A narrative of the depositions of Robert Jenison Esq with other material evidences, plainly proving that Mr. William Ireland, lately executed for high treason, was in London the nineteenth of August, 1678, notwithstanding his condfident denial thereof both at his tryal and execution / collected by Charles Chetwind, Esq. Chetwind, Charles. 1679 Approx. 89 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 9 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2008-09 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A69734 Wing C3792 ESTC R9115 11906211 ocm 11906211 50678 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A69734) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 50678) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 864:4) A narrative of the depositions of Robert Jenison Esq with other material evidences, plainly proving that Mr. William Ireland, lately executed for high treason, was in London the nineteenth of August, 1678, notwithstanding his condfident denial thereof both at his tryal and execution / collected by Charles Chetwind, Esq. Chetwind, Charles. Jenison, Robert, 1648-1688. [5], 13 p. Printed for Henry Hills, Thomas Parkhurst, John Starkey, Dorman Newman, Thomas Cockeril, Thomas Simmons, and Jacob Tonson, London : 1679. Reproduction of original in Union Theological Seminary Library, New York. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Ireland, William, 1636-1679. Popish Plot, 1678. 2006-01 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2006-02 Apex CoVantage Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2007-03 Ali Jakobson Sampled and proofread 2007-03 Ali Jakobson Text and markup reviewed and edited 2008-02 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion AT THE Council Chamber WHITEHALL the 16th of July 1679. PRESENT Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Lord Chancellor Lord President Lord Privy Seal Marquess of Worcester Earl of Bridgwater Earl of Sunderland Earl of Essex Viscount Fauconberg Viscount Halifax Lord Robarts Mr. Secretary Coventry Mr. Chancellor of the Exchequer . IT was this day Ordered by their Lordships in Council , That the Depositions and Letter of Robert Jenison Esq with the Attestations of Sir Michael Warton , George Booth , Robert Bowes , William Burnet Esquires , and Ralph Marshal Gentleman , together with the Narrative of Charles Chetwind Esq ( relating to William Ireland lately executed ) Be Printed by such Persons as Mr. Chetwind shall appoint , the same having been examined and approved by Mr. Treby late Chairman to the Secret Committee of the House of Commons . John Nicholas . By virtue of this Order , I do appoint Henry Hills , Thomas Parkhust , John Starkey , Dorman Newman , Thomas Cockeril , Thomas Simmons , and Jacob Tonson , to Print this Narrative , and that no other presume to Print the same . July the 17th 1679. Charles Chetwind . A NARRATIVE OF THE DEPOSITIONS OF Robert Jenison Esq With other Material Evidences , plainly proving THAT Mr. William Ireland , Lately Executed for HIGH TREASON , Was in London the Nineteenth of August , 1678. Notwithstanding his Confident DENIAL thereof both at HIS Tryal and Execution . Collected by CHARLES CHETWIND Esq LONDON , Printed for Henry Hills , Thomas Parkhurst , John Starkey , Dorman Newman , Thomas Cockeril , Thomas Simmons , and Jacob Tonson . 1679. The Publishers PREFACE . IT is not unknown to all considering and judicious Persons in this Kingdom , that , upon the happy Discovery of the late horrid Popish Plot against his Majesties Person and Government , and the Establisht Protestant Religion ; and upon the Apprehension , Arraignment , Trial , and Condemnation of several of the Conspirators , many Artifices have been used by Persons of the same Persuasion , to defame the Witnesses produced for the King , and to invalidate their Testimonies ; in order whereunto , several Witnesses have been procured , first at the Trial of Ireland , and after at the Trial of White alias Whitebread , &c. ( many of them Scholars belonging to the English Seminary at St. Omers , instructed no doubt , and sent over to act viis & modis , for the preservation of their Conducters and Leaders ) to testifie that Dr. Titus Oates , one of the principal Witnesses for his Majesty , was at St. Omers , at the same time when he upon his Oath affirms himself to have been in London ; other Witnesses have been also produced , to prove that Mr. Ireland ( lately Executed ) was in Staffordshire , at those days and times when Dr. Oates , Mr. Bedloe , and one Sarah Pain , attest upon their Oaths , that they saw him in London , as by the Printed Trials of Ireland , and Whitebread , &c. does appear such a failure in Circumstance of time and place , is of so great consequence in this case that if made out , it would render the said Persons unworthy , the names of just and lawful Witnesses ; and for that reason their Adversaries put so much stress upon it , that ( not contented with the determination of the matter , at the Trial and Condemnation of Ireland ) they again resume it at the Trial of Whitebread , &c. and by their St. Omers Youths , endeavour to fasten falsehood on Dr. Oates , and by consequence to impeach the credit of his Testimony , and the justice of their Condemnation . As to the first particular concerning Dr. Oates , his Testimony is justly secured , and he himself indubitably proved to have been in London , at the times by him mentioned and deposed , by the concurrent evidence of divers creditable Persons , given in upon Oath at the Trial of Whitebread ; so that the Stratagem which his Antagonists did use , to destroy or at least depretiate his Testimony , hath by a gracious emergency of Divine Providence , turned to a strong confirmation thereof , and for ever set him , as to this point , Rectus in curia , a good and lawful Witness , in reference to all the Evidence already given , and which hereafter may be given by him in any future Trials . Their design failing herein , their next attempt was to entrap him and the rest , in relation to Mr. Ireland , whom the Witnesses they produce , affirm to have been in Staffordshire , and other places out of London , all the Month of August , from the fifth of August , to the fourteenth of September ; whereas Dr. Oates , Mr. Bedloe , and Sarah Pain , depose , that they saw him in London within that time . To clear the Truth of this Particular , and to justifie the Evidence of Dr. Oates , and the rest , the Testimony of Mr. Jenison is a pregnant demonstration , which I thought truly to deserve my utmost dilligence to bring to light ; and in order thereunto , communicated the same to the Right Honourable the Earl of Shaftsbury , and by his appointment to Justice Warcup ; before whom Mr. Jenisons Depositions , and the Attestations of the worthy Gentlemen hereafter mentioned , were taken ; and in whose hands , if not transmitted by him to the Clerk of his Majesties Council , the Originals of the ensuing Papers are to be seen , and whose joint endeavours for the Discovery of the Truth in this , as well as other particulars relating to the Plot , deserve an honourable mention . The occasion of what is here publisht arising from several passages in the Trials of Ireland , and Whitebread , &c. those passages are here extracted and presented to the Readers view ; that having the case before him , he may apply this evidence thereto ; whereby his judgment will be clear . The Reader will find this short discourse divided into three parts . The First relates the means and manner of obtaining the Letter and Depositions of that worthy Person , Mr. Jenison . The Second exhibits the Letter and Depositions . The Third , some observations thereupon , for the full satisfaction of all unbiass'd minds in the matter Controverted . THE NARRATIVE . UPon the 15th . of June in this present year 1679. Charles Chettwind of Westminster Esq had occasionally some discourse with a Gentleman till then unknown to him ; to wit , Mr. Griffith of Grayes-Inn , Barrister at Law , concerning the five Traitors that had been condemned the Saturday before , and their attempt to prove Mr. William Ireland , alias Ironmonger , lately executed for High-Treason to have been in Staffordshire , and on his Journey thither from the 5th . of August 1678 till the 7th . of September following , and not to have been within that time in London , which as Mr. Oates and others , had upon his Tryal affirmed him to be there , about the 12th . of that Month , and to be returned thither again about the beginning of September : whereupon the said Mr. Griffith , told Mr. Chetwind , that Sir Michael Warton of Beverly in the County of York Knight , a Worthy Member of the Honourable House of Commons in the last Parliament told him , that since the execution of Ireland , Mr. Jenison ( a Gentleman of very good Quality , and a Student in Grays-Inn , who was a Romanist till about January last ) affirmed , that Mr. Ireland was in