The judgment and doctrine of the Church of England concerning one special branch of the King's prerogative, viz. in dispencing with the penall laws / asserted by the most reverend father in God, the lords Arch-Bishops Bancroft, Laud and Usher, the right reverend fathers in God, the lords Bishops Sanderson and Cartwright, the reverend doctors, Sir Thomas Ridley L.L.D., Dr. Hevlin, Dr. Barrow, Dr. Sherlock master of the temple, Dr. Hicks, Dr. Nalson and Dr. Puller ; and by the anonymus, author of The harmony of divinity and law : together with the concurring resolutions of our reverend judges, as most consonant and agreeable thereunto ; in a letter from a gentleman of Oxford, to his friend at London. Gentleman of Oxford. 1687 Approx. 57 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 24 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2008-09 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A46343 Wing J1172 ESTC R1415 12368658 ocm 12368658 60488 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A46343) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 60488) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 920:13) The judgment and doctrine of the Church of England concerning one special branch of the King's prerogative, viz. in dispencing with the penall laws / asserted by the most reverend father in God, the lords Arch-Bishops Bancroft, Laud and Usher, the right reverend fathers in God, the lords Bishops Sanderson and Cartwright, the reverend doctors, Sir Thomas Ridley L.L.D., Dr. Hevlin, Dr. Barrow, Dr. Sherlock master of the temple, Dr. Hicks, Dr. Nalson and Dr. Puller ; and by the anonymus, author of The harmony of divinity and law : together with the concurring resolutions of our reverend judges, as most consonant and agreeable thereunto ; in a letter from a gentleman of Oxford, to his friend at London. Gentleman of Oxford. 46 p. Printed for J.H. and T.S. ..., London : 1687. Reproduction of original in Huntington Library. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Bancroft, Richard, 1544-1610. Prerogative, Royal -- Great Britain. Church and state -- Great Britain. Religious tolerance -- Church of England. 2007-01 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2007-02 Apex CoVantage Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2007-04 Jonathan Blaney Sampled and proofread 2007-04 Jonathan Blaney Text and markup reviewed and edited 2008-02 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion THE JUDGMENT and DOCTRINE Of the Clergy of the Church of England , CONCERNING One special Branch of the King's Prerogative , Viz. In dispencing with the Penall Laws , Asserted by The most Reverend Fathers in God , The Lords Arch-Bishops Bancroft , Laud and Vsher . The Right Reverend Fathers in God , The Lords Bishops Sanderson and Cartwright . The Reverend Doctors , Sir Thomas Ridley L. L. D. Dr Heylin , Dr Barrow , Dr Sherlock Master of the Temple , Dr Hicks , Dr Nalson and Dr Puller . And by the ANONYMVS , Author of the Harmony of Divinity and Law. Together with the Concurring Resolutions of our Reverend Judges , as most Consonant and Agreeable thereunto . In a Letter from a Gentleman of Oxford , to his Friend at London . Licenced the 2d . of May 1687. Upon whomsoever God is understood to bestow the Soveraign Authority , he must also be understood to bestow upon him all the Jura Majestatis ; or Essential Rights of Soveraignty , according to that Maxim , Qui dat esse , dat & omnia pertinentia ad esse ; He that gives the Essence , gives also the Properties belonging to the Essence . Jovian , or an Answer to Julian the Apostate , chap. 11. London , Printed for J. H. and T. S. and are to be had at most Book-sellers , in London and Westminster . SIR , IN one of the late Conferences you were pleased to have with me , you seemed to be somewhat disatisfied upon the subject we were discoursing of , which was , whither the King had by Law such a Supream Power inherent in , and inseparably annexed to his Crown , as to Dispence with Penal Laws . I remember I then told you , we could not resolve our selves of this Great Point , but by these two wayes . 1. To see , how far the Judgment of our Church-men , appearing in their Doctrines ( which are for our Edification ) doth Warrant this Prerogative to be in the King. II. To see how far the Judges Resolutions ( in declaring their sence of the Law of the Land in this doubtful Question , ) do agree with such their Judgments and Doctrines . And as for the First , Sir , I doubt not but to make it clear , past all peradventure , that our Reverend Clergy of the Church of England have unanimously concurred in this Point of Doctrine , that it doth inseparably belong to the Kingly office to dispence with Penal Laws , when ever such a Supremacy of Power shall be thought necessary to be exerted for the safety of the King , and the Good and Ease of his People in general . And if I can prove this undeniably to You ; I hope then that this nice Scruple of yours ( which by the way , I suppose , you will allow me to call your tender Conscience ) will easily be removed ; and consequently then it may be presumed , I shall have less difficulty to Satisfie You in the other Point , that this sence of the Law of the Land in the point in Question , is no other , than what is exactly Correspondent with the Judgment and Doctrine of the Clergy of the Church of England . To begin then , The Reverend Dean of Worcester , in his so deservedly applauded Answer to Julian the Apostate , declares , that the English Realm is a perfect soveraignty , or Empire , and that the King of England by the Imperial Laws of it , is a Compleat , Imperial , and Independant Soveraign . And he quotes Coke in Cawdrye's Case , who saith , that by the antient Laws of this Realm , England is an absolute Empire , and Monarchy ; and that the King is furnished with plenary and Entire Power , Prerogative , and Jurisdiction , and is supream Governour over all persons within this Realm . Now it would be a contradiction to call this an Imperial Crown ; to acknowledge the King for supream over all Persons , — and that he is furnished with Plenary and entire Power , unless He have all Those Rights , which are involved in the very Notion of his Imperial Soveraignty . By the Rights of Soveraign , saith He , I understand Those Prerogatives , and Preeminences of Power and Greatness , which are involved in the Formal Conception of Soveraignty , and are inseparably annexed to the Soveraign . — He hath no sharers or Co-partners in the Soveraignty ; None Co-ordinate with him in Government ; no Equal , nor Superiour , but only God , to whom Alone He is subject , — All Power and Jurisdiction Spiritual and Temporal is derived and deducted from Him , as supream Head of These Churches , and Realms . There are some Essential Rights of the Crown , which the Subjects cannot obtain from their Soveraign by any Grant or prescription , without destroying the essential and individual Rights of Monarchy . These Rights , called the Flowers of the Crown , are Regalia Suprema , or Summa Jura Imperij , regno tuendo servientia , inherent to his Royal Function , and politick Capacity , and serve for the strength and support thereof — such are the Rights of making War and Peace , of having the last Appeal unto him , or his Great Council and supream Court ; and of making Leagues , and of Dispensing with Penal Laws , granting pardons , and such like . Now if the King hath a perfection and fulness of Imperial Power in him , as Dr Hicks hath clearly made out , and This Power of dispensing with Penal Laws be ( as it must be , or nothing ) one of those Prerogatives and Pre-eminencies of power and Greatness , which are involved in the Formal Conception of Soveraignty ; Then certainly it is very plain , that This is an Essential Right inseparably annexed to our Imperial Soveraign : and to go about to deprive him of such an inherent Right , it would tend to the disinherison of the King and his Crown . This Phrase , he saith , of the disinherison of the King and the Crown in other * Acts of Parliament is called , The Destruction of the King's Soveraignty , his Crown , his Regality , and things that tend thereunto , things that are openly against the King's Crown in Derogation of this Regality . And , Sir to convince You , that the King hath this Perfection and fulness of Power , more especially in matters of Religion , in his sacred Person , you may please to be informed , that that Great Metropolitan of All England , Arch-bishop Bancroft , when Question was made of what matters the Ecclesiastical judges have cognisance , either upon the exposition of the Statutes concerning Tythes , or any other thing Ecclesiastical , or upon the Statute 1 Eliz. concerning the High Commission , or in any other case in which there is not express Authority in Law , declared , That the King himself may decide it in his Royal Person ; and that the Judges are but the Delegates of the King , and that the King may take what causes he shall please to determine , from the Determination of the Judges , and may determine them himself . And the Archbishop said , that this was clear in Divinity , that such Authority belongs to the King by the word of God in the Scripture . So that Eminent Prelate . For , as it is well observed by that Learned Knight , and Doctor in the Civil Law , Sir Thomas Ridley . His Majesty , by communicating his Authority to the Judges to expound his Laws , doth not thereby abdicate the same from himself , but that he may assume it again to him , when , and as often as he pleaseth , whose Interpretation in that is to be preferred before Theirs . For , as he saith in another place , He is both by the Ordinance of God and Man , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , ( as the Apostle terms him ) among them , that is , One who is Supream Soveraign above the Rest , and whom they ought in all things to obey , so it be not against the Law of God , and Common Justice ; for himself is insteed of the whole Law , Yea , he is the Law it self , and the only INTERPRETER thereof , as in whose Breast is the whole Knowledg of the same . Now , Sir , what Answer can you give to all This ? if it be clear in Divinity , that such Authority belongs to the King by the word of God in the Scripture , with what Colour of Reason can you deny the King 's Imperial Soveraignty in dispensing with Penal Laws ? But to proceed more clearly to the Point in Question , The most Reverend , Renowned and Religious Prelate and Patriot , Dr W. Laud , Archbishop of Canterbury , A man of such Eminent vertue , ( as the Author of his life writes of him ) Such an Exemplary Piety towards God , such an unwearied fidelity to his Gracious Soveraign , and of such a Publick Soul towards Church and State , that he lived the Honour , and dyed a Martyr of both . I say , this Great , but at last unfortunate Prelate , thus delivers his Considerate Opinion , that the Supream Magistrate in the Estate Civil , may not abrogate the Laws made in Parliament , though he may dispence with the Sanction or Penalty of the Law , quoad hic & nunc , as the Lawyers speak . The next I shall give You , is , that Learned and moderate Primate and Metropolitan of all Ireland , Dr. James Vsher , late Lord Arch-bishop of Armagh , who in his Book entituled , The Power communicated by God to the Prince , and the obedience required of the Subject , composed purposely for the Rights both of Princes and Subjects , and for the comfirmation of staggering Loyalty , assures us , that POSITIVE LAWS , being ( as other works of men are ) IMPERFECT and not free from many discommodities , if the STRICT OBSERVATION thereof should be pursued in EVERY PARTICULAR ; it is fit the SUPREAM Governour should not himself only be EXEMPTED from SUBJECTION thereunto , but also be so far LORD OVER THEM , that where he feeth cause he may ABATE , or TOTALLY REMIT the PENALTY incurred by the Breach of them , DISPENCE with