The danger of corrupting the faith by philosophy a sermon preach'd before the Right Honble, the Lord Mayor and Court of Aldermen at Guildhall-Chappel on Sunday, April 25, 1697 / by William Sherlock. Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707. 1697 Approx. 46 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 15 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2005-03 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A59808 Wing S3280 ESTC R28137 10410096 ocm 10410096 45001 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A59808) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 45001) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 1389:26) The danger of corrupting the faith by philosophy a sermon preach'd before the Right Honble, the Lord Mayor and Court of Aldermen at Guildhall-Chappel on Sunday, April 25, 1697 / by William Sherlock. Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707. 24 p. Printed for W. Rogers, London : 1697. Reproduction of original in the Union Theological Seminary Library, New York. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Philosophy and religion -- Sermons. Sermons, English -- 17th century. 2003-11 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2003-12 Aptara Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2004-11 Mona Logarbo Sampled and proofread 2004-11 Mona Logarbo Text and markup reviewed and edited 2005-01 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion The Dean of St. PAVL's SERMON Before the Lord Mayor and Aldermen , On APRIL 25. 1697. Clarke Mayor . Martis quarto die Maij 1697. Annoque R. Rs. Wilhelmi Tertii Angliae , &c. Nono . THIS Court doth desire Mr. Dean of St. Paul's to print his Sermon preached before the Lord Mayor and Aldermen of this City , on Sunday the 25th day of April last . GOODFELLOW . The Danger of corrupting the Faith by Philosophy . A SERMON Preach'd before the Right Hon ble the Lord-Mayor , AND Court of Aldermen , At GUILDHALL-CHAPPEL , On SUNDAY , APRIL 25. 1697. By WILLIAM SHERLOCK , D. D. Dean of St. Paul's , Master of the Temple , and Chaplain in Ordinary to His Majesty . LONDON : Printed for W. Rogers , at the Sun against St. Dunstan's Church in Fleetstreet . MDCXCVII . COLOS. II. 8. Beware lest any man spoil you through Philosophy and vain deceit , after the traditions of men , after the rudiments of the world , and not after Christ. HAD St. Paul lived in our Age , it would have required little less than the Courage and Bravery of the Spirit of Martyrdom to have said this : And nothing but the Authority of so great an Apostle ( which though some men do not much value , yet they dare not openly despise ) can skreen those , who venture to say it after him . What some men call Philosophy and Reason ( and there is nothing so foolish and absurd which some men will not call so ) , is the only thing which those men adore , who would either have no God , or a God and a Religion of their own making . And what Attempts some have made to undermine all Religion , and others to corrupt and transform the whole Frame of the Christian Religion , upon a pretence of its contradicting Natural Reason and Philosophy , is too well known to need a Proof . That thus it was in his days , and that thus it was likely to be in future Ages , St. Paul was very sensible , when he gave this Caution to his Colossians ; and I 'm sure it is as proper a Caution for us , as ever it was for any Age since the writing of this Epistle ; for this vain Pretence to Reason and Philosophy never more prevailed , and never did more mischief to the world . It is an endless and fruitless Task to go about to confute all the absurd Hypotheses and wild inconsistent Reasonings wherewith men abuse themselves and others : The Experience of so many Ages wherein Philosophy was in all its Glory , and the several Sects disputed and wrangled eternally , without ending any one Controversy , gives no great Encouragement , to hope for much this way ; at least it can never be expected that ordinary Christians should be better instructed and confirmed in the Faith by Philosophical Disputes . The Christian Religion has from the very beginning been corrupted by a mixture of Philosophy : Thus it was in the Apostles days , and thus it has been more or less in all Ages of the Church to this day ; and the direction the Apostle gives for the security of the Christian Faith , is , Not to dispute such matters , but to distinguish between Philosophical Disputes , and Matters of Revelation ; and to reject all the Pretences of Philosophy , when it does or seems to contradict the Faith of Christ , or would make any corrupt Additions to it . Beware lest any man spoil you through Philosophy and vain deceit ; 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , is to make a Prey , or to carry away as a Prey ; that is , to seduce them from the Christian Faith , or from the Purity and Simplicity of it : Through Philosophy and vain deceit , that is , through the vain deceit of Philosophy , which cheats men with a flattering but empty appearance ; may unsettle weak Minds , but cannot lay a sure and solid foundation of Faith ; may cheat men out of their Faith , but when that is done , can give them nothing certain in the room of it : For it is but after the traditions of men , and after the rudiments of this world : Some of these Doctrines may possibly plead Prescription , as having been so long received that no man knows their Original ; or if they have the Authority of some Great Name , yet it is but a Human Authority , and they are but the traditions of men ; and of men who at best had no better information than from the visible appearances of Nature , and their own imperfect Observations , and corrupt or defective Reasonings , after the rudiments of this world : And is this an Authority to oppose against the Faith of Christ , which both wants that Divine Confirmation which he gave to his Doctrines , and contradicts them ? For they are not after Christ , neither taught by Christ , nor consonant to what he taught . These Words might afford great Variety of Discourse ; but I shall confine my self to what is most Useful , and reduce that into as narrow a compass as I can , by shewing , I. What great need there is of this Caution , To beware lest any man spoil us through Philosophy and vain deceit . II. What great reason we have to reject all these vain Pretences to Philosophy , when they are opposed to the Authority of a Divine Revelation . I. As for the first of these , Whoever considers what an Enemy these vain Pretences to Philosophy have always been to Religion , will see need enough for this Caution . True Reason , and the true Knowledge of Nature , which is true Philosophy , would certainly direct us to the Acknowledgment and Worship of that Supreme Being who made the World : And yet we know , that there never was an Atheist without some Pretence to Philosophy , and generally such loud noisy Pretences too , as make ignorant people think them very notable Philosophers , and that tempts some vain empty persons to affect Atheism , that they may be thought Philosophers . That this is vain deceit , all men must own , who believe there is a God : And if it be possible to pretend Philosophy for Atheism it self , it is no great wonder if it be made to patronize Infidelity and Heresy : But this plainly shews of what dangerous Consequence it is to admit Philosophical Disputes into Religion , which if at any time they may do any service to Religion , much oftner greatly corrupt it , and shake the very Foundations of it ; of which more anon . At present I shall only shew you how the Matter of Fact stands ; That most of the Disputes in Religion are nothing else but the Disputes of Philosophy , and therefore according to the Apostolical Command , to be wholly flung out of Religion , and not suffered to affect our Faith one way or other . To be a Philosopher and a Christian , to Dispute and to Believe , are two very different things ; and yet it is very evident , that most of the Arguments against Revelation in general , and most of the Disputes about the particular Doctrines of Christianity , are no better than this vain deceit of Philosophy ; that were the matters of Faith , and the Disputes of Philosophy truly distinguished , this alone would be sufficient to settle the Faith of Christians , and restore Peace and Unity , at least in the great Fundamentals of Religion , to the Christian World. 1. As to begin with Revelation in general . The Books of Moses are the most Ancient , and that considered , the best attested History in the World ; the whole Nation of the Jews , whose History he writes , pay the greatest veneration to him ; and if we believe the Matters of Fact which he relates , he was certainly an Inspired Man , who could neither deceive , nor be deceived . And it is impossible to have greater Evidence for the Truth and Authenticalness of any Writings , at such a distance of time , than we have for the Writings of the New Testament ; and indeed the Infidels of our Age have very little to say purely against the Credibility of the History ; and then one would think , that all their other Objections should come too late , unless they will justify Pharaoh in disbelieving Moses , and the Scribes and Pharisees in disbelieving our Saviour , after all the Miracles they did : For if they will disbelieve Moses and Christ , though they have nothing material to object against the Truth of these Histories ; nothing , which they would allow to be good Objections against any other History ; they must by the same reason have disbelieved them , though they had seen them do all those great Works which are reported of them in such Credible Histories . But whatever the Authority of these Books are , they think they may securely reject them , if they contain any thing which contradicts their Reason and Philosophy , and they find a great many such things to quarrel with : They think Moses's History of the Creation very unphilosophical ; That the Story of Eve and the Serpent is an incredible Fiction ; That the Universal Deluge is absolutely impossible , and irreconcileable with the Principles of Philosophy ; and it does not become Philosophers to have recourse to Miracles : That what we call Miracles are not the effects of a Divine Power , but may be resolved into Natural Causes ; That Inspiration and Prophesy is nothing but Natural Enthusiasm , and all the Pretences to Revelation a Cheat and Imposture ; That Nature teaches us all that we need to know ; That there is no other certain knowledge but this ; That we are not bound to believe any thing which our own Reason cannot grasp and comprehend , and therefore Revelation is perfectly useless ; and God himself cannot oblige us to believe any thing which does not agree with the Reason of our own Minds , and the Philosophy of Nature . Those who understand the Mystery of Modern Infidelity , know that these , and such like , are the wise Reasons for which they reject and ridicule all Revealed Religion , and endeavour to rob and spoil men of one of the greatest Blessings in the World , A Divine Revelation . So that Infidelity is resolved into these vain Pretences to Philosophy , that Men will understand how to make , destroy , and govern the World better than God. 2. As these men oppose Reason and Philosophy to Revelation , so others either deny the fundamental Articles of Christianity for the sake of some Philosophical Difficulties , or corrupt the Doctrines of