A catalogue of such testimonies in all ages as plainly evidence bishops and presbyters to be both one, equall and the same ... with a briefe answer to the objections out of antiquity, that seeme to the contrary. Prynne, William, 1600-1669. This text is an enriched version of the TCP digital transcription A56148 of text S122412 in the English Short Title Catalog (Wing P3922). Textual changes and metadata enrichments aim at making the text more computationally tractable, easier to read, and suitable for network-based collaborative curation by amateur and professional end users from many walks of life. The text has been tokenized and linguistically annotated with MorphAdorner. The annotation includes standard spellings that support the display of a text in a standardized format that preserves archaic forms ('loveth', 'seekest'). Textual changes aim at restoring the text the author or stationer meant to publish. This text has not been fully proofread Approx. 132 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 22 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. EarlyPrint Project Evanston,IL, Notre Dame, IN, St. Louis, MO 2017 A56148 Wing P3922 ESTC S122412 12367377 ocm 12367377 60442 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A56148) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 60442) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 222:17) A catalogue of such testimonies in all ages as plainly evidence bishops and presbyters to be both one, equall and the same ... with a briefe answer to the objections out of antiquity, that seeme to the contrary. Prynne, William, 1600-1669. [18], 23 p. s.n.], [London : 1641. Attributed to Prynne by C.A. Briggs; in a marginal note on p. [9], the author refers to his The unbishoping of Timothy and Titus. Place of publication from Wing. This seems to be a reissue of the 1637 ed. (STC 4788) with "The epistle to the reader" (p. [3]-[18]) added and the two final digits of the date erased from t.p. and "41" substituted in pen-and-ink. Errata: p. [18]. Reproduction of original in Union Theological Seminary Library, New York. Marginal notes. eng Church of England -- Bishops -- Temporal power. Bishops -- England. A56148 S122412 (Wing P3922). civilwar no A catalogue of such testimonies in all ages as plainly evidence bishops and presbyters to be both one, equall and the same in jurisdiction, Prynne, William 1641 24828 1839 0 0 0 0 0 741 F The rate of 741 defects per 10,000 words puts this text in the F category of texts with 100 or more defects per 10,000 words. 2002-03 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2002-04 SPi Global Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2002-05 TCP Staff (Michigan) Sampled and proofread 2002-05 Olivia Bottum Text and markup reviewed and edited 2002-06 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion A CATALOGVE OF SVCH TESTIMONIES IN ALL AGES AS PLAINLY EVIDENCE BISHOPS AND PRESBYTERS TO BE BOTH ONE , EQUALL AND THE SAME IN IURISDICTION , Office , Dignity , Order , and degree , by divine Law and institution , and their disparity to be a meere humane ordinance long after the Apostles times ; And that the name of a Bishop is onely a Title of Ministration , not Dominion , of Labour not of Honour , of Humility , not of Prelacy , of painfullnesse not of Lordlinesse , with a Briefe Answer to the Objections out of Antiquity , that seeme to the contrary . Printed in the Yeere . 1641. The EPISTLE to the READER . Christian Reader , THere is nothing more fr●quent in the mouthes of our Lording Prelates and their Flatterers , then to vaunt , That their Hierarchie and Episcopall S●periority over other Ministers is by divine Right and Institution ; and that all Antiquity from Christs till Calvins dayes , and all learned men , except a despicable small number of Factious Puritans ( as they term them ) suffragate to this Conclusion . This was the more then thrasonicall b●ast of Dr. La●d , Arch-prelate of Canterbury , and some others , not onely at the Censure of Dr. Layton in the Star-chamber , and Dr. Bastwicke in the High-Commission some few yeares past ; but likewise at the late Censure of Dr. Bastwicke , Mr. Burton , and Mr. Prynne in the Star-chamber , Iune 14. 1637. where , in his learned Speech ( since Printed by speciall command , through his own underhand procurement ) he thus magisterially determines , pag. 6 , 7. This I will say ( he might have done well to have proved it first , but that his Ipse dixit only is now an O●acle ) and abide by it , That the calling of Bishops ( to wit Archbishops and D●ocaesans , superiour to , and distinct from Pres●yters , else his Speech is not onely idle but impertinent ) is Iure divino : though not all adjuncts to their callings : ( he should have done well to have specifie● what adjuncts in particular● ) And I say further , that from the Apostles times in all ages , in all places the Church of Christ was governed by Bishops ( to wit Diocaesan Bishops like to our Prelates now , which he will prove at Graecas Calendas . ) And Lay-Elders never heard of , till Calvins new-fangled devise at Geneva . To disprove which fabulous assertion , I have not only particularly encountred it , in the Unbishoping of Timothy and Titus , to which no Answere yet hath been returned by this Over-confident Boaster , or his Champions , though specially challenged to Answer it ) but likewise by way ef Supplement to that Trea●ise , drawn up this ensuing Catalogue ( which I challenge his Arch-grace , with his brother Prelates , Doctors , Proctors , Parasites to encounter with as many contrary Authorities if they can ; ) ● wherby both learned and illiterate may with ease discern , that both by divine Institution , the suffrages of Fathers , Councels , forraigne and domestick writers of all sorts aswell Papists as Protestants , and the resolution of the Church and State of England in Convocation and Parliament , Bishops and Presbyters are but one and the sam● in point of Office and Iurisdiction ; and that the Superiority of Bishops over other Ministers is a meer humane Institution long after the Apostles dayes , introduced , partly by custome , partly by the Bishops owne insensible incroachme●ts upon their fellow brethren ; but principally by the grants , connivances , or indowments of Christian Princes , destitute of any divine foundation to support it . I confesse , in the * Councel of Trent , it was much debated among the Popish Prelates and Divines there present ; Whether Bishops were by divine Ordination , Superiour to Priests ? But the Councel being divided in opinion , left the Controversie undetermined . Those Bishops and Divines who held the affirmative , produced nothing out of Scripture , or solid Antiquity to justifie their opinions , worthy answere , but that Aerius was deemed an Heretick for affirming the contrary ( which I have ●ere disproved : ) ye● * Michael of Medina who alleageth this of Aerius , was so ingenious to conf●sse , that Hierome , Austin , and some others of the Fathers ( as Ambrose , Sedulius , Primasius , Chrysostomus , Theodoret , Oecumenius ) did fall into Aërius heresie in this point , it being no wonder that they did so , because the matter was not cleare in all points . This his boldnesse , to say that Hierome and Austin did savour of Haeresie , gave great scandall : but h● insisted the more upon it : The Doctors saith the History ) were equally divided into two opinions in this point . And when this * Article was propounded in this Romish Councel ; That the Bishops are instituted by Christ , and are Superiour to Priests de Iure divino ; The Legates with others answered , that the Lutherans and Heretiques having affirmed , that a Bishop and a Priest is the sam● thing ( * putting no difference between a Bishop & a Priest , but by humane constitution ; and affirming , that the Superiority of Bishops was first by custom , and afterwards by Ecclesiasticall constitution , for which they ci●e the Augustane Confession made by the German Churches ; ) it was fit to declare , that a Bishop is Superiour , but that it was not necessary to say qu● jure , nor by whom a Bishop is instituted From whence it appeares clearly ; That halfe or more of these Trent Fathers , with all the Lutherans and Protestant Churches at that time were cleare of opinion ; That Prelates Episcopacy is not Iure divino : and those who peruse that History and * B●llarmine may at ●irst discerne , that all our Prelates arguments and Authorities now produced to maintaine their Episcopall Iurisdiction to be divine , are taken verbatim from these Popish Fathers of Trent who maintain their assertion , and Bellarmine de Clericis the stoutest Champion for their cause . Alas ! to what miserable Shifts are our Prelates driven , when they must thus fly to Trent , to Bellarmine for ayd to support their tottering Thrones ! And yet these will stand them in no stead , all the Trent Prelates confessing with S. Hierom. * That in the first beginnings of Christianity , the Churches were governed by a kind of Aristocracy , by the common Councel of the Presbytery , and that the Monarchicall government and Superiority of Bishops and Archbishops crept in by custome , as the (a) History of the Councel of Trent relates at large ; where you may read the originall of their Courts and Iurisdictions , with the steps and meanes of their exorbitant growth and encroachments upon the temporall Iurisdiction and Prerogative of Princes , well worthy the greatest Statesmens consideration . Besides , Dionysius Cathusianus , and Cardinal Contarenus in their Commentaries on Phil. 1.1 . confesse , that in Pauls time , Bishops and Presbyters were both one , and that either Order was conferred on the Presbyter . That Presbyters are there meant by Bishops , whence it is usually said , That in the Primitive times Bishops were not distinguished from Priests . Azorisus the Iesuite Moral . part . 2. l. 3. c. 16. confesseth , that in the Apostles times , every where , those who were ordained Elders in Cities were Bishops : Cardinal Cusanus . De Concordia Cathol. l. 2. c. 13. writes the same in eff●ct : All Bishops ; and perchance also Presbyters are of equall power , as to Jurisdiction , although not of execution ; which executive exercise is restrained by certaine positive Laws ( not Divine but Canonicall ) whence the cause of these Laws ceasing , (b) the Laws themselvs determine . And Johannes Semeca a Popish Canonist , avers ; That in the first primitive Church the Office of Priests and Bishops was the same : but in the second primitive Church , ( to wit , some space after the Apostles times ) both their names and Offices began to be distinguished . The same Doctrine , together with the Identity and Parity of Bishops and Presbyters is professedly averred , not only by those hereafter cited in the Catalogue ; but also by * Huldrick Bishop of Ausburg , about the year of Christ 860. in his Epistle to Pope Nicholas , in defence of Priests Marriage : by John Crespin . L'estate de L'eglise : printed 15●2 . fol. 14.97 . by Phippe de Mornax , Tablea● des Differens . par . 2. c. 6. p. 67 , 68 , 69. &c. and by Mornay Lord Plessie in his Mystery of Iniquity in the French Edition , p. 7.9 , 10.72.80 . to 87 , 9● . 92.95 . to 123.125.128.152 . to 155.159.160.172.179.197.210 . to 218 . 234.2●4 266 , 267.281.293.304.307.319 , 320 . 366● 389 . 395.397.404.410.412● 418.424 . to 427 . 452● 464.467 , 468.469.503.518.519.520.524 . to 528 533.535.545 , 546 , 547.567.568 , 569.603 . Yea , * Iohn Ma●jor de Gestis Scotorum : l. 2. c. 3. w●ites , that in ancient times the Scots were instructed in the Christian faith , by Priests and Monks , and were then without Bishops . And Iohn Fordon Scotichronicon . l. 3. c. 8. before him , records , That before the coming of Palladius , the Scots had only Presbyters or Monks to instruct them in the Faith and administer the Sacraments , following the custome of the primitive Church . And * from Palladius dayes till the reigne of Malcolm the 3d ; the Bishops of Scotland had no Diocesse at all ( and so were no Diocesan Prelates ) but every Bishop whom holinesse had made reverend in that age , exercised his Episcopall function without distinction in every place he came . If then Bishops and Presbyters were all one and the same in the first Primitive Church , which church , ●ogether with that of Scotland , was anciently governed only by Presbyters , not by any Lordly Prela●es , or Diocesan Bishops ( which Dr. William Fulke in his Answer of a true Christian , &c. p. 20.50 . professeth ●o be Antichristian , Pa●all and no divine institution , ) why the Churches of Scotland , and England may not now be governed by Presbyters only without Bishops , aswell as at first , I canno● conceive● their regiment of late having been so tyrannicall , unchristian , antichristian and exorbitant , that they have almost wholly ruined our Religion , Church , State , and lef● them in a most perplexed , if not desperate condition ; which proves their Hierarchy to be rather Antichristian and Diabolicall , then Divine . And how can it be otherwise , if we rightly consider the Persons or Condition of our Hierarchy● and their Antichristian Attendants ? I remember a merry S●ory in * Giraldus Cambrensis , and out of him related by Mr. Camden in his Britannia : p. 604. It hapned that a certaine Iew travelling towards Shrewsbury with the Archdeacon of Malpas ( in Ches-shire ) whose surname was Peche , that is , Sinne , and a Deane named Devill ; when he heard by chance the Archdeacon telling , that his Archdeaconry began at a place called Ill-street , and reached as farre as to Malpas towards Chester ; he considering and understanding withall aswell the Arch-deacons Surname as the Deans , came out with this merry and pleasant conceit ; Would it not be a wonder ( quoth he ) and my fortune very good , if ever I get safe againe out of this Countrey , where Sinne is the Arch-deacon , and the Devill is the Dean ; where the entry into the Archdeaconry is Illstreet , and the going forth of it Malpas ? It was * St. Bernards complaint in his age , that Iesus Christ elected many Devils to be Bishops , as he chose Iudas to be an Apostle . Since then there be so many Archbishops , Deanes , and Bishops , Devills , so many Archdeacons Sinners , if not Sinne ; and the entrance into these Offices ( by reason of Symony , Ambition , and the like ) a meer Illstreet , and their going forth of them ( by reason of their wicked lives , and exorbitant actions occ●sioned by their very Office ) Malpas , it is almost a wonder , and very good fortune , if any ●onest godly Minister or Professor ever get safe againe out of their Courts and Diocesse , or escape drowning in their Seas . Hence is it , that the devoutest men in all ages since Prelates became Lords paramount to Ministers , have either utterly refused to accept of Bish●pricks , or resigned them after acceptance ; as I have * elswhere manifested by sundry examples , and shall here fur●her exemplifie by ●ther evidences . (a) Ribadenerra a Iesuite , records it to the great praise of Bernardine of Sennes , canonized at Rome for a Saint ; that out of his humility he refused the 3. Bishopricks of Sennes , Ferrara , and Vrban , which severall Popes offred to him : and though one Pope put a Bishops Mi●er on his head with his own hands , yet he put it off againe , humbly beseeching