A comparison of the Parliamentary protestation with the late canonicall oath and the difference betwixt them as also the opposition betwixt the doctrine of the Church of England and that of Rome : so cleared that they who made scruple of the oath may cheerfully and without doubt addresse themselves to take the protestation : as also a fvrther discvssion of the case of conscience touching receiving the sacrament of the Lords Supper, when either bread or wine is wanting or when by antipathy or impotence the party that desires it cannot take it : wherein the impiety, injury and absurdity of the popish halfe communion is more fully declared and confuted : both which discourses were occasioned by a letter of a lay-gentle-man, lately written to the authour for his satisfaction touching the matters fore-mentioned / by John Ley ... Ley, John, 1583-1662. This text is an enriched version of the TCP digital transcription A48307 of text R11663 in the English Short Title Catalog (Wing L1872). Textual changes and metadata enrichments aim at making the text more computationally tractable, easier to read, and suitable for network-based collaborative curation by amateur and professional end users from many walks of life. The text has been tokenized and linguistically annotated with MorphAdorner. The annotation includes standard spellings that support the display of a text in a standardized format that preserves archaic forms ('loveth', 'seekest'). Textual changes aim at restoring the text the author or stationer meant to publish. This text has not been fully proofread Approx. 126 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 32 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. EarlyPrint Project Evanston,IL, Notre Dame, IN, St. Louis, MO 2017 A48307 Wing L1872 ESTC R11663 12832846 ocm 12832846 94344 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A48307) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 94344) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 256:E176, no 9) A comparison of the Parliamentary protestation with the late canonicall oath and the difference betwixt them as also the opposition betwixt the doctrine of the Church of England and that of Rome : so cleared that they who made scruple of the oath may cheerfully and without doubt addresse themselves to take the protestation : as also a fvrther discvssion of the case of conscience touching receiving the sacrament of the Lords Supper, when either bread or wine is wanting or when by antipathy or impotence the party that desires it cannot take it : wherein the impiety, injury and absurdity of the popish halfe communion is more fully declared and confuted : both which discourses were occasioned by a letter of a lay-gentle-man, lately written to the authour for his satisfaction touching the matters fore-mentioned / by John Ley ... Ley, John, 1583-1662. [4], 59 p. Printed by G. M. for Thomas Vnderhill ..., London : 1641. Reproduction of original in Thomason Collection, British Library. eng Catholic Church -- Controversial literature. Church of England -- Controversial literature. Great Britain -- Religion -- 17th century. A48307 R11663 (Wing L1872). civilwar no A comparison of the Parliamentary protestation with the late canonicall oath; and the difference betwixt them. As also the opposition betwix Ley, John 1641 22301 394 10 0 0 0 0 181 F The rate of 181 defects per 10,000 words puts this text in the F category of texts with 100 or more defects per 10,000 words. 2002-06 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2002-07 Aptara Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2002-08 Olivia Bottum Sampled and proofread 2002-08 Olivia Bottum Text and markup reviewed and edited 2002-10 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion A COMPARISON OF THE PARLIAMENTARY PROTESTATION with the late Canonicall Oath ; and the difference betwixt them . As also THE OPPOSITION BETWIXT THE Doctrine of the Church of England , and that of Rome . So cleared , That they who made scruple of the Oath , may cheerfully and without doubt addresse themselves to take the PROTESTATION . As also A FVRTHER DISCVSSION OF THE Case of CONSCIENCE , touching receiving the Sacrament of the Lords Supper , when either Bread or Wine is wanting , or when by antipathy or impotence , the party that desires it cannot take it . Wherein The Impiety , Injury and Absurdity of the Popish halfe Communion is more fully declared and confuted . Both which Discourses were occasioned by a Letter of a Lay-Gentle-man , lately written to the Authour , for his satisfaction touching the matters fore-mentioned . By JOHN LEY Pastor of great Budworth in Cheshire : Ezek. 44. 23. They shall teach my people the difference betweene the holy and prophane ; and cause them to discerne betweene the uncleane and the cleane . London , Printed by G. M for Thomas Vnderhill at the signe of the Bible in Wood-street , neare the Counter , M.DC.XLI . To the much and worthily Honoured Sr. ROBERT HARLEY Knight of the Honourable Order of the Bath , and Knight of the Honourable House of Commons for the County of He●eford . THe desire I had to professe my devoted Service to the pious designes of your honourable Senate , disposed me to a boldnesse of offering this ensuing Discourse by a generall Dedication to your whole House . But my judgement ( upon second cogitations ) gave check to that conceit , as making too neare an approach , towards some presumption , and directed me to value it , below the rate of a competent Present , for so many , so worthy persons of your Assembly , and to select some Patron among you for a singular inscription . Thence were my thoughts conducted to your Selfe ( noble Sir ) to whom ( for your prudent and constant Zeale , to advance all just and conscionable causes , and your many affectionate expressions of respect to me both present and absent ) I held my selfe obliged to take this opportunity , to tender a token of a gratefull memory of such favour as ( without the guilt of ungratitude ) I can neither forget nor forbear to acknowledge . And I should be as ungodly as ungratefull , if ( considering your intentive incumbency upon the common cares of the Church and Sta●e ) I should not ( both in Church and Closet ) addresse my heartiest devotions to the Lord Almighty , to preserve your person ( with the rest of your venerable Associates ) and to prosper your consultations with such happy successe , as m●y occasion an exchange of prayers into praises . In both which sacred Services ( with reference to you and yours , in neerest relations ) none shall be more sincere and serious then he who will never be wanting , Great Budworth , Septem. 20. 1641. Vnfainedly to honour and faithfully to serve you JOHN LEY . A COMPARISON OF THE PARLIAmentary Protestation with the late Canonicall Oath , and the difference betwixt them . SIR , I Have received a long and elabourate Letter from you , wherin you give me a double character of your self . The one notes you for a man very observant of ( that , which is of● most moment ) matter of Religion : The other shews you to be of an ingenuous disposition , for in your discourse with me you personate rather a doubting disciple , then ( as some of lesse learning then your self would have done ) a peremptory dogmatist ; both which make me desirous to be a graduate in your knowledge , and good will , and from a meer stranger ( as untill of late I was unto you ) to become an acquaintance , and from an acquaintance to proceed to the acceptation of a friend , and there to settle . You begin ( as by good order you may ) with the occasion which induced you to write unto me thus . Sir , you may please to remember , that casually in Mr. Lathur●s Shop in Pauls Church-yard , there happening some little discourse betwixt us , you invited me ( according to mine owne present intent ) to reade over your booke treating of doubts upon the Oath of the sixt Canon : and you also moved me , that if any thing in it should stick with me , I would represent it to you . In pursuance wherof , I have perused the book throughout : minding not to take any exceptions at all , or to become a●y way quarrelsome , intending with my self , either ( by iust approbation of your better iudgement ) to assent , or els to be quietly silent , which a man may the more safely doe , because the book doth wisely consist for the most part of Qua●res , ba●kt with reasons therto conducent . But afterwards perusing over a short Tract ( annexed to the end of the book ) concerning a case of Conscience about the receiving of the Eucharist in one kinde in case of necessity , I lighted on a block , at which I have taken a stumble . I supposed ( good Sir ) your sight is too clear to suffer you to dash upon a block before you discern it : and your footing too firme , and fixed to stumble at a straw , nor will I thinke ( since you professe your self so well disposed to peace ) that you have set your self a to seeke a knot in a rush , my discretion and charity divert my minde from such conjectures , and direct it to conceive ( but pardon me good Sir , if I mistake you , as you seem to have mistaken me ) that you took a small appearance of a doubt , rather to initiate my notice of you with a Scholasticall Treatise ( for which I thank you ) then that you need any satisfaction from me to your conscience , as scrupled by that passage , which you have noted for ambiguous in my book . That is more considerable ( me thinks ) which you have said by way of doubt , concerning some conformity betwixt the Oath of the sixt Canon , and the late Protestation framed in the Commons House of Parliament ; wherof you make a Quere , and to which I will first give answer ; and then clear the case of Conscience from just cau●e of offence . I choose to begin with that , though you end with it . Because , 1. It is meet in good manners , that I give that Honourable Assembly precedence of Apology before my self . 2. Because my doubts of the Oath are placed , in order of my tractates , before the case of conscience , where you have either found , or made an occasion of scruple . Touching the former , your words are these , See I pray you the b enclosed , and then consider if your doubts published doe not stand up against it also , as to the matter of it , and of the Oath you fight against , insomuch if the Queres raised against the one , be not an invitation unto scruples , against the other also . Your doubt , and mine Answer , will be better understood on both sides , if , first we consider the Protestation , and declaration upon it , as it is set down interminis thus , I A. B. doe in the presence of Almighty God , Promise , Vow and protest , to maintain and defend , as farre as lawfully I may , with my life , power and estate , the true reformed Protestant Religion expressed in the doctrin of the Church of England , against all Popery and Popish Innovations , within this Realm , contrary to the same doctrine , and according to the duty of my Allegiance , His Maiesties Royall Person , Honour and Estate : As also the power and priviledges of Parliaments : The lawfull Rights and Liberties of the Subiects , and every person that maketh this Protestation , in whatsoever he shall doe in the lawfull pursuance of the same . And to my power , and as farre as lawfully I may , I will oppose , and by all good wayes and means endeavour to bring to condigne punishment all such as shall either by force , practice , counsels , plots , conspiracies , or otherwise , doe any thing to the contrary of any thing in this present Protestation contained : And further that I shall in all iust and honourable wayes indeavour to preserve the union and peace betwixt the three Kingdoms of England , Scotland and Ireland : And neither for hope , feare , nor other respect shall relinquish this Promise , Vow and Protestation . Wheras some doubts have been raised by severall persons out of this House , concerning the meaning of these words , contained in the Protestation lately made by the members of this House ; [ viz. the true reformed p●otestant Religion , expressed in the Doctrin of the Church of England , against all Popery and Popish Innovations within this Realm , contrary to the same Doctrine ] This House doth declare that by those words , was , and is meant , only the publike Doctrine professed in the said Church , so farre as it is opposite to Popery and Popish Innovations : and that the said words are not to be extended to the maintaining of any firme of worship , discipline or Governement , nor of any Rites or Ceremonies of the said Church of England . If it were so , that the doubts of the Oath stood up ( as your Quere hath it ) against the Protestation , or that they were an invitation of scruples against it , it were not my fault ; for my book of doubts was made ( though not printed ) before there was any intimation or expectation of a Parliament , especially by those whose mansion is so remote from the mysteries of State , so farre below the orbe of the highest Intelligence as mine is . 2. I doubt not to make it plain , that the differencies betwixt the Parliamentary Protestation , and the Canonicall Oath are so many and so weighty ; that a man may with good conscience and discretion suspect much perill in taking the Oath , and be well assured of the safety in taking the Protestation composed in the Parliament . Reall differencies betwixt the Protestation of the Parliament , and the Oath of the Canon : first in the matter of them both , the Doctrine established . THe differences betwixt the Protestation of the Parliament , and Oath of the Synod are Reall and Personall . The Reall are such as concern the matter and forme of them both . The matter , ( wheron you ground the chief cause of your doubting ) I shall distinguish into that which is common to them both and that which is peculiar to either . That which is common to both is , the asserting of the Doctrine established in the Church of England , especially as in opposition to Popish Doctrine : wherof ( as it is set down in the Canon ) there be three doubts , 1. c What is meant by the Church of England ? 2. d What is meant by Popish Doctrine ? 