others for the NOT OBSERVING of them at all ; yea , and generally SUSPEND the EXECUTION of them , when by experience he shall find the Inconveniences to be greater then the profit that was expected should redound thereby unto the Common-wealth . PLUTARCH setteth this down as a chief point of that natural skill which PHILOPOEMEN had in Government , that he did not only rule according to the Laws , but over-ruled the Laws themselves , when he found it conducing to the weal-publick . And he saith a little before , by the LAW OF THE KING , I understand such ordinances as are MEERLY CIVIL and POSITIVE ; the COACTIVE POWER whereof being DERIVED from him who is the SUPREAM LAW-GIVER UNDER GOD ON EARTH , He himself cannot properly be said to be tyed thereby . For as with the Grammarians , the Imperative mood hath no first Person , so with the Civilians , a no man can command or forbid himself ; at least wise , no b man can impose such a Law upon himself , but that he may recede from it when he pleaseth . And with the Schoolmen ▪ a Law hath power to direct such Acts as belong to those who are subject to the Government of c another ; whereupon no man , if we speak properly , doth impose a Law upon his own Acts. As no man therefore is superior to himself , so no man hath Jurisdiction over himself ; because none can oblige a man against his will , but only his Superiour , and the Jurisdiction over a man's self may be dissolved at Pleasure . KINGS therefore , as he affirms in another place , are said to be ABOVE THE LAWS whereby they govern their People , partly in respect of Themselves , partly in respect of Others : Of OTHERS , in asmuch as they have POWER to JUDGE a according to their own CONSCIENCE , and not according to the Letter of the Law ; as also to DISPENCE in some Cases with the very OBEDIENCE , in some with the PUNISHMENT required by the LAW . For , he quotes Aeneas Silvius a little after saying , Equity is that which is just beyond the written Law : Now if the Law doth command one thing , and Equity perswade another , it is fit the Emperor should temper the Rigour of the Law with the Bridle of Equity , as He who alone may and ought to look unto that interpretation which lieth interposed between Law and Equity . Especially seeing no Decree of the Law , although weighed with never so considerate Councel , can sufficiently answer the varieties and unthought on plottings of Mans Nature . And seeing the Condition of human Law is such , that it runneth always without stint , and there is nothing in it which can be at a perpetual stand ; it is manifest , that in tract of time the Laws which before were just , prove afterwards to be unjust , and become now unprofitable , now harsh , now unrighteous : for the moderating whereof there is need of the Prince , who is Lord of the LAWS . For if it fall out , that any thing hath been more obscurely delivered therein , it is fit the Emperor should clear it , and amend that harshness of the Laws , which he shall find to be contrary and disagreeable to his humanity . For where it is said , that a Law , although it be hard , should yet be observed ; that respecteth the inferiour Judges , and not the Emperour ; in whom is that Power of moderating the Laws which they call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , or Equity , which is so annexed to the Supremacy of the Prince , that by no Decrees of man it can be pulled from it . Thus far Aeneas Silvius out of him . In regard of Themselves Kings are said to be exempted from Subjection to the Laws , both because they are not tyed ( otherwise than for conveniency and good Example's sake ) to the observance of such as are meer positive and temporary Laws ; and because they are not liable to the Civil Punishments set down for the breach of any Law , as having no superiour upon earth that may exercise any such Power over them . And again , saith this Great Prelate , while the Laws do stand in force , a it is fit that somtimes the King's Clemency should be mingled with the severity of them ; especially when by that means the subjects may be freed from much detriment and dammage : b The Condition of the Magistrates , whose Sentence is held corrupt , if it be milder than the Laws , being one thing ; the Power of Princes , whom it becometh to qualifie the sharpness of them , a far different matter . To this Eminently Reverend and Judicious Primate , I shall next subjoyn the c humble , patient and learned Dr Robert Sanderson , late Lord Bishop of Lincoln , that you may see what his Opinion is in this matter . But before I give you his Words , let me beg your favour to hear what the Modest and Holy Writer of his Life , Dr Isaac Walton says of that Book from whence I produce them . How much the Learned World stands obliged to Him for his Lectures de Conscientia , I shall not attempt to declare , as being very sensible , that the Best Pens must needs fall short in the commendation of them : So that I shall only add , that they continue unto this day , and will do for ever , as a Compleat Standard for the Resolution of the most material doubts in Casuistical Divinity . And now Sir , pray observe what the Bishop says . Vpon a Doubt , how may that be understood which so commonly is spoken , Salus Populi est Suprema Lex , the safety of the People is the Supream Law ; he , among other things , thus declares , There is no sober man will deny , that the Safety of the People , that is , of the whole Commonalty , as that word comprehends the King , together with the Subjects , is the Supream Law ; but that the Safety of the People , that is , of the Subjects , the King being excluded , is the Supream Law , there is no man will affirm it , unless he be a Fool , or an Imposter ; a Fool , if he doth believe what he himself saith , and an Imposter , if he doth not believe it . But if any man will seriously look into the Original of this Aphorism , I do believe he will more easily grant , that it ought more precisely to be understood of