id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_pxss356hvza6pchzg6fbhdd6em	Jesús Zamora Bonilla	Optimal Judgment Aggregation	2007	20	.pdf	application/pdf	5579	292	57	rational collective judgments out of not-so-rational individual opinions, has not been attacked If any judgment aggregation mechanism is liable to lead groups in some cases from the related problem of the aggregation of practical judgments (what propositions own individual opinions and the collective claims, but are not worried at all about the in a simple way the problem of the possible inconsistency of the collective judgments: judgment aggregation: that there is no reason to suppose that the collectively adopted the members of the group to change their individual opinions in any way. Since we assume that every individual has a definite judgment about every proposition, care about how far the collective opinion lies from their own individual judgment about distance between the collective and the individual judgment. the members of the full group vote in favour of A, it becomes the collective opinion. no theory attains a majority, then the group suspends judgment (this can be represented 	./cache/work_pxss356hvza6pchzg6fbhdd6em.pdf	./txt/work_pxss356hvza6pchzg6fbhdd6em.txt