3. e What establishment of Doctrine is here m●ant , and how farre it may be said to be established ? which doubts with their reasons , whosoever reads with an impartiall and unprejudiced apprehension , will never apply to the Protestation of the Parliament . And in what sence we may well understand these words in the printed Protestation ( though I will not take upon me to interpret it , except for satisfaction to my self , and to such as require my Judgement of it ) in my conceipt is very clear , especially by the Declaration annexed to many printed copies of that Protestation ( though that which you sent me came forth without it ) in this tenour ; by these words : [ The true reformed Protestant Religion , expressed in the Doctrine of the church of England against all Popery and Popish Innovations within this Realme , contrary to the same Doctrine , was and is meant only the publike Doctrine professed in the church of England ; so farre as it is opposite to Popery and Popish Innovations ] And that is ( as I take it without taking upon me the Authority of an Interpreter of it , save as before I have said ) the Doctrin contained in the 39. Articles . For , First , that is the most publick Doctrin of the Church ; because in the Church of every Parish , all that are admitted into Benefices must publi●ly read the 39. Articles unto the people within the first month of their admission to them , upon perill of loosing their livings by falling into lapse . 2. That Doctrin is most professedly the Doctrin of the Church of England ; for all Doctours and teachers of the Church are bound , so farre to professe it , as to subscribe unto those Articles , without which subscription , they are not to be allowed for publike Preachers , or teachers , at least not admitted into pastorall charges , in the Church of England . 3. The Doctrin of those Articles is most opposite to Popery , and popish Innovations ; for they were framed and tempered of purpose for an Antidote to Popery , in the Raign of Queen Elizabeth , about four yeers after her coming to the Crown , for she began her f raigne , November 17. 1558. and in 1562. were these Articles concluded on , to be the publike and professed Doctrine of the Church of England . This Doctrine and these Articles are in congruity of right Reason , to be intended in this Protestation . Yet not all of them neither ( though none of them be denied or renounced ) but onely those which are opposite to Popery and popish Innovation : as these that follow . The Protestant Doctrin of the Church of England . The Popish Doctrine opposite unto it . Art. 6.   2 Holy Scripture containeth all things necessary to Salvation . a The Papists joyne traditions unwritten , as of equall authority with the written word . In the name of the holy Scriptures wée doe understand , those canonicall bookes of the old and new Testament : of whose authority was never any doubt in the Church ( i. e. ) al the books of the old Testament , from Genesis to Malachy : as they are placed in our ordinary English Bibles , and all the new Testament . And the other Books ( as Hierom saith ) the Church doth read for example of life , and instruction of manners , but doth not apply them , to establish any Doctrine , and those are they which in many English Bibles begin after Malachy and end with the Maccabees . b The Papists mingle Apochryphall books with the Canonicall , as of the same authority with them thus , lest any one should doubt what books of Scripture are to be received , they are these underwritten , the five books of Moses , Genes . Exod. Levit. Num. Deut. Ios. Iudg. Ruth , foure books of Kings , ( accounting the two books of Samuell for two of the foure ) two books of the Chr. Esd. 1. and 2. called Nehemias , Tobit , Iudith , Esther , Iob , Davids Psalter , consisting of 150. Psalms , the Parables or Proverbs , Ecclesiastes , the Canticles , the books of Wisdome , Ecclesiasticus , Esay , Ierem. with Baruch , Ezech. Daniel , then follow the minor Prophets , as in our Bibles , and after them 2. books of Maccabees . c And require them to be received , as of equall authority with the Canonicall Scripture , with a curse upon such as refuse to take them for ●uch . Art. 9.   Originall sin is the fault and corruption of every man , that naturally is ingendred of the off-spring of Adam , whereby man is farre gone from originall Righteousnesse ; and therefore in every person borne into this world , it deserves Gods wrath and damnation , though there be no condemnation for them that beléeve : and are baptized , yet the Apostle doth confesse , that concupiscence ● lust hath of it selfe , the nature of sinne . d The Papists except the Virgin Mary from all taint of originall sinne , or naturall corruption , and touching concupiscence , contradict the Doctrine of our Church , and with us the blessed Apostle in these words . e This concupiscence , when the Apostle calleth it sinne , the holy Synod declareth that the Catholique Church never understood , that it was called sinne truely and properly in the regenerate , but because it commeth from sinne and inclineth to sin . Art. 11.   We are accounted righteous before God , onely for the merits of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ by ●aith , and not for our owne workes , or deservings ; wherefore that we are justified by faith only , is a most wholesome Doctrine , and very full of comfort . f If any say that a sinner is justified by faith onely , understanding that nothing is required , which doth cooperate to the obtainment of the grace of justification , let him be accursed .   This Canon will appeare more repugnant to the doctrine of the Apostle S. Paul , Rom. 3. 28 , and to our Article of Justification by faith only , by comparing it with the 11. and 12. Canons in the same Session , and with the 7. chapter , pag. 359. and the 10. pag. 360. Art. 14.   Uol●ntary workes , besides or over and above Gods commandements , ( which they call works of supererogation ) cannot be taught without arrogancy and impiety . g We call a counsell of perfection a good worke of God , which is not prescribed us by Christ , but proposed , not commanded , but commended . h The fastings and satisfactory deeds of one man be available to others , yea and holy Saints and other vertuous persons may ( in measure and proportion of other mens necessities ) allot unto them as well the superogation of their spirituall works , as those that abound in worldly goods , may give almes of their superfluities to them which are in necessity . Art. 15.   Of Christ alone without sinn● , Christ in the truth of his humane nature was made like unto us , in all things , sin only excepted , but all we the rest ( i. e ) al man-kinde besides ) although baptized , and borne againe in Christ offend in many things . i Mary the glorious Virgin , a mother of God , by singular preventing grace , was kept free from all originall , and actuall sinne . k This holy Synod ( id est , the Councell of Trent ) doth declare , that it is not their intention to comprehend in this Decree ( of generall guilt of originall sinne ) the blessed and immaculate Virgin Mary the mother of God . Art. 21.   Generall counsels may ●rre , and sometimes have erred , even in things pertaining unto God . l Counsels confirm'd by the Pope cannot erre . m The faith of the Church of Rome founded by Peter on a rock hath not yet failed , nor shall faile for ever . n The Roman Church never erred , nor for ever shall erre . o The Pope cannot possible decree any heresie to be beleeved of the whole Church . Art. 22.   The Romish Doctrine concerning Purgatory , Pardons , Worshipping and Adoration , as well of Images , as of Reliques ; and also invocation of Saints is a fond thing , vainly invented and grounded upon no warrant of Scripture , but repugnant to the Word of God .   p Purgatory . p There is a Purgatory , and there the soules detained , are holpen with the prayers of the faithfull . q Pardons . q Indulgences or Pardons are very healthfull to Christian people ; and so to be retained in the Church , and they that hold them unprofitable are accursed by the Councell of Trent . t Images . t The Images of Christ , and the Saints are to be worshipped , not onely by accident , or improperly ; but properly and by themselves , so that they terminate the worship presented to them . s Images . s The Images of Christ , of the Virgin Mary and of other Saints are to be had and retained in Temples , and due honour and reverence done unto them . t Images . t There is great fruit and benefit to be received by the use of all holy Images . Art.   u Reliques . u Let Bishops and others ( to whom it belongeth to teach the people ) instruct them touching the honour due unto Reliques . w Invocation x of Saints . w And touching the Invocation of Saints .   x It is good and profitable to use humble Invocation of the Saints . Art. 24.   It is a thing plainely repugnant to the Word of God , and to the custome of the Primitive Church , to have publike Prayer in the Church , or to administer the Sacraments in a tongue not understood of the people . y Although the Masse ( which is the Popish service ) have in it much instruction profitable to faithfull people , yet it seemeth not expedient unto the Fathers of the Councell , that it be celebrated in a vulgar tongue . Art. 25.   There be two Sacraments ordained of Christ in the Gospell , that is to far , Baptisme and the Supper of the Lord ; those five commonly called Sacraments , Confirmation , Penance , Orders , Matrimony and extreme Unction , have grown partly of the corrupt following of the Apostles , partly are states of life allowed in the Scripture , but yet have not like nature of a Sacrament with Baptisme , and the Lords Supper ; for that they have not any visible signe , or ceremony , ordained of God . z The Sacraments of the Church are reduced to a septinary number . a Baptisme , Confirmation , the Sacrament of the Eucharist , Penance , extreme unction , Order and Matrimony . Art. 28.   Transubstantiation ( or the change of the substance of the bread and wine ) in the Supper of the Lord , cannot be proved by holy writ , but is repugnant to the plaine words of Scripture , and overthroweth the ●ature of a Sacrament . b Now this sacred Synod doth declare again , that by consecration of the Bread and Wine , there is a conversion of the whole substance of Bread into Christs body , and of the whole substance of the wine , into the substance of his blood , and this conversion is conveniently and properly by the holy Catholike Church called Transubstantiation . The body of Christ is given , taken and eaten in the Supper onely after an heavenly and spirituall manner , and the meane wherby it is received and eaten in the Supper is Faith . c The Bread and wine which are placed on the Altar after consecration , are not onely a Sacrament of the body and blood of Christ , but the very body and blood of Christ indeed , which is sensually and indeed handled by the hands of the Priest , broken and chewed by the teeth of the faithfull , so in the recantation of Berengarius made to Pope Nicolas , and sealed with a solemne Oath . The Sacrament of the Lords Supper was not by Christs ordinance reserved . d That the holy Eucharist be carri●d to the sick , and to that purpose , diligently to be reserved in the Church is joined with great equity and reason , and therfore the holy Synod ordaines that this healthfull and necessary manner is to be observed . e Nor carried about . e The holy Synod declareth , that it is a pious and religious manner , taken up in the Church , that every yeer on a set day , the high and venerable Sacrament , with singular reverence bee carried about the streets and high-waies in solemne Procession . f Nor worshipped . f There is no doubt to be made , but that all the faithfull ( after the accustomed manner in the Catholik Church ) must give to this most holy Sacrament the highest worship ( called Latria ) due unto God . Art. 29.   The wicked and such as be void of ●aith , although they doe carnally and visibly presse with their teeth ( as S. Aug. saith ) the Sacrament of the body and blood of Christ , yet in no wise are they partakers of Christ , but rather to their condemnation , doe eate , and drinke the signe or Sacrament of so great a thing . g First ▪ hereupon marke well , that all men receive the body and blood of Christ , be they Infidels or evill livers , which invincibly proveth against the Heretickes , that Christ is really present . Art. 30.   The cup of the Lord is not to be denied to the Lay people for both parts of the Lords Sacrament by Christs ordinance and commandement ought to be ministred to all Christian men alike . h Since in many parts of the world , there are divers who presume rashly to affirm , that Christian people ought to receive the Sacrament of the Eucharist under both kinds ( scil. ) of bread and wine ( therefore it is decreed ) that no Presbyter under paine of Excommunication doe administer to the people the Communion under both kindes of bread and wine . i The laudable custom of ministring the Communion to the lay-People , in one kinde only , reasonably introduced by the Church and the holy Fathers , is to be held for a law : nor is it lawfull for any one to reject it or without the authority of the Church to change it . k If any one affirme that by the commandment of God , or of necessity to salvation all the faithfull ought to receive the Sacrament in both kinds , let him be accursed . l If any say that the holy Catholik Church ( i.e. in their Dialect the Romane Church ) was not induced by just & reasonable causes , that the Laity and Clergy , which do not consecrate , should communicate but in one kind , or therin to have erred , let him be accursed . An Advertisement touching the wine which in some places is allowed to the Laity after the taking of the bread . SOme ( to excuse the sacriledge of the Romanists ) have said , the people are not deprived of the Communion Cup , as we pretend , for that they have a little wine allowed them after the receit of the wafer . The truth is , some times , and in some places , the people have so , to a wash the wafer down their throats , which otherwise might be like to stick in their mouths ; yet it must not be consecrated wine , least it should be received as the other part of the Sacrament : and where Claret wine is more deare ( as in Spain ) they give the people water instead of wine : To that purpose , the French-Priests were ( as b Chamier noteth ) more bashfull , then to be so base , where that kinde of wine ( which would come nearest the complection of Transubstantiation , if it were true ) is more cheape then in other places . But both the French and the Spanish ( what difference so ever is betwixt their Nations or Churches ) agree in the violation of the Lords ordinance , and an injurious detention of the peoples allowance , since the French-wine , is not more Sacramentall then the Spanish-water , though that seem more hereticall , as carrying an appearance of the Doctrine and practise of the c Aquarij , who held it not unlawfull to administer the Sacrament in meere water , and so forbore the use of wine , though as Cyprian giveth the reason , their practise did partake of policy , as well as of heresie , for they did it lest the smell of wine should bewray them to their enemies , to be Christian Communicants . Art. 31.   