the Safety of the Prince , than of the Safety of the Subjects . This Saying , so tossed up and down in the Mouthes of all Men , came to us from the Romans , and was then used by them when their Republick did flourish most of all under a Popular State : And there is no great Reason that any man should wonder , that the People's Safety was the Supream Law with them , with whom the People themselves were the Supream Power ; In the Judgment therefore of those wise Antients , who were the first Authors of this Aphorism , the Safety of the Supream Power was the Supream Law , of the People indeed in a Democracy , but of a King in Monarchy . But I say , it being admitted , but not granted , that this Aphorism is properly understood of the Safety of the People , that is , of the Subjects , it is nevertheless perversly wrested to the Prejudice of Regal Dignity , which even so doth render its Power more Ample and Illustrious in this sence . A King that gives Laws and Statutes to his People will not be so bound up by his Laws , that it shall not be lawful for him , the safety of the Common-wealth being in an apparent danger , to provide for the safety of Kingdom and People committed to him by God , even against the words of the Law ; not that it is lawful for Subjects under the pretence of the defence of their Liberty to break all the bonds of Laws and Fidelity , and by an intollerable presumption to trample on the Authority of their King , but that it is lawful for the Prince , in the Preservation of his own and his Subjects Safety , to lay aside for a while all strict observance of the Laws , and to make use a little of an Arbitrary Right , least by too unseasonable and superstitious Reverence of the Laws , he may suffer both his own Person , and his People that are subject to him , and even the Laws themselves , to fall into the Power of his Enemies . I will close up this Christian Doctrine of our Bishops with one Authority more , and that is of our Present Right Reverend Father in God , Thomas Lord Bishop of Chester , in his Sermon on the 6th of Feb. 1685 / 6 ; . in the Collegiate Church of Rippon , where you will find him thus to inform you , and all other good Subjects ; So that the King may , it seems , make use of his Prerogative , as God does of his Omnipotence , upon some extraordinary occasions : For as my Lord Hobart well observes , The Statute Laws are made to ease him of his Labour , not to deprive him of his Power , and that he may make a Grant with a Non-obstante to them : And indeed the Power of dispensing with particular Laws , in some Emergencies , is such a Lex Coronae , such a Prerogative , without which no Kingdom can be well governed , but Justice will be turned into Wormwood . For there never was yet , nor ever will be , any human Law , framed with such exact Skill and Policy , that it might not , on some occasion or other , be burthensome to the Subject , and obstructive to the publick good of the Common-wealth : There being particular Cases and Exigencies , so infinitely various , that 't is impossible for the wit of man to foresee or prevent them . And therefore in all Government there must be a Power Paramount to the written Law ; and we have good reason to bless God , that this is lodged but in One , and in him whom he hath set over us , to be his Vice-gerent ; by whose Authority , they who break the Letter of the Law , in pure Zeal and Loyalty , to serve the ends of Government , and to uphold the Crown on the Right Head , that does and ought to wear it , may be relieved , and pardoned , and rewarded too . Thus Sir , have I given you in short the Sence and Judgment of our Spiritual Guides , the Great Fathers of the Church of England in the Point in Question between us ; I will now discend to men of less degree in the Church , but they shall be men of great and eminent Learning , sober Understandings , and of examplary Piety and Gravity , and you shall hear how they All concur in the same Judgment as concerning this Point of Regal Soveraignty . The First shall be the Reverend Dr Peter Heylin . whose knowledge was extensive as the Earth , and who had a parfect familiarity with the present State of all the Countries in the World , ( as the Ingenious Author of his Life informs us ) and one who is honoured by all true Sons of the Church of England , with a due veneration for his Learned and Elabourate Works . And He speaks thus . He ( viz. the King ) hath Authority by his Prerogative Royal to dispence with the Rigor of the Laws , and sometimes to pass by a Statute with a Non-obstante . The Learned and Judicious Dr Isaac Barrow , late Master of Trinity Colledge in Cambridge , in his Treatise concerning the Popes Supremacy affirms thus — It is indeed a proper Indowment of an absolute Soveraignty , immediately and immutably constituted by God , with no Terms or Rules limitting it , that its will declared in way of Precept , Proclamations concerning the Sanction of Laws , the Abrogation of them , the Dispensation with them , should be observed . And says he a few Leaves futher , The Power of enacting and dispencing with Ecclesiastical Laws touching exteriour Discipline did of old belong to the Emperor . And it was reasonable that it should ; because old Lawss might not conveniently sute with the Present State of things , and the publick welfare ; because new Laws might conduce to the good of Church and State , the care of which is incombent on him ; because the Prince is bound to use his Power and Authority to promote Gods Service , the best way of doing which may be by framing Orders conducible thereunto . And in another place he declares that it is a Priviledge of Soveraigns to grant Priviledges , Exemptions , Dispensations . Thus sayes the Reverend Dr Sherlock , Master of the Temple , in a positive manner , it does not become any man , who can think three Consequences off , to talk of the Authority of Laws , in derogation to that Authority of the Soveraign Power . The Soveraign Power made