London about the middle of August , and that he was with him then at a Scriveners at the Sign of the White-hart in Russel-Street in Covent Garden , which relation he confirm'd with several other notable circumstances . Mr. Chetwind , having heard this , went to Whitehall , and there attending on the Right Honourable the Earl of Shaftsbury , Lord President of his Majesties Privy Council , acquainted his Lordship with what Mr. Griffith had told him ; upon which , the said Earl of Shaftsbury told Mr. Chetwind , that it would be very considerable , if it could be made out . Mr. Chettwind thus encouraged by the said Earl , did by his order , make it his business the next morning , being Tuesday June the 16th . to find out Sir Michael Warton , and coming to the Coffee House in Covent Garden , where Sir Michael used to be when in Town , Mr. Chetwind met there with Mr. Ralph Marshal Secretary to the Earl of Craven , who upon discourse told Mr Chetwind that Sir Michael lived at Hampstead this Summer . Mr. Marshal , understanding something of the business for which Mr. Chettwind enquired after Sir Michael , said , that Sir Michael had often related to him , and he was sure he would justifie it , that the said Mr. Jenison of Grays-Inn ( who was lately come over to the Protestant Religion , a person of considerable quality , and Heir to a good Estate , his elder Brother being a priest , and in Newgate ) told him , the said Sir Michael , in the presence of several other Gentlemen of Quality presently after the execution of Ireland the severall following particulars which they had hitherto taken no care to discover , because they expected not that the evidence given in the Triall against him the said Ireland , would after his execution come into question or debate . The Particulars were these . That in the month of August 1678. when His Majesty was at Windsor , Mr. Jenison going to Windsor on Saturday the 17th of August and returning the 19th , immediately upon his return that night , he went to give Mr. Ireland ( the same person who was afterwards executed ) a visit , and found him at the Sign of the Hart in Russel-Street in Covent Garden , and after a Salute , Mr. Ireland asked him several Questions , as , What newes from Windsor ? how his Majesty spent his time ? and what recreations he followed ? and whither he walked abroad much , and how guarded ? to which Mr. Jenison answered that his Majestie delighted much in Hawking and Fishing , but most in the latter , which his Majesty followed early in the morning with some few persons attending him ; upon which Mr. Ireland replyed , I wonder his Majesty is no better guarded , he were easily taken off , whereupon Mr. Jenison said God forbid , or words to that effect , which made Mr. Ireland stop his discourse . Mr. Marshal reporting this to Mr. Chetwind in presence of Mr. Ash and Mr. Spicer , two persons of unquestionable reputation ; Mr. Ash replied , that he was last night in company with Mr. Griffith , and Mr. Booth , Son to my Lord De la More , where he heard them discourse of this very Business ; Mr. Booth saying that he heard Mr. Jenison speak the same things , whereupon Mr. Marshall undertook to go that very Day to Hampstead to Sir Michael Warton , and give Mr. Chetwind an account of it the next Morning . Mr. Ash and Mr. Spicer also , before Mr. Chetwind and they parted , having promised to go to Mr. Booth , met him , who justified every syllable of what he had said , and withall , remembred very well that when Sir Michael Warton took some particular Notice of it , Mr. Jenison seemed to be surprised , and was sorry he had uttered those Words , and began to recall them , as to the time only of Ireland's being in Town : But says Mr. Bowes , ( who was there present , a Person of Quality of Grayes-Inn , and well esteemed in your House ) Jenison you cannot retract your Words , for I have a Letter under your own Hand which will put you in mind of the Time , and repeats the very same thing . The Fryday following being the 20th . of June , Mr. Booth and Mr. Bowes met with Mr. Jenison , and discoursed the matter with him , who then owned all the Questions which Ireland asked him , namely , What News at Windsor ? how his Majesty spent his time ? &c. But , says he , I desire a days time to consider , that I may be exact as to the Day when they were spoken ; for several Persons have told me of a great many out of Staffordshire , who upon the Tryal of the 5 Traitors , Whitebread , &c. had proved Mr. Ireland to be in Staffordshire from the 5th of August to the 7th of September ; and therefore I must seriously consider what time it was that I saw him in London ; upon which they appointed to dine together on Saturday following , being the 21 of June . Which Day being come , there met Sir. Michael Warton , Mr. Jenison , Mr. Bowes , Mr. Booth , Mr. Griffith , and Mr. Marshall , and there they shewed Mr. Jenison his Letter , which he acknowledged to be writ by his own Hand ; and further told them , that upon the 15th of August he came to London from Tunbridge , that upon the 17th he went to Windsor , and upon the 19th he returned to London again , and either that Night or the next Day , he had this Discourse with Mr. Ireland at the Sign of the Hart in Russel-street in Covent Garden ; further he related that on the 4th of September following he went from London into the North , returning back to London in the ensuing November , and so presently after removed to Reading , from whence he writ the forementioned Letter of Mr. Bowes . This Confession of his Mr. Marshal took in Writing at that very Time ( when they dined together ) all of them being present , as also a true Copy of his Letter writ from Reading , both which he brought to Mr. Chetwind the same Night ; immediately upon which Mr. Chetwind and he carried them to my Lord of Shaftsbury , his Lordship the next Day ( being the 22d of June ) communicating them to my Lord Chancellor and several others of his Majesties Privy Council . The following Day ( viz. June23d . ) Mr. Chetwind brought Mr. Bowes and Mr. Marshall with the Original Letter to the Earl of Shaftsbury , before whom Mr. Jenison acknowledged the Letter to be his own , with the circumstances thereunto referring concerning Time and Place . These things will receive a sufficient Confirmation if we do but seriously peruse all the ensuing Informations taken before one of his Majesties Justices of the Peace for the County of Middlesex ; as you will see by his Subscription at the Close , as also the Subscriptions of those that gave the Informations . The Information of Sir Michael Warton Knight . About the month of February last Mr. Bowes and Mr. Burnet of Grayes-Inn and my self , went to dine together at the Mirmaid at Grayes-Inn Gate in Holborn , whither Mr. Jenison , an Acquaintance of Mr. Bowes , accidentally came into the Room , so that we dined together ; and upon general Discourses at Dinner , we were talking of Mr. Irelands Tryal or Execution , whereupon Mr. Bowes begun the discourse of a Letter he had from Mr. Jenison which ( he thought ) if he had received timely enough might have very much cleared the Point of Irelands being in London in August last ; Mr. Jenison owned the Letter , and continued the Discourse ; sometime after I saw the Letter , and by the reading judged it might have been very Material , the matter of the Letter being perfectly owned by Mr. Jenison . June 26th 1679. M. Warton . The Attestation of George Booth Esq I do attest this Matter that Sir Michael Warton has here attested . George Booth . The Information of Mr. Burnet . What Sir Michael Warton has here said , I know to be true ; the Day that Mr. Jenison went to Windsor , I do believe to be the 17th of August last , it was on a Saturday , the day of Dochets Horse-race , for I met him riding to Windsor as I came from the Horse-race . W. Burnet . The Information of Robert Bowes Esq About the latter end of December last I received a Letter from Mr. Robert Jenison , which a little time after I shewed to Mr. Savill and Mr. Ewers of Lincolns-Inn , and have now by me : Mr. Jenison hath owned it all along , and doth so still . I have several times since discourst with him upon it ; I went to Windsor on the 12th or 13th of August last , and staid a Night there , and from thence to Henly , where I staid untill the 6th of September following or thereabouts . June 26th 1679. Rob. Bowes . The Information of Ralph Marshal Gent. is , That in or about the Month of February last , being in discourse with Sir Michael Warton , concerning Mr. Irelands being about that time Executed , and concerning his denying his being in London in August last , Sir Michael told this Informant , That if Mr. Ireland were to be Tryed again , it would be proved that he was in Town in August , by Mr. Jenison , a Gentleman of Quality of Grays-Inn ; Sir Michael then telling him also , what discourse Mr. Jenison , and Mr. Ireland had at that time together , which discourse is particularly mentioned in a Letter , in the hand of Mr. Bowes of Grays-Inn , which Letter I have read , and heard Mr. Jenison own to be his own hand Writing . And this Informant further saith , That he hath often heard Mr. Jenison say , that he believeth the time he had the discourse with Mr. Ireland , mentioned in his said Letter , was the 19th of August last , in the Afternoon , he being come that morning from Windsor , and that it was at one Mr. Coynoes house , at the White-Hart in Russel-street . Ralph Marshal . These Informations above written , were all Written and Subscribed by the Parties above named , on the 26th of June 1679. Before us , Edmond Warcupp . Charles Chetwind . Not to put you off with the Informations of Others , concerning Mr. Jenisons Letter and Words , we shall in the next Place give you the true Copy of the Letter , and also of Two differing Informations of his , both of them full as much , if not more home to the purpose than what had been reported by others . Mr. Jenisons Letter from Reading in Barkshire , upon his return from the North. To Robert Bowes , Esq Son to Sir Francis Bowes . ( Mr. Jenison then being a Papist . ) Reading December 19. 