The Offering of Christonce made is that perfect Redemption , propitiation and satisfaction for all the sinnes of the whole world , both originall and actuall , and there is none other satisfaction for sin , but that alone ; wherfore the Sacrifices of Masses , in the which it was commonly said , that the Priests did offer Christ for the quicke and the dead , to have remission of paine and guilt , were blasphemous fables and dangerous deceits . m In the divine Sacrifice which is made in the Masse , Christ is contained , and is unbloodily offered up in Sacrifice , who on the Altar of the Crosse offered himselfe up a bloody Sacrifice — the fruit of which bloody offering by this unbloody is most plentifully received ; wherfore it is offered , not onely for the sinnes , paines , satisfactions , and other necessities , of the living , but for the dead in Christ , who yet are not purged to the full . n And they that deny this are accursed by the Councell of Trent . Art. 32.   Bishops , Priests and 〈◊〉 are not commanded by Gods ●aw , either to vow the estate of single life , or to ●bstain from marriage ; therefore it is lawfull also for them , as for all other Christian men , to marry at their owne discretion , as they shall ●udge the same to serve better to godlinesse . o If any one say that Clerks that are in holy orders ( or Regulars that have taken the profession of chastity upon them ) may contract matrimony , and that such a contract by them made is valid and of force , notwithstanding the Law of the Church , or the vow of single life , let him be accursed . Art. 37.   The Bishop of Rome hath no ●urisdiction in this Realme of England . p King Iohn was condemned by a sentence in the Court of Rome , to be deposed from all title to this Realme . q Pope Innocent the fourth tooke upon so much power in England as to call the king of England his Vassall or bond-man , and to say he could with a becke or a nod commit him to prison and shamefully confound him . r Pope Pius the fift declared Queen Elizabeth and all her adherents to be Hereticks , absolved her Subjects from the Oath of Allegiance , and accursed all that performed obedience unto her . s The same power he takes upon him in many other Kingdomes , but his hatred to England , which he takes for an hereticall and Apostaticall Kingdom above others , gives just cause of speciall caution ( for the Church and State of England ) against his usurpation . TO these particulars , I might adde other Protestant tenets of our Church , out of the Books of Homilies , wherin , though there be some things doubtfull , there are many very true and Orthodox Doctrines , very soundly stated and proved , and zealously pressed against the Heresies of Popery ; and among these thirty-nine Articles there are some others opposite to Popery , which I have not mentioned , as the tenth of Freewill ; and the thirteenth of workes done before Justification , because the Antithesis betwixt the Protestant and Popish Doctrine , by the subtile and ambiguous formes of expression ( on the Popish-side ) is made more intricate and problematicall , then in the rest , and in these we have exprest , there are some other which are necessarily implied as by mutuall relation , defending or destroying one another . So it is betwixt a Purgatory and prayers for the dead ; for if there be a Purgatory ( as Papists affirme ) prayers for the dead will be needfull , and profitable offices of the living on their behalfe : if no Purgatory ( as our 22. Article orthodoxally determineth ) prayers for the dead are frivolous , and fruitlesse services ; for if there be only two places for receipt of soules after death , Heaven and Hell , to pray for those in Heaven is needlesse , for them in Hell bootlesse : To them no good thing is wanting , for these no good thing will be obtained , not so much refreshing , as a drop of water from the tip of the finger , Luk ▪ 16. 24. These then may be sufficient both to informe such as make this Protestation , what Doctrine of our Church is opposite to Popery : and to assure those that do propound it , of their minds to the Religion established , who willingly present themselv● to promise , vow and protest , in the forme fore-mentioned , for they that are Protestants and Antipapists in these points , will never side with the Popish-party , against the Religion established , or the Parliament assembled . Thus much of matter of Doctrine , mentioned both in the Oath of the sixt Canon , and the late Protestation : Wherin though they materially agree , yet considering what hath beene said by way of b doubt against the meaning of the Canon ( which hath no place in this Protestation . ) They that were affraid of the former ( in this respect ) have no cause to make scruple of the latter . Of that wherin the Oath of the sixt Canon and the Protestation do differ , in respect of the matter contained in either , which the other hath not . THe most doubts for number , and the most perplexing for difficulty , for the Oath of the Canon , are in that part of it , which concerneth discipline and government , by Arch-bishops , Bishops , Deans , Arch-deacons , with that boundlesse &c. beyond which we can find no shore , and wherin our line and plummet can reach no bottom , especially if rites and Ceremonies , be reduced to discipline , as I have observed in● my c first particular doubt of the Oath , from all this perplexity ( wherwith the Canon entangleth a timerous conscience ) the Protestation giveth very good , and undoubted Security , expresly declaring , that these words [ The true reformed Protestant Religion , expressed in the Doctrine of the Church of England , against all Popery and Popish Innovations , within this Realme , contrary to the same Doctrine ] are not to be extended to the maintaining of any forme of worship , discipline or government , nor of any rites or Ceremonies of the said Church of England ; wherin , as they do not require the ratification of any such particulars , so neither do they disa●ow them , but leave them ( as controversed points ) to such a decision as is due unto them . This Declaration was not in that Protestation you sent unto me , if it had , it may be , you had not mooved the doubt ( as you did ) Whether my doubts against the Oath , did not stand up , and invite to scruples against the present Protestation . But though all this doubtfull matter be discarded from it ( which was the most dangerous part of the charge of the Canon ) yet there is other matter of much doubt and great moment within the Protestation , which the Canon contains not , as the Power and Priviledges of Parliaments , the rites and liberties of Subiects , which are points of too high a pitch for common capacities ; and it may be difficult enough for the wiser sort , well , and truly to understand . I will not ( as I said before ) take upon me to expound the meaning of these termes ( for generall satisfaction , for so it belongeth to them that made the Text to make the Comment ) the Authours are the best , and most Authenticke Interpreters of their owne words ; who alone can make the one as generall as the other : but for the guiding of mine own conscience ( touching the sence of these words ) I have this to say . First , for the Power and Priviledges of Parliaments d King Iames taught me to take them in a very large extent , where he repeated and approoved the Speech of that old wise man ( as he cals him ) the Treasurer Burleigh , who was wont to say , he knew not what an Act of Parliam●nt could not doe in England , doubtlesse it may doe any thing , but what is contrary to his Acts or Statutes , whose least word hath more right to rule in all Lands , then any Laws that are made by men , in any one Country or Kingdome whatsoever . 2. For the Rights and liberties of Subjects , I find no cause to doubt of them in the generall , since the word [ lawfull ] is added unto them , and indeed ( throughout the whole Protestation ) here are such words of Caution and limitation , as may serve for prevention of all scruples , in this respect , for though the length of it be not fully twelve lines , there are thus many clauses to give it a relish of regular construction : [ as farre as lawfully I may , lin. 2. lawfull rites , lin. 6. lawfull pursuance , and as farre as lawfully I may , lin. 7. by all good wayes , lib. 8. in● all iust and honourable waies , lin. 10. ] there are no such words of caution to the conscience in the Canonicall Oath . There is one clause in it which seemeth to limit one part of it to the rule of right , for it requireth a ratification of the Governement by Archbishops , Bishops , Deans , Arch-deacons , &c. [ as of right in ought to stand ] which words are like a Picture in a ●urrowed Table , equivocally varying the aspect , according to the site or placing of him that looketh towards it . These limitations are none such : but very plain , and they are so placed as to diffuse an influence of fidelity and Justice the Protestation throughout , and that may suffice for assent unto it in generall termes , and when any particular is singled out for approbation or pursuit , I doubt not but it will come forth so plainly declared , by the same authority that proposeth it , that we may both conceive it well , and conceive well of it , and so addresse our selves to conformity to it . Thus much for comparison of the Oath of the Canon and Protestation in respect of the matter of them both . The difference in forme betwixt the Parliamentary Protestation and the Canonicall Oath may induce us to the one , and with-hold us from the other . IF we consider them in their forme ; we shall finde that difference betwixt them , which may make us more willing to hee Protestants then Canonists : For the Protestation goeth no further then to vow , promise and protest , but the sixt Canon requireth a solemne Oath . Now though a●vow lawfully made , ( and we may say the same of a Promise and Protestation ) must be carefully kept , Numb. 30. 22. Deut. 23. 21. Psalm . 50. 14. Ps. 76. 11. Esa. 19. 21. Eccles. 5. 4 and though made unto men the performance of it ( as of conscience to God ) be a religious duty : and albeit a vow in e some sort be referred to a premissary Oath , and sometimes be a part of divine worship as well as an Oath ( in which respect the Papists are justly charged with Idolatry , for their vowes made unto Saints ) and though as f Bernard saith , he that breaketh a vow is perjured , yet there is great difference betwixt a Promise , vow , Protestation , and an Oath ; for an oath is more then a Promise ( though promises only have served in former times for consent and ratification of g Canonicall Decrees ) for that is but a simple expression of a purpose , for somewhat to come : A vow is that and somewhat more . viz. h a religious engagement of man with reference to God , and i with intention to binde the conscience to the thing vowed , but an Oath goeth beyond all this , and so it giveth vigour and obligation to a vow , whence it is k that the Jewes when they meant to give their vowes the strongest degree of Asseveration and assurance added an Oath unto them ; and an Oath is more then a Protestation ; for that ( as Al●●at defineth it ) is no more l but a declaration of the mind made for the acquiring or preserving of some Right , or for depulsion , or driving away of some damage . And because it is made ( many times ) with vehemency and vigour of spirit , it is defined by some , to be a loud , m or shouting testification , for Caution to him that makes i● . But an Oath ( as we see by that which but now I noted of the Jewes ) engageth the conscience , more deeply then a single promise , ●ow , or protestation doth , and the breach of it bindeth over the forsworne man to the perill of a greater punishment : And of Oaths there be divers kinds in respect of the different Formalities and Ceremonies , wherwith they are taken . Some Oathes are called verball , some corporall : n a corporall Oath is that which hath an outward gesture annexed to it , as the verball hath not : and of these gestures or Ceremonies there is much variety . The manner of old ( even as old as to Abrahams time ) was by lifting up the hand , Gen. 14. 22. The like we read of the Angell , who lifted up his hand to Heaven and swore by him who liveth for ever and ever , Rev. 10. 5. upon which place , o Bezaes note is , That it was the gesture accustomed to accompany an Oath ; as at this day in p France , the Judges use to say to him that is to take an Oath ( as in England is said by the Clerke of the Assize , to the Prisoner at the barre ) hold up thy hand , but an Ecclesiasticall person is bidden , to ●ay his hand on his breast . In the * Palatinate Paraeus observes the manner of taking of an Oath to be , by lifting up three fingers , with reference to the blessed Trinity attested in it . There is a difference also in regard of the dignity of the person who is to sweare , so in the sixt Councell of Millan , a q Bishop or a Prelate , was ( for reverence of his place or dignity ) to be put to no more ( when he was to sweare ) then to lay his hand upon his breast , wheras the Inferiour Clergy were to use another Ceremony ( as I shall shew anon ) Sometimes the r Superiour , caused the Inferiour , to put his hand under his thigh , to whom he swore ; so did Abraham , when he sent , and swore his servant to make choyce of a wife for his sonne , Gen. 24. 