the Laws , and can repeal them , and dispence with them , and make new Laws : the only Power and Authority of the Laws is in the Power which can make and execute Laws . Soveraign Power is inseperable from the Person of a Soveraign Prince . I shall in the next place give you the words of the Ingenious , and most painful Searcher into Truths , John Nalson , Dr. of Laws , whose indefatigable Industry hath sufficiently appeared in those Volumes of Historical Collections he lived to see published to the World , his words are These . In the Kings Power it is to remit the Severities of the Penal Laws , whereby he may manifest his Goodness and Clemency as well as his Greatness and Justice , by graciously pardoning the Smaller Breaches of his Laws , and the more Capital Offences which he might most justly punnish . And who in the World can dispute this ? When , as Dr. Hick's in his Jovian tells us for certain , that upon whomsoever God is understood to bestow the Soveraign Authority , he must also be understood to bestow upon him all the Jura Majestatis , or essential Rights of Soveraignty , according to that Maxime , Qui dat esse , dat et omnia pertinentia ad esse ; He that gives the Essence , gives also the Properties belonging to the Essence . And doth not all mankind consent in this , that the King is the fountain of mercy as well as of Justice ? Surely then the Penal Laws , especially those made meerly for diversity of Opinions in Religion , which ( not to call them unchristian ; since our Saviour never offered any external force and Compulsion to make men obey his Laws , as the Learned master of the Temple assures us , but however ) are in themselves by experience proved very unreasonable , ought at least to be Subject to the Goodness and Mercy of the Prince , to dispence with them , when He in his Wisdom shall judge it most necessary for the Good of his People in generall . For as the Aegyptian Hieroglyphick for Government was an Eye in a Scepter : So the chief Magistrate is like a watchman upon a Tower , who is to look down and view the general state of his People , and to conduct himself accordingly . The Reverend Dr Puller , in his most extraordinary Book concerning the Moderation os the Church of England , saith , that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , Moderation , as it is now generally used , is a word borrowed from the Law , and is used by the Masters thereof , to denote such a gentle and benign temper , as disposeth those who have the Administration of the Laws ( which , You see , is the Imperial Soveraign , who hath the Supream Jurisdiction over all others , and Jurisdiction is defined by the Civilians to be , Potestatem Juris dicendi , a Power of giving Laws to others ) to remit of their Rigour , where either ( first ) they press too hard upon particular persons ; or else ( secondly ) to supply the defects of the said Laws , where they provide not sufficiently for particular cases ; in order thereunto , squaring their Determination by the natural rules of Justice and goodness , rather than by the Letter of the Law. And a little further , the same Doctor goes on , saying , moderation , in the Forensick sence wherein we take it , is defined by Aristotle to be the Correction of the Laws wherein because of their Vniversality they are deficient . From whence , as it must be supposed , to be confined to those to whom the Administration of the Laws is committed , who Alone can have the Power of correcting them : So nothing therefore will be further requisite to shew , than that it disposeth them ; where the Laws press too hard upon particular persons , to relax the Rigour of them ; as on the other side , where they do not sufficiently provide for them , to supply their defect . All Laws , we know , are for the punishment of Evil Doers , or for the praise of them that do well : but it being impossible so to provide for the punishment of evil doers , as not sometimes to bring even the Innocent within the compass of it ; because what , generally considered , ought to be lookt upon and censured as evil , may yet upon sundry considerations and circumstances have nothing of evil in it , or at least be worthy of pardon ; either the Innocent must suffer together with the nocent , ( which so benign a vertue as that we treat of cannot allow ) or it must dispose those to whom the Administration of the Laws is committed to remit of their rigour in such particulars , and exempt them from the undergoing of it : it being in like manner impossible for Laws so to provide for the incouragement of those who deserve well , as that sometime such may not be past over or neglected ; partly because all cases cannot be foreseen by the Law-giver ; and partly by reason of the shortness of his expressions ; either some who may deserve incouragement may be excluded from partaking of it , ( which so benign a vertue as we speak of cannot casily permit ) or it must dispose those to whom the Administration of the Laws is committed to ampliate their favours ; and to take such within the compass of them . Once again , Equity and moderation , saith He in the next page , is the publick honesty of the Laws ; without which , Justice often would be turned into Wormwood : it contains the excellent Spirit ( 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ) the mind and reason of the Law , and is the most Sacred and venerable part of it : As it is the honour and perfection of the Laws , so it is the Sanctuary of such as happen to be oppressed by the Rigour of the Letter . I will now , Sir , trouble you with but one instance more upon this Subject , ( though I could multiply , I am confident , Authorities of this kind even beyond your patience ) and that is of One , that will needs be Anonymus , and therefore so he shall pass for me , but his words are These . It is the Prerogative of the King , to dispence with many Acts of Parliament by a * Non-obstante , or clause of notwithstanding , especially such , as bind