1678. SIR , YOurs I have , bearing Date the 15th instant , and have not missed a Post I could send to you ; I am not ignorant of the offer made by His Majesties Proclamation , and lay hold on nothing but Pardon for concealing that Circumstance I have known so long ; yet I did not altogether conceal it neither : for I told my Cozin Smith of it within Two or Three days of the breaking out of this damnable Conspiracy , which how much it weighs I am not a fit Judg of ; and I would not , were it to gain a Million , Nay , a Million of Worlds , if possible , draw the least drop of innocent Blood upon me ; for I know it is a crying sin , therefore I pray God avert it from me . All that I can tell you , as I hope for forgivness of my Sins and Eternal Salvation , is , ( if you will distinguish between the times ) what follows . Being come from Windsor , where I promised my self the happiness and satisfaction of seeing you , that I might take my leave before my journey for the North , ( which to the best of my Memory was about the latter end of August , ) I went to do the same to Mr. Ireland , whom then , ( with all the rest , ) I did believe to be a man of the best Conversation and Life in the world , ( for you know the Law does presume every man good until it be proved otherwise . ) After my salute , and I had told him I had been at Windsor , his Interrogatory , or Question was , what News ? My teturn was the usual no News , but good ; then he proceeds to ask me to the best of my memory , how his Sacred Majesty and the Court were diverted ? I replied , that I heard , his Majesty took much delight in Hawking and Fishing , but chiefly in the latter , which his Majesty followed early in the morning , as I heard , accompanied only with Two or Three Lords , or other Attendants : I wonder , said Mr. Ireland , why his Majesty should be so thin Guarded , he were easily taken off or removed , or some words to that purpose , so sounding ; God forbid , I returned ; No , subjoyns he , I do not say it is Lawful , and something else I cannot call to mind that did qualifie the former words , that I did then think his meaning was , he was then sorry his Sacred Majesty should go so weakly guarded ; I then took it by that handle , having no other Reason ; for I did believe him a Saint , never hearing him , nor any of them , as I hope for everlasting life , Defend or Maintain in the least , That damnable Doctrine of deposing Kings ; But now I know that passage may be taken by the other handle ; and I am not fit to judg how far , yet you know words are to be taken in the milder sense unless they be positive , which these , with their qualifications as they were spoken , are not . I suppose there is clearer Evidence from Mr. Oates , that better know it than I. There is only another thing ( and I have cleared my Soul , ) has run in my fancy ever since this , ever to be detested Immergency happened , which applyed to these times has an ill sound with it ; you know whom I accuse now , Tho. Je. but in other times is capable of a good Construction , viz. He had some business to acquaint me with , and this for two or three times at our parting ; for I did not see him above Four or five times , as I remember the while I was in London . Once I urg'd him to tell me the business , he replied , he would take some other occasion ; now I did believe he meant somewhat about my setling in the world as a Match , having propounded one to me of a Knights Daughter half a Year before , or of that sort of business ; and 't is capable of that Construction still , if there be no clearer Evidence to give a Luster and a great Light on the other side . We have a good Author that commands us to give unto Caesar what is Caesars , and to God , who is Truth it self , what belongs to him , which I would do to the dividing the minutest Atom in the presence of that Truth which made me . But I can now remember no more if I were to gain Heaven , unless my Cozin Smith put me in mind of a word or two more relating to one of these two passages , that now I don't remember , which I will own if I said it , otherwise not ; for I will have nothing to do with their blood , further then what I can with a clear and safe Conscience swear , which I am ready to do , if sent for , as far as I have declared ; I am in the mean while , Sir , Your assured Friend , and Faithful Servant , ROB. JENISON . This be pleased to shew to Collonel Tempest , our Knight of the Shire , or whom you please to acquaint with it . POSTSCRIPT . I Hear since I have writ this , that 4 of the Jusuits are Condemned , which if the included 2 be in , this might be spared , only for your satisfaction I send it ; and what I have said in this Letter is all I can justly Swear except my Cozin Smith remember a word , or more about one of these passages , the former I mean ; as for the latter , all what I have said is by all that 's Sacred , ( and I hope 't is no offence to swear to the Truth ) all , and some , I say , of what I know , if it were the last moment I have to live , I could confess no more . The information of Robert Jenison of Grays-Inn Esq Son of John Jenison , of Walworth in the County Palatine of Durnam , Esq taken upon Oath this 26th . day of June , 1679. before me Edmund Warcup Esq one of his Majesties Justices of the Peace , in the County of Middlesex . Mid. ss . This Informant saith , that he went from London to see Windsor , and to meet Mr. Robert Bowes , at or about the 17th . of August last past , and returned back to London the 19th . day of the same Month ; on which day in the afternoon , he made a visit to Mr. William Ireland , alias Ironmonger , at his Lodgings in Russel-Street , who was this Informants Relation ; at which time and place , he ( this Informant ) had the discourse with the said Mr. Ireland , mentioned and contained in this Informant ; Letter to the said Mr. Bowes , and now shewed unto him , being all of this Informants own hand writing , dated at Reading in Barkshire , on the 19th . day of December last past . And this Informant doth very well remember , that he went from London into the North , in the York Coach on the 4th . day of September last past , and came thence back to London , in October following ; and thence went to Reading in obedience to his Majesties Proclamation , from whence he wrote the Letter aforesaid to Mr. Robert Bowes , and further at present saith not . Reb. Jenison . Jur. die & anno supr . dict . Cor. me Edm. Warcup . The further Information of Rob. Jenison of Grays-Inn Esq taken upon Oath this 2d . day of July , 1679. before me Edmund Warcup Esq one of his Majesties Justices of the Peace , in the County of Middlesex . Mid. ss . This Informant saith , that he being returned from Windsor upon the 19th . day of August last , went to Mr. William Ireland's Lodging in Russel-Street in Covent-Garden , to visit him ; and passing through the Entry , went directly two pair of Stairs to the said Mr. William Ireland's Chamber , the Door whereof being somewhat open , he entred , and there found the said William Ireland , whom this Informant having told , that he came just then from Windsor upon a Hackney Horse , hired at 3s . per diem , which had much tired him ; the said William Ireland replied , that he was then newly arrived from Wolverhampton in Staffordshire by Post , and was not weary ; Upon which this Informant replied , that he thought that Scholars , as he was , had rather choose to ride ambling Horses , than to ride Post . And this Informant further saith , that he very well remembers , that about the beginning of October last past , Sir Edward Smith came to Walworth in the County of Durham , and then read a Letter newly come from London , purporting the discovery of the Plot , and that the King was to have been killed at Windsor ; which made this Informant call to mind the expressions of the said William Ireland , on the said 19th . day of August , viz. Why his Majesty should be so thin guarded , he was easily taken off or removed , or words of that sounding , &c. And thereupon this Informant did the next day after the reading of the said Letter , relate all the passages between this Informant and the said Mr. Ireland , to this Informants Father , and the said Mr. Smith , as they are contained in this Informants Letter to Mr. Bowes , dated on the 19th . day of December last ; and so the said Mr. Smith hath lately by Letter signified to the said Mr. Bowes . And this Informant further saith , that in the year 1678. several Papists have in this Informants hearing declared , that they doubted not , but their Religion would shortly be uppermost , or to that effect ; And further at present he saith not . Observations deducible from the aforesaid Letter and Testimony , and from the manner of obtaining the same . 