             Anointed
             ,
             as
             to
             hurt
             his
             Prophets
             ,
          
           Thus
           you
           may
           see
           the
           high
           value
           they
           put
           on
           
             G.
             F.
             &c
          
           :
           and
           indeed
           I
           question
           not
           but
           it
           will
           appear
           to
           the
           the
           impartial
           that
           G.
           Fox's
           spirit
           is
           the
           Foundation
           or
           chief
           Corner-stone
           of
           their
           Buildining
           ,
           and
           if
           that
           prove
           fallible
           and
           erroneous
           ,
           (
           as
           is
           proved
           )
           than
           their
           building
           of
           Church-power
           must
           fall
           ;
           therefore
           it
           is
           as
           I
           fear
           that
           so
           many
           wise
           Men
           having
           been
           deceived
           by
           this
           false
           Spirit
           ,
           they
           cannot
           deny
           themselves
           and
           take
           up
           their
           cross
           to
           acknowledge
           it
           ,
           but
           whether
           their
           Reputation
           or
           the
           Authority
           of
           the
           New
           Testament
           be
           of
           most
           advantage
           or
           concernment
           to
           the
           Protestant
           Interest
           ,
           let
           the
           true
           Christians
           judge
           .
           And
           let
           but
           these
           Quakers
           consider
           their
           Dealings
           to
           and
           with
           
             G.
             K.
          
           and
           the
           Reason
           they
           give
           therefore
           ,
           
             i.
             e.
          
           they
           enjoin
           in
           him
           to
           clear
           them
           of
           those
           Errours
           charged
           on
           the
           Brethren-preachers
           in
           Pensilvania
           ,
           but
           these
           Errours
           of
           theirs
           in
           print
           are
           of
           greater
           concernment
           ,
           
           therefore
           by
           the
           same
           rule
           they
           ought
           (
           to
           clear
           the
           protestant
           Religion
           )
           to
           condemn
           and
           disown
           these
           printed
           contempts
           of
           our
           Lord
           Jesus
           ,
           the
           Scriptures
           and
           Magistrates
           ,
           and
           all
           Christendom
           almost
           ever
           since
           the
           Apostles
           to
           the
           end
           of
           time
           ,
           more
           especially
           considering
           how
           the
           endeavour
           by
           high
           Commendations
           in
           print
           to
           exalt
           this
           
             G.
             Fox
          
           ,
           as
           the
           only
           or
           chief
           Luminary
           of
           this
           Age
           ,
           whereby
           they
           are
           so
           far
           from
           disowning
           his
           Errours
           that
           they
           thereby
           do
           more
           effectually
           spread
           them
           ,
           than
           if
           twenty
           of
           the
           ablest
           of
           them
           went
           all
           over
           England
           preaching
           the
           same
           ,
           and
           so
           far
           as
           this
           contemptious
           and
           self-exalted
           spirit
           prevails
           ,
           so
           much
           must
           the
           true
           Faith
           decline
           ,
           and
           is
           undiscernable
           under
           mined
           by
           their
           so
           extolling
           
             G.
             F.
          
           as
           they
           have
           done
           in
           print
           ,
           in
           a
           Journal
           and
           Preface
           thereto
           in
           Folio
           ,
           the
           folly
           and
           wickedness
           thereof
           will
           in
           time
           appear
           ,
           and
           I
           have
           warrant
           from
           themselves
           for
           my
           discovering
           them
           ,
           for
           they
           say
           in
           print
           
             The
             only
             way
             to
             recover
             the
             Deceived
             is
             to
             discover
             the
             Deceivers
             ,
          
           and
           for
           their
           shuffling
           in
           among
           their
           Errours
           some
           sound
           Expressions
           its
           for
           their
           Advantage
           ,
           if
           you
           consider
           they
           must
           be
           very
           silly
           Cheats
           that
           intend
           to
           deceive
           with
           false
           Coin
           if
           they
           should
           not
           put
           some
           Good
           among
           the
           Bad
           ,
           but
           although
           the
           Good
           be
           good
           yet
           that
           doth
           not
           make
           the
           Bad
           good
           .
        
