Obedience due to the present King, notwithstanding our oaths to the former written by a divine of the Church of England.
         Fullwood, Francis, d. 1693.
      
       
         
           1689
        
      
       Approx. 18 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 6 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images.
       
         Text Creation Partnership,
         Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) :
         2008-09 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1).
         A40717
         Wing F2511
         ESTC R7191
         12417307
         ocm 12417307
         61721
         
           
            This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of
             Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal
            . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
          
        
      
       
         Early English books online.
      
       
         (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A40717)
         Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 61721)
         Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 938:37)
      
       
         
           
             Obedience due to the present King, notwithstanding our oaths to the former written by a divine of the Church of England.
             Fullwood, Francis, d. 1693.
          
           [2], 8 p.
           
             Printed for Awnsham Churchill,
             London :
             1689.
          
           
             Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.
          
        
      
    
     
       
         Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.
         Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors.
      
       
         EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.
         EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).
         The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.
         Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.
         Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.
         Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.
         The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.
         Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).
         
          Keying and markup guidelines are available at the
           Text Creation Partnership web site
          .
        
      
       
         
         
      
    
     
       
         eng
      
       
         
           Obedience -- Early works to 1800.
           Great Britain -- Colonies -- Administration -- Pamphlets.
        
      
    
     
        2007-01 TCP
        Assigned for keying and markup
      
        2007-01 Apex CoVantage
        Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images
      
        2007-02 Mona Logarbo
        Sampled and proofread
      
        2007-02 Mona Logarbo
        Text and markup reviewed and edited
      
        2008-02 pfs
        Batch review (QC) and XML conversion
      
    
  
   
     
       
         
         
           OBEDIENCE
           DUE
           TO
           THE
           Present
           KING
           ,
           Notwithstanding
           our
           OATHS
           TO
           THE
           FORMER
           .
        
         
           Written
           by
           a
           DIVINE
           of
           the
           CHURCH
           of
           ENGLAND
           .
        
         
           LONDON
           ,
           Printed
           for
           
             Awnsham
             Churchill
          
           ,
           1689.
           
        
      
    
     
       
         
         
         
           OBEDIENCE
           Due
           to
           the
           Present
           KING
           ,
           Notwithstanding
           our
           OATHS
           To
           the
           FORMER
           .
        
         
           1.
           
           THE
           Oath
           of
           Allegiance
           is
           the
           Expression
           of
           our
           Natural
           Duty
           to
           the
           King
           (
           as
           the
           Coronation-Oath
           is
           of
           the
           Regal
           ;
           which
           in
           Nature
           is
           antecedent
           to
           
           it
           )
           't
           is
           especially
           signified
           in
           these
           Words
           ,
           
             I
             will
             bear
             Faith
             and
             true
             Allegiance
             to
             his
             Majesty
             ,
             his
             Heirs
             and
             Successors
             ,
             and
             him
             and
             them
             will
             Defend
             against
             all
             Attempts
             ,
             which
             shall
             be
             made
             against
             his
             or
             their
             Persons
             ,
             their
             Crown
             and
             Dignity
             .
          
        
         
           2.
           
           If
           the
           King
           do
           manifestly
           separate
           his
           Person
           from
           ,
           and
           engage
           it
           against
           his
           
             Crown
             and
             Dignity
          
           ;
           so
           that
           we
           cannot
           Defend
           
           them
           both
           :
           I
           mean
           ,
           if
           his
           Personal
           Actions
           ,
           contrary
           to
           Law
           ,
           do
           directly
           and
           openly
           tend
           to
           the
           prejudice
           and
           spoiling
           of
           his
           
             Crown
             and
             Dignity
          
           ,
           by
           his
           voluntary
           subjecting
           them
           to
           a
           Foreign
           Power
           ,
           contrary
           to
           the
           plain
           and
           primary
           intention
           and
           Letter
           of
           the
           Oath
           ;
           subverting
           the
           Legal
           Constitution
           ,
           and
           enervating
           the
           very
           Laws
           by
           which
           his
           Crown
           is
           supported
           ,
           his
           Prerogative
           is
           measured
           ,
           and
           the
           Dignity
           of
           the
           King
           ,
           as
           such
           ,
           hath
           its
           very
           being
           ,
           as
           well
           as
           the
           safety
           of
           his
           People
           is
           maintained
           ;
           certainly
           ,
           in
           such
           a
           Case
           ,
           none
           can
           be
           bound
           by
           this
           ,
           or
           any
           other
           Oath
           ,
           to
           Defend
           the
           King's
           Person
           ,
           in
           attempts
           so
           contrary
           to
           the
           very
           Reason
           and
           End
           of
           all
           Government
           ,
           with
           the
           neglect
           of
           the
           other
           part
           of
           our
           Duty
           ,
           which
           is
           to
           Defend
           his
           
             Crown
             and
             Dignity
          
           .
        