2. So also did Iacob sweare his sonne Ioseph for his buriall out of Aegypt . In which Ceremony s St. Augustine imagined a great mystery , viz. a prophesie of the promised Seed , to be derived from the loynes of Abraham , and so of Isaack his sonne , and of Iacob his Grand-childe , &c. The most received Ceremony , ( since the Gospel had the protection of Christian Princes ) hath bin to lay the hand upon some part of Holy-Writ : this was required of t sub 〈◊〉 , Deacons and Presbyters by the Councell of Millan , when Bishops were onely to lay their hands upon their breast ; but with this difference , that in u lesser matters it would suffice inferiour Clerks ( unlesse a Prelate were present ) to use the same Ceremony , but in greater matters they were to take their Oath with touching of the Bible . Of this formality the first instance I meet withall , is the x imperfect worke ( which goeth in Chrysostomes name ) upon S. Matthew : But I find not the expresse manner of it untill the sixt Councell of Constantinople , where y Georgius Chartaphylax a Deacon , gave testimony to two parchment books , touching the holy Oracles of God , saying , by these holy vertues , and by him who hath spoken by them in truth and verity , these are the two bookes which contain the acts of the fif● generall Synod ▪ which the z Magdeburgenses note upon the seventh Century , and about the ninth a Century I finde first mention of kissing of the Booke . Afterwards ( about the eleventh Century ) the forme of an Oath was varied thus : ( as may be seene in an example of Arnulpus giving an Oath to a Bishop in this manner ) He gave him one hand , and laying the other hand upon the Gospell , averred the truth of his words , with this conclusive clause , b so helpe me God , and these holy Gospels . The manner of an Oath among us is commonly knowne to be this : he that sweareth layeth his hand upon the Bible , or some part of it ( especially the Gospell ) and having delivered the matter to be assured by swearing , concludeth it with these words , so helpe me God in Iesus , Christ , sealing up all with kissing the Book . In the forme of the Oath required by the sixt Canon , are all the ingredients , which ( with so much doubtfull matter ) may make it formidable to a scrupulous and timerous conscience , for it is concluded thus : This I do heartily , willingly and truly , upon the Faith of a Christian , so helpe me God in Iesus Christ , wherto the finall c kisse must be added , though it be not mentioned , which , taking it according to the exposition of Doctor Cousins a late famous Civilian , maketh it , is as full of danger , as of doubting ; d We renounce , saith he , in taking a Corporall oath , all the Promises of the Bible , and call upon us all the curses therin contained , if we sweare not truly . A man may be willing to promise , vow and protest , and he is bound in conscience to make good his word , whether it be promise , vow or protestation , if it be of a matter lawfull , and within his power to performe : For instance , a god-father promising and vowing for a childe at Baptisme , but he would be loath to be engaged to performance of what he so saith , with a pawn or forfeiture of goods and lands , of wife , and children , and friends , and whatever else ( wherin he taketh comfort ) and to be whipt , or hang'd , or burnt , or torne in peeces , if he keep not touch for what he undertaketh : and yet all this is nothing , to laying Jesus Christ and his merits to pawne , renouncing all right and interest to him and them : and imprecating all the curses and comminations in the word of God against himselfe , as in this Oath he doth who taketh it , if his sincerity and constancy bee not answerable to what hee professeth . There is no such danger in making the Protestation fore-mentioned : Nay , no danger at all , unlesse a man take no heed how he takes it , or make no conscience how he keeps it . Personall considerations , which may induce to the making of the Protestation , and discouragement from taking of the Oath . ANd yet ( besides this reall difference ) we are in the next place to note , that which is personall ; and therein to observe the different condition betwixt those that proposed the Protestation , and the composers of the Canon , and that is observable in foure particulars . 1. In their Authority . 2. In their Liberty . 3. In their Integrity . 4. In their Benignity . For the first . They who sent forth the Protestation were undoubtedly endowed with sufficient Authority , for what they did : we cannot say so of the Ecclesiasticks of that Synod , wherin the late Canons were decreed since their Assembly , and Acts done in it have beene questioned , and disallowed by the Parliament . 2. For Liberty , they who composed the Protestation , and commended it with generall publication and proposall to all throughout the Land were free and independent , none subordinate to another ( howsoever diversified by the titles of Lords , Knights , Citizens and Burgesses ) and so their consent therin being unanimous is ( in congruity of reason ) to be taken for a dictate of free Judgement , and good conscience : It was not so with those that decreed the Oath of the sixt Canon , as elswhere hath bin observed . 3. For Integrity , the Protestation came from those , who give undoubted evidence of their dislike of all , both black and blanched Popery , opposing , not only the grosser Tenets and superstitions of the Romish-Religion , but the Arminian-fallacies which are devised to ensnare the subtler , as the other to deceive the simpler sort , and they shew therin a sincere and uniforme affection and fore-cast to the welfare of the King and his Subjects of all sorts , and to the establishment of Religion , Justice and Peace , throughout all the Kingdomes of his Majesties Dominions . I am sorry we cannot say nor thinke so of some , who had too great a sway in composing of the Canons ; and who are probably suspected of a partiall intent to maintain their own interests , and to support their Ecclesiasticall Prelation , with little regard of the good of the inferiour Clergy , how good soever , or of the Churches committed to their particular charges . 4. For Benignity ; our Protestant leaders of the Commons-House , give leave to private persons out of their House , to make doubts concerning the meaning of some words , contained in their Protestation . But some of our Canonicall Lords ( who would have us rather their sworne-men , then the Churches free Ministers ; and would have us give our assent to their dictates , with an implicite faith ) much disliked our doubting of their new devised Oath , notwithstanding it be of much more perillous importance to us , then this Protestation can be to any ; and therfore some have bin called in question , and strictly examined ( as if they had been suspected of some haynous crime ) concerning the shewing or communicating of the London Ministers Quaeries of the Oath to the reading of others . 2. The Composers of this Protestation were so facile and favourable to those that doubted of it , that what did scruple them , they expresly discharged and excluded out of the compasse of their Protestation , and that with such readinesse and expedition , that to many , if not to most , the doubt was rather prevented then removed , the Protestation and explanation comming both at once unto their hands . But the doubts of the Oath were not so tenderly taken to heart by some of our Ecclesiasticall Governours , though their title Fathers obliged them to more mildenesse and pitty to their perplexed sonnes : for some were so farre from a compassionate complying with us , by with-drawment of that which was so full of ambiguity and danger in our apprehension , that for moving doubts unto them ( though with as much meeknesse and moderation of spirit as the cause would well beare ) some of us were noted as adversaries to them , and so accompted not onely uncapable of their fatherly indulgence , but unworthy the good will and acceptation of our Bretheren : And if they had still been as predominant as of late they were , wee might have expected rather punishment , b as for some high presumption against our Superiours , then any satisfaction of our scruples , or removall of the scandals that did offend us . This may suffice to manifest such disparity betwixt the Oath and Protestation , that he that is afraid to take the one , may have a good heart to take the other . By that which hath bin said you will well perceive that the doubts in my booke are blocks lying at the doore of the Convocation house ( where the Oath was framed ) none of them will be found in the way of the House of Parliament , from whence this promise , ●ow and protesta●n proceeded . An Answer to your doubt of the ●ase of Conscience , wherin the opposition betwixt your Seminary and me is clearly demonstrated . NOw for your scruple , at some part of my resolution of the Case of Conscience , ( I presume you will not blame mine answer to it in this place , as an hysteron proteron , if you forget not my reasons before delivered , for departing from the order of your proposals ) having promised your first motive of writing unto me , you begin your matter of exception against me , with that which I cannot but receive with much acceptation : viz. a Your zealeus endeavour to reduce one of neare relation to you from the Romish Religion : And I doe as much approve of your prudence in making choice of the grand Sacriledge of the Papists ( in withholding the Communion Cup from the Laity ) as a ground of perswasion to returne to that Church where the Laity receive their full right in both kinds , as well as the Clergy . But then you tell me that having therupon received an escript from a Romish Priest , ( about Christmas , 1639. ) who , as you say , stated the point to the same effect as I have done , wherto you returned an answer , which be tooke with him to Rome , where he hath , as it seemes , ever since beene resident , your indeavour will proove f●uitlesse , if the truth be as I have condescended unto . Afterwards you b twice joyne me and the Seminary together , as if we two were at better accord about their fraudulent detention of half the Sacrament , then you and I. Truly , Sir , I am so farre from all guilt of that Sacrilegious guile of the Romish Church , that I conceive if any had suspected me for it heretofore , my booke which you have read , might have served for a compleat Apology and purgation from it ; but I see , by your conceipt , the saying of Cicero verified betwixt you and me ; c It is not of so much moment , with what minde one writeth , as with what mind another readeth . I suppose you set your selfe so affectionately against the Seminaries sacrilegious tenet , that the heat of your zeale warped your misconceipt to a degree of excesse ; which hath bin an occasion of errour to d some of the greatest Clerkes , as King Iames hath observed of St. Augustine in particular , giving some rules for reading of the Fathers , he adviseth to distinguish e their positive Doctrine from that which they write in heat of opposition , wherin , saith he , sometimes ( through too much vehemency ) they over-straine in their Polemicke Tractates against Hereticks ; for instance , S. Augustine in his worthy Treatises extant in the seaventh Tome of his workes , in vehemently oppugning those Hereticks that agree with our Arminians , to wit , the Pelagians , who denied Originall sin in Infants , and consequently held Baptisme needlesse , was so farre transported to urge the necessity therof , that he excludeth all Infants ( dying unbaptized ) from all hope of Salvation . In application of this to your Case , you may see my disposition to returne you better coyne , then I received from you ; for you joyne me with a Romish Seminary , in society of Sacriledge : I joyne you with a most renowned Doctour of the Church , in an exube●ancy of zeale , easily capable of pardon , and not altogether uncapable of some commendation : and if either you or any one els had convinced me of any errour , whether of this or any other kinde , I would learne of him a better lesson then this example sheweth , which is f f●r want of wisedome before hand to make amends by modest confession of a fault afterwards . But ( as yet I conceive my cause ) I must stand upon my just defence against a three-fold charge in your Letter . 1. Of Popish conformity with the Seminarie Priest . 2. Of ambiguity in mine own Tenet , without reference to him . 3. Of scandall and offence , which you conceive some may take ( as your selfe have done ) at that passage , wherat , you say , you have taken a stumble . For the first , you first set downe my words , then the Seminaries ; my words ( as you rightly set them downe , though you take them in a wrong sence ) are these ; g Though there be most dispute betwixt us and the Papists , upon the with-holding of the Cup of the holy Communion , in the thing it selfe , there is no more necessity held ( by either side ) of the use of the one Element then of the other , nor is Christ lesse present to the faithfull in the one then in the other . The Seminaries Tenet you deliver more largely , but I will note onely so much of it , as is most pertinent to cleare the point of consent or difference betwixt us ; and this it is : I affirme , saith the Seminary , that by one of the Elem●nts alone , the whole thing is both signified , and the efficacy produced , for by the one we receive whole Christ , who is as really present by receiving one , as by both . Hereupon you addresse this demand unto me . Now Sir , if it be true , as to the thing it selfe , that there is no other necessity of the use of one Element then of the other ; ●r that the whole benefit may be received by one ; and that Christ is no lesse present to the faithfull in the one element then in the other , or in both together ; then me thinks it is not well done by any of our side , to foment or cherish so great a controversie , as is maintained betwixt us Protestants and the Papists , concerning the obolition of the Communion Cup . If your Seminary had seen this part of your Letter he would perhaps have taxed you for ●●andering his Church ; since though the Communion Cup be with-held from the Laity , it is not abolished : for you know ( and you shew it afterwards out of Popish Authours ) that they consecrate the Sacrament , and the consecrating Priests and Princes receive it , in both kinds : but ( though I would be so just , as to give the Divell his due , and therfore would not make any point of Popery ( which is bad enough ) worse then it is ) I answer for my selfe touching your conceipt of my conformity with the Seminary Priest , that we differ in two main Points ( which are noted by your self ) besides divers others . First , that the Seminary equals one Element with both , I comp●re the one with the other , the Cup with the bread , and say there is no more necessity of the one then of the other : neither necessitate med●● ( for the one is not either more or lesse needfull to a Christian then the other ) nor necessitate precepti ( for both were alike , and together prescribed by the same precept ) if you hold otherwise , you must shew that the bread is more necessary then the Cup , or the Cup more necessary then the bread ; and that the one was prescribed , the other but permitted , or wholly omitted in Christs institution . 