1. It is a remarkable instance of Divine providence , that this latent evidence casually discovered to Mr. Chetwind ( when he had not known or heard of Mr. Jenison ) should be thus recovered by him ; and that in his pursuit thereof , so many worthy Persons likewise unknown , should accidentally occur to him , and contribute their great assistance . 2. The ' foresaid Mr. Jenison at the writing of his Letter to Mr. Bowes was of the Romish Church , and in obedience to the Kings Proclamation for Banishing Papists out of London , had retired from London to Reading , so that the Discovery made by his Letter cannot rationally be imputed to any other inducement , or incitement , save only the Power of Truth ; especially considering that Mr. Ireland was related to him . 3. The main Plot is evidently confirmed , not only by the Papists expecting some great Change and Alteration , mentioned in one of Mr Jenisons Informations , given in upon his Oath , but also by those suspicious Questions proposed by the said Ireland to Mr. Jenison after his return from Windsor to London , as , What news from Windsor ? How is the King guarded ? And especially those Dangerous Words of his , Then he may easily be taken off , or to that effect ; which do sufficiently argue , not only his being Privy to the Design , but go far to prove his being an Instrument therein . 4. For the Readers fuller satisfaction concerning this Subject , these Particulars are to be noted , viz. That the King went to Windsor about the 13th of August 1678. as appears by Sir Tho. Dolemans Testimony at the Tryals . That Mr. Jenison came from Windsor the 19th of August , and went into the North the 4th of September following . As to the Latter , his going into the North , the Books of Entries of Passengers in the Northern Coach have been examined , and the 4th of September is found to be the very day he took Coach for the North at London ; his going to Windsor is proved by Mr. Burnet , who met him the 17th of August as he came from Dochets Horse-race , which was on that day . That Mr. Jenison in his Letter writes thus , Being come from Windsor , I went to take my leave of Mr. Ireland before I took my journy into the North , and Mr. Ireland asked me what News from Windsor ? How does the King pass his time ? &c. Which notoriously proves , that his Discourse with Mr. Ireland , was when the King was at Windsor , and also that it was after Mr. Jenison came from Windsor , and before he went into the North , viz. betwixt the 19th of August and the 4th of September , and it implies that it was immediately after his coming from Windsor , by the question , What news from Windsor ? and seems also to intimate , that Mr. Ireland had not long been in London , as being eager of News from Windsor , which at that time he might if resident in London have had every 2d Day by Bedingfield's , and other Letters . That this time does nearly agree with Sarah Pain 's Evidence at Irelands Trial , who swears that she saw Ireland here in London about the Time the King went to Windsor ; and there is not above 5 or 6 Days difference , see Whitebreads Trial , Fol. 87. There as Gavan repeats their Evidence , Sir Jo. Southcot and his Family staid with Ireland till the 19th . which 19th was the very day he came Post from Staffordshire to London , and was seen by Mr. Jenison . That Ireland was tryed the 17th of December , and Mr. Jenisons Letter was writ from Reading the 19th following ; and it is clear by the Letter , that Mr. Jenison had then no notice of Irelands being tryed . That Mr. Smith ( a Priest ) hath since by his Letter to Mr. Bowes confirmed the Truth of what Mr. Jenison relates , viz. That he told his Father and Him at his Fathers House at Walworth , immediately upon the first Discovery of the Plot those very Words Mr. Ireland had spoken to him ; then certainly it remains scarcely possible to imagin that unless the matter were exactly true , Mr. Jenison , a Gentleman of a very fair Temper and Sober life , should report such Words as delivered by Mr. Ireland , his Kinsman , and a Kinsman very dear in his esteem , and report them to his own Father old Mr. Jenison and Mr. Smith , and that at that time when they were all Romanists , and Ireland highly valued by them all ; nor is it less absurd to conceive , that Mr. Smith , as is said , a Priest as Ireland was , should confirm the Words of Mr. Jenison , so long after spoken , and that when to witness to them , was even to cut the throat of Irelands Reputation and Truth , and give a very severe stab to the Romish Cause . Certainly the thing seems to look as it writ with a Sun-beam . 5. It appears then an undeniable Truth , that Mr Ireland was in London the 12th or 13th of August 1678. and thence taking a journey into Staffordshire ; he returned and was seen in London and discoursed by Mr. Jenison the 19th of the same Month , from whence 't is probable , having transacted something of the Matter in Hand , he might immediately return . Neither do I know any rational Objection against the clearness of the truth evidenced thereby , unless the three following Objections weigh with some . Obj. 1. The credit and quality of some of the Witnesses , who testifie , they saw Mr. Ireland in Staffordshire on those Days , wherein he is affirmed to have been in London . Ans . To this I shall only answer , that the Credit of the Witnesses , of both sides may be so far salved , as t is possible to affirm , one and the same person may be in London and Stafforshire some part of the same Day ; the distance being not so great betwixt both Places , but the journy ( especially by Post ) may be easily performed ; neither is it improbable , that Mr. Ireland , who was so actively concerned in the Plot , and in the nature of a Treasurer therein , should have frequent occasion to travel by Day and by Night betwixt London and Staffordshire , his Presence being equally necessary to both places , especially in such a critical time of Expectancy , as that of the Kings being at Windsor then wa● . Add hereunto , that Mr. Ireland himself confessed in his Discourse with Mr. Jenison , that he had rode post from Staffordshire to London that day , yet was not weary : a journey , which many other Persons have performed in less then the space of one Day , part of the Night being also , in that usually very hot month of August , more convenient for travelling then the Day ; now If such a Journey were undertaken by Ireland one day ? why not another ? why not many days , according as the Urgency of his grand Affairs , and the teeming pregnancy of them might require ? Obj. 2. If this Evidence be true , why was it not produced before , or at the Tryal of Whitebread , &c. being so material for the clearing of the Truth ? Ans . The matter was a long time kept secret in the Breasts of young Mr. Jenison and his Father , being both ( then ) Romanists , and Smith a Priest , and secured from the knowledge of any Protestant ; neither did Mr. Bowes receive Mr. Jenisons letter of Discovery ( though often pressed by him to declare his Knowledge , upon the Kings Proclamation of Pardon ) till December 19th 1678. which was two days after the Tryal of Ireland , Now the matter having received it's Determination in the Arraignment and Condemnation of the said Ireland , no probability appearing , that it would be again resumed and reinsisted on , no further Divulgation was made thereof ; And unless new provocation had been given by reviving the matter at Whitebreads Tryal , it had possibly lain asleep for ever ; so that what of Indecency may be imputed in combating the Ghost of the deceased is more properly referrable to the importunate arguings or instances of his surviving Friends , then then even to the just Vindication of the Truth . Obj. 3. The confident asseveration of the said Ireland , and the solemn protestation of his innocency , and of his continuing in Staffordshire the days he was alledged to be here in London , shall have the room of the third and last objection . Ans . 