         
           3.
           
           The
           Oath
           of
           Supremacy
           seems
           to
           direct
           us
           more
           clearly
           in
           this
           difficulty
           ;
           the
           words
           are
           ,
           
             I
             shall
             bear
             Faith
             and
             true
             Allegiance
             to
             the
             King's
             Highness
          
           ;
           but
           how
           ?
           it
           follows
           ,
           
             and
             to
             my
             Power
             shall
             Assist
             and
             Defend
             all
             Jurisdictions
             ,
             Priviledges
             ,
             Preheminences
             and
             Authorities
             ,
             Granted
          
           or
           belonging
           to
           the
           King
           ,
           or
           annex'd
           and
           united
           to
           the
           Imperial
           Crown
           of
           this
           Realm
           ;
           that
           is
           ,
           thus
           we
           are
           to
           bear
           Faith
           and
           Allegiance
           to
           the
           King.
           
        
         
           4.
           
           For
           if
           we
           should
           be
           bound
           to
           
             Assist
             and
             Defend
             his
             Person
             ,
             when
          
           it
           is
           ,
           and
           as
           it
           is
           engaged
           against
           his
           Crown
           and
           Dignity
           ,
           we
           seem
           bound
           ,
           
             toto
             posse
             &
             totis
             viribus
          
           (
           so
           far
           Defence
           is
           expounded
           )
           to
           Assist
           and
           Contribute
           to
           the
           Ruine
           both
           of
           our
           King
           and
           Country
           ,
           and
           perhaps
           to
           the
           cutting
           of
           our
           own
           Throats
           .
        
         
           5.
           
           If
           any
           should
           imagine
           ,
           That
           the
           Oath
           will
           not
           suffer
           us
           to
           consider
           the
           Person
           and
           Crown
           of
           the
           King
           thus
           divided
           ;
           but
           that
           it
           binds
           us
           to
           assist
           and
           defend
           them
           together
           :
           't
           is
           true
           ,
           while
           they
           are
           kept
           together
           .
           But
           if
           the
           King
           himself
           divide
           them
           ,
           and
           't
           is
           become
           impossible
           for
           us
           to
           Assist
           his
           Person
           but
           we
           must
           Betray
           his
           Crown
           ;
           nor
           Defend
           his
           Crown
           without
           forbearing
           to
           assist
           his
           Person
           ;
           to
           say
           ,
           now
           we
           are
           bound
           to
           Assist
           and
           Defend
           both
           ,
           makes
           a
           plain
           Repugnancy
           in
           the
           Oath
           ,
           and
           in
           our
           Duty
           (
           to
           do
           and
           
           not
           to
           do
           the
           same
           thing
           )
           and
           consequently
           the
           Obligation
           ceaseth
           .
        
         
           6.
           
           That
           we
           are
           bound
           by
           our
           Allegiance
           to
           Assist
           the
           Person
           of
           the
           King
           ,
           to
           the
           prejudice
           of
           his
           Crown
           and
           People
           ,
           seems
           not
           only
           to
           be
           against
           the
           light
           of
           Nature
           ,
           the
           primary
           End
           of
           it
           being
           the
           safety
           of
           his
           Kingdom
           ,
           and
           the
           safety
           of
           the
           King
           but
           the
           secondary
           end
           of
           it
           ;
           but
           most
           agreeable
           to
           the
           sense
           of
           our
           Ancient
           and
           Learned
           Lawyers
           ,
           and
           also
           ,
           of
           
           the
           plain
           acknowledgment
           and
           profession
           of
           Ancient
           Kings
           and
           Parliaments
           .
        