him not to impose the charge of any Bishoprick upon him , and to change that estate of Poverty to which God had called him ; because he should bring more advantage to the Church by preaching the Word of God , and ayding the Soules of many Bishopricks , then by being a Bishop in one Church : The Pope hearing his reasons confessed them true , and left him to his own liberty . (b) Vincent Ferrier another Popish Saint , is highly magnified , for that ' being urged by the Pope to accept the Bishopricke of Leride , the Archbishopricke of Valence , and a Cardinalship ; it was impossible to move him to accept of any of these charges ; deeming it a greater advantage to free one Soule from the chaines of Sinne , then to gain all the great preferments of the world . For he perceived that these honourable dignities seemed like so many golden chaines , whereby he should be detained at the Court , and deprived of liberty to goe and preach the Gospell with poverty , as God had commanded him . So Thomas of * Aquin , canonised for a Saint , is highly applauded for refusing the Archbishopricke of Naples , with other great dignities offered unto him by the Pope . In like sort * Raimond of Roche●ort , another Roman Saint , is extolled , for refusing to accept the Archbishopricke of Arragon , which the Pope himselfe conferred upon him , and commanded him to accept within few dayes ; at which news he was very sad , and most humbly and instantly intreated his Holinesse , not to lay such a burthen upon him , which he knew not how to beare : and seeing that the Pope was resolved to enforce him to accept it , he fell sicke with indignation , a ●ieuere continuing upon him till he died of regret , and so discharged him of this care . * Antoninus another ●ate Romish Saint , being elected Archbishop o●Florence by Pope Eugenius the 4th , refused to accept thereof , because being retired out of the tempests of the world , he should therby return into ●hem to the great perill of his Salvation . The Pope hereupon commanded him by his Bull to accept it , threatning else to excommunicate him : whereupon by the advise of his Covent and the Magistrates of Florence , who informed him , that he ought to obey the Pope herein , he unwillingly accepted it ; and kneeling down before them , he lift up his eyes and hands to heaven , saying ; O my Lord thou knowest full well that it is much against my will to accept this charge ; which I have undertaken for feare to resist thine and thy Vicars will : and since thou knowest it , I beseech thee direct me to doe what I ought . Then entring into his See , he had only 8. persons in his house ; He had no Cupboord , Tapistry or hangings of Say in his Chamber ; no vessels of Silver ; no Horses nor Coaches , riding upo● a Mule that was given him ; saying , that the goods of the poore ought not to be spent in nourishing beasts , and providing Superfluities . He had the Scripture alwayes read at his Table : and ever said , they should doe him a speciall favour to thrust him from his Archbishopricke , wherein he continued with as great regret as he received it . Adde to these , that * Linus the first Bishop of Rome , after Paul and Peter resigned up his Bishoprick te Anacle●us ; that Pope Cyriacus ( as Fasciculus Temporum , Henry of Erford , Nauclerus , Crispin●and others write ) quitted his Bishopricke in a short space against the will of the Clergy ; whence some have excluded him out of the number of the Roman Ponti●s ; that (a) Pope Stephen t●e 6. renounced his Episcopacy , and became a Monke , repenting of the cruelty shewed by him to his predecessor Formosu● : that Pope Celestine the 5th ( as Platina , Luitprandius , Anasta●ius , and all (b) o●hers in his life accord ) voluntarily renounced the Papacy , as a charge exceeding his forces , and hindering his Devotion : and this (c) Anno 1448. (d) Pope Felix the 5th , renounced and deser●ed the Papacy , which he formerly swa●ed . Lo here five Popes re●ouncing and resigning their Bishopricks . Herman a Weda Archbishop of Colen , who deceased An. 1552. desired often to dye a simple Christian without any charge or dignity , rather then to die a Priest or a Bishop : To come nearer hom● , Dubritius B●shop of Landaffe voluntarily re●ounced his Archbishopricke ; so Sampson , Paulus , Leonorius and Amon made Bishops volens nolens , voluntarily gave over their Episcopacies . St. Patrick the first Archbishop or primate of all Ireland , and Benignus his third Successor in that See , willingly resigned their Prelacies , retiring themselves to Glastenbury Abby : And Anno 1366. (d) Richard Havering , Archbishop of Dublin , voluntarily renounced his Archbishopricke upon this occasion● One night he dreamed that a certaine Monster heavier then the whole world stood eminently aloft upon his brest , from the weight whereof he chose rather to be delivered , then alone to have all the goods of the world . When he wakened , he thought thus with himselfe , that this was nothing ●ls but the Church of Dublin , the fruits whereof he received , but took no paines for the same : ( the case of most Prelates now : ) as soon as he could therfore he came to the Pope , of whom he was much beloved , and there renounced and gave over the Archbishopricke ; for he had fatter and better livings then the Archbishopricke came unto . Why should not our Archbishops and Bishops now follow these many vertuous examples , in resigning and abandoning all their Bishopricks , for the setting of a sweet peace and blessed Harmony in our distracted Church and State , which their ambition , pride , tyranny , Exorbitances and Innovations have almost brought to ruine ? Had they but their humility and piety , they would speedily renounce their most pernicious Hierarchy , to imbrace a fraternall unity and parity with their fellow-brethren , whom Christ hath made their equals , as these and other Prelats have done ; and as our present * Archbishop of Canterbury confesseth that famous Nazianzen , rather th●n the peace should be broken , freely resigneth the great Patriarchate Constantinople , and retired : whose steps he should doe well to follow . But if he or they refuse to do it for our Churches peace , and Kingdomes safety , let them know that it is no new thing to abolish Bishopricks by Act of Parliam● by which * most Bishopricks were first created , and so not Jure Divino . How many Bishopricks have been supprest in Ireland and Wales in Later ages , * Mr. Camden can at large informe us , almost halfe the Ancient Bishopricks there , being not now extant . The Bishopricke of Westminster was no sooner erected almost , but instantly suppressed ; And 7. Ed. 6. The * Bishopricke of Durham by Act of Parliament was dissolved , and the Lands and hereditaments thereof given to the King : but 1. Mariae Pa●l . 2. c. 3. Popery ●lowing in againe , that Bishopricke was revived and reerected ; yet not so fi●mly , but that it and all others are still subject , both to a temporall and finall dissolu●ion , when eve● his Majesty , or the state in Parliament shall thinke meet ; ( as all the Prelates and the whole Convocation expre●ly acknowledge in their * Institution of a Christian man dedicated to King Henry the 8. and ratified by Parliament ) as the Abbies , Priories and such like Nests of Anti●hristianisme in this Real● , though se●led by La●s and long Prescription , were all suppressed by p●blick * Acts of Parliament in a moment . If any de●m the continuance of our Lorly Prelates necessary in regard of their presence in Parliaments , which some conceive cannot be held without the presence of these ●ord● Spirituall . I Answer , first , that Abbots and Priors before the dissolution of Mona●teries were Spirituall Lords in Parliament aswell as Bishops : since then Parliaments both may , have been , and are now held without Lord Abbots and ●riors , they may by the same reason be held without Lo●d Bishops . Second●● , B●shops sit n●t in Parliament of right as they are B●shops ( for as Bishops , they are not * prope●ly Peers , and shal be tryed in case of Treason by a common Iury , as Scr●ope , Fisher , and Cranmer were ) bu● as they hold of the King per ( a ) Baro●iam , in right of their Churches , which few of them at this day doe : Therfore their si●ting in Parliament is not of right , but of meere grace of the King , who may Sommon or not Sommon ●hem at ●is pleasure : sinc● they are no Lords , nor yet so stiled by the King , in any of their Paten●s ; though they so in●itle themselves in some of their (b) late Prin●ed Books . Thirdly , In (c) matters of Treason , Felony , blood and Capitall Crimes debated in Parliament , the Bishops both by Common and Canon Law o●ght not to give their votes , nor yet to be present in the house , but to depart , which no other Peeres doe ●ut they : * If then the Parliament in these cases of highest na●ure may passe a compleat Iudgement without them , their presence is not necessary in it , nor they any needfull members of it . Four●hly , Bishops in former ages e●en under Popish Kings , when they had most sway , have been excluded Parliaments , much more then may they be so now : (c) Gardner and Bonner in King Edwards dayes ; and all Bishops that were married ( as most then were ) in the first Parliament in Queen Maries reigne were excluded the Parliament ; and in King Edward the 1. his time at the Parliament held at S. Edmonds Bury , Anno 1296. all the Bishops were put out of the Parliament and Kings protection , and that Parliament held good and made Laws without them . And Anno 1273. in the 20. yeare of Henry the 3. the Statute of Merton cap. 9. to●ching Bastardy , was made by the Lords temporall and Commons without and against the consent of the Bishops . ●h●se two Presiden●s are cited by Bishop Iewell in his Apology against * Harding ; f. 620. who there affirmes , that a Parliament may be held without any Bishops ; to which * Mr. Crompton , and Bishop Bilson likewise assent : therfore I shall no l●nger debate it , as being pas● all doubt ; concluding this point in Bishop Bilsons words ( a great Champion for Episcopa●y ) which are full and notable . * Claime you ( Bishops ) that interest and prerogative , that without you nothing shal be done in matters of Religion , by the Laws of God , or by the liberties of this Realm . By the Laws of the Land , have no such priviledge . Parliaments have been kept by the King and his Barons , THE CLERGIE WHOLLY EXCLVDED . And when the Bishops were present , their voyces from the Conquest to this day were never negative . ●y Gods●aw you have nothing to doe with making Laws for Kingdome● , & Common-wealths : o● may teach , you may not command : P●rswasion is your part , compulsion is the Princes . I● Princes imbrace the Truth , you must obey them ; If they pursue Truth , you must abide them . By what Authority then claime you this dominion over Princes ; that their Laws for Religion shal be voyd , unlesse you consent ? After which he proves at larg● , that the Kings of Iudah and Israel of old , with many godly Christian Kings and Emperours since , have made not only Civil , but ●cclesiasticall Laws without a Council , or any suffrage of Bishops : Much more then may they hold a Parliament without their presence ; as Bishop Jewel proves at lange . It was a no●able Speech and true of Ludovicus Cardinall Arelatensis in the Councel of Basill ; (q) where he maintained the parity of Bishops and Presbyters : That rich and Lordly Bishops feare the power of the Prince , and to be spoyled of their temporalities , neither have they free liberty to speak as is required in Councels . Albeit if they were true Bishops and true Pastors of Soules , they would not doubt to put their lives in venture for their Sheep , nor be afraid to sh●d their blood for their Mother the Church . But at this present ( the more is the pitty ) it is too rare to find a Prelate in this world , which doth not prefer his temporalities before his Spiritualities , with the love whereof they are so withdrawn , that they study rather to please Princes then God ; and confesse God in corners , but Princes they will openly confesse . Concluding ●hat the poor are more apt to give judgement then the rich , because their riches bringeth feare , and their poverty causeth liberty . For the poore feare not tyranny as rich men do , who being given over to all kind of vanities , idlenesse and sloth , will rather deny Christ then lacke their accustomed pleasures ; Such are they whom not their flock but their revenues make Bishops . Have ye not heard how they said , they would consent to the Kings will and pleasure ? But the Inferiors are they which have had truth , righteousnesse and God himselfe before their eyes , and they are greatly to be commended for shewing themselves such men unto the Church of God . If ●hen any desire the continuance of Lord Bishops in Church or Parliament , yet it wil be necessary to strip them of their Temporalities and Lordships , and to confine them to one living with Cure , where they may reside and preach like other Ministers , because their Temporalities will make them Temporizers , and to vote amisse ag●nst God and the Republike both in Parliament and Convocation , as this Cardinall truly informs us from experience . To close up all in a few words . I shall desire 〈◊〉 ●ordly Prelates and others to observe ; that Rev. 4.4.10.11 . c. 5 , 6.11 , 12.14 . c. 7.11 , 12 , 13 , 14● 15. c. 11.15 , 19 , 17 , 18. c. 19.4 , 5 , 6. The 24 Elders are placed next in rank to the very throne of Christ , as being next to him in Authority and Iurisdiction , no Archb●shops or Bishops ●●ing there named , much lesse interposed between them . That the Angels ( whom our Prelates will needs interpret ●o be Diocesan Bishops in the 2d and 3d of the Revelation , though the Contents of our last ●ranslated Bibles expresly define them , to be the Ministers , not Bishops , of the 7 Churches ) stand round about the Elders , and are remoters from Christs throne then they●therfore not so honourable . That Christ standeth in the midst of the Elders ; to signi●ie , that ●hey are subject to no Diocesan Bishop , but Christ alone , and ●hat no Lord Bishops , but Elders only belong to the Kingdome and Government of Christ , who is never said to be in the midst of Archbishop● and Bishops ( none of his institution ) but of the 24. Elder● only : That these Elders alone worship and prostrate themselves , give thanks , and resolve doubts upo● all occasions●not Bishops : And that when the Kingdomes of this world , become the Kingdome of o●● Lord and his Christ , and when the Lord God omnipotent is said to raigne , the Elders are still said to be about Christs throne , and to adore and praise him , there being no mention at all of Bishops . Therfore our Prelates must needs confesse themselves to be but Elders only & properly ; or else acknowldge , that Elders by divine ●nstitution are Superiour to them in dignity● and that Archbishops and Bishops have no place at all appointed them by Christ about his throne , or with●n his Church and Kingdome , and therfore must needs be Antichristian and in●o●erable in our reformed Church ; out of which I doubt not ●re long to see them quite ejected , and cast unto the Dunghill as most unsavoury Salt ; toward which d●sired good worke I presume this little Catalogue may con●ribute some assistance ; especially if thou correct these ensuing Errors of the Printer , ere thou begin to read it , occasioned by the Authors absence , and the Printers unacquaintednesse with the Authors names the●ein recited : which slips of course find easie pardon . ERRATA . PAg. 1. C●lum 2. line 19 read Papias● p. 2. col . 