1st . I confess this had not a little influence upon me ; for I acknowledge myself subject to the compassionate sentiments of humane nature ; but the same evidence above mentioned which convinced me , will I doubt not , banish all hesitation as to this matter from the minds of others , except of those , who out of guilt or interest are resolved to shut the door against all kind of satisfaction whatsoever . 2 How far equivocations , falsities , mental reserves , and other Salvoes may be allowed , even to dying persons , in the Roman Church , provided they contribute to the advancement of the Catholick Cause , as they phrase it , would require a large field of discourse ; but the clearness of the Evidence justifying Mr. Ireland's being in London , notwithstanding his and his witnesses affirmations to the contrary , doth give just ground of scruple , that a large freedom is allowed to them on that account ; but it would be too tedious to turn over the Popish Casuists , for the deciding of that controversie ; leaving therefore the Scholastical and skirmishing part to abler pens , I shall content my self to exhibit one passage ( relating to the matter in hand ) mentioned in a Book called the Jesuits Catechism , composed ( almost 60 years since ) by a Member of the Roman Church , but not of the Ignatian Order . His words mentioned , lib. 3. Cap. 12. at the end of that Chapter are there . They ( says he , speaking of the Jesuits ) have a rule in practice , that men are bound to accuse themselves to their Confessors , and not themselves only , but all their Confederates also ; and ( for the Magistrate ) the Malefactor being condemned to die , after he hath once made Confession of his sins to his Ghostly Father , he is not tied to reveal it to his Judge , nay it is lawful for him to stand in stiff denial thereof at the time of his Execution , as being clear before God , though he persist in a lie , after he hath once discharged the depth of his conscience to his Confessor . A thing ( that the same Author subjoyns ) that breedeth much scruple in the mind of a Judge , who otherwise is greatly quieted in conscience , when an offender adjudged to die , howsoever he have beforetime stood in denial of the Fact , yet at the time of his death confesseth the Truth . An Abstract of the Material Passages at the Trials of Mr. Ireland and Mr. Whitebread , relating to Mr. Ireland 's being in London about the middle of August 1678. tending to clear much of the matter of Fact mentioned in the foregoing Papers . The things for which Ireland was indicted , were , The conspiring the King's Death ; also , That he did indeavour and contrive to change and alter the Religion established in the Nation , and introduce Popery in the room of it . ( pag. 13. of Ireland's Trial ) And in order thereunto that Pickering and Grove should assassinate the King ( p. 19. ) which Resolve Ireland signed about the 24th of April . 1678. ( p. 19 , 20. ) Pickering and Grove failing , in August following , Mr. Ireland and others met at Harcourt's Chamber , and their held a close Consultation how to accomplish their Design of killing the King , which they determin should be by Four Russians , whom they actually hire and dispatch away to Windsor , in order to the accomplishing that most Barbarous and most Treasonable Project : where Dr. Oates saw Mr. Ireland present . ( p. 26. and 40. ) The Russians also failing to kill the King at Windsor , they determin , That Pickering and Grove should go on , and that Conyers should be joyned with them , to Assassinate the King in his Morning-walks at New-Market ; this they had taken so strongly upon them that they were very eager to accomplish it . ( p. 41. ) These things Ireland was accused of by Mr. Bedlce ; Dr. Oates affirming that he took his leave of Mr. Ireland in his own Chamber between the Twelfth and Four and twentieth of August , Ireland being then Writing a Letter as Dated from St. Omers , and that afterward when Dr. Oates went to Fenwicks Chamber , Ireland came thither also ; so that he saw him twice about a Fortnight within August . ( p. 60. ) Sarah Pain Confirmed both their Evidence by Swearing , that she saw him about the same time at the Door of his own House : ( p. 57. ) These things Mr. Ireland denys , and indeavours to disprove their Evidence only as to time , because not in London in August last , ( i. e. in A. D. 1678. ) but in Staffordshire ; ( p. 46. and 56. ) and this he attempts chiefly to prove against Dr. Oates , in Order to the Nullifying his Evidence , and so confidently affirms himself not in London , for the whole of that August , this he offers to prove by Twenty Witnesses , ( p. 44. and 56. ) and says , First , he would indeavour to prove that there was not Two Witnesses against him ; for that which Mr. Oates said of his being at Harcourts Chamber in August , was false for he was all August long out of Town in Staffordshire ; upon the Third Day he went down to Staffordshire , with my Lord Aston , and his Lady , and his Son , and Sir John Southcot , and his Lady ; and saith he , all these can Testify that I went down with them , here is Mr. John Aston in Town , if he may be found , who was in my Company all August in Staffordshire , ( p. 56. ) But to save him that Labour , the Kings Evidence offered to prove that he was in Town at that time , for which they Swore Sarah Pain , who affirmed she knew Mr. Ireland , and that she saw him in Town in August last at his own House , ( which was at a Scriveners in Russel-street in Covent Garden ) about a week before she went with my Lord Arlington to Windsor , which was about a week after the King was gone thither ; which Sir Tho. Doloman said , was about the 13th of August . How she knew him , was , because he came often to her Masters house , that was Mr. Groves , the Person Condemned with him , averring that he was the Man that broke open the Pacquet of Letters , That her Master carried about aterwards ; and he Sealed all the Pacquets that went beyond the Seas , and he opend them still when the Answers returned them back again . p. 57. Against whose Evidence he opposed that of his Sister Ann Ireland , and his Mother Elinor Ireland , who both said , that on Saturday the Third of August he set out to go into Staffordshire , and he continued there till it was a Fortnight before Michaelmas , which ( says the Sister ) I remembered by a very good Circumstance , because on the Wednesday before , my Brother , and my Mother and I were invited out to Dinner , we staid there all night , and all Thursday night , and Friday night my Brother came home , and on Saturday de set out for Staffordshire . p. 58 , 59. Sarah Pain being again asked , if she was sure that she saw him in the Place she mentioned , and about the time ? She answered , yes , I am sure I saw him at that very Place and at that time ; but Mr. Ireland then confidently professed he never knew her , although she was Mr. Groves Servant , and used to carry him Letters from her Master 's ; his words are , I profess I do not know her , 20 people may come to me , and yet I not know them , and she having been Mr. Groves servant might have brought me Letters , and yet I not remember her . p. 58 , 59. But my L. C. Justice thus recapitulates Sarah Pains Evidence against him : she says that she saw you in London about the 10th or 12th of August , and she makes it out by a Circumstance , which is better Evidence , then if she had come and Swore the precise day wherein she saw you ; for I should not have been satisfied , unless she had given me a good account why she did know it to be such a Day . She does it by Circumstance , by which we must calculate she saw you about the 12th or 13th day ; she went to my Lord Arlingtons at such a day , a week after the King went to Windsor , and that was about the 13th , and she saw you a week before she went to my Lord Arlingtons , which must be the 12th or 13th . You say you went out of Town the 3d of August , who can Swear you did not come back again ? To which Ireland says , all the house can testify I did not come to my Lodging ; his Mother also affirmed it , but they were Parties . p. 59. Dr. Oates , here comes in with his Information , and reports it to my Lord C. Justice thus . My Lord , whenever we had a mind to come to Town , we commonly writ our Letters , and let them come to Town two days after us ; so that we might prove by the Writing of such Letters , if any Question did arise ; that we could not be at such a Place at a such time ; And when we pretended to go into the Country , we have gon and taken a Chamber in the City , and have had frequent Cabals at our Chambers . There Mr. Ireland writ a Letter as Dated at St. Omers , when I took my leave of him at his own Chamber , which was betwixt the 12th and 24th in London ; he was there ; and afterwards when I went to Fenwicks Chamber he came thither , a Fortnight or Ten Days at least , I am