         
           And
           pray
           take
           notice
           that
           the
           matter
           now
           in
           controversy
           is
           not
           so
           much
           what
           these
           Modern
           Quakers
           say
           they
           now
           believe
           but
           about
           those
           printed
           Errours
           ,
           for
           if
           these
           believe
           otherways
           than
           they
           must
           condemn
           and
           disown
           them
           ,
           but
           they
           contrarywise
           excuse
           and
           cover
           them
           ,
           and
           thereby
           make
           themselves
           guilty
           and
           chargeable
           with
           them
           ,
           but
           I
           having
           printed
           a
           Discovery
           of
           some
           of
           G.
           Fox's
           errours
           ,
           and
           for
           brevity
           sake
           I
           took
           his
           Sentences
           short
           ,
           but
           not
           willingly
           to
           wrong
           his
           Sense
           ,
           but
           they
           to
           excuse
           him
           pretend
           I
           have
           abused
           him
           ,
           by
           my
           short
           citation
           ,
           but
           I
           shall
           have
           an
           Opportunity
           to
           cite
           them
           at
           large
           ,
           wherein
           I
           doubt
           not
           but
           it
           will
           appear
           that
           they
           falsly
           accuse
           me
           ;
           but
           seeing
           they
           so
           revile
           me
           for
           short
           Quotations
           ,
           by
           the
           same
           rule
           if
           they
           be
           guilty
           of
           the
           same
           Fault
           they
           deserve
           the
           same
           punishment
           and
           more
           abundantly
           ,
           in
           as
           much
           as
           I
           acknowledge
           my self
           a
           fallible
           sinner
           ,
           for
           which
           they
           have
           banterr'd
           me
           ,
           as
           
             G.
             Fox
          
           ,
           have
           done
           other
           Christians
           ;
           therefore
           the
           chief
           end
           of
           these
           following
           Citations
           is
           to
           shew
           how
           grossly
           wicked
           
             G.
             Fox
          
           was
           in
           short
           and
           false
           quoting
           and
           perverting
           Men's
           words
           and
           meaning
           .
        
         
           
             G.
             Fox
          
           his
           false
           Quotations
           and
           pervertions
           of
           
             J.
             Timson's
          
           words
           in
           his
           Book
           ,
           
             The
             great
             Mystery
          
           ,
           &c.
           
           In
           page
           17.
           
           
             G.
             F.
          
           brings
           
             J.
             T.
          
           saying
           ,
           It
           is
           an
           Expression
           of
           a
           dark
           deluded
           mind
           to
           say
           God
           is
           not
           distinct
           from
           his
           Saints
           ,
           but
           J.
           T.'s
           words
           be
           these
           ,
           would
           they
           counfound
           God
           and
           Man
           into
           one
           ,
           denying
           God
           to
           be
           distinct
           from
           his
           Saints
           ,
           would
           they
           renounce
           all
           former
           Teachings
           and
           Practises
           received
           from
           the
           Lord
           by
           the
           means
           of
           his
           Word
           and
           Ordinances
           ,
           and
           wholly
           follow
           the
           Imaginations
           of
           a
           deluded
           heart
           ;
           consider
           are
           not
           such
           things
           as
           these
           
             expresses
             of
             a
             dark
             deluded
             mind
             ,
             &c.
             
          
           Now
           observe
           
             J.
             T.
          
           sentence
           is
           above
           50
           words
           ,
           and
           
             G.
             F.
          
           takes
           but
           10
           of
           them
           ,
           and
           transposes
           them
           to
           ,
           and
           ,
           its
           confounding
           the
           being
           of
           God
           into
           one
           with
           Man
           that
           
             J.
             T.
          
           opposes
           ,
           as
           in
           8th
           pag.
           he
           says
           ,
           Is
           every
           gift
           and
           work
           of
           God
           in
           Man
           ,
           God
           that
           made
           all
           things
           ,
           it
           s
           this
           confusion
           
             J.
             T.
          
           opposes
           ,
           and
           not
           God
           being
           by
           his
           divine
           power
           in
           the
           Soul.
           
        
         
           Again
           page
           16.
           
           
             G.
             F.
          
           brings
           
             J.
             T.
          
           saying
           ,
           we
           
             (
             Quakers
          
           )
           have
           broken
           the
           everlasting
           Covenant
           of
           God
           ,
           because
           
             (
             says
             G.
             F.
          
           )
           we
           own
           the
           Teachings
           of
           God
           by
           his
           spirit
           and
           light
           ,
           
           but
           J.
           T
           's
           Reasons
           why
           he
           says
           they
           
           have
           broken
           the
           everlasting
           Covenant
           be
           these
           ,
           while
           you
           (
           says
           he
           )
           deny
           the
           Ordinances
           —
           you
           are
           none
           of
           God's
           Saints
           but
           Apostates
           —
           and
           broken
           the
           everlasting
           Covenant
           ,
           whereby
           its
           evident
           
             J.
             T.
          
           doth
           not
           say
           you
           have
           broken
           the
           everlasting
           Covenant
           because
           you
           own
           God's
           teaching
           by
           his
           spirit
           and
           light
           ,
           &c.
           as
           
             G.
             F.
          
           falsly
           says
           ,
           but
           because
           you
           deny
           those
           Ordinances
           ,
           for
           
             J.
             T.
          
           doth
           in
           pag.
           11.
           own
           the
           spirit
           is
           the
           Rule
           ,
           and
           in
           page
           47.
           