         
           King
           Henry
           I.
           five
           Hundred
           Years
           agone
           ,
           told
           the
           Pope
           ,
           Whilst
           I
           live
           ,
           the
           
             Authorities
             and
             Usages
             of
             the
             Kingdom
             shall
             never
             be
             diminished
             :
          
           But
           if
           I
           would
           so
           
             Debase
             my self
          
           (
           which
           
             God
             forbid
             )
             Magnates
             mei
             &
             totus
             Angliae
             populus
             nullo
             modo
             paterentur
             :
          
           The
           Lords
           and
           People
           of
           England
           would
           by
           no
           means
           suffer
           it
           .
           And
           Edward
           I.
           wrote
           himself
           to
           the
           same
           purpose
           .
           Besides
           ,
           with
           his
           consent
           ,
           the
           Lords
           and
           Commons
           in
           Parliament
           ,
           in
           their
           Letter
           to
           the
           Pope
           ,
           have
           these
           Words
           ,
           
             We
             do
             not
             permit
             ,
             or
             in
             the
             least
             will
             permit
             (
             sicut
             nec
             possumus
             nec
             debemus
             )
          
           though
           our
           Soveraign
           Lord
           the
           King
           do
           ,
           or
           in
           the
           least
           wise
           attempt
           to
           do
           any
           of
           the
           Premises
           (
           by
           owning
           the
           Popes
           Authority
           touching
           his
           Right
           to
           Scotland
           )
           so
           strange
           a
           thing
           ,
           so
           unlawful
           ,
           prejudicial
           ,
           and
           otherwise
           unheard
           of
           ,
           
             though
             the
             King
             himself
             would
          
           .
           Once
           more
           ,
           on
           Record
           in
           the
           Fourth
           of
           Henry
           III.
           the
           Commons
           Declare
           ,
           
             Si
             Dominus
             Rex
             &
             Regni
             majores
             hoc
             vellent
             (
          
           Adomer's
           Revocation
           upon
           the
           Popes
           Order
           )
           
             Communitas
             tamen
             ipsius
             ingressum
             in
             Angliam
             ,
             nulla
             tenus
             sustineret
             .
          
        
         
           Now
           what
           's
           the
           meaning
           of
           all
           this
           ?
           but
           that
           the
           King
           's
           Personal
           Will
           ,
           contrary
           to
           Law
           ,
           however
           expsressed
           (
           for
           it
           must
           be
           signified
           by
           his
           Words
           or
           Actions
           )
           if
           the
           performance
           of
           it
           would
           prejudice
           his
           Crown
           and
           Dignity
           ,
           may
           be
           resisted
           .
           Much
           less
           are
           we
           bound
           by
           our
           Allegiance
           to
           Assist
           or
           Defend
           him
           in
           so
           doing
           ,
           in
           
             Reason
             ,
             Law
          
           ,
           or
           the
           sense
           of
           our
           Ancient
           Kings
           or
           Parliaments
           .
        
         
           
           
             Objection
             .
             
               But
               we
               Swear
               to
               Defend
               ,
               not
               only
               the
            
             King
             ,
             
               but
               his
            
             Heirs
             and
             Lawful
             Successors
             .
          
           
             Answer
             1.
             
             True
             ,
             but
             
               Haeres
               non
               est
               viventis
            
             ,
             and
             the
             Successor
             ,
             in
             Law
             and
             Common
             Sense
             ,
             is
             the
             Person
             that
             doth
             actually
             succeed
             ,
             or
             is
             in
             possession
             .
             Now
             if
             the
             actual
             Successor
             be
             the
             Lawful
             Successor
             ,
             we
             are
             bound
             by
             our
             Oaths
             to
             Defend
             him
             ;
             but
             if
             he
             be
             not
             the
             Lawful
             Successor
             ,
             none
             else
             is
             so
             ,
             because
             none
             else
             is
             the
             Successor
             ,
             and
             consequently
             ,
             so
             far
             the
             Object
             and
             Reason
             of
             our
             Oaths
             ceasing
             ,
             our
             Obligation
             by
             them
             ceaseth
             ,
             and
             we
             are
             bound
             to
             none
             besides
             the
             Person
             in
             Possession
             .
          
           
             2.
             
