id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_vl2lkllhlzgxvpaxvcsxhg5hja	Raymond Lal	Categorical Generalization and Physical Structuralism: Figure 1	2015	34	.pdf	application/pdf	17711	1130	60	the benefit of beginning with present applications of category theory to physics (indeed, the ones suggested by Bain's argument) and extracting from these two forms of application in TQFTs. Finally, Section 4.3 discusses the differences between (GenDual) and (GenCat), and the role that category theory plays in each of these forms of Bain (2013) takes as his starting point the assumption that physical objects, i.e. relata, are represented by elements of structured sets5, and proceeds to develop two argumentative strategies. G2: The set-theoretic entities of G1 are to be represented in categorytheoretic language by considering the category whose objects are the relevant structured sets, and whose morphisms are functions that preserve with the premises, but also to draw out conceptual issues concerning Bain's interpretation of category-theoretic methods in physics, not least what he means by 'structure' In particular, we shall discuss (i) how Bain's examples of structural differences between categories leads us to another form of generalization, viz.	./cache/work_vl2lkllhlzgxvpaxvcsxhg5hja.pdf	./txt/work_vl2lkllhlzgxvpaxvcsxhg5hja.txt