           
             J.
             T.
          
           says
           ,
           
             I
             have
             owned
             that
             to
             the
             means
             must
             be
             added
             a
             divine
             hand
             in
             working
             effectually
             upon
             the
             Souls
             of
             Men
             ,
          
           and
           
             G.
             F.
          
           doth
           not
           only
           falsly
           quote
           the
           Man's
           Words
           ,
           but
           falsly
           Accuse
           him
           too
           .
           Again
           ,
           
             G.
             F.
          
           brings
           in
           
             J.
             T.
          
           saying
           ,
           it
           s
           a
           contradiction
           and
           confused
           sensless
           thing
           to
           preach
           the
           Word
           of
           Faith
           in
           the
           Mouth
           and
           in
           the
           Heart
           ;
           but
           J.
           T
           's
           words
           be
           these
           ,
           
             In
             your
             Answer
             you
             say
             none
             know
             the
             Scriptures
             by
             the
             outward
             Declaration
             but
             by
             the
             Word
             of
             Faith
             in
             the
             mouth
             and
             in
             the
             heart
             which
             we
             preach
             ,
          
           and
           then
           saith
           he
           ,
           
             I
             told
             you
             that
             was
             a
             sensless
             thing
             —
             confused
             and
             contradiction
             ,
          
           and
           then
           
             J.
             T.
          
           says
           ,
           
             I
             quered
             you
             whether
             any
             of
             you
             know
             what
             is
             written
             in
             Scripture
             without
             the
             outward
             Declaration
             ,
          
           so
           that
           
             J.
             T.
          
           term'd
           it
           sensless
           ,
           &c.
           to
           affirm
           none
           knew
           the
           Scriptures
           or
           what
           was
           wrote
           in
           them
           but
           by
           the
           word
           of
           Faith
           in
           the
           Mouth
           and
           Heart
           ,
           &c.
           but
           he
           did
           not
           say
           it
           was
           sensless
           &c.
           to
           preach
           the
           word
           of
           Faith
           within
           ,
           as
           
             G.
             F.
          
           falsly
           says
           .
           Again
           in
           page
           17.
           says
           
             G.
             F.
             I.
             T.
          
           says
           ,
           Its
           Blasphemy
           to
           say
           that
           Christ
           is
           in
           them
           as
           God
           and
           Man
           ,
           but
           
             J.
             T.
          
           words
           be
           these
           ,
           
             Its
             Blasphemy
             to
             say
             Christ
             in
             them
             by
             his
             Person
             as
             God
             and
             Man
             ,
             and
             to
             deny
             the
             glorified
             Body
             of
             Christ
             which
             God
             had
             raised
             from
             the
             dead
             ,
             as
             the
             Quakers
             do
             ,
          
           says
           J.
           T.
           but
           
             G.
             F.
          
           leaves
           out
           the
           material
           Words
           of
           J.
           T
           's
           (
           by
           his
           person
           )
           and
           cut
           off
           from
           the
           sentence
           these
           following
           words
           of
           J.
           T
           's
           
             and
             deny
             his
             glorified
             Person
             which
             God
             has
             raised
             from
             the
             dead
             ,
          
           as
           the
           Quakers
           do
           :
           Also
           in
           the
           same
           23d
           .
           page
           ,
           
             J.
             T.
          
           says
           they
           make
           Christ's
           sufferings
           in
           them
           make
           satisfaction
           for
           their
           sins
           ,
           and
           call
           him
           a
           Christ
           without
           ,
           a
           Type
           ,
           a
           Figure
           ,
           also
           in
           page
           4.
           of
           his
           Preface
           
             J.
             T.
          
           charges
           them
           with
           saying
           
             They
             are
             as
             perfect
             as
             Christ
             that
             died
             at
          
           Jerusalem
           ,
           
             and
             that
             they
             which
             trust
             in
             him
             for
             Salvation
             shall
             be
             deceived
             ,
          
           but
           
             G.
             F.
          
           takes
           no
           notice
           of
           all
           this
           ,
           but
           wrongs
           the
           Man's
           words
           and
           sense
           ,
           by
           leaving
           out
           the
           middle
           words
           and
           cutting
           off
           the
           latter
           part
           of
           his
           sentence
           ,
           and
           by
           opposing
           
             J.
             T.
          
           he
           
             G.
             F.
          
           seems
           to
           own
           no
           other
           personal
           Christ
           but
           what
           is
           in
           them
           ,
           and
           thereby
           denies
           our
           Lord
           Jesus
           of
           Nazareth
           to
           be
           Christ
           ,
           for
           he
           as
           God
           and
           Man
           in
           one
           person
           cannot
           be
           in
           them
           ,
           and
           it
           is
           such
           a
           Man
           Christ
           ,
           such
           Blood
           and
           such
           Sufferings
           of
           Christ
           as
           is
           in
           them
           that
           