Christianity by a mixture of Philosophy . The Gospel of our Saviour is the plainest Revelation of the Will of God that ever was made to the World ; all its Doctrines are easily understood , without Art and Subtilty ; and yet there is not a more nice , intricate , perplext thing in the World , than what some men have made the Christian Faith : All the Subtil Disputes of Philosophy are brought into the Church ; and Plato and Aristotle are become as great Apostles , as St. Peter , or St. Paul : As to give some few Instances of it ; for time will not permit me to discourse it at large . What are the Arian , Socinian , Pelagian Controversies , but meer Philosophical Disputes , with which these Hereticks corrupted the Catholick Faith ? There is nothing more plain and express in Scripture than the Faith of Father , Son , and Holy Ghost , or the Doctrine of the Trinity in Vnity ; and that great Art and Subtilty which has been used , and to so little purpose , to pervert those Texts of Scripture , wherein this Doctrine is contained , is an evident proof , That this is the plain , natural obvious sense of those Texts , since it requires so much Art and Criticism to put any other sense on them ; and that will not do neither , till men are resolved rather to make any thing of Scripture , than to find a real Trinity there . If then this Faith be so plainly contained in Scripture , what makes all this dispute about it ? What makes those , who profess to believe the Scripture , so obstinate against this Faith ? Truly that which makes some men Infidels , makes others Hereticks , that is , a vain pretence to Philosophy . The first Philosophical Dispute is about the Divine Unity : We all own with the Scripture , that there is but One God ; but we say further , as the Scripture teaches us , That there are Three , Father , Son , and Holy Ghost , each of which is true and perfect God. This they say is a Contradiction ; and if it be so , there is an end of this Faith , for both parts of a Contradiction can't be true : But to be Three and One upon different accounts , and in different senses , is no Contradiction ; for thus Three may be One , and One Three ; and this is all the Scripture teaches , or that we profess to believe , whatever the Mystery of this Distinction and Unity be : But this will not satisfy these Philosophical Wits , unless they can comprehend how Father , Son , and Holy Ghost , are really and distinctly Three , and essentially One , the manner of which the Scripture gives no account of , and therefore this is no Dispute in Faith , but only in Philosophy . Another Objection concerns the Divine Generation , how God can beget a Son of his own Substance ; which the Arians thought inferred a division of the Divine Substance . And a Third Objection concerns an Eternal Generation ; how it is possible that the Father should beget an Eternal Son ; that the Son should be begotten without any beginning of Being ; and that the Father should not be at least some few moments before the Son , and consequently the Son not Eternal . Now we all grant that we can give no Philosophical account of this , no more than we can of the simple Divine Essence , or of Eternity it self ; but we may believe that God has an Eternal Son , as we do that there is an Eternal God , without knowing how any thing is Eternal : These are Disputes in Philosophy , and such as none but vain men will dispute about , as being acknowledged above our Comprehension , and therefore no reasonable Objection against our Faith. This as for the Doctrine of the Incarnation , nothing can be plainer in Scripture , than that the Son of God was made man ; That the Word was made flesh , and dwelt among us ; That God was manifest in the flesh : And all the disputes about this Article are purely Philosophical : Some men reject it , because they cannot understand how God and Man can be united in one Person : Others confound the Divine and Human Nature , as Eutyches did ; or divide the Persons , as Nestorius did ; both which indeed destroy the Article of the Incarnation ; for the Word is not made Flesh , unless the same Person , who is God , is Man too , and continues perfect God and perfect Man after this Union : But all these disputes concern the Philosophy of the Union of the Divine and Human Nature in Christ ; and if we would separate between Faith and Philosophy , such disputes might soon be ended . Thus most of the difficulties in the Pelagian and Quinquarticular Controversy , are ultimately resolved into mere Philosophical disputes about Fate and Prescience , Liberty and Necessity , and God's concourse with Creatures , or the Powers of Nature and Grace : And would time permit , it were easy to shew this in most of the Controversies of Religion , That it is not what God has revealed , and what he requires us to believe , but such Nice Philosophical Questions as men raise about these matters , which occasion all these disputes . It has often been proposed as a means of Union to silence all disputes , To confine our selves to Scripture-Words and Expressions , without determining the signification of them : But this would make only an Agreement in Words , not a Consent in Opinions ; nor could it secure the Peace of the Church , while all men knew , that under the same form of Words , they had very different and contrary Meanings , which would still make them as much Hereticks to each other , as if their Words did as expresly contradict each other , as their Faith. But would men reduce all their disputes to Scripture , and make that the only Rule of their Faith , without intermixing any Philosophical disputes with it , this would be an infallible means of Union ; for it is only this vain pretence to Philosophy , which raises all these