1. l. 101. and 15. ● . Al●xandrinus , l. 25. Nazianz●num , l. 30. Aerius , col . 2. l. 11. Primasius 22. Nazianze●● l. 25 , 26. Rhabanus Maurus . l. 35. O●●umeniu● . l. 43. for 34.1 , 3 , 4. p. 3. col . r. l. 5. ●vo . l. 6. Decretalium . l. 2● . Pla●ctu . l. 29. ●anormitan . l. 31. Thol●sanus . l. 32. Gratianum . l. 37. for Cla●isio ● . Clavasi● col . 2. Sit , Tit. l. 9. Faber . l. 11. Senensis . l. 13. Annal. l. 22 with , which● l. ●7 . intendent p. 4 col . 1. l. 41. conclusion . p. 5. col . 1. l. 21. Ausittes Hussit●● 24. Sylvius . l. 25 〈…〉 . Illiricus , l. 34. Monuments . col . 2 l 〈…〉 p. 6. col . 1. l. 2. Tabaratrum , Tabaritarum . l. 9. Pig●tum . l. 10. Galata● . l. 14. Epis●opo● . l. 18. W●tenberge . l. 20. ●al. l. 21 , 22. P●tricow , Madestania , Wratis●avia . l. 27. ●ricus . l 41. Con●ugio . l. 42. Zuinglius . l. 44. imitatem , civitatem . l. 51. Musculus . col . 2. l. 14. Responsio . l. 28. Class. l. 38. Casper . l. 34. debe●sis , diversis . l. 40. Saraviam . l. 4● . T●egedinu● . l. 49. Con●r●v●rs . l. 42. Polanus . l. 53. Sy●tagma . l. 53. bibl●ander in chronog● . p. 7. col●● l. 1. Arinis , Aretius . l. 3. lubinu● . l. 2. Wedfulne●●s , Melsure●us . l. 9. edictum . l. 37. Alcuvinus . col . 2 l. 13. Pal●ody . l. 14. M●li●m , Melu●●i . l. 15. Palinodia . l. 36. Nug● . l. 38. Institutione . p. 8. col . 1. l. 12. England , I●eland . l. 26. Chaucer . l. 28. Swinderby . l. 39. vi●iarum vitiorum . col . 2. l. 2. Stokesly . l. 3● . Notingham . p , 9. col . 2. l. ●● . ●ancol●e , lanrelot . l. 24. Osyru . l. 49. exposition . col . 2. l. 6. Ma●tyr●Martyn . l. 10. Benb●●ge . l. 20. vol. 2. f. l. 30.12.10 . r. 1610. p. 10. c. 1. l. 47 Whecen●al . c. 2. l. 45. coverdale . l. 46. Pon●t . l. 47. Scory . l. 52. resolve . l. 54. exstinguished , distinguished . p. 11. c. 1. l. 9. the , thu . c. 2. l. 8. t●rasonicall . l. 2● . ●o●her . l. 41. Aeriu● . p. 12. c 1. l 1. a , a● . l. 17. Ae●ius , make . l. 18. at . l. 3● as , ●● . l. 46. this , the . c 2. l. 4. est ; ●oe witnesse . l. 16. refutation ( in the Margin , l 4. v●ritatu . l. 16. Armat , Anual . ) p. 14. l. 9.10 . Evag●●um . l. 16. ●●etus . p. 13. c. 1. l. 38. inconsequences . l. 50. A●gu●●inum l. 54. Gersomus . 2. l. 32. as , ●● . p. 14. c. 1. l 20. make . l. 29. but , ●oth . l. 41. Tialliano● . l. 46. Maguesiano● . l. 47. Sc●atu● Apost●lorum . l. 49. Lymenses , Smyrnense● . ● . 2. l. 13. Presbytero●um . p. ●5 . c. ●l . 16. for 7 18. l. 1●extravagant l 20 geri● l 23. quod , quoad . l. 28. favour , savour . c. 2. l. 30 largnesse , largesse . p. 16. c. 1. Margin l. 12. Antiquitates , 16 Crantziu● 2● . Annal. c. 2 l. 13. Adcodatus l. 22. W●fred . l. 25. Lanfrankes : l 27. Ca●kel , Corbel p. 18. r. 1. l. ●9 , Aasina , Haf●ia . l. 34 see , so . r. 2. l. 48. these . Thesa . p. 20. c. 1. l. 33. only by : c. 2. l. 15. resolve : l. 17. vag●● : l. 25.435 p. 22. l. 20. with , which : c. 2. l. 6. expending , expecting : l. 15. blot out ● : l. 38. disguises : ( Margin l 1. Chy●rae●● ) p. 22. c. 1. l. 47. was shattered . THE FIRST SQVADRON . THese Tes●imonies I shall Marshal into 5 distinct Squadron● , for o●der sake . The first Sq●●●●on consists of Divine Authorities ; Whereof our Lord and Saviour Christ himselfe ( the (a) chi●fe Shep●ea●d and Bishop of ou● Soules ) is the Sup●eame gene●all , whose testimony of this nature we have upon record . Matth. 10 . 1● . c. 11 . 1● . c. 1● . ● . 4 . ● . 20 . ●0 . to 29. c. 23.8 . to 13. c. 18.19.20 . Ma●k . 9.34.35 . c. 10.35 . to 46. ●●16 . 15 . Luke 9 . 46.47.4● . c. 22 . 2●.24.2●.26.2● . Io●. 6 . 1● . c. 1● . 36 . c. 20 . 2● 23. Ne●t to him we have his Apostl● St. Pete● : 1 Pet. 5.1 , 2 , 3 , 4. together with the Apostle St. Iohn , 1 Iohn 2 . 15.16● 2 Iohn 1 3. I●hn 1.9 . The Apostle St. Iam●s Iam. 5.14 . A●t● . 15.3 . to 30. Pa●l the Apostle . Acts. 20 . 1●.2● . Phil. 1 , 1●1 . Timo. 3.1 . to 6. c. 4.14 . c. 5 . 1● . ●C●r . 1. ●4 . Tit. 1.5 . to 14. 1 Co● . 1.14 . ●3 . to 34. ●phes . 4 . 11.12.●nd Luke the ●●ang●list : Act● 1● . 23 . c. 15.2 , to 30. c. 2● . 17.28 . to which all other ●ore alle●ged ●exts in Tim●t●y and Titus may bee added . THE SECOND SQVADRON . THe second Squadron is made up of Fathers and Councels ranked according to their severall antiquities , Ann● Christi 1●● . We have Ignatius the Ma●tyr ( if the Epistles be his and ●ightly unde●stood ) ●●istle 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 1● , 11 , 12 , 13.14 . 〈◊〉 apa● Lusebiu● Eccles. Hist. l. 3. c. 33. Po●●●●rp the Mar●●● , Epist. ad Ph●lip . Bibl. Patrum . Tom. 1 p ●● . B. Anno 102. Pope Anacle●us , apud 〈◊〉 Decre● , pars 5. c. 5● . & Laurentium 〈◊〉 concil : Tom. 1. p. 165. Anno 150. Iustin Martyr . Apologia 2 Anno 160. A●ollinarius apud Eusebium Eccles. Hist. l. 5. c. 16. An. 1●0 Iren●us Contra har●ses . l. 3. ● . ● . l. 4 c. 43.44 . & apud Eusobium , Eccles. 〈◊〉 . l. 3. c. 23. l. 5. c. 20.26 . Anno 2●● . ●●men● Al●xandrius : Apud Eus●bium 〈◊〉 . l. 3. c. 20. T●●●ullian Apologia ad●●●s● Gen●e● c. 39. Anno 220. O●ig●n in Mattha●● Homily 1 . 13● & 31. in 〈◊〉 Hom. ● . Anno 240. Di●nysius 〈◊〉 . a●ud ●us●●ium ●ccl●s . 〈◊〉 . l. 〈…〉 Ambrose in ●phes . 4. Tom. 3. p , 239 in 1 Tim. 3 , p , 272 , Adrius apud 〈◊〉 ●ontra 〈◊〉 l. 3. 〈◊〉 . ●● , p , 7●● . 7●● . Pope Damasus . the 1 ●pis●le apud 〈◊〉 Tom. 1 p. 466 , 467 , Anno 3●● , Sa●di●●nse Concil●um Can. ● . ● , ibid p , 414 , ●nno ●90 , St. Ierome Epist. 2 , 83 , and●● , ad ●vagi●um . Com , in ●hil . 1 Tit. 1 , & 1 Tim. 3● Epist. 3. ad heliodorum c. 7. C●m in ●zek . l. 10 c , 33 , in Soph. c. 2. C●m l. 2 , in Epist. ad Galatas c , 4 , Com. l. 2 , in Ep●es , ● , 6 , De 7 , Ordinabus ●cclesia , T●m . 9 , p , 58 , 59. Anno 400. S● , Ch●isostome● Hom. 1. in Philip . Tom● 4. Col. 1039 , ●om . 11 , in 1 Tim. Col. 135 9 . ●om . 2. in Tit. 1 , Col. 1463 : Hom● 35 , in o●ere imperfecto in Matth. Homil. 11 , in Ephes. & de Sacerdotio l , ● . Anno 410. St. Augus●ine Epist. 19.38 . ●5 . Tom. 2. ● , ●2 , 3●● , 310 , 311 , questiones ex utroque●ixtim , Qu●st . 101. D●●aptism● Contr Donatum Tom. 7. pa●s ● p , 471 472 , de Civ●●ate Dei l. 1● , c , 1● , En●●●●tio in Psal. 126 , & adv●rsus har●s●s ; 〈◊〉 53 , A● 430 , T●eodorer Interpretatio in Phil. 1● 1 , 1 Tim. 3. and T●t , 1. ● , Tom. 2 , p , 8● , 129 . 1●9 , An 436 , The 4. Councell of C●rthage Can. 14 , to 26 , An 450 , Pope Leo the 1. Epist Docret : 8● . c , 2. Pri●as●u● in P●il . 1 , 1. 1 Tim. 3. & Tit. 1 & Apoc. 2 , Anno 500 Rem●giu● in P●il 1 , 1 , & 1 Tim. 3 , An : 550. Isidor P●l●siota Epist. l , 2 : Epist. 125 , l , 3 , Ep. 223 An 600 Gregory first : Pa●●o●alis cu●a lib pa●● 2 , ●6 , Epist. l , 7 , Epist. 117 , Moral●um l , ●4 , c , 29 , 30 , l , 20. c 28 , l. ●● . c 23. & 〈◊〉 1●● in Evang●l●a . 4●● 30 , Isi●d●●●●palensis O●iginum l , 7 , c 12 , l , ● , ● 5 , & de Ecclesiasticis 〈◊〉 l , 2 , c 71 An. 657. The b councell o●●●ispalis 2 Can. 6 , 7 , An : 790 , Eli●s ●retensis Coment : in Nazianzen Orationes fo●e repeated , An ●16 . The c Counsell of A●en under Lewes the podly , c ● , 8 10 , 11 , Anno 840 Rh●ba●us M●uru● de universo l , 45 ● , ●●Matth . l , 5 , c. 16 , Tom. 5 , p , ●● , ●n ●pist . Pa●●● l , 19. in Phil. 1 , 1 , l , 23 , in 1 Tim. 3 , l , 25 , in Tit. 1 , Tom. 5 , p , 455 , 456 , 498 , 499 , 521 , 522 , 523 , De institu●●ons Clericorur● l , ● , ● , 4 , 5 , 6 , Tom : 6 , p. 5 , 6 , Haymo Halberstatensis , in Phil. 1. ● , & Tit. 1 , An 560. ( ) The 12 Councell of Toledo , Can : 8 , A●●la●i●s Fortunatus d Ecclesiastic●● Ofsi●●s l , 2 , c , 13 , Anno 1050 , Pecumen●a in A●●a Apost : 5 15 , & 2 , in Phil : 1 , 1 Tim: 3 , & Tit : 1 , fol , 79 , 586 , 655 , 683 , Anno 1070 , Theophylact. Com : in Act : 20 , 17● 28 , in Phil : 1 , 1 , 1 , Tim: 3 , & Tit : 1 , p , 517.576 , 600 , 801 , Anno 1●00 , Conradus Bruno , in Phil : 1 , 1 , 1 Tim: 3 , Tit : 1 , Anno 1130 , Barnard De Consideratione ad Eugenium l. 2 , 34 , Epist. 42 , Serm● 23 , 25. & 77. Super ●anti●● De laudibu● Maria , Homil 1 & Concio in Concilio Rhemensi , & ad Past●●●s S●r●● . THE THIRD SQVADRON . THe third Squ●dron is constituted of forraigne Cannonists , and Popish Schoolemen , w●iters and Councels from the Yeare of our Lord 1100 till this present : as I●o Carna●●nsis D● . ●al●lu●● pa. ●5 . c , ●8 , 59.72 , 1●● . 143.144 . Peter Lombard Sententiarum l , 4. distin● . 24. I. K. L , m● & Comen●a●i●m Phil. 1 , 1 , Tit : 1. & 1 , Tim: 3 Gratian the g●ea● Can●onist distinctio 18 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 39 , 50 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 6● , 67 , 68 , 80 , 93 , 95 , Causa 2 , qu. 7 , Causa 24 , qu , 3 , Hugo Ca●dinalis in Phil : ● , 1 , Tit : 1 , & 1 : Tim: 3 , Aquinas secund● secundae , qu : ●4 , Ar : 6 ●rg : 1. Supplementum in tertiam p●rtem qu : 37 , Art 7 Durandus in l , 4 , Sentent : Distinct : 24. qu : 5 , 6 , & Rational Divinorum l , 2 , Iohannis Parisiensi● , de potestate Regia & Pap●li apud mo●●●um de Ecclesia c , 11 , & Catalogum Testium veritatis p , 525 ) Carthusi●● Ca●etan and the Author of the O●dina●y glosse in Acts 15 , & c , 20 , 17 , 28 , Phil : 1 , 1 , 1 , Tim: ● Tit , 1 , 5 , 7 , cardinalis Arelatensi● apud AEneam Sylvium de Gestis Concilij Basiliensis l. 1 , p , 27 , 28 , 29 , Alvarus Pelagius de Plainetu Ecclesia ● , 1 , Art : 70. l , 2 , Art 1 to 17 , Panormitam c , 4 , de Consuetudine , Anselmus Lucensis Collectanea Can : l. ● , c. 87 & 127 : G●egorius Tholosamus , Polycarp l , 2 , Tit : 19 , & 39 , Iohn Thiery Glos●a in G●ationum distinct : 95 , cap olim , with all other Glosses and Canonists on that Text He●●i●us Gorichen . in l , 4 , Sentent : Distinct : 24● Astensis Summa pars 2 l , 6 , Tit : 2 , Artic : 2 , Angelus de claucisio Summa Angelica Ordo 1 , The e councell of Lingon , Anno 1404 , & of Paris Anno 1557 Duarenus de sacr : Eccle : injust l , 1 , c , 7 , Onus Eccl●sia c , 14 , to 27 , Nicholas Cusa●●● de conco●di● Catholic● , l. 2 , c. 13. Alphonsus a C●st●o advers , 〈◊〉 Sit ●piscopus , Michael Medina de sacro h●m O●ig , et continetia , 〈◊〉 ●spenca●● in 1 Tim. c 3 , Digressio●●m in Tim , ● 1 c : 1 , 2 , 3● and in Tit , 1 ● , ● The Rhemist ; ●nnot●tion ; on Acts 〈◊〉 sect 4 and in Tim 4. Phil , 1. 1 , ●it . 1 ●● , I●●obus Fabor in 1 , Tim , ● & , 4 ● & Tit 1. Sixtus Sevensi , Bibl 〈◊〉 , l ● , Anno 32● , Azo●ius M●●●lium : p●r● , 2 l , 3 c , 1●● Buoniu● An●u●ll Eccles , ●om 1. p , 5●● Iacobus de Gr●ss●s d●s●●lionum Au●●carum par● , 2 l , 1 c 9 : 11 , 5 , ● , 9 , 1● , 14 16 , l , 3 , c. 12 , 11 , 3.4 . Pet●●s B●●sseldin , ●uchy●idion , Te●●●giae P●storalis p●●s , 1 c , 15. with other Pontis●●●ans though sundry else of them are the greatest s●icklers for ●●is●op●ll M●●●●ne of Pu●pose to adv●nce the 〈◊〉 Suprem●cy with the Parity of Bishops and P●esbiters Iu●● D●●m● , ●sterly subverts and ruine●● I shall close up this Squ●dr●n with the ●●e Authorities of some Semi●●● Priests in En●land . As namely of Ni●c●●las Smi●h , in his modest and b●iefe discussion of certaine Assertions which are taught by Mr. Doctor ●●l●ison in his Treatise of the ●cclesiasticall 〈◊〉 . where thus he determines , * I judge is no rashnes to affirm that since England enjoyed a Bis●●p● ( to wit a Po●●s ●ishop● to confirme the Papists , and controll the P●iests , namely Rich●●d bis●op of Ch●lced●● created the generall ●ishop and superintend●nt , both of England● and Scotland , by Pope Vrbaus speciall Bull , dated the 4th . of August , Anno 1625. The Coppy whereof you shall ●ind printed , in Censura Proposition●m qua●undam &c. per sacram facultatem Theolog●a Parisi●nsis factae Pa●isiis , 1631 , p , 63 , 64 , 65 : that more damage hath happened to the Catholikes in generall by reason of discord , and frequent losse of charity , then they have received benefit , by the Sacrament of Con●irmation onely conferred on some few . That all holy men have exceedingly e●deavoured to s●un such an high dig●ity . That a Bishop is in a State which presupposeth but yet gives not perfection : which the State of Religion , not onely presupposeth but giveth . That a vow not to receive a Bishopricke is valid and sacred . That ●o desi●e a Bishopricke even for that which i● best in it , to wit for the good of soules according to St : Thom●s s●cunda s●●u●da , que 185. Art , 1 , seemes to be presumpti●n , and there are some who stick not to say ( and that commonly ) it is a mo●tall sinne . That these ●ropositions following are strange , idle , and absurd . That it is d● iure divin● , and that the law of God is , that every particular Church ( as England is ) ought to have a Bishop . That without a Bishop England were not a particular Church . That unlesse every particular Church hath its Bishop or Bishops , the whole and Vnive●sall Church could not be ) as Christ hath instituted it ) an Hierarchie composed of divers particular Churches . That without a Bishop we cannot have con●irmation &c. All which principles ( saith hee ) are worse then the concultion it selfe and demonstrated by us ( to ●it in that Treatise ) to have no foundation at all . Thus this Popish Priest who proving that the Church of England may well subsist without a Popish Bishop to sway and order it ; grants that it may doe the like without our Protes●ant Prelates , and that plainly resolves that it is not from any divine law or institution , that the Church of England should have any Bishop at all to govern it . Daniell a Iesu another Priest , and a Reader of Divinity thus seconds him , in his Apologie for the proceeding of the holy see Apostolike , as to the government of the catholickes in England during the time of Persecution * That it is most false and of dangerous consequence , that a particular Church cannot be without a Bishop : That Gods law requires no more , but that there be som● Bishops in the Church to wit so many , that there bee no danger , that the whole Order should suddainly be taken away by their deaths and so dispersed through the world , that all Christians may bee sufficiently provided of learned and vertuous Priests . If this be done the law of God is satisfied although there be no Bishops in F●ance , Spaine , or , England . Give me there●o●e a mul●itude of Christians how great soever who want not a Bishop to ordaine Priests , and I will boldly affirm that there is n● need that the governour of that society should be a Bi●●op . Yea let us suppose the Ordina●ion o● Priests and the Ministry of the Chu●ch , not to be necessary in the Church , and presently it followes , that there is no need the universall Church should bee governed by Bishops who are superior to Priests . That in the time of Persecution it is neither good , nor convenient , nor any solace or comfort to the Church to have a Bishop . That tho●e who of Bishops are made Religious persons may be said in some sort to fly ●igher , and not at all to descend . That if the Catholickes of England should yeeld to this motion ( name●y to receive the Bishop of Chalcedon as their p●oper Pastor and Bish●p they could by no meanes excuse themselves● from being worthy of that reprehension which the C●rinthians received from Saint Paul , namely , that they rashly , and indiscreetly , put themselves into subjection that they should bestow their temporall goods , so as they could exspect no reward from God , as exercising humility , Obedience , Pat●ence , for which no crowne of Righteousnesse is prepared : yea that they may by their blind receiving o● him ( though by the Popes owne Bull and authority ) expose themselves to manifest perill by falling into mortall sinne &c. These Positions of theirs were publikely taught and maintained by many other Priests both in England , and Ireland as appeares by the censure of the faculty of Paris , and Nicholas I● Maistre his Instauratio antiqui Principatus Episcoporum Parisijs 1633. Written upon this occasion in answer of these Treatises and some others . Some of which Propositions though they were censured as Eronious , by the faculty of the Divine● of Paris . Anno 1631. through the power of the Bishop of Chalcedon , as striking at the Popes Supremacy and the Bishops Hierarchie , yet in all that censu●e , I finde not one passage of Scripture produced to prove them contrary to the word of God , and therfore that censure of theirs not much to be regard●● . THE FOVRTH SQVADRON . THe 4th Squadron consists of Forraigne Protestant Churches and writers , which I shall muster & ranke in order according to their antiquities as neare as I may . I shal begin with the VValdenses Taborites Albigenses & Au●●ites , ( whose opinions and resolutions touching these particulars are registred at large , by AEneas Sylvias : histor , Bohemiae c , 35 , by Renaerus contr : Waldenses lib , c , 6. by Refutatio : Waldensuim , Bibl. Patrū . Tom. 13 , p. 383 , by Thomas Waldenses● operum . Tom. 1 , l , 3 , Arti , c● 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , Tom , 2. de Sacramento ordinis c. 117 , 118 , & Tom , ; , c , 60 , 61 , 62 , by Alphonsus de castro adversus hereses , Tit , Episcopus , & de Sacramento ordinis , by Illiritus Catalogus Testium veritatis , p , 426 , 433 , 445 , by Mr. Iohn Fox Acts and Monnments p , 210 , Albertus Pighius Hierarch . Eccles. l , 2 , c , 10 , Gersomus Bucerus de Gubernatione Ecclesiae p , 599● 600 , 601. Marsilius Patavimus , ( Anno 1320 ) seconds them in his Defensoris Paris pars 2 , c. 