             G.
             F.
          
           means
           when
           he
           mention'd
           Christ
           or
           his
           Blood
           and
           Sufferings
           ,
           &c.
           as
           further
           appears
           by
           his
           Answer
           to
           those
           afore-cited
           words
           of
           
             J.
             T.
          
           says
           
             G.
             F.
             How
             are
             they
             of
             his
             Flesh
             and
             Bone
             ,
             and
             doth
             not
             the
             Scripture
             say
             that
             Christ
             in
             you
             ,
             God
             will
             dwell
             in
             you
             ,
             and
             walk
             in
             you
             ,
             and
             are
             they
             not
             partakers
             of
             divine
             Nature
             ,
          
           therefore
           it
           seems
           by
           G.
           F's
           Doctrine
           that
           Christ
           had
           no
           other
           Person
           ,
           Flesh
           ,
           bone
           ,
           nor
           Blood
           ,
           that
           was
           Christ's
           but
           what
           was
           in
           them
           ,
           and
           that
           him
           whom
           shewed
           himself
           to
           his
           Disciples
           ,
           and
           bid
           them
           feel
           and
           handle
           him
           saying
           ,
           a
           Spirit
           hath
           not
           Flesh
           and
           Bone
           as
           I
           have
           is
           not
           G.
           F's
           Christ
           ,
           but
           a
           Person
           God
           and
           Man
           in
           him
           ,
           and
           our
           Lord
           Jesus
           of
           Nazareth
           but
           a
           Vessel
           or
           Garment
           in
           which
           Christ
           appeared
           in
           ,
           but
           I
           can
           think
           these
           Doctrines
           of
           
             G.
             F.
          
           no
           less
           than
           denying
           the
           Lord
           that
           bought
           them
           ,
           and
           trampling
           under
           foot
           the
           blood
           of
           Christ
           .
        
         
         
           Again
           page
           17.
           
           
             G.
             F.
          
           says
           that
           
             J.
             T.
          
           saith
           ,
           its
           abhorred
           Dotage
           they
           are
           bewitched
           with
           to
           say
           they
           witness
           Forgiveness
           within
           ,
           but
           J.
           T
           's
           words
           be
           thus
           ,
           
             Doth
             Christ
          
           (
           saith
           he
           )
           
             undergo
             the
             stripes
             of
             a
             just
             God
             ,
             and
             shed
             his
             Blood
             for
             our
             Redemption
             and
             Forgiveness
             within
             you
             ,
             what
             abhorred
             Dotage
             are
             you
             bewitched
             with
             .
          
           Here
           J.
           T
           's
           sentence
           is
           twenty
           six
           words
           ,
           and
           
             G.
             F.
          
           culls
           out
           six
           of
           them
           and
           transposes
           them
           to
           make
           a
           sentence
           contrary
           to
           J.
           T
           's
           meaning
           ,
           for
           its
           the
           Sufferings
           of
           Christ
           being
           acted
           
             within
             them
          
           for
           our
           Redemption
           that
           he
           opposes
           ,
           but
           
             G.
             F.
          
           contrarywise
           represents
           him
           as
           denying
           having
           the
           Witness
           of
           Forgiveness
           within
           ,
           as
           G.
           F's
           answer
           also
           shews
           ,
           for
           saith
           he
           to
           
             J.
             T.
             thou
             never
             knew
             a
             Saints
             life
             and
             that
             which
             cleanseth
             ,
             and
             the
             Testimony
             within
             of
             forgiveness
             of
             Sin
             ,
             for
             where
             it
             s
             forgiven
             it
             s
             forgiven
             within
             ,
          
           in
           this
           
             G.
             F.
          
           perverts
           the
           Man's
           words
           and
           falsly
           accuses
           him
           .
        
         
           Again
           
             G.
             F.
          
           brings
           
             J.
             T.
          
           saying
           ,
           None
           ever
           had
           such
           Attainments
           of
           Christ
           a
           Redeemer
           without
           the
           help
           of
           Scripture
           .
           Now
           J.
           T
           's
           words
           be
           these
           pages
           65
           ,
           66.
           saith
           he
           ,
           
             Themselves
             are
             no
             strangers
             to
             those
             Scriptures
             that
             give
             such
             Discoveries
             of
             the
             Person
             ,
             Natures
             and
             Offices
             of
             a
             redeeming
             Christ
             that
             never
             any
             have
             attained
             unto
             and
             discovered
             ,
             either
             by
             Words
             or
             Writings
             ,
             which
             never
             had
             nor
             heard
             of
             the
             help
             of
             the
             Gospel
             as
             contained
             in
             the
             Scripture
          
           ;
           here
           J.
           T
           's
           sentence
           is
           48
           Words
           ,
           and
           
             G.
             F.
          
           takes
           but
           8
           of
           them
           dodging
           from
           one
           place
           to
           another
           perverting
           them
           .
           Again
           page
           18.
           