             'T
             is
             farther
             remarkable
             ,
             That
             though
             the
             word
             Lawful
             be
             once
             in
             the
             Oath
             of
             Supremacy
             ,
             't
             is
             only
             there
             ,
             where
             we
             Swear
             Faith
             and
             Allegiance
             in
             General
             ;
             but
             ,
             as
             if
             it
             were
             intended
             ,
             that
             the
             Subject
             should
             not
             trouble
             himself
             about
             the
             Title
             of
             the
             King
             in
             being
             ,
             where
             that
             Allegiance
             is
             explain'd
             with
             respect
             to
             Practice
             ,
             the
             word
             Lawful
             is
             left
             out
             in
             that
             Oath
             .
             It
             follows
             there
             in
             these
             Words
             ,
             —
             
               Shall
               Assist
               and
               Defend
               all
               Jurisdictions
               ,
            
             —
             Granted
             or
             belonging
             to
             the
             Kings
             Highness
             ,
             his
             Heirs
             and
             Successors
             ,
             without
             the
             word
             Lawful
             .
             And
             agreeable
             hereunto
             ,
             we
             find
             the
             word
             wholly
             left
             out
             in
             the
             Oath
             of
             Allegiance
             ,
             both
             in
             the
             same
             place
             ,
             where
             we
             Swear
             Allegiance
             in
             General
             ,
             as
             well
             as
             in
             the
             other
             place
             of
             our
             more
             particular
             Duty
             ;
             and
             it
             looks
             as
             if
             this
             was
             done
             
               de
               Industria
            
             ,
             for
             the
             same
             reason
             ,
             namely
             ,
             that
             such
             as
             take
             the
             Oaths
             might
             not
             think
             themselves
             bound
             thereby
             to
             be
             Sollicitous
             about
             the
             Title
             to
             the
             Crown
             .
          
           
             3.
             
             The
             Holy
             Scriptures
             seem
             not
             to
             involve
             the
             Consciences
             of
             private
             Christians
             about
             
               Princes
               Titles
            
             ;
             but
             expresly
             require
             their
             Subjection
             to
             the
             
               Powers
               that
               are
            
             ,
             as
             a
             great
             and
             necessary
             instance
             of
             that
             Humility
             and
             peaceable
             Behaviour
             which
             their
             Religion
             teacheth
             them
             .
          
           
             4.
             
             In
             the
             same
             Holy
             Books
             ,
             we
             are
             further
             most
             plainly
             admonish'd
             ,
             that
             (
             by
             what
             means
             soever
             obtained
             )
             't
             is
             God
             
             
               that
               putteth
               down
               one
               ,
               and
               setteth
               up
               another
            
             ;
             and
             upon
             that
             
             ground
             too
             ,
             we
             are
             strictly
             charg'd
             to
             Submit
             to
             the
             
               Powers
               that
               are
            
             ,
             because
             they
             are
             
               Ordain'd
               of
               God.
            
             And
             tho'
             the
             Apostle
             use
             the
             word
             
               〈◊〉
               〈◊〉
               〈◊〉
               〈◊〉
               〈◊〉
            
             ,
             I
             think
             ,
             none
             can
             imagine
             he
             intended
             by
             it
             ,
             to
             determine
             the
             lawfulness
             of
             
             Augustus's
             Title
             ,
             who
             was
             admitted
             by
             the
             Senate
             ;
             but
             rather
             ,
             to
             inforce
             that
             Obedience
             that
             he
             presseth
             the
             Christians
             to
             yield
             ,
             by
             this
             Consideration
             ,
             
             That
             
               all
               Authority
            
             is
             from
             God
             ;
             and
             in
             its
             true
             Nature
             and
             by
             God's
             Ordinance
             ,
             intended
             for
             our
             Good.
             
          
           
             5.
             
             The
             known
             Statute
             of
             11
             H.
             7.
             1.
             is
             of
             the
             same
             import
             ,
             and
             grounded
             ,
             we
             find
             ,
             upon
             the
             like
             Reason
             and
             H.
             Scripture
             ,
             it
             gives
             us
             way
             to
             this
             plain
             inference
             ,
             that
             the
             
               same
               duty
            
             which
             we
             owe
             to
             a
             lawful
             King
             ,
             is
             to
             be
             performed
             to
             the
             
               King
               in
               being
            
             ;
             that
             is
             ,
             to
             the
             King
             in
             Possession
             ;
             and
             that
             no
             other
             King
             or
             future
             Parliament
             can
             in
             
               Reason
               ,
               Law
            
             ,
             or
             
               good
               Conscience
            
             ,
             upon
             any
             pretence
             of
             Usurpation
             in
             the
             Possessor
             of
             the
             Crown
             ,
             or
             any
             Disloyalty
             in
             the
             Subject
             ,
             charge
             us
             with
             guilt
             ,
             for
             Serving
             or
             defending
             the
             King
             in
             Possession
             .
             The
             Subjects
             therefore
             ,
             might
             lawfully
             fight
             for
             him
             ,
             and
             consequently
             take
             the
             Military
             Oath
             ;
             in
             Reason
             (
             by
             the
             Law
             of
             Nature
             )
             in
             Law
             ,
             by
             the
             Law
             of
             the
             Land
             ;
             in
             all
             
               good
               Conscience
            
             ,
             that
             is
             ,
             by
             the
             Law
             of
             God
             ,
             in
             the
             H.
             Scriptures
             .
          
