The case of Dr. John Jones, respondent, upon the appeal of William Beaw, &c.
      
       
         
           1691
        
      
       Approx. 4 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 1 1-bit group-IV TIFF page image.
       
         Text Creation Partnership,
         Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) :
         2009-03 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1).
         B02573
         Wing C905AA
         ESTC R220860
         53981613
         ocm 53981613
         180144
         
           
            This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of
             Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal
            . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
          
        
      
       
         Early English books online.
      
       
         (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. B02573)
         Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 180144)
         Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English Books, 1641-1700 ; 2818:12)
      
       
         
           
             The case of Dr. John Jones, respondent, upon the appeal of William Beaw, &c.
             Jones, John, b. 1644 or 5.
             Beaw, William.
          
           1 sheet ([1] p.)
           
             s.n.,
             [London :
             1691]
          
           
             Caption title.
             Imprint suggested by Wing.
             Reproduction of the original in the British Library.
          
        
      
    
     
       
         Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.
         Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors.
      
       
         EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.
         EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).
         The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.
         Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.
         Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.
         Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.
         The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.
         Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).
         
          Keying and markup guidelines are available at the
           Text Creation Partnership web site
          .
        
      
       
         
         
      
    
     
       
         eng
      
       
         
           Jones, John, b. 1644 or 5 -- Trials, litigation, etc.
           Beaw, William -- Trials, litigation, etc.
           Church of England -- Bishops -- Appointment, call, and election -- Early works to 1800.
           Broadsides -- England -- 17th century.
        
      
    
     
        2008-03 TCP
        Assigned for keying and markup
      
        2008-04 SPi Global
        Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images
      
        2008-05 Mona Logarbo
        Sampled and proofread
      
        2008-05 Mona Logarbo
        Text and markup reviewed and edited
      
        2008-09 pfs
        Batch review (QC) and XML conversion
      
    
  
   
     
       
         
         
           THE
           CASE
           OF
           D
           
             R.
          
           JOHN
           JONES
           RESPONDENT
           ,
           Upon
           the
           APPEAL
           of
           WILLIAM
           BEAW
           ,
           &c.
           
        
         
           THE
           Office
           of
           Chancellor
           ,
           Principal
           Official
           ,
           and
           Vicar-General
           of
           the
           Bishop
           of
           
             Landaffe
          
           was
           ,
           and
           is
           an
           Antient
           Office
           ,
           and
           has
           been
           antiently
           before
           the
           Reign
           of
           Queen
           
             Elizabeth
             ,
          
           usually
           grantable
           ,
           and
           granted
           to
           Two
           Persons
           ,
           to
           hold
           for
           their
           Lives
           ,
           and
           the
           Life
           of
           the
           longer
           Liver
           of
           them
           .
        
         
           
           
             Francis
          
           Lord
           Bishop
           of
           
             Landaffe
             ,
          
           by
           Letters
           Patents
           under
           his
           Episcopal
           Seal
           ,
           granted
           this
           Office
           to
           Dr.
           
             Richard
             Lloyd
          
           and
           the
           Respondent
           
             John
             Jones
             ;
          
           to
           hold
           to
           them
           joyntly
           and
           severally
           ,
           and
           to
           the
           longer
           Liver
           of
           them
           .
           Which
           Grant
           was
           duly
           confirm'd
           by
           the
           Chapter
           of
           that
           Church
           ,
           and
           accordingly
           the
           said
           Dr.
           
             Richard
             Lloyd
             ,
          
           for
           several
           Years
           ,
           by
           the
           Respondent's
           consent
           ,
           quietly
           held
           and
           enjoyed
           the
           same
           .
        
         
           
           The
           said
           Lord
           Bishop
           died
           ,
           and
           Dr.
           
             William
             Lloyd
          
           succeeded
           in
           that
           Bishoprick
           ;
           and
           upon
           his
           Translation
           to
           the
           Bishoprick
           of
           
             Norwich
             ,
          
           Dr.
           
             William
             Beaw
          
           succeeded
           ,
           and
           is
           now
           the
           present
           Lord
           Bishop
           of
           
             Landaffe
             .
          
        
         
           
           The
           present
           Lord
           Bishop
           of
           
             Landaffe
             ,
          
           having
           in
           his
           Custody
           the
           Original
           Grant
           of
           this
           Office
           to
           Dr.
           
