The demonstration of Antichrist. By Edmund Gurnay, Bach. Theol. p. of Harpley Norfolke Gurnay, Edmund, d. 1648. 1631 Approx. 25 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 18 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2009-03 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A02398 STC 12529 ESTC S120940 99856131 99856131 21654 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A02398) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 21654) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1475-1640 ; 1069:9) The demonstration of Antichrist. By Edmund Gurnay, Bach. Theol. p. of Harpley Norfolke Gurnay, Edmund, d. 1648. [6], 28, [2] p. Printed by I[ohn] B[eale] for Iames Boler, and are to be sold at the signe of the Marigold in Pauls Churchyard, London : 1631. Printer's name from STC. Cf. Folger catalogue, which gives signatures: A¹² B⁶. Running title reads: Ecce Antichristum. Reproduction of the original in the Henry E. Huntington Library and Art Gallery. Tightly bound. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800. Transubstantiation -- Early works to 1800. Popes -- Primacy -- Early works to 1800. 2007-11 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2008-01 SPi Global Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2008-02 John Pas Sampled and proofread 2008-02 John Pas Text and markup reviewed and edited 2008-09 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion THE Demonstration OF ANTICHRIST . BY EDMVND GVRNAY , Bach. Theol. P. of Harpley Norfolke . LONDON , Printed by I.B. for Iames Boler , and are to be sold at the signe of the Marigold in Pauls Churchyard . 1631. TO THE ALL-HOPEFVLL Charles , BY THE GRACE OF GOD , PRINCE of Wales , &c. IT is the glorie of all temporall power to maintaine the glory of Christ , and so consequently to confound Antichrist , When , therefore , the prouidence of God sends temporall Princes into the world , such as can giue any intelligēce toward the discouering this Antichrist , cannot be thought ouerhastie in presenting the same vnto them . Indeed , the intelligence which this little Booke can do in such kind of businesse must needs be thought little ; notwithstanding , it was a little pibble-stone that bored the Front of Goliah , when the valiant men of Israel were afraid to encounter him . Also the littlenesse of it may be a meanes to induce Gods little ones , the sooner to begin to turne the leaues thereof as they shall begin to awake vnto the day-light of vnderstanding . Which happy time of our Princes awaking , It resoluing to wait ; the Author shall in the meane time beseech the Almighty to visit him daily with the light of His countenance , and as his Abilities shall grow , to allure them into the most pleasant paths of His most Royal● seruice . ECCE ANTI-CHRISTVM . HEE that professeth himselfe the supreme head of the Church of Christ , and yet forceth men , vpon paine of death , to blaspheme Christ , Hee is Antichrist . Because it cannot be imagined how any power vpon earth can more cunningly , and out of a deeper mysterie doe Christ such vniuersall mischiefe . But the Pope of Rome does professe himselfe the Supreme head of the Church of Christ , ( and that is granted ) and yet forceth men vpon paine of death , ( both temporall and eternall ) to blaspheme Christ . And this we thus proue : Hee that forceth men vpon paine of death to grant , that there is no other Christ but He whose perfit Body , Soule , and Deity hath , for these 1600. yeers last past , beene ordinarily present amongst men vnder that particular forme which immediately before the speaking of a few words was the forme of a senselesse creature , and in that forme does enter into the mouthes of liuing creatures ▪ he forceth men to blaspheme Christ . Because this position does blaspheme , The Manhood of Christ . The God-head of Christ . The Maiesty of Christ . The Holinesse of Christ . The Iustice of Christ . The Mercy of Christ . The Wisdome of Christ . The Power and Word of Christ . First , it blasphemes the manhood of Christ ; because it giues Him such a Body as in the outward eyes of those that are present with Him hath no more similitude with the body of a man than a chip or a stone . Secondly , it blasphemeth His God-head ; because it supposeth the Creator to be ordinarily vnited vnto the forme of a creature . Thirdly , it blasphemeth his Maiesty ; because