disputes , and then tempts men to pervert the Scriptures to justify their Philosophy . In all these cases we are concerned to enquire what the true sense of the Article is ; for this the Scripture teaches , and so far our Faith is concerned ; and these are not only justifiable , but necessary disputes , if the true Faith be necessary : And such were the disputes of the Catholick Fathers with the Sabellian , Arian , and Photinian Hereticks ; Whether Father , Son , and Holy Ghost , were only Three Names , or Three Appearances and Manifestations of the same One single Person , or any other Three , but Three True , Proper , Coeternal , and Coequal Persons : Or whether He , who is in Scripture called the Son of God , be a Creature , though the most Excellent Creature ; or a Son , and God by Nature , truly begotten of his Father's Substance : Or whether Christ be God Incarnate , or a meer Man : And their ancient Creeds pretended to no more , than to teach what the Catholick Faith was , not to expound the Philosophy of the Trinity and Incarnation . And thus far we must explain the Faith , as to know , and to let others know , what it is we believe ; and if to assert the ancient Catholick Faith against old and new Heresies , should be called New Explications , we cannot help it ; for we must explain what the Scripture teaches about these Articles , and how the Catholick Church always understood them : But that which we are to beware of , is , Not to mix Philosophy with our Faith , nor to admit of any mere Philosophical Objections against the Faith , nor to attempt any Explications of these Mysteries , beyond what the Scriptures , and the Faith and Practice of the Catholick Church will justify . Indeed the Importunity of Hereticks did very often engage the Catholick Fathers in Philosophical disputes ; but this they did , not to explain the Christian Mysteries by Philosophy , but only to shew , that as incomprehensible as these Mysteries are , the Philosophy of Hereticks , and their Objections against these Articles , were very absurd : And such disputes as these may sometimes be absolutely necessary , and of great use to shame these vain Pretences to Philosophy , while we do not put the Trial of our Faith upon this Issue . Secondly , Let us now consider what great reason we have to reject all the vain Pretences to Reason and Philosophy , when opposed to a Divine Revelation . For that is all the Apostle intends in this Caution ; not to discourage the use of Reason , or the study of Philosophy , which are great Improvements , and a delightful Entertainment of Human Minds , and with a wise and prudent Conduct may be very serviceable to Religion too ; but we must not set up any Conclusions in Philosophy against the Christian Faith , nor corrupt the Faith with a mixture of Philosophy , nor reject any revealed Truths , for want of Natural Ideas to conceive them by . To shorten this Discourse as much as I can ; I shall at present only shew you what reason we have to believe those Doctrines which are thought the most mysterious and inconceivable , notwithstanding any Objections from Natural Reason and Philosophy against them . And the account of this must be resolved into the Nature , Use , and Authority of Revelation ; that Revelation , as to such matters as are knowable only by Revelation , must serve instead of Sense , Natural Ideas , and Natural Reason ; that is , That we must believe things which we do not see , things which we have no Natural Notion or Conception of , things which are not evident to Natural Reason ; for without this , there is little use of Faith , no Authority of pure Revelation . It is true , the general Corruption of Mankind made it very necessary for God to revive the Laws of Nature , and to reinforce the observation of them by his own Authority and Command ; but the proper work of Revelation is to discover such things to us as Nature cannot teach , of which we have no Natural Notion , nor any Natural Evidence ; At least , thus it may be , if God knows more than Natural Reason teaches , or can comprehend ; and thinks it fit to reveal such Supernatural Truths to us , when he sees it useful for Mankind . Now if God ever does reveal such things to us , if we believe upon God's Authority ( which is the strict Notion of a Divine Faith ) , we must believe without any Natural Evidence , merely because God has revealed it ; and then we must believe such things as are not evident to Sense and Reason ; and then it can be no Objection against Revelation , nor against the belief of any such supernatural Truths , that we have no Natural Notion , nor Natural evidence of them , that they are what we cannot conceive and comprehend . To believe no farther than natural Reason can conceive and comprehend , is to reject the Divine Authority of Revelation , and to destroy the distinction between Reason and Faith. He who will believe no farther than natural Reason approves ; believes his Reason , not the Revelation ; and is in truth a Natural Philosopher , not a Believer : He believes the Scriptures , as he would believe Plato and Tully ; not as inspired Writings , but as agreeable to Reason and the result of wise and deep Thoughts ; and this puts an end to all the disputes about Faith and Revelation at once : For what use is there of Faith ? What matter whether the Scriptures be divinely Inspired or not , when we are no farther concerned with them than with other Human Writings , to believe what they teach agreeable to our own Reason ? Let these Men then either reject Faith and Scripture , or confess , That Revelation , as to all Supernatural Truths , must serve us instead of Sense and Reason . I would gladly know of them , Whether they would not believe such supernatural Truths , as