2. The Seminary holds one as sufficient as both , both for efficacy , and for signification . I compare the one with the other , but for efficacy ( as your self confesse ) and if you hold that the faithfull receiving of the one is not as effectuall as the faithfull receiving of the other , shew which of the two hath the preheminence of efficacy , and your reason why . 3. Your Seminary Priest ( especially if commorant at Rome ( as you note he was , and it may be yet is ) holds himselfe bound to beliefe and practise of the decrees of the Councels of Constance , Basil and Trent ( as I have set them down in the Popish contradiction to our 30. Article ) which not onely forbid the use of the Communion Cup to the Laity in common , but excommunicateth and anathematizeth those that contradict their decree : I hold it is most soundly determined ( in our thirtieth ) That the Cup of the Lord is not to be denied to the Lay-people , for both parts of the Lords Sacrament ( by Christs ordinance and commandement ) ought to be administred to all Christian men alike ; and I take it for no lesse then h Heresie and a most impious presumption , and damnable Sacriledge of the Popish Prelates , so to crosse our Saviours expresse prescription and practice , an● to defraud so many thousands , of halfe that holy portion of the Sacramen● which his beneficence bequeathed to them when he left this world . Therefore ( Sir ) there is certainly very good cause ( though you seeme to doubt of it ) why you and I should contest in this controversie against the Seminaries Tenet ; Yea why the Protestant Church should be for ever at unreconcilable odds and opposition with the Church of Rome . I shall not need much to insist on that you say ( by way of i comparison ) betwixt the Seminary and me , touching the manner of the presence of Christ in the Sacrament : since , First , my words gave you no cause to suspect me , as either unsound or ambiguous in that point : For they are these [ nor is Christ lesse present to the faithfull in the one then in the other ] whereby you may well enough perceive , I meane ( as a true Protestant should doe ) such a presence as is determined in the 15. Article of our Religion , viz. the body of Christ ( and the same must necessarily bee conceived of his blood ) is given , taken and eaten in the Supper onely after an heavenly and spirituall manner , and the means whereby it is received and eaten in the Supper is faith . And supposing your Seminary Priest ( as in congruity of reason you must ) to be a Papist , you need not doubt but he holds such a presence as you set downe , for the k second member of your four-fold distinction of presence , a corporeall presence by transubstantiation , which ( according to the 38. Article of our Church ) I condemne , as repugnant to the plaine words of Scripture , and destructive of the nature of a Sacrament . This is enough to make me an Hereticke to Papists , and that Papists for their Sacramentall Sacriledge are Hereticks to me , you might have observed in the next leafe of my Case of Conscience l before the words , wheron you ground your comparison betwixt the Seminary and me ; so that your joyning of him and me together ( in this sacrilegious Synecdoche , of a part for the whole ) whom Religion hath put a sunder at further distance then Rome ( where the Seminary resided , and London where my Booke was printed ) is a match as unmeet as their divorce is unjust and unlawfull , who sever the Sacramentall Elements ( with a Canonicall curse ) which our Saviour joyned together with a blessing in the first Institution . My words which you take for the ground of your doubt cleared of ambiguity , and the truth declare● , how Christ may be said to be received with one kind , how with both . HAving purged my selfe , I hope , from all appearance of participation with your Romish Seminary , I shall now cleare my words from your three demands which you raise upon them ; and shall further declare , how Christ may be said to bee received with one , how with both the parts of the Sacrament . Your first demand is what I mean by these words [ There is no more necessity of the use of the one Element then of the other ] whereupon m your words are , I cannot tell certainly what to understand , whether you meane comparatively for dimension or number . If I have pusled you in that I have said , you have cryed quittance with me in your distinction of [ comparatively for dimension or number ] for I cannot understand with any congruity to the point in hand , what you meane by the difference betwixt dimension and number , if you had said [ for degree or number ] the termes of your distinction ( being lodged in divers predicaments ) might have been more easily conceived , and then I should have taken your doubt to be , whether the necessity be as binding for the one as for the other , and no more binding for both , but that one alone might serve for both kindes ? If you enquire of the comparison of one single Element with the other , I have answered you to that already : if of one with both , my words give you none occasion of such a doubt : for I compare but one with one , not one with both , yet the Case of Conscience , being mooved upon the inability of one to receive the bread of the Communion , I conceived it most probable , that in such a case it is better to receive the Sacrament in n Wine onely , as for them that have an o Antipathy to Wine to receive it in Bread onely , then either to forbeare both , or to make use of some other thing instead of that which they cannot have , or cannot take , which I propound ( as in a probleme ) but by way of probability , not meaning to binde any one to this resolution , nor to contend with any for it , who is otherwise minded , which , you may perceive by that p I say of substituting some other matter analogicall to bread or wine in some cases of extreame and extraordinary necessity . And for mine opinion in that point conformable to the judgement and practise of the q reformed Churche in France , confirmed in twenty severall Synods , I r rendred two reasons , which have had the approbation of as learned and judicious Divines as any I know . The one is that by receiving the one kinde [ re ] the other [ ●oto ] the one Element in deed , the other in desire ( when it cannot really be had , or not so received ) the party receiveth Christ , and with Christ both his body and blood . The other is , that it seemes hard measure to debarre any from both parts of the Sacrament , because God hath enabled them to partake but of one , especially if they much desire it , and be enclined to scruples and discomforts if they should want it . The latter Reason is obvious to a meane understanding . Of the former an intelligent Citizen ( accustomed both to reading and reasoning more then ordinary Tradesmen ) made some question , but he was not more scrupulous in his doubt , then ingenuous in receiving satisfaction by mine answer unto it . And because others may haply be scrupled ( as well as either you or he ( though I be not made acquainted with it , as I am with your doubts ) I will briefly deliver how I conceive Christ may be said to be received with one kinde , how with both . It is the constant and s common Doctrine of the Papists , that whole and entire Christ is wholy and entirely under each kind , and that as whole Christ , and a true Sacrament is received in one kinde , so as tou●hing the f●uit they are defrauded of no grace necessary to salvation that receive only one kinde : and that not onely t whole Christ is contained under the species of bread , and under the species of wine , but under every part of the consecrated host , and consecrated wine . And this so commonly held and pleaded ( by the Romanists ) that it commeth in continually like the Cuckoes note , as u Chamier observeth , and giveth it a name accordingly . Wherin though the Popish expression have a tang of Transubstantiation , saying , [ in each kinde and under each kind is whole Christ ] and that in such an advancing of the value of one Element only , their craft and drift is , to make the people contented to be cousened of the other ; yet in a case of necessity ( such as that I resolved ) where both Elements cannot be had , or cannot be taken , it is no Popish , but a protestant Doctrine , That he that faithfully receiveth one kinde with an affection to both , receiveth whole Christ both body and blood . This position in expresse or equivalent termes , you might have read before my booke came forth , in the discourses of divers x Protestant Divines , who have approoved themselves very zealous Antipapists in the controversie of the Eucharist for both kinds . Here I may fitly return you an answer to your second demand , viz. what I meane by the thing it selfe ? wherin I may well admit of your distinction of y res Sacramentalis & res Sacramenti , the Sacramentall signes or elements , and the thing of the Sacrament , that is , Christ which is signified and represented by them . In application of which distinction , I say first , that on both sides it is held , as * I have shewed , that he that rightly receiveth but one element only , may receive rem Sacramenti , that is Christ , and whole Christ . 2. For res Sacramentalis , or the Sacramentall signes , there is no difference for the things themselves , but on both sides it is held that Christ is no lesse present to the faithfull receiver , when he receiveth the one signe then when he receiveth the other , which is all one as if we should say , that the bread hath no preheminence over the wine , nor the wine over the bread , as to a Sacramentall either ordinance or operation , and therfore , z as Dr. Willet rightly observeth , the Papists might as well have kept backe the bread , and have given the Cup without bread , as bread without the Cup . But if the Sacrament be received but in one kind , though in such a case as that I discussed , you seem to deny participation of Christ and Sacramentall efficacy ; otherwise your professed pleading against mine assertion were very impertinent , and if that be your mind , I shall desire your further consideration upon the sayings of sundry Orthodox Divines , forenoted in the margine at the letter x , consenting that whole Christ is received with either Element . Of the same Judgement with them is learned Chamier , who , when the Papists urge the receiving of whole Christ , though but with halfe the visible Sacrament , grants a that for the thing signified by the Sacrament , that is all one to eate the body and drinke the blood of Christ ; and that b there is great difference betwixt that , and the signes by which it is signified , for the thing signified , saith he , is neither eaten nor drunken ; and hereto he applieth and approveth the saying of Bellarmine , that for the thing signified there is no distinction betwixt meat and drinke , and we have , saith * he , often protested unto you that we dispute not of the thing signified by the Sacramentall signes , but of the signes themselves ; therfore in this sence your argument is an Alien from the Thesis in Question . Whence we may inferre a spirituall concomitancy and averre it too , though we deny the c●rnall concomitancy of the Papists , as D. Francis White hath done in his answer to Fisher the Jesuite , his words are these . c The ob●ection , to wit , if the soule and blood were not in Christs body by concomitancy ( s●il . according to the Popish tenet , which teacheth that the bread is turned into flesh , and the wine into blood ) communicants should receive the body of Christ , but not truly Christ is inconsequent , because by receiving the 〈◊〉 , they receive the other : So in this kinde of spirituall concommitancy , neither the Fathers , nor Calvin , nor we , nor you , need to be at any difference : which differeth so much from the carnall concomitancy of the Papists , that the one is most abs●rd and contradictory both to Religion , and Reason , and common sence ; the other , though too high a mystery to be perceived by a sensuall apprehension , yet very consonant to sound and religious reason , according to the prec●dent distinction betwixt the signes , and the thing signified . For the Popish concomitancy dasheth upon this horrible absurdity , d That the flesh and bones of Christ without any alteration of them at all are drunke out of the Challice . In which respect with other such like sutable absurdities , which are concomitant with transubstantiation and concomitancy , e Chamier calleth Transubstantiation the most horrid monster that in the whole world was ev●r fained or formed , not onely ●mong the Haeresies , but in Turcisme or He●●henis●e . But of the spirituall concomitance , that is of receiving whole Christ in spirituall manner , though but one element be received , as in the case of necessity fore-mentioned and presupposed in my resolution of the case of conscience , there is good reason very agreeable to Orthodox Doctrine ; as First , because the means of receiving Christ spiritually is by faith , according to our fifteenth Article , and faith so layeth hold upon Christ , as to be partaker of whole Christ , according to the spirituall concomitancy fore-mentioned , and acknowledged by our Protestant Authours . 2. Though the manner of signification of Christ be divers betwixt the Sacrament of Baptisme and the Lords Supper , yet Christ the thing signified is as fully exhibited to those that are fit to receive it by the use of one element ( though but water ) as by the use of both those of the Eucharist , bread and wine ; and therfore it is true which f Beza delivereth , That in Baptisme Jesus Christ is proposed as conceived , borne , crucified , dead , buried , raised up , and ascended into Heaven , that to all beleevers he may become wisdome , justification , sanctification and redemption , and though in the Sacrament of the Lords Supper the signes & significations be divers , the thing signified , that is whol Christ is the same to the faithful receiver : & though the signes be severed , the thing signified is not so , the body and blood of Christ are not divided , as out of our Protestant Writers I have observed . 