it giues Him such an outward presence as the vilest and poorest man liuing would be ashamed of , and euen vtterly abhorre . Fourthly , it blasphemeth His Holinesse ; because it supposeth Him to goe through more vncleane passages , than euer liuing man did , and such as of necessity do either reiect or corrupt whatsoeuer they receiue . Fifthly , it blasphemeth His Iustice ; because it affirmeth Him to be ordinarily present amongst men , in a forme nothing like a man ; and yet wee must vpon paine of damnation beleeue that He is a perfit man. Sixthly , it blasphemeth His Mercy ; because it layes this intolerable burthen vpon the Faith of little ones , either to looke for no saluation , or to beleeue that thing to be their Sauiour which in all outward appearance is but a morsell of bread . Seuenthly , it blasphemeth His Wisedome ; because it supposeth Him to worke daily multitudes of most incredible and most stupendious miracles , for no other purposes but such as are daily effected without any miracles at all : there being no kinde of benefit redounding vnto mankind by this His supposed bodily presence , but such as daily does redound vnto vs in His bodily absence : For daily does Hee giue vs the gift of Faith in His bodily absence ; daily does He conuerse with men , sup with men , and dwell with men in His bodily absence ; daily does Hee giue all kind of gifts vnto men in his bodily absence ; daily does He send the cōforter in his bodily absence ; For the cōforter wil not come vnles He goes away ; Ioh. 16.7 . Yea ( finally ) daily does e giue vs his flesh to eat in His bodily absence ; For except we eat his flesh , we haue no life in vs , ( Ioh. 6.53 . ) But hee that beleeueth hath euerlasting life ( Ioh. 6. ●7 . ) and therefore he that beleeueth , does alwayes ( in His most bodily absence ) eat His Flesh . To conclude , What benefit , what Grace , what comfort was euer heard of , or can be imagined , but may bee imparted vnto men as well ( not to say incomparably more easily , more sweetly , more credibly ) In His bodily absence , as in this supposed bodily presence , wherunto such stupendious miracles must concurre : namely ( for a taste of them ) these amongst others : 1. That the perfit Body of a man must bee couched and contriued into the forme of a bit of bread . 2. That the liuing body of one man must wholly enter into the mouth of another . 3 That the same man shall be in infinite places at once . 4. That the perfit Body of man shall ordinarily come downe from heauen , and yet the outward eyes of those which entertain Him shall not see it . 5. That these so vncouth wonders shall be wrought at the call of mortall men ( euery Priest ) vnto the end of the world , &c. And is not this a blaspheming of the wisedome of the Almighty to make him the de●isor of these so inglorious , and ( to say nothing of the quality of them ) insuperfluous miracles . Also wee further adde , that it blasphemeth his Power ; because it makes it the instrument of such operations as are dishonourable and repugnant vnto His Wisdome , His Maiesty , His Iustice , and euen all His conditions and attributes ; whereas the power of God on the contrary does so infinitely apply it selfe to the honour and glory of God , as that it doth continually resist , confound and destroy whatsoeuer does offer the least diminution vnto it . Last of all , it blasphemeth his Word ; and that both His created Word , and also His reuealed Word . For what is his created Word , but the faculties of Sense & Reason ? What word , or what light had man in his innocency , to shew him which was the middle tree in the garden ( which vpon paine of death he was forbidden to taste of ) but his common Sense ? And what other word or light haue men now in the state of recouery , to tell them which is a man , and which is a beast ; which is a fish , and which is a serpent ; and to lay them out their particular taskes , portion ▪ and callings , but their common Sense ? This therefore so immediately created and sacred light , if it bee made a notorious lyar , ( for what is it else if it constantly affirmes that to bee a morsell of bread which indeed is the perfit Body of a man ? ) Is not therein the Word of God blasphemed ? And as for his Reuealed Word , both His Originall Word ( the Scriptures ) and also His deriued Word ( the Fathers ) are not they also contradicted and blasphemed