           
             G.
             F.
          
           brings
           
             J.
             T.
          
           saying
           ,
           Where
           did
           ever
           any
           say
           they
           went
           through
           the
           Law
           to
           Christ
           ,
           they
           be
           strangers
           to
           the
           Life
           of
           God
           that
           say
           so
           ,
           but
           
             J.
             T.
          
           says
           thus
           ,
           
             Must
             a
             sinner
             go
             through
             the
             Law
             in
             perfect
             Obedience
             ,
             until
             nothing
             remains
             to
             oblige
             him
             further
             ,
             and
             is
             this
             the
             way
             to
             Christ
             in
             whom
             is
             Justification
             only
             witnessed
             —
             whether
             I
             or
             you
             be
             aleniated
             from
             the
             Life
             of
             God
             as
             you
             censure
             me
             let
             the
             sober
             judge
             .
          
           Here
           J.
           T
           's
           sentence
           is
           above
           40
           words
           and
           
             G.
             F.
          
           takes
           but
           10
           of
           them
           and
           transposes
           them
           also
           ,
           and
           its
           the
           attaining
           salvation
           through
           or
           by
           our
           Obedience
           ,
           or
           fulfilling
           the
           Law
           in
           our selves
           that
           
             J.
             T.
          
           is
           against
           ,
           and
           
             G.
             F.
          
           opposes
           him
           perverting
           his
           Words
           .
        
         
           Again
           
             G.
             F.
          
           brings
           
             J.
             T.
          
           saying
           ,
           Christ
           Jesus
           was
           not
           in
           all
           Ages
           and
           Places
           of
           the
           World
           ;
           but
           
             G.
             F.
          
           dishonestly
           cuts
           off
           from
           his
           sentence
           these
           following
           Words
           ,
           
             In
             his
             Person
             ,
             Ministry
             and
             powerful
             Workings
             visibly
             ,
          
           herein
           
             G.
             F.
          
           is
           guilty
           of
           mangling
           and
           cutting
           in
           two
           the
           Man's
           sentence
           as
           well
           as
           perverting
           his
           sence
           .
           Again
           page
           19.
           
           
             G.
             F.
          
           brings
           
             J.
             T.
          
           saying
           ,
           he
           knows
           not
           what
           ,
           the
           true
           Light
           ,
           eternal
           Word
           ,
           the
           everlasting
           Gospel
           ,
           the
           Light
           which
           gave
           forth
           the
           Scriptures
           ,
           the
           Judge
           of
           the
           World
           ,
           the
           Kingdom
           of
           Heaven
           within
           ,
           the
           Law
           of
           the
           New
           Covenant
           and
           Christ
           within
           ,
           these
           says
           
             G.
             F.
          
           he
           knows
           not
           ,
           but
           in
           p.
           84.
           
           
             J.
             T.
          
           having
           reckoned
           up
           all
           these
           afore-named
           Titles
           that
           they
           give
           to
           the
           Light
           within
           them
           ,
           then
           
             J.
             T.
          
           adds
           these
           words
           ,
           
             And
             I
             know
             not
             what
          
           ,
           that
           is
           ,
           he
           knew
           not
           what
           more
           Titles
           they
           dignifie
           the
           Light
           within
           with
           ,
           and
           not
           as
           
             G.
             F.
          
           falsly
           says
           he
           does
           not
           know
           what
           those
           aforementioned
           things
           were
           .
        
         
           Again
           p.
           246.
           
           
             G.
             F.
          
           brings
           
             C.
             Wade
          
           saying
           ,
           O
           horrible
           !
           to
           say
           the
           infallible
           Spirit
           must
           open
           the
           Scripture
           ,
           but
           
             C.
             W.
          
           speaking
           of
           the
           Pope
           ,
           &c.
           taking
           on
           them
           to
           open
           scriptures
           ,
           and
           says
           
             C.
             W.
          
           
           
             The
             Quakers
             differ
             not
             much
             ,
             for
             they
             say
             it
             must
             be
             some
             Spirit
             of
             or
             in
             them
             which
             they
             suppose
             to
             be
             
             infallible
             ,
             O
             horrible
             insolency
             !
             doth
             
               T.
               M.
            
             hereby
             (
             says
             
               C.
               W.
            
             )
             deny
             the
             Spirit
             of
             God
             to
             give
             the
             sense
             of
             the
             Scriptures
             ,
             doth
             he
             not
             deny
             ,
             the
             falsle
             spirit
             in
             them
             to
             give
             the
             sense
             of
             Scriptures
             ,
          
           here
           C.
           W's
           sentence
           is
           78
           words
           and
           