him from any Prerogative , that is solely , and inseparably annexed to his Sacred Person , and Royal Power . And even to the Asterick * There is this marginal Note , viz. 44. Eliz. in the house of Commons Sir George Moor said ; We know the Power of her Majesty cannot be restrained by any Act. Why therefore should we thus talk ? admit we should make the statute with a Non-obstante , yet the Queen may grant a Patent with a Non-obstante to cross this Non-obstante . I have done , Sir , now with our Reverend Prelates and Doctors of the Church of England as to this Particular , and hope , I have sufficiently proved to you , that their Judgment and Doctrine doth clearly warrant this Great Prerogative of dispencing with Penal Laws , to be in the King. Let us see in the next place what were the Reasons that induced the Reverend Judges in Westminster Hall , ( who ( the Law sayes ) are the Expositors of Acts of Parliament , and are likewise Custodes jurati ss . Praerogativae Regiae , ) so openly and solemnly , after mature deliberation , to declare their Resolutions in this Point for the King. The Reasons that perswaded them were These that follow , viz. I. That the Kings of England are Soveraign Princes . II. That the Laws of England are the King's Laws . III. That therefore it is an Incident Inseparable Prerogative in the Kings of England ; as in all other Soveraign Princes to dispence with Penal Laws in particular cases , and upon particular necessary Reasons . IV. That of these Reasons , and these Necessities , the King himself is the sole Judge . And then which is Consequent upon all . V. That this is not a Trust invested in , or granted to the King by the People , but is the antient Remain of the Soveraign Power , and Prerogative of the Kings of England , which never yet was taken from them , nor can be . Now , Sir , if such hath been the Doctrine of our most Eminent Clergy of the Church of England , ( and in it they have delivered to us nothing but the words of Truth in Righteousness ) that the King by his Imperial Soveraignty , when he shall see the Necessity of the State to require it , ( of which he is the only Judge , ) may dispence with Penal Laws ; How can you , or any man , who is a sincere lover of the Church of England , be dissatisfied with the Resolution of our Reverend Judges in this matter , seeing the Reasons they went upon were only such as were exactly correspondent with the avowed Doctrines before recited ; and that by this Declaration of theirs , the Law of the Kingdom of England concerning this soveraign Power in the Crown , is no more , than what was before publickly asserted to be the Divinity of the Kingdom . Besides , Lex vigilat pro Rege , saith the Law , and the Judges are sworn to maintain all the Kings Prerogatives ; which are part of the Law of England , and comprehended within the same ; therefore it is said , that Imperij Majestas est Tutelae Salus , the Dignity of the Prince is the Peoples Security . The Kings Prerogative and Priviledges , are incident to his Crown , and He need not prescribe in any Prerogative , for it is as ancient as his Crown is , and is not only the Law of the Exchequer , but the Law of the Land , as that which is his by the ancient Laws of the Land. Wherefore the Judges of the Courts of Westminster are to judge in matters of Prerogative by this Rule , that whatsoever may be for the Benefit and Profit of the King , shall be taken most largely for him , & whatever may be against him , and for his disprofit shall be taken strictly : and it is the Duty of every Judge of all Courts , High and Low , to take great care to preserve the Kings Right , and for that purpose to take every thing at the best for him . And , Sir , unto the Judges the People are bound lastly and finally to submit themselves for matter of Law , according to the opinion of the Learned Author of the Royallists Defence . But I remember likewise you seemed to startle at the thoughts of this Power ; and were afraid , if at any time the King should think it necessary and convenient to exert it , and to grant a general Liberty of Conscience , that the Church of England would be extreamly shaken in her security . What strange Jealousies and Suspitions some weak men may have , I suppose it will not be here worth while to consider ; but certainly our Great Supporters of the Ark of God can never allow themselves in so feminine a passion . They know they have an infinitely wise God , and a most Gracious King to trust to : this hath been their Doctrine , and ought we not to practice it ? They say , 1. They have the Care and Providence of God for their Security , who is King of Kings , Lord of Lords , and the only Ruler of Princes ; and that the Hearts of Kings are in his Rule and Governance , and He doth dispose and turn them as seemeth best to his godly Wisdom : according to what Solomon said , and perhaps upon his own experience , That the Kings Heart is in the hand of the Lord , as the Rivers of Water , he turneth it whithersoever he will. SO THAT THEY HAVE ALL THE SECURITY THAT ANY PEOPLE IN THE WORLD EVER HAD , HAVE , OR OUGHT TO HAVE . Besides , 2. They have a most Gracious King to trust to . For , 1. They have his Royal Word , that he will protect and maintain the Church of England , in the free exercise of her Religion , as by Law established ; and can she ever be trusted in safer Hands than his ? He hath done more than ever any of us durst ever venture to look for , to give us Confidence in him ; enough to puzzle our Understandings , as well as our Gratitude : And how can he give us better security than he has done ? Shall we suspect him without cause ? or remain dissatisfied when he hath given us the best security that our Cause admits of ? To suspect our Prince , where we cannot help our selves , is of all fears the most unreasonable . 