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , and who Ann● 1330 ) is backed by Michall Cezenas , Henricus de Iota , Nicholaus orem , Ioannes , de Ianduno Petrus de Corbaria , Ioannes de Polaco , Iohn of Castele , ●rancis de Archatara , and divers others of tha●age Witnesse , Extravagant , Ioannis 23 Antoninus quarta pars , Summe , Catalogus , Testium veritatis p , 512 , 524 , 525 , 529 , Fox Acts , and Monuments , p , 358 , 359 360. with others AEtates Ecelesiae written about that time , c. 2 Registred in Catalogo Testium veritatis p , 453 , 454● & Laurentius Valla , The restorer of the Elegance of the Latine tongue , succeed next in order . Annotationes in Act. c. 15 , & c , 20 , in 1 Tim: 3 , & Tit. 1 , Ioh● Hus , and Hierome of Prague , two learned Godly Martyrs , tread in their footsteps witnes AEneas Sylvius Histor● Bohem c , 35 , Fox Acts and Monuments , p 55● , 559 , & Gerson Bucerus de Gubernati●n● Ecclesiae p. 602 , 603 , After these successively ensued Ioannis Lu●atwitz in Confessione ●a●oratrum contr. Roke●zanum c , 13 , apud Lidij Walde● . siam p , 53 , Erasmus of Rot●●rdam , Annota● , & pa●●pht . in Act 1● , in 1 Tim: 3 , & 4 , Phil. 1 , Tit 1 , 1 , ●et . 5 , Scholia in ●pist : ●ieronym : 〈…〉 , & adversus a●●●ert●m 〈◊〉 : Martin Luther , in ●salm . 2 , ●● , & 134 , in Epist. ad Gal●●es 〈…〉 1 , Art● 15 , The Synod of ●e●icon , Artic : 6● The Synod of Modis●a●ia . Ar●●c : 8 , 11 , 12 , & G●rs●m Buc●r●●d 〈◊〉 : E●●●●siae , p , 370 , 373 , 374 , 4●● , 49● , 500 , 51● , 518.575 , 616 . 61● , 618 , C●ristian the 3 , King of Denmarke , Anno 1537● and the whole State of Denma●●e together with ●Gus● 〈◊〉 Cricus ●ing of Sweden , about the same ●ime who s●ppressed , banished , and hanged , up the Lordly Bishops , of their Re●lms , a● false Traitors , and Rebels contrary to Chists ins●itution , and having no foundation in the word of God . Cl●●trae●s Cl●r●n : Saxon l , 6. p. 49. l● 7 , p , 219 . 2●● . l● 9. p , 259 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 270 , 279 , l , 10 , p , 297 , 309 , 311 , 340 , 341 , 342 , l , 12 , p. 358 , 359 , l , 13 , p , 388 , l , 14 , p , 407 , 421 , l , 15 , p● 433 , 434. Philip Melan●●hon , A●gam & Respons● Pezel pa●● 7●Com● in 1 Cor : 4 , Et dis●utatio d● Politia Ecclesias●ica & d● coni●g●o Sacerdotum Oecolampa●ius in Rom : 12 , ●ald●i●us ●●●nglius in Amica s●a Parenaesi a● Commun●m Helve●iorum ●mitatem operum . Tom. 1. p , 115 , 117 , in P●●l . 1.1 , Tom. 3 , p● 504. Opus Articulor●m Artic. 34● 36 : Francis Lambert , his Summa Ch●i●●iani●atis . Anno 1536. Pr●sat Mr. Balli●ger in Act. 20 , v , 28 , & decad. 5. Ser : 3 , 4 , Brentius Apol. 〈◊〉 wettemb : c , 21. Pellican●s in Mat. c. 16 , & 18 , in Act : 16 , & 20. Mustulus loc●rum Com. locut de Ministris verbi D●i . p. 596.597 , 598. Mr. Iohn Calvin Instij● l , 4 , c , 3 , sect. 8 , c , 4 , sect , 2 , in Phil , 1 , 1 , 1 , Tim. 3 , 8 , Ti●● 1 , 5.7 , Antidotum Concilij Tridentin● Ses. 7 de Conformation● Martin B●cer , de vt & usu Ministerij , & in Ma●th . 16 , Araetius Problem : Lo●us de O●si●ijs Eccles. ●● Pi●l , 1 , 1 , in 1 Tim● 3 , & 4● & Tit. 1 , 5 , 7. Mr. Ralph G●●l●her , on Acts. 20. verse ●8 . Phil. 1 , 1 , 1 , Tim. 3. Tit , 1.5.7 . M●rtin Chem●●tius Examen ●on●ilij Trid●●t pars . 2 , de Sac●amento 〈◊〉 , 223 , 224 : Innocentius Gentiletus , exam●●●on●ilij Trid●nt : Ibid Ioa●nis Ma●o● , Kin●sius & Ma●lorat on Phil. 1 , 1 , 1 , Tim. ● , Ti● . 1 , 5 , 7 , Acts 20 , 28. 1 Pet , 5 , 1 , 2 , 〈…〉 2 , ● , 8 , & in 〈…〉 ; c , 53 , 〈…〉 5 , ● , 14 , & Co●●● 3 , c● 3 , 〈…〉 & lig● in 4 P●aecept : Defide c , 25 , s●ct . 9 , & in P●●l . 1 , 1 , ●yperius in Tit , 1 , 17 , & d● M●th●do T●●ologi● l , 3 , Matthi●s Ill●rieus Clavis S●ripturae . Tit Presbiter , Catalogus Testi●m Ve●ita●●s p , 426 , 433 , 445 , 512 , 524 , 525 , 529 , 553 , 554 , 488 , 528 , &c. 〈…〉 & Basilius Faber , Centur : Eccles : Magd● 1 , l , 2 , c , 7 , Col , 530 , 531 , 507 , 508 , Cent. 1. c , ● , Col , 125 , 126 , Centu● 4 , c. 5 , de haresibus , &c , 10 , Peter Martyr Loca●●m com● Tom , 1. Glass , 4 , ●ocus 6 : Tom , 2 , d● Eucharistia locu● 1. Obiect , 50 , Virellas Religioni● Christi co●pendium l , 3 , c , 11 , ●os●annus in Tit , 1 , 5. 7 , Heming●us , and Iohn May●● , in Phil , 1 , 1 , 1 , Tim: 3 , Tit. 1 , 5 , 7. Antonis Sad●el ad Repetita Tarriani Responsio p , 50 , 51 , 61 , De Legitim● voca●ione Pas●oram p , 66 , to 88 , ad Repeti●● Tu●riani locus , 12 , p , 406 , to 500 , Pezelius . A●gum & Respons . pars 7 , de Ordin ministr. . in Argument 1 Cos●●r ●levian in Pi●l : 1 , 1 , & Theodoret Beza de dibes●●s ministrorum grad●●as cont●a Sarabiam & Annotat. in Phil : 1 , 1 , & Tit : 1. 5 , 7 , Viret●s de Minis●●is Verbi Dei , & Sacram : l , 11 , c , 19 , & de Adulterinis Sa●ram Stephanus Ezegedim●s locorum Com de Ministr : Sab 4 , p. 202 : Lavather in Ezech com 10 , George So●i●●● Methodo Theologia , P●scator Theses Theologi● locus 23 : Thes : 50 , in Act : 20 , 28 , P●il , 1. 1 , 1 Tim. 3. & 4 : Tit. 1.5 , 7 Iunius Controa●ares 5 lib. 1. c , 14. n 2 . 15● 23 , c , 25. n. 4.14 . Contr. 3. l. 1. c. 8. n 24●Contr●● . l 1. c. 5. n. 24. Morney Lord of P●essa Tractatus de Ecclesia c 11 Holan●● Syntagin● Theologiae l. 7 , ● . 11 , Bucanus loc. 42.44 . Theodorus Biblainder in Chromagr . Arinis Scult●tus Paraus , Selneccorus , Tossian●● An●onius Fayus , Io●nnis M●d●●lne●●s Eilhard●s Lubmus , George VVeinrichus , ●●d●ous willichus , Cosma● Megalianus Th●m●s Ven●torius Fredericus Baldwenus , & G●o●ge De●vadius on Phil. 1 , 1.1 . Tim. 3. & 4 , 5 , Tit. 1.5.7 . De o●ficio & jus●i● Mi●istorum . & speculum S●●●rdot● Carolus M●linaeus Comment in Edict●●● . 2 , Cont● pa●nas datus & abus●● Papa●●m p. 148 , to 1●6 Petrus Molmeus de vo●a●ion● Mini●tror●m l , 1 , c , 7 , l , 2 , c , 8 , 9 , 10 , l , 3 , c. 6 , 3 , 8 , Daniell Chamierus Pa●stratiae , Catholica . Tom , 2 De O●●um : Pon●if l , 10 , c , 6 , l , 9 , c , 14 , 15 , Gersom Bucerus de Gubernatione E●clesiae● M●●●l● , 1618 , ( in answer to Bishop Downhams Sermon , ●nd his defence thereof , never yet replied to , the best and learnedest Treatise ext●nt of this Subject ) with infinite others (m) Doctor Reynolds ( the greatest bookeman of his age or since ) confessing that all learned men in forraigne Nations● that he had read , and m●ny more ( no doubt ) which he had not re●d , treating of this Subject did all co●sent in this particular of the Parity of Bishops and Presbyters , by Gods law , and divine institution To these I might add many s●ottish writers a● Mr. Iohn Knox in the troubles of Frank●ord in his History of the Church of Scotland & in his godly Letter to the faithfull Mr. Robert Ro●●● : Comment in Ephes : 4 , the whol● Synod of F●●se An 1591 , & Patricke Ad●mso●Arch-Bishop of St An●rewes his Polinody therein●Andrew M●lium , in his M●s● , Patricij : Adamsoni Palniodia , & Cels● Commis●ionis A●●omia , printed Anno 1620. Altare Damascenum . A protestation . and Tre●tise from Scotl●●d Printed 1608. VVilliam Cooper Bishop of Gall●●a● in his Sermon before the States Anno 1606. The review of the Synod of Perth , with sundry others concurring in the selfe same jud●ment with all eage●nesse that may be . THE FIFTH SQVADRON . THe 5. Squadron is compacted and made up of our owne domesticke writers , Martyrs , Authors , aswell ancient as Modern , which I shall here digest i●to a Chronologicall order . Anno 390 , we have Sedulius Scotus in 1 Tim , 3 , & Tit● 1 , Bibl. Patr. Tom. 5 , pars 3 , p , 516. b. 519. g● h. An. 5●0 Gilda● in his Acris co●●eptio Cleri Angli● 720 : Venerable ●eda in acta Apost ● , 20 , Tom : 5 , Col : 657 , Anno 790 , Alcuminus de Divinis officijs c , 35 : 16. Col , 1082 , 108● , Epistola 108 , ad sparatu●● Comment in 5 Ioan l , 5● Cap : 25 , Col. 547 , 548 , 549 , Anno 1080 : Anselme Arch-Bishop of Canterbury (n) stiled the Pope of the other world by Pope Vrb●n himselfe ) Comme●t in Ephes. 4 , Tom : 2 , p , 280 , in Phil : 1 , in 1 Tim. 3.4 . & Titus 1 ibid p. 295 , 356 , 357 Anno 1140 Iohn Saresbury com . in Phil. 1. Tit● 1● & 1. 4 , 1 Tim. ● . 3 & de Nuges Curialium l , 8 , c , 17 , & 23 , Anno 1160 , Petrus Blesensis de I●stitutione Episcop , Tractatus & Epistola 18 , 22 , 25 , 43 , 64 , Anno 12 40 , Alexander Alensis Summa Theologia pars 4. qu. 26 , n. 8 , 9. Artic. 1. & in 1 Tim. 8. & Tit. 1 , An : 1280. Richadus de media Villa . in l , 4. Sent : Distinct . 24. Anno 1320. William Occham in Catalogo Testium veritaris p , 524 , 525 , 589. & Foxe , Acts , and Monuments , p , 358. 359 , 360. Nicholas Lyra , in Act : 20 : Phil. 1 , 1. Tim. ● , Tit. 1 , & 1. Pet : 5 , Anno 1350 , Richard Fitz-ralph Arch-Bishop of Ardmagh , and Primate of all England , Responsio ad quest . Armenorum l : ●1 , c. 1 , to 7. & apud Thomam Waldensem Tom. 3. c. 60.61 , 62 , 63. & Catalogum Testium Veritatis p , 52 S. Robert Holcot in l , Sapienti● Sect. 77 & 163. An. 1380. our Famous English Apostle Iohn Wickliff Dialogorum l , 4 , c. 15.16 , 17 , 18.26 , apud Thomam Waldensem Tom , 1 , l , 3 , Artic . 3 , c● 29 , 30 , 31 , 32. Tom. 2 de Sa●cramento ordinis c , 117 , 118. Tom. 3 , c , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63. Thomam Walsinghamum : hist. Angliae p. 299●303 , 304 , & Fox Acts and Monuments , p , 414 Geofry Chancer the P●oughmans tale patt 1 , 2 , Pierce Plowman passus 23 , Anno 1390 William Swinderbg Martyr . Fox Acts , and Monuments , p , 430. 431 , 434. See the Epistle of Lucifer to the Prelates &c , written about that age ( thought to bee his ) Anno 1391 , Walter Brute Martyr , Ibid p. 439. Anno● 2425. Sir Iohn Old-Castle , the Lord C●bham Martyr . Fox Ibid p , 517 , 518 , 522 , All the Disciples of Wicklif●e in that age , Walsingham hist. Anglia p , 372. & Antiqu , Ecclesia , Brit , p , 302 , Anno 1430 , Alexander Fabritius destructorium viviarum pars 4 , c , 8 B , 5 , 14. C , c. 21 , B. C. I , c. 22. D , pars 5 , c , 2 , E , I , l , c , 14 : A pars 5. c , 2 , L. pars , 6.3 , Iohn de B●rgo , Pupilla Oculi pars , 6 7 , c. ● , C , D , William Lyndewood Provinc . Constit , l , 3 , Tit. de vita & honestate Clerìcorum f , 86 , cap , Ordinis , Iohn de Aton Constit. Othonis de officio Archiepisc. f. 44. c , Archiepiscopum Reginald Peacocke Bishop of Chichester , Anno 1457. de AEqualitate Ministrorum lib. apud Balaum Cent , 8 , Scriptorum Brit , c , ●19 . Anno 1536 , Iohn Lambert Martyr , Fox , Acts , and Monuments p , 1009 , 1016 , Cuthbert Tonstall Bishop of Duresme , and Iohn Stokes by Bishop of London , in their Epistle to Cardinall Poole , Fox p. 972 , 9●3 . & in Thomas B●con his reports of certain men vol , 3 , fol. 267 , VVilliam Tyndall Martyr . Obedience of a Christian man in his workes p , 114 , 124. 133 , 192 , 185. The practise of Popish Prelates p. 342.343.354 . & in Fox p. 986. Anno 1537. Thomas Arch-Bishop of Canterbury , Edward Arch-Bishop of Yorke , Iohn Bishop o● London , Cut●bert Bishop of Durham , Stephen Bishop of Winchester , Robert Bishop of Carlile , Iohn Bishop of Exeter , Iohn Bishop of Lincolne , Iohn Bishop of Bath , Rowland Bishop of Coven●●y and Lichfield , Thomas Bishop of Ely , Nichola● Bishop of Salisbury●Iohn Bishop of Bangor , Edward Bishop of Hereford●Hugh Bishop of Worcester , Iohn Bishop of Ro●hester , Richard Bishop of Chichester , VVilliam Bishop of Norwich , Robert Bishop of Assaph . Robert Bishop of Landaffe , Richard VVolman Arch-Deacon of Sudbury , VVilliam Knight Arch-Deacon of Richmond , Iohn Bells Arch-Deacon of Glocester , Edward Bonner Arch-Deacon of Leicester , VVilliam Skippe Arch-Deacon of Dorcet , Nicholas Heath Arch-Deacon of Stafford , Cuthb●rt Marshall Arch-Deacon of Vottingham Richard Corren Arch-Deacon of Oxford , VVilliam Cliffe , Geoffry Dowes , Robert Oking , Ralph Bradford , Richard Smith● Symon Matthew , Iohn Pryn , VVilliam Buokmaster , VVilliam May , Nicho●as VVottin , Richard Cox , Iohn Edmunds , Thomas Robertson , Iohn Baker , Thomas Barrett , Iohn Hase , Iohn Tyson Doctors , and Professors of Divinity and of the Civill and Canon Law , with the whole convocation house and Clergie of England in their Booke intituled the institution of a Christian man dedicated by them to King Henry 8. Printed cum Privilegio subscribed with all their names , and ratefied by the Statute of 32 H , 8 , c. 26. chap , of the Sacrament of order fol. 48. &c , an excellent place Anno 1538. Robert Barnes Doctor of Divinity , and Martyr in his workes , p. 210. Anno 1540. VVilliam VVragh●on in his h●nting and finding out of the Romish Fox among the Bishops in England , dedicated to King Henry the 8. and his rescue of the Romish Fox A Booke intituled The Image as well of a true Christian Bishop as of a counterfeit and Anti-christian Bishop , printed about the same time , Rode●icke Mors his Supplication or complaint to the ●arleament of England , c. 19.20 . A supplication to King Hen●y the 8. by a namelesse Author , against Bishops their jurisdiction , pride , Lordlinesse , and wealth , Henry Stalbridge his exhortatory Epistle to his most deare Country of England , against the Pompous Bishops of the same , as yet the true members of the great Antichrist of Rome , their most filthy Father Lincolne Ridley , his Exposition on Ihil . 