           
             6.
             
             Hereupon
             ,
             my
             Lord
             
             Coke's
             words
             are
             notable
             :
             This
             Act
             ,
             saith
             he
             (
             meaning
             25
             
               Ed.
               3.
               about
               Treason
            
             )
             is
             to
             be
             understood
             of
             a
             
               King
               in
               Possession
            
             of
             the
             Crown
             and
             Kingdom
             :
             for
             if
             there
             be
             a
             
               King
               Regnant
            
             in
             Possession
             ,
             altho'
             he
             be
             
               Rex
               de
               facto
            
             and
             
               non
               de
               jure
            
             ,
             yet
             is
             he
             
               Seignior
               le
               Roy
            
             ,
             within
             the
             purview
             of
             this
             Statute
             ;
             and
             the
             other
             ,
             that
             hath
             Right
             and
             is
             ▪
             out
             of
             Possession
             ,
             is
             not
             
               within
               this
               Act.
            
             
          
           
             Nay
             ,
             saith
             he
             ,
             if
             Treason
             be
             committed
             against
             a
             King
             
               de
               facto
            
             ,
             and
             
               non
               de
               jure
            
             ,
             and
             after
             the
             King
             
               de
               jure
            
             come
             to
             the
             Crown
             ,
             he
             shall
             punish
             the
             Treason
             done
             to
             the
             King
             
               de
               facto
            
             ;
             and
             a
             pardon
             granted
             by
             a
             King
             
               de
               jure
            
             ,
             that
             is
             not
             also
             
               de
               facto
            
             ,
             is
             void
             ,
             
               Inst
               .
               3.
               l.
               p.
            
             7.
             
          
           
             Now
             if
             by
             the
             Law
             of
             the
             Land
             ,
             which
             I
             think
             is
             our
             only
             guide
             in
             such
             Cases
             ,
             Treason
             may
             be
             committed
             against
             a
             King
             
             that
             is
             so
             only
             by
             Possession
             ,
             without
             Right
             ;
             and
             cannot
             be
             committed
             against
             him
             that
             hath
             Right
             ,
             and
             not
             Possession
             :
             seeing
             he
             is
             not
             within
             the
             purview
             of
             the
             Statute
             ,
             sure
             ,
             we
             cannot
             reasonably
             be
             thought
             to
             be
             intangled
             in
             such
             a
             strait
             ,
             as
             to
             be
             bound
             by
             our
             Allegiance
             to
             commit
             Treason
             ,
             which
             we
             cannot
             presume
             the
             King
             in
             
               Possession
               will
               Pardon
            
             ,
             and
             the
             Law
             tells
             us
             ,
             the
             King
             that
             hath
             Right
             only
             ,
             cannot
             .
             Who
             therefore
             would
             question
             our
             liberty
             to
             be
             
               true
               and
               faithful
            
             to
             the
             King
             in
             Possession
             ,
             so
             far
             at
             least
             ,
             as
             not
             to
             resist
             him
             ,
             or
             to
             be
             Traitors
             to
             him
             ?
             or
             to
             give
             him
             assurance
             thereof
             by
             our
             Oath
             .
             The
             renown'd
             Casuist
             Bishop
             Sanderson
             would
             not
             declare
             the
             very
             Engagement
             to
             be
             unlawful
             ,
             taken
             in
             that
             lower
             Sense
             ,
             
             to
             the
             pretended
             Commonwealth
             without
             any
             King
             or
             
               House
               of
               Lords
            
             .
          
           
             7.
             
             Since
             we
             have
             mention'd
             that
             excellent
             Casuist
             ,
             whose
             
               Loyalty
               ,
               Judgment
               ,
               Fidelity
            
             ,
             and
             Authority
             ,
             is
             unquestionable
             ,
             't
             is
             sit
             for
             us
             to
             observe
             what
             he
             hath
             frequently
             and
             without
             the
             least
             hesitancy
             delivered
             as
             his
             premeditated
             thoughts
             about
             the
             present
             case
             .
          