             G.
             F.
          
           takes
           but
           six
           of
           them
           ,
           transposing
           them
           and
           perverting
           the
           sense
           .
           Again
           p.
           246.
           says
           
             G.
             F.
          
           its
           C.
           W's
           principle
           ,
           flesh
           and
           bone
           cannot
           be
           a
           measure
           in
           one
           and
           a
           measure
           in
           another
           .
           But
           
             C.
             W.
          
           in
           his
           7th
           .
           says
           thus
           ,
           
             Christ
             spiritualized
             and
             glorified
             Person
             ,
             of
             real
             Flesh
             and
             Bone
             ,
             cannot
             be
             part
             thereof
             in
             one
             Man
             ,
             and
             the
             other
             part
             of
             his
             real
             flesh
             and
             bone
             in
             other
             Men
             ,
             as
             you
             falsly
             imply
             ,
             although
             by
             his
             spiritual
             influences
             he
             is
             in
             all
             his
             Saints
             .
          
           Now
           C.
           W.'s
           sentence
           is
           42
           words
           ,
           and
           
             G.
             F.
          
           takes
           but
           8
           of
           of
           them
           and
           transposes
           them
           ,
           and
           by
           opposing
           
             C.
             W.
          
           do
           deny
           Christ
           to
           have
           or
           had
           any
           flesh
           or
           bone
           as
           his
           ,
           but
           what
           they
           have
           in
           them
           .
        
         
           Again
           
             G.
             F.
          
           says
           
             C.
             W.
          
           cries
           ,
           
             O
             Luceferian
             pride
             to
             save
             Souls
             .
          
           But
           C.
           W's
           words
           be
           to
           one
           
             J.
             Milner
          
           to
           whom
           he
           says
           ,
           
             Thou
             by
             thy
             Luceferian
             pride
             to
             save
             Souls
             as
             Christ
             did
             thou
             must
             come
             under
             the
             Lash
             .
          
           Now
           here
           's
           C.
           W's
           own
           Answer
           to
           
             G.
             F.
          
           in
           print
           ,
           says
           he
           ,
           
             I
             do
             no
             where
             say
             so
             as
             thou
             lyingly
             affirms
             ,
             but
             do
             in
             my
             8th
             .
             page
             accuse
             
               J.
               Milner
            
             Quaker
             with
             Luceferian
             pride
             ,
             because
             he
             pretended
             to
             be
             Christ
             ,
             and
             audaciously
             took
             on
             him
             to
             save
             Souls
             ,
             as
             Christ
             did
             ,
             and
             his
             Blood
             was
             shed
             ,
             and
             that
             he
             gave
             up
             the
             Ghost
             ,
             as
             Christ
             did
             ,
             and
             says
             
               C.
               W.
            
             I
             no
             where
             accuse
             any
             Quakers
             of
             saving
             Souls
             ,
             but
             as
             they
             pretend
             to
             be
             Christ
             ,
             and
             apply
             to
             themselves
             his
             Titles
             to
             save
             Souls
             ;
          
           and
           says
           
             C.
             W.
          
           to
           
             G.
             F.
             This
             must
             stand
             up
             as
             a
             Lie
             against
             you
             .
          
        
         
           Again
           p.
           246.
           
           
             G.
             F.
          
           brings
           
             C.
             W.
          
           saying
           ,
           God
           the
           Father
           never
           took
           on
           him
           Human
           Nature
           ;
           but
           C.
           W's
           Words
           be
           thus
           ,
           
             God
             the
             Father
             who
             is
             and
             ever
             was
             totally
             spiritual
             never
             took
             on
             him
             any
             person
             of
             Human
             Nature
             ,
             as
             God
             the
             Son
             hath
             done
             .
          
           Now
           C.
           W's
           sentence
           is
           26
           Words
           ,
           and
           
             G.
             F.
          
           takes
           but
           10
           of
           them
           ,
           and
           by
           opposing
           of
           
             C.
             W.
          
           do
           imply
           no
           difference
           between
           the
           Person
           of
           Jesus
           Christ
           and
           God
           the
           Father
           ,
           and
           so
           Christ
           no
           more
           or
           otherwise
           a
           Man
           ,
           but
           as
           God
           the
           Father
           was
           ,
           and
           so
           consequently
           if
           our
           Lord
           Jesus
           of
           Nazareth
           was
           not
           God
           the
           Father
           he
           was
           not
           Christ
           .
           Again
           p.
           246.
           