1. Iohn Frith a Pious learned Martyr , his answer to Sir Thomas Moore , p. 116. Nayler his answer to the epistle of the great Turke , printed Anno 1542. Iohn Bale afterward Bishop of Osgris , in Ireland , his image of both Churches , on Apoc. c , 6 , f , 42 , 9 , f , 56.65 . c. 13. f. 105 , 116 , 118. c. 14 , f. 126. c , 15 , f , 150. c. 17. f , 160. King Henry the 8 himselfe in his Book inscribed● A necessary erudition for any Christian man published with the advise and approbation of all the Prelates , Clergy of England in their convocation and of the Lords Spirituall and temporall ; and nether house of Parliament with the Kings own Royall Epistle to all his loving Subjects before it Anno 1545. by vertue of the Statute of 32 H. 8. c. 26. chap. of the Sacrament of order Anno 1551. The Book of Ordination of Ministers and Bishops confi●med by act of Parliament 3 Ed. 6. c. 12.5 . & 6. Ed. c. 1. & 8. Elizab . c. 1. ( which prescribed the 1 Tim. 3. & Tit. 1. to be read at the Ordination of Ministers , and consecration of Bishops , and limits the selfe same forme of Ordination , with the power of impesi●ion of hands both to Ministers and Bishop● ) Anno 1552. Iohn Hooper Bishop of Glocester , a Martyr expition upon the 8. Commandements , and in Psalm 23● p. 40. Hugh La●ymer once Bishop of VVorces●er , a Martyr in his Fourt● Sermon of the Plough , and in his 2.3.4 . and 6. Sermons before King Edward the 6. Anno 1●●5 . I●hn Pove● Bishop of VVinchester , in his Apologie against Thomas Martyr● c , 4.5 . f. 43.44.52.53.59 Doctor Harpesfield Arch-Deacon of London , and Iohn Bradford Martyr , Fox Acts , and Monuments , p , 1465 , Anno 1558 , Thomas Bomb●edge Martyr , Fox ibid p , 1856. Iohn Elmer ( after Bishop of London , ) in his Harborow for faithfull Subjects , Master Bullingham , ( after Bishop of Lincolne . ) in his Letter to Master Bull Det 5 . 1●64 . Master Thomas Becon , in his cat●chisme , in his workes dedicated to all , the Bishops of England by name approved , applauded by them , and Printed Cum Privilegio London 1562. vol. 499.500 . The Doctrine of Christ and Anti-christ . vol. 3 , f , 409 , 4010. sect. 18.19 , Iames Pilkington Bishop of Durham , Exposition on Agge c , 1. verse 1 , 2 , 3.4 , 9.12.13 . c. 2. v. 1 , 2 , 3.4.9.10.11 . on Obidias v. 7.8 . and in his Treatise of bu●ning Paules Church . Incomparable Iohn Iuell Bishop of Salisbury , defence of the Apologie of the Church of England , Edit , 16.10 . part 2 , cap : 3 , divis : 5. c : 4 : divis , 2 , cap , 5 , divis : 1 , cap : 7 , divis , 5 , cap , 9. divis : 1 , p 99.100 , 101.196 : 202 , &c , VVilliam Alley Bishop of Exeter , in his poore-mans Library , part 1 , Miscellanea Pr●lect , 3. f. 95 , 96. Printed cum Privilegio Edit. 2.1571 . Alexander Nowell Deane of Paules , his Reproofe of Do●mans Proofe LONDON 1565. cum privilegio f. 43.44.45 . Doctor Lawrence Humfryes Regiu● Professor of Divinitie in the Vniversity of Oxford , Puritano papismi Confu●atio : ad Rat . 3. p. 262.263 Iohn Ke●ridge his Sermon on 1 ●im . 3 : 1 , 2 , 3 , London 1578 , Iohn VVhitgi●t Arch-Bishop of Canterbury against Cart-wright , p , 353 , Master Cart-wright in his second Replie against Whit-gist , Anno 1585. ● Tract , . 8 , of Arch-Bishops , and Bishops p , 404 , to 616. CONFVTATION of the Remish Testament on Acts. 20. sect. 4 , ●hil . 1 , sect. 1 , 1. Tim. 3. sect. 2. Tit. 1 , sect. 2 , Doctor VVilliam Fulk against Brislow motive 40 against Gregory Martin , London , 1583 , p , 172. Confutation of the Rhemi●● Testament , on Tit. 1 , sect 2 , phil. 1 , sect 1. Master Iohn Foxe in his Acts and Monuments , ( prescribed to be had in every Arch-Bishop , Bishops , Archdeacons , Deanes , and Prebend residentiaries house & in every Cathedrall and Collegiate Church by the Canon● made in the Synod of London , Anno 1571 ) Edit 1610 , p , 216 , 358 , 359. 360 , 414 , 430 , 432 , 434 , 439 , 517 , 518 : 599 , 625 , 961 , 972 , 1009 , 1016 , 1465 , 1856 both in the text and marginall Notes . Doctor VVilliam VVhittaker Regius Professor of Divinity in the Vniversity of Camb●id●● : Contra Duraum l , 6 , sect : 19 , Responsio ad 6 , Rationes camp●ani Rat : 10. p , 122 , 141 , Contr , 2 , q● . 5. c , 7 , contr , 4 , qu , 1 , c , 1 , Master P●ilip Stu●t , his display of corruptions neare the end . The ●ee hive of the Romish Church oft printed and lately reprinted Anno 1635. passing on● most learned Doctor Iohn Rayn●lds in his conference with Hart Anno 1584 , London 1609 c , 3 , divis : 1. p , 100 , 101.105 . c , 4 , divis : 2 , p , 122 , 123 , c , 6. divis : p , 185. divis : 3 , p , 218 , c. 8. divis 3 p , 4●1 , divis : 5 , p , 540 , 541 , and his Letter to Sir Francis Knolles , in refutation of Doctor Bancrof●s Sermon at Pauls-Crosse 9. Feb. 1588 , dated s●pt . 19. 1598 Doctor A●dr●●willes Synopsis Papisini , The 5 generall Controversie . Qu : 3 , Doctor Thomas Bilson , after Bishop of VVinchester in his true difference betweene Christian Subjection and unchristian Rebellion Oxon 159● , p , 125 , 126. Iohn Bridges Bishop of Oxford , his defence of the Princes Supremacy p. 359. The Petition to Queen Elizabeth , p , 7 20 , 21 : Discursus de Gubernatione Ecclesiastica . Anno 1584 : Thoma● VVhete●sall , his discourse of the corruptions now in question : London 1607 Doctor Richa●d Field , of the Church . l. 5 , c , 27 , Master Richard Hooker , his Ecclesiasticall Polity ●● 5 , sect , 7. ● , Tho : Wilson his Christian Dictionary , Title Bishop , Doctor Henry Airay Sermon 2. on Phil , 1 , 1 , Doctor Thomas Tailor in his Commentary upon Titus 1 v : 5 , 7 : p , 121 , 122 , Mr: Robert Parker De Politia Ecclesiastica Christi & Hiorarchia , apposita 1614 , a learned discourse Paul Bayne his answer to Bishop Down●ham his consecration Sermon , Doctor William Ames , in his Bellarminus enervatus . Printed by License at Oxford Anno 1629. Tom , 2 , l , 3 , c , 3 , 4●Iamss Peregrin his Letters Patents of the Presbitery Anno 1632. Doctor Iohn Bastwicke his Flagollum Pontificis & Episcoporum La●ialum & his Apologeticus with above 40 , Anonymous T●eatises that I have seene ; All these unamiously testifie ; that Bishops and Presbiters by Gods law and divine institution are all one equall and the same ; That the superiority of Bishops over other Ministers is only of humane and canonicall institution long afte● the Apostles most of them cōdemning it as Anti-christian , unlawfull . Diabolical , pernicious , to Religion , & the Church of God , & the cause of all the tyranny , schismes , corruptions , disorders , errors , abuses that now infest the Church or hinder the power , the purity of Religion and progresse of the Gospell . To these I might accumulate the Statute of 25 , H. 8 c , 19 , 20 , 21 , 26 , H , 8. c , 1 , 27 , H● 8 , c , 15 , 31 , H. 8 , c , 9.10 , 37 , H 8 , c , 17 , 1 , Ed. 6 , c , 21 , & 2 : Phil & Marie c , 8 , 1 Eliz c. 1 , 5 , Eliz. c , 1 , 8 , Eliz. c. 1. The Patents of 31 H , 8 , pars 4. to enable Bishops to consecrate Churches , Chappels , and Church-yards with the Kings License first obtained of 36 H. 8 pars 13. to Robert Holga●e Arch-Bishop of Yorke , to enable and authorize him to keep a Metropolicall visitation , the Patents for the creation of the Bisho●rick● of Oxford , Glocester , Bristol , Peter●●roug● , and VVestminster , An. 34 , & 35 , H , ● , the Patents of Miles Goverdake , Bishop of Exeter , Iohn Povet once Bishop of VVinchester , and Iohn Story Bishop of Rochester , 5 , E. 6 , pars Prima , and of all the other Bishops made in his Raigne , by vertue of the Statute , of 1 E. 6 , c , 2. wiih all the High-Commission Patents grounded on 1 Eliz , c. 1. all which expresly resolves , That all manner of Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction , wherby Bishops are extinguished from , and elivated above ordinary Ministers , is wholy vested in , and for ever , inseperably united and annexed to the imperiall Crowne of this Realme : that our Arch-Bishops , Bishops , Arch-Deacons● and other ●cclesi●sticall Persons have no manner of jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall , but only by , under , and from the Kings Majesty , that they ought to have the jurisdiction delegated and devided to thē by speciall Letters Patents and Commissions under the Kings great Seale to execute the same , not in their owne names and right , but only Nomin● vice , Authoritate nostris Regijs ( as King Edwards , Patents run ) in the Kings owne name right and Authority , as his Officers and subs●itutes , making out all their Proces , Citations , Excommunications , Commissions o● Administration , Probate of wills , and writs of Iur● Patron●●us &c : in the Kings name only , and under his Seale of Armes , not their owne under paine of imprisonment and a premunire ; for the neglect and wilfull contempt whereof all our Bishops and their Officers have encurred severall Premunires to the forfiture of all their temporalities , goods , estates , and liberties to his Majesty , who may much enrich his Exchequer thereby . All which Acts and Patents judicially condemne and overturn our Bishops pretended superiority , over their fellow Brethren by a divine right , the very claime whereof alone makes them all liable to a Premunire and meer perjur'd persons both to God and the King , beeing directly contrary to the very oath of Supremacy , prescribed by 1 Eliz , c , 1 , which every Bishop oft times takes , and every graduate and Clergie man whatsoever who must either abjure this pretended Ius Divinum with which they would support the Hierarchie , or prove : perjur'd disloyall Subjects to their Soveraigne . Having thus presented you with this large Catalogue of Authorities proving the parity ●quality , and identity of Bishops , and Presbiters by divine right and institution . I shall now challenge all our great swelling ●relates , and their s●attere●s joyntly and severally ( ●s●ecially the two Arch-Bishops who have made so many throsonicall bragg●s of the proofe of their divine Title in open Court befo●e thousands of people ) to produce a contrary Catalogue of Auth●rities of thes● severall kinds eviden●ing thei● divine pretended right , supe●io●ity and jurisdiction over other Minis●e●s , ●f they are able to do it and to give a satisfactory , answer to this Treatise , I shall su●s●ib● to their opinion , and recant what I have written . But if they cannot performe ●t , ( as I am certaine they are altogether unable ) then let them retract their former vaine glorious vaunts● and abjure their pretended Ius Divinum by subscribing to that truth , ( which they are unable to contradict ) and laying downe their Bishoprickes at ( least their Rochests● ) as they have oft-times solemnly protested they would doe . If they can or will doe neither , they must give all the world leave to passe this censure on them . That they have neither that learning truth or honesty in them as hitherto they would make the world beleeve they had● And that they may have no starting hole to evade : I shall in as few words as may be , answer what ever they can Object for themselves out of any undoubted A●tiquity which is but this● That Acce●s was bran●ed for an Hereticke by Epipha●i●s and Augu●tine , for affirming Bishops and Presbiters to bee equall one to the other : by divine insti●ution : This is all that either the (o) Papists or (p) our Prelates do or can alleage for their Hierarchie out of the Fathers or Antiquity ; and this in truth is a good as nothing . For first this opinion of Aerius was never condemned as Hereticall , by any Counsell or Father whatsoever , but only by Epiphanius , who alone is unsufficient to brand or make any man an Hereticke . Saint Augustine indeed ( if the Booke be his cites this opinion of his , out of Epiphanius in his Book de haeresibus , c , 53 , yet he brands it not as an Heresie , but stiles it Proprium Dogma in expresse termes to wit , his proper assertion ( and his owne too ) taxing him only of Heresie for●siding with the Arrians in their branded heresie , (q) Isiodor Hispalensis & Gratian reciting the Heresie of Arrius makes no mention a all either of this as an Heresie or error in him , passing it over in silence and expresly averr●ing it thēselves as a truth . Wherefore no ancient Counsell or Author whatsoever but Epiphanius branding it either for an heresie or Error . I see not well how it should be so esteemed . Secondly , this hath been the constant received Doctrine both of Christ and his Apostles , of all the Fathers and learned Orthodoxe writers , in all ages as the precedent Catalogue witnesseth , therefore no Heresie or Error , as Epiphanius and some few of late ( out of him alone ) have rashly deemed it . Thirdly , it cannot properly be called an Heresie , because the superiority of Bishops over other Ministers , by a d●vine institution , as no fundamentall point of faith , neither hath it any foundation at all in Scripture , as I have elsewhere manifested . Therefo●e it is most absurd to call it an heresie . Fourthly , Epipha●ius there condemnes Aerius as much for reprehending and censuring Prayer for the dead , as for affirming Bishops and Presbiters to bee equall . But this our Prelates must confesse ( unlesse they renounce this Doctrine of our Church ) was no Error or Heresie in Aerius but rather in Epiphanius , why not therefore the other . Fifthly , Epiphanius himselfe doth not conde●ne A●rius his opinion in this particular for an Hereticko but onely as a fond opinion ( as his words ) E● quod tota res stu●titiae plena est apud prudentes manifestum est . Sixthly , St. Hierom● Nazia●zen , Basill Sedulius Ambrose , Chrisostome , and Augustine taught the same Doctrine that Aerius did , at or about the same time , but they were never taxed of Heresie or Error for it either then or since : why then should A●rius only be blamed who argues just as Hierome doth , producing the same Sc●ipture to prove his assertion as Hierom● hath done in his Epistle to Evagrius & on Tit. 1. Seventhly , Epiphanius his refutations of Aerius his Arguments and opinion is very ridiculous , false , and absurd . For first he saith , that Presbiters then had not the power of ordination , neither did they use to lay on hands , in the election and Ordination of Ministers , which is a meere falshood , as Hierom in Soph. c. ● . with the ●th . Counsell of Carthage , witnes , and I have elsewhere manifested at large . Secondly , he saith that Presbiters had no voice in the Election of Bishops and Ministers , which is (s) contrary to all Antiquities , extant , and a most palpable untruth . Thirdly , he saith that there were then more Bishops then Presbiters and men sufficient & worthy enough to be made Bishops but no● Presbyters , and therfore the Apostle writing to the Philippians and others makes mention only of Bishops , not of Presbyters , because they had then Bishops but not Presbyters . A miserable ridiculous , answer , which subverts that he contends for , and constitutes Bishops without any Ministers under their command or jurisdiction● whence it will necessarily follow . That seeing the Apostles instituted Bishops without Ministers under them , a●d more Bishops then Presbiters , there ought now to bee no Presbiters subject to Bishops , but Bishops to be pl●ced in every church● without any Ministers under ●hem , but Deacons only and more Bi●hops then Ministers , which I presume the Lordly Prelates will not grant , for this would over-turne not only their Lordships , but their ●ioces●e and Episcopalities Fourthly , he saith that the Apo●●les first constituted Bishops onely in the Church , with●ut Elders and then they afterwards elected Elders as they f●und them worthy , which is contrary to St● t Ierome and ●ll antiquity averring that Elders were first ordained in euery Church , 〈◊〉 14● 23 , Tit. 1 , 5 , and that they afterward elected a Bishop out of themselves . Fifthly , he saith that the Apostles used to write to the Bishops of one Church in the plurall number , when there was but one Bishop there , which is very improb●ble yea contrary of all other expositors , on ●hil . ● . 