           
             Having
             suppos'd
             a
             King
             in
             Possession
             only
             ,
             by
             Power
             ,
             if
             the
             Query
             be
             what
             is
             to
             be
             done
             by
             the
             Subject
             that
             hath
             Sworn
             Allegiance
             to
             the
             
               rightful
               King
            
             :
             he
             answers
             ,
             't
             is
             not
             only
             lawful
             to
             obey
             the
             King
             in
             such
             Possession
             ;
             but
             it
             often
             happens
             that
             not
             doing
             so
             ,
             [
             
               defuisse
               Officio
            
             ]
             we
             are
             wanting
             to
             our
             duty
             .
             Yea
             ▪
             that
             we
             owe
             Subjection
             to
             a
             King
             in
             Possession
             ,
             upon
             the
             grounds
             of
             Justice
             ,
             
               Equity
               ,
               Charity
            
             ,
             and
             Gratitude
             ,
             while
             we
             enjoy
             our
             Liberties
             and
             are
             Protected
             by
             him
             .
          
           
             
               Exigit
               hoc
               a
               nobis
               (
               Optima
               aequi
               boni
               lex
               )
               vetus
               illa
               Commutationum
               formula
               ,
               
                 〈◊〉
                 〈◊〉
                 〈◊〉
                 〈◊〉
                 〈◊〉
              
               .
               &
               profecto
               ,
               perversissimae
               mentis
               ,
               sub
               illius
               dominationis
               patrocinio
               ,
               velle
               vivere
               cui
               parere
               nolis
               :
               &
               cujus
               protectione
               gaudeas
               ,
               ejus
               imperium
               detractare
               .
            
          
           
             8.
             
             His
             Third
             Argument
             for
             the
             Necessity
             of
             Obedience
             to
             the
             
               present
               Power
            
             ,
             however
             obtained
             ,
             is
             taken
             from
             the
             Charity
             we
             owe
             to
             the
             Publick
             ,
             whether
             Church
             or
             State
             ,
             or
             which
             we
             are
             Members
             ,
             and
             for
             the
             good
             of
             which
             we
             are
             born
             ;
             in
             
               quantum
               igitur
               illius
               Societatis
               ,
               cujus
               ipse
               Membrum
               &
               pars
               est
               ,
               Salus
               &
               tranquillitas
               exigit
               ,
               eatenus
               Civis
               unusquisque
               imperiis
               ejus
            
             
             
               qui
               de
               facto
               —
               praeest
               ,
               obtemperare
               tenetur
               .
            
             Words
             worthy
             the
             most
             serious
             reflection
             of
             the
             present
             
               Church
               of
            
             England
             .
             Read
             at
             large
             his
             5th
             Praelect
             .
          
           
             But
             as
             to
             the
             Argument
             from
             Gratitude
             ,
             when
             we
             seriously
             reflect
             upon
             our
             late
             forlorn
             and
             ruinous
             Condition
             both
             in
             Church
             and
             State
             ;
             when
             we
             call
             to
             mind
             that
             all
             our
             Foundations
             were
             put
             out
             of
             course
             ,
             and
             our
             Pillars
             even
             broken
             by
             the
             late
             King
             's
             own
             ill-guided
             hands
             ;
             and
             that
             the
             
               Heroick
               Prince
            
             hath
             been
             at
             so
             great
             Expence
             ,
             and
             exposed
             himself
             to
             so
             many
             hazards
             ,
             in
             his
             own
             Country
             ,
             at
             Sea
             ,
             and
             here
             in
             England
             ,
             in
             Compassion
             both
             to
             our
             Miseries
             and
             Infirmities
             ;
             when
             our
             Land
             was
             weak
             ,
             and
             all
             the
             Inhabitants
             thereof
             in
             an
             utter
             disability
             to
             rescue
             or
             save
             themselves
             ;
             and
             none
             under
             Heaven
             ,
             within
             the
             reach
             of
             humane
             apprehension
             ,
             besides
             that
             one
             Prince
             ,
             could
             possibly
             effect
             it
             ;
             that
             glorious
             Instrument
             under
             God
             ,
             put
             his
             hand
             to
             support
             and
             strengthen
             ,
             and
             
               bear
               up
               our
               Pillars
            
             :
             to
             Redeem
             and
             Secure
             our
             