3. Then if one have received the bread ( faithfully beleeving that he receiveth whole Christ , according to the Protestant concomitancy fore-mentioned ) should by some extraordinary hap be disappointed of the other part of the Sacrament ( as sometimes it hath , and too oft may fall out in Congregations of the Country , where there may be an unexpected failing of wine , and no timely supply from Vintners to be expected , doth that failing which was none of the receivers fault , make his faith to faile , which was his duty and vertue rightly exercised upon the right object , if it doe not in a case of such necessity , as I discussed , the faithfull receiver may receive whole Christ , though for the outward element he receive but one part of the Sacrament . Vpo● your second demand you presently make a third , viz. wh●t I meane by necessity ? To which I need not make a particular reply in this place , for I have made answer to it already under the first part of your charge , wherin you would have chain●d your Seminary and me tog●ther in an hainous breach of the Sacramentall combination . And yet even the word necessity maketh a maine and materiall diff●rence betwixt the halfe Communion of the Papists , and that which I propound and plead for in my Case of Conscience , viz. the lawfulnesse and sufficiency of one Element alone in case of necessity where both cannot be had , or cannot be taken , which is g extraordinary and rare . But the Popish parting of the Sacrament and putting a part for the whole ( saving a few exceptions of conficient or consecrating Priests or Princes ) is generall and ordinary , and that by Canon discharged with a dreadfull curse , as hath before been observed ; so that when you professe to hold , That the Eucharist ought to be communicated by such as are able and fit , both Priests and people in both Elements , and not in one of them indifferently . You hold nothing against me for your limitation [ of able and fit ] maketh for such indulgence as I defend ; otherwise and out of such cases of exception , I hold ( as you doe ) that all both Pastours and people ought to receive in both Elements , and not in one of them indifferently . Though the faithfull receive whole Christ with on● part of the Sacrament , yet it is utterly ●nlawfull , either to administer the Sacrament in the Popish Church with 〈◊〉 kind● , or so to receive it , though none other exception were to be taken at the Religion then their broken communion , with the inducements to it , and consequences upon it . FRom that which hath been said of receiving whole Christ by or with one element only , it will not follow that either the Popish Doctrine , and practise ( concerning the dismembred administration of the Eucharist ) is not to be ●●ndemned as unlawfull , and no lesse then sacrilegious and hereticall , nor that any one may lawfully receive the Sacrament in one kinde only in their Church , though nothing els w●re amisse in it then their maiming and mangling this holy Sacrament . And for their pretence of whole Christ under one kind to defraud the people of the other , it is easily answered . First , that Christ knew that much better then they , and yet he did institute the Sacraments in both kinds , and so delivered it to his Disciples , as is confessed in the Councell of a Constance and b Trent , and so it was accustomed to be from the beginning of Christian Religion , as is likewise confessed by many learned c Papists and the constant practice of it for d twelve hundred yeeres is averred by Protestant Divines , and the Papists themselves in part confor●e to the originall rule and example in consecrating the Sacrament in both kinds ( as in the Priests and Princes receivin● in both kinds ) to which purpose you have e cited sundry testimonies of Romish Writers which make much against their with-holding of the consecrated Cup from the Lay Communicants . But what matter is it , saith f Beca●us , if they have whole Christ , though they have but one halfe of the Sacrament ? Suppose , saith he , that a 〈…〉 a lega●y of a thousand Florens bequeathed to him in two codicills or wills , each containing the same summe , it is s●fficient for him to have the one of them , which will be as beneficiall as both . But he is well answered by g Chamier , that the Testator in this case appoints as well both the codicils to be delivered , as the legacy it selfe ; for it was instituted by our Saviour at the first , and so delivered over in his name to the Church by the Apostle , 1. Cor. 11. Nay to say the truth , he trusteth the Ministers of the Church only with the codicils or outward evidences of this legacy , the gift of himselfe , he reserveth to himselfe , and he giveth himselfe to those only whom he , and he alone knoweth , by faith to be meetly qualified to receive him . They then who are trusted with two tokens of Christs love , and charged to deliver them both to his people , and keepe backe one halfe , doe proove themselves both disobedient and unfaithfull to their Lord , and injurious unto men . Ob. But while they administer in one kind , and in that kinde whole Christ unto the people , though th●y may have some wrong , they have neither damage nor danger , by keeping back the other part of the Sacrament . Sol. The answer to this will require a second reason against their halfe Communion , and it is that which you have touched in your Letter to me , as well as the former , yet in both you will , I hope , give me leave ( if you give me not thanks ) to expresse mine exception● against this Popish Sacriledge in mine own way : and for that I say , that if we consider either the significancy of the signes , or energy of effect where both may be had ▪ there is a double maime in that single administration without the Cup of the Sacrament . For the first , where there is but one Element the signification is defective , and that two wayes . 1. In regard of fullnesse . 2. Of clearnesse . For the former . Our Saviour meant by the●e outward signes to signifie a h perfect refection to the soule of the faithfull by m●at and drinke , which makes up a full and compleat repast , so that whatsoever is needfull for our nourishment is reduced to one of them , this we may call a reall f●ll●esse , and there is a personall also , wherto the Elements must in their use and application be extended , so that they must signifie such a full refreshing to the Laity as well as to the Clergy , since as it is well said in the * Augustan Conf●ssion , the Sacrament was instituted not for a part of the Church , but for the whole Church both Priests and people . 2. For clearnesse ; as this is more fully , so it is more clearly signified in two distinct ●lements , which must be received in a distinct and severall manner , according to their kind : as bread by it selfe in the manner of eating and wine by it selfe in the manner of drinking , not according to the confused concomitancy of the Papists , wherby they fancy the b●dy of Christ to be drun●e in the Cup , and his blood 〈…〉 in the 〈◊〉 . 2. For efficacy where both may be had , and either is refused , there may be a question , whether there be any gracious efficacy at all , and more li●e that there is not , for me thinks that sounds to good reason , which Dr. Francis White hath delivered against Fisher the Iesuite . i The Church ( saith he ) cannot expect that Christ should fullfill his promise in giving his flesh and his blood , unlesse shee observe his ordinance , and do that which he hath appointed . But if there be any benefit by such a receiving , it is like to be lesse ( k according to our Protestant Tenet ) then might bee expected by both . For first , Christ blessed both Elements severally , and they that so take them as he ordained them , take them not with a single , but a double blessing . 2. The double representation works more upon the apprehension and affections ( in one that cometh duly prepared to receive the Sacrament ) and so maketh them fitter to receive Sacramentall grace with the Sacramentall signes , and when men are more fitted for grace , they are like to be more furnished with grace : and as there is a two-fold act of faith on their part who rightly receive the Sacrament in both kinds : So no doubt there is an answerable operation of grace on Gods part , where the words of Salomon ( though spoken in another sence ) may be verified , Two is better then one , for they have a good reward for their labour , Eccles. 4. 9. two Sacramentall ●ignes , two faithfull receivings are better then one , for they have not only a good reward but a better reward , viz. two gracious refreshings from the Authour of the Sacrament , and a stronger union with him then is made by one signe or one act of receiving of the Sacrament , l as by this entire receiving of the Sacrament there is a str●nger union betwixt the mysticall body and the head , then where the Sacrament is received in one kind only . And that there is lesse benefit by one Element then by both ( as hath been said ) is implicitly confessed in the Tridentine Councell , where the Step-Fathers of Trent , decreeing the defra●ding of their children , of halfe the portion of their heavenly fathers provision for their soules , say m That by keeping the Cup from them , they are not deprived of any grace that is necessary to salvation . Of some grace then they are deprived , but not of any without which they cannot be saved . But it is more plainly acknowledged by Vasquez , where he saith , n We grant that the Lay-people ( who are not allowed the Communion Cup ) are defrauded of some grace , but none of that , without which they may not be saved . By the same reason they might take from them the other part of the Sacrament , and so let them have no Sacrament at all , for o though it be necessary , that when the Sacrament of the Lords Supper is administred , it be done according to his institution , except in such cases of necessity ( as I have partly here , and partly in the resolution of the Case of Conscience observed ) yet there is no such simple necessity of it , but that a man may be saved without it , which the Papists themselves will not deny , and though they hold a greater necessity ( for salvation ) of the Sacrament of Baptisme then of the Eucharist , yet they will not gain-say the saying of p S. Aug. that those who have not beene washed in the Laver of Regeneration , if they die for confession of the Christian faith , that is as availeable for remission of their sinnes , as if they had been washed in the fountain of Baptisme . And why should they confine the comforts of a Christian within the narrow lists of necessity to ●alvation ? when the Lord hath been liberall in his allowance of sweet and gracious refreshings , a man may be saved and yet be distressed and tro●bled in conscience ( as * Luther was for three yeers together ) and it may be the want of an entire Sacrament ( according to the Lords ordinance ) may be cause of much discontent to a well affected and scrupulous Christian , will it stand then with the charity of those who ( above others ) affect the name of Fathers , and of that Church which usurps and glories in the title of a common mother to b● so hard-hearted to their children , as not to care how uncomfortable their condition be upon earth , so they goe not to Hell for lacke of necessaries to salvation ? Their doctrine and practice proclaimes them such unkinde , u●naturall Parents as uncharitable to their children in with-holding from them their spirituall aliment , in an entire receipt of the blessed Sacrament , as they are undutifull and disobedient to their Lord and master in breaking his commandment in their broken Communion . Upon these premises it wil necessarily follow that if there were nothing to be blamed in the Service or Lit●rgy of the Romish Church , but this violation of the Lords ordinance , as they make it in decree and practice ( notwithstanding that whole Christ may be , as we have shewed , received with one kind ) it is utterly unlawfull to receive the Sacrament , as the Romanists administer it in one Element only , for that were to consent unto , and ( for his part that so doth ) to confirme their sinfull separation of those things , which God for the good of man , hath ( by expresse both institution and practise ) joyned together . The third p●rticul●● of scandall answered . TOwards the conclusion of your Treatise ( wherto I may now addresse my selfe after full satisfaction ( I trust you will take it for no lesse ) to the two former particulars ) you professe a feare of scandall to many among us ( you mean Protestants ) who may be changed in opinion or at least offended by that passage of my case of conscience , which you have selected , as most worthy of exception , and to the Romish-party who may vouch this concession of mine , for indifferency of Communion in one kind , for which cause you heartily wish , that that peece of my book had been obliterated before it came to the Presse . Sir , I will not blame you for being chary of scandals , it is too common a fault , and more common in these times then in any ( within the compasse of mine observation ) to be too much addicted in self satisfaction , with too little respect of others whether they stumble or stand at our sayings or doings . And if you concived my words so offensive as you say , you could not wish any lesse unto them then the dash of a pen , which mine owne hand should have made , if I had conceived any suspition that they did deserve it . But I hope by this time you well understand , that you were more afraid , then any could be hurt by that I have written : Yet I deny not but there be some , who are either so uncapable of religious reason , especially in problematicall discussion● , or so captiously perverse as to turn most saving truths into matter of scandall , els a Alphonsus a Castro could not have counted thirteen Heresies concerning the Sacrament of the Eucharist , as he hath done . And for the Papists in particular , they are the lesse to be heeded , because they are knowne to make no conscience of corrupting , wresting and misapplying of the writings of the Protestants : Wherin they seeme sometimes to take the Divel● practice for their ●●tterne , who alleadging a Text of angelicall protection out of the 91. Psalm ( when he tempted our Savio●r to cast himselfe down from the Pinacle of the Temple ) b left out the words which were most pe●●nent to repell his temptation . So do c Quirinus Cnoglerus , d Pe●rus Ludsemius and e Franciscus Longus deale with Calvine , where they cite him as such an enemy to the sacred Trinity , that he could not indure the words Trinity , person , {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} , and therefore wished they were buried : and they quote for proof , lib. 1. I●stit . c. 13. Sect. 5. wheras there he reproves the perversnesse of the Arrian spirit in their distaste and detestation of those words , yet shews his owne indisposition to a logomachy or strife of words , so far that he wishes that those words were buried , but upon this condition ( which these Popish , yea divellish slanderers conceale ) that the ●aith of the Trinity were soundly asserted , as I have more lagely shewed in the fourth Chapter of mine Apology for the Geneva annotations , against the ●mputation of Iudaisme and Arri●●isme . And your selfe in your f late detection of papisticall fraud observe how forward they were to falsifie Sir Humphry Linds words touching the number of Sacraments , and most absurdly to make him to dispute against himself and the Church of England ; and your selfe perhaps may be abused by them in the like kinde , for they may say you plead for the use of the ( much abused ) termes g Priest , Altar , Sacrifice with an affectionate relish of the Romish-Religion , and from your tenet of Episcopacy by h divine Right , they may 〈◊〉 that you condemne all the reformed Churches that 〈◊〉 ●ot under the government of Episcopall Authority . And some on the quite contrary side , may 〈◊〉 use of your words in favour to the Lay-Presbytery , in that i you all●adge such instances of Lay-men made Bishops , as k Gersom Bucer bringeth in for establishment of Laicall Presbyters : and if a man will set himself to cavill at your words , it may be he may impose upon you that which is as farre from your purpose , as Popery from mine , viz , l that making Timothy a Bishop , and ordained and consecrated to that office by the office of the Presbytery , ( which you say may be done by one ) then a Presbyter may ordain a Bishop , and so Presbytery shall be superiour to Episcopacy . But for my Tenet touching comm●nicating in one kind ( as I have stated it ) I feare no just occasion of offence , since m D. Featly delivered the same in disputation with M. Everard ; and the n French-Church hath both decreed , and as occasion required , administred the Sacrament accordingly , and yet no scandall hath been given , no advantage taken therof by the Papists , so far as I have either read or heard . So much for your charge and my clearing , or ( if you like better ) for your doubts , and my resolution : wherin if the truth be further cleared and confirmed ( as I doubt not but you will acknowledge upon your unpartiall peru●all of what I have written ) neither you nor I shall have cause to wish that those lines had bin obliterated , which you took for the ground of this intercourse betwixt us . Which I trust for my part you will take as a testimony both of my love to the truth , and of my respect to your self , and that you will be no more displeased with me for my reply , o then I am with you , for your provocation unto it : since I strive not p as with an adversary for victory , but for the prevailing of truth aboue errour , which may be a contestation not incompatible with the affections of very good friends : and such a one I shall be glad upon all good occasions to approve my s●lf on your behalf that you may account me , 〈◊〉 ●●dworth in 〈◊〉 Ju●● 26. 1641. Yours as power and opportunity enable me to doe you Service , John Ley. Notes, typically marginal, from the original text Notes for div A48307e-360 a Proverbium [ nodum in Scyrpo quaerere ] in an●●ium dicebatur , nimisque diligentem aut me●i●ulosu●● , qui illic scrupulum mover●t ubi nihil esset ad dubi . ●andum . E●asm . Ch●liad . p. 158 Col. 1. b That is the Protestation , dated the third of May , 1641● c 2. Parti● . doubt p. 16. d 4. Parti● . doubt . p. 32. e 5 Parti● . doubt . p. 37. f Stow● Annals p. 1074. a Per suos Apostolos tanquam fontem , omnis salutaris veritatis & morum disciplinae omni creaturae praedicari iussit , perspiciensque hanc veritatem , & disciplinam contineri in libris Scriptis & sine Scripto traditionibus quae & ipsius Christi ore ab Apostolis acceptae , aut ab ipsis Apostolis S. S. dictante quasi per manus traditae ad nosusque pervenerunt , Concil. Trid. Ses. 4. Tom. 9. Concil. pag. 354. col . 1. a. Edit. Bin . Paris . 1636. b Ne cui dubitatio suboriri possit , quinam libri sint , qui ab ipsa Synodo suscipiuntur , sunt infra , scripti Testamenti veteris 5. libri Mosis , Gen. Exod. Levit. Numb. Deut. Jos. Judg. Ruth 4. Regum . 2 Paralipon , Esdr. 1. & 2. qui & Nehemias , Tobias , Judith , Esther , Job , Psalterium Davidicum 150. Psalmorum , Parabolae , Ecclesiastes , Cantic. Canticor , Sapientiae , Ecclesiasticus , Esias . Jerem. cum Baruch , Ezech. Dan. Prophetae minores ( prout in nostris codicibus ) & post eos 2 Maccab. Lib. Concil. Trid. Ses. 4. Tom. 9. p. 354. Col. 1. c Siquis autem hos libros integros cum omnibus suis partibus ( prout in Ecclesia catholica legi consueverun● , & in veteri vulgata latina editione habentur ) pro sacris , & canonicis non susceperit , & traditiones praedictas sciens & prudens contempserit , Anathema sit . ibid. d See the letters f. g. e Hanc co●cupiscentiam quam aliquando Apostolus [ dicit non quando , ut supra , sed aliquando ] Caranza Sum. Con. Concil. Trid. S●s . 4. fol. 480 b. & 487. b. f Siquis dixerit sola fide impium iustificari , ita ut intelligat , nihil aliud ▪ requiri , quod ad iustificationis gratiam cooperetur , anathema sit . Concil. Trid. Ses. 6. Can. 9. Tom. 9. pag. 362. col . 2. g Concilium perfectionis vocamus ▪ opus bonum à Christo nobis non imperatum sed demonstratum , non mandatum sed commendatum . Bel. de Mon. l. 2. c. 7. tom . 2. p. 146. h Rhemists Annot. in 2 ad Corinth . 8. 14. See also their ▪ Annot. on 2 Cor. 2. 10. i Gloriosam Virginem Dei genetricem Mariam , perveniente & operante divini numinis gratia singulari , nunquam actualiter subiacuisse originali peccato , sed immunemsemper fuisse ab omni originali & actuali culpa . Concil. Basil. oecumen. Ses. 36. Tom. 8. p. 97. col . 1. prope finem . k Declarat haec sancta Synodus non esse suae intentionis comprehendere in hoc decreto ( ubi de pe●cato originali agitur ) beatam & immaculatam Virginem Mariam D●i genetricem . Concil. Trid. Sess 5. Tom. 9. pag. 357. col . 1. l Bel. de Concil. l. 2. ca. 2. Tom. 2. pag. 22. Col. 1. m Romanae Ecclesiae fides per Petrum super petron aedificata , nec hactenus defecit , nec deficiet in secula . Epist. Leon . pap . 9. c. 32. Tom. 7. Conc. par . 1. p. 239. col . 2. n Romana Ecclesia nunquam erravit nec in perpetuum ▪ errabit . Epist. Gregor. 7. ibid. pag. 362. o Papa non potest ●llo modo definire aliquid haereticumà tota ecclesia ●redendum . Bel. de Ro. po . l. 4. cap. 2. pag. 311. p Purgatorium esse animasque ibi detentas fidelium suffragijs i●vari . Conc. Trid. Ses. 25. Tom ▪ 9. p. 419. col . 2. p Purgatorium esse animasque ibi detentas fidelium suffragijs i●vari . Conc. Trid. Ses. 25. Tom ▪ 9. p. 419. col . 2. q Sacra sancta Syn●dus indulgentiarum usum Christiano pop●do maximè salutarem in Ecclesia retinendum esse docet , eosque anathemate damnat qui inutiles esse asserunt . Ibid. pag. 433. col . 1. See Bel. de Jud. lib. 1. cap. 2. Tom. 2. pag. 438. q Sacra sancta Syn●dus indulgentiarum usum Christiano pop●do maximè salutarem in Ecclesia retinendum esse docet , eosque anathemate damnat qui inutiles esse asserunt . Ibid. pag. 433. col . 1. See Bel. de Jud. lib. 1. cap. 2. Tom. 2. pag. 438. t Imagines Christi & sanctorum venerandae sunt non solum per accidens , vel impropriè , sed per se , & propriè , ita ut ipsae terminent venerationem . Bellar. de Imag. Sanct. lib. 2. cap. 21. Tom. 2. p. 328. princip. cap. t Imagines Christi & sanctorum venerandae sunt non solum per accidens , vel impropriè , sed per se , & propriè , ita ut ipsae terminent venerationem . Bellar. de Imag. Sanct. lib. 2. cap. 21. Tom. 2. p. 328. princip. cap. s Imagines porro Christi , Deiparae Virginis , & aliorum sanctorum , in Templis praesertim habendas , & retinendas , eisque debitum honorem , & venerationem impertiendum . Concil. Trid. Ses. 25. pag. 420. Col. 1. s Imagines porro Christi , Deiparae Virginis , & aliorum sanctorum , in Templis praesertim habendas , & retinendas , eisque debitum honorem , & venerationem impertiendum . Concil. Trid. Ses. 25. pag. 420. Col. 1. t Ex omnibus sacris imaginibus magnum fructum percipi , ibid. t Ex omnibus sacris imaginibus magnum fructum percipi , ibid. u Mandat sancta Synodus Episcopis , &c , de Reliquiarium honore & legitimo Imaginum usu fideles diligenter instruant . Concil. Trid. Ses. 25. Tom. 9. p. 419. col . 2. u Mandat sancta Synodus Episcopis , &c , de Reliquiarium honore & legitimo Imaginum usu fideles diligenter instruant . Concil. Trid. Ses. 25. Tom. 9. p. 419. col . 2. w Imprimis de sanctorum Intercessione & Invocatione , Ibid. Item . Bel. de Sanctor . beatitud . lib. 1. cap. 19. Tom. 2. p. 294. x Bonum atque utile est suppliciter eos invocare , Concil. Trid. ubi supra . w Imprimis de sanctorum Intercessione & Invocatione , Ibid. Item . Bel. de Sanctor . beatitud . lib. 1. cap. 19. Tom. 2. p. 294. x Bonum atque utile est suppliciter eos invocare , Concil. Trid. ubi supra . y Etsi missa magnam contineat populi fidelis eruditionem , non tamen expedire visum est Patribus , ut lingua vulgari celebraretur . Concil. Trid. Ses. 22. c. 8. Tom. 9. p. 402. Col. 2. z Catholicae Ecclesiae Sacramenta septenario numero definita sunt . Catechis . Concil. Trid. ad Parochos p. 173. Conc. Trid. Ses. 23. c. 3. Tom. 9. pag. 406. col . 1. a Prim. est Baptismus , deinde confirmatio , tum Eucharistia 4●0 . loco paenitentia , postea vero extrema unctio , sequitur ●rdo , postremo additur , matrimonium . Catech. Concil. Trid. p. 174. b Nunc denuò sancta haec Synodus declarat post consecrationem panis & vini conversionem fieri totius substantiae panis in substantiam corporis Christi , & totius substantiae vini , in substantiam sanguinis , eiusque conversio convenienter & propriè a sancta Catholica Ecclesia transubstantiatio est appellata , Concil. Trid. Sess. 13. cap. 4. Tom. 9. p. 380. Col. 2. c Panem & vinum ( quae in Altari ponuntur ) post consecrationem , non solum Sacramentum , sed etiam verum corpus & sanguinem Christi esse , & sensualiter , non solum Sacramento , sed in veritate manibus Sacerdotum tractari & frangi & fidelium dentibus atteri , jurans per sanctum & homousion Trinitatem & per haec sacra sancta Dei Evangelia . Concil. Ro. Sub. Nicol. Pap. 2. Tom. 7. Concil. par . 1. p. 274. Col. 2. d Deferri ipsam Sacram Eucharistiam ad infirmos , & in hunc usum diligenter in Ecclesia conservari , cum summa equitate et ratione conjunctum est — quare sancta haec Synodus retinendum omnino falutarem hunc morem statuit . Concil. Trid. Ses. 13. cap. 8. Tom. 9. pag. 381. Col. 1. e Declarat praeterea sancta Synodus piè & religios● , admodum in Dei Ecclesiam inductum fuisse morem , & singulis annis peculiari quodam , & festo die precelsum hoc & venerabile Sacramentum si●gulari veneratione & solemnitate celebreretur , atque in Processionibus reverenter & honorificè per vias & loca publica circumferretur . Concil. Trid. Sess. 13. cap. 5. Tom. 9. pag. 381. Col. 1. e Declarat praeterea sancta Synodus piè & religios● , admodum in Dei Ecclesiam inductum fuisse morem , & singulis annis peculiari quodam , & festo die precelsum hoc & venerabile Sacramentum si●gulari veneratione & solemnitate celebreretur , atque in Processionibus reverenter & honorificè per vias & loca publica circumferretur . Concil. Trid. Sess. 13. cap. 5. Tom. 9. pag. 381. Col. 1. f Nullus dubitandi locus relinquitur quin omnes Christi fideles promore in Catholica Ecclesia semper recepta latriae cultum ( qui vero Deo debetur ) huic sanctissimo Sacramento cum veneratione exhibeant , Ibid. c. 5. p. 380. Col. 2. fine . f Nullus dubitandi locus relinquitur quin omnes Christi fideles promore in Catholica Ecclesia semper recepta latriae cultum ( qui vero Deo debetur ) huic sanctissimo Sacramento cum veneratione exhibeant , Ibid. c. 5. p. 380. Col. 2. fine . g So the Rhemists ●in 1 ▪ Cor. c. 11. ver. 27. Sect. 10. pag. 526. h Cum in nonnullis mundi partibus quidam temerariè asserere praesumant populum Christianum debere sacrum Eucharistiae Sacramentum sub utraque panis & vini specie suscipere , et non solum sub specie panis , sed etiam sub specie vini populum laicum passim communicent ( tum sepuitur decretum Concilij hisce verbis sequentibus ) Quod nullus Presbyter sub poena excommunicationis communicet populum sub utraque specie panis & vini . Conc. Constant. Sess. 13. Tom. 7. Concil. p. 1042. Col. 1. & Col. 2. i Laudabilis quoque cons●etudo communicandi Laicum populum sub una specie , ab Ecclesia & sanctis patribus rationabiliter introducta — pro lege habenda est , nec alicui licitum est eam reprobare aut sine authoritate Ecclesiae ipsam immutare . Concil. Basil. Oecum . Sess. 30. Tom. 8. p. 85. col . 2. et p. 86. col . 1 k Si quis dixerit ex praecepto Dei vel necessitate salutis , omnes & singulos Christi fideles u●●amque speciem sanctissimae Eucharistiae Sacramenti sumere debere , anathema sit . Concil. Trid. Sess. 21. Can. 1. Tom. 9. p. 399. l Si quis dixerit sanctam Ecclesiam Catholicam non iustis causis & rationalibus adductam fuisse , ut Laicos atque Clericos non conficientes , sub panis tantummodo specie communicaret , aut in eo errasse , anathema sit . Ibid. Can. 2. p. 399. a In quibusdum locis po●●●gunt vinum non ●onsecratum ; solet apud Gallos ●ieri , & ex eo prejudicio creadebam ego quidem ap●d omnes , nunc primū audivi , apud quosdam & aliunde didici , in Hispania aquam ●ari , sed our non apud omnes ? nam foliola illa ●arinacia non sunt faciliùs deglubenda alibi , quam apud nos Cham de Euchar. l. 9. c 6. Tom. 4. de Sacr. p. 496. b Itaque nostrotes ▪ Sacerdotes pudor aliquis tenuit , apudquos vili●s est vinum . Chamier . de Eucharist . l. 9. c. 6. Tom. 4. de Sacr. p. 496. Col. 2. c Aquarij loco vini aquâ ●si sunt , ne odore vini Christianit atis judicio proderentur . Cyprian . Ep. 63. ad Caelium . Vide et Baron . Annal. ad an. 257. 〈◊〉 . 