id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_yjoejpqd2rf2zmn6rkgbwynx54	Moti Mizrahi	The Argument from Underconsideration and Relative Realism	2013	16	.pdf	application/pdf	7824	547	59	good reasons to think that science's best theories are close to the truth. our best scientific theories are true, since theory evaluation is comparative, and since scientists true from a set of competing theories, scientists have no good reason to believe that any of the In evaluating theories scientists merely rank the competitors comparatively. successful scientific theories are well-confirmed and approximately true of the world" (Psillos believe that successful scientific theories are approximately true. This argument is a bad inductive generalization because current theories are not quite like past reasons to believe that a theory is comparatively true (i.e., that T1 is closer to the truth than T2, reasonably claim that the theories we have tested are closest to the truth (i.e., likely true), privileged in a way that allows him/her to make good (i.e., true) Xs (i.e., scientific theories), just comparative judgments, about the truth of scientific theories.	./cache/work_yjoejpqd2rf2zmn6rkgbwynx54.pdf	./txt/work_yjoejpqd2rf2zmn6rkgbwynx54.txt