are not evident to Reason , were they sure that God had Revealed them ? I guess they will not be so hardy as to say , That they would not believe God himself , should he Reveal such things as their Reason cannot comprehend ; and if they would believe God in such matters , Why will they not believe a Revelation , which they themselves acknowledge to be Divine , in such matters ? For is there any difference between believing God , and believing a Divine Revelation ? If God does know , and can reveal such Mysteries , and is to be believed when he does reveal them , and such Doctrines are contained in an undoubted Revelation ; then the unconceivableness of them can be no argument against the Truth of the Revelation , or that sense of the words , which contains such Mysteries . Let us then consider the natural consequence of this , which is of great moment in this dispute , viz. That we must allow of no Objections against Revealed Mysteries , which we will not allow to be good Objections against Sense and Reason ; which is a necessary and unavoidable consequence if Revelation , with respect to supernatural Truths , stand in the place of Sense and Reason . Now no man questions the truth of what he sees and feels , or what he can prove to be true by plain and undeniable Reason , merely because there are unconceivable difficulties in it ; as there are in every thing , even the most certain and familiar things in Nature : And if Revealed Truths are not more unconceivable than many natural objects of Sense and Reason , Why should their being unconceivable be a greater Objection against believing a Revelation , than it is against believing our Sense and Reason in matters equally unconceivable ? When God has Revealed to us , That he has an Eternal and Only Begotten Son , though we cannot comprehend the Mystery of the Eternal Generation , Why should we not as firmly believe it , as we do , that Man Begets a Son in his own likeness , the Philosophy of which we as little understand ? Nor can we any more conceive the Union of the Soul and Body , than we do the Incarnation of the Son of God , or the Union of the Divine and Human Nature in one Person ? And if we own the Authority of Revelation , Why should we not as well believe what Revelation teaches , how unconceivable soever it be , as we do what Sense and Reason teaches , though it be alike unconceivable ? All men are sensible , that it is very absurd and foolish to deny the Being of any thing which they have certain evidence of , because they cannot comprehend the Nature and Reasons of it : The Man who rose up and walked before the Philosopher , who was disputing subtilly against the possibility of Motion , put a scorn upon all his Arguments , by shewing him that he could Move : And therefore we see , that all men believe their Senses and Reason against all the difficulties in Nature , and will never be persuaded , by the subtillest Disputant , That that is not , which they certainly see and know to be . Now for the same reason , if men will allow the Authority of Revelation , they must believe what is Revealed , how unconceivable and incomprehensible soever its nature be ; for when we know that a thing is , ( and this may be known by Revelation as well as by Sense , as those men must confess , who acknowledge a Divine Revelation ) no difficulties in conceiving it , must persuade us to deny that it is . This is very plain in it self , though few men consider it , That to disbelieve what is Revealed , for the sake of any difficulties in understanding or conceiving it , is to reject the certainty of Revelation ; For what other account can be given of that difference men make between the Evidence of Sense and Reason , and of Revelation , but that they allow Sense and Reason to be good and certain proofs of the being of such things as are evident to Sense and Reason , how mysterious soever their Natures are ; but that mere Revelation is no certain proof of the being of any thing which is not evident also to Sense and Reason , how plainly soever it be Revealed ; that is , that Revelation alone can prove nothing ; for if Revelation it self could prove the certainty of what is Revealed , the difficulties in Nature and Philosophy could no more disprove a Revelation , than confute our Senses . Now let any man judge , whether this be not unequal usage , to expect more from Revelation , than they do from Sense and Reason , and not to believe Revelation upon the same terms that they believe their Senses . Should men resolve to believe nothing which they see , till they could give a Philosophical account of the Reasons , and Causes , and Natures , of all they see , as they refuse to believe a Revelation any farther than they can conceive and comprehend the thing Revealed , they must of necessity be as great Scepticks , as they are Infidels . For as for contradictions , it is an easy matter to make or find seeming contradictions in what we do not understand ; for when we know not the Philosophical Natures of things , nor how they act , and yet will be reasoning and guessing at them , all our false guesses may be full of contradictions and impossibilities , because we know not the true Mystery of Nature . It is this vain humour of Criticizing upon Nature which makes so many Atheists . They go upon the same Principle with Infidels and Hereticks , To believe nothing which natural Reason cannot conceive and comprehend ; now they cannot comprehend the Notion and Idea of a God , which they say , is made up of Contradictions and impossibilities , and therefore they reject the Being of a God : They cannot conceive a Creating Power , which can give Being to that which had no Being before , which they think a plain Contradiction to make Something of Nothing ; and therefore they reject the Creation of the World , and either assert the Eternity of the World , or at least the Eternity of Matter : They can conceive no Substance but Matter and Body , and therefore reject the Notion of a Spirit , as Nonsense and Contradiction : They will allow nothing to be wisely made , which they understand not the reason and uses of , and therefore they fancy a great many botches and blunders in Nature , which cannot be the designs and contrivance of Wisdom , but the effects of Chance ; and then the consequence is plain , That the World was made by Chance , not by a Wise Author . Now , I confess , if this way of Reasoning be allowed , it will be impossible to defend either Sense , or Reason , or Revelation , against the Cavils of Atheists and Infidels ; for there are unconceivable and incomprehensible Secrets and Mysteries in them all ; and if to conceive and comprehend the Natures of things must be made the measure and standard of true and false , we must deny our Senses and Reason , as well as our Faith ; and if we do and must believe our Sense and Reason beyond our Comprehension , Why must we believe nothing that is Revealed , any farther than we can conceive and comprehend the Nature and Reasons of it ? The Sum is this : Humane Knowledge , whatever the means of knowing be , whether Sense , or Reason , or Revelation , does not reach to the Philosophical Causes and Natures of things , but only to their Being , and Natural Vertues and Powers ; and as a Wise man , who knows the measure of his Understanding , expects no more from Sense and Reason , than to know what things there are in the World , and what they are , as far as they fall under the notice of Sense and Natural Reason ; so we must expect no more from Revelation , than the knowledge of such things as Sense and Natural Reason cannot discover . But we must no more expect the Philosophy of Supernatural Truths from Revelation , than we do the Mysteries of Nature from Sense and Reason . Now since Human Knowledge is not a knowledge of the Mysterious Natures of things , but only to know what things there are , and what they are ; there can be no cantradiction between Sense , and Reason , and Revelation ; unless one denies what the other affirms , not that one teaches more than the other teaches , or that one cannot comprehend what the other teaches . Reason teaches more than Sense teaches , or can comprehend ; and Revelation teaches more than either Sense or Natural Reason teaches , or can comprehend ; but this is no contradiction , but only a subordination between these different kinds and degrees of Knowledge ; but as for Unconceivableness and Incomprehensibility , that is no argument against any thing ; for Sense and Natural Reason can no more comprehend their own Objects , than they do what is revealed : And it is manifest perverseness to make that an objection against Revelation , which we will not allow to be an objection against Sense and Reason . This is sufficient as to the reason of the thing ; but as far as it is possible to remove mens Prejudices also against believing Mysteries , I shall briefly answer two very popular Objections . 1. It is thought very unnatural , that when God has made us reasonable Creatures , and therefore made Natural Reason to us the measure of Truth and Falshood , he should require us to believe without Reason ; as we must do , if he reveals such things to us as we know not , and cannot possibly know the reasons of . If we must believe with our Understanding , how can we believe things which we cannot understand ? This were a reasonable Objection , were it true ; for we cannot believe what we have no knowledge , nor understanding of ; for Faith is Knowledge , though not Natural Knowledge . But do we not understand what it is we believe ? Do we not know what we mean , when we say , We believe in Father , Son , and Holy Ghost ? Nay , do not our Adversaries understand what we mean by it ? How then come they to charge us with believing Contradictions and Impossibilities ? For if they know not what we believe , they cannot know whether we believe Contradictions or not . And if we do understand what it is we believe , then we do not believe without understanding , which is absolutely impossible , if we know what it is we believe . And we know also why we believe : Our Faith is founded in Sense and Reason , and resolved into the Authority of God , which is the highest and most infallible Reason . The Miracles which Christ and his Apostles wrought , were evident to Sense , and owned by Reason to be the effects of a Divine Power ; and the Answer the Blind man gave to the Pharisees , when Christ had opened his Eyes , speaks the true sense of Nature : H●rein is a marvellous thing , that ye know not from whence he is , and yet he hath opened mine eyes . Now we know that God heareth not sinners ; but if any man be a worshipper of God , and doth his will , him he heareth . Since the world began was it not heard that any man opened the eyes of one that was born blind : If this man were not of God , he could do nothing , 9. John 30 , 31 , 32 , 33. And all Mankind own , that the most absolute Faith is due to God , and to those who speak from God ; and this , as I take it , is to believe with Reason . But still we believe such things , whose Natures we do not understand , and cannot account for by Natural Reason , and this is to believe without Reason . We believe , that God the Father hath an Eternal Son , and an Eternal Spirit ; and that Father , Son , and Holy Ghost , are but One Eternal God ; but this is what Natural Reason cannot comprehend , nor give us any notion or conception of , how God can have an Eternal Son , and an Eternal Spirit , really distinct from