1. Tit. 1 , 5 , 7 , Act. 20 , 17 , 2● . Sixthly , he peremptorily determines Timothy to be a Bishop which I have elsewhere proved false , and f●om this false ground would prove Bishops and Presbiters distinct . Seventhly , he interprets an Elder in the 1 Tim. 5.1 , to be a Presbiter which most Fathers else expound only to be an ancient man . Eightly , he would prove Timothy a Bishop and Bishops to be Superior too , and distinct from Presbiters , because Paul exhorts him not to rebuke an Elder , but to exhort him as a Father , and not to receive an accusation against an Elder , but under two or three witnesses , which are grosse inconsequence ( as I have else where manifested ) so that Epiphanius whilst he goes about to prove Aerius his assertion still of folly steps into many Errors , follies , and absurdities himselfe , as Bellarmine is inforced to confesse , though desirous to make the best of it . In a word then as all the forecited Authors in generall , ●o in speciall , Chemnitius examen Concilij Tridentini part 4. de Ordinis ●acramento , Danaus in Augustium de haresibus c. 53 , Theodorus Bibliander , in Chronagr . Bucanus l●corum com . c , 32 , Magdeburgenses cent . ● , c. 5. de haresibus Beza de diversis ministorum gradibus c , 22. Bersomus Bucerus de Gubernation● Ecclesia p , 2●● , to 29● . Bishop Io●●ll defence of the Apologie part 2 , c. 9. divis , 1. p : 196 202. Doctor Humphry conf●tat Puritan● , Papismi ad Rat . 3 , p , 261.262 . Doctor VV●itake● c●ntr . Duraum l , 6. sect , ●● ad ratio 10 Campiani Resp. Contr. lib. ● . qu. 5. c. 7. Doctor Fulke , and Mr. Cartwright confutation of the Remish Testament Phil. 1.1 . Bishop Bridges in his defence of the Princes Supremacy , p. 359. Doctor VVill●t Synopsis Papismi contr. 8. qu. 3. part 2. Dr. Reynolds in his Letter to Sir Francis Knolls and to Michael Medina a Papist●de Sacr. hom Orig. l. 1● c. 5. & Doctor Armes in his Bellarminnus enarvatus Tom. 2. l 3 c , 4. ( to omit others ) do all joyntly acquit A●●ius both ●rō the guilt of Heresie or Error , in thi● very point , and taxe Epiphanius for censuring him without the judgement of a Synod or of the Church , condemning his answers to Aerius his reasons as notoriously absurd & impertinent yea as foolish & Childis● worthy to be hissed and derided I shall therfore conclude as doth our learned w Whittaker , in this case ; verily if to condemne prayers for the dead and to equ●ll Presbiters● with Bishops be hereticall . Nihil Catholicum esse potest , Nothing can be Catholicke , so farre as it from being either an Heresie or Error as o●r absurd Prelates and their Sycophants Pretend . If they object the Authority of x Ignatius that he advanceth Bishops above Presbyters commanding them to obey the Bishops as the Apostles obeyed Christ , and willing the people to be subject to their Bishops as to God and Christ , and to their Elders as to Christs Apostl●s : therfore in his daies Bishops were Superior to Presbiters . To this I answer , that these Epistles of Ignatius are false and spurious as many y of our learned men have proved at large , therefore of no Authority . Secondly , it is cleer by Acts 10 . 2●Phil . 1. 1. Tit. 1 , 5 , 7. that in Ignatius his daies Bishops & Presbiters were all one both in Title , office , and jurisdiction : that there were many Bishops in every chiefe City and Church , not any sole ●ishop paramount the Presbiters , over one or many Churches : and that Dioc●san Bishops were instituted long after the Apostles and therefore after Ignatius his dayes ( who lived in the Apostles age ) as all Authors forecited accord and the whole Clergie of England , in their Institution of a Christian man dedicated to King Henry the 8 resolue in direct termes , These Epistles therefore of Ignatius which spe●k of one Bishop in a ●hurch , distinct ●rom and superior to Presbyters must needs be ●orged . Thi●dly , Ignatius in these Epistles makes Bishops successors to Christ and to s●and in his stead , and Presbyters to succeed the Apostles , whereas all others ma●es them successors to the Apostles only , not to Christ , who z le●t no successor or Vicar generall behind him , b●t a remains himselfe for ever the High-Priest , chiefe Shepheard and Bishop of our S●ules , and hath promised b to ●e with us alwaies even to the end of the world : This therefore ma●es his Authority but suspici●us and co●te●ptible . Fourthly , Ignatius hath not o●e word in him that Bishops are superior to ●●e●biters ●y any divine l●w or i●stitution● ( the thing in question ) therefore his Authority ( if ge●uine ) proves nothing for the oposites . Fifthly , Igna●ius equals Bishops and Presbyters both in jurisdiction , rule , and Authority , for ●pist . ● . ad ●ral●●anus he writes thus : ●ut be ye subject to the Presbyters as to the Apostles of Christ : for the Presbyters are a certaine conjoyned Sessions and ●ssembly of Apostles Epist. 6. ad Magnesianes ●rebyteri president ●oco Sinatus Apostolis The ●resbyters rule in the place of the Senate of the Apostles . Epist. 10. ad Symenses . Do ye al ●ollow the Colledge of the presbiters as Apostles : Now if Presbyters succeed the Apostles in the government o● the Church , & al are to be Subject to them , to follow them as Christs Apostles , then certainely ●hey are equall at least to Bishops , who at the highest are by Gods institution only to be obeyed and followed but as Christs Apostles not to be pre●erred before them , if equalized with them , as the proudest Prelate of them must acknowledge and and the c Fathers witnesse . Sixthly , d Ignatius confesseth that the Churches in those dayes were not ruled by the Bishops as they are now but by the Colledge Senate and Synod of the Elders , & communi Praesbyt●oum concilio as Hierome e and all other after him affirme the Presbiters therefore had then equall and joynt authority with the Bishops even in point of Iurisdiction & governments and did r●le and govern , the Church in common with them , therefore the Bishops were not then Lords Paramount , as now they ma●e themselves , but equall and one with them , yea their Colleagues & companions as Ignatius and the g ●our●h counsel o● Ca●●h●ge stile thē . Seventhly , his words h that they sh●uld ●e s●bject to the Bishop as to God and Christ , if rightly understood ma●e nothing for the Prelates Hiera●chie●●or Saint Paul Ephes. 6 , 5.6 , 7. co●mands servants to be obedient unto them that are their Masters according to the flesh , with ●eare and ●●embling in singlenes●e of heart as unto Christ , not with eye-service as ●en pleasers but as the servants of Christ , doing the will of God from his heart , with good will , doing service unto the Lord , and not to men , &c. Is therefore every Master a Bishop , equall unto Christ , and superior in inrisdiction and degree to Presbyters No , So Polycarpus in his Epistle to the ●hilippians chargeth them i to be subiect to their Elders as unto God and Christ using the same words of Elders as Ignatius doth of Bishops . Are Pre●byters therefore Paramount Bishops , and succes●o●s to Christ himselfe ? I trow not Ignatius his meaning therefore is not , that Bishops are as high above Presbyters and the people as God and Christ are above the Apostles ( as some k ambitious Prelates fansie ) but only that we must obey Bishops in all things that they command and prescribe us out of Gods word , as farre ●orth as we would obey God or Christ himselfe , for he that heareth them , heareth Christ himselfe , and hee that despiseth them , despiseth God and Ch●ist himselfe . Luke 10.16 . 1 Thes. 4● 8. In this manner likewise are we to be subject to every Minister whatsoever●Heb . 13.17.7.1 Thes. 2.13 . This therefore proves nothing for the Prelates superiority over other Bishops , especially since this Igna●●us himselfe Epist. 5 chargeth the Trallians to reverence De●cons ( in●e●●or to ●resbyters ) as Christ himselfe , whose Vicars they are . As for those extravagail expressions of Ignatius l Episcopus typum Dei Patris ●mnium ge●ut , quid enim aliud est Episcopus quam is qui ●mni ●●incipatu & protestate Superior est & quod homini licet pro viribus imitator Christi Dei factus , ( and the m like ) on n which same ground both the Popes and Prelates Monarchie , they are so ridi●ulous , ●alse , ambitious , and hyperbolical , as favor neither of Ignatius or any Christian , but rather of a meere papall and Anti-christian spirit● discovering these Epistles to be none of his , and those ●rela●ts who ass●me these speeches to themselues to be o none of Christs Mat. 11.29 . All which considered● this forged A●tiquity will stand thē in no stead at all , to prove them superior or distinct from Presbyters by any diuine institution , and other Antiquity , making for them I find not extant . That Presbyters and Bishops by Gods law and Ordination are both one and the same & of equall authority and jurisdiction as all these authorities resolve , I shall undeniable manifest by this one Argument . Presqyters by the expresse resolution of the Scripture have the very name , and not so onely but the very office of Bishops Act. 20.17 , 28. P●●l . 1 , 1 , 1. Tim. 3 . 1● to 5. Tit. 1 , 5. to 1● . the same mission , and commission , the same function , charge , Ordination , and quallification . Matth. 28.19.20 . 1 Tim. 3 , 1. to 7. c. 4.14 . c. 5 17. 2 Tim. 4.1 , 2 , 1 , Pet. 5 , 1 , 2 , 3. Tit. 1 , 5. to 12. neither doth the Scripture in any place make any differēce distinction , or superiority between them , or attribute any power to the one , that it doth not to the other , ●s the premises evidence , and Matth. 20 25.26 , 27 , 28. Mar. 10 , 42 , 43 : 44 Luk. 22.25.26 . Therefore by Gods law and institution they are one and the same , and of equall authority power and jurisdiction in all things . As for that distinction in power , precedency , and jurisdiction , whi●● hath since been made between them it hath proceeded , partly from Canons and constitutions made by Bishops themselves , p partly by meer usurpation , and encrochment , but principally from the grant and largenesse of Christian Princes , who as they erected Bishoprickes and Diocesse and multiplyed them or divided them as they saw occasion , so they limitted q and granted them all that Episcopall power , and jurisdiction whereby they were distinguished from , or advanced above Ordinary Ministers , as appeares by the Originall Charters of the foundations and erections of our own English Bishop-rickes , the forecited Statutes , and by our owne and forraigne Histories , Now that jurisdiction and superlority thus acquired , is but meere and humane not divine . Againe Bishop-ricks are meer h●mane institutions directly contrary to the Holy Ghost , who ordained many Bishops in every Church and City , not one Bishop over many ( which he can never well instruct , rule , and oversee ) Acts 20. 17.28 , 1 Tim. 5.17 . P●il . 1 , 1 , Tit. 1● 5 , 7. 1 Pet. 5 , 1 , 2 , 3. Now that Episcopal jurisdiction which distinguishet● Bishops ●rom Presbyters . was r created with and annexed to their Bish●pricks , yea it is delegated bot● by the ●ing to Lay Commi●●ione●s and visitors , and by Bishops themselves to Officials commi●●a●ies and meere Lay men 26. H. 8. c. 1.31 . H. 8 , c , 9 , 37. H. 8 , c , 17.1 ● , 6 , c. 2.1 Eliz , c , 1. Therefore it is meerely humane , and belongs not to Bishops by any divine right , neither is it peculiar unto them alone , Moreover Bishoprickes with all Episcopall ju●isdiction ; incident to them have been s usually granted here●o●ore by our Kings of England to their Chancellours , Trea●u●ers , Secretaries , Kinsmen , and temporall O●hcers , being meere Lay-men , as an advancement and augmentation onely of their temporall revenues , and civill temporall things . And in Germany at this day they are given to Dukes , Earles , and Nobles , yea to Children and in●ants only as a temporall dig●ity and revenue . There●o●e they are ●nly temp●rall ●ffices and revenues , and meere hu●ane in●titutions which may well be spare● in the Church , not divine o● Gods and Christs institution , Moreover most of the t re●ormed ●●otes●ant churches be●ond the 〈…〉 the Re●●●ma●●n 〈…〉 Bishopricks and Dioce●an Bishops as Anti-christian , and humane in●●●tutions pernicious to the Church of Christ , and to the power pu●ity , and progres●e of the Gospell , making Bi●●ops proud , Lordly , idle , Luxu●ious , covetous , Tyrannicall , Symoni●call , Seditious , Sch●smatica● , ●pp●essive , vindictive , prophane , impious , lascivious unchas● , per●ideous , rebellious & ●recherous to their Soveraigns , Therefore certainly they are no divine insti●ution , use●ull or necessary for Gods Church , and people , o● which they have been the bane and ruine in all ages as our Acts and Monuments of Martyrs testifie , they being the Authors of all perse●●tions in our Church , and of al our Martyrs Buchery & blood● shed . And in truth our Kings in all former ages have ●eeme● Bishops not al●oge●her so usefull or necessary in our Church , as some now make them , which may appeare by the long vacancies , o●●●ve●s Bishoprickes in sundry ages , of which I shall give you a ●ho●● ta●● , and so conci●●e u An●● 653 After the death of Honorius Arch-Bishop or Can●erbury , that See continu●● void 18 moneths Ann● 669. After Adeota●us●is death it remained vo●d almost 4 yeares , An 690. Af●e●Th●odorus his death it was void almo●t ●u●● two ye●res● and as long a●ter ●a●●yus●ecease An 734 : After ●u●hber●s death An 758. ●t was vacant above one yeare . Anno 762 two years a●ter ●regwins death An 790 , 3 years a●●er Lamb●r●s death An 830 , a●ove one Yeare after VV●●reds decease An 958 : almost 3 yeares after Odo his expi●ation An 1089. 4 ye●res after La●●●akes departure An 1109 5 yeares after An●elmes death An● . 36. 2 years after VVi●liam Carke● A● . 11 , ● , ●3 , yea●s a●ter Ri●hard VVe●●er●ne● , An 1242 , 2 yeares a●●e● St. ●dm●n● An 1270 ●s long a●●er ●oni●ac● An 1502 , 2 yeares after 〈◊〉 Deane , A● 15●8 , o●e ●ear a●●e● 〈…〉 v A● 644 , a●●er Pau●●nus the 〈◊〉 A●●h-Bi●h●p 〈◊〉 ●o●ke● that ●ee w●s vacant 20 , ( ●●me say 3●● yee●es An 1114 s●●ur , yeares af●er ●●●mas the second An 1140 ●lmost 2 ●eares a●ter T●●●stan An 〈◊〉 10 Years after Rogers de●th●An . 1213. 4 Yea●es after 〈◊〉 , An 1255 , 13 , ●loneths after VV●●●e● G●ay , An● 13●3 , after ●homas de ca●bridge , above 2 , yeares . An 315 , ● Years after ●illiam●●Greenfiel● A●● 1240● 2 ye●res af●er VVi●liam de Mel●●● , An , 1405 , 2 years and an ha●●e a●te● 〈◊〉 S●●ope , that Arch-traitor benea●e● for his Tre●son . An● 1423 , 2 Yeares , after Henry Bowe●● An 14●9 . almost 4 Yeares after Iohn K●mp , An 1464 , 2 Yeares after VVilliam B●●th , almost a ●ull yea●● both after Cardinall VVolpe , and ●●●ard Lee , An● 1559 , ●●●er ●●c●olas Heath . 2 yeares An● 1568 after Thomas ●oung , above one yeare . Thus long have both our Arch-Bishoprickes been , void in severall age● without any prejudice to Church or State w Anno 619 after Mellitus his translation from London to Canterbury , that see continued void 31 Ye●res together , An ●64 2 Yeares An : 1133. 