               Religion
               ,
               Laws
            
             ,
             and
             Liberties
             ;
             and
             when
             our
             late
             King
             ,
             either
             for
             fear
             of
             his
             Person
             ,
             or
             rather
             of
             the
             Issue
             of
             Affairs
             in
             our
             Re-establishment
             ,
             had
             deserted
             or
             
               abdicated
               his
               Kingdom
            
             ,
             and
             left
             us
             in
             Confusion
             to
             shift
             for
             our Selves
             ;
             whose
             return
             now
             cannot
             be
             thought
             of
             without
             Horrour
             :
             and
             the
             present
             
               King
               and
               Queen
            
             ,
             being
             therefore
             first
             Petitioned
             ,
             to
             take
             the
             Government
             ,
             have
             graciously
             accepted
             it
             ,
             upon
             terms
             answering
             all
             mens
             desires
             or
             interests
             .
             I
             say
             ,
             when
             all
             this
             is
             well
             pondered
             ,
             the
             Ground
             and
             Argument
             for
             our
             quiet
             and
             chearful
             submission
             ,
             taken
             from
             Gratitude
             ,
             is
             indeed
             
               too
               big
            
             to
             be
             contained
             in
             a
             sheet
             or
             two
             of
             Paper
             ,
             or
             the
             
               mind
               of
               Man
            
             :
             and
             Prodigious
             ,
             beyond
             the
             credit
             of
             Posterity
             .
          
           
             Lastly
             ,
             One
             would
             think
             there
             was
             no
             place
             left
             for
             any
             further
             Scruple
             .
             The
             late
             Change
             was
             urged
             by
             extream
             Necessity
             ,
             and
             carried
             on
             with
             a
             wonderful
             Providence
             ,
             and
             perfected
             with
             
               Universal
               Consent
            
             ;
             it
             was
             Eminently
             the
             
               Lords
               doing
            
             ,
             and
             
               our
               own
            
             too
             ;
             the
             Government
             was
             unhing'd
             by
             the
             
               late
               King
            
             himself
             .
             The
             present
             King
             ,
             &c.
             was
             put
             into
             Possession
             by
             our selves
             in
             our
             Representatives
             ;
             who
             were
             as
             freely
             chosen
             by
             us
             as
             ever
             any
             Parliament
             was
             :
             The
             Convention
             had
             nothing
             wanting
             but
             the
             previous
             formality
             of
             the
             
               Royal
               Writs
            
             ,
             
             which
             could
             not
             be
             then
             had
             ;
             that
             Punctilio
             of
             Order
             ,
             cannot
             reasonably
             be
             supposed
             to
             go
             into
             the
             being
             of
             the
             Representative
             Body
             ;
             the
             want
             of
             it
             ,
             cannot
             well
             be
             thought
             to
             prejudice
             our
             Election
             ,
             or
             Consent
             to
             what
             they
             have
             done
             ,
             whom
             we
             chose
             and
             entrusted
             with
             our
             Politick
             Reason
             and
             Interest
             ,
             and
             in
             whose
             Acts
             ,
             we
             ought
             to
             acquiesce
             as
             our
             
               own
               doings
            
             ,
             in
             every
             thing
             or
             Matter
             of
             Expediency
             for
             the
             Publick
             good
             ,
             not
             evidently
             contrary
             to
             our
             Duty
             to
             God.
             
          
           
             In
             short
             ,
             The
             Possession
             of
             the
             Throne
             ,
             by
             the
             Act
             of
             the
             People
             of
             England
             ,
             is
             now
             unquestionable
             ;
             we
             have
             no
             liberty
             left
             us
             ,
             either
             to
             dispute
             the
             King's
             Title
             ,
             or
             deny
             him
             our
             Duty
             .
             Give
             unto
             Caesar
             the
             things
             that
             are
             Caesars
             ,
             &c.
             
          
        
         
           FINIS
           .
        
      
    
     
       
         Notes, typically marginal, from the original text
         
           Notes for div A40717-e90
           
             He
             must
             be
             King
             before
             we
             can
             be
             bound
             to
             him
             as
             such
             .
          
           
             Br●ct
             Fleta
             .
             
               E
               〈…〉
               ponere
            
             .
          
           
             Rom.
             13.
             
          
           
             Imperatores
             Rom.
             fatendum
             est
             ,
             non
             optimo
             Jure
             Imperium
             adeptos
             .
             Sanderson
             .
          
           
             
               Case
               of
               Engag
            
             .
             P.
             111.