himself , and yet with himself One Eternal and Infinite God : Reason can give no account of the Eternal Generation of the Son , nor of the Eternal Procession of the Holy Spirit ; and is not this to believe without Reason , which a reasonable Creature ought not to do , and which we ought not to think , that God who made us reasonable Creatures , expects from us ? And this I grant would be a material Objection , were Reason the Judge of the Nature and Philosophy of things ; and did Reason require us to believe nothing but what we understand and comprehend . But then we must no more believe Sense and Reason , than Revelation ; for we do not comprehend the Nature of any one thing in the World , how evident soever it is to Sense and Reason , that there are such things . Nature is as great a Mystery as Revelation ; and it is no greater affront to our Understandings , no more against reason for God to reveal such things to us as our Reason cannot comprehend , than it is to make a whole World , which Reason cannot comprehend . When we make it an Objection against any thing , That it is without Reason , or , as we apprehend , against Reason , and contrary to Reason ; we must first consider whether it be the proper Object of Reason ; otherwise it is no Objection ; as it is no objection against Sounds , that we cannot see them ; nor against Colours , that we cannot hear them ; because Sounds are not the Objects of Sight , nor Colours of Hearing . Now no man pretends , that the pure Natures and Essences of things , or their Essential Reasons , Properties , Unions , Operations , are the Objects of Humane Reason ; for no man living knows any thing about them . And yet this is all the Incomprehensibility men have to complain of in the Doctrine of the Trinity , and the Incarnation ; That they cannot comprehend , how God can beget an Eternal Son ; nor how Three Divine Persons should be so united , as to be essentially One God ; nor how the Divine and Humane Nature can be united into One Person , God-man : All which concern the Essence , and Essential Properties , Operations , Unions , Relations of the Deity , which a modest man might allow to be incomprehensible , if God be infinite , though he could comprehend the Natures , Essences , and Essential Reasons and Properties of Created Beings ; but when all Created Nature is such a Mystery to us , that we know not the pure Nature and Essence of any one thing in the World , is it an affront to our Reason , that we cannot comprehend the Divine Nature ? Such Matters as these are neither without Reason , nor against Reason , nor contrary to Reason ; because Reason has nothing to do with them , and can take no cognizance of them : They belong not to Reason , but to that Infinite Mind , which comprehends it Self , and the Ideas of all possible Beings . A perfect comprehensive Knowledge of Nature belongs only to the Maker of all things ; for it is not only to know what things are , but how to make them ; which would be a vain Curiosity , and useless Knowledge to those , who have not a Making and Creating Power . This is to know things à priori , with an Intuitive Ideal Knowledge , which is infinitely more superior to Reason , than Reason is to Sense : And it is the affection of this Intuitive making Knowledge , which makes some men Atheists , and others Hereticks . 2dly . Another great Objection against such a Revelation as contains matters which Natural Reason cannot comprehend , is , To what purpose such a Revelation serves ? What Merit there can be in believing such Doctrines ? And of what good use such a Faith can be to us ? Now I confess I cannot think it meritorious merely to believe things which are incomprehensible ; or that God any more intended to puzzle our Faith with revealed Mysteries , than to puzzle our Reason in making a Mysterious World. Whether we receive our information from Sense , or Natural Reason , or Revelation , it is certain we must believe Mysteries , if we believe any thing ; for all things have something mysterious and incomprehensible in their natures ; what natural Reason cannot account for , and what God never intended we should understand : for God never intended to teach us how to make the World , nor how every Creature was made ; and therefore we cannot and are not concerned to know the internal frame and constitution of Nature . But though neither Natural nor Revealed Knowledge extends to the Reasons and Causes of Nature , and of essential Properties and Operations ; yet both natural and revealed Knowledge is of as much use to us , as if we did perfectly understand all the secret and incomprehensible Mysteries of the nature of God , or of the natures of Creatures . Both natural and revealed Knowledge are alike upon this account , That they only acquaint us what things are , and what ends they serve ; and then we know what use to make of them , without understanding the secret Mysteries of Nature . Is this World , or any thing in it , the less useful to us , because we cannot conceive how God created all things of nothing ? Or because we do not understand the nature of Matter , nor how the several parts of Matter came by their different Virtues and Qualities ? Is Corn , or Fruit , or Herbs , the less nourishing or refreshing , because we know not how they grow ? Does it require any Philosophy to know how to eat , and drink , and sleep ? Will not our Food nourish us , unless we understand how it is concocted , and turned into Chyle , and Blood , and Spirits ? Nay , is it of no use to know that God is an Eternal , Omnipotent , Omniscient , Omnipresent Being , unless we can conceive how any Being can be Eternal without a Cause , and without a Beginning ? Or can comprehend how he can do and know all things ; and be