           
             G.
             F.
          
           says
           to
           
             C.
             W.
          
           the
           Scriptures
           are
           not
           the
           Word
           of
           God
           ,
           as
           thou
           blasphemously
           affirmed
           ,
           but
           in
           C.
           W's
           sense
           the
           Scriptures
           may
           be
           termed
           the
           Word
           of
           God
           ,
           for
           says
           he
           ,
           they
           are
           the
           Word
           or
           Words
           of
           Christ
           who
           is
           God
           ,
           but
           saith
           
             C.
             W.
          
           p.
           13
           ,
           14.
           we
           do
           not
           expect
           to
           be
           taught
           by
           the
           Letter
           of
           the
           Scripture
           written
           with
           Ink
           and
           Paper
           ,
           but
           by
           the
           spirit
           of
           Christ
           therewith
           ,
           and
           this
           might
           have
           satisfied
           a
           Christian
           that
           
             C.
             W.
          
           did
           not
           intend
           the
           Scriptures
           the
           Word
           of
           God
           ,
           as
           Christ
           is
           ,
           but
           one
           would
           think
           by
           G.
           F's
           niceness
           herein
           that
           he
           were
           a
           consciencious
           humble
           Man
           ,
           but
           his
           Fruits
           proves
           him
           otherwise
           ,
           for
           in
           three
           several
           places
           in
           this
           Book
           says
           he
           ,
           
             This
             is
             the
             Word
             of
             the
             Lord
             ,
          
           pages
           123.
           211.
           225.
           and
           on
           a
           silly
           ,
           idle
           ,
           pamphlet-sheet
           of
           his
           own
           he
           clapt
           on
           the
           Title-page
           
             This
             is
             the
             Word
             of
             the
             Lord
             God
             unto
             you
             all
             ,
             Luceferian-like
          
           exalting
           himself
           .
           Again
           page
           247.
           
           
             G.
             F.
          
           brings
           
             C.
             W.
          
           saying
           ,
           
             God
             limiteth
             the
             supreme
             holy
             One
             ,
             by
             his
             inspired
             Writings
             of
             the
             Apostles
             ;
          
           but
           C.
           W's
           Words
           and
           Sense
           are
           quite
           contrary
           to
           
             G.
             F.
          
           for
           in
           page
           13.
           says
           he
           ,
           
             As
             the
             Devil
             of
             old
             he
             over-powers
             you
             Quakers
             —
             to
             deny
             the
             Scriptures
             to
             be
             any
             help
             —
             and
             as
             he
             thereby
             limits
             the
             supreme
             holy
             
             One
             ,
             so
             he
             over-rules
             you
             ,
             &c.
             
          
           —
           In
           this
           
             G.
             F.
          
           is
           guilty
           of
           no
           less
           Errour
           then
           applying
           
           GOD's
           Name
           to
           the
           Devil
           ,
           and
           it
           may
           be
           he
           has
           been
           so
           mistaken
           in
           his
           pretences
           to
           the
           Infallible
           Spirit
           .
           Again
           p.
           247.
           
           
             G.
             F.
          
           brings
           
             C.
             W.
          
           saying
           ,
           the
           Scripture
           contains
           the
           immediate
           inspired
           Teaching
           ,
           Written
           Word
           of
           God
           ,
           that
           was
           and
           is
           God.
           C.
           W's
           words
           being
           in
           page
           16.
           
           
             The
             very
             Letter
             of
             the
             New
             Testament
             or
             Gospel
             contains
             in
             it
             the
             immediate
             inspired
             teaching
             and
             written
             Word
             of
             Christ
             ,
             who
             was
             and
             is
             God.
             
          
           Now
           of
           his
           26
           Words
           
             G.
             F.
          
           takes
           but
           12
           ,
           and
           change
           his
           words
           
             New
             Testament
          
           for
           Scripture
           ,
           and
           Christ
           for
           God
           ,
           so
           representing
           
             C.
             W.
          
           as
           terming
           the
           
             New
             Testament
          
           God
           ,
           whereas
           
             C.
             W.
          
           says
           ,
           
             Christ
             who
             was
             and
             is
             God
             ,
          
           but
           of
           such
           Falsehoods
           this
           Book
           of
           G.
           F's
           is
           full
           of
           .
           Again
           247.
           
           G.
           F.
           brings
           
             C.
             W.
          
           saying
           ,
           It
           s
           a
           Lye
           to
           say
           the
           Saints
           shall
           judge
           the
           World
           ,
           but
           in
           page
           21.
           
           
             C.
             W.
          
           says
           ,
           
             Thy
             saying
             not
             that
             thou
             shalt
             be
             ,
             but
             that
             thou
             art
             the
             Judge
             of
             the
             world
             is
             a
             Lye
             ,
             for
             no
             Saint
             can
             be
             a
             Judge
             of
             the
             World
             ,
             —
             during
             this
             their
             Life
             of
             Mortality
             :
          
           Hereby
           
             G.
             F.
          
           does
           not
           only
           falsly
           accuse
           
             C.
             W.
          
           but
           implys
           that
           they
           (
           Quakers
           )
           are
           the
           Judges
           of
           the
           World.
           