by this position . For first , concerning the Scripture , does not that euery where tell vs , That our Sauiour was in euery point like a man ? That He had the face , limbs , and properties of a man ? That Hee did eat , drinke , and speake like a man ? Also doe not the Scriptures expresly say , That the Heauens must containe him till all things bee restored ? Acts 3.20 . And that He shall so descend from heauen ; as Hee first ascended vp into heauen ? Whereas by this position Hee hath for these 1600. yeeres continually descended bodily from heauen , not once in such a manner descend , as Hee first ascended : Yea , the Scripture euery where tells vs that now Hee is in the state of Glory ; whereas this position contriues Him into a more vile forme than euer man had , and tyes Him to a more base condition than euer any man ( or indeed any liuing creature ) did vndergoe . For though they seeme to doe Him great honour while they carry Him about ( in those breaden formes ) in their pompous processions ; yer when withall they professe that in the end he is to be eaten vnder those breaden formes , all the honour they bestow on him is no better honour vnto him , then the guilding the Buls hornes when hee is led to be baited , is an honour vnto the Bull. Finally , the Bread which our Sauiour termed His Body , does not the Scripture every where call it still bread notwithstanding , He tooke , brake , blessed , and gaue Bread , say all the Euangelists ; sometime also saying as much of the cup as of the wine : Paul also calling it bread , both in the blessing , and in the eating , and also after the eating : and the Acts of the Apostles terming these Communions ( Chap. 2.42 . ) a continuance in breaking bread : and ( Chap. 20.7 . ) a comming together to break bread : And all the Fathers for many hundred yeeres together immediately following the first Institution , when at any time they made mention of it , as securely calling it bread , as if they neuer imagined that any would euer make question thereof . And for proofe hereof , wee haue thought good to close vp this point with a border of citation● out of them ; leauing the force of their sayings to the applicati●●● of the Reader for breuity sake . Clemens Romanus ( to cite them according to the times wherein they liued ) saith thus of it ; We offer vnto thee our King and our God , this bread and this wine , giuing thee thankes : Concil . Tom. 2. Ignatius thus ; There is one flesh of our Lord Iesus , and one Bloud , one bread and one cup. Epist . 2. Iustine Martyr thus ; When prayers are finished , Bread and Wine is offered : And elsewhere thus ; Christ hath giuen the bread to the end wee should remember that He was made a body for such as should beleeue . In Dial. contra Tryphon . and Apolog. 2. Irenaeus Martyr thus ; As the Eucharist consisting of two natures , the earthly and the heauenly , so our Bodies , &c. Tertullian thus ; Calling the bread His body , to the end you may vnderstand that He hath giuen bread to bee a figure of His body . Contra Marcion . 3.19 . Clemens Alexandrinus thus ; The Wine signifies the Bloud allegorically . Lib. de paedagog . 10.6 . Origen thus ; If you take this saying , [ Except ye eat the flesh of the sonne of man , &c. ] according to the Letter , the Letter killeth . Hom. 7. in Leuit. & elswhere thus ; After we haue giuen thankes , we eat the Loues presented . Contra Celsun . 8. Cyprian thus ; Our Lord gaue with His owne hands bread and wine , which He called His Body . De vnct . Chris . and elswhere thus ; This bread is conuerted into our flesh and bloud , and serueth for our life . Epist . 2. Eusebius Caesariensis thus ; Christ and His Ministers doe represent the mysteries of His Body and Bloud by bread and wine . De Demonst . Euangel . 5.3 . Athanasius thus ; How few would his Body haue sufficed that it should be meat for all the world . In illud [ quicunque &c. ] Concilium Nicenum thus ; Wee must not basely [ humiliter ] be intent vpon the bread and the eup , but lifting vp our mindes by faith , &c. Concil . 1. Macarius Egypt , thus ; In the Church bread and wine is offered being the figure of his flesh and bloud . Homil. 27. Epiphanius thus ; Christ speaking of a loafe which is round in figure , and cannot see , heare , nor feele , saith of it , This is my Body . In Anchor . Ambrose thus ; Thou sawest the Sacraments vpon the Altar , and wondredst at the creature ; yet is it a solemne and knowne creature : De Sacram. 