present in all places at once , without Extension , and without Parts ? We may make all the use that can be made of this world , and of every thing in it , without understanding the essential Reasons and Causes , or internal Nature of any thing ; and we must do so , if we will make any use of it ; and we know God to all the ends and purposes for which Creatures ought to know God , though his Nature be incomprehensible . And thus it is in matters of pure Revelation , such as the Doctrine of the Trinity , and the Incarnation ; how unaccountable soever the Mystery of a Trinity in Unity , the Eternal Generation , and the Incarnation of the Son of God be , yet it is the most useful Knowledge in the world : Though we know not how the Eternal Father begat an Eternal Son of his own Substance , nor how this Eternal Son in time became Man ; yet it is the most desirable knowledge in the world to sinners ; to know , That God has an Eternal Son ; and that he so loved the world , as to give his only begotten Son for the redemption of mankind , that whosoever believes in him , should not perish , but have everlasting life ; and that this Eternal Son of God became Man , lived a poor , necessitous , laborious Life , and died an accursed Death for the Salvation of Sinners ; and to know , That the Holy Spirit , which proceeds from Father and Son , dwells in the Christian Church , and quickens and animates the whole Body of Christ. If this be true ( as we must suppose in this Argument ) , all Mankind must confess , that this is a very useful Knowledge ; and never the less useful , because a Trinity in Unity , and the Eternal Generation , and the Incarnation of the Son of God , are great and inconceivable Mysteries . Could we give a Rational and Philosophical Account of the Eternal Generation , and of the Incarnation , we should know more than we now do ; but Faith makes it as useful to all the purposes of Religion , as the most perfect intuitive Knowledge could do . This is a sufficient Answer to that Objection against the Usefulness of such Mysteries as have something incomprehensible and unconceivable in their Natures : Which is an equal Objection against all created Nature , which is but one great Mystery ; and yet the World is a very useful World , and we know in some good degree what use to make of it : And the Knowledge of those Gospel Mysteries which are the Subject of our present dispute , are manifestly of infinite use to us , if the certain knowledge of the Pardon of Sin , and eternal Life , by the Obedience , and Sufferings , and Death , and Intercession of the Son of God Incarnate , be of any use ; and therefore it became the Wisdom and Goodness of God to reveal these Mysteries of Salvation to us . Especially if we add to this , That the lapsed state of Human Nature makes supernatural Knowledge necessary . Natural Knowledge we grant was sufficient for a state of Nature , though no man would have had reason to complain , had God in a state of Innocence by a more familiar intercourse with Man , or by the frequent Conversation of Angels , improved his Knowledge beyond the mere attainments of his Natural Faculties ; and it is not improbable , but this might have been ; I am sure there is an impatient thirst after knowledge in human Nature , and such a great curiosity for secret and hidden Mysteries , that it looks very unnatural for Men to complain , that God Reveals more to them than Nature teaches . But yet I say , Natural Knowledge must be allowed sufficient to all the ends of Human Life , while man continued Innocent ; for that is the Original state of human Nature , as all men must grant , who believe that Man was made by God. But when man sinned , he forfeited the Favour of God , and a natural Immortality ; and whether he should be restored or not , and by what means he should be restored , depended wholly on the Sovereign Will and Pleasure of God : And therefore the Light of Nature , though it could direct an Innocent Man how to Please and Worship God , and to preserve himself Immortal , it could not teach Sinners how to make atonement for Sin , nor give them any certain hopes that God would forgive Sins , and bestow immortal Life on them ; which makes it necessary , that the Religion of a sinner be a Revealed Religion . And if God in infinite Goodness is not only pleased to restore sinners to Grace and Favour , but to advance them to a supernatural state of Perfection and Happiness both of Soul and Body in the next World ; this must be done by supernatural Means , and therefore requires a supernatural Knowledge ; for the Light of Nature can neither raise us above Nature , nor discover supernatural Truths to us ; and this makes it necessary to know and believe such things , as we have no natural Notion or Idea of , Such things , as neither eye hath seen , nor ear heard , neither hath it entred into the heart of man to conceive . If Nature can't save us , it can't discover to us the way of Salvation neither ; and if we must be saved by a supernatural Grace and Power , it must be supernaturally Revealed ; and what is Supernatural , is the Object of Faith , not of natural Knowledge . This seems to me to give a plain account , Why God thinks fit to Reveal such Mysteries to us as Nature cannot teach , and as we have no natural Notion of , Because our lapsed state has made such supernatural Revelations necessary to the recovery of Mankind ; and when we are fallen below the relief of Nature , and of natural Knowledge , we ought to be very thankful to our Good God for supernatural Knowledge , and supernatural Means of Salvation . To God the Father , God the Son , and God the Holy Ghost , Three Persons , One Eternal God , be Honour , Glory and Power , now and for ever . Amen . FINIS .