             Richard
             Lloyd
             ,
          
           and
           the
           Respondent
           Constituted
           Commissioners
           to
           Execute
           the
           Office
           ,
           and
           refused
           to
           admit
           the
           Petitioner
           to
           Execute
           and
           Enjoy
           the
           said
           Offices
           ,
           as
           by
           Law
           he
           ought
           .
        
         
           Whereupon
           the
           Respondent
           brought
           an
           Action
           at
           Law
           against
           the
           Appellant
           ,
           and
           others
           for
           the
           Profits
           of
           the
           Office
           by
           them
           received
           ;
           which
           Action
           ,
           by
           the
           Death
           of
           One
           of
           the
           then
           Defendants
           abated
           .
        
         
           Afterwards
           ,
           the
           Respondent
           brought
           his
           Bill
           in
           Equity
           against
           rhe
           Appellant
           ,
           to
           have
           an
           Account
           of
           ,
           and
           Satisfaction
           for
           the
           Profits
           of
           the
           said
           
             Office
             ,
          
           to
           which
           the
           Appellant
           answered
           ,
           and
           confessed
           the
           Patent
           and
           Grant
           to
           the
           said
           Dr.
           
             Richard
             Lloyd
          
           and
           the
           Respondent
           ;
           whereupon
           the
           Respondent
           proceeded
           to
           try
           his
           Right
           and
           Title
           to
           the
           said
           
             Office
          
           in
           an
           Action
           at
           the
           Common
           Law
           against
           the
           Appellant
           ;
           and
           at
           
           Gloucester-Assizes
           ,
           on
           full
           Evidence
           ,
           obtained
           a
           Verdict
           ,
           and
           had
           Judgment
           thereupon
           .
        
         
           That
           afterwards
           the
           Court
           of
           
             Chancery
          
           Ordered
           ,
           That
           a
           Trial
           at
           Bar
           should
           be
           had
           upon
           an
           Action
           of
           the
           Case
           for
           Trial
           of
           the
           Title
           of
           the
           said
           
             Office
             ;
          
           whereupon
           ,
           a
           Trial
           was
           had
           at
           the
           
             Kings-Bench-Bar
             ;
          
           and
           upon
           full
           and
           long
           Evidence
           ,
           a
           Verdict
           was
           given
           for
           the
           Respondent
           ,
           and
           upon
           the
           Importunity
           of
           the
           Appellant's
           Counsel
           ,
           the
           Case
           was
           Stated
           ,
           and
           Argued
           before
           all
           the
           
             Judges
          
           of
           the
           said
           Court
           of
           
             Kings-Bench
             ;
          
           who
           on
           Hearing
           several
           Arguments
           on
           both
           Sides
           ,
           were
           all
           of
           Opinion
           ,
           That
           the
           Letters-Patents
           and
           Grant
           made
           to
           Dr.
           
             Richard
             Lloyd
             ,
          
           and
           the
           Respondent
           were
           good
           in
           Law
           ;
           and
           that
           the
           Respondent
           was
           well
           Intituled
           to
           the
           said
           
             Office
          
           for
           his
           Life
           .
        
         
           
           That
           the
           said
           Cause
           coming
           to
           be
           Heard
           in
           
             Chancery
             ,
          
           on
           the
           Equity
           reserved
           in
           the
           Presence
           of
           Council
           on
           both
           Sides
           ,
           the
           Lords-Commissioners
           were
           of
           the
           same
           Opinion
           ;
           and
           Decreed
           an
           Account
           to
           be
           taken
           of
           the
           Profits
           of
           the
           said
           
             Office
             ,
          
           and
           the
           Respondent
           to
           be
           quieted
           in
           the
           Possession
           and
           Enjoyment
           thereof
           .
        
         
           
             Which
             Decree
             ,
             the
             Respondent
             hopes
             is
             Just
             ;
             and
             that
             it
             shall
             be
             Confirmed
             .
          
        
      
    
     
       
         Notes, typically marginal, from the original text
         
           Notes for div B02573-e10
           
             7.
             
             Septemb.
             1671.
             
          
           
             20.
             
             March
             1674.
             
          
           
             June
             1686.
             
          
           
             20
             Novemb.
             1691.