4.3 . And elsewhere thus ; In the Law was a shadow , in the Gospell an image , in Heauen the truth . Lib. 10. ex offic . C. 48. Gregory Nissen , thus ; Whose hath abundantly drunke of the Apostles springs , hath already receiued whole Christ . In vi● Mos . Chrysostome thus ; If it be dangerous to transferre sanctified vessels vnto priuate vses , where in not the true Body of Christ but onely a mysterie of that body is contained : how much les● ought wee to giue the vessels of our owne bodies to the deuil● which God hath prepared for himselfe to inhabit . In Matth. 5. Homil. 11. and elsewhere thus ; It is counted worthy to be called the Lords Body , though the nature of bread remaineth there still . Ad Caesar . Monach. citat . à ●arijs Author . And againe , thus ; Wooll when it is died , is called no longer wooll , but Purple or Scarlet , though the nature of wooll stil remaineth . In Psal . 22. Gregory Nazianzen thus ; We ●ow partake the Passeouer , ●hough in a figure , yet much more cleare than in the old Law. De Pasch . Orat. 2. Hierome thus ; Christ is not corporally in the Church . In Prou , 1. ● . and elsewhere thus ; Christ left bread and wine , as he that goes ●voyage leaues a gage : In prim . ●d Corinth . 11. and againe , thus ; I take the Gospel to be the body of Christ , and that more truly than the Sacrament . In Psal . 147. Austine thus ; If we looke to the visible signes , by which the Sacraments are performed , who can bee ignorant that they are corruptible . De Bapt. Lib. 3. Cap. 10. And elsewhere thus ; By reason of the resemblance betwixt the Sacraments and the things , the Sacraments often times take the name of the things . Epist . 23. And elsewhere thus ; this is a perfit rule to vnderstand whether a speech be figuratiue , that whatsoeuer in Scripture cannot bee referred vnto integrity o● faith , or verity of manners , that resolue thy selfe is figuratiue . D● doctr . Chr. Lib. 3. Chap. 10. Where upon hee inferres our Sauiour speech , [ of eating his flesh ] to be figuratiue , because according to the Letter , it is a sinfull act ; calling it a carnall sense to take figuratiue speeches properly , and a miserable bondage of the soule . Theodoret thus ; He honoured the signes which we see , with the name of His body , not changing the nature , but casting grace vpon nature . And elsewhere thus ; The mysticall signes after sanctification doe not depart from their nature , but remaine in their former substance , figure , and ●orme . Dial. 2. Cyril thus ; Our Sacrament a●oucheth not the eating of a man. Ad obiect . Theod. And elsewhere thus ; He gaue peeces of bread to His Disciples . In 4. Io●n . Gelasius thus ; By the Sacraments we are made partakers of the heauenly nature and yet for all that ceaseth not the nature of bread and wine . Contra Eutichens . Fulgentius thus ; How did He goe vp to heauen but as he is very man , contained in a place ? Or how is Hee present with the faithfull , but as He is very God without all measure ? Ad Thrasimach . Regul . 2. Ephrem thus ; Taking bread into His hands , He blessed it , and brake it for a figure of His body . Contra Inquis . Diuin . Natur. Vigilius thus ; To goe to His Father , and from vs ; was to take from the world that nature which he receiued of vs. Contra Eutichens . Concilium Constant . thus ; Christ commanded the whole substance of bread , chosen for His Image to bee set on the table , lest if it resembled the shape of a man , Idolatry might bee committed . Extat in Concil . Nicen. 2. Procopius Gazeus thus ; There is now giuen an Image , a Type , a Figure of His body , receiuing no more the bloudy Sacrifices of the Law. Super Gen. 49. Beda thus ; Hee substituting the Sacrament of His Flesh in the figure of bread and wine . In Luk. 22. And elsewhere out of Austine thus ; That which you see , ●is bread and wine , which your very eyes can tell you . In 1 Cor. 10. Druthmarus thus ; Wine maketh glad , and increaseth blood ; and therfore the blood of Christ is aptly figured thereby . In Mat. Rhabanus Maurus thus ; The Sacrament is turned into the bodies nourishment . Lib. 1. Chap. 13. Paschasius thus ; What finde they which taste these things , beside bread and wine , otherwise than by faith and hearing ? De corp . & sang . Dom. Bertramus thus ; The signes , as touching the substance of the creatures , are the same after consecration that they were before . De corp . & sang . Dom. Bernard thus ; What is it to eat His flesh , and drinke His blood , but to communicate with His passions , and to imitate His conuersation . In Psalm . [ qui habitat &c. ] Bonauenture thus ; The Sacraments are said to containe Gods Grace , not as a vessell does water , but because they signif● Gods Grace . In 4. Sentent . Dis● 1.9.3 . And his Text-man Lumbard thus ; Christ offered Himselfe vpon the Crosse , and his remembrance in the Sacrament . Lib. 4. dist . 