id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_r6omrgatdvcibiryikkiv73n2m	Joseph D. Martin	Is the Contingentist/Inevitabilist Debate a Matter of Degrees?	2013	19	.pdf	application/pdf	5124	314	44	collection of distinct concepts, distinguished by how they hold science contingent, by what have been asked in the first place.1 Contingency, for Hacking, enters into science by allowing When distinguishing contingency from inevitability, Hacking observes the debate's Pickering: It is contingent what ontological entities scientists claim to find in the natural Glashow: The theoretical structure of science is not contingent. Soler: Science is contingent only if it has available at least two equally successful, but described by Hacking, admit both unpredictability and causal dependence contingency, while have reasonable disagreements about what aspects of science are subject to contingency claims contingency, claims that some set of causal factors is inadequate offer a complete explanation of these many aspects of science are claimed contingent. If I claim that one part of the scientific process is contingent while holding that "Are the Results of Our Science Contingent of Inevitable?" Studies in the 	./cache/work_r6omrgatdvcibiryikkiv73n2m.pdf	./txt/work_r6omrgatdvcibiryikkiv73n2m.txt