        
         
           Again
           p.
           248.
           
           G.
           F.
           says
           ,
           that
           C.
           W.
           denies
           the
           Son
           to
           be
           revealed
           in
           Man
           only
           by
           Adoption
           ;
           but
           
             C.
             W.
          
           says
           in
           p.
           24
           ,
           
             The
             Saints
             are
             not
             God's
             Sons
             ,
             any
             otherway
             but
             by
             Adoption
             ,
             only
             by
             Christ
             ,
             not
             as
             being
             Christ
             ,
             as
             you
             foolishly
             fancy
             ;
             so
             that
             its
             evident
             
               C.
               W.
            
             did
             not
             deny
             the
             Revelation
             of
             Christ
             in
             Man
             ,
             as
             
               G.
               F.
            
             falsly
             says
             ,
             but
             their
             being
             Sons
             as
             Christ
             .
          
           Again
           
             G.
             F.
          
           says
           that
           
             C.
             W.
          
           cries
           against
           Equality
           with
           the
           Father
           ;
           but
           pray
           hear
           what
           Equality
           it
           is
           that
           
             C.
             W.
          
           does
           oppose
           ;
           in
           page
           24
           says
           
             C.
             W.
          
           
           
             Creature
             adopted
             Sons
             cannot
             be
             equal
             with
             the
             heavenly
             uncreated
             Father
             —
             neither
             can
             any
             creature
             adopted
             Sons
             be
             equal
             with
             God's
             only
             begotten
             Son
             ,
             and
             by
             thy
             making
             no
             reserve
             or
             distinction
             says
             
               C.
               W.
            
             in
             thy
             pretended
             Equality
             with
             God
             shews
             —
             that
             thou
             art
             a
             Lyer
             ;
          
           and
           G.
           F.
           by
           opposing
           C.
           W.
           doth
           claim
           Equality
           with
           the
           Father
           .
           Again
           page
           248.
           
           G.
           F.
           brings
           
             C.
             W.
          
           saying
           ,
           it
           is
           a
           false
           thing
           to
           say
           Christ's
           person
           is
           in
           Man
           ,
           but
           C.
           W's
           words
           be
           page
           25.
           
           
             Christ's
             Person
             in
             them
             God
             and
             Man
             ,
          
           but
           them
           words
           God
           and
           Man
           G.
           F.
           leaves
           out
           .
           Again
           page
           248.
           
           G.
           F.
           says
           C.
           W.
           calls
           it
           Satanical
           to
           say
           ,
           as
           he
           is
           so
           are
           we
           in
           this
           World.
           In
           page
           26.
           
           
             C.
             W.
          
           says
           ,
           
             They
             (
             Quakers
             )
             do
             declare
             themselves
             to
             be
             totally
             without
             Sin
             as
             Christ
             is
             
               —
               Satanically
            
             perverting
             that
             Scripture
             —
             and
             affirm
             ,
             That
             they
             are
             without
             Sin
             in
             them
             ,
             as
             some
             of
             them
             have
             said
             in
             my
             hearing
             of
             themselves
             .
          
           Again
           page
           249
           G.
           F.
           brings
           
             C.
             W.
          
           saying
           ,
           no
           People
           on
           Earth
           go
           about
           to
           save
           Souls
           but
           the
           Quakers
           ,
           C.
           W's
           words
           in
           page
           32
           ,
           
             Where
             is
             to
             be
             found
             any
             People
             —
             as
             the
             Quakers
             in
             a
             false
             way
             do
             declare
             themselves
             to
             be
             Christ
             ,
             and
             do
             apply
             to
             themselves
             Christ's
             Titles
             and
             take
             on
             them
             to
             save
             Souls
             .
          
           Again
           G.
           F.
           brings
           
             C.
             W.
          
           saying
           ,
           There
           is
           not
           whole
           Christ
           God
           and
           Man
           in
           Man
           ;
           G.
           F.
           mangles
           this
           Sentence
           by
           cutting
           off
           the
           latter
           part
           of
           C.
           W's
           words
           ,
           
             By
             his
             Spirit
             ,
             by
             faith
             .
          
           All
           these
           false
           and
           short
           Quotations
           ,
           pervertions
           and
           Untruths
           aforementioned
           of
           G.
           F's
           considered
           ,
           it
           may
           be
           said
           of
           him
           more
           truly
           than
           as
           
             W.
             P.
             Many
             have
             done
          
           wickedly
           ,
           
             but
             thou
             dear
          
           George
           
             excelleth
             them
             all
          
           .
        
      
    
     
       
         
           LONDON
           ,
           Printed
           for
           
             T.
             C.
          
           and
           sold
           by
           
             John
             Gwillim
          
           Bookseller
           within
           Bishopgat●
           ,
           1695.