12. The glosse vpon the Common-Law ( a principall witnesse in this cause ) thus ; It is His body improperly after a fashion , not in truth but in signification , quoting Austine for it . Super Canon . Hoc est corpus meum . Decr. p. 3. dist . 2.16 . Most true therfore our ground is , that whosoeuer inforceth men vpon paine of death , to grant that there is no other Christ but he which is ordinarily present amongst men in the forme of common bread , he forceth men ●o blaspheme Christ . All the na●ures , properties , and attributes of Christ being blasphemed by ●uch assertion . But the Pope of Rome does force men vpon paine of death ( both spirituall and temporall ) so to grant : Their Tridentine Councell inforcing it vpon paine of spiritual death , in these words ; viz. Whosoeuer shall deny that in the most holy Sacrament of the Eucharist , is truly and really contained the Body and Bloud , together with the Soule and Diuinity of our Lord Iesus Christ , and therefore whole Christ ; but shall say that it is there onely as in a signe , or in a figure , or vertue , let him be accursed . Concil . Trident. Sess 3. And one of their Synode enioyning Berengari● thus to say ; With my mouth and with my heart , I profes● that the bread and the wine afte● consecration , is not onely a Sacrament , but also the true body and blood of Iesus Christ , and sensually in truth is handled and broken with the hands of the Priests , and torne ( atteri ) with the teeth of the faithfull . Decret . p. 3. dist . 2.16 . Ego Berengarius , &c. And as for temporall death which the gaine-sayer of this position did thereupon vndergoe ; what Nation vnder their authority hath not records thereof written in bloud ? Not to cite their secular lawes , which condemne all , heretikes ( amongst which , the resister of this position they count the cheefe ) ad poenam ignis : i.e. To bee burnt to death , and to vndergoe all kinde of penalties beside , in their name , friends , fautors , posterity , goods and fortunes that can bee imagined . Summa Angelica . Litera here●icus . Or if our English Admirers of Rome will beleeue nothing concerning the Discipline of that Church , but so farre forth as they can be assured thereof within the bounds of England ; they may haue recourse to the six Articles established in English Parliament ▪ the first whereof enacteth thus ▪ Whosoeuer shall say , that in the Sacrament of the Altar vnder the forme of bread and wine ( after the consecration thereof ) there is not present , really , the naturall Body and Bloud of our Sauiour Iesus Christ ; conceiued of the Virgine Mary ; or that after the said consecration there remaineth any substance of bread or wine , or any other substance but the substance of Christ , both God and man , &c. then he shall be adiudged an heretike , and suffer death by burning , and shall forfeit to the King , all his lands , tenements , &c. as in case of hye reason . An. 31. Hen. 8.14 . For though this law was enacted when the Popes authority was suppressed , yet did it take the beginning from the Church of Rome : and a little after , in the reigne of Quene Mary , was executed to the full , by vertue of the Romish authority . Our Demonstration therefore is most plaine , and let hea●en and earth bee Iudge of it . Hee that professeth himselfe the Supreme head of the Church of Christ , and yet forceth men ●pon paine of death ( both temporall and eternall ) to blaspheme Christ ; hee is Antichrist . But the Pope of Rome so professeth , and so inforceth . Therefore En & ecce Antichristum . FINIS . Notes, typically marginal, from the original text Notes for div A02398-e190 Circa An. c. p 2. An. c. 10● 133. An. 172. An. 196. An. c. 207. An. 250. An. 308. An. 327. An. 329. An 360. An. 379. An. 384. An. 385. An. 378. An. 394. An. 424. An. 490. An. 550. An. 526. An. 550.