id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_yb6rpcvbkfax7i26glea3kzkpa	Robert Smithson	The Principle of Indifference and Inductive Scepticism	2015	17	.pdf	application/pdf	8260	725	69	According to Huemer, we can think of the inductivist, the skeptic, and the counterinductivist as offering competing constraints on the probability distribution for the phenomenon in question. To respond to the inconsistency objection, Huemer offers the Explanatory Priority Proviso (EPP) to the Principle of Indifference: when applying the PI, one ought to assign Solution 1 : Apply the PI to the possible lamp states, assigning 1/2 probability to each apply the PI a second time across this sub-partition, yielding a 1/4 probability for blue presumably Huemer must be thinking that the level of possible objective chances is explanatorily prior In that case, Huemer identified a new partition at the level of possible psychological makes certain assumptions about how to partition the level of possible probabilistic laws (assumptions I note in every other case in the paper, Huemer uses the PI to assign prior probabilities. into those level-specific hypotheses with a constant time-to-objective chance function,	./cache/work_yb6rpcvbkfax7i26glea3kzkpa.pdf	./txt/work_yb6rpcvbkfax7i26glea3kzkpa.txt