sure it was in August . — p. 60. Upon which , and what went before my Lord Ch. Justice Reflects as follows . Here are 3 Witnesses upon Oath about this one thing : Here is Mr. Bedloe , that Swears the Fact upon which the Question arises to be in August ; that you deny , and say you were out of Town then ; he produces a Maid here , and she Swears that about that time , which by Calculation must be about the 12th or 13th , she saw you going into your own house . And here is a 3d Witness , who Swears he knows nothing of the matter of Fact , but he knows you were in Town then , and that he took his leave of you as going to St. Omers . p. 60. In the next place Ireland produceth one Harrison , a Coachman , to testifie that he was in his Company from the 5th of August to the 16th , and at that time he was with him 3 or 4 days at my Lord Astons House at Tixall in Staffordshire , p , 62. [ In which time Mr. Ireland might easily steal a Journey to London , and return without notice being taken of it ; and this might be the time in which Sarah Pain saw him . ] Also Harrison affirmed that he was with Mr. Ireland at Westchester , and that there he left him ; [ And here let it be remembred that Mr. Ireland confidently averred himself to be in Staffordshire all August , p. 56. and one of his own Witnesses declared him to be even in another County , which he granted to be true , but came off with this Evasion , in Staffordshire or thereabout . P. 61 , 62. ] You may here take a view of Irelands Dying Words , concerning the thing in Hand , delivered January 24. at the Common Place of Execution . We are come hither upon the Theatre of the World , and we do conceive we lye under an obligation to speak . And 1st we do confess that we do pardon all and every one whatsoever that had any Interest or Concern , or Hand in the taking away our Lives . 2dly . We do here profess and acknowledge , we are obliged , that if we were Guilty of any Treason , or knew any Person faulty therein , although he were our Father , we would detect and discover him . And as for our Selves , we would beg a thousand and a thousand Pardons both of God and man ; but seeing we cannot be believed , we must beg leave to commit our selves to the mercy of Almighty God , and we hope to find a pardon of Him. As for my own Part , having been twenty years out of England , and then coming over , I was resolved to take a Journey into Staffordshire ; and setting out in August , and not returning back to this Town untill before the 14th day of September , as many Witnesses can testifie : for I believe an hundred or more saw me there ; Therefore now , how in this time we should be accused of Treasonable Stratagems , I do not well know or in any wise understand . Thus much out the Tryals of Ireland , &c. But because Mr. Ireland's not being in London , from about the beginning of August till about the beginning of September , A. D. 1678. is urged and prosecuted with more importunity in the Tryals of White aliàs Whitebread , &c. I shall here present you with the whole that referred to this matter , as debated in the Court , only leaving out every thing that had not a special Reference to the thing Intended , to wit , the Proving Mr. Ireland out of Town for the whole forementioned time . Whitebread . My Lord , I have only this , and I desire to be heard in this point , to prove that Mr. Oates was mistaken in his Evidence that he gave at the last Tryal against Mr. Ireland . L. C. J. Look you . I must break in upon you ; you have been told so often , all of you have been told it , and yet you are upon the former Trials again . You are now upon your tryal for your Life , if you could have disproved any thing that he said at a former Tryal , you should have taken a legal way and convicted him of Perjury ; but now to charge him with a Printed paper is not fair . You must speak to what he says now . Whitebread . He says the same now . But all that I say is this , if he be not honest , he can be witness in no case . I suppose if any one can prove him not Probus Testis , his Testimony is not to be received in any case . L. C. J. But how will you prove that ? Come on , I 'le teach you a little Logick : If you will come to contradict a Witness , you ought to do it in a matter which is the present debate here ; for if you would convict him of any thing that he said in Irelands Tryal , we must try Irelands Cause over again . But if you will say any thing against what he says now , do . Whitebread . That which I would aledge is this , if he be convicted of Perjury in one Case , he is not to be believed in another . L. C. J. You say right , if he be convicted . Whitebread . He is not only then an incompetent Witness , for he cannot be said to be Probus Testis . but he is Improbus . Now this is that I can prove . Mr. Just . Pemberton . Nay , you must shew it by a Record . L. C. J. You cannot have so little understanding , you that have been , and were to be so great a Man among them , had been Provincial , and was to have been somewhat else . I have told you already that to prove him to be a man that hath no Faith in him he must be convicted . You must have indicted him , and convicted him , of the thing wherein he did commit Perjury , and then he had been prepared to justifie himself . But shall you come now , and at this your Tryal , and prove what he said at Staley's Tryal , and Colemans Tryal , and Irelands Tryal ? And must we examine what matters have receiv'd a Verdict and a Judgement there ? for consider what will be the consequence of it ; if it should be false , you there arraign a Verdict : You should have convicted him of the falshood first . Whitebread . I desire the Jury to take notice , that he does not stick to the Testimony that he gave then , for if he does it was false . L. C. J. They must not take notice of any thing that was done at a former Tryal , unless it be spoken of now . P. 69. L. C. J. North. Do not call any witnesses to prove what he said then , but to disprove what he hath said now . Harcourt . Mr. Oates did accuse me of paying Fourscore pounds at my Chamber , and he did say afterwards it was at Wild-house . I have Persons to justifie what was done at my own Chamber ; and he says , Mr. Ireland was by ; now here are Witnesses to prove that Mr. Ireland was in Staffordshire all the month of August , therefore he could not be present . P. 70. Mr. J. Pemberton . That was urged before ; pray do not insist upon that , it hath received a Tryal . L. C. J. I 'le tell you what he says , and I 'le ask him the question : Dr. Oates , it is supposed by your Testimony , that Mr. Ireland and Mr. Harcourt were together when this Fourscore pounds was paid , for the Villains that went to Windsor to murther the King. Dr. Oates . I never said such a word . Harcourt . Here it is in the Tryal . L. C. J. I stand not by the Printed Tryal , it is no Record in Law. In short , Were Mr. Ireland and Mr. Harcourt together at that time ? Dr. Oates . No , they were not . Gavan . He did then say , that he did receive of Mr. Ireland , the 2d of September , 20s . that he borrowed of him : now the 2d of September he was at Boscobel . Dr. Oates . My Lord , I was not positive as to the Day ; but as near as I remember ( those were the words I said ) it was the 2d of September ; but whether it was the First , Second , Seventh , Eighth or Ninth , I would not be positive in it . Then the Prisoners called Pendrel and his Wife , and Gifford and his Wife ; and Gifford stood up . Gifford . My Lord , I was here the last Sessions , where I did testifie the Seeing of Mr. Ireland in Staffordshire on the 24th of August , Bartholomew-day , and the next day after ; at which time Mr. Oates said that he saw him here in Town . But Mr. Oates could not be particular in every thing ; but at last he came to a circumstance , and averred that the first or second of September he did receive 20s . of Mr. Ireland in Harcourts Chamber ; he said it was about the Fast-day . Dr. Oates . That was as near as I remembred . Gifford . Here is in Court at least six People that know it ; I saw him several other of those days there ; but these six People conversed with him every day . Mr. J. Pemberton . How do you know all that ? L. C. J. North. Come , come , you must not speak as to what he said in Irelands Tryal . L. C. J. What time was it that Mr. Harcourt and Mr. Ireland conferred together about this same business ? Dr. Oates . My Lord , I do not charge Ireland , but I charge Harcourt with being at Wild-house , and that there Coleman met him , and that there was greatest part of the money , which was carried back to Harcourts Chamber , and given to the person that was to carry it down to Windsor ; but Mr. Celeman was gone away before , and had left a Guiny behind him , which was given to the messenger for Expedition . L. C. J. I am mistaken if you have not testified that Ireland was in Town in August and September with Harcourt . Dr. Oates . Ireland took his