id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_zyqsrxy2dzdhpjwe2rl4sps46y	Henry Taylor	Conceptual fragmentation and the rise of eliminativism	2016	25	.pdf	application/pdf	13986	1059	63	refer to the term corresponding to the concept in question, so SPECIES should be taken to mean the species definitions are adopted for different theoretical uses.5 This is intended to cover cases thinkers take conceptual fragmentation as justification for retaining the different individual meanings whilst eliminating the original term that has been subject to In Section 3 we ask the question under what circumstances conceptual fragmentation warrants an eliminativist approach to the term/concept in question, and two are so many different proposed definitions of any given term no one of which is of a given term/concept is theoretically useful.12 various definitions already in the literature can be useful in different contexts, but we do we really mean to refer to are the various different definitions of a single term (which is often assumed by the use the same terms in a very wide variety of different ways, and meanings are being	./cache/work_zyqsrxy2dzdhpjwe2rl4sps46y.pdf	./txt/work_zyqsrxy2dzdhpjwe2rl4sps46y.txt