7 Yeares a●ter Guilbert An. 1187 alter Gilbert Fol●o● above 2 yeares An : 1279 above one yeare a●●er Iohn de Chishul . An : 1303 , almost 2 yeares after Richard de Granef●rd . Anno 1501 after Thomas Sa●age above two yeares An 1171 after the death of Henry de Bloyes , the Bishopricke of Wincheste● was void above 3 yeares An 1238 , after Peter de la Roch 5● years● An 1243. after William de Rawley 16 Ye●res , Ethelmanus holding it 9 , yeares without consideration Anno 1259 after Henry de Wengham 6 , yeares , An 1492 , after Peter Coventry aboue one Yeare An 1500 after Thomas Langton 2 yeares An : 1528 a●ter Richard Fox 2 Yeares An 1530. after Cardinal● Woolsey , almost 4 yea●es , w An 1131 after the death of H●rnaus first Bishop o●Ely , that See was void above 2 yeares , An : 1169 after Negellus the Second Bishop 5 yeares An 1197 , afte● William Longchamp , above one Yeare . An 1214 , after Eustachius above 5 yeares , An 1256 , after William de Kil●enny above one yeare , An 1297 , after William de Luda 2 Yeares . An 1373 after Iohn Barnet 2 yeares An 1434 after ●hillip Morgan 3 yeares●An : 1486 after I●●n ●oorion 3 yeares An 1500 a●●er I●hn Alcocke one whole yeare , An : 1533 : as long after Nicholas West ; An : 158● after Richard Coxe almost 20 yeares together x ●n 11●7 , after the death of Ro●ert de Chisney the 4 Bish●p o● Lincoln , that See continued v●cant almost 17 yeares , Ce●●ry ●en●y the 2 , his base S●nne ta●ing the ●rofits thereof without any consecration An 1184 , af●er Walte● de C●●st●rtiis 2 ●eares , An , 1200 after St. ●ugh almost ● years , ●n 1206 , after William de Bl●yes 3 ye●res , An , 1490 , after Iohn Rus●el 2 yeares An 1513 , after William Smith one yeare , y An 1086 the Bishoprick of Coventry and Lichf●eld was vacant 2 yeares , after the death of ●eter , and as long An 1●27 after Robert ●each , as long An 118 after Gi●acdus Puella , as long , An 1208 , ●fter Geof●ry de Muschamp , An 1238 , almost 3 yeares after Alexander●e Sa●ensby An 1243 , after Hugh Pateshul 2 ye●es , An 1386 as long after ●ichard Scroope An 1490 : as long after Iohn Hu●●e z An 1099 after Os●ond his death the second Bishop of Salisbury that See was 8 yeares vacant An 1225 , after Richard Poore 4 years , An 1●●0 , 4 years a●●er Walter de la Wi●e , An 1588 3 yeares a●ter Iohn ●ierce , An 1596 2 yeares a●ter Iohn Coldwell a An 1166 , the Bishopricke of Bath and Wels upon the death of Robert continued void 8 , yeares , 8 moneths , and 15 dayes An 1242 after Ioceline , 2 yeares , Anno 1262 as long after William Butt●n Anno 1503 as long after Oliver King , An 1547. as long after William Knight , An 1381 3 yeares after Gilbert Barkely An 1590 , 2 yeares a●●er Thomas Godwin , b An. 1103 the Bishoprick of Exeter after Osber●us decease was vacant 4 yeares , Anno 1182 after Bartholmeus Iscartus 2 , yeares An 1119 after William Herbert the last Bishop of Thelfords , death that See ( now Norwich ) was vacant 2 Yeares , An 1214 , after Iohn de Grey it was vacant 7 yeares , Anno 1222 afte● Pandulfus 3 yea●es , Anno 1236 after Rodulphus almost 3 years , and as long after William de Releigh , An 1240 , after Henry Spencer An. 1406 , ●lmost 2 yeares , c An 1095 after the death of Wolstan Bishop of Wor●hester , that See was vacant 2 yeares An 1113 , as long after Sampsons , An 1123 almost as long after Theulphus , & An , 1179. after Roger An 1184 , after William de Northale 5 yeares An 1198 , after Iohn de Constantijs 2 yeares An ●1212 , 〈◊〉 long after Mangere , Anno 1373 , as long after VVilliam de Lyn , An 1417 as long after Thomas Pondrell An 1427 7 yeares after Thomas Polton Anno 1590 , 3 yeares after Ednica Freat , d An 1556 the Bishopricke of Hereford , after Leoneyards death continued 4. yeares vacant , An , 1127 , after Richa●d above 4 yeares An● 1167 , after Ro●ert de Melim , above 6 yeares , An 1539 after Iohn Skip above 13 yeeres An , 1585 after Herbert West failing 17 yeares , An 1526 the Bishopricke of Chichester was void almost 4 yeares , after Iohn Reempale his death , An 1006 , after Richard Fitz-Iames 2 yea●es , An 1235 , the Bishopricke of e Rochester , after ●enry de Sand●ords death , was va●●nt 3 yeares , An : 1277 , 2 yeares a●●er Walter de Merton 1316 after Thomas de Waldham 3 yeares , An 1401 , as long after Iohn Boltesham● Anno 1535 , after Iohn Fisher 2 , yeares , An : 1557 , the new created Bishopricke of Oxford , after the decease of Iohn King first Bishop , there , was vacant 10 yeares , An 1568 , af●er Hugh Carrow the 2. Bishop it was voyd 21. yeares together . An 1592 , after Iohn Vnderhill the third Bishop it continued void 11. yeares , so little want was there of a Bishop in that See , An● 1559 , the new created Bishopricke of Oxford , after Iames Brookes the third Bishops death was vacant three yeares● An 1578 , as long after Edmond Cheyney . An 1558 , the new created Bishopricke of Bristoll , after Paul Bush the first Bishop was vacant 4● yeares● An : 1578 , 3 , yeares after Richard Cheyney which See continued void otherwise then by Commendani 31 yeares together . Anno 1593 , it continued vacant 10 yeares together . So little need was there of a Bishop in this See , f An 1397 , the Bishopricke of St. Davids after Iohn Gilberts death , was vacant 4. yeares , An : 1592 after Marmaduke Middleton almost 2 yeares : An : 1133 , the Bishoprick of Landa●●e upon Vrbans decease was void 6 , yeares An : 1183 , after Nicholas ap Georgant , 5 , yeares An : 1240 , after Elias de Radnor , above 4 , yeares , An 1287 , after William de Brews 9 yeares : An 1213 , the Bishopricke of Bangor after Robert of Shrewsbury was vacant 2 yeares , An. 1374 , as long after Iohn Gilbert , An : 1378 , after Iohn Swaffham 22 , yeares● An , 1266 , after 〈◊〉 the 1 of Bangor , that See was vacant two yeares , An : 1313 , after Lewelin 6 , yeares , Anno : 1406 , after Iohn Trevane 5 , yeares , An 1439 , after Robert 5. yeares , g An 1017 , after Aldhunus of Durham , that See continued void above 3 yeares , An 1097 , as long after William Carlaypho An 1140. after Geoffry Rufus above five yeares , An 1207 , after Philip of Poitiers , above 10 yeares , An 1226. above 2 yeares the King threatning the Covent that they should have no Bishop in 7. yeares , An , 1237 , after Richard Poore 2 yeares . An : 1249 , the King threatned to keep it vacant 8 , or 9 , yeares , till ( Ethelmare his halfe Brother ( whom he commended to the Monkes election ) should be of age . An 1505 , after William Severus 2 yeares , An 1587. after Ri● Ba●n●s , almost 2 years An : 1577 , the Bishoprick of Chester was vacant two years . If then all our Bishoprickes in severall ages have been void thus , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 15 , 17 , 20 , and 30 , yeares or more together at divers times ( to omit all annuall vacancies ) without any prejudice to the Church or State , and with great benefit to the Kings of England , who enjoyed the temporalities in the meane time , t●en certainly Bishops are no such necessary creatures of divine institution , but that we may spare them all together , For if we may want them 2 , 3 , 5 , 9 , 10 , 15 , 20 , 30 , yeares without prejudice , Why not an Hundred ? why not 500. yeares ? yea why not altog●ther , as they doe in all reformed Churches , who have quite cacashierd them long agoe ? when as no Church can spare or want their Pastors and Ministers that are of Gods institution above 6 moneths , at most h After which if the Patron present not in the interim an able and sufficient Clerke the ord●nary by the common Law may collate , and may seqnester , the profits in the meane time for the officiating of the cure , which must be at no time intermitted or neglected because of divine institution , and so absolutely neces●ary which the Bishops are not● I shall close up this discou●se with a m●morable I resident of the D●nes , An Dom , 1537 Christian the third King of Denma●●e , removed and suppressed by publike Edict , all the Bishops of his Kingdome , for their intolerable Treasons & Rebellions , abolishing their Bishopricks as contrary to our Saviours institutions , ( the meanes that made them , Idle , proud , ambitious , unpreaching ●relates , and seditious t●echerous Rebels to their ●rinces , and in stead of 7 , Bishops of De●mark , he instituted 7 , Superintendents to execute the office of Bishops , to give orders to others , and execute all Ecclesiasticall af●ai●es , which 7 , Superintendents , ( Aug●st 26 , 1537. ) ●eceived ●heir ordi●ation from Iohn Bugenhagius ( ● P●otestant minis●er ) in the Cathedrall of H●sina , in the prese●ce of the King , and Se●ate of the Kingdome , Lo ●e●e all Bishops cashiered as false rebellious Traytors to their Soveraigne , ( as they have ever been in all States and ages , the●e having been more noto●i●us Traitors Rebells , and conspir●tors , of Bishops then of all other ranks of men in the world ( as I ●m able to ma●e good ) as contr●ry to divine institution , and see not Iure divino , as they now bo●st , and Superinte●dents ordained by a meere ●●es●iter in their stead , to conferre orders unto others in all the Danish Churches . In the beginning of reformation in Germany and other places , Luther and other Ministers usually ordained Deacons and Ministers , and set out Bookes of t●e manner of Ordination without any Bishops assistance , which power of Ordination and imposition of hands hath , ever since been pr●ctised by Ministers in all reformed Chu●ches which have abandoned Bishops ( such as ours are and ma●e themselves as contrary to Gods word , ) ●atrick Adamso● ( Ar●h-Bishop of St. Andrews in Scotland , ) in his recantation publickly made in the Synod of Fi●●e , ( Aprill 8 , 1591 , ) con●es●eth , that this office of a Diocesan Bishop Omne ●uthoritate verbi dei destituitu● & solo politico h●minum c●n●mento ●u●datur is destitute of of all authority from Gods word , and is onely ●ounded in the politicke figment of men , out of which the primacy of the ●ope or Antichrist ●ath sprung , and is worthily to be condemned , bec●use the as●embly of the ●●esbytery penes qu●m est j●risdictio & inspectio●●m in visitationibus tum in ordinationibus , which having the jurisdiction and inspection , both in visitations and in Ordinations , will performe all these things , with greater authority , piety , and zeale , then any Bishop whatsoever , whose ca●e is for t●e most part , intent not upon ●od or his ●●●ction , but t●e world which he especially serves , A 〈◊〉 bl●w to our prelates Hie●achie . For i● Bishops be not Iure divino and have no ●oundation in the word of ●od , the● the power of Ordinatiō belōgs not ●to them Iure divino as they a●e Bishops neither can do or ●ught , they to con●e●●e Orders as Bishops but ●rely as they are Ministers : And if so ( as is most certaine , ) Then this power of Ordination belongs not at all to Bishops as Bis●ops , but only as Ministers , and every Minister as he is a Minister , ●ath as much right and authority to give o●ders as any Bishop whatsoever , the true reason why even among us at this day , Ministers ought to joyn with the Bishop in the imposition of hands , neither can our Bishops ordaine any one a Minister , unlesse 3 , or 4 , Ministers at least , joyne with him in the Ordination and laying on of hands . This being an apparent ●●uth , I shal hence from the Bishops owne principles prove Presbyters Superior and greater then Bishops , in jurisdiction dignity and deg●ee . These , say they , to whom the power of Ordination belongs of Right are ●●eater in jurisdiction , dignity , ●●d degree then those who have not this power , and the Ordainer higher in all these then the ordained , But the power of Ordination belongs onely jure divino to ●resbyters as presbyters , not to Bishops , as to Bishops themselves , not , as Bishops , but Presbyters and Bishops when they ordaine in a lawfull manner , do it onely as Presbyters not as Bishops . Therefore Presbyters are Superior to Bishops in jurisdiction , Order , and degree , and Bishops themselves ●arre greater in all these● as they a●e Presbyters , an office of divine ●●nction , then as they are Lordly Prelates or Diocesan Bishops , a meer humane institution . Thus are our great Lord Bishops who vaunt of the weaknesse of puri●●ne principles , whereas their Episcopall are farre more feeble and absur● , wounded to death with their own weapons , and all their Domi●eering , swelling authority overthrowne by that very principle , and foundation on which they have presumed to erect it , the ancient proverbe being here truly verified , vis ●●nsilij ●●p●rs ●ol● ruit s●● . I shall close ●p this with the words of acute A●t●●ius S●d●●l , who after a large proof of Bi●●ops and presbyter● to be both ●ne and the same by divine institution , winds up all in this m●nner . We couclude therefore , seeing that Superior Episcopall dignity is to be avouched onely humane institution , Tantum ess● h●m●ni iuris , that it is only of hum●ne right : On the contrary , since it is evident by the express● testimonies of Scripture , that in the Apostles times Bishops were the same with Presbyters jur● diuin● p●t●st●t●● ordinandi no● minus presbyt●ri● qu●m Episc●pis convenir● , that by God● law and divine right , the power of Ordination belongs as much to pre●biters as to Bishops . I have now , I hop● sufficiently ma●ifested our Lordly prelates , Arch-●ishops , Dioces●n Bishops , distinct from presbyters to be none of Gods institution being therefore : none of Gods Bishop● , as they vainly pretend whose then must they be , not the kings● for th●n they are onely Iur● human● which they have publikely ●●s●l●imed i● Court● therefore certainly eithe● the Popes or the ●evils or both , as many of the recited writers stile thē , for I know no other that can claime or own them : wherfore being neither Gods nor the Kings , but the Pope● or Devills● or both● what remaines but that now at last they should be sp●red out of our Church● as no members at all of Christs Church , or body● but of the Devill , Pope , or Antichrist of Rome ( whose limbs and creatures in t●uth they are as Mauritius d● i Al●●d● , Henry k St●lbrid●● and others● expresly resolves , and their actions past all dispute , discover many of them to be ) yea as meere Individuum vaginus and meere unnaturall monsters , they being neith●r Pastors nor members of any particular Church or congregation , as all other Christians are beside● themselves . I read in the l great Dutch Chronicle written by an Augustin● Frier , that in the year of our Lord 1033 , beyond Poland there was a strange Fis● taken , of the quantity , length , and breadth , and shape of a living man , adorned with a Bishop● Miter● a pastorall Staff , a Cassock , a white Surplesse , a Chessible Sandals● Gloves● and all othes Robes● and ornaments requisite to the Dignity of ● Prelate , like a Bishop solemnly attired and prepared to say divine Service● his Cassocke might be well lifted up before , and behind , from the feet , to the knees , but not higher● and he permitted himselfe to bee sufficiently ●andled , and touched by many● but especi●lly of the Bishops of that Country● which Fish being presented to the King , and demanded in the Language of that Country● and of divers other● nations who hee was , and answering ●othing , albeit he had opened hi● mouth , giving reverence and hono●r to the Bishop● that were there in the Kings presence , one Monster and dumbe