leave of London betwixt the 8th and 12th of August , as to go to St. Omers , p. 71. Lord Ch. Just . Here is the matter , they must have right , though there be never so much time lost , and patience spent : say they , we must prove and contradict men by such matters as we can ; People may swear down-right things , and 't is impossible to contradict them ; but we will call witnesses to prove those particulars that can be proved : say where Mr. Ireland was in August ? Dr. Oates . He took his leave of us in Town in August , and that was between the Eighth and Twelfth at Harcourts Chamber L. C. J. What do you infer from Irelands being there then ? Dr. Oates . I le tell you what I design in it ; your Lordship may perceive that I did methodize my Evidence according to the time ; for I said this was our business in April , this in July ; and now we come to the business of August , said I , we took our leaves of Mr. Ireland between the eighth and twelfth . I said in July Mr. Fenwick was out of Town , but then if your Lordship remembers I said he was in Town , and took his leave of Mr. Ireland between the eighth and the twelfth of August . L. C. J. Was Mr. Ireland in Fenwicks company at that time in August ? Dr. Oates . Yes my Lord he was when he took his leave . L. C. J. Did they talk then of this business . Dr Oates . They took their leaves one of another , but as to what particular things of the Plot they spoke about , I do not remember . L. C. J. Look you now , mind what he says , Ireland and Fenwick were together in August between the eighth and the twelfth , but b●ing 〈◊〉 , Whether they were met on purpose to talk of the Plot ? he says he does not remember the Particular : Here the Lady Southcot , her Son , and her Daughter , were called . L. C. J. Did you say that Fenwick there at the Bar , had converse with Ireland in August , for the carrying on of the Plot ? Dr. Oates . Yes , my Lord. L. C. J. My rule is this in doubtful cases ; when men are upon their Lives , I had rather hear what is impertinent , than not ●● them make a full defence . L. C. J. North. I had rather hear things at a venture , than forbid things at a venture . Lady Southcot stood up . L. C. J. How long were you in Mr. Ireland ; company ? Lady Southcot . From the fifth of August to the sixteenth . L. C. Just . What every day ? Lady Southcot . Yes every day . Dr. Oates . My Lord , here is Sarah Pain , who before hath testified what she hath known in this matter . If your Lordship 〈…〉 , I desire she may be called in readiness to speak to it . L. C. J. Are y●● sure it was the fifth ? Lady Southcot . Yes , as sure as I can be of any thing . Mr. Recorder . D● . Oates , you had best keep your Evidence intire till the last . Then Sir Jo. Southcot was called , and appeared . L. C. Just . Did you know Mr. Ireland ? Sir Jo. Southcot . Yes , I did know him by face . L. C. J. Where did you see him ? Sir Jo. Southcot . I saw him the 5th . of August at Sir. Albans . L. C. J. And did he travel along with you ? Sir Jo. Southcot . Yes , he did travel along with us , the sixth , seventh , eighth , and ninth . L. C. J. How many days did he travel along with you ? Sir Jo. Southcot . He travel'd along with us , four days together , I am sure . L. C. J. What from the fifth to the ninth ? Sir Jo. Southcot . Yes , Sir. L. C. J. Is this all that you can say ? Sir Jo. Southcot . Yes , my Lord. L. C. J. But we would know where he was afterwards ; did you see him after the ninth ? Sir Jo. Southcot . My Lord , I saw him at St. Albans , and we went from thence to Northampton , and from thence to Coventry , and from thence to my Lord Astons , that is four days ; and I saw him Thursday , I saw him Friday , Saturday , and Monday following : Tuesday , I had occasion to go further into the Countrey , and he went along with us ; so I saw him Tuesday , Wednesday , Thursday , and Fryday , afterwards . L. C. J. Why then , you saw him at least twelve days ? Sir Jo. Southcot . Yes . L. C. J. Have you any more . Then Mr. Edward Southcot stood up . L. C. J. Were you here , when Ireland was tried ? Sir Jo. Southcot . No. L. C. J. Did you see Mr. Ireland in August last ? Mr. Southcot . The third of August , he came down to my Lord Astons at Stanmore , they said so ; but I cannot swear he came that night , but I saw him very early the next morning ; the 5th . we went to St. Albans , and we kept on till we came to Tinall , and I was in his company from the 4th . to the 16th . L. C. J. Why , you hear what he says , he was in Company with him every day from the 4th . to the 16th . Gavan . Call Mrs. Harewell and her daughter , Mrs. Gifford , and Mrs. Pendrel . Then Mrs. Harewell stood up . L. C. J. Did you see Mr. Ireland in August last ? Harewell . I saw Ireland in August last , the 17th . day ; he came then to my house at Wolverhampton , and there he continued every day , and lay in my house every night till the 26th . day . Then young Mrs. Harewell stood up . Harewell . Mr. Ireland came to our house in Staffordshire the 17th . of August , and stayed there till the 26th . I saw him every day , unless it was Friday , the day before Bartholomew-day , when he went to Litehfield , and returned again . Gavan . My Lord , there is a Prisoner now in Newgate that can testifie the same . L. C. J. North. Would you ask your fellow if you be a Thief ? he is in for the same offence . Gavan . My Lord , I desire to know , if a man be not convicted of the same offence , whether he be not a good witness ? L. C. J. North. If he stand charged with the same Plot , his Evidence is of little weight . Then Elisabeth Keiling stood up . L. C. J. Did you see Mr. Ireland in August ? Keiling . Yes , my Lord , I did . p. 73. L. C. J. Where did you see him ? Keiling . I saw him at Wolverhampton , there he was from Saturday the 17th . to Monday , and then I went to see my Mother , and came back again on Thursday , and found him there , and there he was till the 26th . Then stood up Mr. Gifford . L. C. J. When did you see Mr. Ireland ? Gifford . My Lord , Mr. Ireland came to Wolverhampton the 17th . of August , and he stayed there till the 26th . it was of a Monday , I remember it by several circumstances . L. C. J. Did you know Mr Ireland ? Gifford . I never saw him before . L. C. J. Do you know it was the same that died ? Gifford . My Lord , here was my brother in Town , who saw him executed , and he did assure me he was the same . I saw him again the 2d of September , and the 7th . of September again , and the 10th . and the 11th . my Lord , he was the same man I believe , because my brother told me so . p. 74. Sir Cr. Levins . Gentlemen of the Jury , you have heard the Prisoners , and they have had a great deal of time to make their defence ; but the greatest part of their defence hath been to invalidate the Testimony of Mr. Oates ; and what is the Evidence they have brought against him ? they tell you first , that he did not come over in this Company that he says he came over with . And whereas he hath sworn he was here the 24th of April , they have taken a great deal of pains by fifteen or sixteen Witnesses , to prove that he was all the time at St. Omers . — P. 76. Sir C. Levins . — Now as for Mr. Oates Testimony , and what they have to say to him ; in the first place , they have brought a young Gentleman , Mr. Hilsley , and he says he did not come over with him , and there 't is one against one , but Dr. Oates hath Sworn it , and hath given you such convincing Circumstances how he lost his money , &c. so that I leave it to you , which of the two is in the right , and ought to be believed . But then , my Lord , as to the rest of the Witnesses , here are a great many brought over to prove that Dr. Oates was all the while at St. Omers ; but I shall bring you a considerable number of Witnesses , to prove that Dr. Oates was then in London , and that all these Persons are mistaken : They do all pitch upon the first of May , to six it upon a time , wherein he says he was here in Town : But Gentlemen , I hope you did observe , that as to other things and time that were not so necessary as to this matter , there they were pleased to mistake , and to differ one from another , to contradict one another ; for some of them said he went away and left St. Omers the 10th of June , others the 23d others , which was the same Flemish Gardiner , that he stay'd till July : Truly half that variance in the time which is necessary , would serve our turn , we are but for eight days time , that is , he was not above eight or ten days here ; truly these Gentlemen will be sure to speak punctually to all those eight days that hurt the Prisoners , but they will vary thirty days at another time , that hurts them not : Why may they not be mistaken as well with that portion of time , as they were in the other , wherein they so much differed one from another ? But I shall give you most infallable proof by and by , that Mr. Oates was in England at that time , that he said he was