9 , 10 , 11. m In divino hoc Sacrificio quod in missa peragitur , idem ille Christu● continetur & in-cruentè immolatur qui in ●●a crucis semel seipsum cruentè obtulit — cujus oblationis ( cruentae inquam ) fructus per hanc incruentam uberrimè percipiuntur , quare non solum profidelium virorum peccatis , poenis , satisfactionibus & alijs necessitatibus , sed & pro defunctis in Christo , nondum ad plenum purgatis , ritè , juxta Apostolorum traditio●●m offertur . Concil. Trid. Sess. 22. c. 3. Tom. 9. p. 402. Col. 1. n Qui dixerit missae Sacrificium soli prodesse sumenti , neque pro vivis & defunctis pro peccatis , poenis satisfactionibus atque necessitatibus offerri debere , anathema sit . Ib. Can. 3. p. 403. Col. 1. o Si quis dixerit Clericos in sacris ordinibus constitutos ( vel regulares castitatem solemniter professos ) posse matrimonium contrahere , contractumque validum esse , non obstante lege Ecclesiastica vel voto anathema sit . Concil. Trid. Sess. 24. Can. 9. Tom. 9. Concil. p. 411. Col. 1. fine . See also Bel. de Cleric . l. 1. c. 18. p. 112. Col. 2. p Papa gravi maerore de consilio Cardinalium , Episcoporum & aliorum virorum prudentum sententialitèr definivit , ut Rex Anglorum Johannes a solio Regni deponeretur , & alius , Papa procurante , succederet qui dignior esset . Math. Paris Histor. major . in Ioh. p. 310. q Nonne Rex Anglorum noster est Vassalus , & ut plus dicam mancipium ? possumus eum nuto nostro incarcerare & ignomi●iae mancipare . Ib. in Hen. 3. pag. 1160. r S. N. D. Pij Papae 5. sententia declaratoria contra Eliz. ( pretensam Angliae Reginam ) qua declaratur absoluti omnes subditi à iuramento fidelitatis , & quocunque alio debito , & deinceps obedientes anathemate illaqueantur . Bull . Pij 5. San. de Schis. Angl. pag. 182. s Non regnum hoc Angliae solum sed & reliqua omnia quae per Europam sunt regna ( nec vel unum excipio ) omnia inquam sunt pontificis ; constat hoc ex Registro Greg. 7. apud Steuchum 2. lib. contra Vallam pro donatione Constantini . Regnum Arragoniae , Sardiniae , Hispaniae , Hungariae , Danorum , Russiae , Portugaliae , Boemiae , Sueciae , Norvegiae , Galliae , Poloniae . Vide Tort. Torti . p. 217 , 218. a H●retici omnes tum recentiores , tum antiquiores , qui purgatorium negarunt , consequenter etiam suffragia & indulgentias mortuis prodesse negaverunt . Bellar. de Indulg. lib. 1. c. 14 Tom. 2 p. 456. col . 1. See also Bell. de purg . l. 1 c. 15. Tom: 2. p : 250. Suffragia Ecclesiae defunctis prodesse . Ibid : l : 2. de purg . ca. 15. Tom. 2. p 264. col . 2. b In my booke ag●inst the Oath , D●ubt . 2. pag. 16. and Doubt . 4. p ▪ 32. and Doubt . 5. p. 37. c My booke of Doubts and Hopes , p. 15 , 16. d K. Iames in his Speech in Starr-chamb●r . 1●16 . Op●● . p. 552. e Votum quodammodo ad ●uramen●um promissarium referri debet . Rivet . in Dec● l. p 146. M Whateley his Prototypes ▪ part ● p. 51. f Vovens & non solvens quid nisi perjuro . Bern ▪ de praecept ▪ & dispensat c. 20. col : 930. g Haec itaque legalia statuta vel decreta in nostro conventu Synedali edicta ●uncti tunc temporis optimates se observaturos fideliter spondebant Conc. Aenham . Can 7. Tom 1. Con● D. Spelm p. 527. h Votum est testificatio quaedam promissionis spontaneae , quae Deo & de●is que Dei sunt propriè fieri debet , Lumbard . l 4. dist. 38. a. fol. 423. pag. 1. i Per●ins vol● pag 111. col . ● . k Gravissimum vovendi 〈◊〉 fuit cum juramentum adhi●●batur , M●●don . in M●th. 15. v. 6. col . 315. Votum est actus religiosus soli Deo debitus . Bell. de cul●u Sanct. l. 1. c. 9. Tom. 2 p. 355. l Protestatio est animi nostri declaratio juris acquirendi vel conservandi , vel damni depellendi causa acta Andr. Alceat . de verbor . signif. Comment. in Vlp. l. 6. leg. 40. p●g . 89. Votum est aelicujus faciendi vel non saciendi versu● Deum deliberata & justa promissio . Andr. Alc●at . de verbor . signif Commentar. p. 474. m Protestationem quidam defiaiu●r clamosam esse Testationem , quae in obtestantis ipsius cantionem i●venta ●it . Ibid. pag. 88 ▪ Votum est promissio & sponsio Deo ●acta . Azor. Instit. l. 11. c. 12 p. 754 Quod inter homines dicitur promissio id Dei respectu votum appellatur . Z●nch . Tom. 7. p. 707. col . 2. n D. Cous. Apol. for Ecclesiasticall proceedings c. 3. p. 23. o Hic erat gestus jurantium 〈◊〉 ●●iamnùm bodie . Beza Annot. in R●v. 10. 5. p Rivet . exercit 81. in Gen. p. 390. * Pa●aeus Gen. 24. c. 2. q Quid ab Episcopis Prelatisve ob dignitatem qua praecellunt ex instituto fieri decet , ut manu ad pectus admota , si quando oportet jusjurandum prestent . Concil. Mediol . Tom. 9. pag. 676. col . 2. r Inferiores sub superiorum ●emore manum ponebant . Gen. 24. 2. & 34 7. & 47. 29. Dud . Fenneri The●● . l. 5. c. 3. fol. 53. pa. 2. s Aug. de C. D. l. 16. c. 33. pag. 608. t Reliqui Ecclesiastici bomines subdiacon● Diaconi , Presbyteri , si jura re necesse habent , id tactis sacri● litteris aga●t . Concil. medio l●n . 6. Tom. 9. pag. 676 col 2. u In causis vero levibus , ubipo 〈◊〉 est , jurent manu pectori almotâ s● modo superior praesen● no● adest , quo praese●te contactis Scripturis jusjurandum prestent . Ibid pag. 676. col . 2. 677. col . 1. x Homil. 44. op●r Imper● . in Math. y Georgius Deo a nabilis , & Charta●●ylax dixit hi sunt duo Codices qui continet Acta Sanctae Synodi — tangens igitur proposita sa●ro sanct ● Dei eloquia , dixit per ist as sanctas virtutes & D●um 〈…〉 est per eas , cum 〈…〉 libri , &c. Sext. Synod . Constantinop . Art. 14. Tom 5. pag. 231. 232. z Centu● . 7. col . 227. 20. a Centur. 9. col 287. 40. b Sic me Deus adsuve● & ista sancta Evangelia . Centur. 11. col . 131. 20. c Why do they not as vvell challenge us that vvee give the booke to touch and kisse in taking an oath . The defence of the Humble Remonstrance , §. 11. p 81. d D. R Cousins Apology for proceeding in Ecclesiasticall Courts , part . 3. c 4. 1. Authority . 2. Liberty . See the Preface pr●fixed before the doubts of the Oath . fol. 2. p. 2. 3. Integrity . 4. Benignity . b See the Defence of the Humble Remonstrance , p. 162. a I have heretofore endeavoured tovvith●dravv one ( vvho had neere relation to mee ) from the Rom●sh Religion , attempting to vvork it , upon the great vvrōg the Laity did suffer in that Religion for vvant of the Communion Cup M. Harlow p ▪ 1. If you and the Seminary doe meane , &c. ● Ibid. b Because neither you nor the Seminary have declared vvhat kinde of presence , &c. p. 6. c Non tam interest quo animo s●ribatur , quam quo accip●atur , Cic. Ep. f●● . l. 6. p 65. nu 26. d Ardebant veteres tanto syncerae pietatis ardore , ut dum unum errorem omni virium conatu destru . ere annituntur , s●epe in alterum oppositum errorem , vel deciderint , vel quoda●●●odo decidisse videantur , Sixt. Senens . Prefat. in lib. ● . Biblioth. Sanct. p. 1. & 2. e D. Featley Cygnea ca●tio , p. 31. f Secundas babeat mod estiae , qui primas non po●uit ba●ere sa●ientiae . Aug. Ep 7. Marc●llino . Tom. 2. p. 32. g M. Ley his Case of Conscience . p. 17. Answ. h I ranke the Papists with grosse Heretiks for taking the Communion Cup from the Laity . In my case of conscience , p. 15 , 16. i Because neither you nor the Semina●y have decl●red what kinde of pr●sence you intend , &c. p. 6. And again if you a●d the Seminary due meane , &c ●b . As before is noted . k Ibid. l Pag. 15 , 16. 1. Demand ▪ m Pag. 1. n See the case of conscience , p. 13 , 14 , 18 , 19 o Su●t qui sine animi deliquio 〈…〉 n●n possunt . Calv. Ep inter Ep. Bez Ep. 15. p. 167. p Case of conscience , pa. 8. q Ibid. p. 10. r Ibid. p. 13 , 14. s Totum & integrum Christum a● verum S●cramentum subqualibet specie sumi . Conc. Trid. Sess. 21. c 3. Tom. 9. pa. 399. Bin . euit . 1636. t Nec Vllatenus ambigendum est quod non sub specie panis caro tantum , nec sub specie vini sanguis tantum , sed sub qualibet specie est integer & totus Christi●s . Basil Conc●● . Oecumen. Sess. 30. Tom. 8. p. 85. col 2. Totus Christus continetur sub specie panis , & totus sub specie vini , & sub qualibet qu●que parte host●ae consecratae , & vini consc●rati . Concil. Floren●● . 3. sub Eugen. 4. Decret. super unione Jacobinorum & Atmenorum . Tom. 8. Conc●l p 866. col 1. Lumbard . l. 4. dist. 11. fol. 354 b Bel. l 4 de ●uchar . cap. 21. Tom. 3 pag 287. Col 2. Ruardus Tapperun . act . 15 notat . post pag. 402. Tom. 1. Hard apud Jewell . Act. 2. pag 75. Ecciu● in locis suis dicit in unâ specie tantumesse quantum sub utraque , ideo quod sub qualibet specie totus fit Christus . Musc. loc. com . de caena . Dom. p. 373. u In utraque specie totu●● Christus {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} perpetu●● . Chami●r de Euch. l. 9. c. 10. Tom. 4. p. 510. col . 1. x They ( as we ) also hold that whole Christ is received in either kind , for Christ is not d●vided . Bishop Morton . instit. Sacr lib. 1. c. 3. Sect. ● p. 58 So also saith D. Willet . Synops. Papis . 13 Gen. controv. . q. 8. pa. 640. As touching the use of the Eucharist , though we doe not deny that whole Christ is distributed , as well in the bread as in the wine , yet we teach the use of both parts to be common to the whole Church . Confess . Wittenburg . Harm. Confess . Sect 14. c 9. p 459. And the note of other Protestant D●vines upon it is , notwithstanding the signes be severally distributed , nothing is divided in the humanity of Christ . Observ. in Harm. Observ. 41. 42. He that receiveth in one kinde being not qualified to receive the other , receiveth the whole substance of the Sacrament , as it is taken for the thing signified . Dr. Featly in his conference with Mr. Everard , pag. 267. Idem . pag 201. The same confession of whole Christ received with either element . Dr Fr. White maketh , as his words are cited afterwards at the letter ● . See also to the same purpose Fest. Hommij dis. 648 p. 263. y Mr. Harlow . pa. 2. * At the letter● . z D. Willet Synops Papis . 13. Gen. controv . q. 8. p. 644. x ● a Concedo quod ad rem significatam , idem else edere corpus & bil ere sanguinem . Chamier . de Euchar. l. 9. c. 10. Tom. 4. p. 511. col . 1. b De re significata non est quod agane prolixius , quia bujus ratio longè est diversa á ratione signorum , certè res significata , neque editur , neque bibitur , cujus ●ei illud argumentum est quod verè Bell●●minus asserit non distirgui , sci l. in ie significata cilum & potum . Ibid. p. 508. col 2. * I am saepius protestati sumus non disputari de re significatâ , Itaque hoc sensu argumentum est extra Thesi● . Cham. de Euchar l. 9. c. 10. Tom 4. p. 510. col . 2. c D Ft. White ans●er to Fisher , p. 4●6 . d To this absu●dity 〈◊〉 M. E●erar● driv●● by D Featly in his disput. pag. 268 , 269. e 〈…〉 illu●●●rrendum , & qua●e nu●qu●m 〈◊〉 in 〈…〉 , vel 〈…〉 vel 〈…〉 , nullum no● 〈…〉 , sed ●eque , i● Tur●ismo , out etia● 〈…〉 de Euc●ar . l. 9. c. 6. Tom. 4 de S●cr . p. 497. c●l . ● . f In baptism● proponitur Iesus Christus conceptus , ●atus , crucifixus , ut omnibus credentibus fiat sapientia . justitia , sanctificatio & redemptio , Sic Beza confess . c. 4. Act. 50. 3. Demand . g Extraordin●ry cases ought not to ju●tle outordinary laws & customes ; ●or th●t command of Christ to his Apostles , Goe 〈…〉 every crea●ure of ma● , stood good in the generall , albeit many men hapned to b●● deafe — every one by S Peter is to give an answer of his faith , to every one t●at asketh , which precept was not therefore alterable because of multitudes of men that were dūb Bish. Morton of t●e Instit. of the Sacr. l 1. c. 3. §. ●0 p. 61. a Licet Christ●● post caenam i●stituerit & suis Disci●●li● a●ministraverit sub utraque specie ven●rabile 〈◊〉 Sacramentum , tamen hoc non o●sta●te , &c. Concil. Constant. Self 13. Tom. 7. part . 2. pag. 1042. col ● . b Insuper declarat 〈◊〉 Redemptor n●ster ut antedict●m est in suprema illa cae●a h●c Sacramentum in 〈◊〉 speci●bus instituerit & Apostolis tradiderit , tamen fatendum esse etiam su● altera tantum specie totum atque integrum Christum 〈◊〉 Sacramentum s●mi . Concil. Trid. Sess. 21. Tom. 9. c. 3. p. 399. Col. 1. & 2. c See Dr. Featley , Grand Sacriledge . c. 1● . p. 143 , &c. d Praxis Ecclesi● per 1200. secula ●ro cal●ce . 〈◊〉 . Tom. 4 l. 9. ● . 10. p. 512 col . 2. e ● Harlow , p. 10. f 〈◊〉 facia●us ( 〈…〉 ) legatum 〈…〉 sibi ess● & totum in 〈…〉 scriptum co●tineri , &c. 〈…〉 Chamier . Tom 4. de Sacrament . Euch : l. 9. c. 7. p. 498. col . 2. g Ibid. h Bi. Morton in his Institut . of the Sacrament . l. 1. Sect. 8 p. 57. * Dat●● Laicis utraque pars Sacramenti , quia Sacra●entum institutum est non solum pr● parte Eccle●● scil●pro Presbyteris , sed etia● pro reliqua Ecclesia Confess . Aug. Syn●ag . confess . p. 36. i D. Fr. White against Fisher , p. 479. k Cham. Tom. 4 l. 9. c 9 p ●06 . D. Willet . synops Papis . 13. Gen. contr. q. 8. pag. 64● . Bish. White answer to Fisher , p. 463. & 479. & 480. D. Featly in the grand Impost . p. 205. l Sumpto hoc Sacramento dign● 〈…〉 , specie major est affectus unionis corporis mystici cum capite quam sumptio sub altera . Alex Hal. 4 , q. 10. in 4. act . 1. §. 1. m Quod ad frustum attinet nulla gratia ●ecessaria ad salutem eos defraudari qui unam speciem solùm accipi●n●Concil . Trid. Sess 21. c 3. Tom. ● p. 399. col . 1 & 2. n Concedimus Laicos quibus altera species negatur , gratia aliqua defra●dart , non tamen necessaria ad salutem . Vasq. in 3 c. 4. dis. 215 o Nec sane conclusimus unquā necessitatem Eucharistiae ; quomodo ergo utrius● , speciei ? Sed tantum necessitatem utri●sque specieiposito usu Eu●●ar . Cham. Tom 4 l. 9 c. 10. p. 508. col . 2 p Quicurque e●tam non percepto regenerationis lavacro pro Christi confessione , moriun●ur ta●●um , eis valet ad demittenda peccata , quātum si abluerentur sacro fonte Baptismatis . Aug. de Civ. Deid . 13. c. 7. * Perkins ope● . vol. 1. p. 417. col . 2. b. M Harlow p. 11 I pray God that on our side it ca●se not many among us to becom changed in opinion , or at least o●●ēded therby , & that on the Romish Party , this confession of yours be not vouched against us for indifferency of communion in one kinde , as the concessions of their learned men for communion in both kind● are cited against the practice of the Romish Church the●in . a Alphonsu● a Castro 〈◊〉 13. H●res de Eucharisti● . l. 6. a ●ol . 169. 〈◊〉 . 190. b [ In all thy wa●es , Ps. 91. 11. c Quirinus Cn●gler . in his book called Symbola tria Act 1. Symbol Cal p 25. a. d Petrus Lud●●mius de desperata Calv ni 〈◊〉 S●ct 5. p 64. e Fr●nci●c . Lon prelu● in sum . Concil. p. 91. f M. Harlow his detection of papisticall fraud . Sect. 3. p. 24. g Ibid. p ●5 . h Ibid. p● 40. i Ibid p. 8. k Gerso● B●cer dissertat . de gubernat . Eccles. p 27. l M. Har. p. 38. m D. ●eatly in his confer. with Everard added to his grand Imposture , pag. ●67 . n In my case of conscience , p. 10. the like is proposed by D. Featly in his grand Imposture , p. 200. o Si culpa est respondi●●e , qu●so ut patienter a●dias mul●o maj●● est prov●casse Aug. ●p . ●●ter op●ra . Hier. Tom. ● . p. 257. p Non de aduersario victoria● , sed de mendacio 〈◊〉 veritate●D●●l inter Aug. & Hier . Tom. 4. oper H●er . p. ●97 .