unpreaching beast● saluting and respecting another , the King being a●gry when hee had determined to commit him to prisō● or shut him up i● sōe strōg tow●r , the Fis● being very sorrowfull at this newes , thereupon closed his eyes and would by no meanes open them untill the Bishops , of that Kingdome ( m kneeling downe before the king in the fish●s prese●ce , had with many prayers intreated and obtained of the King that he should be sent backe againe alive to the Seashore● where hee had been taken● that God whose workes are incomprehensible might shew his nature and Acts , least otherwise a plague should there ensue , both to the King and his Subjects , which their suit the King had no sooner granted , but presently the ●oresaid Monster opened his eyes , giving great thankes as it were to the King , and especially to those Bishops . After with a Chariot being prepared to carry the Fish backe againe , the Fish in presence of an infinite multitude ( of both sexes ) ascending into it in a decent manner with the said Bishops , ●ate down between them like ● Domestical tame creature endued with reason . The Bishops whiles they were yet f●rre off from the Sea , descended out of the Chariot , and the Fish like●●se ●omming downe from the chariot by himselfe , stood upon his feet and began to walke between two Bishops , putting one of his hands upon one Bishops shoulder● & the other upon the other Bishops ●houlder , ( so lovingly ●id these Monsters embrace on the other ) as if he had been● a reasonable creature , neither wondred he or was he moved with the tumult of the people● who flocked round about thē , but walked modestly . When he was come to the Sea-shore hee courteously beheld the Bi●hops and rout of people there present and craving leave to depart of the Bishops with all humility , by the gesture of hi● body , and obtaining it he thereupon went into the Sea-water . And going into the Water , on his feet as high as his belly ( the Se● being hard ●y to deep for him to wade in● turning himsel●e towards the Bishops , and people expending the end of this matter he bowed downe his head in a most humble manner● bestowing a blessing on them with his right hand in forme of ● crosse● and fo●thwith descended into the depth of the Sea after which he was no more seene of any man . Thus the Historian ve●batim . Now what should I make this strange dumbe Devill or Monster , in the shape , the habit and attire of a Lordly Bishop , so courteous loving , and ●●miliar towards these Lordly Bis●ops● and they re●iprocally thus to him , or what doth or could all this pretend But that Lordly Prelates with their pontificiall Masse-array , and muming disguises are meere monsters in Gods Church , and for the most part as mute as thi● dumbe or other fishes in the Pulpit opening their mouthes wide oft-times , to bite , yea devoure their fellow Brethren , and God● faith●ull people with their teeth like so many ravening wol●es or Sea Monsters , but seldome or never piously to instruct thē wth their diligent , pious , gracious preaching tongues , and that therefore they shal one day and I hope that day is now at hand , ) with all their Anti-Christian Pompe , Pride , Vestments , Trinkets , and masking massing disguised , be eternally cast out of the Church of God , sent backe againe to ( the Sea of Rome ) from whence they came , and there so utterly drowned , that they shall never be seen nor heard of more in our or any other true Christian Church . This hath beene already fulfilled , not long after the appa●ition of this Monster in n Denmarke , and most of the reformed Churches beyond the Seas , which cast out their Lordly Prelates , as meere Anti-christian , dumbe , mishappen , ravenous Monster , , devouring Christs deare flocke , and likewise in Biscaie among the Papists o where Bi●hops a●e so execrable , to the people , that they will admit no Bishop so much as to come among , them or enter into their Territories , ( such terrible mons●ers are they ) insomuch that when Ferdinand the catholicie came in Progresse thither accompanied among others● with the Bishop of Pamp●line , the people ar●se in Armes , draue back the Bishop and gathering all the dust which they thought he had troden on● and ●lung it ●nto the Sea . And certainly their late intollerable ty●anny , pride , amb●tion , cruelty , oppression , cove●uous●es , Poperie , secularity ( for now they are altogether secula● , not spirituall Lords , iniustice malice , persecutions , impieties , and monstrous prophannes , haue deservedly made our Bishops as detestable as execrable to all sorts of English men ( who now groane and languish under these outragious dumbe silencing and silent Monsters , ) as ever ●hey were , or are to Bis●ane●s , so as we shall doubtlesse shortly see their fatall finall ruine who now seeke nothing but the utter overthrow both of our Church , our State , and our Religion , as I will make good , at my uttermost perill , to all their faces , and proue it to their shame . We know , that two of their Cathedrals , Ely & Chichester , where Bishop White and Mountague , two late Innovaters and Champions of the Prelates , Lord it , were lately s●attered & much of them blown downe , and that the Bishop of Lincolnes chaire with the fall of his study of Bugden shattered all to peices , with a poore despicable instrument a suddaine unexspected blast● of wind , all in one day on Novemb. 4 1636. What is this and their present great wrath , and malice against Gods people : but a certaine prognosticke , that p their time and Lording tyranny is short , and their totall finall ruine neer at hand , though to carnall reason it seemes impossible : and that a suddain unexpected puffe of wind , ( even the prayers , c●ie● , and teares , of those many Godly Ministers , and poor christians they haue lately si●enced , persecuted , oppressed , and still proceed to vexe and greiue with all despite and cruelty , not withstanding all God● plagues , all late discoveries of ●heir vilenes , tyranny and injus●ice , shall shortly and suddainly overturn their Lordly Chaires , throw downe their Epicureous Sees , Dismount their mushrom Lordships , unexspectedly sprung out of the earth , the dunghill , and swoln so great with pride and ambition , that they will bee all head , yea heads and Lords over all in Church and State affaires , and dash ( q , these Babilonish brats of Rome in peices so as they shall never recover or get head againe . In the mea●e time I shall pray and conclude all in the words of our English Letany● From all our Lordly Prelates evill and mischiefe , from the crafts and assaults of the Devill , ( who rules and workes both in and by them ) from their wrath and unjust damnations , in any of their courts and High●commissions , meere Spanish inquisitions , ) from all their blindnes of heart , their pride vaine glory● and Hypocrisie , their envy hatred , malice , and all their uncharitablenesse , from all their sedition & priuy conspiracy ( with Rome Priests Iesuites and betweene themselves● to ruine , & root out our faithfull preaching Ministers and Religion , and set up popery ) from al their false doctrine and Heresie● ( both in Presse and Pulpit , ) from their hardnesse of heart , against their poore persecuted and oppressed Brethren , against all Gods mercies , threatnings , Iudgements , a●d Plague● of late inflicted ) and from all their contempt of Gods word and commandements● in suppressing the frequent Preachers , and preaching of the one , and most insolent violation of the other , especially the 2 , 4 , 6th Command●men●s , by setting up Altars , images , crucifixes , crosses &c , & bowing downe unto them , by idolizing their owne canons● ceremonies , an● Romish Fopperies , by maintaining the open prophanation of Gods holy Sabbath , with all Heathenish sports and pastimes● and spurring men on headlong to this sinne , and starving , murthering the very soules of thousands of Gods people , by robbing them of their ●pirituall ●ood , and encouraging them to al sin and dissolutenes . ) r Good Lord deliver us And le● all the people say Amen . FINIS . Notes, typically marginal, from the original text Notes for div A56148e-90 * Histo●y of the Councel of Trent : Edit , 3. p. 589 , 590 , 591. to ●16 . * Idid . p. 59● See M●●i●● de Sacra . Horm . Origine et Cont. l. 1. c. 5. * Ibid. p. 589. * Ib. 591 . 60●.606 . * De Clericis . l. 1. c. 14. * History of the Councel of Trent : p. 220. (a) Pag. 220.330 . to 335. an excellent considerable place . (b) Glossa , Decret. Distinct . 93 c. Legimu● . * In Iohn Crespin . L'estate de Leglise f. 254. * Both cite●●y Bishop Vs●er , d● B●ittanicarum Eccles. primo● diis , p. 800. * Henric● 〈◊〉 man , 〈…〉 Tom. 1 p. 31● * Itinear , l. 2. c 13. * Fratres sic facit Iesus h●di● , multos si●i elige●● Dia●olos Episc●po● . In Gone●● . Rhemensi S●imo . * In the Epistl● Dedica●o●y befo●e the Vnbishoping of Timothy and Titus . (a) Les Fl●wrs de● vies des So●●cts : part 1. Parisiis : 1637. p. 500. (b) Ribadenerra Ibid. p. 3●8 . * Idem Ibidem , p. 313. * Idem Ibidem , p. 303● 304. * Idem Ibidem , p 358. * Iohn Crespin Lestate de ●eglig● , f , 29 , with Platina , Anas●a●ius , and Balz●● i● h●s life . (a) Iohn Crespin ●● . p. 59. Brit. Eccles. A●tiqu● p. 620 , 621 , 625 , 633. (b) Crespin ●b . p. 266. (c) Crespin p. 405 , 40● (d) C●espin p. ● 404. C●e●pin . p. 587. Gal●●●●u●Monumetensis . l 9. c. 15. ●●rald●● Cambr. li 2. c. 4. Ia●●bus Vsse●●● de Ecclesiarum Britt●a . Primordin , p. 81.532.538 . Idem . p. 876.1012.1140 . (d) The Annals of I●eland i● Camdens Bri●●●nia , p. 169. * Relation of ● Con●erenc● , p. 169 in the margin . * 31. H. 8. c 9.33 H. ● . c. 31.34 . H. 8. ● . * In his Britania p. 160.161 . and Ireland , p. 73 , 74. * Rastall Du●ham : f. 149. Camdens Brit. pag. 736 , and Godwins Catalogu● of Bishops , p. 533. * Chapter of the Sacrament of O●de●s . * 27. H. 8. c ● 3● . H , 8 , c. 1● . ●● , ● . ● . 14. * Cromptous Iurisdiction , ● , 12 , b , Stamford Plee . d●l Corone l , 3 , c , 1 , ● , 153 , ● , 3 , ● , 3 , p , 161 , 33 , 1● . ● . Br , Trial , 142 , (b) Cromptons Iurisdiction of Courts , f , 12 , b , (c) Bishop White Bishop Morton , Arcshbishop Laud , and Bishop Hall , in the T●tles of ●heir late Books , * io , E , 4 , f , 6 , Br , Crown 153 , Stamford Plee● , l. ●Pet●us ●l●sonsis de Institat . Episc●pi ●●bl , Part , Tom , 12 , p , 941 , 943. (c) Fox Acts and Monument● in the old Edition , p. 748. 901 905 , 9●7 b 1706 , b , i , 17 , b , * So Cr●mt●n quotes it . But it ●s in his defence of hi . Apology , at pa●t 6 c. 2 p. 5 , i 522 * Crompto●s Iuri●diction of Cou●●s f ●9 b. * Of the true dif●e●ence between Chri●●ian ●ubjection● and Antichristian ●ebellion , pa●t 3 , p , 541 , 542 , 543 , (q) For Acts & Monu●ent● Lond. 1●10● p● 624● 625● Ma● . ● . 13 . Luk. 14.35 . Notes for div A56148e-4920 (a) 1 〈◊〉 . 2 , ● , ●4 , 4. Iohn 10 , 1.2 , 3. Notes for div A56148e-5220 b Suriu● cōcil Tom. 2. p. 719. c Surius● Tom. 3 , p● 299.302 309 d Suriu● Tom. 3 , p. 4 , 5. Notes for div A56148e-5890 e Apud Bochellum decreta Eccles Gal l 3. Tit. 2. de Ordinie c : 4 5. * See C●●su●●a u●ta●tis Pa●●●ien●is 〈◊〉 16.31 . p. 16 21 24 . 2● , 37 * Cens●rae Pa●isi●nsis p , 40 , 48 , 49 , 60 Notes for div A56148e-6800 (m) In his Letter to Sir Fran●is K●ol● Notes for div A56148e-8610 (n) Antiqu●●ates E●ol●sia Brit. & Godwin in thi● life , Speeds History p. 463. Obiect 1. (o) Thomas VValdensis Tom : 3 , c. 60 , 61 , 62. Rhemists Notes ●n Phil. 1.1 : Alphonsus de Castrò advers. h●r . tit. Episcopus . Harding in Bishop Iewel , p. 196.202 . with others● (p) Sacramia Contra Bezam Bi●hop Bancroft in his Se●mon at Paules Crosse , Bishop Downeham in his Consecration Sermon , Bishop VVhit● and others in t●e censure of Doctor Bastwick● , Bishop Bridges Defence of Governeme●● . p. 26● , 373 , 44● . (q) Origi●um l , ● , c , 5 Causa ● . qu , 3 , (s) See Appendix catalogo testium veritis Endmerus hist. novorum l , 2 3 , p , 34 , 36 , 50 , 71 , 97 , 109 , 110 , 112 , 131 , 132 , Godwi●● catalogue of Bishops , p , 74. ●1 , 84.106 , 437 , 516.525 , Aventinus Armak , Boicorum , l , 3 , p. 214 , 219 , and heretofore p : 9● . 93 , 103. t ●●i●● . ad Ev●●r●● & 〈◊〉 , in Ti●● 1. Tom. 1 C●ntr . 5 , l , 1●● , 15. ● . w Ad ra●ione● 10 Camp●ani Respons● p. 51 , Obiect . ● . x Epist. 5 , 6 , 7 8 , 9 , 10. Espenc●us digresi . in Tim. l 3 , c , 1 , 2 , 3 A●s●er . y C●ci censu●● p , 5● , &c. z Heb , 7 , 24. a Heb. 7 : 17 , ●1 24 , 28 , 1 P●t , 2 , ●9 . b Matth. 28 , 20. c Isiodor ●●isp : de Eccles. O●●●● cii● l , 2 , c , 17 , Amalarius ●or●unatus de Eccles● Officij● l● 2 , c , 13.6 d Epist , 5 , 6 , 10. e Epist. ad Enagrilem & in Tit. 1. Quid ve●● S●c●●do●ium aliud estquam sacerc●●as consiliary & assessorores E●iscopo Epist : 5. g Can , 35 , collegam se Presbyterorum ess● cognos●at● h Epist 5 6 7. i Subjecti esto●e Presbyteris & Diacon●s sicut Deo et Christo Ibid● k See Espen●●us Digress . in Ti● l , 1 , c , 12 , 3. l Epis●l . 5. m See Coci censura p. 61.62.63 n Esp●encaeus digres , in Ti●●l , 1 ●● 1 . 2● o Rom. ● . 9 . p Institution of a Christian man ch. o● Orders , q See G●d●in● Co●aloge● of Bishops Chytr●●●●● an S●xoni● , p. 23.31.226 , 615.616 , 617. Cent. ●agd . 8. col . 786 , 794 , S. ●● . Eccles. tu●● l , 5 , c. 8 , Evag●●●● ec●l●s● 〈◊〉 l , 2. c 4 1●Eadiner●●●nst Novorum l , 4 ● 95.96 , et Seld● ni spicelagium ibid p. 209.210 , 211 , 21● r See 31 , H 8. c. 9.33 . H , 8 , c 31 , 34 , & 35 , H , ● c , 17 , & the ●atents of the creation of the Bishopricks of Ox●ord , Bristol● Glocester and Chester . s see Antiqui●atae Ecclesia Brit. Godwins catalogue of Bishops Cranthius Metr●p . Chytraeus ●hron . Saxoniae & ●●entinus Anuall l 5 6 , 7. pass●● . t Chytraeus ●●on Saxoniae ●● p 339 340 , l 11 l 14 15 , p. 241 43● . 434 435. u God●● 1 Calog●● of Bis●op . ● p , 52 , 53 , 55. ●● 57 , 58 , 59 , 76 , ●1 83 , 84 , 111 , 11● 114.119 , See Malmesbury d● G●stis Pon●●●icum Anglia antiquitates Ecclesia Br●t●an●●●● Mat●hew wo●mins●er , Matthew Paris , Hav●d●n ●alsingham and others accordingly . v God●in p 559 579 587 5●8 599 , 607 , 608 , 623. w ●odwin p , 183 184 , 189 , 190 , 191 , 196 , 202 , 224 , 227 , 229.230 244 245 , 247 , w God●in p , 255 , 256 , 261 , 262 , 2●4 , 265 , 266 , 275 , 277 , 279 , 181. x ●●dwin p 1294 29● , 297 , 308 , 309. y Godwin p , 317 , 31● , 319 , 321 , 3●2 , 343 , 3●● , ●2● . z God●in p. 337 33● , 344 , 345 , 3●5 . 356 . a Godwin p 364 365 , 368 , 360 , 383 , 385 , 386. b God●in p , 396 398 , 420 , 421 429 , c Godwin p , 439 440 , 444 , 44● , 446 , 449. d Godwin p , 453 454 , 455 , 460● 561 , 473 , 478 , e ●odwin p , 484 485 . 4●6 , 48● 488.452 , 496.501 , 502 , f Godwin p. 512 514 , 530 , 536 , 558 , 547 , 549 , 531. g Godwin p , 634 644 , 647 , 651 , 652 , 653 , 656 , 667 , 671 , 685 , 6●6 . h Rostall Advi●son 1 , 2 , concil● Lat●ran●nsis 2 Can. 29 , S●●ma Angelicae ben●ficium sect , 31 Summa Rosella Beneficium 1 , i D● Pra●●ll●nti● Episcopal●● dignitatis l , ● . ● , 1 , sect , 21 , & ● . 8 , sect , 29● k Henry S●albridge his Ex●ortatoris Ep●stle Iohn Ball n●● Image of both Churches . l Magnum chro● B●lgicum A●●● 1433 , p. 374. m One Monster ininterceeds for anothers safety , but ●id they ever so for a good pious christians life or liberty ? n Chri●●au● chron , Saxo●i● l. 11 , p 33● , ●40 , ●41 , l , 14 , & 15 , p , 412 , 43● , 4●4 , 4●5 , o Peter Heyl●ns Geography . Edit. 3 , p. 55. p Rev , 12 , 12. q Psal. 137. ● . 9 . r Psal. 10● , 4● , ●