in England : This he does in the Trials of Whitebread , &c. from Pag. 79. to Pag. 85. to which the Reader is referred . Pag. 77. Sir Ch. Levins . — Then truly , my Lord , they are fixed upon another great matter to blemish Dr. Oates as to Mr ▪ Ireland , a person that is dead and out of the way . Mr. Ireland hath been hanged upon that Evidence , so far it was believed , but now after all this will these Gentlemen come to question the Evidence that was given against Mr. Ireland . They have likewise , my Lord , brought my Lady Southcot , and some other persons who give you an Evidence concerning Mr. Ireland , that he should not be here at this time ; but Gentlemen under favour , Mr. Oates hath sworn before , and he hath now sworn it again , that Mr. Ireland was at that time in London , and Gentlemen , I will confirm him in that by another Witness that did see him here in Town at that time . And when you have two Witnesses for the King upon their Oaths come and testifie it , I hope you will beleive them , rather then other persons that testifie only by Hear-say . It was the matter then in Issue , and had saved his Life if it had been true , but though it be now setled , and none could think it would be again started , they would make that an Objection , but by chance we have a Witness still to give you satisfaction , that Mr. Ireland was in London at that time that Mr. Oates did swear him to be . We will begin with that Witness about Ireland . And then we will call our Witnesses to prove that Mr Oates was in England , and did come over when he said he did . Call Sarah Pain ( who was sworn ) Sir Ch. Levins . What time did you see Mr. Ireland in London ? did you see him in August last ? S. Pain . I saw him about 7 or 8 days before I came to my Lord Chamberlain , and that was about a week before the King went to Windsor . L. C. J. Where did you see him ? S. Pain . At his own door in Russel-street . L. C. J. Did you speak to him ? S. Pain . No ; I knew him very well , and saw him as I came by . Sir Ch. Levins . Had not you carried many Letters to him ? S. Pain . Yes , several Letters , p. 78. Sir Ch. Levins . But where did you live before ? S. Pain . I lived at Mr. Grove's . Sir Ch. Levins . Did not Mr. Ireland use to come there too ? S. Pain . Yes , he did often . L. C. Just . Was any one talking with Ireland then ? S. Pain . No. Sir Ch. Levins . How long did you look upon him ? did you see him go in ? did you see his face or his back ? S. Pain . I saw his face , and made him a Courtesie . L. C. J. This she said to Irelands face . Mr. J. Dolben . Your Evidence is , that Mr. Ireland went out of Town the 5. of August , and she says she saw him about that time , which must be the 12th or 14th of August . Gavan . How does she prove it ? she does not say she spoke with him . Mr. Just . Dolben . She swears it . Sir Ch. Levins . Now we must prove what time the King went to Windsor . L. C. J. Sir Tho. Doleman , what time in August did the King go to Windsor last Summer ? Sir Tho. Doleman . I believe ( I cannot charge my memory so well ) it was the 13th , it was about the 12th or 13. L. C. J. Was my Lord Chamberlain there then ? S. Pain . My Lord Chamberlain went after the King. L. C. J. And when do you say , you saw Ireland ? S. Pain . I saw him seven or eight days before I went to my Lord Chamberlains , which was before my Lord went to Windsor , and that was a week after the King went thither . Sir Ch. Levins . Now I 'le tell you what she says ; she says she saw Ireland a week before she went to my Lord Chamberlain's , and she saw him go into Grove's House , where he did usually go for Letters . She says she saw his face , and made him a Courtesie ; and that this was a week before she went to my Lord Chamberlains , and that was a week after the King went to Windsor . Now the time that Mr. Oates pitches upon , is between the eighth and the twelfth of August , which by computation is the time she speaks of . P. 79. Gavan . — My Lord , we have here 16 at least Staffordshire Witnesses , who give you an account of Mr. Ireland's being out of London from the 3d of August till 14th of September . So that in these two things he hath been contradicted without any answer , for he says , the 12th of August he was with him , when they say he was in Staffordshire . L. C. J. You have forgot the maid that saw him in London the 12. or 13th . Gavan . No , my Lord , I have not . And this is it , I answer to it ; she is a witness that only says , she just saw him , but did not speak to him . L C. J. She made a Courtesie to him . P. 86. Gavan . We were talking now of seeing Ireland in August , and we prove by Sir. Jo. Southcot and all his Family , who say they began their journey with him the 5th of August ; and staid with him till the 19th , after the particular Day that she speaks of , you find 7 or 8 of them swear that they saw him all the time . P. 87. I will close up the Whole with a little of my Lord Chief Justices Speech , at the end of the Tryals of Whitebread , &c. p. 92 , 93. Which though it may not at first seem to answer our particular design , the demonstrating Ireland's being in London , yet it truly answers our general design , to con●●●● the reality of the Plot , and in order thereunto it is a most noble Argument , and really merits not only the transcribing into this Tract to fill up an empty space , but even into the memories of all true Protestants . L. C. J. I will challenge all the Papists in England to satisfie any man that hears me this day of one piece of Evidence , which will turn every Protestants heart against the Papists . If so be , they murdered Sir Edmund-Bury Godfrey , the Plot even by that is in a great measure proved upon them , by that base murther . And what can be a plainer proof of it , than the evidence of this Day , which Mr. Dugdale produces ? Who had notice ( saith he ) on Monday night , that on the Saturday before it , Sir Edm. Godfrey was kill'd ( which falls out to be that very Saturday he was first missing ) which notice was given in a Letter writ by Harcourt to Ewers ' another Priest , that same Saturday night , wherein were these words , This night Sir Edmund-bury Godfrey is dispatched ; and I am sure if this be true , then no man can say but they murdered Him. Now the question is , whether it be true or no ? To make it out , he produces Mr. Chetwind , whom I hope you will not deny to be a Gentleman of one of the best Families of his Country , and of honest Reputation , who says ; that on the Tuesday following that Saturday Sir Edmund-bury Godfrey was miss't , he and another were walking together in Staffordshire , and that the other Person asked him if he knew of the Death of any Justice of the Peace at Westminster , and when he told him , he had heard of no such thing ; No , said he , that is strange , you living sometimes about Westminster ; for said he , the Wench at the Ale-house says , That this morning Mr. Dugdale said to two other Gentlemen , there was a Justice of Peace of Westminster killed ; and Mr. Dugdale swears , That was Sir Edmund-bury Godfrey ; now if Dugdale be fit to be believed , that he saw such a Letter , as he must be if he be not a very great Prophet , to be able to foretell this : or if the Maid that said this , did not invent it ( a thing then impossible to be done : ) or Mr. Chetwind feigned that he heard the Man make his report from the Maid ; this thing could not come to pass , but by these men . Nay , if Mr. Dugdale could not do as great a Miracle as any are in the Popish Legends , how could he tell that it was done on the same Night when it was done at London ? or speak of it on the Monday night after , when it was not known in London till the Thursday following ? This will stick , I assure you ( Sirs ) upon all your Party . For my own part , this evidence of Mr. Dugdals , gives me the greatest satisfaction of any thing in the World , in this matter , and whilst we rest satisfied in the Murder of that Man , and are morally certain you must do it , knowing of what Principles you are , you cannot blame us , if upon such manifest reasons we lay it upon you . And this is occasional Evidence , which I for my part never heard before this day ; nor can I ever be more or better satisfied , then I am upon this point , viz. The Testimony that I have received this afternoon , concerning the murder of Sir Edmund-bury Godfrey : As to the defences they have made , they are exceptions in point of time , but do not effect Mr. Dugdale ; for they have hardly the confidence to deny the things he says to be true against them . They fall foul indeed upon Mr. Oates : He appears to have been their Agent ; and whilst so , bad enough ; but if he had not had a mind to have become a good man , he would not likely have done us that good that he hath done , in discovering the Design you had engaged him in : let any man judge by your Principles and Practices , what you will not do for the promoting of the same . FINIS .