2. Again , We have the Conscience of the Prince for our security , who hath all the moral Obligations , and the fear of God , to keep him from oppressing us , so long as we keep our selves within the Conscience of the Duty which we owe unto him . The Common Principles of Humanity , Justice and Equity , are engraven by the Finger of God upon the Minds of Kings , as well as upon other Mens ; and they cannot do wrong upon any particular Person , much less to great numbers of their Subjects , without undergoing the same uneasie remorse that other men do , when they injure one another . This hath been found by sad experience in Pagan Princes . — And if Conscience be a restraining Principle in Heathen Princes , if they cannot without such Soul torments pervert Justice , and violate their Oathes , and the Laws , it must needs much more be a powerful Principle of Restraint to Christian Kings , who are taught to know that they are Gods Ministers , and that he will call them to a severe Account for oppressing his People over whom he set them : And shall not the fear of God's Anger and Judgments keep the Soveraign from injuring of them ? 3. But further still , As the Church of England hath the Prince's Conscience , for her Security , so she hath his honour too . For Princes ( like other men ) are tender of their Honour , and good Name , and are powerfully restrained by shame from doing Evil to their Subjects . — Though they may be desirous for their honour to have the Times computed from their Conquests , yet the same Principle of Honour will ordinarily make them ashamed to have them computed from their Massacres , and Persecutions , which will but get them the Surname of the Bloudy , or the Tyrant , unto the end of the World. Honour , as Moralists observe , is a Secondary , or Civil Conscience . And as for our Prince , who was ever so exceeding tender of his Honour as He ? so just to all , and hath He not promised to uphold and maintain this Church , and her Legitimate Children ? — He knows , that ours is a Religion that hath alwayes asserted the Rights of the Crown , with life and fortune : and how chearfully the Members of it have spent their Blood and Treasure in his Own , his late Majestie 's , and his Father's Service , and how they stand affected to his Prerogative . And He is very well content , we should be as faithful to God , as we are to him ; as true to our Religion , as to our King : God preserve and prosper him for it . Now since our own Religion ( as to the free exercise of it ) is thus Secured to us , and seeing that by his Majesties Gracious Declaration he is willing that no man should be forced to his Religion , or drove against his Conscience from the Religion he professeth ; and seeing it is manifestly necessary , that , as Sails , so Laws , are to be turned , and as Occasion , time and circumstance , and reason of state shall direct , either to be altered , or revoked : And if Acts of Parliament formerly made to try what good effects they could work in the state , do apparently prove mischievous and ineffectual by their too great rigour and violence , and by the Great Numbers of those that are of dissenting Judgments ? What dishonour can it be for the King to lay them asleep for a while to stay those passionate heats , and fierce oppositions of such as seem adversaries to his Grace , or for any Parliament to repeal them , for the same Reasons , non coercet sed provocat violentia , For too heavy a hand upon those whom the Law casts down , shews the will rather to oppress the Offender , then to cure the offence ? 'T is the greatest honour to Kings , that their mercy , like that of the Almighty , is more eminent than their Justice , and that their Benches , and Courts , can witness more compassion than severity ; for He that sets open the Prison doors in so wise and gracious a manner , meaneth not to conquer the Hearts and Consciences of his People by Torment , but to winn them by mercy and sweetness . Clemency is a virtue sometimes of as great policy as Piety , because it begets Love , and Love breeds Loyalty , commands the very Soul , and lays the Body at the Feet of the obliger : Mercy kindles Fire and Zeal in the Hearts of Subjects . Liberty of Conscience is a Natural Right , and therefore our Saviour compelled none to receive his Doctrine , but est Dominus non Cogens , he is not a constraining Lord , but committing his Liberty to the will , said publickly to all , if any man will come after me ; and to his Apostles , Will ye also go away ? and his Disciples were not Commanders , but Instructors and Teachers , which was their Commission . Compulsion and terrene Penalties are out of his Jurisdiction , whose Kingdom was not of this World , which he acknowledgeth not only in speech , but in practise : For when the Disciples would have commanded Fire from Heaven to have consumed the Samaritans , he rebuked them ; and when he was apprehended by the Chief Priests and Elders , he could have commanded Legions of Angels , but would not . It is Irreligion to take away the Liberty of Religion ; so Tertullian , ad Irreligiosiatis Elogium concurrit , this concurreth to the commendation of Irreligion , to take away the liberty of Religion , &c. and therefore , saith the Apostle , we have not Dominion over Your Faith. Sir , I cannot tell how well to shut up this Discourse without the words of that Learned and most Reverend Dr. Gerard Langbaine , who was Provost of Queen's Colledge in Oxford , so well known to all , not only at home , but abroad , that the Famous Rhetorician , Longinus , could scarce speak any thing beyond the merit of so excellent a Person : This Doctor in his Judicious Refutation of the Damnable League & Covenant , ( which was then so furiously contended for ) to be imposed upon the Consciences of those who expressed their Zeal to his Majesties righteous cause , in which , without all peradventure , he spoke the inward Sentiments of all the Loyal Suffering Clergy of England , doth there most admirably instruct us , what a sandy Foundation that is , which supports Persecution for Conscience sake . His words follow . Persecution in matters