id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_xwb4lxijvfcg7prlrkfudj5iiu	Mauricio Suárez	A critique of empiricist propensity theories	2014	31	.pdf	application/pdf	9568	556	58	identity thesis – the identification of propensities with objective probabilities. The difference between long run and single case propensity theories may be in the long run version of the theory, the single case – or the particular outcome event – ascribing propensities relative to the set of 'repeatable generating conditions'. case in ascribing propensities to the chance set up and in no way to sequences. Propensities and probabilities alike then turn out to be features of the sequences generated fact, it is arguable that for any objective conditional probability that represents a propensity, matter of fact, shows not the failure of the probability-to-propensity half (Identity1), but those cases where a conditional probability may receive a propensity interpretation, its not arise as to whether this conditional probability may be interpreted as propensity. conditional probabilities are perhaps not propensities at all. conditional probabilities cannot be interpreted as propensities. example illustrates, most propensities cannot be represented as conditional probabilities.	./cache/work_xwb4lxijvfcg7prlrkfudj5iiu.pdf	./txt/work_xwb4lxijvfcg7prlrkfudj5iiu.txt