of meer Religion is a Course against the Nature of Religion it self , for Faith , the Soul of Religion , is an inward Act of the Soul , which all the Tyranny in the World , that the malice of the Devil can invent , or the wit of man can exercise , can neither plant where it is not , nor extirpate where it is . It is the gift of God , freely begotten in the Hearts of Men , not by threats and Terrors , not by Tortures and Massacres , but by the quiet still voice of the word preached , Suadenda , non cogenda . And therefore St. Paul , though a Lawful Governour in the Church , flatly disclaims any domineering Power over the Conscience . As for the outward profession of Religion , neither is that Subject to force and violence : A man may confefs Christ , and his Faith in him , as freely in bonds , as at Liberty ; as gloriously upon the Cross , as upon the Throne . Fear indeed may incline a weak Conscience to dissemble his Opinion , but cannot constrain him to alter it : Fire and Faggot are strong Arguments of a weak Cause , undeniable Evidences of Cruelty in Those that use them , but slender , motives of Credibility to beget faith in those that suffer by them . Lastly , for the external , free , and publick practise of Religious Duties , that I grant may be restrained by the outward violence of man , but when it is so , it is not required by God , who never expects to reap what he did not fow . In another place , he says , the most Antient Apologists for the Christian Faith , use this as an Argument to prove the Religion of their Persecutors to be false , and their own true , That stood in need of humane force to maintain it , but theirs stood by the sole Power of God. It is against ( sayes he a little further ) the Innate Principle of the Law of Nature , Quod tibi fieri non vis , alteri ne feceris . Those , who plead most for extirpation of Hereticks , when it comes to be their own Turn to be under the Cross , stand for Liberty of Conscience , and declaim against Persecution for Religion , as a thing utterly unlawful ; and surely if we will not suffer it from others , we may not use it our selves . Therefore , as Dr Puller rightly sayes , if ever the Practice of Moderation , as well as any Discourse thereof , were seasonable ; it may be supposed now , when , for ought we know , the lasting happiness of the Kingdom and Church , may depend immediately upon this rare and desirable Temper , acknowledged of all most excellent . I will conclude all with that Admirable Sentence of Dr Barrow in his forementioned Treatise , that Relief of the Oppressed , or Clemency to the distressed , are noble Flowers in every Soveraign Crown . Thus , Sir , You see how ready I am , as far as my Abilities will extend , to contribute to the Satisfaction of Your Judgment . I shall be as zealous still to go on in so pious a Duty , if there be any remaining doubts and Scruples you will make known to , SIR , Your humble Servant , &c. FINIS . Notes, typically marginal, from the original text Notes for div A46343-e460 Dr Hick's Jovian . chap. 10. Sir Robert Pointz Knight of the Bath , his vindication of Monarchy . chap. 8. Dr. Hicks ut . Sup. 4. Inst . p 14. Suprema Jurisdictio & potestas Regia , et si Princeps velit , se seperari non possunt , sunt enim ipsa forma , et Substantialis Essentia Majestatis , ergo manente Rege ab eo abdicari non possunt . Cavedo , Pract. observ . p. 2. decis . 40. n. 8. * Stat. of Praemunire , 16. R. 2. cap. 5. Dr. Richard Bancroft made Lord Arch-Bishop of Cant. 1604. 12. Co. fo . 64. 5. Jac. Ridley's View of the Civil and Ecclesiastical Law , dedicated to King James 1. 3d Edition , part 4. chap. 1. Sect. 1. Id. part 2. ch . 1. sect . 7. 1 Pet. 2. 13. Cyprianus Anglicus , by Dr Heylin , D. D. and Chaplain to Charles the 1st and Charles the 2d , 2 part . Epist . Dedicat. Arch-Bishop Laud against Fisher , Printed 1673. Vid Epis . dedicat . to King Charles 2. by James Tyrr●●l Esq Plutarch , in Comparat . Flaminij et Philopoemen . a Marcian in l. si de re sua , de recept , arbit , vid. et Vlpian in l. ille a quo , Sect. Tempestivum , D. ad Senat . Trebel . et in l. Quod autem , Sec. Vxori quis D. de donat inter , viz. b Hermog , in l. si quis Sect. 1. D. deleg 3. c Thom. 112. quest . 93. artic . 5. a Cynus in l. rescript , Cod. de precib . Imper . offerend . Thom. in 1. 2. quest . 96. artic . 5. ad 3. Aeneas Silvius de Ortu & Authoribus Imperii , cap. 20. 21. a Justin Junior , Imp. in praefatione conseit 3. b Symmach , l. 10. Ep. ult . c In his Preface and Life by Dr Isaac Walton . Bishop Sanderson's Cases of Conscience , translated by Robert Codrington , Master of Arts , Printed 1660. ninth Lecture . Sermon preached upon the aniversary solemnity of the happy Inauguration of our dread Soveraign Lord King James 2. by Thomas Cartwright , D. D. Dean of Rippon , and Chaplain in Ordinary to his Majesty . Colt and Glover against the Bishop of Litchfield . In the Account of Dr Heylin's Life . Dr Sherelock's Case of Resistance , chap. 6. Dr Nalson's Common Interest of King & People , chap. 6. Case of Resistance . De jure Uniformitatis Ecclesiasticae : by Hugh Davis , L. L. B. lib. 3. chap. 15. Chap. 1. Davia's ut sup . lib. 2. chap. 6. Dr Puller's Moderation of the Church of England , chap. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . Arist . Eth. l. 5. chap. 14. Est Scriptum Legis angustum inter pretatio diffusa . Senec. l. 4. controv . 27. The Harmony of Divinity and Law , in a discourse about not resisting of Soveraign Princes . Townsend's Collect. pag. 234. Co. 2 Inst . f. 496. 1. Inst . 64. b. Lane. 26. N. Bendl. 117. Sheph. tit . Prerog . 2 Ro. rep . 508. Royallists defence chap. 5. pag. 49. Jovian chap. 12. His Majesties most Gratious Declaration , &c. Bishop of Chesters Sermon ut sup . Jovian ut sup . Bishop . of Chesters Serm. ut sup . Grotius . Luke 9. 54. Math. 26. 53. Chap. de Act. Imp. f. 139. 2 Cor. 1. 24. Langbain's Review of the Covenant , Printed 1661. Puller's Moderation . To the Reader .